DOCSLIB.ORG

Air Quality Monitoring Alaska Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Air Quality Monitoring Alaska Region Ri O-TB-46 on theTongass National September, 1994 Forest Methods and Baselines Using Lichens September 1994 Linda H. Geiser, Chiska C. Derr, and Karen L. Diliman USDA-Forest Service Tongass National Forest/ Stikine Area P.O. Box 309 Petersburg, Alaska 99833 ,, ) / / 'C ,t- F C Air Quality Monitoringon the Tongass National Forest Methods and Baselines Using Lichens Linda H. Geiser, Chiska C. Derr and Karen L. Diliman USDA-Forest Service Tongass National Forest/ Stikine Area P.O. Box 309 Petersburg, Alaska 99833 September, 1994 1 AcknowJedgment Project development and funding: Max Copenhagen, Regional Hydrologist, Jim McKibben Stikine Area FWWSA Staff Officer and Everett Kissinger, Stikine Area Soil Scientist, and program staff officers from the other Areas recognized the need for baseline air quality information on the Tongass National Forest and made possible the initiation of this project in 1989. Their continued management level support has been essential to the development of this monitoring program. Lichen collections and field work: Field work was largely completed by the authors. Mary Muller contributed many lichens to the inventory collected in her capacity as Regional Botanist during the past 10 years. Field work was aided by Sarah Ryll of the Stikine Area, Elizabeth Wilder and Walt Tulecke of Antioch College, and Bill Pawuk, Stikine Area ecologist. Lichen identifications: Help with the lichen identifications was given by Irwin Brodo of the Canadian National Museum, John Thomson of the University of Wisconsin at Madison, Pak Yau Wong of the Canadian National Museum, and Bruce McCune at Oregon State University. Much appreciation is due to both Dr. Brodo and Dr. Thomson for making the verification of the major portion of the collections possible. A number of specimens were also examined and identified by Trevor Goward at the University of British Columbia and by Bruce Ryan at Arizona State University. Preparation of herbarium specimens and database compilation: was coordinated by Karen Dillman, with help from Rick Schreiber, Paula Rak and Tara Lathrop of the Stikine Area. Technical support: Technical advice was provided by many Forest Service personnel and others, particularly Jim Bennett of the National Park Service Air Quality Division, Bruce McCune at Oregon State University, Tom DeMeo, former Ketchikan Area ecologist, and Paul Alaback, Research Ecologist at the Juneau Forest Science Laboratory. John Martin, former Regional Ecologist, Dave Kellaher, Chatham Area hydrologist, Ken Holbrook, Yakutat District Ranger, and Michael Sheppard of the Nature Conservancy also provided advice and assistance. A special debt of appreciation is owed to John DeLapp of the Alaska Natural Heritage Program for frequent consultations over the past several years. Field logistics and project support: Dispatch and aviation personnel on all three Areas, and the business office personnel on the Stikine Area, played essential roles in transportation logistics and safety. Manuscript review: A draft version of this report was reviewed by Bruce McCune at Oregon State University, Jim Bennett of the NPS Cooperative Research Division, Tom Nash at Arizona State University and Richard Fisher, USFS-WO Air Resource Specialist. Linda Ii Geiser Chiska C. Derr Karen L. Dillman Ecologist Ecologist/ Coop Ed. Biological Technician USDA Forest Service USDA Forest Service USDA Forest Service Siuslaw National Forest Chugach National Forest Tongass National Forest Corvallis, OR 97331 Girdwood, AK 99587 Petersburg, AK 99833 2 CONTEN § J'age List of Figures 4 Summary 7 llntroduction 1.1 Why an air quality monitoring program? Agency and legal directives. 8 1.2 Lichens and air quality. 11 1.3 The Tongass National Forest. 13 1.4 Regional meteorological patterns and pollutants. 14 1.5 Point sources of air pollution in Southeast Alaska. 17 1.6 Program objectives. 21 Methods 2.1 Plots: selection and description. 22 2.2 Element analysis: collection, preparation and analysis of lichen tissue. 24 2.3 Lichen species inventory. 26 2.4 Quantitative lichen community analysis of old-growth shorepine and western hemlock 27 forests. 2.5 Preliminary study near an air pollution point source. 30 Results and Discussion 3.1 Plots: data summary and conclusions. 32 3.2 Element analyses. 32 3.21 Procedural error and sample variability. 37 3.22 Description of the data. 37 3.23 Normalization of the data. 37 3.24 Influence of lichen species on tissue element concentrations. 38 3.25 Temporal variability. 39 3.26 Spatial variability. 39 3.27 Effect of substrate and habitat. 39 3.28 Establishment of baselines for lichen element concentrations. 40 3.29 Evaluation of baselines: biological significance and comparison to literature values. 