DOCSLIB.ORG

Oklahoma National Guard - 2009 Governor’S Report 2 | Oklahoma2 | Oklahoma National National Guard - 2009Guard Governor’S Frontline Report Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oklahoma National Guard - 2009 Governor’S Report 2 | Oklahoma2 | Oklahoma National National Guard - 2009Guard Governor’S Frontline Report Table of Contents 1 | Oklahoma National Guard - 2009 Governor’s Report 2 | Oklahoma2 | Oklahoma National National Guard - 2009Guard Governor’s Frontline Report TABLE OF CONTENTS OMD Organization ................................................4-5 Staff Operations .................................................. 6-47 Army Commands ..............................................48-51 Air Commands ...................................................52-59 Financial Summary ................................................ 61 Military Department Workforce ........................ 62 Youth Programs ................................................63-67 REPORT DESIGN AND LAYOUT Sgt. 1st Class Kendall James, Oklahoma Army National Guard Joint Force Headquarters Office of Visual Information. 3 | Oklahoma National Guard - 2009 Governor’s Report HONORABLE BRAD HENRY Governor Commander-in-Chief Oklahoma National Guard MG MYLES L. DEERING CSM STEVEN L. JENSEN The Adjutant General State Command Sergeant Major Oklahoma National Guard Oklahoma National Guard 4 | Oklahoma National Guard - 2009 Governor’s Report BG RICKY ADAMS BRIG. GEN. JAMES MCCORMACK Assistant Adjutant General Assistant Adjutant General Oklahoma Army National Guard Oklahoma Air National Guard BG ROBBIE ASHER BRIG. GEN. WILLIAM HADAWAY III Director, Joint Staff Chief of Staff Oklahoma Army National Guard Oklahoma Air National Guard COL MICHAEL THOMPSON CW5 PAUL E. MERCHANT Chief of Staff State Command Chief Warrant Officer Oklahoma Army National Guard Oklahoma Army National Guard 5 | Oklahoma National Guard - 2009 Governor’s Report STATE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LT. COL. BRENT WRIGHT Director, State Resource Management Com: (405) 228-5373 DSN: 628-5373 MISSION employees on board in this agency. A high percentage Our mission is to provide the best facilities for our of these employees have also made a positive impact Soldiers and Airmen in the Oklahoma National Guard on the youth of our state through the administration of within regulatory guidelines of National Guard Bureau several “at-risk” and troubled youth programs. and the financial capability of the State of Oklahoma. The quality of the facilities relates to the quality of the 45TH INFANTRY DIVISION MUSEUM work environment, efficiency of the work force, and the The 45th Infantry Division Museum is acknowledged overall readiness of the unit. as the largest and the best National Guard Museum in the United States. As such, it is held as the model for STATE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DIRECTORATE all other National Guard Museums. The 2003 Scholastic The State Resource Management Director is the Book of World Records lists Oklahoma as the state with state advisor to the Adjutant General and is responsible the largest military museum, “The 45th Infantry Division for the State of Oklahoma operating budget for the Museum.” Oklahoma National Guard. He is detailed to receive The Museum’s ten galleries tell the story of and account for all allotted state funds, equipment, and Oklahoma’s military history from the year 1541 through property (including all state facilities) in the possession Operation Desert Storm. The 45th Infantry Division’s of the Oklahoma Military Department. He is director history is a large part of the story line with its 511 for the State Accounting Section, State Employee combat days and eight campaigns in World War II Personnel Office, Youth Program Division, State and 429 combat days and four campaigns during the Transition and Reintegration System, and Thunderbird Korean War. Youth Challenge Program which received the “Best All- Plans stand ready to tell the story of Oklahoma’s Around Program Award” from National Guard Bureau contribution in the current War on Terror pending the in 2006. arrival of artifacts from the theatre of operations. With its surrounding 15-acre military park containing STATE ACCOUNTING OFFICE over 60 military vehicles, aircraft, armored vehicles, The State Accounting Office, with seven state artillery, and ancillary equipment, the museum’s two employees, is responsible for budgeting, procurement, ceremonies on Veterans Day and Memorial Day attract