Introduction & Mark 1:1-13

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction & Mark 1:1-13 Introduction & Mark 1:1-13 Class Discussion for September 23, 2020 Trinity Lutheran, Zanesville, OH Opening Prayer As We Begin As we begin our study of Mark’s gospel what do you know about it already? Feel free to list or share as many things as you can think of. What do you hope to learn as we read through this account together over the next several weeks? About the Author (From CPH’s Mark Study Questions) The Gospel of Mark was written c. AD 50-60 by John Mark. John Mark was a youth during Jesus’ ministry and yet he likely was present at certain events in the early church. His mother’s house served as a meeting place for the early Christians in Jerusalem (Acts 12:12), and some Bible scholars believe that Jesus celebrated the Last Supper at Mark’s house. Other scholars suggest that Mark was the young man who appeared in the Garden of Gethsemane when Jesus was arrested (Mark 14:51-52). One might wonder though how Mark was able to provide the eyewitness account of Jesus’ ministry in this gospel if he was only a youth at the time. Here’s the rest of the story… Mark was a cousin of Barnabas (Colossians 4:10) and accompanied Paul and Barnabas on their first missionary journey but then he abandoned the mission at Pamphylia. When Paul brought up the idea of returning to those churches, Barnabas wanted to give Mark a second chance and bring him along. But Paul did not think that would be a good idea. So Barnabas took Mark along to Cyprus while Paul took Silas on his second journey (Acts 15:36–40). Eventually, Mark found his way to Rome, where he met up with Peter and became his helper. Early church historians tell us Mark composed this Gospel from his recollections of sermons he had heard Peter preach while in Rome. Around AD 130, Bishop Papias of Hierapolis wrote, “Mark, having become Peter’s interpreter, wrote down accurately, though not in order, as many as he remembered of the things said or done by the Lord. For he neither had heard the Lord nor followed Him, but at a later time, as I said, [he followed] Peter, who delivered his instructions according to the needs [of the occasion].” So Peter’s eye witness accounts of the words and works of Jesus are the source material for the Gospel of Mark. The Purpose of the Gospel We remember that the synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke were all written from slightly different points of view and different purposes. Matthew being a Jew, wrote his gospel to appeal to the Jewish people to show them that this Jesus was the long-promised Messiah of the Old Testament- the One that they had been waiting for. Meanwhile, Luke, the doctor, wrote his gospel with precision and exacting details to show his hearers how Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection fit into the landscape of human history. Mark’s gospel account was written to convince Peter’s Roman readers that Jesus was who He said He was- God’s Son and the Savior of the world. Mark’s Favorite Sport What is your favorite sport to watch? What is your least favorite? Why do you feel that way? Feel free to share with the group. Based on the style of writing in Mark’s gospel, perhaps we could say that his favorite sport was basketball- because his gospel is written like he is on a fast break. The Greek word euthus is used 51 times throughout the New Testament, with 41 of those occurrences in the Gospel of Mark. Euthus is translated in English as “immediately.” Time and time again Mark uses this word to transition from one event of Jesus’ ministry to another. Other than two discourses in chapters 4 and 13, the Gospel of Mark is all about the actions of Jesus- immediately coming one after another after another. In this way Mark seeks to remove all doubt from his readers of who this Jesus truly is through an ever-increasing onslaught of His works that happen immediately on top of each other throughout the gospel. Do you think this is an effective technique? What type of people might it appeal to most? What type of people might it not appeal to? Because of Mark’s focus on the events and actions of Jesus’ ministry, Mark is the lone synoptic gospel that doesn’t include a genealogy or an account of Jesus’ birth. What do you think this conveys to his readers? The Gospel’s Great Secret In addition to his supposed love of