DOCSLIB.ORG

Full Issue, Vol. 58 No. 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full Issue, Vol. 58 No. 1 Great Basin Naturalist Volume 58 Number 1 Article 13 1-30-1998 Full Issue, Vol. 58 No. 1 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation (1998) "Full Issue, Vol. 58 No. 1," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 58 : No. 1 , Article 13. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol58/iss1/13 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. T H E GREAT BASIN naturalistnaturalist moe A VOLUME 58 n2naN I1 JANUARY 1998 BRIGHAM YOUNG university GREAT BASIN naturalist httpwwwlibbyuedu amsnms editor assistant editor RICHARD W BAUMANN NATHAN M SMITH 290 MLBM 190 MLBM PO box 20200 PO box 26879 brigham young university brigham young university provo UT 84602020084602 0200 provo UT 84602687984602 6879 8013785053801 378 5053 8013786688801 378 6688 FAX 8013783733801 378 3733 emailE mail nmshbllibyuedunmshbll1byuedu associate editors BRUCE D ESHELMAN STANLEY D SMITH department of biological sciences university of department of biology wisconsin whitewater whitewater w1WIwa 53190 university of nevada las vegas las vegas NV 89154400489154 4004 JEFFREY J JOHANSEN department of biology john carroll university PAUL T TUELLER university heights OH 44118 department of environmental resource sciences university of nevada reno 1000 valley road BORIS C reno kondratieff reno NV 89512 department of entomology colorado state university fort collins CO 80523 ROBERT C WHITMORE of box PAUL C MARSH division forestry 6125 west virginia morgantown center for environmental studies arizona university Morgan town WV 26506612526506 6125 state university tempe AZ 85287 editorial board berranjerran T flinders chairman botany and range science duke S rogers zoology wilford M hess botany and range science richard R tolman zoology all are at brigham young university ex officio editorial board members include steven L taylor college of biology and agriculture H duane smith director monte L bean life science museum richard W baumann editor great basin naturalist the great basin naturalist founded in 1939 is published quarterly by brigham young university unpublished manuscripts that further our biological understanding of the great basin and surrounding areas in western north america are accepted for publication subscriptions annual subscriptions to the great basin naturalist for 1998 are 25 for individual sub- scriscribersbers 30 outside the united states and 50 for institutions the price of single issues is12is 12 all back issues are in print and available for sale all matters pertaining to subscriptions back issues or other busi- ness should be directed to the editor great basin naturalist 290 MLBM PO box 20200 brigham young university provo UT 84602020084602 0200 scholarly exchanges libraries or other ororganizations9anizationsanimations interested in obtaining thethegreatcreatgreat basin naturalist through a continuing exchange of scholarly publications should contact the exchange librarian 6385 HBLL PO box 26889 brigham young university provo UT 84602688984602 6889 editorial production staff joanne abel technical editor copyright 0 1998 by brigham young university ISSN 001736140017 3614 official publication date 30 january 1998 1981 98 750 24893 the great basin naturalist PUBLISHED AT PROVO UTAH BY BRIGHAM YOUNG university ISSN 001736140017 3614 VOLUME 58 31 JANUARY 1998 no I1 great basin naturalist 581 0 1998 appp 1 11 TAXONOMY OF sphaeromeria ARTEMISIA AND TANACETUM compositae anthemideae BASED ON RANDOMLY AMPLIFIED polymorphic DNA RAPD E durant McMcArthurarthuriArthurl1 reneerenge van Buren233 stewart C SandersoSandersonsandersonlsanderson1nl1 and kimball T harper2harpere ABSTRACT relationships within between and among the anthemideae genera sphaeromeria artemisia and tanacetum were investigated using 238 randomly amplified polymorphic DNA RAPD markers obtained from twenty lomer10 mer primers amplified on genomic DNA forty one populations from 16 taxa 15 species were studied jaccard s coefficient of similarity and UPGMA clustering analysis were used to construct phonophenogramsphonogramsgrams T tests were used to make comparisons between samples at various systematic levels DNA markers were 75 similar for conspecific populations sixteen sphaeromeriasphaeromena populations 5 species showed an average interspecific similarity of 21 interspecific similarity among 23 artemisia populations 8 species with 2 subspecies