and the financial management of funds processed over 37,000 visitors per year from all over the United States through the Military Department, to include and the world. appropriated and non-appropriated state and federal This year, the 45th Infantry Division Association voted funds. to donate two very important items to the museum. First, the 45th Infantry Division Monument which the STATE EMPLOYEE PERSONNEL OFFICE Association recently relocated from downtown Oklahoma The State Employee Personnel Office is responsible City to the museum grounds. for the state employees authorized by our state Second, the over 200 original Bill Mauldin “Willie & Joe” legislature for Fiscal Year 2008. cartoons. The significance of these donations cannot be Although limited in the number of employees, there overstated. The artifacts enhance the standing of the 45th is a significant economic impact made by the 351 state Infantry Division Museum as a world-class historical facility. 6 | Oklahoma6 | Oklahoma National National Guard - 2009Guard Governor’s Frontline Report UNITED STATES PROPERTY AND FISCAL OFFICE COL Larry Stice USPFO for Oklahoma Com: (405) 228-5280 DSN: 628-5280 MISSION During CY 2009, the Internal Review (IR) Division The United States Property and Fiscal Officer is completed 29 engagements, identifying over the federal agent representing the Chief, National $338,000 in cost savings. The IR Division also Guard Bureau, with a duty station in Oklahoma City. identified non-monetary benefits resulting in 63 The USPFO is detailed to receive and account for recommendations in the area of improved processes, all allotted federal funds, equipment and property regulatory compliance, and improved management (including all federal facilities) in the possession of controls. Further, the IR Division assisted the the Oklahoma Military Department. His principal Oklahoma National Guard through eight external staff consists of employees of the Oklahoma Military audit agency inspections. Department with the following functions in support of the Oklahoma Army National Guard. In addition, DATA PROCESSING DIVISION he has a secondary staff at each Oklahoma Air The Data Processing (DP) Division maintains the National Guard base with senior officials serving necessary system and database administration to as Assistant USPFO’s for Air in the areas of resource protect against unlawful intrusion and to provide the management, logistical management and facilities or highest degree of data integrity and accessibility for real property management. OKARNG pay and personnel systems. The DP Division In the event of a mobilization of any of the reserve assists management by designing and developing components in Oklahoma, the Office of the USPFO local computer applications, including the creation of for Oklahoma is prepared to extend their support the software interface used to pay insurance benefits function to assist that unit in the transition to federal to state Guardsmen through Oklahoma’s State- active duty. Sponsored Life Insurance program. All DP personnel acquire and maintain civilian-acquired Information ADMINISTRATION Technology security and operating environment The Administration Division performs general accreditations in accordance with Department of office services; operates official mail desk; provides Defense Directive 8570.1-M. defense communications service; obtains and provides duplicating and printing services; and COMPTROLLER DIVISION procures, stores, issues, and handles the disposition The Comptroller Division is responsible for of federal supplies and equipment. receiving and accounting for all federal funds issued to the USPFO for Oklahoma to include: Budgeting, INTERNAL REVIEW & AUDIT COMPLIANCE Accounting, Military Pay and Entitlements, Civilian The IR Division performs internal audits, non-audit Payrolls, Travel Pay and Commercial Accounts. The consulting and advisory services, and follow-up Division ensures that all expenditures of federal reviews for the Oklahoma Army and Air National funds comply with the State Operating Budget as Guard under the supervision and direction of the well as applicable laws and regulations. The Budget USPFO, with input from the Adjutant General. Office is responsible for monitoring fund control and Internal Review provides a systematic, objective budget execution. The goal of the Fiscal Accounting evaluation of operations and controls within an Office is to provide accurate accounting data to the organization, in order to assist management in funds