Colonel Thomas T. Munford and the Last Cavalry Operations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Colonel Thomas T. Munford and the Last Cavalry Operations COLONEL THOMAS T. MUNFORD AND THE LAST CAVALRY OPERATIONS OF THE CIVIL WAR IN VIRGINIA by Anne Trice Thompson Akers Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History APPROVED: l%mes I. Robertson, Jr., Chiirmin Thomas Al"/o Adriance Lar;b R. Morrison December, 1981 Blacksburg, Virginia ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I acknowledge, with great respect and admiration, Dr. James I. Robertson, Jr., Chairman of my thesis committee, mentor and friend. He rekindled my ardor for history. With unstinting encouragement, guidance, support and enthusiasm, he kept me in perspective and on course. I also thank Drs. Thomas Adriance and Larry Morrison who served on my committee for their unselfish expense of time and energy and their invaluable criticisms of my work. Special thanks to , Assistant Park Historian, Petersburg National Battlefield, for the map of the Battle of Five Forks, and to , Photographer with the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, who reproduced the map and the photograph. To ., Indian fighter par excellence, I extend warmest regard and appreciation. Simply, I could not have done it without him. I further acknowledge with love my husband who thought I would never do it and my mother who never doubted that I would. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDG}fENTS. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • . • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • ii Chapter I. MtJNFORD: THE YOUNG MA.N'. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 II. MUNFORD: THE SOLDIER. • • . • . • . • . • • • . • . • • 13 III. FIVE FORKS: WATERLOO OF THE CONFEDERACY .....•...•..•....•• 31 IV. LAST DAYS OF FITZ LEE'S CAVALRY DIVISION .....••..•.••.••... 82 V. MUNFORD: THE RETIRED CAVALRYMAN •.....•......•.......••..•. 119 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ..•......•.•.•..............•.•......•••.•...130 VITA . ............................................................ 133 iii Thomas Taylor Munford 1 CHAPTER I MUNFORD: THE YOUNG MAN Thomas Taylor· MUnford emerges from history a man out of focus. Of all the dashing, vivid personalities who were part of the Civil War, his name is obscure, his image blurred. A man who rubbed elbows with the likes of J. E. B. Stuart and capered with Stonewall Jackson's cavalry should be well-known in his own right. MUnford is not. He stands unrecognized in the shadows of history. Save for his war experiences, Munford's life was relatively quiet. A picture of his life before the war smacks of Southern tradition and a Virginia heritage. Born in the foreboding year of Nat Turner's re- hellion, Thomas Taylor Munford became the fourth generation of a prominent Old Dominion family. Presumably the first Munford in recorded genealogy to come to Virginia was with the expedition that discovered the Chesapeake Bay. Great-grandfather Robert Munford fought in the Indian Wars as a captain in George Washington's regiment and later in the American Revolution. He was also a member of the Virginia General Assembly. Grandfather William Munford came to Richmond around 1800 from Mecklen- 1 Richmond Times Dispatch, Mar. 1, 1918; "Munford Family Bible, Records of the Munford Family: Births, Marriages, Deaths," Jones Memorial Library, Lynchburg, Va., 3; "Munford Family Genealogy," Munford Family Papers, Duke University. 2 3 burg County and sought his fortune as a lawyer. Later he became Clerk of the House of Delegates, a position he held until his death in 1825. William Munford studied law under George Wythe, pronounced the oration at Wythe's funeral and, in ultimate admiration, had named his first child after the judge. 2 George Wythe Munford chose to study law at William and Mary under the direction of Wyndam Robertson, who later became governor of Virginia. He continued his father's position as Clerk of the House of Delegates until elected Secretary of the Commonwealth, a position he held for twenty-five years. Colonel MUnford, as he was known, compiled the Virginia Code of 1873. He also authored a book on early Virginians entitled Jewels of Virginia. 3 Thomas Taylor Munford, born March 29, 1831, w~s the second son of Colonel Munford and Lucy Harrison Taylor. Munford was a child when his mother died. Colonel Munford later married Elizabeth Thorowgood Ellis. Letters written later in his life reveal that Tom Munford probably thought of Elizabeth Munford as his real mother. From his father's two marriages, Munford had a total of twelve brothers and 4 sisters. Munford grew up in Richmond. He attended the Richmond Academy along with his good friend John Esten Cooke. On July 30, 1849, Munford 2Ibid,; Riehmond Times Dispatch, Mar. 19, 1905; "Munford Family Bible,11"3. 3rbid. 4 Ibid, 8. 