Thesis Title

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thesis Title How does carbohydrate supply limit flower development in grape and kiwifruit vines? Annette Claire Richardson July 2014 Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Agricultural and Wine Sciences Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga Australia i Table of Contents Table of Contents ii List of Figures vii List of Tables xix Certificate of Authorship xxvi Acknowledgements xxviii Abstract xxx Abbreviations xxxii 1 Literature review 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 The flowering process 3 1.2.1 Floral Initiation 3 1.2.2 Floral organ morphogenesis 7 1.3 How does flowering behaviour of perennials affect crop yield? 11 1.3.1 Are yields of perennial fruiting crops similar? 11 1.4 Is low flower production typical of fruiting vines? 16 1.4.1 Are the flowering behaviours of grape and kiwifruit vines similar? 16 1.4.2 When do carbohydrates limit flower development of grape and kiwifruit? 24 1.5 Thesis aims and hypotheses 28 2 General materials and methods 31 2.1 Plant material 31 2.1.1 Commercial vines 31 2.1.2 Potted vines 35 2.2 Meteorological data 38 2.3 Vine phenology 38 2.3.1 Budbreak and flowering 38 2.3.2 Phenological stages of development 39 2.4 Leaf area estimation 42 2.5 Gas exchange 42 ii 2.6 Carbohydrate analysis 43 2.6.1 Tissue extraction 43 2.6.2 Starch determination 43 2.6.3 Soluble carbohydrate determination 44 2.7 Data handling and statistical analysis 44 2.7.1 Data handling 44 2.7.2 Data analysis 45 2.7.3 Data plots and curve fitting 45 3 Seasonal patterns of kiwifruit and grapevine development 47 3.1 Introduction 47 3.2 Materials and Methods 50 3.2.1 Plant Material 50 3.2.2 Vine phenology 50 3.2.3 Gas exchange measurements 52 3.2.4 Net carbon balance 53 3.2.5 Sampling and carbohydrate analysis 53 3.2.6 Statistical analysis 55 3.3 Results 56 3.3.1 Vine phenology 56 3.3.2 Gas exchange 67 3.3.3 Total carbohydrate concentrations 77 3.4 Discussion 91 3.4.1 Seasonal patterns of vine growth 91 3.4.2 Carbohydrate composition 95 3.4.3 Gas exchange 98 3.4.4 Carbon acquisition and balance 100 3.4.5 Whole vine carbon budgets 102 3.4.6 Summary 103 4 Carbohydrate supply during inflorescence initiation and bud development 105 4.1 Introduction 105 iii 4.2 Materials and Methods 107 4.2.1 Plant Material 107 4.2.2 Experimental design 107 4.4 Results 114 4.4.1 Shoot growth 114 4.4.2 Axillary bud and internode dry weight in winter 120 4.4.3 Winter bud and internode carbohydrate content 124 4.4.4 Effects on spring development 127 4.4.5 Relationship between carbohydrate content, dry weight and bud performance 136 4.5 Discussion 138 4.5.1 Effects of shoot treatments on inflorescence initiation 139 4.5.2 Seasonal effects on shoot growth and floral development 141 4.5.3 Effects of treatments on shoot development and inflorescence production 143 4.5.4 Summary 144 5 Modifying carbohydrate supply during autumn: effect on the early stages of floral morphogenesis in grape and kiwifruit vines 147 5.1 Introduction 147 5.2 Materials and Methods 150 5.2.1 Plant material 150 5.2.2 Experimental design 150 5.2.3 Measurements 152 5.3 Results 155 5.3.1 Total carbohydrate concentrations and content 155 5.3.2 Amount of budbreak and flowering 163 5.3.3 Time of budbreak and flowering 171 5.3.4 Shoot growth 180 5.4 Discussion 182 5.4.1 Effect of treatments on total carbohydrate accumulation 182 5.4.2 Effects of autumn shade and girdling on subsequent flower production 185 iv 5.4.3 Effect of girdling on other metabolites 187 5.4.4 Summary 188 6 Carbohydrate supply during floral sex organ development 190 6.1 Introduction 190 6.2 Materials and Methods 192 6.2.1 Plant material 192 6.2.2 Experimental design and treatments 192 6.2.3 Measurements 195 6.2.4 Statistical analysis 197 6.3 Results 198 6.3.1 Shoot measurements 198 6.3.2 Inflorescence and flower measurements 203 6.3.3 Fruit set, seed number and seed weight 206 6.3.4 Yield 211 6.3.5 Shoot dry weight