40 3.3 Lichen inventory. 45 3.31 Forest-wide lichen inventory. 45 3.32 Air pollution sensitivity of the lichens of the Tongass National Forest. 50 3.33 Most common lichens of the Tongass National Forest. 52 3.4 Lichen Community Analyses 53 3.41 Variables affecting lichen species composition. 3.42 Relationship of lichen species composition to canopy cover. 53 3.43 Relationship of elevation to lichen species composition. 56 3.44 Relationship of dominant vegetation types to lichen species composition. 57 3.45 Lichen species composition of typical vegetation types in southeastern Alaska. 56 3.5 Preliminary assessment of air quality near a point source. 67 3 Recommendations for continued monitoring 4.1 Detection of Forest-wide air quality changes. 74 4.2 Assessment of point source impacts. 75 References Cited 78 Appendices 85 6.1 Appendix A. Plot locations and descriptions. Al 6.2 Appendix B. 1989-1990 Elemental analysis data. Bi 6.3 Appendix C. 1991-1992 Elemental analysis data. CI 4 List of Figures Figure 1.Air quality monitoring locations on the Tongass National Forest. 15 Figure 2.Facilities with state air quality control permits in Southeast Alaska. 18 Figure 3.Fielddata card. 23 Figure 4.Dominant vegetation types of southeastern Alaska. 28 Figure 5.Effect of number of branches counted on estimations of species richness and abundance of some 28 common lichens. Figure 6.Distribution of plots among administrative districts of the Tongass National Forest. 32 Figure 7.Distribution of piots by elevation. 32 Figure 8. Distribution of plots within forested plant communities. 33 Figure 9.Distribution of plots among landforms. 34 Figure10. Laboratory detection limits for ICP-AES. S 35 Figure 11. ICP-AES quality control "check". Statistics for replicate analyses. 35 Figure12. Sulfur and nitrogen statistics for cumulative and current runs of reference standards. 36 Figure 13Reference lichen (Alectoria sarmentosa) statistics for 17 elements. 36 Figure 14Differences between 6 ICP-AES and 24 S analytical splits in 1990. 37 Figure 15 Normal distribution superimposed on Pb, Ni, Cr and Cd density histograms. 38 Figure 16Distribution of element analysis data by vegetation type and lichen species. 39 Figure 17Statistics of baseline element analysis data by lichen species, year and element. 41 Figure 18Tongass National Forest baseline values for tissue concentrations and standard errors of 17 elements43 in Alectoria sarmentosa, Cladina ran gferina, Hypogymnia enteromorpha, and Lobaria oregana. Figure 19Comparison of baseline elemental concentrations and standard error of four lichen species on the 44 Tongass National Forest to other United States National Park and Forest values and to international ranges for combined lichen genera. Figure 20Lichens of the Tongass National Forest. 46 Figure 21Air pollution sensitivity of Tongass National Forest lichens. 51 Figure 22Most common macrolichens of the Tongass National Forest. 52 Figure 23Correlation between lichen species compositions in forests of varying canopy cover. 54 Figure 24Effect of canopy cover on lichen constancy. 55 Figure 25Similarities of lichen species compositions across a range of overstory canopy cover (%). 56 Tree diagram. Figure 26Similarities of lichen species compositions across a range of overstory canopy cover (%). 56 Multidimensional scaling model. Figure 27Correlation between lichen species compositions at various elevations in southeastern Alaska. 57 5 Figure 28Similarities of lichen species composition across a range of elevations (ft). Tree diagram. 57 Figure 29Similarities of lichen species composition across a range of elevations (ft). Multidimensional 58 scaling model. Figure 30Correlation between lichen species compositions of dominant vegetation types in southeastern 58 Alaska. Figure 31Similarities between lichen species compositions of dominant vegetation types in southeastern 59 Alaska Tree diagram. Figure 32Similarities between lichen species compositions of dominant vegetation types in southeastern 59 Alaska. Multi-dimensional scaling model. Figure 33Typicallichen communities and species constancy of common habitatson the Tongass N. F. 62 Figure34Lichen tissue collection sites in the vicinity of Sitka, Alaska. 68 Figure35Three dimensional presentation of lichen tissue concentrations of 15 elements around the community 70 of Sitka, Alaska in 1990. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service is a diverse organization committedto equal opportunity in employment and program delivery. USDA prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, co'or, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political affiliation and familial status. Persons believing they have been discriminated against
Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Material for Nelson, P. R., B. Mccune & D. K. Swanson

