Volume II Detail Project Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Volume II Detail Project Report TRISHULI JAL VIDHYUT COMPANY LIMITED UPPER TRISHULI 3B HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (42 MW) Powerhouse Site Volume II Detail Project Report Prepared by: Trishuli Jal Vidhyut Company Limited Sohrakhutte, Kathmandu Ph : 4363681, Fax No. 4363681, P.O Box 6464 Date: October 2013 Detail Project Report of UT3B HEP Content of Reports, Drawings and Appendix Volume 1: Executive Summary Volume 2: Detail Project Report Volume 3: Drawings ( Detail Project Report) Volume 4: Drawing of Structural Design Appendix A: Topographic Survey and Cadastral Mapping Appendix B: Hydrology Appendix C: Geological Study Appendix D: Hydraulic Design Appendix E: Rate Analysis Appendix F: Cost Estimate Appendix G: Structure Design Report Engineering Study and Design Team: S.N Name and Designation Signature 1 Er. Damodar Bhakta Shrestha (CEO) 2 Er. Bishow Kumar Shrestha (Structural Engineer) 3 Er. Sunil Basnet (Hydropower Engineer) 4 Er. Deepak Pandey (Contract Engineer) 5 Er. Rajesh Sharma (Civil Engineer) 6 Er. Kalyan Khanal (Civil Engineer) Trishuli Jal Vidhyut Company Limited Detail Project Report of UT3B HEP Table of Content Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Study Background ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Previous Studies ............................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Objectives and Scope of Work ...................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Field Investigation Works ............................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4.1 Topographical Survey and Mapping ...................................................................................... 1-3 1.4.2 Geological and Geotechnical Investigation ........................................................................... 1-3 1.4.3 Project supports facilities ......................................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 Design Work ..................................................................................................................................... 1-4 Chapter 2 Description of Project Area 2.1 Location ............................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Physical Features ............................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.3 Accessibility ...................................................................................................................................... 2-3 Chapter 3 Field Investigation and Data Collection 3.1 Topographic Survey and Mapping ............................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Previous Study ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Additional Topographic Mapping and Survey, Fiscal Year-2013 ....................................... 3-1 3.1.3 Scope of works ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.4 Monumentation of Ground Control Points and Benchmarks ........................................ 3-3 3.1.5 Detail Topographical Survey ................................................................................................ 3-4 3.1.6 Cross- Section Survey ............................................................................................................ 3-4 3.1.8 Location of Bore Holes, Test Pits and Resistivity Line ..................................................... 3-6 3.2 Hydrological Investigations ........................................................................................................... 3-7 3.2.1 Collection of Available Meteorological and Hydrological Data ...................................... 3-7 3.2.2 Establishment of Gauging Station ........................................................................................ 3-7 3.2.3 Water Level Recording and Flow Measurement ................................................................. 3-7 3.3 Geological and Geotechnical Investigations............................................................................... 3-7 3.3.1 Previous Study ........................................................................................................................... 3-8 i Trishuli Jal Vidhyut Company Limited Detail Project Report of UT3B HEP 3.3.5 Field Investigation .................................................................................................................... 3-9 3.3.5.1 Core Drilling .................................................................................................................. 3-9 3.3.5.2 Geological Mapping .................................................................................................. 3-10 3.3.5.3 Seismic Refraction Survey ........................................................................................ 3-10 3.3.5.4 Construction Material Survey .................................................................................. 3-12 3.3.2 Additional geological geotechnical investigation, Fiscal Year-2013 ............................... 3-13 Chapter 4 Hydrology and Sediment Study 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Basin Characteristic ........................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Review of Catchment Area ............................................................................................................... 