DOCSLIB.ORG

"The Business Solution to the Problem of Climate Change"

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SPEECH/09/258 José Manuel Durão Barroso President of the European Commission "The business solution to the problem of climate change" World Business Summit on Climate Change Copenhagen, 25 May 2009 Distinguished guests, Ladies and gentlemen, Let me start by thanking the organisers, especially Tim Flannery and Erik Rasmussen, for inviting me to speak to you today. [I'd also like to thank Anders Eldrup for his very kind introduction.] Business input is going to be very important to the success of the other climate change conference in Copenhagen in December, so I very much welcome this timely initiative to hold a World Business Summit. If you allow me, I'd like to take you back to Copenhagen in the 17th century. From the beginning of recorded history, humans wondered why seashells and shark teeth could be found at the top of mountains. For many, the explanation was obvious, and could be found in the Bible: the maritime remains were left behind by Noah's Flood! It took a young Danish scientist, Nicolas Steno – or Niels Stensen, to give him his original name – to discover that the teeth and shells were in fact fossils, deposited millions of years ago when the land was beneath the sea. He realised that the layers of rock in which the fossils were embedded told the story of Earth. And that story was a violent and ever-changing one. He didn't know it at the time, but his work would unlock the door to a great deal of what we know today about plate tectonics, dinosaurs, geology and, of course, climate change. That we are now entering a new period of climate change, there can be no reasonable doubt. However, this is not - as many of the climate sceptics tell us – simply just another one of the many periods of global warming that the Earth has experienced in its 4 and a half billion year existence. All serious scientists agree that this time, it is being caused by Man, and it poses unprecedented risks to both human life and even to human civilisation itself. With the scientific knowledge at our disposal on both the magnitude of the problem and its potential consequences, I think we can say that combating this self-inflicted climate change is fast becoming the defining challenge of our generation. We know that decisive and urgent action is needed. And I am proud that the European Union is leading global efforts to mitigate its effects. When the Commission's energy and climate change package was recently formally adopted, Europe became the first region in the world to implement such far- reaching, legally binding climate and energy targets. The package delivers on EU leaders' commitments in March 2007 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 20% of 1990 levels and to raise the share of energy consumption provided by renewable resources to 20%, both by 2020. It also contributes to the target of improving energy efficiency by 20%. Critically, the package also lays the basis for increasing the emissions reduction from 20% to 30% in the context of a satisfactory international climate agreement in which other developed and developing countries contribute their fair share to the limiting global emissions. Ambitious targets, no question. Some people however have questioned whether this is the right direction for Europe during the economic crisis. In my view, the question they pose is a false dichotomy. 2 We must be capable of dealing with the financial challenges and the difficulties posed by energy insecurity and climate change. These challenges are not mutually exclusive, and must be tackled together. We cannot postpone today the need to modernise the European economy for the challenges of tomorrow. Indeed, the economic case for action on climate change is as compelling as the scientific case: The costs of climate change will be much higher if we don't make adjustments now – up to 20% of GDP annually, according to the Stern Review. We think we can limit the cost of our package to around half of one percent of GDP; Without the package, the EU will be much more vulnerable to energy shocks, with potentially drastic consequences for our industry and economies. We are already dependent on others for more than 50% of our needs - this could rise to 64% by 2020 under business as usual projections; Finally, and most importantly of all: we must recognise that change brings big economic opportunities – if the EU further exploits its first mover advantage and consolidates its position on world markets for energy efficient and low carbon technologies. Achieving a 20% share for renewables, for example, could mean more than a million jobs in this industry by 2020. We have, in short, the chance to build a low carbon opportunity society, and we must not miss this chance. So when the Commission designed the European Economic Recovery Plan, we were careful to ensure that the short-term response was consistent with our long- term goals. Smart investment in infrastructure, energy efficiency, and clean car technology will support vulnerable industries in intelligent ways: by preparing them to thrive in markets of the future, instead of artificially propping them up for markets that are fading into the past. Our Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan from last summer was designed to help industry seize the opportunities to reduce CO2 emissions and generate cost savings. Rewarding the best-performing products and consumers' eco-friendly behaviour in this way will strengthen the competitiveness of European industry, and keep it at the cutting edge of emerging global markets. At the same time, the barriers that hamper the growth of environmental industries in the Internal Market, and limit their full uptake by other industries, are being identified and tackled. There are so many other examples of our efforts to combat climate change while driving economic recovery. New rules on industrial motors that will save the equivalent of the entire annual electricity consumption of Sweden. Or proposals to make greater use of information and communication technologies that could reduce the energy consumption of buildings by up to 17%. A quick word here about energy-intensive industries, and the problem of carbon leakage. Obviously, there is no point in implementing a shift to a low-carbon economy if it only succeeds in pushing such industries to countries where there are few, if any, environmental controls. The best way of avoiding this is to implement an ambitious and comprehensive agreement in Copenhagen. That will enable us both to enforce strict global targets – and ensure a level playing-field for energy intensive industries. 