REQUEST for PROPOSALS for P38602 LINDBERGH CENTER STATION TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (“TOD”) PROJECT Docusign Envelope ID: F1E5954B-5D75-4E26-8C7A-0901575960F3
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lindbergh Center Station: a Commuter Commission Landpro 2009
LINDBERGH CENTER Page 1 of 4 STATION Station Area Profile Transit Oriented Development Land Use Within 1/2 Mile STATION LOCATION 2424 Piedmont Road, NE Atlanta, GA 30324 Sources: MARTA GIS Analysis 2012 & Atlanta Regional Lindbergh Center Station: A Commuter Commission LandPro 2009. Town Center Station Residential Demographics 1/2 Mile The MARTA Transit Oriented Development Guidelines Population 7,640 classify Lindbergh Center station as a “Commuter Town Median Age 30.7 Center”. The “Guidelines” present a typology of stations Households 2,436 ranging from Urban Core stations, like Peachtree Center Avg. Household Size 3.14 STATION ESSENTIALS Station in downtown Atlanta, to Collector stations - i.e., end of the line auto commuter oriented stations such as Median Household Income $69,721 Daily Entries: 8,981 Indian Creek or North Springs. This classification system Per Capita Income $28,567 reflects both a station’s location and its primary func- Parking Capacity: 2,519 tion. Business Demographics 1 Mile Parking Businesses 1,135 The “Guidelines” talk about Commuter Town Center Utilization: 69% Employees 12,137 stations as having two functions – as “collector” stations %White Collar 67.8 Station Type: At-Grade serving a park-and ride function for those travelling else- %Blue Collar 10.5 Commuter where via the train, and as “town centers” serving as Station Typology Town Center %Unemployed 10.0 nodes of dense active mixed-use development, either Source: Site To Do Business on-line, 2011 Land Area +/- 47 acres historic or newly planned. The Guidelines go on to de- MARTA Research & Analysis 2010 scribe the challenge of planning a Town Center station which requires striking a balance between those two in Atlanta, of a successful, planned, trans- SPENDING POTENTIAL INDEX functions “… Lindbergh City Center has, over the dec- it oriented development. -
Raise the Curtain
JAN-FEB 2016 THEAtlanta OFFICIAL VISITORS GUIDE OF AtLANTA CoNVENTI ON &Now VISITORS BUREAU ATLANTA.NET RAISE THE CURTAIN THE NEW YEAR USHERS IN EXCITING NEW ADDITIONS TO SOME OF AtLANTA’S FAVORITE ATTRACTIONS INCLUDING THE WORLDS OF PUPPETRY MUSEUM AT CENTER FOR PUPPETRY ARTS. B ARGAIN BITES SEE PAGE 24 V ALENTINE’S DAY GIFT GUIDE SEE PAGE 32 SOP RTS CENTRAL SEE PAGE 36 ATLANTA’S MUST-SEA ATTRACTION. In 2015, Georgia Aquarium won the TripAdvisor Travelers’ Choice award as the #1 aquarium in the U.S. Don’t miss this amazing attraction while you’re here in Atlanta. For one low price, you’ll see all the exhibits and shows, and you’ll get a special discount when you book online. Plan your visit today at GeorgiaAquarium.org | 404.581.4000 | Georgia Aquarium is a not-for-profit organization, inspiring awareness and conservation of aquatic animals. F ATLANTA JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2016 O CONTENTS en’s museum DR D CHIL ENE OP E Y R NEWL THE 6 CALENDAR 36 SPORTS OF EVENTS SPORTS CENTRAL 14 Our hottest picks for Start the year with NASCAR, January and February’s basketball and more. what’S new events 38 ARC AROUND 11 INSIDER INFO THE PARK AT our Tips, conventions, discounts Centennial Olympic Park on tickets and visitor anchors a walkable ring of ATTRACTIONS information booth locations. some of the city’s best- It’s all here. known attractions. Think you’ve already seen most of the city’s top visitor 12 NEIGHBORHOODS 39 RESOURCE Explore our neighborhoods GUIDE venues? Update your bucket and find the perfect fit for Attractions, restaurants, list with these new and improved your interests, plus special venues, services and events in each ’hood. -
Piedmont Area Trans Study.Indd
