Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program Federal Fiscal Year 2018

Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program Federal Fiscal Year 2018 – 2022

Endorsed: May 22, 2017 Draft Amendment 1: Released October 16, 2017 for 21-calendar-day public review

Prepared by Cape Cod Commission staff on behalf of the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

This report was funded in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), United States Department of Transportation (USDOT). The views and opinions of the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the USDOT.

Title VI Notice of Nondiscrimination

The Cape Cod MPO complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related federal and state statutes and regulations. It is the policy of the Cape Cod MPO to ensure that no person or group of persons shall on the grounds of Title VI protected categories, including race, color, national origin, or under additional federal and state protected categories including sex, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, religion, creed, ancestry, veteran's status (including Vietnam-era veterans), or background, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity administered by the Cape Cod MPO. To request additional information about this commitment, or to file a complaint under Title VI or a related nondiscrimination provision, please contact the MPO’s Title VI Coordinator by phone at (508)362-3828, TTY at 508-362-5885, fax (508) 362-3136 or by e-mail at [email protected].

If this information is needed in another language, please contact the MPO’s Title VI Coordinator by phone at (508)362-3828.

Caso estas informações sejam necessárias em outro idioma, por favor, contate o Coordenador de Título VI da MPO pelo telefone 508-744-1299.

The public discussion of the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) at CCJTC, MPO, and transportation meetings satisfies the Program of Projects (POP) public hearing requirements of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA).

Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) prepared by the

Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Members:

• Stephanie Pollack, Secretary and Chief Executive Officer, Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) • Thomas J. Tinlin, Administrator, MassDOT Highway Division • Tom Guerino, Chair, Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority • Harold Mitchell, Cape Cod Commission • Jessica Rapp Grassetti, President, Barnstable Town Council • Leo Cakounes, Barnstable County Commissioners • R. Patrick Ellis, Mashpee Selectman, for Bourne, Falmouth, Mashpee, and Sandwich • Sheryl A. McMahon, Dennis Selectman, for Dennis and Yarmouth • Sims McGrath, Orleans Selectman, for Brewster, Chatham, Harwich, and Orleans • Robert Weinstein, Truro Selectman, for Eastham, Provincetown, Truro, and Wellfleet • Cedric Cromwell, Chairman, Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council

MPO Ex-Officio Members:

• Roger Parsons, Chairman, Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee • George Price, National Park Service/Cape Cod National Seashore • Lawrence T. Davis, US Army Corps of Engineers/Cape Cod Canal • Wayne Lamson, Woods Hole, Martha’s Vineyard, and Nantucket Steamship Authority • Jeffrey McEwan, Federal Highway Administration • Mary Beth Mello, Federal Transit Administration and the

Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee

• Roger Parsons, Chairman, Barnstable • Catherine Laurent, Vice-Chairman, Mashpee

Cape Cod Commission TIP Staff Contact:

• Glenn Cannon, P.E., Technical Services Director, Cape Cod Commission

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page i Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

ENDORSEMENT, TIP The signatures to follow certify that the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) hereby endorses the Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Federal Fiscal Years 2018 -2022 in fulfillment of the requirements of 23 CFR Part 450.324.

CERTIFICATION:

The Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Planning Process The signatures to follow certify that the Comprehensive, Continuing, Cooperative Transportation Planning Process for the current local, regional, state, and federal fiscal years in the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization planning area is addressing major issues facing the region and is being conducted in accordance with the requirements of:

1. Section 134 Title 23, U.S.C., and Title 49 U.S.C. 5303, and this subpart; 2. Sections 174 and 176(c) & (d) of the Clean Air Act, as amended {42 U.S.C. 7504, 7506 (c) & (d)} and 40 CFR part 93; 3. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended {42 U.S.C. 2000d-1} and 49 CFR part 21: 4. 49 U.S.C. 5332, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age in employment or business opportunity; 5. Section 1101 (b) of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) (Pub. L. 109-59) and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises (DBE) in USDOT funded projects; 6. Title 23 CRF part 230, regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on Federal and Federal-aid highway construction contracts; 7. The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and 49 CFR Parts 27, 37, and 38; 8. The Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101), prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance; 9. Section 324 of title 23 U.S.C. regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender; and 10. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27 regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities. 11. Anti-lobbying restrictions found in 49 USC Part 20. No appropriated funds may be expended by a recipient to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract. The currently endorsed Unified Planning Work Program, Regional Transportation Plan, and the Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) were developed in accordance with FHWA/FTA regulations, EPA regulations, and fully incorporate the applicable requirements of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page ii

Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Executive Summary

The Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO) transportation capital plan, the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), lists major transportation projects planned in the next five years. The MPO is made up of eleven voting members with representatives of state agencies, regional organizations, and Cape Cod towns. Discussions at MPO meetings help to establish a preference for which projects are funded through the TIP. Members of the public are welcome and encouraged to attend these meetings and voice opinions. Contents of the Plan

The TIP includes a discussion of the transportation planning process, a discussion of the TIP development process, a table of available TIP funding, descriptions of TIP projects selected for funding, and a series of tables detailing TIP project funding allocations. The TIP also includes appendices that detail project evaluation including equity analyses, air quality conformity, projects in need of funding, the status of previous TIP projects, and public comments. Project selected for funding are presented on the following page. How to Get Involved

The Cape Cod MPO voted to release the draft TIP Amendment 1 for the public review/ comment period at their 1:00 PM meeting on October 16, 2017, which would officially begin the 21-calendar-day public comment period. The MPO is expected to consider endorsement of the TIP at their 1:00 PM meeting on November 20, 2017. All MPO meetings are held at the Cape Cod Commission Office at 3325 Main Street (Route 6A) Barnstable, MA 02630. Transit service is available on the Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority’s Barnstable Villager Route (the Barnstable Village-Courthouse stop). Comments on this plan may be sent by November 6, 2017 via mail, hand delivered, by facsimile, or via e-mail, as follows: Mailed or dropped off: Cape Cod Commission Transportation Program Glenn Cannon, Technical Services Director 3225 Main Street (Route 6A) PO Box 226 Barnstable MA 02630-0226 Sent by facsimile to the attention of Glenn Cannon, Technical Services Director, CCC: FAX: 508-362-3136 Electronic mail “email”—please put “TIP” in the subject line and send to: [email protected]

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page iv Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

2018-2022 Projects

The following projects are included in the draft Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for Federal Fiscal Year 2018-2022: • Chatham, Rte 28 - George Ryder Rd to Barn Hill Rd (2018) • Cape Cod, Bicycle Rack Program (2018-2022) • Barnstable, CCRTA Hyannis Loop Demo (Year 3 of 3) (2018) • Barnstable, Rte 28 at Osterville-West Barnstable Rd (2018) • Truro, Route 6 Bicycle Accommodations (2019) • Barnstable, Rte 28 at Yarmouth Rd (2019) • Cape Cod National Seashore - Pavement Overlay on Doane Rd. (2019) • Bourne-Falmouth, Rte 28 Guide and Traffic Sign Replacements (2019) • Wellfleet, Rte 6 at Main St (2020) • Mashpee, Rte 151 (2020-21) • Bourne, Belmont Circle Multi-modal Improvements (2020) • Orleans, Rte 28 Stormwater Improvements (2020) • Chatham, Rte 28 at Main St, Depot Rd, Queen Anne Rd and Crowell Rd (2021) • Yarmouth, Route 28 at North Main St and Old Main St (2021) • Harwich, Bridge Replacement - Azalea Dr over Herring River (2021) • Sandwich, Shared Use Path on Service Rd (Rte 130 to Chase Rd) (2021) • Dennis-Harwich, Rte 28 Reconstruction (Upper County Rd to Herring River (2022) • Orleans, Route 28 at Route 39 and Quanset Rd (2022) • Falmouth, Rte 28A at Rte 151 (2022) • Barnstable, Route 6 Repaving and Related Work (2022) • Yarmouth-Barnstable, Cape Cod Rail Trail Extension (2022) • Various transit projects to allow the Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority (CCRTA) to operate their year-round and seasonal fixed-route services, operate their demand response services, and maintain the vehicles and other infrastructure. (2018-2022)

In total, the FFY2018-22 TIP includes over $144 million in funded projects.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page v Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Table of Contents

Executive Summary ...... iv Table of Contents ...... vi Chapter 1: Transportation Planning Process ...... 1 Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) ...... 1 Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee (CCJTC)...... 2 Federal Certification Documents ...... 3 Transportation Legislation ...... 4 Chapter 2: TIP Development Process ...... 7 Development Schedule ...... 7 Adjustment and Amendment Procedures ...... 7 Public Participation Process ...... 9 Chapter 3: TIP Funding ...... 10 Chapter 4: TIP Project Map and Descriptions ...... 13 Map of Funded Highway Projects ...... 13 Description of Funded Highway Projects ...... 13 Description of Funded Transit Projects ...... 17 Chapter 5: TIP Project Listing/Financial Plan ...... 19 Summary of Funding for Cape Cod Highway and Transit Projects ...... 19 Highway Project Listing ...... 21 Transit Project Listing ...... 36 Glossary ...... 41 Appendices ...... 45 Appendix A: Project Evaluation ...... 45 Appendix B: Air Quality Conformity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...... 56 Appendix C: Projects in Need of Funding ...... 85 Appendix D: Status of Previous TIP Projects ...... 87 Appendix E: Comments on Public Draft ...... 93

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page vi Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Page left intentionally blank.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page vii Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Chapter 1: Transportation Planning Process

Decisions about how to spend transportation funds in a metropolitan area are guided by information and ideas from a broad group of people, including elected officials, municipal planners and engineers, transportation advocates, other advocates, and other interested persons. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are the bodies responsible for providing a forum for this decision-making process.

Each metropolitan area in the United States with a population of 50,000 or more has an MPO, which decides how to spend federal transportation funds for capital projects and planning studies. In order to be eligible for federal funds, metropolitan areas are required to maintain a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive (3C) transportation planning process that results in plans and programs consistent with the planning objectives of the metropolitan area. The 3C transportation-planning process on Cape Cod is the responsibility of the Cape Cod MPO.

Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) The Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is the regional governing body established by federal law to oversee regional transportation planning and recommend the distribution of transportation funds on Cape Cod (Barnstable County). The MPO is made up of eleven voting members as presented in Table 1. Town representation on the body is depicted in Figure 1.

Table 1. Cape Cod MPO Membership

AGENCY MPO SIGNATORY Massachusetts Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation (MassDOT) MassDOT Highway Division Administrator Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority (CCRTA) Chairman Cape Cod Commission (CCC) Chairman Barnstable County Commissioners Commissioner Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Tribal Chairman Town of Barnstable Town Council President Sub-region A (Bourne, Falmouth, Mashpee, Selectman Sandwich) Sub-region B (Dennis, Yarmouth) Selectman Sub-region C (Brewster, Chatham, Harwich, Selectman Orleans) Sub-region D (Eastham, Provincetown, Truro, Selectman Wellfleet)

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 1 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Figure 1. Map of Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization Sub-regions The Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Army Corps of Engineers, Cape Cod National Seashore, the Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority, and the Chair of the Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee serve as non-voting, Ex-Officio members of the MPO.

Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee (CCJTC) The Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee (CCJTC) is the advisory group to the Cape Cod MPO. The CCJTC was formed more than 40 years ago with the first meeting being held in 1973. Membership on the CCJTC consists of one appointee from each town, selected by the town’s highest elected officials, as well as a Bicycle Representative designated by the CCJTC. Town appointees are generally department of public work directors, town engineers, or town planners; individuals familiar with their town’s transportation needs. Individuals representing MassDOT, the CCRTA, and the CCC also generally attend and participate in CCJTC meetings.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 2 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Federal Certification Documents The MPO is required to endorse other federal certification documents including the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), and the Public Participation Plan (PPP).

The RTP establishes a regional vision for the transportation system; the UPWP studies investigate deficiencies in that system and identify potential solutions, and the TIP details specific transportation projects that are implemented to improve the transportation system. The PPP provides a framework to ensure public involvement and cooperative decision making throughout the transportation planning process. A summary of the primary function, time horizon, and update timeline is presented in Table 2. The table also includes links to the Cape Cod MPO webpages that contain more detailed information on each of the documents.

Table 2. Federal Certification Documents

TIME UPDATE DOCUMENT PRIMARY FUNCTION HORIZON TIMELINE Establishes long-range vision Regional Transportation and goals, identifies major Every 4 20+ years Plan (RTP)1 projects, studies, and years programs Transportation Identifies specific Improvement Program transportation investments 5 years Annually (TIP)2 (projects) Unified Planning Work Details planning studies and 1 year Annually Program (UPWP)3 tasks Every 5 Establishes plan for public years or Public Participation Plan participation for transportation Ongoing more (PPP)4 decision-making frequently as needed

1 The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is available at www.capecodcommission.org/rtp 2 The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is available at www.capecodcommission.org/tip 3 The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) is available at www.capecodcommission.org/upwp 4 The Public Participation Plan (PPP) is available at www.capecodcommission.org/ppp

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 3 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Transportation Legislation Federal legislation that contains requirements for transportation plans, programs and projects includes the current legislation: Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act and the outgoing legislation: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) as well as the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA).

Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act On December 4, 2015, President Obama signed the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act (Pub. L. No. 114-94) into law—the first federal law in over a decade to provide long-term funding certainty for surface transportation infrastructure planning and investment. The FAST Act authorizes $305 billion over fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for highway, highway and motor vehicle safety, public transportation, motor carrier safety, hazardous materials safety, rail, and research, technology, and statistics programs.

Building on outgoing legislation (MAP-21), the FAST Act maintains a focus on safety, keeps intact the established structure of the various highway-related programs, continues efforts to streamline project delivery and, for the first time, provides a dedicated source of federal dollars for freight projects. As required under this legislation, the planning process used in the development of this plan includes consideration of projects that:

(A) support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; (B) increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; (C) increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; (D) increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight; (E) protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns; (F) enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight; (G) promote efficient system management and operation; (H) emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system; (I) improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation; and (J) enhance travel and tourism.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 4 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Title VI/Nondiscrimination The Cape Cod MPO follows federal and state non-discrimination laws and seeks to ensure that all interested parties in Barnstable County have access to the MPO’s activities and services and that public involvement in the MPO’s decision making comes from a diverse socioeconomic group that is representative of the county’s population. The MPO has developed a nondiscrimination program, in accordance with federal and state requirements, to encourage broad public participation, representation, and equity in the region’s transportation planning.

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. Organizations that receive Federal funds are obligated to assure nondiscrimination in their programs and activities and are required to have a comprehensive Title VI enforcement program to prevent and eliminate discrimination in their federally funded programs. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) set forth Title VI compliance requirements for “primary” funding recipients such as MassDOT and sub-recipients such as the MPOs to follow. Effective transportation decision making depends upon understanding and properly addressing the needs of different socioeconomic groups. The MPO’s Title VI program includes identifying the demographic distribution of minority and limited English proficiency populations within the region and implementing a comprehensive strategy to ensure that the MPO conducts effective outreach to encourage their involvement in and access to the transportation planning and decision-making process.

The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) is responsible for ensuring that the state’s MPOs comply with federal program requirements. Following MassDOT’s 2013 Title VI program update, the Cape Cod MPO developed and adopted a Title VI Program in 2014. The Title VI plan provides information about beneficiaries’ rights, how to file a complaint, regional demographic data, maps, a public participation plan, a language access plan, and analyses of transportation spending in the region, project locations and potential impacts from projects to ensure equity in the planning and implementation process for the region.

Although Title VI is the focal point of non-discrimination law in the United States, FHWA incorporates a broader spectrum of statutes, executive orders, and regulations into its requirements for states and MPOs. For example, Section 324 of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination based on sex; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability status, as does the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 prohibits age discrimination. In addition, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (FHWA Notice 4720.6) clarified the original intent of Congress with respect to Title VI by restoring the broad, institution-wide scope and coverage of the nondiscrimination

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 5 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

statutes to include all programs and activities of federal-aid recipients and enforcing the application of the laws that include nondiscrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, gender, or disability.

Other Federal and State Legislative Requirements and Policies In addition to federal transportation legislation, the transportation planning process must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); the Clean Air Act; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Executive Order 12898; Executive Order 13330; the Global Warming Solutions Act; and MassDOT and GreenDOT Policies.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 6 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Chapter 2: TIP Development Process

The Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a listing of federal aid eligible transportation projects for Cape Cod prepared under the direction of the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The plan is prepared by the Cape Cod Commission (CCC) transportation staff, the Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority (CCRTA) staff, Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) staff, and the Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee (CCJTC) with input from the public and in cooperation with multiple state and federal agencies.

The TIP is developed based on a vision defined in the Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and includes the transportation projects proposed for implementation in the next five years. Each year of the TIP must be financially constrained; anticipated project costs cannot exceed available funding. The TIP must conform with a host of federal and state requirements and polices including air quality and equity programs.

The inclusion of a project in the TIP is one step on the path towards construction. Inclusion on this list does not guarantee funding; the project proponent is responsible for completing the steps toward implementation within the program. For a highway project, the obligation of the federal and state funds occurs when the project is advertised for construction by MassDOT. For a transit project, the obligation of the funding is through an electronic approval system by FTA.

Development Schedule The Cape Cod MPO process follows an annual schedule for development of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to be compatible with the development schedule of the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), as is required under 23 CFR 450.324. The STIP includes projects lists in the Cape Cod TIP, projects listed in the TIP from other planning regions, and projects that span multiple planning regions. The Cape Cod TIP is generally endorsed by the Cape Cod MPO each May with the STIP being submitted for federal approvals prior to the beginning of the Federal Fiscal Year on October 1.

Adjustment and Amendment Procedures The Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee recommends inclusion in the statewide program of the projects as programmed in this TIP for Cape Cod, with regional consensus and endorsement by the Cape Cod MPO. Projects that are in the first years of the TIP, which have designs completed or well underway, have public support in addition to the regional support.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 7 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Administrative Adjustment Process In the event a project in the annual element, or current Federal Fiscal Year, is not proceeding in the programmed year, the substitution of another project from the outer years of the TIP for implementation in the current year is considered by the Cape Cod MPO to be an administrative adjustment provided that the following conditions are true:

• Financial constraint of the TIP is maintained. • The project must be an exempt project, conformity determination not required. • A letter requesting the administrative adjustment is forwarded to the Director of the MassDOT Office of Transportation Planning to reflect the adjustment in the STIP. • Administrative Adjustments to the TIP shall be included within the next MPO agenda. Administrative Adjustments do not require public comment periods.

Other changes that are allowed as administrative modifications include project name, scope, and/or cost estimate changes, as long as those changes are considered to be minor in nature. For example, a project cost increase within 10% of the existing amount programmed already, may be considered an administrative adjustment.

Amendment Process In order for implementation of projects to proceed in the current year, a previously unlisted project may be amended into the TIP. An action to add a new project or remove an existing project is considered by the Cape Cod MPO to be an amendment if the following conditions are true:

• Consensus in the region for this project to be included and move forward. • Financial constraint of the TIP is maintained. • A Cape Cod MPO meeting to endorse the amendment(s). • Conformity determination is required unless the amendment(s) consist(s) entirely of exempt projects. • An outer year TIP project or a Non Federal Aid project is not considered a new project and may be an Administrative Adjustment—see above Administrative Adjustment Process.

Amendments to the TIP are be presented to the MPO as draft and released by vote for a 21-calendar-day public comment period. At that time, Cape Cod MPO Staff distributes the draft document and announces the beginning of the public comment period. Comments received by staff are documented, presented to the MPO and may result in changes to the document. After the 21-calendar-day public comment period the MPO can endorse, reject or rerelease the draft for an additional comment

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 8 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

period by vote. The comment period for these documents may be abbreviated as determined by the MPO.

Public Participation Process Pursuant to Federal Highway Administration 23 CFR Part 450 and Federal Transit Administration 49 CFR, the Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) was developed locally, and is based on the latest Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).

The development of the TIP occurs in public meeting of the CCJTC and the Cape Cod MPO. Presentations on potential new projects typically occur in the fall. Discussions of the scoring of potential projects and development of a potential program of projects occurs in the winter and spring. Meetings related to the development of the TIP for discussion and/or endorsement in Table 3.

Table 3. Transportation Improvement Program Development Meetings

DATE MEETING TYPE LOCATION March 20, 2017 Cape Cod MPO CCC Office April 14, 2017 CCJTC CCC Office April 24, 2017 Cape Cod MPO CCC Office May 12, 2017 CCJTC CCC Office May 22, 2017 Cape Cod MPO CCC Office

In addition to discussion at CCJTC and Cape MPO public meetings, CCC staff makes efforts to reach out directly to members of the public interested in development of the TIP. Public outreach events were held across the region including collecting comments at Bay State Bike Week events. Staff also made a presentation and collected comments at a Sunday service at the largest Portuguese church on Cape Cod. CCC staff received additional comments at an outreach table set up at the Hyannis Transportation Center.

The TIP is be presented to the MPO as draft and released by vote for a 21-calendar-day public comment period. At that time, Cape Cod MPO Staff distributes the draft document and announces the beginning of the public comment period. Comments received by staff are documented, presented to the MPO and may result in changes to the document. After the 21-calendar-day public comment period the MPO can endorse, reject or rerelease the draft for an additional comment period by vote. The comment period for these documents may be abbreviated as determined by the MPO.

CCC staff maintains an electronic mailing list of persons interested in transportation issues in the region. Notice of the public meetings where discussion of draft TIP documents is to occur is emailed at least seven days in advance. Public comments may be made in person or via email, telephone, fax, or regular mail.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 9 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Chapter 3: TIP Funding

This TIP was developed during a transition between two Federal transportation-funding bills. Most funding categories in this TIP are through federal sources: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) as provided by federal legislation. The current legislation is Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. The outgoing federal transportation legislation is the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21). Table 4 and Table 5 provide brief descriptions of the funding programs used for transportation improvement projects on Cape Cod.

