DOCSLIB.ORG

San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan 2040 SMCTP 2040

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan 2040 SMCTP 2040 February 9, 2017 San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan 2040 SMCTP 2040 Prepared by the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Adopted February 9, 2017 City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Acknowledgements A special thanks to the following individuals for their vital participation throughout the planning and implementing process for the San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan 2040. C/CAG Board of Directors Elizabeth Lewis, Atherton Doug Kim, Belmont Cliff Lentz, Brisbane Ricardo Ortiz, Burlingame Diana Colvin, Colma Judith Christensen, Daly City Lisa Gauthier, East Palo Alto Herb Perez, Foster City Debbie Ruddock, Half Moon Bay Larry May, Hillsborough Catherine Carlton, Menlo Park Gina Papan, Millbrae Mike O’Neill, Pacifica Maryann Moise Derwin, Portola Valley - Vice Chair Alicia Aguirre, Redwood City - Chair Irene O’Connell, San Bruno Mark Olbert, San Carlos Diane Papan, City of San Mateo David Canepa, San Mateo County Karyl Matsumoto, South San Francisco and San Mateo County Transportation Authority Deborah Gordon, Woodside C/CAG Congestion Management and Environmental Quality / Policy Advisory Committee Alicia Aguirre, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Emily Beach, Burlingame Charles Stone, Belmont Elizabeth Lewis, Atherton Irene O’Connell, San Bruno Linda Koelling, Business Community John Keener, Pacifica Lennie Roberts, Environmental Community Mike O’Neill, Pacifica -Vice Chair Adina Levin, Agencies with Transportation Interests Richard Garbarino, South San Francisco -Chair Rick Bonilla, City of San Mateo Josh Powell, Public Member Wayne Lee, Millbrae Doug Kim, San Mateo County Transit District (Samtrans) Elizabeth Scanlon, Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Countywide Transportation Plan 2040 i 2017 City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Project Team Joe Hurley, San Mateo County Transportation Authority Joel Slavit, San Mateo County Transportation Authority Doug Kim, San Mateo County Transit District (Samtrans) Elizabeth Scanlon, Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Sandy Wong, C/CAG John Hoang, C/CAG Bill Louden, DKS Associates Robert Vance, DKS Associates Other Supporting Staff: Jean Higaki, C/CAG Eliza Yu, C/CAG Countywide Transportation Plan 2040 ii 2017 City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 Vision and Goals ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Challenges and Opportunities ................................................................................................................... 3 Approach ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Major Initiatives ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Implementation Process ........................................................................................................................... 9 1. INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 10 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Purpose of the San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan 2040 ........................................................ 10 Relationship of SMCTP 2040 to Other Transportation Plans .................................................................. 11 Short Range Transit Plans (SamTrans, Caltrain, and BART) ................................................................................. 11 Strategic Plans (SamTrans, Caltrain, BART and the TA) ....................................................................................... 12 Congestion Management Program ...................................................................................................................... 12 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy ............................................................... 12 Cities and County Capital Improvement Programs .............................................................................................. 12 Sales Tax Expenditure Plan (Measure A) ............................................................................................................. 13 Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan ....................................................................................................... 13 San Mateo County Congestion Relief Plan (Deficiency Plan)............................................................................... 13 Community-Based Transportation Plans (East Palo Alto, Bayshore, North Central San Mateo) ......................... 13 Core Capacity Transit Study ................................................................................................................................. 13 Organization of CTP 2040 ........................................................................................................................ 14 2. SETTING ............................................................................................................................................... 15 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 15 Physical Setting ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Socio-Economic Setting ........................................................................................................................... 15 Travel Characteristics .............................................................................................................................. 17 Transit Ridership ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Forecasts of Growth and Travel .............................................................................................................. 