managers of the Oklahoma Army National accomplishing goals and objectives. Guard. The mission of the Entitlements Section is 7 | Oklahoma National Guard - 2009 Governor’s Report to accurately process the pay and entitlements of SUPPLY & SERVICES all soldiers and civilians assigned to the OKARNG as The Supply and Services Division is responsible timely as possible. for planning, organizing and directing the logistical and supply services of the USPFO for Oklahoma to PURCHASING & CONTRACTING include; Central Issue Facility, Individual Clothing, The Purchasing and Contracting Division provides Property Management, Commercial Transportation, federal acquisitions for services, supplies, and and Storage & Distribution Management. This construction through various contract vehicles such includes but is not limited to receiving, procuring, distributing and accounting for all federal property as: Indefinite
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eisenhower and the Gaither Report: the Influence of a Committee of Experts on National Security Policy in the Late 19501
    Eisenhower and the Gaither Report: The Influence of a Committee of Experts on National Security Policy in the Late 19501 David Lindsey Snead Richmond, Virginia B.A., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univenity, 1990 M.A., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Uuivenity, 1991 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the Univenity of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History Univenity of Virginia January 1997 ii (c) Copyright by David Lindsey Snead All Rights Reserved January 1997 iii Eisenhower and the Gaither Report: The Influence of a Committee of Experts on National Security Policy in the Late 19505 by David Lindsey Snead Melvyn P. Leffler, Chairman (ABSTRACT) As the United States reeled from the Soviet Union's launch of Sputnik in late 1957, President Dwight D. Eisenhower received a top secret report prepared by a committee of leading scientific, business, and military experts. The panel, called the Gaither committee in recognition of its first chairman, H. Rowan Gaither, Jr., emphasized both the inadequacy of U.S. defense measures designed to protect the civil population and the vulnerability of the country's strategic nuclear forces in the event of a Soviet attack. The Gaither committee viewed these defense measures--ranging from a missile system to defend the continental United States to the construction of shelters to protect the population from radioactive fallout-and the maintenance of sufficient strategic forces to launch military strikes against Soviet targets as essential for the preservation of U.S. security. It concluded that in the case of a surprise Soviet nuclear attack the United States would be unable to defend itselfwith any degree of success.
    [Show full text]
  • Adjutant-General*
    AN N U AL REPORT** S7*Tf Oh- THE WAR 171959 GOVEfi/VjvjEN'f DOCUMENTS ADJUTANT-GENERAL* OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. FOR THE YEAR 1901. Registers of the Sixty-ninth, Seventieth, Seventy-first, Seventy-second, Seventy-third and Seventy- fourth Regiments of Infantry. TRANSMITTED TO THE LEGISLATURE JANUARY 7, 1902. SERIAL No. 28. ALBANY J. B. LYON COMPANY, STATE PRINTERS 1902 NEW YORK STATE LIBRARY ALBANY SIXTY-NINTH REGIMENT. ABBEBTON, JOHN.— Age, 21 years. Enlisted at New York city, to serve tliree years, and mustered in as private, Co. 0, October 9, 1861; deserted, November 15, 1861, at New York city. ABBITT, THOMAS.—• Age, 28 years. Enlisted at New York city, to serve tbree years, and mustered in as private, Co. A, Marcb 1, 1864; deserted, Marcb 29,1864, at Stevensburg, Ya.; also borne as Abbott. ABBOTT, JAMES H.— Age, 19 years. Enlisted at Plattsburgb, to serve one year, and mustered in as private, Co. H, August 25, 1864; captured in action, October 30, 1864, near Petersburg, Ya.; no furtber record; also borne as James Abott and Abbatt. ABEAMS, see Abrams. ABEAMS, "WILLIAM.— Age, 27 years. Enlisted at Jamaica, to serve one year, and mustered in as private, Co. O, October 5,1864; wounded in action, Marcb 25, 1865, before Petersburg, Ya.; promoted corporal, June 21, 1865; mustered out witb com• pany, June 30, 1865, near Alexandria, Ya.; also borne as Abeams. ACKEBMANN, SAMUEL.— Age, 34 years. Enlisted, August 27, 1864, at Poughkeepsie, to serve tbree years; mustered in as private, Co. E, September 3, 1864; wounded on picket and died of his wounds, October 28, 1864, at City Point Hospital, Ya.; also borne as Ackerman.
