DOCSLIB.ORG

Project DFS Executive Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project DFS Executive Summary CJSC Bazovye Metally Kekura Gold Project Feasibility Study Section 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY January 2018 This page is intentionally blank. CJSC Bazovye Metally Kekura Gold Project Project No. A9KU Feasibility Study CONTENTS SECTION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Project Description ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Geology and Mineral Resources ...................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.1 Summary ............................................................................................................. 1-2 1.2.2 Geology ............................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.3 Database ............................................................................................................. 1-5 1.2.4 Domain Modelling and Estimation ...................................................................... 1-5 1.2.5 Mineral Resource Classification .......................................................................... 1-5 1.2.6 Geotechnics ........................................................................................................ 1-7 1.3 Mining ............................................................................................................................. 1-13 1.3.1 Open Pit Mining ................................................................................................. 1-13 1.3.2 Underground Mining ......................................................................................... 1-17 1.3.3 Mining Schedule................................................................................................ 1-26 1.3.4 JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Report ..................................................... 1-30 1.4 Process Plant ................................................................................................................. 1-57 1.5 Dry Stacked Tailing Storage Facility .............................................................................. 1-58 1.6 Power Supply ................................................................................................................. 1-59 1.7 Onsite Infrastructure....................................................................................................... 1-60 1.8 Offsite Infrastructure....................................................................................................... 1-62 1.9 Project Execution ........................................................................................................... 1-63 1.10 Capital Cost Estimate..................................................................................................... 1-64 1.11 Operating Cost Estimate ................................................................................................ 1-66 1.12 Mine Closure .................................................................................................................. 1-66 1.13 Financial Analysis .......................................................................................................... 1-67 1.14 Risks and Opportunities ................................................................................................. 1-68 JANUARY 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CJSC Bazovye Metally Kekura Gold Project Project No. A9KU Feasibility Study TABLES Table 1-1 Mineral Resources at Kekura Deposit as of December 2017 - Open Pit and Underground Mining Potential1,2,3,4,5,6 ................................................................................................ 1-6 Table 1-2: Mechanical Properties of Key Geotechnical Domains.............................................................. 1-7 Table 1-3: Hoek-Brown Strength Parameters for Geotechnical Domains ................................................. 1-8 Table 1-4: Average Rock Mass Rating Parameters by Lithological Units ................................................. 1-9 Table 1-5: Limit Equilibrium Slope Stability Estimation Results for Kekura Open Pit .............................. 1-12 Table 1-6: Finite Elements Slope Stability Estimation Results for Kekura Open Pit ............................... 1-12 Table 1-7: Cut-Off Grade Estimation ....................................................................................................... 1-13 Table 1-8: Pushback Volumes ................................................................................................................. 1-15 Table 1-9: Open Pit Mining Fleet ............................................................................................................. 1-16 Table 1-10: Open-Pit Mining Capital Costs .............................................................................................. 1-17 Table 1-11: Equipment Operating Unit Costs .......................................................................................... 1-17 Table 1-12: Indicative Unsupported Spans at Kekura by Q Class.......................................................... 1-19 Table 1-13: Tributary Area Pillar Stress versus Depth at Varying Extraction Ratios .............................. 