Basketball Guys Instructions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Basketball Teams As Strategic Networks
Basketball Teams as Strategic Networks Jennifer H. Fewell1,3*, Dieter Armbruster2,3, John Ingraham2, Alexander Petersen2, James S. Waters1 1 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America, 2 School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America, 3 Center for Social Dynamics and Complexity, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America Abstract We asked how team dynamics can be captured in relation to function by considering games in the first round of the NBA 2010 play-offs as networks. Defining players as nodes and ball movements as links, we analyzed the network properties of degree centrality, clustering, entropy and flow centrality across teams and positions, to characterize the game from a network perspective and to determine whether we can assess differences in team offensive strategy by their network properties. The compiled network structure across teams reflected a fundamental attribute of basketball strategy. They primarily showed a centralized ball distribution pattern with the point guard in a leadership role. However, individual play- off teams showed variation in their relative involvement of other players/positions in ball distribution, reflected quantitatively by differences in clustering and degree centrality. We also characterized two potential alternate offensive strategies by associated variation in network structure: (1) whether teams consistently moved the ball towards their shooting specialists, measured as ‘‘uphill/downhill’’ flux, and (2) whether they distributed the ball in a way that reduced predictability, measured as team entropy. These network metrics quantified different aspects of team strategy, with no single metric wholly predictive of success. -
Science out of the Box
BRITISH COLUMBIA COUNCIL SCIENCE OUT OF THE BOX A SCIENCE RESOURCE F R O M THE BC PROGRAM COMMITTEE (Replaces “Science in a Box”) © Girl Guides of Canada - Guides du Canada BC Program Committee (2003; Rev2.2016) SCIE NCE OUT OF THE BOX BRITISH COLUMBIA COUNCIL Copyright © 2016 Girl Guides of Canada-Guides du Canada, British Columbia Council, 1476 West 8th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 1E1 Unless otherwise indicated in the text, reproduction of material is authorized for non-profit Guiding use within Canada, provided that each copy contains full acknowledgment of the source. Any other reproduction, in whole or in part, in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without prior written consent of the British Columbia Council, is prohibited. © Girl Guides of Canada - Guides du Canada BC Program Committee (2003; Rev2.2016) SCIENCE OUT OF THE BOX CONTENTS Introduction to Science Out of the Box ....................................................................... 1 Science “In a Box” vs. “Out of the Box”? ...................................................................... 1 What’s in this Resource? .............................................................................................. 2 Safety in the Laboratory, Kitchen or Meeting Place ...................................................... 3 Applied Science ............................................................................................................ 4 Engineering ................................................................................................................. -
PE Final Exam Review 2016-17 Quarter 2
PE Final Exam Review 2016-17 Quarter 2 SPORTSMANSHIP - expresses an aspiration that the activity will be enjoyed for its own sake, with proper consideration for fairness, ethics, respect, and a sense of fellowship with one's competitors. Being a "good sport" involves being a "good winner" as well as being a "good loser." OFFENSE – the team/person in possession of the ball; usually on the attack to score. DEFENSE – the team/person that is guarding or protecting their goal/area from the opposing team. HANDBALL- Fast paced game of two teams who pass, catch, and dribble a small ball with their hands while trying to score a goal. Object of the game is to score more goals than your opponents by throwing the ball into their netted goal. Scoring – A goal is scored when the entire ball crosses the goal line inside the goal. A goal may be scored from any throw (free-throw, throw-in, throw-off, goal-throw one point per goal, team with most points at end of game play wins Rules of play/Key terms: Seven players per team Duration of game – 2, 30 minute halves with a 10 minute half-time Start of Game: Throw-Off: A throw-off is taken by the team that wins the coin toss and chooses to start the game with the ball. Each team must be in its own half of the court with the defense 3 meters away from the ball. Following a whistle, the ball is passed backward from center court to a teammate and play begins. -
Official Basketball Statistics Rules Basic Interpretations