Table 4. Federal Highway Funding Administration Programs

PROGRAM ELIGIBLE USES Congestion Mitigation and A wide range of projects in air quality nonattainment Air Quality and maintenance areas for ozone, carbon monoxide, Improvement (CMAQ) and small particulate matter, which reduce transportation-related emissions. Highway Safety Implementation of infrastructure-related highway Improvement Program safety improvements (HSIP) National Highway Improvements to interstate routes, major urban and Performance rural arterials, connectors to major intermodal Program (NHPP) facilities, and the national defense network. Also includes replacing or rehabilitating any public bridge, and resurfacing, restoring, and rehabilitating routes on the Interstate Highway System. Surface Transportation A broad range of surface transportation capital needs, Block Grant (STBG) including roads; transit, sea, and airport access; and [Surface Transportation vanpool, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Program (STP) under MAP-21] Transportation Alternatives Construction of infrastructure-related projects (for (TA) example, sidewalk, crossing, and on-road bicycle [Transportation facility improvements). Alternatives Program (TAP) under MAP-21] Bridge Replacement and Replacement or repair of bridges on or off the federal Rehabilitation Program aid system. (BR) Non Federal Aid (NFA) These projects are not funded with federal dollars. Typically, projects in this category are funded through state bonding, and are generally state maintenance projects.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 10 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Table 5. Federal Transit Funding Administration Programs

PROGRAM ELIGIBLE USES Bus and Bus Facilities This category is discretionary funds for capital (FTA 5309) expenditures such as buses and terminal facilities; projects need federally earmarked 5309 funds to proceed. Urbanized Area Formula These funds are primarily for capital expenditures. In Grant Program (FTA 5307) urbanized areas (UZA) with a population over 200,000, the use for operating assistance is limited. This funding is distributed to UZAs over 200,000 population via formula. Elderly Persons and This program funds public transit projects in rural areas. Persons with Disabilities Formula Program (FTA 5310) Rural Area Formula This program funds public transit projects in rural areas. Program (FTA 5311) MassDOT and FTA grant 5311 funds on a discretionary basis. Funds are for both capital and operating expenses. Federal share currently funds approximately 13% of total cost. Mobility Assistance This MassDOT program funds capital improvements for Program (MAP) transportation services for people who are elderly and/or have disabilities. State Contract Assistance These funds are provided through the Commonwealth (SCA) Transportation Fund (CTF) and the Massachusetts Transportation Trust Fund (MTTF) and are used as matching funds to make federal programs.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 11 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

For federal fiscal years 2018-2022 the anticipated available funding from the Federal Highway Administration with the state match is presented in Table 8.

Table 6. Summary of Available Federal Highway Administration Funding with State Match

YEAR STP HSIP CMAQ TAP TOTAL 2018 $8,331,266 $458,514 $1,146,285 $205,809 $10,141,874 2019 $8,732,008 $458,514 $1,146,285 $205,809 $10,542,616 2020 $8,650,392 $458,514 $1,146,285 $205,809 $10,461,000 2021 $8,892,488 $458,514 $1,146,285 $205,809 $10,703,096 2022 $9,024,998 $458,514 $1,146,285 $205,809 $10,835,606 2018- 2022 $43,631,152 $2,292,570 $5,731,425 $1,029,045 $52,684,192 Total

For federal fiscal years 2018-2022 the anticipated available funding from the Federal Transit Administration with the state match is presented in Table 8.

Table 7. Summary of Available Federal Transit Administration Funding with State Match

Federal State Match Local Match YEAR TOTAL (5339/5307) (RTACAP/SCA) 2018 $111,410,844 $2,795,172 $207,500 $14,413,516 2019 $10,429,774 $2,714,592 $212,500 $13,356,866 2020 $9,674,418 $3,205,120 $212,500 $13,092,038 2021 $9,270,471 $2,555,117 $212,500 $12,038,088 2022 $9,479,027 $2,607,257 $212,500 $12,298,784 2018-2022 $50,264,534 $13,877,258 $1,057,500 $65,199,292 Total

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 12 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Chapter 4: TIP Project Map and Descriptions

Map of Funded Highway Projects Figure 2 shows the location and extent of highway projects funded in this Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). An interactive map of these projects is available on the Cape Cod TIP website at www.capecodcommission.org/tip.

Figure 2. Map of Funded Highway Projects

Description of Funded Highway Projects

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 13 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

The following descriptions for highway projects were prepared by MassDOT and are subject to change as the projects are further developed.

Chatham, Rte 28 - George Ryder Rd to Barn Hill Rd (#606596) The purpose of this project is to construct safety and multimodal improvements along a 1700 foot linear segment of West Main Street (Route 28) between George Ryder Road and Barn Hill Road. The intent of the project is to provide improved safety and accessibility for bicyclists, pedestrians and motorists traveling through this corridor.

Cape Cod, Bicycle Rack Program (#CC2000) Reimbursement program for the towns and other eligible entities to receive bicycle racks.

Barnstable, Rte 28 at Osterville-West Barnstable Rd (#607435) This project proposes to address vehicular safety by upgrading traffic signals to include exclusive left turn lanes at the Route 28 approaches in addition to emergency vehicle pre-emption. There is also a need to improve bicycle and pedestrian accommodation at the intersection in addition to updating pavement markings and signage.

Truro, Route 6 Bicycle Accommodations (#608588) This project is in the preliminary design phase.

Barnstable, Rte 28 at Yarmouth Rd (#606272) This project involves improving safety and congestion for all users at the intersection of Iyanough Road (Route 28) and Yarmouth Road. Additional approach turn lanes are required at the intersection to alleviate congestion and improve corridor/intersection level of service. Traffic signal upgrades are also planned, in addition to new pavement markings and signage. Sidewalks will be reconstructed to ADA standards where necessary.

Cape Cod National Seashore - Pavement Overlay on Doane Rd. (#CC1001) This project is in the preliminary design phase.

Bourne-Falmouth, Rte 28 Guide and Traffic Sign Replacements (#608571) This project is in the preliminary design phase.

Wellfleet, Rte 6 at Main St (#607397) This project proposes to address traffic safety, multi-modal accommodation and the need for updated pavement markings. Upgrading of the traffic signals to include ped activation is proposed, in addition to the construction of sidewalks and extensions at the

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 14 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

intersection. Pavement markings are also proposed to be updated at the intersection crossings.

Cape Cod, Bicycle Rack Program (#CC2000) Reimbursement program for the towns and other eligible entities to receive bicycle racks.

Mashpee, Rte 151 (#607319) Work on this project will consist of corridor improvements on Route 151. Work will include intersection improvements, channelization, and potential exclusive left turn lanes at key driveways. In addition, traffic signals upgrading is required at key intersections such as Frank Ellis Drive/Job Fishing Rd. and Old Barnstable Rd. The project will address the lack of continuous 'complete streets' (bicycle and pedestrian accommodation) along the corridor, particularly at 2 key intersections: Frank Ellis Drive/Job Fishing Rd. and Old Barnstable Rd. Also, there is a need to update the crosswalks and pedestrian actuation equipment at the intersections to ADA compliance. Finally, signage, pavement markings and drainage need upgrading.

Bourne, Belmont Circle Multi-modal Improvements (#606900) This project is intended as an interim improvement to address safety and congestion issues at Belmont Circle. Proposed improvements include upgraded pavement markings and signs, as well as improved pedestrian and bicycle through the installation of sidewalks and shared use paths.

Orleans, Rte 28 Stormwater Improvements (#608598) This project is in the preliminary design phase.

Chatham, Rte 28 at Main St, Depot Rd, Queen Anne Rd and Crowell Rd (#607405) This project is intended to address the need for geometric, safety and multimodal improvements at the intersection. Proposed improvements include realignment of approach travel lanes and traffic islands at the intersection. The existing traffic signals also need upgrading to include pedestrian activation. There is also a lack of sidewalks on the South side of the intersection in addition to bike accommodating shoulders. Existing signage and pavement markings need upgrading. New sidewalk extensions and provision of upgraded pavement markings including ADA compliant crosswalks and ramps will serve to improve multimodal accommodation.

Yarmouth, Route 28 at North Main St and Old Main St (#608568) This project is in the preliminary design phase.

Harwich, Bridge Replacement - Azalea Dr over Herring River (#608617)

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 15 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

This project is in the preliminary design phase.

Sandwich, Shared Use Path on Service Rd (Rte 130 to Chase Rd) (#608422) In 2013, National Grid (NGRID, an international electricity and gas company, approached the Town of Sandwich with a request to construct and maintain a 20” gas main in the roadside area between the Service Road pavement and the Mid-Cape Highway right-of-way. The Town of Sandwich, as part of the local permit process, mandated that a variety of public betterments be included in the project. One such betterment requires National Grid to include tree removal and rough grading along the proposed gas line alignment that would serve as a base for constructing this first phase of a multi-phase shared-use path project from Route 130 to Chase Road.

Dennis/Harwich, Route 28 Reconstruction (Upper County Rd to Herring River Bridge) (#608742) This project is in the preliminary design phase.

Orleans, Route 28 at Route 39 and Quanset Rd (#608666) This project is in the preliminary design phase.

Falmouth, Rte 28A at Rte 151 (#607444) This project is intended to address the following needs: upgrading of traffic signals; geometric work in the form of minor widening; providing multi-modal accommodation.

Barnstable, Route 6 Repaving and Related Work (#608819) This project is in the preliminary design phase.

Yarmouth-Barnstable, Cape Cod Rail Trail Extension (#607398) This project is intended to provide an extension of the Cape Cod Rail Trail multi-use path connecting the communities of Barnstable and Yarmouth.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 16 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Description of Funded Transit Projects Transit projects funded in the TIP allow the Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority (CCRTA) to operate and maintain the fleet of vehicle and other infrastructure needed to meet the transportation needs of the Cape Cod region. The agency offers many types of services that cater to many different customer types including provides year-round and seasonal fixed-route services and a variety of demand response services. There is emphasis on providing transportation to the transit dependent demographics on Cape Cod, the elderly and individuals with disabilities.

Year-round fixed route service is offered on major roads. Stops are positioned to provide mobility and convenience for customers. Passengers may also flag down the bus between scheduled stops along the route. The FLEX route is a hybrid, which allows passengers to request a pick-up or drop off location up to ¾ of a mile from the designated route. The routes with the highest ridership are the H2O and Sealine, which travel on Route 28. Some of the fixed routes show ridership that changes seasonally, such as the FLEX route, but others show more steady year round use, including the Sandwich Line and Barnstable Villager. The newest regular services, the Sandwich Line and the Bourne Run have been meeting the fixed-route needs of previously unserved areas. Still running as a demonstration route, the Hyannis Loop is providing improved access to employment and services in Hyannis. Figure 3 shows the agencies year- round, fixed-route services.

Seasonal fixed-route services are provided in the downtown portions of Falmouth, Hyannis and Provincetown. These services have high ridership and measure well in performance during the summer months. The Provincetown shuttle has the highest ridership in the months of July and August of all the services offered. The CapeFLYER, a train from Boston targeted for vacationers traveling to Cape Cod, and the Outer Cape Bike shuttle, a vehicle with a trailer to carry bicycles, are provided in partnership with other agencies and are not included in this evaluation.

Demand response services make up a large portion of total ridership including; Dial-A- Ride Transportation (DART), Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) paratransit services and the Boston Hospital Transportation.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 17 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Figure 3. Map of Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority Year-round, Fixed-route Services

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 18 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Chapter 5: TIP Project Listing/Financial Plan

The following pages include the projects for the Cape Cod region that are in this program for Federal Aid or Non Federal Aid funding.

While it is recognized that this TIP is a planning program of projects and implementation must follow from the responsible implementing agency or agencies, the Cape Cod region expects cooperation, communication and an expeditious review process by agencies with the responsibility of overseeing steps toward implementation in order to ensure the maximum compliance with the programmed plan of projects. This effort by overseeing agencies will promote implementation of projects within the planned program and allow the financial plan to remain in balance.

Summary of Funding for Cape Cod Highway and Transit Projects The Cape Cod federal aid target amounts, from Federal Highway Administration sources through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Highway Department, based on approximately 4.6% of the statewide amounts, are presented in Table 8, and the current amount programmed is the right column.

Table 8. Cape Cod Federal Aid Target Programmed Amounts

YEAR TOTAL FEDERAL AID AMOUNT PROGRAMMED 2018 $10,141,874 $8,143,451 2019 $10,542,616 $10,443,649 2020 $10,461,000 $10,105,360 2021 $10,703,096 $10,004,000 2022 $10,835,606 $10,835,606 2018-2022 Total $52,684,192 $49,532,066

Projects programmed in years 2018-2022 reflect 2018 cost estimates. An inflation rate of 4% per year is added to project cost estimates in years 2019-2022, and therefore, the project cost estimates are by Year Of Expenditure (YOE) for the target projects.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 19 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

In addition to funding of highway projects, a significant amount of TIP funding is allocated for public transportation. Table 6 shows the programming amounts for both highway and transit projects provided from the TIP. The highway totals includes projects outside of the Cape Cod TIP Target such as Cape Cod specific bridge and maintenance projects.

Table 9. Cape Cod TIP Funding Programmed for Highway and Transit Projects

YEAR HIGHWAY TRANSIT TOTAL 2018 $8,143,451 $14,413,516 $22,556,967 2019 $11,755,302 $13,356,866 $25,112,168 2020 $10,680,298 $13,092,038 $23,772,336 2021 $13,795,776 $12,038,088 $25,833,864 2022 $36,095,019 $12,298,784 $48,393,803 2018-2022 $80,469,846 $65,199,292 $145,669,138 Total

The list of specific Cape Cod projects is presented on the following pages. From the system level anticipated revenues continue to fall short of anticipated needs as evidenced by the projects in need of funding listed in the Appendix C.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 20 2018 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

►Section 1A / Regionally Prioritized Projects ►Regionally Prioritized Projects Construction; Total project cost = $4,139,760 Roadway CHATHAM- IMPROVEMENTS ON MAIN (STP + CMAQ + TAP); MPO score = 66; reconstruction 606596 Cape Cod Chatham STREET (ROUTE 28), FROM GEORGE 5 STP $ 3,599,494 $ 2,879,595 $ 719,899 Municipality is TAP proponent; RSA conducted; program RYDER ROAD TO BARN HILL ROAD CMAQ approved Construction; Total project cost = $4,139,760 Roadway CHATHAM- IMPROVEMENTS ON MAIN (STP + CMAQ + TAP); MPO score = 66; reconstruction 606596 Cape Cod Chatham STREET (ROUTE 28), FROM GEORGE 5 CMAQ $ 334,457 $ 267,566 $ 66,891 Municipality is TAP proponent; RSA conducted; program RYDER ROAD TO BARN HILL ROAD CMAQ approved Construction; Total project cost = $4,139,760 Roadway CHATHAM- IMPROVEMENTS ON MAIN (STP + CMAQ + TAP); MPO score = 66; reconstruction 606596 Cape Cod Chatham STREET (ROUTE 28), FROM GEORGE 5 TAP $ 205,809 $ 164,647 $ 41,162 Municipality is TAP proponent; RSA conducted; program RYDER ROAD TO BARN HILL ROAD CMAQ approved BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION Roadway IMPROVEMENTS @ FALMOUTH ROAD Construction; Total project cost = $3,191,863 reconstruction 607435 Cape Cod Barnstable 5 STP $ 2,733,349 $ 2,186,679 $ 546,670 (ROUTE 28) & OSTERVILLE-WEST (STP + HSIP); MPO score = 65; RSA conducted program BARNSTABLE ROAD BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION Roadway IMPROVEMENTS @ FALMOUTH ROAD Construction; Total project cost = $3,191,863 reconstruction 607435 Cape Cod Barnstable 5 HSIP $ 458,514 $ 412,663 $ 45,851 (ROUTE 28) & OSTERVILLE-WEST (STP + HSIP); MPO score = 65; RSA conducted program BARNSTABLE ROAD Construction; Total project cost = $1,423,656 Planning / BARNSTABLE - HYANNIS LOOP (CMAQ + CCRTA SCA match); AC Year 3 of 3; Adjustments / CC1000 Cape Cod Barnstable 5 CMAQ $ 711,828 $ 569,462 $ 142,366 DEMONSTATION MPO score = 60; Transfer to FTA; CCRTA SCA Pass-throughs match Planning / Construction; Total project cost = $100,000; Adjustments / CC2000 Cape Cod Multiple CAPE COD - BICYCLE RACK PROGRAM 5 CMAQ $ 100,000 $ 80,000 $ 20,000 MPO score = 52; CMAQ approved; Funds to be Pass-throughs applied for by municipalites. Regionally Prioritized Projects subtotal ► $ 8,143,451 $ 6,560,612 $ 1,582,839 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Section 1A / Fiscal Constraint Analysis Total Regional Federal Aid Funds Programmed ► $ 8,143,451 $ 10,141,874 ◄Total $ 1,998,423 Target Funds Available STP programmed ► $ 6,332,843 $ 8,331,266 ◄ Max STP $ 1,998,423 STP available Section 1A instructions: MPO Template Name) Choose Regional Name from dropdown list to populate header and MPO column; Column C) Enter ID from ProjectInfo; Column E) Choose Municipality Name from dropdown list; Column H) Choose the Funding HSIP programmed ► $ 458,514 $ 458,514 ◄ Min. HSIP $ - HSIP recommended met Source being used for the project - if multiple funding sources are being used enter multiple lines; Column I) Enter the total amount of funds being programmed in this fiscal year and for each funding source; Federal funds autocalculates. Please verify the Column J) CMAQ programmed ► $ 1,146,285 $ 1,146,285 ◄ Min. CMAQ $ - CMAQ recommended met amount and only change if needed for flex. Column K) Non-federal funds autocalculates. Please verify the split/match - if matching an FTA flex, coordinate with Rail & Transit Division before programming; Column L) Enter Additional Information as described - please do not use any other format. TAP programmed ► $ 205,809 $ 205,809 ◄ Min. TAP $ - TAP under maximum

Remaining HSIP, CMAQ, and TAP Funds $ 1,998,423 ►Section 1B / Earmark or Discretionary Grant Funded Projects ►Other Federal Aid Earmark Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District HPP $ - $ - $ - Discretionary Earmark Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District HPP $ - $ - $ - Discretionary Other Federal Aid subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Section 2A / State Prioritized Reliability Projects ►Bridge Program / Inspections Bridge Program Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - 2018 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

Bridge Program / Inspections subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Bridge Program / Off-System Bridge Program Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District STP-BR-OFF $ - $ - $ - Bridge Program / Off-System subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Bridge Program / On-System (NHS) Bridge Program Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District NHPP-On $ - $ - $ - Bridge Program / On-System (NHS) subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) Bridge Program Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District NHPP-Off $ - $ - $ - Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance Bridge Program Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District NHPP-On $ - $ - $ - Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Interstate Pavement Interstate Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Pavement Insterstate Pavement subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 90% Federal + 10% Non-Federal ►Non-Interstate Pavement Non-Interstate Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Pavement Non-Interstate Pavement subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ► Roadway Improvements Roadway Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District STP $ - $ - $ - Improvements Roadway Improvements subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ► Safety Improvements Safety Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District STP $ - $ - $ - Improvements Safety Improvements subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source ►Section 2B / State Prioritized Modernization Projects ► ADA Retrofits ADA Retrofits Project # MPO Municipalities Description District STP $ - $ - $ -

ADA Retrofits subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Intersection Improvements Intersection Project # MPO Municipalities Description District CMAQ $ - $ - $ - Improvements Intersection Improvements subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source ►Intelligent Transportation Systems Intelligent Transportation Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Systems Intelligent Transportation System subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Roadway Reconstruction Roadway Project # MPO Municipalities Description District CMAQ $ - $ - $ - Reconstruction 2018 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

Roadway Reconstruction subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Section 2C / State Prioritized Expansion Projects ►Bicycles and Pedestrians Bicycles and Project # MPO Municipalities Description District CMAQ $ - $ - $ - Pedestrians Bicycles and Pedestrians subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Capacity Capacity Project # MPO Municipalities Description District CMAQ $ - $ - $ -

Capacity subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source ►Section 3 / Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs ►Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs Planning / Adjustments / Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Pass-throughs Other Statewide Items subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Section 4 / Non-Federally Aided Projects ►Non-Federally Aided Projects Non Federal Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NFA $ - $ - Aid Non-Federal Aid subtotal► $ - $ - ◄100% Non-Federal TIP Section 1 - TIP Section Total of All 2018 Summary 3: ▼ 4: ▼ Projects ▼

Total ► $ 8,143,451 $ - $ 8,143,451 ◄ Total Spending in Region Federal Funds ► $ 6,560,612 $ 6,560,612 ◄ Total Federal Spending in Region Non-Federal Funds ► $ 1,582,839 $ - $ 1,582,839 ◄ Total Non-Federal Spending in Region

701 CMR 7.00 Use of Road Flaggers and Police Details on Public Works Projects / 701 CMR 7.00 (the Regulation) was promulgated and became law on October 3, 2008. Under this Regulation, the CMR is applicable to any Public works Project that is performed within the limits of, or that impact traffic on, any Public Road. The Municipal Limitation referenced in this Regulation is applicable only to projects where the Municipality is the Awarding Authority. For all projects contained in the TIP, the Commonwealth is the Awarding Authority. Therefore, all projects must be considered and implemented in accordance with 701 CMR 7.00, and the Road Flagger and Police Detail Guidelines. By placing a project on the TIP, the Municipality acknowledges that 701 CMR 7.00 is applicable to its project and design and construction will be fully compliant with this Regulation. This information, and additional information relative to guidance and implementation of the Regulation can be found at the following link on the MassDOT Highway Division website: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/Highway/flaggers/main.aspx 2019 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

►Section 1A / Regionally Prioritized Projects ►Regionally Prioritized Projects Construction; Total project cost = $9,584,449 Roadway BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION with 4% inflation (STP + HSIP + CMAQ + TAP + reconstruction 606272 Cape Cod Barnstable IMPROVEMENTS AT IYANOUGH ROAD 5 STP $ 7,333,041 $ 5,866,433 $ 1,466,608 Statewide CMAQ); MPO score = 83; Municipality program (ROUTE 28) AND YARMOUTH ROAD is TAP proponent; RSA performed; CMAQ approved Construction; Total project cost = $9,584,449 Roadway BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION with 4% inflation (STP + HSIP + CMAQ + TAP + reconstruction 606272 Cape Cod Barnstable IMPROVEMENTS AT IYANOUGH ROAD 5 HSIP $ 458,514 $ 412,663 $ 45,851 Statewide CMAQ); MPO score = 83; Municipality program (ROUTE 28) AND YARMOUTH ROAD is TAP proponent; RSA performed; CMAQ approved Construction; Total project cost = $9,584,449 Roadway BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION with 4% inflation (STP + HSIP + CMAQ + TAP + reconstruction 606272 Cape Cod Barnstable IMPROVEMENTS AT IYANOUGH ROAD 5 CMAQ $ 1,046,285 $ 837,028 $ 209,257 Statewide CMAQ); MPO score = 83; Municipality program (ROUTE 28) AND YARMOUTH ROAD is TAP proponent; RSA performed; CMAQ approved Construction; Total project cost = $9,584,449 Roadway BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION with 4% inflation (STP + HSIP + CMAQ + TAP + reconstruction 606272 Cape Cod Barnstable IMPROVEMENTS AT IYANOUGH ROAD 5 TAP $ 205,809 $ 164,647 $ 41,162 Statewide CMAQ); MPO score = 83; Municipality program (ROUTE 28) AND YARMOUTH ROAD is TAP proponent; RSA performed; CMAQ approved TRURO- BICYCLE ACCOMMODATION Non-interstate IMPROVEMENT ON ROUTE 6 FROM SOUTH Construction; Total project cost = $1,300,000; DOT pavement 608588 Cape Cod Truro 5 STP $ 1,300,000 $ 1,040,000 $ 260,000 HIGHLAND ROAD TO SOUTH HOLLOW ROAD MPO score = 62 program (PHASE 2) Planning / Construction; Total project cost = $100,000; Adjustments / CC2000 Cape Cod Multiple CAPE COD - BICYCLE RACK PROGRAM 5 CMAQ $ 100,000 $ 80,000 $ 20,000 MPO score = 52; CMAQ approved; Funds to be Pass-throughs applied for by municipalites. Regionally Prioritized Projects subtotal ► $ 10,443,649 $ 8,400,771 $ 2,042,878 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Section 1A / Fiscal Constraint Analysis Total Regional Federal Aid Funds Programmed ► $ 10,443,649 $ 10,542,616 ◄Total $ 98,967 Target Funds Available STP programmed ► $ 8,633,041 $ 8,732,008 ◄ Max STP $ 98,967 STP available Section 1A instructions: MPO Template Name) Choose Regional Name from dropdown list to populate header and MPO column; Column C) Enter ID from ProjectInfo; Column E) Choose Municipality Name from dropdown list; Column H) Choose the Funding HSIP programmed ► $ 458,514 $ 458,514 ◄ Min. HSIP $ - HSIP recommended met Source being used for the project - if multiple funding sources are being used enter multiple lines; Column I) Enter the total amount of funds being programmed in this fiscal year and for each funding source; Federal funds autocalculates. Please verify the Column J) CMAQ programmed ► $ 1,146,285 $ 1,146,285 ◄ Min. CMAQ $ - CMAQ recommended met amount and only change if needed for flex. Column K) Non-federal funds autocalculates. Please verify the split/match - if matching an FTA flex, coordinate with Rail & Transit Division before programming; Column L) Enter Additional Information as described - please do not use any other format. TAP programmed ► $ 205,809 $ 205,809 ◄ Min. TAP $ - TAP under maximum

