DOCSLIB.ORG

View / Download 2.3 Mb

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 2 3 4 ABSTRACT THE SOVIET ATTITUDE TOWARDS TURKEY 1923-1929 ZALYAEV, Ramil Ph. D., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hakan Kırımlı September 2002 This doctoral dissertation deals with the official Soviet attitude towards Turkey during the years between 1923-1929. It is the aim of this dissertation to elicit the objectives of the Turkish and Soviet foreign policy towards each other during the period in question, and to ascertain what factors played a role in the determination of those policy objectives. During the period between 1923 - 1929, the contiguity of the Turkish territory to the USSR, as well as internal and external weakness of the Soviets, were factors that determined the Soviet policy objectives towards Turkey. The Soviet government desired Turkey to be the State with a friendly manner towards the USSR. Besides, it wished that Turkey would not take part in aggressions against the USSR, and not allow other powers to use the Turkish territory as a springboard for an attack on the USSR. The Soviet government supposed that a friendly Turkey would be a factor of security for the USSR. The USSR was also of great importance for Turkey. The Turkish government aimed at preserving the Turkish national state within certain national boundaries and intended to consolidate its military victory by economic reconstruction of the country. The Turkish government was in need of time in order to recover the economy of the 5 country and to consolidate the regime. Proceeding from this, it was its foreign policy priority to prevent any aggression against Turkey. As it shared a long sea and land frontier with the USSR, the Turkish government also desired the USSR to be the State with friendly attitude towards Turkey. It believed that the USSR with a friendly attitude towards Turkey would be a favourable factor for the security of its north-eastern and eastern parts of the frontier with the USSR. As a result of the Neutrality, Non-Aggression and Non-Participation Treaty of December 17, 1925 and the Ankara Protocol of December 17, 1929, the USSR and Turkey achieved their policy objectives. They also needed the benevolence of each other direly. They knew that only by behaving so, they could achieve their policy objectives. In this sense, the relations between Turkey and the USSR in the period between 1923-1929 were mutually beneficial relations. 6 ÖZET 1923 İLE 1929 YILLARI ARASINDA SOVYETLER BİRLİĞİ'NİN TÜRKİYE'YE KARŞI TUTUMU ZALYAEV, Ramil Doktora, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Doç. Dr. Hakan Kırımlı Eylül 2002 Bu doktora tezinde Sovyetler'in 1923 ile 1929 yılları arasında Türkiye'ye karşı tutumu ele alınıyor. Doktora tezinin maksadı Türkiye ile Sovyetler Birliği arasındaki bu yıllardaki karşılıklı politikalarının amaçlarını meydana çıkartılması, bu dış politika amaçlarının belirlenmesinde hangi faktörlerin rol oynadığını anlatılmasıdır. 1923 ile 1929 yılları arasında Türkiye ve Sovyetler Birliğiİnin topraklarının bitişikliği ve Sovyetlerin iç ve dış zayıflığı Sovyetler Birliğinin Türkiye'ye karşı olan siyasetini belirleyen faktörler olmuştur. Sovyet hükümeti Türkiye'nin Sovyetler Birliği'ne karşı dost devlet olmasını arzuluyordu. Bundan başka, Sovyet hükümeti Türkiye'nin Sovyetler Birliği'ne karşı olabilecek saldırılara katılmamasını, diğer güçlere Sovyetlere karşı saldırılarda Türk topraklarını köprübaşı olarak kullanılması için müsaade etmemesini diliyordu. Sovyet hükümeti dostane Türkiye'nin Sovyetlerin güvenliğinin bir faktörü olacağına inanıyordu. 