of A tntritrldentata included averaged 27 two tanacetum species 1 I1 population each were 89 similar the high similarity of the tanacetum species was in the range of observed values for conspecific populations indeed those 2 species T vulgare and T boreale have been considered conspecific by some authors the 3 subgenerasub genera of artemisia studied artemisia dracunculus and tndentataetridentataeTridentatae formed separate groups in comparisons among the genera sphaeromeriasphaeromena was 18 similar to artemisia more similar to subgenus tri- dentdentataeatae than the other artemisia subgenerasub genera interintergenericmtergenencgeneriegeneric comparisons of sphaeromeriasphaeromena and artemisia and artemisia and tanacetum each were found to be 7 similar to each other thus based on DNA markers sphaeromeriasphaeromena is more similar to artemisia than it is to tanacetum which supports previously established morphological distinctions sphaeromeriasphaeromena potentilloides may be misplaced in the genus sphaeromenasphaeromeria based on DNA marker resultsi it is likely that north american anthemideae are circumboreal derivatives of ancestral eurasian stock and that sphaeromeriasphaeromena is derived from an artemisia likeilke ancestor key words sphaeromenaspbaeromeria artemisia tanacetum anthemideae RAPD taxonomy two decades ago holmgren et al 1976 duceddeuced the taxon to subgeneric status section published an intriguing article sphaeromesphaeroma sphaeromeriasphaeromerid in the genus tanacetum sahaesphae ria a genus closer to artemisia than to tanace- romeria endemic to western north america tum asteraceae anthemideae in their article Hohnholmgrengren et al 1976 mcarthur et al 1989 holmgrenho1mgren et al 1976 returned sphaeromeria cronquist 1994 consists of 9 species 8 of to the generic rank first proposed by nuttall them rare several authors have noted that an 1841 torrey and gray 1843 however re understanding of relationships between and 1 shrub1shrub sciences laboratoqlaboratory rocky mountain research station forest service united states department of agricultureofagriculture 735 N 500 E provo UT 84606 department of botany and range science brigham young university provo UT 84602 spiesent3presentSpie seatsent address department of life science utah valley state college orem UT 84058 1 2 GREAT BASIN naturalist volume 58 within the genera artemisia and tanacetum were grown in our greenhouse from seed ob- would be enhanced by new information on the tained from european colleagues table 1 we distribution and phylogeny of that portion of collected samples between may and august the tribe anthemideae hall and clements 1995 inm most cases 3 populations range 1 4 1923 holmgren et al 1976 mcarthur 1979 for each taxon by combining tissue young meartmcarthurMcArthuihul et al 1989 leaves from 30 healthy but otherwise ran- artemisia is the largest genus of anthem- domly chosen individuals of each population ideae consisting of 250 or more species divided we obtained a bulked sample for each popu- into 4 subgenerasubgencrasubgenera it is distributed mostly in lation leaves were collected in nylon bags temperate portions of the northern hemisphere immersed immediately in liquid nitrogen and but also in south america and south africa transported to the laboratory where they were willis 1973 bailey HorthortonumhortoriumHortooriumorlumnum staff 1976 stored at ultra cold temperatures 80c800csoc until greger 1978 mcarthur 1979 mcarthur et al DNA was extracted herbarium voucher spec- 1981 ling 1995a tanacetum consists of some imensamens are deposited in the shrub sciences 50 species with a eurasian distribution except laboratory SSLP or the brigham young uni- for the T bipinnatumbipinnatum complex which is cir-circlr versity BRY herbaria following methods of cumcumpolarpolar willis 1973 bailey HorthortonumhortoriumHortooriumorlumnum staff mcarthur and sanderson 1985 we made a 1976 mcarthur 1979 kyhos and raven 1982 chromosome count from root tips of sahaesphae here we address relationships among the romeriaromena diversidiversifoliadzversifohafolia to extend the cytological genera sphaeromeriasphaeromena artemisia and tanace- knowledge base in sphaeromenasphaeromeria several but tum using genomic DNA markers from repre- not all sphaeromenasphaeromeria species are cytologically sentativesentative species from each genus we also re- known powell et al 1974 sanderson et al view species and generic distributions 1984 mcarthur et al 1989 randomly amplified polymorphic DNA DNA and amplification RAPD analysis has been shown to be useful extraction in studying plant population biology in pre- bulked leaf samples were thoroughly mixed paring genetic maps and in classifying plants and a sample weighing 030.30 3 050.50 5 g from each williams et al 1990 1993 dawson et al 1993 population was used for DNA extractioneftiexti action russell et al 1993 williams
