Level Crossing Removal Authority Site 37 Moreland Road Urban Design Guidelines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Level Crossing Removal Authority Site 37 Moreland Road Urban Design Guidelines LEVEL CROSSING REMOVAL AUTHORITY SITE 37 MORELAND ROAD URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES AUGUST 2019 VERSION 1 LXRA-LX31-037-UD-RPT-0002 LXRA-LX31-037-UD-RPT-0002 Rev 1 PRINT A3 DOUBLE SIDED, FLIP ON SHORT EDGE # ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES STATUS DATE NOTES 1 PROJECT DIRECTOR A 0 31/01/2019 2 DIRECTOR - ENGINEERING AND C PROGRAM SERVICES 3 SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER RC 16/06/2018 (FOR SITE) 4 UDAP WORKING GROUP ED 04/12/2018 5 MANAGER - TECHNICAL SERVICES C 6 PROGRAM WIDE PLANNING AND C Document Status ENVIRONMENT SPECIALIST PMF Classification 7 ACTIVE TRANSPORT - TRAFFIC CD 04/12/2018 TRIM Reference FOL/16/48141 Version 0 ENGINEER Issue date 02/08/2019 Status Final 8 DEVELOPMENT MANAGER C Owner 33(1) Approver 33(1) AECOM-GHD JV Project Director Roles and Accountability Version Control RACI MATRIX Version Date Author Title Description of Responsible (R) The individual(s) who perform(s) an activity - responsible for action / change 4 implementation. Urban Design Guidelines Final - Revised Consulted (C) The individual(s) to be consulted prior to a final decision or action being 1 15/08/2019 JV taken. Urban Design Guidelines Final 0 02/08/2019 JV D Urban Design Guidelines Final Draft Endorse (E) The individual(s) who need(s) to endorse key decisions, actions or 09/11/2018 JV deliverables. In-progress draft C 14/06/2018 JV Urban Design Guidelines Accountable (A) The individual who is ultimately accountable, including yes/no authority B 14/03/2018 JV Urban Design Guidelines In-progress draft and power of veto. A 15/12/2017 JV Urban Design Guidelines In-progress draft Informed (I) The individual(s) who need(s) to be informed after a decision or action is Approval taken. Version Issue date Approved by Title 1 15/08/2019 33(1) Principal Adviosr B URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES | SITE 37 - MORELAND ROAD | LEVEL CROSSING REMOVAL PROJECT - LX31 | 2019 LXRA-LX31-037-UD-RPT-0002 Rev 1 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 4.0 COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 34 1.1 PROJECT SUMMARY 3 4.1 OVERVIEW 35 1.2 SITE OVERVIEW 4 4.2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 35 1.3 DOCUMENT PURPOSE 4 4.3 COMMUNITY CONSULTATION 35 1.4 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE 5 5.0 ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 38 1.5 METHODOLOGY 5 6.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 42 1.6 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK 6 6.1 GUIDELINES STRUCTURE AND ROLE 43 2.0 CONTEXT ANALYSIS 8 6.2 VISION 44 2.1 BROADER AREA CONTEXT 9 6.3 DESIGN GUIDELINES 45 2.2 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 10 APPENDIX 54 2.3 LOCAL CONTEXT 11 A GLOSSARY AND REFERENCE LIST 55 2.4 PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY 23 B STRATEGIC PLANNING BACKGROUND 57 2.5 DEMOGRAPHICS AND COMMUNITY PROFILE 25 3.