1. Cherry Bark Tortrix (CBT), Cherry Washington. Thetrees Have
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Area-Acct & Title-Project Investigator4
Washington State University Sponsored Programs Services Area/Budget/Account - FY 03 - Direct and Facilities & Administrative Costs - 06/30/2003 AR BUD CFDA SPG ACCOUNT EA GET NO M ACCOUNT DIRECT COSTS F&A COSTS TOTAL PRIMARY PI OTHER PI TITLE 1 2926 12-999 12F 2926-0001 25,037.85 0 25,037.85 HERBST C JOHANSEN W / B GRANT BASIC AND ADVANCE 1 2933 84-342 12G 2933-0004 5,152.80 412.22 5,565.02 HALL L BROWN G / BROWPREPARE TOMORROW'S TEACHERS/USE TECH 1 2934 - 14N 2934-0010 28,589.78 0 28,589.78 KILGORE S STONE C VISIBLE KNOWLEDGE PROJECT 1 2934 84-336 12G 2934-0011 13,374.87 1,069.98 14,444.85 LAW R MOORE M CO-TEACH 1 2934 45-999 12W 2934-0012 -454.49 0 -454.49 KILGORE S CONDON W NMC VISUAL EVIDENCE & US PAST 1 2936 84-116 12G 2936-0007 134,239.30 8,594.81 142,834.11 CONDON W KELLY-RILEY D / FOSTER CRITICAL THINKING/FACULTY PRACTICE 2 1170 84-042 12G 1170-0011 32,525.00 2,602.01 35,127.01 JAMISON A STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM 2 1170 84-042 12G 1170-0012 125.62 0 125.62 JAMISON A STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM 2 1170 84-042 12G 1170-0013 158,877.13 7,404.48 166,281.61 JAMISON A STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PROG 2 1170 84-042 12G 1170-0014 2,488.62 0 2,488.62 JAMISON A STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PROG SUPPL 2 1170 84-042 12G 1170-0015 9,800.00 0 9,800.00 JAMISON A STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PROG GRANT AID 2 2968 - 14A 2968-0036 0 270.95 270.95 VOSS E SPECIAL NEEDS CAPACITY PROJECT 2 2968 - 14A 2968-0037 0 117.14 117.14 VOSS E INFANT CARE PROJECT 2 2968 93-596 14A 2968-0038 721.14 80.12 801.26 CILLAY V VOSS E CHILD CARE RES & REF/BLDG BLOCKS -
Pests in Northwestern Washington Prompted a 1994-1995 CAPS Survey of Apple Trees to Identify All Leaf-Feeding Apple Pests Currently in Whatcom County
6. Biology / Phenology a. Biology 1. Exotic Fruit Tree Pests in Whatcom County, Washington Eric LaGasa Plant Services Div., Wash. St. Dept. of Agriculture P.O. Box 42560, Olympia, Washington 98504-2560 (360) 902-2063 [email protected] The Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) has conducted detection surveys and other field projects for exotic pests since the mid-1980's, with funding provided by the USDA/ APHIS Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey (CAPS) program. Recent discovery of several exotic fruit tree pests in northwestern Washington prompted a 1994-1995 CAPS survey of apple trees to identify all leaf-feeding apple pests currently in Whatcom County. Additional exotic apple pest species, new to either the region or U.S. were discovered. This paper presents some brief descriptions of species detected in that project, and other exotic fruit tree pest species discovered in northwest Washington since 1985. Table 1. - Exotic Fruit Tree Pests New to Northwestern Washington State - 1985 to 1995 green pug moth - Geometridae: Chloroclystis rectangulata (L.) An early, persistent European pest of apple, pear, cherry and other fruit trees. Larvae attack buds, blossoms, and leaves from March to June. Damage to blossoms causes considerable deformation of fruit. Larvae are common in apple blossoms in Whatcom County, where it was first reared from apple trees in 1994. This pest, new to North America, was also recently detected in the northeastern U.S. Croesia holmiana - Tortricidae: Croesia holmiana (L.) A common pest of many fruit trees and ornamental plants in Europe and Asia, where it is considered a minor problem. Spring larval feeding affects only leaves. -
Biological-Control-Programmes-In
Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012 This page intentionally left blank Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012 Edited by P.G. Mason1 and D.R. Gillespie2 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada iii CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Offi ce CABI Nosworthy Way 38 Chauncey Street Wallingford Suite 1002 Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Boston, MA 02111 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 T: +1 800 552 3083 (toll free) Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 T: +1 (0)617 395 4051 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org Chapters 1–4, 6–11, 15–17, 19, 21, 23, 25–28, 30–32, 34–36, 39–42, 44, 46–48, 52–56, 60–61, 64–71 © Crown Copyright 2013. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery. Remaining chapters © CAB International 2013. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electroni- cally, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Biological control programmes in Canada, 2001-2012 / [edited by] P.G. Mason and D.R. Gillespie. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-78064-257-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests--Biological control--Canada. 2. Weeds--Biological con- trol--Canada. 3. Phytopathogenic microorganisms--Biological control- -Canada. -