Remaining HSIP, CMAQ, and TAP Funds $ 98,967 ►Section 1B / Earmark or Discretionary Grant Funded Projects ►Other Federal Aid Earmark Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District HPP $ - $ - $ - Discretionary Earmark Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District HPP $ - $ - $ - Discretionary Other Federal Aid subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Section 2A / State Prioritized Reliability Projects ►Bridge Program / Inspections Bridge Program Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - 2019 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

Bridge Program / Inspections subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Bridge Program / Off-System Bridge Program Project # MPO Municipalities Description District STP-BR-OFF $ - $ - $ - Bridge Program / Off-System subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Bridge Program / On-System (NHS) Bridge Program Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP-On $ - $ - $ - Bridge Program / On-System (NHS) subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) Bridge Program Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP-Off $ - $ - $ -

Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance Bridge Program Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP-On $ - $ - $ - Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Interstate Pavement Interstate Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Pavement Insterstate Pavement subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 90% Federal + 10% Non-Federal ►Non-Interstate Pavement Non-Interstate Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Pavement Non-Interstate Pavement subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ► Roadway Improvements Roadway Project # MPO Municipalities Description District STP $ - $ - $ - Construction Improvements Roadway Improvements subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ► Safety Improvements BOURNE TO FALMOUTH- GUIDE AND Safety 608571 Cape Cod Multiple TRAFFIC SIGN REPLACEMENT ON A 5 HSIP $ 433,353 $ 390,018 $ 43,335 Construction Improvements SECTION OF ROUTE 28 Safety Improvements subtotal ► $ 433,353 $ 390,018 $ 43,335 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source ►Section 2B / State Prioritized Modernization Projects ► ADA Retrofits ADA Retrofits Project # MPO Municipalities Description District STP $ - $ - $ -

ADA Retrofits subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Intersection Improvements BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION Construction / Total Cost = $9,584,447 w/ Intersection 606272 Cape Cod Barnstable IMPROVEMENTS AT IYANOUGH ROAD 5 CMAQ $ 540,800 $ 432,640 $ 108,160 $9,043,647 in Cape Cod MPO funding / PSAC Improvements (ROUTE 28) AND YARMOUTH ROAD score 67 Intersection Improvements subtotal ► $ 540,800 $ 432,640 $ 108,160 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source ►Intelligent Transportation Systems Intelligent Transportation Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Systems Intelligent Transportation System subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Roadway Reconstruction 2019 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

Roadway Project # MPO Municipalities Description District CMAQ $ - $ - $ - Reconstruction Roadway Reconstruction subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Section 2C / State Prioritized Expansion Projects ►Bicycles and Pedestrians Bicycles and Project # MPO Municipalities Description District CMAQ $ - $ - $ - Pedestrians Bicycles and Pedestrians subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Capacity Capacity Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ -

Capacity subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source ►Section 3 / Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs ►Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs Planning / CAPE COD NATIONAL SEASHORE - Construction; MPO score = 36; Transfer to Adjustments / CC1001 Cape Cod Eastham 5 Other FA $ 337,500 $ 270,000 $ 67,500 PAVEMENT OVERLAY ON DOANE ROAD Eastern Federal Lands (National Park Service) Pass-throughs Other Statewide Items subtotal ► $ 337,500 $ 270,000 $ 67,500 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

Total ► $ 11,755,302 $ - $ 11,755,302 ◄ Total Spending in Region Federal Funds ► $ 9,493,429 $ 9,493,429 ◄ Total Federal Spending in Region Non-Federal Funds ► $ 2,261,874 $ - $ 2,261,874 ◄ Total Non-Federal Spending in Region

701 CMR 7.00 Use of Road Flaggers and Police Details on Public Works Projects / 701 CMR 7.00 (the Regulation) was promulgated and became law on October 3, 2008. Under this Regulation, the CMR is applicable to any Public works Project that is performed within the limits of, or that impact traffic on, any Public Road. The Municipal Limitation referenced in this Regulation is applicable only to projects where the Municipality is the Awarding Authority. For all projects contained in the TIP, the Commonwealth is the Awarding Authority. Therefore, all projects must be considered and implemented in accordance with 701 CMR 7.00, and the Road Flagger and Police Detail Guidelines. By placing a project on the TIP, the Municipality acknowledges that 701 CMR 7.00 is applicable to its project and design and construction will be fully compliant with this Regulation. This information, and additional information relative to guidance and implementation of the Regulation can be found at the following link on the MassDOT Highway Division website: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/Highway/flaggers/main.aspx 2020 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

►Section 1A / Regionally Prioritized Projects ►Regionally Prioritized Projects Construction; Total project cost = $9,240,112 MASHPEE- CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS & with 8% inflation (2020 STP + 2021 STP + 2021 Roadway RELATED WORK ON NATHAN ELLIS HSIP + 2021 CMAQ + 2021 TAP); MPO score = reconstruction 607319 Cape Cod Mashpee 5 STP $ 2,120,112 $ 1,696,090 $ 424,022 HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151), FROM MASHPEE 80; AC Year 1 of 2; Municipality is TAP program ROTARY TO FALMOUTH T.L. proponent; RSA conducted; CMAQ analysis to be completed Construction; Total project cost = $2,240,448 Intersection WELLFLEET- INTERSECTION with 8% inflation (STP + HSIP + TAP); MPO improvements 607397 Cape Cod Wellfleet IMPROVEMENTS & RELATED WORK AT 5 STP $ 1,576,125 $ 1,260,900 $ 315,225 score = 82; Municipality is TAP proponent; RSA program ROUTE 6 & MAIN STREET completed Construction; Total project cost = $2,240,448 Intersection WELLFLEET- INTERSECTION with 8% inflation (STP + HSIP + TAP); MPO improvements 607397 Cape Cod Wellfleet IMPROVEMENTS & RELATED WORK AT 5 HSIP $ 458,514 $ 412,663 $ 45,851 score = 82; Municipality is TAP proponent; RSA program ROUTE 6 & MAIN STREET completed Construction; Total project cost = $2,240,448 Intersection WELLFLEET- INTERSECTION with 8% inflation (STP + HSIP + TAP); MPO improvements 607397 Cape Cod Wellfleet IMPROVEMENTS & RELATED WORK AT 5 TAP $ 205,809 $ 164,647 $ 41,162 score = 82; Municipality is TAP proponent; RSA program ROUTE 6 & MAIN STREET completed Roadway BOURNE- TRAFFIC AND MULTI-MODAL Construction; Total project cost = $5,644,800 reconstruction 606900 Cape Cod Bourne IMPROVEMENTS @ BELMONT CIRCLE AT 5 STP $ 4,598,515 $ 3,678,812 $ 919,703 with 8% inflation = STP + CMAQ); MPO score = program ROUTES 6/25/28 82 Roadway BOURNE- TRAFFIC AND MULTI-MODAL Construction; Total project cost = $5,644,800 reconstruction 606900 Cape Cod Bourne IMPROVEMENTS @ BELMONT CIRCLE AT 5 CMAQ $ 1,046,285 $ 837,028 $ 209,257 with 8% inflation = STP + CMAQ); MPO score = program ROUTES 6/25/28 82 Planning / Construction; Total project cost = $100,000; Adjustments / CC2000 Cape Cod Multiple CAPE COD - BICYCLE RACK PROGRAM 5 CMAQ $ 100,000 $ 80,000 $ 20,000 MPO score = 52; CMAQ approved; Funds to be Pass-throughs applied for by municipalites. Regionally Prioritized Projects subtotal ► $ 10,105,360 $ 8,130,139 $ 1,975,221 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Section 1A / Fiscal Constraint Analysis Total Regional Federal Aid Funds Programmed ► $ 10,105,360 $ 10,461,000 ◄Total $ 355,640 Target Funds Available STP programmed ► $ 8,294,752 $ 8,650,392 ◄ Max STP $ 355,640 STP available Section 1A instructions: MPO Template Name) Choose Regional Name from dropdown list to populate header and MPO column; Column C) Enter ID from ProjectInfo; Column E) Choose Municipality Name from dropdown list; Column H) Choose the Funding HSIP programmed ► $ 458,514 $ 458,514 ◄ Min. HSIP $ - HSIP recommended met Source being used for the project - if multiple funding sources are being used enter multiple lines; Column I) Enter the total amount of funds being programmed in this fiscal year and for each funding source; Federal funds autocalculates. Please verify the Column J) CMAQ programmed ► $ 1,146,285 $ 1,146,285 ◄ Min. CMAQ $ - CMAQ recommended met amount and only change if needed for flex. Column K) Non-federal funds autocalculates. Please verify the split/match - if matching an FTA flex, coordinate with Rail & Transit Division before programming; Column L) Enter Additional Information as described - please do not use any other format. TAP programmed ► $ 205,809 $ 205,809 ◄ Min. TAP $ - TAP under maximum

Remaining HSIP, CMAQ, and TAP Funds $ 355,640 ►Section 1B / Earmark or Discretionary Grant Funded Projects ►Other Federal Aid Earmark Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District HPP $ - $ - $ - Discretionary Earmark Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District HPP $ - $ - $ - Discretionary Other Federal Aid subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Section 2A / State Prioritized Reliability Projects ►Bridge Program / Inspections Bridge Program Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - 2020 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

Bridge Program / Inspections subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) Bridge Program Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP-Off $ - $ - $ - Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Interstate Pavement Interstate Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Pavement Insterstate Pavement subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 90% Federal + 10% Non-Federal ►Non-Interstate Pavement Non-Interstate Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Pavement Non-Interstate Pavement subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ► Roadway Improvements Roadway ORLEANS- STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS 608598 Cape Cod Orleans 5 STP $ 574,938 $ 459,950 $ 114,988 Construction Improvements ALONG ROUTE 28 Roadway Improvements subtotal ► $ 574,938 $ 459,950 $ 114,988 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ► Safety Improvements Safety Project # MPO Municipalities Description District STP $ - $ - $ - Improvements Safety Improvements subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source ►Section 2B / State Prioritized Modernization Projects ► ADA Retrofits ADA Retrofits Project # MPO Municipalities Description District STP $ - $ - $ -

ADA Retrofits subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Intersection Improvements Intersection Project # MPO Municipalities Description District CMAQ $ - $ - $ - Improvements Intersection Improvements subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source ►Intelligent Transportation Systems Intelligent Transportation Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Systems Intelligent Transportation System subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Roadway Reconstruction Roadway Project # MPO Municipalities Description District TAP $ - $ - $ - Reconstruction 2020 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

Total ► $ 10,680,298 $ - $ 10,680,298 ◄ Total Spending in Region Federal Funds ► $ 8,590,090 $ 8,590,090 ◄ Total Federal Spending in Region Non-Federal Funds ► $ 2,090,208 $ - $ 2,090,208 ◄ Total Non-Federal Spending in Region

701 CMR 7.00 Use of Road Flaggers and Police Details on Public Works Projects / 701 CMR 7.00 (the Regulation) was promulgated and became law on October 3, 2008. Under this Regulation, the CMR is applicable to any Public works Project that is performed within the limits of, or that impact traffic on, any Public Road. The Municipal Limitation referenced in this Regulation is applicable only to projects where the Municipality is the Awarding Authority. For all projects contained in the TIP, the Commonwealth is the Awarding Authority. Therefore, all projects must be considered and implemented in accordance with 701 CMR 7.00, and the Road Flagger and Police Detail Guidelines. By placing a project on the TIP, the Municipality acknowledges that 701 CMR 7.00 is applicable to its project and design and construction will be fully compliant with this Regulation. This information, and additional information relative to guidance and implementation of the Regulation can be found at the following link on the MassDOT Highway Division website: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/Highway/flaggers/main.aspx 2021 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

►Section 1A / Regionally Prioritized Projects ►Regionally Prioritized Projects CHATHAM- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Roadway & RELATED WORK AT MAIN STREET Construction; Total programmed with 12% reconstruction 607405 Cape Cod Chatham 5 STP $ 2,784,000 $ 2,227,200 $ 556,800 (ROUTE 28), DEPOT ROAD, QUEEN ANNE inflation applied = $2,784,0000; MPO score = 76. program ROAD AND CROWELL ROAD Construction; Total project cost = $9,240,112 MASHPEE- CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS & with 8% inflation (2020 STP + 2021 STP + 2021 Roadway RELATED WORK ON NATHAN ELLIS HSIP + 2021 CMAQ + 2021 TAP); MPO score = reconstruction 607319 Cape Cod Mashpee 5 STP $ 5,409,392 $ 4,327,514 $ 1,081,878 HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151), FROM MASHPEE 80; AC Year 2 of 2; Municipality is TAP program ROTARY TO FALMOUTH T.L. proponent; RSA conducted; CMAQ analysis to be completed Construction; Total project cost = $9,240,112 MASHPEE- CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS & with 8% inflation (2020 STP + 2021 STP + 2021 Roadway RELATED WORK ON NATHAN ELLIS HSIP + 2021 CMAQ + 2021 TAP); MPO score = reconstruction 607319 Cape Cod Mashpee 5 HSIP $ 458,514 $ 412,663 $ 45,851 HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151), FROM MASHPEE 80; AC Year 2 of 2; Municipality is TAP program ROTARY TO FALMOUTH T.L. proponent; RSA conducted; CMAQ analysis to be completed Construction; Total project cost = $9,240,112 MASHPEE- CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS & with 8% inflation (2020 STP + 2021 STP + 2021 Roadway RELATED WORK ON NATHAN ELLIS HSIP + 2021 CMAQ + 2021 TAP); MPO score = reconstruction 607319 Cape Cod Mashpee 5 CMAQ $ 1,046,285 $ 837,028 $ 209,257 HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151), FROM MASHPEE 80; AC Year 2 of 2; Municipality is TAP program ROTARY TO FALMOUTH T.L. proponent; RSA conducted; CMAQ analysis to be completed Construction; Total project cost = $9,240,112 MASHPEE- CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS & with 8% inflation (2020 STP + 2021 STP + 2021 Roadway RELATED WORK ON NATHAN ELLIS HSIP + 2021 CMAQ + 2021 TAP); MPO score = reconstruction 607319 Cape Cod Mashpee 5 TAP $ 205,809 $ 164,647 $ 41,162 HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151), FROM MASHPEE 80; AC Year 2 of 2; Municipality is TAP program ROTARY TO FALMOUTH T.L. proponent; RSA conducted; CMAQ analysis to be completed Planning / Construction; Total project cost = $100,000; Adjustments / CC2000 Cape Cod Multiple CAPE COD - BICYCLE RACK PROGRAM 5 CMAQ $ 100,000 $ 80,000 $ 20,000 MPO score = 52; CMAQ approved; Funds to be Pass-throughs applied for by municipalites. Regionally Prioritized Projects subtotal ► $ 10,004,000 $ 8,049,051 $ 1,954,949 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Section 1A / Fiscal Constraint Analysis Total Regional Federal Aid Funds Programmed ► $ 10,004,000 $ 10,703,096 ◄Total $ 699,096 Target Funds Available STP programmed ► $ 8,193,392 $ 8,892,488 ◄ Max STP $ 699,096 STP available Section 1A instructions: MPO Template Name) Choose Regional Name from dropdown list to populate header and MPO column; Column C) Enter ID from ProjectInfo; Column E) Choose Municipality Name from dropdown list; Column H) Choose the Funding HSIP programmed ► $ 458,514 $ 458,514 ◄ Min. HSIP $ - HSIP recommended met Source being used for the project - if multiple funding sources are being used enter multiple lines; Column I) Enter the total amount of funds being programmed in this fiscal year and for each funding source; Federal funds autocalculates. Please verify the Column J) CMAQ programmed ► $ 1,146,285 $ 1,146,285 ◄ Min. CMAQ $ - CMAQ recommended met amount and only change if needed for flex. Column K) Non-federal funds autocalculates. Please verify the split/match - if matching an FTA flex, coordinate with Rail & Transit Division before programming; Column L) Enter Additional Information as described - please do not use any other format. TAP programmed ► $ 205,809 $ 205,809 ◄ Min. TAP $ - TAP under maximum

Remaining HSIP, CMAQ, and TAP Funds $ 699,096 ►Section 1B / Earmark or Discretionary Grant Funded Projects ►Other Federal Aid Earmark Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District HPP $ - $ - $ - Discretionary Earmark Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District HPP $ - $ - $ - Discretionary Other Federal Aid subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

2021 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

►Section 2A / State Prioritized Reliability Projects ►Bridge Program / Inspections Bridge Program Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ -

Bridge Program / Inspections subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Bridge Program / Off-System HARWICH- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, H-10- Bridge Program 608617 Cape Cod Harwich 5 STP-BR-OFF $ 1,007,776 $ 806,221 $ 201,555 Construction 019, AZALEA DRIVE OVER HERRING RIVER Bridge Program / Off-System subtotal ► $ 1,007,776 $ 806,221 $ 201,555 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance Bridge Program Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP-On $ - $ - $ -

Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Interstate Pavement Interstate Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Pavement Insterstate Pavement subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 90% Federal + 10% Non-Federal ►Non-Interstate Pavement Non-Interstate Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Pavement Non-Interstate Pavement subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ► Roadway Improvements Roadway Project # MPO Municipalities Description District STP $ - $ - $ - Improvements Roadway Improvements subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ► Safety Improvements Safety Project # MPO Municipalities Description District STP $ - $ - $ - Improvements Safety Improvements subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source ►Section 2B / State Prioritized Modernization Projects ► ADA Retrofits ADA Retrofits Project # MPO Municipalities Description District STP $ - $ - $ -

ADA Retrofits subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Intersection Improvements YARMOUTH- IMPROVEMENTS AT MAIN Intersection 608568 Cape Cod Yarmouth STREET (ROUTE 28) AT NORTH MAIN 5 HSIP $ 2,784,000 $ 2,505,600 $ 278,400 Construction; MPO Score 76; PSAC score 54 Improvements STREET AT OLD MAIN STREET Intersection Improvements subtotal ► $ 2,784,000 $ 2,505,600 $ 278,400 ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source ►Intelligent Transportation Systems 2021 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information Intelligent Transportation Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Systems Intelligent Transportation System subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Roadway Reconstruction Roadway Project # MPO Municipalities Description District CMAQ $ - $ - $ - Reconstruction Roadway Reconstruction subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Section 2C / State Prioritized Expansion Projects ►Bicycles and Pedestrians Bicycles and Project # MPO Municipalities Description District CMAQ $ - $ - $ - Pedestrians Bicycles and Pedestrians subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Capacity Capacity Project # MPO Municipalities Description District CMAQ $ - $ - $ -

Total ► $ 13,795,776 $ - $ 13,795,776 ◄ Total Spending in Region Federal Funds ► $ 11,360,872 $ 11,360,872 ◄ Total Federal Spending in Region Non-Federal Funds ► $ 2,434,904 $ - $ 2,434,904 ◄ Total Non-Federal Spending in Region

701 CMR 7.00 Use of Road Flaggers and Police Details on Public Works Projects / 701 CMR 7.00 (the Regulation) was promulgated and became law on October 3, 2008. Under this Regulation, the CMR is applicable to any Public works Project that is performed within the limits of, or that impact traffic on, any Public Road. The Municipal Limitation referenced in this Regulation is applicable only to projects where the Municipality is the Awarding Authority. For all projects contained in the TIP, the Commonwealth is the Awarding Authority. Therefore, all projects must be considered and implemented in accordance with 701 CMR 7.00, and the Road Flagger and Police Detail Guidelines. By placing a project on the TIP, the Municipality acknowledges that 701 CMR 7.00 is applicable to its project and design and construction will be fully compliant with this Regulation. This information, and additional information relative to guidance and implementation of the Regulation can be found at the following link on the MassDOT Highway Division website: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/Highway/flaggers/main.aspx 2022 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

