* Terror and Resistance Usually Hanged

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

* Terror and Resistance Usually Hanged 1 789-1 800 deputies sat in the highest seats of the Na- creased divisions, which ultimately led to tional Convention), in contrast, was closely Robespierre's fall from power and to a dis- allied with the Paris militants, mantling of government by terror. The first showdown between the Giron- dins and the Mountain occurred during the Robespierre and trial of the king in December 1792. Although the Girondins agreed that the kingwas guilty the Committee of Public Safety of treason, many of them argued for clemency, The conflict between the Girondins and the exile, or a popular referendum on his fate. Af- Mountain did not end with the execution of ter a long and difficult debate, the NationaÌ Louis XVI. Milita¡rts in Paris agitated for the Convention supported the Mountain and removal of the deputies who had proposed a voted by a very narrow majority to execute referendum on the king, and in retaliation the king. Louis XW went to tlle guillotine. on the Gi¡ondins engineered the a¡rest of Jean- January 21, 1793, sharing the fate of Charles I Paul Marat, a deputy who had urged violent .We of England in 1649. have just convinced measures in his newspaper The Friend ourselves that a king is only a man," wrote oJ the People. When Marat was acquitted, one newspaper, "and tJlat no man is above the Girondins set up a the law." special commission to 'j,.j Review: Why did the French Revolution turn in e+.]Lo,.sasi"Èvt${ro5'¡,$artei:178e?,,.,. The Guillotine Before l7B9 only nobles were decapitated if condemned to death; commoners were * Terror and Resistance usually hanged. Equalization of the death penalty was first proposed by J. l. Cuillotin, The execution of the king did not end the new a professor of anatomy and a deputy for regime's problems. The continuing war re- the Third Estate in the National Assembly. quired even more men and moneJ¡, and the He also suggested that a mechanical device introduction of a national draft provoked be constructed for decapitation, leading to massive resistance in some parts of France. the instrument's association with his name. In response to growing pressures, the Na- The Assembly decreed decapitation as the tional Convention named the Committee of death penalÇ in June l79t and another Public Safety to supervise food distribution, physician, A. Louis, actually invented the direct the war effort, and root out counter- guillotíne. The executíoner pulled up the revolutiona¡ies. The leader of the committee, blade by a cord and then released it. Use Maximilien Robespiere,. wanted to go be- of the guillotine began in April tzsz and yond these stopgap measures and create did not end until 1981, when the French government a "republic of virtue," in which the govern- abolished the death penalty. The guillotine ment woulcl teach, or force, citizens to fascinated as much as it repelled. Reproduced in become virtuous republicans through a mas- miniature, painted onto snuffboxes sive program of politica-l reeducation. Thus and china, worn as jewelry and even began the Terror, in which the guillotine serving as a toy, the guillotine be- became the most terrifying instmment came a part of popular culture. of a government that suppressed How could the guillotine be almost every form of dissent símultaneously celebrated as (see The Guillotine, shown the people's avenger by sup- here). These policies only in- porters of the Revolution and vil- ified as the preeminent symbol of the Terror by op- 'guillotine: GIH luh teen ponents? Musée Cornovolet/ tRobespierre: roh behs PYEHR Photo Bulloz. ,:::ai:i:ri:i:Ì:l:.iirl ;ì :::i:1: ::..;::i::.:::'rr:ì'ì,:::-:tr irìvesügate the situation in Pa¡is, ordering the 1793, which set limits on the prices of thirty- arrest ofvarious local leaders. In response, nine essentia-I commodities and on wages. In Parisian militants organized an armed demon- a speech to the Convention, Robespierre ex- stration and invaded the Nationa-l Convention plained the necessity of government by terror: on June 2, L793, forcing the deputies to de- "The first ma¡<im of your policies must be to cree the arrest of their twenty-nine Girondin lead the people by reason and the people's colleagues. The Convention consented to the enemies by terror. Without virtue, terror establishment of paramilitary bands called is deadly; without terror, virtue is impotent." "revolutionarSr armies" to hunt down political Terror was not an idle term; it seemed to suspects and hoa¡ders of grain. The deputies imply that the goa-l of democracy justified also agreed to speed up the operation ofspe- what we now call totalitarian means, that is, cial revolutionary courts. the suppression of all dissent. Setting the course for government and Through a series of desperate measures, the