    Supplementary Material for Nelson, P. R., B. Mccune & D. K. Swanson

    Supplementary material for Nelson, P. R., B. McCune & D. K. Swanson. 2015. Lichen traits and species as indicators of vegetation and environment. The Bryologist 118(3): XX–XX. Supplementary Table S2. Trait matrix (alphabetical by species). “1” indicates a species possesses that trait. cladoniiform Filamentous Squamulose Cyano Erect Appressed 3D s branched Tripartite Fruticose Terricole Epiphyte Lignicole Saxicole p soredia lobules Foliose Simple foliose Green rawlin isida foliose Lichen Species Subspecies richly Only g Alectoria ochroleuca 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Allantoparmelia almquistii 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Allantoparmelia alpicola 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Allocetraria madreporiformis 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Anaptychia bryorum 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Arctoparmelia centrifuga 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Arctoparmelia incurva 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Arctoparmelia separata 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Arctoparmelia subcentrifuga 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Asahinea chrysantha 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Baeomyces carneus 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baeomyces placophyllus 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baeomyces rufus 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blennothallia crispa 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Brodoa oroarctica 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Bryocaulon divergens 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Bryoria capillaris 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Bryoria chalybeiformis 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation

    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation

    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
  • New Or Interesting Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi from Belgium, Luxembourg and Northern France

    New Or Interesting Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi from Belgium, Luxembourg and Northern France

    New or interesting lichens and lichenicolous fungi from Belgium, Luxembourg and northern France. X Emmanuël SÉRUSIAUX1, Paul DIEDERICH2, Damien ERTZ3, Maarten BRAND4 & Pieter VAN DEN BOOM5 1 Plant Taxonomy and Conservation Biology Unit, University of Liège, Sart Tilman B22, B-4000 Liège, Belgique ([email protected]) 2 Musée national d’histoire naturelle, 25 rue Munster, L-2160 Luxembourg, Luxembourg ([email protected]) 3 Jardin Botanique National de Belgique, Domaine de Bouchout, B-1860 Meise, Belgium ([email protected]) 4 Klipperwerf 5, NL-2317 DX Leiden, the Netherlands ([email protected]) 5 Arafura 16, NL-5691 JA Son, the Netherlands ([email protected]) Sérusiaux, E., P. Diederich, D. Ertz, M. Brand & P. van den Boom, 2006. New or interesting lichens and lichenicolous fungi from Belgium, Luxembourg and northern France. X. Bul- letin de la Société des naturalistes luxembourgeois 107 : 63-74. Abstract. Review of recent literature and studies on large and mainly recent collections of lichens and lichenicolous fungi led to the addition of 35 taxa to the flora of Belgium, Lux- embourg and northern France: Abrothallus buellianus, Absconditella delutula, Acarospora glaucocarpa var. conspersa, Anema nummularium, Anisomeridium ranunculosporum, Artho- nia epiphyscia, A. punctella, Bacidia adastra, Brodoa atrofusca, Caloplaca britannica, Cer- cidospora macrospora, Chaenotheca laevigata, Collemopsidium foveolatum, C. sublitorale, Coppinsia minutissima, Cyphelium inquinans, Involucropyrenium squamulosum, Lecania fructigena, Lecanora conferta, L. pannonica, L. xanthostoma, Lecidea variegatula, Mica- rea micrococca, Micarea subviridescens, M. vulpinaris, Opegrapha prosodea, Parmotrema stuppeum, Placynthium stenophyllum var. isidiatum, Porpidia striata, Pyrenidium actinellum, Thelopsis rubella, Toninia physaroides, Tremella coppinsii, Tubeufia heterodermiae, Verru- caria acrotella and Vezdaea stipitata.
  • Lichenicolous Biota (Nos 201–230)

