DOCSLIB.ORG

Regenerative Agriculture in Latin America

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regenerative Agriculture in Latin America Regenerative Agriculture in Latin America Published by the Mustardseed Trust By Massimiliano Miatton and Michael Karner June 2020 About this report This internal research report was written for the Mustardseed Trust to expand its knowledge about Regenerative Agriculture (RA) in Latin America. Although a significant amount of information is beginning to emerge on RA in Western Europe, North America and Australia, there is still a lack of awareness about its degree of development in other parts of the world. To address this knowledge gap, we carried out a 9-week desktop research project from April-June 2020 based on the following research questions: ● Which actors and factors are either enhancing or inhibiting a shift in thinking and practice to regenerative agriculture in Latin America? ● Who are the most influential (male and female) people and organisations that are enhancing/driving the practice of RA in Latin America? What innovations do they present? ● What are the most influential factors that are enhancing/driving the practice of RA in Latin America? What are the most important factors that are inhibiting the practice of RA in Latin America? Disclaimer: This report focuses on continental Latin America (LA) and does not delve into RA in the Caribbean. Any opinions, points of view or conclusions expressed in this document are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views and position of any other person or organisation (unless explicitly indicated). NB: You can access the websites of the RA actors listed in this report by clicking on their logos. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the Mustardseed Trust for its support in making this research possible. We would especially like to thank our interviewees for their precious orientation and insights: Elliott Powell, Ercilia Sahores, José Francisco Valle Soto, Fernando Russo, Daniele Cesano, Daniel Froebel, Rafaella Mazza, Gabriela Paraná, Stephen Sherwood, Alejandro Solano, Joe Brewer, and Luis Camargo, Eduard Muller and Melina Angel, convenors of the Regenerative Communities Network Latin America. Thank you also to all the individuals who provided us with precious guidance and ideas: Koen van Seijen, John D. Liu, Yonah Berger, Jonas Steinfeld and Matteo Mazzola. 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Enhancing and Inhibiting factors for RA in Latin America 8 3. Livestock 13 4. Agroforestry 20 5. Broad-acre annual cropping 29 6. Funding for Regenerative Agriculture 35 7. Regenerative Agriculture Networks 41 8. Conclusions 49 References 55 3 An increasing number of scientific publications recognise that the Earth has entered a new human-induced geological epoch, the Anthropocene, in which human activities and pressures on natural systems are driving the Earth’s climate and other crucial biophysical processes beyond any “safe operating space” (Rockström et al., 2009). These “ecological overshoots” are growing together with a series of “socio-economical shortfalls” on major global 1 challenges such as extreme poverty and inequality, healthcare, social justice, gender equality, and other United Nations Sustainable Introduction Development Goals (Raworth, 2017). Regenerative agriculture (RA) aims to address both the environmental and socio-economic aspects of this planetary emergency by redesigning human systems to function from scarcity to abundance. It is rapidly gaining momentum as a worldview, a body of knowledge, a series of principles and practices and a set of social movements. In this study, we will delve into the numerous ways in which RA is unfolding and innovating in Latin America. The common denominator behind all regenerative approaches is the intention to move beyond sustainability (adapted from Mang & Reed, 2012). 4 Defining Regenerative Agriculture One of the first documented uses of “regenerative agriculture” dates back to the early 1980s. Robert Rodale, son of J.I. Rodale, founder of the pioneering organic agriculture Rodale Institute, defined RA as “a holistic systems approach to farming that encourages continual innovation for environmental, social, economic and spiritual well-being” (Rodale Institute, 2014). This definition goes beyond conventional understandings of farming and sustainable agriculture, i.e. the simple “sustainment” of the land, to designate the active regeneration of its resources through agriculture itself. In this configuration, land managers go from acting on nature to acting as nature. Since its early beginnings, the concept and practice of regeneration has evolved to encompass a plurality of meanings, practices and actors, and still eludes any precise definition. Indeed, as Soloviev and Landua (2016) suggest, defining RA goes against the very spirit of regeneration itself. “To define” stems from the Latin de-finire (i.e. “completely bounding, limiting, bringing to an end”), and can therefore not apply to an approach which targets the “health, vitality, and evolutionary capability of whole living systems”. These authors nonetheless identify a series of “levels” at which RA actors are