piedmont area transportation study final report Several portions of the corridor, such as near the northern and southern activity centers, do have more consistent and attractive streetscape environments. However, other portions existing of the corridor have not received improvements during recent years. This creates a disconnected corridor and provides unattractive and difficult conditions for individuals wishing to walk between the areas with nicer aesthetics and well-kept conditions streetscapes. This discontinuity between areas is even more noticeable to motorists who drive along the corridor. Zoning Structure Portions of the corridor lie within Special Public Interest (SPI) districts which provide an additional layer of zoning. These areas are located on the east side of Piedmont Road north of Peachtree Road as well as on both sides of Above: Recently completed Phase I Peachtree Road Piedmont Road in the Lindbergh Center Complete Streets streetsape area. These overlay districts allow for Right: Lindbergh Center as common goals pertaining to aesthetics, a model of good streetscape attractiveness to all user groups, and unity of appearance in these locations as development occurs. Several areas that are prime for redevelopment are currently not within overlay districts (along the west side of Piedmont Road south and north of Peachtree Road), making them vulnerable to development that does not support the common goals of the corridor. “ … We have worked with the City of Atlanta very closely throughout this process so that our recom- mendations can be put directly into the plan they create for the entire city. That gives Buckhead a fast start on making vital transportation improvements.” 22 23 piedmont piedmont area area transportation transportation study final report study final report 3.0 Existing Conditions The current state of Piedmont Road is the result of decades of substantial use without requisite investment in maintenance and improvement to the transit, pedestrian, bicycle, and roadway infrastructure along the corridor. -
Soohueyyap Capstone.Pdf (6.846Mb)
School of City & Regional Planning COLLEGE OF DESIGN A Text-Mining and GIS Approach to Understanding Transit Customer Satisfaction Soo Huey Yap MS-GIST Capstone Project July 24, 2020 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Transit Performance Evaluation……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.2 Using Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis to Measure Customer Satisfaction………… 5 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Site and Transit Authority……………………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.2 Description of Data…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 2.3 Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis 2.3.1 Data Preparation……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.3.2 Determining Most Frequent Words…………………………………………………………… 12 2.3.3 Sentiment Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………. 13 2.4 Open-Source Visualization and Mapping………………………………………………………………… 14 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Determining Most Frequent Words………………………………………………………………………… 16 3.2 Sentiment Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 3.3 Location-based Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 4. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE WORK……………………………………………………………………………………. 24 5. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 25 6. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 7. APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Appendix 1: Final Python Script for Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 2: Results from 1st Round Data Cleaning and Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 3: Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using the NLTK Vader Module Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using TextBlob Appendix 4: -
Served Proposed Station(S)
CURRENT PROPOSED ROUTE NAME JURISDICTION PROPOSED MODIFICATION STATION(S) STATION(S) SERVED SERVED Discontinue Service -N ew proposed Routes 21 and 99 would provide service along Jesse Hill Ave., Coca Cola Pl. and Piedmont Ave. segments. New proposed Route 99 would provide service along the Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr. segment. New proposed Routes 32 and 51 would provide service on Marietta St. between Forsyth St. and Ivan Allen Jr. Blvd. New proposed Route 12 would provide service on the Howell Mill Rd segment between 10th St. and Marietta Chattahoochee Ave.. New proposed Route 37 would provide service on Chattahoochee Ave. between Hills Ave. and Marietta Blvd and Marietta Blvd City of Atlanta, 1 Boulevard/Centennial between Bolton Dr. and Coronet Way. New proposed Routes 37 and 60 would provide service on Coronet Way between Marietta Blvd and Bolton Rd Georgia State Fulton County Olympic Park segments. Service