►Section 1A / Regionally Prioritized Projects ►Regionally Prioritized Projects DENNIS- HARWICH- RECONSTRUCTION & Construction; Total programmed with 16% RELATED WORK ON MAIN STREET (ROUTE inflation applied = $5,170,090 (Project limits to 0 608742 Cape Cod Orleans 5 STP $ 5,170,090 $ 4,136,072 $ 1,034,018 28), FROM UPPER COUNTY ROAD TO THE be adjusted to match available funding); MPO HERRING RIVER BRIDGE score = 79 ORLEANS- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Roadway Construction; Total programmed with 16% AT ROUTE 28 (SOUTH ORLEANS ROAD), reconstruction 608666 Cape Cod Orleans 5 STP $ 2,114,191 $ 1,691,353 $ 422,838 inflation applied = $2,320,000 (STP + TAP); ROUTE 39 (HARWICH ROAD) AND QUANSET program MPO score = 64; Municipality is TAP proponent ROAD ORLEANS- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Construction; Total programmed with 16% Roadway AT ROUTE 28 (SOUTH ORLEANS ROAD), inflation applied = $5,170,090 (Project limits to reconstruction 608666 Cape Cod Orleans 5 TAP $ 205,809 $ 164,647 $ 41,162 ROUTE 39 (HARWICH ROAD) AND QUANSET be adjusted to match available funding); MPO program ROAD score = 79 FALMOUTH- INTERSECTION Construction; Total programmed with 16% Roadway IMPROVEMENTS & RELATED WORK AT inflation applied = $3,245,516 (STP + HSIP + reconstruction 607444 Cape Cod Falmouth NORTH FALMOUTH HIGHWAY (ROUTE 5 STP $ 1,740,717 $ 1,392,574 $ 348,143 CMAQ); MPO score = 63; CMAQ analysis to be program 28A),NATHAN ELLIS HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151) completed AND COUNTY ROAD FALMOUTH- INTERSECTION Construction; Total programmed with 16% Roadway IMPROVEMENTS & RELATED WORK AT inflation applied = $3,245,516 (STP + HSIP + reconstruction 607444 Cape Cod Falmouth NORTH FALMOUTH HIGHWAY (ROUTE 5 HSIP $ 458,514 $ 412,663 $ 45,851 CMAQ); MPO score = 63; CMAQ analysis to be program 28A),NATHAN ELLIS HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151) completed AND COUNTY ROAD FALMOUTH- INTERSECTION Construction; Total programmed with 16% Roadway IMPROVEMENTS & RELATED WORK AT inflation applied = $3,245,516 (STP + HSIP + reconstruction 607444 Cape Cod Falmouth NORTH FALMOUTH HIGHWAY (ROUTE 5 CMAQ $ 1,046,285 $ 837,028 $ 209,257 CMAQ); MPO score = 63; CMAQ analysis to be program 28A),NATHAN ELLIS HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151) completed AND COUNTY ROAD Planning / Construction; Total project cost = $100,000; Adjustments / CC2000 Cape Cod Multiple CAPE COD - BICYCLE RACK PROGRAM 5 CMAQ $ 100,000 $ 80,000 $ 20,000 MPO score = 52; CMAQ approved; Funds to be Pass-throughs applied for by municipalites. Regionally Prioritized Projects subtotal ► $ 10,835,606 $ 8,714,336 $ 2,121,270 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Section 1A / Fiscal Constraint Analysis Total Regional Federal Aid Funds Programmed ► $ 10,835,606 $ 10,835,606 ◄Total $ - Target Funds Available STP programmed ► $ 9,024,998 $ 9,024,998 ◄ Max STP $ - STP available Section 1A instructions: MPO Template Name) Choose Regional Name from dropdown list to populate header and MPO column; Column C) Enter ID from ProjectInfo; Column E) Choose Municipality Name from dropdown list; Column H) Choose the Funding HSIP programmed ► $ 458,514 $ 458,514 ◄ Min. HSIP $ - HSIP recommended met Source being used for the project - if multiple funding sources are being used enter multiple lines; Column I) Enter the total amount of funds being programmed in this fiscal year and for each funding source; Federal funds autocalculates. Please verify the Column J) CMAQ programmed ► $ 1,146,285 $ 1,146,285 ◄ Min. CMAQ $ - CMAQ recommended met amount and only change if needed for flex. Column K) Non-federal funds autocalculates. Please verify the split/match - if matching an FTA flex, coordinate with Rail & Transit Division before programming; Column L) Enter Additional Information as described - please do not use any other format. TAP programmed ► $ 205,809 $ 205,809 ◄ Min. TAP $ - TAP under maximum

Remaining HSIP, CMAQ, and TAP Funds $ - ►Section 1B / Earmark or Discretionary Grant Funded Projects ►Other Federal Aid Earmark Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District HPP $ - $ - $ - Discretionary Earmark Project # Cape Cod Municipalities Description District HPP $ - $ - $ - Discretionary Other Federal Aid subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Section 2A / State Prioritized Reliability Projects 2022 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

►Bridge Program / Inspections Bridge Program Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ -

Bridge Program / Inspections subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) Bridge Program Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP-Off $ - $ - $ -

Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal

►Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance Bridge Program Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP-On $ - $ - $ -

Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source

►Interstate Pavement Interstate Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Pavement Insterstate Pavement subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 90% Federal + 10% Non-Federal ►Non-Interstate Pavement Non-Interstate BARNSTABLE- RESURFACING AND 608819 Cape Cod Barnstable 5 NHPP $ 11,826,432 $ 9,461,146 $ 2,365,286 Construction Pavement RELATED WORK ON ROUTE 6 Non-Interstate Pavement subtotal ► $ 11,826,432 $ 9,461,146 $ 2,365,286 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ► Roadway Improvements Roadway Project # MPO Municipalities Description District STP $ - $ - $ - Improvements Roadway Improvements subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ► Safety Improvements Safety Project # MPO Municipalities Description District HSIP $ - $ - $ - Improvements Safety Improvements subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source ►Section 2B / State Prioritized Modernization Projects ► ADA Retrofits ADA Retrofits Project # MPO Municipalities Description District STP $ - $ - $ -

ADA Retrofits subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Intersection Improvements Intersection Project # MPO Municipalities Description District HSIP $ - $ - $ - Improvements Intersection Improvements subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ Funding Split Varies by Funding Source ►Intelligent Transportation Systems Intelligent Transportation Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Systems Intelligent Transportation System subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal 2022 Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement Program Amendment / STIP MassDOT Metropolitan Municipality MassDOT MassDOT Funding Total Federal Non-Federal Adjustment Type ▼ Program ▼ Project ID ▼ Planning Name ▼ Project District ▼ Source ▼ Programmed Funds ▼ Funds ▼ Additional Information ▼ Present information as follows, if applicable: a) Organization ▼ Description▼ Funds ▼ Planning / Design / or Construction; b) total project cost and funding sources used; c) advance construction status; d) MPO project score; e) name of entity receiving a transfer; f) name of entity paying the non- state non-federal match; g) earmark details; h) TAP project proponent; i) other information

►Roadway Reconstruction Roadway Project # MPO Municipalities Description District NHPP $ - $ - $ - Reconstruction Roadway Reconstruction subtotal ► $ - $ - $ - ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Section 2C / State Prioritized Expansion Projects ►Bicycles and Pedestrians SANDWICH- CONSTRUCTION OF SHARED Bicycles and 608422 Cape Cod Sandwich USE PATH ALONG SERVICE ROAD FROM 5 CMAQ $ 5,800,464 $ 4,640,371 $ 1,160,093 Construction / PSAC score 22 Pedestrians ROUTE 130 TO CHASE ROAD YARMOUTH- BARNSTABLE- CAPE COD RAIL Bicycles and TRAIL EXTENSION, INCLUDES NEW BRIDGE 607398 Cape Cod Multiple 5 CMAQ $ 7,632,517 $ 6,106,014 $ 1,526,503 Construction / PSAC score 20 Pedestrians OVER WILLOW STREET & RAILROAD (PHASE III) Bicycles and Pedestrians subtotal ► $ 13,432,981 $ 10,746,385 $ 2,686,596 ◄ 80% Federal + 20% Non-Federal ►Capacity Capacity Project # MPO Municipalities Description District CMAQ $ - $ - $ -

Total ► $ 36,095,019 $ - $ 36,095,019 ◄ Total Spending in Region Federal Funds ► $ 28,921,867 $ 28,921,867 ◄ Total Federal Spending in Region Non-Federal Funds ► $ 7,173,152 $ - $ 7,173,152 ◄ Total Non-Federal Spending in Region

5307 Project Agency Line Project Description Carry Over Federal State TDC Local Total Number Item Funds Funds Funds RTD0005485 CCRTA 117C00 NON FIXED ROUTE ADA PARA $532,126 $133,032 $0 $0 $665,158 SERV RTD0005486 CCRTA 117L00 MOBILITY MANAGEMENT $1,206,864 $301,716 $0 $0 $1,508,580 RTD0005488 CCRTA 300900 OPERATING ASSISTANCE $600,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $1,200,000 RTD0005487 CCRTA 117A00 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE $5,630,000 $1,200,000 $0 $207,500 $7,037,500

$7,968,990 $2,234,748 $0 $207,500 $10,411,238

5339 Project Agency Line Project Description Carry Over Federal State TDC Local Total Number Item Funds Funds Funds RTD0005481 CCRTA 113400 REHAB/RENOVATE BUS STATIONS $152,000 $38,000 $0 $0 $190,000 RTD0005505 CCRTA 114211 ACQUIRE - SUPPORT VEHICLES $53,651 $13,413 $0 $0 $67,064 RTD0005483 CCRTA 114207 ACQUIRE - ADP HARDWARE $24,000 $6,000 $0 $0 $30,000 RTD0005506 CCRTA 114209 ACQUIRE - MOBILE $153,600 $38,400 $0 $0 $192,000 SURV/SECURITY EQUIP RTD0005484 CCRTA 119302 CONSTRUCTION - BUS SHELTERS $25,600 $6,400 $0 $0 $32,000 RTD0005507 CCRTA 117000 OTHER CAPITAL ITEMS (BUS) $660,000 $165,000 $0 $0 $825,000 RTD0005482 CCRTA 114200 ACQUISITION OF BUS SUPPORT $71,235 $17,809 $0 $0 $89,044 EQUIP/FACILITIES RTD0006286 CCRTA 114210 ACQUIRE - MOBILE FARE COLL $113,448 $28,362 $0 $0 $141,810 EQUIP RTD0006386 CCRTA 442400 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING $40,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $50,000 RTD0004395 CCRTA 111203 BUY REPLACEMENT 30-FT BUS (3) 2016 - $1,380,000 $1,380,000 $0 $345,000 $0 $1,380,000

$2,673,534 $323,384 $345,000 $0 $2,996,918

11,410,844 2,795,172 345,000 207,500 14,413,516 TIP 2018 - 2022 2019

5307 Project Agency Line Project Description Carry Over Federal State TDC Local Total Number Item Funds Funds Funds RTD0005489 CCRTA 300900 OPERATING ASSISTANCE 2018 - $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $1,200,000 RTD0005490 CCRTA 117C00 NON FIXED ROUTE ADA PARA 2018 - $542,769 $542,769 $135,692 $0 $0 $678,461 SERV RTD0005491 CCRTA 117A00 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 2018 - $5,258,400 $5,258,400 $1,102,100 $0 $212,500 $6,573,000 RTD0005492 CCRTA 117L00 MOBILITY MANAGEMENT 2018 - $1,231,001 $1,231,001 $307,750 $0 $0 $1,538,751 RTD0005494 CCRTA 114200 ACQUISITION OF BUS SUPPORT 2018 - $56,516 $56,516 $14,129 $0 $0 $70,645 EQUIP/FACILITIES RTD0005495 CCRTA 114207 ACQUIRE - ADP HARDWARE 2018 - $25,702 $25,702 $6,425 $0 $0 $32,127 RTD0005509 CCRTA 117000 OTHER CAPITAL ITEMS (BUS) 2018 - $672,000 $672,000 $168,000 $0 $0 $840,000

$8,386,388 $2,334,096 $0 $212,500 $10,932,984

5339 Project Agency Line Project Description Carry Over Federal State TDC Local Total Number Item Funds Funds Funds RTD0004408 CCRTA 111203 BUY REPLACEMENT 30-FT BUS 2018 - $1,421,400 $1,421,400 $0 $0 $0 $1,421,400 RTD0005493 CCRTA 113400 REHAB/RENOVATE BUS STATIONS 2018 - $456,000 $456,000 $114,000 $0 $0 $570,000 RTD0005496 CCRTA 119302 CONSTRUCTION - BUS SHELTERS 2018 - $26,400 $26,400 $6,600 $0 $0 $33,000 RTD0005508 CCRTA 114211 ACQUIRE - SUPPORT VEHICLES 2018 - $99,586 $99,586 $24,896 $0 $0 $124,482 RTD0006387 CCRTA 442400 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING 2018 - $40,000 $40,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $50,000

$2,043,386 $155,496 $0 $0 $2,198,882

Other NonFederal Project Agency Line Project Description Carry Over Federal State TDC Local Total Number Item Funds Funds Funds RTD0002642 CCRTA 111204 BUY REPLACEMENT <30 FT BUS $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $225,000

$0 $225,000 $0 $0 $225,000

10,429,774 2,714,592 0 212,500 13,356,866

1 4/12/2017 TIP 2018 - 2022 2020

5307 Project Agency Line Project Description Carry Over Federal State TDC Local Total Number Item Funds Funds Funds RTD0005497 CCRTA 117C00 NON FIXED ROUTE ADA PARA 2019 - $553,624 $553,624 $138,406 $0 $0 $692,030 SERV RTD0005498 CCRTA 117A00 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 2019 - $5,173,979 $5,173,979 $1,080,995 $0 $212,500 $6,467,474 RTD0005499 CCRTA 114200 ACQUISITION OF BUS SUPPORT 2019 - $80,000 $80,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $100,000 EQUIP/FACILITIES RTD0005500 CCRTA 114207 ACQUIRE - ADP HARDWARE 2018 - $4,480; $69,440 $17,360 $0 $0 $86,800 2019 - $64,960 RTD0005501 CCRTA 117L00 MOBILITY MANAGEMENT 2019 - $1,255,621 $1,255,621 $313,905 $0 $0 $1,569,526 RTD0005502 CCRTA 300900 OPERATING ASSISTANCE 2019 - $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $1,200,000 RTD0005504 CCRTA 119302 CONSTRUCTION - BUS SHELTERS 2018 - $28,800 $28,800 $7,200 $0 $0 $36,000 RTD0005510 CCRTA 114209 ACQUIRE - MOBILE 2019 - $66,133 $66,133 $16,533 $0 $0 $82,666 SURV/SECURITY EQUIP RTD0006303 CCRTA 114208 ACQUIRE - ADP SOFTWARE 2018 - $2,800 $2,800 $700 $0 $0 $3,500 RTD0006316 CCRTA 111203 BUY REPLACEMENT 30-FT BUS 2019 - $732,021 $732,021 $732,021 $0 $0 $1,464,042

$8,562,418 $2,927,120 $0 $212,500 $11,702,038

5339 Project Agency Line Project Description Carry Over Federal State TDC Local Total Number Item Funds Funds Funds RTD0005503 CCRTA 113400 REHAB/RENOVATE BUS STATIONS 2018 - $428,000 $428,000 $107,000 $0 $0 $535,000 RTD0005511 CCRTA 117000 OTHER CAPITAL ITEMS (BUS) 2019 - $684,000 $684,000 $171,000 $0 $0 $855,000

$1,112,000 $278,000 $0 $0 $1,390,000

9,674,418 3,205,120 0 212,500 13,092,038

1 4/12/2017 TIP 2018 - 2022 2021

5307 Project Agency Line Project Description Carry Over Federal State TDC Local Total Number Item Funds Funds Funds RTD0005512 CCRTA 117L00 MOBILITY MANAGEMENT 2020 - $1,280,734 $1,280,734 $320,183 $0 $0 $1,600,917 RTD0005513 CCRTA 117C00 NON FIXED ROUTE ADA PARA 2020 - $564,697 $564,697 $141,174 $0 $0 $705,871 SERV RTD0005514 CCRTA 117A00 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 2020 - $6,032,400 $6,032,400 $1,295,600 $0 $212,500 $7,540,500 RTD0005515 CCRTA 300900 OPERATING ASSISTANCE 2020 - $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $1,200,000 RTD0005518 CCRTA 119302 CONSTRUCTION - BUS SHELTERS 2020 - $30,400 $30,400 $7,600 $0 $0 $38,000

$8,508,231 $2,364,557 $0 $212,500 $11,085,288

5339 Project Agency Line Project Description Carry Over Federal State TDC Local Total Number Item Funds Funds Funds RTD0005516 CCRTA 114207 ACQUIRE - ADP HARDWARE 2019 - $22,240 $22,240 $5,560 $0 $0 $27,800 RTD0005520 CCRTA 114220 ACQUIRE - MISC SUPPORT 2019 - $40,000; $56,000 $14,000 $0 $0 $70,000 EQUIPMENT 2020 - $16,000 RTD0006305 CCRTA 117000 OTHER CAPITAL ITEMS (BUS) 2020 - $684,000 $684,000 $171,000 $0 $0 $855,000

$762,240 $190,560 $0 $0 $952,800

9,270,471 2,555,117 0 212,500 12,038,088

1 4/12/2017 TIP 2018 - 2022 2022

5307 Project Agency Line Project Description Carry Over Federal State TDC Local Total Number Item Funds Funds Funds RTD0006312 CCRTA 117L00 MOBILITY MANAGEMENT 2021 - $1,306,348 $1,306,348 $326,588 $0 $0 $1,632,936 RTD0006313 CCRTA 117C00 NON FIXED ROUTE ADA PARA 2021 - $575,991 $575,991 $143,997 $0 $0 $719,988 SERV RTD0006314 CCRTA 300900 OPERATING ASSISTANCE 2021 - $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $1,200,000 RTD0006315 CCRTA 117A00 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 2021 - $6,136,048 $6,136,048 $1,321,512 $0 $212,500 $7,670,060

$8,618,387 $2,392,097 $0 $212,500 $11,222,984

5339 Project Agency Line Project Description Carry Over Federal State TDC Local Total Number Item Funds Funds Funds RTD0006306 CCRTA 119202 PURCHASE BUS SHELTERS 2021 - $60,800 $60,800 $15,200 $0 $0 $76,000 RTD0006307 CCRTA 114207 ACQUIRE - ADP HARDWARE 2020 - $19,840 $19,840 $4,960 $0 $0 $24,800 RTD0006309 CCRTA 111700 VEH OVERHAUL (UP TO 20% VEH 2021 - $720,000 $720,000 $180,000 $0 $0 $900,000 MAINT) RTD0006311 CCRTA 114220 ACQUIRE - MISC SUPPORT 2020 - $60,000 $60,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $75,000 EQUIPMENT $860,640 $215,160 $0 $0 $1,075,800

9,479,027 2,607,257 0 212,500 12,298,784

1 4/12/2017 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Glossary

Table 10. Definitions Used in Project Listings

LABEL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION This column is a brief description of the project. Complete descriptions can be obtained through the project proponent. MUNICIPALITY This column lists the town(s) of project location, “Capewide” for a regional project. The project proponent may also be listed in this column, e.g. “CCRTA, Capewide.” SID # (State identification number) This column contains the number of the project assigned by the state. When a MHD “PROJIS” number has been assigned to the project, this number is included. FUND Proposed funding category for the project (described in A6. Transportation Funding Programs) FED FUNDS Estimated federal share cost of the project. STATE FUNDS Estimated state share cost of the project. TOTAL COST Estimated total project cost. STATEWIDE Anywhere in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. CAPEWIDE Anywhere on Cape Cod (Barnstable County).

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 41 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Table 11. Acronyms

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 42 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

ACRONYM MEANING AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ARC Available Reserve Capacity BTP&D (Massachusetts) Bureau of Transportation Planning and Development CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 CEPO Capital Expenditure and Program Office CCC Cape Cod Commission CCJTC Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee CCRTA Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program CMR Code of Massachusetts Regulations CO Carbon Monoxide CTPS Central Transportation Planning Staff CZM (Massachusetts) Coastal Zone Management DCPO Division of Capital Planning and Operations DEP Department of Environmental Protection DOT United States Department of Transportation DRI Development of Regional Impact EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EOEA (Massachusetts) Executive Office of Environmental Affairs EOTPW (Massachusetts) Executive Office of Transportation and Public Works (2007) EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESC (Massachusetts) Enhancements Steering Committee FA Federal Aid FAST Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration FY Fiscal Year or Federal Fiscal Year GPS Global Positioning System HPP High Priority Project ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 ITC Intermodal Transportation Center ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers ITS Intelligent Transportation System(s) LOS Level of Service LRTP Long Range Transportation Plan MAP Mobility Assistance Program MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century MassDOT Massachusetts Department of Transportation MEPA Massachusetts Environmental Protection Act MHD Massachusetts Highway Department or MassHighway (now MassDOT/Highway Division)

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 43 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization or Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NFA Non Federal Aid NHPP National Highway Performance Program NHS National Highway System NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NOx Nitrogen Oxides PPP Public Participation Process, or Public Participation Plan PWED Public Works Economic Development Program RPA Regional Planning Agency RPP Regional Policy Plan RTA Regional Transit Authority RTP Regional Transportation Plan SIP State Implementation Plan SOV Single Occupancy Vehicle STBG Surface Transportation Block Grant STEA Surface Transportation Extension Act of 1997 STIP Statewide Transportation Improvement Program STP Surface Transportation Program TA Transportation Alternatives TAP Transportation Alternatives Program TAZ Traffic Analysis Zone TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TDM Transportation Demand Management TIP Transportation Improvement Program TMA Transportation Management Area TSM Transportation Systems Management USGS United States Geographical Survey v/c Volume to Capacity VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled VPD Vehicles Per Day VPH Vehicles Per Hour

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 44 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Appendices

Appendix A: Project Evaluation Regional Transportation Plan Consistency All projects included in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) are either specifically identified in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) or are consistent with programs in the RTP. Looking at the first time band (2016-2020) in the RTP, phase 1 of the Hyannis Access Study (intersection of Route 28 and Yarmouth Road) appears and is programmed in TIP in FY2019. Also in the first time band is "Route 28 Multimodal Improvements." This appears as a series of projects in the 2018-2022 TIP. Other projects in the 2018-2022 TIP are consistent with programs in the RTP such as "Roadway Rehabilitation & Reconstruction" and "Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects."

Furthermore, the goals, objectives, performance measures, and recommendations of the 2016 RTP were used in the development of the TIP Transportation Evaluation Criteria.

Project Evaluation Process All highway projects under consideration for funding through the TIP are scored using the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)’s TIP Transportation Evaluation Criteria. These criteria were approved by the Cape Cod MPO in 2016 following the review and recommendation of the Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee. Projects are scored each spring based on the latest information available. The resulting project scores are one of the considerations in selecting projects for funding in the TIP. Other considerations include, but are not limited to:

• Project evaluation score, • Project readiness, • Project cost (in relation to available funding), • Project qualification for different funding programs, • Greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts, • Title VI/Equity, and • Community support.

The following pages presents the scores for each project and the criteria used to arrive at these scores. The projects where evaluated by Cape Cod MPO staff and were reviewed by the CCJTC and the Cape Cod MPO.