operating, that offer insights into the different existing perspectives on regeneration. Most agree that a regenerative land management approach is based on four cornerstones (for a detailed overview, see Merfield, 2019): ● Minimum soil disturbance: building rich organic soils by leveraging the photosynthetic ability of plants to capture atmospheric carbon dioxide. This increases the soil’s organic matter and biological health, as well as its capacity to act as a net carbon sink. ● Fostering biological diversity: ensured by intercropping and complex rotations in both time and space, with a focus on perennials and on closing nutrient cycles. ● Maintaining constant soil cover using cover crops and a combination of the approaches above. ● Integrating livestock and production adopting a stock management approach that takes the physiological needs of plants, animals, and the farm as a whole into account. A series of best practices A shift from a mechanistic world view to a thriving Through holistic design, best regenerative culture, which practices are combined in an implies a deep understanding integrative system that of the human history and enables the mimicking of Integrated rootedness into a specific Evolutionary Regeneration natural ecosystems. The farm’s landscape place. This is based on a pattern ecology determines the form of as... design multi-dimensional and its agricultural enterprises, multi-generational with the ultimate goal of perspective, conveyed through creating an Earth-as-Eden pattern languages of songs, landscape. stories, rituals, etc. Applied living systems thinking Different entities are intertwined into an ecosystem of regenerative enterprises, operating as a decentralised network in which wealth goes beyond purely monetary terms to embrace all the 5 different forms of capital and human exchange. Adapted from Soloviev and Landua (2016) Research Methodology Our inclusion criteria In our view (based on C self-reported impact data, number of citations in RA-related sources, or expert indications), the project/actor is innovating The project/actor uses the and/or mainstreaming RA in term “regenerative” to Latin America. describe its activities. If not, it is nonetheless clearly connected to RA initiatives A B or networks. The project/actor is engaged in RA or regenerative activities in at least one Latin American country. Our research process Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Online desktop research and Snowball sampling to identify Clustering the entries based on literature review (including further initiatives falling under their field of action and filtering academic and grey literature, criteria A and B, combined them according to criteria C, while websites, social media), with online interviews of Latin identifying the most innovative consultations with RA experts American RA frontrunners and/or influential actors in our and practitioners from our identified during Phase 1. view. networks. The limitations of our study Our research was conducted exclusively online over a short, 2 month period and over a very broad geographical zone. This limited our capacity to carry out an exhaustive analysis of RA in Latin America backed up by fieldwork and in-depth interactions with local RA actors. The virtual nature of our research did not allow us to assess which RA initiatives are truly applying RA principles and techniques in their daily activities, as opposed to projects that may be using regenerative terminology mainly as a means of communication. We can realistically expect numerous relevant RA projects to be underrepresented or absent from the internet, especially those that lack the means or interest to develop an online presence. 6 Structure & Framework Livestock Chapters _________________________ This report focuses on RA projects Networks Agroforestry and initiatives that are explored in the these 5 thematic chapters. Since there is significant overlap in RA approaches and activities, attributing a project to a single field of action was not always possible. This classification is not Broad-acre intended to be a strict annual categorisation, but rather a Funding cropping functional layout that allows for a clear and structured narrative. Food System Level 1: increase the efficiency of conventional 1 practices to reduce the use of scarce or Levels environmentally-detrimental inputs. __________________ RA innovations are summarised according to the level of food Level 2: substitute resource-depleting practices system they are leveraging at and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soil Regeneration Increases Crop Nutrients, Antioxidants and Adaptive Responses
