DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Transport and Access Review Arden Macaulay Amendment C190

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrated Transport and Access Review Arden Macaulay Amendment C190 Integrated Transport and Access Review Arden Macaulay Amendment C190 28/06/13 13M1028000 Integrated Transport and Access Review Arden Macaulay Amendment C190 Issue: A 28/06/13 Client: Melbourne City Council Reference: 13M1028000 GTA Consultants Office: VIC Quality Record Issue Date Description Prepared By Checked By Approved By Cameron Martyn / Tom A 28/06/13 Final Nathan Moresi Courtice / Rory Rathborne © GTA Consultants (GTA Consultants (VIC) Pty Ltd) 2012 The information contained in this document is confidential and intended solely for the use of the client for the purpose for which it has been prepared and no representation is made or is to be implied as being made to any third party. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of GTA Consultants constitutes an infringement of copyright. The intellectual property contained in this document remains the property of GTA Consultants. Executive Summary Executive Summary GTA Consultants (GTA) has undertaken a review of the existing and future transport and access conditions for the Arden-Macaulay Structure Plan area, as shown in the figure below, to support Melbourne City Council’s C190 Amendment. Arden-Macaulay Structure Plan Area and C190 Amendment Area The review has been based on the land use and transport change envisaged in the Arden-Macaulay structure plan. The following summary sets out the key findings of the review. Future Land Uses i Based on the land use and development assumptions agreed with Council, the following growth estimates have been adopted across the Arden-Macaulay Structure Plan area for the purpose of this study: an additional 9,328 residential dwellings an additional 467,000 sq.m of office/commercial area an additional 73,000 sq.m of retail area. 13M1028000 28/06/13 Integrated Transport and Access Review, Arden Macaulay Issue: A Amendment C190 Executive Summary ii The above land use estimates are considered to represent a highly conservative assessment and further consideration of these figures may be beneficial. Existing Issues The following existing issues have been identified and will need to be considered further in assessing the viability of the proposed Structure Plan. The pedestrian environment in the precinct offers opportunity for improvement. The existing network is not at ‘human scale’ (predominantly industrial scale streets) and this poses a challenge to pedestrian movement and activity e.g. lack of passive surveillance and perceptions of safety, poor surface quality, lack of DDA treatments. This will present an ongoing challenge to provide an improved public realm to support land use change and activity in the precinct. It is anticipated that Development Contribution Plans (DCPs) will have a strong role to play in providing public realm improvements. CityLink, the Upfield railway line and Moonee Ponds creek present a barrier with limited crossing points and poor surveillance, lighting and safety. This also represents an opportunity due to the north-south accessibility afforded by the Capital City Trail alignment. A high proportion of traffic in the precinct is through traffic, which does not promote local amenity or land uses. As the precinct develops, this through traffic is likely to be displaced to other routes and / or modes as local traffic increases, which will further impact on the congestion on surrounding arterial roads. Significant traffic volumes on roads at the edge of the precinct (Racecourse Rd / Flemington Rd) form barriers to local access. Freight traffic interface with sensitive land uses will need to be increasingly considered and carefully managed as the precinct transitions. In order to maintain a good public transport level of service, there is a need to relieve existing congestion, provide additional connectivity, cater for external growth and through trips (for example to growth areas) as well as growth within the study area . A key challenge for the future will be ensuring that public transport in the precinct (which will be carrying through trips) has sufficient capacity to cater for both existing and future local needs. Accessibility upgrades are required at local railway stations and tram stops to be consistent with Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport (DSAPT). The main on-road cycling routes do not comply with the relevant Austroads guidelines, and should be upgraded to separated routes to encourage new cyclists to use them (part of a wider network issue). Future Transport Network Operation Traffic i GTA undertook an assessment of the likely additional traffic generated by future development as envisaged in the Structure Plan (based on agreed land uses) and its impacts on the surrounding road network. ii This assessment indicated that traffic generated by additional development in the precinct will be less than the existing through traffic (or within the capacity of the existing road network). This will likely result in a displacement of through traffic to accommodate locally generated traffic once the network reaches capacity. This displacement of traffic will occur gradually as local traffic demands on the network increase due to ongoing development activity. 