WOMEN IN POLITICS A CHRISTIANSBORG SEMINAR 2012 REPORT

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

Participants in the workshop session on day 2 listening tenta- tively to one of the many speakers from more than 20 coun- tries participating in the 2012 Christians- borg Seminar.

Photos: All photos have been taken by Lars Schmidt: www.schmidtaps.com

Disclaimer: This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the Danish Institute for Parties and Democracy or the members of the Board.

Editors: Marie Skov Madsen and Bjørn Førde, with contributions from Line Holmung and Karina Pultz.

Editorial principle: Whenever possible we have used the material provided by the speakers as the basis for editing the report. In some cases we have relied on our own notes.

Danish Institute for Parties and Democracy Strandgade 56, 1401 Copenhagen K, Denmark Tel: +45 32 69 89 89 Email: [email protected]

Publication is available on: www.dipd.dk

Published in October 2012.

Page 2

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

Contents

FOREWORD

OFFICIAL OPENING 1 The Danish Minister for Foreign Affairs

SCREENING OF THE FILM 2 Introduction by the Danish Minister for Gender Equality

KEYNOTE SPEECHES 3 Minister from Zimbabwe and Director from UNDP

PANEL 1 ON WOMEN IN LOCAL POLITICS 4 Tanzania, Mozambique, Bhutan, Bolivia and UN Women

PANEL 2 ON YOUNG WOMEN IN POLITICS 5 Egypt, Nepal, Tanzania, Ghana and the Palestinian Territories

PANEL 3 ON WOMEN IN TRANSITION COUNTRIES 6 Afghanistan, Kenya, Tunisia, Nepal and Zimbabwe

METHODS AND APPROACHES 7 UNDP, Jordan and OSCE

CONCLUSIONS 8 and recommendations to the Christiansborg Statement

ANNEX: BIOGRAPHIES OF SPEAKERS

Page 3

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

FOREWORD

The Christiansborg 2012 Seminar was an important milestone for the Danish Institute for Parties and Democracy (DIPD) because it was the first time we had the opportunity to bring together representatives of our partners after having started the practical work of the institute in 2011. As stated in our 2010-2013 strategy on “Political parties in a democratic cul- ture”, the Christiansborg Seminar is intended to be an annual event which can offer an opportunity for Danish political parties and NGOs to learn from other Nordic organizations as well as from partners in political parties and democracy organizations in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America. We are extremely pleased that it was possible to bring representatives from all our partnerships to Copenhagen. When we say ‘our’ partners, we think of the partners of the Danish political parties working on a party-to-party basis in Kenya, Ghana, Tanzania, Bolivia, the Palestinian Territories, and Egypt, as well as the partners in the multi-party partnerships in countries like Bhu- tan, Nepal, Egypt, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and Myanmar. We are equally pleased that some Danish development organisations like Ibis, MS/ActionAid and KVINFO decided to invite their own representatives from countries like Afghanistan, Tunisia, Mozambique and Jordan, and that our sister institute in Finland, Demo Finland, decided to invite their partners from Nepal and Tanzania. All together this meant that the Christiansborg 2012 Seminar in addition to the more than 100 Danish and Nordic participants brought together more than 30 women from 25 countries, who generously shared their stories and experiences from being actively involved in politics in general and political party politics in particular. This report is not able to do justice to the very rich and often very personal stories presented during the two days, but we hope that it will nevertheless capture the very positive and constructive atmos- phere that characterized the seminar. The conclusions from the two days of sharing and discussion will be pre- sented in a separate ‘Statement’. I would finally like to thank all the people who accepted our call to participate and make the seminar possible – the Ministers and Members of the Danish Parliament who participated in the official opening and as moderators of panels; the keynote speakers from Zimbabwe and UNDP; MP’s and key personalities in political parties around the world; and the consultants who used their expertise to help us develop a useful background document.

Bjørn Førde, Director October 2012

Page 4

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

OFFICIAL OPENING

The Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the former Prime 1 Minister participated in the official opening.

Mr. Villy Søvndal, Minister of Foreign Affairs (right) and former Prime Minister Mr. Lars Løkke Ras- mussen (left) in in- formal discussion be- fore the official open- ing of the seminar.

MR. HENRIK BACH MORTENSEN, CHAIRMAN OF DIPD

The Chairman extended a special welcome to DIPD partners from around the world, both the partners of the Danish political parties working on a party-to-party basis in Kenya, Ghana, Tanzania, Bolivia, the Palestinian Territories and Egypt – as well as the parties of the multi-party partnerships of the Institute in countries like Bhutan, Ne- pal, Egypt, Tanzania, Zimbabwe and Myanmar. An equally warm welcome was extended to the partners of Danish organisations like Ibis, MS/ActionAid, and KVINFO from countries like Afghanistan, Tunisia, Mozam- bique and Jordan – and from Nordic partners like Demo Finland, with their partners from Nepal and Tanzania. We are delighted that you have decided to contribute to the Seminar in such a substantive manner. The essence of the Christiansborg Seminar is to offer an opportunity for Danish polit- ical parties and NGOs to learn from other Nordic organisations, as well as from part- ners in political parties and democracy organisations in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America. This year the Board had decided to focus on “Women in Politics’ because this con- tinues to be a challenge all over the world. The Chairman noted that we might have something to show from the Danish experience – but he was also convinced that we can still learn a lot as well.

Page 5

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

MR. VILLY SØVNDAL, MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Mr. Søvndal thanked for the invitation to speak and stated that all human beings are born free and have the right to participate in politics. Referring to the CEDAW con- vention he underlined that all political parties should take all means to promote wom- en’s rights. The right of women to enjoy equal representation is relevant globally and important for political life. In Africa women cultivate land and provide income to their family. But they do not own the land. Do men and women have the same view on ag- ricultural policy? Not necessarily. During the Arab spring women were participating in the uprisings but are not included in formal political process following the revolution. It all starts within the political parties. I am head of a party with more women than men in the parliament. Denmark is a Scandinavian latecomer on the equality agenda. Not before October last year did we get a female Prime Minister but the Scandinavi- an situation does not reflect the global picture. In a world, where more than 50 pct. of the total population is female, it stands against reason why only 17 heads of govern- ment are women. It is plainly wrong that only 30 pct. of the members of parliament are women. I am well aware that there is no simple recipe for changing this situation, and I am glad that this issue will be discussed at length at this seminar. Because the world needs to change here! While the challenges are easily found, I think it is worth noticing that there are strong signs of a positive and irreversible development. Fortunately, progress happens in very different parts of the world. The latest election law in Tunisia stipulates that all political parties should list an equal number of men and women candidates, and en- sure that every second candidate is a women. In Rwanda, 45 out of 80 members of parliaments are women. This is all very good news! Women’s position in society is slowly improving, and there are now female presidents, members of parliament, lead- ing business people, ambassadors, teachers and nurses, that play an important role in society and act as role models. Young slowly change their perspective on where they can go, and how far they can get. The Danish government puts strong emphasis on actively promoting women’s rights. Not only to promote human rights and equality, but also to promote economic growth, strengthen public health and improve education. Promoting women’s participation in politics is an essential part of this process. That is also why Denmark supports and trains female internet-bloggers, female parliamentarians’ network, female political candidates and many more. The work of the Danish Institute for Parties and Democracy is particularly important in this regard. It is a strong instrument in the Danish government’s continuous work to promote democracy and broad-based political participation. I am particularly happy about the theme for this seminar – Women in Politics – because it is an issue that is at the heart of Denmark’s foreign policy.

MR. LARS LØKKE RASMUSSEN, CHAIRMAN OF VENSTRE AND FORMER PRIME MINISTER

Mr. Rasmussen introduced by telling about his personal experience with women in politics: My wife is member of Gribskov local community. I have been leading 14 fe- male ministers as Prime Minister in a government as close to gender balance as you can come. I got beaten by a who is now the first female Prime Minister in Denmark. I am not convinced that she was the right choice, but it was an important testimony to the success of women’s equal rights in our national, political arena.

Page 6

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

In Denmark we have been slow. Women were given the right to vote in 1915. In 1925 we got the first female minister - 35 years went by before the first female mayor was elected, and it took almost 100 years for a woman to become Prime Minister. Now, even though in many respects Denmark is one of a kind, I think that the Danish history teaches us something relevant, even today. It teaches us that progress is possible even though it takes time, sacrifice and hard work. It teaches us that secur- ing progress is a continuous effort. And it teaches us that exogenous ideas, ideas from the surrounding world, will only take root and flourish if committed groups and individuals keep pushing on. It was with that in mind, that my government established the Danish Institute for Par- ties and Democracy. To support change and progress in parts of the world where democratic traditions are still weak, in corporation with parties and institutions that seek to strengthen those traditions. The Institute is something of an experiment. The promotion of ideas goes beyond the usual scope of development aid. And even though we know that there will be set- backs, we all recognize the potential of supporting and aiding promotion of democrat- ic ideas, and those individuals and institutions that seek to promote them. Women’s participation is part of that potential. Speaking generally, of course, it has been my experience that women bring a different perspective and unique values into political debates. Values like tolerance, trust and empathy. This makes women abso- lutely essential to civil and public service. We need those values to be represented. Lady Astor was the first women to be elected to the British House of Commons. In 1922 she gave a speech of her experience and said that “men have a greater sense of justice” and women “a greater sense of mercy. Men must borrow women’s mercy and women must use men’s justice.” I agree – adding that the justice of men must al- low for the equal participation of women in politics for it to be real justice, and that the mercy of women must allow forgiveness for past transgressions to be real mercy. I think we can all agree that the time to act is now. All too often we forget the devas- tating consequences of the failure to act. These consequences define the opportuni- ties of whole generations. And if no one has the courage to speak up and lead, there will always be misrepresentation of interests based on gender bias. That is not only individually unfair; it is a catastrophic societal loss! If a bright young grows up with the noble aspiration of making a difference in the life of her family, the conditions of her civil society, or the prosperity of her country, her right to seek office must be unconditionally protected. Not just because it is her individual right, but also because it should be a society’s right and democratic re- sponsibility to elect the representative most competent to lead.

Page 7

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

SCREENING OF THE BHUTAN FILM

Introduction by the Minister for Gender Equality and 2 comments from the MP from Bhutan.

Ms. Sangay Zam, Member of the Na- tional Council (Upper House of Parliament) in Bhutan speaking to the audience in Par- liament following the screening of the film.

MR. BJØRN FØRDE, DIRECTOR OF DIPD

This session is about Bhutan – and Denmark. Some of you will know that these two Kingdoms have had a very unique relationship around development cooperation since the mid-1980’ies. Unique not least because it was actually Bhutan that decided to select Denmark as a ‘donor’, not the other way around, which is normally the case. Denmark is now in the process of phasing out after decades of successful coopera- tion, and in that process DIPD has been invited to engage on issues of democracy. When I met with key stakeholders in government and civil society last year in Bhutan, it quickly became clear that the area of women’s participation in politics should be a key focus area. Just by accident I heard about this idea for a film production entitled “Yes, Madam Prime Minister’, which the Board of DIPD was happy to support. So here we are today, a week after it has been launched in Bhutan, and I am delight- ed to welcome the Danish Minister for Gender Equality, Mr. Manu Sareen, who is al- so featured in the film.

MR. MANU SAREEN, MINISTER FOR GENDER EQUALITY

Personally I wish to emphasize one key aspect, namely: Empowerment! I firmly be- lieve that the empowerment of women is one of the greatest challenges of our time. Women must have full and equal rights to influence society. There can be no true democracy without the full participation of women. Diversity must be the core of all

Page 8

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

political decision making processes – for the sake of the individual as much for the sake of our societies. We all share the responsibility of ensuring women’s equal par- ticipation – governments and political parties, as well as... yes, women themselves. There can be no doubt, that governments must take responsibility to ensure the nec- essary basic rights and opportunities of women. Without opportunities, no empower- ment! Empowerment is built on: Education, access to the labour market, and on the right to freely control ones own body. Only when these conditions are in place, can women truly take equal part in society. However, women’s access to decision making positions on an equal footing with men is not done overnight – no matter how well educated and liberated women have become. In Denmark, the rather uneven repre- sentation in local politics clearly indicates, that despite women’s empowerment and formal equal status - we can do better. However, women’s full participation does also require the will of women to engage in local surroundings as well as society at large. But taking part is not always that easy – it takes knowledge and training to be able to know how to exert influence. Denmark is defined by having a large amount of civil voluntary associations and or- ganisations. And women, as well as men, take part in these. They are involved in school boards, unions, grass roots organisations and so on. This is an extremely im- portant source of basic training in how decision-making works. The responsibility of women hence builds on: The will of women to exert influence; on changing the mind- set of people to allow women to take up the task; and on the training of women in basic decision making processes and democratic life through voluntary work. Only when these conditions are in place, can women truly take part in the democratic and political processes. However, in many countries it might seem like an almost impos- sible task to ensure all these conditions and hence women’s full empowerment. In a few moments you will watch a short film, which is a good example of how we can help raise awareness and mobilise women. Two important points made in the film is the need of ensuring day care institutions, and involving the whole society in achiev- ing gender balance in politics – hence including men as partners. Only this way can we create a win-win situation. As a former political colleague of mine, Norwegian Gro Harlem Brundtland, once said: Women will not become more empowered merely because we want them to be, but through legislative changes, increased information, and redirection of resources. In conclusion, let me ensure you, that as minister for gender equality you have my full support. And as you heard my colleague before me say, we are dedicated to promot- ing more women in politics. Only by joining forces can we reach our ultimate goal: The empowerment of women and true democratic societies!

