General Convocation 37Th Annual Meeting Minutes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Convocation 37Th Annual Meeting Minutes HERIOT-WATT UNIVERSITY MINUTES of the thirty-seventh Annual Meeting of the General Convocation held in the Auditorium,Edinburgh Business School,Edinburgh Campus, Riccarton, on Wednesday, 17 March 2004, attended by the following members: In the Chair: The Rt Hon The Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Chancellor of the University Principal J S Archer Professor J E L Simmons Ms S A Ashby Professor B S Wherrett Mr A P Buchan Professor I Mason Mr J B Buchanan Mrs I G Brydie Dr V R F de Lima Mr G Brown Ms J M Hill Mr G J N Gemmell Ms M Rudd Ms K Lavery Ms M D Thomson Dr A Bell Mr J Alexander Professor A M Close Mr J Millard Professor B Edwards Mr B Roberts Professor P John Ms K M Patrick Professor M F Lang Professor G S Milne Dr A Lyndon Professor R T Beaty Dr J M Mair Professor A A I Wedderburn Mr D H Marwick Sir Peter Heatly Professor G Pender Mr R J Taylor Professor B G D Smart Dr S K Monro Professor A C Todd Mr R Harper Professor A C Walker Ms M R W Caden Professor J I B Wilson Ms K M Dinnis Professor J Wolfram Professor J E McLachlan Professor E Brown Mr J Stuart Mr J A G Fiddes Ms E J M Broughton Dr N Irons Mr D H Guest Mr D Riddell Ms M P Henton Mr P L Wilson Mrs L Kirkwood-Smith Mr A G Hood Dr A Boyd Ms A Hetherington Ms S Mackenzie Ms R McSween Mr A Myers Mr J D Polson Mr A L Richardson Mrs M Stenhouse Ms M Watson Mrs M S M Thornton Ms F Williams Ms K J Wilson 1 1 WELCOME AND APOLOGIES The Chancellor welcomed those attending the thirty-seventh annual meeting, expressing the hope that all present would find the proceedings stimulating. The Secretary of the University, Mr P L Wilson, indicated that apologies for absence had been received from 70 members. As in past years, interested members of the University who were not members of the Convocation had been invited to attend the meeting as observers. 2 OBITUARIES The Chancellor referred with sadness to the deaths since the last meeting of a number of friends and servants of the University, including a number of honorary graduates. Maclean Fraser The University had noted with great sadness the death in service of Maclean Fraser, since 1970 lecturer and senior lecturer in the Department of Accountancy and Finance, latterly the School of Management and Languages. He was closely associated with the development and operation of the distance learning BA, and would be greatly missed by many colleagues and students. Dr Andrew M Russell An honorary graduate of the University (D.Univ 1989) and former member of the University Court, Dr Russell had served on Court and on the Finance Committee from March 1980 to July 1989 and as Chairman of the Finance Committee from August 1983 to July 1989. Professor William Cochran An honorary graduate of the University (DSc 1992), Professor Cochran did pioneering work in the 1950’s and 1960’s underpinning research on many of the scientific problems later the subject of Nobel prizes won by others, including the structure of DNA.He made fundamental contributions to several areas of research including crystal structures, xray scattering, ferroelectricity in crystals, and latterly, condensed matter physics. Dr Wilhelmina Barns-Graham A recent honorary graduate of the University, Dr Barns-Graham had received the degree of Doctor of Letters in July 2003 in recognition of her distinguished artistic career in the field of painting. Professor Sir Robert Boyd Professor Sir Robert Boyd FRS, an honorary graduate of the University (DSc 1979), was a pioneer of space physics and a founder of the European Space Research Organisation, playing also a leading part in the development of its successor body, the European Space Agency. Dorothy, Lady Ross The University had noted with great sadness the death, on 7 February 2004, of Lady Ross, whose association with the University was most active in the period of service which Lord Ross offered to the University as member and Chairman of the Court from 1978 until 1990, but had continued to be expressed in warm friendship and staunch support for the University in subsequent years. 2 3 QUEEN’S BIRTHDAY AND NEW YEAR HONOURS The Chancellor referred with pleasure to the following honours conferred since the 36th Annual Meeting: Queen’s Birthday Honours 2003 The Court had noted with pleasure the conferral of Honours on members and associates of the University as follows: Dr J McClure, member of Convocation and of Court-CBE Professor G H O Palmer, School of Life Sciences – OBE Professor R Beaty, Member of Convocation – OBE Dr Elizabeth Blackadder, Honorary Graduate – DBE Dr John Tusa, Honorary Graduate – Knighthood New Year Honours 2004 Rt Hon Menzies Campbell PC MP, Member of Convocation – Knight Bachelor 4 MINUTES The Minutes of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Convocation had been circulated with the Agenda, and were approved by the meeting. 