DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloaded on 2017-02-12T04:42:19Z

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloaded on 2017-02-12T04:42:19Z Title Skin and bone: the face in the archaeological imagination Author(s) Beatty, Katherine E. Publication date 2015 Original citation Beatty, K. E. 2015. Skin and bone: the face in the archaeological imagination. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Rights © 2015, Katherine E. Beatty. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Embargo information No embargo required Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2107 from Downloaded on 2017-02-12T04:42:19Z SKIN AND BONE: THE FACE IN THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMAGINATION By Katherine E. Beatty July 2015 Thesis submitted for the qualification of PhD Department of Archaeology National University of Ireland, Cork Head of Department: Professor William O’Brien Supervisor: Dr Barra O’Donnabhain ABSTRACT Title: Skin and Bone: The Face in the Archaeological Imagination Author: Katherine E. Beatty Keywords: facial reconstruction, bioarchaeology, the face, Emmanuel Levinas, Ireland, theoretical archaeology, archaeological imagination Thirteen unique archaeological countenances from Ireland were produced through the Manchester method of facial reconstruction. Their gaze prompts a space for a broad discourse regarding the face found within human and artefactual remains of Ireland. These faces are reminders of the human element which is at the core of the discipline of archaeology. These re-constructions create a voyeuristic relationship with the past. At once sating a curiosity about the past, facial re-constructions also provide a catharsis to our presently situated selves. As powerful visual documents, archaeological facial reconstructions illustrate re-presentations of the past as well as how the present can be connected to the past. Through engagment with Emmanuel Levinas’s (1906-1995) main philosophical themes, the presence of the face is examined in a diachronic structure. The ‘starting point’ is the Neolithic period which has been associated with the notion of visuality with a re- construction from the early Neolithic site of Annagh, Co. Limerick. The following layer of analysis appears with attention to intersubjectivity in the early medieval period with facial reconstructions from Dooey, Co. Donegal and Owenbristy, Co. Galway. Building upon the past concepts, the late medieval period is associated with the notion of alterity and paired with faces from Ballinderry, Co. Kildare and a sample of males from Gallen Priory, Co. Offaly. The final layer of examination culminates with the application of response and respons-ibility to the post-medieval Irish landscape with facial reconstructions from the prison on Spike Island, Co. Cork. These layers of investigation are similar to the stratigraphical composition of both the archaeological landscape and the skeletal/soft tissue landscape of the face. The separation of the neglected phenomenon of the face from the overwhelming embrace of the field of craniometrics is necessary. Through this detachment a new manner in which to discuss the face and its place within the (bio)archaeological record is possible. Encountering the faces seen in mortuary contexts, material culture, and archaeological facial reconstructions, inform and shape the archaeological imagination. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... II TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... III LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................. VI LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ XIV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ XV CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER TWO - THE FACE: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS AND APPLICATION TO THE DISCIPLINE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ................................................................... 14 2.1 THEORETICAL NOTIONS .............................................................................................. 14 2.1.1 Emmanuel Levinas .............................................................................................. 16 Position within the Phenomenological Tradition ..................................................... 17 The Central Task of Levinas .................................................................................... 19 The Same and the Other ........................................................................................... 20 Totality and Infinity ................................................................................................. 24 2.1.2 Applying Levinas: His Position within Archaeological Theory ......................... 26 2.2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF LEVINAS ........................................................... 37 2.2.1 Craniometrics, Bioarchaeology, and Traditional Interpretations of the Face ..... 38 2.2.2 Head vs. Face: Reinvigorating the Undermined Face ......................................... 45 2.2.3 Exposing a Gendered Binary .............................................................................. 48 2.2.4 The Face as Analogy for the Discipline of Archaeology .................................... 53 CHAPTER THREE – FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION: A HISTORICAL TRAJECTORY AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCIPLINE ................... 