13M1028000 28/06/13 Integrated Transport and Access Review, Arden Macaulay Issue: A Amendment C190 Executive Summary iii Boundary Road is a key north-south link through the precinct and is likely to carry in the order of 20,000vpd (in comparison to the estimated existing daily volume of 6,000vpd). Whilst at the upper limit of a 2 lane road, with appropriate intersection upgrades this is considered to be acceptable. Furthermore, introduction of bus priority measures could be considered to improve operation. iv Macaulay Road traffic capacity is currently restricted by the existing at-grade rail crossings. This situation may be exacerbated by additional train services on the Upfield and Craigieburn Lines. Traffic volumes on Macaulay Road are not predicted to increase although through trips are likely to be redistributed to other arterial routes. Direct access (crossovers) to major traffic routes should be avoided where practical or otherwise treated appropriately. v Stubbs Street is expected to carry in the order of 12,000vpd (in comparison to the estimated existing daily volume of 3,900vpd) and is an important route for traffic avoiding congestion in the vicinity of the Macaulay Road level crossing of the Craigieburn Line. The existing road configuration is considered appropriate to support this level of traffic. Direct access (crossovers) should be avoided where practical. vi The remaining local road network is expected to carry less than 3,000vpd (i.e. no significant increase on the existing daily volumes that will result in the re-classification of the roads) reflective of their local road status and could support pedestrian and cycle activity. vii More broadly, traffic demands on the surrounding arterial network are anticipated to increase significantly in the next 20 years resulting in increased pressure on the existing road network. In order to maintain good amenity to the future residents and encourage active transport take up, appropriate Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) measures should be implemented to restrict the intrusion of external traffic. viii The proposed East-West Link has minimal impact on the predicted traffic volumes within this precinct, but results in a decrease in the traffic demands on a number of surrounding arterial roads (Racecourse Road, Flemington Road). Cycling i Key cycle routes through the precinct are Macaulay Road and Boundary Road. Given that both these routes are expected to carry significant levels of traffic, bicycle segregation along these routes is required. ii Given the other demands on Boundary Road, it is likely that in order to provide segregated cycle lanes a decrease in on-street car parking capacity would be required. A potential future cross section for Boundary Road is shown at Appendix C. iii Local roads are anticipated to carry levels of traffic that would support shared use by both bicycles and private vehicles, if appropriate speed limits are in place. Walking i The existing pedestrian network provides adequate access but poor amenity within the structure plan area with low levels of priority at arterial road crossings. In addition, the Moonee Ponds Creek is a significant barrier to pedestrians. ii Improvements to walkability and the pedestrian network can usually be undertaken relatively simply with low cost when compared to new public transport or road infrastructure. iii The development of future land uses and built form changes envisaged by C190 are likely to improve the amenity for pedestrians. 13M1028000 28/06/13 Integrated Transport and Access Review, Arden Macaulay Issue: A Amendment C190 Executive Summary iv The proposed Smith Street crossing of Moonee Ponds Creek will increase the ability for pedestrians to cross the creek and responds to a key gap in the network between Racecourse Road and Macaulay Road. v The proposed network of roads generally provides for good connectivity for pedestrians linking them to key destinations such as transport nodes. vi Improvements to pedestrian priority and safety around key transport nodes will be required to support the take up and efficient operation of the future public transport network. Public Transport i Significant increases to the existing public transport frequencies (such as a train every 10 minutes on the Upfield line) are anticipated in the modelling used for this report and result in a greater take up of public transport. ii The introduction of the Arden Station as part of the Melbourne Metro rail project will improve access to a broad range of employment and services in the area, in particular for commuters from southern and eastern suburbs. iii Implementation of a bus route on Boundary Road will provide an important north-south link with a direct connection via the Boundary Road extension to the future Arden Station. iv Improvements to bus priority on key links such as Macaulay Road and Boundary Road are required to encourage the take up of public transport.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recommendation of the Executive Director and Assessment of Cultural Heritage Significance Under Part 3 of the Heritage Act 2017
