DOCSLIB.ORG

Suffolk Local Access Forum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LAF 11/18 Suffolk Local Access Forum Title: Letter to Independent Panel on Forestry Meeting Date: 14 July 2011 Author/Contact: David Falk Venue: Aspall Room, Kerrison Conference Centre, Stoke Road, Thorndon, Nr Eye, Suffolk, IP23 7JG SLAF SLAF Suffolk Local Access Forum PO Box 872 Ipswich Suffolk IP1 9JW To the Right Reverend James Jones, Bishop of Liverpool, Tel: 01473 264759 chairman of the independent panel Fax: 01473 216877 on forestry. Email: [email protected] Web: By email. http://www.suffolk.gov.uk/Environment/Public RightsOfWay/SuffolkLocalAccessForum Your Ref: Our Ref: Date: 16 June 2011 Dear Chairman From the chairman of the Suffolk Local Access Forum. I am writing on behalf of the Suffolk Local Access Forum (SLAF). Local access forums are statutorily prescribed bodies, introduced by s94 and s95 of the Countryside and Rights of Way (CROW) Act 2000. Their main function is to advise their appointing authority as to the improvement of public access to land in that area for the purposes of open-air recreation and the enjoyment of the area. Local access forums comprise appointed members who represent both users of local rights of way or access land and owners and occupiers of access land or land encompassing local rights of way. SLAF understand that the Panel has recently opened its doors for views on forests and woods and announced forest visits. The forum further understands that following your second meeting, you have announced initial visits to the Forest of Dean, Northumberland and Kent. The Suffolk Local Access Forum wishes to convey its views to the panel on the future of the public forest estate (PFE) in Suffolk, in particular on the future of public access for all those groups currently enjoying access in the county’s woodland and forest, whether by right, permission or de facto. Providing independent advice on access to the countryside in Suffolk LAF 11/18 Suffolk has extensive tracts of forest in the west of the county around Thetford, and in the east of the county within the Suffolk Coast and Heaths AONB. Perhaps I could start by giving you a flavour of the PFE in those areas, and the access enjoyed therein. Thetford Forest In putting its successful case together in 2008/09 to object to the dualling of the A11 near Elveden on the grounds of lack of access for non motorised users, SLAF sought background information from the county council for the surrounding area. This confirmed the area around Elveden enjoys a very high quality of public access for walkers, cyclists and horse-riders (non motorised users) – on public rights of way, Forestry Commission tracks and land designated as open access. The network is actively promoted by both the Forestry Commission and the county council at Santon Downham and Brandon Country Park. The area serves the local towns of Thetford, Brandon, Lakenheath, Mildenhall, and Bury St Edmunds. The Center Parcs at Elveden also attracts many visitors to the area. The total population of the parishes within 10 miles of the scheme in 2005 was 91,870. As well as being a sustainable source of recreation for the local population, this resource contributes to the health, well being and economy of the area – all national and local government priorities. Levels of use of local visitor attractions were noted as follows: Brandon Country Park: Visitor centre numbers – 06/07 - 104,198 07/08 - 163,087 Total vehicle visits - 06/07 – 51,398 07/08 – 63,603 Total people visits - 06/07 – 114,078 07/08 – 137,431 West Stow Country Park: Numbers through Park Gate 2007 = 170,289 Visitors to Anglo Saxon Village 2007 = 33,207 The Forestry Commission reported a minimum of 500,000 day visits per year in the Brandon Park and High Lodge forest blocks. Roughly a third of the more than 300,000 visitors at High Lodge in 2010 came for a cycling activity and both of the car parks at Kings Forest host at least 10,000 cars each year. The Forestry Commission has also held 19 equestrian events at Santon Downham and Kings Forest in 2008. There are a number of riding schools in the area, the closest being at Elveden, Santon Downham, Brandon, Lakenheath and Riddleworth. In addition there is a cycling club at Mildenhall and an active rambling fraternity. The Forest Heath District Council’s Access and Tourism Strategy has the following to say about the forest: “Thetford Forest currently covers 14,320 ha of accessible land and accommodates 1.5 million visitors annually, the number of visitors to Thetford is set to grow with the populations in Thetford, Providing independent advice on access to the countryside in Suffolk LAF 11/18 Bury St Edmunds, Cambridge, Norwich and the Haven Gateway growth points. There is a legal requirement to protect the nature conservation interest whilst at the same providing a regional green infrastructure resource for the growing population. “As a key green infrastructure