Run Date:11/20/12 General Election Official Final Results Run Time:11:55 Am St

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Run Date:11/20/12 General Election Official Final Results Run Time:11:55 Am St RUN DATE:11/20/12 GENERAL ELECTION OFFICIAL FINAL RESULTS RUN TIME:11:55 AM ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2012 VOTES PERCENT PRECINCTS COUNTED (OF 658). 658 100.00 REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . 697,903 BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. 531,939 VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . 76.22 U.S. PRESIDENT & VICE-PRESIDENT (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 658 OF 658 COUNTED) BARACK OBAMA & JOE BIDEN (DEM) . 297,097 56.04 MITT ROMNEY & PAUL RYAN (REP). 224,742 42.39 GARY JOHNSON & JAMES P. GRAY (LIB) . 5,748 1.08 VIRGIL GOODE & JIM CLYMER (CON) . 1,089 .21 INVALID WRITE-IN . 1,440 .27 U.S. SENATOR (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 657 OF 657 COUNTED) CLAIRE McCASKILL (DEM). 335,573 64.23 TODD AKIN (REP) . 164,267 31.44 JONATHAN DINE (LIB). 21,499 4.11 SEE OFFICIAL WRITE-IN RESULTS. 1,145 .22 U.S. REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 1 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 275 OF 275 COUNTED) LACY CLAY (DEM) . 155,804 76.93 ROBYN HAMLIN (REP) . 39,745 19.63 ROBB E. CUNNINGHAM (LIB) . 6,752 3.33 INVALID WRITE-IN . 218 .11 U.S. REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 2 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 382 OF 382 COUNTED) GLENN KOENEN (DEM) . 116,258 37.61 ANN WAGNER (REP). 184,414 59.65 BILL SLANTZ (LIB) . 6,785 2.19 ANATOL ZORIKOVA (CON) . 1,508 .49 INVALID WRITE-IN . 177 .06 GOVERNOR (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 655 OF 655 COUNTED) JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON (DEM). 324,748 62.30 DAVID (DAVE) SPENCE (REP). 185,704 35.62 JIM HIGGINS (LIB) . 10,537 2.02 SEE OFFICIAL WRITE-IN RESULTS. 291 .06 LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 655 OF 655 COUNTED) SUSAN MONTEE (DEM) . 284,267 55.61 PETER KINDER (REP) . 206,918 40.48 MATTHEW COPPLE (LIB) . 10,871 2.13 CYNTHIA L. DAVIS (CON) . 8,781 1.72 SEE OFFICIAL WRITE-IN RESULTS. 318 .06 SECRETARY OF STATE (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 655 OF 655 COUNTED) JASON KANDER (DEM) . 300,324 59.09 SHANE SCHOELLER (REP) . 193,419 38.06 CISSE W. SPRAGINS (LIB). 10,262 2.02 JUSTIN HARTER (CON). 3,961 .78 INVALID WRITE-IN . 255 .05 STATE TREASURER (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 655 OF 655 COUNTED) CLINT ZWEIFEL (DEM). 308,331 60.76 COLE McNARY (REP) . 183,249 36.11 SEAN O'TOOLE (LIB) . 15,585 3.07 INVALID WRITE-IN . 278 .05 ATTORNEY GENERAL (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 655 OF 655 COUNTED) CHRIS KOSTER (DEM) . 325,170 63.54 ED MARTIN (REP) . 174,343 34.07 DAVE BROWNING (LIB). 12,028 2.35 INVALID WRITE-IN . 230 .04 STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 1 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 106 OF 106 COUNTED) SCOTT SIFTON (DEM) . 45,689 50.85 JIM LEMBKE (REP). 44,055 49.03 12el1106.html[12/17/2020 10:28:46 AM] INVALID WRITE-IN . 101 .11 STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 13 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 100 OF 100 COUNTED) GINA WALSH (DEM). 67,715 81.57 JACQUELYN THOMAS (REP). 15,243 18.36 INVALID WRITE-IN . 61 .07 STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 15 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 122 OF 122 COUNTED) NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 ERIC SCHMITT (REP) . 77,745 97.65 INVALID WRITE-IN . 1,874 2.35 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 66 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 18 OF 18 COUNTED) TOMMIE PIERSON (DEM) . 12,724 91.70 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 JULIE STONE (LIB) . 1,135 8.18 INVALID WRITE-IN . 17 .12 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 67 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 17 OF 17 COUNTED) STEVE WEBB (DEM). 18,856 99.06 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 INVALID WRITE-IN . 179 .94 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 68 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 21 OF 21 COUNTED) KEITH ENGLISH (DEM). 14,085 78.38 REKHA SHARMA (REP) . 3,863 21.50 INVALID WRITE-IN . 22 .12 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 69 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 20 OF 20 COUNTED) MARGO McNEIL (DEM) . 