will no longer be provided on Edgewood Ave. between Piedmont Ave. and Marietta St.; Marietta St. between Edgewood Ave. and Forsyth St.; Marietta St. between Ivan Allen, Jr. Blvd and Howell Mill Rd; Howell Mill Rd between Marietta St. and 10th St.; Huff Rd, Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Marietta Blvd; Chattahoochee Ave. between Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Hill Ave.; Bolton Pl., Bolton Dr.; Coronet Way between Defoors Ferry Rd and Moores Mill Rd, and Moores Mill Rd between Bolton Rd and Coronet Way. Proposed modification includes Route 2 operate from Inman Park station via Moreland Ave. (currently served by Route 6-Emory) Freedom Parkway and North Avenue, North Avenue City of Atlanta, 2 Ponce De Leon Avenue Ralph McGill Blvd (currently served by Route 16-Noble), continuing via Blvd,and North Ave. -
South Fork Conservancy/Peachtree Creek
Georgia’s 2017 CLEAN WATER HEROES South Fork Conservancy PEACHTREE CREEK Creek Conservancy Group Connects Neighborhoods, Streams INTRODUCTION: If Peachtree Street is the iconic thoroughfare of Atlanta, the creek that gives the street (and countless others) its name must also be the iconic waterway of the city. But, as is the case with so many of Atlanta’s urban streams, Peachtree Creek, once a waterway where people gathered at ferries, farms, mills and baptism pools, was bridged, bulldozed and forgotten, its banks overgrown with kudzu and privet and inaccessible except for the hardiest of explorers. PEACHTREE In stepped a group of citizens that saw the potential for Peachtree Creek to CREEK reconnect communities—from apartment complexes to reclaimed industrial sites—through a trail and parks system that would reunite Atlantans with this historic creek. Since 2008, the South Fork Conservancy (SFC) has established some five miles of creekside trails and restored dozens of acres of land through the removal of invasive plants and reintroduction of native species. The group even played a role in the remediation of a 12-acre hazardous waste site that now is home to one of SFC’s signature trails. THE WATER BODY: Peachtree Creek, formed by its north and south forks which join in the shadows of I-85 near Piedmont Road, is Atlanta’s iconic creek. It was at one time the source of many Atlantans’ drinking water, powered their grist mills and provided them with a livelihood. Along its banks in 1864, more than 4,000 soldiers died in the Battle of Peachtree Creek during the Civil War. -
Executive Summary Lindbergh Tsads 2001
LINDBERGH TSADS 2001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 LINDBERGH TSADS 2001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PART ONE STUDY PARAMETERS Introduction Picture, if you will, a tree-lined urban neighborhood where you can live, work, shop, and play without ever needing a car. Homes, offices, restaurants, and shops are all within a short walk of one another and are connected by a system of pleasant, tree-lined sidewalks, greenways, and bicycle facilities. Sidewalk cafes, public plazas, and other urban open space amenities beautify the area and provide opportunities for socializing with neighbors. At the center of this urban neighborhood, a MARTA transit station puts you within a few minute train ride of Downtown, Midtown, Buckhead, the airport, and Pe- rimeter Center, and a short bus ride of Emory University, Cheshire Bridge Road, and other intown neighborhoods. This is the vision for the Lindbergh transit station area. Purpose The purpose of the 2000 Lindbergh Transportation Area Development Study (TSADS) is to help achieve this vision by providing a concept plan and action program for the development of a transit oriented neighborhood around the Lindbergh MARTA transit station. The study was developed by the City of Atlanta’s Department of Planning, Development and Neighborhood Conservation, Bureau of Planning utilizing resources developed by Pickering Firm, Inc. and its consultants in cooperation with MARTA, and a Planning Advisory Committee (PAC). The PAC was made up of representatives from the study area neighborhoods, as well as commercial property owners and managers. Context The Lindbergh Transit Station Area is lo- cated in northeast Atlanta at the conver- gence of the North and Northeast lines along MARTA's North-South rail line. -
NPU POLICIES NPU-A Policies