basketball, I wouldn’t be surprised if Mark enjoyed a good mystery novel too. I say that because his writing of this gospel carries a great secret with it throughout. The secret is who Jesus is- that is the underlying tension throughout the entire gospel. Mark opens in the very first verse with a narrative introduction of who Jesus is, but it is clear throughout that almost everyone encountering Jesus’ ministry is still in the dark about that truth. Four times in the gospel, Mark shares testimonies of who Jesus is. Early on God Himself testifies to Jesus’ identity. Then later a demon does. Still later a disciple comes around to make the confession. And in the climatic peak of the book, even someone who was not a follower of Jesus does too. When we get to the end of the book, there is a long-held debate if the final 12 verses of the gospel (Mark 16:9-20) were original to Mark or if they were added later. Without them the gospel seems to end abruptly without a clear summation from the author of who Jesus is. But perhaps that fits into Mark’s mystery novel style too. He shared the events and actions of Jesus’ life again and again throughout his gospel. He dropped the testimonies of who certain people believed Jesus to be too, but then he leaves his readers with the responsibility of making their own confession based off what they read that Jesus had done. As we read through the gospel together over the next few weeks, be on the lookout for the people who testify to who Jesus is and take note of what Jesus’ actions say about who He is too. John Baptizes Jesus + Read Mark 1:1-13 It only takes ten verses for Mark to break out his favorite word. Re-read Mark 1:10 without the word immediately, then read it one more time with that word. What does the word add to the account of Jesus’ Baptism? What do you think is the significance of the violent opening of the heavens in verse 10? Lookup Isaiah 64:1 and Mark 15:37-38. In verse 11, Mark drops the first testimony to who this Jesus is. Adding to the mystery, Mark doesn’t spell out who speaks these words- what does he say instead? Who does the voice testify that Jesus is? What happened immediately after Jesus’ baptism? Why do you think the devil seeks to tempt Jesus? Prayer Requests and Closing Prayer Sources + The Lutheran Study Bible (ESV), Concordia Publishing House, St. Louis, 2009. + Books of the Bible Study Questions: Mark from Concordia Publishing House. + Concordia Commentary: Mark 1:1-8:26, James W. Voelz, CPH, St. Louis, 2013. .
Recommended publications
  • Papias and Matthew, Papias and His Elder John (Three Topical Studies)
    _______________________________________________________________ Papias and Matthew, Papias and his Elder John (Three Topical Studies) I Papias and Matthew (Who Wrote Matthew’s Gospel?) p. 1 II. Papias and His “Elder John” (Who Wrote John’s Gospel and Revelation?) p. 49 III. Messianic Prophecy p. 79 A Confirmation that the Bible Is True and that Jesus Is the Promised Savior by Steven Waterhouse Westcliff Press www.webtheology.com (Free download) [email protected] i _______________________________________________________________ Other books by Steven Waterhouse Not By Bread Alone; An Outlined Guide to Bible Doctrine Strength For His People; A Ministry For the Families of the Mentally Ill Blessed Assurance; A Defense of the Doctrine of Eternal Security What Must I Do To Be Saved? The Bible’s Definition of Saving Faith Life’s Tough Questions Holy Matrimony; The Image of God in the Family Outside the Heavenly City; Abortion in Rome and the Early Church’s Response Jesus and History; How We Know His Life and Claims Depression Recovery; According to the Bible Suffering; Why Would a Good God Allow Evil and Pain? Messianic Prophecy A Biblical Look at Unborn Children Husband and Wife; The Imitation of Christ Jesus, Miracles and History Bible Counsel for Raising Children Understanding Dispensationalism The Gifts of the Spirit All Books Available for FREE DOWNLOAD at www.webtheology.com ISBN #9780991358540 Available at Amazon.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Published by Westcliff Press (www.webtheology.com). First Edition 2014 Copyright 2014 by Steven W. Waterhouse All rights reserved. This book or portions thereof may be reproduced or retransmitted without written permission from the publisher only if attributed to the author and without alteration.