    MOJ Food Processing & Technology Research Article Open Access Soil regeneration increases crop nutrients, antioxidants and adaptive responses Abstract Volume 6 Issue 2 - 2018 Since 1981, the Rodale Farming Systems Trial (RFST) differentiated organic (org) from conventional (con) farming systems showing that org systems can have a transformative Paul Reed Hepperly,1 Emmanual Omondi,2 potential to increase soil quality. On the other hand, throughout the RFST history, con Rita Seidel1 system never increased soil organic carbon (SOC) nor soil nitrogen, (SON). During the 1Department of plant pathology, The Rodale Institute, USA first 5 years, org systems were increased significantly (p = 0.05) for SOC and SON. Organic 2Director of the Farming Systems Trial, The Rodale Institute, farming systems do not employ org restricted inputs i.e. synthetic fertilizers and pesticides USA instead they relied on biologically based inputs such as cover crops, extended legume rotation and organic amendment. Conventional system used recommended fertilizer and Correspondence: Paul Reed Hepperly, Department of plant herbicide without biological based inputs. Both Org systems, significantly increased both pathology, The Rodale Institute, Kutztown, 611 Siegfriedale Road, SOC and SON but were not statistically different from each other. Increased SOC and Pennsylvania, USA, Email [email protected] SON opened a research venue supporting testing hypotheses of how soil improvement can affect i) crop nutrition ii) disease reactions and iii) adaptability. Unique org and con Received: March 06, 2018 | Published: March 26, 2018 system legacies allowed effective SOC/SON differentiations and comparison. Different soil levels were compared under the same location and same genotypes eliminated confounding factors to better evaluate the effect of the differentiated soil condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Finca+Slow+Permaculture.Pdf
    Farming and Smallholding © Johanna McTiernan Dan McTiernan describes how regenerative agriculture is transforming olive groves in Spain and introduces © Johanna McTiernan transnational cropshare Restoring Agriculture in the Mediterranean “It’s not just that traditional Mediter- Together with our friends, who own healthy, perennial Mediterranean crops heavy input, bare-earth paradigm ranean agriculture isn’t sustainable a similar piece of land, and working that can’t be grown in Britain easily. of agriculture that is having such a ... it isn’t even viable on any level in partnership with IPM, we have If managed holistically, olives, nut destructive impact on the environ- anymore!” That was one of the first started Terra CSA, a multi-farm com- bearing trees such as almonds, and ment and the climate. All other things Richard Wade of Instituto munity supported agriculture project vine products like red wine, are about non-cold-pressed seed oils require Permacultura Montsant (IPM) said using permaculture and regenerative as perennial and sustainable as crops high levels of processing involving to us during our six month intern- agriculture to build soil and deliver come. We want the UK to still be heat and solvents in the extraction ship with him here in the south of olive oil, almonds and wine direct to able to access these incredibly process that are energy and resource Catalunya, Spain. cropshare members in the UK. nutritious products alongside the heavy and questionable in terms of With his doom laden words still Having been involved in community need to relocalise as much of our health to people and the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Regenerative Agriculture Is an Inclusive Agroecosystems Approach Session I: Introduction for Conserving Land and Soil, Biodiversity, and Improving
    Research and Extension - TECA Webinar Regenerative Agriculture: good practices for small scale agricultural producers ©Inga Foundation 28 July 2021 | 14:00 – 15:30 Registration link: CET https://fao.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_ojcMJ_NyRKWMxYia9V57og AGENDA Regenerative agriculture is an inclusive agroecosystems approach Session I: Introduction for conserving Land and soiL, biodiversity, and improving • Technologies and Practices for Small Agricultural Producers (TECA) ecosystem services within farming Selvaraju Ramasamy, Head of Research and Extension Unit, Office of systems. It focuses on the Innovation, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). regeneration of Living soiL, • Regenerative agriculture: ecologically sustainable and economically viable improved micro hydrology, and option for sustainable future conserving biodiversity at aLL LeveLs Chandrashekhar Biradar, Principal Agroecosystems Scientist, Head of whiLe enhancing inputs use Geoinformatics and Research Data Management Unit, ICARDA. efficiency and ecosystem system services. The approach helps to • Q & A session achieve food and nutritional Session II: Good practices for small holder agricultural producers security with economicaLLy viabLe and ecoLogical sustainabLe options. • Farmer managed natural regeneration Practices presented in this webinar Sarah McKenzie, Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration (FMNR) Programme focus on experiences and Lessons and Online Learning Advisor for World Vision Australia, Australia. learned from adoption of good • The Inga tree model: regenerative agroforestry practices reLated to regenerative agricuLture. Mike Hands, Founder and Director of The Inga Foundation, United Kingdom. • Good practices of agro-forestry systems: the Kuxur rum system The TECA Platform contains a wide Ogden Rodas, Project manager, FAO-KOICA project, Guatemala. range of practices that promote • Moderated discussion regenerative agricuLture from • Q & A session different parts of the worLd.