    [Show full text]
  • Barrow Hanley Presentation
    PORTFOLIO REVIEW MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF LOUISIANA JOHN P. HARLOE, CFA COLEMAN HUBBARD, CFA APRIL 18, 2019 BARROW, HANLEY, MEWHINNEY & STRAUSS, LLC 2200 Ross Avenue | 31st Floor | Dallas, TX 75201-2761 Telephone: 214.665.1900 | [email protected] FIRM OVERVIEW BARROW, HANLEY, MEWHINNEY & STRAUSS, LLC 1 BARROW HANLEY: A LEGACY OF STABILITY STABILITY OF THE FIRM ❑ 40-Year-Old Firm, Founded in 1979 in Dallas, Texas, USA – $76 Billion AUM (3/31/19) ❑ Four-Decade History of Unique Organizational Stability ❑ Institutional Focus – Boutique Culture ❑ 99 Employees, Including 57 Investment Professionals ❑ Significant Employee Equity Ownership STABILITY OF THE PROCESS ❑ For the Past 40 Years, the BHMS Value-Oriented Approach to Stock Selection has Always Emphasized the Importance of Dividends and the Protection of Assets ❑ Our Firm’s Size and Stature Provides Direct Access to the Senior Management of Publicly-Traded Companies Worldwide Benefiting our Research ❑ BHMS has a 40-Year Record of Consistently Producing Alpha in the Large, Mid, and Small Cap Sectors of the Market with a Proven Ability to Protect Assets in Down Markets through Risk Control and Yield STABILITY OF OUR PARTNERSHIPS ❑ Uniquely Stable Client Base – 45 Clients for More than 20 Years ❑ Experienced in Management of Large Portfolios – 25+ Larger than $500 Million ❑ Serving Clients Globally: North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, Africa BARROW, HANLEY, MEWHINNEY & STRAUSS, LLC 2 BRIEF HISTORY OF BHMS Global Value Dividend 2019 Bank Loans 2018 ESG Strategies
    [Show full text]
  • The Missile Plains: Frontline of America's Cold
    The Missile Plains: Frontline of America’s Cold War Historic Resource Study Minuteman Missile National Historic Site, South Dakota Prepared for United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Midwest Regional Office 2003 Prepared under the supervision of: Dr. Jeffrey A. Engel, Principal Investigator Authors: Mead & Hunt, Inc. Christina Slattery Mary Ebeling Erin Pogany Amy R. Squitieri Recommended: Site Manager, Minuteman Missile National Historic Site Date Superintendent, Badlands National Park Date Concurred: Chief, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Associate Regional Director Date Cultural Resources and Stewardship Partnerships Approved: Regional Director Date Midwest Region Minuteman Missile National Historic Site Historic Resource Study Table of Contents List of Illustrations ................................................................................................................ iv List of Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................viii Preface....................................................................................................................................x Introduction ..........................................................................................................................xi Establishment and Purpose................................................................................................................... xi Geographic Location ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1984: Vol.9, No.2
    Pg. 2 Buckeye Guard March '84 ********************************** Letter of Thanks . STATE OF OHIO . OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ' \ COLUMBUS 43215 RI C HARD F . CELESTE •GOVER N Oct Dear Ohio National Guardmembers: I express my deepest appreciation to everyone who assisted during the recent statewide snow emergency. The situation was the worst we have encountered since the 1978 blizzard. The recent snow emergency was of such severity and magnitude that the usual response capabilities of local and state governments were exceeded. We can once again be proud of the dedication, responsiveness and professionalism displayed by State Disaster Services employees and Ohio National Guard­ membe rs of the Adjutant General's Department. The Ohio National Guard committed nearly 1,000 guardmernbers, helicopters, four-wheel drive vehicles and construction equipment in completing hundreds of missions involving transport of patients and medical personnel to hospitals; e v acuation and shelter for stranded motorists; and clearing critical transportation routes to hospitals. Once again, the "citizen-soldiers" of the Ohio National Guard have richly added to their nearly 200-year proud legacy of service to the nation and to the citizens of Ohio. We salute you. Sincerely, RICHARD F. CELESTE Governor ********************************** March '84 Buckeye Guard Pg. 3 Vol. 9, No.2 Departments People ............. 18-20 Cover Photo ONGA ................ 21 BLINDING SNOW-Ohio National Guard helicopter is on a mission in northern Ohio dur­ ONGEA ............... 21 ing the 1984 statewide snow emergency. (Photo by SSgt. KEN WHITE) BUCKEYE GUARD Magazine is an unofficial bimonthly offset publication in which the views and opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the Department of the Army or the Adjutant General of Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • Oppenheimer: a Life April 22, 1904-February 18, 1967