12,313 69.68 GLEN LINDEMANN (REP) . 5,341 30.22 INVALID WRITE-IN . 18 .10 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 70 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 20 OF 20 COUNTED) BILL OTTO (DEM) . 7,814 56.68 EUGENE DOKES (REP) . 5,955 43.20 INVALID WRITE-IN . 17 .12 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 71 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 25 OF 25 COUNTED) SUSAN MEREDITH (DEM) . 13,431 97.57 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 INVALID WRITE-IN . 335 2.43 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 72 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 27 OF 27 COUNTED) MARY NICHOLS (DEM) . 9,815 62.65 PATRICK J. BRENNAN (REP) . 5,828 37.20 INVALID WRITE-IN . 23 .15 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 73 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 23 OF 23 COUNTED) COURTNEY CURTIS (DEM) . 13,495 98.75 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 INVALID WRITE-IN . 171 1.25 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 74 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 23 OF 23 COUNTED) SHARON L. PACE (DEM). 14,356 98.75 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 INVALID WRITE-IN . 182 1.25 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 75 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 31 OF 31 COUNTED) ROCHELLE WALTON GRAY (DEM). 16,600 99.46 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 INVALID WRITE-IN . 90 .54 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 83 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 21 OF 21 COUNTED) GINA MITTEN (DEM) . 11,023 97.26 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 INVALID WRITE-IN . 310 2.74 12el1106.html[12/17/2020 10:28:46 AM] STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 85 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 28 OF 28 COUNTED) CLEM SMITH (DEM). 15,570 98.77 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 INVALID WRITE-IN . 194 1.23 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 86 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 23 OF 23 COUNTED) RORY ELLINGER (DEM). 17,721 98.92 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 INVALID WRITE-IN . 194 1.08 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 87 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 28 OF 28 COUNTED) STACEY NEWMAN (DEM) . 15,823 96.88 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 INVALID WRITE-IN . 509 3.12 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 88 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 31 OF 31 COUNTED) JILL SCHUPP (DEM) . 15,334 97.08 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 INVALID WRITE-IN . 462 2.92 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 89 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 31 OF 31 COUNTED) NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 JOHN J. DIEHL, JR. (REP) . 18,474 98.03 INVALID WRITE-IN . 371 1.97 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 90 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 24 OF 24 COUNTED) DEB LAVENDER (DEM) . 11,172 49.39 RICK STREAM (REP) . 11,438 50.57 INVALID WRITE-IN . 10 .04 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 91 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 21 OF 21 COUNTED) JEANNE KIRKTON (DEM) . 11,895 58.94 ELIZABETH DEAL (REP) . 8,272 40.98 INVALID WRITE-IN . 16 .08 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 92 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 25 OF 25 COUNTED) GENISE D. MONTECILLO (DEM). 9,723 56.30 AL FAULSTICH (REP) . 7,529 43.60 INVALID WRITE-IN . 18 .10 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 93 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 17 OF 17 COUNTED) BOB BURNS (DEM) . 7,139 63.47 TONY LEECH (REP). 4,094 36.40 INVALID WRITE-IN . 14 .12 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 94 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 22 OF 22 COUNTED) VICKI LORENZ ENGLUND (DEM). 8,568 50.86 CLORIA BROWN (REP) . 8,255 49.01 INVALID WRITE-IN . 22 .13 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 95 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 16 OF 16 COUNTED) JOE ZELLE (DEM) . 8,025 40.22 MARSHA HAEFNER (REP) . 11,920 59.73 INVALID WRITE-IN . 10 .05 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 96 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 27 OF 27 COUNTED) NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 MIKE LEARA (REP). 