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vascular Plant List Whatcom County Whatcom County. Whatcom County, WA
    Vascular Plant List Whatcom County Whatcom County. Whatcom County, WA. List covers plants found in Whatcom County. Combination of plant lists of areas within Whatcom County, made by various observers over several years, with numerous additions by Jim Duemmel. Plants collected in Whatcom County found in the UW and WSU herbariums have been added to the list. 1175 spp., 223 introduced. Prepared by Don Knoke 2004. These lists represent the work of different WNPS members over the years. Their accuracy has not been verified by the Washington Native Plant Society. We offer these lists to individuals as a tool to enhance the enjoyment and study of native plants. * - Introduced Scientific Name Common Name Family Name Abies amabilis Pacific silver fir Pinaceae Abies grandis Grand fir Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Sub-alpine fir Pinaceae Abies procera Noble fir Pinaceae Acer circinatum Vine maple Aceraceae Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple Aceraceae Achillea millefolium Yarrow Asteraceae Achlys triphylla Vanilla leaf Berberidaceae Aconitum columbianum Monkshood Ranunculaceae Actaea rubra Baneberry Ranunculaceae Adenocaulon bicolor Pathfinder Asteraceae Adiantum pedatum Maidenhair fern Polypodiaceae Agoseris aurantiaca Orange agoseris Asteraceae Agoseris glauca Mountain agoseris Asteraceae Agropyron caninum Bearded wheatgrass Poaceae Agropyron repens* Quack grass Poaceae Agropyron spicatum Blue-bunch wheatgrass Poaceae Agrostemma githago* Common corncockle Caryophyllaceae Agrostis alba* Red top Poaceae Agrostis exarata*
    [Show full text]
  • North Cascades National Park — 50 Years
    VOLUME 42, NO. 2 Summer 2018 Journal of the Douglasia WASHINGTON NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY To promote the appreciation and conservation of Washington’s native plants and their habitats through study, education, and advocacy. North Cascades National Park — 50 Years Summer 2018 • DOUGLASIA Douglasia VOLUME 42, NO. 2 SUMMER 2018 journal of the washington native plant society About This Issue WNPS Fellows* by David Giblin Clay Antieau Joe Miller** William Barker** Margaret Miller** Sometime last year WNPS Fellow Fred Weinmann sug- Nelsa Buckingham** Mae Morey gested that the summer 2018 Douglasia issue be dedicated to Pamela Camp Brian O. Mulligan** Tom Corrigan** Ruth Peck Ownbey** the flora of Washington’s national parks. The editorial board Melinda Denton** Jim Riley thought this was a great idea, so here it is. Thanks to Fred for Lee Ellis Gary Smith the inspiring idea and to all of the authors for sharing their Betty Jo Fitzgerald** Ron Taylor** knowledge about the plants, people, and resources affiliated Mary Fries** Richard Tinsley Amy Jean Gilmartin** Ann Weinmann with these parks. Al Hanners** Fred Weinmann Lynn Hendrix** * WNPS Fellow is the highest WNPS President Don Schaechtel provides a delightful Karen Hinman** honor given to a member by reminiscence of his more than 30 years of hiking, climbing, Marie Hitchman our society. This title is given and botanizing throughout Washington’s three national parks. Catherine Hovanic to those who have made Two articles in this issue remind us of the significant contribu- Art Kermoade** outstanding contributions to Don Knoke** the understanding and/or tions that amateur botanists have made at two of these parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
    Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Natural History Museum