3 All our industry must make decisive efforts for climate protection, but the solution must encourage industry to be innovative and competitive; not to relocate half way round the world. Ladies and gentlemen, in tackling climate change, public sector action will not be enough. Only concerted efforts by all parties – policy makers, businesses and consumers – will allow us to tackle the climate change challenge with success. The case for private sector involvement, as I mentioned earlier, is clear. So it is no surprise that businesses are increasingly taking a long-term view, and becoming a driving force in the fight against climate change; and it is no surprise that businesses are asking for a coherent, stable and efficient policy framework to guide investment decisions. So many businesses are increasing efforts to curb emissions, optimise their supply chains, to improve information to consumers, and most of all, a number of industrial sectors are starting to come together to develop sectoral approaches to reduce emissions or develop energy efficiency benchmarks at international level. But I am preaching to the choir. This event has been organised by six of the most impressive and influential business initiatives on climate change. 3C, the Climate Group, the UN Global Compact, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, the World Economic Forum and of course, our hosts, the Copenhagen Climate Council, have all shown vision and leadership when it is needed most. This is vitally important, because most of the necessary change in investment direction to address climate change has to come - is already coming - from the private sector. We will need a strong public - private partnership, if we are going to deliver the necessary emissions reduction in the most cost effective manner possible, and ensure effective diffusion of new technologies. So in the longer term, we should see a Copenhagen agreement as a major milestone on the path to a global carbon market which would increase business opportunities, particularly for European industry, and help to bring average carbon costs further down. This is not some naïve aspiration. Look at Denmark. This country's commendable push for clean tech development, for example, has gone hand in hand with the rise of innovative home-grown companies that are now of global importance. Finally, let me briefly update you on where we are on preparations for the Copenhagen Conference, and how I expect events to unfold over the coming months. Based on our binding targets, now fully agreed at European level, we have a strong EU position on key building blocks for Copenhagen. The main outstanding issues are to ensure the necessary mitigation commitments and actions, based on what science recommends: first, comparable emission reduction targets by developed countries. The EU has consistently asked developed countries to take the lead in emission reductions by committing collectively to cut emissions by 30% below 1990 levels by 2020, and we have proposed a balanced combination of criteria to compare developed country targets, and to help ensure equivalence of effort. Secondly, and as agreed in Bali, we want to see developing countries do their part by designing and implementing national low carbon development strategies containing a set of mitigation actions for each key emitting sector, so that collectively they reduce their emissions by 15 to 30% below Business as Usual by 2020.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blessed Nicholas Steno
    BLESSEDThe Scientist NICHOLAS and STENO (IN DANISH, NIELS STEENSEN) 1638-1686 After a youth spent in studying and then in scientific research, Nicolas Steno at age St. Nicholas of Flue, better known as “Brother Klaus,” was declared patron saint of Switzerland by Pope Pius XII in 1947. He was born 28 converted to the Catholic of a farmer's family in 1417 in Flueli, in the Alpine foothills above Sachseln, in the region of Obwald. He married, had ten children, Church while watching the Portrait of Blessed and conducted a normal life until he was 50. Then he felt a very Nicholas Steno strong call from God to leave everything and follow Him. He therefore asked for three graces: to obtain the consent of his wife Corpus Christi procession, Dorothy and their older children; to never feel the temptation to turn back, and finally, God willing, to be able to live without drinking or eating. All his requests were granted. He lived for twenty years in the thus realizing the greatness forest as a hermit with no food except for the Eucharist, as many witnesses testified. and magnificence of the Eucharist; the Real Presence of Jesus in the Host. He then decided to become a priest and missionary in his own country. In Belgium, at Bois-d’Haine, the Servant of God Anne-Louise Lateau lived for twelve years without eating or drinking, and without sleeping, starting on March 26, 1871. On January 11, 1868, she received stigmata at her feet, hands, head, the left side of her chest and at her right shoulder.