    Page | 1 Recommendation of the Executive Director and assessment of cultural heritage significance under Part 3 of the Heritage Act 2017 Name Upfield Railway Line Precinct Location Wilson Avenue and Victoria Street Brunswick and Cameron Street and Victoria Street Coburg, Moreland City Date Registered 23 October 1997 VHR Number VHR H0925 VHR Categor(ies) Registered Place Hermes Number 2135 Upfield Railway Line Precinct (2019) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE HERITAGE COUNCIL: To amend the existing registration for VHR H0952 in accordance with s.62 of the Heritage Act 2017 by: • Clarifying the extent of registration by adding land and removing land. • Updating the statement of significance. • Adding a permit policy and permit exemptions in accordance with s.49(3) of the Act. • Changing the name of the place. STEVEN AVERY Executive Director Recommendation Date: 30 August 2019 Advertising Period: 4 September 2019 – 3 November 2019 This recommendation report has been issued by the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria under s.37 of the Heritage Act 2017. 1 Name: Upfield Railway Line Precinct VHR number: VHR H0952 Hermes number: 2135 Page | 2 AMENDMENT BACKGROUND Application One to amend a place in the VHR On 22 July 2019, the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria (ED) accepted an application to amend the registration in the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR) for the Upfield Railway Line Precinct. The application was prompted by the replacement of level crossings with elevated rail at the northern end of the existing extent of registration. The application identified a number of elements including structures, trees and land along the Upfield Railway Line for potential inclusion in the registration.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Strategy Refresh
    Transport Strategy refresh Background paper Public Transport Network March 2018 Dr John Stone (University of Melbourne) Dr Ian Woodcock (RMIT) 1 This report has been prepared by Dr John Stone (University of Melbourne) and Dr Ian Woodcock (RMIT) as independent advice for the City of Melbourne. The aim of the report is to encourage public conversation and to inform the City of Melbourne’s forthcoming Transport Strategy refresh. 2 Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Current performance ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Mode share ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Overcrowding ................................................................................................................................ 9 2.3. Reliability and speed ..................................................................................................................... 9 3. Better public transport for the City of Melbourne: Key issues in brief ............................................... 10 4. Public transport issues & options ...................................................................................................... 11 4.1. Significant growth is expected in public transport demand ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABOUT US (i) FACTS ABOUT DVDs / POSTAGE RATES (ii) LOOKING AFTER YOUR DVDs (iii) Greg Scholl 1 Pentrex (Incl.Pentrex Movies) 9 ‘Big E’ 32 General 36 Electric 39 Interurban 40 Diesel 41 Steam 63 Modelling (Incl. Allen Keller) 78 Railway Productions 80 Valhalla Video Productions 83 Series 87 Steam Media 92 Channel 5 Productions 94 Video 125 97 United Kindgom ~ General 101 European 103 New Zealand 106 Merchandising Items (CDs / Atlases) 110 WORLD TRANSPORT DVD CATALOGUE 112 EXTRA BOARD (Payment Details / Producer Codes) 113 ABOUT US PAYMENT METHODS & SHIPPING CHARGES You can pay for your order via VISA or MASTER CARD, Cheque or Australian Money Order. Please make Cheques and Australian Money Orders payable to Train Pictures. International orders please pay by Credit Card only. By submitting this order you are agreeing to all the terms and conditions of trading with Train Pictures. Terms and conditions are available on the Train Pictures website or via post upon request. We will not take responsibility for any lost or damaged shipments using Standard or International P&H. We highly recommend Registered or Express Post services. If your in any doubt about calculating the P&H shipping charges please drop us a line via phone or send an email. We would love to hear from you. Standard P&H shipping via Australia Post is $3.30/1, $5.50/2, $6.60/3, $7.70/4 & $8.80 for 5-12 items. Registered P&H is available please add $2.50 to your standard P&H postal charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Management Plan