MS. SANGAY ZAM, BHUTAN

Bhutan is a young democracy, currently undertaking its first democratic steps in a po- litical culture which is unique. This is why I believe that gender equity is so doable in Bhutan. Democracy is new in Bhutan and gender equity could ride the same wave of this new change. The first democratic took place in 2008 and the next elections will take place in 2013. Thus we are currently facing a window of opportunity. People in Bhutan like to think that men and women have equal opportunities; so if women are not forthcoming in this new democratic change, it appears that we can’t blame anyone else but women themselves. In a country of happiness and a country of equal opportunities, if women do not find politics so compelling or personally ful- filling; if women are not charged with ambitions; if women sacrifice their own for the

Page 9

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

sake of their home and children, there seems no one else to blame but women our- selves. So women have been blamed for a long time now. From my association with DIPD and women leaders in Denmark I have come to real- ize that we must first tackle the problem of ignorance and theoretical deficiency in the area of gender equity. While we blame the women and while women take the back seat, we seem to have neglected to see that the real reason why women have not been very forth coming is in fact because of the inherent institutional deficiencies. So the real problem is more in the policies and in the systems – much beyond the ma- kings of individual women. This project has raised a great deal of awareness. It has drawn much needed atten- tion to the value of women – particularly value of women’s participation in politics. As more and more people get convinced, the magic question will hopefully begin to arise: What can we do to make women more forth coming? What can we do to make women want to be a part of the changing process of their own lives? In the words of some women leaders in Denmark; “the blame has got to shift from women to society”. The ownership of the problem then becomes stronger and the task of gender equity so much more possible. To make a real break-through, Bhutan needs to promote gender equity scholarships to increase the knowledge base; strengthen research and gender disaggregated sta- tistics to compel people to look at the real picture without squinting, and keep the de- bate on gender equity fired up if we are to increase visibility of women beyond token numbers in leadership positions. Only when the people can debate intellectually on the topic of gender equality can we help the rest of the others to see through the gender lens, have a clear picture of the gender gap, and then take informed decisions. Only then can we channel our efforts productively, and only then can we harness the abundance of women’s potentials waiting to be tapped. A media launch of the film: “Yes, Madam Prime Minister” took place on 1st of Sep- tember 2012, and was graced by Her Royal Highness, Princess Sonam Dechan Wangchuck as the chief guest. The chief election commissioner delivered the key- note address. The august gathering included senior members and representatives of the government, honourable members of parliament, representatives from autono- mous agencies, heads of civil society organizations and students. This media launch has raised a great deal of awareness. It has drawn much needed attention to the value of women – particularly value of women’s participation in poli- tics. As more and more people get convinced, the magic question will hopefully begin to arise, “What can we do to make women more forth coming? What can we do to make women want to be a part of the changing process of their own lives?”

Page 10

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

KEYNOTE SPEECHES

The Minister from Zimbabwe and the Director from 3 UNDP made the keynote speeches.

Ms. Winnie Byanyima from UNDP (left) and Ms. Priscilla Mis- ihairabwi-Mushonga (right) from Zimbabwe responding to ques- tions from the audi- ence following their presentations.

MODERATED BY THE DIPD CHAIRMAN

The DIPD Chairman, Henrik Bach Mortensen, first invited the Honourable Minister for Regional Integration and International Cooperation in Zimbabwe, Ms. Priscilla Mis- ihairabwi-Mushonga, to speak - while highlighting the fact that while the Minister has played an important role in the very difficult and sensitive political developments in Zimbabwe over the last decade, she also has a long and strong track record from civ- il society, working with women’s issues in particular. He then invited the Director of the Gender and Development Unit in the Bureau for Development Policy of the United Nations Development Programme, Ms Winnie Byanyima to speak to us. He referred to her biography in the programme and high- lighted that she has a long career in politics in Uganda before she worked for the Af- rican Union and now for the UNDP, which is in a sense the powerhouse for setting global standards for the area of democratic governance in its many forms and shapes, including women and political parties.

MS. PRISCILLA MISIHAIRABWI-MUSHONGA, ZIMBABWE

There exists a ‘myth of numbers’ which is too much in focus because more women do not necessarily lead to women-sensitive policies. Political space is confrontational and women often conform. Women who refuse to conform tend to be ostracised by both men and women.

Page 11

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

As an example, in Zimbabwe a constitutional process has led to a quota for women in the lower house. The critical argument against this was that women were already in parliament, but we need to look beyond numbers: Let’s not assume that because one is women, she is an agent of change. There is a tendency to move away from a focus on creating ‘safe spaces’ for women, and rather look at creating strong alliances with men. Such alliances with men are a necessity to include more women in politics, but must not be substituted for the spaces needed for women. We need to both work with women to create spaces, and to form strategic alliances with men. Political parties are like marriages; closed in, and have their own specific dynamics, which are difficult to understand for the outsider. Many political parties have an image of being ‘female friendly’, but have internal dynamics that exclude women from deci- sion-making. We have to look at the political culture of political parties where wom- en’s groups and women’s assemblies are often reduced to people who cook, dance and entertain, rather than taking part in political discussions. DIPD could focus on this particular aspect in its work.

MS. WINNIE BYANYIMA. UNDP

UNDP has an explicit mandate to promote democratic governance of which the par- ticipation and representation of both women and men is part and parcel, and this is also very much a human rights issue and a precondition for democracy. At UNDP, we work with a variety of partners and sister UN agencies, including UN Women, to promote women’s political participation. That work encompasses more than just supporting women as elected candidates, although we engage in that im- portant effort too, both to help women run for office and get elected, and to help them be effective once in office. Our democratic governance work also focuses on civic engagement, electoral cycle support, parliamentary development, e-governance, public administration reform, local governance and decentralization, access to jus- tice, human rights and anti-corruption. It also includes supporting electoral system reforms, such as implementing gender quotas. The use of temporary special measures, like gender quotas, is the single most important policy measure for increasing the number of women in parliaments. Evidence over the past five years reveals a stable pattern between women’s repre- sentation in countries that have employed temporary special measures and those that have not. In countries that use temporary special measures, the average repre- sentation of women was 27 pct. compared to 13.8 pct. for those that have not. Political parties are gatekeepers to political office. In order for women to lead govern- ance they must lead in political parties. Globally, while 40 to 50 pct. of party members are women, women hold only about 10 pct. of leadership positions within those par- ties. Without access to established networks of influence, and with very limited re- sources, few role models and mentors, it is understandable that the proportion of high ranking women in political parties has remained well below that of men across the globe. Unless political parties step up and reform, we can expect that the institu- tions that make decisions affecting people’s lives everywhere will continue to be dominated by men. If we want to have more women leading government as well as sitting as members, we must make inroads with political parties. Last spring, UNDP and the National Democratic Institute published “Empowering Women for Stronger Political Parties: A Guidebook to Promote Women’s Political Participation.” This guidebook identifies the range of steps and entry points that polit- ical parties can take throughout the electoral cycle to advance women’s participation and leadership and to promote gender equality in general.

Page 12

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

The response to the Guidebook has been phenomenal. Originally published in five languages (English, French, Russian, Arabic and Spanish), the guidebook has been picked up and translated by UNDP country offices into Indonesian, Portuguese, Mongolian and Burmese. This extremely practical guidebook highlights good practices drawn from 20 case studies from around the world for promoting women’s participation in political parties. The guidebook underscores that there are common challenges facing women in poli- tics, regardless of the region of the world in which their country is located, or the country’s size or development status. The challenges are shared by women across new democracies and established ones, and by women in parties across the political spectrum. The guidebook examines how political parties have successfully promoted women’s advancement in the political system throughout the electoral cycle. They are pre- sented as successful examples that can be replicated in different countries and dif- ferent situations. For example: Parties can commit to support women’s political empowerment: A commitment to gender equality and women’s empowerment should be reflected in the founding doc- uments and constitutions of the party. Parties can adopt voluntary quotas to guarantee women’s presence in the party: Some kind of quota for women’s representation at a local, management or national candidature level has been enacted by such diverse political organizations as Aus- tralia’s Labor Party, Cambodia’s Sam Rainsy Party, Morocco’s Socialist Union of Popular Forces, Mexico’s Party of the Democratic Revolution and National Action Party India’s Bhatariya Janata Party, Germany’s Christian Democratic Union and South Africa’s parliament. Quotas can also ensure that the party selects or nominates women candidates to its slate of candidates for election and places them in winnable positions on party lists: In countries like the United States, which have majority elections, measures other than quotas need to be developed. Parties must support women to stand in ‘safe’ seats and challenge the power of incumbency. Prior to elections, parties can take concrete steps to ensure that women are placed in winnable positions on party lists, or in safe or winnable constituencies: In Canada, a party created a recruitment committee to ensure diversity in its candidate selection. A party in Costa Rica alternates men and women candidates on its electoral lists. During elections, parties can provide skills and networks for raising money and cam- paigning; ensure women’s visibility in campaigns; and make sure that electoral moni- toring, security provision and voter information are gender-sensitive. After elections, parties can support newly elected candidates: In El Salvador, the Association of Sal- vadoran Women Parliamentarians and Ex-Parliamentarians offers training in com- munication and organizing skills, which help women become more effective in their political work both inside and outside parliament. In South Africa, women party mem- bers pushed for changes to the parliamentary calendar to accommodate the needs of parliamentarians with families. What’s notable about engaging with political parties is that they are increasingly rec- ognizing gender equality and women’s empowerment as not only fair, but beneficial to the parties as well as the women. Research suggests that political parties have increased their support base and gained electorally after adopting reforms to promote women’s empowerment. In- creasing the proportion of women candidates for elected positions can also increase the flow of public funding to the party. Women candidates are more likely to come from civil society and have strong relationships with civil society organizations. These

Page 13

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

connections can help parties establish better relations with grassroots and civil socie- ty constituencies. Putting in place strategies to promote women’s empowerment can lead to more democratic and transparent political parties. In developing countries, political parties are very often weak, relying largely on personal family connections or networks of elite men. Developing strategies for women’s participation may also result in more in- clusive processes, which can also benefit other marginalized and under-represented groups. In addition, women’s participation in political decision-making bodies also has been shown to improve the quality of governance. Some recent studies have found a posi- tive correlation between women’s increased participation in public life and a reduction in the level of corruption. A poll conducted by Gallup and the Inter-American Dialogue in five Latin American countries in 2000 found that most of those surveyed believed that having more women in power improves government and that women are better able than men to handle a wide range of policy issues. Political parties should be mindful of these perceptions and use them to their ad- vantage in their electoral campaigns. Much more must be done with and by political parties to ensure they enable rather than obstruct women’s political participation. Ultimately, we need women role models and men to champion the advancement of women in all aspects of political life. Only when they do that – and succeed in dramatically increasing the number of women participating in and leading political life – will we be able to speak of true democracy and gender equality.

Page 14

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

PANEL 1: WOMEN IN LOCAL POLITICS

What challenges are women politicians facing? 4 How can political party assistance actors support?

Ms. Susan Lyimo from Tanzania is seen in the foreground, to- gether with Ms. Anne Steenhammer from UN Women. In the background the mod- erator, the Mayor of Roskilde.

DAY 1

MODERATED BY MS. JOY MOGENSEN, MAYOR OF ROSKILDE MUNICIPALITY

Local politics may not be a theme that clears the front pages every day, but it is of essential importance for people all over the world that their local politicians are able to understand and meet their needs. In most countries local level politics is about di- viding the resources in the local society and as such of great importance for the daily lives of people all over the world. The lack of women in local politics is a global issue that has been debated for many years. Women’s involvement in decision and policy-making processes is absolutely essential for changes in women’s political, social and economic status. As such women are seen as actors of change. Supporting the participation of women in local politics therefore has great potential for improving the lives of women in general.

HON. SUSAN LYIMO, TANZANIA

Equitable participation is far from reality in Tanzania. Women and men do not enjoy equal access to or control over the basic services provided by local government, mainly because women continue to be under-represented in both the political leader-

Page 15

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

ship and administration at the local level. Tanzania is mainly a rural country which means that local politics is very important. There is greater representation of women in local level politics than in national politics. Possible explanations to the relatively high ratio of women participating in local level politics could be that the eligibility criteria is less stringent at local level, and that it is easier to combine participation in local level politics with the role as care taker in a family. Furthermore, local politics can be more interesting as it is closer to women’s everyday life. Women participate actively in organizations at local level which often leads to the conclusion that decentralisation is in women’s interest. But decentralisa- tion makes the local level more important, and as this importance grows, so does male interest in it. Women are still hampered by many barriers, individual as well as institutional factors related to the organisation of society and the political system, with the risk that they will not reap equal benefits. The inclusion/representation of women in local politics is important because of: Jus- tice - women constitute 50 pct. or more of the country’s population which need to be mirrored in women’s representation; Efficiency - women offer different experiences and resources – their resources needs to be included to secure optimal policies; Di- versity - women and men are different and live under different circumstances, and therefore they prioritize differently e.g. women tend to prioritize an area like health, whereas men often look at employment. More women in politics can change the polit- ical system e.g. in terms of corruption. Research on corruption shows that women are less likely than men to behave opportunistically, thus bringing more women into gov- ernment may have significant benefits for the society in general. The challenge in Tanzania is that the constitution provides basis for women to partic- ipate, yet, representation of women is minimal. Due to historical and cultural factors the number of females has remained low compared to males since independence. According to the election monitor’s report of 2010, women participated equally as men in registering for both local and national elections, but fewer women than men offered themselves for nomination at the primaries. Interestingly, fewer women suc- ceeded in the primaries and fewer still succeeded at the national polls. In Tanzania, legislative affirmative action has done much to ensure women’s quanti- tative representation in local governance. Special seats for women have been im- plemented both in Parliament and Local Councils. There is now a legal requirement to reserve one-third of all seats of municipal councils for women, which has in- creased the number of women councillors. However, the number of women elected as MPs and in District, Ward and Village Councils continues to be low: In 2010 there were 3350 councillors out of whom only 1006 (29 pct.) were women, but only 9 pct. were directly elected. It is pertinent to note that majority of the women councillors were elected through special seat ar- rangements. So the numbers look prettier than the reality. While women’s numeric representation may be significant, it does not guarantee that women have actual in- fluence over policy decisions or that women’s rights and gender equality are ad- dressed in local government policies and programs. Women who are involved via special seats are treated differently e.g. they cannot become Prime Minister; they are not allowed to be involved in the finance committee, and they cannot access constit- uency development funds. Some of the factors that help explain the lack of women in politics are: Lack of confi- dence e.g. as a consequence of lack of education. Cultural barriers - perception of the role of women or of what is acceptable e.g. women can not prepare campaigns during the night. Women are poor and do not have resources to campaign. In Tanza- nia for example, a car is needed during a campaign to cover the great distances. Po-

