India and the Global Economy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

India and the Global Economy India and the Global Economy A collection of essays presented at the Hudson Institute-Observer Research Foundation Roundtable on “India’s Economic Engagements with the World,” New Delhi, India, March 25-26, 2014 Edited by Husain Haqqani July 2014 India and the Global Economy A collection of essays presented at the Hudson Institute-Observer Research Foundation Roundtable on “India’s Economic Engagements with the World” held in New Delhi, India on March 25-26, 2014 Edited by Husain Haqqani © 2014 Hudson Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. For more information about obtaining additional copies of this or other Hudson Institute publications, please visit Hudson’s website, www.hudson.org ABOUT HUDSON INSTITUTE Hudson Institute is an independent research organization promoting new ideas for the advancement of global security, prosperity and freedom. Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps manage strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary studies in defense, international relations, economics, health care, technology, culture, and law. Hudson seeks to guide public policy makers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, policy briefings and recommendations. Visit www.hudson.org for more information. Hudson Institute 1015 15th Street, N.W. Sixth Floor Washington, D.C. 20005 P: 202.974.2400 [email protected] www.hudson.org Table of Contents Introduction India’s Reform Agenda Husain Haqqani 1 Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights and Healthcare Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Modernization of India’s Economy Robert Shapiro 5 Health Care in India: Challenges and Opportunities Kristina Lybecker 22 International Trade, Foreign Direct Investment & Capital Market Reforms Reforms and Global Economic Integration of the Indian Economy: Challenges and Future Directions Nagesh Kumar 46 Indian Capital Market Reforms Chaitanya Pande 67 Defense and Military Industries India-US Defense Ties Manoj Joshi 86 Building Toward A Partnership: The India-U.S. Defense Trade Relationship Roger Zakheim 99 Energy, Environment and Education Sector – Reform & Private Sector Participation Energy sector in India: The challenges Nitin Zamre 114 Skill Development in India: Navigating the Labyrinth Saurabh Johri 120 References 136 Introduction: India’s Reform Agenda Husain Haqqani ndia, the world’s largest democracy, has yet to realize its full potential as a leading global economy. The rapid economic growth that India has witnessed since the mid- I 1990s was ushered in through much-needed reforms. After being criticized by economists for low growth, India has finally earned a place among the world’s leading emerging marketsi. Further reform could lead India to further success among the BRICS – Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa –and beyond. The Indian economy today is more integrated and more dependent on the global economy than ever before. The country has come a long way from decades of stalled economic growth, exchange rate fluctuations, a severely negative balance of payments, and intermittent crises. An insulated and largely socialist economy was liberalized, rescuing the country from the brink of default and initiating a period of sustained economic growth. Given the criticality of its external engagements, India needs to renew its commitment to reforms and better exploit the benefits of global integration. A number of sectors are still governed by rules and norms of the past that need to be liberalized, rationalized and strengthened to allow for resilient and sustainable growth. Some sectors offer immediate benefits and need to be prioritized while others need long-term and far- sighted reforms. The election of a new government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), presents an opportunity to advance India’s agenda of reform. Mr. Modi has a demonstrated commitment to free market ideals. His election reflects the Indian people’s embrace of an open, modern economy that allows individuals to realize their potential unencumbered by an over-weaning State. After independence in 1947, Indian policy makers preferred a heavily insulated, self- reliant economy, with a major focus on poverty reduction. India tried to achieve progress through state-directed industrialization and followed a socialist economic model. The focus was on import substitution and limited international trade. As a result, the Indian economy cycled through low productivity and slow growth, especially in comparison to its East Asian neighbors. 