20 Population and Employment Growth .................................................................................................................. 20 Growth in Travel .................................................................................................................................................. 23 3. VISION & GOALS .................................................................................................................................. 25 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 25 An Overarching Vision ............................................................................................................................. 25 Visions & Goals for Each SMCTP 2040 Element ...................................................................................... 25 Land Use and Transportation .............................................................................................................................. 25 Roadway System .................................................................................................................................................. 25 Bicycles ................................................................................................................................................................ 25 Pedestrians .......................................................................................................................................................... 26 Public Transportation .......................................................................................................................................... 26 Transportation System Management .................................................................................................................. 26 Transportation Demand Management ................................................................................................................ 26 Parking ................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Modal Connectivity .............................................................................................................................................. 27 Goods Movement ................................................................................................................................................ 27 Countywide Transportation Plan 2040 iii 2017 City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County 4. LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION ...................................................................................................... 28 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 28 Issues ......................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Argonaut #2 2019 Cover.Indd 1 1/23/20 1:18 PM the Argonaut Journal of the San Francisco Historical Society Publisher and Editor-In-Chief Charles A
    1/23/20 1:18 PM Winter 2020 Winter Volume 30 No. 2 Volume JOURNAL OF THE SAN FRANCISCO HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOL. 30 NO. 2 Argonaut #2_2019_cover.indd 1 THE ARGONAUT Journal of the San Francisco Historical Society PUBLISHER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Charles A. Fracchia EDITOR Lana Costantini PHOTO AND COPY EDITOR Lorri Ungaretti GRapHIC DESIGNER Romney Lange PUBLIcatIONS COMMIttEE Hudson Bell Lee Bruno Lana Costantini Charles Fracchia John Freeman Chris O’Sullivan David Parry Ken Sproul Lorri Ungaretti BOARD OF DIREctORS John Briscoe, President Tom Owens, 1st Vice President Mike Fitzgerald, 2nd Vice President Kevin Pursglove, Secretary Jack Lapidos,Treasurer Rodger Birt Edith L. Piness, Ph.D. Mary Duffy Darlene Plumtree Nolte Noah Griffin Chris O’Sullivan Richard S. E. Johns David Parry Brent Johnson Christopher Patz Robyn Lipsky Ken Sproul Bruce M. Lubarsky Paul J. Su James Marchetti John Tregenza Talbot Moore Diana Whitehead Charles A. Fracchia, Founder & President Emeritus of SFHS EXECUTIVE DIREctOR Lana Costantini The Argonaut is published by the San Francisco Historical Society, P.O. Box 420470, San Francisco, CA 94142-0470. Changes of address should be sent to the above address. Or, for more information call us at 415.537.1105. TABLE OF CONTENTS A SECOND TUNNEL FOR THE SUNSET by Vincent Ring .....................................................................................................................................6 THE LAST BASTION OF SAN FRANCISCO’S CALIFORNIOS: The Mission Dolores Settlement, 1834–1848 by Hudson Bell .....................................................................................................................................22 A TENDERLOIN DISTRIct HISTORY The Pioneers of St. Ann’s Valley: 1847–1860 by Peter M. Field ..................................................................................................................................42 Cover photo: On October 21, 1928, the Sunset Tunnel opened for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission District