resource, the forest contributes to Local Development Framework and Local Area Agreement targets for health, the economy, wildlife and biodiversity, renewable energy, air quality, public access and sustainable transport routes.” Forest in the Suffolk Coast and Heaths AONB The PFE in the AONB totals 3,107 hectares and is primarily made up of Rendlesham, Tunstall and Dunwich Forests. All are predominantly coniferous forests, originally planted in the 1920s on what was once Sandlings heathland. All contain significant elements of broadleaf woodland, having been planted or, in many cases, regenerating naturally. At over 3000ha, the estate is by far the largest area of land, under one owner, within the AONB. Given its size, single public ownership and that the forests lie on former Sandlings heath, they present the most significant opportunity within the AONB for major enhancements of landscape quality, wildlife conservation and public access. All are important for public access, Rendlesham & Tunstall particularly so, with c.950,000 person- visits per year. They provide a wide range of public access opportunities including walking, cycling, horse-riding, carriage driving and husky racing. Rendlesham Forest and the forest centre at Tangham is one of the focal points for tourism and recreation in the Sandlings, as well as being designated for its wildlife value. In addition to a campsite, there are numerous walking and cycling routes around the forest, with a special UFO trail, as a legacy of the world-renowned “close-encounter” in 1980. In recent years the Red Rose Chain theatre company have successfully run an open air-theatre at Tangham throughout the month of August. Tunstall Forest consists of coniferous plantations, broadleaved belts and heathland areas which link up with both Tunstall and Blaxhall Common. Tunstall is very popular with walkers, cyclists and horse riders alike. Rendlesham and Tunstall Forests are currently subject to restoration programmes where conifer plantation is being restored to heathland and open forest and this is supported by funding from the Lottery and also from the SITA Trust Landfill Communities Fund. Development of the access and recreation facilities in the forests are likely to help reduce the people pressure on other more sensitive areas of the AONB, less able to withstand large numbers of visitors, such as some coastal and estuary locations. This view is also supported by the Haven Gateway Green Infrastructure strategy. In short, the PFE in Suffolk enjoys a very high level of public use of all types, from walking to cycling and horse riding, with clear benefits both socially, economically and in general health and well being. All these outcomes meet both local and national policies and priorities. What SLAF Would Like To See SLAF believes strongly that the PFE in its entirety should be publically accessible to walkers, cyclists and equestrians (and other forms of access where these are enjoyed currently). This applies to both the 70% of the estate which is freehold and the remainder in leasehold. Protecting and improving public access will have many benefits, including on physical and mental health, enhancing the appreciation of the natural world, strengthening social bonds and providing a low cost source of recreation. Providing independent advice on access to the countryside in Suffolk LAF 11/18 Protecting public access can be simply achieved through dedication under Section 16 of the Countryside and Rights of Way (CROW) Act 2000 Act, which gives landowners and long leaseholders the opportunity to voluntarily dedicate land for public access. A dedication lasts in perpetuity or, where relevant, for the duration of a long lease. Making a dedication under the Act can: • give a legal public right of access to land that would not otherwise be covered by the CROW Act, such as woodland; or • ensure that land mapped as open country or registered common land will continue to be access land in the future, even if it ceases to be open country or registered common land. Dedication can be used to create higher rights of access, for example for cycling and horse riding. The advantage of dedication as open access is that once dedicated the land becomes access land under Part 1 of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 and subject to the same management and use. Access to dedicated land can be restricted or excluded in the same way as with other access land (e.g. for up to 28 days per year, or where necessary for land management, safety or fire prevention reasons). To make sure access routes remain physically available, the Government should ensure funding is in place to continue their maintenance (in the same way the Forestry Commission maintains the routes now). SLAF notes that a policy of open access already exists in Thetford Forest for horse riders.
Recommended publications
  • Thetford Area Hereward Way P 2 Santon House Little Ouse River