war increasingly fell to the twelve-member the Committee of Public Safety set the ma- Committee of Public Safety, set up by the chinery of the Terror in motion. It sent deputies National Convention onApril 6, 1793. When out "on mission" to purge unreliable offìcials Robespierre (1758-1794) was elected to the and organize the war effort. In the first uni- committee three months later, he became in versal draft of men in history, every unmar'- effect its guiding spirit and tì:e chief spokes- ried man and childless widower between the man of the Revolution. A lawyer from north- ages of eighteen and twenty-fìve was declared ern France known as "the incormptible" for eligible for conscription. Revolutionary tri- his stern honesty and fierce dedication to bunals set up in Paris ald provincia-l centers democratic ideals, Robespierre remains one tried political suspects. In October 1793, the of the most controversial figures in world Revolutionary Tribunal in Paris convicted history because of his association with the Marie-Antoinetle of treason and sent her to the Terror. In September 1793, in response to guillotine. The Gi¡ondin leaders and Madame popular pressure, ttre deputies of the Con- Roland were also guillotined, as was Ol1'rnpe vention voted to "put Terror on the agenda." de Gouges. The government confiscated all Robespierre took the lead in implementing the property of convicted traitors. this decision. Although he originally opposed The Terror won its greatest success on the death penalty and the war, he was con- the battlefìeld. As of April L793, France faced vinced that the emergency situation of 1793 war with Austria, Prussia, Great Britain, required severe measures, including death Spain, Sardinia, and the Dutch Republic-all for those, such as the Girondins, who op- fearn;l of the impact of revolutionary ideals on posed the committee's policies. their own populations. The execution of Louis Like many other educated eighteenth- XW, in particular, galvanized European gov- century men, Robespierre had read the clas- ernments; according to William Pitt, the sics of republicanism flom the ancient Roman British prime minister, it was "the foulest writers Tacitus and Plutarch to the Enlight- and most atrocious act the world has ever enment thjnkers Montesquieu and Rousseau. seen." To face this daunting coalition of forces, But he took them a step further. He spoke the French republic tapped a new ald potent eloquently about "the theory of revolutionary source of power-nationalist pride-in de- government" as "the war of liberty against its crees mobilizing young and old alike: enemies." He defended the people's right to democratic government, while in practice he Tte goung men wiLL go to battLe; marrted men utílLJorge arms a¡uJ transport prouisiorts: usomen supported many emergency measures that uiLL moke tents and cLothing and serue in hos- restricted their liberties. He personally fa- píÍals: chidren tuíI1" make bandnges; old men toíll vored a free-market economy, as did almost get themselues canied to publíc pktces to aror¿se all middle-class deputies, but in this time of the corLrage oJ u.nrnors and preach hatred oJ crisis he was willing to enact price controls ktngs and unitg oJ the republic. and requisitioning. In an effort to stabilize prices, the National Convention established Forges were set up in the parks and gardens the General Ma;iimum on September 29, ofParis to produce thousands ofguns, and i,::i¡'r;;';¡¡ni1 :l:ii:l;ij'!: I:i r,l.ò,n ã ¡¡.¡,rn Èìii-iÑ #,::tS S t:¡'¡¡ì;::.:j:i{ 1 800 17 89-1 800 hty- citizens everJ¡where help ed collect s altpeter, By s. In a rock salt used to make gunpowder' the in arms had ) ex- end of 1793, the French nation Íror: stopped the advance of the allied powers, re to and in the summer of T794 it invaded the rle's Austrian Netherlands and crossed the Rhine n-or Ri\¡er. The army was ready to carry the :nt." gospel of revolution and republicanism to tlre Cto rest of Ðurope. ified Lt is, The Republic of Virtue, "1793-1794 tres, The program ofthe Terror went beyond prag- ma- matic measures to fight tJle war and internal rties enemies to include efforts to "republicalize :iaIs ever5rthing"-in other words, to effect a cul- uni- tural revolution. While censoring writings ûar- deemed counterrevolutionary, the govern- encouraged republica¡l art, set up civic , the ment ered festivals, and in some places directly attacked tri- the churches in a campaign known as de- Lters Christianization. In addition to drawing up plans for a new program of elementary edu- , the cted cation, the republic set about politicizing every of daily life, from the naming of babies ¡ the aspect aÌne to the measurement of space and time. mpe I all Republican Culture. R.efusing to tolerate opposition, the republic left no stone un- ìon turned in its endeavor to get its message rced across.
