DOCSLIB.ORG

{PDF EPUB} the Road to Self-Actualization Is Littered with F-Bombs by Blue Fjords Justification for Using Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{PDF EPUB} the Road to Self-Actualization Is Littered with F-Bombs by Blue Fjords Justification for Using Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} The Road to Self-Actualization Is Littered with F-Bombs by blue fjords Justification for Using Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The horrific atom bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan on August 6th and 9th of 1945 brought about several reactions in the United States. Starting with the controversial events leading up to the atomic with the Potsdam Proclamation, many Americans began to wonder whether the total destruction of these two cities were necessary. However, immediate American responses and reactions to the bombs were contrary to what they became later on. Americans slowly stopped being ignorant of what had happened. The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki. In August of 1941, the United States of America dropped two atomic bombs on the nation of Japan. The bombings decimated the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Thousands were left either dead, wounded, homeless, or scarred for life. The bombings also brought World War II to an end and prevented a full-scale invasion japan which surely would have result in the death of more Americans, but was it justified. Over the years many ethicists have argued on whether or not the bombings were, in fact, necessary. The Atom Bomb. The dropping of the Atom Bomb is one of many historical events of the World War II. The Atom Bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, two Japanese cities. The two nuclear bombs were dropped by the Americans at the end of the war, more specifically on August 6th and August 9th in 1945. The reason for these events is to this day, not clearly understood by many, but for the Americans it was believed to be the best way to end the war. The attack being so controversial, in this paper, I will give. The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb On Japan. dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan? Sub Issues Questions: Scott Carroll The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945 and Nagasaki on August 9th, 1945 was the first and last time the weapon has been used to date; the atomic explosions exposed the true potential of nuclear warfare whilst also highlighting the global superiority that America possessed at the conclusion of World War II. On August 6th, 1945 “Little Boy”, a uranium atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima in an effort. Was The Atomic Bomb Justified. Eager to end WWII the atomic bomb was created to end the fight between Japan and the United States. The U.S. dropped it on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The atomic bomb was created with uranium (U-235) and by using fission it would form a large nuclear chain reaction that would be devastating. The creation of this mass destruction weapon was called the Manhattan Project. The project cost around two billion dollars. In mid-July, 1945, these bombs were tested to see if they would be successful. The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima. The dropping of the Atomic bomb on Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945 and Nagasaki on August 9th, 1945 was the first and last time the weapon has been used to date; the atomic explosions exposed the true potential of nuclear warfare whilst also highlighting the global superiority that America possessed at the conclusion of World War II. On August 6th, 1945 “Little Boy”, a uranium atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima in an effort by the United States (U.S.) and backed by the Soviet Union, the British and. The Debate Over The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki. The debate over the impact of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki concerns the ethical, legal and military controversies surrounding the United States ' atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This tragedy occurred on two occasions; the 6th and the 9th of August 1945, and signified the conclusion of the Second World War, 1939-1945. There were many questionable motives involved in the event, as such a decision required moral certainty. Proceeding the bombings, the terms of surrender for the. The Pros And Cons Of Hiroshima. Ray Bradbury once said, “After Hiroshima was bombed, I saw a photograph of the side of a house with shadows of the people who had lived there burned into the wall from the intensity of the bomb. The people were gone, but their shadows remained.” Keep in mind that quote only described the intensity of “Little Boy”, the nickname for the bomb that devastated Hiroshima. The bombs that dilapidated both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were harrowing, gruesome, and in all sincerity, needless. The reasoning people. Ib History Internal Assessment : The Bombings Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki. Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Research Question- To What Extent were the Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Necessary to end World War II? Word Count: 2,192 Section 1: Identification and Evaluation of Sources Source #1 - Emperor Showa’s address This document, a written version of the Japanese Emperor’s radio address to announce his intention to surrender to the Allies in 1945, is valuable source when analyzing the necessity of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki because it. Was Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki Necessary to End World War 2? proposal of an atomic bomb landing over Hiroshima and Nagasaki to finalize the war. To this day there is still controversy that if that atomic bomb was actually necessary to end the war, because of the number of innocent casualties suffered from the Japanese. The aim of this investigation is to answer the question: To what extent was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary to end the war with Japan? To answer this question, the. Fearing Crash And Detonation On Takeoff, The First Atomic Bomb Had To Be Assembled In Flight. In 1945, the final days of World War II were coming to a close – but not before the world was forever changed. Over the years of the war, both those who fought on the battlefields and those who watched from afar were introduced to entirely new evils, surprising successes, and much more. As the conflict cooled in Germany and the Allied troops ended Adolf Hitler’s Nazi reign, one more enemy remained standing: Japan. The attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 turned the world’s attention to a new major player in the ongoing war and launched the United States into the middle of the international conflict. Yet that day also led to the creation and dropping of the first-ever atomic bomb, and to the final wartime encounters between the Allied and Axis forces. After Germany surrendered to the Allied forces and the war in Europe came to a close, Japan remained the sole enemy standing – and Japan was not a nation that would surrender easily. The Allied nations prepared for the costly and deadly possibility of an invasion, readying the plans and the necessary men to fight Japan as had Germany. All of these plans changed when the world’s first nuclear weapons were introduced and launched. Though the stories of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings are familiar ones in the history of both World War II and the Pacific War, not all went as smoothly as we might think today. In fact, getting that very first nuclear bomb off the ground and to its final destination wasn’t as easy as it sounds in history textbooks. Atomic cloud over Nagasaki. Getting Project A Off the Ground. Before the world’s first nuclear weapon made its way to Japan, it began under the great secrecy of the Manhattan Project. Though the Manhattan Project started in June of 1941, before the U.S. entered World War II, the bombs that would eventually fall on Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren’t part of the project’s original plan. Instead, the Manhattan Project was meant to develop fissile, or nuclear, materials; it wasn’t until 1943 that Brigadier General Leslie R. Groves, Jr., leader of the project, spurred the creation of the Los Alamos Laboratory. Groves developed the nuclear lab solely for the purpose of the atomic bomb – he brought Robert Oppenheimer onto the Manhattan Project to lead a new project, Project Y, which would be charged with the design and physical creation of atomic bombs. Members of the Manhattan Project team. When Project Y began at Los Alamos, the nuclear bomb was meant to help Allied forces by reducing the number of aircraft needed to drop bombs. As the design, building, and testing took place throughout 1943, problems began to appear. The members of Project Y discovered that the aircraft of the time needed significant modifications – and for some, complete redesign – in order to carry nuclear bombs to their drop sites. Furthermore, as test runs took place, only disappointing results were seen; the bombs weren’t falling as intended, and the Project Y team quickly realized that they had a long and thorough road of in-depth testing ahead. Over the course of the next two years, Project Y developed and executed a careful testing program. By the war’s end in August of 1945, bomb testing had progressed to live explosives – and the completion of the nuclear bomb was growing near. As those involved with Project Y began to see success with the bombs, their spin, and their detonation, it was time to devise exactly how such a history-altering weapon would be delivered to an enemy. Project Alberta’s Commander Francis Birch (left) assembles the Little Boy bomb while physicist Norman Ramsey watches. The deployment of the initial nuclear bomb itself fell under Project Alberta, or Project A and the first steps towards this goal took place when the project began in March of 1945.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reflections of War Culture in Silverplate B-29 Nose Art from the 509Th Composite Group by Terri D. Wesemann, Master of Arts Utah State University, 2019