1 Introduction: India’s Reform Agenda The reforms that began in the 1990s catalyzed unprecedented growth rates that were driven by a large and young workforce and a growing consumption class. The rise of the Indian middle class to over 250 million and decline in poverty levels from 37 per cent to 22 per cent over the last decade is an outcome of these reforms and their attendant growth. To spur economic growth, India increased focus on exports, non-factor and labor services. This translated into increased capital inflows and foreign direct investment (FDI). Foreign investment in India increased from a meagre $132 million in 1991 to a peak of $43 billion in 2008. The country was lauded internationally for its reduction and rationalization of tariffs and removal of non-tariff barriers. The average tariff on consumer goods was reduced from 153 percent in 1990 to 25 percent in 1997. These reforms led to deeper integration of the Indian economy with the global economy. The share of merchandise trade has risen since 1991 and a dramatic transformation of services trade has occurred. India emerged as one of the most attractive destinations for FDI, as well as an important source of FDI outflows. The trade structure changed in terms of product composition and destinations and the economy became more diversified. But much of the export growth benefited from expansion in world trade and enhanced competitiveness. There is still a lot of potential for diversification in the economy and a number of opportunities are yet to be fully exploited. The opening up of the Indian economy in the early to mid-nineties ushered in a decade where 8-10 percent GDP growth rates became the norm. As India’s economy flourished, investors, policymakers, and Indian citizens began to believe that such high rates of growth would be the standard. But the stalling of reforms resulted in slowing down this momentum. During the last few years of the Manmohan Singh government, India’s growth rate hovered around the 4.5 percent level. Inflation reached a peak of 10 percent, and the current account deficit mushroomed to almost 4.5 percent of GDP. At a time when the government should have liberalized the markets for labor, energy, and land, India’s policymakers became complacent. Coupled with a global financial crisis that began in 2008, India’s economy began stagnating and the Indian miracle seemed a thing of the past. The election of the Modi government has rekindled hope for a new round of economic reforms that would revive economic growth. Anticipating the change, the Hudson Institute’s India and Globalization Initiative held a conference with the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi on ‘India’s Global Engagements’ a few weeks before the Indian election of 2014. The purpose of the conference was to make a significant contribution to the ongoing debate about economic reforms in India. Scholars from India and the United States deliberated on policy ideas 2 India & the Global Economy that could lead to further opening the Indian market and integrating it with the global economy. India can achieve rapid economic growth via innovation by opening up its economy to foreign technologies. India must strengthen its intellectual property (IP) rights regulations and protect foreign investors that are exporting new technologies to India. Greater protection for foreign technologies will not only encourage growth and innovation, but will also bring in vital foreign direct investment. Chapter 1 in this volume discusses the challenges India faces and the policies that can be implemented to enhance innovation in the Indian economy. Spending on healthcare is only about 1 percent of GDP in India, making it one of the lowest spenders on healthcare in the world. A number of issues plague India’s healthcare sector, ranging from a lack of infrastructure and financing to a dearth of health workers across the country. Chapter 2 highlights the problems faced by India’s healthcare sector and argues that a well-rounded set of policies with participation from all stakeholders is needed to address the challenge. While India has emerged as a hub for IT outsourcing, it has lagged behind in exporting value-added manufactured goods. India has been unable to increase its share of technology-intensive manufactured goods. With wages rising and productivity falling in China, India has a great opportunity to attract FDI in its manufacturing sector. Chapter 3 argues that implementing a cohesive set of reforms that seek to encourage investment in the manufacturing sector will go a long way in kick-starting India’s stagnating economy. Sturdy capital markets form the backbone of any modern economy, especially one seeking to achieve high rates of development. India will require over $500 billion just for funding its infrastructure needs in the next five years, making capital markets reform a critical component of the reform agenda.
