DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology of Uranium and Associated Ore Deposits Central Part of the Front Range Mineral Belt Colorado by P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology of Uranium and Associated Ore Deposits Central Part of the Front Range Mineral Belt Colorado by P Geology of Uranium and Associated Ore Deposits Central Part of the Front Range Mineral Belt Colorado By P. K. SIMS and others GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 371 Prepared on behalf of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thoma~B.Nobn,D~ec~r The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page 119 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 PREFACE This report is bused on fieldwork in the central part of the Front Range mineral belt between 1951 and 1956 by geologists of the U.S. Geological Survey on behalf of the U.S. Atomic Energy Co1nmission. The work was cn.rriecl on by nine authors working in different parts of the region. Therefore, although the senior author is responsible for the sections of the report thn,t are not ascribed to inclividualrnembers, the entire report embodies the efrorts of the group, which consisted of F. C. Armstrong, A. A. Drake, Jr., J. E. Harrison, C. C. Hawley, R. H. l\1oench, F. B. l\1oore, P. K. Sims, E. W. Tooker, and J. D. Wells. III CONTENTS Page Page Abstract------------------------------------------- 1 Uranium deposits-Continued Introduction ______________________________ - _______ _ 2 ~ineralogy-Continued Purpose and scope of report _____________________ _ 2 Zippeite and betazippeite ___________________ _ 39 Geography ____________________________________ _ 2 Schroeckingerite _________________________ --- 39 Previous geologic studies ________________________ _ 3 Thucholite(?) ___ --------------------------- 39 Johannite _________________________________ _ Present investigation ___________________________ _ 4 39 Acknowledgments ______________________________ _ 4 Paragenetic relations of pitchblende to the common History of uranium mining and production ____________ _ 5 vein-forming minerals ______________________ --- 39 Geologic setting ___________________________________ _ 6 General character and structure _______________ --- 41 Rock units ____________________________________ _ 6 Relation of deposits to fault sets _________ -_--- 41 Precambrian rocks _________________________ _ 6 Ore shoots _______ --- --- __________ ---------- 41 Tertiary intrusive rocks ____________________ _ 8 Grade of primary depqsits ____________________ --- 43 Radioactivity of country rocks __________________ _ 9 ~ineralogical and chemical character of wallrocks-- _ 44 Precambrian rocks _________________________ _ 9 Localization of ore ___________________________ --- 44 Thorium- and rare-earth-bearing gneiss and Relation of primary ores to depth _______________ -- 48 migmatite ___________________________ _ 9 Relation of uranium deposits to sulfide mineral zoning ______________________________________ _ Uranium-bearing pegmatite _____________ _ 10 48 Biotite.. m uscovite granite _______________ _ 12 Supergene alteration_---_--- _____ -_-------_-_--- 49 Tertiary intrusive rocks _____________________ _ 13 Structure _____________________________________ _ Relation of alteration products to water table 13 and primary ore ________________________ -- 49 Structure of Precambrian rocks ______________ _ 13 Occurrence of secondary uranium minerals ____ - 50 Form of Tertiary intrusive rocks _____________ _ 14 Grade of secondary deposits ________________ -- 51 Joints-----~------------------------------- 14 Chemical consi::lerations ____________________ _ 51 Faults ___________________________________ _ 15 Origin of uranium deposits ______________________ _ 52 Classification and description ____________ _ 15 Source of uranium ___________________ :.. _____ _ 53 Faults of Precambrian(?) age ________ _ 16 Chemical environment of deposition __________ - 54 Age __________________________________________ _ Faults of Laramide age _____________ _ 18 54 Fault pattern ___________ ---_- __ -- ___ --- 18 Future production __________________ ----_----------- 55 Age and origin of faults _________________ _ 19 ~ine descriptions __________ - ___ - ________ ------------ 55 Summary of geologic history ________________________ _ 20 Ore deposits _______________________________________ _ 21 Central City district _____________________ ------- 55 Structure and general character __________________ _ 21 Quartz Hill-upper Russell Gulch area ________ -- 