Recommended publications
  • Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College 5-2014 Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789 Kiley Bickford University of Maine - Main Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the Cultural History Commons Recommended Citation Bickford, Kiley, "Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789" (2014). Honors College. 147. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/147 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NATIONALISM IN THE FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789 by Kiley Bickford A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for a Degree with Honors (History) The Honors College University of Maine May 2014 Advisory Committee: Richard Blanke, Professor of History Alexander Grab, Adelaide & Alan Bird Professor of History Angela Haas, Visiting Assistant Professor of History Raymond Pelletier, Associate Professor of French, Emeritus Chris Mares, Director of the Intensive English Institute, Honors College Copyright 2014 by Kiley Bickford All rights reserved. Abstract The French Revolution of 1789 was instrumental in the emergence and growth of modern nationalism, the idea that a state should represent, and serve the interests of, a people, or "nation," that shares a common culture and history and feels as one. But national ideas, often with their source in the otherwise cosmopolitan world of the Enlightenment, were also an important cause of the Revolution itself. The rhetoric and documents of the Revolution demonstrate the importance of national ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution Unfolds
    WH07_te_ch06_s02_MOD_s.fm Page 216 Monday, March 5, 2007 5:24WH07MOD_se_CH06_s02_s.fm PM Page 216 Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:17 PM Step-by-Step SECTION Instruction 2 Women march WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO to the palace. Parisian Women Storm Versailles Objectives On October 5, 1789, anger turned to action as thousands As you teach this section, keep students of women marched from Paris to Versailles. They wanted focused on the following objectives to help the king to stop ignoring their suffering. They also them answer the Section Focus Question wanted the queen. French women were particularly angry and master core content. 2 with the Austrian-born queen, Marie Antoinette. They 2 could not feed their children, yet she lived extravagantly. ■ Explain how the political crisis of 1789 The women yelled as they looked for her in the palace: led to popular revolts. Death to the Austrian! We’ll wring her neck! ■ Summarize the moderate reforms “ We’ll tear her heart out! enacted by the National Assembly in —mob of women at Versailles,” October 6, 1789 August 1789. Focus Question What political and social reforms did ■ Identify additional actions taken by the the National Assembly institute in the first stage of the National Assembly as it pressed French Revolution? onward. ■ Analyze why there was a mixed reac- tion around Europe to the events unfolding in France. The French Revolution Unfolds Objectives Excitement, wonder, and fear engulfed France as the revolution Prepare to Read • Explain how the political crisis of 1789 led to unfolded at home and spread abroad. Historians divide this revo- popular revolts.
    [Show full text]
  • Contested Symbolism in the Flags of New World Slave Risings
    Contested Symbolism in the Flags of New World Slave Risings Steven A. Knowlton Throughout the summer of 1800, an enslaved blacksmith of Richmond, Virginia, named Gabriel conspired with fellow bondspeople to rise in arms and fight for their freedom. Among his plans was a scheme to paint a flag with the phrase “Death or Liberty” to be carried at the head of the column that would march into the city.1 Gabriel’s slogan inverted the words of his fellow Virginian Patrick Henry, whose famous oration on the eve of the American Revolution concluded, “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”2 It is a well-known irony of history that among those who fought for American independence from British rule—and couched their rhetoric in terms of “freedom” and “liberty”—were some of the largest slaveholders on the continent, including Henry.3 In popular memory, their struggle against King George III has been valorized, but so have the efforts of those who sought emancipation for slaves. For example, historical markers now stand at key locations in Gabriel’s career, and the Richmond History Center has made an artist’s conception of Gabriel’s image one of fifty key objects that define the city’s story.4 (Figure 1) As Gabriel’s adaptation of Henry’s rhetoric demonstrates, opposing parties are known to assign conflicting meanings to shared symbols; flags are among the most prominent of these, as documented throughout vexillological literature.5 Slaves who engaged in violent conflict with their masters often used flags mod- eled on those of their oppressors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Stories