    Former Melville’s Grain Store at 11-17 Colebrook Street, Brunswick. CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Bruce Trethowan B. Arch., FAIA with Mark Stephenson BSc Building Conservation and Architecture trethowan architecture interior design 47 Dove Street Richmond P O Box 221 East Melbourne VIC 8002 tel 9421 5448 fax 9421 5449 email [email protected] Final Document: (Issued) 6 July, 2012 Shed 4 Former Melville’s Grain Store Conservation Management Plan CONTENTS SECTION ONE Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Heritage Listing 1 1.2.1 National – Register of the National Estate. 1 1.2.2 State - Heritage Victoria 1 1.2.2 Local - City of Moreland 1 1.2.3 Other - National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 1 1.3 Definition of the Property (The Heritage Place) 1 1.4 Extent and Limitations of the Project 2 SECTION TWO Historical Overview 3 2.1 Brunswick Context 3 2.2 Donald Melville’s Grain Stores 4 2.3 Commonwealth Storage and Supply Co 5 2.4 State Electricity Commission of Victoria 5 SECTION THREE Current Physical Fabric 7 3.1 External 7 3.2 Internal 8 3.3 Condition and Identified Changes 11 SECTION FOUR Analysis 13 SECTION FIVE Significance 14 5.1 Methodology 14 5.2 Statement of Cultural Significance 14 5.3 Levels of Significance 14 SECTION SIX Conservation Policy 17 6.1 Use 17 6.1.1 Policy 17 6.1.2 Objective 17 6.1.3 Rationale 17 6.2 Fabric 17 6.2.1 Policy 17 6.2.2 Objective 18 6.2.3 Rationale 18 6.3 Setting 18 6.3.1 Policy 18 6.3.2 Objective 18 6.3.3 Rationale 18 trethowan architecture interior design i Shed 4 Former Melville’s Grain Store Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Corrected Transcript 36 Kb
    CORRECTED VERSION SELECT COMMITTEE ON TRAIN SERVICES Inquiry into the factors leading to and causes of failures in the provision of metropolitan and V/Line train services Melbourne — 5 October 2009 Members Mr B. Atkinson Mr S. Leane Mr G. Barber Mr E. O’Donohue Mr D. Drum Mr M. Viney Ms J. Huppert Chair: Mr B. Atkinson Deputy Chair: Mr S. Leane Staff Executive Officer: Mr R. Willis Research Assistant: Mr A. Walsh Witness Mr D. Watson, Upgrade Upfield Corridor Committee. 5 October 2009 Select Committee on Train Services 24 The CHAIR — Welcome, Mr Watson. We have noted your submission and would be interested to hear a little more from you. All evidence taken at this hearing is protected by parliamentary privilege as provided under the Constitution Act 1975 and is further subject to the provisions of the Legislative Council Standing Orders. So you have qualified privilege for what you say in here. However, any comments you make outside the hearing in respect of the same matters may not be afforded the same privilege. All evidence is being recorded by Hansard and you will be provided with a proof version of the transcript within a couple of days. If there are some errors in that transcript, then you can certainly bring them to our attention. But it is not possible to change the substance of the evidence you have given. I invite you to perhaps make some opening remarks and then we will proceed to some questions. Mr WATSON — Thanks very much, Chair. First of all, thanks for accepting our late submission and inviting us along to talk to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Level Crossing Removal Authority Site 4 Bell Street, Coburg Urban Design Guidelines
    LEVEL CROSSING REMOVAL AUTHORITY SITE 4 BELL STREET, COBURG URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES AUGUST 2019 VERSION 1 LXRA-LX31-004-UD-RPT-0001 LXRA-LX31-004-UD-RPT-0001 Rev 1 PRINT A3 DOUBLE SIDED, FLIP ON SHORT EDGE # ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES STATUS DATE NOTES 1 PROJECT DIRECTOR A 0 31/01/2019 2 DIRECTOR - ENGINEERING AND C PROGRAM SERVICES 3 SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER R C 16/06/2018 (FOR SITE) 4 UDAP WORKING GROUP E D 04/12/2018 5 MANAGER - TECHNICAL SERVICES C 6 PROGRAM WIDE PLANNING AND C ENVIRONMENT SPECIALIST Document Status 7 ACTIVE TRANSPORT - TRAFFIC C D 04/12/2018 PMF Classification ENGINEER TRIM Reference FOL/16/48141 Version 0 8 DEVELOPMENT MANAGER C Issue date 02/08/2019 Status Final Owner 33(1) Approver 33(1) AECOM-GHD JV Project Director Roles and Accountability RACI MATRIX Version Control Responsible (R) The individual(s) who perform(s) an activity - responsible for action / implementation. Version Date Author Title Description of change 4 Consulted (C) The individual(s) to be consulted prior to a final decision or action being 1 15/08/2019 JV Urban Design Guidelines Final - Revised taken. 31/01 2019 JV 0 / Urban Design Guidelines Final Endorse (E) The individual(s) who need(s) to endorse key decisions, actions or 09/11/2018 JV D Urban Design Guidelines Final draft deliverables. JV C 14/06/2018 Urban Design Guidelines In-progress draft Accountable (A) The individual who is ultimately accountable, including yes/no authority 09/03/2018 JV Urban Design Guidelines In-progress draft and power of veto.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of Council Meeting