    Bulletin of _ The Natural History Bfit-RSH MU8&M PRIteifTBD QENERAl LIBRARY Botany Series VOLUME 23 NUMBER 2 25 NOVEMBER 1993 The Bulletin of The Natural History Museum (formerly: Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History)), instituted in 1949, is issued in four scientific series, Botany, Entomology, Geology (incorporating Mineralogy) and Zoology. The Botany Series is edited in the Museum's Department of Botany Keeper of Botany: Dr S. Blackmore Editor of Bulletin: Dr R. Huxley Assistant Editor: Mrs M.J. West Papers in the Bulletin are primarily the results of research carried out on the unique and ever- growing collections of the Museum, both by the scientific staff and by specialists from elsewhere who make use of the Museum's resources. Many of the papers are works of reference that will remain indispensable for years to come. All papers submitted for publication are subjected to external peer review for acceptance. A volume contains about 160 pages, made up by two numbers, published in the Spring and Autumn. Subscriptions may be placed for one or more of the series on an annual basis. Individual numbers and back numbers can be purchased and a Bulletin catalogue, by series, is available. Orders and enquiries should be sent to: Intercept Ltd. P.O. Box 716 Andover Hampshire SPIO lYG Telephone: (0264) 334748 Fax: (0264) 334058 WorW Lwr abbreviation: Bull. nat. Hist. Mus. Lond. (Bot.) © The Natural History Museum, 1993 Botany Series ISSN 0968-0446 Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 55-177 The Natural History Museum Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD Issued 25 November 1993 Typeset by Ann Buchan (Typesetters), Middlesex Printed in Great Britain at The Alden Press.
    [Show full text]
  • A Second Annotated Checklist of Vascular Plants in Wells Gray Provincial Park and Vicinity, British Columbia, Canada
    A second annotated checklist of vascular plants in Wells Gray Provincial Park and vicinity, British Columbia, Canada Version 1: April, 2011 Curtis R. Björk1 and Trevor Goward2 ENLICHENED CONSULTING LTD. Box 131, Clearwater, BC, V0E 1N0, Canada [email protected], [email protected] Vascular Plants in Wells Gray SUMMARY Wells Gray Provincial Park is a vast wilderness preserve situated in the mountains and highlands of south-central British Columbia. The first major floristic study of the vascular plants of Wells Gray and its vicinity was published in 1965 by Leena Hämet-Ahti, who documented 550 taxa, including a first Canadian record of Carex praeceptorium. The present study contributes nearly 500 additional taxa documented by us between 1976 and 2010 in connection with our personal explorations of the Clearwater Valley. The vascular flora of Wells Gray Park and vicinity now stands at 1046 taxa, including 881 native species and 165 species introduced from Eurasia and other portions of British Columbia. Wells Gray Park is notable both for the presence of numerous taxa (45) at or near the northern limits of their range, as well as for an unexpectedly high number of taxa (43) accorded conservation status by the British Columbia Conservation Data Centre. Antennaria corymbosa has its only known Canadian locality within Wells Gray, while five additional species reported here are known in Canada from fewer than six localities. About a dozen unknown, possibly undescribed taxa have also been detected. Botanical inventory has thus far been confined to the southern portions of Wells Gray. Future studies in northern half of the park will certainly greatly increase our knowledge of the biological diversity safeguarded in this magnificent wilderness preserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Wenatchee Confluence State Park
    Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Wenatchee Confluence State Park Pacific Biodiversity Institute 2 Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of the Wenatchee Confluence State Park George Wooten [email protected] and Peter H. Morrison [email protected] December 2008 Pacific Biodiversity Institute P.O. Box 298 Winthrop, Washington 98862 509-996-2490 Recommended Citation Wooten G. and P.H. Morrison, 2008. Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of the Wenatchee Confluence State Park. Pacific Biodiversity Institute, Winthrop, Washington. 58 p. Acknowledgements Juliet Rhodes, Diana Hackenburg, and Alexis Monetta entered the data we collected into databases. Juliet Rhodes checked the data to ensure data integrity. The photographs in this report were taken during this project by George Wooten and Peter Morrison. Project Funding This project was funded by the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. 