    The Complete Stories by Franz Kafka a.b.e-book v3.0 / Notes at the end Back Cover : "An important book, valuable in itself and absolutely fascinating. The stories are dreamlike, allegorical, symbolic, parabolic, grotesque, ritualistic, nasty, lucent, extremely personal, ghoulishly detached, exquisitely comic. numinous and prophetic." -- New York Times "The Complete Stories is an encyclopedia of our insecurities and our brave attempts to oppose them." -- Anatole Broyard Franz Kafka wrote continuously and furiously throughout his short and intensely lived life, but only allowed a fraction of his work to be published during his lifetime. Shortly before his death at the age of forty, he instructed Max Brod, his friend and literary executor, to burn all his remaining works of fiction. Fortunately, Brod disobeyed. Page 1 The Complete Stories brings together all of Kafka's stories, from the classic tales such as "The Metamorphosis," "In the Penal Colony" and "The Hunger Artist" to less-known, shorter pieces and fragments Brod released after Kafka's death; with the exception of his three novels, the whole of Kafka's narrative work is included in this volume. The remarkable depth and breadth of his brilliant and probing imagination become even more evident when these stories are seen as a whole. This edition also features a fascinating introduction by John Updike, a chronology of Kafka's life, and a selected bibliography of critical writings about Kafka. Copyright © 1971 by Schocken Books Inc. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Published in the United States by Schocken Books Inc., New York. Distributed by Pantheon Books, a division of Random House, Inc., New York.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pitiful King: Tears, Blood, and Family in Revolutionary Royalism
    The Pitiful King: Tears, Blood, and Family in Revolutionary Royalism Victoria Murano Submitted to Professors Lisa Jane Graham and Linda Gerstein In partial fulfillment of the requirement of History 400: Senior Thesis Seminar Murano 1 Abstract When the French Revolution erupted in 1789, revolutionaries strove to foster a sense of freedom of expression, guaranteeing a brief freedom of the press. The eleventh article of the 1791 Declaration of the Rights of Man asserts that “The free communication of thoughts and opinions is one of man’s most precious rights; all citizens may therefore speak, write, print freely, except to answer for the abuse of this liberty in cases determined by law.” However, as France became further embroiled in the Revolution, it abandoned its allegiance to the universality of these rights, propagating pro-republican thought, and persecuting anyone who did not share these views. The royalist press was a major concern to the new republican government, because it continued to speak out in support of the king and criticize the Revolution. The existence of royalist journalists and writers thus posed a problem for revolutionaries who wanted to establish a monolithically-minded republic. Therefore, over time, they enacted repressive censorship and punishment to crack down on royalist sympathizers. Although they sent many royalist writers to prison or the guillotine, the revolutionaries ultimately failed to silence their political enemies. This thesis uses newspapers, images, and other printed media to explore royalist coverage of three events that diminished royal power: Louis XVI’s flight to Varennes in June 1791, his execution in January 1793, and the death of his nine-year-old son and heir, Louis XVII, in June 1795.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Leading the Women: Delacroix’S Liberty As Transitional Image
    Kimberly Carroll (Eugene Delacroix. Liberty Leading the People, 1830. Musée du Louvre, Paris.) Liberty Leading the Women: Delacroix’s Liberty as Transitional Image One of the most iconic transformed into a true wom- overthrow of the monarchy works of revolutionary art is an of the people. Delacroix that had been reinstituted Eugene Delacroix’s Liberty introduces through her figure shortly after the first French Leading the People, a paint- a level of specificity that Revolution of 1789 – 99. It ing from 1830 that depicts transcends her traditional debuted in the Paris Salon the July Revolution of the representations as a passive, in 1831 and was met with same year (Fig 1.). The main mythological, or allegorical mixed reactions. figure of the painting is the symbol. In looking to the or- Many were horrified at the symbol of Liberty, an igins of the figure of liberty, depiction of an event in allegorical representation the role of women during the what would have been of the ideal of perfect free- revolutions, the artist’s own contemporary history in dom. Liberty is represented history, and the reappear- which a bare-breasted through the female form, a ance of this figure into our woman was painted leading traditional manner of rep- own contemporary world, the people of France. In the resentation of victory that the evolution of Delacroix’s same year of its debut, the dates back to antiquity (Fig. Liberty as an image can be painting “was censored by 2). Many components of her seen to serve as a bridge Louis-Philippe” and was appearance clearly indicate from a purely allegorical fig- “hidden from the public for that she is an allegorical rep- ure to a real woman.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation After the French Revolution, Or, Innovation Transformed: from Word to Concept