58 3.1 FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION: A TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SYNTHESIS ........................... 58 3.1.1 Examples from the Prehistoric Period................................................................. 59 3.1.2 Examples from the Early Modern Period............................................................ 61 3.1.3 Examples from the Modern Period ..................................................................... 63 3.2 DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNIQUES .................................................................................. 66 3.2.1 The Russian School ............................................................................................. 66 3.2.2 The American School .......................................................................................... 68 3.2.3 The Manchester Method ..................................................................................... 71 3.2.4 Computerized Facial Reconstruction .................................................................. 73 3.2.5 Variation between Forensic and Archaeological Realms of Re-construction .... 76 3.3 FURTHER THEMES IN THE DISCUSSION AND CRITIQUE OF (ARCHAEOLOGICAL) FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION ............................................................................................................. 80 3.3.1 The Face in the Archaeological Imagination ...................................................... 80 3.3.2 Critique of the use of Facial Reconstructions in the Discipline of Archaeology .................................................................................................................................... 105 CHAPTER FOUR – “THE STARTING POINT”: PREHISTORIC IRELAND AS PROMPTING VISUALITY ................................................................................................ 115 4.1 ANNAGH, CO. LIMERICK ........................................................................................... 119 iii 4.1.1 Site information ................................................................................................. 119 4.1.2 Burial 2 .............................................................................................................. 120 Osteobiography ...................................................................................................... 121 Soft tissue prediction .............................................................................................. 123 Facial Reconstruction ............................................................................................. 128 4.2 THE FACE IN THE NEOLITHIC IRISH ARCHAEOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE: BURIAL PRACTICES AND OSTEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 129 4.3 THE FACE IN NEOLITHIC IRISH MATERIAL CULTURE ................................................ 143 CHAPTER FIVE – THE “ME-AND-OTHER” OR “THE OTHERNESS OF THE OTHER?”: INTERSUBJECTIVITY AND EARLY MEDIEVAL IRELAND ................... 152 5.1 DOOEY, CO. DONEGAL .............................................................................................. 154 5.1.1 Site information ................................................................................................. 154 5.1.2 Skeleton 41A ..................................................................................................... 157 Osteobiography ...................................................................................................... 157 Soft tissue prediction .............................................................................................. 159 Facial Reconstruction ............................................................................................. 164 5.2 OWENBRISTY, CO. GALWAY ..................................................................................... 167 5.2.1 Site information ................................................................................................. 167 5.2.2 Skeleton
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Settentrione 32.Pdf (4.412Mb)
    SETTENTRIONE NUOVA SERIE Rivista di studi italo-finlandesi n. 32 anno 2020 SETTENTRIONE NUOVA SERIE Rivista di studi italo-finlandesi n. 32 anno 2020 SETTENTRIONE NUOVA SERIE. Rivista di studi italo-finlandesi ISSN 1237 - 9964 Pubblicata a cura della Società finlandese di lingua e cultura italiana con contributo finanziario dell’Istituto Italiano di Cultura di Helsinki. Fondatori • Lauri Lindgren – Luigi G. de Anna Direzione culturale • Antonio D. Sciacovelli Redazione • Cecilia Cimmino Settentrione, Lingua e cultura italiana, Università di Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finlandia [email protected], [email protected] ISSN 1237 - 9964 Painosalama Oy, Turku Italian kielen ja kulttuurin seura ry Turku 2020 INDICE pagina Un anno particolare 3 Alessandro Colombo, de signo disegno design: un viaggio italiano 5 Luigi G. de Anna, Il Caravaggio da Roma alla Sicilia, passando per Malta 15 Andrea Rizzi, Sulle tracce di Lenin: le Lettere scandinave e il mito nordico 21 interpretato da Luigi Barzini (1920-1921) Tauno Nurmela, Verso l’Italia di Mussolini 41 Federico Prizzi, Yrjö von Grönhagen, un antropologo finlandese al servizio del 43 III Reich nella Carelia Orientale Nicola Guerra, The Italian SS-fascist Ideology. An ideological Portrait of the 51 Italian Volunteers in the Waffen-SS. A Summary Essay Claudio Mutti, L’Iran e l’Europa 61 Silvio Melani, Tales from ancient bog bodies: witchcraft, physical abnormity and 75 homosexuality during the Northern Iron Age Giovanni Carmine Costabile, ‘Dove sono ora Bucefalo e il prode Alessandro?’ 119 Tolkien