5 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE COURT 5.1 Appointments to the Convocation With reference to Minute 5.2 of the Minutes of the thirty-sixth Annual Meeting of the General Convocation, held on 21 March 2003, the Convocation noted that the proposals transmitted by the Court to the Privy Council for approval, and amended slightly in correspondence, had been approved. The Court might identify up to fifteen MSPs to be appointed under the new paragraph 1(4)(n) of the Statute. The following members had accepted the Court’s invitation in terms of this paragraph to serve on the Convocation: Ms Sarah Boyack, MSP Mr Robin Harper, MSP Ms Fiona Hyslop, MSP Mr David Davidson, MSP Mr Jeremy Purvis, MSP David McLetchie, MSP Mr Alasdair Morgan, MSP 3 The fifteen members of the Scottish Parliament invited to join the Convocation had been identified in terms of geographical representation, and of ministerial and committee responsibilities as follows: Edinburgh Borders Others Rt Hon Lord James Douglas-Hamilton Mr Jeremy Purvis Rt Hon Jim Wallace Mr Robin Harper Mr Euan Robson Mr D Davidson Ms Fiona Hyslop Ms Rhona Brankin Mr David McLetchie Committee Chairs Ministers Mr Alasdair Morgan Mr Lewis McDonald Ms Sarah Boyack Mr Ross Finnie Mr Malcolm Chisholm Mr Frank McAveety Those declining had cited possible difficulties with conflict of interests or other commitments. The Court had agreed that the following religious and cultural groups be invited to be represented under the provisions of the new paragraph 1(4)(o) : religious communities – Muslim, Jewish, Roman Catholic, Episcopalian, Baptist, Hindu cultural groups – Chinese, Norwegian The following new members had been identified in terms of this paragraph Miss Mary Rose Caden Mr Amrit Lal Professor Jeff McLachlan Mr John Stuart Ms Kirsti Dinnis No nominations had emerged from correspondence directed towards the Muslim, Jewish or Chinese communities 6 MEMBERSHIP OF CONVOCATION The Chancellor referred to the information set out in Agenda Paper B for the meeting, relating to changes in the membership of the Convocation other than by election or co-option. These changes were embodied in the Convocation’s list of members as at 1 February 2004, circulated with the Agenda. A number of corrections had been notified since the circulation of the papers which had been noted for the future. Notable among these was the retiral of the Earl of Morton , and his replacement, as Lord Lieutenant of West Lothian, by Mrs Isobel Brydie MBE, attending the present meeting. 7 ELECTION OF MEMBER OF CONVOCATION TO COURT The Chancellor referred to the provision of Statute XII.I(v), set out in Agenda Paper C for the meeting, that the Convocation might appoint four of its members to the Court of the University, and to the two vacancies presently arising in consequence of the expiry of appointment of Mr Jobson and Lord Johnston. 4 The Secretary of the University reported that one eligible nomination had been received, relating to THE HON LORD JOHNSTON. In accordance with Clause 1(v) of Statute XII, Lord Johnston had therefore been elected to serve as a member of the Court appointed by the Convocation for the period until the fortieth Meeting of the Convocation in 2007. 8 CO-OPTION TO MEMBERSHIP OF CONVOCATION In accordance with Statute XI.1(5)(a), Convocation might co-opt to its membership such other persons, not exceeding six in all, who should hold office for a period of three years and should be eligible for re-appointment. Present members in this category were: Dr J McClure, co-opted for the period to 31 July 2004. Dr I C Ritchie, co-opted for the period to 31 July 2004. Mr R W Thomson, co-opted for the period to 31 July 2005 Mrs E J M Broughton, co-opted for the period to 31 July 2006. Mr D H Guest, co-opted for the period to 31 July 2006. There were therefore three vacancies. The Secretary of the University reported that at the closing date for receipt of nominations, three eligible nominations had been received. These were Mr G Bissett Dr J McClure Mr A B Taylor who had therefore been appointed in accordance with Clause 1(5)(a) of Statute XI to serve as members co-opted by the Convocation for the period 1 August 2004 to 31 July 2007. 9 ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE UNIVERSITY 2003 Before speaking on a number of the salient developments and successes enjoyed by the University in the past year, the Principal gave an outline summary of the University’s financial position, set out in full in the Accounts for the 12 months to 31 July 2003, circulated to Members of the Convocation.