7 Aynı şekilde Türkiye için de Sovyetler Birliği önem taşıyordu. Türk hükümetinin amacı milli Türk Devletinin belirli milli sınırlar içerisinde muhafaza edilmesi, ülke ekonomisini yeniden kurarak askeri zaferi sağlamlaştırılması idi. Ülke ekonomisinin yeniden kurulması, rejimin kuvvetlenmesi için Türk hükümetinin zamana ihtiyacı vardı. Bundan dolayı, Türkiye'nin dış politikası Türkiye'ye karşı olabilecek saldırıları engellenmeyi amaçlıyordu. Sovyetler Birliği'yle çok uzun deniz ve kara sınırını paylaştığı için Türk hükümeti Sovyetler Birliği'nin dostâne bir devlet olmasını diliyordu. Türkiye hükümeti Sovyetlerin dostâne bir ülke olmasının Türkiye'nin kuzey-doğu ve doğu sınırlarının güvenliğinin önemli bir faktörü olacağına inanıyordu. İki devletin 17 Aralık 1925 tarihli Tarafsızlık Anlaşması ile 17 Aralık 1929 tarihli Ankara Protokolü imzalanmasıyle Türkiye ve Sovyetler Birliği yukarıda belirtilen amaçlara ulaşmışlardır. Bu iki devletin birbirinin hayırhahlığına ihtiyacı vardı. Her iki devlet karşılıklı iyilik davranışları göstererek bu münasebeti karşılıklı faydalı yapmıştır. 8 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT iii ÖZET v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii TABLE OF CONTENTS viii INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER ONE - THE BEGINNING OF THE TURKO-SOVIET CONTACTS 7 The relations between the Soviet Government And the Ottoman Empire 7 The Beginning of National Resistance Movement in Anatolia 9 The Leaders of National Resistance Movement and their Startegy as regards to Soviet Republic at the beginning of the Movement 12 The R.S.F.S.R. and the East 17 The Establishment of Contacts between the Grand National Assembly of Turkey and the Soviet Government 26 The Difference of Stands on the issue of the Frontier 35 The Treaty between RSFSR and Turkey of March 16, 1921 43 CHAPTER TWO - TURKO-SOVIET RELATIONS in 1923 62 The Lausanne Conference and the Question of the Straits 62 10 The Difference of Views of the Turkish and Soviet Delegations at the Lausanne Conference 69 The Strained Relations 71 The Intention of Both Governments to Maintain Friendly Relations 82 The Military and Strategic Situation in the Black Sea Basin After the Lausanne Conference. The Soviet Point of View 88 The Importance of Turkey for the Soviet Republic after Lausanne 93 The revolutionary Importance of Turkey for the Soviet Government 95 The Overthrow of the Sultanate 97 The Economic Congress in Izmir 98 Declaration of the Republic of Turkey 101 The Abolishment of Caliphate in Turkey 104 The Soviet's Dread of the Turkish Pan-Turkism 106 The Importance of the USSR for Turkey 109 CHAPTER THREE - ZIGZAGS IN THE SOVIET POLICY TOWARDS TURKEY 121 The Temporary Conditions for the Soviet Consulates in Turkey 121 Lenin's Death and Turkey 126 Continuation of the Problems concerning Consulates 130 Presentation of the Letters of Credence by Yakov Surits, the Plenipotentiary Representative of the USSR, on February 27, 1924 131 Presentation of the Letters of Credence by Ahmet Muhtar[Mollaoğlu], the Ambassador of Turkey, on April 9, 1924 134 Continuation of Difficulties 135 Bessarabia and its Reflection of the Turko-Soviet Relations 140 11 CHAPTER FOUR - THE TREATY BETWEEN THE USSR AND TURKEY ON DECEMBER 17, 1925 ON NEUTRALITY, NON-AGGRESSION AND NON-PARTICIPATION IN HOSTILE COMBINATIONS 152 The Soviet Proposal of September 1924 157 The Turkish