4 entered the Virginia Military Academy as a third classman. He proved to be a capable student at the end of his first year, standing number twenty in a class of forty-five. In his second year, he rose to Sergeant-Major, ranking number thirteen out of thirty-one. At his July 5, 1852 graduation, he stood fourteenth of twenty-four cadets. 5 Graduating with Munford were James A. Walker, who would become the last surviving commander of the Stonewall Brigade, and George Smith Patton, grandfather of the famous World War II general. Perhaps the most interesting of the people Munford met at V. M. I. was the new Pro- fessor of Natural and Experimental Philosophy (Physics) and Artillery Tactics, Thomas Jonathan Jackson, who came to the Institute at the out- set of Munford's senior year. As a senior, Munford was Cadet Adjutant and he remembered distinctly Jackson's first review of cadets. On August 14, 1851, the regular commandant of cadets, Major William Gilham, was absent and no one had met his substitute. A ruckus occurred during the parade review when a cadet yelled at someone wearing improper boots. The someone turned out to be the substitute commandant, Jackson, who had slipped in unnoticed among the spectators to watch the review. In his role as Cadet Adjutant, Munford's first association with the future Confederate legend was an apology for the cadet who had criticized 5"Munford Family Bible," 1; John 0. Beaty, John Esten Cooke, Virginian (New York, 1922), 15-16; The Southern Historical Publica­ tion Society, The South in the Building of the Nation (Richmond, 1909), XII, 220-21; Merit Roll, Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, Va., 1849-1850, 1850-1851, 1851-1852. 5 6 Jackson's boots. Munford served Jackson closely at V. M. I. throughout his senior year. He observed that Jackson seemed at his best when instructing cadets in artillery tactics. Munford stated: "When he would give the command to the cannoneers to fire! the ring of that voice was clear enough to be heard and to burn amid the rumbling of the wheels, giving life and nerve to the holder of the lanyard. • • • No two individuals could be more unlike • • • than was Major Jackson in repose when thinking of some thing, way off, before he was aroused and interested, the brow that had appeared inanimate and almost drooping at once elevated itself in all the consciousness of power and the whole countenance and figure of the soldier the change [sic] as one who had become inspired. • • I flatter myself to have had extraordinary advantage to learn to honor and to respect and to love •.• this grand, gloomy and peculiarly good man."7 Until 1852, Munford had followed a path commonly traversed by young Southern men of his class. He had been schooled in the proper subjects and educated at one of the finest military institutions in the country. Upon graduation he had several possible careers to pursue. He could, like his father and grandfather, study law. He could go into business. He could become a civil engineer. It seems, however, that Munford was a country boy at heart. Life at Lexington had led him to realize that he preferred the mountanious expanse to city confines. So he abandoned a job in Richmond as clerk to Judge John Mason of the I. R. & K. Railroad and joined a younger brother to seek his fortune 6Julia Smith Martin, Alumni Secretary, V. M. I., to writer, Jan. 7, 1977; Douglas Southall Freeman, Lee's Lieutenants: A Study in Command (New York, 1942), I, 707; Frank E. Vandiver, Mighty Stonewall (New York, 1957), 74. 7 II Ibid., I very much doubt if there was a man at the Institute at any time who had been thrown more directly with him Qackson] or who knew him personally better than I did." Thomas Taylor Munford to E. W. Nichols, July 23, 1911, Munford Papers, V. M. I. 6 as a farmer.8 By October, 1853, he was.engaged happily in a farmer's life. He wrote his father that his corn crop was in first-rate condition. He was concerned about the price of wheat and how his crop would fare against the "joint worm and fly." Munford boasted of having twenty- seven shoats that he would "guarantee" to weigh in at 180 pounds next year and twenty-five more which he thought would weigh in at an average of 140 pounds. He also reassured his father, who had apparently provided much of the financial backing for the Munford brothers' enter- prise: "You may rest assured that the last pack of corn has been bought for the place that will come out of your pocket--Everything was improving when I left home."9 It is unclear exactly where Munford was farming. A letter written by his stepmother in 1853 told of visiting Tom at Rock Spring. A deed with his father, signed the next year, gave Munford property known as the Rock Spring Estate in Powhatan County, Va. Perhaps he had been renting this property to see if he could indeed succeed at farming before making a major purchase. Whatever the case, Munford's main news to his father was not of his wheat or corn or hogs; rather, it was of his impending marriage.