    Oppenheimer: A Life April 22, 1904-February 18, 1967 an online centennial exhibit of J. Robert Oppenheimer http://ohst.berkeley.edu/oppenheimer/exhibit/ This print edition of the online exhibit is free for use, reproduction, and distribution for educational purposes as long as this cover page and the acknowlegments page are included. It may not be altered or sold. For other usage questions, please contact the Office for History of Science and Technology, Univer- sity of California, Berkeley, at http://ohst.berkeley.edu. All image copyrights are retained by their hold- ers. © 2004 by The Regents of the University of California. 1 Oppenheimer: A Life April 22, 1904-February 18, 1967 Introduction As Alice Kimball Smith and Charles Weiner have noted, “Part of Oppenheimer’s attraction, at first for his friends and later for the public, was that he did not project the popularly held image of the scientist as cold, objective, rational and therefore above human frailty, an image that scientists themselves fostered by underplaying their per- sonal histories and the disorder that precedes the neat scientific conclusion.” There is a cacophony of conflicting descriptions of Oppenheimer – as friends have remembered him, as historians have analyzed him. He has been labeled both warm and cold, friendly and condescending, affable as well as hurtful. Learning Sanskrit and cultivating the air of an aesthete, as a young professor he stretched the bounds of the scientist’s persona. Yet in the space of a decade, the otherworldly theorist was transformed into a political insider par excellence. His fellow scientists remembered him as a visionary and capable leader at Los Alamos, while his security hearing brought to light foolish mistakes in judgment and human relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing
    Battlefi eld of the Cold War The Nevada Test Site Volume I Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing 1951 - 1963 United States Department of Energy Of related interest: Origins of the Nevada Test Site by Terrence R. Fehner and F. G. Gosling The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb * by F. G. Gosling The United States Department of Energy: A Summary History, 1977 – 1994 * by Terrence R. Fehner and Jack M. Holl * Copies available from the U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave. S.W., Washington, DC 20585 Attention: Offi ce of History and Heritage Resources Telephone: 301-903-5431 DOE/MA-0003 Terrence R. Fehner & F. G. Gosling Offi ce of History and Heritage Resources Executive Secretariat Offi ce of Management Department of Energy September 2006 Battlefi eld of the Cold War The Nevada Test Site Volume I Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing 1951-1963 Volume II Underground Nuclear Weapons Testing 1957-1992 (projected) These volumes are a joint project of the Offi ce of History and Heritage Resources and the National Nuclear Security Administration. Acknowledgements Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing, Volume I of Battlefi eld of the Cold War: The Nevada Test Site, was written in conjunction with the opening of the Atomic Testing Museum in Las Vegas, Nevada. The museum with its state-of-the-art facility is the culmination of a unique cooperative effort among cross-governmental, community, and private sector partners. The initial impetus was provided by the Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation, a group primarily consisting of former U.S. Department of Energy and Nevada Test Site federal and contractor employees.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Shield, 1947 / 1952