1-19 Table 1-14: Mine Plan ............................................................................................................................. 1-27 Table 1-15: Ore Reserves for the Kekura Deposit as at 1st January 2018 1, 2, 3 .................................... 1-29 Table 1-16: Sampling Techniques and Data ........................................................................................... 1-30 Table 1-17: Reporting of Exploration Results ......................................................................................... 1-35 Table 1-18: Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources ................................................................. 1-38 Table 1-19: Estimation and Reporting of Ore Reserves ......................................................................... 1-47 Table 1-20: Major Process Equipment ..................................................................................................... 1-57 Table 1-21: Project Schedule Major Milestones ...................................................................................... 1-64 Table 1-22: Capital Cost Summary .......................................................................................................... 1-65 Table 1-23: Estimated Operating Costs by Category .............................................................................. 1-66 Table 1-24: Financial Summary ............................................................................................................... 1-67 Table 1-25: NPV Sensitivity to Gold Price and Discount Rate ................................................................. 1-68 FIGURES Figure 1-1: Project Location ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 Figure 1-2: Kekura Project Annual Plant Feed and Ore Grade ................................................................. 1-2 Figure 1-3: General View of Kekura Deposit with Open Pit and Underground Workings ....................... 1-3 Figure 1-4: Typical Geological Cross-Section, Line PR2B ...................................................................... 1-4 Figure 1-5: View of Final Structural Model of Kekura Deposit with Cross-Section .................................... 1-9 Figure 1-6: Pit Domaining Based on Stable Bench Parameters .............................................................. 1-11 Figure 1-7: Example of Finite Element Model for Kekura Open Pit, Section S01 Maximum Shear Strain ................................................................................................................................................ 1-12 Figure 1-8: Pit Shell and Metal Price Sensitivity Diagram ................................................................ 1-14 Figure 1-9 Final Pit and Dump Design and Layout .................................................................................. 1-15 Figure 1-10: Underground Access Scheme for Kekura Deposit .............................................................. 1-21 Figure 1-11: Capital Development Schedule ........................................................................................... 1-21 Figure 1-12: Stope Development Schedule ............................................................................................. 1-22 Figure 1-13: Losses and Dilution During Development of Ore Drifts ....................................................... 1-23 Figure 1-14: Underground Mining Schedule ............................................................................................ 1-24 Figure 1-15: Operating Costs by Year ..................................................................................................... 1-25 Figure 1-16: Operating Costs by Category .............................................................................................. 1-25 Figure 1-17: Operating Costs by Year ..................................................................................................... 1-26 Figure 1-18: Simplified Overall Process Diagram .................................................................................... 1-57 Figure 1-19: Process Plant General Arrangement ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure- Present State And
    Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present State and Future Potential By Claes Lykke Ragner FNI Report 13/2000 FRIDTJOF NANSENS INSTITUTT THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE Tittel/Title Sider/Pages Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present 124 State and Future Potential Publikasjonstype/Publication Type Nummer/Number FNI Report 13/2000 Forfatter(e)/Author(s) ISBN Claes Lykke Ragner 82-7613-400-9 Program/Programme ISSN 0801-2431 Prosjekt/Project Sammendrag/Abstract The report assesses the Northern Sea Route’s commercial potential and economic importance, both as a transit route between Europe and Asia, and as an export route for oil, gas and other natural resources in the Russian Arctic. First, it conducts a survey of past and present Northern Sea Route (NSR) cargo flows. Then follow discussions of the route’s commercial potential as a transit route, as well as of its economic importance and relevance for each of the Russian Arctic regions. These discussions are summarized by estimates of what types and volumes of NSR cargoes that can realistically be expected in the period 2000-2015. This is then followed by a survey of the status quo of the NSR infrastructure (above all the ice-breakers, ice-class cargo vessels and ports), with estimates of its future capacity. Based on the estimated future NSR cargo potential, future NSR infrastructure requirements are calculated and compared with the estimated capacity in order to identify the main, future infrastructure bottlenecks for NSR operations. The information presented in the report is mainly compiled from data and research results that were published through the International Northern Sea Route Programme (INSROP) 1993-99, but considerable updates have been made using recent information, statistics and analyses from various sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Audit Report 2017
    SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT for the August 2016 International Cyanide Management Code Recertification Audit Prepared for: Chukotka Mining and Geological Company Kinross Gold Corporation/ Kupol Project Submitted to: International Cyanide Management Institute 1400 I Street, NW, Suite 550 Washington, DC 20005, USA FINAL 26 April 2017 Ramboll Environ 605 1st Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98104 www.ramboll.com SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT Name of Mine: Kupol Mine Name of Mine Owner: Kinross Gold Corporation Name of Mine Operator: CJSC Chukotka Mining and Geological Company Name of Responsible Manager: Dave Neuburger, General Manager Address: CJSC Chukotka Mining and Geological Company Legal Address: Rultyegina Street, 2B Anadyr, Chukotka Autonomous Region Russia, 689000 Postal Address: 23 Parkovaya Street Magadan, Russia, 685000 Telephone: +7 (4132) 22-15-04 Fax: +7 (4132) 64-37-37 E-mail: [email protected] Location details and description of operation: The Kupol Mine is located in a remote north-central area of the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug (AO), Russian Federation. Majority ownership of the mine was acquired by Kinross Gold Corporation (Kinross) in 2008, and has been 100% owned since 2011. The mine is operated by a wholly-owned subsidiary, CJSC Chukotka Mining and Geological Company (CMGC). The Kupol deposit is presently mined using underground methods. Another underground operation has been developed at Dvoinoye, a site 100 km due north of Kupol. No separate milling or leaching operations are presently undertaken at Dvoinoye, and ore from this operation is being processed in the Kupol mill. In 2015, combined gold production from both mines was 758 563 ounces. The Kupol and Dvoinoye mine locations are shown in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources and Pathways 4.1
    Chapter 4 Persistant toxic substances (PTS) sources and pathways 4.1. Introduction Chapter 4 4.1. Introduction 4.2. Assessment of distant sources: In general, the human environment is a combination Longrange atmospheric transport of the physical, chemical, biological, social and cultur- Due to the nature of atmospheric circulation, emission al factors that affect human health. It should be recog- sources located within the Northern Hemisphere, par- nized that exposure of humans to PTS can, to certain ticularly those in Europe and Asia, play a dominant extent, be dependant on each of these factors. The pre- role in the contamination of the Arctic. Given the spa- cise role differs depending on the contaminant con- tial distribution of PTS emission sources, and their cerned, however, with respect to human intake, the potential for ‘global’ transport, evaluation of long- chain consisting of ‘source – pathway – biological avail- range atmospheric transport of PTS to the Arctic ability’ applies to all contaminants. Leaving aside the region necessarily involves modeling on the hemi- biological aspect of the problem, this chapter focuses spheric/global scale using a multi-compartment on PTS sources, and their physical transport pathways. approach. To meet these requirements, appropriate modeling tools have been developed. Contaminant sources can be provisionally separated into three categories: Extensive efforts were made in the collection and • Distant sources: Located far from receptor sites in preparation of input data for modeling. This included the Arctic. Contaminants can reach receptor areas the required meteorological and geophysical informa- via air currents, riverine flow, and ocean currents. tion, and data on the physical and chemical properties During their transport, contaminants are affected by of both the selected substances and of their emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Providing Rationale for the Possibility of Decommissioning Bilibino