Table of Contents
Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ 1 Authors, Reviewers, Draft Log ........................................................................................ 3 Introduction to Reference ................................................................................................ 5 Introduction to Stone Fruit ............................................................................................. 10 Arthropods ................................................................................................................... 16 Primary Pests of Stone Fruit (Full Pest Datasheet) ....................................................... 16 Adoxophyes orana ................................................................................................. 16 Bactrocera zonata .................................................................................................. 27 Enarmonia formosana ............................................................................................ 39 Epiphyas postvittana .............................................................................................. 47 Grapholita funebrana ............................................................................................. 62 Leucoptera malifoliella ........................................................................................... 72 Lobesia botrana .................................................................................................... -
Pathways Analysis of Invasive Plants and Insects in the Northwest Territories
PATHWAYS ANALYSIS OF INVASIVE PLANTS AND INSECTS IN THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Project PM 005529 NatureServe Canada K.W. Neatby Bldg 906 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6 Prepared by Eric Snyder and Marilyn Anions NatureServe Canada for The Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Wildlife Division, Government of the Northwest Territories March 31, 2008 Citation: Snyder, E. and Anions, M. 2008. Pathways Analysis of Invasive Plants and Insects in the Northwest Territories. Report for the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Wildlife Division, Government of the Northwest Territories. Project No: PM 005529 28 pages, 5 Appendices. Pathways Analysis of Invasive Plants and Insects in the Northwest Territories i NatureServe Canada Acknowledgements NatureServe Canada and the Government of the Northwest Territories, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, would like to acknowledge the contributions of all those who supplied information during the production of this document. Canada : Eric Allen (Canadian Forest Service), Lorna Allen (Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Alberta Community Development, Parks & Protected Areas Division), Bruce Bennett (Yukon Department of Environment), Rhonda Batchelor (Northwest Territories, Transportation), Cristine Bayly (Ecology North listserve), Terri-Ann Bugg (Northwest Territories, Transportation), Doug Campbell (Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre), Suzanne Carrière (Northwest Territories, Environment & Natural Resources), Bill Carpenter (Moraine Point Lodge, Northwest -
T.A. Murray1, L.K. Tanigoshii &B. Bar2 Washington State University
Section IV. Biological & Cultural Control BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF THE CHERRY BARK TORTRIX, ENARMONIA FORMOSANA SCOP. (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) T.A. Murray1, L.K. Tanigoshii &B. Bar2 [email protected] [email protected] Washington State University-Vancouver Vancouver, WA 98665 [email protected] 2Oregon Department ofAgriculture Salem, OR 97310 Thecherry barktortrix (CBT), Enarmoniaformosana Scop., is a recent pestof Rosaceous trees and shrubs. AlthoughCBT has been found in appleandcherryorchards in Western Washington, CBT is mainly an urban landscape pest. In urbanareas suchas Bellingham, CBT infests 100% of the sweetcherries, Prunus avium. Additionally, CBT has moved intoournative flora, suchas Prunus emarginata, Malus oregonensis and Crataegus douglasii. SinceCBT is ingrained into our landscapes, control of CBT andits expanding range is becoming moredifficultto achieve. Withnewsurges southward, CBT will pose a threat to western nurseries and eastern orchards. Although chemical control is nowan optionfor controlling CBTpopulations, biological control is stillthe mostpractical and economical strategy. For the pasttwo seasons, WSU-Vancouver has been surveying Western Washingtonfor endemic natural enemies. This endemic survey is the first phase in the 'classical' biological control approach. CBT achieves peststatus rarely andsporadically in its native range; webelieve Europe houses a natural enemy complex that regulates CBT populations. Trichogramma egg parasitoidsurvey Three Mount Fujioriental flowering cherries, P. serrulata, were tracked foregg parasitism. The same area ofthe tree, 2000 cm2, was sampled weekly. Counts oftotal eggdeposition andtotal 'mummified' eggsweretaken. When CBT eggs areparasitized with Trichogramma, the eggs turna darkmetallic blue as the wasp begins to pupate. Tentatively, the identification is Trichogramma cacoeciae, a native, solitary, lepidopteran egg parasitoid in the Northwest. -
