Species-Related Variability of Hydrological Properties of The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Species-Related Variability of Hydrological Properties of The Species‐related variability of hydrological properties of the branches of 12 deciduous tree species Klamerus‐Iwan Anna1*, Łagan Sylwia2 Zarek Marcin3, Słowik‐Opoka Ewa1, Bartłomiej Wojtan1 Supplementary Materials a) b) c) Syringa vulgaris L upper surface: a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Syringa vulgaris L lower surface: a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Betula pendula upper surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Betula pendula lower surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Quercus robur upper surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Quercus robur lower surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Fraxinus excelsior upper surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Fraxinus excelsior lower surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Aesculus hippocastanum upper surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Aesculus hippocastanum upper surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Acer platanoides upper surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Acer platanoides lower surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Ligustrum vulgare upper surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Ligustrum vulgare upper surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Tilia cordata upper surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Tilia cordata lower surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Elaeagnus angustifolia upper surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Elaeagnus angustifolia lower surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Robinia pseudoacacia upper surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Robinia pseudoacacia lower surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Rhus typhina upper surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Rhus typhina lower surface a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Salix caprea upper area a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin a) b) c) Salix caprea lower area a) water, b) diiodomethane, c) glycerin Figure S1. Droplets of the liquids measured Table S1. Measurements of the angle of the droplet to the leaf surface Species Surface Water Diiodomethane Glycerin Syringa vulgaris upper 110,83±12,87 78,20±4,15 106,24±6,19 lower 103,42±4,73 66,80±4,80 98,84±7,50 Betula pendula upper 105,56±2,97 66,01±2,83 105,90±5,20 lower 124,07±6,18 81,84±3,89 118,68±2,34 Quercus robur upper 112,98±6,84 70,10±5,16 111,50±3,48 lower 120,93±10,10 88,08±7,99 121,31±837 Fraxinus excelsior upper 107,76±3,95 59,70±6,97 101,38±6,22 lower 113,76±2,63 63,87±4,82 104,11±3,08 Aesculus hippocastanum upper 113,11±7,81 64,85±4,15 116,60±4,42 lower 118,35±7,88 65,37±4,87 123,88±4,10 Acer platanoides upper 107,21±6,17 63,18±5,56 96,35±6,51 lower 141,53±4,26 105,17±5,29 135,60±3,48 Ligustrum vulgare upper 107,74±5,39 67,09±2,86 104,44±6,37 lower 111,45±6,49 66,68±4,17 96,32±5,62 Tilia cordata upper 95,22±3,18 58,00±7,17 105,33±7,29 lower 132,56±8,30 100,22±5,06 129,05±5,45 Elaeagnus angustifolia upper 111,70±12,39 62,14±7,03 120, 00±5,31 lower 129,06±6,31 95,17±3,58 115,62±3,79 Robinia pseudoacacia upper 135,14±2,95 110,94±3,66 133,08±4,26 lower 136,37±4,93 113,57±5 130,82±5,67 Rhus typhina upper 113,65±8,06 68,33±5,51 111,21±3,66 lower 136,56±5,12 104,12±5,91 134,69±6,98 Salix caprea upper 74,47±5,18 50,49±3,89 98,24±4,27 lower 123,04±3,75 95,60±2,21 137,08±5,91 Table.S2. Components necessary to calculate the surface free energy Species Surface Syringa vulgaris upper 18,65 18,42 0,23 19,93 18,42 1,50 0,35 1,61 lower 25,12 24,68 0,44 26,84 24,68 2,16 0,45 2,60 Betula pendula upper 25,33 25,13 0,21 30,16 25,13 5,03 1,68 3,76 lower 16,74 16,56 0,18 17,54 16,56 0,98 1,12 0,22 Quercus robur upper 22,82 22,82 0,00 26,38 22,82 3,56 1,81 