National Hazardous Materials Route Registry (March 31, 2021)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Hazardous Materials Route Registry (March 31, 2021) 32306 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 115 / Thursday, June 17, 2021 / Notices under which such actions were taken Resource Conservation and Recovery Office hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., are described in the Environmental Act (RCRA) [42 U.S.C. 6901–6992(k)]. ET., Monday through Friday, except for Assessment (EA) approved on December 10. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 Federal holidays. 17, 2020, in FHWA’s FONSI issued on Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988 Legal Basis and Background May 26, 2021, and other documents in Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898, the project file. The EA, FONSI and Federal Actions to Address Paragraphs (a)(2) and (b) of section other project records are available by Environmental Justice in Minority 5112 of title 49 United States Code contacting FHWA or the Georgia Populations and Low Income (U.S.C.) permit States and Tribal Department of Transportation at the Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and governments to designate and limit addresses listed above. The EA and Enhancement of Cultural Resources; highway routes over which hazardous FONSI can also be reviewed and E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred Sites; E.O. materials (HM) may be transported, downloaded from the project website at 13287 Preserve America; E.O. 13175 provided the State or Tribal government https://majormobilityga.com/projects/ Consultation and Coordination with complies with standards prescribed by eastsideic/. Indian Tribal Governments; E.O. 11514 the Secretary of Transportation (the This notice applies to all Federal Protection and Enhancement of Secretary) and meets publication agency decisions as of the issuance date Environmental Quality; E.O. 13045 requirements in section 5112(c). To of this notice and all laws under which Protection of Children from establish standards under paragraph (b), such actions were taken, including but Environmental Health Risks and Safety the Secretary must consult with the not limited to: Risks; E.O. 13112 Invasive Species. States, and, under section 5112(c), 1. General: National Environmental (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance coordinate with the States to ‘‘update Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321– Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and publish periodically’’ a list of 4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 and Construction. The regulations currently effective HM highway routing U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128]. implementing E.O. 12372 regarding designations and restrictions. The 2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401– intergovernmental consultation on Federal requirements that States and Tribal 7671(q)]. programs and activities apply to this governments must follow to establish, 3. Land: Section 4(f) of the program.) maintain, or enforce routing Department of Transportation Act of Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). designations for the transport of 1966 [49 U.S.C. 303]; Landscaping and placardable quantities of NRHM are set Moises Marrero, Scenic Enhancement (Wildflowers) [23 forth in 49 CFR part 397, subpart C. U.S.C. 319]. Division Administrator, Atlanta, Georgia. Subpart D of part 397 sets out the 4. Noise: Noise Control Act of 1972 [FR Doc. 2021–12597 Filed 6–16–21; 8:45 am] requirements for designating preferred [42 U.S.C. 4901–4918]; 23 CFR part 772; BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P routes for highway route controlled Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1970, quantities of HRCQ/RAM shipments as Public Law 91–605 [84 Stat. 1713]. an alternative, or in addition, to 5. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Interstate System highways. For HRCQ/ (ESA) [16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and Section RAM shipments, § 397.101 defines a 1536]; Fish and Wildlife Coordination Federal Motor Carrier Safety preferred route as an Interstate Highway Act [16 U.S.C. 661–667d]; Migratory Administration for which no alternative route is Bird Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703–712]. designated by the State; a route 6. Historic and Cultural Resources: National Hazardous Materials Route specifically designated by the State; or Section 106 of the National Historic Registry both. (See § 397.65 for the definitions of Preservation Act of 1966, as amended AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety NRHM and routing designations.) [16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.]; Archeological Administration (FMCSA), Department Resources Protection Act of 1977 [16 Under a delegation from the of Transportation (DOT). 