    [Show full text]
  • Tema Del Día
    TEMA DEL DÍA LAS RAÍCES DE LA GEOLOGÍA. NICOLAS STENO, LOS ESTRATOS Y EL DILUVIO UNIVERSAL The roots of the Geology. Nicolaus Steno, the strata and the Deluge Leandro Sequeiros * RESUMEN El De Solido intra solido naturaliter contento dissertatinis prodromus, uno de los libros más importan- tes para los inicios de la geología, fue publicado en Florencia en 1669. Su autor, Niels Steensen (también conocido por su nombre latinizado de Nicolaus Steno), fue un anatomista y naturalista danés nacido en Copenhague (Dinamarca) el 11 de enero de 1638. Estudió primero medicina en su ciudad y anatomía en Holanda y París. En 1660, visitó Roma y en 1666 se había establecido en Florencia donde fue acogido por el Gran Duque de Toscana Fernando II. En Florencia, estudiando los dientes puntiagudos que formaban diversas coronas en las mandíbulas de los tiburones, se sorprendió por su gran número, y sus semejanzas con las llamadas Glossopetrae, ob- jetos de piedra traídos de Malta. Steno pensó que ellos pertenecían a partes anatómicas de animales que habían vivido en otro tiempo, y que habían podido transformarse con facilidad mediante procesos quími- cos que no habían afectado a la forma. Los resultados llevaron a Steno a extender sus hipótesis a amplios estudios sobre las conchas de los moluscos antiguos, de los que describe su estructura y su origen orgáni- co, llegando a conclusiones muy cercanas a las aceptadas hoy día. ABSTRACT The De Solido intra solido naturaliter contento dissertationis prodromus, one of the most important bo- ok in the beginning of geology, was published at Florence in 1669.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geohistorical Time Arrow: from Steno's Stratigraphic Principles To
    JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCE EDUCATION 62, 691–700 (2014) The Geohistorical Time Arrow: From Steno’s Stratigraphic Principles to Boltzmann’s Past Hypothesis Gadi Kravitz1,a ABSTRACT Geologists have always embraced the time arrow in order to reconstruct the past geology of Earth, thus turning geology into a historical science. The covert assumption regarding the direction of time from past to present appears in Nicolas Steno’s principles of stratigraphy. The intuitive–metaphysical nature of Steno’s assumption was based on a biblical narrative; therefore, he never attempted to justify it in any way. In this article, I intend to show that contrary to Steno’s principles, the theoretical status of modern geohistory is much better from a scientific point of view. The uniformity principle enables modern geohistory to establish the time arrow on the basis of the second law of thermodynamics, i.e., on a physical law, on the one hand, and on a historical law, on the other. In other words, we can say that modern actualism is based on the uniformity principle. This principle is essentially based on the principle of causality, which in turn obtains its justification from the second law of thermodynamics. I will argue that despite this advantage, the shadow that metaphysics has cast on geohistory has not disappeared completely, since the thermodynamic time arrow is based on a metaphysical assumption—Boltzmann’s past hypothesis. All professors engaged in geological education should know these philosophical–theoretical arguments and include them in the curriculum of studies dealing with the basic assumptions of geoscience in general and the uniformity principle and deep time in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Kochanowski University Press
    Jan Kochanowski University Press This is a contribution from Token: A Journal of English Linguistics Volume 8/2019. Edited by John G. Newman, Marina Dossena and Sylwester Łodej. Special Editors for volume 8: Giovanni Iamartino and Irma Taavitsainen. © 2019 Jan Kochanowski University Press. Token: A Journal of English Linguistics 8, 2019 Italy and the Royal Society: Medical papers in the early Philosophical Transactions Lucia Berti University of Milan ABSTRACT During the first years of the Royal Society’s existence, a whole network of natural philosophical exchanges was set up between the Fellows and foreign gentlemen interested in the study of nature. From the exchanges with Italy, medicine appears to be one of the major topics of interest; and a series of medical papers based on Italian researches appear in the Society’s journal, the Philosophical Transactions (PT). This article is a linguistic and socio-historical analysis of 25 medical papers published in the PT in the first fifty years of its existence. The selected articles