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND POLICY ANALYSIS 30 3.1 STATE PLANNING POLICY 31 3.2 STRATEGIC TRANSPORT DIRECTIONS 31 3.3 LOCAL STRATEGIES AND POLICY 31 2019 | LEVEL CROSSING REMOVAL PROJECT - LX31 | SITE 37 - MORELAND ROAD | URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES C LXRA-LX31-037-UD-RPT-0002 Rev 1 This page has intentionally been left blank 1 URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES | SITE 37 - MORELAND ROAD | LEVEL CROSSING REMOVAL PROJECT - LX31 | 2019 LXRA-LX31-037-UD-RPT-0002 Rev 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY 1.3 DOCUMENT PURPOSE 1.4 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE 1.5 METHODOLOGY 1.6 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK 2017 | LEVEL CROSSING REMOVAL PROJECT - LX31 | SITE [NO] - [SITE LOCATION] | URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES 2 LXRA-LX31-037-UD-RPT-0002 Rev 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.0 By 2025, the Level Crossing Removal Authority (LXRA) will oversee the removal of 75 dangerous and congested level Sunbury Goonawarra BELGRAVE MERNDA 61 Sunbury 1 Mountain Highway, Bayswater 53 Bell Street, Preston Craigieburn crossings across Melbourne and perform vital rail corridor 2 Scoresby Road, Bayswater 54 High Street,Reservoir upgrades, including rail extensions and duplication works 3 Mont Albert Road, Mont Albert 55 Cramer Street, Preston Craigieburn Mernda St Andrews 4 Union Road, Surrey Hills 56 Murray Road, Preston 57 Oakover Road, Preston (refer to Figure 1). CRAIGIEBURN 5 Buckley Street, Essendon SUNBURY The project is designed to: Diggers Rest Bulla Epping 6 Glenroy Road, Glenroy 58 Main Road, St Albans Hurstbridge 59 Furlong Road, St Albans CRANBOURNE • Improve the reliability and efficiency of transportation 60 Melton Highway, Sydenham Upfield 7 HealesvilleAbbotts Road, Dandenong South 61 Gap Road, Sunbury Wattle 8 Thompsons Road, Lyndhurst networks, through reducing overall congestion; Glen 9 Camms Road, Cranbourne UPFIELD Thomastown Diamond 10 Evans Road, Lyndhurst 62 Bell Street, Coburg • Enhance the urban amenity of local areas; and Creek 11 Greens Road, Dandenong South 63 Camp Road, Campbellfield 63 12 Webster Street, Dandenong 64 Moreland Road, Brunswick 60 Tullamarine Campbellfield Greensborough 65 Munro Street, Coburg Glenroy FRANKSTON • Create safer, better connected, liveable and thriving Sydenham 6 66 Reynard Street, Coburg Reservoir Eltham 13 North Road, Ormond 54 communities. Keilor 14 McKinnon Road, McKinnon WERRIBEE Caroline Springs 15 Centre Road, Bentleigh Coburg 67 Kororoit Creek Road, Williamstown 56 Warrandyte 16 Char man and Park roads, Cheltenham North The LXRA was formed in May 2015 to oversee the delivery of 62 55 Rosanna 58 65 53 Preston 32 17 Balcombe Road, Mentone 68 Aviation Road, Laverton Essendon the project and to ensure that level crossings are removed in St Albans 66 57 Heidelberg 36 18 Edithvale Road, Edithvale 69 Cherry Street, Werribee 5 64 70 Werribee Street, Werribee Deer Park 59 Lilydale 19 Station Street/Bondi Road, Bonbeach a coordinated and efficient manner. LXRA’s vision is ‘delivering 75 20 Station Street, Carrum 71 Old Geelong Road, Hoppers 74 Brunswick 31 Launching Place 73 Seville and Mascot Avenue, Bonbeach Crossing Sunshine 35 Woori Yallock great change, by transforming the way Victorians live, work Mount Evelyn 21 Eel Race Road, CarrumYarra Junction Alphington Doncaster 22 Seaford Road, Seaford WILLIAMSTOWN and travel’. This vision is underpinned by 5 strategic objectives, Mooroolbark Derrimut 23 Skye/Overton Road, Frankston 72 Ferguson Street, Williamstown including a committment to creating great places. Kew 24 Argyle Avenue, Chelsea Balwyn Ringwood BALLARAT/GEELONG LINES 33 34 25 Chelsea Road, Chelsea CBD 4 73 Fitzgerald Road, Ardeer Mont Albert 26 Glen Huntly Road, Glen Huntly LXRA and the AECOM-GHD Joint Venture (Technical Advisor), 27 Neerim Road, GlenHoddles Huntly Creek 74 Mt Derrimut Road, Deer Park Box Hill Mount Dandenong 3 2 28 Swanpool Avenue, Chelsea 75 Robinsons Road, Deer Park have led site investigations, functional and reference design Port Melbourne Camberwell 30 29 Bayswater GLEN WAVERLEY packages, and the