    [Show full text]
  • Church History - Week 1 60 - 312 AD
    Church History - Week 1 60 - 312 AD Hebrews 13:7 (NIV) - "Remember your leaders, who spoke the word of God to you. Consider the ​ ​ ​ ​ outcome of their way of life and imitate their faith." 1. Church Structures a. Acts 2:42-47 and the whole of the New Testament describes early Church structure ​ and practices. b. Homes and some larger rented buildings for meetings - Acts 12:12; Rom 16:5; 1 Cor 16:19; Col 4:15; Phm 1:2; Acts 2:46; Acts 19:9. Because Christianity was illegal, special Church buildings were not used in this time. c. There were local elders but all Christians were ministers - there was no “clergy and laity” distinction - all gifts were important. 2. Church Persecution was a part of life 3. Church Growth a. In his book, The Rise of Christianity, Rodney Stark (professor of Social Sciences at Baylor ​ University) says that in the first three centuries of the Church, Christianity grew by ​ 40% every decade. This means that they grew from a few thousand in 40 AD to 34 million in 350 AD. They grew from less than 1% of the total population to 56% of the empire in a few centuries. 4. Miracles a large part of life but may have been starting to wane. 5. Church beliefs a. Early Church fathers’ writings - Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp of Smyrna, Papias of Hierapolis, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus of Lyons, Clement of Alexandria, Origen of Alexandria, Athanasius of Alexandria, Tertullian, didache. Structures and forms start to exist. b. Heresies & Creeds - Gnosticism, Marcionism.
    [Show full text]
  • PAT101 Booklet.Pdf
    Coptic Orthodox Diocese of the Southern United States PAT 102 NICENE AND POST NICENE FATHERS Servants’ Preparation Program 2007 ( TABLE OF CONTENTS ( • Introduction • The Beginnings of Liturgical Formulas and Canonical Legislation • The Apostolic Fathers • St. Clement of Rome • St. Ignatius of Antioch • St. Polycarp of Smyrna • The Epistle of Barnabas • Papias of Hierapolis • The "Shepherd" of Hermas • The Epistle to Diognetus • QUADRATUS 2 PAT 102 Nicene and Post Nicene Fathers © 2007 Coptic Orthodox Diocese of the Southern United States INTRODUCTION Patrology The word “Patrology” is derived from the Latin word “Pater” which means, “Father.” Patrology is the science, which deals with the life, acts, writings, sayings, doctrines and thoughts of the orthodox writers of the early church: 1) The life of the Fathers: In order to understand their writings and sayings, their lives and the environment in which they lived, must also be considered. 2) Their acts: The writings, sermons, dialogues, letters, etc. of the Fathers are inseparable from their own lives. Patrology’s message is to be sure of the authenticity of these acts scientifically, publishing them and translating them in modern languages. 3) More importantly is the discovery of the thoughts of the Fathers, their dogma, doctrines and concepts concerning God, man, church, salvation, worship, creation, the body, the heavenly life, etc. Patrology is the door through which we can enter into the church and attain her spirit, which affects our inner life, conduct and behavior. Through Patrology, the acts of the Fathers are transferred into living thoughts and concepts which are based on a sound foundation, without ignoring the world around us.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Peter Bible Study Lesson 40
    A Study of The Epistle of 1st Peter Theme: “A LIVING HOPE!” Trinity Lutheran Church - Norman, OK. Pastor David R. Nehrenz – www.tlcnorman.org Lesson: 40 Chapter 5:13-14 Date: 6-13-21 BIBLE TEXT: (13) She who is at Babylon, who is likewise chosen, sends you greetings, and so does Mark, my son. (14) Greet one another with the kiss of love. Peace to all of you who are in Christ. STUDY NOTES: (13) She who is at Babylon, who is likewise chosen, sends you greetings, and so does Mark, my son. (John Mark: Mark 10:17-25; 14:43-52; 16:1-8; Acts 12:12-25; 15:35-41; Col 4:10; Philemon 1:24; Chosen sons in the faith: Eph 1:4; 1 Tim 1:2,18; 2 Tim 4:11; Babylon: Rev 14:8; 16:19; 17:5-10; 18:2,10,21) Mark = John Mark – the associate of Peter and the writer of the Gospel of Mark: Proposed Author by Tradition: John Mark, who transcribed the teachings of Simon Peter, is traditionally held to be the author of the Second Gospel. John Mark was the son of a widow woman named Mary (Acts 12:12-17). The disciples met in Mary’s home. Her home may have even served as the location of the Last Supper. John Mark was also the cousin of Barnabas (Colossians 4:10). John Mark accompanied Paul and Barnabas on their missionary journeys. He was, however, scolded by Paul and was disallowed to continue after Mark left the missionaries for unknown reasons (Acts 13:13).