55 Flack vein ____________________________ _ ~ineralogY------------------------------------ 21 55 Classification of veins __________________________ _ 22 West Flack mine __________________ _ 56 Hypogene mineral zoning _______________________ _ 24 ~ercer County mine ______________ -- 58 Regional zoning_ -' _________________________ _ 24 German and Belcher mines ______________ - 59 Longitudinal zoning of veins ________________ _ 26 Iron mine, by A. A. Drake, Jr ___________ _ 61 Depth zoning _____________________________ _ 26 Jefferson-Calhoun vein _________________ _ 62 Paragenesis of vein minerals _____________________ _ 26 Kirk mine ____________________________ _ 63 Wallrock. alteration, by E. W. Tooker ____________ _ 27 Old Town mine, by A. A. Drake, Jr ______ _ 65 Genesis of sulfide veins _________________________ _ 28 Springdale (Gold Rock) mine, by A. A. Uranium deposits __________________________________ _ 29 Drake, J r ________________________ ---- 67 Abundance and distribution of uranium in veins ___ _ 29 Telegraph mine ________________________ _ 68 Mineralogy ______________________ - ___ ---- ___ --- 32 Wood vein ____________________________ _ 69 Pitchblende _______________________________ _ 32 Eureka Gulch area _______________________ --- 70 Texture ______________________________ _ 32 Carroll mine _________________________ - _ 71 Variation in physical appearance _________ _ 34 Claire ~arie mine __ -------------------- 77 Variation in state of oxidation ___________ _ 35 St. Anthony and R.H.D. mines __________ _ 78 Chemical composition of pitchblende __ ·___ _ 36 Two Sisters mine _____________________ - _ 80 ~in or elements in pitchblende ___________ _ 36 Justice Hill and adjacent areas ______________ _ 82 Torbernite and metatorbernite ______________ _ 38 Bonanza mine-------------~------------ 82 Autunite and metf£-autunite _________________ _ ·as Cherokee vein ________________________ -- 84 Kasolite __________________________________ _ 38 Pewabic tunnel, by A. A. Drake, ·J r __ .:. ___ _ 87 Dumontite ________________________________ _ 38 Silver Hill area _______________________ - _---- 88 Uranophane _______________________________ _ 39 Blackhawk Lode No.2 claim ____________ _ 88 Bayleyite _________________________________ _ 39 Powhatan tunnel, by A. E. Dearth _______ _ 91 v I , VI CONTENTS Mine descriptions-C~:mtinued Page Mine descriptions-Continued Lawson-Dumont-Fall River district, by C. C. Hawley Freeland-Lamartine district, etc-Continued and F. B. Moore _____________________________ _ Crazy G~lmine ___________________________ _ 92 110 Fall River area ____________________________ _ 92 Diamond Mountain mine ___________________ _ 110 Almaden mine _________________________ _ 94 Harrisburg mine ___________________________ _ 111 Golconda tunneL ______________________ _ 94 Lamartine mine ___________________________ _ 111 Mary mine ____________________________ _ 96 Little Johnie group ________________________ _ 111 Lawson area ______________________________ _ 98 Lone Tree mine ___________________________ _ 111 Bellevue-Hudson mine _________________ _ 98 Miller mine _______________________________ _ 111 Jo Reynolds mine ______________________ _ 99 Poor Man mine ____________________________ _ 111 Robineau (Peabody) prospect ___________ _ 101 . Chicago Creek area, by J. E. Harrison and J. D. Other mines _____________________________ ~ __ Wells _______________________________________ _ 101 111 Albro mine _____________ --------- ______ _ 101 AI pine mine _______________________________ _ Golden Calf mine ______________________ _ 111 101 Blackwood mine ___________________________ _ 111 Idaho Springs district, by R. H. Moench _________ _ 103 Bruce mine _______________________________ _ Alma Lincoln mine _________________________ _ 111 103 Brunswick tunneL _________________________ _ 112 Diamond Joe tunnel, by A. A. Drake, Jr ______ _ 104 Chicago mine _____________________________ _ 112 Jennie Lind No. 1 tunneL __________________ _ 104 Dixie mine ________________________________ _ 112 MAB tunneL ________ ~ ____________________ _ 105 Eclipse mine ______________________________ _ 112 New Bedford tunneL ______________________ _ 105 Gomer mine _______________________________ _ 112 Red Jacket mine ___________________________ _ 106 H urn bold t mine ___________________________ _ 112 Shafter mine ______________________________ _ 106 Katie Emmett mine ________________________ _ 112 Stanley mine ______________________________ _ 106 Martha E mine ____________________________ _ Star mine _________________________________ _ 112 107 Muscovite tunneL _________________________ _ 113 Sunnyside mine, by J. E. Harrison and R. H. Orinoco tunneL ___________________________ _ Moench ________________________________ _ 113 108 Silver Link tunneL _____________· ___________ _ 113 Freeland-Lamartine district, by J. E. Harrison and Tyone mine _______________________________ _ 113 J. D. Wells ___________ ----------------------- 110 Wall ace tunnel ____________________________ _ 114 Ariadne mine ______________________________ _ 110 Literature cited _______________________ ·____________ -· Belle Creole