    METAL STORYTELLERS: REFLECTIONS OF WAR CULTURE IN SILVERPLATE B-29 NOSE ART FROM THE 509TH COMPOSITE GROUP by Terri D. Wesemann A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in American Studies Specialization Folklore Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Randy Williams, MS Jeannie Thomas, Ph.D. Committee Chair Committee Member ______________________ ____________________ Susan Grayzel, Ph.D. Richard S. Inouye, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice Provost for Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2019 Copyright © Terri Wesemann 2019 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Metal Storytellers: Reflections of War Culture in Silverplate B-29 Nose Art From the 509th Composite Group by Terri D. Wesemann, Master of Arts Utah State University, 2019 Committee Chair: Randy Williams, MS Department: English Most people are familiar with the Enola Gay—the B-29 that dropped Little Boy, the first atomic bomb, over the city of Hiroshima, Japan on August 6, 1945. Less known are the fifteen Silverplate B-29 airplanes that trained for the mission, that were named and later adorned with nose art. However, in recorded history, the atomic mission overshadowed the occupational folklore of this group. Because the abundance of planes were scrapped in the decade after World War II and most WWII veterans have passed on, all that remains of their occupational folklore are photographs, oral and written histories, some books, and two iconic airplanes in museum exhibits. Yet, the public’s infatuation and curiosity with nose art keeps the tradition alive. The purpose of my graduate project and internship with the Hill Aerospace Museum was to collaborate on a 60-foot exhibit that analyzes the humanizing aspects of the Silverplate B-29 nose art from the 509th Composite Group and show how nose art functioned in three ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Memories of Secret City Days1
    MEMORIES OF SECRET CITY DAYS1 William J. (Bill) Wilcox Jr., Oak Ridge City Historian Retired Technical Director for the Oak Ridge Y-12 & K-25 Plants [During the Manhattan Project (from May 25, 1943) a Jr. Chemist, Tennessee Eastman Corp., Y-12 Plant] A Guest Column for the Newspaper Based on the Memoirs Paper, June, 19991 We need to go back to the early days of 1939 for a little background in telling why Oak Ridge came to be in World War II and to appreciate better the remarkable things that were done here. PRELUDE In January of 1939, two brilliant chemists over in Germany proved that if you bombard the heavy ele- ment uranium with neutron radiation, some of the uranium atoms split in two and become entirely different elements of about half the weight of uranium, like barium and lanthanum. And when the atom's nucleus splits, a huge amount of energy is released-10 million times the energy released in chemical reactions we are familiar with, like burning coal and gasoline, or exploding dynamite and TNT. The physicists in those days were working with only microscopic amounts of uranium, but could detect the energy released easily. Nu- clear energy is the energy of the universe-God’s way- the energy of the sun that keeps us warm. On the grand scale, nuclear energy is the most common kind; the chemical energy that we humans know is a rare thing only known on planets such as ours! Now a significant aspect of this finding was that the world in January 1939 was still at peace, so this exciting development was immediately published in a scientific journal read by scientists in every country all over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Rescue Training at Angel Thunder
    June 2013/$5 Rescue Training at Angel Thunder Worldwide Air Force: Operations in Libya, the Horn of Africa, and Cyberspace The future of Light Attack is here. The Beechcraft AT-6 is the world’s finest Light Attack and Armed Reconnaissance aircraft. Purpose-built to leverage prior investment in the U.S. Air Force’s T-6, A-10C, and MC-12W platforms. The AT-6 is available at a fraction of the acquisition, sustainment and training costs of other combat aircraft. The AT-6 provides a full suite of synchronized, ground-based training capabilities and an established global logistics infrastructure. The AT-6 is the only American-made aircraft designed to meet the needs of a world where unpredictability is commonplace and flexibility is crucial. Learn more, visit missionreadyat-6.com ©2013 AT-6 is the trademark of Hawker Beechcraft Defense Company, LLC. ® We build aircraft you can believe in. All rights reserved. Beechcraft is a registered trademark of Hawker Beechcraft Corporation. Beech130259 Air Force Mag Ad - Light Attack 01.indd 1 2/1/13 2:12 PM BAILEY LAUERMAN Beechcraft Air Force Mag Ad - Light Attack 02 Beech130259 Pub: Air Force Mag Color: 4-color Size: Trim 8.125" x 10.875", Bleed 8.375" x 11.125" June 2013, Vol. 96, No. 6 Publisher Craig R. McKinley Editor in Chief Adam J. Hebert Editorial [email protected] Editor Suzann Chapman Executive Editors Michael C. Sirak John A. Tirpak News Editor Amy McCullough Senior Editor Marc V. Schanz Associate Editors 26 Aaron M. U. Church June Lee FEATURES Merri M.