Recommended publications
  • 1 on Lee's Management of Cavalry During The
    ON LEE'S MANAGEMENT OF CAVALRY DURING THE GETTYSBURG CAMPAIGN Terrence L. Salada and John D. Wedo High on the list of reasons for the Union victory at Gettysburg is the erratic performance of the Confederate cavalry. Toxic side effects galore get ascribed to the absence of General James Ewell Brown (J.E.B.) Stuart and his three brigades, especially in the days leading up to the battle. Because of this, the Army of Northern Virginia (ANV) entered the battle blind to the location of the Federal Army and to the topography and cartography of the Gettysburg area. Without a doubt cavalry was scarce where it was needed; blame is normally assigned to cavalry commander Stuart for his dispositions and for placing his command incommunicado with his commander, General Robert E. Lee. As commander, however, Lee was responsible for the army's operations and was therefore accountable for its defeat despite the errors of his subordinates. Many questions arise concerning Lee's management of the Confederate cavalry, particularly what this paper calls the "proximal cavalry," which remained with the main body of the ANV. Is it true that "Stuart's absence" is equivalent to "Lee had no cavalry," as many interpret? How much of the blame for its dispositions and usage should be assigned to Lee, if any? In addition, could Lee have attempted any correction to his cavalry operations based on hearing no word from Stuart? Finally, how does Lee's performance compare to commanders in other wars who were compelled to use forces considered substandard? This paper analyzes the command decisions relative to the Confederate cavalry to determine if the forces with Lee were adequate to substitute for the tasks that Stuart 1 should have done.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Little River Rural Historic District_____________________________ Other names/site number: VDHR File No. 030-5579 ___________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: _______N/A____________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing _________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Roughly bounded on E by SR 629, on N by SR 776 & USR 50, on W by Cromwell’s Run RHD, on S ¾ mile N of SR 55, and on SE by Broad Run RHD City or town: The Plains_____ State: VA__________ County: Fauquier________ Not For Publication: Vicinity: N/A X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X__ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • VMI Architectural Preservation Master Plan
    Preservation Master Plan Virginia Military Institute Lexington, Virginia PREPARED BY: JOHN MILNER ASSOCIATES, INC. West Chester, Pennsylvania Kimberly Baptiste, MUP Krista Schneider, ASLA Lori Aument Clare Adams, ASLA Jacky Taylor FINAL REPORT – JANUARY 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Preservation Master Plan Virginia Military Institute The funding for the preparation of the Preservation Master Plan for Virginia Military Institute was provided by a generous grant from: The Getty Foundation Campus Heritage Grant Program Los Angeles, California Throughout the course of the planning process, John Milner Associates, Inc. was supported and assisted by many individuals who gave generously of their time and knowledge to contribute to the successful development of the Preservation Master Plan. Special thanks and acknowledgement are extended to: VMI ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS • COL Keith Gibson, Director of VMI Museum Operations and Preservation Officer, Chair • COL Bill Badgett, Professor of Fine Arts and Architecture • COL Tom Davis, Professor of History • COL Tim Hodges, Professor of Engineering • LTC Dale Brown, Director of Construction • LTC Jay Williams, Post Engineer • MAJ Dallas Clark, VMI Planning Officer VMI FACULTY AND STAFF MEMBERS • COL Diane Jacob, Head of Archives and Records • Mr. Rick Parker, VMI Post Draftsman OTHER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • All historic images and photographs included within this report are courtesy of the Virginia Military Institute Archives. • All planning and construction documents reviewed during the course of this project
    [Show full text]
  • General AP Hill at Gettysburg
