University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2015 Experiments, Simulations, and Lessons from Experimental Evolution Emily Parke University of Pennsylvania,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Biology Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Parke, Emily, "Experiments, Simulations, and Lessons from Experimental Evolution" (2015). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1114. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1114 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1114 For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Experiments, Simulations, and Lessons from Experimental Evolution Abstract Philosophers and scientists have sought to draw methodological distinctions among different kinds of experiments, and between experimentation and other scientific methodologies. This dissertation focuses on two such cases: hypothesis-testing versus exploratory experiments, and experiment versus simulation. I draw on examples from experimental evolution--evolving organisms in a controlled laboratory setting to study evolution via natural selection in real time--to challenge the way we think about these distinctions. In the case of hypothesis-testing versus exploratory experiments, philosophers have distinguished these categories in terms of the role of theory in experiment. I discuss examples from experimental evolution which occupy the poorly characterized middle ground between the two categories. I argue that we should take more seriously the point that multiple theoretical backgrounds can come into play at multiple points in an experiment, and propose some new contributions toward clarifying the conceptual space of experimental inquiry. In the case of experiment versus simulation, people have attempted to clearly delineate cases of science into these two categories, and base judgments about their epistemic value on these categorizations.