1,75 lower 13,57 13,57 0,00 16,32 13,57 2,75 1,27 1,50 Fraxinus upper 28,75 28,75 0,00 30,92 28,75 2,17 1,03 1,14 excelsior lower 26,45 26,35 0,10 27,09 26,35 0,74 0,75 0,18 Aesculus upper 25,84 25,79 0,05 32,69 25,79 6,90 4,09 2,91 hippocastanum lower 25,88 25,49 0,39 32,92 25,49 7,42 5,85 2,36 Acer platanoides upper 26,79 26,75 0,04 27,32 26,75 0,57 0,17 0,49 lower 7,30 6,92 0,38 7,03 6,92 0,11 0,64 0,00 Ligustrum upper 24,61 24,51 0,10 27,49 24,51 2,98 1,04 2,13 vulgare lower 24,74 24,74 0,00 24,75 24,74 0,01 0,01 0,00 Tilia cordata upper 30,87 29,73 1,14 43,88 29,73 14,15 4,04 12,40 lower 8,67 8,59 0,07 9,28 8,59 0,69 0,65 0,18 Elaeagnus upper 27,39 27,34 0,04 38,80 27,34 11,45 6,47 5,07 angustifolia lower 10,57 10,51 0,06 10,52 10,51 0,01 0,00 0,10 Robinia upper 5,25 5,25 0 5,87 5,25 0,62 0,32 0,30 pseudoacacia lower 4,57 4,57 0 4,71 4,57 0,13 0,06 0,07 Rhus typhina upper 23,83 23,81 0,02 27,01 23,81 3,20 1,86 1,37 lower 7,39 7,26 0,13 8,02 7,26 0,76 0,86 0,17 Salix caprea upper 41,02 34,00 7,02 65,29 34,00 31,29 6,26 39,06 lower 10,39 10,34 0,05 18,95 10,34 8,61 3,72 4,98 Table. S3. Mutual relations between the studied features. Correlation Direction of Strength of Variables p coefficient dependence dependence Wax [µg/cm2] S [g/g] ‐0,021 0,827 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ Wax [µg/cm2] SEP_ad 0,103 0,276 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ Wax [µg/cm2] SEP_ab 0,136 0,152 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ Wax [µg/cm2] Angle_ad ‐0,275 0,003 negative very weak Wax [µg/cm2] Angle_ab ‐0,245 0,009 negative very weak S [g/g] SEP_ad 0,587 <0,001 positive average S [g/g] SEP_ab ‐0,038 0,692 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ S [g/g] Angle_ad ‐0,608 <0,001 negative average S [g/g] Angle_ab 0,155 0,102 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ SEP_ad SEP_ab 0,034 0,723 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ SEP_ad Angle_ad ‐0,629 <0,001 negative average SEP_ad Angle_ab 0,043 0,651 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ SEP_ab Angle_ad ‐0,045 0,637 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ SEP_ab Angle_ab ‐0,806 <0,001 negative Strong Angle_ad Angle_ab 0,049 0,605 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ .
Recommended publications
  • Verticillium Wilt of Fraxinus Excelsior
    Verticillium wilt of Fraxinus excelsior - ' . ; Jt ""* f- "" UB-^/^'IJ::J CENTRALE LANDBOUWCATALOGUS 0000 0611 8323 locjs Promotoren: Dr.Ir. R.A.A. Oldeman Hoogleraar ind e Bosteelt en Bosoecologie Dr.Ir. J. Dekker Emeritus Hoogleraar ind e Fytopathologie /OMOS-Zöl,^ Jelle A. Hiemstra Verticillium wilt of Fraxinus excelsior Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor in de landbouw- en milieuwetenschappen, op gezag van de rector magnificus, dr. C.M. Karssen, inhe t openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 18apri l 1995 des namiddags omvie r uur ind e aula van de Landbouwuniversiteit te Wageningen J\ ABSTRACT Hiemstra, J.A. (1995). Verticillium wilt of Fraxinus excelsior. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands, xvi + 213 pp, 40 figs., 28 tables, 4 plates with colour pictures, 327 refs., English and Dutch summaries. ISBN 90-5485-360-3 Research on ash wilt disease, a common disease of Fraxinus excelsior L. in young forest and landscape plantings in several parts of the Netherlands, is described. By means of a survey for pathogenic fungi in affected trees, inoculation and reisolation experimentsi ti sdemonstrate d thatth ediseas ei scause db y Verticilliumdahliae Kleb . Hostspecificit y andvirulenc e of aV. dahliae isolatefro m ashar ecompare d tothos e of isolatesfro m elm,mapl ean dpotato .Diseas eincidenc ean dprogress , andrecover y of infected trees are investigated through monitoring experiments in two permanent plots in seriously affected forest stands. Monitoring results are related to the results of an aerial survey for ash wilt disease in the province of Flevoland to assess the impact of the disease on ash forests.