4-3 4.4 Climate Study ...................................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.5 Available Hydrological Data ............................................................................................................. 4-4 4.5.1 Installation of Hydrometric Station ............................................................................................ 4-4 4.5.2 Hydrometric Stations .................................................................................................................... 4-5 4.5.3 Discharge Measurement by DHM and NEA ............................................................................ 4-5 4.6 Rating Curves ..................................................................................................................................... 4-7 4.7 Reference Hydrology ......................................................................................................................... 4-7 4.7.1 Mean Monthly Flow .................................................................................................................. 4-7 4.7.2 Long Term Trends in Flows .................................................................................................... 4-9 4.7.3 Correlation between Flows on Trishuli River at Upper Trisuli 3A dam site and Betrawati Gauge station 447 ...................................................................................................................... 4-9 4.7.4 Flow Duration Curve .............................................................................................................. 4-10 4.7.5 Downstream Release Flow ..................................................................................................... 4-10 4.8 Flood Estimates ............................................................................................................................... 4-10 4.8.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4-10 4.8.2 Flood Estimation by Regional Analysis ............................................................................... 4-11 4.8.3 Flood Frequency Analysis ...................................................................................................... 4-13 4.8.4 Flood levels ............................................................................................................................... 4-15 4.8.5 Construction Flood ................................................................................................................. 4-15 4.9 Glacier Lake Outburst Floods (GLOF) ....................................................................................... 4-15 4.9.1 General ...................................................................................................................................... 4-15 4.9.2 Historical Record of GLOF ................................................................................................... 4-16 4.9.3 GLOF Hazard .......................................................................................................................... 4-24 ii Trishuli Jal Vidhyut Company Limited Detail Project Report of UT3B HEP 4.9.4 Peak Flows from GLOFs ....................................................................................................... 4-24 4.9.5 Peak Flow Attenuation with Distance .................................................................................. 4-25 4.9.6
Recommended publications
  • Damage Mapping of April 2015 Nepal Earthquake Using Small
    J-Rapid Final Workshop 21 June, 2016, Kathmandu Inventory mapping of landslides induced by the Gorkha earthquake 2015 and a proposal for hazard mapping of future landslides for making a plan of better reconstruction "Impact on infrastructure by Gorkha earthquake 2015 induced landslides" Masahiro CHIGIRA Masahiro CHIGIRA Professor, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Professor, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University Kyoto University Vishnu DANGOL Vishnu DANGOL Professor, Department of Geology, Professor, Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University Tribhuvan University Objective 1. to make an inventory mapping on landslides, cracks, and landslide dams induced by the Nepal earthquake and to investigate their formative mechanisms 2. to detect displaced areas of slope surfaces, of which future susceptibility to landslides would be evaluated on the basis of geology, geomorphology, and groundwater conditions. 3. propose a methodology of hazard mapping for earthquake-induced landslides in Nepal. Members (Japan side) 1. Masahiro CHIGIRA (Kyoto Univ.) PI Applied Geology 2. Daisuke HIGAKI (Hirosaki Univ.) Landslide control 3. Hiroshi YAGI (Yamagata Univ.) Landslide susceptibility mapping 4. Akihiko WAKAI (Gunma Univ.) Geotechnical analysis of landslide 5. Hiroshi, P. SATO (Nihon Univ.) Remote sensing 6. Go, SATO (Teikyo Heisei Univ.) Geomorphology 7. Ching-Ying, TSOU (Hirosaki Univ.) GIS analysis 8. Akiyo YATAGAI (Res. Inst. Humanity and Nature) Meteorology Members (Nepali side) 1. Vishnu DANGOL (Tribhuvan Univ.) PI Applied Geology 2. Smajwal BAJRACHARYA (ICIMOD) Remote sensing 3. Shanmukhesh Chandra AMATYA (DWIDP) Hydrogeology 4. Tuk Lal ADHIKARI (ITECO-Nepal) Geotechnical Field survey • Trishuli River catchment from Trishuli to Syabrubesi (29 October to 1 November, 2015) • Sun Kosi and Bhote Kosi River catchments from Bansaghu to Kodari.