Monitoring the Seasonal Flight Activity of Three Tortricid Pests in Bulgaria with a Single Sex Pheromone-Baited Trap
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository of the Academy's Library ACTA ZOOLOGICA BULGARICA Applied Zoology Acta zool. bulg., 69 (2), 2017: 283-292 Research Article Monitoring the Seasonal Flight Activity of Three Tortricid Pests in Bulgaria with a Single Sex Pheromone-baited Trap Teodora B. Toshova1, Boyan Zlatkov2, Mitko Subchev1 & Miklós Tóth3 1Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria; E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] 2Faculty of Biology, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 8 Dragan Tsankov Blvd., 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria; E-mail: [email protected] 3Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman O. u. 15., H-1022 Budapest, Hungary; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Transparent sticky CSALOMON® RAG traps baited with (E)-9-dodecenyl acetate (E9-12Ac) and (Z)- 9-dodecenyl (Z9-12Ac) were used to study the seasonal flight of the cherry bark tortrix, Enarmonia for- mosana and the pine resin-gall moth, Retinia resinella in the region of Sofia, Bulgaria during 2008 - 2010. Our results showed a continuous flight period for E. formosana - from the beginning of May to the first decade of October. Catches of R. resinella were recorded from the beginning of May to the second half of July. In addition to target species, we recorded 14 non-target tortricids during this study. The most abundant species among them was Cnephasia pasiuana, a known pest on poaceous crops in Bulgaria. We reported the attraction of males of this species to a mixture of E9-12Ac and Z9-12Ac in a ratio of 1: 1 (dos- age 300 µg). -
The Tachinid Times February 2014, Issue 27 INSTRUCTIONS to AUTHORS Chief Editor James E
Table of Contents Articles Studying tachinids at the top of the world. Notes on the tachinids of Northeast Greenland 4 by T. Roslin, J.E. O’Hara, G. Várkonyi and H.K. Wirta 11 Progress towards a molecular phylogeny of Tachinidae, year two by I.S. Winkler, J.O. Stireman III, J.K. Moulton, J.E. O’Hara, P. Cerretti and J.D. Blaschke On the biology of Loewia foeda (Meigen) (Diptera: Tachinidae) 15 by H. Haraldseide and H.-P. Tschorsnig 20 Chasing tachinids ‘Down Under’. Expeditions of the Phylogeny of World Tachinidae Project. Part II. Eastern Australia by J.E. O’Hara, P. Cerretti, J.O. Stireman III and I.S. Winkler A new range extension for Erythromelana distincta Inclan (Tachinidae) 32 by D.J. Inclan New tachinid records for the United States and Canada 34 by J.E. O’Hara 41 Announcement 42 Tachinid Bibliography 47 Mailing List Issue 27, 2014 The Tachinid Times February 2014, Issue 27 INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Chief Editor JAMES E. O'HARA This newsletter accepts submissions on all aspects of tach- inid biology and systematics. It is intentionally maintained as a InDesign Editor OMBOR MITRA non-peer-reviewed publication so as not to relinquish its status as Staff JUST US a venue for those who wish to share information about tachinids in an informal medium. All submissions are subjected to careful editing and some are (informally) reviewed if the content is thought ISSN 1925-3435 (Print) to need another opinion. Some submissions are rejected because ISSN 1925-3443 (Online) they are poorly prepared, not well illustrated, or excruciatingly bor- ing. -
Area-Wide Survey of Tree Fruit Pests Including Nurseries in Utah – 2004
Area-wide Survey of Tree Fruit Pests including Nurseries in Utah – 2004 Final Report for USDA APHIS Western Region CAPS Project James. P. Pitts and Diane G. Alston Department of Biology, Utah State University Introduction The focus of this study was to survey for five exotic lepidopteran pests in northern and central Utah. The pests surveyed included the light brown apple moth Epiphyas postvittana (Tortricidae), the false codling moth Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Tortricidae), the apple ermine moth Yponomeuta malinellus (Yponomeutidae), the cherry ermine moth Yponomeuta padellus (Yponomeutidae), and the cherry bark tortrix Enarmonia formosana (Tortricidae). All five of these species could potentially pose a threat to the orchard industry in Utah, but have not been encountered in Utah to date. The light brown apple moth Epiphyas postvittana is an endemic to Australia. The larval stage of this species causes damage to both foliage and fruit and has been put on the National Priority List. This species has a wide host range, but economic damage most often occurs in apples. Early instars feed on tissue beneath the surface layer of leaves, while larger larvae construct feeding sites between adjacent leaves, or other areas, forming the typical leaf roll. Larvae can also cause superficial fruit damage in apple varieties that form compact fruit clusters. Internal damage to apple, pear, and citrus fruits is less common, but a young larva may enter the interior of an apple or pear fruit through the calyx or beneath the stem of a citrus fruit (Buchanan, 1977). The false codling moth Cryptophlebia leucotreta is endemic to and occurs throughout sub-Saharan Africa and the neighboring islands of the Indian and Atlantic Oceans. -