Page 16

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

litical party culture - structures within political parties are not conducive to women’s participation, and lack of political support and leadership affect their abilities to climb the electoral ladder. Following Tanzania’s endorsement of the Beijing Platform for Action, it was agreed to prioritize women’s political empowerment in line with the Southern African Develop- ment Community (SADC) Declaration, which had set a benchmark of 30 pct. female representation in parliaments. The amendment to the Tanzanian Constitution in 2005 resulted in an increase to 30 pct., in line with the 1997 SADC benchmark, while the motion was towards achieving 50 pct. women representation in line with the SADC goal and African Union Constituent benchmark of 50/50 by 2010. Nevertheless, Tan- zania has not managed to live up to this yet. Additionally, the discourse on 30 pct. or 50 pct. has not gone hand in hand with a discourse of transforming the broader pic- ture and addressing the general condition of women in the economy. Whilst reserved seats may give women increased presence, questions about their accountability and legitimacy defuse their impact. By default, the quota system has created a secondary status for woman councillors: Councillors elected from wards and constituencies, who are predominantly men, are seen as first class, while women councillors chosen through special seats find themselves side-lined from decision- making. The ‘special seat’ councillors are seen to not having a mandate equal to those ‘elected by the ballot’ councillors. The decision to ensure gender parity in political participation requires a more holistic approach which will address the underlying causes of discrimination in the broader context. In the political sphere, the discourse has to move beyond numbers to also address ideological position, and the broader issues of transformation of a politics of exclusion. While numbers are useful benchmarks, they are only the beginning of measuring women’s equitable participation in decision making organs. From this conclusion the following recommendations are put forward: Constitutional reform is crucial in order to address the whole electoral system and address legal and policy frameworks so as to make politics truly democratic. Political will, which will then translate to the development of a new constitution, hold political parties ac- countable to be required by law to practice internal democracy or to institute affirma- tive action. Autonomous women wings within political parties are to promote women’s interests in party policy platforms and strengthen the demand for increasing women’s representation in party nomination lists and decision making processes. Also broad based public awareness programme on the duties, rights and obligations of all citizens in policy is required. It is also important with role models; some out- standing Tanzanian women have in the recent past featured very well in global wom- en movements. It is a sign of confidence to women and a challenge to male dominat- ed systems that women are indeed powerful players in politics both local and interna- tional if availed with opportunities without prejudice to their gender attributes. It is important to promote intra party democracy by putting in place transparent mechanisms for identification, selection and/or appointment of leaders. Well stipulat- ed procedures to get into the leadership coupled with regular and timely elections could open gates for more women to take part in party politics. Promoting networking facilities and coalition building with other entities, both within political parties and out- side the party, are issues of common concern.

MS. ANNE STENHAMMER, UN WOMEN

The speaker started by referring to the cover photo of the background document for the Christiansborg Seminar: This is from Bihar, India, and it illustrated what you could call a ‘silent revolution’ of women engaging in grass-root mobilization campaigns.

Page 17

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

This has been hugely successful in several parts of India. It illustrates an example of much more progressive politics coming up to secure the representation of women in politics. In India there are 1.5 million elected women representatives at the local level – one of the highest in the world. These women on the cover are supported by UN Women programme on ‘Promoting Women’s Political Leadership and Governance in India and South Asia’ which aims to build women’s capacity to lead as decision-makers in local governance structures. In India, we are implementing the programme in part- nership with the Ministry of Panchayati Raj, a branch of the Government of India looking after the on-going process of decentralization and local governance in the States. The programme covers over half a million elected women representatives and will improve grassroots democracy in these states for an estimated 365 million people in India. For the programme, the biggest achievement is to see women in grassroots politics breaking traditional barriers and asserting their demands, emerg- ing as decision makers and administrators – only this can ensure gender equality. In my personal experience as a local level politician to a Minister and my deep and sustained interactions with the elected women representatives spread over 16 prov- inces in 5 States, I have three key messages for today: First, research plays a very important role – it should not serve academia but should serve to improve the condi- tions of the women. It is critical to remember that women are not living at the regional or national level, they are at the grassroots level, and our work should impact their lives at this level. There is a significant research component under the governance programme. Among other activities we are partnering with the Royal University of Bhutan to build re- search capacity on women’s political participation in Bhutan. We are also partnering with the Norwegian Institute for Regional and Urban Research (NIBR) to develop a Gender Responsive Governance Index (GRGI) as a scorecard on women’s political leadership and governance in local governance structures. Our research highlights the following positive developments in South Asia: Women in rural India are asserting their own individual aspirations to become elected leaders. A small fraction of women across India have raised issues of domestic vio- lence consistently in otherwise gender insensitive village council meetings – a small but significant step towards achieving gender equality. If India is the prototype of long standing struggle for democracy, Bhutan represents the youngest country in the region to aspire for democracy. In Bhutan our research indicates: Traditional stereotypes related to decision-making as a male prerogative, the double and sometimes triple burden of women as , wives, and income earners in the household prevent women from achieving their new found desire to emerge as political leaders in Bhutan. Like India, the lack of education and aware- ness of their rights and responsibilities, the social barriers to women’s political partic- ipation are some of the challenges that women of Bhutan also face. In Nepal, our work indicates that the issue of women’s participation in local level poli- tic is part of a broader process of social inclusion and democratic development. At present there is no representation in local governance due to the absence of elec- tions over a decade. Even among political parties the participation of women is signif- icantly low, which both men and women alike single out discriminatory social and family factors as the main reason for the poor representation of women within politi- cal parties. A political process which has witnessed significant changes towards the articulation of democratic rights and responsibilities, we must attempt to understand what role women will play in the political decision-making in Nepal. Second, if an enabling environment is created then there must be credible action on the ground to support and reinforce that enabling environment.

Page 18

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

The GOI-UN Women Programme is very different from other programmes of capacity building of local governance in a significant way: It focuses explicitly on the role and potential of panchayats (village council) to promote gender equality. In this pro- gramme, it is not that women are trained to deliver for panchayats - for better village planning and project implementation. The roles are reversed – the panchayat is in- stead expected to deliver for women – focusing on issues that are central to the lives of India’s women e.g. physical security, political empowerment, good health, and economic security and rights. Plans of panchayats, and budgets for them, must relate directly to improving the quality of life of women, their households, and communities. This is very much a field based programme. Through this programme we will reach out to women at the gram sabha (village councils) level to raise their awareness of issues on governance; to introduce them to the diversity of issues and challenges that women across India face everyday; train them in leadership skills; and how women can participate in key decision-making bodies to address women’s issues which have remained long neglected. Learning from field experiences under the programme, the Ministry of Panchayati Raj is advocating for the institutionalisation of ‘women only village council meetings’ prior to holding gram sabha meetings. This will enable women to discuss more sensitive issues related to domestic violence, sexual harassment, and others which are usually difficult to put on the discussion table in gram sabha meetings due to cultural conventions. Third, it is critical to build alliances not only for individual women but for institutions of women in politics. There are several examples but we would like to refer to our excel- lent partnership with UNDP Bhutan, Denmark and Civil Society Organizations to build the largest Bhutanese network of elected women representatives. In addition, under the governance programme we have also initiated the establishment of a Regional Centre of Excellence on Promoting Women’s Political Leadership and Governance in India and South Asia. This is UN Women’s exit strategy on gender responsive gov- ernance: To establish a virtual institution which brings together institutions and ex- perts on gender and governance in South Asia as a resource centre which will con- solidate all the research and capacity building interventions initiated under the UN Women programme. It will accommodate knowledge resources on gender respon- sive governance, training resources on women’s political empowerment, and best practices from learning across South Asia on gender responsive governance. It is envisioned to act like a ready-reckoner for anybody from academics to parliamentari- ans to women leaders and aspirants at the grass-root level in the South Asia region on any information related to gender responsive governance. There will not only be one physical centre but multiple centres spread across South Asia to cater to the different aspects of gender responsive governance, depending on whichever institution or country has the comparative advantage on the matter. Ac- cessibility that is easy and inclusive is the mantra of the proposed virtual Regional Centre of Excellence providing the best quality information to all stakeholders.

DAY 2

PANEL AND WORKHOP MODERATED BY MS. SUMONA DASGUPTA, INDIA

India is laboratory in local politics! Local politics rather than local government are an important opening of the political space. Politics is a question of how the distribution of public goods is being contested. There is a broader space in local politics than in the government.

Page 19

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

MS. NZIRA DEUS, MOZAMBIQUE

In Mozambique there is better representation of woman at national than local level politics with a total of 39,2 pct. representation of women in Parliament. The President of the parliament is also a woman. The process of decentralization has brought the possibilities of having provincial and municipal assemblies. Women are elected to Parliament and local assemblies through their political parties and not by the com- munities. At local level women in assemblies are represented by 15 pct. At local lev- el, women are not well represented. There are 43 municipalities where only 8-10 pct. of council members are women, and only three municipalities are run by a woman. Women do not take part in local politics. They are not represented and do not take part in debates. Possible explanations include: Women chosen by their parties do not understand politics and do not know how to produce speeches and question the change of power and gender relation; the level of education is low; Cultural norms dictate the behaviour of women and man in the Parliament where women see men as superior, not questioning their standpoint and argumentation, and in the public space women are discriminated by men by not being allowed to speak; socialisation - women learn to obey men and consequently lack confidence to participate in public speaking; household activities which women are primarily responsible for, thus hav- ing too many tasks for engaging in politics; lack of confidence; women do not consid- er their ideas as important, they are not encourage to speak and participate in public; men dominate sessions and discussions, and even intimidate women. To address these problems we must train women to participate: Training women in gender, political participation, and leadership in order to give them confidence and help them develop argumentation skills; help women in local politics being in touch with their base, listen to the problems and push the agenda of gender equality; train women to understand their role and functions as soon as they are elected; promote ‘woman to woman dialogue’ through mentoring; technical support on how to elabo- rate gender budgeting analysis and affirmative policies; training in lobby and advoca- cy to push women’s rights agenda; guarantee the implementation of the legislation, and regional and international instruments which stipulate 50 pct. of the seats must be for women; local assemblies must be trained in gender issues and women’s rights; assemblies should create a good environment and timing of meetings for women in order for them to take care of others responsibilities; promote a creation of network between women at parliament at central level and local level, to share expe- riences and mentoring; CSOs should work directly with political parties to ensure the promotion of women participation and indication of active women to be at local as- semblies.

MS. PHUNTSHOK CHHODEN TSHERING, BHUTAN

The initiatives of the DIPD are very timely vis-à-vis the political situation in Bhutan which is a young democracy. With the first Parliamentary Elections held in March 2008 and elected government in place by April of the same year, democracy in Bhu- tan is only around four and half years old. Some call it a ‘baby democracy’ and others agree it is truly unique because of its origins – having been handed down from the throne in a somewhat ‘imposed’ manner as a gift and not as a result of demand, re- volt or revolution. Peacefully land-locked and mountainous, independent and never colonized, Bhutan survived in a self imposed isolation setting till the late 1950’ies, when it began to tread the ‘development’ journey. A home-grown model of a Buddhist democracy in Bhutan is being nurtured and shaped which embraces democratic principles in the context of Gross National Hap- piness (GNH) which is Bhutan’s guiding development philosophy articulated by the

Page 20

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

Fourth Monarch in the late 1970’ies so that the rat race of GDP does not engulf and blind the Bhutanese. This means a people centred development where the well-being of all citizens is at the core and seen as a state responsibility. As a Buddhist nation, this is a fundamental value, given that people’s well-being indicators are not exem- plary in our immediate neighbourhood despite decades of democracy. The Gender Pilot Study carried out by UNIFEM South Asia and Planning Commis- sion, Bhutan in 2001 states that “Bhutan has an extremely enabling environment for gender mainstreaming” whilst pointing out that certain dominant socio-cultural per- ception seem to be continuing to perpetuate male superiority and that, as societies move from rural agrarian backgrounds to more urban-modern settings “women seemed to be losing their decision-making role”. When the first local government elections (LG) were held in 2005, it was assumed that women would make it to positions of authority given that gender relations are highly egalitarian and society is largely matrilineal. Property right is almost a birth right for women. Customarily, family land, property and assets are handed down from to daughter. Hence, women are quite empowered when compared to women elsewhere in South Asia. Yet, in the LG elections of 2005, women were unable to break into the power ghetto. Only one woman got elected as ‘Gup’ - the highest post in LG - out of 202 and a few as deputy posts making the average 4 pct. women in lo- cal governments across Bhutan. The elections of 2011 did not change the picture dramatically (7 pct.). Overall, women are passive participants in development, and there is a low represen- tation in politics and decision-making positions. Local politics is not easier to access – on the contrary; gender bias is closer to home. Entry and acceptance of women as local leader is harder at local level, although ‘changes begin at home’. At national level, less than 14 pct. of the members of parliament are women, and there are no female ministers. It is clear that governance and politics in Bhutan is highly male dominated, despite the egalitarianism that is predominant in the society in general, with no overt forms of discrimination against women or any blatant subordination. With the exception of a small percentage in the south and eastern parts of the coun- try, where patrilineal pattern of inheritance is predominant, women largely inherit fam- ily property and land, and play a central role in the households. From a GNH perspective, especially in the context of national politics, as Bhutan is a small and thinly populated country, BNEW (a platform for women supported by DIPD) aims to bring women of all parties and levels together from the beginning to interact, share and discuss issues and concerns so that - as women elected - they can stand together in harmony and help society see and value the unique qualities women can bring to the table. BNEW will work towards acting as the registry of women interested in joining politics and prepare them, as well as ensuring political parties can access necessary information and approach potential candidates. Party walls and wars, once overcome by elected women through a non-partisan platform like BNEW would help the Bhutanese public see and understand that politics need not divide society forever after the bitter experiences from first parliamentary elections of 2008.