and leaf area 218 6.3.6 Shoot total carbohydrate concentrations and content 228 6.3.7 Gas exchange 233 6.3.8 Net carbon balance 241 6.4 Discussion 246 6.4.1 Floral morphogenesis 247 6.4.2 Shoot development prior to anthesis 248 6.4.3 Shoot development after anthesis 252 6.4.4 Pollination and fruit set 254 6.4.5 Changes in carbon supply before anthesis influences final yield 255 6.4.6 Summary 256 7 Conclusions and Integration 259 7.1 Hypothesis 1: 259 7.2 Hypothesis 2: 263 7.3 Hypothesis 3: 264 7.4 Hypothesis 4: 266 7.5 Future studies 269 v 7.6 Overall Summary 270 References 273 Appendix 1 Kiwifruit and grape pest and disease programme 293 Appendix 2 Meteorological Data 295 Appendix 3 Leaf area determination 300 Appendix 4 Measurements of SolarshadeTM characteristics 302 vi List of Figures Figure 1.1: Key stages of floral development in grape buds. Reproduced from Dunn and Martin (2007). ....................................................................... 19 Figure 1.2. Key stages in the floral development of kiwifruit buds as described by Brundell (1975c) and Walton et al. (1997). .............................. 21 Figure 2.1: ‘Hayward’ vines on ‘Bruno’ rootstocks were 24-years-old, cane- pruned and grown on a pergola at the Kerikeri Research Centre. ................ 34 Figure 2.2: ‘Shiraz’ vines on ‘101-14-m470’ rootstocks were five-years-old, cane-pruned and grown on a Smart-Dyson split canopy trellis at Marsden Estate. .......................................................................................................... 34 Figure 2.3: ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ vines on ‘SO4’ rootstocks were 20-years- old, cane pruned and trained on a VSP system at Ivana Wines Vineyard. ... 35 Figure 2.4: ‘Hayward’ and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ vines were grown in pots at the Kerikeri Research Centre for use in multi-season studies. ..................... 36 Figure 3.1: Timing of key growth stages for ‘Hayward’ (A, B and C), ‘Shiraz’ (D, E and F) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (G) vines. Data are for the 2008/2009 season (A and D), 2009/2010 season (B and E) and the 2010/2011 season (C, F and G). .................................................................. 59 Figure 3.2: Dynamics of budbreak in A, 2009/2010 and B, 2010/2011 for ‘Hayward’ (), ‘Shiraz’ () and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (; 2010/2011 only) vines. Data are the means ± SEM, n = 16. The lines are the fit of data to the Boltzmann sigmoid function. ......................................................................... 61 Figure 3.3: Dynamics of flowering in A, 2009/2010 and B, 2010/2011 seasons for ‘Hayward’ (), ‘Shiraz’ () and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ ( 2010/2011 only) vines. Data points are the means ± SEM, n = 16. The lines are the fit of data to the Boltzmann sigmoid function. ................................... 61 Figure 3.4: Periods of root loss (die back of root tips observed at sampling) and root growth (white root tips present at sampling). Data are for ‘Hayward’ vines (A, 2008/2009, B, 2009/2010 and C, 2010/2011) ‘Shiraz’ (D, 2008/2009, E, 2009/2010 and F, 2010/2011) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (G, 2010/2011). .................................................................................................. 63 Figure 3.5: The development of ‘Hayward’ (), ‘Shiraz’ () and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ () shoots across the 2010/2011 season. A, total leaf area per vii shoot, B, shoot length and C, shoot basal diameter. Data are means ± SEM, n = 16. ...........................................................................................................66 Figure 3.6: Changes in the total dry weight per shoot during the 2010/2011 season. Data for A, ‘Hayward’ (), leaves (), stems (), and fruit (), B, ‘Shiraz’ (), leaves (), stems (), and fruit () and C, ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (), leaves (), stems (), and fruit () shoots. Note the different scales for each vine cultivar. Data are means ± SEM, n = 6. .........67 Figure 3.7: Photosynthetic light responses of youngest mature leaves from A, ‘Hayward’ (), B, ‘Shiraz’ () and C, ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ () shoots at anthesis (December 2010). Data are mean values ± SEM, n = 4. ...............68 Figure 3.8: Rates of A, photosynthesis, B, stomatal conductance, and C, transpiration measured concurrently under ambient conditions (temperature o -2 -1 21 - 33 C, PFD 329 - 1665 µmol (photons) m s , CO2 399.3 - 400.4 µmol -1 CO2 mol , VPD 1.02 - 2.64 kPa) over the growing season. Data for ‘Hayward’ (), ‘Shiraz’ () and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ () shoots are mean values for every second leaf on a shoot ± SEM, n = 8. .................................71 Figure 3.9: Changes in gas exchange with leaf position along a shoot from the base to the tip at around 80 DAB. Rates of A, photosynthesis, B, stomatal conductance and C, transpiration. Measurements were made concurrently under ambient conditions (temperature 28.2 - 33.1oC, PFD 677 - -2 -1 -1 1091 µmol (photons) m s , CO2 399 - 400 µmol CO2 mol , VPD 201 - 264 kPa) at approximately 80 DAB, during the very early stages of fruit development. Data are for ‘Hayward’ (), ‘Shiraz’ () and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ () shoots. Data are means ± SEM, n = 8. ...............................72 Figure 3.10: Changes in rates of carbon acquisition (A - C), carbon accumulated as biomass (D - F) and the net carbon balance of shoots (G - I) of ‘Hayward’ ( A, D, G), ‘Shiraz’ ( B, E, H) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ ( C, F, I) shoots. Note the different scales between ‘Hayward’ and other vines for each parameter. Data are means ± SEM, n = 6. ....................................76 Figure 3.11: Changes in TNC in the leaves (A - C), developing axillary buds (D - F) and internodes G - I) of shoots during the 2008/09 (A, D, G), 2009/10 (B, E, H) and 2010/11 (C, F, I) growing seasons.
Recommended publications
  • Current Breeding Efforts in Salt‐And Drought-Tolerant Rootstocks –
    12/12/2017 Current Breeding Efforts in Salt‐and Drought-Tolerant Rootstocks – Andy Walker ([email protected]) California Grape Rootstock Improvement Commission / California Grape Rootstock Research Foundation CDFA NT, FT, GV Improvement Advisory Board California Table Grape Commission American Vineyard Foundation E&J Gallo Winery Louise Rossi Endowed Chair in Viticulture Rootstock Breeding Objectives • Develop better forms of drought and salinity tolerance • Combine these tolerances with broad nematode resistance and high levels of phylloxera resistance • Develop better fanleaf degeneration tolerant rootstocks • Develop rootstocks with “Red Leaf” virus tolerance 1 12/12/2017 V. riparia Missouri River V. rupestris Jack Fork River, MO 2 12/12/2017 V. berlandieri Fredericksburg, TX Which rootstock to choose? • riparia based – shallow roots, water sensitive, low vigor, early maturity: – 5C, 101-14, 16161C (3309C) • rupestris based – broadly distributed roots, relatively drought tolerant, moderate to high vigor, midseason maturity: – St. George, 1103P, AXR#1 (3309C) 3 12/12/2017 Which rootstock to choose? • berlandieri based – deeper roots, drought tolerant, higher vigor, delayed maturity: – 110R, 140Ru (420A, 5BB) • champinii based – deeper roots, drought tolerant, salt tolerance, but variable in hybrids – Dog Ridge, Ramsey (Salt Creek) – Freedom, Harmony, GRNs • Site trumps all… soil depth, rainfall, soil texture, water table V. monticola V. candicans 4 12/12/2017 CP‐SSR LN33 1613-59 V. riparia x V. rupestris Couderc 1613 14 markers 22 haplotypes Harmony Freedom V. berlandieri x V. riparia Couderc 1616 Ramsey Vitis rupestris cv Witchita refuge V. berlandieri x V. rupestris 157-11 (Couderc) 3306 (Couderc) V. berlandieri x V. vinifera 3309 (Couderc) Vitis riparia cv.