1 U.S.C. 470(aa)–470(mm)]; Archeological Secretary, FMCSA has authority to ACTION: Notice; revisions to the listing of and Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C. implement 49 U.S.C. 5112. designated and restricted routes for 469–469(c)]; Native American Grave Currently, § 397.73 establishes public hazardous materials. Protection and Repatriation Act information and reporting requirements for NRHM. States or Tribal governments (NAGPRA) [25 U.S.C. 3001–3013]. SUMMARY: This notice provides revisions are required to furnish information 7. Social and Economic: Civil Rights to the National Hazardous Materials regarding any new or changed routes to Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000(d)— Route Registry (NHMRR) reported to the FMCSA within 60 days after 2000(d)(1)]; American Indian Religious FMCSA from April 1, 2020 through establishment. Under § 397.103, a State Freedom Act [42 U.S.C. 1996]; Farmland March 31, 2021. The NHMRR is a routing designation for HRCQ/RAM Protection Policy Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C. listing, as reported by States and Tribal routes (preferred routes) as an 4201–4209]. governments, of all designated and alternative, or in addition, to an 8. Wetlands and Water Resources: restricted roads and preferred highway Interstate System highway, is effective Land and Water Conservation Fund routes for transportation of highway when the authorized routing agency (LWCF) [16 U.S.C. 4601–4604]; Safe route controlled quantities of Class 7 provides FMCSA with written Drinking Water Act (SDWA) [42 U.S.C. radioactive materials (HRCQ/RAM) and notification, FMCSA acknowledges 300(f)–300(j)(6)]; Wild and Scenic non-radioactive hazardous materials receipt in writing, and the route is Rivers Act [16 U.S.C. 1271– 1287]; (NRHM). Flood Disaster Protection Act [42 U.S.C. published in FMCSA’s NHMRR. The 4001–4128]. DATES: June 17, 2021. Office of Management and Budget has 9. Hazardous Materials: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. approved these collections of Comprehensive Environmental Melissa Williams, Hazardous Materials information under control number Response, Compensation, and Liability Division, Office of Enforcement and 2126–0014, Transportation of Act (CERCLA) [42 U.S.C. 9601–9675]; Compliance, FMCSA, 1200 New Jersey Hazardous Materials, Highway Routing. Superfund Amendments and Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590, (202) Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA); 366–4163, [email protected]. 1 49 CFR 1.87(d)(2). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Jun 16, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 115 / Thursday, June 17, 2021 / Notices 32307 In this notice, FMCSA is merely August 8, 2016, August 9, 2018, Route Order Designator ‘‘A2A’’ is performing the ministerial function of September 24, 2019, and June 3, 2020 revised to rename I–680 to I–880. updating and publishing the NHMRR notices. Continue to refer to the April Route Order Designator ‘‘A2B’’ is based on input from its State and Tribal 29, 2015 notice for additional revised to rename I–680 to I–880. partners under 49 U.S.C. 5112(c)(1). background on the NHMRR and the Route Order Designator ‘‘A3B’’ is Accordingly, this notice serves only to August 8, 2016 notice for the procedures revised to rename I–680 to I–880. provide the most recent revisions to the for State and Tribal government routing Route Order Designator ‘‘A3B–2.0’’ is NHMRR; it does not establish any new agencies to update their Route Registry revised to rename I–680 to I–880. public information and reporting listings and contact information. Route Order Designator ‘‘A3B–3.0’’ is requirements. The full current NHMRR for each revised to rename I–680 to I–880. State is posted on the FMCSA’s website Route Order Designator ‘‘A4B–1.0’’ is Updates to the NHMRR at: https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/ revised to rename I–680 to I–880. FMCSA published the full NHMRR in regulations/hazardous-materials/ Route Order Key a Federal Register notice on April 29, national-hazardous-materials-route- 2015 (80 FR 23859). Since publication registry. Each listing in the NHMRR includes of the 2015 notice, FMCSA published codes to identify each route designation four updates to the NHMRR in Federal Revisions to the NHMRR in This Notice and each route restriction reported by Register notices on August 8, 2016 (81 In accordance with the requirements the State. Designation codes identify the FR 52518), August 9, 2018 (83 FR of §§ 397.73 and 397.103, the NHMRR is routes along which a driver may or must 39500), September 24, 2019 (84 FR being revised as follows: transport specified HM. Among the 50098), and June 3, 2020 (85 FR 34284). designation codes is one for preferred This notice provides revisions to the Table 2—California—Designated routes, which apply to the NHMRR, reported to FMCSA from April NRHM Routes transportation of a highway route 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. The Route Order Designator ‘‘A3A–3.0’’ controlled quantity of Class 7 revisions to the NHMRR listings in this with ‘‘I’’ designation is removed. (radioactive) material. Restriction codes notice supersede and replace identify the routes along which a driver Table 3—Iowa—Designated NRHM corresponding NHMRR listings may not transport specified HM Routes published in the April 29, 2015 notice shipments. Table 1 presents information and corresponding revisions to the Route Order Designator ‘‘A1’’ is on each restriction and designation NHMRR listings published in the revised to rename I–680 to I–880.
Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Introduction........................................................................................ 1 County Overview ............................................................................... 2 Population Trends & Demographic Profile .................................... 3 Population Trends in Pottawattamie County ....................................................... 3 Population Profile.............................................................................................. 5 Demographic Profile ......................................................................................... 7 Employment Profile ........................................................................................... 7 Projected Population & Employment ................................................................ 10 Roadways & Bridges ........................................................................ 12 Roadway Systems ............................................................................................ 12 Profile of County Roadways............................................................................. 14 Pavement Condition ........................................................................................ 16 Bridges in Pottawattamie County ..................................................................... 19 Traffic Trends in Pottawattamie County ........................................................... 21 Roadway Safety ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx
    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Burbank/Del Monte SNI Planning Area Boundary February 7, 2002 %
    Burbank/DelBurbank/Del MonteMonte SNISNI PlanningPlanning AreaArea AVE TAMARACK UNIVERSITY WAY FREMONT BEL-AIR LIBRARYLIBRARY AVE THETHETHE ALAMEDA ALAMEDAALAMEDA DELMAS SEQUOIA (STATE ROUTE 82) THETHETHE ALAMEDA ALAMEDAALAMEDA AVE ALAMEDA THE BUSH CLEAVES WILSON SINGLETARY SUNOL ATLAS S KEEBLE AVE S MORRISON STOVER HOOVERHOOVER WHITEWHITEWHITE WHITEWHITEWHITE HOOVERHOOVER RACE HOOVERHOOVER WHITEWHITEWHITE HADLEY TRACETRACE TRACETRACE TILLMAN AVE ST DR MCENERYMCENERY LAURELEI AVE MIDDLEMIDDLE SCHOOLSCHOOL HEDDING MIDDLEMIDDLE SCHOOLSCHOOL MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARYELEMENTARY CRANDALL ST DR PARKPARK CAHILL ST ST SCHOOLSCHOOL UNIVER AVE AVE SITY AVE HESTER AVE AVE DR BELLEROSE DR SHASTA STSTST MCALISTER AVE AVE GARLAND STSTST EMORY STSTST GENEVIEVE LN AVE ST AVE WW W SAN SAN SAN FERNANDO FERNANDO FERNANDO AVE WW W SAN SAN SAN FERNANDO FERNANDO FERNANDO AVE AVE ST (STATE ROUTE 87) TRACE AVE ST. LEO THE GREAT HANCHETT (PRIVATE) ST WOZ ST GARDEN DR SONOMA BELLEROSE MCDANIEL GIFFORD LAKEHOUSE S MORRISON S CALAVERAS W SAN FERNANDO ST AVE CLEAVES MARTIN ST NAGLEE AVE AVE OTTERSONST ST DANIEL AVE O'CONNOR DR LINCOLNLINCOLN LINCOLNLINCOLN LUTHER AVE ST SIERRA RANIER ST SENIORSENIOR HIGHHIGH SCHOOLSCHOOL AVE SENIORSENIOR HIGHHIGH SCHOOLSCHOOL AVE FORESTFOREST BROOKLYN AVE WABASH AVE FLORENCE CIRO SALVO DI O'CONNOR RAMOS AVEAVE ST AVE EUGENE AVE WAY FORESTFOREST FORESTFOREST AVE WAY ST AVE POSA AVE JOSEFA CLARMAR AVE AVE AVE BOSTON AVE HESTER AVE AVE MONROE ST MONROE MARI REVEY ST. MARTIN OF TOURS AVE BIRD BIRD BIRD SHASTA AVEAVEBIRD BIRD BIRD YOSEMITENORTON
    [Show full text]
  • Socioeconomic Assessment for the Tonto National Forest
    4. Access and Travel Patterns This section examines historic and current factors affecting access patterns and transportation infrastructure within the four counties surrounding Tonto National Forest (TNF). The information gathered is intended to outline current and future trends in forest access as well as potential barriers to access encountered by various user groups. Primary sources of data on access and travel patterns for the state’s national forests include the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), the Arizona Department of Commerce (ADOC), and the circulation elements of individual county comprehensive plans. Indicators used to assess access and travel patterns include existing road networks and planned improvements, trends in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on major roadways, seasonal traffic flows, and county transportation planning priorities. Additional input on internal access issues has been sought directly from forest planning staff. Various sources of information for the area surrounding TNF cite the difficulty of transportation planning in the region given its vast geographic scale, population growth, pace of development, and constrained transportation funding. In an effort to respond effectively to such challenges, local and regional planning authorities stress the importance of linking transportation planning with preferred land uses. Data show that the area surrounding Tonto National Forest saw relatively large increases in VMT between 1990 and 2000, mirroring the region’s relatively strong population growth over the same period. Information gathered from the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) and county comprehensive plans suggest that considerable improvements are currently scheduled for the region’s transportation network, particularly when compared to areas surrounding Arizona’s other national forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • 0253S04.45H Sb 89