17,087 98.43 INVALID WRITE-IN . 272 1.57 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 97 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 2 OF 2 COUNTED) SAM KOMO (DEM) . 607 41.12 JOHN C. McCAHERTY (REP). 868 58.81 INVALID WRITE-IN . 1 .07 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 98 12el1106.html[12/17/2020 10:28:46 AM] (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 18 OF 18 COUNTED) NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 DWIGHT SCHARNHORST (REP) . 15,534 98.13 INVALID WRITE-IN . 296 1.87 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 99 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 26 OF 26 COUNTED) WILLIAM H. (BILL) PINKSTON (DEM). 7,405 40.71 ANDREW KOENIG (REP). 10,755 59.13 INVALID WRITE-IN . 29 .16 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 100 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 29 OF 29 COUNTED) NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 SUE ALLEN (REP) . 16,814 98.02 INVALID WRITE-IN . 339 1.98 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 101 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 21 OF 21 COUNTED) NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 DON GOSEN (REP) . 16,962 98.14 INVALID WRITE-IN . 322 1.86 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 110 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 18 OF 18 COUNTED) NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 TIMOTHY W. JONES (REP) . 12,496 97.67 INVALID WRITE-IN . 298 2.33 COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT 2 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 101 OF 101 COUNTED) KATHLEEN KELLY BURKETT (DEM) . 40,991 65.52 OREN WALTON (REP) . 21,462 34.30 INVALID WRITE-IN . 113 .18 COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT 4 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 77 OF 77 COUNTED) MIKE O'MARA (DEM) . 59,690 88.86 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 JEFF COLEMAN (LIB) . 7,345 10.93 INVALID WRITE-IN . 141 .21 COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT 6 (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 84 OF 84 COUNTED) STEVE STENGER (DEM). 37,667 55.19 ANTHONY (TONY) POUSOSA (REP). 30,505 44.69 INVALID WRITE-IN . 82 .12 GEORGE W. DRAPER, III SUPREME COURT (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 655 OF 655 COUNTED) YES . 291,853 66.90 NO. 144,386 33.10 GARY M. GAERTNER, JR. COURT OF APPEALS-EASTERN DISTRICT (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 653 OF 653 COUNTED) YES . 291,595 67.50 NO. 140,389 32.50 SHERRI B. SULLIVAN COURT OF APPEALS-EASTERN DISTRICT (Vote for ) 1 (WITH 653 OF 653 COUNTED) YES . 294,055 68.56 NO.
Recommended publications
  • EX ALDERMAN NEWSLETTER 137 and UNAPPROVED Chesterfield 82 by John Hofmann July 26, 2014
    EX ALDERMAN NEWSLETTER 137 and UNAPPROVED Chesterfield 82 By John Hofmann July 26, 2014 THIS YEAR'S DRIVING WHILE BLACK STATS: For some reason the Post-Dispatch did not decide to do a huge article on the Missouri Attorney General's release of Vehicle Traffic Stop statistical data dealing with the race of drivers stopped by police. The stats did not change that much from last year. Perhaps the Post-dispatch is tired of doing the same story over and over or finally realized that the statistics paint an unfair picture because the overall region's racial breakdown is not used in areas with large interstate highways bringing hundreds of thousands of people into mostly white communities. This does not mean profiling and racism doesn't exist, but is not as widespread as it was 30 years ago. Traffic stop statistics for cities are based on their local populations and not on regional populations. This can be blatantly unfair when there are large shopping districts that draw people from all over a region or Interstate highways that bring people from all over the region through a community. CHESTERFIELD: Once again the Chesterfield Police come off looking pretty good. The four largest racial groups in Chesterfield are: Whites (84%) Asians (9%), Hispanics (2.9%) and Blacks (2.6%). If you believe in these statistics they show the Chesterfield Police are stopping too many whites and blacks and not stopping enough Asians and Hispanics. That is what is wrong with the Missouri Collection of Traffic data. The County wide population data comes into play since there is a major Interstate Highway going through Chesterfield and four major shopping districts.