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Interview
    ALIEN INTERVIEW Based On Personal Notes and Interview Transcriptions Provided by : Matilda O'Donnell MacElroy Editing and Supplemental Footnotes by: Lawrence R. Spencer ( Author of "The Oz Factors" ) 1 Alien Interview Copyright (c) 2008 by Lawrence R. Spencer. All Rights Reserved. Cover and book design by Lawrence R. Spencer Printed in The United States of America First Edition Printing: 2008 ISBN: 978-0-6152-0460-4 2 Acknowledgements My sincerest thanks to the enthusiastic, insightful support of Michel and Brenda. Thank you very much to all of the diligent and unselfish work of the owners, staff and tireless contributors and editors of Wikipedia.org upon which the material in this book relies heavily for efficacious documentary support of many of the footnoted items sited in the text of the transcripts and comments from Matilda O'Donnell MacElroy. Disclaimer As far as the Editor of the book, "Alien Interview" is concerned, and for all practical purposes, the content of the book is a work of fiction. The Editor makes no claim to the factuality of the content, and in fact, cannot prove that the alleged author actually ever existed. Although some of the dates, locations, persons and incidents described may be factual or based on fact, there is no evidence to authenticate that equally as many may be subjective contrivances of the author. All of the information, notes and transcripts received by the Editor are contained in their complete, original form, as represented in the book. The Editor is no longer in possession of any original documents or copies of original documents from the author, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Last Piece of Little Boy Got to Tinian Island
    1 “From Us in Oak Ridge to Tojo”-NDG THE STORY OF LT. NICHOLAS DEL GENIO’S AUTOGRAPHED DOLLAR BILL WM. J. WILCOX JR. PREPARED FOR THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND ENERGY FOUNDATION OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE JUNE 15, 2000 2 HOW THE LAST PIECE OF “LITTLE BOY” GOT TO TINIAN ISLAND The Story of Lt. Nicholas Del Genio’s Autographed Dollar Bill 1 2 From Us in Oak Ridge to Tojo”-NDG William J. (Bill) Wilcox Jr., Oak Ridge City Historian Retired Technical Director for the Oak Ridge Y-12 & K-25 Plants [During the Manhattan Project (from May 25, 1943) a Jr. Chemist, Tennessee Eastman Corp., Y-12 Plant] The glass-framed one-dollar bill with its 34 autographs hung for years in Nick and Martha Del Genio’s living room in Chevy Chase, MD, a treasured remembrance of Nick’s part in the sudden ending of World War II. 3 Nick died in 1995 at 88, and as they had agreed, Martha made a gift of the treasured bill to the American Museum of Science and Energy (AMSE) in Oak Ridge, the town where they met and where the story of this treasured souvenir began. 4 Martha Farrar met Nick Del Genio when she worked in Oak Ridge as a dietician in one of the school cafeterias of that secret city during WWII. i Nick was an Army officer, and they married in 1949, four years after the end of WWII and the events described here. She learned from him after the War was over that Nick’s assignment was to serve in Military Security.