    0253S04.45H SB 89 House _______________________________________________________ Amendment NO.____ Offered By _____________________________________ ___________________________________ 1 AMEND Senate Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 89, Page 1, Section A, Line 3, by 2 inserting after all of said section and line the following: 3 4 "227.463. The portion of Interstate 29 from its intersection of Interstate 70/U.S. State 5 Highway 71/40 in Jackson County north to the bridge crossing over Nishnabotna River in Atchison 6 County, except for those portions of Interstate 29 previously designated as of August 28, 2019, shall 7 be designated the "Purple Heart Trail". Costs for such designation shall be paid by private 8 donations. 9 227.465. The portion of Interstate 55 from State Highway O in Pemiscot County to U.S. 10 Highway 40 in St. Louis City, except for those portions of Interstate 55 previously designated as of 11 August 28, 2019, shall be designated the "Purple Heart Trail". Costs for such designation shall be 12 paid by private donations. 13 227.466. The portion of Interstate 57 from the Missouri/Illinois state line in Mississippi 14 County continuing south to U.S. State Highway 60/State Highway AA in Scott County shall be 15 designated the "Purple Heart Trail". Costs for such designation shall be paid by private donations. 16 227.467. The portion of Interstate 64 from Interstate 70 from the city of Wentzville in St. 17 Charles County continuing east to Interstate 55 at the Missouri/Illinois state line in St. Louis City, 18 except for those portions of Interstate 64/US40/US61 previously designated as August 28, 2019, 19 shall be designated the "Purple Heart Trail".
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Report Cover Template
    Rigel Robinson Councilmember District 7 REVISED AGENDA MATERIAL Meeting Date: January 28 Item Number: 11 Item Description: Letter in Support of a Dedicated Bus Lane on the Bay Bridge Submitted by: Councilmember Rigel Robinson Addition of AC Transit buses per hour data and resolutions passed by AC Transit and BART. Addition of Mayor Arreguin and Councilmember Droste as cosponsors. Edits and minor grammatical changes to letter. 2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 Tel: 510.981.XXXX TDD: 510.981.6903 Fax: 510.981.XXXX E-Mail: [email protected] CONSENT CALENDAR January 28, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Councilmembers Rigel Robinson, Councilmember Droste, and Mayor Arreguin Subject: Letter in Support of a Dedicated Bus Lane on the Bay Bridge RECOMMENDATION Send a letter to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, Assemblymember Rob Bonta, Assemblymember Jim Frazier, State Senator Nancy Skinner, and Senator Jim Beall in support of the reinstatement of a dedicated bus lane on the San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge. BACKGROUND On January 15, 1961, the State of California established a temporary dedicated bus lane on the Bay Bridge to alleviate rush hour congestion. The bus-only lane enabled buses to remain on schedule and reduced bus travel time across the bridge from 25 minutes to 13 minutes, twice as fast as automobiles during rush hour. Implementation had an immediate effect on AC Transit ridership — Transbay ticket sales increased 12.8 percent in just a year, from $134,699 in January 1961 to $153,912 in January 1962.1 On January 31, 1963, the San Francisco Division of Bay Toll Crossing under the California Department of Public Works, now renamed the Division of Bay Toll Crossing, announced that it would be removing the bus express lane after only a year of operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacant Manufacturing Building 3444 N Summit Drive Toledo, OH 43611 2 SANDS INVESTMENT GROUP EXCLUSIVELY MARKETED BY
    1 Vacant Manufacturing Building 3444 N Summit Drive Toledo, OH 43611 2 SANDS INVESTMENT GROUP EXCLUSIVELY MARKETED BY: BILL ROBERTSON COLE KOEPSELL Lic. # 403061 Lic. # 405304 770.672.5614 | DIRECT 770.672.5564 | DIRECT [email protected] [email protected] SOLOMON COLVIN III SCOTT REID Lic. # 205030 OH Lic. # BRKP.2020001224 770.744.4555 | DIRECT 949.942.6585 | DIRECT [email protected] [email protected] 1501 Johnson Ferry Road, Suite 200 Marietta, GA 30062 844.4.SIG.NNN www.SIGnnn.com In Cooperation With ParaSell, Inc., A Licensed Ohio Broker Lic. # REC.2020005946 BoR: Scott Reid – Lic. # BRKP.2020001224 3 SANDS INVESTMENT GROUP TABLE OF CONTENTS 04 06 11 INVESTMENT OVERVIEW PROPERTY OVERVIEW AREA OVERVIEW Investment Summary Property Images City Overview Investment Highlights Location, Aerial & Retail Maps Demographics © 2021 Sands Investment Group (SIG). The information contained in this ‘Offering Memorandum’, has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Sands Investment Group does not doubt its accuracy; however, Sands Investment Group makes no guarantee, representation or warranty about the accuracy contained herein. It is the responsibility of each individual to conduct thorough due diligence on any and all information that is passed on about the property to determine its accuracy and completeness. Any and all projections, market assumptions and cash flow analysis are used to help determine a potential overview on the property, however there is no guarantee or assurance these projections, market assumptions and cash flow analysis are subject to change with property and market conditions. Sands Investment Group encourages all potential interested buyers to seek advice from your tax, financial and legal advisors before making any real estate purchase and transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • I-29 - Exit 62 to Exit 73 INTERSTATE Corridor Study 29