    Nuclear Energy and Technology 6(3): 195–201 DOI 10.3897/nucet.6.58969 Research Article Providing rationale for the possibility of decommissioning Bilibino nuclear cogeneration plant based on the onsite disposal option* Igor A. Engovatov1, Rinat Kh. Adiyatullin2 1 National Research University Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (NRU MSUCE), 26 Yaroslavskoye shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russia 2 Startech Co. Ltd., 84 Metallurgov St., room 26, Yekaterinburg, 620131, Russia Corresponding author: Lyudmila M. Danilenko ([email protected]) Academic editor: Georgy Tikhomirov ♦ Received 24 January 2020 ♦ Accepted 25 August 2020 ♦ Published 6 November 2020 Citation: Engovatov IA, Adiyatullin RK (2020) Providing rationale for the possibility of decommissioning Bilibino nuclear cogeneration plant based on the onsite disposal option. Nuclear Energy and Technology 6(3): 195–201. https://doi.org/10.3897/ nucet.6.58969 Abstract The problem of the NPP decommissioning after the end of the specified or extended life has reached the practical solution stage for countries possessing a nuclear power industry. The major decommissioning options, both in Russia and abroad, include immediate dismantling and deferred dismantling. At the same time, there are NPP units for which, for a number of reasons, none of the two options are acceptable in terms of ensuring the safety of the personnel, the public and the environment. Disposal, the third and a more rare option, shall be used for decommissioning in this case. The purpose of the work is to provide rationale for the possibility of decommissioning Bilibino Nuclear Cogeneration Plant based on the Onsite Disposal option by covering the main building with an inert material with the formation of a mound.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Akademik Lomonosov – the First Modern Floating Nuclear
    Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov – The First Modern Floating Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP) Peter Lobner, 15 May 2021 1. Introduction Designated Project 20870, construction of Akademik Lomonosov started on 15 April 2007, when the keel was laid at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk, which also is Russia’s premier submarine building shipyard. Originally, Akademik Lomonosov was expected to supply power to the Sevmash shipyard itself and the town of Severodvinsk, in Northwest Russia. Cutaway drawing showing the general arrangement of the Akademik Lomonosov. Source: Rosatom In August 2008, the hull of Akademik Lomonosov was transferred to the Baltic Shipyard in St. Petersburg, where a second “keel laying” was held in May 2009. Plans for deploying the FNPP were reconsidered, leading to the final selection of Pevek, a remote Arctic coastal city in Russia’s Far East. The FNPP was launched on 30 June 2010 and outfitting continued with the vessel secured dockside at the Baltic Shipyard. Two un-fueled OKBM Afrikantov KLT-40S modular pressurized water reactors (PWRs) were installed in October 2013. 1 After work on the vessel and reactor systems was completed in April 2018, Akademik Lomonosov was towed 4,000 km (2,485 miles) around Norway to Murmansk, where the reactors were fuelled and tested at Rosatomflot facilities, which also support their nuclear- powered icebreaker fleet. In June 2019, the Russian nuclear regulatory agency Rostekhnadzor issued a 10-year license to Rosenergoatom to operate Akademik Lomonosov until 2029. After successfully completing testing, Akademik Lomonosov departed Murmansk on 23 August 2019 and was towed 4,770 km (2,964 miles) along the Northern Sea Route, arriving at its final destination on 9 September 2019 at a new protected pier at Pevek, which is about 980 km (609 miles) west of the Bering Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Chukotka
    ISSN 1883-1656 Центр Российских Исследований RRC Working Paper Series No. 71 Demographic Situation and Its Perspectives in the Russian Far East: A Case of Chukotka Kazuhiro KUMO August 2017 RUSSIAN RESEARCH CENTER INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH HITOTSUBASHI UNIVERSITY Kunitachi, Tokyo, JAPAN DEMOGRAPHIC SITUATION AND ITS PERSPECTIVES IN THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST: A CASE OF CHUKОТКА Kazuhiro KUMO 1. INTRODUCTION The purposes of the present study are, first of all, a general review of the population migration patterns in the Far East region of Russia following the demise of the Soviet Union; and secondly, a study of the situation that emerged in the developing regions as a result of the state policy of the Soviet period, using the example of the demographic trends in the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug as one of the most distal Russian territories with respect to the center of Russia. To date, several studies have been conducted on inter-regional migration in Russia; by the the author (Kumo, 1997, 2003) a comparative analysis of migration in the post-Soviet Russia was conducted and major changes taking place in the migration patterns were considered in the specified periods. Yu. Andrienko and S. Guriev (Andrienko and Guriev, 2002) performed a comparative analysis of inter-regional migration based on the gravity model and showed that the adoption of the migration decision by the population depended on the regional-economic variables. The results of the above-mentioned studies demonstrate that traditional means of analyzing migration patterns can be applied to Russia, which went through the change in the state system, and the authors conclude that migration flows are largely dependent on economic reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Years of Sustainable Development