    [Show full text]
  • 9 the Role of the Bog in Ethnic Tourism
    BOGS OF IRELAND text 11/18/03 2:33 pm Page 53 9 THE ROLE OF THE BOG IN ETHNIC TOURISM. BOGS IN THE IRISH PSYCHE. You can take the man out of the bog but you can’t take the bog out of the man. We, the Irish, are bog people. The bog water runs in our veins. The bog represents our collective unconsciousness. The bog is a symbol of our Irishness. It awakens our ancient race memory of pain and suffering, poverty and famine when we were deprived of everything except the bog. This hurts us deeply and makes us uncomfortable and ashamed. To escape this shame we refer to the bog in derisory terms i.e. "He’s only a bogman". But, painful as the past has been, we cannot forget it. Neither do we want to forget it because our past is part of what we are. To the Irish, the bog is also a very beautiful and benign place. We associate quietness, stillness, reflection and otherness with the bog. The bog represents the mystery inside us. When we go there as children, we go with older people. It is the place where age barriers break down. Games are played, stories are told and songs are sung in spite of the back-breaking work. Grown men light fires and make tea, normally women’s work. The simple bread and butter tastes like heavenly food. We stay there all day and it is usually summer. There is a sense of being in migration. The place is physically beautiful.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctoral Thesis Rights © 2015, Katherine E
    UCC Library and UCC researchers have made this item openly available. Please let us know how this has helped you. Thanks! Title Skin and bone: the face in the archaeological imagination Author(s) Beatty, Katherine E. Publication date 2015 Original citation Beatty, K. E. 2015. Skin and bone: the face in the archaeological imagination. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Rights © 2015, Katherine E. Beatty. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Embargo information No embargo required Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2107 from Downloaded on 2021-10-11T04:54:32Z SKIN AND BONE: THE FACE IN THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMAGINATION By Katherine E. Beatty July 2015 Thesis submitted for the qualification of PhD Department of Archaeology National University of Ireland, Cork Head of Department: Professor William O’Brien Supervisor: Dr Barra O’Donnabhain ABSTRACT Title: Skin and Bone: The Face in the Archaeological Imagination Author: Katherine E. Beatty Keywords: facial reconstruction, bioarchaeology, the face, Emmanuel Levinas, Ireland, theoretical archaeology, archaeological imagination Thirteen unique archaeological countenances from Ireland were produced through the Manchester method of facial reconstruction. Their gaze prompts a space for a broad discourse regarding the face found within human and artefactual remains of Ireland. These faces are reminders of the human element which is at the core of the discipline of archaeology. These re-constructions create a voyeuristic relationship with the past. At once sating a curiosity about the past, facial re-constructions also provide a catharsis to our presently situated selves. As powerful visual documents, archaeological facial reconstructions illustrate re-presentations of the past as well as how the present can be connected to the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Cours De Sédimentologie
    La classification des roches sédimentaires F. LES ROCHES ORGANIQUES (charbon, huile et pétrole) La matière organique qui compose l’essentiel des organismes vivants se décompose en présence d’oxygène et donne du dioxyde de carbone et de l’eau selon la réaction suivante: C6H12O6 + 6O2 -> 6CO2 + 6 H2O Il s’agit de la réaction inverse de la photosynthèse qui associe le dioxyde de carbone et l’eau en utilisant la lumière solaire comme énergie et la chlorophylle comme catalyseur pour fabriquer des hydrates de carbone. Les bactéries et les microbes participent à la décomposition de la matière organique et ce dans tous les environnements à l’exception des environnements anoxiques où les conditions anaérobies sont actives très tôt. Comme la plupart des environnements sont oxydants, beaucoup de roches ne contiennent que très peu de matière organique (0,05% dans les grès, 0,3% dans les carbonates et 2% dans les mudstones). Les dépôts organiques modernes Trois types sont connus actuellement, l’humus, la tourbe et les sapropèles. L’humus se forme dans la partie supérieure des sols (voir partie concernant les sols). La décomposition affecte la matière organique et produit des acides humiques qui sont capables de lessiver les roches et les argiles. Il ne forme pas un dépôt organique car il est complètement oxydé avec le temps. La tourbe est une accumulation massive de débris de plantes dans des zones de marais. Les conditions anaérobiques préservent de manière extraordinaire la matière organique. La tourbe se forme à toutes les latitudes mais le climat froid ralentit encore l’activité des bactéries comme en témoigne les tourbes du Canada et du Nord de l’Europe développées au cours de l’Holocène.