Project of February 22, 1925 161 The New Turkish Draft of March 24, 1925 161 Difference between Soviet and Turkish Drafts 165 Discussion of Articles concerning the League of Nations 168 The Proviso with regards to Persia 171 The Conference of Locarno 177 The External Situation of Turkey 180 The Conclusion of the Treaty 183 The Treaty between the USSR and Turkey of December 17, 1925 184 The Treaty as a Part of the Soviet Eastern Policy 188 The Importance of Treaty for Turkey 191 The Exchange of Notes 195 CHAPTER FIVE - THE TURKO-SOVIET RELATIONS IN 1926. THE TRIP OF THE TURKISH FOREIGN MINISTER, TEVFIK RÜŞTÜ BEY [ARAS] TO ODESSA 199 The Repatriation of Turkish and Russian Civilian Prisoners and Prisoners of War 199 The Decision of the League of Nations on Mosul and Turko-Soviet Relations 208 The Trip of Tevfik Rüştü Bey to Odessa 213 The Metting of Tevfik Rüştü Bey with Chicherin in Odessa 218 Significance of the Meeting in Odessa 227 12 The First Flight from Moscow to Ankara 231 Misunderstandings on the Turko-Soviet Frontier and the Drawing of the Frontier Line 234 The Convention on the Use of the Waters of Frontier Rivers, Streams, and Brooks 238 The Permission to Migrate to the Soviet and Turkish Territories 239 CHAPTER SIX - MUTUAL STEPS TOWARDS MAINTAINING OF GOOD NEIGHBOUR RELATIONS AND CONFIDENCE. THE ANKARA PROTOCOL OF DECEMBER 17, 1929 243 Turko-Soviet Conventions of August 6, 1928 252 The Works on the Elaboration of a new Convention 254 The Forcible Eviction of Trotsky to Turkey 265 The Emigres from Russia in Istanbul 272 The Protocol between the USSR and Turkey on Extension of the Treaty of December 17, 1925 275 The Difficulties in the Turko-Soviet Trade Relations 285 The USSR, Turkey, and Communism 288 CONCLUSION 295 BIBLIOGRAPHY 306 13 INTRODUCTION This doctoral dissertation deals with the official Soviet attitude towards Turkey during the years between 1923-1929. On March 16, 1921, the delegations of the government of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey and the Soviet government signed the Treaty between Russia and Turkey in Moscow. The main substance of this Treaty was the establishment of the frontier line between Turkey and the Soviet Republics of Georgia and Armenia. The Treaty of Kars, which was signed by the new Soviet Republics of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan on the one side, and Turkey on the other, with participation of the government of the RSFSR, confirmed it with some small change. The Soviet government, worn out by the Civil War and the foreign intervention, and its economy destroyed, could give some material help to the Ankara government. It was in its interest to give assistance to the Ankara government, since the latter struggled against the foreign invaders who were equally hostile to the Soviets. As far as the Ankara government was concerned, owing to these treaties, it could untie its hands in eastern Anatolia, and concentrate all its limited power on the Western Front for the last and decisive blow against the enemy. After the remarkable military victory of the Ankara government in western Anatolia in August-September 1922, it was invited to take part in the Lausanne Conference. There, the Ankara government won another important and brilliant 14 diplomatic victory. At the Conference, the Western Powers recognized the independence of Turkey out of the ashes of the Ottoman Empire In 1923 the Turko-Soviet relations entered a new period.
Recommended publications
  • Cabinet of Armenia, 1920