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Spirituality
    THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM Ascertaining the literary dependence of the Synoptic Gospels constitutes what is commonly termed the Synoptic Problem. Site to compare Gospels: http://sites.utoronto.ca/religion/synopsis/ A. Similarities between the Synoptic Gospels 1. Common Material: Matthew Mark Luke Total Verses: 1,068 661 1,149 Triple Tradition (verses): 330 330 330 Double Tradition: 235 235 Note the similarity of the following pericopes: Matt 19:13-15/Mark 10:13-16/Luke 18:15-17 Matt 24:15-18/Mark 13:14-16/Luke 21:20-22 Matt 3:3; Mark 1:3; Luke 3:4 (Note the text of Isa 40:3 reads in the Septuagint: “Make straight the paths of our God,” and in the Hebrew “Make straight in the wilderness a highway for our God.”). Matthew 22:37; Mark 12:30; Luke 10:27 (This biblical quotation does not agree with the Hebrew text, which mentions heart and not mind, nor the Greek which never combines both heart and mind).1 2. Basic Agreement in Structure: Mark Matthew Luke a. Introduction to Ministry: 1:1-13 3:1-4, 11 3:1-4, 13 b. Galilean Ministry: 1:14-19, 50 4:12-18, 35 4:14-19, 50 c. Journey to Jerusalem: 10:1-52 19:1-20, 34 9:51-19:41 d. Death and Resurrection: chs. 11-16 chs. 21-28 chs. 19-24 3. Triple Tradition: An examination of “triple tradition,” reveals that while there is much material which is similar to all three Gospels, there is a good amount of material that show agreements between Matthew and Mark, and also Mark and Luke, but there is almost no material in the triple tradition that is common to Matthew and Luke (Matt 9:1-2; Mark 2:1-5; Luke 5:17-20).
    [Show full text]
  • Pericope Adulterae: a Most Perplexing Passage
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 56, No. 1, 91–114. Copyright © 2018 Andrews University Seminary Studies. PERICOPE ADULTERAE: A MOST PERPLEXING PASSAGE Steven Grabiner Collegedale, Tennessee Abstract The account of the woman caught in adultery, traditionally found in John’s Gospel, is full of encouragement to sinners in need of for- giveness. Nevertheless, due to its textual history, this story—referred to as the Pericope Adulterae—is considered by many scholars to be an interpolation. The textual history is one of the most intriguing of any biblical passage. This article reviews that history, examines possible reasons for the passage’s inclusion or exclusion from John’s Gospel, engages discussion on the issue of its canonicity, and gives suggestions for how today’s pastors might relate to the story in their preaching. Keywords: Pericope Adulterae, adulteress, textual history, canon, textual criticism Introduction The story of the woman caught in adultery, found in John 7:52–8:11, contains a beautiful and powerful portrayal of the gospel. It has no doubt encouraged countless believers from the time it was first written. Despite the power in the story, it is unquestionably one of the most controverted texts in the New Testament (NT). Unfortunately, when a conversation begins regarding the textual variations connected with this account, emotions become involved and if the apostolic authorship is questioned and its place in the canon threatened, then, no matter the reasoning or the evidence, the theological pull frequently derails a calm discussion. Fears of releasing a river of unbelief that will sweep away precious truth and create a whirlpool of doubt arise.
