DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Notice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Notice DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS PENSACOLA REGULATORY OFFICE 41 NORTH JEFFERSON STREET, SUITE 301 PENSACOLA, FLORIDA 32502-5794 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF November 13, 2017 Regulatory Division North Permits Branch Pensacola Permits Section PUBLIC NOTICE Permit Application No. SAJ-2006-00556 (SP-HMM) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Jacksonville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344) as described below: APPLICANT: The Residence at Nature Creek, LLC 3838 North Palafox St Pensacola, FL 32505 WATERWAY AND LOCATION: The project would affect waters of the United States associated with unnamed wetlands adjacent to Eleven Mile Creek. The project site is located north of Highway 90 and south of Interstate 10, Parcel Number 03-1S-31-3101- 001-001, in Section 03, Township 1 South, Range 31 West, Escambia County, Florida. Directions to the site are as follows: From downtown Pensacola take Interstate 110 north to Interstate 10 west. Take the Highway 90 exit (Exit 5), and turn west on Nine Mile Road (Highway 90). The subject property is located on the north side of Nine Mile Road immediately east of the Navy Federal Credit Union complex. APPROXIMATE CENTRAL COORDINATES: Latitude 30.538972°, Longitude -87.343194° PROJECT PURPOSE: Basic: Residential Development Overall: Construct a multi-family residential development to accommodate the growing housing needs of Midwest Escambia County, Florida EXISTING CONDITIONS: The 35.94 acre project area consists of 24.72 acres of mixed hardwood uplands and 11.22 acres of palustrine freshwater forested wetlands. The upland are dominated by slash pine (Pinus elliottii), live oak (Quercus virginiana), yaupon holly (Ilex vomitoria), gallberry (Ilex glabra), and bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum). The wetlands are dominated by slash pine (Pinus elliottii), sweet bay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana), swamp bay (Persea palustris), red maple (Acer rubrum), black titi (Cyrilla racemiflora), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), and large gallberry (Ilex coriacea). There is an 80 foot wide access easement that is bisected by an unnamed tributary of Eleven Mile Creek. The site is bordered to the north by Interstate 10, to the south by Highway 90 (West Nine Mile Road) to the east by Eleven Mile Creek, and the west by the Navy Federal Credit Union complex. PROPOSED WORK: The applicant seeks authorization to discharge fill over 0.661 acres of wetlands for the construction of an access road associated with an upland residential development that includes 216 townhome units, a 14-unit apartment building, a 4,000 square foot club house and pool, and associated infrastructure. The access road would include two 20 foot by 6.5 foot metal box culverts (arched, with no bottom) over the creek and two 14 inch by 23 inch elliptical reinforced concrete pipes in the northern portion of the road crossing. The work also includes minor fill within 115 square feet of wetlands for a drainage feature at the southeast corner of the residential development. PERMIT HISTORY: The project was previously permitted on December 21, 2009, but expired on December 21, 2014. That permit authorized 0.71 acres of wetland impacts for an access road that included a 50 foot span bridge across a creek and a 14 inch by 23 inch culvert within the northern portion of the road crossing. To offset impacts, the permit required onsite permittee responsible mitigation consisting of 9.59 acres of wetland enhancement and preservation within the Eleven Mile Creek drainage basin. No construction or other activities authorized by the previous permit have been initiated. AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION INFORMATION – The applicant has provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the aquatic environment: “Proposed wetland impacts are limited to only where necessary to achieve the project purpose and to provide necessary access to developable uplands. Impacts associated with the road crossing constitute 100% of the proposed permanent wetland impacts. All other wetlands outside the limits of the proposed roadway crossing were completely avoided. In addition, the applicant is proposing a twenty five foot upland buffer along the entire length of wetlands located within the plan of development to limit secondary and cumulative impacts to wetland resources. There is only one small area located within the extreme southeast corner of the development site where wetlands will not be afforded at least at 25-ft. buffer. In this area, the right of way of a cul-de-sac will be located near (not within) an adjacent wetland complex. The road was positioned in an effort to avoid primary wetland impacts and allow access to developable uplands. Access to the Residences at Nature Creek project is via an 80-ft. wide easement that runs along the east side of the Navy Federal [Credit Union complex]. There are no alternatives to access the development site other than the 80-ft. easement. Due to the size of the development and the fact that only one access is available, Escambia County Life Safety Department will require a boulevard entrance. The boulevard is comprised of two lane road with