    Thetford Area Hereward Way P 2 Santon House Little Ouse River

    Norfolk health, heritage and biodiversity walks Blood Hill 3 Tumulus Walks in and around the Thetford area Hereward Way P 2 Santon House Little Ouse River Norfolk County Council at your service Contents folk or W N N a o r f o l l k k C o u s n t y C o u n c y i it l – rs H ve e di alth io Introduction page 2 • Heritage • B Walk 1 Thetford Castle Hill page 6 Walk 2 Thetford Haling Path page 10 Walk 3 Thetford Abbeygate page 14 Walk 4 Thetford Spring Walk page 18 Walk 5 Thetford BTO Nunnery Lakes Walk page 22 Walks 6 and 7 Great Hockham Woods page 28 Walks 8, 9 and 10 Santon Downham page 32 Walks 11 and 12 Lynford Stag Walks page 38 Walk 13 Rishbeth Wood page 42 Walks locations page 46 Useful contacts page 47 Project information page 48 •Song thrush Photograph by John Harding 1 Introduction ontact with natural surroundings offers a restorative enhance and restore the County’s biological diversity. On these walks you C environment which enables you to relax, unwind and recharge your will be able to see many aspects of the rich and varied biodiversity Norfolk batteries, helping to enhance your mood and reduce your stress levels. has to offer. More details can be found at www.norfolkbiodiversity.org To discover more about the Brecks, visit the website www.brecks.org Regular exercise can help to prevent major conditions, such as coronary heart disease, type II diabetes, high blood pressure, strokes, obesity, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, bowel cancer and back pain.
  • Six Circular Cycle Routes Starting from Thetford

    Six Circular Cycle Routes Starting from Thetford

    Six Circular Cycle Routes Starting from Thetford Base map cartography (c) OSM Foundation, CC BY-SA. Map data (c) OpenStreetMap Contributors, ODbL. Thetford Town Circular (10km; town roads and cycleways) A 10km circular route around the town. Mostly on quiet roads and smooth off-road cycleways. There is one 200m section on the A1066, where you could walk along the pavement instead, and one rough section along Joe Blunt’s Lane. High Lodge Loop (25km; quiet roads and forest tracks) From the centre of Thetford, follow Sustrans Route 30 on quiet roads north via Croxton to Santon Downham, then take forest tracks to the High Lodge Forest Centre. Return to Thetford via forest tracks and then alongside the Little Ouse river. Harling Road Loop (33km; quiet roads, one short busier section) From Thetford, take Sustrans Route 13 north to East Wrethem, then cut across via Illington to Harling Road Station. Continue via Roudham to Bridgham, and then return to Thetford along Sustrans Route 30. The route is completely on tarmacked roads. There is one slightly busy section of about 1.5km on the B1111 down to Harling Road. Barnham and Knettishall Loop (40km; quiet roads, one off-road section) Leave Thetford on the new cycleway alongside the A11, and then take the C633 to Barnham. Continue east to Knettishall Heath, and then return following Sustrans Route 13. It’s awkward to get to the start of the A11 cycleway from the town centre, as there is no cycle path along most of London Road. The route is all tarmacked apart from a 2km off-road section along Bridgham Lane.
  • Breckland Warrens