Official Basketball Statistics Rules With Approved Rulings and Interpretations (Throughout this manual, Team A players have last names starting with “A” the shooter tries to control and shoot the ball in the and Team B players have last names starting with “B.”) same motion with not enough time to get into a nor- mal shooting position (squared up to the basket). Article 2. A field goal made (FGM) is credited to a play- Basic Interpretations er any time a FGA by the player results in the goal being (Indicated as “B.I.” references throughout manual.) counted or results in an awarded score of two (or three) points except when the field goal is the result of a defen- sive player tipping the ball in the offensive basket. 1. APPROVED RULING—Approved rulings (indicated as A.R.s) are designed to interpret the spirit of the applica- Related rules in the NCAA Men’s and Women’s Basketball tion of the Official Basketball Rules. A thorough under- Rules and Interpretations: standing of the rules is essential to understanding and (1) 4-33: Definition of “Goal” applying the statistics rules in this manual. (2) 4-49.2: Definition of “Penalty for Violation” (3) 4-69: Definition of “Try for Field Goal” and definition of 2. STATISTICIAN’S JOB—The statistician’s responsibility is “Act of Shooting” to judge only what has happened, not to speculate as (4) 4-73: Definition of “Violation” to what would have happened. The statistician should (5) 5-1: “Scoring” not decide who would have gotten the rebound if it had (6) 9-16: “Basket Interference and Goaltending” not been for the foul. -
Ranking the Greatest NBA Players: an Analytics Analysis
1 Ranking the Greatest NBA Players: An Analytics Analysis An Honors Thesis by Jeremy Mertz Thesis Advisor Dr. Lawrence Judge Ball State University Muncie, Indiana July 2015 Expected Date of Graduation May 2015 1-' ,II L II/du, t,- i II/em' /.. 2 ?t; q ·7t./ 2 (11 S Ranking the Greatest NBA Players: An Analytics Analysis . Iv/If 7 Abstract The purpose of this investigation was to present a statistical model to help rank top National Basketball Association (NBA) players of all time. As the sport of basketball evolves, the debate on who is the greatest player of all-time in the NBA never seems to reach consensus. This ongoing debate can sometimes become emotional and personal, leading to arguments and in extreme cases resulting in violence and subsequent arrest. Creating a statistical model to rank players may also help coaches determine important variables for player development and aid in future approaches to the game via key data-driven performance indicators. However, computing this type of model is extremely difficult due to the many individual player statistics and achievements to consider, as well as the impact of changes to the game over time on individual player performance analysis. This study used linear regression to create an accurate model for the top 150 player rankings. The variables computed included: points per game, rebounds per game, assists per game, win shares per 48 minutes, and number ofNBA championships won. The results revealed that points per game, rebounds per game, assists per game, and NBA championships were all necessary for an accurate model and win shares per 48 minutes were not significant. -
Improving Your Youth Basketball Team: Five Simple Skills by Brian Mccormick
Improving Your Youth Basketball Team: Five Simple Skills by Brian McCormick As a basketball consultant and personal trainer, I work with numerous youth, high school and college basketball teams and players every year. At every practice, players are deficient in at least one of these five simple skills, ultimately decreasing the team's offensive efficiency. While none will automatically make someone a great basketball player or turn a team into a championship contender, every player must possess these skills so his/her team's offense runs smoothly. These are simple skills which can easily be introduced and reinforced through everyday drills that require little practice time. However, these skills must be emphasized. 1. Left-handed Lay-ups. At an "elite" camp last summer, a high school freshman informed me she did not have to practice using her right hand (she was left-handed) because her coach never put her on the right side of the floor. Every good player possesses the ability to use either right or left hand. I am not an old-school coach (like my father) who believes a player should always use the outside hand on the dribble or a lay-up. However, players must possess the ability to use either hand and must use the correct hand based on the situation. Watching Manu Ginobili and Steve Nash during the play-offs should only serve to reinforce the importance of ambidexterity around the basket. 2. The Box. Youth basketball's biggest detraction is the number of jump balls; while some see jump balls as great defense and hustle, many result from weak offensive play, and the constant barrage of whistles slows the game's tempo. -
Measuring Production and Predicting Outcomes in the National Basketball Association
