Cantor Zoe Jacobs 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Imprisonment of Jeremiah in Its Historical Context
The Imprisonment of Jeremiah in Its Historical Context kevin l. tolley Kevin L. Tolley ([email protected]) is the coordinator of Seminaries and Institutes of Religion in Fullerton, California. he book of Jeremiah describes the turbulent times in Jerusalem prior to Tthe Babylonian conquest of the city. Warring political factions bickered within the city while a looming enemy rapidly approached. Amid this com- . (wikicommons). plex political arena, Jeremiah arose as a divine spokesman. His preaching became extremely polarizing. These political factions could be categorized along a spectrum of support and hatred toward the prophet. Jeremiah’s imprisonment (Jeremiah 38) illustrates some of the various attitudes toward God’s emissary. This scene also demonstrates the political climate and spiritual atmosphere of Jerusalem at the verge of its collapse into the Babylonian exile and also gives insights into the beginning narrative of the Book of Mormon. Jeremiah Lamenting the Destruction of Jerusalem Jeremiah Setting the Stage: Political Background for Jeremiah’s Imprisonment In the decades before the Babylonian exile in 587/586 BC, Jerusalem was the center of political and spiritual turmoil. True freedom and independence had Rembrandt Harmensz, Rembrandt not been enjoyed there for centuries.1 Subtle political factions maneuvered The narrative of the imprisonment of Jeremiah gives us helpful insights within the capital city and manipulated the king. Because these political into the world of the Book of Mormon and the world of Lehi and his sons. RE · VOL. 20 NO. 3 · 2019 · 97–11397 98 Religious Educator ·VOL.20NO.3·2019 The Imprisonment of Jeremiah in Its Historical Context 99 groups had a dramatic influence on the throne, they were instrumental in and closed all local shrines, centralizing the worship of Jehovah to the temple setting the political and spiritual stage of Jerusalem. -
A Brief Chronology
A Brief Chronology B.C.E. is an abbreviation of "Before the Common Era" and C.E. of the "Common Era." The Common Era is that of the Gregorian calendar, where time is measured before or after what was thought to be the birth year of Jesus: in Latin, Anno Domini, the "Year of the Lord," abbreviated A.D. In fact, Jesus' date of birth is now placed in or about 4 B.C.E. Muslims also use a "before" and "after" system. In their case the watershed date is that of the Hijrah or Emigration of Muhammad from Mecca to Medina in 622 C.E., called in the West A.H., or Anno Hegirae. Jewish time reckoning is only "after," that is, from the Creation of the World, normally understood to be about 4000 years B.C.E. B.C.E. ca. 1700 God's Covenant with Abraham ca. 1200 The exodus from Egypt; the giving of the Torah to Moses on Mount Sinai ca. 1000 David, king of the Israelites, captures Jerusalem and makes it his capital ca. 970 Solomon builds the First Temple in Jerusalem 621 Josiah centralizes all Jewish worship in the Temple in Jeru- salem 587 Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar carry Israelites into exile in Babylon; the destruction of Solomon's Temple £38 Exiles return to Judea; Ezra; Nehemiah; rebuilding of Jerusa- lem Temple 332 Alexander the Great in the Near East; Greek dynasties rule Palestine ca. 280 Translation of Bible in Greek: the "Septuagint" 200 The Seleucid dynasty of Syria replaces the Ptolemies as rulers of Palestine 17 £-164 Antiochus IV Epiphanes; profanation of the Temple 164 Maccabean revolt; Jewish independence 164-37 The Hasmonean dynasty rules Palestine xviii CHRONOLOGY 37-4 Herod the Great, king of Judea ca. -
Israelite Inscriptions from the Time of Jeremiah and Lehi
Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Faculty Publications 2020-02-04 Israelite Inscriptions from the Time of Jeremiah and Lehi Dana M. Pike Brigham Young University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, Mormon Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Pike, Dana M., "Israelite Inscriptions from the Time of Jeremiah and Lehi" (2020). Faculty Publications. 3697. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/3697 This Peer-Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Chapter 7 Israelite Inscriptions from the Time of Jeremiah and Lehi Dana M. Pike The greater the number of sources the better when investi- gating the history and culture of people in antiquity. Narrative and prophetic texts in the Bible and 1 Nephi have great value in helping us understand the milieu in which Jeremiah and Lehi received and fulfilled their prophetic missions, but these records are not our only documentary sources. A number of Israelite inscriptions dating to the period of 640–586 b.c., the general time of Jeremiah and Lehi, provide additional glimpses into this pivotal and primarily tragic period in Israelite history. The number of inscriptions discovered from ancient Israel and its immediate neighbors—Ammon, Moab, Edom, Philistia, and Phoenicia—pales in comparison to the bountiful harvest of texts from ancient Assyria, Babylonia, and Egypt. -
Hebrew Names and Name Authority in Library Catalogs by Daniel D