    [Show full text]
  • REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE and the SOIL CARBON SOLUTION SEPTEMBER 2020
    REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE and the SOIL CARBON SOLUTION SEPTEMBER 2020 AUTHORED BY: Jeff Moyer, Andrew Smith, PhD, Yichao Rui, PhD, Jennifer Hayden, PhD REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE IS A WIN-WIN-WIN CLIMATE SOLUTION that is ready for widescale implementation now. WHAT ARE WE WAITING FOR? Table of Contents 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 9 A Potent Corrective 11 Regenerative Principles for Soil Health and Carbon Sequestration 13 Biodiversity Below Ground 17 Biodiversity Above Ground 25 Locking Carbon Underground 26 The Question of Yields 28 Taking Action ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 30 Soil Health for a Livable Future Many thanks to the Paloma Blanca Foundation and Tom and Terry Newmark, owners of Finca Luna Nueva Lodge and regenerative farm in 31 References Costa Rica, for providing funding for this paper. Tom is also the co-founder and chairman of The Carbon Underground. Thank you to Roland Bunch, Francesca Cotrufo, PhD, David Johnson, PhD, Chellie Pingree, and Richard Teague, PhD for providing interviews to help inform the paper. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The environmental impacts of agricultural practices This introduction is co-authored by representatives of two The way we manage agricultural land 140 billion new tons of CO2 contamination to the blanket of and translocation of carbon from terrestrial pools to formative organizations in the regenerative movement. matters. It matters to people, it matters to greenhouse gases already overheating our planet. There is atmospheric pools can be seen and felt across a broad This white paper reflects the Rodale Institute’s unique our society, and it matters to the climate. no quarreling with this simple but deadly math: the data are unassailable.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Afforestation on Soil Structure Formation in Two Climatic Regions Of
    JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 61, 2015 (5): 225–234 doi: 10.17221/6/2015-JFS Eff ects of aff orestation on soil structure formation in two climatic regions of the Czech Republic V. Podrázský1, O. Holubík2, J. Vopravil2, T. Khel2, W.K. Moser3, H. Prknová1 1Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic 2Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Department of Soil Science and Soil Conservation, Prague-Zbraslav, Czech Republic 3U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of agricultural land afforestation on soil characteristics. Two sites in two regions of the Czech Republic were evaluated, at lower as well as higher submountain elevations: in the regions of the Orlické hory Mts. and Kostelec nad Černými lesy, afforested, arable and pasture lands were com- pared for basic chemical and physical characteristics. It was determined: pH, CEC, exchangeable nutrients, SOC, bulk density, volume density, porosity (differentiated by pore size), water conductivity and soil aggregate stability. This study demonstrated the important influence of previous land use upon soil characteristics. The characteristics of the arable horizon can persist for many years; in forests, the mineral horizons (15–30 cm) can persist within 15–30 years after afforestation. Afforestation, which caused an increase in soil porosity by decreasing reduced bulk density and increasing capillary and gravitational pores (increasing the water-holding capacity and soil air capacity), is important for maintaining the soil stability. The positive effect on infiltration and retention capacity resulted not only from the presence of a forest overstorey, but also from the presence of permanent grass cover of pasture land.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Biodiversity Benefit Agriculture?
    latrobe.edu.au How does biodiversity benefit agriculture? Jim Radford Research Centre for Future Landscapes La Trobe University Presentation to Goulburn Broken CMA, October 20, 2020 latrobe.edu.au What is biodiversity? latrobe.edu.au What is biodiversity? latrobe.edu.au What is biodiversity? latrobe.edu.au What is biodiversity? Biodiversity – is the diversity of all forms of living organisms. It includes diversity within and among species (including genetic diversity) and diversity within and among ecosystems. latrobe.edu.au What are ecological processes? Biotic processes – interactions between individual organisms or species (e.g. predation, herbivory, competition, parasitism, mutualisms) and movement of organisms that facilitate processes latrobe.edu.au What are ecological processes? Abiotic processes – processes associated with the physical environment, such as climatic processes, weathering, formation of biophysical habitats, hydrological processes (groundwater and surface water) latrobe.edu.au What are ecological processes? Biotic-abiotic processes – interactions between organisms and physical environment (e.g. photosynthesis, disturbance regimes, ecosystem engineers) Photo credit: Birchip Cropping Group latrobe.edu.au What are ecological processes? Ecosystem services – ecological processes that benefit people – crop production, timber, fibre and meat production – pollination, seed dispersal, pest control, waste decomposition – nitrogen-fixation, nutrient cycling, carbon sequestration Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) latrobe.edu.au
    [Show full text]
  • Regeneration of Soils and Ecosystems: the Opportunity to Prevent Climate Change