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Significance of Mineralogy in the Development of Flowsheets for Processing Uranium Ores
    JfipwK LEACHING TIME REAGENTS TEMPERATURE FLOCCULANT CLARITY AREA COUNTER CURRENT DECANTATION It 21 21 J^^LJt TECHNICAL REPORTS SERIES No.19 6 Significance of Mineralogy in the Development of Flowsheets for Processing Uranium Ores \W# INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 1980 SIGNIFICANCE OF MINERALOGY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF FLOWSHEETS FOR PROCESSING URANIUM ORES The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN HOLY SEE PHILIPPINES ALBANIA HUNGARY POLAND ALGERIA ICELAND PORTUGAL ARGENTINA INDIA QATAR AUSTRALIA INDONESIA ROMANIA AUSTRIA IRAN SAUDI ARABIA BANGLADESH IRAQ SENEGAL BELGIUM IRELAND SIERRA LEONE BOLIVIA ISRAEL SINGAPORE BRAZIL ITALY SOUTH AFRICA BULGARIA IVORY COAST SPAIN BURMA JAMAICA SRI LANKA BYELORUSSIAN SOVIET JAPAN SUDAN SOCIALIST REPUBLIC JORDAN SWEDEN CANADA KENYA SWITZERLAND CHILE KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC COLOMBIA KUWAIT THAILAND COSTA RICA LEBANON TUNISIA CUBA LIBERIA TURKEY CYPRUS LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA UGANDA CZECHOSLOVAKIA LIECHTENSTEIN UKRAINIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST DEMOCRATIC KAMPUCHEA LUXEMBOURG REPUBLIC DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S MADAGASCAR UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF KOREA MALAYSIA REPUBLICS DENMARK MALI UNITED ARAB EMIRATES DOMINICAN REPUBLIC MAURITIUS UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT ECUADOR MEXICO BRITAIN AND NORTHERN EGYPT MONACO IRELAND EL SALVADOR MONGOLIA UNITED REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA MOROCCO CAMEROON FINLAND NETHERLANDS UNITED REPUBLIC OF FRANCE NEW ZEALAND TANZANIA GABON NICARAGUA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC NIGER URUGUAY GERMANY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA VENEZUELA GHANA NORWAY VIET NAM GREECE PAKISTAN YUGOSLAVIA GUATEMALA PANAMA ZAIRE HAITI PARAGUAY ZAMBIA PERU The Agency's Statute was approved on 23 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters, New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial for Special Issue “Ore Genesis and Metamorphism: Geochemistry, Mineralogy, and Isotopes”
    minerals Editorial Editorial for Special Issue “Ore Genesis and Metamorphism: Geochemistry, Mineralogy, and Isotopes” Pavel A. Serov Geological Institute of the Kola Science Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 184209 Apatity, Russia; [email protected] Magmatism, ore genesis and metamorphism are commonly associated processes that define fundamental features of the Earth’s crustal evolution from the earliest Precambrian to Phanerozoic. Basically, the need and importance of studying the role of metamorphic processes in formation and transformation of deposits is of great value when discussing the origin of deposits confined to varied geological settings. In synthesis, the signatures imprinted by metamorphic episodes during the evolution largely indicate complicated and multistage patterns of ore-forming processes, as well as the polygenic nature of the mineralization generated by magmatic, postmagmatic, and metamorphic processes. Rapid industrialization and expanding demand for various types of mineral raw ma- terials require increasing rates of mining operations. The current Special Issue is dedicated to the latest achievements in geochemistry, mineralogy, and geochronology of ore and metamorphic complexes, their interrelation, and the potential for further prospecting. The issue contains six practical and theoretical studies that provide for a better understanding of the age and nature of metamorphic and metasomatic transformations, as well as their contribution to mineralization in various geological complexes. The first article, by Jiang et al. [1], reports results of the first mineralogical–geochemical Citation: Serov, P.A. Editorial for studies of gem-quality nephrite from the major Yinggelike deposit (Xinjiang, NW China). Special Issue “Ore Genesis and The authors used a set of advanced analytical techniques, that is, electron probe microanaly- Metamorphism: Geochemistry, sis, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry Mineralogy, and Isotopes”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Model of the Hohentauern/Sunk Sparry Magnesite Deposit (Eastern Alps/Austria)