Measuring Production and Predicting Outcomes in the National Basketball Association Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael Steven Milano, M.S. Graduate Program in Education The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Packianathan Chelladurai, Advisor Brian Turner Sarah Fields Stephen Cosslett Copyright by Michael Steven Milano 2011 Abstract Building on the research of Loeffelholz, Bednar and Bauer (2009), the current study analyzed the relationship between previously compiled team performance measures and the outcome of an “un-played” game. While past studies have relied solely on statistics traditionally found in a box score, this study included scheduling fatigue and team depth. Multiple models were constructed in which the performance statistics of the competing teams were operationalized in different ways. Absolute models consisted of performance measures as unmodified traditional box score statistics. Relative models defined performance measures as a series of ratios, which compared a team‟s statistics to its opponents‟ statistics. Possession models included possessions as an indicator of pace, and offensive rating and defensive rating as composite measures of efficiency. Play models were composed of offensive plays and defensive plays as measures of pace, and offensive points-per-play and defensive points-per-play as indicators of efficiency. Under each of the above general models, additional models were created to include streak variables, which averaged performance measures only over the previous five games, as well as logarithmic variables. Game outcomes were operationalized and analyzed in two distinct manners - score differential and game winner. -
Basketballitsori017877mbp.Pdf
' ; ; ' * *' H 1 * * * * ?, rX>- > \; ', ^ / 5* * ' 796,34- Keep Your Card in This Pocket Boob will be issued only on presentation of proper library cards. Unless labeled otherwise, boob may be retained for two weeks. Borrowers finding books marked, de- faced or mutilated are expected to report same at library desk; otherwise the last borrower will be held The card holder is responsible for all books drawn on this card. Penalty for over-due books 2c a day plus cost of notices. Lost cards and change of residence must be re- Public Library Kansas City, Mo. Keep Your Card inTbis Pocket ENVELOPE 00., K. 0.. MO. BASKETBALL ITS OEIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT B A S K E ITS ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT BY JAMES NAISMITH INVENTOR OF THE GAME INTRODUCTION BT CLAIR BEE BASKETBALL COACH LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY AS S O C I AT ION PRESS 347 MADISON AVENUE NEW YORK 1941 COPYRIGHT, 1941, BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES 07 AlflBSICA 35 PREFACE WRITING of the origin and development of INbasketball, forty-three years after its invention, I have given little space to technical aspects of the game; but rather I have written the book in an at- tempt to answer a number of questions. Since it was impossible for me to gather the data myself, I have been forced to call on men from all parts of the world for some of the information that I have used. I have mentioned some of these men in the text of the book; but they are only a few of the persons who have contributed. -
Partner Passing – Passing Drill
Partner Passing – Passing Drill Overview: Partner passing teaches the absolute basics of passing and allows your players to practice different types of passes and the correct technique. A great drill for kids beginning to learn the game of basketball. Setup: Players get into pairs and should have one basketball between them. Once the players are in pairs, they must stand on a line parallel from their partner. How it Works: The coach will explain which type of pass they want performed and then the players will pass back and fourth to each other. Every minute or so the coach can change the type of pass the players are performing or increase the distance they are apart if it’s too easy. Coaching Points: Make sure you mix up which type of pass you want them to perform (bounce pass, chest pass, one-handed push-pass, ect). Don’t allow players to be silly and throw the basketball too hard at their partner. It will end up with blood noses. Make sure all coaches are teaching the same passing technique so the kids don’t get confused. Stationary Keepings Off – Passing Drill Overview: This main goal of this drill is to teach the basics of spacing between players and also to teach decision making on the catch. When players are young we all know they constantly sprint towards the basketball. By keeping them stationary in this drill, we show them that it’s easier to keep the ball away from the defense if we’re spread apart. Setup: Select one or two players to be the defenders and get the rest of your players to spread out in a small area like the three-point line. -
From the Triangle to the Cage