were either translations of Italian writings or reports of Italian research. The purpose of the study is: (1) to illustrate from a linguistic and socio-cultural point of view the nature of Italian medical contributions to the early PT; and (2) to investigate Anglo-Italian relations through the Royal Society’s medical interaction with Italians by analysing the PT articles and further contextual resources from a critical perspective. Keywords: Anglo-Italian relations, medical writing, Philosophical Transactions, Royal Society, seventeenth century. And your own intelligence will spur you on, without the urging of others, to inform yourself about these matters; in the same way you will be led, without doubt, to encourage all the keen minds of Italy to employ their talents in advancing the sciences and the arts by observations and experiments faithfully and diligently performed.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Saint and Bio. Science 'S' Block Blessed Nicolas Steno
    Building Saint and bio. Science Blessed Nicolas Steno (Niels Stenson) (1638-1686) was a convert to ‘S’ block Catholicism, a bishop, a pioneer in anatomy and geology, and the father of palaeontology because he discovered what fossils were. His laws of stratigraphy are still in use. And he managed all this before dying at the age of 48! Saint Servulus of Rome Saint Servulus was a perfect model of submission to the divine Will; it would be difficult to offer a more consoling example to persons afflicted by poverty, illnesses and the other miseries of life. He was deprived of all the goods of this world; a long illness had reduced him to a pitiful state. From his youth he was paralyzed in all his limbs. Not only could he not stand up, but he was unable to rise from his bed; he could neither sit down nor turn himself from one side to the other, nor bring his hand to his mouth. This unfortunate man, who had learned the mysteries of religion, meditated unceasingly on the sufferings of the Saviour, and never did he complain. He was surrounded by the loving care of his mother and brother. Neither the mother nor the children had ever studied, yet he had pious books bought for himself, in particular the Psalms and the Holy Gospels, and he would ask the religious who came to visit him on his cot to read from them to him. In this way he learned these books by heart; he spent days and part of the nights in singing or reciting them, and meditating them, and he constantly thanked the Lord for having taken him to be a victim associated with the pains and sufferings of Jesus Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Niels Stensen: a 17Th Century Scientist with a Modern View of Brain Organization André Parent
    HISTORICAL REVIEW Niels Stensen: A 17th Century Scientist with a Modern View of Brain Organization André Parent ABSTRACT: In 1665 the Danish scholar Niels Stensen (1638-1686) reached Paris, where he pronounced a discourse on brain anatomy that was to orient neuroscientists for years to come. In his lecture, Stensen rejected ancient speculations about animal spirits and criticized René Descartes and his followers who, despite a poor knowledge of brain anatomy, elaborated complex models to explain the multifaceted function of what he considered the principal organ of the human mind. He advocated the need for studying the brain through a comparative, developmental and pathological convergent approach and called for appropriate dissection methods and accurate illustrations. His own careful anatomical studies permitted him to precisely depict many brain structures. After pioneering works in paleontology and geology, he devoted himself to theology. In 1677 Stensen converted from Lutheranism to Catholicism and, while working relentlessly as a bishop and apostolic vicar in Northern Europe, he died in self-imposed poverty at age 48. RÉSUMÉ: L’organisation anatomique et fonctionnelle du cerveau selon Sténon. En 1665, le savant Danois Nicolas Sténon (1638-1686) arrive à Paris où il prononce un remarquable discours sur l’anatomie du cerveau. Dans cette allocution, il dénonce d’abord l’ancienne théorie des esprits animaux pour ensuite critiquer vertement les philosophes comme Descartes qui, malgré une piètre connaissance de l’anatomie du cerveau, développent des modèles complexes pour expliquer le fonctionnement de ce qu’il considère être l’organe suprême. Il souligne l’importance d’utiliser une approche multidisciplinaire, impliquant l’anatomie comparée, l’embryologie et la pathologie et insiste sur la nécessité de méthodes de dissection et d’illustration adéquates.