preparation of associated requirements 1 67 29 Burke Road, Glen Iris 68 72 and guidelines, to support the removal of level crossings at Hoppers Crossing St Kilda 30 Toorak Road, Kooyong Alamein 71 Laverton 43 Ferntree Gully HURSTBRIDGE each nominated location. Stakeholder engagement and Williamstown 39 Glen 40 Waverley 31 Grange Road, Alphington 27 45 community consultation is an important part of this process, 69 26 32 Lower Plenty Road, Rosanna 70 Knoxfield Glen Huntly Upwey to ensure that stakeholder and community considerations are LILYDALE 13 Oakleigh Werribee 14 33 Blackburn Road, Blackburn suitably addressed in the design and delivery of the project. 38 Belgrave Brighton 15 34 Heatherdale Road, Mitcham Clayton 35 Manchester Road, Mooroolbark Moorabbin Further design development, construction and delivery works Emerald 36 Maroondah Highway, Lilydale 37 Springvale are now being delivered by LXRA through Program Alliance PAKENHAM 42 partnerships with leading industry specialists. Design and Sandringham 37 Centre Road, Clayton 38 ClaytonGembrook Road, Clayton 16 41 Cheltenham 39 Koornang Road, Carnegie construction works for each site have been prioritised and 44 Noble Park aneebmurruM ,daoR aneebmurruM ,daoR aneebmurruM 17 40 staged to ensure that critical crossings are addressed as a Dandenong 41 Chandler Road, Noble Park Mentone 48 42 Corrigan Road, Noble Park priority and transport route delays and other impacts are 43 Grange Road, Carnegie 12 Hallam minimised. Mordialloc 47 44 Heatherton Road, Noble Park 11 45 Poath Road, Hughesdale Berwick 46 Clyde Road, Berwick Dandenong South This project has the potential to set strong benchmarks and 46 47 Hallam Road South, Hallam 18 7 28 48 htuoS dnalsppiG ,yawhgiH gnonednaD act as a catalyst for positive urban renewal that reinvigorates 25 49 Cardinia Road, Pakenham 24 Beaconsfield and reconnects communities. In order to create a lasting Chelsea 50 Main Street, Pakenham 49 51 McGregor Road, Pakenham legacy, innovative and high quality urban design is key to the 19 Lyndhurst 51 52 Racecourse Road, Pakenham 10 52 20 Nar Nar Goon success of the project. 21 8 Tynong Carrum Pakenham 50 9 Cranbourne 22 Portarlington 23 Frankston Langwarrin St Leonards Sites are numbered for identification purposes only. Numbering does not indicate Mount Eliza order or removal Baxter Koo Wee Rup Pearcedale Figure 1: Level Crossing Removal - Project Map 3 URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES | SITE 37 - MORELAND ROAD | LEVEL CROSSING REMOVAL PROJECT - LX31 | 2019 LXRA-LX31-037-UD-RPT-0002 Rev 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.0 1.2 SITE OVERVIEW 1.3 DOCUMENT PURPOSE This Urban Design Guidelines Report has been prepared for The successful delivery of the project requires an integrated Figure 2: Urban Design Requirements the Moreland Road Level Crossing Removal Project (the site). design solution that brings together the technical aspects of the project with innovative, locally responsive and high quality Moreland Road is located approximately 6.5km kilometres PROJECT WIDE SITE SPECIFIC urban design approaches. north of the Melbourne CBD on the Upfield rail line and URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES PROJECT REQUIREMENTS approximately 150m west of Sydney Road. The purpose of these Urban Design Guidelines (UDGs) is to SPECIFICATION illustrate and describe the key urban design objectives and The site is within the Moreland City Council Local Government LEVEL CROSSING REMOVAL AUTHORITY GLENROY ROAD, GLENROY outcomes, which are sought for the Moreland Road level URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES 28/08/2017 LEVEL CROSSING VERSION A Area.