Hebrew Names and Name Authority in Library Catalogs by Daniel D. Stuhlman BHL, BA, MS LS, MHL In support of the Doctor of Hebrew Literature degree Jewish University of America Skokie, IL 2004 Page 1 Abstract Hebrew Names and Name Authority in Library Catalogs By Daniel D. Stuhlman, BA, BHL, MS LS, MHL Because of the differences in alphabets, entering Hebrew names and words in English works has always been a challenge. The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) is the source for many names both in American, Jewish and European society. This work examines given names, starting with theophoric names in the Bible, then continues with other names from the Bible and contemporary sources. The list of theophoric names is comprehensive. The other names are chosen from library catalogs and the personal records of the author. Hebrew names present challenges because of the variety of pronunciations. The same name is transliterated differently for a writer in Yiddish and Hebrew, but Yiddish names are not covered in this document. Family names are included only as they relate to the study of given names. One chapter deals with why Jacob and Joseph start with “J.” Transliteration tables from many sources are included for comparison purposes. Because parents may give any name they desire, there can be no absolute rules for using Hebrew names in English (or Latin character) library catalogs. When the cataloger can not find the Latin letter version of a name that the author prefers, the cataloger uses the rules for systematic Romanization. Through the use of rules and the understanding of the history of orthography, a library research can find the materials needed. -
Was Jesus Ever a Disciple of John the Baptist? a Historical Study
Was Jesus Ever a Disciple of John the Baptist? A Historical Study Max Aplin Ph.D. The University of Edinburgh 2011 Declaration I hereby declare that I have composed this thesis, the work is my own, and that this work has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. ii Abstract This study asks if the historical Jesus was ever a disciple of John the Baptist, where by ‘disciple’ is meant someone who would have been in a close personal relationship to John as their leader and teacher, and who would have spent considerable time in his presence. The current majority view of scholars is that Jesus is likely to have been John’s disciple at some time before beginning his own ministry (and in the opinion of some, during the early part of his ministry too). However, this study argues that, although we cannot be sure, he is actually unlikely to have chosen to submit himself to John in this way. Reasons are provided for believing that, even early in his ministry, Jesus had a profound confidence in his (sometimes distinctive) beliefs across a range of religious issues, including those beliefs that had to do with his own extremely important place in God’s plan. It is argued too that if Jesus was ever John’s disciple, he would very probably have to have first become his disciple no more than a matter of months before beginning his own ministry. The shortness of the time in which his confidence in his religious beliefs could have developed means that, during the period in which any potential discipleship would have begun, it is probable that Jesus had at least a fairly deep assurance about what he believed in religious matters, including what he believed concerning his own crucial place in God’s plan. -
The Consolation of Rabban Yohanan Ben Zakkai
ERIC OTTENHEIJM The Consolation of Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai DE TROOST VAN RABBAN YOHANAN BEN ZAKKAI Volgens een bekend verhaal zou Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai (ca. 30-90 n.C.), bij het zien van de verwoeste Tempel, hebben verklaard dat goede werken de door God ge- wilde vervanging zijn van verzoenende Tempeloffers. Deze nieuwe visie, gebaseerd op Hosea 6:6, liet echter geen sporen na in vroeg-Rabbijnse discussies over verzoening. Bovendien bleven oudere, apocalyptische noties van goede werken als voorsprekers aan een hemels gerechtshof een rol spelen. Waarschijnlijk leidde Ben Zakkai’s theologie van verzoening door goede werken lange tijd een marginaal bestaan. Pas toen de Rabbijnen een dominante positie hadden verworven kon deze opvatting worden gepre- senteerd als het Rabbijnse antwoord op de val van de Tempel. For Pieter W. van der Horst, on the occasion of his 65th Birthday1 Or is the discord not in truth, Since truth is self consistent ever? But, close in fleshly wrappings held, The blinded mind of man can never Discern - so faint her taper shines - The subtle chain that all combines? Boëthius, Consolatio Philosophiae, Song III (transl. H.R. James) In the course of its history, Judaism has always reframed itself by interpreting Biblical texts. Thus continuity and change can be observed within the flow of an ongoing revelation, rooted in the text of the Hebrew Bible. During great historical turmoil, this hermeneutical process acquired a special urgency. A prime example of this is the destruction of the Second Temple in the year 70 CE, which engendered an acute religious crisis because of the loss of the _____________ 1 This article is based on a lecture given at the Symposium on the Occasion of the 100th Birthday of W.C. -
Birth of John the Baptist – 24Th June 2018 (Year B), Truro Cathedral