    Breckland Warrens

    The INTERNAL ARCHAEOLOGY of the BRECKLAND WARRENS A Report by The Breckland Society © Text, layout and use of all images in this publication: The Breckland Society 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright holder. Text written by Anne Mason with James Parry. Editing by Liz Dittner. Front cover: Drawing of Thetford Warren Lodge by Thomas Martin, 1740 © Thetford Ancient House Museum, Norfolk Museums and Archaeology Service. Dr William Stukeley had travelled through the Brecks earlier that century and in his Itinerarium Curiosum of 1724 wrote of “An ocean of sand, scarce a tree to be seen for miles or a house, except a warrener’s here and there.” Designed by Duncan McLintock. Printed by SPC Printers Ltd, Thetford. The INTERNAL ARCHAEOLOGY of the BRECKLAND WARRENS A Report by The Breckland Society 2017 1842 map of Beachamwell Warren. © Norfolk Record Office. THE INTERNAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE BRECKLAND WARRENS Contents Introduction . 4 1. Context and Background . 7 2. Warren Banks and Enclosures . 10 3. Sites of the Warren Lodges . 24 4. The Social History of the Warrens and Warreners . 29 Appendix: Reed Fen Lodge, a ‘new’ lodge site . 35 Bibliography and credits . 39 There is none who deeme their houses well-seated who have nott to the same belonging a commonwalth of coneys, nor can he be deemed a good housekeeper that hath nott a plenty of these at all times to furnish his table.
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment

    Habitats Regulations Assessment

    Recreational Disturbance Avoidance & Mitigation Strategy for Ipswich Borough, Babergh District, Mid Suffolk District and East Suffolk Councils Habitats Regulations Assessment Recreational Disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy for Ipswich Borough, Babergh District, Mid Suffolk District and East Suffolk Councils – Technical Report Rachel Hoskin, Durwyn Liley & Chris Panter Recreational Disturbance Avoidance & Mitigation Strategy for Ipswich Borough, Babergh District, Mid Suffolk District and East Suffolk Councils Footprint Contract Reference: 472 Date: 23rd May 2019 Version: V5 – Final Recommended Citation: Hoskin, R., Liley, D. & Panter, C. (2019). Habitats Regulations Assessment Recreational Disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy for Ipswich Borough, Babergh District, Mid Suffolk District and East Suffolk Councils – Technical Report. Footprint Ecology. Footprint Ecology, Forest Office, Cold Harbour, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 7PA. [email protected] Cover image: walkers on seawall at Woodbridge © Footprint Ecology Recreational Disturbance Avoidance & Mitigation Strategy for Ipswich Borough, Babergh District, Mid Suffolk District and East Suffolk Councils Acknowledgements This Technical Report has been commissioned jointly by Babergh District Council, Ipswich Borough Council, Mid Suffolk District Council and East Suffolk Council. Our thanks to the Steering Group that comprised: Clare Dawson (Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils), Natasha Moreno-Roberts and Anna Roe (Ipswich Borough Council), Sam Hubbard and Laura
  • Kings Forest Design Plan

    Kings Forest Design Plan

    EaEastEEastastst EnglandEngland KinKingsgsKings Thetford Forest Forest Plan 20162016 ——— 202620262026 KKingsings Forest Plan Page 2 Contents Contents ........................................................................... 2 1. What are Forest Plans? ................................................... 3 2. Standard Practices and Guidance ..................................... 4 3. Introduction .................................................................... 5 4. Design Brief and analysis map .......................................... 6 5. Nature ............................................................................. 8 6. People ........................................................................ .. 11 7. Economy ........................................................................ 12 8. Plan Maps & Appraisal .................................................... 13 9. Summary of Proposals ................................................... 17 10. Glossary of Terms .......................................................... 18 11. Management Prescriptions………………………………………...20 12. Tolerance Table………………………………………………………..21 13. Appendices……………………………………………………………...22 Protecting And Expanding England’s forests And woodlands, and increasing their value to society and the environment. Page 3 KKingsings Forest Plan 1. What are Forest Plans? Forest Plans are produced by us, the Forestry Commission (FC), as a means of communi- cating our management intentions to a range of stakeholders. They aim to fulfil a number of objectives: •
  • High Lodge and Elveden FP 2015.Pdf