Recommended publications
  • Recommendation of the Executive Director and Assessment of Cultural Heritage Significance Under Part 3 of the Heritage Act 2017
    Page | 1 Recommendation of the Executive Director and assessment of cultural heritage significance under Part 3 of the Heritage Act 2017 Name Upfield Railway Line Precinct Location Wilson Avenue and Victoria Street Brunswick and Cameron Street and Victoria Street Coburg, Moreland City Date Registered 23 October 1997 VHR Number VHR H0925 VHR Categor(ies) Registered Place Hermes Number 2135 Upfield Railway Line Precinct (2019) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE HERITAGE COUNCIL: To amend the existing registration for VHR H0952 in accordance with s.62 of the Heritage Act 2017 by: • Clarifying the extent of registration by adding land and removing land. • Updating the statement of significance. • Adding a permit policy and permit exemptions in accordance with s.49(3) of the Act. • Changing the name of the place. STEVEN AVERY Executive Director Recommendation Date: 30 August 2019 Advertising Period: 4 September 2019 – 3 November 2019 This recommendation report has been issued by the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria under s.37 of the Heritage Act 2017. 1 Name: Upfield Railway Line Precinct VHR number: VHR H0952 Hermes number: 2135 Page | 2 AMENDMENT BACKGROUND Application One to amend a place in the VHR On 22 July 2019, the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria (ED) accepted an application to amend the registration in the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR) for the Upfield Railway Line Precinct. The application was prompted by the replacement of level crossings with elevated rail at the northern end of the existing extent of registration. The application identified a number of elements including structures, trees and land along the Upfield Railway Line for potential inclusion in the registration.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Strategy Refresh
    Transport Strategy refresh Background paper Public Transport Network March 2018 Dr John Stone (University of Melbourne) Dr Ian Woodcock (RMIT) 1 This report has been prepared by Dr John Stone (University of Melbourne) and Dr Ian Woodcock (RMIT) as independent advice for the City of Melbourne. The aim of the report is to encourage public conversation and to inform the City of Melbourne’s forthcoming Transport Strategy refresh. 2 Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Current performance ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Mode share ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Overcrowding ................................................................................................................................ 9 2.3. Reliability and speed ..................................................................................................................... 9 3. Better public transport for the City of Melbourne: Key issues in brief ............................................... 10 4. Public transport issues & options ...................................................................................................... 11 4.1. Significant growth is expected in public transport demand ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABOUT US (i) FACTS ABOUT DVDs / POSTAGE RATES (ii) LOOKING AFTER YOUR DVDs (iii) Greg Scholl 1 Pentrex (Incl.Pentrex Movies) 9 ‘Big E’ 32 General 36 Electric 39 Interurban 40 Diesel 41 Steam 63 Modelling (Incl. Allen Keller) 78 Railway Productions 80 Valhalla Video Productions 83 Series 87 Steam Media 92 Channel 5 Productions 94 Video 125 97 United Kindgom ~ General 101 European 103 New Zealand 106 Merchandising Items (CDs / Atlases) 110 WORLD TRANSPORT DVD CATALOGUE 112 EXTRA BOARD (Payment Details / Producer Codes) 113 ABOUT US PAYMENT METHODS & SHIPPING CHARGES You can pay for your order via VISA or MASTER CARD, Cheque or Australian Money Order. Please make Cheques and Australian Money Orders payable to Train Pictures. International orders please pay by Credit Card only. By submitting this order you are agreeing to all the terms and conditions of trading with Train Pictures. Terms and conditions are available on the Train Pictures website or via post upon request. We will not take responsibility for any lost or damaged shipments using Standard or International P&H. We highly recommend Registered or Express Post services. If your in any doubt about calculating the P&H shipping charges please drop us a line via phone or send an email. We would love to hear from you. Standard P&H shipping via Australia Post is $3.30/1, $5.50/2, $6.60/3, $7.70/4 & $8.80 for 5-12 items. Registered P&H is available please add $2.50 to your standard P&H postal charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Management Plan
    Former Melville’s Grain Store at 11-17 Colebrook Street, Brunswick. CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Bruce Trethowan B. Arch., FAIA with Mark Stephenson BSc Building Conservation and Architecture trethowan architecture interior design 47 Dove Street Richmond P O Box 221 East Melbourne VIC 8002 tel 9421 5448 fax 9421 5449 email [email protected] Final Document: (Issued) 6 July, 2012 Shed 4 Former Melville’s Grain Store Conservation Management Plan CONTENTS SECTION ONE Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Heritage Listing 1 1.2.1 National – Register of the National Estate. 1 1.2.2 State - Heritage Victoria 1 1.2.2 Local - City of Moreland 1 1.2.3 Other - National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 1 1.3 Definition of the Property (The Heritage Place) 1 1.4 Extent and Limitations of the Project 2 SECTION TWO Historical Overview 3 2.1 Brunswick Context 3 2.2 Donald Melville’s Grain Stores 4 2.3 Commonwealth Storage and Supply Co 5 2.4 State Electricity Commission of Victoria 5 SECTION THREE Current Physical Fabric 7 3.1 External 7 3.2 Internal 8 3.3 Condition and Identified Changes 11 SECTION FOUR Analysis 13 SECTION FIVE Significance 14 5.1 Methodology 14 5.2 Statement of Cultural Significance 14 5.3 Levels of Significance 14 SECTION SIX Conservation Policy 17 6.1 Use 17 6.1.1 Policy 17 6.1.2 Objective 17 6.1.3 Rationale 17 6.2 Fabric 17 6.2.1 Policy 17 6.2.2 Objective 18 6.2.3 Rationale 18 6.3 Setting 18 6.3.1 Policy 18 6.3.2 Objective 18 6.3.3 Rationale 18 trethowan architecture interior design i Shed 4 Former Melville’s Grain Store Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Transport and Access Review Arden Macaulay Amendment C190