    [Show full text]
  • Article of a Given In- with Postdepositional Erosion
    Earth Surf. Dynam., 8, 769–787, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-8-769-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Timing of exotic, far-traveled boulder emplacement and paleo-outburst flooding in the central Himalayas Marius L. Huber1,a, Maarten Lupker1, Sean F. Gallen2, Marcus Christl3, and Ananta P. Gajurel4 1Geological Institute, Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland 2Department of Geosciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA 3Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics (LIP), Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8093, Switzerland 4Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal acurrent address: Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CRPG, 54000 Nancy, France Correspondence: Marius L. Huber ([email protected]) Received: 28 February 2020 – Discussion started: 20 March 2020 Revised: 21 July 2020 – Accepted: 11 August 2020 – Published: 22 September 2020 Abstract. Large boulders, ca. 10 m in diameter or more, commonly linger in Himalayan river channels. In many cases, their lithology is consistent with source areas located more than 10 km upstream, suggesting long trans- port distances. The mechanisms and timing of “exotic” boulder emplacement are poorly constrained, but their presence hints at processes that are relevant for landscape evolution and geohazard assessments in mountainous regions. We surveyed river reaches of the Trishuli and Sunkoshi, two trans-Himalayan rivers in central Nepal, to improve our understanding of the processes responsible for exotic boulder transport and the timing of em- placement. Boulder size and channel hydraulic geometry were used to constrain paleo-flood discharge assuming turbulent, Newtonian fluid flow conditions, and boulder exposure ages were determined using cosmogenic nu- clide exposure dating.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Valued Environmental Component: Aquatic Habitat
    CHAPTER 5: VALUED ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENT: AQUATIC HABITAT Rationale for Screening Baseline Conditions The impacts of hydropower development on aquatic Elevation Profile of the Trishuli River Basin biodiversity are well known and are summarized in (TRB) IFC (2018a). In addition to barriers to fish migration and dispersal, hydropower projects may also alter Figure 5.1 illustrates the elevation profile of the Trishuli downstream flow and sediment volumes, timing, River and the distribution of elevation and temperature predictability, and flow change rates, which, together zones. The upper reach of the river from the Chinese with temperature, water clarity, and other water quality border up to the Upper Trishuli-3B hydropower plant changes, can alter species composition and relative (HPP) is steep with an average slope of 3 percent. abundance, and can disrupt flow-related cues that From Upper Trishuli-3B to just above the Tadi Khola trigger important fish life milestones such as migration confluence, the river is moderately steep, with an average or spawning. slope of 1 percent. From there onward, downstream of Super Trishuli, the Trishuli River has a relatively mild slope with an average slope of 0.3 percent. Map 5.1 of the TRB portrays these zones geographically. Figure 5.1 Elevation Zones of the Trishuli River with Slope and Temperature Zones 2,500 Moderately steep Steep section of river section of river Section of river with mild slope 2,000 Cold water zone Cold-cool water zone Cool-warm water zone Rasuwagadhi Rasuwa Bhotekoshi 1,500
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Assessment of Extreme Events and Hydrological Responses of Indo‑Nepal Gandak River Basin
    Environment, Development and Sustainability https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00986-6 Integrated assessment of extreme events and hydrological responses of Indo‑Nepal Gandak River Basin Pawan K. Chaubey1 · Prashant K. Srivastava1 · Akhilesh Gupta2 · R. K. Mall1 Received: 15 November 2019 / Accepted: 15 September 2020 © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Changes in climate cause signifcant alterations in morphometric parameters and may lead to hydro-meteorological hazards. In this study, an attempt has been made to identify drain- age morphometric characteristics through topographic, geologic and hydrological infor- mation to assess the extreme weather events (food) over the Gandak River Basin (GRB). The standardized precipitation index (SPI) and rainfall anomaly index (RAI) were used for deducing extreme rainfall incidences derived from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mis- sion precipitation datasets. An assembled frequency distribution as well as trends in RAI and SPI was calculated to understand the hydro-climatological behaviour of the basin. Dur- ing the monsoon season, the years 1998, 2007, 2011, 2013 and 2017 witnessed the extreme food events. The variations in heavy and intense rainfall in short time can be linked to extreme food events, which leads to channel shifting and modifcations, can be deduced from provided asymmetric factors and sinuosity index. The results illustrated that both the monsoonal rainfall and the frequency of extreme rainfall over the basin are increasing, which could be a reason for a high severity and frequency of food events in the GRB. Keywords Flood · Standardized precipitation index (SPI) · Rainfall anomaly index (RAI) · Morphometric · Gandak basin (Indo-Nepal region) 1 Introduction The Indo-Gangetic Basin (IGB) comprises several river streams and act as an important source for freshwater resources in the Indian region.