    Papers of the 2017 Gettysburg National Park Seminar General A.P. Hill at Gettysburg: A Study of Character and Command Matt Atkinson If not A. P. Hill, then who? May 2, 1863, Orange Plank Road, Chancellorsville, Virginia – In the darkness of the Wilderness, victory or defeat hung in the balance. The redoubtable man himself, Stonewall Jackson, had ridden out in front of his most advanced infantry line to reconnoiter the Federal position and was now returning with his staff. Nervous North Carolinians started to fire at the noises of the approaching horses. Voices cry out from the darkness, “Cease firing, you are firing into your own men!” “Who gave that order?” a muffled voice in the distance is heard to say. “It’s a lie! Pour it into them, boys!” Like chain lightning, a sudden volley of musketry flashes through the woods and the aftermath reveals Jackson struck by three bullets.1 Caught in the tempest also is one of Jackson’s division commanders, A. P. Hill. The two men had feuded for months but all that was forgotten as Hill rode to see about his commander’s welfare. “I have been trying to make the men cease firing,” said Hill as he dismounted. “Is the wound painful?” “Very painful, my arm is broken,” replied Jackson. Hill delicately removed Jackson’s gauntlets and then unhooked his sabre and sword belt. Hill then sat down on the ground and cradled Jackson’s head in his lap as he and an aide cut through the commander’s clothing to examine the wounds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rifle Clubs of Columbia, South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 8-9-2014 Before They Were Red Shirts: The Rifle lubC s of Columbia, South Carolina Andrew Abeyounis University of South Carolina - Columbia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Abeyounis, A.(2014). Before They Were Red Shirts: The Rifle lC ubs of Columbia, South Carolina. (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/2786 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Before They Were Red Shirts: The Rifle Clubs of Columbia, South Carolina By Andrew Abeyounis Bachelor of Arts College of William and Mary, 2012 ___________________________________________ Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in Public History College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2014 Accepted by: Thomas Brown, Director of Thesis Lana Burgess, Reader Lacy Ford, Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies © Copyright by Andrew Abeyounis, 2014 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my parents and family who have supported me throughout my time in graduate school. Thank you for reading multiple drafts and encouraging me to complete this project. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As with every thesis, I would like to thank all the people who helped me finish. I would like to thank my academic advisors including Thomas Brown whose Hist. 800 class provided the foundation for my thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • VMI Men Who Wore Yankee Blue, 1861-1865 by Edward A
    VMI Men Who Wore Yankee Blue, 1861-1865 by Edward A. Miller, ]r. '50A The contributions of Virginia Military Institute alumni in Confed­ dent. His class standing after a year-and-a-half at the Institute was erate service during the Civil War are well known. Over 92 percent a respectable eighteenth of twenty-five. Sharp, however, resigned of the almost two thousand who wore the cadet uniform also wore from the corps in June 1841, but the Institute's records do not Confederate gray. What is not commonly remembered is that show the reason. He married in early November 1842, and he and thirteen alumni served in the Union army and navy-and two his wife, Sarah Elizabeth (Rebeck), left Jonesville for Missouri in others, loyal to the Union, died in Confederate hands. Why these the following year. They settled at Danville, Montgomery County, men did not follow the overwhelming majority of their cadet where Sharp read for the law and set up his practice. He was comrades and classmates who chose to support the Common­ possibly postmaster in Danville, where he was considered an wealth and the South is not difficult to explain. Several of them important citizen. An active mason, he was the Danville delegate lived in the remote counties west of the Alleghenies where to the grand lodge in St. Louis. In 1859-1860 he represented his citizens had long felt estranged from the rest of the state. Citizens area of the state in the Missouri Senate. Sharp's political, frater­ of the west sought to dismember Virginia and establish their own nal, and professional prominence as well as his VMI military mountain state.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Fought for the Union Which Represent 52% of the Sons of Harvard Killed in Action During This Conflict
