Recognizing Heritage Sites
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Running Head: RECOGNIZING HERITAGE SITES Running Head: RECOGNIZING HERITAGE SITES Resources for Recognizing Heritage Sites in Thailand An Interactive Qualifying Project/Science & Social Project Report submitted to the faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE and CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Sponsoring Agency: The Department of Fine Arts Submitted by: Petra Kumi Hiruncheth Mangornchai Sebastian Rodriguez Robert Scalfani Nunnaphat Songmanee Chotiwit Takahashi Alex Tavares Rediet Tegegne Date: March 1, 2019 Submitted to: Professor Brajendra Mishra, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Professor Gary Pollice, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Professor Numpon Insin, Chulalongkorn University Professor Supawan Tantayanon, Chulalongkorn University RECOGNIZING HERITAGE SITES i Abstract Throughout Thailand and the world, heritage sites are under threat. To alleviate this, our project’s goal was to increase the protection heritage sites in Thailand attain. Initially, we aimed to create a resource for heritage site owners to understand and apply for official recognition by the Department of Fine Arts (DFA). We interviewed conservation organizations, the DFA, and heritage site owners and found that there exist misconceptions surrounding the DFA. Our goal expanded to include developing methods to alleviate this through increased transparency, communication, and protections. RECOGNIZING HERITAGE SITES ii Acknowledgements We would like to thank our sponsor, the Department of Fine Arts, and especially Khun Som for her constant willingness and availability to answer any questions as they came up throughout our project. We would also like to thank our Worcester Polytechnic Institute advisors: Professor Brajendra Mishra and Professor Gary Pollice for their constant support. Their comments were especially helpful in teaching us strategies to improve our project. Finally, we would like to thank our Chulalongkorn University Advisors: Professor Numpon Insin and Professor Supawan Tantayanon for their guidance and for connecting us with the Department of Fine Arts. RECOGNIZING HERITAGE SITES iii Authorship Section Primary Author Secondary Author Primary Editors Executive Summary Petra Kumi Rediet Tegegne Introduction Robert Scalfani Rediet Tegegne & Alex Tavares Background & Literature Petra Kumi Nunnaphat Alex Tavares & Review Songmanee & Rediet Robert Scalfani Tegegne Methodology Robert Scalfani Petra Kumi Rediet Tegegne & Alex Tavares Results Robert Scalfani Petra Kumi Rediet Tegegne & Alex Tavares Conclusions & Robert Scalfani Petra Kumi Rediet Tegegne & Recommendations Alex Tavares Interview Questions Hiruncheth Alex Tavares Sebastian Mangornchai Rodriguez Deliverable: Guidebook Robert Scalfani Alex Tavares Rediet Tegegne Deliverable: Letter Hiruncheth Nunnaphat Sebastian Application Template Mangornchai Songmanee Rodriguez Deliverable: Repair Petra Kumi Urgency Ranking Deliverable: Infographics Rediet Tegegne & Petra Kumi Alex Tavares Although there were some primary editors, everyone read through and edited every portion of the report. Much of the content and data provided for the report was from those team members who conducted interviews, research, and translated documents. For this reason, we could not represent all contributions by data-gathering members in the above table. This authorship also does not include the translated versions of the documents. RECOGNIZING HERITAGE SITES iv Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ i Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... ii Authorship...................................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... iv Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................ vii Table of Tables ............................................................................................................................. vii Glossary ....................................................................................................................................... viii Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... ix Methodology .............................................................................................................................. ix Results ......................................................................................................................................... x Department of Fine Arts Recognition ...................................................................................... x UNESCO Recognitions .......................................................................................................... xii Creating a Foundation .......................................................................................................... xii Recommendations ..................................................................................................................... xii Availability of Information, Transparency, Objectivity ........................................................ xiii Efficiency and Elimination of Stigma ................................................................................... xiii Further Protection ................................................................................................................ xiii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Background & Literature Review ............................................................................................ 3 2.1 The Definitions of Heritage, Cultural, and Historical Sites ............................................... 3 2.1.1 The distinction between heritage, cultural, and historical sites ................................... 3 2.1.2 Definition by the Department of Fine Arts .................................................................. 4 2.2 Value of Heritage Sites ...................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Types of values and their categorizations.................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Societal view of the value of heritage sites in Thailand .............................................. 6 2.3 Various Forms of Recognition of Heritage Sites ............................................................... 7 2.3.1 Internationally recognized heritage sites ..................................................................... 7 2.3.2 Nationally recognized historical sites .......................................................................... 7 2.3.3 Other official recognitions heritage sites can receive .................................................. 8 2.4 Protection Offered to Officially Recognized Heritage Sites .............................................. 8 RECOGNIZING HERITAGE SITES v 2.4.1 Protection offered to members of DFA’s List of Recognized Ancient Monuments ... 9 2.5 The Department of Fine Arts as our Sponsor ..................................................................... 9 3 Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Determine What Options Exist for Unrecognized Heritage Sites .................................... 10 3.1.1 Interview Department of Fine Arts on protections they offer ................................... 10 3.1.2 Interview and network with Siam Society ................................................................. 10 3.1.3 Interview managers of sites who have created their own foundations ...................... 11 3.1.4 Interview site owners who have accepted and declined recognition by the DFA ..... 11 3.1.5 Evaluate and translate books and documents ............................................................ 12 3.2 Determine the Criteria for Applying for Recognitions .................................................... 12 3.2.1 Interview Department of Fine Arts for their criteria ................................................. 12 3.3 Determine the Timeline and Process for Becoming Officially Recognized .................... 12 3.3.1 Interview DFA about their process and timeline ....................................................... 12 3.3.2 Interview heritage site owners on how they received official recognition ................ 13 4 Results & Findings ................................................................................................................ 14 4.1 Site Owners Decline DFA Recognition due to Stigma and Minimal Protections ........... 14 4.2 The DFA Criteria for Registering Heritage Sites is confusing and vague ....................... 16 4.3 The DFA Process of Registration is Opaque ................................................................... 17 4.4 Creating a Foundation can be a Useful Option ................................................................ 18 5 Conclusions & Recommendations ........................................................................................