    [Show full text]
  • Papias and the Gospels: Analysis and Evaluation of His Testimony in Eusebius’ H.E
    PAPIAS AND THE GOSPELS: ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF HIS TESTIMONY IN EUSEBIUS’ H.E. 3.39 ___________________ A Paper Presented to Dr. Michael J. Svigel Dallas Theological Seminary ___________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Course HT217 Apostolic Fathers ___________________ by Kyle R. Hughes December 2011 Box #531 PAPIAS AND THE GOSPELS: ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF HIS TESTIMONY IN EUSEBIUS’ H.E. 3.39 Papias, bishop of Hierapolis in Asia Minor, was the author of the five-volume Exposition of the Sayings of the Lord in the early second century. His testimony is exceedingly important for our understanding of early Christianity and the origin of certain New Testament writings because of the very early date of his writing and the several unique facts which his writings preserve. Significantly, however, Papias’ testimony flies in the face of prominent scholarly views concerning the origins of the Gospels, and has in recent years often been ignored or rejected by skeptical academia.1 The purpose of this paper is first to determine, as close as possible, precisely what Papias records about the origins of the Gospels, and, second, to assess to what extent such a statement coheres with our understanding of the development of the various Gospels. After a close study of Papias’ words on the Gospels, preserved in Eusebius’ Hist. Eccl. 3.39, we will conclude that Papias provides evidence for eyewitness testimony behind at least three of the canonical Gospels within one generation of the apostles. And, more controversially, we will postulate that Papias’ writings on the nature of the Gospels in fact derived from a desire to defend the Fourth Gospel against those who believed the Synoptics, and not John’s Gospel, preserved the correct ordering of the events of Jesus’ life and ministry.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AUTHORSHIP of the FOURTH GOSPEL by DWIGHT CROWELL
    THE AUTHORSHIP OF THE FOURTH GOSPEL by DWIGHT CROWELL B.A., Kingswood University, 2014 M.A., Acadia Divinity College, 2016 Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Theology, Acadia Divinity College, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (New Testament) Acadia Divinity College Acadia University Spring Convocation 2016 © by DWIGHT CROWELL, 2016 This thesis by Dwight Crowell was defended successfully in an oral examination on 19 April 2016. The examining committee for the thesis was: Dr. Robert Wilson, Chair Dr. Paul Anderson, External Examiner Dr. Allison Trites, Internal Examiner Dr. Craig A. Evans, Supervisor This thesis is accepted in its present form by Acadia Divinity College, the Faculty of Theology of Acadia University, as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Theology). ii I, Dwight Crowell, hereby grant permission to the University Librarian at Acadia University to provide copies of my thesis, upon request, on a non-profit basis. Dwight Crowell Author Dr. Craig A. Evans Supervisor 19 April 2016 Date iii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................1 DEFINITION OF QUESTION .....................................................................................1 OVERVIEW OF SECONDARY LITERATUR ...........................................................3 Agnostic concerning the Identity of the Beloved Disciple ......................................3 The Beloved Disciple is a Literary Device or
    [Show full text]
  • Who Are the Fathers of the Church the Fathers of the Church Are So
    Who are the Fathers of the Church The Fathers of the Church are so called because of their leadership in the early Church, especially in defending, expounding, and developing Catholic doctrines. For the first two centuries, most of these men were bishops, although in later years certain priests and deacons were also recognized as Fathers. The list includes such notables as: Clement of Rome (d. A.D. 97), He is believed to have been the fourth bishop of Rome and served during the last decade of the first century. Around 96, he sent a letter from the Church of Rome to the Church of Corinth, a major city in northeastern Greece and the site of St. Paul's evangelization. This letter, known as Clement's First Epistle to the Corinthians, is most likely directed against immoral practices of prostitution connected with the Temple of Aphrodite. In the letter, Clement expresses his dissatisfaction with events taking place in the Corinthian Church and asks the people to repent for their un-Christian ways. The letter is important because it indicates that the author was acting as the head of the Christian Church and that it was centered in Rome. Clement was allegedly put to death under Emperor Domitian. http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/resources/church-fathers/biographies-of-church-fathers/st-c lement-of-rome/ The Church demands four major characteristics to be exhibited in the life and works of an early Church leader if he is to be considered a Father of the Church. These are antiquity, meaning that he lived before the eighth century (the death of St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epistle of Barnabas
    THE EPISTLE OF BARNABAS BARNABAS THE EPISTLE OF BARNABAS Table of Contents THE EPISTLE OF BARNABAS.............................................................................................................................1 BARNABAS..................................................................................................................................................1 THE EPISTLE OF BARNABAS(1)...........................................................................................................................1 CHAP. I.AFTER THE SALUTATION, THE WRITER DECLARES THAT HE WOULD COMMUNICATE TO HIS BRETHREN SOMETHING OF THAT WHICH HE HAD HIMSELF RECEIVED...................................................................................................................................................1 CHAP.(11)THE JEWISH SACRIFICES ARE NOW ABOLISHED.........................................................2 CHAP. III.THE FASTS OF THE JEWS ARE NOT TRUE FASTS, NOR ACCEPTABLE TO GOD.....2 CHAP.IV.ANTICHRIST IS AT HAND: LET US THEREFORE AVOID JEWISH ERRORS................3 CHAP. V.THE NEW COVENANT, FOUNDED ON THE SUFFERINGS OF CHRIST, TENDS TO OUR SALVATION, BUT TO THE JEWS' DESTRUCTION.....................................................................3 CHAP. VI.THE SUFFERINGS OF CHRIST, AND THE NEW COVENANT, WERE ANNOUNCED BY THE PROPHETS.........................................................................................................4 CHAP. VII.FASTING, AND THE GOAT SENT AWAY, WERE TYPES OF CHRIST.........................5
    [Show full text]
  • Map Who Was St. Mark?