    [Show full text]
  • What Happened in Missouri? America's Most Controversial Medical Marijuana Licensing Process Explained
    What Happened in Missouri? America’s Most Controversial Medical Marijuana Licensing Process Explained Cannabis Consumers Coalition, October 29, 2020 Executive Summary: The struggle to control medical marijuana licenses & market share in Missouri has been hotly contested since at least 2014. This has led to 5 diverging campaign groups differing over access to licensing and strategy during the time period 2014-2018. In November 2018, Missouri voters approved New Approach Missouri’s initiative petition, Constitutional Amendment 2, implementing medical marijuana in Missouri (now Amendment XIV to the Missouri Constitution). In January 2020, some 1800 out of 2200 license applications were denied, sparking a public controversy & legislative investigations into the process. Founder Larisa Bolivar About Us The Cannabis Consumers Coalition (registered as CCU) is a federally recognized 501(c)(3) consumer advocacy organization that acts as a consumer watchdog in the cannabis industry. Protecting the consumer is at the heart of what we stand for and we do this by helping to create an ethical cannabis industry through advocacy, activism, education, and policy work. Consumers are who voted for cannabis legalization and it is in our power to ensure that we have an industry that puts consumers’ needs above all else based on sound market research via political and social advocacy. As a membership organization, we work collectively to educate consumers and the general public. The Cannabis Consumers Coalition strives to set industry standards in the areas of public safety, quality control, pricing, pesticide and fertilizer use, labeling, testing, customer service, ethical business practices, consumer rights in the workplace, and any emerging issues impacting cannabis consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Biennial Report
    BOARD OF ELECTION LETTER FROM THE DIRECTORS COMMISSIONERS Richard H. Kellett, Chairman John W. Maupin, Secretary his biennial report of the Board of Election Trudi McCollum Foushee, Commissioner Commissioners (BOEC) continues a tradition initiated in 1986 of informing the voting public of John P. King, Commissioner T our activities for the previous two years. This and Directors previous biennial reports may be found on the BOEC Eric Fey website: www.stlouisco.com/elections. Honorable Gary Fuhr The 2013-2014 election cycle began like most others Deputy Directors with municipal and special elections spread throughout Mary Wall 2013 and early 2014. It initially appeared as though the Christian Tolbert 2014 primary and general elections would be relatively mundane affairs. For the first time since 1990 there would be no Presidential or U.S. Senate contest on the general election ballot. Compounding this dynamic was the fact that the Democratic Party did not field a candidate for state auditor which was the only statewide race on the ballot. For St. Louis County voters, however, the dull tint to the 2014 primary and general elections was quickly wiped away by the Table of Contents increasingly competitive race for county executive. On the first day of candidate filing, sixth district County Councilman Steve Stenger entered the Democratic primary for county executive against 10 year incumbent Letter from the Directors 1 Charlie Dooley. On the Republican side, term-limited Election Summaries 3 State Representative Rick Stream entered the fray Legislative Changes 6 buoying Republican hopes that the party might retake the county executive suite for the first time since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2016 (PDF)
    EXTRAORDINARY MARY WHERE TECHNOLOGY AND HEALING MEET Page 14 Page 18 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE VOLUME 42, ISSUE 1 EDITOR Laura Geiser (A&S ’90, Grad ’92) ASSOCIATE EDITOR Amy Garland (A&S ’97) ART DIRECTOR While some may believe that Matt Krob the academy is impervious to CONTRIBUTORS Marie Dilg (Grad SW ’94) Danielle Lacey the needs and pressures of the Maggie Rotermund Maria Tsikalas Students line up for free coffee during a outside world, nothing could be weekly Java with the Jesuits gathering. For more, see page 10. ON CAMPUS NEWS STORIES University Communications further from the truth. Medical Center Communications PHOTO BY STEVE DOLAN Billiken Media Relations t Saint Louis University we remain very much of the and service. Without a doubt, we have earned our reputation as one FEATURES world — grappling with the critical issues and trends of the nation’s outstanding universities. ON THE COVER of our times. And we are having good success in doing But challenges remain, and we must always strive to improve and Jesuit scholastics talk with fellow so, from reducing student indebtedness to adopting meet the key pressures of our times. With Magis we recommit our- students near the clock tower. 10 new technology in teaching, learning and the prac- selves to be innovators and standard-bearers. We must not be afraid tice of medicine. In short, we continue to excel in preparing men to forge new paths, to test our creativity and to dream big. In Formation A Universitas is published by Saint Louis and women to live lives of meaning and purpose, providing com- Magis outlines the new paths we must take.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterans Resource Directory
    Veterans Resource Directory of the St. Louis Metropolitan Area Veterans Program VETERANS RESOURCE DIRECTORY FOREWORD This Veterans Resource Directory was first published in 1987 to assist Veterans and their families in finding necessary information and referral sources. Through the years we have updated and expanded the information in this directory. We offer you the best resource information available in response to community need relating to Veterans and human services professionals. The Veterans Resource Directory has been very well received, and we would like to thank all those people who have helped us update and print this directory. Our directory has been replicated in many other states and is a well- worn resource for many St. Louis area Veteran advocates. We are constantly striving to provide new information and to keep up with the daunting task of updating hundreds of telephone numbers and addresses in an ever-changing world. This directory is a product of the Saint Louis County Office of Family and Community Services, County Veterans Program. As a division of the Saint Louis County Department of Human Services, the Office of Family and Community Services are comprised of three components: County Older Resident Programs, County Veterans Program, and County Youth Programs. Though these programs all have services that target specific populations, they also work in concert with other programs to provide services for those St. Louis County residents who may find themselves "falling through the cracks" of other organizations. Though developed for Veterans this directory is designed to offer resources to all of our customers. We will continue to provide you with quality information and referral services through the publication of this Veterans Resource Directory.