    VOLUME II A HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ATOMIC SHIELD, 1947 / 1952 RICHARD G. HEWLETT AND FRANCIS DUNCAN 1969 ii ATOMIC SHIELD / 1947-1952 Contents Foreword by the Chairman, Historical Advisory Committee xi Preface xiii 1 The Terrible Responsibility 1 2 Uncertain Mandate 17 The Veterans . 17 The Human Equation . 21 Personnel Security . 26 Labor Crisis . 29 Whither Research? . 30 Weapons . 36 Research and Development . 37 Field Operations . 39 Balancing Production and Research . 41 First Summation . 46 Report to the President . 51 Confirmation . 53 First Decisions . 58 Mission to Educate . 61 3 First Venture 63 Atomic Arsenal . 64 Adjusting Priorities . 68 Toward a Weapon Stockpile . 70 Reorienting the Laboratories . 73 Reactors at Clinton . 75 Reactors for the Military . 79 iii iv ATOMIC SHIELD / 1947-1952 Exit Monsanto . 84 Opening Doors for Research . 87 A Sobering Decision . 92 Construction at Hanford . 94 Talent Search . 95 Shadow of Security . 97 4 The Peaceful Image 107 Ingredients of a Research Policy . 108 Completing the Organization . 113 Clinton Again . 114 Reactors at Clinton . 116 Military Reactors . 117 Bohemian Grove . 119 Foreign Distribution of Isotopes . 121 A Policy for Research . 122 Biology and Medicine . 125 The Future of Nuclear Power . 127 A Course for Reactor Development . 129 The Reactor Development Group . 131 The Fate of Clinton . 134 Black Christmas . 137 Year-End Reflections . 139 5 Call to Arms 141 The Old Order Changes . 142 Relations with the Military . 143 New Life at Los Alamos . 146 Operational Responsibilities . 150 Activities at Sandia . 153 Plans for Sandstone ............................155 Production Planning . 156 Strengthening Production Operations .
    [Show full text]
  • The Business of the Atomic Secret: Discerning the Cultural Dimension
    The Business of the Atomic Secret: Discerning the Cultural Dimension in the Strategic Economy of the Cold War Robert Dalton Harris and Diane DeBlois The Atomic Energy Commission was designed “to get the whole atomic energy business in civilian hands completely.” But once in civilian (that is, political) hands, atomic energy was too linked to defense strategy to avoid military control, and too much “big business” to escape government control. In this paper, we focus on a little-known bureaucrat, Bryan F. LaPlante of the Atomic Energy Commission (to whose personal files we had access), to explore the evolution of the military-industrial complex, 1946-1961. Despite the culture of secrecy, atomic energy policy provided an attractive career alternative for America’s brightest scientists, as well as business and political bases for promoting America as a force for “good.” LaPlante was working within an emerging culture that provided a strategic blend of business, political, and social involvement as an alternative to the market and a limit on the analytics of rational action. The Cold War was often styled as an economic contest, a struggle between the free-market capitalism of the United States and the Communism of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).1 This may have been the case for the respective consumer economies, but for both countries the strategic business of making atom bombs was an invention of the state and conducted in secret. In the United States, then, the “invisible hand” was a mailed fist and our economy was at war for five decades.2 Agency theory, whose proponents articulate the governance of business in the absence of free markets in game theoretic terms of the rational actor, may be used to understand the political economy of the United States during this 1 Quotation in abstract: President Harry Truman to the Atomic Energy Commission’s first chair, David E.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF's Ballistic Missiles --- 1954-1964 a Concise History by DR
    1:1 iiiiiial TH VIM 1/0/17 ANNIVERSARY USAF's Ballistic Missiles --- 1954-1964 A Concise History BY DR. ERNEST G. SCHWIEBERT From the Author . ONDAY morning quarterbacking has furnished information on the Peenemiinde staff ex- always been a diverting and favorite ploitations by the Soviets and the August 1952 pastime in this country. There is al- briefing; and Mr. Darol Froman, Los Alamos - ways the temptation, even for the his- Scientific Laboratory, for explanations of nuclear torian, to view earlier history in the developments leading to a ballistic missile war- light of subsequent perspectives. Leopold von head. Ranke, the father of modern history, laid an ex- Mention must also be made of the contributions acting requirement on the Air Force historian of the entire staff of the Office of Information when he stated that the historical account must in AFSC Headquarters, which was most coop- reconstruct the historical climate of an event "as erative in supporting this effort. This account it actually was." In at least