    [Show full text]
  • National Security History Series
    National Security History Series The Manhattan Project 5 Visit our Manhattan Project web site: http://www.cfo.doe.gov/me70/manhattan/index.htm 5 DOE/MA-0002 Revised National Security History Series The Manhattan Project F. G. Gosling Office of History and Heritage Resources Executive Secretariat Office of Management Department of Energy January 2010 5 National Security History Series Volume I: The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb Volume II: Building the Nuclear Arsenal: Cold War Nuclear Weapons Development and Production, 1946-1989 (in progress) Volume III: Nonproliferation and Stockpile Stewardship: The Nuclear Weapons Complex in the Post-Cold War World (projected) The National Security History Series is a joint project of the Office of History and Heritage Resources and the National Nuclear Security Administration. 5 Foreword to the 2010 edition In a national survey at the turn of the millennium, journalists and historians ranked the dropping of the atomic bomb and the surrender of Japan to end the Second World War as the top story of the twentieth century. The advent of nuclear weapons, brought about by the Manhattan Project, not only helped bring an end to World War II but ushered in the atomic age and determined how the next war—the Cold War—would be fought. The Manhattan Project also became the organizational model behind the impressive achievements of American “big science” during the second half of the twentieth century, which demonstrated the relationship between basic scientific research and national security. This edition of the Office of History’s perennial “bestseller” is part of a joint project between the Office of History and Heritage Resources and the National Nuclear Security Administration to produce a three- volume National Security History Series documenting the Department of Energy’s role in developing, testing, producing, and managing the Nation’s nuclear arsenal.
    [Show full text]
  • Musashino Air Raids and Nakajima Aircraft Co
    Committee for the Declaration of Musashino as a Nuclear-free City and the Promotion of Peace — A World Free of Wars and Nuclear Weapons Starts with Musashino — Panel Documents November 24, 1944~ Musashino Air Raids and Nakajima Aircraft Co. *Why was Musashino targeted? Sponsor: Committee for the Promotion of Peace under the Declaration of Musashino as a Nuclear-free City Cooperation and materials: Association for the Preservation and Recording of Musashino Air Raids and War Relics １．Why was the city bombed? —The Nakajima Aircraft Co. Musashi Plant Did you know that Musashino Municipal Chuo “Harappa” Park, Musashino Municipal Apartments, Midoricho Park Town, and the Municipal Office were once home to a huge military factory that was bombed during World War II? That factory was the Nakajima Aircraft Co. Recon. photograph taken early November, 1944 Musashi Plant (“Nakajima Musashi Plant”), which produced engines for one of the largest aircraft producers in pre-war Japan. At the peak of its operations, the factory ran 24 hours per day and had a staff of over 50,000 who worked to manufacture engines for fighter aircrafts such as the Zero and Hayabusa used by the Japanese military. The factory’s production constituted nearly 30% of Japan’s national production of these engines. The Musashi Plant’s facilities were vast, covering a total area of 560,000 square meters, or 12 Tokyo Domes, from the present-day Musashino Athletic Stadium in the east to Yahatacho, 4-chome in the west. So, why are there no remains of such vast facilities? That would be because the plant and its facilities were destroyed in the air raids conducted by the US military toward the end of World War II (1941-1945).
    [Show full text]
  • Military History Mar 2018
    Page 1 A Quarterly Publication MARCH 2018—ISSUE NO. 16 U3A NUNAWADING MILITARY HISTORY GROUP The 1918 German Spring Offensive 2018 Program for Term 1 The 1918 Spring Offensive or Kaiserschlacht (Kaiser's Battle), also known as the Ludendorff Offensive, Program may be subject to changes was a series of German attacks along the Western Front during the First World War, beginning on 21 March 1918, which marked the deepest advances by either side since 1914. The Germans had realised that their Thu, 1st Mel The Stuart Highway only remaining chance of victory was to defeat the Allies before the overwhelming human March Green and matériel resources of the United States could be fully deployed. They also had the temporary advantage in numbers afforded by the nearly 50 divisions freed by the Russian surrender (the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk). Thu, 8th Albert Story of a conman