Recommended publications
  • Britton, Theodore R. Jr. – 1981
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project Ralph J Bunch Legacy: Minority Officers AMBASSADOR THEODORE R. BRITTON, JR. Interviewed by: Ruth Stutts Njiiri Initial interview date: July 16, 1981 Copyri ht 2008 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Ambassador to Barbados and Grenada' Special Representative to Antigua, Dominica, St Christopher-,evis-Anguilla, St Lucia, and St -incent 1.70-1.77 Bac1ground of appointment Barbados environment 2S presence and facilities Relations Foreign diplomatic community Family Being a blac1 Ambassador Embassy staff Relations with State Department Marriott Corporation Consular offices Loss of son South Carolina and New 5or1 bac1ground ,omination as Ambassador H2D in South Carolina Residence in New 5or1 City Confirmation Hearing Government officials British Cubans 2S Airline problem Grenada relations Churches Personal sources of inspiration The 6ueen7s visit Family INTERVIEW 1 &: This is an interview with Ambassador Theodore R. Britton, Jr. as part of a Phelps, Sto-es Fund oral history project on former Blac- Chiefs of Mission, funded by the Ford .oundation. Ambassador Britton served in Barbados and the State of 1renada and as 2.S. Special Representative to the States of Anti ua, Dominica, St. Christopher, Nevis, An uilla, St. Lucia and St. 4incent. He served in these countries from 1977 to 1977. He is presently Actin Assistant to the Secretary for International Affairs, Department of 5ousin and 2rban Development. The interview is bein conducted on Thursday, July 16, 1981 in the
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Eye Care Seeking Behaviour Change with Increasing Age and Visual Impairment? Intersectional Analysis of Older Adults In
    Barman and Mishra BMC Geriatrics (2020) 20:71 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-1438-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access How does eye care seeking behaviour change with increasing age and visual impairment? Intersectional analysis of older adults in the Indian Sundarbans Debjani Barman* and Manasee Mishra Abstract Background: Visual impairment disproportionately affects people in the low-income countries. A high proportion of visual impairment can be prevented or cured. Yet, care seeking for eye health is restricted for women and older adults. This article uses the intersectionality approach to understand how eye care seeking behaviour changes in men and women with increase in age and visual impairment in a poor and underserved region of India. It brings forth the commonalities and differences between the various groups. Methods: The article is based on qualitative data. Persons aged 50 years and more are categorized into young-old, middle-old and old-old. Men and women with low vision/ high visual impairment have been selected from each of the three age groups. In-depth interviews have been carried out with 24 study participants. Data saturation has been attained. The JHPIEGO Gender Analysis Framework underpins the study. The narrative data has been coded in NVivo 10 software. Results: Various symptoms are associated with visual impairment. The young-old with low vision do not report much difficulty due to visual impairment. Study participants with high visual impairment, and in the older age groups do. Difficulty in the discharge of regular chores due to visual impairment is rarely reported. Impaired vision is considered to be inevitable with advancing age.
    [Show full text]
  • Sagamore in the Nation's Service
    SAGAMORE IN THE NATION’S SERVICE 2006-2009 Deborah Daniels served as president of Sagamore lowed by a half dozen Sagamore board members Institute from 2006-08 and her career epitomizes the eventually serving in the Bush administration. think tank’s vision for local impact and national influ- The Honorable Daniel R. Coats served as U.S. Am- ence. As the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District bassador to Germany from 2001-2005. He currently of Indiana during the President George H.W. Bush represents the people of Indiana as a member of the administration, Daniels helped pioneer the Weed and U.S. Senate. Seed program in Indianapolis integrating law enforce- James T. Morris served as the Executive Director of ment, community policing, violence prevention and the United Nations World Food Program, the world’s neighborhood restoration efforts. The success led to largest food aid organization, from 2002-07. He is her being named the first Director of the Executive presently President of Pacers Sports and Entertain- Office of Weed and Seed at the U.S. Department of ment. Justice in 1992-93. Dr. Leslie Lenkowsky was chief executive officer of Daniels returned to Indianapolis in the mid-1990s the Corporation for National and Community Service to lead the Greater Indianapolis Progress Committee from 2001-04 serving under the leadership of CNCS which bolstered economic development and neigh- chair Stephen Goldsmith. Lenkowsky is now a faculty borhood revitalization during the national pace-set- member at Indiana University. ting administration of Indianapolis mayor Stephen Dr. Carol D’Amico served as Assistant Secretary Goldsmith.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Health Under Modi: Agenda for the Next Two Years
