Multipoint Genome-Wide Linkage Scan for Nonword Repetition in a Multigenerational Family Further Supports Chromosome 13Q As a Locus for Verbal Trait Disorders D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Biochemistry and Microbiology Faculty Research 12-2016 Multipoint genome-wide linkage scan for nonword repetition in a multigenerational family further supports chromosome 13q as a locus for verbal trait disorders D. T. Truong L. D. Shriberg S. D. Smith K. L. Chapman A. R. Scheer-Cohen See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://mds.marshall.edu/sm_bm Part of the Behavioral Medicine Commons, Genetic Phenomena Commons, Genetic Processes Commons, Genetic Structures Commons, and the Speech Pathology and Audiology Commons Recommended Citation Truong DT, Shriberg LD, Smith SD, Chapman KL, Scheer-Cohen AR, DeMille MMC, et al. Multipoint genome-wide linkage scan for nonword repetition in a multigenerational family further supports chromosome 13q as a locus for verbal trait disorders. Hum Genet. 2016;135(12):1329-41. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Research at Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biochemistry and Microbiology by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Authors D. T. Truong, L. D. Shriberg, S. D. Smith, K. L. Chapman, A. R. Scheer-Cohen, M. M.C. DeMille, A. K. Adams, Alejandro Q. Nato Jr., E. M. Wijsman, J. D. Eicher, and J. R. Gruen This article is available at Marshall Digital Scholar: https://mds.marshall.edu/sm_bm/228 Hum Genet (2016) 135:1329–1341 DOI 10.1007/s00439-016-1717-z ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Multipoint genome‑wide linkage scan for nonword repetition in a multigenerational family further supports chromosome 13q as a locus for verbal trait disorders D. T. Truong1 · L. D. Shriberg2 · S. D. Smith3 · K. L. Chapman4 · A. R. Scheer‑Cohen5 · M. M. C. DeMille1 · A. K. Adams6 · A. Q. Nato7 · E. M. Wijsman7,8 · J. D. Eicher6 · J. R. Gruen1,6,9 Received: 11 May 2016 / Accepted: 22 July 2016 / Published online: 17 August 2016 © The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Verbal trait disorders encompass a wide range region in verbal trait disorders. Future studies will further of conditions and are marked by deficits in five domains refine the specific causal genetic factors in this locus on that impair a person’s ability to communicate: speech, lan- chromosome 13q that contribute to language traits. guage, reading, spelling, and writing. Nonword repetition is a robust endophenotype for verbal trait disorders that is sensitive to cognitive processes critical to verbal develop- Introduction ment, including auditory processing, phonological working memory, and motor planning and programming. In the pre- Verbal trait disorders are comorbid, developmentally asso- sent study, we present a six-generation extended pedigree ciated disorders and deficits in communication. These with a history of verbal trait disorders. Using genome-wide include clinical and subclinical disorders of speech, lan- multipoint variance component linkage analysis of non- guage, reading, spelling, and writing (Shriberg et al. 2012). word repetition, we identified a region spanning chromo- Speech sound disorders (i.e., excluding dysfluency) are the some 13q14–q21 with LOD 4.45 between 52 and 55 cM, most prevalent verbal trait disorders at preschool age, with = spanning approximately 5.5 Mb on chromosome 13. This an estimated population prevalence of 16 % at age 4 years region overlaps with SLI3, a locus implicated in reading (Campbell et al. 2003), decreasing to 3.8 % at age 6 years disability in families with a history of specific language (Shriberg et al. 1999) and 3.6 % at age 8 years (Wren et al. impairment. Our study of a large multigenerational fam- 2012). Deficits in speech frequently co-occur with impair- ily with verbal trait disorders further implicates the SLI3 ments in multiple domains. For example, 11–15 % of chil- dren with speech sound disorders at age 6 also have lan- guage disorder (a neurodevelopmental disorder that can Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00439-016-1717-z) contains supplementary affect both spoken or written language; Shriberg et al. material, which is available to authorized users. * J. R. Gruen 6 Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New [email protected] Haven, CT 06510, USA 7 Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, 1 Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA Haven, CT 06510, USA 8 Department of Biostatistics and Department of Genome 2 Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, Madison, WI 53705, USA USA 3 Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 9 Investigative Medicine Program, Yale School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68182, USA New Haven, CT 06510, USA 4 Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA 5 Department of Speech‑Language Pathology, California State University, San Marcos, CA 92096, USA 1 3 1330 Hum