    [Show full text]
  • Passiflora Tarminiana, a New Cultivated Species of Passiflora Subgenus
    Novon 11(1): 8–15. 2001 Passiflora tarminiana, a new cultivated species of Passiflora subgenus Tacsonia. Geo Coppens d'Eeckenbrugge1, Victoria E. Barney1, Peter Møller Jørgensen2, John M. MacDougal2 1CIRAD-FLHOR/IPGRI Project for Neotropical Fruits, c/o CIAT, A.A. 6713, Cali Colombia 2Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, U.S.A. Abstract The new species Passiflora tarminiana differs from its closes relative by the character combination of very small acicular stipules and large almost reflexed petals and sepals. This species has escaped detection despite being widely cultivated. Naturalized populations, particularly on Hawa'ii, have created problems for conservation of the native flora. In Colombia it is more frequently adopted in industrial cultivation because of its rusticity and resistance to fungal diseases. Introduction Passifloras of the subgenus Tacsonia are cultivated by many small farmers, from Venezuela to Bolivia. Some species are cultivated in New Zealand. The main cultivated species is Passiflora mollissima (Kunth) Bailey (Escobar, 1980 & 1988), also called P. Coppens et al. 2000 Passiflora tarminiana 2 tripartita var. mollissima (Kunth) Holm-Nielsen & P. Jørgensen (Holm-Nielsen et al., 1988). It is called "curuba de Castilla" in Colombia, "tacso de Castilla" in Ecuador, and “banana passionfruit” in English-speaking countries.. The second species of importance in the Andes is "curuba india," "curuba ecuatoriana," or "curuba quiteña" in Colombia, called "tacso amarillo" in Ecuador (Pérez Arbeláez, 1978; A.A.A., 1992; Campos, 1992). It is most frequently found in private gardens, but some commercial growers have, because of its rusticity, started to grow it instead of the "curuba de Castilla." We describe this overlooked cultigen as a new species under the name Passiflora tarminiana, in recognition of Tarmín Campos, a Colombian agronomist who contributed with enthusiasm to the development of banana passion fruit cultivation and introduced the first author to the cultivated passifloras of the central Colombian highlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Resistance to Grape Phylloxera in Vitis Species with an in Vitro Dual Culture Assay WLADYSLAWA GRZEGORCZYK ~ and M
    Evaluating Resistance to Grape Phylloxera in Vitis Species with an in vitro Dual Culture Assay WLADYSLAWA GRZEGORCZYK ~ and M. ANDREW WALKER 2. Forty-one accessions of 12 Vitis L. and Muscadinia Small species were evaluated for resistance to grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) using an in vitro dual culture system. The performance of the species tested in this study was consistent with previously published studies with whole plants and helps confirm the utility of in vitro dual culture for the study of grape/phylloxera interactions. This in vitro system provides rapid results (8 wk) and the ability to observe the phylloxera/grape interaction without interference from other factors. This system also provides an evaluation that overemphasizes susceptibility, thus providing more confidence in the resistance responses of a given species or accession. Among the unusual responses were the susceptibility of V. riparia Michx. DVIT 1411; susceptibility within V. berlandieri Planch.; relatively wide ranging responses in V. rupestris Scheele; and the lack of feeding on the roots of V. califomica Benth., in contrast to the severe foliar feeding damage that occurred on this species. Vitis califomica #11 and V. girdiana Munson DVIT 1379 were unusual because phylloxera on them had the shortest generation times. Such accessions might be used to examine how grape hosts influence phylloxera behavior. Very strong resistance was found within V. aestivalisMichx. DVIT 7109 and 7110; I/. berlandieric9031; V. cinereaEngelm; I/. riparia (excluding DVIT 1411 ); V. rupestris DVIT 1418 and 1419; and M. rotundifolia Small. These species and accessions seem to possess enough resistance to enable their use in breeding with minimal concern about phylloxera susceptibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Vitaceae Based on Plastid Sequence Data
    PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF VITACEAE BASED ON PLASTID SEQUENCE DATA by PAUL NAUDE Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTAE in BOTANY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR: DR. M. VAN DER BANK December 2005 I declare that this dissertation has been composed by myself and the work contained within, unless otherwise stated, is my own Paul Naude (December 2005) TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Abstract iii Index of Figures iv Index of Tables vii Author Abbreviations viii Acknowledgements ix CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Vitaceae 1 1.2 Genera of Vitaceae 6 1.2.1 Vitis 6 1.2.2 Cayratia 7 1.2.3 Cissus 8 1.2.4 Cyphostemma 9 1.2.5 Clematocissus 9 1.2.6 Ampelopsis 10 1.2.7 Ampelocissus 11 1.2.8 Parthenocissus 11 1.2.9 Rhoicissus 12 1.2.10 Tetrastigma 13 1.3 The genus Leea 13 1.4 Previous taxonomic studies on Vitaceae 14 1.5 Main objectives 18 CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 21 2.1 DNA extraction and purification 21 2.2 Primer trail 21 2.3 PCR amplification 21 2.4 Cycle sequencing 22 2.5 Sequence alignment 22 2.6 Sequencing analysis 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 32 3.1 Results from primer trail 32 3.2 Statistical results 32 3.3 Plastid region results 34 3.3.1 rpL 16 34 3.3.2 accD-psa1 34 3.3.3 rbcL 34 3.3.4 trnL-F 34 3.3.5 Combined data 34 CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 42 4.1 Molecular evolution 42 4.2 Morphological characters 42 4.3 Previous taxonomic studies 45 4.4 Conclusions 46 CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES 48 APPENDIX STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DATA 59 ii ABSTRACT Five plastid regions as source for phylogenetic information were used to investigate the relationships among ten genera of Vitaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Differences in Grape Phylloxera-Related Grapevine Root
    PLANT PATHOLOGY HORTSCIENCE 34(6):1108–1111. 1999. ing vineyards may result in reduced phyllox- era numbers and phylloxera-related damage. The purpose of this work was to determine Differences in Grape Phylloxera- whether differences in phylloxera populations or phylloxera-related damage could be attrib- related Grapevine Root Damage in uted to organic or conventional management Organically and Conventionally regimes. Materials and Methods Managed Vineyards in California Two types of long-term vineyard manage- ment regimes were compared, organic and D.W. Lotter, J. Granett, and A.D. Omer conventional. Organically managed vineyards Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, (OMV) chosen for study were certified by the Davis, CA 95616-8584 California Certified Organic Farmers program (Santa Cruz) and were characterized by the Additional index words. Vitis vinifera, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae, organic farming, sustain- use of cover crops and composts and no syn- able agriculture, soil suppressiveness, Trichoderma thetic fertilizers or pesticides. Vineyards that had been organically certified for at least 5 Abstract. Secondary infection of roots by fungal pathogens is a primary cause of vine years and were infested with phylloxera were damage in phylloxera-infested grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.). In summer and fall surveys selected for this study. The time threshold of 5 in 1997 and 1998, grapevine root samples were taken from organically (OMVs) and years of organic management was chosen based conventionally managed vineyards (CMVs), all of which were phylloxera-infested. In both on experiences of organic farmers, consult- years, root samples from OMVs showed significantly less root necrosis caused by fungal ants, and researchers indicating that the full pathogens than did samples from CMVs, averaging 9% in OMVs vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Rootstocks As a Management Strategy for Adverse Vineyard Conditions