    India’s Health Under Modi: Agenda for the Next Two Years Aparna Pande November 2016 Husain Haqqani Briefing Paper South Asia Program India's Health Under Modi: Agenda for the next Two Years Aparna Pande, Director, India Initiative Husain Haqqani, Director, South and Central Asia South Asia Program © 2016 Hudson Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. For more information about obtaining additional copies of this or other Hudson Institute publications, please visit Hudson’s website, www.hudson.org ABOUT HUDSON INSTITUTE Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership and global engagement for a secure, free, and prosperous future. Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps manage strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary studies in defense, international relations, economics, health care, technology, culture, and law. Hudson seeks to guide public policy makers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, policy briefings and recommendations. Visit www.hudson.org for more information. Hudson Institute 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20004 P: 202.974.2400 [email protected] www.hudson.org Table of Contents Overview 5 India’s Healthcare Trends 8 India’s Statistical Healthcare Profile 8 India’s Health Compared with Other Nations 13 Modi Government’s Two Year Performance 25 National Health Policy 25 Swaach Bharat (Clean India) 28 Infrastructure and Services 32 The Private Sector 34 Challenges & Opportunities: The Next Two Years 37 Accessibility 37 Affordability and Innovation 40 Challenges and Opportunities 43 India’s Health Under Modi 4 India’s Health Under Modi Overview rime Minister Narendra Modi came to power in May 2014 promising changes in a number of areas, including healthcare.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Strategies for a Healthy India: Imperatives for Consolidating the Healthcare Management Ecosystem
    Sustainable Strategies for a Healthy India: Imperatives for Consolidating the Healthcare Management Ecosystem For private circulation only June 2013 www.deloitte.com/in Contents Health in India 1 Emerging trends and imperatives 3 Collaborate to Innovate 6 Creating and facilitating a collaborative environment 13 References 14 Contacts 16 2 Health in India – Status and successes India rightly brands itself as incredible. in-patient treatment, possibly making The country’s remarkable political, quality healthcare and private sector economic and cultural transformation facilities accessible to the poor. over the past few decades has made it a geopolitical force. Healthcare is However, these exciting opportunities one of the industries that marks this often mask certain urgent predicaments. strengthened global presence. The healthcare sector in India is As per industry reports, healthcare is currently at a cusp. Issues of access, poised to grow at an estimated annual affordability, quality of care and rate of 19 per cent to reach USD efficiency remain significant. A number 280 billion by 20201 with India being of reports have been published about recognized as a destination for world the poor health status of India, class healthcare. During the last decade compared to its Low and Middle the private sector grew to become the Income Country (LMIC) peers. In terms major provider of healthcare services. of vital statistics like infant mortality Its share of beds increased from 49 (IMR) and maternal mortality, India has per cent in 2002 to 63 per cent in lagged behind significantly. Even life 20102. As per NSSO 2008, the private expectancy, at 62 years, is three years sector accounted for 60 percent of all below the LMIC average.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcribed By
    - Edited Transcript - presented a discussion entitled Keeping the Republic: Saving America by Trusting Americans September 26, 2011, 12:00–1:30pm Program and Panel 12:00 p.m. Welcome by Hudson Institute's John Walters 12:10 Panel discussion Mitch Daniels, Governor of Indiana and and former Hudson Institute president and CEO David Brooks, New York Times Op-Ed Columnist William Galston, Senior Fellow of Governance at The Brookings Institution John Walters, Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of Hudson Institute (moderator) 1:10 Question-and-answer session 1:30 Adjournment HUDSON INSTITUTE JOHN WALTERS: Good afternoon. I’m John Walters. I’m senior vice president and chief operating officer here at Hudson. Let me welcome you to the Betsy and Walter Stern Conference Center on behalf of Hudson Institute. We are glad you all could be here. We’re honored to have as today’s guest Governor Mitch Daniels. He is of course no stranger to Hudson. He led us in the past and went on to be an enormously important national leader. About a year ago we were given the opportunity to honor him as the recipient of the 2010 Herman Kahn Award. He tells the story of how he was punished for telling the truth during that in his book, so I’ll let him follow up. Let me just briefly introduce our speakers. In addition to Governor Daniels, who has served in many leadership positions, we’re joined by David Brooks, who is a New York Times columnist and has been a senior editor at the Weekly Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neoconservative Persuasion: Selected Essays, 1942-2009