    Lichenicolous Biota (Nos 201–230)

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Fritschiana Jahr/Year: 2015 Band/Volume: 80 Autor(en)/Author(s): Hafellner Josef Artikel/Article: Lichenicolous Biota (Nos 201-230) 21-41 - 21 - Lichenicolous Biota (Nos 201–230) Josef HAFELLNER* HAFELLNER Josef 2015: Lichenicolous Biota (Nos 201–230). – Frit- schiana (Graz) 80: 21–41. - ISSN 1024-0306. Abstract: The 9th fascicle (30 numbers) of the exsiccata 'Lichenicolous Biota' is published. The issue contains ma- terial of 20 non-lichenized fungal taxa (14 teleomorphs of ascomycetes, 4 anamorphic states of ascomycetes, 2 an- amorphic states of basidiomycetes) and 9 lichenized as- comycetes, including paratype material of Dimelaena li- chenicola K.Knudsen et al. (no 223), Miriquidica invadens Hafellner et al. (no 226, 227), and Stigmidium xantho- parmeliarum Hafellner (no 210). Furthermore, collections of the type species of the following genera are distributed: Illosporiopsis (I. christiansenii), Illosporium (I. carneum), Marchandiomyces (M. corallinus), Marchandiobasidium (M. aurantiacum, sub Erythricium aurantiacum), Micro- calicium (M. disseminatum), Nigropuncta (N. rugulosa), Paralecanographa (P. grumulosa), Phaeopyxis (P. punc- tum), Placocarpus (P. schaereri), Rhagadostoma (R. li- chenicola), and Stigmidium (S. schaereri). *Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften, NAWI Graz, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, AUSTRIA e-mail: [email protected] Introduction The exsiccata 'Lichenicolous Biota' is continued with fascicle 9, containing 30 numbers. The exsiccata covers all lichenicolous biota, i.e., it is open not only to non- lichenized and lichenized fungi, but also to myxomycetes, bacteria, and even animals, whenever they cause a characteristic symptom on their host (e.g. discoloration or galls).
  • Opuscula Philolichenum, 6: 1-XXXX

    Opuscula Philolichenum, 6: 1-XXXX

    Opuscula Philolichenum, 15: 56-81. 2016. *pdf effectively published online 25July2016 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) Lichens, lichenicolous fungi, and allied fungi of Pipestone National Monument, Minnesota, U.S.A., revisited M.K. ADVAITA, CALEB A. MORSE1,2 AND DOUGLAS LADD3 ABSTRACT. – A total of 154 lichens, four lichenicolous fungi, and one allied fungus were collected by the authors from 2004 to 2015 from Pipestone National Monument (PNM), in Pipestone County, on the Prairie Coteau of southwestern Minnesota. Twelve additional species collected by previous researchers, but not found by the authors, bring the total number of taxa known for PNM to 171. This represents a substantial increase over previous reports for PNM, likely due to increased intensity of field work, and also to the marked expansion of corticolous and anthropogenic substrates since the site was first surveyed in 1899. Reexamination of 116 vouchers deposited in MIN and the PNM herbarium led to the exclusion of 48 species previously reported from the site. Crustose lichens are the most common growth form, comprising 65% of the lichen diversity. Sioux Quartzite provided substrate for 43% of the lichen taxa collected. Saxicolous lichen communities were characterized by sampling four transects on cliff faces and low outcrops. An annotated checklist of the lichens of the site is provided, as well as a list of excluded taxa. We report 24 species (including 22 lichens and two lichenicolous fungi) new for Minnesota: Acarospora boulderensis, A. contigua, A. erythrophora, A. strigata, Agonimia opuntiella, Arthonia clemens, A. muscigena, Aspicilia americana, Bacidina delicata, Buellia tyrolensis, Caloplaca flavocitrina, C. lobulata, C.
  • Die Gattung Aspicilia, Ihre Ableitungen Nebst