Birth of John the Baptist – 24th June 2018 (Year B), Truro Cathedral What’s in a name? Isaiah 40.1-11; Acts 13.14b-26; Luke 1.57-66, 80 What’s in a name? Knowing that I was going to be moving house this past week and that I was going to be preaching this morning, I managed to get really ahead of myself and first looked at today’s Bible readings about a fortnight ago. Have you ever noticed how when you’re reading or listening to familiar passages of scripture, different things seem to jump out at you each time you come to them? The thing that really caught my attention on this occasion was the beginning of our gospel reading: Elizabeth and Zechariah have just produced a longed-for, miracle baby son; all their relatives and friends have gathered to celebrate the occasion and suddenly a major disagreement erupts as to what they’re actually going to call him. You can almost imagine it – transpose the scene to the present day and a baptism service at church; parents, godparents and bemused small children are gathered around the font, assorted family and friends look on with varying degrees of interest and excitement; the vicar is holding the baby and asks what name she will be given … and before the parents can get a word in edgeways, everybody else is arguing about which grannies and aunties and cousins she’s going to be named after. What’s in a name? Some of us met on Thursday evening to talk about the future of our ‘Growing in Discipleship/Pondering’ courses. -
Queen Alexandra-Complete-Revised
Queen Alexandra: The Anomaly of a Sovereign Jewish Queen in the Second Temple Period Thesis submitted for the degree of “Doctor of Philosophy” by Etka Liebowitz Submitted to the Senate of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem November 2011 This work was carried out under the supervision of: Professor Daniel R. Schwartz Acknowledgements This dissertation commenced almost a decade ago with a conversation I had with the late Professor Hanan Eshel, of blessed memory. His untimely passing was a great loss to all. It continued at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, where I was privileged to study with the leading scholars in the field of Jewish History. First and foremost, I wish to thank my supervisor, Professor Daniel Schwartz, for the generous amount of time and effort he invested in seeing this dissertation to fruition. I learned much from his constructive suggestions and valuable insights, from our meetings, and from his outstanding classes on Josephus at the Hebrew University. I would also like to express my deep gratitude to the other members of my supervisory committee for their guidance, encouragement and useful critiques: Professor Lee Levine, who initially served as my supervisor until his retirement, and Professor Tal Ilan, whose pioneering feminist studies on the topic of Queen Alexandra led the way for my research. Professor Ilan devoted much time to this project, and has become a valued colleague, mentor and friend. My grateful thanks are also extended to Rivkah Fishman-Duker and Dr. Shaul Bauman for their comments, suggestions and invaluable assistance with various chapters. Finally, I wish to express my gratitude to my beloved family for their understanding, encouragement and support throughout my studies – my husband, Moshe, my children Shlomo, Tzipi and Naomi, and my mother, Rifka, who was an independent (and anomalous) woman many years before the feminist movement. -
YOHANAN PETROVSKY-SHTERN the Crown Family Professor of Jewish Studies Northwestern University
YPS curriculum vitae 1 YOHANAN PETROVSKY-SHTERN The Crown Family Professor of Jewish Studies Northwestern University (NU) 1881 Sheridan Road, Room 317, Evanston, Il 60208 Phone: (847) 467-3399 Fax: (847) 467-1393 e-mail: [email protected] website: http://yps.gallery PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE The Crown Family Professor of Jewish Studies, Professor of Jewish History, Department of History and the Crown Family Center for Jewish and Israel Studies, Northwestern University, 2011—present Ordinary Professor, Department of Philosophy, Freie Ukrainische Universität, Munich, 2018—present Visiting Professor, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Summer, 2016 The Kosciuszko Visiting Professor, University of Warsaw, Spring-Summer, 2016 The Lady Davis Visiting Professor, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Spring-Summer, 2014 Recurrent Visiting Professor, Ukrainian Catholic University, Lviv, 2015—present Associate Fellow, Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute, 2010—present Fulbright Specialist, Visiting Professor, Center for Urban History, Lviv, Ukraine, 2014 Director, the Crown Family Center for Jewish Studies, NU, 2009—2012 Fellow, Institute for Advanced Studies, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 2008, 2011, 2019 Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, Department of History and the Crown Family Center for Jewish Studies, NU, 2003—2011 Visiting Professor, Harvard University, Summer School, 2010 Fulbright Visiting Professor, University Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Kyiv, 2008 Visiting Scholar, Institute for Advanced Studies, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 2007 The Sensibar Visiting -