    PHILANTHROPY / EVENT TRANSCRIPT The Neoconservative Persuasion: Selected Essays, 1942-2009 By Irving Kristol Edited by Gertrude Himmelfarb February 2, 2011 Panel Discussion of The Neoconservative Persuasion: Selected Essays, 1942-2009 By Irving Kristol Edited by Gertrude Himmelfarb Wednesday, February 2, 2011 Table of Contents Ken Weinstein 1 Amy Kass 1 Charles Krauthammer 3 Irwin Stelzer 7 Leon Kass 11 William Kristol 15 Q&A 23 Gertrude Himmelfarb (“Bea Kristol”) 30 Speaker Biographies 31 © 2011 Hudson Institute Hudson Institute is a nonpartisan, independent policy research organization. Founded in 1961, Hudson is celebrating a half century of forging ideas that promote security, prosperity, and freedom. www.hudson.org Ken Weinstein Good afternoon. I’m Ken Weinstein, CEO of Hudson Institute. I’d like to welcome everyone to today’s Book Forum on the newly published The Neoconservative Persuasion: Selected Essays 1942- 2009, by Irving Kristol, which has been edited by the redoubtable Gertrude Himmelfarb. The book is available for sale in the back at the discounted price of $20, and I urge all of you to get one before you leave. This is a truly remarkable book, one that shows the breadth and the depth of Irving Kristol’s thought over some 67 years, which you’ll be hearing about shortly. My colleagues and I frankly feel privileged that Hudson Institute is the venue for today’s book forum, and I should thank the book’s editor, Gertrude Himmelfarb, for giving us this auspicious honor. (Applause.) We have a truly distinguished panel, who will offer their reflections shortly, but before we get underway I should note that this is Hudson Institute’s 50th anniversary year, and to mark this occasion, the Institute has begun a 50th anniversary seminar series, and today’s exceptional Book Forum is the second event in this series.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY COMPETITION in the POLITICS INDUSTRY IS FAILING AMERICA a Strategy for Reinvigorating Our Democracy
    SEPTEMBER 2017 WHY COMPETITION IN THE POLITICS INDUSTRY IS FAILING AMERICA A strategy for reinvigorating our democracy Katherine M. Gehl and Michael E. Porter ABOUT THE AUTHORS Katherine M. Gehl, a business leader and former CEO with experience in government, began, in the last decade, to participate actively in politics—first in traditional partisan politics. As she deepened her understanding of how politics actually worked—and didn’t work—for the public interest, she realized that even the best candidates and elected officials were severely limited by a dysfunctional system, and that the political system was the single greatest challenge facing our country. She turned her focus to political system reform and innovation and has made this her mission. Michael E. Porter, an expert on competition and strategy in industries and nations, encountered politics in trying to advise governments and advocate sensible and proven reforms. As co-chair of the multiyear, non-partisan U.S. Competitiveness Project at Harvard Business School over the past five years, it became clear to him that the political system was actually the major constraint in America’s inability to restore economic prosperity and address many of the other problems our nation faces. Working with Katherine to understand the root causes of the failure of political competition, and what to do about it, has become an obsession. DISCLOSURE This work was funded by Harvard Business School, including the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness and the Division of Research and Faculty Development. No external funding was received. Katherine and Michael are both involved in supporting the work they advocate in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson News and Review
    HUDSON INSTITUTE News & Review WWW.HUDSON.ORG FALL 2008 FOUR NEW SCHOLARS EXPAND HUDSON’S NATIONAL SECURITY AND FOREIGN POLICY WORK Hudson Institute is proud to announce the arrival of four Senior Fellows, each HUDSON with extensive experience in foreign policy and national security. “These distin- guished scholars highlight the speed and strength with which Hudson’s research SCHOLARS portfolio is growing,” Chairman Allan Tessler says. “National security studies RESPOND were a core part of Herman Kahn’s legacy, and we’re pleased to be extending our work in this vital field.” TO RUSSIAN ANDREW NATSIOS served as Administrator for U.S. Agency for Inter- AGGRESSION national Development from 2001 until 2006, where he oversaw the agency’s AGAINST reconstruction programs in Afghanis tan, Iraq, and Sudan. In 2006, President Bush appointed him Special Coor dinator for International Disaster Assistance GEORGIA and Special Humanitarian Coordinator for the Sudan. Natsios served previously at USAID, first as Director of the Office of Foreign When Russia rolled its tanks and artillery into Georgia on the eve of Disaster Assistance and then as Assistant Administrator for the Bureau for Food the 2008 Olympics—initiating the and Humanitarian Assistance. He also served as a member CONTINUED ON PAGE 23 biggest European conflict since Clockwise from upper left, Douglas Feith, Andrew Natsios, Christopher Ford, and Hassan Mneimneh World War II—Hudson scholars were quickly sought out to dis- cuss the situation. From the inter- nal political ramifications in Rus- sia, to the constantly-changing geostrategic im plic a tions of the crisis, Hudson scholars examined the crisis from every angle.