    Dissertation Amir Morteza Azim Zadeh The genetic model of the Hohentauern/Sunk sparry magnesite deposit (Eastern Alps/Austria) Dissertation PhD Thesis submitted to obtain the degree of: Doktor der montanistischen Wissenschaften Amir Morteza Azim Zadeh BSc. & MSc. Supervisor: O. Univ.-Prof. Dr. phil. Fritz Ebner Department of Applied Geosciences and Geophysics Geology and Economic Geology University of Leoben, Austria 2009 Referees: O. Univ.-Prof. Dr. phil. Fritz Ebner Ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Ronald J. Bakker I declare in lieu of oath, that I wrote this thesis and performed the associated research myself, using only literature cited in this volume. Amir M. Azimzadeh Leoben, May 2009 „…und dicht neben meinem Wissen lagerte mein schwarzes Unwissen.“ Also sprach Zarathustra Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche Contents . Contents: Abstract I Zusammenfassung II Publications and conference presentations of A. M. Azim Zadeh related to this thesis IV Acknowledgment VI List of figures VIII List of tables XVI 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Aim 2 1.2 Applied methods 2 1.2.1 Field methods and sampling 3 1.2.2 Analytical techniques 3 1.2.2.1 Petrography 3 1.2.2.2 Cathodoluminescence microscopy 3 1.2.2.3 Electron microprobe analysis (EPMA) 3 1.2.2.4 X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) 4 1.2.2.5 Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) 4 1.2.2.6 Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) 5 1.2.2.7 Fluid inclusion analysis 6 1.2.2.7.1 Ion chromatography (IC) 6 1.2.2.7.2 Microthermometry 7 1.2.2.8 Raman spectroscopy 8 1.2.2.9 Laser-ablation MC-ICP-MS isotope analysis 9 1.3 Magnesite as mineral and ore 9 1.4 Types and origin of magnesite 11 Contents .
    [Show full text]
  • Uraninite Alteration in an Oxidizing Environment and Its Relevance to the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel
    TECHNICAL REPORT 91-15 Uraninite alteration in an oxidizing environment and its relevance to the disposal of spent nuclear fuel Robert Finch, Rodney Ewing Department of Geology, University of New Mexico December 1990 SVENSK KÄRNBRÄNSLEHANTERING AB SWEDISH NUCLEAR FUEL AND WASTE MANAGEMENT CO BOX 5864 S-102 48 STOCKHOLM TEL 08-665 28 00 TELEX 13108 SKB S TELEFAX 08-661 57 19 original contains color illustrations URANINITE ALTERATION IN AN OXIDIZING ENVIRONMENT AND ITS RELEVANCE TO THE DISPOSAL OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL Robert Finch, Rodney Ewing Department of Geology, University of New Mexico December 1990 This report concerns a study which was conducted for SKB. The conclusions and viewpoints presented in the report are those of the author (s) and do not necessarily coincide with those of the client. Information on SKB technical reports from 1977-1978 (TR 121), 1979 (TR 79-28), 1980 (TR 80-26), 1981 (TR 81-17), 1982 (TR 82-28), 1983 (TR 83-77), 1984 (TR 85-01), 1985 (TR 85-20), 1986 (TR 86-31), 1987 (TR 87-33), 1988 (TR 88-32) and 1989 (TR 89-40) is available through SKB. URANINITE ALTERATION IN AN OXIDIZING ENVIRONMENT AND ITS RELEVANCE TO THE DISPOSAL OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL Robert Finch Rodney Ewing Department of Geology University of New Mexico Submitted to Svensk Kämbränslehantering AB (SKB) December 21,1990 ABSTRACT Uraninite is a natural analogue for spent nuclear fuel because of similarities in structure (both are fluorite structure types) and chemistry (both are nominally UOJ. Effective assessment of the long-term behavior of spent fuel in a geologic repository requires a knowledge of the corrosion products produced in that environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of U Rani Urn Deposits in Triassic Rocks of the Colorado Plateau Region