    [Show full text]
  • Landslide Susceptibility in Rasuwa District of Central Nepal After the 2015 Gorkha Earthquake
    Journal of Nepal Geological Society, 2019, vol. 59, pp. 79–88 DOI: https://doi.org/103126/jngs.v59i0.24992 Landslide susceptibility in Rasuwa District of central Nepal after the 2015 Gorkha Earthquake *Badal Pokharel1,2 and Prem Bahadur Thapa1 1Department of Geology, Tri-Chandra Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal 2Himalayan Risk Research Institute, Bhaktapur, Nepal *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT The 2015 Gorkha Earthquake (7.8 Mw) triggered several landslides in central Nepal with major damages in 14 districts. Among them, the Rasuwa district at the north of Kathmandu Valley faced severe landslides due to rugged topography, complex geology and improper landuse development. The landslides had blocked the Pasang Lhamu Highway and dammed the Trishuli River at many places. A total of 1416 landslide locations were detected in the district from high resolution satellite images in Google Earth. In this study, landslide susceptibility was modeled in the Rasuwa District by considering slope, aspect, elevation, geology, peak ground acceleration (PGA), landuse, drainage proximity and thrust proximity as the predictive factors for landslide occurrences. The landslide inventory was split into 70% and 30% portions as the training dataset and testing dataset respectively. The results from modified frequency ratio (FR) suggest that effect of geology with prediction rate 2.52 is the highest among all factors and is followed by elevation (2.38) and drainage proximity (2.12). The results were verified using area under curve (AUC) and the prediction rate was found to be 79.14%. The computed landslide susceptibility map is helpful for landuse planning and landslide risk reduction measure in the Rasuwa District.
    [Show full text]
  • CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: a RAPID ASSESSMENT Published in August 2013 by WWF Nepal
    Hariyo Ban Program CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: A RAPID ASSESSMENT Published in August 2013 by WWF Nepal Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. Citation: WWF Nepal 2013. Chitwan Annapurna Landscape (CHAL): A Rapid Assessment, Nepal, August 2013 Cover photo: © Neyret & Benastar / WWF-Canon Gerald S. Cubitt / WWF-Canon Simon de TREY-WHITE / WWF-UK James W. Thorsell / WWF-Canon Michel Gunther / WWF-Canon WWF Nepal, Hariyo Ban Program / Pallavi Dhakal Disclaimer This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Kathmandu Forestry College (KAFCOL) and do not necessarily reflect the views of WWF, USAID or the United States Government. © WWF Nepal. All rights reserved. WWF Nepal, PO Box: 7660 Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal T: +977 1 4434820, F: +977 1 4438458 [email protected] www.wwfnepal.org/hariyobanprogram Hariyo Ban Program CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: A RAPID ASSESSMENT Foreword With its diverse topographical, geographical and climatic variation, Nepal is rich in biodiversity and ecosystem services. It boasts a large diversity of flora and fauna at genetic, species and ecosystem levels. Nepal has several critical sites and wetlands including the fragile Churia ecosystem. These critical sites and biodiversity are subjected to various anthropogenic and climatic threats. Several bilateral partners and donors are working in partnership with the Government of Nepal to conserve Nepal’s rich natural heritage. USAID funded Hariyo Ban Program, implemented by a consortium of four partners with WWF Nepal leading alongside CARE Nepal, FECOFUN and NTNC, is working towards reducing the adverse impacts of climate change, threats to biodiversity and improving livelihoods of the people in Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • Download From