3 Executive Summary Pacific Biodiversity Institute (PBI) conducted a rare plant and vegetation survey of Wenatchee Confluence State Park for the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (WSPRC). Wenatchee Confluence State Park covers 231.08 acres in Chelan County. The park is situated within the northern city limits of Wenatchee along the Columbia River, where it is impounded by the Rock Island Dam. Wenatchee Confluence State Park is a popular camping area and has heavy use by bicyclists and walkers. Trails are both paved and gravel. Wenatchee Confluence State Park was mapped into 22 polygons covered by eight primary plant communities or mapped as developed, disturbed or water. Existing plant communities were characterized within each polygon. Several of the primary plant communities are globally rare, however restoration opportunities are limited in a practical sense to the existing natural area where there is already a wetland and a wildlife restoration project underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6.8-A
    Appendix 6.8-A Terrestrial Wildlife and Vegetation Baseline Report AJAX PROJECT Environmental Assessment Certificate Application / Environmental Impact Statement for a Comprehensive Study Ajax Mine Terrestrial Wildlife and Vegetation Baseline Report Prepared for KGHM Ajax Mining Inc. Prepared by This image cannot currently be displayed. Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. #112, 9547 152 St. Surrey, BC V3R 5Y5 July 2015 Ajax Mine Terrestrial Wildlife and Vegetation Baseline Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared exclusively for KGHM Ajax Mining Inc. by Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. The quality of information, conclusions and estimates contained herein is consistent with the level of effort expended and is based on: i) information available at the time of preparation; ii) data collected by Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. and/or supplied by outside sources; and iii) the assumptions, conditions and qualifications set forth in this report. This report is intended for use by KGHM Ajax Mining Inc. only, subject to the terms and conditions of its contract with Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. Any other use, or reliance on this report by any third party, is at that party’s sole risk. 2 Ajax Mine Terrestrial Wildlife and Vegetation Baseline Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Baseline wildlife and habitat surveys were initiated in 2007 to support a future impact assessment for the redevelopment of two existing, but currently inactive, open pit mines southwest of Kamloops. Detailed Project plans were not available at that time, so the general areas of activity were buffered to define a study area. The two general Project areas at the time were New Afton, an open pit just south of Highway 1, and Ajax, east of Jacko Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of British Columbia Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae Through Cucurbitaceae)
    The Vascular Plants of British Columbia Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae through Cucurbitaceae) by George W. Douglas1, Gerald B. Straley2 and Del Meidinger3 1 George Douglas 2 Gerald Straley 3 Del Meidinger 6200 North Road Botanical Garden Research Branch R.R.#2 University of British Columbia B.C. Ministry of Forests Duncan, B.C. V9L 1N9 6501 S.W. Marine Drive 31 Bastion Square Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 Victoria, B. C. V8W 3E7 April 1989 Ministry of Forests THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae through Cucurbitaceae) Contributors: Dr. G.W. Douglas, Douglas Ecological Consultants Ltd., Duncan, B.C. — Aceraceae through Betulaceae Brassicaceae (except Arabis, Cardamine and Rorippa) through Cucurbitaceae. Mr. D. Meidinger, Research Branch, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C. — Gymnosperms. Dr. G.B. Straley, Botanical Garden, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C. — Boraginaceae, Arabis and Rorippa. With the cooperation of the Royal British Columbia Museum and the Botanical University of British Columbia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to Dr. G.A. Allen for providing valuable suggestions during the initial stages of the project. Thanks are also due to Drs. G.A. Allen, A. Ceska and F. Ganders for reviewing taxonomically difficult groups. Mrs. O. Ceska reviewed the final draft of Part 1. Mr. G. Mulligan kindly searched the DAO herbarium and provided information on Brassicaceae. Dr. G. Argus helped with records from CAN. Louise Gronmyr and Jean Stringer kindly typed most of the contributions and helped in many ways in the production of the final manuscript which was typeset by Beth Collins.