    20 YEARS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Polymetal International plc Sustainability Report 2017 THE GROUP CEO’S STATEMENT OVERVIEW Action expresses priorities OVERVIEW HEALTH AND SAFETY Welcome to our Sustainability Report, which marks Polymetal’s 20th year of conducting business responsibly: Welcome to our At a glance 06 Safety risks management 48 two decades in which we have achieved tremendous Where we operate 08 Safety performance 50 success. We currently employ around 12,000 people at eight Sustainability Business model 10 operations covering three countries and seven time zones. Our approach 12 COMMUNITIES Of our employees, 20% are under 30, and more than 500 come from families who have worked at Polymetal for years. Report 2017 How we manage sustainability 14 Community engagement 55 Materiality 17 Social investment 56 Altogether we have produced almost 16.6 Moz of gold, and over 350 Moz of silver. We have discovered 20 mineral ENVIRONMENT Stakeholder engagement 18 Impact assessment 58 deposits, performed 2,200 km of exploration drilling, and Sustainable development goals 20 developed over 550 km underground. Our current licensed Our performance 21 ECONOMIC area is the size of 1,000,000 football pitches. We were the first company in the former Soviet Union to use pressure Financial assistance 63 ENVIRONMENT oxidation technology (POX) for extracting gold from refractory Local employment 63 concentrates, and the first in post-Soviet states to establish Water 26 Supply chain 63 When our environment and society an in-house engineering and design centre. Waste 27 R&D 64 ABOUT THIS REPORT flourish, our business can flourish. Our achievements spread beyond Polymetal to the benefit Polymetal International’s Sustainability Report 2017 covers Energy and carbon 29 Markets served 64 of the wider community.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Reactors in Arctic Russia
    NUCLEAR REACTORS IN ARCTIC RUSSIA Scenario 2035 The nuclearification of Russian Arctic territories is by Moscow given highest priority for development in shipping, infrastructure and exploration of natural resources. Additionally, the number of navy military reactors in the north will increase substantially over the next 15 years. This scenario paper gives an overview of the situation. The paper is part of the Barents Observer’s analytical popular science studies on developments in the Euro-Arctic Region. Thomas Nilsen June 2019 June 2019 The Barents Observer – Nuclear Reactors in Northern Russia, June 2019 1 June 2019 Published by: The Independent Barents Observer Address: Storgata 5, 9900 Kirkenes, Norway E-mail: [email protected] thebarentsobserver.com (English, Russian and Chinese versions of the news-portal) Twitter @BarentsNews Instagram: @BarentsObserver Facebook.com/BarentsObserver/ Author: Thomas Nilsen, E-mail: [email protected] Twitter: @NilsenThomas Photos and illustrations: Rosatom, Rosatomflot, Thomas Nilsen, Oleg Kuleshov, H I Sutton, Atle Staalesen, Alexey Mkrtchyan, Wikimedia Commons. Keywords: Nuclear, Reactors, Icebreakers, Submarines, Northern Fleet, Russia, Arctic, Northern Sea Route, Nuclear Power, Kola Peninsula, Siberia, Arkhangelsk, Severodvinsk, Severomorsk, Murmansk, Pevek, Barents Sea, Kara Sea, White Sea. This publication is financially supported with a grant from the Norwegian Government’s Nuclear Action Plan administrated by the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority. (www.dsa.no/en/). The Barents Observer – Nuclear Reactors in Northern Russia, June 2019 2 June 2019 Introduction At the peak of the Cold War some 150 nuclear-powered submarines were based on the Barents Sea coast of the Kola Peninsula. Many ships were transporting and storing nuclear waste and at shipyards and bases, spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste was accumulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Winds in the Arctic Coast of Russia: Genesis, Climatology, Trends
    EMS Annual Meeting Abstracts Vol. 16, EMS2019-147, 2019 © Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 License. Extreme winds in the Arctic coast of Russia: genesis, climatology, trends Anna Shestakova A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation ([email protected]) A joint analysis of observational data (both surface and upper-air), Arctic System Reanalysis version 2 (ASR2) and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) wind data allowed to thoroughly investigate all the areas in the Russian Arctic where extremely strong winds (with the wind speed greater than 30 m s-1) are observed, as well as to investigate the genesis of these winds. Special emphasis was made on downslope windstorms, which pose a particular danger, even if the wind does not reach hurricane strength (due to gustiness, potential for vessel icing, clear-air turbulence and sharp temperature fluctuations). In addition to the well-known Novaya Zemlya bora, the Spitsbergen foehn and the windstorm in Pevek (Chukotka), the lesser-known downslope windstorms in Tiksi, on Wrangel Island and on the north-eastern coast of the Gulf of Anadyr were analysed. Statistical estimates of the frequency, duration, wind speed and tem- perature fluctuations during windstorms, as well as long-term trends from the second half of the 20th century to the present, have been obtained. Noticeably, most of trends in the downslope windstorms characteristics is tied to the period August-October, which indicates the connection of these changes with changes in the Arctic climate system, namely, with the enhanced melting of sea ice during this period.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Reactors in Arctic Russia