MR. JULIO HURAYA CABRERA, BOLIVIA

The constitution of Bolivia establishes that every citizen has the right to participate freely in the formation, exercise and control of political power. Participation will be fair and equal between men and women. Among the principles, the electoral rules in- clude equality and equivalence as compulsory. Furthermore the law guarantees gen- der equality and equal opportunities between men and women based on the criteria of alternation and parity. The electoral legislation recognizes political harassment as

Page 21

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

an electoral offense. The person that harasses a candidate will be sentenced two to five years of prison! In Bolivia there are 327 municipal governments. The electoral legislation demands that political parties include 30 pct. women candidates in their lists and in the case of citizen groups 50 pct. On the 23th of January 2012, the President was behind an im- portant milestone for women: For the first time, half of his appointed cabinet were women. In the case of ministers, the ratio is today 35 pct. women and 65 pct. men. During the entire republican history of Bolivia, among the 85 presidents, there has been only 1 woman president (interim), during the transition process (November 1979 – July 1980). In the judicial organ, women have had a minority presence of 13 pct. until elections in 2011. Now women represent 43 pct. of the judicial authorities. We can see that the participation of women in the executive organ at the municipal level (mayors) is still minor and demonstrates the continuance of gender inequality that hinders the entry of women in this power space. Only 22 women mayors won the elections in 2010, out of the 337 municipalities that exist in Bolivia. Nonetheless, in the local councils the participation of women has risen from 19 pct. in 2004 to 43 pct. in 2010. In this respect, the results of the latest elections of councilmen are signifi- cant and encouraging regarding the parameters of gender equality. In spite of not having achieved 50 pct. of women in top positions, a visible increase can be ob- served in the number of women assuming top positions in the councils: Women have attained 43 pct. of seats, a ratio close to parity. The support of MAS (the leading party) has been fundamental for the positive chang- es in relation to women’s political participation at different levels of government. MAS has promoted the important normative progress towards the parity and alternation foreseen as principles in the ‘New Carta Magna’ and in the electoral legislation, and the law against political violence and harassment against women. Although the pro- cess of political participation of women shows progress towards gender equality in the different levels of the state, there is no equal participation, except in the judicial organ. In the municipal elections of 2004, 337 women were elected as councilmen, but less than 4 pct. of them were elected mayors. As a state and as a society, we must sup- port the work of the female councilmen, so we can fight the existing gender discrimi- nation inside and outside of the political institutions. In the indigenous municipalities (11 of the 337 Bolivian municipalities), the representation of women councilmen is maintained with a ratio of 43 pct. Out of the total of 55 seats in these municipalities, 23 are occupied by women.

Page 22

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

PANEL 2: YOUNG WOMEN IN POLITICS

Who and what interests will, can or should the political 5 parties ideally seek to represent?

Ms. Mary Mourad Shenouda from Egypt responding to ques- tions from the audi- ence, together with Ms. Manju Yedav from Nepal. Both of these countries are consid- ered transition coun- tries.

DAY 1

MODERATED BY MS. LONE LOKLINDT, MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Engaging youth and especially young women in politics is a challenge for all democ- racies. The importance of engaging youth is self-evident considering their majority status in many populations and the fact that the future belongs to the youth. Often young women in politics are supported on the assumption that they will be agents of change. But will youth, and in particular young women, act differently if the basic in- centive structures of the political system remain the same? Ms. Loklindt introduced the panel by stating that the general political participation in politics is declining and that women have double barriers. Women tend to be active on specific issues instead of party politics. It is very important that we have young women active in politics, that they build up capacity, and are given the opportunity to take on a political role.

MS. MARY MOURAD SHENOUDA, EGYPT

I left home to Tahrir Square, clutching my husband’s hand, dressed to be ready for not coming back, with layers of clothes and stuffed pockets. I chanted, with hundreds of thousands of voices, calling for bread, freedom and dignity. Someone made space for me to pass, another held my hand while running, a third carried me across a wall,

Page 23

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

a fourth gave me a sip from a personal bottle, and the fifth offered a bed for rest at night. I do not recall from among those who were women and who were men, and I’m sure they never noticed whether they helped a man or a woman. We were first of all humans, and second, Egyptians, and revolutionaries. On February 11, I was out in the streets celebrating a falling regime, and at one point I became a woman! Me and many others suffered the first instant of harassment that quickly made it to world headlines and became a common phenomenon, like it has been for years before. Not only did harassment return, but also the entire social and political structure under which the less advantaged still suffer. Between January 25 2011 and February 11 a crack appeared into the future! We lived the ‘Egyptian Utopia’ if we may call it, a small world where everyone’s equal, liv- ing on solidarity, and calling for a new regime. But the paradise was soon over, and the present came to overshadow the future. The present reality that forced itself brought women back to their traditional social positions, struggling their traditional issues and suffering (or enjoying) their everyday challenges. The public space in Egypt is not a welcoming environment for that mat- ter. Not only for harassment, but also because women are not expected to raise their voices higher than a certain level, and certainly keep it lower the younger they are. Compared to the past, women are in a risky position, although a few gains have been won. Yes, we have taken many steps forward as a country, securing right to free speech and organizing, many more still remain, and women are bound to pay a high- er token. Under the current Freedom and Justice Party’s Muslim Brotherhood Presi- dent it’s not proven yet where women stand on the agenda. Statements by President Morsi’s party members and even female consultant are contradictory. The sporadic calls to remove the so-called ‘Mrs. Mubarak laws’ related to women’s rights to divorce and punishment for harassment are only some of the battles we may have to go through to sustain our gains as women so far, without being called too Westernized or irreligious. Yet, all these are not to be taken as final signs of failure, but rather as questions and as new titles for women to gather around and attempt to change. It is an embarrassment to tell you that after this grand revolution we elected a parlia- ment with the least representation of women in Egyptian modern parliamentary histo- ry, without a single woman elected below 30. Yet, there was still a ray of light inside it; women were elected on merit. We have had cases where women quota and clear- ing seats for women in the parliament during the era of the late president was only a media show, with women unable to act as independent politicians that disappeared from the public space altogether. But today, the power we saw in Tahrir Square still exists: We see young women taking lead across many youth movements and infor- mal coalitions. In order for this new rising energy to be harnessed and become an enabler for change, we must continue to build on the lessons of the first year and a half post-revolution: First, following so many years of refrain from politics, in order for young women to engage, politics cannot be limited to the usual legal structures, but should continue to be nourished through informal coalitions, NGOs, student unions, trade unions and even community clubs. Many women, who are already participating in the public space, whether through work or study, are uncomfortable diving into formal politics. Second, an active partisan structure and a party-list electoral system are much more likely to attract women and drive them into the political sphere than the traditional in- dividual-based structure or a two-party informal structure. The presence of a shared space under a legal title is a great opportunity for young talents. This structure would help in various ways, including enabling fundraising, and could be utilized to push women into parliament seats, such as ruling for the presence of one woman on every party list etc.

Page 24

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

Third, local politics are a great first entry point. Not only because the proximity to home renders participation logistically less problematic, but also because the quick reflection of the woman’s effort on the immediate vicinity will encourage more neigh- bours, relatives and friends to engage further, and will, therefore, enable a greater support for her and for the women surrounding her. Fourth, allowing politics to adapt to young women, not only forcing women to accept its rules. This is really a very personal experience from work at the South-Cairo divi- sion of the Egyptian Social Democratic party of which I was member. We had a woman as division head, and from the 7 member steering committee there were two women and they were among the youngest in the group, which was the highest rep- resentation of young women in any division of the entire party. The experience was very powerful: Politics had been a male-dominated arena for so long that men had ‘shaped’ its norms to their usual behaviour. The only division that did things different- ly was this one! First foundation for engaging more women was encouraging female family members of existing male members: Sisters, wives, neighbours etc. were the nearest candi- dates and had also the logistical and family support for their effort. In addition, we had a small children play area and we loaded it with activities so the care-taking women participating could bring their little ones. Soon enough, men were also bring- ing their children, thus liberating their wives to do other things. What would sound like the noisiest and most-distracting environment for work soon became a key attraction to work in politics ‘it didn’t sound so women-hostile any more.’ We also planned all our meetings and activities in early evenings. The tradition of post midnight politics could not work for most women, young or old, due to safety and traditions. By forcing earlier times, more women were able to make it to meetings and activities without forcing their homes to suffer. Finally, we took special care to reduce stress during exam times when additional time for personal lives is required; we re- duced number of meetings and size of activities for the four week period. We soon realized it was actually very wise because the majority of households are engaging with exams and activities were hardly attended. We learnt a new lesson: The closer we are to women and the more we adapt to their needs, the more likely we are to engage with the broader street and the wider society base. Our division team has decided to take that experience one step further and initiated an inter-party board aiming to coordinate between parties and coalitions for the up- coming elections, and applying the new rules on a broader scale. The last lesson, and really I cannot stress how important this is, relates to protection of women in the public space. The conflict between a Muslim-conservative ruling power and a pro- gressive revolutionary spirit is reaching its peak whenever the discussion of women harassment in the streets is brought up, but without clear measures to protect women and defend their right for safe access to the street, we are only forcing them back- wards. These lessons were the very first fruit of the year and a half effort in the new Egyp- tian political sphere. We keep our eyes focused on the future, the memories of the first 18 days of the revolution will remain in the hearts of Egyptians and for genera- tions to come they will not accept to be silenced or oppressed. We now have some- thing that was never there before: That is Hope!

MS. MANJU YEDAV, NEPAL

I come from a very remote and rural area in the Southern Nepal. Here I like to share my own experiences of how I came into politics from very remote and rural areas of southern Nepal and the different problems I was facing. The problems were mainly

Page 25

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

created by a male dominated society, discrimination of women by the Nepalese laws, not equal opportunity of education, not equal salary for the same work, high depend- ency on males, not having freedom of expression etc. Currently the Nepalese women are raising their voices and fighting against all kinds of suppression and domination. I myself work in an organization fighting to establish the rights of . In Nepal, the place of girl is either under the husband or under the soil. This shows that girl should not be free. The state has provided equal rights to women and men but in practice women do not enjoying equality – in practice men are ministers of women issues in Nepal. Young women face lack of inclusion, nepotism and favorit- ism. Ms. Chitra Yedav was chosen by the people to represent them after the upris- ings, but when it came to formal politics her nomination was cancelled. I was nomi- nated for the constitutional assembly but after one day my nomination was cancelled. “To do politics for a woman is the same as to loose her character” is a saying in Ne- pal. Women do not get prober economic backing from the family or the state. Properties belong to the men, and women depend on men. In those circumstances a young woman faces very hard difficulties participating in politics. Most of the women dis- connect from politics due to the financial factor. Peace and progress cannot be obtained without female representation. Young wom- en should be encouraged. Youth women in politics must be recommended and rec- ognized by the state. Government should support training portfolio and financial sup- port. Civil society should encourage young women to participate in politics. Also, the media plays an important role. The media is dominated by men. Media has the opportunity to make a ‘zero to a hero and a hero to zero’. No woman dares to put herself out in public in this setting. But if affirmative action towards young women was put in place then it would be a revolutionary change for young women in politics. To publish positive achievement, rather than sex scandals or glamorous news is the support we need from media to enter politics. You should support women from the grass-root level, encourage and support them to go into politics.

DAY 2

PANEL AND WORKSHOP MODERATED BY MS. MARYSE HELBERT, AUSTRALIA

The moderator started by referring to her presentation of the issues in the back- ground document. From Bhutan we learnt that a woman in political offices have to work harder. Young women get more involved in movements than political parties. Political parties are duty bearers to recruit and promote young women within their party structures. Mentoring could be a useful method. It is what you make of it – both the mentor and mentee decide what they want to get out of it. We had a discussion on women’s wings. Women and youth wings are very useful in Ghana - in other countries they are used as places to outcast women.

MS. LETICIA NYERERE, TANZANIA

I am a Member of Parliament of the United Republic of Tanzania, and before I was selected as special seats MP. I had contested in the constituency and I know exactly how tough the battle is when competing with men.

Page 26

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

In Tanzania many women and men still hold very traditional views of gender. Women are ‘owned’ by men and they should do everything that their husbands ask of them. Young women in politics are suffering from these views. They are not given the same respect as men. They loose because they do not have the same funding and back up. Even though women have greater skills, they will be outvoted by men, because women are not well seen. Male politicians think that their female counterparts should do as they say even though it does not make sense. Women can be empowered to accomplish their goals. We have laws of women’s rights but they are not implemented by government. I thought that it would be easier to change things as I am now a lawmaker, but men hold key decision-making posi- tions in parties. As a member of the finance and economic committee I would wish that the government would focus on women’s issues like health care. Male politics should stop making decisions for us! I see myself as someone who should use the opportunities I have been given to help women. It is harder to be a woman. Sometimes I feel unrecognized. I feel that I have to work harder than men, but I am proud to be a woman. Women all over the world must prepare for battle. Not with weapons but with education and will. Women need more international exposure. They need to understand their rights and the functioning of democracy. Men need to understand our reality. Men need to be educated. They need more understanding. Many men see women as house keepers and not as part of politics. I want all women around the world to work in order to change this mentality. I see things that I like in my society, but laws are not implemented. I want negative laws to be changed in order for women and men to be equal. I face challenges like corruption, lack of education and poverty which are used against people to cast their vote. Women empowerment will speed up development. Decision maker positions must be given to women. Women are good leaders -they are used to working in their family.