    [Show full text]
  • CHINESE PRIVET Due to Its Ability to Successfully Compete with And
    Plant Guide by this species is large-scale ecosystem modification CHINESE PRIVET due to its ability to successfully compete with and Ligustrum sinense Lour. displace native vegetation. Chinese privet plants Plant Symbol = LISI mature rapidly and are prolific seed producers. They also reproduce vegetatively by means of root suckers. Contributed by: USDA NRCS National Plant Data Once established, Chinese privet is difficult to Center & Louisiana State University-Plant Science; eradicate because of its reproductive capacity. partial funding from the US Geological Survey and the US National Biological Information Impact/Vectors: Ligustrum sinense is native to China Infrastructure and was introduced into the United States in 1852 for use as an ornamental shrub. It is used for hedge and mass plantings, and sometimes as single specimens for its foliage and its profusion of small white flowers (Dirr 1990; Wyman 1973). It continues to be widely sold in the nursery and gardening industry. The foliage of Chinese privet is also used, presumably, for cut-flower arrangements. This horticultural introduction has been cultivated for a relatively long time in the United States. Wyman (1973) reports that this species is still growing as a hedge on the old Berkman’s Nursery grounds in Augusta, Georgia, where it was planted in the early 1860’s. It was planted on the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park after it came under the control of the Secretary of War in 1890. Present day plants are descendants of those early plantings (Faulkner et al. 1989). According to Small (1933), the species was escaping from cultivation in southern Louisiana by the 1930’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Overview of Ligustrum (Oleaceae) Naturalizaed in North America North of Mexico
    Phytologia (December 2009) 91(3) 467 TAXONOMIC OVERVIEW OF LIGUSTRUM (OLEACEAE) NATURALIZAED IN NORTH AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO Guy L. Nesom 2925 Hartwood Drive Fort Worth, TX 76109, USA www.guynesom.com ABSTRACT A key, morphological descriptions, and basic synonymy are provided for the eight species of Ligustrum known to be naturalized in North America north of Mexico: L. japonicum, L. lucidum, L. obtusifolium (including L. amurense), L. ovalifolium, L. quihoui, L. sinense, L. tschonoskii, and L. vulgare. Identifications have been inconsistent particularly between L. sinense and L. vulgare and between L. japonicum and L. lucidum. The occurrence of L. quihoui outside of cultivation in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Oklahoma is documented. Phytologia 91(3): 467-482 (December, 2009). KEY WORDS: Ligustrum, Oleaceae, North America, naturalized, taxonomy The lustrous, mostly evergreen leaves and masses of white, fragrant flowers make privets popular for landscaping and hedges. Many of the species, however, have become naturalized in the USA and Canada and already have proved to be destructive colonizers, especially in the Southeast. Among the naturalized species, European privet (Ligustrum vulgare) is native to Europe and northern Africa; all the rest are native to Asia, mainly China, Japan, and Korea. Many new species and varieties of Ligustrum have been described since overviews of Koehne (1904), Lingelsheim (1920), and Mansfield (1924). The genus in eastern Asia has recently been studied by Chang & Miao (1986), and Qin (2009) has provided a taxonomic overview of the whole genus that recognizes 37 species - divided into five sections based primarily on fruit and seed morphology. In Qin’s arrangement, among the North American species, sect.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN PRIVET [Ligustrum Vulare L.] LIVU