    [Show full text]
  • HUD Great Plains Region VII News
    HUD Great Plains Region VII News July 2015 IN THIS ISSUE A Message from the Regional Administrator HUD News News & Events from around the Region Kansas Iowa Missouri Nebraska What’s New Quick Resources Stay Connected A MESSAGE FROM THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR In his first year, Secretary Castro has focused on advancing policies, helping families and individuals secure quality housing, ending homelessness, addressing climate change and natural disasters, leveling the playing field for Americans from all walks of life, strengthening all communities in this century of cities, and building a stronger HUD. Across the country HUD continues to provide rental assistance to low-moderate income households and making homeownership more affordable for families. In an ongoing effort to end homelessness, HUD awarded, almost $55 million in Continuum of Care grants to support over 300 homeless programs in Region VII. In addition, permanent housing for nearly 350 homeless veterans was provided through the HUD-VASH program. To further encourage self-sufficiency among HUD assisted households, invest in neighborhood revitalization, and expand economic opportunity, communities in Region VII received much needed assistance through the Jobs Plus Program, Choice Neighborhood Program, and Promise Zone Initiative. HUD continues to strive to improve the quality of life in some of the country’s most vulnerable areas. KS Over the past 22 years, communities have produced more than 1.2 million affordable housing units with HOME funds. HOME provides financing for a variety of housing related projects, including critical affordable rental and homeownership housing, and housing for the homeless. In FY 2015, approximately $36 million in HOME funding reached urban, suburban, and rural communities across Region VII.
    [Show full text]
  • Race & Criminal Injustice Theme Issue
    Volume 71 Number 4 Winter 2014 Race & Criminal Injustice Theme Issue Racial Disparities in 193 Punishment and Alienation: Rebelling For Justice Adjoa Artis Aiyetoro My Time in Ferguson 236 Curtis McGuire #BlackLivesMatter 246 Kitchen Talk Richael Faithful editor’s preface Criminal justice in the U.S. has always been color-coded. The extent to which the influence of white supremacy—including its latest mutation, white privilege hidden in the guise of “color-blindness”—has predominated has varied according to time and place, but has never been wholly absent. It’s a cancer the nation has never been able to cut out of itself. The reality of this racial ideology is at once too obvious for most blacks to doubt and too difficult for most whites to genuinely acknowledge. Blacks are arrested, incarcerated, and menaced by police violence at significantly higher rates than whites. To residents of black communities, the presence of this especially virulent and invasive aspect of oppression is as immediate as being thrown up against a wall and patted down. Whites are privileged by their skin color in a thousand different ways, but perhaps never more dramatically than when it comes to their interactions with law enforcement. This privilege carries with it a blinding effect. 64 percent of the U.S. population is white, 13 percent is black. Yet currently more blacks than whites are incarcerated.1 Clever minds have been able to convince themselves that there are reasons for this uniquely American form of ethnic semi-cleansing beyond anti-black prejudice. Perhaps it’s true that other reasons—a colorblind contempt for the poor, for instance—might contribute to the great disparity, but nothing other than abiding racism can even begin to fully make sense of it.