    Geology of U rani urn Deposits in Triassic Rocks of the Colorado Plateau Region By W. I. FINCH CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1074-D This report concerns work done on behalf ~1 the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission -Jnd is published with the permission of ~he Commission NITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printin~ Office Washin~ton 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Abstract---------------------------------------------------------- 125 Introduction__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 125 History of mining and production ____ ------------------------------- 127 Geologic setting___________________________________________________ 128 StratigraphY-------------------------------------------------- 129 ~oenkopiformation_______________________________________ ~29 Middle Triassic unconformity_______________________________ 131 Chinle formation__________________________________________ 131 Shinarump Inernber____________________________________ 133 ~udstone member------------------------------------- 136 ~oss Back member____________________________________ 136 Upper part of the Chinle formation______________________ 138 Wingate sandstone_________________________________________ 138 lgneousrocks_________________________________________________ 139 Structure_____________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • The Reduced Uraniferous Mineralizations Associated with the Volcanic Rocks of the Sierra Pena Blanca (Chihuahua, Mexico)
    American Mineralogist, Volume 70, pages 1290-1297, 1985 The reduced uraniferous mineralizations associated with the volcanic rocks of the Sierra Pena Blanca (Chihuahua, Mexico) BRtcIrrn ANru, Centre de Recherchessur la Giologie de I'Urqnium BP 23, 54 5 0 1, V andoeuure-les-Nancy C6dex, F rance ,lwo hcquns LERoY Centre de Recherchessur la Giologie de l'Uranium BP 23,54501, Vaniloeuure-les-Nancy Cidex, France and Ecole Nationale Supirieure ile Gdologie Appliquie et de Prospection Miniire ile Nancy, BP 452,54001, Nancy Cidex, France Abstrect The uraniferousmineralizations of the Nopal I deposit (Sierra Pena Blanca, Chihuahua, Mexico) are related to a breccia pipe in a tertiary vitroclastic tuff (Nopal Formation). De- tailed mineralogicaland fluid inclusion studies led to the discovery of a primary mineral- ization stageof tetravalenturanium as part of an ilmenite-hematitephase. This stageoccurs soon after the depositionof the tuff and is relatedto H2O-CO, N, fluids, similar to those of the vapor phase,under temperaturesranging from 300 to 350'C. The well developedkaolini- zation of the Nopal tuff is associatedwith a secondtetravalent uranium stage(pitchblende- pyrite association).Fluids are aqueousand their temperatureranges from 250 to 200'C. The precipitation of pitchblende with pyrite within the pipe is due to a HrS activity increase strictlylimited to this structure.The remainderof mineralizingevents, either hydrothermal or supergene,led to the hexavalenturanium minerals that prevailtoday. Introduction of Chihuahua city. This Sierra
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Fact Sheet
    Fact Sheet Adopted: December 2018 Health Physics Society Specialists in Radiation Safety 1 Uranium What is uranium? Uranium is a naturally occurring metallic element that has been present in the Earth’s crust since formation of the planet. Like many other minerals, uranium was deposited on land by volcanic action, dissolved by rainfall, and in some places, carried into underground formations. In some cases, geochemical conditions resulted in its concentration into “ore bodies.” Uranium is a common element in Earth’s crust (soil, rock) and in seawater and groundwater. Uranium has 92 protons in its nucleus. The isotope2 238U has 146 neutrons, for a total atomic weight of approximately 238, making it the highest atomic weight of any naturally occurring element. It is not the most dense of elements, but its density is almost twice that of lead. Uranium is radioactive and in nature has three primary isotopes with different numbers of neutrons. Natural uranium, 238U, constitutes over 99% of the total mass or weight, with 0.72% 235U, and a very small amount of 234U. An unstable nucleus that emits some form of radiation is defined as radioactive. The emitted radiation is called radioactivity, which in this case is ionizing radiation—meaning it can interact with other atoms to create charged atoms known as ions. Uranium emits alpha particles, which are ejected from the nucleus of the unstable uranium atom. When an atom emits radiation such as alpha or beta particles or photons such as x rays or gamma rays, the material is said to be undergoing radioactive decay (also called radioactive transformation).