    EUROPEAN PRIVET [Ligustrum vulare L.] LIVU Fig. 1 UGA 5369085 Problem: Native to Europe, L. vulgare. was brought to North America as an ornamental in the 1700’s.1 It escaped cultivation and displaces native species by forming dense thickets.2 Habit: Stout, multi-stem trunk growing up to 4.5 m tall with unevenly spreading branches.3 Often as wide as tall.4 Stems and leaves at near right angles.5 Reproduction: Sexually by seeds from drupes which are widely disseminated by birds.4 Leaves: Simple, opposite, ovate to elliptic, margins entire. Lustrous green above and pale green beneath, turning purple in the fall. 2.5-7 cm long.2, 4 Fig. 2 UGA 5272067 SHRUBPLANT EUROPEAN PRIVET Ligustrum vulgare L. Fig. 3 UGA 5397688 Fruits/Seeds: Lustrous4 dark purple to black, spherical, about 8.5mm long drupe.3 Flowers: Arranged in a terminal 2.5-7.5 cm panicle.2 Individual flowers small (2.5-3 mm)6 are tubular with four lobes that are equal or less than the length of the tube. Sta- mens are mostly included or slightly projecting from tube.6 Flowers are white, with a strong scent.2 Habitat: Full sun or partial shade.4 Often found in areas of disturbed soil, along streams, and in the forest understory (though it does not produce seed in low light).1, 3 Similar Species: Ligustrum species are difficult to distin- guish vegetatively. L. obtusifolium has a flower tube about twice as long its the lobesGC and its leaves are smaller, blunt-tipped, and have a pubescent mid-rib.7 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Control of Invasive Privets (Ligustrum Spp.) in the Middle Southern United States
    Invasive Plant Science and Management 2010 3:482–488 Notes and Commentary Identification and Control of Invasive Privets (Ligustrum spp.) in the Middle Southern United States Victor Maddox, John Byrd, Jr., and Brett Serviss* The identification of privet in the middle southern United States can be difficult. Because most introduced species of privet can be invasive, and recent mapping projects seek location and species population data, proper identification is important. Without proper identification of privet species, data on species distributions and other pertinent information regarding invasiveness could lead to improper conclusions. Currently, information on privet identification is scattered throughout a number of reference materials. The purpose of this publication is to assist with the proper identification of escaped privet species, and suggest management options. Nomenclature: Fosamine ammonium; glyphosate; hexazinone; imazapyr; metsulfuron; triclopyr; 2,4-D; 2,4-DP; Amur privet, Ligustrum obtusifolium Sieb. & Zucc. var. suave (Kitagawa) Kitagawa (Syn. L. amurense Carrie`re); border privet, Ligustrum obtusifolium Sieb. & Zucc. var. obtusifolium; California privet, Ligustrum ovalifolium Hassk.; Chinese privet, Ligustrum sinense Lour.; common privet, Ligustrum vulgare L.; glossy privet, Ligustrum lucidum Ait.; Japanese privet, Ligustrum japonicum Thunb.; waxyleaf privet, Ligustrum quihoui Carrie`re. Key words: Invasive species, management. Since the 1700s, at least nine species of privets have been Thunb.) is native to Korea and Japan. The most common introduced into the United States; it is probable that all species in the southern portion of the middle southern were introduced as ornamentals. They have been very region is Chinese privet, although Amu, border, California, successful as ornamentals and continue to be marketed for common or European, glossy, Japanese, and waxyleaf or such purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ligustrum Sinense LOUR.)
    CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF CHINESE PRIVET (Ligustrum sinense LOUR.) INVASION IN HYDROLOGICALLY ALTERED FORESTED WETLANDS Meghan Foard A thesis presented to the faculty of Arkansas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Arkansas State University August 2014 Approved by Dr. Travis D. Marsico, Thesis Advisor Dr. Jennifer Bouldin Committee Member Dr. Richard Grippo, Committee Member Dr. Esra Ozdenerol, Committee Member Dr. Paul Sikkel, Committee Member UMI Number: 1563273 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 1563273 Published by ProQuest LLC (2014). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 © 2014 Meghan Foard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Meghan Foard CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF CHINESE PRIVET (Ligustrum sinense LOUR.) INVASION IN HYDROLOGICALLY ALTERED FORESTED WETLANDS What drives invasive species success? My research consists of four studies aiming to answer this question for Ligustrum sinense. The four projects are: (1) Synthesis of invasion literature within passenger-driver-backseat driver frameworks; (2) hydrochory investigation of water as a dispersal mechanism for invasion; (3) ecohydrology investigation of inundation effects on seed viability of L.
    [Show full text]
  • Ligustrum Vulgare)
    Genetic, Age, and Spatial Structure to Improve Management of Common Privet (Ligustrum vulgare) THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Wanying Zhao Graduate Program in Horticulture and Crop Science The Ohio State University 2012 Master's Examination Committee: John Cardina, Advisor Andy Michel Charles Goebel Copyrighted by Wanying Zhao 2012 Abstract Invasive plants that spread through natural areas are likely to threaten sensitive and unique habitats. Since it is impossible to kill every individual invasive plant, managers need landscape-scale strategies to direct management efforts along invasion sites and corridors of spread. Therefore, managers need information of how invasive plants spread over time and space with respect to sensitive habitats. Ligustrum vulgare L. (common privet) is a woody invasive plant that is spreading to sensitive habitats in eastern North America. To assist in developing efficient management approaches for this species, we studied the spatial genetic structure of L. vulgare across the landscape within the 325-acre Wooster Memorial Park (WMP) and in three states, using sequences from two chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) genes. For samples taken within the park, we combined patch age, spatial features, and genetic data to reconstruct invasion history and analyze spatial distribution patterns. We conducted a comprehensive survey in the park, mapping and sampling established stands of L. vulgare. Ages of 331 patches in WMP were determined by examining tree-rings. DNA was extracted from samples taken from eight sites in Ohio and two adjacent states along with 313 samples from WMP.
    [Show full text]
  • West Bridgford
    2290m2 woodland edge mix (2.00Ctr) 28Nr Cornus sanguinea 28Nr Corylus avellana 171Nr Crataegus monogyna 85Nr Ilex aquifolium 57Nr Prunus avium 85Nr Prunus spinosa 118Nr Rosa canina 238m2 woodland edge mix (2.00Ctr) 1Nr Acer campestre 2Nr Cornus sanguinea 12-14cm 2Nr Corylus avellana 29lm Hedge Mix (5/m double staggered row) 17Nr Crataegus monogyna 7Nr Cornus sanguinea WEST BRIDGFORD 8Nr Ilex aquifolium 21Nr Corylus avellana 5Nr Prunus avium 72Nr Crataegus monogyna 8Nr Prunus spinosa 7Nr Ilex aquifolium 15Nr Rosa canina 7Nr Ligustrum vulgare 1Nr Fraxinus excelsior 21Nr Prunus spinosa 12-14cm 10Nr Rosa canina 1Nr Acer campestre 12-14cm 1Nr Acer campestre 12-14cm 1Nr Malus sylvestris 12-14cm Bus 551lm Hedge Mix (5/m double staggered row) 2Nr Acer campestre 12-14cm 137Nr Cornus sanguinea gate 413Nr Corylus avellana 416m2 Woodland scrub mix (2.0Ctr) 1Nr Acer campestre 1377Nr Crataegus monogyna 12-14cm 13Nr Cornus sanguinea 137Nr Ilex aquifolium 20Nr Corylus avellana 33Nr Crataegus monogyna 137Nr Ligustrum vulgare 20Nr Ilex aquifolium 413Nr Prunus spinosa 6Nr Ligustrum vulgare 141Nr Rosa canina 20Nr Prunus spinosa 1Nr Fraxinus excelsior 23Nr Rosa canina 12-14cm 52lm Hedge Mix (5/m double staggered row) 2Nr Acer campestre 325m2 woodland edge mix (2.00Ctr) 13Nr Cornus sanguinea 39Nr Corylus avellana 12-14cm 4Nr Cornus sanguinea 1Nr Fraxinus excelsior 130Nr Crataegus monogyna 4Nr Corylus avellana 1Nr Acer campestre 12-14cm 12-14cm 13Nr Ilex aquifolium 1Nr Acer campestre 24Nr Crataegus monogyna 1Nr Fraxinus excelsior 13Nr Ligustrum vulgare 12-14cm