Recommended publications
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • Lettre Conjointe De 1.080 Parlementaires De 25 Pays Européens Aux Gouvernements Et Dirigeants Européens Contre L'annexion De La Cisjordanie Par Israël
    Lettre conjointe de 1.080 parlementaires de 25 pays européens aux gouvernements et dirigeants européens contre l'annexion de la Cisjordanie par Israël 23 juin 2020 Nous, parlementaires de toute l'Europe engagés en faveur d'un ordre mondial fonde ́ sur le droit international, partageons de vives inquietudeś concernant le plan du president́ Trump pour le conflit israeló -palestinien et la perspective d'une annexion israélienne du territoire de la Cisjordanie. Nous sommes profondement́ preoccuṕ eś par le preć edent́ que cela creerait́ pour les relations internationales en geń eral.́ Depuis des decennies,́ l'Europe promeut une solution juste au conflit israeló -palestinien sous la forme d'une solution a ̀ deux Etats,́ conformement́ au droit international et aux resolutionś pertinentes du Conseil de securit́ e ́ des Nations unies. Malheureusement, le plan du president́ Trump s'ecarté des parametres̀ et des principes convenus au niveau international. Il favorise un controlê israelień permanent sur un territoire palestinien fragmente,́ laissant les Palestiniens sans souverainete ́ et donnant feu vert a ̀ Israel̈ pour annexer unilateralement́ des parties importantes de la Cisjordanie. Suivant la voie du plan Trump, la coalition israelienné recemment́ composeé stipule que le gouvernement peut aller de l'avant avec l'annexion des̀ le 1er juillet 2020. Cette decisioń sera fatale aux perspectives de paix israeló -palestinienne et remettra en question les normes les plus fondamentales qui guident les relations internationales, y compris la Charte des Nations unies. Nous sommes profondement́ preoccuṕ eś par l'impact de l'annexion sur la vie des Israelienś et des Palestiniens ainsi que par son potentiel destabilisateuŕ dans la regioń aux portes de notre continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports to Conference Spring 2015 Contents
    REPORTS TO CONFERENCE SPRING 2015 CONTENTS Contents Page Federal Conference Committee……….……………………….……………..4 Federal Policy Committee......................…………...……………………......9 Federal Executive.............………………... ………………………………...17 Federal Finance and Administration Committee………….….…..............25 Parliamentary Party (Commons)……………………………. ……………...29 …………. Parliamentary Party (Lords)………………………..………………………...35 Parliamentary Party (Europe)………………………….……………………..41 Campaign for Gender Balance……………………………………………...45 Diversity Engagement Group……………………………………………..…50 3 Federal Conference Committee Glasgow 2015 Last autumn we went back to Glasgow for the second year running. As in 2013 we received a superb welcome from the city. We continue to ask all attendees to complete an online feedback questionnaire. A good percentage complete this but I would urge all members to take the time to participate. It is incredibly useful to the conference office and FCC and does influence whether we visit a venue again and if we do, what changes we need to try and make. FCC Changes Following the committee elections at the end of last year there were a number of changes to the membership of FCC. Qassim Afzal, Louise Bloom, Sal Brinton, Prateek Buch, Veronica German, Evan Harris and David Rendel either did not restand or were not re-elected. All played a valuable role on FCC and will be missed. We welcome Jon Ball, Zoe O’Connell and Mary Reid onto the committee as directly elected members. FPC have elected two new representatives onto FCC and we welcome back Linda Jack and Jeremy Hargreaves in these roles. Both have previously served on FCC so are familiar with the way we work. One of the FE reps is also new with Kaavya Kaushik joining James Gurling as an FE rep on FCC.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicol Stephen Speech to Liberal Democrats Spring Conference 2008
    Nicol Stephen Speech to Liberal Democrats Spring Conference 2008 As we meet here in Aviemore we have good reasons to be confident. In Nick Clegg an outstanding new leader, with an inspirational first conference speech determined to double our number of MPs at Westminster And in our MPs the strongest team of powerful campaigners. To one of whom I give special mention today. He gave exceptional leadership at a time when our party needed it the most. Menzies Campbell has given huge commitment to this party and we give him our heartfelt thanks. At Holyrood, we now have five new MSPs – a young, positive, dynamic team and most spectacular of all our outstanding success in Dunfermline for Jim Tolson MSP – until this week the biggest earthquake we had seen for a generation. Reasons to be confident And none more so than our growing strength in local government Those Labour fiefdoms swept away after decades of one party rule. Now 13 councils with Liberal Democrats in government And some of Scotland’s most important councils led by Liberal Democrats the great cities of Edinburgh and Aberdeen; Aberdeenshire council all led by Liberal Democrats Our councillors do a fantastic job. We should thank all 167 of them for all that they have done - and do - to build the strength of our party. The biggest reason of all for our confidence and optimism is an enduring one. It is about what unites us all It is about liberalism The rights of the individual, decentralising power, fighting for communities standing up against injustice freedom, fairness, honesty the great values of liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Lords' Interests