    Die Gattung Aspicilia, Ihre Ableitungen Nebst

    Acta Botánica Malacitana, 16(1): 133-140 Malaga, 1991 DIE GAUG ASPICILIA, IE AEIUGE ES EMEKUGE OE CYOECAOIE ASCOCAOGAISAIO EI AEE GENERA E LECANORALES (ASCOMYCEES ICEISAI Josef HAFELLNER SUMMARY: Some evolutionary lines are shown within Aspicilia coll, and the taxonomical and nomenclatural consequences for species commonly classified in Sphaerothallia Nees are discussed. The generic rank (Lobothallia (Clauzade & Roux) Hafellner) is proposed for the Aspicilia radiosa group and the following new combinations are introduced: Lobothallia alphoplaca (Wahlenb. in Ach.)Haf., Lobothallia melanaspis (Ach.)Haf., Lobothallia praeradiosa (Nyl.)Haf. and Lobothallia radiosa (Hoffm.)Haf. Key words: Lichenized Ascomycetes, Aspicilia, Lobothallia, taxonomy. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG: Innerhalb der Gattung Aspicilia coll. werden einige Evolutionslinien aufgezeigt und taxonomische wie nomenklatorische Konsequenzen für gewtihnlich als Sphaerothallia Nees bezeichnete Arten werden diskutiert. Lobothallia (Clauzade & Roux) Hafellner wird in den Gattungsrang erhoben und folgende neue Kombinationen werden vorgeschlagen: Lobythallia alphoplaca (Wahlenb. in Ach) Haf., Lobothallia melanaspis (Ach) Haf., Lobothallia praeradiosa (NYL.) Haf. und Lobothallia radiosa (Hoffm.)Haf. Schltisselwórter: Licheniscerte Ascomyceten, Aspiclia, Lobothallia, Taxonomie. EINLEITUNG Der schon von Massalongo (1852) beschriebenen Gattung Aspicilia war emn wechselvolles Schicksal beschieden. Ober lange Zeit in Lecanora eingeschlossen und oft in dieser als Subgenus bewertet (z.B. Magnusson 1939, Poelt 1958, Eigler 1969), hat sich erst in jtingerer Zeit die Erkenntnis allgemein durchgesetzt, daB Aspicilia mit Lecanora nicht ndher verwandt ist (Poelt 1974, Roux 1977, Hawksworth & al. 1980, Santesson 1984, Clauzade & Roux 1984, 1987, Hafellner 1984, Esnault 1985), obwohl einige Autoren schon früh die Selbstdndigkeit betont hatten (z.B. Kürber 1855, Hue 1910, Choisy 1929). Poelt (1974) hat sogar die neue Familie Aspiciliaceae vorgeschlagen, urn die taxonomische Distanz zwischen Aspicilia und Lecanora augenfdllig zu machen.
  • 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska A, , Frank Kauff B,1, Filip Högnabba C, Jeffrey C

    1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska A, , Frank Kauff B,1, Filip Högnabba C, Jeffrey C

    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10, Soili Stenroos c,10 a Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0338, USA b FB Biologie, Molecular Phylogenetics, 13/276, TU Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, 67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany c Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland d Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 358 ESC, 21 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA e Institut für Botanik, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Holteigasse 6, A-8010 Graz, Austria f Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, University of Gdan´sk, ul. Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdan´sk, Poland g Science and Education, The Field Museum, 1400 S.
  • Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska

    Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska

    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Kaleigh Spickerman for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on June 11, 2015 Title: Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Bruce McCune Functional traits of vascular plants have been an important component of ecological studies for a number of years; however, in more recent times vascular plant ecologists have begun to formalize a set of key traits and universal system of trait measurement. Many recent studies hypothesize global generality of trait patterns, which would allow for comparison among ecosystems and biomes and provide a foundation for general rules and theories, the so-called “Holy Grail” of ecology. However, the majority of these studies focus on functional trait patterns of vascular plants, with a minority examining the patterns of cryptograms such as lichens. Lichens are an important component of many ecosystems due to their contributions to biodiversity and their key ecosystem services, such as contributions to mineral and hydrological cycles and ecosystem food webs. Lichens are also of special interest because of their reliance on atmospheric deposition for nutrients and water, which makes them particularly sensitive to air pollution. Therefore, they are often used as bioindicators of air pollution, climate change, and general ecosystem health. This thesis examines the functional trait patterns of lichens in two contrasting regions with fundamentally different kinds of data. To better understand the patterns of lichen functional traits, we examined reproductive, morphological, and chemical trait variation along precipitation and temperature gradients in Oregon.
  • The Revision of Specimens of the Cladonia Pyxidata-Chlorophaea Group

    The Revision of Specimens of the Cladonia Pyxidata-Chlorophaea Group

    Acta Mycologica DOI: 10.5586/am.1087 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Publication history Received: 2016-04-02 Accepted: 2016-12-21 The revision of specimens of the Cladonia Published: 2017-01-16 pyxidata-chlorophaea group (lichenized Handling editor Maria Rudawska, Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Ascomycota) from northeastern Poland Sciences, Poland deposited in the herbarium collections of Funding Research funded by the Polish University in Bialystok Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the statutory research. Anna Matwiejuk* Competing interests Department of Plant Ecology, Institute of Biology, University of Bialystok, Konstantego No competing interests have Ciołkowskiego 1J, 15-245 Bialystok, Poland been declared. * Email: [email protected] Copyright notice © The Author(s) 2017. This is an Open Access article distributed Abstract under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, In northeastern Poland, the chemical variation of the Cladonia chlorophaea-pyxi- which permits redistribution, data group was much neglected, as TLC has not been used in delimitation of spe- commercial and non- cies differing in the chemistry. As a great part of herbal material of University in commercial, provided that the article is properly cited. Bialystok from NE Poland was misidentified, I found my studies to be necessary. Based on the collection of 123 specimens deposited in Herbarium of University Citation in Bialystok, nine species of the C. pyxidata-chlorophaea group are reported from Matwiejuk A. The revision of NE Poland. The morphology, secondary chemistry, and ecology of examined li- specimens of the Cladonia pyxidata-chlorophaea group chens are presented and the list of localities is provided. The results revealed that (lichenized Ascomycota) from C.
  • BLS Bulletin 111 Winter 2012.Pdf

    BLS Bulletin 111 Winter 2012.Pdf

    1 BRITISH LICHEN SOCIETY OFFICERS AND CONTACTS 2012 PRESIDENT B.P. Hilton, Beauregard, 5 Alscott Gardens, Alverdiscott, Barnstaple, Devon EX31 3QJ; e-mail [email protected] VICE-PRESIDENT J. Simkin, 41 North Road, Ponteland, Newcastle upon Tyne NE20 9UN, email [email protected] SECRETARY C. Ellis, Royal Botanic Garden, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR; email [email protected] TREASURER J.F. Skinner, 28 Parkanaur Avenue, Southend-on-Sea, Essex SS1 3HY, email [email protected] ASSISTANT TREASURER AND MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY H. Döring, Mycology Section, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, email [email protected] REGIONAL TREASURER (Americas) J.W. Hinds, 254 Forest Avenue, Orono, Maine 04473-3202, USA; email [email protected]. CHAIR OF THE DATA COMMITTEE D.J. Hill, Yew Tree Cottage, Yew Tree Lane, Compton Martin, Bristol BS40 6JS, email [email protected] MAPPING RECORDER AND ARCHIVIST M.R.D. Seaward, Department of Archaeological, Geographical & Environmental Sciences, University of Bradford, West Yorkshire BD7 1DP, email [email protected] DATA MANAGER J. Simkin, 41 North Road, Ponteland, Newcastle upon Tyne NE20 9UN, email [email protected] SENIOR EDITOR (LICHENOLOGIST) P.D. Crittenden, School of Life Science, The University, Nottingham NG7 2RD, email [email protected] BULLETIN EDITOR P.F. Cannon, CABI and Royal Botanic Gardens Kew; postal address Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, email [email protected] CHAIR OF CONSERVATION COMMITTEE & CONSERVATION OFFICER B.W. Edwards, DERC, Library Headquarters, Colliton Park, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 1XJ, email [email protected] CHAIR OF THE EDUCATION AND PROMOTION COMMITTEE: S.
  • One Hundred New Species of Lichenized Fungi: a Signature of Undiscovered Global Diversity

