The Hilltop 9-25-1992
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Hilltop 3-18-1977
Howard University Digital Howard @ Howard University The iH lltop: 1970-80 The iH lltop Digital Archive 3-18-1977 The iH lltop 3-18-1977 Hilltop Staff Follow this and additional works at: http://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_197080 Recommended Citation Staff, Hilltop, "The iH lltop 3-18-1977" (1977). The Hilltop: 1970-80. 181. http://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_197080/181 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The iH lltop Digital Archive at Digital Howard @ Howard University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH lltop: 1970-80 by an authorized administrator of Digital Howard @ Howard University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. •• Hilltop Highlights ''/)cl \ f ' ! < c 111c <' Cf(•<.. A Brother Is Gon.e ...... p4 !l(Jfl1i11~ Alh aji Dada Us man ..... c p5 Securit y Co unc il Debate p6 111 h<1u1" c/e11L1n c/" HU Cho ir Globetrots .... p7 • ' Faculty Art Exhibition . p8 Bison Sto rm Miami ....••• p9 ) . , ''THE VOICE OF THF HOWARD COMMUNITY'' Track Ninth Best .. ....... p10 • Vol1.' 59, No. 21 Howard University, Washington, D.C. 20059 '' 18 March 1977 H U Mourns Loss of Alumnus Memorial Fund Established Funeral Services Held shi ps and serve as a By Denise R. Williams Cheek, joined Maurice's memorial to the contri By Venola Rolle Hilltop Stilffwriter family and friends, the city , butions that Williams made Hilltop Stilffwriter to the broadcast jou rnalism council -- lead by Mayor WHUR - FM, Howard Walter Washington and O.C. field for years to come. A tense, gloomy quiet University radio station, 1n Delegate Walter Fauntroy - The station manager in filled W H UR-F M's news conjunction with the and WHUR-FM's·staff at Tur dicated that the goal 1s to room Wednesday, March 9, Howard University School of ner Me.morial A.M.E. -
The Hilltop 4-11-1997
Howard University Digital Howard @ Howard University The iH lltop: 1990-2000 The iH lltop Digital Archive 4-11-1997 The iH lltop 4-11-1997 Hilltop Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_902000 Recommended Citation Staff, Hilltop, "The iH lltop 4-11-1997" (1997). The Hilltop: 1990-2000. 187. https://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_902000/187 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The iH lltop Digital Archive at Digital Howard @ Howard University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH lltop: 1990-2000 by an authorized administrator of Digital Howard @ Howard University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. II lume 80, No. 26 Serving the Howard University community since 1924 This Week's Highlights: Before and A~er Students CAMPUS arrested I :;-~~... .:.~· .. r ·-!II~ 'I I . ~ -- ~ ~ •~ . ,;..,.......... at local Students, adminis trators react to the cybercafe beatings of HU students. from the March 11 Administration By Valyncla Saunders and building takeover. A2. Bishop Chui Hilttop Staff Wr~ers Muhammad said the meeting of students ''planning to make Howard a better place" was disrupted by CAMPUS PLUS An argument over a coffee table police because of the organization's resting on a sidewalk erupted into positions on Black education and lfUSA offers retrea a melee with police last week, end the Anti-Defamation League. ryoung Ne"v Jersey ing with three Howard students and ''There were not 52 cars called in 1wo alumni arrested on misde under five minules 10 a table outside students. meanor charges. A pre-trial date is a cafe. -
Passmark Android Benchmark Charts - CPU Rating
PassMark Android Benchmark Charts - CPU Rating http://www.androidbenchmark.net/cpumark_chart.html Home Software Hardware Benchmarks Services Store Support Forums About Us Home » Android Benchmarks » Device Charts CPU Benchmarks Video Card Benchmarks Hard Drive Benchmarks RAM PC Systems Android iOS / iPhone Android TM Benchmarks ----Select A Page ---- Performance Comparison of Android Devices Android Devices - CPUMark Rating How does your device compare? Add your device to our benchmark chart This chart compares the CPUMark Rating made using PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark with PerformanceTest Mobile ! results and is updated daily. Submitted baselines ratings are averaged to determine the CPU