    CITY WITHIN A CITY: HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR SAN FRANCISCO’S MISSION DISTRICT November 2007 Prepared by: City and County of San Francisco Planning Department ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Mayor Gavin Newsom Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Lily Chan Robert W. Cherny, Vice President Courtney Damkroger Ina Dearman Karl Hasz M. Bridget Maley, President Alan Martinez Johanna Street Planning Department Dean Macris, Director of Planning Neil Hart, Chief of Neighborhood Planning Mark Luellen, Preservation Coordinator Matt Weintraub, Citywide Survey Project Manager (Author) Thanks also to: N. Moses Corrette, Rachel Force, and Beth Skrondal of the Historic Resources Survey Team Survey Advisory Committee Charles Edwin Chase San Francisco Architectural Heritage (former Executive Director), Historic Preservation Fund Committee Courtney Damkroger Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Neil Hart Planning Department Tim Kelley Kelley & VerPlank Historical Resources Consulting M. Bridget Maley Architectural Resources Group, Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Mark Ryser San Francisco Beautiful Marie Nelson California Office of Historic Preservation Christopher VerPlank Kelley & VerPlank Historical Resources Consulting CITY WITHIN A CITY: HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR SAN FRANCISCO’S MISSION DISTRICT The activity which is the subject of this Historic Context Statement has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, through the California Office of Historic Preservation. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation. Regulations of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum Balboa Park Station Area Plan Archeological Context I Final
    TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM BALBOA PARK STATION AREA PLAN ARCHEOLOGICAL CONTEXT I FINAL Date 3 November 2006 To File No 2004 1059E Balboa Park Station Area Plan From Randall Dean of resources Topic an evaluation of potential presence significance archeological within the Balboa Park Station Area Plan area OBJECTIVES for the of this memorandum is information environmental The purpose provide background evaluation of the proposed Balboa Park Station Area Plan BPSAP regarding potential effects resources resources as to legally-significant archeological C'significant archeological and To achieve this the memorandum defined by CEQA 15064 5b c1 objective the basis for a provides an historic context of the Plan Area to serve as preliminary of that be identification and significance evaluation archeological properties may present information in this is within the Plan Area The historical and archeological provided report related the Plan Area and on and based on secondary archeological literature to primary General Land Office secondary historical documentation including historic maps US plats Census US Coast Surveys Sanborn Fire Insurance maps etc US Bureau population the Western Project historical schedules city directories Municipal Reports Neighborhoods discussion of the reports etc This report provides a general program-level general types that be within the Plan Area and property types of archeological resources may present affected future under the General thus potentially by physical projects proposed regulatory identification of Plan and Planning
    [Show full text]
  • 11201 San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito, Ca 94530 I ±2,511 Sf I Mixed Use Building
    11201 SAN PABLO AVENUE EL CERRITO, CA 94530 I ±2,511 SF I MIXED USE BUILDING EL CERRITO DEL NORTE BART STATION OHLONE GREENWAY CYPRESS AVENUE SAN PABLO AVENUE 11201 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito, CA St. John’s Baptist school PURCHASE PRICE $550,000san francisco marin NOI EL CERRITO DEL NORTE $5,542 BART STATION PROFORMA CAP RATE golden gate10.5% fields Potrero AVENUE SQ. FT. 2,511 PRICE PER SF 11201 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito, CA $219 CYPRESS AVENUE OCCUPANCYEl Cerrito BART Station 34% SAN PABLO AVENUE 2 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 OHLONE GREENWAY PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS 8 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW 12 MARKET OVERVIEW 14 LOCATION OVERVIEW 16 EXCLUSIVELY OFFERED BY: Bryan C. Webb Senior Vice President + 1 415 788 7873 [email protected] Lic: 01826546 11201 SAN PABLO AVE | EL CERRITO, CA 3 san francisco oakland 11201 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito, CA SAN PABLO AVENUE 4 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Colliers International, as Exclusive Advisor to the Seller, is pleased to present the opportunity to acquire the 100% fee simple interest in 11201 San Pablo Ave, El Cerrito, CA (the “Property”), a 2,511 square foot mixed-use building, The building is currently spilt up into three spaces: a ground floor florist which includes a temperature controlled cool room behind the space, an upstairs studio apartment and a vacant in-line retail space previously occupied by a bar which is currently in cold shell condition. The building was built in 1929 and has been used as a Florist shop since the 1950’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Seek Funds for Added Oakland Study
    Transportation planning Seek funds for added Oakland study Action Agenda, '84 AC Transit's Board of Directors gave Under the program, a steering com­ the green light May 23 to the second mittee made up of representatives from phase of a program which could reshape AC Transit, BART, City of Oakland, the face of downtown Oakland. Oakland Chamber of Commerce and the Proposed service adjustments They approved a proposal to seek Metropolitan Transportation Commis­ $142,000 of federal money to fund the sion would direct the project. In addition, would aid bus/rail linkage next step in planning transportation for a Citizens Advisory Committee and a downtown Oakland under the Central Technical Advisory Committee would be District Transit Improvement Plan. The established to provide informational sup­ We are currently weighing a series of proposed service adjustments to first phase of the project involved port services. better meet East Bay commuters' future transit needs. preliminary analysis of existing traffic A key element in the proposals - some to be implemented in Septem­ and transportation conditions. ber, others scheduled for late 1984 and early 1985 - is maintaining an The second phase of the overall plan is State finance to help even closer working relationship with BART to improve coordination of designed to provide the City of Oakland, With 30-Z operation bus and train schedules and service. AC Transit and BART with information The District also will begin trimming lightly-patronized bus trips and and direction regarding coordinated tran­ With. the aid of a $300,000 state trans­ bus routes, and the coaches and drivers will be redeployed to areas where sit efforts, producing both short term and portation subsidy, AC Transit is taking long range proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitcenter Equity Dashboard: Technical Documentation