    High Lodge and Elveden FP 2015.Pdf

    ~ Forestry Commission EAST ENGLAND England HIGH LODGE THETFORD FOREST FOREST PLAN 2015-2025 . HIGH LODGE FOREST PLAN PAGE 2. Contents Contents 2 1. What are Forest Plans? 3 2. Standard Practices and Guidance 4 3. Introduction 5 4. Design Brief.I 1. I •• I •• 11.1 ••••• 1 ••••••••••• 1 ••••••• 1••••• 1 •• 1 •• 1 •••• 6 S. Natural and Historic Environment 8 6. Communities and Places ........................•....................... 10 7. Working Woodlands 11 8. Maps It Plan Appraisal ..........................•......................... 12 Forestry Commission 9. Summary of Proposals 17 England 10. Glossary of Terms 18 11. Management Prescriptions 20 12. Tolerance Table 21 13. Appendix A Scheduled Monument Plans 22 PROTECTING AND EXPANDING ENGLAND'S FORESTS AND WOODLANDS, AND INCREASING THEIR VALUE TO SOCIETY Forestry Commission AND THE ENVIRONMENT. woodlands have been certified in IJFSC accordance with the www.fsc.org rules of the Forest PeFC/1S·4(HOOI FSC' C011771 Stewardship Council. Promoting Sustainable Forest ~anagem8nt The mark of responsible forestry www.pefc.org PAaE3 HIGH LODGE FOREST PLAN 1. What are Forest Plans? Forest Plansare produced by us, the Forestry Commission (FC), as a means of communicating our management intentions to a range of stakeholders. They aim to fulfil a number of objectives: To provide descriptions of our woodlands to show what they are like now. To explain the process we go through in deciding what is best for the wood• lands' long term future. To show what we intend the woodlands to look like in the future. To outline our management proposals, in detail, for the first ten years so we can seek approval from the statutory regulators.
  • Thetford Forest Thetford Forest

    Thetford Forest Thetford Forest

    EEastEastast EnglandEngland HOCKHAM Thetford Forest Forest Plan 2016 ——— 202620262026 Hockham Forest Plan Page 2 Contents Contents ........................................................................... 2 1. What are Forest Plans? ................................................... 3 2. Standard Practices and Guidance ..................................... 4 3. Introduction .................................................................... 5 4. Design Brief and analysis map .......................................... 6 5. Nature ............................................................................. 8 6. People ........................................................................ .. 11 7. Economy ........................................................................ 12 8. Plan Maps & Appraisal .................................................... 13 9. Summary of Proposals ................................................... 18 10. Glossary of Terms .......................................................... 19 11. Management Prescriptions………………………………………...21 12. Tolerance Table………………………………………………………..22 Protecting And Expanding England’s forests And woodlands, and increasing their value to society and the environment. Page 3 Hockham Forest Plan 1. What are Forest Plans? FForest Plans are produced by us, the Forestry Commission (FC), as a means of communi- cating our management intentions to a range of stakeholders. They aim to fulfil a number of objectives: • To provide descriptions of our woodlands to show what they are like
  • Norfolk & Suffolk Brecks

    Norfolk & Suffolk Brecks

    NORFOLK & SUFFOLK BRECKS Landscape Character Assessment Page 51 Conifer plantations sliced with rides. An abrupt, changing landscape of dense blocks and sky. Page 34 The Brecks Arable Heathland Mosaic is at the core of the Brecks distinctive landscape. Page 108 Secret river valleys thread through the mosaic of heaths, plantations and farmland. BRECKS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 04 Introduction Page 128 Local landscapes Context Introduction to the case studies Objectives Status Foulden Structure of the report Brettenham Brandon Page 07 Contrasting acidic and calcareous soils are Page 07 Evolution of the Mildenhall juxtaposed on the underlying Lackford landscape chalk Physical influences Human influences Page 146 The Brecks in literature Biodiversity Article reproduced by kind permission of Page 30 Landscape character the Breckland Society Landscape character overview Page 30 The Brecks Arable Structure of the landscape Heathland Mosaic is at the Annexes character assessment core of the Brecks identity Landscape type mapping at 1:25,000 Brecks Arable Heathland Mosaic Note this is provided as a separate Brecks Plantations document Low Chalk Farmland Rolling Clay Farmland Plateau Estate Farmland Settled Fen River Valleys Page 139 Brettenham’s Chalk River Valleys landscape today, explained through illustrations depicting its history 03 BREAKING NEW GROUND INTRODUCTION Introduction Context Sets the scene Purpose and timing of the study How the study should be used Status and strategic fit with other documents Structure of the report BRECKS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION Introduction Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Context Study Area (NCA 85) Study Area Buffer This landscape character assessment (LCA) County Boundary Castle Acre focuses on the Brecks, a unique landscape of District Boundary heaths, conifer plantations and farmland on part Main Road of the chalk plateau in south-west Norfolk and Railway north-west Suffolk.
  • Suffolk Argus Broad-Bordered Bee Hawk-Moth