Transit projects are evaluated and recommended for inclusion in the TIP by the Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority Advisory Board.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 45 Cape Cod TIP Project Evaluation Scoring Summary System Preservation Environmental and Cost and Modernization (For FFY2018-2022 TIP) Mobility Safety Economic Impact Health Effects Effectiveness Policy Support See www.capecodcommission.org/tip for a map of the projects and data layers used to score the projects. Supports Federal/State policies/goals Primary asset condition / effect on condition Enhancements to other assets Existing motorist congestion / effect on motorist congestion Motoristanticipated crash and history impactsafety Effect on regionally-designated economic development area Cultural resources space or open Community support (demonstrated through highest officials) elected Regional plans/policies Modern technology/regional ITS effortsModern technology/regional Effect / accommodation on mobility of non-motorists Effect / access on connectivity Non-motorist and crash history impact safety anticipated Effect business on locally-designated district Housing, job, cultural centers, & essential services connections / freight Wetlands, or other wildlife, resources Stormwater management/treatment GHG / emissionAir quality Coastal Vulnerability Resiliency/SLR Transportation OptionsHealthy Project costuser per Local plans/policies Project# Project A1- A2- A3- B1- B2- B3- C1- C2- D1- D2- D3- E1- E2- E3- E4- E5- E6- G1- G2- G3- G4- Total Score F1- Proposed TIP (Future Year = NOT funded) funds statewide Funded with (outside of target) Title VI Population Affected (I=Income; LEP = LimitedM = Minority; English Proficiency) Cost Estimate inflation) (without

606272 Barnstable, Rte 28 at Yarmouth Rd 15 10 9 4 3 3 5 2 4 3 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 10 3 3 2 1 83 2019 OI, M, LEP $9,215,816 607397 Wellfleet, Rte 6 at Main St 15 10 9 3 3 3 5 4 3 3 3 1 1 2 0 0 1 8 3 3 1 1 82 2020 O None $2,000,400 606900 Bourne, Belmont Circle Multi-modal Improvements 12 10 5 3 3 3 5 4 4 3 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 15 2 3 1 1 82 2020 O M $5,040,000 607398 Yarmouth-Barnstable, Cape Cod Rail Trail Extension 15 10 7 3 3 3 3 5 4 3 3 0 0 2 0 1 1 10 3 3 2 1 82 2022 OI, M, LEP $7,632,517 607319 Mashpee, Rte 151 [AC Year 1 of 2] 12 10 7 4 3 3 5 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 12 2 2 1 1 80 2020 O M, LEP $8,250,100 608742 Dennis/Harwich, Route 28 Reconstruction (Upper County Rd to Herring 12 10 7 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 1 1 2 0 0 1 12 2 3 1 1 79 2022 O I, M $5,601,000 608196 Dennis, Route 28 Streetscape Improvements (Phase 2) 12 10 7 2 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 1 1 2 0 1 1 12 2 3 1 1 79 Future O I, M $4,500,000 608744 Provincetown, Shank Painter Road Improvements 12 10 7 1 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 1 1 2 0 1 1 12 3 2 1 1 78 Future O I $6,201,375 607405 Chatham, Rte 28 at Main St, Depot Rd, Queen Anne Rd and Crowell Rd 15 10 9 4 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 10 2 3 1 1 76 2021 O None $2,400,000 608568 Yarmouth, Route 28 at North Main St and Old Main St 12 8 7 4 3 3 5 4 4 3 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 10 2 3 1 1 76 2021 OI, M, LEP $2,400,000 608422 Sandwich, Shared Use Path on Service Rd (Rte 130 to Chase Rd) 15 10 5 3 3 3 3 4 3 2 3 0 0 2 0 1 1 10 3 3 1 1 76 2022 O M $5,800,464 607394 Yarmouth, Rte 6 Exit 8 Ramps 15 7 7 3 3 2 5 2 4 3 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 10 1 1 1 1 71 Future OI, M, LEP $5,000,400 606596 Chatham, Rte 28 - George Ryder Rd to Barn Hill Rd 6 10 10 3 3 3 2 3 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 10 3 3 1 1 66 2018 O None $4,139,760 607435 Barnstable, Rte 28 at Osterville-West Barnstable Rd 8 10 8 3 3 2 5 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 12 2 3 1 1 65 2018 O M, LEP $3,191,863 608666 Orleans, Route 28 at Route 39 and Quanset Rd 10 10 8 1 3 2 3 3 1 3 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 8 3 2 1 1 64 2022 O I $2,000,000 607444 Falmouth, Rte 28A at Rte 151 10 10 8 1 3 3 5 2 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 8 3 1 1 1 63 2022 O M $2,797,859 608588 Truro, Route 6 Bicycle Accommodations 10 5 0 3 3 3 1 4 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 15 3 3 1 1 62 2019 O None $1,300,000 608264 Yarmouth, Rte 28 Resurfacing and Related Work 15 7 0 1 2 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 15 1 3 1 1 61 Future OI, M, LEP $4,000,000 CC1000 Barnstable, CCRTA Hyannis Loop Demo (Year 3 of 3) 8 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 4 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 15 2 2 1 1 60 2018 OI, M, LEP $659,100 606082 Bourne, Rte 6 Scenic Highway Median Installation 12 7 0 1 1 2 5 2 3 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 15 2 3 1 1 60 Future O M $8,050,000 CC2000 Cape Cod, Bicycle Rack Program 15 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 15 3 2 1 1 52 2018 O TBD $100,000 606236 Barnstable, Rte 28 Resurfacing and Related Work 15 3 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 15 1 2 1 1 51 Future OI, M, LEP $2,875,000 608819 Barnstable, Route 6 Repaving and Related Work 15 3 0 1 0 1 3 0 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 0 2 1 1 46 2022 OI, M, LEP $11,826,432 608545 Yarmouth, Rte 6 Resurfacing and Related Work 15 3 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 0 2 1 1 45 Future OI, M, LEP $5,750,000 608571 Bourne-Falmouth, Rte 28 Guide and Traffic Sign Replacements 12 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 1 0 1 38 2019 O M $433,353 CC1001 Cape Cod National Seashore - Pavement Overlay on Doane Rd. 10 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 1 1 1 36 2019 O LEP $337,500 608598 Orleans, Rte 28 Stormwater Improvements 4 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 15 2 2 2 1 36 2020 O I $574,938 608617 Harwich, Bridge Replacement - Azalea Dr over Herring River 15 8 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 2 1 1 36 2021 O I, M $1,007,776

Printed on: 5/19/2017 Maximum Possible 15 10 10 4 3 3 5 5 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 15 4 3 3 5 100 Cape Cod TIP Project Evaluation - Detailed Scoring Template

Notes on Project Scoring Points within each criterion should be seen as guides. Points should be given based on the best match and may be awarded in between increments as appropriate. Project receiving a negative score on any question should be further analyzed.

Cape Cod TIP Evaluation Template Page 1 of 4 MPO Approved 4-25-16 A - System Preservation and Modernization Scoring Criterion Factor Points 1 Primary asset condition / effect on condition Poor or failing / substantial improvement 15 Fair / moderate improvement 8 Good / minor improvement 4 Excellent / no improvement 0 2 Enhancements to other assets (Projects elements included in the Poor or falling / substantial improvement 10 project, but not part of the primary project focus ie. Sidewalks with Fair / moderate improvement 7 repaving project) Good / minor improvement 4 Excellent / no improvement 0 Use of innovative technology and/or incorporation of traffic 3 Use of modern technology to improve efficiency and support ITS 10 regional efforts (ie. continuous traffic counting equipment, counting technology adaptive signal control, emergency preemption systems) Improvement in technology to current best practices 7 Maintain/repair existing technology 4 Not applicable 0 Total Score = up to 35 B - Mobility Scoring Criterion Factor Points Location identified in the CMP network/ substantial 1 Existing motorist congestion / effect on motorist congestion 4 (Projects identified in Congestion Management Plan network are improvement able to receive maximum points) Significant existing / substantial improvement 3 Significant existing / moderate or minor improvement 2 Minimal existing / minor improvement 1 No change 0 Negative effect -1 2 Effect on mobility / accommodation of non-motorists Substantial improvement 3 Moderate improvement 2 Minimal improvement 1 No effect for non-motorists 0 Negative effect on mobility / accommodation -1 3 Effect on connectivity / access (emphasis placed on key Substantial improvement to connectivity through the corridor 3 emergency and evacuation routes) Moderate improvement to connectivity 2 Minimal effect on connectivity 1 No effect on connectivity 0 Negative effect on connectivity -1 Total Score = up to 10 C - Safety Criterion Factor Points Location is HSIP eligible and project is anticipated to improve 1 Motorist crash history and anticipated safety impact (Note: 5 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) eligible locations are motorist safety Location has a demonstrated crash problem and project is determined by MassDOT and includes the 5% percent of locations 3 anticipated to improve motorist safety in the region based on a severity weighted crash rate) No demonstrated crash problem, but project is anticipated to 2 improve motorist safety No safety improvement anticipated 0 The project many adversely affect motorist safety -1 Location identified as a HSIP Bicycle or Pedestrian Cluster and 2 Non-motorist crash history and anticipated safety impact 5 project is anticipated to improve non-motorist safety Location has a demonstrated safety deficiencies for non- motorists and project is anticipated to improve non-motorist 3 safety Location has a demonstrated safety deficiencies for non- motorists and project is anticipated to improve non-motorist 2 safety No safety improvement anticipated 0 The project many adversely affect non-motorist safety -1 Total Score = up to 10

Cape Cod TIP Evaluation Template Page 2 of 4 MPO Approved 4-25-16 D - Economic Impact Scoring Criterion Factor Points 1 Effect on access to or within a regionally-designated economic Substantial improvement 4 development area (ie. Economic Center, GIZ, etc.) Moderate improvement 3 Minor improvement 1 No effect 0 Negative effect -1 2 Effect on access to or within a locally-designated business district Substantial improvement 3 Moderate improvement 2 Minor improvement 1 No effect 0 Negative effect -1 3 Effect on connections between housing, job, cultural centers, and Substantial improvement 3 essential services within and beyond the region or effect on the Moderate improvement 2 freight network Minor improvement 1 No effect 0 Negative effect -1 Total Score = up to 10 E - Environmental and Health Effects Scoring Criterion Factor Points 1 Effect on wetlands, wildlife, or other resource protection Anticipated improvement 2 Minor contribution to preservation 1 No anticipated impact or negative impacts adequately mitigated 0 Negative impact -1 Anticipated improvement in stormwater management and 2 Effect on water quality through stormwater management and 2 treatment with an emphasis on for nitrogen (points for treatment anticipated improvements may also be given for projects involving Anticipated improvement in stormwater management 1 culvert widening) No anticipated impact or negative impacts adequately mitigated 0 Negative impact -1 3 Effect on air quality / GHG emission Significant, quantifiable decrease in GHG anticipated 2 Minor, quantifiable or qualitative decrease in GHG anticipated 1 No effect on GHG anticipated 0 Anticipated increase in GHG -1 4 Coastal Resiliency / Sea Level Rise Vulnerability (Vulnerable areas Project vulnerable area with resilient design 2 Project in not in a vulnerable area but includes with resilient include those identified as a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), 1 areas identified by the Sea, Land, and Overland Surges from design elements Project not in vulnerable area and not special consideration Hurricanes (SLOSH) model, or areas susceptible to sea level rise 0 given to resilient design Project in a vulnerable area and is not a resilient design -1 5 Effect on cultural resources or open space Anticipated improvement 1 No anticipated impact or negative impacts adequately mitigated 0 Negative impact -1 6 Healthy Transportation Options Increase in healthy transportation options 1 No anticipated impact or negative impacts adequately mitigated 0 Negative impact -1 Total Score = up to 10

Cape Cod TIP Evaluation Template Page 3 of 4 MPO Approved 4-25-16 F - Cost Effectiveness Scoring Criterion Factor Points 1 Project cost per user (Use cost/ADT/lane mile calculation as a up to See reference table below, but consider unique circumstances general indicator, but flexibility is appropriate when considering 15 unique project circumstances particularly for projects involving bicyclists and pedestrians. Low cost safety measures can be given High cost project serving a small number of users -1 full points.) Total Score = up to 15 Notes Value Cost Estimate ADT For intersections, enter combined ADT of intersecting roads. For projects where ADT is unknown, use regional data to approximate. Length (in miles) For intersections, enter total length of all approaches within project limits. Number of Lanes Travel lanes only Project Service Life 7, 14, or 21 years Reference Cost/ADT/Lane Mile* Points is less than $50 15 is less than $100 12 is less than $200 8 is less than $500 4 is less than $1000 0 is more than $1000 -1 *Multiply by 2/3, 1, or 1.5 for service life of 7, 14, or 21 years, respectively G - Policy Support Scoring Criterion Factor Points 1 Community support (as indicated through collective statements or Stated support of the project by the highest elected officials 3 actions of the highest elected officials in the effected communities) Actions by highest elected officials indicate general support of 2 the project Neutral 0 Collective opposition voiced by the highest elected officials -1 2 Regional plans/policies (ie. RTP, Regional Policy Plan, CEDS) Project specifically identified in Regional Plan 3 Strongly supports Regional Plans/Policies 2 Moderately supports Regional Plans/Policies 1 Neutral 0 Inconsistent with Regional Plans/Policies -1 3 Local plans/policies(ie. LCP, local ordinances, bylaws, etc.) Project specifically identified in Local Plan 2 Consistent with Local Plans/Policies 1 Neutral 0 Inconsistent with Local Plans/Policies -1 4 Project supports Federal or State (including MassDOT) policies Project specifically identified in a existing Federal or State Plan 2 and goals not accounted for in other criteria (GreenDOT, Healthy Transportation, Complete Streets, TZD etc.) Consistent with Federal or State Policies or Principles 1 Neutral 0 Inconsistent with Federal or State Policies or Principles -1 Total Score = up to 10

Cape Cod TIP Evaluation Template Page 4 of 4 MPO Approved 4-25-16 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Equity Analysis by Community An equity analysis of projects included in the TIP as well as recently completed TIP projects was conducted. The maps at the end of this Appendix show the locations of these projects in relation to the 15 Cape Cod communities. The distribution of these funds are summarized in the following tables.

Table 12. Distribution of TIP Funds by Community

2018-2022 2008-2017 2018-2022 2008-2017 Community Community Community Total Total Share Share Barnstable $17,304,399 21.6% $16,855,409 13.2% Bourne $5,969,815 7.5% $19,058,378 14.9% Brewster $0 0.0% $6,714,952 5.2% Chatham $6,923,760 8.7% $15,298,631 11.9% Dennis $0 0.0% $25,859,613 20.2% Eastham $1,630,023 2.0% $0 0.0% Falmouth $3,245,516 4.1% $12,062,385 9.4% Harwich $4,885,344 6.1% $7,407,993 5.8% Mashpee $9,348,450 11.7% $0 0.0% Orleans $2,894,938 3.6% $5,216,312 4.1% Provincetown $0 0.0% $2,500,000 2.0% Sandwich $17,626,896 22.0% $7,685,086 6.0% Truro $1,300,000 1.6% $350,000 0.3% Wellfleet $2,240,448 2.8% $150,000 0.1% Yarmouth $6,600,259 8.3% $8,867,815 6.9% Regional $500,000 - $50,000 - CCRTA $64,193,932 - $106,141,402 - CCNS - - $860,100 - Total $144,663,778 100.0% $235,078,074 100.0% Notes: Where projects spanned multiple communities, project costs where distributed based on the approximate project length within each community.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 51 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Equity Analysis by Impacted Population An equity analysis of projects included in the TIP was conducted with respect to anticipated impacts on minority, low income, and limited English proficiency populations. An equity analysis of the previous ten years of TIP projects was also conducted. The maps at the end of this Appendix show the locations of projects in relation to identified concentrations of these populations both for the current TIP and the ten-year look back.

Overall, 73% of the FFY 2018-20122 TIP funding in allocated to projects that will positively impact minority populations, 36% to projects that will positively impact low income populations, and 45% to projects that will positively impact limited English proficiency populations. These estimates exclude transit-funded projects. No projects are anticipated to negatively impact these identified populations. Specific projects and their anticipated impacts are presented in Table 13.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 52 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Table 13. Anticipated Impacts of TIP Projects on Minority (M), Low Income (I), and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Populations

Impacted Anticipated Impact Project (#) Year Population Barnstable, CCRTA Hyannis Loop 2017- I, M, LEP Improved transit Demo (Year 3 of 3) (#CC1000) 2019 connections Barnstable, Rte 28 at Osterville-West 2018 M, LEP Improved bicycle/ Barnstable Rd (#607435) pedestrian access, safety, traffic flow Barnstable, Rte 28 at Yarmouth Rd 2019 I, M, LEP Improved bicycle/ (#606272) pedestrian access, safety, traffic flow Cape Cod National Seashore - 2019 LEP condition Pavement Overlay on Doane Rd. (#CC1001) Bourne-Falmouth, Rte 28 Guide and 2019 M Improved safety Traffic Sign Replacements (#608571) Mashpee, Rte 151 (#607319) 2020 M, LEP Improved bicycle/ pedestrian access, safety, traffic flow Bourne, Belmont Circle Multi-modal 2020 M Improved bicycle/ Improvements (#606900) pedestrian access, safety, traffic flow Orleans, Rte 28 Stormwater 2020 I Improved safety Improvements (#608598) Yarmouth, Route 28 at North Main St 2021 I, M, LEP Improved bicycle/ and Old Main St (#608568) pedestrian access, safety Harwich, Bridge Replacement - Azalea 2021 I, M Improved asset condition Dr over Herring River (#608617) Sandwich, Shared Use Path on Service 2021 M Improved bicycle/ Rd (Rte 130 to Chase Rd) (#608422) pedestrian access, safety Yarmouth, Route 28 at North Main St 2022 I, M Improved bicycle/ and Old Main St (#608568) pedestrian access, safety Dennis-Harwich, Route 28 2022 I Improved bicycle/ Reconstruction (Upper County Rd to pedestrian access, safety Herring River) (#608742) Falmouth, Rte 28A at Rte 151 2022 M Improved bicycle/ (#607444) pedestrian access, safety, traffic flow Barnstable, Route 6 Repaving and 2022 I, M, LEP condition Related Work (#608819) Yarmouth-Barnstable, Cape Cod Rail 2022 I, M, LEP Improved bicycle/ Trail Extension (#607398) pedestrian access, safety Note: Based on projects within 3 miles of the populations identified on the maps on the following page.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 53 Provincetown 89:¨ )s 89:¨ ?¾ Truro

)s A¿

Wellfleet 89:¨ ?Ò 89:¨

A t l a n t i c )s O c e a n 89:¨ C a p e C o d B a y Eastham

Orleans ?¾ 89:¨?Ò Brewster 89:¨ 89:¨ A{ AÄ )s Dennis )s89:¨ ?¾ ?¾ A½ ?Ò Sandwich 89:¨ Bourne Barnstable AÁ ?Ò # Yarmouth )s Chatham AÐ 89:¨ 89:¨ Harwich ?Ý 89:¨ 89:¨ A¿ 89:¨ ?Ò ?Ò 89:¨ 89:¨ OverallLEP_PotentialTIP20182022.mxd AÓ AÒ 89:¨ Falmouth

Mashpee ?Ò N a n t u c k e t S o u n d Document Path: P:\Transpo Document Path: VI P:\Transpo -Special Projects\MPO\Title Environmental and Justice\Maps\TIP UPWP Equity Maps 2017\MXD\TitleVI_ Proposed 2018-2022Transportation Demographics Barnstable County Improvement Program (TIP), Limited English Proficiency Transportation Projects Demographics Census Block Group Minority Population Mean percent minority: 8.45% Minority, Low Income and Limited English Joint Base Cape Cod Represents One (1) Portuguese or Income: Median household income of census TIP Specific Location Improvements Minority Median percent minority: 6.39% Proficiency Populations Boundary Portuguese Creole speaking person block is less than or equal to 60% Barnstable ! who speaks English less than very well County median household income ($59,500) The information depicted on these maps is for planning TIP Road Segment Improvements Low Income Population classified as minority ¸ purposes only. It is not adequate for legal boundary Barnstable County (Points have been randomly located definition, regulatory interpretation, or parcel level Date: 5/19/2017 # represents residents who self 02461 analysis. It should not substitute for actual on-site Correctional Facility within the Census Tract represented) "¿ "¿ Low Income Minority: 15% or more residents of census block Miles User: stupper TIP Transit Demonstration Project identify as a race other than white survey, or supersede deed research. & Minority self-identify as a race other than white Provincetown

)s ?¾ Truro

A¿ )s

Wellfleet ?Ò

A t l a n t i c )s O c e a n

C a p e C o d B a y Eastham

Orleans ?¾ ?Ò Brewster A{ AÄ )s Dennis )s ?¾ ?¾ A½ ?Ò Sandwich Bourne Barnstable AÁ ?Ò # Yarmouth Chatham AÐ )s Harwich ?Ý A¿ ?Ò ?Ò OverallLEP_TIP10YearsReview 2017.mxd OverallLEP_TIP10YearsReview AÓ AÒ

Falmouth

Mashpee ?Ò N a n t u c k e t S o u n d DocumentP:\Transpo Special Path: Projects\MPO\Title Environmental VI - Justice\Maps\TIP andUPWP Maps Equity 2017\MXD\TitleVI_ 10 Years Review (2008-2017) Demographics Barnstable County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Limited English Proficiency Transportation Projects Demographics Census Block Group Minority Population Mean percent minority: 8.45% Minority, Low Income and Limited English Joint Base Cape Cod Represents One (1) Portuguese or Income: Median household income of census TIP Specific Location Improvements Minority Median percent minority: 6.39% Proficiency Populations Boundary Portuguese Creole speaking person block is less than or equal to 60% Barnstable ! who speaks English less than very well County median household income ($59,500) The information depicted on these maps is for planning TIP Specific Location Traffic Monitoring Low Income Population classified as minority ¸ purposes only. It is not adequate for legal boundary Barnstable County # (Points have been randomly located represents residents who self 02461 definition, regulatory interpretation, or parcel level Date: 4/18/2017 Correctional Facility analysis. It should not substitute for actual on-site within the Census Tract represented) TIP Road Segment Improvements Low Income Minority: 15% or more residents of census block Miles User: stupper identify as a race other than white survey, or supersede deed research. & Minority self-identify as a race other than white ¿" ¿" TIP Transit Demonstration Project Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Appendix B: Air Quality Conformity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Air Quality Conformity Status Since most all of Massachusetts (with limited exceptions) was designated on 5/21/12 by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as “unclassifiable/ attainment” for the latest ozone standard, a conformity determination for the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is not currently required. Further details and background information are provided below:

Air Quality Conformity Background The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) require metropolitan planning organizations within nonattainment and maintenance areas to perform air quality conformity determinations prior to the approval of Long-Range Transportation Plans (LRTPs) and Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs), and at such other times as required by regulation. A nonattainment area is one that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated as not meeting certain air quality standards. A maintenance area is a nonattainment area that now meets the standards and has been re-designated as maintaining the standard. A conformity determination is a demonstration that plans, programs, and projects are consistent with the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for attaining the air quality standards. The CAAA requirement to perform a conformity determination ensures that federal approval and funding go to transportation activities that are consistent with air quality goals.

The entire Commonwealth of Massachusetts was previously classified as nonattainment for ozone, and was divided into two nonattainment areas. The Eastern Massachusetts ozone nonattainment area included Barnstable, Bristol, Dukes, Essex, Middlesex, Nantucket, Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk, and Worcester counties. Berkshire, Franklin, Hampden, and Hampshire counties comprised the Western Massachusetts ozone nonattainment area. With these classifications, the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) required the Commonwealth to reduce its emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), the two major precursors to ozone formation to achieve attainment of the ozone standard.