    TransitCenter Equity Dashboard: Technical Documentation June 2021 Prepared for: TransitCenter Prepared by: Sustainable Systems Research, LLC SF2 Enterprises Inc Klumpentown Consulting University of Vermont Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Dashboard overview 2 3. Data and analysis 4 3.1. Scope 4 3.1.1. Spatial areas 4 3.1.2. Time periods 5 3.2. Accessibility 5 3.2.1. Time periods 5 3.2.2. Transit travel times 5 3.2.3. Automobile travel times 6 3.2.4. Destinations 7 3.2.5. Fare data, fare rules and fare analysis 8 3.2.6. Evaluating accessibility 11 3.3. Transit service analysis 14 3.3.1. Transit service intensity 14 3.3.2. Transit reliability 14 3.4. Equity analysis 15 4. Web framework and database 17 4.1. Conceptual design 17 4.2. Code structure 17 4.3. Web application 18 4.4. URL structure 19 4.5. Backend data queries 20 4.5.1. Score queries 20 4.5.2. Date queries 21 4.6. Database 21 4.7. Updating the dashboard 25 5. References 26 Appendix A: Definition of essential workers 27 Appendix B: Fare calculations and assumptions 33 TransitCenter Equity Dashboard Technical Documentation 1. Introduction The purpose of this project is to provide timely indicators of public transit system performance via a publicly available web dashboard. The focus of the dashboard is to track the equity of transit service over time in seven US regions. The dashboard facilitates visualization and assessment of changes in accessibility (measured as access to various opportunities with and without a fare constraint), transit service intensity, and transit reliability (delay) and their varying effects on different neighborhoods and populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Snapshot Workbook
    SnapshotFOSTER CITY Workbook GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2011 Produced for the City of Foster City by METROPOLITAN PLANNING GROUP CONTENTS About the General Plan Update A general plan is intended to announce a future vision for a city and guide the growth and development of the city. The Foster City General Plan is intended to be a statement of how the citizens of Foster City view their community, how they want it to be in the future and how they intend to deal with planning and development issues facing the community. Introduction 1 California Planning law requires every City to prepare and update the Community Profile 3 various required elements of a General Plan for the purpose of providing for the orderly development (and redevelopment) of the City. Foster Trends Analysis 63 City’s General Plan was comprehensively updated in 1993 and has been amended several times since on a site-by-site basis as new opportunities Strengths, Weaknesses, 87 have arisen. However, the data, background studies and goals, policies Opportunities, and Threats and programs have not been reevaluated since adoption in 1993. Issues and Constraints 123 City staff is preparing to update the Land Use and Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan. This is the most complex and far reaching of the Plan’s legally required Plan Elements. Metropolitan Planning Group, a Climate Change 127 local city planning consulting firm, is assisting the City in performing the necessary studies and gathering input from the community. Next Steps 143 Introduction This is who we are. This is a 2011 snapshot of where we live.
    [Show full text]
  • Homestead Maps – a & B
    San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library Homestead Maps – A & B Contents ALPHA BY MAP SUBJECT [(year )=recording date or filing date] PAGE Exterior Line of Block No. 453 p. 68 # 2072 p. 61 Map of the Lands of the Alamo Square Homestead Association p. 25 Jonas Barman Map p. 27 Plat of the Barstow Ranch p. 72 Property of the Bay Park Homestead Association p. 28 Map of the Bay View Turnpike p. 73 Map of the Beideman Tract p. 26 Map of Lands of the California Avenue Homestead Association p. 33 Map of the Central Homestead Association formerly Reilly and Bryan Tract p. 75 Plat of the Chamblin Ranch p. 74 Map of Property of the City Homestead Association p. 29 Map of 23 Lots Belonging to S. P. Collins and Others p. 34 Map of the College Homestead Association p. 30 Plan of the Lands of the Cosmopolitan Homestead Association p. 76 Property of the Cottage Savings and Homestead Association p. 1 Survey of County Road Land p. 32 Courter’s and Estis’ claim of 320 Acres p. 36 Property of the Eureka Homestead Association p. 4 Map of Fairmount, a portion of the San Miguel Ranch, November 1862 p. 3 Map of the Property of the Fairmount Land Association p. 77 Farrell and Smith p. 37 San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library ALPHA BY MAP SUBJECT ________ PAGE A. E. Field and Co. p. 38 Edward Gallagher’s Lot p. 78 Map of the property of the Garden Land Homestead Association p. 39 Map of the Lands of the Geary Street Extension Homestead Association p.