    [Show full text]
  • Niels Stensen and the Discovery of the Parotid Duct
    Int. J. Morphol., 31(4):1491-1497, 2013. Niels Stensen and the Discovery of the Parotid Duct Niels Stensen y el Descubrimiento del Conducto Parotídeo Goran Strkalj* STRKALJ, G. Niels Stensen and the discovery of the parotid duct. Int. J. Morphol., 31(4):1491-1497, 2013. SUMMARY: Niels Stensen was a renowned Danish scientist, theologian and Catholic bishop. Stensen’s early career was devoted to anatomy and it is in this discipline that he made many important contributions. His method in anatomy was rooted in systematic observations based on meticulously executed dissections of human and animal cadavers, as well as experiments on animals. His first important discovery in the field of anatomy, which is the main focus of this paper, was the discovery of the parotid duct. The discovery brought Stensen recognition and fame but only after a controversy in which he was accused of plagiarism by his mentor Gerard Blaes. Although still in an early stage of his career Stensen dealt with the accusation masterfully, producing further research which confirmed him as the discoverer of the parotid duct. KEY WORDS: Niels Stensen; History of anatomy; Parotid duct; Scientific discovery. INTRODUCTION The year 2013 marks the 375th anniversary of the birth of the renowned Danish scholar Niels Stensen (Fig. 1). He is remembered for his contribution to science, theology and as a Catholic bishop who was beatified by Pope John Paul II in 1988. Stensen’s remarkable scientific opus includes seminal contributions to anatomy and geology. In anatomy he made several important discoveries, described previously unknown structures and elucidated their function.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Anatomy and Clinical Medicine in 17Th-Century Europe by Rina Knoeff
    Dutch Anatomy and Clinical Medicine in 17th-Century Europe by Rina Knoeff The Leiden University medical faculty was famous in 17th-century Europe. Students came from all over Europe to sit at the feet of the well-known medical teachers Peter Paauw, Jan van Horne and Franciscus dele Boë Sylvius. Not only the lecture hall, but also the anatomical theatre as well as the hospital were important sites for medical instruction. The Dutch hands-on approach was unique and served as an example for the teaching courses of many early modern cen- tres of medical education. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Medicine in the 17th-Century Netherlands 2. Anatomy 1. Otto Heurnius and the Theatre of Wonder 2. Johannes van Horne and the Theatre of Learning 3. Govert Bidloo and the Theatre of Controversy 3. Clinical Teaching 4. Appendix 1. Bibliography 2. Notes Indices Citation Medicine in the 17th-Century Netherlands Until well into the 18th century Leiden University was an important stop on the peregrinatio medica, a medical tour to foreign countries undertaken by ambitious students from the late 12th century onwards (Leiden was particularly popular in the 17th and 18th centuries). The town of Leiden was an attractive place for students – it had excellent facilities for extracurricular activities such as theatre visits, pub crawls, horse riding and boating. The English student Thomas Nu- gent stated that Ÿ1 They [the students] wear no gowns, but swords and if they are matriculated they enjoy a great many privi- leges. Those that are above twenty years of age, have a turn of eighty shops of wine a year, and half a barrel of beer per month free of duty of excise.1 Unlike most universities, Leiden welcomed students of all religious affiliations and it was praised for its "great liberty, the freedom of thinking, speaking and believing".2 Additionally, the medical curriculum was significantly shorter than in other places, which more than compensated for Leiden's high living costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Printing Natural Knowledge
    Chapter 3: Printing Natural Knowledge “The purpose of writing may be to persuade the wise and intelligent; or else it may be to persuade everyone in town.” So wrote Giovanni Alfonso Borelli, pro- fessor at the university of Pisa and already the author of an important work on Euclid, to his ex-colleague Marcello Malpighi, just starting out on the faculty at the university of Bologna and about to publish his fundamental work revealing the microstructure of the lungs. Deciding what to publish, and for whom, was no easy matter, still some thirty years after the twin trials of Orazio Morandi and Galileo Galilei. “But if you choose to write to the common citizens of Bo- logna to persuade them about the calumnies made against truth,” Borelli con- tinued, “I conceive that in this case you may use every effort to deride any per- son who peddles a pile of idiocies just to offend virtuous and meritorious people.” 1 Of course, for Borelli, “virtuous and meritorious people” meant per- sons who followed empirical method for the study of nature, exemplified by Galileo; and “truth” meant the truth drawn from the use of that method. “Idio- cies” meant ideas conceived by those whom the Galileians conceived as dogma- tists and mystifiers. Still in the 1660s, whether Galileo’s disciples and their followers would triumph against the dogmatists and mystifiers was by no means clear. The story of their campaign to capture public attention, with all its fits and starts, is far less well known than the content of their ideas. It will occupy us here.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bishop and Anatomist Niels Stensen (1638–1686) and His Contributions to Our Early Understanding of the Brain