    NUCLEAR REACTORS IN ARCTIC RUSSIA Scenario 2035 The nuclearification of Russian Arctic territories is by Moscow given highest priority for development in shipping, infrastructure and exploration of natural resources. Additionally, the number of navy military reactors in the north will increase substantially over the next 15 years. This scenario paper gives an overview of the situation. The paper is part of the Barents Observer’s analytical popular science studies on developments in the Euro-Arctic Region. Thomas Nilsen June 2019 0 June 2019 The Barents Observer – Nuclear Reactors in Northern Russia, June 2019 1 June 2019 Published by: The Independent Barents Observer Address: Storgata 5, 9900 Kirkenes, Norway E-mail: [email protected] thebarentsobserver.com (English, Russian and Chinese versions of the news-portal) Twitter @BarentsNews Instagram: @BarentsObserver Facebook.com/BarentsObserver/ Author: Thomas Nilsen, E-mail: [email protected] Twitter: @NilsenThomas Photos and illustrations: Rosatom, Rosatomflot, Thomas Nilsen, Oleg Kuleshov, H I Sutton, Atle Staalesen, Alexey Mkrtchyan, Wikimedia Commons. Keywords: Nuclear, Reactors, Icebreakers, Submarines, Northern Fleet, Russia, Arctic, Northern Sea Route, Nuclear Power, Kola Peninsula, Siberia, Arkhangelsk, Severodvinsk, Severomorsk, Murmansk, Pevek, Barents Sea, Kara Sea, White Sea. This publication is financially supported with a grant from the Norwegian Government’s Nuclear Action Plan administrated by the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority. (www.dsa.no/en/). The Barents Observer – Nuclear Reactors in Northern Russia, June 2019 2 June 2019 Introduction At the peak of the Cold War some 150 nuclear-powered submarines were based on the Barents Sea coast of the Kola Peninsula. Many ships were transporting and storing nuclear waste and at shipyards and bases, spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste was accumulated.
    [Show full text]
  • New Projects for the Development of the Russian Arctic: Space Matters!  © Aleksandr N
    Aleksandr N. Pilyasov, Elena S. Putilova. New projects for the development… 17 UDC [911.3:33](98)(045) DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.38.21 New projects for the development of the Russian Arctic: space matters! © Aleksandr N. PILYASOV, Dr. Sci. (Geogr.), professor E-mail: [email protected] Lomonosov Moscow State University, Institute of Regional Consulting, Moscow, Russia © Elena S. PUTILOVA, expert E-mail: [email protected] Institute of Regional Consulting, Moscow, Russia Abstract. The article summarizes the results of the analysis of 23 recent projects for the development of Rus- sian Arctic resources in terms of the spatial effects they generate or rely on. It is proved to be the feature of the economic and geographical approach to the analysis of Arctic projects. The most critical change, com- pared with the realities of the late Soviet era, is the reliance on the sea logistics of most new projects for the development of Russian Arctic resources. Three main spatial effects of development projects are described in detail: the localization effect, the regional effect, and the corporate effect. The first one reflects the desire of companies to the utmost compactness and a sparsely populated production site, platform solutions using artificial intelligence, remote control, robotic mining, and processing schemes. The second effect revives the Soviet district effect within the contour of the resource corporation as their desire to provide cost savings on the “soft” infrastructure pairing of neighboring production facilities. The third effect characterizes the cooperation of usually competing companies in severe natural and economic conditions for the development of Arctic projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Audit Report
    ICMI Cyanide Code Gold Mining Summary Audit Report Kinross Kupol Mine Russia 2019 Re-Certification Audit Submitted to: The International Cyanide Management Institute 1400 I Street, NW – Suite 550 Washington, DC 20005 USA www.mss-team.com Table of Contents Company Names and Contact Information: ................................................................................. 3 Location detail and description of Operation: .............................................................................. 3 Auditor’s Finding ....................................................................................................................... 11 Auditor’s Attestation .................................................................................................................. 11 Summary Audit Report ............................................................................................................... 12 1. PRODUCTION: . ............................................................................................................. 12 2. TRANSPORTATION:. ........................................................................................................ 13 3. HANDLING AND STORAGE ............................................................................................. 16 4. OPERATIONS .................................................................................................................... 21 5. DECOMMISSIONING ....................................................................................................... 40
    [Show full text]