    [Show full text]
  • A Prospector's Guide to URANIUM Deposits in Newfoundland and Labrador
    A Prospector's guide to URANIUM deposits In Newfoundland and labrador Matty mitchell prospectors resource room Information circular number 4 First Floor • Natural Resources Building Geological Survey of Newfoundland and Labrador 50 Elizabeth Avenue • PO Box 8700 • A1B 4J6 St. John’s • Newfoundland • Canada pros pec tor s Telephone: 709-729-2120, 709-729-6193 • e-mail: [email protected] resource room Website: http://www.nr.gov.nl.ca/mines&en/geosurvey/matty_mitchell/ September, 2007 INTRODUCTION Why Uranium? • Uranium is an abundant source of concentrated energy. • One pellet of uranium fuel (following enrichment of the U235 component), weighing approximately 7 grams (g), is capable of generating as much energy as 3.5 barrels of oil, 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas or 807 kilograms (kg) of coal. • One kilogram of uranium235 contains 2 to 3 million times the energy equivalent of the same amount of oil or coal. • A one thousand megawatt nuclear power station requiring 27 tonnes of fuel per year, needs an average of about 74 kg per day. An equivalent sized coal-fired station needs 8600 tonnes of coal to be delivered every day. Why PROSPECT FOR IT? • At the time of writing (September, 2007), the price of uranium is US$90 a pound - a “hot” commodity, in more ways than one! Junior exploration companies and major producers are keen to find more of this valuable resource. As is the case with other commodities, the prospector’s role in the search for uranium is always of key importance. What is Uranium? • Uranium is a metal; its chemical symbol is U.
    [Show full text]
  • Iidentilica2tion and Occurrence of Uranium and Vanadium Identification and Occurrence of Uranium and Vanadium Minerals from the Colorado Plateaus
    IIdentilica2tion and occurrence of uranium and Vanadium Identification and Occurrence of Uranium and Vanadium Minerals From the Colorado Plateaus c By A. D. WEEKS and M. E. THOMPSON A CONTRIBUTION TO THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM GEOLOGICAL S U R V E Y BULL E TIN 1009-B For jeld geologists and others having few laboratory facilities.- This report concerns work done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1954 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE- INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan. Director Reprint, 1957 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Ofice Washington 25, D. C. - Price 25 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page 13 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 16 16 17 17 17 18 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 25 26 27 28 29 29 30 30 31 32 33 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 , 40 41 42 42 1v CONTENTS Page 46 47 48 49 50 50 51 52 53 54 54 55 56 56 57 58 58 59 62 TABLES TABLE1. Optical properties of uranium minerals ______________________ 44 2. List of mine and mining district names showing county and State________________________________________---------- 60 IDENTIFICATION AND OCCURRENCE OF URANIUM AND VANADIUM MINERALS FROM THE COLORADO PLATEAUS By A. D. WEEKSand M. E. THOMPSON ABSTRACT This report, designed to make available to field geologists and others informa- tion obtained in recent investigations by the Geological Survey on identification and occurrence of uranium minerals of the Colorado Plateaus, contains descrip- tions of the physical properties, X-ray data, and in some instances results of chem- ical and spectrographic analysis of 48 uranium arid vanadium minerals.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrare D Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Minerals
    Infrare d Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Mineral s THE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM Infrare d Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Mineral s G. C. Jones Department of Mineralogy The Natural History Museum London, UK and B. Jackson Department of Geology Royal Museum of Scotland Edinburgh, UK A collaborative project of The Natural History Museum and National Museums of Scotland E3 SPRINGER-SCIENCE+BUSINESS MEDIA, B.V. Firs t editio n 1 993 © 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally published by Chapman & Hall in 1993 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1993 Typese t at the Natura l Histor y Museu m ISBN 978-94-010-4940-5 ISBN 978-94-011-2120-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-2120-0 Apar