rating seen on the charts. This chart shows the CPUMark for various phones, smartphones and other Android devices. The higher the rating the better the performance. Find out which Android device is best for your hand held needs! Android CPU Mark Rating Updated 14th of July 2016 Samsung SM-N920V 166,976 Samsung SM-N920P 166,588 Samsung SM-G890A 166,237 Samsung SM-G928V 164,894 Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge (Various Models) 164,146 Samsung SM-G930F 162,994 Samsung SM-N920T 162,504 Lemobile Le X620 159,530 Samsung SM-N920W8 159,160 Samsung SM-G930T 157,472 Samsung SM-G930V 157,097 Samsung SM-G935P 156,823 Samsung SM-G930A 155,820 Samsung SM-G935F 153,636 Samsung SM-G935T 152,845 Xiaomi MI 5 150,923 LG H850 150,642 Samsung Galaxy S6 (Various Models) 150,316 Samsung SM-G935A 147,826 Samsung SM-G891A 145,095 HTC HTC_M10h 144,729 Samsung SM-G928F 144,576 Samsung -
Guide to Resources on the Black Press MSRC Staff Howard University
Howard University Digital Howard @ Howard University Moorland Spingarn Research Center Publications Moorland-Spingarn Research Center 8-1-2015 Guide to Resources on the Black Press MSRC Staff Howard University Follow this and additional works at: http://dh.howard.edu/msrc_pub Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Staff, MSRC, "Guide to Resources on the Black Press" (2015). Moorland Spingarn Research Center Publications. Paper 8. http://dh.howard.edu/msrc_pub/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Moorland-Spingarn Research Center at Digital Howard @ Howard University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Moorland Spingarn Research Center Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Howard @ Howard University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GUIDE TO RESOURCES ON THE BLACK PRESS IN THE MOORLAND-SPINGARN RESEARCH CENTER HOWARD UNIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS LIBRARY DIVISION RESOURCES............................................................................... , UNITED STATES............................................................................................... ' Bibliographies ......................................................................................... I Biographies (Collected).................................................................... Biographies/Remimscences............................................................ -j Books (General)...................................................................................... -
Letters. with an English Translation by Roy J. Deferrari
THE LOEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY EDITED BV T. E. PAGE, LITT.D. E. CAPPS, PH.D., LL.D. W. H. D. ROUSE, litt.d. SAINT BASIL THE LETTERS SAINJ BASIL THE LETTERS WITH AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION BY ROY J. DEFERRARI, Ph.D. OF THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA IN FOUR VOLUMES II nM^S 2) LONDON : WILLIAM HEINEMANN NEW YORK : G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS MCMXXVIII Printed in Great Britain BR (at)' PREFATORY NOTE St. Basil's letters in the present volume include numbers LIX to CLXXXV, and in nearly every ease are of great human interest. Highly technical letters, as, for example, on the Trinity or on the Canons, do not appear. All of the letters included here, with the exception of numbers LXIV and CII, appear in the MS. known as Coislinianus 237 (sig. = E). No letter of this volume, however, appears in any of the other MSS. collated by the author, i.e. Parisinus 506 (A), Parisinus 763 S (B), Parisinus 967 (C), Parisinus 1021 S (D), and Parisinus 1020 S (F). The last- named MS. (F), noted in the Benedictine edition as Harlaeanus, has since the time of that edition been greatly curtailed, a large portion at the end having been destroyed. This accounts for the appearance of readings from that MS. as noted by the Bene- dictine editors, and not as my own collations. Other important or interesting readings from the edition of the Benedictines have also been included in the critical apparatus. One probably important fact has been noted in the process of this work : the Benedictine editors frequently quoted readings as found only in the earlier editions (^editi antiqui), and apparently without any MS. -
Brand Association List Is Your Registration up to Date?