    [Show full text]
  • Healthcare Tourism in India
    C M Y K 3 Healthcare Tourism In India 3.1 HEALTHCARE SCENARIO IN INDIA 3.1.1 Overview India’s health system can be categorized into three distinct phases31: a) In the initial phase of 1947-1983, health policy was assumed to be based on two broad principles: (i) that none should be denied healthcare for want of ability to pay, and (ii) that it was the responsibility of the state to provide healthcare to the people. This phase saw moderate achievements. b) In the second phase of 1983-2000, a National Health Policy was announced for the first time in 1983, which articulated the need to encourage private initiative in healthcare service delivery and encouraged the private sector to invest in healthcare infrastructure through subsidies. The policy also enhanced the access to publicly funded primary healthcare, facilitating expansion of health facilities in rural areas through National Health Programmes (NHPs). c) The third phase, post-2000, is witnessing a further shift and broadening of focus; the current phase addresses key issues such as public-private partnership, liberalization of insurance sector, and the government as a financier. 31 Report of the National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, August 2005 77 C M Y K C M Y K Healthcare Tourism: Opportunities for India The National Health Policy, 200232 outlines improvement in the health status of the population as one of the major thrust areas in social development programme. It focuses on the need for enhanced funding and an organizational restructuring of the national public health initiatives in order to facilitate more equitable access to the health facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Mapping of Healthcare Sector in India
    Report on Mapping of Healthcare Sector in India SWECARE AND SWEDISH TRADE COUNCIL, INDIA 2012 This page has been intentionally left blank Page 2 of 294 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 8 1.1. OVERVIEW - HEALTH SITUATION IN INDIA .................................................................................................... 8 1.2. SHORTLISTED SECTORS AND MAJOR BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES............................................................... 11 1.3. PERCEPTION REGARDING SWEDISH TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS ........................................................ 22 2. HEALTHCARE SECTOR IN INDIA ....................................................................................................... 24 2.1. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................. 24 3. MAJOR HEALTHCARE PROGRAMS .................................................................................................. 33 3.1. NATIONAL RURAL HEALTH MISSION ......................................................................................................... 34 3.2. NATIONAL URBAN HEALTH MISSION ......................................................................................................... 39 3.3. NATIONAL VECTOR BORNE DISEASE CONTROL PROGRAM ........................................................................ 42 3.4. REVISED
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Draft the G-2 Chimera
    REVISED DRAFT THE G-2 CHIMERA: FUSION OR ILLUSION?1 Harry Harding Dean Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy University of Virginia The title and subtitle of my talk, “The G-2 Chimera: Fusion or Illusion?,” may require some explanation. The title refers to two concepts – G-2 and “Chimerica” – that embody, in different ways, the proposition that the bilateral relationship between the United States is uniquely important – that, as Hillary Clinton wrote during the 2008 presidential election campaign, it is “the most important bilateral relationship in the world in this century.”2 The concept “G-2” is associated most prominently with C. Fred Bergsten, the director of the Peterson Institute of International Economics.3 This concept focuses on the roles of China and the United States in the broader international trade and financial system, and their unique ability to set the agenda and possibly forge agreements on a wide range of international issues. China and the U.S. form a G-2, according to Bergsten, because they are the world’s two largest economies, and because they represent the interests of the developing and developed worlds respectively. The term “chimera,” in turn, is a reference to the etymology of the concept of “Chimerica,” which in turn is most closely associated with the Harvard historian Niall Ferguson and, more recently, with author Zachary Karabell.4 This second concept focuses less on the two countries’ role in the world than on their high degree of mutual integration, despite their differences in structure and values, such that one country’s economic circumstances strongly influence the other’s.
    [Show full text]