t fro m any fair dealin g for the purpose s of researc h or privat e study , or criticis m or review , as permitte d unde r the UK Copyrigh t Design s and Patent s Act , 1988, thi s publicatio n may not be reproduced , stored , or transmitted , in any for m or by any means , withou t the prio r permissio n in writin g of the publishers , or in the case of reprographi c reproductio n onl y in accordanc e wit h the term s of the licence s issue d by the Copyrigh t Licensin g Agenc y in the UK, or in accordanc e wit h the term s of licence s issue d by the appropriat e Reproductio n Right s Organizatio n outsid e the UK. Enquirie s concernin g reproductio n outsid e the term s state d here shoul d be sent to the publisher s at the Londo n addres s printe d on thi s page.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Geology and Ore-Deposit Styles of the Trans-Border Region, Southwestern North America
    Arizona Geological Society Digest 22 2008 Regional geology and ore-deposit styles of the trans-border region, southwestern North America Spencer R. Titley and Lukas Zürcher Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA ABSTRACT Nearly a century of independent geological work in Arizona and adjoining Mexico resulted in a seam in the recognized geological architecture and in the mineralization style and distribution at the border. However, through the latter part of the 20th century, workers, driven in great part by economic-resource considerations, have enhanced the understanding of the geological framework in both directions with synergistic results. The ore deposits of Arizona represent a sampling of resource potential that serves as a basis for defining expectations for enhanced discovery rates in contiguous Mexico. The assessment presented here is premised on the habits of occurrence of the Arizona ores. For the most part, these deposits occur in terranes that reveal distinctive forma- tional ages, metal compositions, and lithologies, which identify and otherwise constrain the components for search of comparable ores in adjacent crustal blocks. Three basic geological and metallogenic properties are integrated here to iden- tify the diagnostic features of ore genesis across the region. These properties comprise: (a) the type and age of basement as identified by tectono-stratigraphic and geochemi- cal studies; (b) consideration of a major structural discontinuity, the Mojave-Sonora megashear, which adds a regional structural component to the study and search for ore deposits; and (c) integration of points (a) and (b) with the tectono-magmatic events over time that are superimposed across terranes and that have added an age component to differing cycles of rock and ore formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Robotic Asteroid Prospector
    Robotic Asteroid Prospector Marc M. Cohen1 Marc M. Cohen Architect P.C. – Astrotecture™, Palo Alto, CA, USA 94306-3864 Warren W. James2 V Infinity Research LLC. – Altadena, CA, USA Kris Zacny,3 Philip Chu, Jack Craft Honeybee Robotics Spacecraft Mechanisms Corporation – Pasadena, CA, USA This paper presents the results from the nine-month, Phase 1 investigation for the Robotic Asteroid Prospector (RAP). This project investigated several aspects of developing an asteroid mining mission. It conceived a Space Infrastructure Framework that would create a demand for in space-produced resources. The resources identified as potentially feasible in the near-term were water and platinum group metals. The project’s mission design stages spacecraft from an Earth Moon Lagrange (EML) point and returns them to an EML. The spacecraft’s distinguishing design feature is its solar thermal propulsion system (STP) that provides two functions: propulsive thrust and process heat for mining and mineral processing. The preferred propellant is water since this would allow the spacecraft to refuel at an asteroid for its return voyage to Cis- Lunar space thus reducing the mass that must be launched from the EML point. The spacecraft will rendezvous with an asteroid at its pole, match rotation rate, and attach to begin mining operations. The team conducted an experiment in extracting and distilling water from frozen regolith simulant. Nomenclature C-Type = Carbonaceous Asteroid EML = Earth-Moon Lagrange Point ESL = Earth-Sun Lagrange Point IPV = Interplanetary Vehicle M-Type = Metallic Asteroid NEA = Near Earth Asteroid NEO = Near Earth Object PGM = Platinum Group Metal STP = Solar Thermal Propulsion S-Type = Stony Asteroid I.
    [Show full text]