    REGISTER OF LORDS’ INTERESTS _________________ The following Members of the House of Lords have registered relevant interests under the code of conduct: ABERDARE, LORD Category 10: Non-financial interests (a) Director, F.C.M. Limited (recording rights) Category 10: Non-financial interests (c) Trustee, National Library of Wales Category 10: Non-financial interests (e) Chairman and Trustee, Berlioz Society Trustee, St John Cymru-Wales Trustee, West Wycombe Charitable Trust Trustee, Stephen Dodgson Trust (promotes continued awareness/performance of works of composer Stephen Dodgson) Chairman and Trustee, Berlioz Sesquicentenary Committee (music) ADAMS OF CRAIGIELEA, BARONESS Nil No registrable interests ADDINGTON, LORD Category 1: Directorships Chairman, Microlink PC (UK) Ltd (computing and software) Member of and Adviser to the Board of X-Forces (XF) Ltd (supporting ex-forces and their families to start up businesses) Category 10: Non-financial interests (d) President (formerly Vice President), British Dyslexia Association Category 10: Non-financial interests (e) Vice President, UK Sports Association Vice President, Lakenham Hewitt Rugby Club Trustee, The Atlas Foundation (registered charity; seeks to improve lives of disadvantaged people across the world) ADEBOWALE, LORD Category 1: Directorships Director, Leadership in Mind Ltd (business activities; certain income from services provided personally by the Member is or will be paid to this company; see category 4(a)) Director, IOCOM UK Ltd (visual business platform) Independent Non-executive
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Tram (Line Two) Bill Committee
    EDINBURGH TRAM (LINE TWO) BILL COMMITTEE Tuesday 29 June 2004 (Afternoon) Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2004. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Tuesday 29 June 2004 Col. INTERESTS............................................................................................................................................................ 1 CONVENER ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 DEPUTY CONVENER .............................................................................................................................................. 3 ITEMS IN PRIVATE ................................................................................................................................................. 4 THE EDINBURGH TRAM (LINE TWO) BILL COMMITTEE 1st Meeting 2004, Session 2 OLDEST COMMITTEE
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Parliament Election
    The Scottish Parliament Election Report 3 May 2007 and Analysis The Scottish Parliament Election Report and 3 May 2007 Analysis The Scottish Parliament Election 3 May 2007 3 Preface The 2007 election produced a Parliament that Although the Electoral Reform Society would like broadly reflected the views of Scottish voters. to see the Scottish Parliament elected using the While the number of rejected ballot papers was Single Transferable Vote (STV) method, as was a serious cause for concern, it should not di- the case for the local government elections, the vert attention from an election in which the ac- Additional Member System (AMS) has given tual system worked tolerably well. No Scottish Scotland a representative Parliament. The mi- party had the support of anything like a major- nority SNP administration that has been formed ity of voters, and as a consequence, no party will need to seek the support of the other parties now has anything approaching a majority of in order to enact legislation, and that will ensure the seats. If the First-Past-the-Post system that decisions taken reflect the views of a much (which we still use to elect our MPs), had been higher proportion of voters than would otherwise used, Labour would have won an outright ma- have been the case – very much in keeping with jority of seats, despite only having had the sup- the four founding principles of devolution: the port of little more than 30 per cent of voters. sharing of power, accountability, openness and equal opportunities. This report has been prepared by Dr Martin Steven, Research Officer for ERS Scotland, with contributions from Christine McCartney and David Orr, and additional assistance from Ashley Dé, Dr Ken Ritchie, Amy Rodger, George Sheriff and Laura Woods.