    LESSON ONE: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MARK l St. Mark is also called John Mark in the New Testa- MAP ment. He was the cousin of St. Barnabas, and was close to St. Peter. l St. Mark probably wrote his Gospel between 64-68 AD. l This Gospel was written in Rome to a Gentile audience. FACTS l There are many similarities between the “synoptic Gospels:” Matthew, Mark, and Luke. l St. Mark wrote his Gospel to spread the good news to the Gentiles, to defend the faith against false accu- sations, and to teach that Jesus Christ is God. FAST FACTS FAST From your early youth, the light of truth enlightened When you received the grace of the spirit from on high, you, O Mark, and you loved the labor of Christ the Sav- O Apostle, you broke the webs of the philosophers, and ior. Therefore, you followed Peter with zeal and minis- gathered all nations into your net and brought them to tered unto Paul as a good fellow-laborer, and having your Lord, O glorious Mark, by the preaching of the written the Gospel, you enlightened the whole world. divine Gospel. WHO WAS ST. MARK? LOOK AT YOURSELF St. Mark is referred to in the Bible as John Mark. His The fact that Ss. Paul and Barnabas parted over mother was a Christian woman in Jerusalem named Mary, their argument about St. Mark teaches us two impor- who knew the Holy Apostle Peter (Acts 12:12). He was the tant things. cousin of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Table of Contents
    CONTENTS Acknowledgments xv Diodore of Tarsus, Preface to Commentary on Introduction 1 Psalm 118 27 Theodore of Mopsuestia, from Commentary on Galatians 30 CHAPTER 1 John Chrysostom, from Homily 3 32 BIBLICAL TRADITIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS: SOURCES OF AUTHORITY 5 Latin Interpretation Jerome, Prefaces to the Vulgate Version of the New EXTS AND ANON 11 1. T C Testament: The Four Gospels 34 Papias of Hierapolis Jerome, The Prologue to Genesis 35 Eusebius, from Ecclesiastical History 11 Jerome, from Letter 18A (to Pope Damasus) 36 Marcion of Sinope Augustine, from De doctrina Christiana 42 Irenaeus of Lyons, from Against Heresies 12 Pelagius, from Commentary on Romans 51 Tertullian, from Against Marcion 12 Cappadocian Interpretation Irenaeus of Lyons Basil the Great, from On the Holy Spirit 52 Irenaeus of Lyons, from Against Heresies 14 Gregory of Nyssa, from Treatise on the Inscriptions of the Psalms 54 Some Early Lists of the Books of the Bible Gregory of Nyssa, from Commentary on the Song of The Muratorian Fragment 15 Songs 61 The Canon of Origen, in Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 16 Medieval Interpretation The Canon of Eusebius of Caesarea, in Gregory the Great, from Morals on the Book of Job 67 Ecclesiastical History 17 Bonaventure, Prologue to Breviloquium 76 The Catalog in the Codex Claromontanus 18 Bonaventure, “On the Third Commandment of The Canon of Athanasius, in Festal Epistle 18 the Decalogue” 82 The Canon of Jerome, in Letter 53 Thomas Aquinas, “Can One Passage of Holy (to Paulinus) 19 Scripture Bear Several Senses?” 85 Reformation
    [Show full text]