    RIS-Gosainkunda and Associated Lakes Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2006-2008 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8 th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9 th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands . Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 7, 2 nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3 rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY . Jhamak B.Karki DD MM YY Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation P.O.Box 860, Babarmahal, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel No: 977-1-4220912, 4220850, 4227926 Fax No: 977-1-4226675 Designation date Site Reference Number Email: [email protected], [email protected]; [email protected] Website: www.dnpwc.gov.np Neera Shrestha Pradhan WWF Nepal Program Baluwatar, Kathamndu, Nepal Tel No-977-1-4434820 Fax No: 977-1-4434820 Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] Website: www.wwfnepal.org 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Trishuli River Rafting -Overnight :- 2 Days - USD 125 Per Person
    Himalayan Adventure Treks & Tours Thamel, Marg Kathmandu, [email protected] WhatsApp +977- 98511 38 875 (Bhagwat Simkhada ) Trishuli River Rafting -Overnight :- 2 Days - USD 125 Per Person The content which have been downloaded from Himalayan Adventure Treks & Tours Pvt Ltd is strictly prohibited to use, reproduce & share in website without prior notice. Our customer eligible to download & read only. All contents registered under copyright act 2063. Highlights Rafting in Trishuli River. Breakfast at the sandy beach of Trishuli River. Campfire along the banks of Trishuli River. Overnight at Riverside Resort. Overview Trishuli River Rafting is an outdoor sport done on the Trishuli river. The river has varying water currents and lush vegetation around its banks. This makes it a perfect place to raft. The starting point of the Trishuli River rafting is Charaudi. We reach this place following 3-4 hours of drive from Kathmandu and Pokhara. A more 2-hour drive from Chitwan will lead us to this place. After we arrive, we put on the rafting gear. It includes a lifejacket, helmet, paddle, and necessary safety equipment. The instructor will then brief us on scenarios and safety issues. Hence, we hop on the raft with our group. Trishuli River has a different water flow according to the season. Thus, we meet various classes of rapids according to the flow of water. On the first day, we meet class 2 to class 3 rapids along the trip. At first, we raft over a rapid called “Ladise” delight. Then after we stop for lunch and follow the trip with overcoming rapids called “Upset” and rightly named “Surprise”.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Systems Modeling for Ganga Basin Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
    Public Disclosure Authorized Water Systems Modeling for Ganga Basin Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized INRM Consultants Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi Submitted to the World Bank Water Systems Modeling for Ganga Basin Final Report CONTRACT NO. 7152490 Submitted to: World Bank Prepared by: INRM Consultants Pvt. Ltd. In Association with: Prof. A. K. Gosain Professor, Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi Prof. R. Srinivasan Director of Spatial Sciences Laboratory Professor of Ecosystem Science and Management and Biological and Agricultural Engineering Texas A&M University Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 6 1.1. About the Ganga basin ............................................................................................ 6 2. Scope of the study .......................................................................................................... 8 3. Methodology .................................................................................................................. 8 3.1. Brief Description of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model ........... 8 3.2. Advantages of the SWAT model ........................................................................... 10 3.3. Development of hydrologic model
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro-Meteorology of the Country