    [Show full text]
  • Bog Bodies Appears to Be the Hope Couple, Who Died in a Snowstorm in the Peak District of Northern Britain in 1674 (See Chapter 2)
    249 Disquieting exhibits: displaying 8 the dead Introduction: ‘exposed for a sight’ The first attested ‘exhibiting’ of bog bodies appears to be the Hope couple, who died in a snowstorm in the Peak District of northern Britain in 1674 (see Chapter 2). Following their burial on the spot when the snow had melted, they lay undisturbed in the ‘peat moss’ for ‘twenty- eight years and nine months’ when the curiosity of the locals got the better of them. Dr Charles Balguy, the medic from Peterborough who had grown up in Hope, attributes this interest to the parish- ioners’ knowledge of peat’s preservative properties. Once the marvel of their flesh and clothing had been seen, their fame spread, and as Balguy (1735: 413– 14) puts it, ‘They were afterwards exposed for a Sight 20 Years, though they were much changed in that time’. The vicar Wormald, who would later inter them in Hope’s churchyard (once the grazier’s appalled grandson had coughed up the fee) told the antiquarian Samuel Pegge that ‘they were expos’d to ye view of people who came every summer to see them for the space of 20 years longer’ (Wormald’s affi- davit of 1758: see Figure 2.2, Derbyshire Record Office manuscript ref. D1828/P1 449/3). As with the Drumkeeragh bog body seventy years later, visitors took curios or souvenirs, particularly ‘relics’ of clothing, and their disproportionate interest in the corpse of the young woman exacerbated her decay. One of those visitors was Dr Bourn of Chesterfield, who in 1716, as we have learned, pocketed one of the woman’s teeth as well as sending his account to Balguy (1735: 414)! Wormald himself attended their final exhumation in 1722 (‘I had the Curiosity myself to go to the place & see ’em taken up’ (Wormald’s affidavit of 1758: see Figure 2.2, Derbyshire Record Office manuscript ref.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.7.1.1 Background 2.7.1.2 Methodology
    Bord na Móna Drehid WMF Intensification and Extension- EIS 2.7 Ecology 2.7.1 Introduction 2.7.1.1 Background TOBIN Consulting Engineers were commissioned by Bord na Móna to undertake the Environmental Impact Assessment for the intensification and extension to the Drehid Waste Management Facility in County Kildare. The ecological assessment, as reported herein, was carried out on the areas of lands entailing the previously permitted landfill footprint, the proposed landfill extension area, the previously permitted sand and gravel borrow area and the previously permitted clay borrow area. For the purposes of this EIS, this assessment area is referred to as the ‘development site’. It should be noted that an ecological assessment for the EIS to accompany the original application for the facility was also undertaken. This previous assessment covered a wider study area to include all of the land owned by Bord na Móna in the southern section of the Timahoe Bog (referred to as the ‘study area’). This previous assessment has been considered in the preparation of the current EIS. This assessment was conducted in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Guidelines on the Information to be contained in Environmental Impact Statements (EPA, 2002), EPA Advice Notes on Current Practice (in the preparation of Environmental Impact Statements) (EPA, 2003), and also in general accordance with the Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the United Kingdom For inspection purposes only. (Institute of Ecology and EnvironmentalConsent of copyright ownerManagement, required for any other2006). use. 2.7.1.2 Methodology This ecological assessment comprised both a desktop study and field surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bog Bodies
    Curious Dragonfly Monthly Science Newsletter The Bog Bodies Bog Bodies of the Iron Age Archeologists and scholars in North- ern Europe have been investigating a mystery dating back 10,000 years, all the way to the Iron Age. Hundreds of bodies were discovered buried in the peat moss wetlands around the area. These "bog bodies" have been found in regions of Ireland, the United King- dom, Germany, the Netherlands, and most particularly, in Denmark. Due to a lack of oxygen and to the anti-microbial properties of the peat moss, the bodies are well-preserved. Facial features, fingerprints, hair, nails and other identifiable traits are impressively preserved. With no written records from Iron Age Europeans (800B.C. to A.D.200), scientists can only speculate how and why the bodies ended up where they did. Cremation was customary at that time, so bog burials must have a special meaning. Why do you think the ancient people buried their bodies in the bog? What is a Bog? A bog is one of the four main types of wetlands. A bog is made up of peat, dense layers of decayed vegetaion, mostly bog moss and low shrubs, which settle at the bottom of pools and is compressed over cen- turies by the weight of more plant matter accumulating on top. The only water source comes from precipitation, and the water is highly acidic, is low in nutrients, and has very little oxygen. Who are They? "Bog bodies" is a term commonly used to classify the hundreds of human remains from Northwestern Europe that date to the Iron Age (500 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Trowel XII Logo