    Integrated Transport and Access Review Arden Macaulay Amendment C190 28/06/13 13M1028000 Integrated Transport and Access Review Arden Macaulay Amendment C190 Issue: A 28/06/13 Client: Melbourne City Council Reference: 13M1028000 GTA Consultants Office: VIC Quality Record Issue Date Description Prepared By Checked By Approved By Cameron Martyn / Tom A 28/06/13 Final Nathan Moresi Courtice / Rory Rathborne © GTA Consultants (GTA Consultants (VIC) Pty Ltd) 2012 The information contained in this document is confidential and intended solely for the use of the client for the purpose for which it has been prepared and no representation is made or is to be implied as being made to any third party. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of GTA Consultants constitutes an infringement of copyright. The intellectual property contained in this document remains the property of GTA Consultants. Executive Summary Executive Summary GTA Consultants (GTA) has undertaken a review of the existing and future transport and access conditions for the Arden-Macaulay Structure Plan area, as shown in the figure below, to support Melbourne City Council’s C190 Amendment. Arden-Macaulay Structure Plan Area and C190 Amendment Area The review has been based on the land use and transport change envisaged in the Arden-Macaulay structure plan. The following summary sets out the key findings of the review. Future Land Uses i Based on the land use and development assumptions agreed with Council, the following growth estimates have been adopted across the Arden-Macaulay Structure Plan area for the purpose of this study: an additional 9,328 residential dwellings an additional 467,000 sq.m of office/commercial area an additional 73,000 sq.m of retail area.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrected Transcript 36 Kb
    CORRECTED VERSION SELECT COMMITTEE ON TRAIN SERVICES Inquiry into the factors leading to and causes of failures in the provision of metropolitan and V/Line train services Melbourne — 5 October 2009 Members Mr B. Atkinson Mr S. Leane Mr G. Barber Mr E. O’Donohue Mr D. Drum Mr M. Viney Ms J. Huppert Chair: Mr B. Atkinson Deputy Chair: Mr S. Leane Staff Executive Officer: Mr R. Willis Research Assistant: Mr A. Walsh Witness Mr D. Watson, Upgrade Upfield Corridor Committee. 5 October 2009 Select Committee on Train Services 24 The CHAIR — Welcome, Mr Watson. We have noted your submission and would be interested to hear a little more from you. All evidence taken at this hearing is protected by parliamentary privilege as provided under the Constitution Act 1975 and is further subject to the provisions of the Legislative Council Standing Orders. So you have qualified privilege for what you say in here. However, any comments you make outside the hearing in respect of the same matters may not be afforded the same privilege. All evidence is being recorded by Hansard and you will be provided with a proof version of the transcript within a couple of days. If there are some errors in that transcript, then you can certainly bring them to our attention. But it is not possible to change the substance of the evidence you have given. I invite you to perhaps make some opening remarks and then we will proceed to some questions. Mr WATSON — Thanks very much, Chair. First of all, thanks for accepting our late submission and inviting us along to talk to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Level Crossing Removal Authority Site 4 Bell Street, Coburg Urban Design Guidelines
    LEVEL CROSSING REMOVAL AUTHORITY SITE 4 BELL STREET, COBURG URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES AUGUST 2019 VERSION 1 LXRA-LX31-004-UD-RPT-0001 LXRA-LX31-004-UD-RPT-0001 Rev 1 PRINT A3 DOUBLE SIDED, FLIP ON SHORT EDGE # ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES STATUS DATE NOTES 1 PROJECT DIRECTOR A 0 31/01/2019 2 DIRECTOR - ENGINEERING AND C PROGRAM SERVICES 3 SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER R C 16/06/2018 (FOR SITE) 4 UDAP WORKING GROUP E D 04/12/2018 5 MANAGER - TECHNICAL SERVICES C 6 PROGRAM WIDE PLANNING AND C ENVIRONMENT SPECIALIST Document Status 7 ACTIVE TRANSPORT - TRAFFIC C D 04/12/2018 PMF Classification ENGINEER TRIM Reference FOL/16/48141 Version 0 8 DEVELOPMENT MANAGER C Issue date 02/08/2019 Status Final Owner 33(1) Approver 33(1) AECOM-GHD JV Project Director Roles and Accountability RACI MATRIX Version Control Responsible (R) The individual(s) who perform(s) an activity - responsible for action / implementation. Version Date Author Title Description of change 4 Consulted (C) The individual(s) to be consulted prior to a final decision or action being 1 15/08/2019 JV Urban Design Guidelines Final - Revised taken. 31/01 2019 JV 0 / Urban Design Guidelines Final Endorse (E) The individual(s) who need(s) to endorse key decisions, actions or 09/11/2018 JV D Urban Design Guidelines Final draft deliverables. JV C 14/06/2018 Urban Design Guidelines In-progress draft Accountable (A) The individual who is ultimately accountable, including yes/no authority 09/03/2018 JV Urban Design Guidelines In-progress draft and power of veto.