    REGENERATION OF SOILS AND ECOSYSTEMS: THE OPPORTUNITY TO PREVENT CLIMATE CHANGE. BASIS FOR A NECESSARY CLIMATE AND AGRICULTURAL POLICY. From the International Year of the Soils and Paris COP21 to the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021-2030 SUMMARY We are probably at the most crucial crossroad of Humanity’s history. We are changing the Earth’s climate as a result of accelerated human---made Greenhouse Gases Emissions (GHG) and biodiversity loss, provoking other effects that increase the complexity of the problem and will multiply the speed with which we approach climate chaos1, and social too: --- Climate Change: A Risk Assessment: The report argues that the risks of climate change should be assessed in the same way as risks to national security, financial stability, or public health. (http://www.csap.cam.ac.uk/projects/climate---change---risk--- assessment/). --- “Over---grazing and desertification in the Syrian steppe are the root causes of war” (http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_analysis/2871076/overgrazing_and_des ertification_in_the_syrian_steppe_are_the_root_causes_of_war.html). We explain and justify scientifically the need to give absolute priority to the regeneration of soils and ecosystems. The sustainability concept has driven positive changes but has failed on two levels: it has been easy to manipulate because of its inherent laxness, and because of the fact that since the Earth Summit (Rio de Janeiro, 1992) indicators show much worsening and certainly no improvement. Global emissions increase and soil erosion is every year hitting new negative records. Ecological and agrosystem regeneration necessarily implies a change for the better, a positive attitude and the joy of generating benefits for all living beings, human or not.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Role of Soils When Developing Sustainable Agricultural Production Systems Focused on Achieving the UN-Sdgs and the EU Green Deal
    Review Assessing the Role of Soils When Developing Sustainable Agricultural Production Systems Focused on Achieving the UN-SDGs and the EU Green Deal Johan Bouma 1,*,† , Teresa Pinto-Correia 2 and Cees Veerman 3,4,5,6,† 1 Department of Soil Science, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands 2 MED—Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Universidade de Évora, Núcleo da Mitra Gab. 206, Edificio dos Regentes Agrícolas, Apartado 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal; [email protected] 3 Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands; [email protected] 4 Department of Economic and Social Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands 5 Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands 6 Department of Economic and Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] † They are Prof. Emeritus. Abstract: The general concept of sustainable development has been specified in terms of goals, targets, and indicators by the UN Sustainable Development Goals, adopted in 2015, followed by the Green Deal of the European Union in 2019. The focus on targets and indicators does, however, not address the issue as to how these goals can be achieved for land-related SDGs in the real world, and Citation: Bouma, J.; Pinto-Correia, T.; attention in this paper is therefore focused on how land management can contribute to providing Veerman, C. Assessing the Role of ecosystem services in line with the aims of the SDGs and the Green Deal. Agricultural production Soils When Developing Sustainable systems should at least produce healthy food (SDG2 and 3), protect ground- and surface water Agricultural Production Systems quality (SDG6), mitigate climate change (SDG13), avoid soil degradation, and support biodiversity Focused on Achieving the UN-SDGs (SDG15).
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Capital
    About Soil Capital Soil Capital is a farm management and independent agronomy company, with activities across Europe, Latin America and beyond. As a team of farming and finance professionals, we are committed to scaling regenerative agriculture through market solutions. Regenerative agriculture prioritises soil health, captures more carbon than it emits, produces nutrient-dense food and is more resilient to extremes of weather – all driven by the natural productivity of farm ecosystems rather than costly inputs. Our experience has shown us that, if managed well, the adoption of farming practices that build soil health can be the single most important driver in increasing farm productivity, reducing risk in operations and protecting profitability. About Systemiq SYSTEMIQ was established in 2016 with the mission to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Climate Agreement. SYSTEMIQ works to transform markets and business models across natural systems, including food, agriculture and oceans, as well as energy and the circular economy. Through its development of regenerative business models, SYSTEMIQ aims to manage the social and economic needs of society and conserve the integrity of nature. With headquarters in London, Munich and Jakarta, SYSTEMIQ works with thought-leaders like the Food and Land Use Coalition, leading businesses and governments and communities around the world. With many thanks to: Regenerating Europe’s soils: making the economics work Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Holistic Management Science Library Technical Papers