    COUNCIL AGENDA WEDNESDAY 8 FEBRUARY 2017 COMMENCING 7 PM COBURG TOWN HALL, MORELAND CIVIC CENTRE, 90 BELL STREET, COBURG D17/33328 INFORMATION ABOUT COUNCIL MEETINGS Moreland City Council encourages its citizens to participate in the local government of Moreland. Accordingly, these notes have been developed to help citizens better understand Council meetings. All meetings are conducted in accordance with Council’s Meeting Procedure Local Law. WELCOME The Mayor, who chairs the meeting, formally opens the meeting, delivers an acknowledgement of country and welcomes all present. This Council meeting will be recorded and webstreamed live to Council’s website. This recording will also be available as Video on Demand. Although every care is taken to maintain privacy, gallery attendees are advised they may be recorded. APOLOGIES Where a Councillor is not present, his/her absence is noted in the Minutes of the meeting. DECLARATION OF INTERESTS AND/OR CONFLICT OF INTERESTS Under the Local Government Act 1989, a Councillor has a duty to disclose any direct or indirect pecuniary (financial) interest, s/he may have in any matter to be considered by Council that evening. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES The minutes of the previous meeting are placed before Council to confirm the accuracy and completeness of the record. PETITIONS Council receives petitions from citizens on various issues. Any petitions received since the previous Council meeting are tabled at the meeting and the matter referred to the appropriate Council Director for consideration. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE TO COUNCIL Council considers reports from Committees that Councillors represent Council on. QUESTION TIME This is an opportunity (30 minutes), for citizens of Moreland to raise questions with Councillors.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurs & Vieurs
    NEurS & VIEurS lssN 0817-0347 Volume 18 No.3 July 1994 Printed on recycled paper Turning On the Off Peak While there are many important factors get the message across. We will be asking mem- that influence the usage of public tranpsort, bers to participate over the coming months in recent overseas interstate and even local raising the profile of this issue, details will follow. Anyone interested in helping in the office with experience is showing that one of the most mailouts or other apects of this campaign should powerfulfactors is the frequency of service. call and let us know. Because of this the PTUA will be undertaking On the 28th of July Environment Victoria are a service frequency campaign beginning in August bringing out Cr. Mike Colle, Head of Toronto to promote better off peak frequencies- the key to Transit Commission, who wrll explain at a public attracting people back to public transport and meeting how Toronto has produced a system that making it more financially viable. carries three time the passengers of the Melbourne system with almost a third the subsidy (25 We plan to run a campaign based on the positive of instead 70 percent aspects of frequent public transport,and will con- of of operating costs). You'll find details the meeting inserted this news- centrate on all forms of media, and government to of into letter and we urge PTUA members to come along. ft-iuoens Strte eT fl-Atfoqtl l,?,3, 9,s,6,?, t19 or lo <-- Getting in toueh with the PTUA The Publc Transport LJsers' Association office is located on the ground floor, 247 Flinders Lane, Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL MINUTES of the PROCEEDINGS No
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS No. 1 No. 1 — Wednesday, 19 December 2018 1 The Council met pursuant to the Proclamation of the Governor dated 12 December 2018, which was read by the Clerk and is as follows: CONSTITUTION ACT 1975 PROCLAMATION I, Linda Dessau AC, Governor of the State of Victoria, acting under sections 8 and 20 of the Constitution Act 1975 and all other powers vested in me, fix 19 December 2018 at 11.00 am as the time for the commencement and holding of the First session of the Fifty- ninth Parliament of Victoria for the dispatch of business, at Parliament House, Melbourne. The Members of the Legislative Council and the Members of the Legislative Assembly are required to attend at that time and place. Given under my Hand and the Seal of the State of Victoria, at Melbourne, this 12th day of December 2018 LINDA DESSAU Governor (L.S.) By Her Excellency’s Command DANIEL ANDREWS MP Premier 2 INTRODUCTION OF COMMISSIONER — The Honourable the Chief Justice, the Commissioner from the Governor appointed to open the Parliament, was introduced to the Council Chamber by the Usher of the Black Rod. The Honourable the Chief Justice said — MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL — The Governor has caused a Commission to be issued under the Seal of the State constituting her Commissioners to do in her name all that is necessary to be performed in this Parliament. This will more fully appear from the Commission which will now be read by the Clerk. The Commission was then read and is as follows: BY HER EXCELLENCY THE HONOURABLE
    [Show full text]