one respect the also draws heavily on contributions of individual Air Force historian enjoys a marked advantage historians at each Air Force Systems Command over his academic colleagues in that he is able to division or center whose periodic histories reveal consult the written sources without regard to se- the contributions of that unit in support of the curity classifications while files are still intact. massive undertaking. To all these the author ex- In addition, he has the advantage of being able tends his heartfelt thanks. to consult the actual participants in an event, There are numberless other contributors to the since documents alone cannot be accepted as success of the ballistic missile effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of the Nevada Test Site
    DOE/MA-0518 Origins of the Nevada Test Site United States Department of Energy Terrence R. Fehner F. G. Gosling History Division Executive Secretariat Management and Administration Department of Energy December 2000 Acknowledgments Origins of the Nevada Test Site was written in conjunction with the 50th anniversary commemoration of the Nevada Test Site. The history was released at the official celebration held in Las Vegas, Nevada, on December 18, 2000, fifty years after President Harry S. Truman formally designated the site as the location for conducting nuclear weapons tests within the continental United States. The history represents a unique partnership between a field office and two headquarters offices of the U.S. Department of Energy. The Department’s Nevada Operations Office provided the initial impetus for the project and offered support and resources throughout the researching and writing of the history. The Office of Defense Programs of the Department’s National Nuclear Security Administration provided funding for printing the history. The History Division of the Department’s Executive Secretariat researched and wrote the history. Terrence R. Fehner is a senior historian working in the History Division. F.G. Gosling is the Department’s Chief Historian and Federal Preservation Officer. The authors wish to thank the many individuals who offered comments, sup­ port, and assistance. They made this work possible and helped make it a bet­ ter and more complete history. Retta Helling of the Nevada Operations Office and Jim Landers of the Office of Defense Programs served as the primary points of contact for their respec­ tive offices. Troy Wade, former assistant secretary for defense programs, pro­ vided the original inspiration for the project and tireless support throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Office of Public Relations for Release in AFTERNOON Massachusetts Institute of Rechnology Papers Cambridge 39, Mass
    MIT Institute Archives & Special Collections. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. News Office (AC0069) From the Office of Public Relations For Release in AFTERNOON Massachusetts Institute of rechnology Papers Cambridge 39, Mass. THURSDAY, JUNE 12, 1958 NOTE TO EDITORS: Names of those receiving Air Force and Army commissions at Commissioning Exercises Thursday morning are attached; home addresses are not available. Photographs of the principals in the Commissioning Exercises may be made at 10:15 Thursday morning in the "Green Room" of Kresge Auditorium. One hundred and thirty-one science, engineering and management graduates of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology joined the ranks of United States Army and Air Force officers at commissioning ceremonies this morning (Thursday). Most of them received their Army orAir Force reserve commissions during this morning's ceremonies; 21 were cited for commissioas which they will receive later in the summer, after attending training camps or the M.I.T. Summer Session. All will enter active duty with the armed forces during the next twelve months. Major General James McCormack, Jr., Vice Fresident of M.I.T. presided at the exercises, Speakers were Major General Walter C. Sweeney, Jr., Commanding General. Eighth Air Force, Strategic Air Command, representing the Air Force; Rear Admiral William E. Howard, Jr., Commander, Boston Naval Shipyard, representing the Navy; and Brigadier General Alden K. Sibley, Division Engineer for the New England Division, Corps of Engineers, representing the Army. General Sweeney and General Sibley presented commissions to the Air Force and Army officers, respectively, and the oath of office was administered by Colonel Harmon Lampley, Jr., Professor of Air Science at M.I.T.
    [Show full text]