    One Hundred New Species of Lichenized Fungi: a Signature of Undiscovered Global Diversity

    Phytotaxa 18: 1–127 (2011) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Monograph PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2011 Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) PHYTOTAXA 18 One hundred new species of lichenized fungi: a signature of undiscovered global diversity H. THORSTEN LUMBSCH1*, TEUVO AHTI2, SUSANNE ALTERMANN3, GUILLERMO AMO DE PAZ4, ANDRÉ APTROOT5, ULF ARUP6, ALEJANDRINA BÁRCENAS PEÑA7, PAULINA A. BAWINGAN8, MICHEL N. BENATTI9, LUISA BETANCOURT10, CURTIS R. BJÖRK11, KANSRI BOONPRAGOB12, MAARTEN BRAND13, FRANK BUNGARTZ14, MARCELA E. S. CÁCERES15, MEHTMET CANDAN16, JOSÉ LUIS CHAVES17, PHILIPPE CLERC18, RALPH COMMON19, BRIAN J. COPPINS20, ANA CRESPO4, MANUELA DAL-FORNO21, PRADEEP K. DIVAKAR4, MELIZAR V. DUYA22, JOHN A. ELIX23, ARVE ELVEBAKK24, JOHNATHON D. FANKHAUSER25, EDIT FARKAS26, LIDIA ITATÍ FERRARO27, EBERHARD FISCHER28, DAVID J. GALLOWAY29, ESTER GAYA30, MIREIA GIRALT31, TREVOR GOWARD32, MARTIN GRUBE33, JOSEF HAFELLNER33, JESÚS E. HERNÁNDEZ M.34, MARÍA DE LOS ANGELES HERRERA CAMPOS7, KLAUS KALB35, INGVAR KÄRNEFELT6, GINTARAS KANTVILAS36, DOROTHEE KILLMANN28, PAUL KIRIKA37, KERRY KNUDSEN38, HARALD KOMPOSCH39, SERGEY KONDRATYUK40, JAMES D. LAWREY21, ARMIN MANGOLD41, MARCELO P. MARCELLI9, BRUCE MCCUNE42, MARIA INES MESSUTI43, ANDREA MICHLIG27, RICARDO MIRANDA GONZÁLEZ7, BIBIANA MONCADA10, ALIFERETI NAIKATINI44, MATTHEW P. NELSEN1, 45, DAG O. ØVSTEDAL46, ZDENEK PALICE47, KHWANRUAN PAPONG48, SITTIPORN PARNMEN12, SERGIO PÉREZ-ORTEGA4, CHRISTIAN PRINTZEN49, VÍCTOR J. RICO4, EIMY RIVAS PLATA1, 50, JAVIER ROBAYO51, DANIA ROSABAL52, ULRIKE RUPRECHT53, NORIS SALAZAR ALLEN54, LEOPOLDO SANCHO4, LUCIANA SANTOS DE JESUS15, TAMIRES SANTOS VIEIRA15, MATTHIAS SCHULTZ55, MARK R. D. SEAWARD56, EMMANUËL SÉRUSIAUX57, IMKE SCHMITT58, HARRIE J. M. SIPMAN59, MOHAMMAD SOHRABI 2, 60, ULRIK SØCHTING61, MAJBRIT ZEUTHEN SØGAARD61, LAURENS B. SPARRIUS62, ADRIANO SPIELMANN63, TOBY SPRIBILLE33, JUTARAT SUTJARITTURAKAN64, ACHRA THAMMATHAWORN65, ARNE THELL6, GÖRAN THOR66, HOLGER THÜS67, EINAR TIMDAL68, CAMILLE TRUONG18, ROMAN TÜRK69, LOENGRIN UMAÑA TENORIO17, DALIP K.
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska

    Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska

    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.