    Chapter 3 Hydro-Meteorology of the Country 3.1 RIVER B ASINS For hydrological studies, Nepal is divided into seven drainage basins: the Kankai Mai River Basin, the Koshi River Basin, the Bagmati River Basin, the Narayani River Basin, the West Rapti River Basin, the Karnali River Basin, and the Mahakali River Basin. Among them only the four basins described below contain glaciers and glacial lakes. The Koshi River basin The river system of eastern Nepal is occupied by the Koshi River Basin, which is also known as the Sapta Koshi River, i.e., a network of seven major rivers flowing through the Koshi River Basin. All these seven rivers, namely, the Tamor River, the Arun River, the Dudh Koshi River, the Likhu River, the Tama Koshi River, the Sun Koshi River, and the Indrawati River, from east to west, originate from the High Himalaya. Among the tributaries, the Sun Koshi-Bhote Koshi, the Tama Koshi, and the Arun River originate in Tibet. The Gandaki River basin The river network of central Nepal is occupied by the Gandaki River system, which is popularly known as Narayani. The river network forming Narayani comprises the Trishuli River, the Budhi Gandaki River, the Marsyangdi River, the Seti Gandaki River, and the Kali Gandaki River. Among these rivers, some parts of the Kali Gandaki River and the Budhi Gandaki River and major parts of the Trishuli River lie in Tibetan territory and flow down through the Himalayan range to Nepal. The Karnali River basin The Karnali River is about 507 km in length and is formed by the joining of Mugu Karnali and Humla Karnali at Galwa.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Nepal: Upper Trishuli 1 Hydro Project Project Preparation Missions March 16-23 and April 19-24, 2015 AIDE-MÉMOIRE Public Disclosure Authorized I. Background 1. This Aide Memoire provides a summary of key findings from two due diligence missions that were undertaken, respectively, from March 16-23, 20151, and April 19-24, 2015. Both missions were with respect to the Upper Trishuli (UT1) Hydro Project - a run-of-river project with an installed capacity is 216 MW to produce an estimated 1,533.1 GWh per year – located on the Trishuli River in Rasuwa District of central Nepal. 2. The first mission (the WB mission2) was led by Sandeep Kohli, Task Team Leader (TTL), and Patrice Caporossi, the Co-Task Team Lead (Co-TTL), while the second mission, was led by International Finance Corporation (IFC) (the UT1 Lenders’ mission) included representatives from various commercial and developmental financial institutions, as well as WBG members, including MIGA3. From the World Bank, Pravin Karki, Arnaud Braud, and Leanne Farrell – covering respectively, technical, commercial, and Public Disclosure Authorized environmental aspects of due diligence, were part of this UT1 Lenders mission. 3. On April 25, 2015 just at the end of the UT1 Lenders’ mission, the first of two devastating earthquakes struck Nepal. This earthquake with epicenter at Barpak, Gorkha, killed over 9,000 people, and injured over 23,000. There was widespread damage in Rasuwa District, including at the UT1 site. Road access to the site was cut off, and there were casualties reported. The earthquake was followed by several aftershocks which are continuing till date.
    [Show full text]
  • 49086-001: Upper Trishuli 1 Hydroelectric Power Project
    Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Final Report (Part 2) Project Number: 49086-001 June 2018 NEP: Upper Trishuli-1 Hydropower Project Prepared by Environmental Resources Management (ERM) for the Nepal Water & Energy Development Company Pvt. Ltd. And the Asian Development Bank. The environmental and social impact assessment report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Non-Technical Updated Environmental and Social Assessment Summary Report Chapter 6 Upper-Trishuli Hydroelectric Power Project Current Environmental and Social Baseline Conditions (Bajracharya et al. 2011) indicate climate change will affect flow regimes, as glaciers continue to decline in some parts of the region and monsoon patterns may become altered. Hydrographic data for the Project are based on a 44-year record of continuous daily observations made at Betrawati (Gauge Station 447, Nepal Department of Hydrology and Meteorology), located 14 kilometres downstream of the proposed UT-1 powerhouse (see Figure 6.1-8). To predict daily hydrographs at the UT-1 intake, Betrawati gauge data are adjusted downward by a factor of 0.8971 to account for the slightly smaller watershed area upstream of the gauge. The daily hydrographs show the extent of variation in daily discharge for representative low-flow and high-flow in years 1970 and 2000 respectively (see Figure 6.1-9).
    [Show full text]