An Assessment of Invasive Species Management in Idaho
University of Idaho Archives, University of Idaho, www.invasive.org Robert L. Johnson, Cornell University, www.invasive.org Preparing to Meet the Challenge An Assessment of Eric Coombs, Oregan Department of Agriculture, www.invasive.org Invasive Species Management in Idaho Prepared for: The Idaho Invasive Species Council With the Support of: Kenneth R. Law, The Idaho Department of Agriculture USDA APHIS PPQ, www.invasive.org and The Nature Conservancy Northwest Natural Resource Group, LLC Joe Hinson, ©2003 i Table of Contents Foreword....................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................v Executive Summary...................................................................................................... vii Introduction.....................................................................................................................1 The Concept of ÒInvasivenessÓ ....................................................................................1 Why Should IdahoÕs Citizens Worry About Invasive Species?.....................................4 Facing Up to the Challenge..............................................................................................7 What Level of Commitment is Needed?.....................................................................14 Conclusions ...............................................................................................................18 -
Meet the Challenge an Assessment of Eric Coombs, Oregan Department of Agriculture, Invasive Species Management in Idaho
University of Idaho Archives, University of Idaho, www.invasive.org Robert L. Johnson, Cornell University, www.invasive.org Preparing to Meet the Challenge An Assessment of Eric Coombs, Oregan Department of Agriculture, www.invasive.org Invasive Species Management in Idaho Prepared for: The Idaho Invasive Species Council With the Support of: Kenneth R. Law, The Idaho Department of Agriculture USDA APHIS PPQ, www.invasive.org and The Nature Conservancy Northwest Natural Resource Group, LLC Joe Hinson, ©2003 i Table of Contents Foreword....................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................v Executive Summary...................................................................................................... vii Introduction.....................................................................................................................1 The Concept of ÒInvasivenessÓ ....................................................................................1 Why Should IdahoÕs Citizens Worry About Invasive Species?.....................................4 Facing Up to the Challenge..............................................................................................7 What Level of Commitment is Needed?.....................................................................14 Conclusions ...............................................................................................................18 -
Plant Pest and Disease Emergency Response Plan September 2010
Plant Pest and Disease Emergency Response Plan September 2010 Photo credit: co.nrcs.usda.gov CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose & Scope ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Situation .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Assumptions ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Legal Authority .................................................................................................................. 3 1.5 Plan Maintenance ................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 Concept of Operations .......................................................................................3 2.1 Plant Pests and Diseases of Regulatory Concern ................................................................ 4 2.2 APHIS Select Agent Disease List ....................................................................................... 4 2.3 Criteria for Plant Emergency Response ............................................................................. 4 2.4 Incident Command System ................................................................................................ 4 3.0 Response Framework ...........................................................................................5