    [Show full text]
  • 1504 863890.Pdf
    Prodanović et al.: Changes in the floristic composition and ecology of ruderal flora of the town of Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia - 863 - CHANGES IN THE FLORISTIC COMPOSITION AND ECOLOGY OF RUDERAL FLORA OF THE TOWN OF KOSOVSKA MITROVICA, SERBIA FOR A PERIOD OF 20 YEARS PRODANOVIĆ, D.1* – KRIVOŠEJ, Z.2 – AMIDŽIĆ, L.3 – BIBERDŽIĆ, M.1 – KRSTIĆ, Z.2 1University of Priština, Faculty of Agriculture Lešak Kopaonička Street bb, 38219 Lešak, Serbia (phone: + 381 64 007 27 87) 2University of Priština, Faculty of Natural Science Lole Ribara Street, No. 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 3University Union Nikola Tesla, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Protection Cara Dušana street, No. 62-64, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] (Received 23rd May 2017; accepted 2nd Aug 2017) Abstract. The paper is concerned with the results of the ruderal flora investigation carried out in the vicinity of the town of Kosovska Mitrovica (Serbia) and its surroundings, in different urban and suburban habitats, and is based on the copious floristic researches conducted between 1995 and 1996 and repeated in 2016. The total number of 444 taxa was reported in the course of 2016. Not only was reported the presence of 386 taxa in the same areas between 1995 and 1996, but also 58 new taxa were recorded in recent field explorations. The ruderal flora composition in Kosovska Mitrovica area has changed by 13.06% in the past 20 years. Detailed taxonomic, ecological, and phyto-geographical analyses were provided for the discovered synanthropic flora. Special attention was paid to the appearance of new invasive species unregistered 20 years ago, but which, due to the more intensive anthropogenic influence, have become more diverse in number and frequency in the investigated areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Topography Affect the Colonization of Lonicera Maackii and Ligustrum Vulgare in a Forested Glen in Southwestern Ohio?1
    Does Topography Affect the Colonization of Lonicera maackii and Ligustrum vulgare in a Forested Glen in Southwestern Ohio?1 ANN GAYEK AND MARTIN F. QUIGLEY, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1086 ABSTRACT. Lonicera maackii (Amur honeysuckle) and Ligustrum vulgare (Common privet) are two exotic shrubs that have naturalized throughout the eastern and midwestern United States. This study examines the influence of topography on the level of invasion of Lonicera maackii and Ligustrum vulgare in a second growth forested glen in southwestern Ohio (Glen Helen, Yellow Springs, OH). The topographic positions compared were east-facing slope, bottomland, and west-facing slope using twelve 100 m transects through each of the three habitats for a total of 36 transects. L. maackii andZ. vulgare plants were counted in ten 3 x 3 m quadrats along each transect for a total of 120 quadrats per topographic position. Two-way analysis of variance compared interaction between topography and numbers of plants in three size classes (small, medium, large). Average density of L. maackii for all size classes was 1136 plants/ha. East-facing slopes were most heavily invaded with 497 plants/ha; there were 238/ha in the bottomland; 401/ha on the west-facing slopes. East- facing slopes are close to town, one of the original sources of seed. West-facing slopes are surrounded by farmland, fence rows, and farmhouses, a second source of seed. West-facing slopes have significantly fewer large L. maackii and L. vulgare than east- facing slopes but it may only be a matter of time until they are as heavily colonized as the east-facing.