    [Show full text]
  • Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21St Century
    Serving Scotland Better: Better: Scotland Serving Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century Final Report – June 2009 Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century 21st the in Kingdom United the and Scotland Commission on Scottish Devolution Secretariat 1 Melville Crescent Edinburgh EH3 7HW 2009 June – Report Final Tel: (020) 7270 6759 or (0131) 244 9073 Email: [email protected] This Report is also available online at: www.commissiononscottishdevolution.org.uk © Produced by the Commission on Scottish Devolution 75% Printed on paper consisting of 75% recycled waste Presented to the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament and to the Secretary of State for Scotland, on behalf of Her Majesty’s Government, June 2009 Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century | Final Report – June 2009 Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century It was a privilege to be asked to chair a Commission to consider how the Scottish Parliament could serve the people of Scotland better. It is a task that has taken just over a year and seen my colleagues and me travelling the length and breadth of Scotland. It has been very hard work – but also very rewarding. Many of the issues are complex, but at the heart of this is our desire to find ways to help improve the lives of the people of Scotland. The reward has been in meeting so many people and discussing the issues with them – at formal evidence sessions, at informal meetings, and at engagement events across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report October 2011–September 2013
    HOUSE OF LORDS APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT October 2011 to September 2013 House of Lords Appointments Commission Page 3 Contents Section 1: The Appointments Commission 5 Section 2: Appointments of non-party-political peers 8 Section 3: Vetting party-political nominees 11 Annex A: Biographies of the Commission 14 Annex B: Individuals vetted by the Commission 16 and appointed to the House of Lords [Group photo] Page 4 Section 1 The Appointments Commission 1. In May 2000 the Prime Minister established the House of Lords Appointments Commission as an independent, advisory, non-departmental public body. Commission Membership 2. The Commission has seven members, including the Chairman. Three members represent the main political parties and ensure that the Commission has expert knowledge of the House of Lords. The other members, including the Chairman, are independent of government and political parties. The independent members were appointed in October 2008 by open competition, in accordance with the code of the Commissioner for Public Appointments. The party-political members are all members of the House of Lords and were nominated by the respective party leader in November 2010 for three year terms. 3. The terms of all members therefore come to an end in the autumn of 2013. 4. Biographies of the Commission members can be seen at Annex A. 5. The Commission is supported by a small secretariat at 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ. Role of the House of Lords Appointments Commission 6. The role of the Commission is to: make recommendations for the appointment of non-party-political members of the House of Lords; and vet for propriety recommendations to the House of Lords, including those put forward by the political parties and Prime Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports to Conference
    The cost of not Reports to choosing our greener options Conference Every year for Conference, we spend around £30,000 and use Autumn Conference 2014 over 2 tonnes of FSC® recycled paper on printing copies of Glasgow, 4th - 8th October agendas, directories, policy papers, and reports to conference. Hundreds of our members are already selecting our Green Pack and our online-only options. Why not join them next time and get your papers digitally at: www.libdems.org.uk/autumnconferencepapers Reports to Conference Autumn 2014 ISBN 978-1-907046-91-9 Please note: there is no Federal Appeals Panel report within this report, because no Federal Appeals were held in the year running up to this conference. 2 REPORTS TO CONFERENCE AUTUMN 2014 CONTENTS Contents Federal Conference Committee……….……………………….……………..4 Federal Policy Committee......................…………...……………………....11 Federal Executive.............………………... ………………………………...18 Federal Finance and Administration Committee………….….…..............24 Federal Party Accounts…….…….…p(1)-(25) (inserted between 30 & 31) The Liberal Democrats Ltd…………………..………………………………31 Parliamentary Party (Commons)……………………………. ……………...34 Parliamentary Party (Lords)………………………..………………………...39 Parliamentary Party (Europe)………………………….……………………..43 Campaign for Gender Balance……………………………………………...45 Diversity Engagement Group……………………………………………..…50 3 Federal Conference Committee York 2014 This spring we held our conference in York for the first time. It proved to be a very popular venue receiving excellent feedback. Just over 25% of attendees completed the online questionnaire which is sent to all members attending. This document is incredibly useful to the conference office and FCC and I would urge all members to take the time to complete it. FCC continues to keep a close eye on the number of debates on the agenda against non-debate items such as Ministerial speeches and Q&A items.