    [Show full text]
  • FEIS Citation Retrieval System Keywords
    FEIS Citation Retrieval System Keywords 29,958 entries as KEYWORD (PARENT) Descriptive phrase AB (CANADA) Alberta ABEESC (PLANTS) Abelmoschus esculentus, okra ABEGRA (PLANTS) Abelia × grandiflora [chinensis × uniflora], glossy abelia ABERT'S SQUIRREL (MAMMALS) Sciurus alberti ABERT'S TOWHEE (BIRDS) Pipilo aberti ABIABI (BRYOPHYTES) Abietinella abietina, abietinella moss ABIALB (PLANTS) Abies alba, European silver fir ABIAMA (PLANTS) Abies amabilis, Pacific silver fir ABIBAL (PLANTS) Abies balsamea, balsam fir ABIBIF (PLANTS) Abies bifolia, subalpine fir ABIBRA (PLANTS) Abies bracteata, bristlecone fir ABICON (PLANTS) Abies concolor, white fir ABICONC (ABICON) Abies concolor var. concolor, white fir ABICONL (ABICON) Abies concolor var. lowiana, Rocky Mountain white fir ABIDUR (PLANTS) Abies durangensis, Coahuila fir ABIES SPP. (PLANTS) firs ABIETINELLA SPP. (BRYOPHYTES) Abietinella spp., mosses ABIFIR (PLANTS) Abies firma, Japanese fir ABIFRA (PLANTS) Abies fraseri, Fraser fir ABIGRA (PLANTS) Abies grandis, grand fir ABIHOL (PLANTS) Abies holophylla, Manchurian fir ABIHOM (PLANTS) Abies homolepis, Nikko fir ABILAS (PLANTS) Abies lasiocarpa, subalpine fir ABILASA (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica, corkbark fir ABILASB (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. bifolia, subalpine fir ABILASL (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa, subalpine fir ABILOW (PLANTS) Abies lowiana, Rocky Mountain white fir ABIMAG (PLANTS) Abies magnifica, California red fir ABIMAGM (ABIMAG) Abies magnifica var. magnifica, California red fir ABIMAGS (ABIMAG) Abies
    [Show full text]
  • An Anthology of the Sampson-Ellison Photo Plots (1913 to 2003) and a Short History of the Great Basin Experiment Station
    United States Department Beginnings of Range of Agriculture Forest Service Management: An Anthology of the Rocky Mountain Research Station Sampson-Ellison Photo Plots General Technical (1913 to 2003) and a Short History Report RMRS-GTR-154 July 2005 of the Great Basin Experiment Station David A. Prevedel E. Durant McArthur Curtis M. Johnson Abstract ______________________________________ Prevedel, David A.; McArthur, E. Durant; Johnson, Curtis M. 2005. Beginnings of range management: an anthology of the Sampson-Ellison photo plots (1913 to 2003) and a short history of the Great Basin Experiment Station. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-154. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 60 p. High-elevation watersheds on the Wasatch Plateau in central Utah were severely overgrazed in the late 1800s, resulting in catastrophic flooding and mudflows through adjacent communities. Affected citizens petitioned the Federal government to estab- lish a Forest Reserve (1902), and the Manti National Forest was established by the Transfer Act of 1905. The Great Basin Station, a forerunner of the Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, was created in 1911 within this area to study the influence of rangeland vegetation on erosion and floods. This publication contains a collection of 12 recurring sets of photographs that started in 1913 on these depleted high-elevation rangelands. The sites were repho- tographed in the 1940s, 1972, 1990, and 2003. It is also a tribute to two men who pioneered the science of range management—Arthur W. Sampson and Lincoln Ellison. As Directors of the Experiment Station, they initiated and maintained the early photo sites and study plots.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Peaks Important Plant Area (IPA)