    FACT SHEET 14 MODULE 14 Rootstocks as a management strategy for adverse vineyard conditions AUTHOR: Catherine Cox - Phylloxera and Grape Industry Board of South Australia These updates are supported by the Australian Government through the Irrigation Industries Workshop Programme - Wine Industry Project in partnership with the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and the Grape and Wine Research and Development Corporation. waterandvine.gwrdc.com.au Rootstocks as a management strategy for adverse vineyard conditions Introduction 2 Understanding different rootstock This Fact Sheet consolidates current knowledge around the key characteristics rootstocks used in Australian Viticulture in terms of tolerance to V. riparia x V. rupestris drought, salinity and lime. These rootstocks offer low-moderate vigour to the scion, and in The aim of this module is to briefly summarise the pros and cons certain situations hasten ripening. They do not tolerate drought of each rootstock and showcase the existing industry resources conditions. These characteristics make them particularly suited that can be used to aid in the selection of rootstocks in the key to cool climate viticulture. These rootstocks perform best on growing regions within the Murray Darling Basin. soils that dry out slowly and have moderate-high water holding For more information and training contact your local Innovator’s capacities. They impart low vigour to the scion and hence are Network member or go to http://waterandvine.gwrdc.com.au. suitable to high fertility sites and growing conditions. V. berlandieri x V. riparia 1 Introduction to rootstocks These rootstocks offer moderate-high vigour to the scion Grapevine rootstocks are derived from American Vitis species that depending on the soil type.
    [Show full text]
  • Vitis Riparia
    OPTIMISATION OF SUSTAINABILITY OF GRAPEVINE VARIETIES BY SELECTING ROOTSTOCK VARIETIES UNDER DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND CREATING NEW ROOTSTOCK VARIETIES Joachim Schmid, Frank Manty, Ernst Rühl Geisenheim University Institut for Grapevine Breeding Joachim Schmid Entrance to UNESCO world heritage site Rüdesheim Joachim Schmid 16.01.2015Titel der 2 Präsentation Joachim Schmid • Rootstock breeding and the use of rootstocks is the result and the answer to the introduction of phylloxera • All present rootstocks are hybrids of wild Vitis species with specific characteristics Titel der Präsentation Joachim Schmid 16.01.2015 4 VITIS RIPARIA Advantages Phylloxera tolerant very high frost resistance (<‐40°C) early bud break, early ripening good rooting ability Disadvantages susceptible to drought Low lime tolerance Joachim Schmid 5 VITIS BERLANDIERI Advantages Phylloxera tolerant high lime tolerance salt tolerant medium to good drought tolerance Disadvantages poor rooting ability late ripening Joachim Schmid 6 VITIS RUPESTRIS Advantages Phylloxera tolerant good rooting ability average lime tolerance good drought tolerance – but susceptible on shallow soils Disadvantages low vigour (in the motherblock) early bud break Joachim Schmid 7 VITIS CINEREA Advantages Phylloxera resistant good drought tolerance Disadvantages poor rooting ability low lime tolerance late bud break Joachim Schmid 8 ROOTSTOCK BREEDERS IN HUNGARY, AUSRTRIA AND GERMANY Sigmund TELEKI (1854‐1910) & Franz KOBER (1864‐1943) Vitis berlandieri x Vitis riparia • Teleki 8
    [Show full text]
  • Rôles Du Porte-Greffe Et Du Greffon Dans La Réponse À La Disponibilité En Phosphore Chez La Vigne