MS. JEMINA DE-SOSOO, GHANA

The role of young women in politics and public offices is one of the current burning governance issues because of the acknowledged potential and contribution of the youth to governance process. Youth must participate effectively and meaningfully in order to have an impact on empowerment that enhances the self esteem of individu- als and groups. But we see few young women in politics in Ghana. I am a social democrat a party which is part of improving health care and who is against discrimi- nation. Equality means individual rights should not depend on gender. Even once elected, women tend to hold lesser valued cabinet ministries or similar positions. These are described as ‘soft industries’ and include health, education, and welfare. Rarely do women hold executive decision-making authority in more powerful domains or those that are associated with traditional notions of masculinity (such as finance and the military). Typically, the more powerful the institution, the less likely it is that women’s interests will be represented. Political parties in Ghana are driven by the lust to win votes. Women are better in some issues than men, and therefore it should be in the interest of the party to pro- mote women, but financial and logistics issues are barriers for women in politics. In our country we have voting stations and trainings for young women. They travel to China and Angola to receive training. If you are a women leader, you have to go lob- by for younger women. Some are not so qualified and educated, so we need to train

Page 27

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

them. The following are the measures that should be put in place to strengthen the participation of young women in politics: Religion: Religious groups still have aspect which does not promote women taking up frontline leadership roles; women are to play second fiddle to their male counterparts even in churches, mosques or shrines. Unfortunately, this scenario has a serious bearing on how politics is done in the country. The political environment tends to re- flect this backward religious view of making women not to play lead roles in our politi- cal institutions. Lack of political will/political culture: There has been a demonstrable lack of political will on the part of leading political parties to promote the involvement of young wom- en in frontline politics. The parties, in its medium term goal, should set up a special fund to support young women candidates contesting for parliamentary seats. Young women should be encouraged to contest men in strong hold constituencies through- out the country. The parties should review its constitution to enable young women to participate actively. Young women should be motivated to get into politics. Financing: Women need funding and affirmative action in order to actively participate in partisan politics and its decision making processes. Lack of funding is a major problem. Mentorship and motivation: Young women need mentoring, motivation and funding to promote their participation in partisan politics, in order to break the barrier created over time. The business of doing politics involves self awareness, self esteem, confi- dence and strong written and oral advocacy skills. Their male counterparts appear to edge them out in this regard, however, in recent times as a result of increased ac- cess to education and skills training, guidance, mentoring and counseling pro- grammes, young women now have the needed self esteem and confidence to brace their male counterparts in partisan politics in strong advocacy for better right for women. The men are not our enemy. If we want to follow them we need their advice and as- sistance. We need to have a quota system in the party constitution. I am very happy that the chairman of my party is on our side. We need to shake hands with men to achieve results. In Ghana, women in civil organizations do not want to be part of poli- tics. But we need them! We need them to move on.

MS. RATEEBEH ABU GHOUSH, PALESTINE

The Declaration of the Independence of the Palestinian state in 1988 approved the principle of equality and non-discrimination against women and confirmed on full equality in rights and duties. This assertion did not come from a vacuum, but was the result of the hard work of Palestinian women. This is exactly what makes the situa- tion very disappointing and leaves a feeling of going backwards for miles in women’s situation now a day. Palestinian women have struggled side by side with men on ending the occupation. Women participated with men in politics and there were generally high expectations to the women in the country. But no one talked about ‘women’s role’ and ‘women’s issues’ were not discussed. After signing the Oslo Agreement a change in the political landscape began to ap- pear, although the first presidential election experienced competition between a man and a woman, the reality reflected superiority of men in both the presidential and par- liamentary elections, and a crushing superiority in the municipalities’ elections. The first parliamentary election in 1996 was held on a base of majority act which led to the scaling of the role of women in access to the dome of the Parliament. Women

Page 28

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

have fought to nominate 27 women to membership of the Legislative Council, where 5 women won. One of the fundamental causes of this small percentage was the elec- toral system, which was laid off in small constituencies, where the consolidated clan does not believe in and do not recognize the rights of women and is not willing to support a female candidate. The five winners were from large constituencies, where the clan force is limited. It became very clear that the politics is a men’s world. We discovered that we are facing the traditional and historical challenge of getting the women a fair share of the political scene. The most frightening thing was that even the women didn’t support each others. Youth didn’t get any chance to be presented in the parliament which made them feel that political parties are not addressing them or their interests, and they felt power- less in relation to the political system - especially young women. They perceived for- mal political participation as dangerous work which led to nowhere, and they got in- volved in informal political activities in civil society. This was an open space for them and empowered them socially and economically. The women’s organization units in parties and NGO’s work hard to promote gender equality and women debates have become more regular. Political policies to promote greater inclusion of women in decision-making and politi- cal representation have been put in place, but the question of quotas sparked a lot of debate. The current election law now provides a quota of 20 pct. of the candidate’s list to women, thus supporting women’s involvement. However, at the election in 2006 the two largest parties did not support female candidates. The election resulted in only 12. pct. of parliamentarians being women and in having no youth representa- tion, even though 72 pct. of the Palestinian population is below the age of 30. Since 2006, many good initiatives concerning the involvement of women and youth have taken place both in civil society and within the political parties: Establishment of Youth Shadow Local Councils which are democratically elected by their peers to emulate the actual local councils in their communities with the long term vision of emerging as future youth leaders Activating the UN resolution 1325 by empowering young women who want to run for elections and supporting them with local networks, and motivate the energy of young women leaders to develop their leadership skills within politics. Grassroots campaigns to demand reduction in the age of candidacy for the parlia- mentary elections; the campaign has received response by the government who is pushed toward lowering the age for the municipal elections. We, as a party, took a very innovative step in allowing 50 pct. of the political bureau to consist of young people and 40 pct. of women. Furthermore, we are the first to have a woman as a Secretary General for a Palestinian party.

Page 29

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

PANEL 3: WOMEN IN TRANSITION

How can we ensure that women take part in decision- 6 making processes in transition countries?

Ms. Janah Ncube gave a very strong presentation on the challenges facing women in Zimbabwe in the panel on Day 2.

DAY 1

MODERATED BY MS. GITTE LILLELUND BECH, MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Women have played a central role in transition countries on an equal footing with men. But women seem to be marginalized in the formal transformation processes, and tend not to do well in post transition elections. Women have a tendency to be left out of political space where future governance structures are negotiated. How is diversity managed in transitional faces when for example new constitutions are negotiated? What are the experiences from earlier transition processes in Latin America, Indonesia and Turkey? There is a need to develop a special post-conflict or post-revolutionary framework for the inclusion of women in countries that can be considered as being in transition (which is different from the traditional concepts of ‘failed’ or ‘fragile’ states).

Page 30

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

MS. SELAY GHAFFAR, AFGHANISTAN

Afghanistan has been through three decades of war. Today, women are struggling for the same rights as 10 years ago and are subjected to both discrimination and vio- lence. Trust Law Survey indicated in 2011 that: “Afghanistan is the world's most dan- gerous country for women to live in due to violence, dismal healthcare and brutal poverty’’. The concerning access to justice, education, health care, politics, economic opportunities, and the social and cultural arena is at its high peak and is increased year by year. The reasons are a society dominated by human rights abusers; criminal parties and warlords in power; lack of serious and honest commitment from the international community; and a culture of impunity. Tra- ditionalism and patriarchy are violating the rights of women to the extreme stand. The real participation of women in the decision making levels in all sectors are the matter of concerns in the current catastrophic political situation of Afghanistan. We do have a quota system of 20 pct. , but it doesn’t guarantee women’s emancipation and empowerment. The harsh reality is that the majority of women are elected/selected with the help of parties with a criminal history. Further- more, both the UN and the international community are silence when it comes to women’s rights and women political participation. Afghanistan is presently in a state of transition. The process of transitions started in 2001 with international intervention and throughout the process women have been excluded. The 2001 conference on Afghanistan in Berlin was not a good starting point because power was given to the wrong party. The US and its international allies brought to power again all those criminal parties and warlords that are responsible for countless crimes and atrocities in Afghanistan. The UN and the international commu- nity’s commitment for protection and promotion of women’s rights are just lied down in papers and on conferences.

After the interim government Afghanistan had two elections which were the most fraudulent elections in the world: The warlords and extremist groups used their pow- er, money and guns to ‘buy’ the people’s votes for their male and female candidates, and the real democratic, intellectual, and trustworthy candidates who had the support of people, but of course not money and guns, had to face huge challenge and threats to contest, particularly female candidates. The fact is that women made up 27 pct. in the lower house of the parliament, and 21 pct. in the upper house, but their represen- tation is just symbolic, and most of them are not the real representative of women’s voices. With few minority exceptions the majority of female MPs are just sitting there to fill the seats and do not even have the right to take a decision without their boss’ approval. The few of them who have the courage to speak up and tell the truth, bring- ing the reality on the table of discussion, are never given a chance to participate or be heard or they are even thrown out of the Parliament. The Afghan government with support of the international community made a High Peace Council composed of all those who destructed the peace, started war and committed unforgettable crimes in Afghanistan. How could people trust such a HPC? What kind of peace should they expect from this HPC? The unfortunate reality is that again the presence of women in HPC, especially in decision making level, is matter of concern; 9 out of 69 members are women. Afghan people, in particular women, want peace but definitely not on the cost of women’s right. We don’t want women’s right to be a bargaining chip of peace negotiation and we don’t want any peace of which women are not part of the decision-making process. Peace without justice is not acceptable by the Afghans! I must indicate that no country and its people want to be militarily occupied or ruled by other countries. Afghan people are welcoming the withdrawal of international troops. They came to Afghanistan to bring security but they failed because year by

Page 31

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

year the security got worse and the civilian causalities increased. Therefore, this is the time for them to wrap up and leave it for Afghans to decide about their future. Currently the Afghan government with the support of the US and other international allies are supporting a parallel security structure and legalizing the Afghan Local Po- lice (ALP). Now the former militias and local commanders who belong to the warlord parties are officially given authority to rule over poor people in the provinces. Since the ALP has started to operate in the provinces the sexual abuses against women, especially girls, have increased. Every month Humanitarian Assistance for the Wom- en and Children of Afghanistan (HAWCA) and other organizations who run shelters in the country are registering a number of rape cases and other form of violence by the ALP. The power of ALP has resulted in a decreased number of girls in school and restrictions of movement for women. The experience from the war torn countries shows that during transition women are most vulnerable which has been the case in Afghanistan as well. HAWCA is cooperating with other women’s and human rights based organizations such as Action Aid, Danish Institute from Human Rights and other national and inter- national organizations to ensure are protected. Together we are strongly advocating for women’s rights and women’s empowerment. Today I request the Danish people, organizations, parties and government to strongly support the intellectual individual, women’s right and human rights organizations, CSOs, the true democratic parties and institutions in order to have a prosperous Af- ghanistan where both women and men equally enjoy their human rights. The equal participation of women and men in all areas is the sign of the democratic state. Women need to build alliances: Women united will never be defeated!

MS. NJERI KABEBERI, KENYA

Kenya qualifies as a nation in transition because it, since August 2010, has been un- der a New Constitutional Dispensation. Following the 2008 post election violence, the Constitution was identified as a long pending matter, that could have prevented the crisis had it been in place, and it was therefore among the key issues identified as a priority for completion under what the citizens popularly refer to as ‘agenda no. 4’. Although Kenya is the economic power house in the East African Community its per- formance on gender parity in the current National Assembly is dismal and a poor comparison to the general status in the region – only 9.8 pct., much lower than coun- tries like Tanzania; 36 pct., and Rwanda; 56.3 pct. A 2011 research commissioned by International IDEA in which I examined the politi- cal parties policy documents via-á-vis the actual reality within political parties on gen- der representation showed that; what many parties state in their policy documents, is contrary to the reality on the ground with most political parties doing very poorly. Chapter four of the Constitution (the Bill of Rights) introduces the ‘Not more than two thirds’ of either gender in elective and appointive positions. Because these clauses are anchored in the Bill of Rights, they can only be amended by a referendum. This therefore, leaves the country with no choice but to find a formula to ascertain this rep- resentation before elections in March 2013 to avoid the National Assembly and the Senate being declared unconstitutional. To give full effect to the realization of the rights guaranteed in the Constitution, the state “shall take legislative and other measures, including affirmative action pro- grammes and policies designed to redress any disadvantage suffered by individuals or groups because of past discrimination”.

Page 32

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

Though we are a country in transition with one of the best constitutions in the world which guarantees all rights including gender equality, I noted Kenya is exactly where Rumbidzai argues in her paper on ‘Women in Transition Countries’; that in-fact the unfinished business of political transitions is the ”inclusion and representation of women” which makes transitions ‘unfinished’ by this very omission. Ever since the new Constitution came into force, the women lobby has been in court on almost each and every appointment because the thinking of the president and other leaders continues to be in the past. The Presidential and government policy pronouncements on gender have not translated into implementation of gender poli- cies. Thus, there is a need for a greater focus on implementation. We need an af- firmative action act to amend the Constitution. Political parties have on paper em- braced the thought of including more women, yet seem to forget their promises fol- lowing elections and act as though the affirmative action is a choice rather than a re- quirement. Thus, political parties should be using quotas. Without the representation of women, the transition in Kenya is incomplete. The suggested/recommended areas of focus are: Support for women to mobilize as women: The women lobby in Kenya is active on all elective and appointive positions and has been constantly in court challenging a number of appointments, including the first appointment of the Chief Justice and the Supreme Court which did not take into account the 2/3rds requirement. This ap- pointment was reversed as many others but not without constant challenges. They are also jointly pushing towards the Affirmative Action Bill. Agenda setting: The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission has not dealt with this matter, although women are confronting them on a solution for elec- tions in March 2013. The Registrar of Political Parties is satisfied that all political par- ties have met the 2/3rds gender rule, though many have placed women at the bottom of their list. The political parties have just woken up to reality after constant lobbying by the CMD (Center for Multiparty Democracy) but are treating it like a strange re- quirement. Many members of these institutions, although willing to do what is neces- sary to provide the quotas, are completely unfamiliar with why affirmative action is necessary. Adoption and implementation of positive measures: There is constant training and lobbying of the media, the members of parliament and the political parties. The UN has supported high level meetings to help sensitize the leadership. Lobbying each of the presidential candidates is seen as the next step. We need to get the commitment of political parties that they will provide the relevant quotas in their nomination lists. Male advocates: A number of male advocates have begun to state that gender is- sues are not women’s issues but are part of our national agenda as guaranteed in the Kenyan constitution. Men are finding it very challenging to relinquish some of ‘their’ power in order for women to have a fair share in political participation and rep- resentation. We are very near the election but far from finding the solution. Mobilization of media support: CMD has taken as their priority to sensitize the media on gender issues and an understanding of the principle of affirmative action. Meet- ings at all levels have taken place the last months. Advocacy to end gender based violence: The codes of conduct in both our Elections Act and Political Parties Act have spoken loudly against gender based electoral vio- lence and have taken strict penalties on perpetrators. We have introduced a group of national artists to the UN Women who will be working with them on the ’16 days of violence against women’ campaign in November which is the theme for the upcoming elections.