    Advocates for Harvard ROTC . H CRIMSON UNION ARMY VETERANS Total served Died in service Killed in action Died by disease Harvard College grads 475 73 69 26 Harvard College- non grads 114 22 Harvard Graduate schools 349 22 NA NA Total 938 117 69 26 The above total of Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union included 5 major generals, 3 Brigadier Generals, 6 colonels, 19 LT Colonels and majors, 17 junior officers in the Army, 3 sergeants plus 3 Naval officers, including 2 Medical doctors. 72% of all Harvard alumni who served in the Civil War fought for the Union which represent 52% of the sons of Harvard killed in action during this conflict. As result among Harvard alumni, Union military losses were 10% compared with a 21% casualty rate for the Confederate Army. The battle of Gettysburg (PA) had the highest amount of Harvard alumni serving in the Union Army who were killed in action (i.e. 11), in addition 3 Harvard alumni Confederates also died in this battle. Secondly, seven Crimson warriors made the supreme sacrifice for the Union at Antietam (MD) with 5 more were killed in the battles of Cedar Mountain (VA) and Fredericksburg (VA). As expected, most of the Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union were born and raised in the Northeastern states (e.g. 74% from Massachusetts). However, 9 Harvard alumni Union casualties were from the Mid West including one from the border state of Missouri. None of these Harvard men were from southern states. The below men who made the supreme sacrifice for their country to preserve the union which also resulted in the abolition of slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • “Never Have I Seen Such a Charge”
    The Army of Northern Virginia in the Gettysburg Campaign “Never Have I Seen Such a Charge” Pender’s Light Division at Gettysburg, July 1 D. Scott Hartwig It was July 1 at Gettysburg and the battle west of town had been raging furiously since 1:30 p.m. By dint of only the hardest fighting troops of Major General Henry Heth’s and Major General Robert E. Rodes’s divisions had driven elements of the Union 1st Corps from their positions along McPherson’s Ridge, back to Seminary Ridge. Here, the bloodied Union regiments and batteries hastily organized a defense to meet the storm they all knew would soon break upon them. This was the last possible line of defense beyond the town and the high ground south of it. It had to be held as long as possible. To break this last line of Union resistance, Confederate Third Corps commander, Lieutenant General Ambrose P. Hill, committed his last reserve, the division of Major General Dorsey Pender. They were the famed Light Division of the Army of Northern Virginia, boasting a battle record from the Seven Days battles to Chancellorsville unsurpassed by any other division in the army. Arguably, it may have been the best division in Lee’s army. Certainly no organization of the army could claim more combat experience. Now, Hill would call upon his old division once more to make a desperate assault to secure victory. In many ways their charge upon Seminary Ridge would be symbolic of why the Army of Northern Virginia had enjoyed an unbroken string of victories through 1862 and 1863, and why they would meet defeat at Gettysburg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Watchdog
    THE WATCHDOG. - A QUARTEX,, IEVIEW FOR CIVIL WAR ENACTOR, Volume 9, NO.2 Guarding your interests.. SPRING 2001 The Civil War Artifact Forum. New Staff Additions and a New Watchdog Web Site. Anyone interested in the "real stuff' should heed W.C. I am pleased to announce two additions. Jomarie Soszynski Fields and, frankly, be in Philadelphia at the end of October. will be using her knowledge of textiles, sewing methods and Why? Because the Civil War Artifact Forum take place at the nineteenth-century clothing to increase our coverage of civilian city's beautiful Union League facilities during the weekend matters. Her educational experience includes a degree in Home of 26-28 October 2000. Economics and certification in consumer's education. She is a The conference is for collectors, curators and historical member of the Costume Society of America, and has practical interpreters interested in civilian and military items. The list of experience in nineteenth-century garment design and scheduled presentations and topics is impressive.. .some of the construction. Jomarie and her husband, Dennis, have been best and most knowledgable experts in their respective fields of enacting for over ten years with the Mid-Michigan Civil War interest. You will learn more in two days than you could research Reenactors and the Citizens of Wheeling. One of her primary in two decades. We are supporting the Artifacts Forum and interests is in pattern design and construction. urge you to attend if at all possible. Watchdog subscribers who Larry See is joining the staff as the editor of the Watchdog's register for the conference before 1 September 2000 get an early web site.