NPU POLICIES NPU-A Policies A-1: Preserve the single-family character of NPU ‘A’, including the following neighborhoods: Paces, Mount Paran- Northside, Chastain Park, Tuxedo Park, Moores Mill, Margaret Mitchell, Randall Mill, and West Paces Ferry- Northside. Maintain the historic and residential character of West Paces Ferry Road. A-2: Maintain the boundaries of the I-75/West Paces Ferry commercial node. Incorporate pedestrian amenities and encourage street-level retail uses in order to maximize pedestrian activity. Treat low- and medium- density residential areas as buffers for surrounding single-family neighborhoods. Maintain the existing scale of the structures in the commercial district. A-3: Preserve the single family residential character of the neighborhoods surrounding Chastain Park, a unique single-family residential and historic area, as well as the only significant park and green space in North -At lanta. Maintain the boundaries of the Roswell Road commercial area as a medium density corridor. Maintain the maximum allowable density of the Chastain Park Civic Association neighborhoods at the current R-3 zoning. Recognize the historic Sardis Church and the Georgia Power substation as the established buffers between Roswell Road commercial area and the single-family residential areas surrounding Chastain Park. Preserve the current residential zoning of all gateway streets from Roswell Road to Chastain Park, including West Wieuca, Interlochen, Laurel Forest, Le Brun, and Powers Ferry Roads. A-4: Limit the development of office-institutional uses to the northwest quadrant of the I-75/Mount Paran Road/I-75 Interchange and prevent the development of additional commercial use property in this area. -
Reconnecting Communities: Atlanta Rail Corridors Assessment
Reconnecting Communities: Atlanta Rail Corridors Assessment PREPARED BY RAILS-TO-TRAILS CONSERVANCY FOR THE A RTHUR M. BLANK FAMILY FOUNDATION AND THE T URNER FOUNDATION INC. PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS Jeffrey Ciabotti Hugh Morris Darren Smith Brian Yourish MISSION: The purpose of Rails-to-Trails Conservancy is to enrich America’s communities and countryside by creating a nationwide network of public trails from former rail lines and connecting corridors. This report was made possible by generous grants from The Arthur M. Blank Family Foundation and the Turner Foundation Inc. Rails-to-Trails Conservancy and our many Georgia partners extend our gratitude for the foundations’ support and vision to create a regional transit greenway system that will reconnect communities with parks and open space, walking and bicycling facilities, mass transit and cultural and historical resources. SPECIAL ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The Rails-to-Trails Conservancy would like to recognize the work of several individuals that greatly enhanced the accuracy and utility of this report: Members of the Project Advisory Committee, Andrea Ferster, RTC general counsel, Barbara Richey, RTC graphic designer and Jennifer Simmons, RTC editor. Reconnecting Communities Atlanta Rail Corridors Assessment FINAL REPORT April 2004 TRAILDART TRAIL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE RESPONSE TEAM A Service of Rails-to-Trails Conservancy TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Project -
Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative Fact Sheet Spring 2018
Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative Fact Sheet Spring 2018 What is the Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative? A transit expansion project connecting the Red/Gold and Blue MARTA rail lines to major employment, educational, healthcare, and shopping destinations, while providing transportation options along a congested corridor. Destinations: Type: Funding Source: Service Areas: • Lindbergh Center Station • Clairmont Road Retail • Light Rail • Local/Federal • City of Atlanta • Cheshire Bridge Road • Suburban Plaza Retail Transit (LRT) (Capital • DeKalb County • Centers for Disease • DeKalb Medical Center Investment Control and Prevention Grant) • City of Decatur • Your DeKalb Farmers Market • Emory University • Avondale Station ▶ How will the project benefit the Clifton Corridor? Increases Service Improves Access Provides Emergency Provides Alternate Reliability and Frequency and Connectivity Evacuation Option Transportation Options ▶ Cost & Ridership Phase 1 Full Build Ridership Only (MOS) (including Phase 1) $900M - $1.3B $1.8 - $2.1B 23,300 Contact Us On the Web Bryan Hobbs http://www.itsmarta.com/clifton-corridor-overview.aspx 404-848-5733 | [email protected] PLANNING Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative Fact Sheet Spring 2018 ▶ Project Schedule We are Here 2012 2015 2018 2022 2026 Planning Environmental Engineering Construction Operation review (NEPA) This timeline is an estimate and is subject to change. ▶ Project Area Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative Alternative 6 (Light Rail) LINDBERGH At grade, non-roadway alignment CENTER At grade, median roadway alignment At grade, lateral roadway alignment Aerial section . D R CHESHIRE F Cut and cover tunnel F I BRIDGE L C R Proposed stations - alt 6 A I R B Y. W D H R E SAGE HILL/ CDC/EMORY L X PHASE 2 IL O V N BRIARCLIFF E E CONFERENCE CENTER L ALIGNMENT C N E R W EMORY/CDC A CITY OF L ATLANTA EMORY- ANDREWS SUBURBAN DEKALB MEDICAL ROLLINS CIRCLE PLAZA CENTER N. -
Detailed Screening Results and Selection of Locally Preferred Alternative
Detailed Screening Results and Selection of Locally Preferred Alternative Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority January 2007 Detailed Screening Results and Selection of Locally Preferred Alternative Prepared For: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Prepared By: Corporation 400 Northpark Town Center 1000 Abernathy Road N.E., Suite 9000 Atlanta, Georgia 30328 In association with: Connetics Transportation Group DW & Associates PBS&J Planners for Environmental Quality Sycamore Consulting Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Development Process..............................................................1-1 1.2 Study Area Description ........................................................................1-3 1.3 Report Organization .............................................................................1-3 2.0 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION PROCESS .......................................2-1 2.1 FTA Project Development Process ......................................................2-1 2.2 Goals and Objectives ...........................................................................2-2 2.3 Evaluation Process ..............................................................................2-5 3.0 IDENTIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES .........3-1 3.1 TSM Alternative....................................................................................3-1 -
Old Growth in the East, a Survey
Old Growth in the East (Rev. Ed.) Old Growth in the East A Survey Revised edition Mary Byrd Davis Appalachia-Science in the Public Interest Mt. Vernon, Kentucky Old Growth in the East (Rev. Ed.) Old Growth in the East: A Survey. Revised edition by Mary Byrd Davis Published by Appalachia-Science in the Public Interest (ASPI, 50 Lair Street, Mount Vernon, KY 40456) on behalf of the Eastern Old-Growth Clearinghouse (POB 131, Georgetown, KY 40324). ASPI is a non-profit organization that makes science and technology responsive to the needs of low-income people in central Appalachia. The Eastern Old-Growth Clearinghouse furthers knowledge about and preservation of old growth in the eastern United States. Its educational means include the Web site www.old-growth.org . First edition: Copyright © 1993 by the Cenozoic Society Revised edition: Copyright © 2003 by Mary Byrd Davis All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without written permission from the author. ISBN 1-878721-04-06 Edited by John Davis. Design by Carol Short and Sammy Short, based on the design of the first edition by Tom Butler Cover illustration by William Crook Jr. Old Growth in the East (Rev. Ed.) To the memory of Toutouque, companion to the Wild Earthlings Old Growth in the East (Rev. Ed.) C O N T E N T S Introduction 5 Northeast Connecticut 7 Maine 9 Massachusetts 19 New Hampshire 24 New Jersey 32 New York 36 Pennsylvania 52 Rhode Island 63 Vermont 65 Southeast Alabama 70 Delaware 76 Florida 78 Georgia 91 Maryland 99 Mississippi 103 North Carolina 110 South Carolina 128 Tennessee 136 Virginia 146 Ohio Valley Indiana 156 Kentucky 162 Ohio 168 West Virginia 175 Southern Midwest Arkansas 179 Kansas 187 Louisiana 189 Missouri 199 Oklahoma 207 Texas 211 Northern Midwest Illinois 218 Iowa 225 Michigan 227 Minnesota 237 Wisconsin 248 Appendix: Species Lis t 266 Old Growth in the East (Rev.