    Trowel Volume XII 2010 Edited by Andrea Watters and Niamh Ní Riain Cover Illustration: Irene Carroll. Based on an Archaeological Consultancy Services Ltd computer-generated reconstruction of an Iron Age post enclosure excavated by Aidan O'Connell at Lismullin, Co. Meath. For enquiries please contact: The Editors, Trowel c/o School of Archaeology Newman Building Belfield Dublin 4 Ireland. Email: [email protected] Web: www.trowelucd.com Published in 2010 by Andrea Watters and Niamh Ní Riain. © 2010 The Individual Contributors ISSN Number: 0791-1017. Contents Editors Foreword 1 Sponsorship Acknowledgements 2 Biographies 3 Articles The Archaeology of Ambiguity 9 Andrew May Dying for their King: A critical analysis of the relationship 20 between Iron Age bog bodies and boundaries Sarah Forde Transformations: assessing the relationship between 31 ironworking and burial in early medieval Ireland Margaret Williams Never trust a text: Rediscovering “De Oratorio” in Hisperica 46 Famina Oliver Reuss 56 Late Iron Age/Early Medieval Burial Grounds Claire Kavanagh The Round Towers of Ireland: Date, Origin, Functions and 67 Symbolism Russell Ó Riagáin i Turning stone into Bread: Harrylock Millstone Quarry, The Hook 82 Peninsula, County Wexford. Niall Colfer The Murder of Murchad Ua Maelsechnaill: a re-examination of 98 the Irish Round Towers Nienke Van Etten. With your shield or on it: An experimental approach to the 109 Greek Hoplite shield Kevin Rowan De Groote. The Ancient Greek Kopis and Machaira 120 Catherine Sara Parnell Occupant, house and state
    [Show full text]
  • Faces of the Past and the Ethical Display of Bog Bodies in “Kingship and Sacrifice”
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-2019 Faces of the Past and the Ethical Display of Bog Bodies in “Kingship and Sacrifice” Julia Marie Walsh University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Walsh, Julia Marie, "Faces of the Past and the Ethical Display of Bog Bodies in “Kingship and Sacrifice”" (2019). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/2290 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Faces of the Past and the Ethical Display of Bog Bodies in “Kingship and Sacrifice” Julia Walsh Chancellor’s Honors Program Undergraduate Thesis The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 2019 Walsh 2 Table of Contents Introduction … 3 Chapter One … 5 Chapter Two … 12 Chapter Three … 15 Conclusion … 24 Bibliography … 26 Appendix A … 28 Appendix B … 29 Walsh 3 Introduction Bog bodies are unique natural phenomenon. Localized, mythologized, and often misunderstood. As such they have captivated the cultural imagination for centuries for their blank and uncanny nature, appearing in the works of Seamus Heaney and Hozier alike. They emerge from the depths of peat bogs with eerie countenances – creatures of liminal realms, the past, and the undercarriage of ancient natural formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Buried in a Bog Free
    FREE BURIED IN A BOG PDF Sheila Connolly | 293 pages | 05 Feb 2013 | Berkley Books | 9780425251898 | English | New York, United States Buried in a Bog - - Audible Premium Plus. Cancel anytime. Bostonian Maura is beginning to feel settled in her new Irish home, just in time for summer tourist season to bring fresh business to her pub. But the first traveler to arrive is thirsty for more than just a pint of Guinness. Althea Melville is hot on the trail of a long-lost Van Dyck Buried in a Bog. Maura agrees to help Althea meet with the residents at the local manor house, the most likely location of the missing art. But when the manor's gardener is found murdered, Maura wonders what Althea's real motives are. By: Sheila Connolly. Summer is ending in County Cork, Ireland, and with it the tourist season. Expat Maura Donovan is determined to keep Sullivan's Pub in the black as the days grow shorter - but how? When she hears that the place was once a hot spot for Irish musicians who'd come play in the back room, she wonders if bringing back live music might be Sullivan's salvation. After calling Ireland home for six months, Boston expat Maura Donovan still has a lot to learn about Irish ways - and Sullivan's Pub is her classroom. Maura didn't only inherit a business, she inherited a tight-knit community. Buried in a Bog when a tragedy strikes, it's the talk of the pub. A local farmer, out for a stroll on the beach with his young son, has mysteriously disappeared.