    [Show full text]
  • Ligustrum Vulgare (Common Privet) Common Privet Is a Medium Sized Spreading Deciduous Shrub Reaching Maximum of 2 M with an Equal Width
    Ligustrum vulgare (Common Privet) Common Privet is a medium sized spreading deciduous shrub reaching maximum of 2 m with an equal width. It has simple dark leathery green leaves which turn purple at fall. The flowers are white clustered with a nice fragrance. The fruit is a black drupe stays on the plant and attracts birds. Very adaptable to any soil type, leaves on full sun or partial shade. Used mainly as a hedge as it take trimming very well, but also nice as a screen or a foundational plant. Prune after flowering. Plant common privet with caution, it is considered an invasive exotic plant in parts of the United States and prohibited by some entities. All parts of plant are poisonous if ingested Landscape Information French Name: Troène commun,Troène d'Europe Pronounciation: lig-GUS-trum vul-GAIR-ee Plant Type: Shrub Origin: Europe, North Africa Heat Zones: 5, 6, 7, 8 Hardiness Zones: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Uses: Screen, Hedge, Border Plant, Pollution Tolerant / Urban Size/Shape Growth Rate: Fast Tree Shape: Round Canopy Symmetry: Symmetrical Canopy Density: Dense Canopy Texture: Fine Height at Maturity: 1.5 to 3 m Spread at Maturity: 1.5 to 3 meters Time to Ultimate Height: 5 to 10 Years Plant Image Ligustrum vulgare (Common Privet) Botanical Description Foliage Leaf Arrangement: Opposite Leaf Venation: Pinnate Leaf Persistance: Deciduous Leaf Type: Simple Leaf Blade: Less than 5 Leaf Shape: Ovate Leaf Margins: Entire Leaf Textures: Smooth Leaf Scent: No Fragance Color(growing season): Green Flower Image Color(changing season): Purple Flower
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Invasive Plant List January 2004
    CONNECTICUT INVASIVE PLANT LIST JANUARY 2004 This is a list of species that have been determined by floristic analysis to be invasive or potentially invasive in the state of Connecticut, in accordance with PA 03-136. The Invasive Plants Council will generate a second list recommending restrictions on some of these plants. In developing the second list and particular restrictions, the Council will recognize the need to balance the detrimental effects of invasive plants with the agricultural and horticultural value of some of these plants, while still protecting the state's minimally managed habitats. CONNECTICUT INVASIVE PLANT LIST ( Produced by the Connecticut Invasive Plants Council ) Connecticut Public Act No. 03-136 The Connecticut Invasive Plants Council encourages the use of non- invasive alternatives, particularly when planting near parks, natural areas, or other minimally managed habitats. AQUATIC & WETLAND PLANTS Species Common Invasive Potentially name Invasive Butomus umbellatus L. Flowering rush X Cabomba caroliniana A. Fanwort X Gray Callitriche stagnalis Scop. Pond water- X starwort Egeria densa Planchon Brazilian water- X weed †Eichhornia crassipes Common water- X (Mart.) Solms hyacinth Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Hydrilla X Royle Iris pseudacorus L. Yellow Iris X Lythrum salicaria L. Purple X loosestrife Marsilea quadrifolia L. European X waterclover Myosotis scorpioides L. Forget-me-not X Myriophyllum aquaticum Parrotfeather X (Vell.) Verdc. Myriophyllum Variable-leaf X heterophyllum Michx. watermilfoil Myriophyllum spicatum L. Eurasian X watermilfoil Najas minor All. Brittle water- X nymph Nelumbo lutea (Willd.) American water X Pers. lotus †Nymphoides peltata Yellow floating X (Gmel.) Kuntze heart †Pistia stratiotes L. Water lettuce X Potamogeton crispus L.
    [Show full text]