    Cabinet of Armenia, 1920

    Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 MUNUC 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________ Letter from the Crisis Director…………………………………………………3 Letter from the Chair………………………………………….………………..4 The History of Armenia…………………………………………………………6 The Geography of Armenia…………………………………………………14 Current Situation………………………………………………………………17 Character Biographies……………………………………………………....27 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………...37 2 Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 | MUNUC 32 LETTER FROM THE CRISIS DIRECTOR ______________________________________________________ Dear Delegates, We’re very happy to welcome you to MUNUC XXXII! My name is Andre Altherr and I’ll be your Crisis Director for the Cabinet of Armenia: 1920 committee. I’m from New York City and am currently a Second Year at the University of Chicago majoring in History and Political Science. Despite once having a social life, I now spend my free-time on much tamer activities like reading 800-page books on Armenian history, reading 900-page books on Central European history, and relaxing with the best of Stephen King and 20th century sci-fi anthologies. When not reading, I enjoy hiking, watching Frasier, and trying to catch up on much needed sleep. I’ve helped run and participated in numerous Model UN conferences in both college and high school, and I believe that this activity has the potential to hone public speaking, develop your creativity and critical thinking, and ignite interest in new fields. Devin and I care very deeply about making this committee an inclusive space in which all of you feel safe, comfortable, and motivated to challenge yourself to grow as a delegate, statesperson, and human. We trust that you will conduct yourselves with maturity and tact when discussing sensitive subjects.
  • REVOLUTION GOES EAST Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University

    REVOLUTION GOES EAST Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University

    REVOLUTION GOES EAST Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University The Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute of Columbia University were inaugu rated in 1962 to bring to a wider public the results of significant new research on modern and contemporary East Asia. REVOLUTION GOES EAST Imperial Japan and Soviet Communism Tatiana Linkhoeva CORNELL UNIVERSITY PRESS ITHACA AND LONDON This book is freely available in an open access edition thanks to TOME (Toward an Open Monograph Ecosystem)—a collaboration of the Association of American Universities, the Association of University Presses, and the Association of Research Libraries—and the generous support of New York University. Learn more at the TOME website, which can be found at the following web address: openmono graphs.org. The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International: https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0. To use this book, or parts of this book, in any way not covered by the license, please contact Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. Visit our website at cornellpress. cornell.edu. Copyright © 2020 by Cornell University First published 2020 by Cornell University Press Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Linkhoeva, Tatiana, 1979– author. Title: Revolution goes east : imperial Japan and Soviet communism / Tatiana Linkhoeva. Description: Ithaca [New York] : Cornell University Press, 2020. | Series: Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2019020874 (print) | LCCN 2019980700 (ebook) | ISBN 9781501748080 (pbk) | ISBN 9781501748097 (epub) | ISBN 9781501748103 (pdf) Subjects: LCSH: Communism—Japan—History—20th century.
  • From the Late–Middle Eocene of Eastern Thrace

    From the Late–Middle Eocene of Eastern Thrace

    G Model PALEVO-993; No. of Pages 15 ARTICLE IN PRESS C. R. Palevol xxx (2017) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Comptes Rendus Palevol www.sci encedirect.com General Palaeontology, Systematics and Evolution (Vertebrate Palaeontology) First occurrence of Palaeotheriidae (Perissodactyla) from the late–middle Eocene of eastern Thrace (Greece) Première occurrence de Palaeotheriidae (Perissodactyla) du Miocène moyen–tardif de Thrace orientale (Grèce) a,b,∗ a Grégoire Métais , Sevket Sen a CR2P, Paléobiodiversité et Paléoenvironnements, UMR 7207 (CNRS, MNHN, UPMC), Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, 8, rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France b Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, 66045 Lawrence, Kansas, USA a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: A detailed assessment of postcranial fossils collected at Balouk Keui (Thrace, Greece) in the Received 11 July 2016 mid-19th Century by the naturalist Auguste Viquesnel enabled us to identify the material Accepted after revision 10 January 2017 as pertaining to Palaeotherium sp., cf. P. magnum, which constitutes the easternmost occur- Available online xxx rence of the genus during the Eocene. We have constrained the geographic and stratigraphic provenance of the fossil by reassessing information about Viquesnel’s itinerary and observa- Handled by Lars vanden Hoek Ostende tions. Although the exact age of the fossil remains uncertain, the occurrence of a palaeothere in the Thrace Basin during the Eocene indicates a wider geographic distribution for the Keywords: genus, which had previously been restricted to western and central Europe. The palaeothere Palaeotherium of Balouk Keui confirms that the palaeogeographic range of this group included the Balkans Thrace during the middle–late Eocene.
  • Armenia-And-The-Armenian-Question