Last updated: 7/30/19 Brand Association List Below is the list of brands used in the 2020 Tier Assignment Schedule for Washington’s Electronic Product Recycling Program. Brands are associated with the responsible manufacturer. The manufacturers listed are those Ecology has identified as the brand owners of electronic products covered by this program (computers, monitors, laptops, televisions, portable DVD players, tablets, and e-Readers). Is Your Registration Up to Date? • Manufacturers who own additional brands of covered electronic products not currently registered must add those brands to their registration. • Brand owners of covered electronic products that are not on this list must register as a new participant. • Access your registration by going to our webpage for manufacturers and clicking “Submit my annual registration.” If you have questions, please contact Jade Monroe at 360-407-7157 or [email protected]. Brand Manufacturer 2go PC Computer Technology Link 3D Corporation 3D Corporation 3M Dynapro 3M Touch Systems 4th Dimension Computer 4th Dimension Computer 888 (Chinese Characters) Fry's Electronics, Inc. Abacus Abacus Office Machines ABS ABS Computer Technologies Inc ABS Newegg ACC Tech ACC Tech ACC Tech Angel Computer Systems Inc Access HD GXi International Accu Scan J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. Accurian General Wireless Operations Inc dba RadioShack Accuvision QubicaAMF Acer Acer America Corp ACI Micro ACI Micro ACW Computer Warehouse of Central Florida, Inc ADEK ADEK Industrial Computers Ademco Honeywell ACS Division ADP ADP ADT ADT LLC dba ADT Security Services ADVENT VOXX International Corp. Affinity Kith Consumer Product Inc. AFUNTA Afunta LLC Last updated: 7/30/19 AG Neovo AG Neovo Technology Corp Agasio Amcrest Technologies LLC AGPTEK Mambate USA, Inc. -
Androidtm Benchmarks
PassMark Android Benchmark Charts - CPU Rating http://androidbenchmark.net/cpumark_chart.html Shopping cart | Search Home Software Hardware Benchmarks Services Store Support Forums About Us Home » Android Benchmarks » Device Charts CPU Benchmarks Video Card Benchmarks Hard Drive Benchmarks RAM PC Systems Android iOS / iPhone TM Android Benchmarks ----Select A Page ---- Performance Comparison of Android Devices Android Devices - CPUMark Rating How does your device compare? Add your device to our benchmark chart This chart compares the CPUMark Rating made using PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark with PerformanceTest Mobile! results and is updated daily. Submitted baselines ratings are averaged to determine the CPU rating seen on the charts. This chart shows the CPUMark for various phones, smartphones and other Android devices. The higher the rating the better the performance. Find out which Android device is best for your hand held needs! Android CPU Mark Rating Updated 13th of May 2014 Thl T100S 18,316 Ecs TA10TA2 18,082 Samsung SM-G900W8 18,026 HTC 831C 17,993 HTC HTC6525LVW 17,932 Sony SGP412 17,851 Lenovo K910 17,711 Samsung SM-G900P 17,683 HTC One_M8 17,628 Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (SC-01F) 17,499 Asus Transformer Pad K00C 17,414 Samsung SM-G900V 17,414 Gionee E7 17,363 Sony SOL23 17,351 Samsung SM-P905V 17,331 Samsung SM-G900T 17,313 Hewlett-packard Slate 21 17,299 Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (SM-N9000Q) 17,282 Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition (SM-P600) 17,247 Samsung SM-G900FQ 17,246 Samsung SM-G900F 17,228 1 z 64 13.5.2014 08:42 PassMark -
The Hilltop 11-13-1998