Page 33

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

DAY 2

MODERATED BY MS. RUMBIDZAI KANDAWASVIKA, INTERNATIONAL IDEA, SWEDEN

Transitions never come to an end – it is an ongoing process. Women’s political par- ticipation and representation is often very minimal during transition processes. Why are women there physically, but not taking part – or being included in – the political platforms?

MS. CHEMA GARGOURI, TUNISIA

In relation to the Arab spring it is important to remember that the countries involved all have their specificities. Following the revolution in Tunisia there was a debate about national identity: Are we a Muslim country, Mediterranean, how close are we to the Western world etc.? The question of national identity will determine politics: ‘Um- mah’ vs. a different version with openness, will determine whether women’s rights will be an issue for debate. Women’s rights were present before the revolution e.g. the statute of 1956 guaran- teeing women political rights. have never fought for their rights in politics – or men for that matter – and it has not been debated. Generally, participa- tion in politics has not been an issue in Tunisia. Out of 150 political parties in Tunisia, only 2 pct. are founded by women. At every party list there had to be a man and a woman, and 30 pct. of seats are reserved to women. Currently, Tunisian women hold 63 out of the 217 seats making up the country’s Constituent Assembly. More than 80 pct. of these women belong to the Islamic party that won the majority in the election. They speak on behalf of an ideology and are not there to represent women in general regardless of their affiliation. The question is whether a woman necessarily will support progressive ‘women’s values’. Leadership should start at the grassroots level. The cultural aspect of the problem is that women are not willing to take on leadership and aspirations. They need support! It is not too late for women to take part in the transition. But there are numerous chal- lenges facing female participation in politics in Tunisia: Cultural challenges; today we are more oriented towards traditional roles. Education; we do not invest in women leadership, and women follow careers that fit their socially acceptable roles. Econo- my; women do not have the money to invest in a political career, so economic em- powerment of women is a key issue for political participation. Women are often referred to as victims in relation to e.g. poverty and illiteracy, which leads to a lack of self-esteem with no aspiration and no dreams of a political career. The relationship between religion and political participation is an issue. Political par- ticipation is at the top in the “power ladder’: Women should have a guarantee for their rights in the constitution if they want to go that far in their career: Is this the case in the Muslim Arab countries? Maybe women participation in politics should be studied in a regional, socio-economic and religious perspective.

MS. CHITRA LEKHA YADAV, NEPAL

The mass movement of 2006 restored democracy in Nepal and declared the country a secular, federal democratic republic. Both the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2006 and the Interim Constitution of Nepal 2007 promised to ‘restructure’ the Nepa-

Page 34

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

lese state to address historically existing class, gender, regional and ethnic injustice and to create an inclusive system of governance. The major tasks of the post-movement regimes were: Holding the election of the 601 member Constituent Assembly (CA) to draft a new constitution, logical conclusions about the peace process by addressing its root causes of conflict, transitional justice, peace building activities and structural transformation of public sphere. After four years of political exercise, the CA was dissolved on May 27, 2012, without producing a new constitution. This marked the beginning of another phase of transi- tion without ending the previous one. About 117 issues remained unsolved and the major contentious issues are: Defining the form of governance (parliamentary or presidential), electoral system, gender-equality in citizenship for women marrying for- eigners, etc. Protracted transition of Nepalese politics caused by rival conceptions of identity, ideology and interest of top male leaders of mainstream parties could not create “common ground’ for the resolution of these issues and consolidate the achievements made in the areas of women’s participation. Political and constitutional crisis are inducing political polarization between the incumbent Maoist-Madhesi coali- tion in power and its opposition led by the Nepali Congress (NC) and CPN-UML af- fecting the development-oriented transformations for gender justice. A number of gender-related advancements were made during the transition time. First, 33 pct. of representation of women in the CA brought 198 women in the parlia- ment. The reservation of seats to women in the state institutions has fostered gender equality in governance. But Nepalese women’s representation is weak in vital deci- sion making centers of the state which have only two women, one minister and one secretary. Provisions have been made to include women in all-party committees, local peace committees, consumer committees, cooperatives and development organizations. The state has adopted concrete measures to promote equality of opportunity in policy making, and governmental bodies have been established to oversee the implementa- tion of gender rights. A paradigm shifts in favor of gender-friendly policy in Nepal have increased women’s participation. First, the Nepalese state has become more active in controlling domestic violence and promoting child rights, paternal property rights etc. and thereby removing the separation of the public and the private realm. Second, the state has also enlarged the domain of women’s rights in various areas; reproduction rights, equal parental authority, right against exploitation, non- discrimination, social inclusion and affirmative action or positive discrimination in ed- ucation, health, income-generating and peace-promoting activities. Third, the state has adopted new concepts such as gender budgeting and gender and governance to improve gender-sensitive indicators. Despite the above reforms, the structural barriers to women’s political participation in decision-making stem from a lack of their control at the top leadership of the parties and their absence in the national policymaking body. To overcome these barriers, women have formed a caucus group across party lines and built solidarity with local, regional and global civil society organizations, networks and movements, exerted pressure on increased access to bilateral and multilateral development agencies and expanded the domain of elite driven democracy to broad-based participation of sev- eral sectors of society. Women are engaged in social movements but do not want to risk joining politics. Thus, inter party women’s network has to be expanded to the grassroots level which can act as an incentive for bringing more and more women into politics and leader- ship positions, as well as a catalyst of social transformation of Nepal’s informal socie-

Page 35

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

ty, economy and politics. Similarly, there is a need to set up gender-based focal cen- ters at the local level to monitor the violation of their rights and provide promotional measures.

MS. JANAH NCUBE, ZIMBABWE

Countries in transition are very different, and have often experienced armed conflict. Zimbabwe is different as the conflict has been mainly political rather than armed. Women in Zimbabwe participated in the liberation struggle legitimating their claims for participation in politics. However, they were afterwards sent back home to their traditional roles in the family although some token participation was granted. In 1998- 1999 Zimbabweans were fighting for a new constitution demanding a REAL multipar- ty democracy. As women, we wanted a constitutional guarantee for equality and eq- uity which was not eroded by culture and traditions. Following the establishment of a political opposition to Mugabe and ZANU-PF in Zimbabwe - the Movement for Democratic Change – new issues began to emerge, including women’s rights. In 2008 there were elections for local government, parlia- ment, senate and presidential. The presidential results were disputed followed by massive violence, resulting in a run-off whose results were disputed. This led to polit- ical negotiations where only the three political parties that succeeded to gain seats in Parliament were invited to the negotiations. Each party sent in two negotiators and only one party included a woman in the negotiations – Ms. Priscilla Misihairabwi- Mushonga. The Global Political Agreement, an inclusive governing framework, was thus established. Women in the parties got seats as ministers, ambassadors etc. in this era of inclusive government. These negotiations are the basis for the current po- litical framework in Zimbabwe which have left the country with no opposition parties as the three parties are together in government. Currently a draft constitution is being debated but there is a huge vacuum in which women's discourse and gender analy- sis is missing. The general key challenges in the period of transition have been: Violence and poli- tics of fear; intimidation and abductions, which also affects women’s participation; brain drain - leadership of women’s movement (including myself) left Zimbabwe. Massive capacity challenges - women have different political convictions, thus, the gender agenda is not leading us together. A polarized civil society, also amongst the women’s organizations, made it difficult to establish alliances. The opportunities for women in such a context are: Civil society can provide research and technical assistance to the negotiators and develop policy papers – knowledge and information is needed to make informed decisions. Institutions to provide tech- nical support and push for women’s agenda –women’s organizations are key actors. When negotiations are on-going articulation of the practical issues is needed; how policies, e.g. on women, will actual be implemented. Share lessons learned, also across countries. Zimbabwe can learn from Kenya. Use regional and international in- struments as norms and standards to guide content of negotiations, e.g. the African Union Charter on women’s right, and break it down so common people can under- stand it. The challenges for women are: Women issues are relegated to the bottom of the list; it is not perceived as hard core politics, and not seen as immediate and urgent. The situation pertaining before is what is used as a basis of how things are managed dur- ing a transition; token peripheral participation. Who is sitting at the table pushing and protecting women's interests, rights, representation, physical presence and num- bers? Women must develop effective political strategies and tactics to plot how to meander the political terrain.

Page 36

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

Unfortunately political parties are a very dis-empowering space, yet, it is the only way to politics. Once you are in, you maybe locked into a position you may not agree to, how do you turn the women's wing of the party to political currency within the party? Political parties are not really serious about gender equality, women's rights or wom- en's participation. Issues to look out for: Negotiations - who is negotiating and how are they supported; provide them with technical support. Constitution process - advocacy to guarantee increased participation. Capacity building - learning experiences, networking among women from different countries and continents. It is important to support the women's rights agenda broadly by keeping women's organizations funded and connected to the key issues that ordinary women in the villages find RELEVANT. There is need to make gender equality and women's participation a non-negotiable issue and a deal breaker in political negotiations!

Page 37

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

PANEL ON METHODOLOGIES

How can political parties and civil society establish a 7 fruitful relationship in the future?

Four participants from Africa - repre- senting political par- ties in Tanzania and Ghana – use a break in the discussions to dig into some of the suggestions for the final Statement.

MODERATED BY MS. ANNE STENHAMMER, UN WOMEN

In addition to the three thematic panels, it had been decided to add a panel on day 2 on principles and methodologies cutting across the different themes. This is some- thing that multilateral organizations like UNDP, UN Women and OSCE in particular have a mandate to work on and share with the rest of the global community.

MS. WINNIE BYANYIMA, UNDP

She opened the panel by pointing to the fact that today’s focus will be on methods. Today we will get our hands dirty and be occupied with the nitty-gritty of the empow- erment of women in politics. The effectiveness of our impact on women in politics must be understood in a greater context, which is a context of promoting women’s rights more broadly. If there is no access to health, women do not have the capacity to make progress in politics. This is why we need to strengthen the women’s movements. To strengthen the places where women from all sectors of society can come together and fight for improving women’s right’s and women’s life in order to get more women to have the capacity to get into politics. Some methods to empower women are well tested, while others are novel. Pippa Norris has developed a framework that is useful for a country to identify where it would be relevant and useful to set in on the area. Times of constitutional reform are very open opportunities to improve the rights of women. Many women in Africa did

Page 38

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

this. They made contributions to the work on the new constitutions. The critical as- pect is not only the introduction of quotas but equality across all areas. I was promot- ing the reform of women’s right to land. When women know that they have legal title to land, then they are able to get involved in politics. The issue of electoral laws is another area to focus on. The electoral system is very important – proportional repre- sentation is the best system for women to get elected. Regulation of the media to make sure that men and women stand an equal chance to get their voice heard. Financing is a major issue for women’s participation in the political life. Women need finance. Many countries have regulation on political finance, but not many take the next step for getting it implemented and subscribed to. There are different tools to make them deliver. You can make sure that parties do not get state funds if they do not empower women. Strong regulation of political funding and fighting against cor- ruption is part of the fight for women. Women cannot compete against “dirty money’. Mentorship is a novel method to help women in politics. Strong women will help young women forward. Sharing experience across regions is another method – there is so much innovation that we do not learn from. We will learn so much new creating synergy among regions. Strategic alliances that can help further the women’s agen- da. Alliances between women in politics, academia and civil society are important. Women’s organizations can be a platform where strong women can meet.

MS. AMNEH ZUBI, JORDAN

In the Arab world the women’s issues is part of the historical context – history of col- onies, patriarchal society – where men are considered over women. The women’s position in politics compared to men is very low. Jordanian Women’s Union work with women to be involved in politics. If we want to be influential we have to come up with initiatives that promote women. We are mainstreaming gender and working with the political leadership on this. We also worked with the women’s movements on the agenda that democracy is a right to be practiced. This is also a part of what we work with through good govern- ance practices. We have a partnership with KVINFO in Denmark to work on promot- ing quotas. But it is a challenge to work in a society where women are not equal with men. We are trying to make progress within the tribal structure. We are not trying to change the structures, but we are trying to help the women to do better.

MS. AJLA VAN HEEL, OSCE

OSCE has 56 participating States, many of which are in Europe and in the Balkans. The average of women’s representation in parliaments in the OSCE region is 23.4 per cent. We can do better!

When we talk to political leaders, they always ask for evidence. We tried to collect ev- idence on certain strategies to help increase women’s representation and have de- veloped the report “Gender Equality in Elected Office: A Six-Step Action Plan”. We have suggested a six step action plan, which includes: constitutional rights; elec- toral systems; legal quotas; party rules and recruitment procedures; capacity devel- opment; and parliamentary reform. While the OSCE has no official stand on legal gender quotas, the Six Step Action Plan studied the impact of quotas and evidence shows that they work! The countries that have adopted legal gender quotas have double the progress getting women elected to Parliaments, compared to countries without quotas.