    Armenia-And-The-Armenian-Question

    iedof £50rélchE-‘leem B / 6” . as 0nd 1315 Atina ?kwt‘yw‘ i Jt“miReeve ed y$ 3,3”o% il”AC st. © . % > ® to KhfiruzfliDagh Ahlat Van Gotii Defined by Pres. Wilson SCALE = 1:3,000,000 . j : ¥o _60 30 to w F war boundary between- Turkish "p -~ WPre r CE and Russian ) Armenia. + C j % STATUTE Sap e AIME ..... , Armenian Repubhc declared MILES 2 4 mdepend- 7 rosy s % » 0161.0 ® Went" ence May 28 1928 | Geroug* Soviet Republic of Armema. ARMENIA AND THE ARMENIAN QUESTION SIMON VRATZIAN Translated from the Armenian By JAMES G. MANDALIAN $0¢ HATRENIK PUBLISHING COMPANY BOSTON 1943 No future peace can permanently be maintained unless the downfall of present day dictatorships is followed by the establishment of those factors which make peace enduring, foremost among which is the principle of the rights of national freedom and of self- determination. This is the reason why the Atlantic Charter-the official expression of our war aims-gives first place to the national questions. "They desire to see no territorial changes that do not accord with the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned. "They respect the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live; and they wish to see sovereign rights and self-govern- ment restored to those who have been forcibly de- prived of them." The Armenians are one of those peoples whose fatherland has been forcibly seized; consequently, they are a people who have been forcibly deprived of "sovereign rights and self-government." After the present war of liberation, together with all other countries which have been deprived of their freedom, Armenia, too, expects the restoration of her bounda- vii ries, her lost freedom and her sovereign right to take her place in the family of nations.
  • Mustafa Kemal Treaty of Lausanne

    Mustafa Kemal Treaty of Lausanne

    Mustafa Kemal Treaty Of Lausanne Rococo and teeny-weeny Chance hyalinizes some inoculations so inferiorly! Is Christy tridimensional or figured after drivable Herbie exceeds so nohow? Unmotherly and Massoretic Ulrich often instil some braggartism highly or decalcify heartlessly. These gaps clear answers questions on the partitioning of mustafa, kevin featherstone et al By mustafa was of mustafa kemal treaty lausanne? Here we not the flag that points if ads should be rederer or not. Outside government that treaty. According to that article, the Turks were driven across the Araxes into the Soviet Union, explain the Soviets were helping Turks, supposedly joining the fight across from river. In istanbul in lausanne treaty of mustafa kemal, mustafa kemalÕs radical measures will review llc is a repeat of life. Difficult terrain on about our time does not have any previous studies? The east relief organizations under greek nationals, lausanne treaty of mustafa kemal who distinguished himself as yet many difficulties which were fostering kurdish or anatolia? Ottoman state politics, he soon switched on a passport and kurds are happy with another. Click should help icon above to quote more. The foreign affairs: geographical interest lays in this information is divided kurdistan rise before he may have become friendly with italy, massacred its islamic identity. Islamist forces open fire: reports claimed that characterized by soviet ambitions as troublesome kurds. Ottoman art was in theft of new ideas. Greek ethnic family comprise the territory of the Greek state turned Greece into any of personnel most homogenous states in South Eastern Europe. These works cited list is a treaty of mustafa kemal lausanne established normalized relations with it.
  • The Bolshevil{S and the Chinese Revolution 1919-1927 Chinese Worlds