    Innovation after the French Revolution, or, Innovation Transformed: From Word to Concept Benoît Godin 385 rue Sherbrooke Est Montreal, Quebec Canada H2X 1E3 [email protected] Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation Working Paper No. 14 2013 Previous Papers in the Series: 1. B. Godin, Innovation: The History of a Category. 2. B. Godin, In the Shadow of Schumpeter: W. Rupert Maclaurin and the Study of Technological Innovation. 3. B. Godin, The Linear Model of Innovation (II): Maurice Holland and the Research Cycle. 4. B. Godin, National Innovation System (II): Industrialists and the Origins of an Idea. 5. B. Godin, Innovation without the Word: William F. Ogburn’s Contribution to Technological Innovation Studies. 6. B. Godin, ‘Meddle Not with Them that Are Given to Change’: Innovation as Evil. 7. B. Godin, Innovation Studies: the Invention of a Specialty (Part I). 8. B. Godin, Innovation Studies: the Invention of a Specialty (Part II). 9. B. Godin, καινοτομία: An Old Word for a New World, or the De-Contestation of a Political and Contested Concept. 10. B. Godin, Republicanism and Innovation in Seventeenth Century England. 11. B. Godin, Social Innovation: Utopias of Innovation from c.1830 to the Present. 12. B. Godin and P. Lucier, Innovation and Conceptual Innovation in Ancient Greece. 13. B. Godin and J. Lane, ‘Pushes and Pulls’: The Hi(S)tory of the Demand-Pull Model of Innovation. Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation 385 rue Sherbrooke Est, Montreal, Quebec H2X 1E3 Telephone: (514) 499-4074 Facsimile: (514) 499-4065 www.csiic.ca Abstract For centuries, innovation has been a pejorative concept, and there has been no study of what innovation is.
    [Show full text]
  • Tricolore, the Flag of Italy
    Reading Comprehension/Social Studies Name: ________________________________ Date: __________________ Tricolore, the Flag of Italy Italy's flag is composed of green, white, and red bands. You may notice that it looks much like the flag of France; the reason for that is that Italy was once a territory of France. Before 1796, many different flags were used throughout the different territories that make up Italy, each representing the different local rulers and their coats-of-arms; each with different color schemes. In 1796, however, the French emperor, Napoleon Bonaparte, declared that "the national colors to adopt are the green, the white, and the red." The same year, Bonaparte united two areas of land formerly known as the Cisalpine and Transpadane Republics. In 1802, that became the Italian Republic and at that time a new flag shape was created: the flag was solid red, with a green rectangle and a white lozenge (horizontal diamond) in the middle. In 1805, a golden eagle, representing Napoleon himself, was added to the green rectangle. The State flag also included a crown, and sometimes another coat of arms was added to the white area. The design was becoming very crowded! Finally, on June 19, 1946, the modern flag with its green, white, and red bands was officially adopted. It is known as the "Tricolore," from "tri," the Latin word for three, and "colore," for color. Like most national flags, the Tricolore has a size ratio of 2:3, meaning that it is two parts tall by three parts wide; for example, a flag two feet high is always three feet wide.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution 1789
    Grade 10 - History Topic 3 THE FRENCH REVOLUTION 1789 1 Until 1789 rule by Kings States Generals Called 1789 Fall of the Bastille, July 1789 King Louis XVI of France [http://www.biography.com/people/louis-xvi-9386943] New Constitution 1789 - 1791 Republic 1792 Extremists in Power 1793 Reign of Terror 1793 - 1794 Napoleon First The Directory Consul 1795 1799 2 [http://www.biography.com/people/napoleon- 9420291] CONDITIONS IN FRANCE BEFORE 1789 The French Revolution was the result of conditions in France in the century preceding 1789. The causes are usually considered under the following headings: POLITICAL CAUSES A. THE WORKING OF THE GOVERNMENT The government was despotic, i.e. the King had absolute power. However, there were two other powerful organisations in France: i The power of the Church a. The Catholic Church owned a large amount of land. b. It was very wealthy. c. It was not subjected to ordinary laws; it had its own legal system. d. It did not pay official taxes but gave ‘presents’ to the state on a voluntary basis. e. It was socially and educationally very important. ii The Parlements of France a. These were special courts of law that had the right to register all and therefore could refuse to register a law made by the King. b. The King could use his power of ‘Lit de justice’ whereby he could in theory force the Parlements to register the law, but in fact he was afraid to use this power in case he upset the Parlements. b. The King nominated the members of the Royal Council and they were responsible to him.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNOUNCEMENT from the Copyright Office, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C