    Rôles du porte-greffe et du greffon dans la réponse àla disponibilité en phosphore chez la Vigne Antoine Gautier To cite this version: Antoine Gautier. Rôles du porte-greffe et du greffon dans la réponse à la disponibilité en phosphore chez la Vigne. Biologie végétale. Université de Bordeaux, 2018. Français. NNT : 2018BORD0257. tel-02388497 HAL Id: tel-02388497 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02388497 Submitted on 2 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE PRÉSENTÉE POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX École doctorale des Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé Spécialité : Biologie Végétale Par Antoine GAUTIER Rôles du porte-greffe et du greffon dans la réponse à la disponibilité en phosphore chez la Vigne Sous la direction de : Sarah Jane COOKSON Soutenue le 30 novembre 2018 Membres du jury : Mme GENY, Laurence Professeur, Université de Bordeaux Présidente M. DOERNER, Peter Directeur de Recherche, University of Edinburgh Rapporteur M. PERET, Benjamin Chargé de Recherche, CNRS Montpellier Rapporteur M. HINSINGER, Philippe Directeur de Recherche, INRA Montpellier Examinateur Mme OLLAT, Nathalie Ingénieure de Recherche, INRA Bordeaux Invitée Mme COOKSON, Sarah J.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature Is an Important Environmental Factor Affecting Growth and Mycotoxin Production by Molds
    Grapes, wine and other derivatives. OTA content. CHAPTER 6 GRAPES, WINE AND OTHER DERIVATIVES. OTA CONTENT 6.1. WORLD-WIDE PRODUCTION OF GRAPES, WINE AND OTHER GRAPE- DERIVATIVES Grape is the fruit of a vine in the family Vitaceae (Table 7). It is commonly used for making grape juice, wine, jelly, wine, grape seed oil and raisins (dried grapes), or can be eaten raw (table grapes). Table 7. Scientific classification of grapes. Kingdom: Plantae Division: Magnoliophyta Class: Magnoliopsida Order: Vitales Family: Vitaceae Genus: Vitis Many species of grape exist including: • Vitis vinifera, the European winemaking grapes. • Vitis labrusca, the North American table and grape juice grapes, sometimes used for wine. • Vitis riparia, a wild grape of North America, sometimes used for winemaking. • Vitis rotundifolia, the muscadines, used for jelly and sometimes wine. • Vitis aestivalis, the variety Norton is used for winemaking. • Vitis lincecumii (also called Vitis aestivalis or Vitis lincecumii), Vitis berlandieri (also called Vitis cinerea var. helleri), Vitis cinerea, Vitis rupestris are used for making hybrid wine grapes and for pest-resistant rootstocks. 73 CHAPTER 6 . The main reason for the use of most V. vinifera varieties in wine production is their high sugar content, which after fermentation, produce a wine with an alcohol content of 10 % or slightly higher. Grape varieties of V. vinifera have a great variation of composition. Skin pigment colours vary from greenish yellow to russet, pink, red, reddish violet or blue-black. The colour of red wines comes from the skin, not the juice. The juice is normally colourless, though some varieties have a pink to red colour.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Hymenopterous Parasitoids of Dasiops (Diptera: Lonchaeidae
    Agronomía Colombiana ISSN: 0120-9965 [email protected] Universidad Nacional de Colombia Colombia Santamaría, Maikol; Ebratt, Everth; Castro, Angela; Brochero, Helena Luisa Hymenopterous parasitoids of Dasiops (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) infesting cultivated Passiflora spp. (Passifloraceae) in Cundinamarca and Boyaca, Colombia Agronomía Colombiana, vol. 34, núm. 2, 2016, pp. 200-208 Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=180348900009 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Hymenopterous parasitoids of Dasiops (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) infesting cultivated Passiflora spp. (Passifloraceae) in Cundinamarca and Boyaca, Colombia Parasitoides himenópteros de Dasiops (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) que infestan Passiflora spp. (Passifloraceae) cultivadas en Cundinamarca y Boyacá, Colombia Maikol Santamaría1, 2, Everth Ebratt3, Angela Castro3, and Helena Luisa Brochero1 ABSTRACT RESUMEN Dasiops spp. are the most important pest in cultivated Passiflora Dasiops spp. son la plaga más importante de plantas cultivadas plants. Larvae of these fruit flies are herbivores, feeding on de Passiflora. Las larvas de estas moscas de la fruta consumen flower buds and fruit of yellow passionfruit, sweet granadilla, botón floral y fruto de cultivos de maracuyá, granadilla, curuba banana passionfruit and purple passionfruit crops located in y gulupa localizados en los departamentos de Cundinamarca Cundinamarca and Boyaca, Colombia. Geographic distribu- y Boyacá en Colombia. Se determinó la distribución geográ- tion, natural abundance and percentage of parasitoidism for fica, abundancia natural y porcentaje de parasitoidismo para every Dasiops species by each plant species were determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Modifications Induced by Rootstocks on Yield, Vigor and Nutritional