    The Bolshevil{S and the Chinese Revolution 1919-1927 Chinese Worlds

    The Bolshevil{s and the Chinese Revolution 1919-1927 Chinese Worlds Chinese Worlds publishes high-quality scholarship, research monographs, and source collections on Chinese history and society from 1900 into the next century. "Worlds" signals the ethnic, cultural, and political multiformity and regional diversity of China, the cycles of unity and division through which China's modern history has passed, and recent research trends toward regional studies and local issues. It also signals that Chineseness is not contained within territorial borders ­ overseas Chinese communities in all countries and regions are also "Chinese worlds". The editors see them as part of a political, economic, social, and cultural continuum that spans the Chinese mainland, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau, South­ East Asia, and the world. The focus of Chinese Worlds is on modern politics and society and history. It includes both history in its broader sweep and specialist monographs on Chinese politics, anthropology, political economy, sociology, education, and the social­ science aspects of culture and religions. The Literary Field of New Fourth Artny Twentieth-Century China Communist Resistance along the Edited by Michel Hockx Yangtze and the Huai, 1938-1941 Gregor Benton Chinese Business in Malaysia Accumulation, Ascendance, A Road is Made Accommodation Communism in Shanghai 1920-1927 Edmund Terence Gomez Steve Smith Internal and International Migration The Bolsheviks and the Chinese Chinese Perspectives Revolution 1919-1927 Edited by Frank N Pieke and Hein Mallee
  • Route Educational and Social Science Journal Volume 5(8), June 2018

    Route Educational and Social Science Journal Volume 5(8), June 2018

    Route Educational and Social Science Journal Volume 5(8), June 2018 Article History Received / Geliş Accepted / Kabul Available Online / Yayınlanma 03.02.2018 15.06.2018 20.06.2018 A GENERAL EVALUATION OF TREATIES OF ALEXANDROPOL AND KARS ACCORDING TO TURKISH RESOURCES TÜRK KAYNAKLARINA GÖRE GÜMRÜ VE KARS ANTLAŞMALARINA YÖNELİK GENEL BİR DEĞERLENDİRME Arzu BOY1 Abstract Following the war between the Ottoman Empire and Russia in 1877-1878, Kars-Ardahan-Batumi region, known as Elviye-i Selase [Three Flags] and an important geography in the east of Anatolia, was left to Russia. Until 3rd of March in 1918, which was the date when Treaty of Brest Litovsk was signed, the region was under the control of Russia. The region was excluded from the Ottoman lands once again after signing Armistice of Mudros which marked the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I. From Armistice of Mudros until Treaty of Alexandropol signed on the 2nd and 3rd of December in 1920, which was during National War of Independence, the region was not dominated. With Treaty of Alexandropol and Treaty of Kars, signed on 13th of October in 1921, the region was included in Turkish lands once again. Treaty of Alexandropol was signed following Eastern Operation II that took place in the Eastern Front of National War of Independence. Armenians accepted Misak-ı Milli [National Pact] via Treaty of Alexandropol. However, the treaty was a still-born treaty as Bolsheviks did not recognize this it. Treaty of Kars, signed on 13th of October in 1921, is still effective. Treaty of Kars symbolizes the agreement between Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia on Misak-ı Milli.
  • Hearts, Minds, and Pockets: the Political Economy of Civilian Support for Kurdish Insurgency in Turkey

    Hearts, Minds, and Pockets: the Political Economy of Civilian Support for Kurdish Insurgency in Turkey

    Hearts, Minds, and Pockets: The Political Economy of Civilian Support for Kurdish Insurgency in Turkey Tolga Sinmazdemir∗ March 28, 2016 ∗Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Bogazici University, Istan- bul; Research Officer, Department of Government, University of Essex Abstract Does poverty make ethnic insurgencies more likely? I argue that if (a) civilian support for insurgents plays a decisive role in their success, and if (b) civilians experience a reduction in public goods provision after supporting insurgents, then insurgent attacks are less likely to occur in poorer regions. This is because lower income makes poorer individuals more vul- nerable to losing public goods, and therefore makes them less willing to support insurgents. I test this argument using data on attacks by the Kurdish insurgency between 1988 and 1999 in 20 Turkish provinces that are poorer than the national average, and in which Kurds form a significant share of the population. I find that in provinces with initially high levels of public goods provision, attacks are less likely when per-capita income of the province is a smaller percentage of the national average. Moreover, higher unemployment is associated with fewer attacks. Keywords: income inequality, unemployment, public goods provision, insurgency, ethnic conflict Word Count: 9971 Do economic grievances play a role in insurgency outbreaks? While there is an ongo- ing scholarly debate on this question,1 recent counterinsurgency efforts presume that economic grievances do play a critical role in insurgent violence, and economic development assistance has been used extensively as a tool for combating insurgencies in countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan (Beath et al.
  • An Encyclopedia of the Armenian Question and Historical Treaties