    [Show full text]
  • Sppa/S3/09/6/A Standards, Procedures and Public
    SPPA/S3/09/6/A STANDARDS, PROCEDURES AND PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS COMMITTEE AGENDA 6th Meeting, 2009 (Session 3) Tuesday 28 April 2009 The Committee will meet at 2.15 pm in Committee Room 6. 1. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take item 5 in private and to consider a draft report on its Hybrid Bills inquiry in private at future meetings. 2. Cross-Party Groups: The Committee will consider applications for recognition from three proposed Cross-Party Groups. 3. Annual report: The Committee will consider a draft annual report for the Parliament year from 9 May 2008 to 8 May 2009. 4. Review of Section 2 of the Code of Conduct (in private): The Committee will receive a briefing. 5. Hybrid Bills inquiry: The Committee will consider written evidence received. 6. Accuracy of contributions in parliamentary proceedings (in private): The Committee will consider a draft report. Gillian Baxendine/Alison Walker Clerks to the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee Room TG.01 The Scottish Parliament Edinburgh Tel: 0131 348 5239 Email: [email protected] SPPA/S3/09/6/A The papers for this meeting are as follows— Agenda item 2 Note by the Clerk SPPA/S3/09/6/1 Agenda item 3 Draft annual report SPPA/S3/09/6/2 (P) Agenda item 5 Written evidence SPPA/S3/09/6/3 (P) Note by the Clerk SPPA/S3/09/6/4 (P) Agenda item 6 Draft report SPPA/S3/09/6/5 (P) SPPA/S3/09/6/1 Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee 6th Meeting, 2009 (Session 3) Tuesday 28 April 2009 Cross-Party Group applications Introduction 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Power and People in the Uk Constitution
    POWER AND PEOPLE IN THE UK CONSTITUTION Seminar on Thursday 29th June 12.30-5.00pm, Attlee Suite, Portcullis House POWER AND PEOPLE IN THE UK CONSTITUTION Seminar on Thursday 29th June 12.30-5.00pm, Attlee Suite, Portcullis House Hosted by Electoral Reform Society with former members of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Devolution, Decentralisation and Reform; Local Government Association; RSA; Involve Context Despite huge constitutional changes taking place, important questions remain concerning the role of the people in constitution making. From the recent election of the first ever ‘metro-mayors’ to continued disagreement about the form Brexit should take, the voice of citizens is often lacking in these momentous debates. With this in mind, we are organising a seminar in London comprised of civil servants, politicians, academics, campaigners and democracy practitioners to discover how we can advance understanding of, and promote good practice in, the realm of democratic engagement. The questions raised about where powers will be held once transferred from EU institutions, the possibility of a second Scottish independence referendum, the functioning of the new mayoralties, and the subsequent calling of a UK general election on June 8th make the issue of public involvement in the UK constitution more vital than ever. This event will be a post-election examination of the issue of where powers lie within and between the nations of the UK and one year after the EU referendum examine what role there is for the public in shaping the future of UK democracy. The event will address two main questions: 1. Where should powers lie within and between nations once Britain is no longer an EU member? 2.
    [Show full text]