    [Show full text]
  • Balboa Park Station Area Plan Archeological Context (Final)
    TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: BALBOA PARK STATION AREA PLAN ARCHEOLOGICAL CONTEXT (FINAL) Date: 3 November 2006 To: File No. 2004.1059E. - Balboa Park Station Area Plan From: Randall Dean Topic: an evaluation of potential presence & significance of archeological resources within the Balboa Park Station Area Plan area OBJECTIVES The purpose of this memorandum is provide background information for the environmental evaluation of the proposed Balboa Park Station Area Plan (BPSAP) regarding potential effects to legally-significant archeological resources ("significant" archeological resources as defined by CEQA §15064.S(b) and (c)(l)). To achieve this objective the memorandum provides an historic context of the Plan Area to serve as the basis for a preliminary identification and significance evaluation of archeological properties that may be present within the Plan Area. The historical and archeological information provided in this report is based on secondary archeological literature related to the Plan Area and on primary and secondary historical documentation including historic maps (U.S. General Land Office plats, U.S. Coast Surveys, Sanborn Fire Insurance maps etc.) U.S. Census Bureau population schedules, city directories, Municipal Reports, the Western Neighborhoods Project historical reports, etc). This report provides a general (program-level) discussion of the general types ("property types") of archeological resources that may be present within the Plan Area and, thus, potentially affected by future physical projects under the proposed regulatory General Plan and Planning Code changes proposed in the BPSAP. Site-specific identification of potential archeological resources is attempted for the Phelan Loop Site and the Kragen Auto Parts site for which the BPSAP proposes specific physical projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context Statement for San Francisco's Mission
    CITY WITHIN A CITY: HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR SAN FRANCISCO’S MISSION DISTRICT November 2007 Prepared by: City and County of San Francisco Planning Department ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Mayor Gavin Newsom Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Lily Chan Robert W. Cherny, Vice President Courtney Damkroger Ina Dearman Karl Hasz M. Bridget Maley, President Alan Martinez Johanna Street Planning Department Dean Macris, Director of Planning Neil Hart, Chief of Neighborhood Planning Mark Luellen, Preservation Coordinator Matt Weintraub, Citywide Survey Project Manager (Author) Thanks also to: N. Moses Corrette, Rachel Force, Beth Skrondal, and Sonya Banks of the Historic Resources Survey Team Survey Advisory Committee Charles Edwin Chase San Francisco Architectural Heritage (former Executive Director), Historic Preservation Fund Committee Courtney Damkroger Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Neil Hart Planning Department Tim Kelley Kelley & VerPlank Historical Resources Consulting M. Bridget Maley Architectural Resources Group, Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Mark Ryser San Francisco Beautiful Marie Nelson California Office of Historic Preservation Christopher VerPlank Kelley & VerPlank Historical Resources Consulting CITY WITHIN A CITY: HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR SAN FRANCISCO’S MISSION DISTRICT The activity which is the subject of this Historic Context Statement has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, through the California Office of Historic Preservation. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Options, Markets, and Performance Robert Cervero Working Paper UCTC No
    CommercialParatransit in the United States: Service Options, Markets, and Performance Robert Cervero Working Paper UCTCNo. 299 The University of California Transportation Center Umversity of California Berkeley, CA 94720 The University of California Transportation Center The University of California Center activities. Researchers Transportation Center (UCTC) at other universities within the is one of ten regional units region also have opportunities mandated by Congress and to collaborate with UCfaculty established in Fall 1988 to on selected studies. support research, education, and training in surface trans- UCTC’seducational and portation. The UCCenter research programs are focused serves federal Region IX and on strategic planning for is supported by matching improving metropolitan grants from the U.S. Depart- accessibility, with emphasis ment of Transportation, the on the special conditions in California Department of Region IX. Particular attention Transportation (Caltrans), and is directed to strategies for the University. using transportation as an instrument of economic Based on the Berkeley development, while also ac- Campus, UCTCdraws upon commodatingto the region’s existing capabilities and persistent expansion and resources of the Institutes of while maintaining and enhanc- Transportation Studies a~ ing the quality of life there. Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, and Los Angeles; the Institute of The Center distributes reports Urban and Regional Develop- on its research in working ment at Berkeley; and several papers, monographs, and in academic departments at the reprints of published articles. Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, and It also publishes Access, a Los Angeles campuses. magazine presenting sum- Faculty and students on other males of selected studies. For University of California a list of publications in print, campuses may participate in write to the address below.
    [Show full text]
  • 34Th America's Cup People Plan
    p People Plan The 34th America’s Cup San Francisco November 2013 S S SFMTA People Plan November 2013 Acknowledgements Resources Team provided essential expertise. Insights, services and coordination support was also provided by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and The 34th America’s Cup “People Plan” is an unprecedented regional Development Commission, the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit planning effort, drawing from the time and resources of residential District, the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transit District, the and business community groups, transportation advocates, Water Emergency Transportation Authority, Blue and Gold Fleet, the environmental stewardship advocates, city departments, county Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, Caltrain, San Mateo County authorities, local schools and universities, regional transportation Transit, the Presidio Trust, the California Department of Transportation. planning and service agencies, state and federal safety and regulatory divisions, state and national parks departments, elected The San Francisco office of the British Consulate General afforded and appointed officials: all in collaboration with the America’s Cup this effort the extremely inspirational and instructive benefit of Event Authority. perspective gained from the 2012 London Olympics. Many San Francisco City and County staff contributed extensive time Finally, we’d especially like to acknowledge the generous work of and support,
    [Show full text]