    [Show full text]
  • The Melbourne Tram Book Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THE MELBOURNE TRAM BOOK PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Dale Budd,Randall Wilson | 80 pages | 20 May 2015 | UNSW Press | 9781742233987 | English | Sydney, Australia The Melbourne Tram Book PDF Book A W7-class tram on Flinders Street. This included acquiring new tram rolling stock, in addition the existing tram fleet was refurbished. Main article: W-class Melbourne tram. Museum Victoria. Art Victoria. At pp, this well researched history contains pictures and illustrations as well as numerous innovative tables. By the s Melbourne was the only Australian city with a major tram network. Retrieved 19 November It is planned to further extend the tram line to Knox City Shopping Centre, replacing the bus, maybe even in the future extending all the way down the highway to Belgrave. Are you happy to accept all cookies? Show less Show more Advertising ON OFF We use cookies to serve you certain types of ads , including ads relevant to your interests on Book Depository and to work with approved third parties in the process of delivering ad content, including ads relevant to your interests, to measure the effectiveness of their ads, and to perform services on behalf of Book Depository. I overhear the conversation from the young student couple seated ahead: 'But we are moving beings! We move, and are moved, in so many different ways. Swinburne University of Technology. Following the privatisation of Melbourne's tram system in , the private operators acquired new trams to replace the older Z-class trams. Some slight modifications were incorporated, the main visible ones being a larger anti-climber bumper and larger opening area for the driver's side-window, otherwise they resemble the Z1-class vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of Council Meeting
    COUNCIL AGENDA WEDNESDAY 8 FEBRUARY 2017 COMMENCING 7 PM COBURG TOWN HALL, MORELAND CIVIC CENTRE, 90 BELL STREET, COBURG D17/33328 INFORMATION ABOUT COUNCIL MEETINGS Moreland City Council encourages its citizens to participate in the local government of Moreland. Accordingly, these notes have been developed to help citizens better understand Council meetings. All meetings are conducted in accordance with Council’s Meeting Procedure Local Law. WELCOME The Mayor, who chairs the meeting, formally opens the meeting, delivers an acknowledgement of country and welcomes all present. This Council meeting will be recorded and webstreamed live to Council’s website. This recording will also be available as Video on Demand. Although every care is taken to maintain privacy, gallery attendees are advised they may be recorded. APOLOGIES Where a Councillor is not present, his/her absence is noted in the Minutes of the meeting. DECLARATION OF INTERESTS AND/OR CONFLICT OF INTERESTS Under the Local Government Act 1989, a Councillor has a duty to disclose any direct or indirect pecuniary (financial) interest, s/he may have in any matter to be considered by Council that evening. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES The minutes of the previous meeting are placed before Council to confirm the accuracy and completeness of the record. PETITIONS Council receives petitions from citizens on various issues. Any petitions received since the previous Council meeting are tabled at the meeting and the matter referred to the appropriate Council Director for consideration. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE TO COUNCIL Council considers reports from Committees that Councillors represent Council on. QUESTION TIME This is an opportunity (30 minutes), for citizens of Moreland to raise questions with Councillors.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurs & Vieurs