    July 2018 I-29 - Exit 62 to Exit 73 INTERSTATE Corridor Study 29 Project No: HP 5596 19 prepared for: South Dakota Department of Transportation 700 East Broadway Avenue Pierre, SD 57501 I-29 Exit 62 to Exit 73 Corridor Study Lincoln County, SD Project No: HP 5596 19 Prepared for: South Dakota Department of Transportation 700 East Broadway Avenue Pierre, SD 57501 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt and Ullevig 11422 Miracle Hills Drive, Suite 115 Omaha, NE 68154 402-445-4405 In Association with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Principal-in-Charge / Project Manager: Kyle Anderson, PE, PTOE Deputy Project Manager: Mark Meisinger, PE, PTOE FHU Reference No. 17-089 July 2018 The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant(s) from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. The South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) provides services without regard to race, color, gender, religion, national origin, age or disability, according to the provisions contained in SDCL 20-13, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 1994. To request additional information on the SDDOT’s Title VI/Nondiscrimination policy or to file a discrimination complaint, please contact the Department’s Civil Rights Office at 605-773-3540.
    [Show full text]
  • Creighton Athletics Hall of Fame in Inducted Into the Creighton 1992, Along with Sister and Bluejay Athletics Hall of Fame in 2012
    2 0 1 7 CREIGHTON SOFTBALL 2017 MEDIA GUIDE Table of Contents/Quick Facts Creighton Quick Facts Table of Contents Introduction Record Book General Information Table of Contents/Quick Facts .................................... 1 Year-by-Year Statistics ........................................... 46-47 Location ................................................................ Omaha, Neb. 2017 Roster Information ................................................ 2 Year-by-Year Leaders ............................................. 48-51 Founded ................................................................................1878 2017 Outlook ..................................................................... 3 Single-Season Records .......................................... 52-53 Enrollment...........................................................................8,393 Rasmussen Fitness & Sports Center .......................... 4 Career Records ......................................................... 54-55 Nickname .......................................................................Bluejays Creighton Sports Complex ........................................... 5 Miscellaneous Records .......................................... 56-57 Colors .................................................................Blue and White Creighton All-Americans ...................................... 58-60 Affiliation ........................................................NCAA Division I Meet the Bluejays Creighton Softball Hall of Famers ............................61
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Traffic
    4.13 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC This chapter describes the existing traffic conditions of the EA Study Area and evaluates the potential envi- ronmental consequences of future development that could occur by adopting and implementing the pro- posed Housing Element Update, General Plan Consistency Update, and associated Zoning Ordinances amendments, together referred to as the “Plan Components” on transportation and traffic. A summary of the relevant regulatory setting and existing conditions is followed by a discussion of Plan Components and cumulative impacts. The chapter is based on the traffic analysis prepared by TJKM Transportation Consultants dated March 8, 2013, herein referred to as “Traffic Study.” The future baseline traffic volumes have been developed from output of the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) travel demand model run by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The travel demand associated with the Plan Components have been obtained from the C/CAG Model based upon the anticipated future land uses that have been developed resulting from the land use controls under Near-Term 2014 and 2035 condi- tions. The complete Traffic Study and technical appendices are included in Appendix F of this EA. A. Regulatory Framework 1. Federal Laws and Regulations a. Federal Highway Administration The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the agency of the United States (U.S.) Department of Transportation (DOT) responsible for the federally-funded roadway system, including the interstate high- way network and portions of the primary State highway network, such as Interstate 280 (I-280). b. Americans with Disabilities Act The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 provides comprehensive rights and protections to indi- viduals with disabilities.
    [Show full text]