    Childs Nerv Syst (2011) 27:1–6 DOI 10.1007/s00381-010-1236-5 COVER PICTURE The bishop and anatomist Niels Stensen (1638–1686) and his contributions to our early understanding of the brain R. Shane Tubbs & Martin M. Mortazavi & Mohammadali M. Shoja & Marios Loukas & Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol Published online: 11 August 2010 # Springer-Verlag 2010 Abstract Many physicians are familiar with the parotid “Fair is what we see, Fairer what we have perceived, duct and the Danish physician/anatomist's name associated Fairest what is still in veil.” with it. However, most are unaware of Niels Stensen's life Niels Stensen and his significant contributions to the early study of the brain. This physician of the Medici court was clearly ahead of his time and found errors in the publications of such Early life giants as Varolius and Willis. The present review discusses the life of this seventeenth century anatomist, physician, The Dane Niels Stensen (Latin Nicolaus Stenonis)was and priest/bishop and highlights his contributions to born on January 11, 1638, and died on November 25, neuroanatomy. 1686, and was a pioneer in both anatomy and geology (Fig. 1). A native of Copenhagen, Denmark, Stensen Keywords Brain anatomy. Neuroanatomy. Stensen began his education in the country's most exclusive school, the grammar school Vor Frue (1647–1656). In 1654–1655, when Stensen was 16, over 200 students of his school died of the plague that killed approximately one third of Copenhagen's population [1]. Stensen was : born during the 30 Years War, and interestingly, was R. S.
    [Show full text]
  • Steno and the Rock Cycle
    Firenze University Press www.fupress.com/substantia Steno and the Rock Cycle Citation: A.H. Cutler (2021) Steno and the Rock Cycle. Substantia 5(1) Suppl.: Alan H. Cutler 89-97. doi: 10.36253/Substantia-1280 Department of Engineering, Physical and Computer Sciences, Montgomery College, 51 Copyright: © 2021 A.H. Cutler. This is an Mannakee Street, Rockville, MD 20850 USA open access, peer-reviewed article E-mail: [email protected] published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress.com/substantia) and distributed under the terms of the Abstract. Geologists categorize the basic types of rock according to their origin – igne- Creative Commons Attribution License, ous, sedimentary, or metamorphic – rather than by their physical properties. This is which permits unrestricted use, distri- expressed dynamically by the fundamental concept of the rock cycle, which describes bution, and reproduction in any medi- how the basic rock types are derived from one another within the Earth system as a um, provided the original author and result of ongoing cyclic geologic processes. In Nicolaus Steno’s published geological source are credited. work, particularly De Solido, he takes a similar approach, outlining how a substance Data Availability Statement: All rel- can be examined “to disclose the place and manner of its production”. Steno also rec- evant data are within the paper and its ognizes the roles of erosion, transport, and deposition in the production of sedimen- Supporting Information files. tary strata from pre-existing Earth materials. His description and diagrams of the geo- logical evolution of Tuscany also show a clear cyclicity of process. While the modern Competing Interests: The Author(s) concept of the rock cycle did not emerge until the 19th century, Steno’s work contains declare(s) no conflict of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Scientists the Art of Experimentation in the Galilean Accademia Del Cimento (1657–1667)
    Court Scientists The Art of Experimentation in the Galilean Accademia del Cimento (1657-1667) © 2001-2002 Institute and Museum of the History of Science - Florence. All rights reserved. INDEX 1. THE HISTORY................................................................................................... 5 1.1. THE ORIGINS ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. THE ACCADEMIA AND MEDICI PATRONAGE................................................................. 6 1.3. THE ACCADEMIA’S SETTINGS ........................................................................................... 6 1.4. OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACADEMIES ...................................................................................... 8 1.5. CHRONOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 10 2. THE EXPERIMENTAL METHOD............................................. 11 2.1. CRITICISING ARISTOTLE.................................................................................................. 11 2.2. MATHEMATICAL REASON ............................................................................................... 12 2.3. THE RECOURSE TO EXPERIMENT.................................................................................. 13 2.4. TESTING AND RETESTING .............................................................................................. 13 3. THE PROTAGONISTS ............................................................................
    [Show full text]