    [Show full text]
  • November 13, 2014 the Honorable Jay Nixon Office of the Governor P.O. Box 720 Jefferson City, MO 65102 the Honorable Chris
    3601 Main Street Kansas City, MO 64111 (816) 470-9933 November 13, 2014 454 Whittier Street St. Louis, MO 63108 (314) 652-3114 The Honorable Jay Nixon www.aclu-mo.org Office of the Governor Chief Jon Belmar BOARD OF TRUSTEES P.O. Box 720 St. Louis County Police Department Brad Pierce Jefferson City, MO 65102 7900 Forsyth Boulevard President St. Louis, MO 63105 Shontaia Riley The Honorable Chris Koster Pam Woodard Missouri Attorney General’s Office The Honorable Francis G. Slay Vice Presidents Supreme Court Building City of St. Louis, Mayor’s Office Bob Waugh 207 West High St. 1200 Market, City Hall, Room 200 Treasurer P.O. Box 899 St. Louis, MO 63103 Daron Smith Jefferson City, MO 65102 Secretary Colonel G. Samuel Dotson III Terry Bloomberg Colonel Ronald K. Replogle Metropolitan Police Department of St. Louis Missouri State Highway Patrol St. Louis Tricia Bushnell General Headquarters 1915 Olive Street Kansas City 1510 East Elm Street St. Louis, MO 63103 Susan Carlson St. Louis Jefferson City, MO 65101 Nimrod Chapel The Honorable James Knowles III Jefferson City The Honorable Charles Dooley Office of the Mayor, City of Denise Field Office of the County Executive Ferguson St. Louis Sheila Greenbaum St. Louis County Admin. Building 110 Church Street St. Louis 41 South Central Avenue Ferguson, MO 63135 Laurie Hauber Clayton, MO 63105 St. Louis Chief Thomas Jackson Robert King St. Louis The Honorable Steve Stenger Ferguson Police Department David Nelson St. Louis County Admin. Building 222 S. Florissant Road St. Louis 41 South Central Avenue Ferguson, MO 63135 Aaron Novack St.
    [Show full text]
  • Can St. Louis City and County Get Back Together? (Do Municipal Boundaries Matter Today?)
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Saint Louis University School of Law Research: Scholarship Commons Saint Louis University Public Law Review Volume 34 Number 1 United We Stand or United We Fall: The Reunification of St. Louis City and County Article 5 (Volume XXXIV, No. 1) 2014 Can St. Louis City and County Get Back Together? (Do Municipal Boundaries Matter Today?) Peter W. Salsich Jr. Saint Louis University School of Law, [email protected] Samantha Caluori [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/plr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Salsich, Peter W. Jr. and Caluori, Samantha (2014) "Can St. Louis City and County Get Back Together? (Do Municipal Boundaries Matter Today?)," Saint Louis University Public Law Review: Vol. 34 : No. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/plr/vol34/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Saint Louis University Public Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Commons. For more information, please contact Susie Lee. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW CAN ST. LOUIS CITY AND COUNTY GET BACK TOGETHER? (DO MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES MATTER TODAY?) PETER W. SALSICH, JR.* AND SAMANTHA CALUORI** INTRODUCTION We are a border city. Missouri was a slave state that stayed in the Union; it did not experience Reconstruction. Immediately after the Civil War, it passed a host of Jim Crow laws, and added Jim Crowism to its Constitution and created a legacy of racial injustice.1 This statement by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Public Officials Directory
    2017 Public Officials Directory East-West Gateway Council of Governments Gateway Tower One S. Memorial Dr., Ste. 1600 St. Louis, MO 63102-2451 314-4421-44220 618-2274-22750 Fax 314-231-6120 www.ewgateway.org EAST-WEST GATEWAY Council of Governments Creating Solutions Across Jurisdictional Boundaries EWGCOG 2017 - Public Officials Directory * * * * * INTENTIONALLY BLANK * * * * * July 2017 The East-West Gateway Council of Governments (EWG) is pleased to provide the 2017 Public Officials Directory (POD). The directory is available online at www.ewgateway.org. The website also contains additional local government resources and publications. This bi-state reference guide contains contact information for key municipal and county elected officials and personnel for the eight counties in the St. Louis metropolitan area as well as state elected officials, fire/ambulance districts, school districts and resource organizations. We’ve recently made several improvements. We have merged the fire and ambulance listings and we have begun to list the organization(s) that provides fire services at the end of each municipal entry, making it easier to cross-reference with the fire/ambulance sections. We are also now providing email addresses for mayors/village presidents, city managers/administrators and city clerks. We strive to keep the directory as current as possible, and your ongoing input helps us to ensure the accuracy of the information provided. Throughout the directory you will find a convenient PODupdate e-mail link at the bottom of each page that you can use to provide updates and corrections or please feel free to give us a call. The POD is easy to navigate.
    [Show full text]