    Suffolk Argus Broad-Bordered Bee Hawk-Moth

    SuThe ffolk Argus The Newsletter of the Suffolk Branch of Butterfly Conservation y r r e B t t a M y b y r a l l i t i r F d e h s a w - r e v l i S Summer 2012 Volume 54 The Suffolk Argus Broad-bordered Bee Hawk-moth Photo Neil Sherman Larval leaf damage on honeysuckle Larva Typical habitat Photos Tony Prichard 2 Summer 2012 Contents New Members 3 Editorial 4 Events Programme 5 2011 Butterfly Report 6 Wall Brown Survey: 2011 Results 10 Wider Countryside Butterfly Surveys 12 Broad-bordered Bee Hawk-moth 14 The Butterfly Isles 15 Black hole survey 16 Olympic Stadium wildflower meadows 17 Butterfly Nets Again 18 Butterflies of Europe for iPhone 19 Greek Island Odyssey 20 New Members We welcome the following new members who have joined the Branch and we look forward to meeting them at our events this year. Mr Steve Aylward Woodbridge Mr Hawk & Mrs Joanne Honey Ipswich Mr Richard & Mrs Esme Wanner Kesgrave Mr Andrew & Mrs Sarah Thompson & Family Rushmere St Andrew Mrs Gillian Campbell Weston Miss Susie Mellor Ashfield Cum Thorpe Mr Ron Taylor Bury St Edmunds Ms Louise & Mr Daniel Gallegher Bury St Edmunds Mr Terry & Mrs Glenys Riley Mildenhall Mrs Valerie Sherwen Woodbridge Miss Naomi Rose Ipswich Mr Mark Jackson Ipswich Mrs Juliet Hymphrey Benhall Miss Amelie Cutter Ipswich Mrs Genine & Mr Gary Harrison & Family Bury St Edmunds Miss Zara Pulchan Ipswich Miss Zhang Pulchan Ipswich Miss Naomi Pulchan Ipswich Mr Gary Murphy Reydon Mr J A Bedwell Ilketshall St Andrew Mr D Grieco Ipswich Mr P De’ath Glemsford Mr Gary & Mrs Murriekah Walpole Mrs Val & Mr Ivan Lockwood Ipswich Mr K B Beattie Martlesham Heath Mr Richard J Crosby Ipswich Mr Ashley M & Mrs Susannah Grimson & Family Bury St Edmunds 3 The Suffolk Argus Editorial Peter Maddison The Orange-tip is such a reliable butterfly.
  • Forest Heath District Council April 2016