    agronomy Article Modifications Induced by Rootstocks on Yield, Vigor and Nutritional Status on Vitis vinifera Cv Syrah under Hyper-Arid Conditions in Northern Chile Nicolás Verdugo-Vásquez 1 , Gastón Gutiérrez-Gamboa 2,* , Irina Díaz-Gálvez 3, Antonio Ibacache 4 and Andrés Zurita-Silva 1,* 1 Centro de Investigación Intihuasi, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Colina San Joaquín s/n, La Serena 1700000, Chile; [email protected] 2 Escuela de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Mayor, Camino La Pirámide 5750, Huechuraba 8580000, Chile 3 Centro de Investigación Raihuén, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Casilla 34, San Javier 3660000, Chile; [email protected] 4 Private Consultant, La Serena 1700000, Chile; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (G.G.-G.); [email protected] (A.Z.-S.) Abstract: Hyper-arid regions are characterized by extreme conditions for growing and lack of water (<100 mm annual rainfall average), where desertification renders human activities almost impossible. In addition to the use of irrigation, different viticultural strategies should be taken into account to face the adverse effects of these conditions in which rootstocks may play a crucial role. The research Citation: Verdugo-Vásquez, N.; aim was to evaluate the effects of the rootstock on yield, vigor, and petiole nutrient content in Syrah Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Díaz-Gálvez, grapevines growing under hyper-arid conditions during five seasons and compare them to ungrafted I.; Ibacache, A.; Zurita-Silva, A. ones. St. George induced lower yield than 1103 Paulsen. Salt Creek induced higher plant growth Modifications Induced by Rootstocks on Yield, Vigor and Nutritional Status vigor and Cu petiole content than ungrafted vines in Syrah, which was correlated to P petiole content.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Rootstock on Vegetative Growth, Yield, and Fruit Composition of Norton Grapevines
    Effect of Rootstock on Vegetative Growth, Yield, and Fruit Composition of Norton Grapevines A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By JACKIE LEIGH HARRIS Dr. Michele Warmund, Thesis Supervisor December 2013 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the Thesis entitled EFFECT OF ROOTSTOCK ON VEGETATIVE GROWTH, YIELD, AND FRUIT COMPOSITION OF NORTON GRAPEVINES Presented by Jackie Leigh Harris A candidate for the degree of Master of Science And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Michele Warmund David Trinklein Stephen Pallardy ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Michele Warmund, for her willingness to take me on as a graduate student and guide me through the writing process. Her insight and knowledge was extremely helpful these past couple of years. I would also like to that my other committee members, Dr. David Trinklein and Dr. Steven Pallardy for their valuable insight. Additionally, I would like to thank all the past and present faculty, staff, and students of the Grape and Wine Institute at the University of Missouri. In particular, Dr. Keith Striegler, Elijah Bergmeier, Dr. Anthony Peccoux, Dr. Misha Kwasniewski, and Dr. Ingolf Gruen for their guidance and encouragement. Also, I would like to thank my family for all their support throughout my studies. The assistance of all these individuals made the completion of my master’s a reality. Last but not least, I would like to thank the funding sources that contributed to my research.
    [Show full text]