each lane 16-ft. in width. The overall width of the 2 boulevard is 40-ft. not including grading, and stormwater management structures which extend beyond the width of the boulevard. The applicant has avoided and minimized impacts to wetland resources via the use of a retaining wall structure along the east side of the boulevard eliminating the need for side slopes to meet grading requirements. The engineer of record for the project, Hammond Engineering, Inc. subjected this crossing to a detailed engineering analysis to determine the peak flow rate of the tributary. The analysis resulted in the use of two (2) 20.08-ft. x 6.5’ Aluminum Metal Box Culvert (Arched culvert with no bottom) structure. Two additional 14-inch by 23- inch elliptical reinforced concrete pipe will be placed in the norther portion of the road crossing.” COMPENSATORY MITIGATION – The applicant has offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable functional loss to the aquatic environment: To offset wetland impacts, 9.65 acres of onsite forested wetlands would be enhanced and perpetually preserved by placing the area into a conservation easement with the Northwest Florida Water Management District. The areas would be enhanced by removing exotic and nuisance species and planting the areas with a total of 680, 3-gallon sized hardwood trees consisting of sweet bay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana), black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), and red maple (Acer rubrum) on 25 foot centers. CULTURAL RESOURCES: The Corps is not aware of any known historic properties within the permit area. By copy of this public notice, the Corps is providing information for review. Our final determination relative to historic resource impacts is subject to review by and coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer and those federally recognized tribes with concerns in Florida and the Permit Area. ENDANGERED SPECIES: The Corps has determined the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) as determined using the 2013 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Eastern Indigo Snake Programmatic Effect Determination Key, following couplets A> B> C> D> E. ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH): This notice initiates consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service on EFH as required by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 1996. Our initial determination is that the proposed action would not have a substantial adverse impact on EFH or Federally managed fisheries. Our final determination relative to project impacts and the need for mitigation measures is subject to review by and coordination with the National Marine Fisheries Service. NOTE: This public notice is being issued based on information furnished by the applicant. This information has not been verified or evaluated to ensure compliance with laws and regulation governing the regulatory program. The jurisdictional line has not been verified by Corps personnel. 3 AUTHORIZATION FROM OTHER AGENCIES: Water Quality Certification may be required from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and/or one of the state Water Management Districts. COMMENTS regarding the potential authorization of the work proposed should be submitted in writing to the attention of the District Engineer through the Pensacola Permits Section, 41 North Jefferson Street, Suite 301, Pensacola, Florida, 32502 within 21 days from the date of this notice. The decision whether to issue or deny this permit application will be based on the information received from this public notice and the evaluation of the probable impact to the associated wetlands. This is based on an analysis of the applicant's avoidance and minimization efforts for the project, as well as the compensatory mitigation proposed. QUESTIONS concerning this application should be directed to the project manager, Holly Millsap, in writing at the Pensacola Permits Section, 41 North Jefferson Street, Suite 301, Pensacola, FL 32502, by electronic mail at [email protected], by fax at (850) 433-8160, or by telephone at (850) 470-9823. IMPACT ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Coordination with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Marine Fisheries Services, and other Federal, State, and local agencies, environmental groups, and concerned citizens generally yields pertinent environmental information that is instrumental in determining the impact the proposed action will have on the natural resources of the area. EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx
    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 RTP/SCS Transportation Finance Appendix, Adopted April
    TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMFINANCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS APPENDIX ADOPTED | APRIL 2016 INTRODUCTION 1 REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 1 CORE AND REASONABLY AVAILABLE REVENUES 3 EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES AND METHODOLOGY 14 SUMMARY OF REVENUE SOURCES AND EXPENDITURES 18 APPENDIX A: DETAILS ABOUT REVENUE SOURCES 21 APPENDIX B: SCAG REGIONAL FINANCIAL MODEL 30 APPENDIX TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM I TRANSPORTATION FINANCE APPENDIX C: ADOPTED | APRIL 2016 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR REASONABLY AVAILABLE REVENUE SOURCES 34 APPENDIX D: FINANCIAL PLAN ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST 39 TRANSPORTATION FINANCE INTRODUCTION REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS In accordance with federal fiscal constraint requirements (23 U.S.C. § 134(i)(2)(E)), the The region’s revenue forecast timeframe for the 2016 RTP/SCS is FY2015-16 through Transportation Finance Appendix for the 2016 RTP/SCS identifies how much money the FY2039-40. Consistent with federal guidelines, the financial plan takes into account Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) reasonably expects will be available inflation and reports statistics in nominal (year-of-expenditure) dollars. The underlying data to support our region’s surface transportation investments. The financially constrained 2016 are based on financial planning documents developed by the local county transportation RTP/SCS includes both a “traditional” core revenue forecast comprised of existing local, commissions and transit operators. The revenue model also uses information from the state and federal sources and more innovative but reasonably available sources of revenue California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the California Transportation to implement a program of infrastructure improvements to keep freight and people moving. Commission (CTC). The regional forecasts incorporate the county forecasts where available The financial plan further documents progress made since past RTPs and describes steps and fill data using a common framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Influence of an Interstate Highway on the Growth and Development of Low-Income Minority Communities
    60 Transportation Research Record 1074 Differential Influence of an Interstate Highway on the Growth and Development of Low-Income Minority Communities ROOSEVELT STEPTOE and CLARENCE THORNTON ABSTRACT The purpose of the research on which this paper is based was to measure the changes in land use and related economic and environmental variables that were attributable to the location and operation of a portion of an Interstate high­ way in the Scotlandville community of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. More specifi­ cally, the research was designed to determine the degree to which low-income minority communities experience unique highway impacts. The research was con­ ducted in two phases--a baseline assessment phase and a follow-on, longitudinal phase. In the baseline phase, measures were taken of several significant vari­ ables including (a) land use on a parcel-by-parcel basis; (b) recreational pat­ terns; (cl traffic volumes and residential densities; (d) number and variety of minority businesses; (e) housing types, quality, and conditions; and (fl street types and conditions. The follow-on phase was completed after the highway was completed and opened to traffic. A comparison of these two sets of data consti­ tutes the assessment of the highway impacts on this community. The literature was carefully examined and the reported impacts on nonminority communities were summarized for comparison with the Scotlandville community. One conclusion reached was that many of the highway impacts identified in Scotlandville were similar to those reported in other communities. The major exception is that, whereas highways generally induced commercial developments around major inter­ changes in nonminority communities, the highway does not appear to attract new businesses in minority communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter IV TRANSPORTATION and CIRCULATION
    Chapter IV TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION Central City is bordered by a "freeway ring" formed by the Harbor Freeway (Interstate 110) to the west, the Hollywood Freeway (US 101) to the north, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) to the east, and the Santa Monica Freeway (Interstate 10) to the south. In addition to the freeway ring, five other freeway corridors provide regional access to the downtown area: the Golden State Freeway (Interstate 5), the Glendale Freeway (State Route 2), the Pasadena Freeway (State Route 110), the San Bernardino Freeway (Interstate 10) and the Pomona Freeway (State Route 60). The Downtown roadway system is basically a grid network of streets which has remained unchanged for decades. The majority of the changes that have occurred on these streets have been to convert some segments into one-way operation. Several streets also serve a regional function by providing access to the adjacent freeway system. These include Hope Street, Grand Avenue, Broadway, and Spring Street in the north-south direction and Third Street, Fourth Street, Fifth Street, Sixth Street, Eighth Street, and Ninth Street in the east west direction. Significant congestion occurs on the regional transportation network due to the combined impacts of trip demands within Central City as well as regional trips that pass through Central City. In fact, more than half of downtown freeway traffic is through traffic. Pedestrian circulation in downtown Los Angeles takes place for the most part during the weekday business hours with the heaviest volumes during the lunch hours. Most of the pedestrian movement occurs between Bunker Hill, the Financial Core, and the Historic Core where daytime employment centers are located.