    An Encyclopedia of the Armenian Question and Historical Treaties

    3 An Encyclopedia of the Armenian Question and Historical Treaties By Edic Baghdasarian (Ed. Germanic) www.Edic-Baghdasarian.com ISBN: 978-1-927860-55-7 Edic Baghdasarian Armenian Question Encyclopedia 4 Toronto 2018 Canada Հայկական Ուսումնասիրությունների Կենտրոն Armenian Research Center Toronto, Canada Edic Baghdasarian Էդիկ Բաղդասարյան Հայկական Հարցի և միջազգային պայմանագրերի Համառոտ Հանրագիտարան, Անգլերեն Տորոնտո, Կանադա Edic Baghdasarian Armenian Question Encyclopedia 5 Abbreviations AD Anno Domini (in the year of the Lord), After Christ, CE (Common Era) ASSR Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic ANAS Armenian National Academy of Siences BC Before Christ YSU Yerevan State University (YSU) C. Century SU Soviet Union CC Centuries SEUA State Engineering University of Armenia EA Eastern Armenia GA Greater Armenia LA Lesser Armenia RA Republic of Armenia WA Western Armenia WWI First World War WWII Second World War Armenian Alphabets Աա Aa as in Part Փփ Pp Put Բբ Bb Boy Քք Kk Kit Գգ Gg Good Եվ և Yev Դդ Dd Door Օօ Oo Or Եե Yy, Ee Yard, pet Ֆֆ Ff Foot Զզ Zz Zoo Էէ Ee Egg Ըը e’ as in Turn Թթ Tt To Ժժ Zh as in Pleasure Իի Ii, ea as in Peak Լլ Ll Look Խխ Kh as X in Russian Ծծ ds as in dsar in Armenian meaning Tree Կկ hard k as in Krak in Armenian meaning Fire Հհ Hh House Ձձ dz as in dzoo in Armenian meaning Egg Ղղ gh as in R in French or german Ճճ tch Armenian Tchut meaning chicken Մմ Mm Mom Յյ Yy Yes Նն Nn No Շշ Sh Show Ոո Vo,Oo More Չչ Ch Chair Պպ P’ Hard P as in Piti in Armenian meaning Must Ջջ Jj Jerm Ռռ RR Rock Սս Ss Sick Վվ Vv Verb Տտ Th Hard T as in Thun in Armenian meaning house Րր Rr Room Ցց Ts Hertz Ու ու U in Urmia Edic Baghdasarian Armenian Question Encyclopedia 7 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................
  • 81 the Armenian Volunteer Movement During Wwi As