    Holistic Management Science Library Technical Papers © Savory Institute 2020 1 Contents EVALUATION OF HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT Gosnell H., S. Charnley and P. Stanley. 2020. “Climate change mitigation as a co-benefit of regenerative ranching: Insights from Australia and the United States.” Interface Focus 10: 20200027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2020.0027 Gosnell, Hannah, Kerry Grimm, and Bruce E. Goldstein. 2020. “A half century of Holistic Management: what does the evidence reveal?” Agriculture and Human Values, published online, 23 January 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10016-w Gosnell, Hannah, Nicholas Gill, and Michelle Voyer. 2019. “Transformational adaptation on the farm: Processes of change and persistence in transitions to 'climate-smart' regenerative agriculture.” Global Environmental Change 59: 101965, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101965 Hillenbrand, Mimi, Ry Thompson, Fugui Wang, Steve Apfelbaum, and Richard Teague. 2019. “Impacts of holistic planned grazing with bison compared to continuous grazing with cattle in South Dakota shortgrass prairie.” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 279:156-168, DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2019.02.005 Teague, W. Richard. 2018. "Forages and Pastures Symposium: Cover Crops in Livestock Production: Whole-System Approach: Managing Grazing to Restore Soil Health and Farm Livelihoods,” Journal of Animal Science, skx060. Peel, Mike, and Marc Stalmans, 2018. The Effect of Holistic Planned Grazing on African Rangelands: A Case Study from Zimbabwe,” African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 35:1, 23-31, DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2018.1440630 Mann, Carolyn and Kate Sherran. 2018. “Holistic Management and Adaptive Grazing: A Trainers’ View.” Sustainability 10(6), 1848. doi: 10.3390/su10061848 Ferguson, Bruce G., Stewart A.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    PHN Technical Kote 85-19a Public Disclosure Authorized POPULATION GROWTH AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA by Teresa J. Ho Public Disclosure Authorized November 1985 Population, Health and Nutrition Department World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank does not accept responsibility for the views expressed herein which are those of the author(s) and should not be attributed to the World Bank or to its affiliated organizations. Tne findings, interpretations, and conclusions are the results of research supported by the Bank; they do not necessarily represent official policy of the 3ank. The designations employed, the presentation of material, and any maps used in this document are solely for the convenience of the reader and do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsover on the part of the World Bank or its affiliates concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city area, or of its authorities, or concerning the Public Disclosure Authorized delimitations of its boundaries, or national afLiliation. PHN Technical Note 85-19a POPULATION GROWTH AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA A B S T R A C T This paper considers the consequences of rapid population growth on labor productivity in agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. Observers have often pointed to the presence of large untapped land resources in the region to deny the presence of a population problem; in addition, a recent Food and Agriculture Organization study on potential population supporting capacities estimated that sub-Saharan Africa can support a population more than double its present size even with the most rudimentary of inputs and technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Regenerative Agriculture & General Mills’ Commitment to Advancing It by 2030 What You’Ll Learn
    Regenerative Agriculture & General Mills’ commitment to advancing it by 2030 What you’ll learn This interactive PDF is designed to highlight: The critical challenges facing farmers and food production. What regenerative agriculture is and how it can address those challenges. How General Mills is advancing regenerative agriculture and measuring environmental and economic impacts where it sources key ingredients. Regenerative Agriculture & General Mills commitment to advancing it Click a chapter to learn more 1 Regenerative Agriculture The Critical Challenges We are losing farmable topsoil at unsustainable rates. Agriculture’s contribution and susceptibility to climate change is increasing. We depend on thriving farms for all the food we make Farmers are under mounting economic pressure. and eat, but there are many critical challenges facing the Agriculture practices are threatening water quality and quantity. productivity and livelihoods of farmers. Regenerative Biodiversity loss negatively affects farm productivity & resilience. agriculture can help address all of these challenges. Considering the full value chain Nat Geo Image Collection from farm to fork to landfill, David Liittschwager, agriculture makes up more than half of General Mills’ greenhouse gas emissions, making it our biggest lever to reduce our footprint and reach our climate commitment. 1 sq ft of undisturbed 1 sq ft of grassland farmland NPR Illustration The Critical Challenges 2 Regenerative Ag Defined 6 Principles of Regenerative Agriculture MINIMIZE KEEP THE SOIL INTEGRATE What is it? SOIL DISTURBANCE COVERED LIVESTOCK Agriculture’s contribution and susceptibility to climate change is increasing. Regenerative agriculture is a holistic, principles-based Farmers are under mounting economic pressure. approach to farming and ranching that seeks to strengthen Agriculture practices are threatening water quality and quantity.
    [Show full text]