Page 39

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

The internal party democracy is crucial for women’s political participation. Political parties are the “gatekeepers” of democracy, and have a special role to represent citi- zen’s interests in the political process. Political parties often secure access to public funds and resources, access to taxpayer’s money, in order to play this role. As citi- zens, as tax payers, we have a stake in knowing how political parties function inter- nally, and whether they respect democratic principles in how they operate. When assessing the democratic functioning of political parties, we should ask how many women are on party selection, nomination commissions and whether selection procedures for candidacy are formally written down, transparent and fair. How are parties recruiting and nominating candidates, party leaders, campaign managers? Parties should look at their rules for allocating party resources, such as money, ac- cess to party property, airtime. Are those resources allocated fairly to women and men candidates? When talking about women in politics, people often argue that this may lead to com- promising the quality of elected office. We should absolutely evaluate the skills, ca- pacities, merit in politics, because we want the best people to represent us, but this should by no means turn into a screening process of women only. This discussion is necessary, but it should scrutinize both, women and men politicians, on an equal footing. How are political institutions working? Parliaments should mainstream gender into their policy work, priorities, and budgets. Just like in political parties, the procedures for appointments to parliamentary committees must be transparent and gender bal- anced, so that women are on an equal footing nominated as chairs of parliamentary committees, not only in traditional women areas, such as committees on education or health, but also in areas such as finance or defence. Parliaments should alter their working conditions and cultures. Issues such as working hours, childcare facilities, parental leave can generate obstacles to the equal inclusion of women in decision making and leadership roles within parliaments, and should be addressed.

Page 40

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

CONCLUSIONS

How can political parties and civil society establish a 8 fruitful relationship in the future?

Ms. Ulla Tørnæs, for- mer Minister for De- velopment Coopera- tion in Denmark, pre- sents her reflections on the presentations of day 1 taking place in the Parliament called ‘Folketinget’.

DAY 1

BY MS. ULLA TØRNÆS, MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT AND FORMER MINISTER FOR DEVELOPMENT

Ms. Tørnæs congratulated the DIPD and thanked all the participants from around the world for their effort. There are people in all countries that go against all odds and show what you can do in politics. I have never regarded my sex as an obstacle in pri- vate or public life. We can be proud when we see women from Bhutan using Den- mark as an inspirational country. The keynotes this morning told us that numbers are important, but it is not everything -still figures are ways to measure development. Strategic alliances are important both between women and with men. Financing is a very important part of supporting women in politics. As a donor country we should look at how we finance women par- ticipating in the political party politics. She highlighted some key points from the panel on women in local politics: Local politics is closer to the everyday life of women and can be more attractive for women to take part in, and serve as an entry point for women’s political par- ticipation at national level. Affirmative action as quotas can be an important tool to secure political repre- sentation of women, but also cultural and economic barriers must be ad-

Page 41

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

dressed. It was discussed if affirmative action as for example quotas is useful tool to promote young women Alliances between women and grass-root mobilization are key tools to support the political participation of women at local level. The barriers for young women to participate in politics were discussed and some very concrete advices were given as how to create a women friendly atmosphere within the political party: Sexual harassment is a barrier for young women participating in Egypt after the revolution. There are places where women cannot come. It is difficult to raise women’s issues without being seen as westernized and irreligious. Young women need to be encouraged to raise their voice and empowered to participate in the political life. In Nepal, women who participate in politics are not well regarded. Political parties need to create a space for women – women friendly atmos- phere. In the social democratic party in Egypt they created space for children in the offices and made sure that meetings were held during the day time and not evening where young women have difficulties going out. The potential is seen in Nepal where women have started expressing their rights. In Egypt, many women were active in Tahrir Square and many women are leaders of civil movements. The political parties need to encourage and recruit them. Concerning transition countries we got a strong testimonial from Afghanistan stressing that women should stay united to have a strong voice. From Kenya, it was stated that affirmative action has been changing the mindset and changing the cul- ture. All of these stories can indeed inspire to promote change. Some points: Legislation ensuring the political rights of women must be put in place in coun- tries in transition. Pay attention to the implementation of the political rights of women – enforce- ment is of major importance. “Women united will never be defeated’ - through women’s alliances and lobby groups, women’s political perspectives can be heard. In 2008, I launched a campaign to bring together private business, governments, and NGOs to empower women. I gave them a torch of a Danish design and asked them to do something extra for women. They should hand in a written statement on what they would do for women. Mr. Ban Ki Moon asked me to continue the project when it was supposed to end. In 2009, we made a booklet on if it worked. And it did! Some places better than others. The final touch was given to Michele Bachelet, when she was appointed director for UN women.

DAY 2

MS. ANNE STENHAMMER, UN WOMEN

Anne Stenhammer stated that she had learned a lot. Listening to the speakers at this seminar has been promising as to the hope that women will be a greater part of poli- tics in the future. She underlined that the background paper and the Christiansborg Statement should be living documents: We all need to ask ourselves in which ways can I use this? It should be used as a frame for our way forward.

Page 42

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

The Christiansborg Seminar is a communication platform and a modality for building alliances and network among NGOs, political parties etc. This global seminar gather- ing women politicians and academics should be replicated. The UN Women will con- tinue supporting empowerment of women in politics and as decision makers in the South Asian region, and we will follow up with the local offices of the countries, which have been participated here to ask them to follow up on the documents from this seminar.

MS. WINNIE BYANYIMA, UNDP

Winnie Byanyima said that she was fascinated by the size and the diversity at the seminar, gathering politicians, activists, and international organizations: In a few days we have engaged and learned from each other and you couldn’t have picked more essential themes. We are talking about how best to engage young people. We need to change the structures. I will very much like to continue this work with the DIPD and others to find the best way to put young people into this process. Local government is the most im- portant platform to fight poverty. Women’s own organizing is important here. In the transition theme, you have an important agenda for the UNDP and we are happy to keep working with you.

MR. BJØRN FØRDE, DIRECTOR OF DIPD

The DIPD director, Bjørn Førde, ended the seminar by thanking the participants and speakers at the seminar who have all sacrificed a lot in their lives to be where they are today, and thanking all for being willing to share openly and honestly. He also gave special thanks to the moderators and writers of the background paper, and the DIPD staff members who have worked hard to put it all together – not least Marie as the project coordinator. He also promised that all participants would receive the seminar report as soon as possible, together with a list of all participants. The Statement would also be distrib- uted to all participants.

Page 43

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

ANNEX BIOGRAPHIES OF SPEAKERS

The following list includes all speakers, moderators and presenters featuring in the programme on Both September 11 and September 12. They are mentioned in alpha- betical order based on the surname.

Ms. Gitte Lillelund Bech Member of the Parliament, Denmark Gitte Lillelund Bech has been a Member of Parliament for the Liberal Party in Copenhagen County constituency from October 1999. She served as Minister of Defense from February 2010 to October 2011 and is currently Chairperson of the Committee of Fiscal Affairs. She was spokeswoman on development 2010, transport policy spokeswoman 2005-2006, and education policy spokeswoman 2001-2005. Chairwoman of the Foreign Policy Committee 2006-2010. Vice-chairwoman of the Defense Committee 2005-2006. She holds an MSc (Business Admin- istration and Management Science). In 2003, she was appointed German Marshall Fellow. Prior to the membership of Parliament, she worked as Financial Specialist in the financial sector and as a consultant.

Ms. Winnie Byanyima Director of the UNDP Gender Team, Bureau for Development Policy Before joining UNDP, Ms. Byanyima served as Director of the Women, Gender and Develop- ment Directorate of the African Union Commission. She has served on many expert and adviso- ry panels and as a consultant for UNDP, UNIFEM and other UN agencies. She is a member of the Executive Board of the African Capacity Building Foundation and the International Centre for Research on Women. Ms. Byanyima has produced several publications on issues of gender and governance, including a handbook she co-authored for the Inter-Parliamentary Union enti- tled “Parliaments, the Budget Process and Gender”. Ms. Byanyima holds a M.Sc. in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from Manchester University.

Mr. Julio Huaraya Cabrera Member of the National Board, MAS-IPSM, Bolivia He is elected member of the national board of MAS-IPSP, the governing socialist party in Boliv- ia, and works as secretary for the coordination with the social organizations and members of the political commission. Mr. Cabrera has spent most of his political life in local politics in his home municipality of Chuma in the Province of Muñecas in the La Paz Department. He is at present Secretary General for the municipal government. He is educated as an agricultural engineer and has previous experience with agricultural development projects. Mr. Cabrera is invited by MAS’ Danish partner, the Socialist People’s Party.

Ms. Phuntshok Chhoden Independent consultant for B-NEW, Bhutan She is a development worker engaged in gender mainstreaming for many years at national, re- gional and international level. In 2010 she got deeply involved in setting up a new women’s NGO, Bhutan Association of Women Entrepreneurs, which brings women entrepreneurs to- gether to work on economic empowerment of rural and poor women in Bhutan. Ms. Chhoden serves as the Chair of Bhutan Country Coordinating Mechanism for the Global Fund to fight AIDS, TB ant Malaria, and is a Board Member of the SAARC Business Association of Home- based Workers. Currently, she is working on the establishment of the Bhutan Network of Elect- ed Women (B-NEW) which is an outcome of the first ever national consultation in Bhutan of the elected female representatives in local government and the . This project is supported by DIPD.

Ms. Sumona DasGupta Political Scientist and independent research consultant, India Based in New Delhi, she is currently senior research consultant with Society for Participatory Research in Asia. Her research and publications focus on issues of governance and democratic

Page 44

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

dialogue, conflict and peace building, and South Asian politics. Gender is a cross cutting issue that informs all of her work. Her book "Citizen Initiatives and Democratic Engagements: Experi- ences from India" from 2010 deals with issues concerning women's political leadership in local governance as one of the issues covered. Ms. DasGupta was the author of the India country paper on analysis of political parties from a gender perspective, a research initiative of Interna- tional IDEA in 2011.

Ms. Jemina Anita De-Sosoo National Women’s Organizer, Ghana She is the leader of the women’s wing of the National Democratic Congress, the ruling party in government in Ghana. Prior to that, she was a Constituency Deputy Organizer and a National Deputy Propaganda Secretary. She is also the West African Women Commissioner for Women Academy for Africa, as well as an executive board member of the National Board for Small Scale Industries under The Ministry of Trade and Industry. Ms. De-Sosoo is a gender and a human rights activist. She is also the founder and president of Foundation for Women Devel- opment and Empowerment which seeks to empower women in education, health, politics, gov- ernance and leadership in Ghana. She is currently studying Public Administration. Ms. De- Sosoo is invited by NDC’s Danish partner, the Social Democratic Party.

Ms. Nzira Deus Programme Director at Forum Mulher, Mozambique In addition to Forum Mulher, she is the National Coordinator of the Movement of Young Women Feminists. She holds a Diploma in International Relations and Diplomacy and is specialized in community development with a gender focus. She has coordinated research on culture and tra- dition, women’s access to land and political participation, and HIV/AIDS. She has been involved in dialogue with government regarding monitoring of public policies, and she has been attending international conferences on Human rights of women like CSW, AWID and the World Social Fo- rum. Ms. Deus is invited by her Danish partner Ibis.

Mr. Bjørn Førde Director of DIPD Before joining DIPD, he was Director of the UNDP Oslo Governance Centre, a global thematic facility in the Democratic Governance Group of UNDPs Bureau for Development Policy, estab- lished to help position UNDP as a champion of democratic governance. Previously, he was the Resident Representative of UNDP and Resident Coordinator of the UN in Botswana. He is edu- cated as a political scientist from the University of Copenhagen, and from 1975 to 2002 he held various positions with the Danish NGO Mellemfolkeligt Samvirke, including that of Secretary General 1995-2002. He has served as a member of the Board of Danida appointed by the Min- ister for Development.

Ms. Chema Gargouri President of Tunisian Association for Management and Social Stability, Tunisia Founder and President of the Tunisian Association for Management and Social Stability (TAMSS), a community development and micro-lending NGO for women and youth located in Borj-Louzir in Tunis, an area facing difficulties and socio-economic problems. In 2011 two addi- tional offices were opened in Sidi Bouzid and in Gafsa. The organization works to strengthen the social and economic inclusion of women and youths in disadvantaged communities by strengthening the economic and social capacities of families by establishing innovative com- plementary services based on leadership, training, education, assistance and the promotion of entrepreneurship. Ms. Gargouri is invited by her Danish partner KVINFO.

Ms. Selay Ghaffar Executive Director of HAWCA, Afghanistan The organization is Humanitarian Assistance for the Women and Children of Afghanistan. She studied Economics in Iran and Pakistan at a time when women’s education was not possible in Afghanistan, and after the fall of Taliban, Ms. Ghaffar found an opportunity to work for emanci- pation of women in the repressive systems and joined HAWCA. Ms. Ghaffar is actively involved in lobbying and advocacy for women’s rights and human rights issues in Afghanistan. She led the nine members CEDAW Initiative Committee for the first time in Afghanistan to write the CEDAW Shadow Report. The last three years, she has effectively highlighted the issues of Af-

Page 45

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

ghan women at different international events, and she has raised their visibility and voice in the international community. Ms. Ghaffar is invited by her Danish partner MS/ActionAid.

Ms. Ratebeh Adnan Abu Ghoush Member of the international department of the Palestinian Democratic Union, Pales- tinian Territories Since 2003 Ms. Abu Ghoush has worked as program coordinator on youth with many local or- ganizations. She is currently working with the Palestinian Medical Relief Society on a project aiming at empowering youth with skills and knowledge. Furthermore, she was one of the found- ers of SHAREK Youth Forum where she presented the Head of Board of Directors in 2006- 2010. As a feminist, she participated in women debates under the leadership of the women’s project: The Palestinian Women's Research and Documentation Center -a Special Project of the Social and Human Sciences Sector (UNESCO) 2008-2009. She is also a member of the committee to revive the voluntary and civil work in Jerusalem. Currently, Ms. Abu Ghoush stud- ies for an MA in Development Studies at Al- Quds University in Jerusalem. Ms. Ghoush is invit- ed by her Danish partner, the Red-Green Alliance.

Ms. Ajla van Heel Gender Officer at the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Her expertise include promoting women’s political participation and strengthening national mechanisms for the advancement of women. Prior to joining the OSCE, she worked with the In- ternational Organisation for Migration and the United Nations Development Programme, mainly focusing on prevention of trafficking in women and girls in the Western Balkans. Ms. van Heel holds a BA in international affairs from Princeton University and an MA in human rights from University of Bologna.