March Isaacs There were four German offensives, codenamed Michael, Georgette, Gneisenau, and Blücher- Yorck. Michael was the main attack, which was intended to break through the Allied lines, outflank the British Thu, Michael Battle of Lyte Gulf forces which held the front from the Somme River to the English Channel and defeat the British Army. Once 15th Lewino Oct 1944 this was achieved, it was hoped that the French would seek armistice terms. The other offensives were sub- March sidiary to Michael and were designed to divert Allied forces from the main offensive on the Somme. Thu, Joe Caricatures from No clear objective was established before the start of the offensives and once the operations were under- 22nd Borg wars—Napoleonic way, the targets of the attacks were constantly changed according to the battlefield (tactical) situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Radioactivity from Military Installations Sites and Effects on Population Health
    http://www.ancia.be/radio/ Radioactivity from Military Installations sites and Effects on Population Health CONTENTS <% 'CSS %> Foreword Acknowledgements List of Participants Executive Summary R.Kirchmann & A.Cigna Introduction R.Kirchmann 1.1. Background 1.2. Selected Sites 1.3. Organization SCOPE-RADSITE Chap.1 WISMUT Karin Wichterey and Peter Schmidt Edited by: René J.C.Kirchmann 1.1 Generalities & 1.1.1 History and Brief Characteristics of the Object Arrigo A. Cigna 1.2 Source term 1.2.1 Production Capacities and Operation Characteristics of the Objects 1.2.2 Characteristics of accumulated radioactive materials (RM) and radioactive wastes (RW) 1.3 Pathways 1.3.1 Characteristics of radionuclide releases 1.3.2 Atmospheric pathways 1.3.3 Aquatic pathways 1.3.4 Terrestrial pathways 1.3.5 General remarks 1.4. Dose assessment 1.5.Impact on population health 1.6. Impact on environment 1.6.1 Nuclear impact 1.6.2 Other nuclear directly related impact s1.6.3 Non-nuclear site related impact References Chap.2 P.R.CHINA Mao Yongze, Lu Jiandong,Pan Ziqiang 2.1 Generalities 2.1.1 Foundation and feature of nuclear fuel cycle facilities 2.1.2. Overview of foundation of nuclear fuel facilities. http://www.ancia.be/radio/ (1 sur 6)04/08/2005 16:27:24 http://www.ancia.be/radio/ 2.2 Source term 2.2.1 Environmental protection in nuclear industry 2.3 Pathways 2.4 Dose assessment 2.4.1 Environmental evaluation and impact of nuclear industry on environment 2.4.2 Environmental radiation monitoring and dose evaluation 2.5 Impact on population health References Chap.3 ELEKTROSTAL A.A.Iskra, V.K.Popov 3.1 Generalities 3.2 Source term 3.2.1 Characteristics of radioactive releases and discharges 3.2.2 Characteristics of accumulated radioactive wastes 3.2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Collection Xii. World War Ii Papers, 1939 – 1947 Xiv
    MILITARY COLLECTION XII. WORLD WAR II PAPERS, 1939 – 1947 XIV. PRIVATE COLLECTIONS Some of the materials listed in this old finding aid have been reprocessed with new Military Collection WWI Papers collection numbers. For those that have been reprocessed, they were removed from this finding aid, leaving box number gaps. For information on the reprocessed collections, contact the State Archives of North Carolina’s Reference Unit or the Military Collection Archivist. —Matthew M. Peek, Military Collection Archivist October 2017 Box No. Contents 1 John R. Conklin Papers. Papers reflecting the service of Cpl. John R. Conklin of Ohio in the 345th Infantry Regiment, 87th Division, including personal correspondence, 1943-1947, n.d.; service medals and ribbons, including two Bronze Stars; and a disassembled “War Scrapbook” that contained official correspondence and documents (including honorable discharge), 1941-1948, n.d.; photographs; chits; identification cards; newspaper clippings (originals replaced by Xerox copies); and foreign paper currency. 2 William J. Jasper Papers. Contains manuscript autobiography of the service of Lt. William J. Jasper in the U.S. Navy during World War II and the Korean War, 1943-1955. See World War II vertical files for Xerox copies of Jasper’s service records and newspaper articles relating to the USS Antietam. Charles M. Johnson Jr. Papers. Papers reflecting the service of PFC Charles M. Johnson Jr. of Raleigh (Wake County) in the 79th Division, including typescript reminiscence titled, “The World War II Years: My Story”; two copy print photographs; panoramic photograph of Battery B, 5th Battalion, 2nd Training Regiment, Fort Bragg, 1943 [removed and filed as MilColl.WWII.Panoramas.2]; twelve war ration books (various names) with paper envelope carrier; and special section from The Times (London) on the fiftieth anniversary of D-Day.