    Forest Heath District Council April 2016

    Forest Heath District Council Evidence paper for Single Issue Review (SIR) of Core Strategy Policy CS7 and Site Allocations Local Plan Accessible Natural Greenspace Study April 2016 1 Accessible Natural Greenspace Study 1. Introduction 2. Context and Growth Agenda 3. Planning Policy Context 4. Evidence on Recreation Pressure and mitigation options 5. Developing a Recreation Mitigation Strategy for Forest Heath District 6. Proposed recreation Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy 7. Appendix 1 2 1. Introduction 1.1. This study has been prepared to support Forest Heath District Councils Single Issue Review of Core Strategy Policy CS7 and separate Site Allocations Local Plan. The purpose of the study is to provide evidence on appropriate accessible open space that will support the planned growth in the district. The study is required because there is concern that increased development in the district has the potential to contribute to recreational pressure on Breckland Special Protection Area (SPA) and Breckland Special Area of Conservation (SAC) The SPA and SAC are shown on figure 1 1.2. Natural England, in their response to the Regulation 18 Consultation for the 2015 issues and options documents, remarked in relation to the potential for recreational disturbance: we recommend that, effort is placed into ensuring that each area has an appropriate level of green infrastructure, including sufficient amenity grasslands, improvements in access for walkers and cyclists and facilities for dog walkers. In our view there are areas, such as in Lakenheath for example, that are lacking local green infrastructure. The provision of an appropriate level of green infrastructure within local communities is likely to alleviate pressure on designated sites, as well as supporting the health and wellbeing of residents.
  • Landmark House Beside the River Little Ouse

    Landmark House Beside the River Little Ouse

    Landmark house beside the river Little Ouse Spring House, Thetford, Norfolk Freehold Entrance hall • Drawing room • Sitting room • Kitchen Dining room • Snug • Utility • Conservatory • WC Master bedroom with en-suite bathroom, four further bedrooms • WC Family bathroom • Spacious landing Useful range of outbuildings, private parking, mature gardens, former swimming pool. In all about 0.83 acres. The Property Situation Spring House is a landmark The property is located within house within the town of the historic market town of Thetford, enjoying a Thetford, in an unspoilt area of wonderfully private position trees and park adjoining the set behind a high brick wall on banks of the River Little Ouse . the banks of the River Thet. Formerly an important Iron The house is late Georgian and Age settlement, the town has Grade II listed, with attractive retained many of its landmarks main façade of gault brick with including Thetford Castle, a French and sash windows . motte and bailey castle where There is plenty of further the castle was destroyed by period detail, internally and Henry II, but the motte externally including high remains. The town is now well skirting boards, fireplaces and served by a selection of elegant rooms typical of the supermarkets, independent period. There is approximately shopping, butchers, 4,100 square feet of living convenience stores, banking space, with conventional light facilities and education and spacious living space. including Thetford Grammar. The house has a functional There are many restaurants kitchen and some fitted and pubs, notably The bathrooms but now requires Mulberry, and it is a short drive refurbishment throughout, to to the Elveden Farm shop restore the house to it’s former famous for its local produce.
  • Red Band Needle Blight of Pine

    Red Band Needle Blight of Pine

    231 Corstorphine Road Red Band Needle Edinburgh EH12 7AT www.forestry.gov.uk Blight of Pine INFORMATION NOTE BY ANNA BROWN, DAVID ROSE & JOAN WEBBER OF FOREST RESEARCH SEPTEMBER 2003 Forestry Commission SUMMARY ARCHIVE Red band needle blight is an economically important disease affecting a number of coniferous species, in particular pines. It has a world-wide distribution, and since the late 1990s the incidence of the disease in the UK has increased, particularly on Corsican pine (Pinus nigra var. laricio) in Thetford Forest Park. The disease causes premature needle defoliation, loss in yield and sometimes tree mortality. In other countries where the disease has a significant economic impact, successful methods of control have included good stand management, fungicide application and the use of resistant species. INTRODUCTION infected by D. pini. The majority of this information was obtained from Gadgil (1984) and Ivory (1967). Apart Red band needle blight, so called because of the symptoms from pines, other coniferous species such as European it causes on pine, is an economically important disease with larch (Larix decidua), Norway spruce (Picea abies), sitka a widespread distribution (Gibson, 1974; Bradshaw et al., spruce (Picea sitchensis) and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga 1997). It is caused by the fungus Mycosphaerella pini, but menziesii) are occasionally susceptible. is probably better known by the name Dothistroma pini (formerly D. septospora). In total, over 60 pine species are reported to be prone to infection: radiata pine (Pinus radiata), Austrian pine The disease was first observed in the UK in 1954 on nursery (Pinus nigra) and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) are stock (Murray and Batko, 1962), but until recently it was considered to be the most susceptible, and spreading- only seen very sporadically.