Ms. Maryse Helbert Researcher and advocate, Australia She has been an advocate for, and researcher on, women’s participation in politics and deci- sion-making for over a decade. After completing a Master’s thesis on the comparative strengths and weaknesses of the French and Finnish political systems in encouraging and increasing women’s political participation, she became actively involved in the movement to institute the so-called ‘Parity Law’ in France (1999-2000). Maryse Helbert has since broadened her research to include women’s involvement in decision-making processes related to development, specifi- cally in the context of resource exploitation and climate change, where evidence shows that women are being sidelined.

Ms. Njeri Kabeberi Executive of Director for the Centre for Multi Party Democracy, Kenya Prior to becoming Executive Director of CMD-Kenya in 2004, she worked for seven years for Amnesty International as the Development Coordinator for East & Southern Africa. She has served on the board of the Kenya Human Rights Commission, the Release Political Prisoners Pressure Group (RPP) and the International Centre for Policy and Conflict. Ms. Kabeberi is also an opinion shaper in the areas of equality, governance, democracy and human rights. Njeri Kabeberi was awarded the inaugural ‘Humanity Award’ by the Chamber of Lawyers, Frankfurt am Main for ‘Commitment to Law and Justice’ in 2009; she was awarded the ‘Democracy Rib- bon’ by the City of The Hague in 2009 for ‘Commitment to Peace and Democracy’. In 2010, Njeri received the ‘ILO Wedge Award 2010’ given jointly by ILO and the Women’s Entrepre- neurship Development in recognition for her work to increase Women Rights in Kenya. She is invited by her Danish partner, the Danish Liberal Party.

Ms. Rumbidzai Kandawasvika-Nhundu Senior Programme Manager, International IDEA She is responsible for the Global Programme on Democracy and Gender at the International In- stitute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) in Stockholm, Sweden. She is a gender equality advocate and practitioner, with more than twenty years of hands-on profes- sional experience on gender equality and women’s empowerment initiatives at national, regional and international levels. She has worked with capacity building and gender mainstreaming in parliaments, intra-party democracy processes, and management of electoral processes from a gender perspective and transformative leadership strategies for women in politics.

Page 46

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

Ms. Lone Loklindt Member of Parliament, Denmark She is Member of Parliament for the Social Liberal Party (Radikale Venstre), chairperson of the Environment Committee and spokesperson on environment, development cooperation, and human rights. She holds a M.Sc. in Business and Development from Copenhagen Business School, and an MBA from European University in Brussels. Ms. Loklindt’s working career in- cludes positions abroad, intercultural management, entrepreneurship and CSR consulting. She has been involved in international political activities through ELDR and Liberal International and now also PACE and IPU. She has been elected councilor to the local municipality at Frederiks- berg, deputy party chairman and held various other positions in the party organization.

Hon. Susan Lyimo Member of Parliament, Tanzania Since 2005, she has represented the opposition party Chadema in Parliament. During her first tenure 2005-2010, she also acted as a Shadow Minister of Education and Vocational Training. Ms. Lyimo has played a leading role in joint women's movement in Tanzania. She acted as the National Chairperson of CHADEMA Women Council in 2011-2013 and is currently the Vice Chairperson of Tanzania Women Parliamentary Group as well as the Vice Chairperson of Tan- zania-Women Cross-party Platform. She holds a MA of Applied Social Psychology from the University of Dar Es Salaam and Certificate of Career Counseling from the University of Minne- sota, USA. She is invited by her Danish partner, the Conservative Party.

Hon. Priscilla Misihairabwi-Mushonga Minister of Regional Integration and International Cooperation, Zimbabwe Honorable Priscilla Misihairabwi-Mushonga, is a member of the Inclusive Government of Zim- babwe as a Senator and the Minster for Regional Integration and International Co-operation, One of only 7 female members of Cabinet, she is also the only female negotiator in the SADC facilitated Zimbabwe Dialogue Process as a Chief Negotiator for the Professor Welshman Ncu- be led Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) of which she is also the Secretary-General (2nd female Secretary-General of a political party in SADC). Minister Misihairabwi-Mushonga is a Co-chair of the Joint Operation and Implementation Committee (JOMIC) responsible for over- sight and implementation of the Global Political Agreement (GPA) and a member of the 15 member Constitutional Management Committee (COPAC) with representatives from the three political parties to oversee and guide the constitutional development process in Zimbabwe. Pre- viously she was the Deputy Secretary-General of the MDC and a Member of Parliament for Glen-Norah Constituency for two parliamentary terms, wherein she also served as the first fe- male Chairperson of the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee from 2002-2008. She has a strong history of civic participation in the Zimbabwean political movement and in particular as a Feminist in the Zimbabwe Women’s Movement which was a large aspect of the creation of the National Constitutional Assembly (NCA) which she co-founded. She founded and led the Wom- en and Aids Support Network (WASN) which grew to become a lead organization in the HIV/AIDS advocacy and work in Zimbabwe. She was awarded the Kofi Annan Awards for her advocacy work on the female condom.

Ms. Joy Mogensen Mayor of Roskilde Municipality The municipality has 83.000 inhabitants and a budget of almost 1 billion Euros. She is a mem- ber of The Social Democratic Party, and has been involved in international activities in the Dan- ish Social Democratic Youth Organization, the Danish Youth Council and in her current work. She holds a BA in Cultural Encounters from Roskilde University, and has worked as a consult- ant in Business and City Development, before being elected Mayor.

Mr. Henrik Bach Mortensen Chairman of DIPD He is a member of the National Board of Venstre, The Liberal Party, and he is a co-founder of the political think tank CEPOS. He holds an MA in Economics from the University of Copenha- gen and an M.Phil. in Economics from Cambridge University. Mr. Mortensen is the executive di- rector of the Confederation of Danish Employers Association, and he represents private busi- ness in three partite negotiations with the government and unions on economic and social is- sues, employment and education. He has been involved in international activities through the Liberal Party, the ELDR, The German Marshall Fund, the OECD, and as a Danish delegate to

Page 47

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

the UN General assembly. He has been the Chairman of DIPD since it was established by Par- liament in 2010.

Ms. Janah Ncube CEO for Centre for Citizens’ Participation, the African Union, Zimbabwe Janah Ncube is the Executive Director of the Centre for Citizens’ Participation in the African Un- ion. Prior to this, she was working as a Senior Policy Advisor on Poverty and Development at the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) Secretariat. Ms. Ncube was also the first Gender Programme Manager for ACORD, an alliance of international development actors work- ing in conflict and post conflict countries across Sub-Sahara Africa. During the period 2001– 2004 she worked in Zimbabwe on human rights and Constitution issues as the Director of Women in Politics Support Unit, the Chairperson of the Women’s Coalition of Zimbabwe and Vice Chairperson of the Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition. She holds a Masters Degree on Gender and Women’s Studies and currently serves as an advisory board member of the ICCO Southern Africa Regional Council. In July 2011 she was named one of the Ten Outstanding Young Per- sons of Zimbabwe.

Mr. Lars Løkke Rasmussen Chairman of Venstre (Danish Liberal Party) and former Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen has been President of Venstre since 2009, the same year that he was appointed Prime Minister following the appointment of former Prime Minister Anders Fogh Ras- mussen to the post of Secretary General of NATO. He has had a long career in the party, start- ing with his election to the post of Chairman of the youth wing in 1986; in 1998 he was elected Deputy President of the party. He was elected to Parliament for the first time in 1994, following a long career in local politics – first as a member of the council of a municipality, then as Deputy Mayor, and while being MP he was also Mayor of Frederiksborg County 1998-2001. When the party won the election in 2001 and formed the government, he became Minister for the Interior and Health 2001-2007, and then Minister of Finance 2007-2009 before becoming Prime Minis- ter.

Mr. Manu Sareen Minister for Gender Equality In addition to gender equality, he is also Minister for Ecclesiastical Affairs as well as Minister for Nordic Cooperation in Denmark. He is a Member of Parliament for the Danish Social-Liberal Party (Radikale Venstre). Mr. Sareen was appointed minister in October 2011. From 2008 to 2010 he worked as Auditor of Public Accounts. From 2002 to 2011, he served as a member of the City Council in the municipality of Copenhagen. The minister is educated as a social worker and he has previously among other things worked as lecturer, teacher and integration consult- ant. He is also the author of children’s books as well as academic publications.

Ms. Mary Mourad Shenouda Coordinator for Cross-party Board in South Cairo & Journalist for Al-Ahram Online She was previously an active member of the Egyptian Social Democratic party, and was re- sponsible for the campaigning team at the latest parliamentary elections. She has also cam- paigned for parliament candidate A. Abdallah Roza in 2005. Shenouda is currently an editor for Al-Ahram online portal and responsible for the book review section. Previously, she worked as Sustainability Business Advisory Associate in International Finances Corporation. In 1999, Shenouda graduated from Faculty of Economics and Political Science- Economics section, and obtained a master degree in development economics (2002) from University of Sussex- Eng- land.

Ms. Anne F. Stenhammer Regional Programme Director for UN Women, South Asia Sub Regional Office With work experience, spanning a period of over forty years, she was formerly the Deputy Minis- ter of International Affairs of the Government of Norway, where she was responsible for Peace and Security, Human Rights, Gender Equality issues, NORAD and relations with the UN system and multilateral development banks. She has been active in politics for a period of twenty years and has held various political posts in the Socialist Left Party during this time. Ms. Stenhammer has served as Mayor in northern Norway (1991-1999) and as Administrative Chief. She holds a Masters degree in Public Administration from the Copenhagen Business School in Denmark and London School of Economics.

Page 48

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

Mr. Villy Søvndal Minister of Foreign Affairs, Denmark Minister of Foreign Affairs since October 2011, when the new coalition government took over af- ter winning a majority in the September 2011 election. He has been Chairman of the Socialist People's Party since 2005, and he was elected to Parliament for the first time in 1994. Following his studies to become a teacher, he was employed as such by the Municipality of Kolding 1980- 1992, and during this period he was also a member of the Council of Kolding 1982-1994.

Ms. Ulla Tørnæs Member of Parliament, Denmark She is a member of Parliament for Venstre, The Liberal Party, since 1994. From 2001 to 2005 she was Minister of Education. In 2005 she was appointed Minister for Development Coopera- tion, a position she held in five years from 2005-2010. While being Minister for Development Cooperation she was able to put great emphasis on women in developing countries, especially concerning women’s status in countries in which they are often disempowered and treated une- qually. Being Minister for Development Corporation it was very important for Ms. Tørnæs to em- phasize that no culture, tradition or religion should ever justify unequal treatment. Additionally, Ms. Tørnæs initiated the Program MDG3 Torch Bearers, which is a programme for people whom are committed to fighting gender inequality and to fight for the empowerment of women.

Ms. Manju Yadav Member of the Communist Party student organization, Nepal She joined politics of Nepal’s Unified Marxist-Leninist party in 1997, and is a member of All Ne- pal National Free Students Union (ANNFSU). Since 1999 she has been an active member of the youth organization, Youth Federation – Nepal, of the same party. Today she is a central committee member of the Youth Federation and a central member of inclusion and social secu- rity department of her party. Ms. Yadav holds a Masters Degree on Population and has been providing several trainings on gender issues. She writes for national magazines and newspa- pers regularly. She is invited by her Finnish partner Demo Finland.

Ms. Chitra Lekha Yadav Treasurer of the Nepali Congress Party Central Committee, Nepal She has held several prestigious ministerial posts e.g. as Deputy Speaker of the House of Rep- resentative from 1999-2008. She has worked as Central Working Committee member and Chief of the women department of the Nepali Congress (Democratic), and as Eastern Regional coor- dinator of Nepal Women’s Association (sister organization of Nepali Congress). As a profes- sional, Ms. Yadav is well versed in issues of gender equality, equity and social inclusion, and provides inputs on policies relating these issues for the Nepali Congress Party. She is one of the key initiators in the formation of the multi-party Women Caucus that has contributed signifi- cantly in advancing women’s issues. Ms. Yadav took major initiative for adopting the policy of 33% representation of women in parliament, and holds an MA from Tribhuwan University, Ne- pal. Ms. Yadav is also the Chair of the Steering Committee for DIPD’s programme in Nepal.

Hon. Sangay Zam Member of Parliament, Bhutan She is a member of the National council of Bhutan (upper house) since the first democratically elected Parliament of Bhutan was instituted in 2008. The constituency she represents is the capital city Thimphu and she is one among six women MPs in the NC and one among ten wom- en MPs in the Parliament when combined with the National Assembly. Ms. Sangay Zam serves on the Social and Cultural Committee and Legislative committee of the National Council. Issues close to her heart are Women’s empowerment and youth problems. Having served as a pas- sionate educator for 25 years, today she continues to counsel youth and mentor some of the leading school principals, and is also actively involved in parenting programs and career coun- seling in schools. Ms. Zam is also a member of the B-NEW Steering Committee, which is sup- ported by DIPD.

Page 49

Women in Politics Christiansborg 2012 Seminar Report

Ms. Amneh Zubi President of Jordanian Women's Union Senator and President of Jordanian Women's Union (JWU), a non-governmental organization working to abolish gender discrimination and empower women to practice their rights as citi- zens. Furthermore, the organization works to eliminate all legislative, economic, social and cul- tural hindrances to women's participation as stipulated by human rights conventions. JWU has local offices across Jordan and is in addition currently the chair of the regional Arab Women's Network. Ms. Zubi is invited by her Danish partner KVINFO.

Ms. Leticia M. Nyerere Member of Parliament, Tanzania She represents the opposition CHADEMA party in Parliament, holding a special women‘s seat, and is currently serving on the Finance and Economic Affairs Committee. She is also a champi- on of women‘s, children‘s and human rights. In addition to her political career, she has been an independent lecturer in Women and Politics at Bowie State University in Maryland, USA. Ms. Nyerere is currently working on a PhD on the theme of ”Women and general elections in Tan- zania” at the Open University of Tanzania. She also holds a Masters in Business Administration and Finance from Collin’s University in the US and an ASC Degree in Criminal Justice from Kaplan University, also in the US. She is invited by her Danish Partner, the Conservative Party.

Page 50