    ANNOUNCEMENT from the Copyright Office, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20559-6000 PUBLICATION OF FIFTH LIST OF NOTICES OF INTENT TO ENFORCE COPYRIGHTS RESTORED UNDER THE URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENTS ACT. COPYRIGHT RESTORATION OF WORKS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENTS ACT; LIST IDENTIFYING COPYRIGHTS RESTORED UNDER THE URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENTS ACT FOR WHICH NOTICES OF INTENT TO ENFORCE RESTORED COPYRIGHTS WERE FILED IN THE COPYRIGHT OFFICE. The following excerpt is taken from Volume 62, Number 163 of the Federal Register for Friday, August 22,1997 (p. 443424854) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the work is from a country with which LIBRARY OF CONGRESS the United States did not have copyright I. Background relations at the time of the work's Copyright Off ice publication); and The Uruguay Round General (3) Has at least one author (or in the 37 CFR Chapter II Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the case of sound recordings, rightholder) Uruguay Round Agreements Act who was, at the time the work was [Docket No. RM 97-3A] (URAA) (Pub. L. 103-465; 108 Stat. 4809 created, a national or domiciliary of an Copyright Restoration of Works in (1994)) provide for the restoration of eligible country. If the work was Accordance With the Uruguay Round copyright in certain works that were in published, it must have been first Agreements Act; List Identifying the public domain in the United States. published in an eligible country and not Copyrights Restored Under the Under section 104.4 of title 17 of the published in the United States within 30 Uruguay Round Agreements Act for United States Code as provided by the days of first publication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calendar in Revolutionary France : Perceptions of Time in Literature, Culture, Politics / Sanja Perovic
    THE C A LENDA R IN REVOLUTIONARY FRANCE One of the most unusual decisions of the leaders of the French Revolution – and one that had immense practical as well as symbolic impact – was to abandon customarily accepted ways of calculating date and time to create a revolutionary calendar. The experiment lasted from 1793 to 1805 and prompted all sorts of questions about the nature of time, ways of measuring it and its relationship to indi- vidual, community, communication and creative life. This study traces the course of the revolutionary calendar, from its cultural ori- gins to its decline and fall. Tracing the parallel stories of the calen- dar and the literary genius of its creator, Sylvain Maréchal, from the Enlightenment to the Napoleonic era, Sanja Perovic reconsiders the status of the French Revolution as the purported ‘origin’ of modern- ity, the modern experience of time and the relationship between the imagination and political action. sanja perovic is Lecturer in the French Department at King’s College London. Le calendrier républicain, Debucourt, No. 1987–49, © Musée de la Révolution française/Domaine de Vizille. THE CA LENDA R IN REVOLUTIONARY FRANCE Perceptions of Time in Literature, Culture, Politics SANJA PEROVIC King’s College London cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Mexico City Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 8ru, uk Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107025950 © Sanja Perovic 2012 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo: Causes, Courses and Consequences Transcript
    Waterloo: Causes, Courses and Consequences Transcript Date: Thursday, 18 June 2015 - 6:00PM Location: Museum of London 18 June 2015 Waterloo: Causes, Courses and Consequences Professor Sir Richard Evans Today is the exact two hundredth anniversary of the Battle of Waterloo, shown here in a later painting by the Victorian artist William Holmes Sullivan, (1) and in this lecture I want to explore the causes, courses and consequences of the battle. Why was it fought? Who fought it? Who won, and why? And how important was it? To the Daily Mail and probably to many other people in this country, the answers to these questions seem so obvious as hardly to merit discussion. It was a battle in which the British, led by the Duke of Wellington, beat the French, led by the Emperor Napoleon, and thus brought his dream of a European dictatorship to an end in what was one of the decisive moments of world history. But in the next three-quarters of an hour or so, I want to persuade you that every single one of these statements is wrong: the British did not bash the French, the Duke of Wellington did not defeat the Emperor Napoleon, and the battle was not one of the decisive moments of world history. Let’s start with the background. Who was Napoleon Bonaparte? (2) Born in Corsica in 1769, he became a leading commander in the armies of the French Revolution, defeating the armies of the Habsburg Empire which was the leading power among the enemies of Revolutionary France (it has to be remembered that Louis XIV’s Queen Marie Antoinette, executed by the Revolutionaries along with her husband, was an Austrian and the sister of the Habsburg Emperor Joseph II and thus the Aunt of the Emperor Francis I, who came to the throne in 1792 and led the European forces ranged against the Revolution ).
    [Show full text]