Legislative and Regulatory Background The 1970 Clean Air Act defined a one-hour national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for ground-level ozone. The 1990 CAAA further classified degrees of nonattainment of the one-hour standard based on the severity of the monitored levels of the pollutant. The entire commonwealth of Massachusetts was classified as being in serious nonattainment for the one-hour ozone standard, with a required attainment date

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 56 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

of 1999.The attainment date was later extended, first to 2003 and a second time to 2007.

In 1997, the EPA proposed a new, eight-hour ozone standard that replaced the one- hour standard, effective June 15, 2005. Scientific information had shown that ozone could affect human health at lower levels, and over longer exposure times than one hour. The new standard was challenged in court, and after a lengthy legal battle, the courts upheld it. It was finalized in June 2004.The eight-hour standard is 0.08 parts per million, averaged over eight hours and not to be exceeded more than once per year. Nonattainment areas were again further classified based on the severity of the eight- hour values. Massachusetts as a whole was classified as being in moderate nonattainment for the eight-hour standard, and was separated into two nonattainment areas—Eastern Massachusetts and Western Massachusetts.

In March 2008, EPA published revisions to the eight-hour ozone NAAQS establishing a level of 0.075 ppm, (March 27, 2008; 73 FR 16483). In 2009, EPA announced it would reconsider this standard because it fell outside of the range recommended by the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee. However, EPA did not take final action on the reconsideration so the standard would remain at 0.075 ppm.

After reviewing data from Massachusetts monitoring stations, EPA sent a letter on December 16, 2011 proposing that only Dukes County would be designated as nonattainment for the new proposed 0.075 ozone standard. Massachusetts concurred with these findings.

On May 21, 2012, (77 FR 30088), the final rule was published in the Federal Register, defining the 2008 NAAQS at 0.075 ppm, the standard that was promulgated in March 2008. A second rule published on May 21, 2012 (77 FR 30160), revoked the 1997 ozone NAAQS to occur one year after the July 20, 2012 effective date of the 2008 NAAQS.

Also on May 21, 2012, the air quality designations areas for the 2008 NAAQS were published in the Federal Register. In this Federal Register, the only area in Massachusetts that was designated as nonattainment is Dukes County. All other Massachusetts counties were classified as unclassifiable/attainment.

Therefore, conformity for ozone in the Cape Cod MPO region is required until July 20, 2013 for only the 1997 ozone standard.

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Monitoring and Evaluation This section summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts that are anticipated to result from the projects that are included in this FFY 2018 - 2022 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). It includes a summary of the state laws and policies that

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 57 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022 call for reducing greenhouse gas in order to mitigate global climate change, actions that are being to respond to these state laws and policies, the role of regional planning and TIP development in reducing GHG emission and tracking these reductions, and the projected GHG emission impacts from the projects programmed in the TIP.

State Policy Context The Global Warming Solutions Act (GWSA), which Governor Deval Patrick signed into law in August 2008, makes Massachusetts a leader in setting aggressive and enforceable GHG reduction targets, and implementing policies and initiatives to achieve these targets. In keeping with the law, on December 29, 2010 the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EOEEA), in consultation with other state agencies and the public, released the Massachusetts Clean Energy and Climate Plan for 2020. This implementation plan establishes targets for overall, statewide GHG emissions:

• By 2020 25 percent reduction below statewide 1990 GHG emission levels • By 2050 80 percent reduction below statewide 1990 GHG emission levels

GreenDOT Policy The transportation sector is the single largest emitter of greenhouse gases, accounting for over a third of GHG emissions, and therefore the transportation sector is a key focus of the Clean Energy and Climate Plan. MassDOT's approach to supporting the implementation of the plan is set forth in its GreenDOT Policy Directive, a comprehensive sustainability initiative that sets three principal objectives:

• Reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. MassDOT will achieve this by taking GHG emissions into account in all of its responsibilities, from strategic planning to project design and construction and system operations. • Promote the healthy transportation modes of walking, bicycling, and public transit. MassDOT will achieve this by pursuing multi-modal, "complete streets" design standards; providing choice in transportation services; and by working with MPOs and other partners to prioritize and program a balance of projects that serve drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transit riders. • To support smart growth development. MassDOT will achieve this by working with MPOs and other partners to make transportation investments that enable denser, smart growth development patterns that support reduced GHG emissions.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 58 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

GreenDOT Policy and Metropolitan Planning Organizations The Commonwealth's thirteen metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are integrally involved in helping to achieve the GreenDOT goals and supporting the GHG reductions mandated under the GWSA. The MPOs are most directly involved in helping to achieve the GHG emissions reductions under the second goal - to promote healthy transportation modes through prioritizing and programming an appropriate balance of roadway, transit, bicycle and pedestrian investments - and assist in the third goal by supporting smart growth development patterns through the creation of a balanced multimodal transportation system. This will be realized through the transportation goals and policies espoused in the Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs), the major projects planned in the RTPs, and the mix of new transportation projects that are programmed and implemented through the TIPs. The GHG tracking and evaluation processes enable the MPOs to identify the anticipated GHG impacts of the planned and programmed projects, and also to use GHG impacts as a criterion in prioritizing transportation projects.

Regional GHG Tracking and Evaluation in RTPs MassDOT coordinated with MPOs and regional planning agency (RPA) staffs on the implementation of GHG tracking and evaluation in development of each MPO's 2035 RTPs, which were adopted in September 2011.

Working together, MassDOT and the MPOs have attained the following milestones:

• Modeling and long-range statewide projections for GHG emissions resulting from the transportation sector. Using the Boston MPO's regional model and the statewide travel demand model for the remainder of the state, GHG emissions were projected for 2020 no-build and build conditions, and for 2035 no-build and build conditions. • All of the MPOs included these GHG emission projections in their RTPs, along with a discussion of climate change and a statement of MPO support for reducing GHG emissions as a regional goal.

Project-Level GHG Tracking and Evaluation In The Transportation Improvement Program It is also important to monitor and evaluate the GHG impacts of the transportation projects that are programmed in the MPO Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP). The TIP includes both the larger, regionally-significant projects from the RTPs, which have already had their aggregate GHG impacts calculated and reported in the RTP, as well as smaller projects that are not included in the RTP but that may nevertheless have impacts on GHG emissions. The principal objective of this tracking is to enable the

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 59 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

MPOs to evaluate expected GHG impacts of different projects and to use this information as a criterion for prioritizing and programming projects in future TIPs.

In order to monitor and evaluate the GHG impacts of TIP projects, MassDOT and the MPOs have developed the following approach for identifying anticipated GHG impacts and quantifying GHG impacts of projects, when appropriate, through the TIP. Different types of projects will have different anticipated GHG emissions impacts. The different project categories are outlined on the next two pages with this region's project tracking sheet on the third page.

RTP Projects - Major capacity expansion projects (e.g. Green Line Extension, I-95 Whittier Bridge Replacement) would be expected to have a significant impact on GHG emissions. However, these projects are included in the RTPs and analyzed using the statewide model or Boston regional model, which would reflect their GHG impacts. Therefore, no independent TIP calculations are required.

• Quantified Decrease in Emissions - Projects that would be expected to produce a measurable decrease in emissions. The approach for calculating these impacts is described below. These projects should be categorized in the following manner: • Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Traffic Operational Improvement - An intersection reconstruction or signalization project that is projected to reduce delay and congestion. • Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure - A shared-use path that would enable increased walking and biking and decreased vehicle-miles traveled (VMT). • Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service - A bus or shuttle service that would enable increased transit ridership and decreased VMT • Quantified Decrease in Emissions from a Park and Ride Lot A park-and-ride lot that would enable increased transit ridership/ increased ridesharing and decreased VMT • Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bus Replacement - A bus replacement that would directly reduce GHG emissions generated by that bus service. • Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Other Improvement • Quantified Increase in Emissions - Projects that would be expected to produce a measurable increase in emissions.

The Office of Transportation Planning at MassDOT provided the spreadsheets that are used for determining Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) eligibility. These spreadsheets require the same inputs as the CMAQ calculations, and have been adapted to provide CO2 impacts. The data and analysis required for these

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 60 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

calculations is available from functional design reports that should be submitted for projects that would produce a measurable GHG impact.

No Assumed Impact/Negligible Impact on Emission - Projects that do not change the capacity or use of a facility (e.g. a resurfacing project that restores a roadway to its previous condition, or a bridge rehabilitation/replacement that restores the bridge to its previous condition) would be assumed to have no GHG impact.

Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions - Projects that would be expected to produce a minor decrease in emissions that cannot be calculated with any precision. Examples of such projects include roadway repaving or reconstruction projects that add a new sidewalk or new bike lanes. Such a project would enable increased travel by walking or bicycling, but there may be not data or analysis to support any projections of GHG impacts. These projects should be categorized in the following manner:

• Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Sidewalk Infrastructure • Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle Infrastructure • Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure • Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and/or Traffic Operational Improvements • Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from Other Improvements • Assumed Nominal Increase in Emissions - Projects that would be expected to produce a minor increase in emissions that cannot be calculated with any precision.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 61 Cape Cod Region Completed Highway Projects GHG

Fiscal Year of Total GHG Contract MassDOT Programmed Analysis Type GHG CO2 GHG Additional Award Project ID ▼ MassDOT Project Description ▼ Funds ▼ ▼ Impact (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ (2015 and forward)▼ MULTI-USE PATH OVER THE BASS RIVER, Quantified Decrease in INCLUDES NEW PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE D-07-007=Y- Emissions from Bicycle and 607571 01-010 $ 3,765,741 Quantified 3668.2 Pedestrian Infrastructure 2016 2018 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

►Section 1A / Regionally Prioritized Projects ►Regionally Prioritized Projects 606596 CHATHAM- IMPROVEMENTS ON MAIN $ 3,599,494 Quantified 175 Quantified Decrease in Emissions from STREET (ROUTE 28), FROM GEORGE RYDER Complete Streets Project ROAD TO BARN HILL ROAD

606596 CHATHAM- IMPROVEMENTS ON MAIN $ 334,457 Quantified - Quantified Decrease in Emissions from GHG CO2 impact listed under STP funding line STREET (ROUTE 28), FROM GEORGE RYDER Complete Streets Project ROAD TO BARN HILL ROAD

606596 CHATHAM- IMPROVEMENTS ON MAIN $ 205,809 Quantified - Quantified Decrease in Emissions from GHG CO2 impact listed under STP funding line STREET (ROUTE 28), FROM GEORGE RYDER Complete Streets Project ROAD TO BARN HILL ROAD

607435 BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION $ 2,733,349 Qualitative - Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from IMPROVEMENTS @ FALMOUTH ROAD Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure (ROUTE 28) & OSTERVILLE-WEST BARNSTABLE ROAD 607435 BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION $ 458,514 Qualitative - Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from IMPROVEMENTS @ FALMOUTH ROAD Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure (ROUTE 28) & OSTERVILLE-WEST BARNSTABLE ROAD CC1000 BARNSTABLE - HYANNIS LOOP $ 711,828 Quantified 70,080 Quantified Decrease in Emissions from DEMONSTATION New/Additional Transit Service

CC2000 CAPE COD - BICYCLE RACK PROGRAM $ 100,000 Quantified 1,000,967 Quantified Decrease in Emissions from GHG reduction rate based on SRPEDD analysis Other Improvements for comparable program

Quantified Impact ► 1,071,222

►Section 1B / Earmark or Discretionary Grant Funded Projects ►Other Federal Aid Project # Description $ -

Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 2A / State Prioritized Reliability Projects ►Bridge Program / Inspections Project # Description $ - 2018 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / Off-System Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / On-System (NHS) Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Interstate Pavement Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Non-Interstate Pavement Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

► Roadway Improvements Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

► Safety Improvements Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 2B / State Prioritized Modernization Projects ► ADA Retrofits Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Intersection Improvements Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Intelligent Transportation Systems Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Roadway Reconstruction Project # Description $ - 2018 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 2C / State Prioritized Expansion Projects ►Bicycles and Pedestrians Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Capacity Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 3 / Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs ►Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects ►Non-Federally Aided Projects Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 Total Quantified 2018 X Region MPO GHG Tracking Summary Impact ▼

Quantified Impact ► 1,071,222 2019 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

►Section 1A / Regionally Prioritized Projects ►Regionally Prioritized Projects 606272 BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION $ 7,333,041 Quantified 623,168 Quantified Decrease in Emissions from IMPROVEMENTS AT IYANOUGH ROAD Traffic Operational Improvement (ROUTE 28) AND YARMOUTH ROAD

606272 BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION $ 458,514 Quantified Quantified Decrease in Emissions from GHG CO2 impact listed under STP funding line IMPROVEMENTS AT IYANOUGH ROAD Traffic Operational Improvement (ROUTE 28) AND YARMOUTH ROAD

606272 BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION $ 1,046,285 Quantified Quantified Decrease in Emissions from GHG CO2 impact listed under STP funding line IMPROVEMENTS AT IYANOUGH ROAD Traffic Operational Improvement (ROUTE 28) AND YARMOUTH ROAD

606272 BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION $ 205,809 Quantified Quantified Decrease in Emissions from GHG CO2 impact listed under STP funding line IMPROVEMENTS AT IYANOUGH ROAD Traffic Operational Improvement (ROUTE 28) AND YARMOUTH ROAD

608588 TRURO- BICYCLE ACCOMMODATION $ 1,300,000 Qualitative - Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from IMPROVEMENT ON ROUTE 6 FROM SOUTH Bicycle Infrastructure HIGHLAND ROAD TO SOUTH HOLLOW ROAD (PHASE 2) CC2000 CAPE COD - BICYCLE RACK PROGRAM $ 100,000 Quantified 1,000,967 Quantified Decrease in Emissions from GHG reduction rate based on SRPEDD analysis Other Improvements for comparable program

Quantified Impact ► 1,624,135

►Section 1B / Earmark or Discretionary Grant Funded Projects ►Other Federal Aid Project # Description $ -

Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 2A / State Prioritized Reliability Projects ►Bridge Program / Inspections Project # Description $ - 2019 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / Off-System Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / On-System (NHS) Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Interstate Pavement Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Non-Interstate Pavement Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

► Roadway Improvements Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

► Safety Improvements 608571 BOURNE TO FALMOUTH- GUIDE AND $ 433,353 Qualitative Decrease in Emissions TRAFFIC SIGN REPLACEMENT ON A SECTION OF ROUTE 28 Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 2B / State Prioritized Modernization Projects ► ADA Retrofits Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Intersection Improvements 606272 BARNSTABLE- INTERSECTION $ 540,800 Quantified Quantified Decrease in Emissions from GHG CO2 impact listed under STP funding line IMPROVEMENTS AT IYANOUGH ROAD Traffic Operational Improvement (ROUTE 28) AND YARMOUTH ROAD Quantified Impact ► 0

►Intelligent Transportation Systems Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Roadway Reconstruction 2019 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 2C / State Prioritized Expansion Projects ►Bicycles and Pedestrians Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Capacity Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 3 / Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs ►Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs CC1001 CAPE COD NATIONAL SEASHORE - $ 337,500 Qualitative Decrease in Emissions PAVEMENT OVERLAY ON DOANE ROAD

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects ►Non-Federally Aided Projects Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 Total Quantified 2018 X Region MPO GHG Tracking Summary Impact ▼

Quantified Impact ► 1,624,135 2020 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

►Section 1A / Regionally Prioritized Projects ►Regionally Prioritized Projects 607319 MASHPEE- CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS & $ 2,120,112 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from RELATED WORK ON NATHAN ELLIS Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151), FROM MASHPEE ROTARY TO FALMOUTH T.L.

607397 WELLFLEET- INTERSECTION $ 1,576,125 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from IMPROVEMENTS & RELATED WORK AT Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure ROUTE 6 & MAIN STREET

607397 WELLFLEET- INTERSECTION $ 458,514 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from IMPROVEMENTS & RELATED WORK AT Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure ROUTE 6 & MAIN STREET

607397 WELLFLEET- INTERSECTION $ 205,809 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from IMPROVEMENTS & RELATED WORK AT Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure ROUTE 6 & MAIN STREET

606900 BOURNE- TRAFFIC AND MULTI-MODAL $ 4,598,515 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from IMPROVEMENTS @ BELMONT CIRCLE AT Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure ROUTES 6/25/28 606900 BOURNE- TRAFFIC AND MULTI-MODAL $ 1,046,285 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from IMPROVEMENTS @ BELMONT CIRCLE AT Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure ROUTES 6/25/28 CC2000 CAPE COD - BICYCLE RACK PROGRAM $ 100,000 Quantified 1,000,967 Quantified Decrease in Emissions from GHG reduction rate based on SRPEDD analysis Other Improvements for comparable program

Quantified Impact ► 1,000,967

►Section 1B / Earmark or Discretionary Grant Funded Projects ►Other Federal Aid Project # Description $ -

Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 2A / State Prioritized Reliability Projects ►Bridge Program / Inspections Project # Description $ - 2020 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / Off-System Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / On-System (NHS) Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Interstate Pavement Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Non-Interstate Pavement Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

► Roadway Improvements 608598 ORLEANS- STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS $ 574,938 No assumed impact/negligible impact on ALONG ROUTE 28 emissions Quantified Impact ► 0

► Safety Improvements Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2B / State Prioritized Modernization Projects ► ADA Retrofits Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Intersection Improvements Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Intelligent Transportation Systems Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Roadway Reconstruction Project # Description $ - 2020 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 2C / State Prioritized Expansion Projects ►Bicycles and Pedestrians Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Capacity Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 3 / Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs ►Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects ►Non-Federally Aided Projects Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 Total Quantified 2018 X Region MPO GHG Tracking Summary Impact ▼

Quantified Impact ► 1,000,967 2021 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

►Section 1A / Regionally Prioritized Projects ►Regionally Prioritized Projects 607405 CHATHAM- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS & $ 2,784,000 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from RELATED WORK AT MAIN STREET (ROUTE Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure 28), DEPOT ROAD, QUEEN ANNE ROAD AND CROWELL ROAD 607319 MASHPEE- CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS & $ 5,409,392 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from RELATED WORK ON NATHAN ELLIS Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151), FROM MASHPEE ROTARY TO FALMOUTH T.L.

607319 MASHPEE- CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS & $ 458,514 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from RELATED WORK ON NATHAN ELLIS Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151), FROM MASHPEE ROTARY TO FALMOUTH T.L.

607319 MASHPEE- CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS & $ 1,046,285 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from RELATED WORK ON NATHAN ELLIS Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151), FROM MASHPEE ROTARY TO FALMOUTH T.L.

607319 MASHPEE- CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS & $ 205,809 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from RELATED WORK ON NATHAN ELLIS Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151), FROM MASHPEE ROTARY TO FALMOUTH T.L.

CC2000 CAPE COD - BICYCLE RACK PROGRAM $ 100,000 Quantified 1,000,967 Quantified Decrease in Emissions from GHG reduction rate based on SRPEDD analysis Other Improvements for comparable program

Quantified Impact ► 1,000,967

►Section 1B / Earmark or Discretionary Grant Funded Projects ►Other Federal Aid Project # Description $ -

Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 2021 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

►Section 2A / State Prioritized Reliability Projects ►Bridge Program / Inspections Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / Off-System 608617 HARWICH- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, H-10-019, $ 1,007,776 No assumed impact/negligible impact on AZALEA DRIVE OVER HERRING RIVER emissions Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / On-System (NHS) Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Interstate Pavement Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Non-Interstate Pavement Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

► Roadway Improvements Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

► Safety Improvements Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2B / State Prioritized Modernization Projects ► ADA Retrofits Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Intersection Improvements 608568 YARMOUTH- IMPROVEMENTS AT MAIN $ 2,784,000 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from STREET (ROUTE 28) AT NORTH MAIN STREET Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure AT OLD MAIN STREET Quantified Impact ► 0

►Intelligent Transportation Systems 2021 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Roadway Reconstruction Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 2C / State Prioritized Expansion Projects ►Bicycles and Pedestrians Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Capacity Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 3 / Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs ►Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects ►Non-Federally Aided Projects Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 Total Quantified 2018 X Region MPO GHG Tracking Summary Impact ▼

Quantified Impact ► 1,000,967 2022 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

►Section 1A / Regionally Prioritized Projects ►Regionally Prioritized Projects 608742 DENNIS- HARWICH- RECONSTRUCTION & $ 5,170,090 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from RELATED WORK ON MAIN STREET (ROUTE Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure 28), FROM UPPER COUNTY ROAD TO THE HERRING RIVER BRIDGE 608666 ORLEANS- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS $ 2,114,191 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from AT ROUTE 28 (SOUTH ORLEANS ROAD), Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure ROUTE 39 (HARWICH ROAD) AND QUANSET ROAD 608666 ORLEANS- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS $ 205,809 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from AT ROUTE 28 (SOUTH ORLEANS ROAD), Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure ROUTE 39 (HARWICH ROAD) AND QUANSET ROAD 607444 FALMOUTH- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS $ 1,740,717 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from & RELATED WORK AT NORTH FALMOUTH Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure HIGHWAY (ROUTE 28A),NATHAN ELLIS HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151) AND COUNTY ROAD

607444 FALMOUTH- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS $ 458,514 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from & RELATED WORK AT NORTH FALMOUTH Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure HIGHWAY (ROUTE 28A),NATHAN ELLIS HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151) AND COUNTY ROAD

607444 FALMOUTH- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS $ 1,046,285 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from & RELATED WORK AT NORTH FALMOUTH Sidewalk and Bicycle Infrastructure HIGHWAY (ROUTE 28A),NATHAN ELLIS HIGHWAY (ROUTE 151) AND COUNTY ROAD

CC2000 CAPE COD - BICYCLE RACK PROGRAM $ 100,000 Quantified 1,000,967 Quantified Decrease in Emissions from GHG reduction rate based on SRPEDD analysis Other Improvements for comparable program

Quantified Impact ► 1,000,967

►Section 1B / Earmark or Discretionary Grant Funded Projects ►Other Federal Aid Project # Description $ -

Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 2A / State Prioritized Reliability Projects 2022 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

►Bridge Program / Inspections Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / Off-System Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / On-System (NHS) Project # Description $ - Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / On-System (Non-NHS) Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Bridge Program / Systematic Maintenance Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Interstate Pavement Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Non-Interstate Pavement 608819 BARNSTABLE- RESURFACING AND RELATED $ 11,826,432 Qualitative Decrease in Emissions WORK ON ROUTE 6 Quantified Impact ► 0

► Roadway Improvements Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

► Safety Improvements Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 2B / State Prioritized Modernization Projects ► ADA Retrofits Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Intersection Improvements Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Intelligent Transportation Systems Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 2022 GHG Tracking Cape Cod Region Transportation Improvement

MassDOT MassDOT Total GHG GHG CO2 Impact GHG Additional Project ID ▼ Project Description▼ Programmed Analysis (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼

►Roadway Reconstruction Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 2C / State Prioritized Expansion Projects ►Bicycles and Pedestrians 608422 SANDWICH- CONSTRUCTION OF SHARED $ 5,800,464 Quantified 795 Quantified Decrease in Emissions from USE PATH ALONG SERVICE ROAD FROM Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure ROUTE 130 TO CHASE ROAD 607398 YARMOUTH- BARNSTABLE- CAPE COD RAIL $ 7,632,517 Qualitative Qualitative Decrease in Emissions Assumed Nominal Decrease in Emissions from TRAIL EXTENSION, INCLUDES NEW BRIDGE Bicycle Infrastructure OVER WILLOW STREET & RAILROAD (PHASE III) Quantified Impact ► 795