  • Non -Indigenous Cultural Heritage and Historic Places on Public Land in VEAC’S Metropolitan Melbourne Investigation Area
    Non -Indigenous cultural heritage and historic places on public land in VEAC’s Metropolitan Melbourne Investigation Area September 2009 Department of Sustainability and Environment This report was prepared for the Victorian Environmental Assessment Council by Public Land Division Department of Sustainability and Environment with contributions from Dr Mel Mitchell Victorian Environmental Assessment Council © Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne 3002, September 2009 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 Acknowledgements Heritage Victoria provided information from the Victorian Heritage and Hermes databases. Fiona McKenzie (DPCD) provided valuable insights on historic population data. Jenny Walker compiled site information relating to historic themes and Joo-Shan Ong (VEAC) carried out the GIS mapping of Victorian Heritage Register sites on public land. Cover image: Drawn by N. Whittock from sketches taken in 1854 by G. Teale. The City of Melbourne. 1 May 1855. The image shows Cremorne Garden steamship (possibly the Gondola), Batman’s Hill, gunpowder magazine, Government dock and telegraph in William Street. SLV Accession Number: H34147 Image Number: b28661. Pictures Collection, State Library of Victoria. Contents Page 1. Introduction 4 2. Protection and management of non-indigenous cultural heritage and historic sites 4 2.1 Legislation 4 2.2 Management 6 3. Identification of sites and survey coverage
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Park – Transport Discussion Paper
    Royal Park – Transport Discussion Paper City of Melbourne 9 September 2019 FIGURE 1: MAIN FEATURES OF ROYAL PARK Source: Phillip Boyle & Associates Executive Summary This discussion paper considers transport in relation to Royal Park. The paper has been developed to support the City of Melbourne’s preparations for the process of creating the next Royal Park Masterplan. For this preparation it is appropriate that a detailed transport study be prepared that considers transport in relation to the aims for the park and reviews the directions and actions related to transport in the current and previous Masterplans. The aim of the paper is to provoke thinking about issues related to transport and recommend areas for further analysis by the City of Melbourne and the community as the next masterplan develops. Royal Park is the largest park in the City of Melbourne with important values, including biodiversity and cultural heritage. The passive and active recreation opportunities in the park make a significant contribution to people’s social connectedness, mental health and wellbeing. The park also provides ecosystem services such as stormwater reuse and the mitigation of urban heat. The importance of this area of parkland will grow as Melbourne’s population increases. The high value of this park land has not protected Royal Park from damage. The original area of park land envisioned in in the 1840s has been repeatedly cut back to provide land for other purposes and repeatedly cut across by transport links including a railway and tram line in the 1800s and a tram line and east-west road in the 1900s.
    [Show full text]
  • Northerncentralcity Corridorstudy
    NORTHERN CENTRAL CITY CORRIDOR STUDY HERITAGE LANDSCAPE & URBAN DESIGN SCENARIO APPRAISAL OF STRATEGY ELEMENTS OCTOBER 2002 HELEN LARDNER CONSERVATION & DESIGN In association with EDGe Environmental Design Group Dr Carlotta Kellaway Isabel Ellender Northern Central City Corridor Study Appraisal of Strategy Elements Heritage, Landscape & Urban Design October 2002 CONTENTS Page 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 About this report 3 1.2 Study Team 3 2.0 THE ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK 4 2.1 Goals and indicators for assessment 4 2.2 Assessment Framework Flowchart 5 2.3 The strategy elements 6 3.0 ASSESSMENT OF THE STRATEGY ELEMENTS 7 3.1 A Improvements to public transport 7 3.2 B Local street management and amenity improvements 11 3.3 C Cycling and walking initiatives 15 3.4 D Measures to reduce car use/dependency 19 3.5 E Land use initiatives 22 3.6 F Doncaster area rapid transit system 23 3.7 G Improvements to arterial roads/tunnels 26 4.0 SUMMARY 30 4.1 Appraisal Summary Tables 30 5.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY 37 6.0 APPENDICES 38 6.1 Strategy A Improvements to public transport 6.2 Strategy B Strategy A, plus local street management and amenity improvements 6.3 Strategy C Strategy B, plus cycling and walking initiatives 6.4 Strategy D Strategy C, plus measures to reduce car use/dependency 6.5 Strategy E Strategy D, plus land use initiatives 6.6 Strategy F Strategy E, plus Doncaster area rapid transit (DART) system) 6.7 Strategy G Strategy F, plus improvements to arterial roads in inner north (east-west tunnel) 6.8 Extract: ‘Works Undertaken by Local Government’, Guidelines for the Assessment of Heritage Planning Applications, (draft), Heritage Victoria, August 2000, pp 37-42.
    [Show full text]