Genet (2016) 135:1329–1341 1999). Additionally, children with speech disorders are at of specific language impairment (SLI) identified a linkage higher risk for reading disability, with an estimated 18 % of peak on chromosome 16q for poor performance on NWR children with speech disorders and 75 % of children with (SLI Consortium 2002, 2004). Follow-up family-based both speech and language disorders meeting criteria for and population-based association studies on NWR identi- reading disability at school age (Lewis et al. 2000). fied CMIP and ATP2C2 as candidates responsible for the Research in the genetics of verbal trait disorders was linkage signal (Newbury et al. 2009). CNTNAP2 on chro- catalyzed by the seminal studies of the KE family, a large mosome 7q35 was also associated with NWR in families extended pedigree segregating verbal dyspraxia (also enrolled in the SLI consortium study using a candidate termed Childhood Apraxia of Speech; ASHA 2007; RCSLT gene approach after it was identified as a transcriptional 2011), suggesting autosomal dominant inheritance of a sin- binding target of FOXP2 by chromatin immunoprecipi- gle gene mutation (Hurst et al. 1990). Genome-wide link- tation (Vernes et al. 2008). In addition, CNTNAP2 was age showed a signal peak on chromosome 7q31.1 (Fisher identified by fine mapping a linkage analysis signal on et al. 1998). Further fine mapping identified a point muta- 7q35 conditioned on language delay in the Autism Genetic tion in FOXP2 that resulted in a truncated protein and loss Resource Exchange sample (Alarcón et al. 2002, 2005, of function in all affected individuals, but not observed in 2008). Taken together, NWR satisfies specific testable cri- unaffected individuals (Lai et al. 2001). FOXP2 loss of teria for the objective identification of endophenotypes, function as a causal factor for verbal dyspraxia was fur- supporting NWR as a credible endophenotype for verbal ther validated in unrelated individuals with severe speech trait disorders (Glahn et al. 2014; Lenzenweger 2013). impairments similar to those in the KE family (Lai et al. With the exception of the KE family, most families with 2001; MacDermot et al. 2005) and has been cross-validated a history of language impairment show a complex pattern in a number of case studies (e.g., Rice et al. 2012; Shriberg of inheritance with subtle differences in clinical presenta- et al. 2006). Although the KE family provided an example tion within the family. In the present study, we examined of a verbal trait disorder phenotype with a typical pattern of an extended six-generation family with a complex pattern monogenic inheritance, their story is the exception rather of inheritance for verbal trait disorders. We chose NWR than the norm. In fact, verbal trait disorders are generally in this analysis because (1) it is a robust endophenotype multifactorial and associated with multiple genetic and for verbal trait disorders (i.e., speech sound disorder, lan- environmental factors (Kang and Drayna 2011; Peterson guage disorder, and developmental dyslexia); (2) is highly and Pennington 2015). heritable; (3) has a Mendelian model of inheritance (in Due to the behavioral and cognitive heterogeneity of at least one study; Wijsman et al. 2000); and (4) is stable verbal trait disorders, the use of endophenotypes—underly- throughout an individual’s lifetime, even in those who are ing phenotypic factors that are associated with or contrib- language recovered following impairment in childhood ute to the manifestation of the disorder of interest because (Bishop et al. 1996; Shriberg et al. 2009). The latter attrib- of shared genetic factors—have been critical to the genetic ute of NWR tasks is particularly important because sub- study of verbal trait disorders. One endophenotype is non- jects within this family range in age from 3 to 95 years, word repetition (NWR), which loads onto several cogni- requiring a phenotype that can be ascertained and com- tive processes critical for language-related ability includ- pared across all age groups. The present analysis provides ing auditory processing, receptive language ability, and strong support for chromosome 13q14–q21 as a locus that motor planning and programming (Dollaghan and Camp- contributes to poor performance on NWR in this extended bell 1998). NWR tasks examine the ability to process and pedigree. temporarily store a novel series of meaningless units of phonological information in short-term memory, and then verbally repeat the stimuli. Such measures, which are sen- Methods and materials sitive to but not specific for any one disorder, may be more closely influenced by genetic variation than the verbal trait Ascertainment disorder itself. NWR task performance has a strong genetic influence, We studied 62 individuals from a six-generation 90-mem- with higher concordance among monozygotic twins com- ber family of European ancestry with a history of verbal pared to dizygotic twins, and heritability ranging from 0.64 trait disorders.