© COPYRIGHT By Curtis Matthew Harris 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED i FROM THE TRIANGLE TO THE CAGE: BASKETBALL’S CONTESTED ORIGINS, 1891 - 1910 BY Curtis Matthew Harris ABSTRACT As the United States increasingly urbanized in the late nineteenth century, white middle- class Americans faced crises of gender, racial, and class status. Fears of young men and women absorbing improper values and behavior from urban life abounded. Countering this dirty and rough landscape, middle-class reformers developed increasingly sophisticated physical education programs that promoted “clean sport” as a way to inoculate themselves from urban ills. Creating the sport of basketball in 1891 was a calculated attempt by these reformers at rescuing society through clean sport. Nonetheless, by 1910, it was apparent that basketball was not the panacea for promoting middle-class conceptions of clean sport and proper living. As basketball spread across the country, rough play, riots, and professionalism undermined the “respectable” intentions middle-class reformers had invested in the game. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I must acknowledge my parents and the proud example they set for me. Through Beatrice Luchin, an ardent educator, and Dennis Harris, a firm advocate of parks and recreation programs, I have learned that my life is to serve and do right by others. To them I am forever indebted. Other persons through the years have helped make me the person and scholar I am. Three of my grade school teachers – Mickey Shannon, Gwendolyn Cash, and Jeff Cherry – deserve special praise for furthering my love of history at a young age. Callie Hawkins, Jamie Cooper, and Erin Carlson-Mast at President Lincoln’s Cottage provided my first opportunity to work as a public historian and have continuously been supportive of academic and professional endeavors. -
Basketball Statistics Manual
Basketball Statistics Manual FIBA Europe Statistics Manual Field Goals A field goal attempt (FGA) is charged to a player any time they shoot, throw or tap a live ball at their opponent’s basket in an attempt to score a goal unless the player is fouled in the act of shooting and the goal is missed or not counted. When a violation or foul is committed by the shooter or a player from either team, after the ball has been released for a shot, a FGA is credited because the shot would count if successful. A field goal attempt (FGA) is not charged to the shooter if the shot is nullified because of illegal interference with the ball (goal tending) by an offensive player. In this case the offensive player who commits the violation is charged with a turnover and a team rebound charged to the defensive team. A field goal made (FGM) is credited to a player any time a FGA by them results in a goal being scored or being awarded because of illegal interference with the ball (goal tending) by a defensive player. When a player is fouled in the act of shooting and the shot results in a FGM, then a FGA must also be credited. A FGA is not charged if the player shooting the ball, a teammate or a defensive player commits a violation or foul just prior to the ball being released. The official will call the violation or foul and signal that the score or play following the call is canceled. This indicates that the ball was not released for the shot prior to the infringement so no FGA is awarded. -
Granville County Parks and Recreation Comprehensive
GRANVILLE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN April 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Granville County Board of Commissioners County Manager Mike Felts Chairman Zelodis Jay Vice Chairman R. David Currin, Jr. David T. Smith Tony W. Cozart Ed Mims Timothy Karan Edgar Smoak Granville County Parks and Grounds Director Raymond Allen Granville County Parks and Recreation Committee Chairman Michael Ciriello Vice Chairman Michael McFadden Ruth Hicks James Williams Betty Lou Davis John L. Bryant Ivan Washburn Commissioners David T. Smith Timothy Karan Staff Representative Banita Onyirimba TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………….p.1 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE…………………..………………………..……………………………..p.2 INVENTORY ANALYSIS…………………………………………………………….………………..p.8 COUNTY FACILITIES MUNICIPAL FACILITIES TOWN OF BUTNER CITY OF CREEDMOOR CITY OF OXFORD TOWN OF STEM TOWN OF STOVALL SCHOOL FACILITIES OTHER COMMUNITY FACILITIES COMMUNITY NEEDS AND RECREATION STANDARDS..………………………………………….…………………………………….………p.22 COMMUNITY INPUT NRPA STANDARDS PARK CLASSIFICATIONS………………………….…………………………………….………..p.28 FACILITY RECOMMENDATIONS………………….………………………………….…………..p.36 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES…………………………………………………………….…………p.39 APPENDIX………….……………………………………………………………………..…………..p.41 INTRODUCTION Granville County has experienced many changes within its various communities during the past few decades. The County’s Parks & Recreation Comprehensive Master Plan has been updated constantly during that time, but another update is necessary to keep pace with the changing demographics and influx of new citizens who are seeking recreational opportunities. The last Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan that was approved by Granville County government was in 1998, followed by a master plan update that was approved in 2004. The Recreation Advisory Committee voted to approve the last update to the plan in October 2008. That update was then forwarded to the Granville County Board of Commissioners the following month and unanimously approved on November 17, 2008.