►Capacity Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 ►Section 3 / Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs ►Planning / Adjustments / Pass-throughs Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0

►Section 2A / Non-Federal Projects ►Non-Federally Aided Projects Project # Description $ -

Quantified Impact ► 0 Total Quantified 2018 X Region MPO GHG Tracking Summary Impact ▼

Quantified Impact ► 1,001,762 Cape Cod Region Completed Transit Projects GHG

GHG Fiscal Year FTA Activity Analysis Type GHG CO2 GHG Additional Programmed Line Item ▼ Transit Agency ▼ Project Description▼ Total Cost ▼ ▼ Impact (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Description ▼ (2015 and forward)▼ Quantified Decrease in Emissions from CCNS- NEW TRANSIT SERVICE DEMONSTRATION New/Additional Transit OUTER CAPE BIKE SHUTTLE $ 87,610 Quantified 62390.8 Service 2015 2018 Cape Cod Region Transit GHGs

Fiscal Year of Total Contract Award MassDOT/FTA MassDOT/FTA Project Programmed GHG Analysis GHG CO2 Impact GHG Total (2015 and Project ID ▼ Description ▼ Funds ▼ Type ▼ (kg/yr)▼ Impact Description ▼ Cost ▼ Additional Information▼ forward)▼ 2019 Cape Cod Region Transit GHGs

Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Appendix C: Projects in Need of Funding

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 85 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Table 14. Projects in Need of Funding (For Information Only)

Estimated Town(s) Project Cost Barnstable Improved access for Hyannis Transportation Center $5,000,000 Barnstable Parking garage and related improvements to the $5,000,000 Hyannis Transportation Center Barnstable Route 28 Repaving and Related Work $2,875,000 Barnstable Improvements to Real Time Traffic Information $3,000,000 Bourne System Barnstable Hyannis Access Preferred Alternative $90,000,000 Yarmouth Bourne Bourne Rotary Improvement Project $50,000,000 Bourne Memorial Circle Intersection Improvement Project $2,000,000 Bourne Route 6 Scenic Highway Median Barrier $8,000,000 Bourne Shining Sea Bike Path Extension $25,000,000 Falmouth Brewster Full depth reclamation Harwich Road / Rte. 124, Long $3,400,000 Pond Road / Rte. 137 CCRTA Intercity Seasonal Connector-demonstration $4,000,000 Dennis Route 28 Streetscape Improvements (Phase 2) $4,500,000 Dennis/ Route 28 Reconstruction (Upper County Road to $5,600,000 Harwich Herring River Bridge) Harwich Route 39 section, 1.6 miles from Bay Road to $4,500,000 Brewster TL and 2.0 miles from Oak Street to Queen Anne Road Orleans Rock Harbor Road drainage improvements and $600,000 roadway reconstruction Orleans Main Street Sidewalk extension and reconstruction of $300,000 Meeting House Road intersection Outer Cape Outer Cape Rail Trail Extension $28,300,000 Provincetown Shank Painter Road Improvements $6,200,000 Steamship Relocation of Administrative Offices $6,600,000 Authority Steamship Woods Hole Terminal Reconstruction Project $61,750,000 Authority Steamship M/V Martha’s Vineyard Mid-Life Refurbishment $10,000,000 Authority Project Wellfleet Chequessett Bridge Rehabilitation $12,000,000 Yarmouth Safety improvements at Route 6 ramps at Exit 8 $5,000,000 (Union Street/Station Avenue). Yarmouth Yarmouth, North Main Street sidewalk improvements $650,000 Yarmouth Route 28 Repaving and Related Work $4,000,000 Yarmouth Route 6 Repaving and Related Work $5,750,000 TOTAL 354,025,000

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 86 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Appendix D: Status of Previous TIP Projects

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 87 Cape Cod Projects Advertised and Status Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) PROJIS or Low bid, award Estimated cost, YEAR State MUNICIPALITY of amount, or TIP FUND in Project award amount, adver- DESCRIPTION Completed? Identification project location Programmed TIP Proponent or Construction tised (SID) number Amount Contract Value (FFY) 56206 BOURNE Bridge, Perry St, replacement/related BR# B-17-010 $857,648 BR 11/30/94 town $857,648 1993 600326 DEN to ORL Route 6, Install surface mount delineators $37,717 NFA YES state $37,717 1993 Eastham, Wellfleet Cape Cod Rail Trail (extension) $1,239,333 CMQ 9/30/94 DEM $1,239,333 1993 53355 FALMOUTH Bridge, Menauhant Rd over Green Pond, BR#F-03-002 $2,274,690 BR 12/1/96 town $2,274,690 1993 600485 HARWICH Bridge #H-10-014, Rte 137 Br betterment over Rte 6 $564,384 NFA BR 7/15/95 state $564,384 1993 600111 ORLEANS Roof Replacment Orleans Depot, Bay Ridge La & 6, 6A $68,500 NFA done? state $68,500 1993 17400 SANDWICH Bridge#S-04-02/Conrail, Old County Rd & Related $282,240 BR 7/29/96 town $282,240 1993 1993 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $5,324,512 600897 BARNSTABLE Route 132 @ Bearses Way Intersection $357,790 NFA 6/14/96 town $357,790 1994 600694 Barns, Bour, Sand Route 6 Sign Update & Replacement $590,021 NFA 11/30/95 state $590,021 1994 600492 BOURNE Rte 6@Bournedale & Nightingale Rds, sig & safety $662,568 NFA 7/31/98 state $662,568 1994 600728 Dennis, Yarmouth Bridge Maint. Rte 6, Y-1-7,15,16, D-7-11 $1,392,855 NFA 9/16/96 state $1,392,855 1994 600407 MASHPEE Rte 151 Resurface & related $145,680 NFA 10/1/95 town $145,680 1994 1994 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $3,148,914 BARNSTABLE Route 6 rest area renovations $168,736 NFA 8/8/96 state $168,736 1995 601219 BARNSTABLE SSA ferry terminal & marine facilities $4,568,000 FBD 7/9/97 SSA $4,568,000 1995 600564 HARWICH Rte 124 @ Rte 6, Park & Ride Lot Construction $182,900 NFA 8/19/96 state $182,900 1995 601039 MASHPEE Route 130 section, resurfacing & related $160,369 NFA 7/20/95 town $160,369 1995 1995 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $5,080,005 601396 BARNSTABLE Route 28 Recons & Signals on a section $1,249,101 STP 11/30/99 town $1,278,140 1996 601194 Bourne / Plymouth Route 25 EB to rest area, water service tie in $361,495 NFA 7/13/96 state $545,719 1996 601423 BOURNE Buzzards Bay Train Station Improvements $149,747 STP-E 12/31/99 town $155,677 1996 601418 BOURNE Monument Beach Train Station Improvements $28,698 STP-E completed 1999 town $32,163 1996 601634 EASTHAM Route 6 / Rogers Lane, drainage readv 6/15/96 NFA 11/6/96 state $30,950 1996 601257 FALMOUTH Route 151 @ Sandwich Rd $408,260 STP 7/5/97 town $499,676 1996 601690 FALMOUTH Construct Shining Sea Bikeway, Phase II $299,974 NFA 7/12/97 town $273,399 1996 600402 FALMOUTH Route 151 Section $1,524,864 STP 5/28/99 town $1,622,950 1996 601563 TRURO Cons. Two Chemical Storage Sheds $200,000 NFA ? state $199,850 1996 601084 YARMOUTH Route 6 Bridges #’s: Y-1-5, 5a, 6, 12, 13, 14 $986,000 NFA 1/14/98 state $986,332 1996 601859 YARMOUTH Recons railroad grade crossing Willow St $375,222 NFA 7/30/97 state $269,298 1996 1996 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $5,894,154 601541 BARNS-ORLEANS Route 6 safety improvements, signs NFA complete 1997 state $659,265 1997 105701 BARNSTABLE Route 28 section NFA 11/30/98 state $4,168,495 1997 600969 EASTHAM Bridge, Bridge Rd over Boat Meadow River #E-04-001 NFA completed 1999 town $565,363 1997 601095 FALMOUTH Bridge, Quaker Rd over Herring Brook #F-03-011 $1,198,203 BR complete may00 town $1,256,079 1997 600517 FALMOUTH Pedestrian signal Rte 28 @ Falmouth Mall $54,738 NFA 11/1/97 town $51,920 1997 601465 HARWICH Cons of Bike Path CCRT extension $698,302 NFA 8/22/98 town $674,451 1997 601883 MASHPEE Great Neck Rd South section $667,492 NFA complete town $750,910 1997 601882 MASHPEE Route 151 section NFA complete town $344,993 1997 601706 MASHPEE Route151 @ Old Barns Rd (signal) $279,706 NFA complete 1999 town $315,539 1997 601849 SANDWICH Route 6 Rest Area Site Improvements WB readvertised state 1997 601849 SANDWICH Route 6 Rest Area Site Improvements WB readvertised 98 state 1997 117808 SANDWICH Route 6A, Tupper Rd to Chipman Rd $1,812,077 NFA 11/30/00 state $2,212,787 1997 601582 BARNSTABLE Park & Ride lot expansion, Rte 6 at Rte 132 $799,528 CMQ 8/29/98 state $931,620 1997 Cape Cod Projects Advertised and Status Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) PROJIS or Low bid, award Estimated cost, YEAR State MUNICIPALITY of amount, or TIP FUND in Project award amount, adver- DESCRIPTION Completed? Identification project location Programmed TIP Proponent or Construction tised (SID) number Amount Contract Value (FFY) 600795 YARMOUTH Route 28@ Forest Rd $539,380 NFA ??? deobligated state 1997 1997 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $11,931,422 601801 BARNSTABLE Barns, Route 132 Signal Coordination $249,305 NFA 9/26/98 town $290,000 1998 600966 BARNSTABLE Bridge, Craigville Beach Rd over Centerville River #B-01-002 $834,399 BR 6/1/02 town $906,759 1998 600967 Barns, Mashpee Bridge, School St over Santuit River See 2000 Adv BR re-advertised town see below 1998 601522 DENNIS Setucket Rd (Old Bass River Rd to Rte 134) $657,694 STP complete town $706,960 1998 601849 SANDWICH Route 6 Rest Area Site Improvements WB NFA ? state $150,914 1998 600970 FALMOUTH CHURCH ST BR#F-03-014 (timber bridge replacement) E. T. & L. Corp. BR 5/27/00 town $1,170,899 1998 601966 BOURNE Intersect Rte 6 and Nightingale Pond Dr & Scenic Dr P.A. Landers NFA 11/22/99 town $251,678 1998 1998 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $3,477,210 601422 BOURNE + Head of the Bay Road, (also Plymouth and Wareham) STP advertised in 2000 town see below 1999 1999 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $0 600967 Barns, Mashpee Bridge, School St, Re-advertised May 2000 (orig 11/97) $698,584 BR complete town $698,584 2000 601422 BOURNE + Head of the Bay Road, (also Plymouth and Wareham) $1,285,815 STP complete state $1,248,879 2000 601955 DENNIS Route 6 @ Interchang 9 -- Route 134 $2,165,316 NFA complete state $3,038,500 2000 601751 YARMOUTH Buck Island and Town Brook Roads $1,389,680 STP complete town $1,665,000 2000 no projis PROVINCETOWN Shank Painter Property Acquisition - statewide Enhancements $247,000 STP-E complete town $247,000 2000 2000 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $6,897,963 BOURNE Academy Road Railroad crossing NFA ? state $247,507 2001 602309 HARWICH, CCRT BRIDGE, Route 6/ Cape Cod Rail Trail, H-10-020 $703,342 CMAQ 11/24/01 regional $703,342 2001 602293 HARWICH BRIDGE, Lower County Road over the Herring River ------state see below 2001 602293 HARWICH BRIDGE, Lower County Road over the Herring River H-10-01 $1,386,288 NFA complete state $1,386,288 2001 600756 HARWICH BRIDGE, Route 6 over Depot Street H-10-016 $1,895,284 NFA complete state $1,895,284 2001 601930 MASHPEE Route 28 FalTL to Rotary, Shoulders & Sidewalk $959,370 STP complete state $959,370 2001 603304 ORLEANS, CCRT BRIDGE, Route 6/ Cape Cod Rail Trail $2,754,491 CMAQ complete regional $2,350,000 2001 600392 SANDWICH Route 130 Reconstruction & related $1,904,711 NFA town $1,900,000 2001 2001 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $9,441,791

601466 CHATHAM Bike Spur, from HarTL by airport then to downtown Chatham $1,438,041 CMAQ town $1,800,000 2002 602842 Dennis Harwich Route 28 overlay $1,509,535 NFA complete state $1,491,063 2002 602520 Eastham Wellfleet Route 6, Traffic safety improvements $1,038,839 NFA complete 2004 state $996,181 2002 602531 FALMOUTH BRIDGE, Meadow Neck Rd over the Moonakis River #F-03-019 $861,489 BR town/state $861,489 2002 602562 ORLEANS Main St, Rock Harbor Rd & Old Colony Rd $362,181 NFA town $362,181 2002 2002 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $5,510,914

603427 BARNSTABLE Route 6 Resurfacing and drainage improvements $4,000,000 STP complete 2005 state $4,000,000 2003 602559 ORLEANS Skaket Corners, Rte. 6A @ West Rd / Eldredge Park Way $730,000 NFA complete 2006 town $962,000 2003 2003 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $4,962,000

603521 FALMOUTH Shining Sea Bikeway Phase IIB, Skating Lane to Carlson Lane $672,000 CMAQ 7/2/05 town $423,450 2004 601916 BARNSTABLE Bearse's Way, Route 28 norhterly to Pitcher's Way $1,651,000 STP complete town $1,757,596 2004 603847 BOURNE Sagamore Rotary Area Improvements Depot & temp P&R lot $5,000,000 STP complete state $3,475,470 2004 Cape Cod Projects Advertised and Status Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) PROJIS or Low bid, award Estimated cost, YEAR State MUNICIPALITY of amount, or TIP FUND in Project award amount, adver- DESCRIPTION Completed? Identification project location Programmed TIP Proponent or Construction tised (SID) number Amount Contract Value (FFY) 603847 BOURNE Sagamore Rotary Chapter 149 fire station construction STP complete state $4,065,000 2004 603847 BOURNE Sagamore Rotary -- grade separation STP complete state $36,336,000 2004 602326 YARMOUTH Willow Street Recons (Rte 6 to relocated Higgins Crowell Rd) $2,652,000 STP complete town $2,652,000 2004 2004 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $48,709,516

601441 BARNSTABLE Route 132 Boulevard $10,000,000 STP complete town $9,600,000 2005 603813 EASTHAM-ORLEANS Route 6 Resurfacing and related $ 2,200,000 NFA complete state $2,200,000 2005 603349 FALMOUTH WOODS HOLE BRIDGE $ 7,800,000 BR complete town $8,000,000 2005 2005 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $19,800,000

S117 earmarkBARNSTABLE Hyannis Gateway / Main St. Lighting etc. S117 complete town $378,944 2006 604091 DENNIS Swan River Road reconstruction $2,395,528 CMAQ complete town $2,300,000 2006 55400 FALMOUTH Palmer Avenue BR BR warded-terminate state $1,500,000 2006 603666 ORLEANS Route 28 and Finlay Road intersection $645,524 STP complete town $590,000 2006 604335 SANDWICH Route 130/Water St and Main St Intersection TOWN HALL SQ $546,657 STP complete town $600,000 2006 2006 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $5,368,944

603520 FALMOUTH Shining Sea Bikeway Ph III $3,631,123 CMAQ 7/09 complete town $4,000,000 2007 2007 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $4,000,000

603894 BOURNE Rte. 6 Scenic Highway at Edgehill Road $4,935,910 STP complete town $3,948,728 2008 605037 DENNIS Rte. 28 at Rte. 134 intersection improvements $843,000 CMAQ complete town $596,000 2008 604919 HARWICH Rte. 124 at Queen Anne Road intersection improvements $1,200,000 CMAQ complete town $859,800 2008 CCNS PROVINCETOWN Rte. 6 at Province Lands Rd. $2,500,000 Parks complete NPS $2,500,000 2008 602923 YARMOUTH Packet Landing site improvements $633,436 HPP complete town $633,436 2008 2008 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $8,537,964

604521 BARNSTABLE Route 6A resurfacing $3,045,000 ARRA complete state $3,045,000 2009 604914 BARNSTABLE Rte. 132 Boulevard Landscaping $1,500,000 STP-E REJECTED - ReADV town $0 2009 604914 BARNSTABLE Rte. 132 Boulevard Landscaping $1,100,000 STP-E complete town $783,933 2009 604096 BARNSTABLE Rte. 28 at 3 locations Rte. 149, So, County Rd., Lumbert Mill R $3,200,000 CMAQ complete town $3,200,000 2009 604224 BOURNE Rte. 6 Scenic Highway resurfacing $1,651,519 ARRA complete state $1,651,519 2009 CAPE Safety Hwy Safety Improvement Program DESIGN (Sand. Cotuit Harlo $458,514 HSIP complete state $458,514 2009 605214 DENNIS Route 6A resurfacing $1,680,620 ARRA complete state $1,680,620 2009 603494 FALMOUTH BRIDGE Chapoquoit Road BR#F-03-009 over W. Falm Harbor $3,000,000 BR Spring 2012 town / state $2,667,948 2009 603609 FALMOUTH Route 28 Section known as "Reine's Corner" $2,000,000 STP Spring 2011 state $1,237,500 2009 2009 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $14,725,034

604093 BARNSTABLE Rte 149 at Rte 6 EB off-ramps, Roundabout construction $1,868,000 HSIP completed state $1,868,000 2010

604744 SANDWICH Rte 130 at Rte 6 off-ramps, construct traffic signals & improv $2,434,000 STP completed state $1,521,000 2010 605943 BOURNE-SANDWICH ITS - Camera & equipment installation at Sagamore & Bourne B $1,000,000 STP completed state $1,076,269 2010 CCRTA Vehicles, equipment & terminal improvements $635,322 ARRA FTA transferred state $635,322 2010 Cape Cod Projects Advertised and Status Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) PROJIS or Low bid, award Estimated cost, YEAR State MUNICIPALITY of amount, or TIP FUND in Project award amount, adver- DESCRIPTION Completed? Identification project location Programmed TIP Proponent or Construction tised (SID) number Amount Contract Value (FFY) 2010 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $5,100,591

604918 HARWICH Route 137 Reconstruct & Improve QueenAnneRd to BrewTL $5,916,934 STP-U, CMAQ completed state $5,333,643 2011 606131 SANDWICH Intersection Cotuit Rd at Harlow / So. Sand. Rd. roundabout $1,043,641 HSIP completed state $1,098,743 2011 606295 SANDWICH Route 6 cable barrier installation $300,000 HSIP completed state $289,867 2011 605619 FALMOUTH Route 28 Resurfacing & Related Work $5,686,424 NHS completed state $5,369,217 2011 2011 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $12,091,470

605243 YARMOUTH Old Town House Rd at Forest Rd Intersection & Signal improv $1,221,000 HSIP completed town $1,221,000 2012 605375 DENNIS Rte. 134 from Upper County Rd. to Rte. 28 $4,390,504 CMAQ TE HSIP completed town $4,390,504 2012 605291 DENNIS BR# D-007-001 UpperCountyRd, BR# D-07-006 $10,964,561 BR completed state $10,964,561 2012 CCRTA New transit service Bourne-Sandwich $138,580 CMAQ transferred CCRTA $138,580 2012 CCRTA New transit service Bourne-Falmouth $137,540 CMAQ transferred CCRTA $137,540 2012 2012 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $16,852,185

602213 ORLEANS Roundabout at Route 28 & Route 6a $1,331,245 CMAQ complete state $1,668,830 2013 605671 FALMOUTH Rte 28 Improvements: Davisville/Old Mtghouse & Jones/Worce $3,308,075 CMAQ underway state $2,787,720 2013 607263 BARN-BOU-SAN Changeable Message Boards/Cameras on Rtes 6, 25 and 28 $1,500,000 STP complete state $1,144,444 2013 606286 BOURNE-SANDWICH Rte 6 Resurfacing:Sagamore Bridge - Sandwich/Barnstable T.L $8,200,948 NHS complete state $8,061,702 2013 605792 CCNS Various Pavement Management Projects $587,000 NHS transferred CCNS $587,000 2013 CCRTA New transit service Bourne-Sandwich $180,154 CMAQ transferred CCRTA $180,154 2013 CCRTA New transit service Bourne-Falmouth $178,803 CMAQ transferred CCRTA $178,803 2013 CCRTA Ouer Cape Bike Shuttle $101,250 CMAQ transferred CCNS $101,250 2013 2013 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $14,608,653

606178 BOURNE Resurfacing and related work $7,389,353 NHPP/HSIP underway state $7,778,789 2014 604488 DENNIS-YARMOUTH Cape Cod Rail Trail Extension $7,234,133 CMAQ underway towns $8,061,016 2014 603690 CHATHAM Mitchell River Bridge Replacement $13,894,007 ABP-GANS underway state $15,298,631 2014 606016 BREWSTER Route 6A resurfacing $5,861,202 STP underway state $6,714,952 2014 Ouer Cape Bike Shuttle $84,240 CMAQ transferred CCNS $84,240 2014 2014 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $37,937,628 TAP/STP/CM 2015 606394 BARNSTABLE Route 28 at Bearses Way $5,509,246 AQ/HSIP advertised state $6,522,364 606179 DENNIS-HARWICH Route 6 resurfacing $2,429,099 STP underway state $2,429,099 2015 Ouer Cape Bike Shuttle $87,610 CMAQ transferred CCNS $87,610 2015 2015 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $9,039,073

CAPE COD Cape Cod Bicycle Rack Program $100,000 CMAQ transferred CCC $80,000 2016 608033 BARNSTABLE Rte 6 Exit 5 Lighting and Landscaping $600,000 HSIP underway state $459,906 2016 606461 ORLEANS Main St at Rte 28 and Main St at Rte 6A $3,411,040 CMAQ/TAP underway town $3,727,761 2016 607571 DENNIS-YARMOUTH Cape Cod Rail Trail Extension - Bass River Bridge $2,403,106STP/earmark underway towns $3,497,963 2016 608349 TRURO-WELLFLEET Route 6 Bicycle Accommodations $500,000 TAP underway state $290,030 2016 608409 Dennis Route 6 Resurfacing and Related Work $2,500,000 STP advertised state $2,430,550 2016 607753 Barnstable Rte 28 at Strawberry Hill Rd $550,000 HSIP underway state $690,277 2016 Cape Cod Projects Advertised and Status Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) PROJIS or Low bid, award Estimated cost, YEAR State MUNICIPALITY of amount, or TIP FUND in Project award amount, adver- DESCRIPTION Completed? Identification project location Programmed TIP Proponent or Construction tised (SID) number Amount Contract Value (FFY) BARNSTABLE Hyannis Loop Demonstration (Year 1 of 3) $659,100 CMAQ transferred CCRTA $659,100 2016 2016 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $11,835,586

TAP/STP/CM 606707 DENNIS Rte 28 Corridor & Streetscape Improvements $7,016,265 AQ/HSIP town 2017 608544 BOURNE Rte 6&28 Bypass Rd Resurfacing and Related Work $2,400,000 STP state 2017 HARWICH- 608201 BREWSTER- Route 6 Resurfacing $10,405,837 State 2017 608102 HARWICH Improvements at Rte 124 Park and Ride $575,000 STP advertised state $355,938 2017 BARNSTABLE Hyannis Loop Demonstration (Year 1 of 3) $685,464 CMAQ CCRTA 2017 CAPE COD Cape Cod Bicycle Rack Program $100,000 CMAQ CCC 2017 2017 ADVERTISING PROGRAM TOTAL $355,938

TOTAL amount advertised or obligated $270,631,468 Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022

Appendix E: Comments on Public Draft The Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization voted to release the draft TIP for the public review/ comment period at their 1:00 PM meeting on April 24, 2017, which officially began the 21-calendar-day public comment period. The MPO is expected to consider endorsement of the TIP at their 1:00 PM meeting on May 22, 2017. All MPO meetings are held at the Cape Cod Commission Office at 3325 Main Street (Route 6A) Barnstable, MA 02630. Transit service is available on the Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority’s Barnstable Villager Route (the Barnstable Village-Courthouse stop). Comments on this plan may be sent by May 15, 2017 via mail, hand delivered, by facsimile, or via e-mail, as follows: Mailed or dropped off: Cape Cod Commission Transportation Program Glenn Cannon, Technical Services Director 3225 Main Street (Route 6A) PO Box 226 Barnstable MA 02630-0226 Sent by facsimile to the attention of Glenn Cannon, Technical Services Director, CCC: FAX: 508-362-3136 Electronic mail “email”—please put “TIP” in the subject line and send to: [email protected] Comments / Questions received on this TIP: The attached Public Comment Summary Grid presents a summary of the comments received during the 21-day public comment period. The comments were presented in their entirety to the Cape Cod MPO during their May 2017 meeting where the body considered the comments. Consideration of the comments is detailed in the meeting minutes for that meeting. The response and any action taken by the MPO are summarized in this table. Discussion of UPWP activities is also included in the previous MPO and CCJTC meetings listed in Chapter 2 of this document.