    [Show full text]
  • European Bog Bodies: from the Iron Age Peat Bog
    European Bog Bodies: From the Iron Age peat bog to the 21st century Samantha Brown: University of Wyoming Dr. Rick Weathermon: University of Wyoming Senior Honors Project 04/24/2017 Abstract: Well preserved bodies dating from the prehistoric era to the 19th century have been found across northwestern Europe; specifically in the peat bogs of Ireland, Great Britain and Denmark. These discoveries were especially prevalent in the late 19th and early 20th centuries when mass peat extraction was at its height. Many of these finds have been dated to the Iron Age and have previously been attributed to patterns of ritual violence. This paper focuses on three finds from the Iron Age: Graubelle man, Tollund man, and the Weerdinge couple. This project intends to exhibit the types of information which have been and can be gleaned from the European bog bodies, and by doing so illustrate that Archaeologists have a responsibility to examine these individuals. Introduction: European bog bodies have garnered the attention of archaeologists, anthropologists, and forensic pathologists alike for years. This fascination is associated mainly with the level of preservation of these individuals. The discovery of these individuals is spread across northwestern Europe concentrating in Ireland, England, Scotland and Denmark, and they have been dated across history dated as early as 8000 BCE and as last as World War I (Killgrove 2016). This range of dates and varying levels of preservation have the potential to provide incredible scientific and cultural insight both historically and prehistorically. One important aspect to address is the process and quality of preservation. The unique preservation associated with these individuals gives forensic scientists the ability to analyze and observe unique taphonomic processes associated with the bog.
    [Show full text]
  • YEAR 11 Ancient History Investigating Ancient History
    YEAR 11 Ancient History Investigating Ancient History Due Date: Thursday 2nd April Assessment Name: Investigating Ancient History – Source Task Mark: x/30 Weighting: 30 % SYLLABUS OUTCOMES TO BE ASSESSED: AH11-3 A student analyses the role of historical features, individuals and groups in shaping the past. AH11-5 A student examines the significance of historical features, people, places, events and developments of the Ancient World. AH-6 A student analyses and interprets different types of sources for evidence to support an historical account or argument. AH11-10 A student discusses and evaluates differing interpretations and representations of the past. DIRECTIVES TO BE ASSESSED: Analyse – Identify components and the relationship between them Examine – Enquire into Interpret – Draw meaning from Evaluate – Make a judgement based on criteria TASK DESCRIPTION: Select ONE case study of Ancient Human Remains from the following list: Scythian Mummies Osterby Head Tollund Man Rendswuhren Fen Man Inuit Boy Datgan Man Kayhausen Boy Husbake Man Elling Woman Clonycavan Man Emmer=Erfscheidenveen Man Old Croghan Man Huldremose Woman Meenybradden Woman Neu Versen Man Gallagh Man - Locate sources and enquire into the specific details and circumstances surrounding your body. - Using Google Sites, create an online microsite devoted to informing visitors about your chosen body. - Your Site should use multimedia, and interactive components to engage and educate its visitors. Your site also requires a special ‘Primary Education’ section aimed at K-6 students with information and diagrams designed to engage their interest. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA – STUDENT CHECKLIST: You will be assessed on your ability to: - Use sources to create an engaging and informative microsite dedicated to your chosen body.
    [Show full text]