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER/Format a Text Template
    Case Study of the Transportation Sector’s Response to and Recovery from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita prepared for Committee on Climate Change and U.S. Transportation Division on Earth and Life Studies Transportation Research Board prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. January 2007 www.camsys.com The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board or its sponsors. This document is not a report of the Transportation Research Board or of the National Research Council. commissioned paper Case Study of the Transportation Sector’s Response to and Recovery from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita prepared for Committee on Climate Change and U.S. Transportation Division on Earth and Life Studies Transportation Research Board prepared by Lance R. Grenzeback Andrew T. Lukmann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 January 2007 Case Study of the Transportation Sector’s Response to and Recovery from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Hurricanes Katrina and Rita....................................................................................... 3 3.0 Central Gulf Coast........................................................................................................ 6 4.0 Highway System..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Supplement to Oversize/Overweight Permit
    Rev. 02/15 STATE OF LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT SUPPLEMENT TO OVERSIZE/OVERWEIGHT PERMIT 1. GENERAL This special permit must be carried with the vehicle using same and must be available at all times for inspection by proper authorities. This permit is subject to revocation or cancellation at any time. The applicant assumes responsibility for and obligates himself to pay for any damages caused to highways, roads, bridges, structures or any other state-owned property while using this permit. Issuance of this permit is not assurance or warranty by the State or DOTD that the highways, roads, bridges and structures are capable of carrying the vehicle and load for which this permit is issued; nor shall issuance stop the State or said department from any claim which may arise for damage to its property. The applicant hereby accepts this permit at his own risk. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Department and its duly appointed agents and employees from and against any and all claims, suits, liabilities, losses, damages, cost or expense including attorney fees sustained by reason of the exercise of the permit, whether or not the same may have been caused by negligence of the Department, its agent or employees. When required, by the permit, the vehicle and load for which the permit is issued shall be accompanied by a proper escort, State Police or otherwise, all at the expense of the user: and such other conditions or requirements as are herein imposed by the Secretary shall be complied with. This permit is issued pursuant to R.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Winn Dixie Prairieville, Louisiana Approx
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM WINN DIXIE PRAIRIEVILLE, LOUISIANA APPROX. 17 MILES FROM BATON ROUGE, LA EXCLUSIVELY OFFERED BY: IN ASSOCIATION WITH: NET LEASE GROUP ANDREW BOGARDUS BARRY COHN JOHN FAWER +1 415 677 0421 +1 510 267 6003 Corporate Realty [email protected] [email protected] Louisiana licensed agent CA LIC #00913825 CA LIC #0 SUBJECT PROPERTY The information contained in the Materials has been obtained by Agent from Confidentiality & Disclaimer sources believed to be reliable; however, no representation or warranty is made The information contained in this marketing brochure (“Materials”) is proprietary regarding the accuracy or completeness of the Materials. Agent makes no and confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the person or entity representation or warranty regarding the Property, including but not limited to receiving the Materials from Cushman & Wakefield (“Agent”). The Materials are income, expenses, or financial performance (past present, or future); size, square intended to be used for the sole purpose of preliminary evaluation of the subject footage, condition, or quality of the land and improvements; presence or absence property/properties (“Property”) for potential purchase. of contaminating substances (PCB’s, asbestos, mold, etc.); compliance with laws and regulations (local, state, and federal); or, financial condition or business The Materials have been prepared to provide unverified summary financial, prospects of any tenant (tenants’ intentions regarding continued occupancy, property, and market information to a prospective purchaser to enable it to payment of rent, etc). A prospective purchaser must independently investigate establish a preliminary level of interest in potential purchase of the Property. The and verify all of the information set forth in the Materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice
    PUBLIC NOTICE The Zoning Commission of the City of Baton Rouge and the Parish of East Baton Rouge will hold a public hearing on Monday, March 16, 2020 at 5:00 p.m., in Room 348, City Hall located at 222 St. Louis Street, 3rd floor, Baton Rouge, Louisiana to consider the following rezoning requests and amendments to the “Comprehensive Land Use Plan” as indicated: PUBLIC HEARINGS – CITY & PARISH CURRENT ZONING CASES: PA-4-20 2630-2730 UND Harding Boulevard To amend the Comprehensive Land Use PlanfromResidentialNeighborhood to Compact Neighborhood on property located on the south side of Harding Boulevard and west of Interstate 110 on Lot A, First Filing, Section 2 of Southern Heights Subdivision. Section 50, T6S, R1W, GLD, EBRP, LA (Council District 2-Banks) ISPUD-1-20 Harding Boulevard Proposed medium density residential development, on property located on the south side of Harding Boulevard and west of Interstate 110 on Lot A, First Filing, Section 2 of Southern Heights Subdivision. Section 50, T6S, R1W, GLD, EBRP, LA (Council District 2-Banks) PA-5-20 2070 South Acadian Thruway To amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan from Institutional to Office on property located on the west side of South Acadian Thruway and north of Interstate 10, on Lots 5-A, 5-B, 5-C and 5-D of Hundred Oaks Park. Section 96, T7S, R1E, GLD, EBRP, LA (Council District 7-Cole) Case 8-20 2070 South Acadian Thruway To rezone from Single Family Residential (A1) to General Office Low Rise (GOL) on property located on the west side of S Acadian Thruway, north of the Interstate 10, on Lots 5-A, 5-B, 5-C and 5-D, Hundred Oaks Park Subdivision.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Florida 5110 North 9Th Ave
    DF Downing Frye Realty, Inc. Pensacola Florida 5110 North 9th Ave. Cordova Mall Pensacola, Florida 32504 Asking Price - $5,254,775,000 | 6.20% CAP Rate Financial Offering Summary FRDF Asking Price – $5,254,775.00 | 6.20% CAP RATE Rent Increases Annual Rent Monthly Rent Location – 5110 North 9th Ave Cordova Mall Pensacola, FL 32504 Year 7 (8/01/2020) $325,796 $27,149.65 Year 8 $332,312 $27,692.65 Building Size – 8,298 SF Year 9 $338,958 $28,246.50 Lot Size – 1.03 acres Year 10 $345,737 $28,811.43 Date Remodeled – 11/04/2008 Year 11 $352,652 29,387.66 Year 12 $359,705 29,975.41 Tenant – Red Lobster Hospitality, LLC Year 13 $366,899 $30,574.92 Guarantor – Red Lobster Intermediate Holdings, LLC Year 14 $274,237 $31,186.42 Year 15 $381722 $31,810.15 Lease Term – 25-years Year 16 $389,256 $32,446.35 Lease Commencement – 12/17/2015 Year 17 $397,143 $33,095.28 Lease Expiration – 1/31/2040 Year 18 $405,806 $33,757.18 Lese Term Remaining – 18+ years Year 19 $413,188 $34,432.33 Lease Type – Triple-Net (NNN) Year 20 $421,452 $35,120.97 Roof & Structure - Tenant Responsibility Year 21 $429,881 $35,823.39 Year 22 $438,478 $36,539.86 Options to Renew – Four (4) Five Year Option Periods Year 23 $447,248 $37,270.66 Rental Increases – 2% Annually Year 24 $456,193 $38,016.07 Listing Agent: Rob Bollinger -#SL3335600 Year25 $465,317 $38,776.39 Phone # - (239) 776-2080 Email – [email protected] All information deemed reliable.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Pavement Rehabilitation with Long Life Asphalt Concrete
    Rapid Pavement Rehabilitation with Long Life Asphalt Concrete Project experience from the rehabilitation of Interstate 710 in Long Beach, California using 55-hour weekend closures In 1998, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) ment exhibited severe faulting and cracking. A project was started the Long-Life Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies (LLPRS) undertaken to rehabilitate a 4.4 centerline-km (26.4 lane-km in program to rebuild approximately 2,800 lane-km of deteriorated total) section of Interstate 710 (I-710) during a series of 55- freeway of the total 78,000 lane-km within the California state hour weekend closures (Figure 1). The rehabilitation included highway system. Among the LLPRS candidate corridors, the all three lanes in each direction plus the shoulders and median. Long Beach Freeway (Interstate 710) stood out as an important Encouraged by an incentive provision of $100,000 per week- route for its high traffic volume (164,000 vehicles per day), end closure in the Caltrans contract, the contractor shortened 13 percent of which is trucks serving the Port of Long Beach. the initial ten-weekend plan and was able to finish the main re- habilitation work in eight consecutive closures for a total award In service since 1952, the original pavement structure consist- of $200,000. ed of 200 mm Portland cement concrete (PCC) slabs placed on cement-treated and aggregate base layers. By 2003, the pave- November 2004 The project consisted of three full-depth asphalt concrete (FDAC) After the weekend closures were finished, nighttime closures were replacement sections (1.6 km total) under freeway overpasses, used to pave the entire project with a 25-mm surface layer of open- and two sections (2.8 km total) with crack, seat, and overlay graded rubberized asphalt concrete (RAC-O) to reduce hydro- (CSOL) of existing PCC slabs with AC.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 10 Corridor Implementation Plan for Florida's Principal FIHS
    Technical Memorandum No. 4.3 Interstate 10 Corridor Implementation Plan for Florida’s Principal FIHS Limited-Access Corridors Prepared for: Florida Department of Transportation ITS Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 90 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 (850) 410-5600 June 20, 2002 Phase I – ITS Corridor Master Plans – I-10 Corridor Implementation Plan Document Control Panel File Name: Technical Memorandum No. 4.3 – I-10 Corridor Implementation Plan Travis Justice Created By: David Chang Date: February 18, 2002 Version No.: 2 Reviewed By: Terrel L. Shaw, II Reviewed By: Travis Justice Modified By: Pamela Hoke Date Modified: June 20, 2002 i Phase I – ITS Corridor Master Plans – I-10 Corridor Implementation Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction.......................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Corridor Description................................................................................ 1 1.3 Document Organization .......................................................................... 1 2. Legacy Systems................................................................................4 2.1 Current ITS Plans and Programs.......................................................... 11 2.2 Existing Communications Infrastructure............................................. 14 2.3 Proposed Capacity Improvement Projects.......................................... 14 3. Need for ITS and Proposed
    [Show full text]