Howard University Digital Howard @ Howard University The iH lltop: 1990-2000 The iH lltop Digital Archive 11-13-1998 The iH lltop 11-13-1998 Hilltop Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_902000 Recommended Citation Staff, Hilltop, "The iH lltop 11-13-1998" (1998). The Hilltop: 1990-2000. 227. https://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_902000/227 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The iH lltop Digital Archive at Digital Howard @ Howard University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH lltop: 1990-2000 by an authorized administrator of Digital Howard @ Howard University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Voice ofHoward University Since 1924 FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1998 hilltop.howard.edu VOLUME 82, No. 13 Women's G-roup Aims to Bolster Awareness At Predominatelyjemale Howard, Group Aims for Women's Studies Program ways to raise the consciousness of By CHARLES COLEMAN JR. female students toward leadership Hilltop Staff Writer roles on campus. "In terms of females in positions Aiming to raise the level of con of leadership, we are definitt:ly sciousness toward gender issues at underrepresented, given the number Howard University, leaders of the (of women] in the student body," Women's Action Coalition say they said Lakeysba Thompson, a sopho arc vehemently pushing for the cre more history major. "Having more ation of a women's studies pro women in leadership positions on gram al Howard, and say that it's campus helps bring women's issues time for a new era of female polit closer to the forefront," she said. -
The Hilltop 5-13-2000
Howard University Digital Howard @ Howard University The iH lltop: 1990-2000 The iH lltop Digital Archive 5-13-2000 The iH lltop 5-13-2000 Hilltop Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_902000 Recommended Citation Staff, Hilltop, "The iH lltop 5-13-2000" (2000). The Hilltop: 1990-2000. 267. https://dh.howard.edu/hilltop_902000/267 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The iH lltop Digital Archive at Digital Howard @ Howard University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH lltop: 1990-2000 by an authorized administrator of Digital Howard @ Howard University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. -· ' ' ' ' THE HILLTOP .. Serving the Howard University Co1n111unity Since 1924 VOLUME 84, N0.1 MAY 13, 2000 Today Howard, Tomorrow the World Howard Engineered DNA Test To Help Trace Roots By Nsenga Knight Americans. For years, Howard Uni will be able 10 do two versions of the Hilltop Staff Writer versity has used similar genetic data DNA test. The first looks at nnito 10 study diseases affecting African chondrial DNA, which is handed This summer, a team of Howard Americans. including sick.le-cell down, unchanged, from mother 10 University geneticists plan to offer a anemia, high-blood pressure and child. The other uses the male, or DNA test that could allow African diabetes. 'Y', chromosome, which it passed Americans to trace their roots direct• Kittles, 34, said the idea for the on from mother to son. ly 10 a region in Africa. test came to him some ten years ago. -
Campus Facilities and Space Utilization Campus Facilities and Space Utilization
CAMPUS FACILITIES AND SPACE UTILIZATION CAMPUS FACILITIES AND SPACE UTILIZATION (CONTiNUED) CAMPUS FACILITIES ANALYSIS SPACE CLASSIFICATION This chapter includes information related to academic and Space categorization in this study is based on information support spaces, housing, athletic and recreational facilities. from Postsecondary Education Facilities Inventory and The analysis included a review of existing documentation, Classification Manual (FICM): 2006 Edition, published by the collection of new data, and input from Howard University the Institute of Education Sciences National Center for stakeholders. Educational Statistics (INCESS). This document serves as the standard for space inventories for institutions of higher Rickes Associates (RA) conducted the Instructional Space education. Utilization Analysis (ISUA) for both Central Campus and the West Campus. (Note: West Campus findings are included in Per FICM guidelines, all assignable space at Howard a separate report.) RA analyzed an estimated 223 general University is classified into one of ten major assignable purpose classrooms and 82 specialized instructional spaces use categories or one of three major nonassignable use based on Fall 2010 data. categories. Each of these major categories encompasses subcategories of more specialized uses. Howard University stakeholders were identified and interviewed to gather additional information regarding space • 100 Series- Classrooms use and future needs. Using all of these sources an updated • 200 Series- Laboratory Facilities inventory of existing space on Campus was developed. The course data and the space inventory are the primary data • 300 Series- Office Facilities for the instructional utilization analysis. • 400 Series- Study Facilities • 500 Series - Special Use Facilities The findings from this analysis help to inform the planning and prioritization of capital improvements for the University. -