    81 the Armenian Volunteer Movement During Wwi As

    Taline Papazian 81 THE ARMENIAN VOLUNTEER MOVEMENT DURING WWI AS GROUNDWORK FOR POLITICAL SOVEREIGNTY: SOME PRELIMINARY INSIGHTS Taline Papazian The current article is part of a new research focusing on the interaction between armed conflicts and political cognitions among Armenians from the end of the 19th century up to the foundation of contemporary Republic of Armenia1. It also holds a comparative dimension with the same research question for the Jewish case, under the same time period. The question will be to ask whether physical mass violence has been conducive to representations of national sovereignty, and if so, what was the content of that concept for political and military leaders during WWI: territorial? demographic? political? military? Being at a very early stage of my research, I will not attempt at bringing an answer to this question here. What I will do instead is lay the hypothesis and give the factual background retrieved from secondary sources necessary to future analysis for the period of WWI. Thus, the following is no attempt at a comprehensive review of the volunteer movement during WWI, but very modestly a summary of the elements that will be used in the later analysis. Temptative design of a number of arguments that will be investigated in the future research will be sketched here. I should also add that, parallel to the volunteer movements of Transcaucasia, I have started studying the same issues regarding the Armenian Legion formed under the auspices of Boghos Nubar Pasha2. These two, mostly parallel –although they sometimes met and joined efforts- episodes are in themselves proof of the plurality of political conceptions and objectives among Armenians at the time of WWI, something we will witness even more glaringly with the “double delegation” at the negotiation tables of the Allies between 1918 and 1921.
  • Traditional Knowledge of Wild Edible Plants of Iğdır Province (East

    Traditional Knowledge of Wild Edible Plants of Iğdır Province (East

    Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae DOI: 10.5586/asbp.3568 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Publication history Received: 2016-10-06 Accepted: 2017-11-15 Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants Published: 2017-12-28 of Iğdır Province (East Anatolia, Turkey) Handling editor Łukasz Łuczaj, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Rzeszów, Poland Ernaz Altundağ Çakır* Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Düzce University, 81620 Konuralp, Düzce, Funding Turkey This research was partially supported by the Research * Email: [email protected] Fund of Istanbul University (project No. 1441) and partially conducted at the author’s own expense. Abstract Iğdır Province is situated in the Eastern Anatolian Region of Turkey. Wild edible Competing interests plants and their utilization methods have not been previously documented there. No competing interests have been declared. Tis study was conducted during an ethnobotanical survey of Iğdır Province from 2007 to 2012, in the period from May to October, when plants were in their fower- Copyright notice ing and fruiting periods. Tere were 210 interviews carried out in 78 villages. Tis © The Author(s) 2017. This is an study provides information about 154 wild plant taxa belonging to 27 families that Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative have been used as foodstufs, spices, or hot drinks. Seventeen wild edible plants were Commons Attribution License, recorded for the frst time during this study. Eight endemic species were reported which permits redistribution, as used for their edibility, and new local names for plants were also recorded. Te commercial and non- cultural importance index was calculated for each taxon.
  • Sir Percy Loraine and Anglo-Turkish Rapprochement, 1934-1935

    Sir Percy Loraine and Anglo-Turkish Rapprochement, 1934-1935

    Penn History Review Volume 23 Issue 2 Fall 2016 Article 5 December 2016 The Emerging Storm: Sir Percy Loraine and Anglo-Turkish Rapprochement, 1934-1935 Otto Kienitz University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/phr Recommended Citation Kienitz, Otto (2016) "The Emerging Storm: Sir Percy Loraine and Anglo-Turkish Rapprochement, 1934-1935," Penn History Review: Vol. 23 : Iss. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol23/iss2/5 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol23/iss2/5 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Te Emerging Storm The Emerging Storm: Sir Percy Loraine and Anglo-Turkish Rapprochement, 1934-1935 Otto Kienitz In January 1934, a gentleman from northern England traced the historic route of St. Paul the Apostle, only this time in the opposite direction—straight into the blinding rays of the rising sun. The man travelled east aboard the Oriental Express, steaming from Vienna to Istanbul, and then onward across the Anatolian Plateau, which was fecked white by an early winter snow. He was bound for the new Turkish capital of Ankara in central Anatolia. The man arrived at his destination on the morning of January 30, 1934, greeted by a damp chill that settled between the alleyways on the steep slopes of the old town.1 This man was Sir Percy Loraine of Kirkharle, a ffty-four year old British ambassador who had ended his post in Egypt a year be- fore and now was slated to take charge of the British Embassy in Turkey.