With Letters of Light: Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Early Jewish
With Letters of Light rwa lç twytwab Ekstasis Religious Experience from Antiquity to the Middle Ages General Editor John R. Levison Editorial Board David Aune · Jan Bremmer · John Collins · Dyan Elliott Amy Hollywood · Sarah Iles Johnston · Gabor Klaniczay Paulo Nogueira · Christopher Rowland · Elliot R. Wolfson Volume 2 De Gruyter With Letters of Light rwa lç twytwab Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Early Jewish Apocalypticism, Magic, and Mysticism in Honor of Rachel Elior rwayla ljr Edited by Daphna V. Arbel and Andrei A. Orlov De Gruyter ISBN 978-3-11-022201-2 e-ISBN 978-3-11-022202-9 ISSN 1865-8792 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data With letters of light : studies in the Dead Sea scrolls, early Jewish apocalypti- cism, magic and mysticism / Andrei A. Orlov, Daphna V. Arbel. p. cm. - (Ekstasis, religious experience from antiquity to the Middle Ages;v.2) Includes bibliographical references and index. Summary: “This volume offers valuable insights into a wide range of scho- larly achievements in the study of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Jewish apocalypti- cism, magic, and mysticism from the Second Temple period to the later rabbinic and Hekhalot developments. The majority of articles included in the volume deal with Jewish and Christian apocalyptic and mystical texts constituting the core of experiential dimension of these religious traditions” - ECIP summary. ISBN 978-3-11-022201-2 (hardcover 23 x 15,5 : alk. paper) 1. Dead Sea scrolls. 2. Apocalyptic literature - History and criticism. 3. Jewish magic. 4. Mysticism - Judaism. 5. Messianism. 6. Bible. O.T. - Criticism, interpretation, etc. 7. Rabbinical literature - History and criticism. -
Rabbi Dov Linzer Is Rosh Hayeshiva of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah and the Chair of Its Departments of Talmud and Jewish Law
MillinHavivinEng06 7/19/06 11:07 AM Page 1 Rabbi Dov Linzer is Rosh HaYeshiva of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah and the Chair of its Departments of Talmud and Jewish Law. RABBAN YOHANAN BEN ZAKKAI AND ZEKHER LE-MIKDASH Rabbi Dov Linzer THE TAKANOT OF RABBAN YOHANAN BEN ZAKKAI Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai (RYBZ), leader of the Jewish people in the period immediately following the destruction of the Temple, established a number of edicts (takanot) during his tenure.1 The Talmud places the total number at nine, six of which are stated explicitly in the Mishnah2 and three more are attributed to him by the Talmud.3 While only one of his takanot explicitly mention the phrase “a commemoration for the Temple (zekher le-mikdash),”4 many are intro- duced by the phrase “when the Temple was destroyed he enacted (mi-sheharav hamikdash hitkin),” and almost all of them seem to be responding to the destruction of the Temple. The Talmud, commenting on the Mishnah that employs the phrase zekher le- mikdash, underscores the imperative to make such commemorations: What is the basis for commemorating the Temple (zekher le-mikdash)? Because Scripture says, “For I will restore health unto you and I will heal you of your wound, says the Lord, because an outcast they have called you, ‘she is Zion, there is none that inquires after her.’ ” (Jer. 30:17) From this we gather that she ought to be inquired after.5 1 Tosafot in a number of places (Yoma 66a, s.v. ain makdishin, Avodah Zarah 13a, s.v. -
Yohanan Ben Zakkai, Amicus Caesaris:* a Jewish Hero in Rabbinic Eyes
JSIJ 4 (2005) 133–149 YOHANAN BEN ZAKKAI, AMICUS CAESARIS:* A JEWISH HERO IN RABBINIC EYES AMRAM TROPPER** In a famous rabbinic legend, Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai flees besieged Jerusalem, surrenders to the Romans and heartens the Roman leadership by predicting their military success and Vespasian’s promotion to emperor. This very same legend, in three of its four versions, also describes how Vespasian enabled Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai to establish a rabbinic academy in Yavneh, the academy that would come to be viewed retrospectively as the central core of the burgeoning rabbinic movement. Thus the foundation myth of Yavneh, the story designed to describe the providential establishment of the rabbinic academy in the wake of the destruction of Jerusalem, risks depicting its central hero as a deserter, perhaps even as a defector and a traitor. Why would the rabbis have portrayed one of the most important sages of the formative period in rabbinic Judaism in this apparently unfavorable manner? Perhaps this unflattering interpretation of Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai’s role in the Yavneh legend is anachronistic in that it projects modern ideologies and ethical sensibilities into the past.1 Thus, for example, when Y. Baer rejected the historical veracity of this escape story on the grounds that a man of Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai’s stature would never have fled to the Romans, he may very well have been influenced by modern ideological considerations, whether appear respectively in Avot de-Rabbi ”אוהבו של מלך“ and ”מאוהבו של קיסר הוא“ * Nathan A chapter 4 (Aboth de-Rabbi Nathan, ed. S.