Passmark Android Benchmark Charts - CPU Rating
PassMark Android Benchmark Charts - CPU Rating http://www.androidbenchmark.net/cpumark_chart.html Home Software Hardware Benchmarks Services Store Support Forums About Us Home » Android Benchmarks » Device Charts CPU Benchmarks Video Card Benchmarks Hard Drive Benchmarks RAM PC Systems Android iOS / iPhone Android TM Benchmarks ----Select A Page ---- Performance Comparison of Android Devices Android Devices - CPUMark Rating How does your device compare? Add your device to our benchmark chart This chart compares the CPUMark Rating made using PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark with PerformanceTest Mobile ! results and is updated daily. Submitted baselines ratings are averaged to determine the CPU rating seen on the charts. This chart shows the CPUMark for various phones, smartphones and other Android devices. The higher the rating the better the performance. Find out which Android device is best for your hand held needs! Android CPU Mark Rating Updated 11th of August 2016 Samsung SM-G930W8 189,083 Lemobile Le X520 184,124 Samsung SM-N920P 168,971 Samsung SM-G890A 167,226 Samsung SCV31 166,812 Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge (Various Models) 165,338 Samsung SM-G928V 164,894 HTC 10 164,138 Samsung SM-G930F 163,461 HTC 2PS5200 163,113 Samsung SM-N920V 163,087 Samsung SM-N920T 162,504 Oneplus A3003 159,868 Samsung SM-G935F 159,781 Samsung SM-N920W8 159,160 Samsung SM-G930T 158,021 Samsung SM-G930V 157,587 LG H820 156,995 Samsung SM-G935P 156,823 Cmdc M836 156,217 Samsung SM-G930A 155,820 Xiaomi MI 5 152,639 Samsung Galaxy S6 (Various Models) 152,343 1 -
Androidtm Benchmarks
28. 1. 2015 PassMark Android phone model listing Shopping cart | Search Home Software Hardware Benchmarks Services Store Support Forums About Us Home » Android Benchmarks » Device List CPU Benchmarks Video Card Benchmarks Hard Drive Benchmarks RAM PC Systems Android iOS / iPhone TM Select A Page Android Benchmarks Performance Comparison of Android Devices How does your device compare? Device List Add your device to our benchmark chart with PerformanceTest Mobile! Below is an alphabetical list of all Android device types that appear in the charts. Clicking on a specific device name will take you to the charts where it appears in and will highlight it for you. Android Devices Find Device PassMark Rating CPUMark Rating Rank Android Device Type (higher is better) (higher is better) (lower is better) 1005tg N10QM 935 3377 3948 1080pn003 1080PN003 2505 9820 815 1life 1Life.smart.air 2282 10103 1170 3q RC9731C 2154 5756 1394 3q LC0720C 1646 4897 2414 3q QS0717D 1363 1760 3109 3q RC9712C 2154 5223 1396 9300 9300 1275 3364 3321 Alink PAD10 ICS 616 1130 4249 A.c.ryan dyno 7.85 2749 11065 596 A2 A2 1240 2784 3388 A800 XOLO_A800 1344 3661 3157 A830 Lenovo A830 2114 8313 1470 Abs_a Aqua_7 1522 3640 2713 Abc Vision7DCI 2602 6880 704 Abroad ABROAD 1438 3379 2929 Acer A1713 2229 9069 1273 Acer A1810 2265 8314 1203 Acer A1811 2233 8524 1268 Acer A1830 3004 9207 507 Acer A1840 3962 23996 267 Acer A1840FHD 5141 28720 58 Acer A101 1577 3758 2586 Acer A110 1964 8623 1822 Acer A200 1559 3822 2621 Acer A210 2135 8315 1428 Acer A211 1848 8130 2035 Acer A3A10 2351 8128 1032 Acer A3A20FHD 3269 11265 428 Acer AA3600 5451 22392 22 Acer B1710 1336 3897 3173 Acer B1711 2293 8583 1142 Acer b1720 2058 4371 1613 Acer B1730HD 3064 9031 487 Acer B1A71 1308 4119 3236 Acer beTouch E140 567 475 4264 Acer CloudMobile S500 2111 4874 1478 Acer DA220HQL 1156 2960 3545 http://www.androidbenchmark.net/device_list.php 1/71 28.