    IMPORTANT PLANT AREA NOMINATION FORM – MONTANA Nominated Site Name: Italian Peaks Important Plant Area (IPA) General Location: The Italian Peaks area occurs at the southern end of the Bitterroot (or Beaverhead) Range at the very extreme southwest corner of Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest (Fig. 1). The main divide ridge forms the Montana-Idaho border. Site Coordinates: T16S R10W Sections: 32, 33 T17S R10W Sections: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 17, 18 T17S R11W Section 1 Maps: Two maps of the Italian Peaks IPA boundary are attached. Photographs: Landscape photographs as well as photos of the following rare plants are included: Agastache cusickii, Anelsonia eurycarpa, Caltha leptosepala var. sulfurea, Erigeron asperugineus, Erigeron leiomerus, Pedicularis contorta var. ctenophora, Physaria carinata, Potentilla jepsonii, Townsendia condensata Counties: Beaverhead County Elevation: above treeline (9,400 ft) Size of Area: approximately 2,000 acres Property Ownership: U. S. Forest Service Other designations for the site: Roadless Area Table 1. Vascular plant species of concern in the Italian Peaks IPA Species MNHP MNHP FS Last Population Trend global rank state rank Sensitive Obs. Size Agastache cusickii G3G4 S2S3 Yes 2015 50-500 Unknown Anelsonia eurycarpa None None 2015 Unknown Unknown Caltha leptosepala sulfurea None None 2015 >1000 Unknown Erigeron asperugineus G4 S2 Yes 2015 100-1000 Unknown Erigeron leiomerus G4 S2 2015 Unknown Unknown Pedicularis contorta ctenophora G5T3 S2S3 2015 Unknown Unknown Physaria carinata G3G4 S1S2 Yes 2015 50-500 Unknown Potentilla jepsonii G5T4 S3 Yes 2015 100-1000 Unknown Townsendia condensata G4 S1S3 2015 50-500 Unknown Agastache cusickii and Anelsonia eurycarpa occur in barren limestone talus.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification Report Great Basin National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Mojave Desert Inventory and Monitoring Network Vegetation Classification Report Great Basin National Park ON THE COVER Mount Wheeler (from saddle between Bald Mountain) Photograph by: Keith Schulz Vegetation Classification Report: Great Basin National Park Keith A. Schulz NatureServe 4001 Discovery, Suite 2110 Boulder, CO 80303 Mark Hall NatureServe 4001 Discovery, Suite 2110 Boulder, CO 80303 March 2011 NatureServe Western Regional Office Boulder, Colorado Fort Collins, Colorado i Please cite this publication as: Schulz, K. A. and M. E. Hall. 2011. Vegetation Classification Report: Great Basin National Park. Unpublished Report submitted to USDI, National Park Service, Mojave Desert Inventory and Monitoring Network. NatureServe, Western Regional Office, Boulder, Colorado. 30 pp. plus Appendices A-H. ii Contents Page Figures............................................................................................................................................ iv Tables.............................................................................................................................................. v Appendices..................................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgments......................................................................................................................... vii Introduction....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]