    NEurS & VIEurS lssN 0817-0347 Volume 18 No.3 July 1994 Printed on recycled paper Turning On the Off Peak While there are many important factors get the message across. We will be asking mem- that influence the usage of public tranpsort, bers to participate over the coming months in recent overseas interstate and even local raising the profile of this issue, details will follow. Anyone interested in helping in the office with experience is showing that one of the most mailouts or other apects of this campaign should powerfulfactors is the frequency of service. call and let us know. Because of this the PTUA will be undertaking On the 28th of July Environment Victoria are a service frequency campaign beginning in August bringing out Cr. Mike Colle, Head of Toronto to promote better off peak frequencies- the key to Transit Commission, who wrll explain at a public attracting people back to public transport and meeting how Toronto has produced a system that making it more financially viable. carries three time the passengers of the Melbourne system with almost a third the subsidy (25 We plan to run a campaign based on the positive of instead 70 percent aspects of frequent public transport,and will con- of of operating costs). You'll find details the meeting inserted this news- centrate on all forms of media, and government to of into letter and we urge PTUA members to come along. ft-iuoens Strte eT fl-Atfoqtl l,?,3, 9,s,6,?, t19 or lo <-- Getting in toueh with the PTUA The Publc Transport LJsers' Association office is located on the ground floor, 247 Flinders Lane, Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Moreland City Council.Pdf 53.75 Kb
    CORRECTED VERSION SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC LAND DEVELOPMENT Coburg — 17 March 2008 Members Mr D. Davis Ms S. Pennicuik Mr P.Hall Mr B. Tee Mr P. Kavanagh Mr E. Thornley Mr E. O’Donohue Chair: Mr D. Davis Deputy Chair: Mr B. Tee Staff Secretary: Mr R. Willis Research Officer: Mr A. Walsh Witnesses Mr P. Brown, chief executive officer, and Mr D. Dunstan, manager, open space, Moreland City Council. 17 March 2008 Select Committee on Public Land Development 1 The CHAIR — I welcome Mr Peter Brown, the chief executive officer of Moreland City Council. Peter, if you could make a presentation and then we will ask a few questions. Again I thank you for your time this morning when you assisted the committee. Mr BROWN — Thank you for the opportunity of actually putting council’s submission to the Select Committee. I just thought we would start with a bit of a PowerPoint presentation which will hopefully clarify some points, and answer some of the questions you have raised earlier. Overheads shown. Mr BROWN — I suppose council’s position very much is its resolution, which is that the land should be gifted to council. In doing this, council is very conscious of it and is not trying to be opportunistic about this. As Cr Sharam actually indicated, council is very supportive of the Melbourne 2030 strategy and making Melbourne a more compact and sustainable city. To that end, council has invested, as Cr Sharam indicated, quite a considerable sum of money in the structure planning exercise. Just for the Coburg area alone, the structure planning exercise has been at $1.3 million and we are undertaking structure plans for both Brunswick and Glenroy as well.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL MINUTES of the PROCEEDINGS No
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS No. 1 No. 1 — Wednesday, 19 December 2018 1 The Council met pursuant to the Proclamation of the Governor dated 12 December 2018, which was read by the Clerk and is as follows: CONSTITUTION ACT 1975 PROCLAMATION I, Linda Dessau AC, Governor of the State of Victoria, acting under sections 8 and 20 of the Constitution Act 1975 and all other powers vested in me, fix 19 December 2018 at 11.00 am as the time for the commencement and holding of the First session of the Fifty- ninth Parliament of Victoria for the dispatch of business, at Parliament House, Melbourne. The Members of the Legislative Council and the Members of the Legislative Assembly are required to attend at that time and place. Given under my Hand and the Seal of the State of Victoria, at Melbourne, this 12th day of December 2018 LINDA DESSAU Governor (L.S.) By Her Excellency’s Command DANIEL ANDREWS MP Premier 2 INTRODUCTION OF COMMISSIONER — The Honourable the Chief Justice, the Commissioner from the Governor appointed to open the Parliament, was introduced to the Council Chamber by the Usher of the Black Rod. The Honourable the Chief Justice said — MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL — The Governor has caused a Commission to be issued under the Seal of the State constituting her Commissioners to do in her name all that is necessary to be performed in this Parliament. This will more fully appear from the Commission which will now be read by the Clerk. The Commission was then read and is as follows: BY HER EXCELLENCY THE HONOURABLE
    [Show full text]