    [Show full text]
  • 180 Degrees Out: the Change in U.S. Strategic Bombing Applications, 1935-1955
    180 Degrees Out: The Change in U.S. Strategic Bombing Applications, 1935-1955 By C2008 John M. Curatola B.A. University of Nebraska, 1987 M.A. George Mason University, 2001 M.M.A.S. U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, 2002 Submitted to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy ______________________________ Theodore Wilson ______________________________ Roger Spiller ______________________________ Jenny Weber ______________________________ Christopher Gabel ______________________________ Phillip Schrodt Date defended: October 21, 2008 The Dissertation Committee for John Curatola certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: 180 DEGREES OUT: THE CHANGE IN U.S. STRATEGIC BOMBING APPLICATIONS 1935-1955 Committee: Theodore Wilson Chairperson Date approved: October 21, 2008 ii ABSTRACT 180 DEGREES OUT: The Change in U.S. Strategic Bombing Applications, 1935-1955. By John M. Curatola Professor Theodore A. Wilson, Advisor This dissertation examines how the U.S. Army/Air Force developed strategic bombing applications during the 1930s and then changed them during World War II and in early Cold War planning. This narrative history analyzes the governmental, military, and social influences that changed U.S. bombing methods. The study addresses how the Air Force diverted from a professed strategy of precision bombardment during the inter-war years only to embrace area, fire, and atomic bombardment during WW II. Furthermore, the treatise continues in this vein by examining how the USAF developed atomic and thermonuclear applications during the post war era and the Cold War.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Times
    Newsletter Issue 12 Spring 2007 Front Cover Top: WF512 (44 Squadron) at dispersal, RAF Coningsby ( Ernest Howlett ) Lower: Nose of B-29-45-MO 44-86292 better known as Enola Gay on display at the Smithsonian’s Udvar Hazy Center, Washington Dulles Airport, Maryland, USA. ( Chris Howlett ) Inside Front Cover Top : It’s Hawg Wild at Duxford ( Chris Howlett ) Lower : Enola Gay being reversed over the atomic bomb loading pit. (USAF ) This Page Enola Gay photographed while being stored at Davis Monthan AFB 23 July, 1947 as part of the collection destined for preservation. The Circle R tail markings were probably added post the retirement of Enola Gay since Enola Gay and the 509th CG aircraft reverted to the Circle Arrow marking once WWII ended. Also note the ‘fat man’ symbols on the nose denoting pumpkin bomb missions (although one may also represent the actual atomic mission). The Smithsonian is restoring Enola Gay to the condition she was in on the 6 August, 1945 mission so neither these symbols nor the red tip to the tail are present on the aircraft as displayed. Next Page It’s Hawg Wild in the American Air Museum, Duxford. ( Chris Howlett ) Chris Howlett The Barn Isle Abbotts Taunton Somerset TA3 6RS e-mail [email protected] Contents Introduction 1 Silverplate, Enola Gay and the First Atomic Mission 2 Walkthrough 5 Forward entry hatch 5 Bombardier Station 6 Honeywell C-1 Autopilot 8 Common Equipment 11 Interphone System 11 Oxygen System 12 Heated Flying Suits 12 Armour Protection 13 Smoking 14 Remote Control Turret System 16 Airplane Commander’s Station 20 Copilot’s Station 22 Central Aisle Stand 23 Flight Engineer’s Station 27 Navigator’s Station 35 Weaponeer’s Station 39 Radio Operator’s Station 40 The Communication Tunnel 45 Forward Bomb Bay 47 Rear Bomb Bay 49 Bomb Hoist, Bomb Release Mechanisms and Bomb Shackles 50 Gunner’s Compartment 52 Radar and Countermeasure Operators’ Stations 61 Countermeasure Officer’s Station 65 The Rear Unpressurised Area 67 Tail Gunner’s Station 71 Introduction Welcome to issue 12 of Washington Times.
    [Show full text]