    [Show full text]
  • Wardlaw Family
    GENEALOGY OF THE WARDLAW FAMILY WITH SOME ACCOUNT OF OTHER FAMILIES WITH WHICH IT IS CONNECTED DATE MICROFILM GENEALOGICAL DEPARTMENT ITEM ON ROLL CAMERA NO CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS CATALOGUE NO. iKJJr/? 7-/02 ^s<m BY JOSEPH G. WARDLAW EXPLANATION OF CHARACTERS The letters A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H denote the generations beginning with Robert (Al). The large figures indicate the heads of families, or those especially mentioned in their generation. Each generation begins with 1 and continues in regular sequence. The small figures show number, according to birth, in each particular family. Children dying in infancy or early youth are not mentioned again in line with their brothers and sisters. As the work progressed, new material was received, which, in some measure, interfered with the plan above outlined. Many families named in the early generations have been lost in subsequent tracing, no information being available. By a little examination or study of the system, it will be found possible to trace the lineage of any person named in the book, through all generations back to Robert (Al). PREFACE For a number of years I mave been collecting data con­ cerning the Wardlaw and allied families. The work was un­ dertaken for my own satisfaction and pleasure, without thought of publication, but others learning of the material in my hands have urged that it be put into book form. I have had access to MSS. of my father and his brothers, Lewis, Frank and Robert, all practically one account, and presumably obtained from their father, James Wardlaw, who in turn doubtless received it from his father, Hugh.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Soldiers and Southern Society, 18611880
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository “What A Fall Was There—My Country Ruined!”: Confederate Soldiers and Southern Society, 1861­1880 David Christopher Williard A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2012 Approved by: William L. Barney W. Fitzhugh Brundage Laura Edwards Joseph T. Glatthaar Heather Andrea Williams © 2012 David Christopher Williard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT DAVID WILLIARD: “What A Fall Was There—My Country Ruined!”: Confederate Soldiers and Southern Society, 1861‐1880 (Under the direction of William L. Barney) This dissertation traces the paths that former Confederate soldiers took in attempting to reclaim control over their personal lives and reconstitute their relationship to southern society at large in the aftermath of the Civil War. Participation in the war gave men status, purpose, a sense of worth in the eyes of their families and white southern society at large, and investment in a collective endeavor. Defeat shattered Confederate soldiers’ self‐image and led soldiers to doubt the purpose of their sacrifices, to believe that hardships came unequally, and to question whether their society had any right to determine the status of men whose experiences it did not understand. At the war’s conclusion, the links of ideology and experience that had bound Confederate soldiers and civilians together stood largely broken. The consequences of this division became evident in the postwar South.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Historic Events in March Cape May County Civil War Round Table Newsletter 1860 February 2014 No Major Battles, Etc
    150 th Anniversary of the American Civil War [email protected] No minutes from the December meeting as there was no business meeting. REMINDER: DUES FOR 2014 ARE DUE NOW!!!! Send to Jim Marshall, address above Civil War Historic Events in March Cape May County Civil War Round Table Newsletter 1860 February 2014 No major battles, etc. in 1860 Meeting Schedule: 1861 March 4 Lincoln inaugurated 21 March : Matthew Bruce : Confederate Cruisers 1862 18 April: 16 May: March 7-8 Battle of Pea Ridge (AR) 20 June: 8 Confederate ironclad Merrimac enters 18 July: Hampton Roads, destroys Union 15 August: warships 19 September: 17 October: 9 Battle of Monitor-Merrimac in Hampton 21 November: Roads ?? December: 21 First battle of Kernstown (VA) 28 Battle of Glorieta (NM) CMCCWRT Officers for 2014 1863 President: Marty Runner No major battles, etc. in 1863 1402 Rt 9 South, Lot 193, Cape May Court House, NJ 08210 1864 609-536-8235 No major battles, etc. i9n 1864 [email protected] 1865 Vice President: Lou Bishop Jr. March 2 Battle of Waynesboro (VA) 21 Schoolhouse Ln, Cape May Court House, NJ 08210 4 Lincoln inaugurated 609-463-9277 or 741-5438 25 Battle of Fort Stedman at Petersburg [email protected] Secretary: Pat Munson-Siter 42 Franklin Ave., Villas, NJ 08251-2407 609-287-5097 [email protected] Treasurer: Jim Marshall 202 Bartram Ln., Ocean City, NJ 08226 609 – 602 - 3243 1 Cape May County Civil War Round Table Newsletter = February 2014 Civil War Related Events Heroes or Enemies?" at the Museum of the March 2014 Confederacy in Appomattox.
    [Show full text]