Prepared by the Cape Cod Commission Page 93 Cape Cod FFY 2018-22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Comment Matrix

Date Received/ # Comment From Summary of Comment Potential Response/Action for Consideration Format Public comments submitted in advance of the March 20, 2017 MPO Meeting (FFY2018-22 TIP Development was on the agenda) 1 3/16/2017 William Marsh, Notes business owns land with the West Chatham roadway project Thank you for your comment. letter via email Owner, Eastward area. Supports the project noting it is needed to support the village Companies center. 2 3/17/2017 George Meyers Proponent of West Chatham roadway project, was party of Section Thank you for your comment. email 106 consulting party, since moved to Florida. Notes selectmen's unanimous support of the project in May 2014. Notes the often references May 2013 special town meeting citizen petition was to cut off project funding not to oppose the project and that is was non- biding. Notes that the often referenced citizen petition against the project was six years before the current consultant came on board and reflected fear of construction impacts in light of a recent sewer projects. Notes that with further public outreach opposition has diminished and is only carried forward by a small number of individuals who do not represent the overall sentiment of Chatham residents. 3 3/16/2017 David Smith Chatham resident notes support of the West Chatham roadway Thank you for your comment. email project specifically citing anticipated improvements in the ability to get out of George Ryder Road onto Route 28. 4 3/17/2017 Joanne R. Donoghue Year-round resident off of Barn Hill Road notes support of the West Thank you for your comment. email Chatham roadway project citing safety improvements at the Barn Hill Road intersection, improvements in bicycle and pedestrian accommodation, and removal of the center turn lane which she notes is confusing to many. 5 3/17/2017 Sara Whiteley Chatham resident notes support of the West Chatham roadway Thank you for your comment. letter project citing significant positive impacts on the community. 6 3/16/2017 Don and Debbie Chatham residents note support of the West Chatham Roadway Thank you for your comment. email Aikman project citing selectmen and public support of the project and safety improves to the two dangerous intersections included in the project. Applauds MassDOT for the design. 7 3/17/2017 Jim Bast Year-round Chatham resident notes support of the West Chatham Thank you for your comment. email Roadway project for safety, continence, and aesthetic reasons.

Page 1 of 9 Cape Cod FFY 2018-22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Comment Matrix

Date Received/ # Comment From Summary of Comment Potential Response/Action for Consideration Format 8 3/18/2017 Julie Eldredge-Dykens Business owner on Route 28 between George Ryder Road and Barn Thank you for your comment. email Hill Road notes support of the West Chatham Roadway citing witness numerous dangerous situations along the corridor involving pedestrians and bicyclists, difficulty getting onto Route 28 anywhere along the corridor, and safety and aesthetic issues with the existing center turn lane. 9 3/19/2017 Joe Meeks Full-time Chatham resident notes support of the West Chatham Thank you for your comment. email Roadway project citing the confusing and dangerous center turn lane. 10 3/18/2017 Susan Hebert Year-round Chatham resident notes support of the West Chatham Thank you for your comment. email Roadway project citing the confusing and dangerous center turn lane, challenge getting out of Ocean State Job lot, support of roundabouts, and uplift the project will give the town of Chatham. 11 3/17/2017 Joe and Louise Craig West Chatham residents note support of the West Chatham Thank you for your comment. email Roadway project citing improvements to the unsafe roadway corridor. 12 3/16/2017 Ronald Rudnick, Property manager for several commercial and residential properties Thank you for your comment. email Owner, GRS Property in Chatham including some in the West Chatham Village notes Management support of the West Chatham Roadway project. Cities need for improvements for safety of bicyclists, including J1 workers, and pedestrians, including school-aged students. Notes need of project to support mixed-use, traditional village despite having some property taken as part of the project.

Public comments submitted in advance of the April 24, 2017 MPO Meeting (FFY2018-22 TIP Development was on the agenda) 13 4/11/2017 Rick Leavitt, Notes support of the West Chatham roadway project citing the Thank you for your comment. letter with Chairman, West project evaluation score, community support, project readiness, attachment Chatham Village & project support and refuting objections based on threats of business Business Association disruption, congestion, and historic structures. 14 4/12/2017 Dr. Florence Seldin Notes support of the West Chatham roadway project refuting claims Thank you for your comment. letter of broad community opposition to the project and claims of excessive construction impacts.

Page 2 of 9 Cape Cod FFY 2018-22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Comment Matrix

Date Received/ # Comment From Summary of Comment Potential Response/Action for Consideration Format 15 4/15/2017 Michael S. Walters, Notes support of the West Chatham roadway project citing improved Thank you for your comment. letter Chairman, Chatham safety for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Summer Residents Advisory Committee 16 4/20/2017 Jill R. Goldsmith, Informs the MPO and MassDOT, as directed by the Chatham Board of Thank you for passing on this information. letter Town Manager, Town Selectmen, that at the April 18, 2017 Chatham Board of Selectmen, a of Chatham motion to continue support of West Chatham roadway project failed with a 2-2-0 vote (one member recusing himself). 17 4/20/2017 Susan Dimm Williams Notes, as a resident and business owner in West Chatham, support Thank you for your comment. email of the West Chatham roadway project citing existing roadway safety issues and positive changes that will result from the installation of the roundabouts and sidewalks. 18 4/20/2017 Paul C. Dooley, Vice Notes, as owner of Main Street Plaza, continued opposition to the Thank you for your comment. email President, Kimco West Chatham Roadway Project. Also notes opposition of their Realty tenant, Ocean State Job Lots. 19 4/21/2017 Rick Leavitt, Attachment presents Mr. Leavitt's interpretation of "Binding vs Non- Thank you for your comment. email with Chairman, West binding" nature Article 3 of the Chatham Special Town Meeting vote attachment Chatham Village & on May 13, 2013. Business Association Public comments received at Outreach event at the Revival Presbyterian Church of Cape Cod (predominately Portuguese speakers) on April 20, 2017 20- 4/30/2017 Various See completed comment cards Action: Some of the ideas support projects already 169 comment cards included in the plan; others will be taken into with consideration in the development of future project. translations Comments relating to public transportation will be shared with the CCRTA. Comments referring to a specific location will be shared with the appropriate Town.

Page 3 of 9 Cape Cod FFY 2018-22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Comment Matrix

Date Received/ # Comment From Summary of Comment Potential Response/Action for Consideration Format Public comments received during the Public Comment Period (April 24, 2017 - May 15, 2017) 170 4/26/2017 Elaine Gibbs Notes opposition to the West Chatham roadway project questioning Thank you for your comment. email the motives of some of the proponents and citing a 5-13-13 Town Meeting vote to defund the project, a 4-18-17 Board of Selectmen vote failing to affirm support of the project, an incomplete testing of the proposed plan, inadequate traffic studies and testing and issues with liability and cost. 171 4/28/2017 Mark S. Ells, Town Notes the importance of the Route 28 and Yarmouth Road Thank you for your comment. letter Manager, Town of intersection to the region for hospital access and access to the Barnstable regions commercial, medical, and transportation hub and urges keeping the project on schedule for FFY 2019. 172 4/28/2017 Mary McCauley West Chatham resident notes opposition to the West Chatham Thank you for your comment. email Roadway project citing issues with the traffic study, business opposition, issues with large trucks navigating the roundabout, and spending money on something that doesn't need fixing. 173 4/28/2017 Mary McCauley Adds to Comment 172 noting safety concerns with encouraging Thank you for your comment. email bicycling on Route 28 and issues with the Summer Residents Committee speaking on behalf of summer residents, and questions the motives of development community in supporting the project.

174 4/28/2017 Mary McCauley Same message as Comment 172 forwarded from a different Thank you for your comment. email recipient. 175 4/28/2017 Judith B. Kelley Notes opposition to the West Chatham roadway project citing lack of Thank you for your comment. email Board of Selectmen support for the project at their 4-18-17 meeting, impacts on businesses, citizen petitions against the project, safety concerns, and concerns with the designs ability to accommodate summer traffic. 176 4/29/2017 Dr. David E. Burns, Notes opposition to the West Chatham roadway project citing Thank you for your comment. email President, West negative business impacts and concerns with the project timeline Chatham Association, and requesting the project schedule be released as soon as possible. Inc. 177 4/30/2017 Sadie G. Joyce Notes opposition to the West Chatham roadway project citing Thank you for your comment. email negative business impacts, confusion and traffic backups caused by the proposed design, and concerns with the project development process.

Page 4 of 9 Cape Cod FFY 2018-22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Comment Matrix

Date Received/ # Comment From Summary of Comment Potential Response/Action for Consideration Format 178 5/1/2017 Tony Zombas, Owner, Notes opposition to the West Chatham roadway project citing Thank you for your comment. email Shop Ahoy Plaza negative business impacts, impacts of new housing in the area, the 4- 18-17 Selectmen vote no to reaffirm support of the project, the May 2013 Town Meeting voted to turn down the project, and citizen petition opposing the project. 179 5/2/2017 David Norris, Shop Notes opposition to the West Chatham roadway project citing Thank you for your comment. email Ahoy Liquors resident opposition, West Chatham business opposition, harm to businesses, and better uses for the money. 180 5/2/2017 David Norris, Shop Same message as Comment 179 forwarded from a different Thank you for your comment. email Ahoy Liquors recipient. 181 5/3/2017 David Norris, Shop Same message as Comment 179 forwarded from a different Thank you for your comment. email Ahoy Liquors recipient. 182 5/3/2017 Judy Patterson, Notes opposition to the West Chatham roadway project citing Thank you for your comment. email Representing the proponents being influenced by developers, lack of current safety Harding Patterson issues, the May 2013 Town Meeting voted to turn down the project, Family Trust the 4-18-17 Selectmen vote no to reaffirm support of the project, and negative business impacts. 183 5/4/2017 Bill and Ann Comeau Notes opposition to the West Chatham roadway project citing citizen Thank you for your comment. email petitions opposing the project. 184 5/7/2017 Elaine Gibbs Email communications between Ms. Gibbs and Ms. Pamela Haznar Thank you for your comment. email (MassDOT District Five Project Development Engineer) regarding clarification on the construction timeline for the West Chatham roadway project including a request to released the draft construction timeline. 185 5/8/2017 Dr. David E. Burns Note to MassDOT staff expressing frustration with the not having the Thank you for your comment. email construction timeline available for the West Chatham roadway project available during the [FFY2018-22 TIP] public comment period. 186 5/10/2017 Jeff Hyman AMC [Appalachian Mountain Club] member requesting consideration Action: Thank you for the comment. This comments email for the addition of bike trail mileage on the Cape Cod Rail Trail. will be shared with the Massachusetts Department of Recreation, the agency who maintains the Cape Cod Rail Trail. 187 5/10/2017 Harriet Dann Notes support for improvements to the bike system on Cape Cod in Thank you for your comment. email the interest of improving health and decreasing our carbon footprint.

Page 5 of 9 Cape Cod FFY 2018-22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Comment Matrix

Date Received/ # Comment From Summary of Comment Potential Response/Action for Consideration Format 188 5/10/2017 Jill R. Goldsmith, Communication between Ms. Goldsmith, Ms. Elaine Gibbs, and Note: The CTD, along with other project email with Town Manager, Town MassDOT staff regarding the public distribution of the Contract Time documentation is available on the West Chatham attachment of Chatham Determination (CTD) for the West Chatham roadway project with the roadway project website: CTD attached. http://www.wcroadwaydesign.info/documents.html

189 5/12/2017 Elaine Gibbs Email request for clarification to MassDOT staff on "years to Thank you for your comment. email complete" versus "construction seasons" referenced in the communications included as part of comment 188. 190 5/15/2017 John O'Toole Meeting Facilitator for the Chatham Bikeways Committee notes Thank you for your comment. email with support of the West Chatham roadway project notes the challenges attached letter he and his wife currently have navigating the corridor as both motorists and bicyclists. 191 5/15/2017 Stephen Buckley Email from Mr. Buckley informing the MPO that he has submitted a Thank you for your comment. email Public Records Request to MassDOT "looking for any record received by MassDOT from the Town of Chatham concerning its choice of a recommended "pre-25%" design concept from amongst the various design alternatives for MassDOT Project #606596 [West Chatham roadway project]. . ." 192 5/15/2017 Dr. David E. Burns, Notes continued opposition to the West Chatham roadway project Thank you for your comment. email with President, West and included a comply of the "latest petition from business and attachment Chatham Association, property owners in the West Chatham neighborhood center." Inc. 193 5/11/2017 Thomas S. Cahir, Notes the importance of the Route 28 and Yarmouth Road Thank you for your comment. letter Administrator, CCRTA intersection project given the significant safety hazards present at the intersection today urges keeping the project on schedule for FFY 2019. 194 5/10/2017 Rick Leavitt, Attachmented letter details th West Chatham Village & Business Thank you for your comment. email with Chairman, West Association's support of the West Chatham Roadway Project citing attachment Chatham Village & consistency with the Town of Chatham Long Range Comprehesive Business Association Plan, selectmen support of the project, and support by various other boards in town 195 5/15/2017 Comments for Bike Notes the following biking issues in Orleans: Main Street Cape Cod Thank you for your comment. in person Week Outreach Event Rail Trail Crossing, biking on Route 28, biking through town on Main in Orleans Street 196 Need to get bike safety gear to J-1 workers Thank you for your comment.

Page 6 of 9 Cape Cod FFY 2018-22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Comment Matrix

Date Received/ # Comment From Summary of Comment Potential Response/Action for Consideration Format Motions by the Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee at their May 12, 2017 meeting 197 5/12/2017 Motions voted Add project 608742 [Dennis/Harwich, Route 28 Reconstruction Action: This recommendation will be presented to CCJTC Meeting affirmatively by the (Upper County Road to Herring River)] to FFY 2022 within the the MPO for their consideration. This potential CCJTC available funding with project scope to be adjusted as needed change is included in the May 22, 2017 Draft FFY 2018-2022 TIP presented to the MPO for their consideration. 198 Add a project for ADA sidewalk upgrades in the amount of up to Note: Based on a follow-up with MassDOT staff, $100,000 for any FFY where funding is available. such a project cannot be added at this time. CCC staff will consult with MassDOT staff on the possibility of developing such a project for future TIP consideration. 199 Recommended the MPO adopts the FFY2018-22 TIP as released for This recommendation will be presented to the MPO public comment with the addition of the previously described for their consideration. projects. Public comments received after the close of the Public Comment Period but in time to be distributed to the MPO prior to their May 22, 2017 meeting 200 5/16/2017 Comments for Bike Need north side transit service. Thank you for your comment. 201 in person Week Outreach Event Need a cape-wide bike summit. Thank you for your comment. in Dennis 202 5/17/2017 George Meyers Proponent of West Chatham roadway project, notes Mr. Seth Taylor Thank you for your comment. email (opponent of the project) was defeated in his bid for re-election as Chatham selectmen and has been replaced by Ms. Shareen Davis who, citing a Cape Cod Chronicle article, Mr. Meyers notes supports the project. Mr. Meyers suggests that if a new vote were taken on whether to support the project the vote would be 3-1 with Mr. Dykens recusing himself as in the past. 203 5/17/2017 Sean Summers Former Chatham Selectmen notes continued support for the West Thank you for your comment. email Chatham roadway project citing citizen support of the project, support from the current Board of Selectmen (based on Mr. Summers analysis of the current members), positive impacts on business, thorough project vetting, and economic and aesthetic improvements for the Town and the district.

204 5/17/2017 Rick Leavitt Notes the progress to the widespread community support of the of Thank you for your comment. email with the West Chatham roadway project and urges MPO members and attachment MassDOT to move ahead with the project.

Page 7 of 9 Cape Cod FFY 2018-22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Comment Matrix

Date Received/ # Comment From Summary of Comment Potential Response/Action for Consideration Format 205 5/17/2017 David Mohler, Add a signed GHG self-certification sheet to final version of the Action: These recommendations will be presented letter via email Executive Director, document. to the MPO for their consideration. These potential MassDOT Office of Narrative: Various grammatical, typographic, and clarification changes are included in the May 22, 2017 Draft FFY Transportation adjustments to the narrative. 2018-2022 TIP presented to the MPO for their Planning Federal Highway Project Listings: Update Total Federal Participating consideration. Cost (TFPC) to match the latest estimate in ProjectInfo for project 606596, 607435, 607444. Adjust inflation rate used for project 607319, 607405, and 608666. Adjust Additional Information column width for project 607319. Appendix A: ensure equity analysis includes an evaluation of the pervious five years in addition to the current TIP. GHG Assessment: Adjust GHG description for projects 608571, CC1001, 607319, and 608819 and add bus replacements. 206 5/18/2017 Elaine Gibbs Letter to Mr. Tohomas Tinlin details a request to delay the West Thank you for your comment. email with Chatham roadway project detailing concerns with projects Contract attached letter Time Determination (CTD) and overall constuction impacts of the project 207 5/16/2017 Comments for Bike Not big enough shoulders on the road for riding bikes, potholes Action: Some of the ideas support projects already 208 in person Week Outreach Event sidewalks & crosswalks down and around Cranberry Highway E. included in the plan; others will be taken into in Bourne Wareham (priority - shopping centers/crosswalks) consideration in the development of future project. Comments relating to public transportation will be 209 Less potholes shared with the CCRTA. Comments referring to a 210 More bike paths. Fewer potholes. Better sidewalks. specific location will be shared with the appropriate 211 Better lights. Better signage Town. 212 Give Glenn C. and Emily B. a raise. Make Cape Fler for after Red Sox and Celtics games. #bikelife 213 I work driving a red car (translated from Spanish) 214 Need to see an increase in helmet safety for adults & students at Cape, sidewalks, and creating walking routes for schools 215 3rd bridge over canal with 4 lanes + bike lane on shoulder 216 Less traffic could be helped with more and better back roads Acronyms: AC = advanced construction; CCC = Cape Cod Commission; CCRTA = Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority; CMAQ = Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality; DPW = Department of Public Works; GHG = Greenhouse gas; HSIP = Highway Safety Improvement Program; MassDOT = Massachusetts Department of Transportation; MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization; RTP = Regional Transportation Plan; TIP = Transportation Improvement Program; TFPC = Total Federal Participating Cost; UPWP = Unified Planning Work Program; YOE = Year of Expenditure

Page 8 of 9 Cape Cod FFY 2018-22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Comment Matrix

Date Received/ # Comment From Summary of Comment Potential Response/Action for Consideration Format Note: The Public Comment Summary Grid presents a summary of the comments received during the 30-day public comment period. The comments were presented in their entirety to the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) during a public meeting where the body considered the comments. The response and any action taken by the MPO are summarized in this table. This table will be included in the final plan and is available at www.capecodcommission.org/mpo.

Page 9 of 9 Comment 1 - W. Marsh [3-16-17].pdf Comment 2 - G. Myers [3-17-17].pdf From: George Myers Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 9:07 AM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: MassDOT Project #606596 – Route 28 West Chatham

My name is George Myers. I am a retired Massachusetts attorney and have been an active proponent of the above-referenced West Chatham roadway project from a time prior to the PIF submission to MassDOT in July 2011. I recently changed my domicile to Florida, but I maintain a home in Chatham and remain very active in town affairs, including participation as a Section 106 consulting party in MassDOT's Mitchell River Bridge reconstruction and the MassDOT West Chatham Roadway Project, a proponent of other town infrastructure, such as sidewalk projects and other matters, such as review of town bylaws and sewer regulations.

I am submitting herewith my remarks concerning the "Route 28, Chatham discussion" listed on the agenda for the March 20, 2017 Public Meeting of the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization. I wish to address some of the statements made by Chatham Selectman Seth Taylor in his past comments to the MPO and in his recent (undated) 8 page submission to Mr. Mohler and the MPO.

Prior to the election of Mr. Taylor (a non-lawyer) in May 2014, Chatham’s Board of Selectmen voted its unanimous support for the West Chatham project, which was the last vote taken by the Board on the overall project. Mr. Taylor acknowledged that unanimous support at the MassDOT Public Information Meeting on May 5, 2015. See the transcript of that meeting at pp. 122-23.

In anticipation that, at your March 20 meeting, Mr. Taylor will offer some of the same arguments in opposition to the West Chatham project that he has made to you in the past and in his aforementioned letter, please consider the following.

Mr. Taylor’s primary argument against the project has always been an alleged lack of “due process” and “democratic principles.” His argument is based on the claim that the Board of Selectmen did not abide by a 214-204 vote (Chatham has about 5,200 registered voters) at a May 2013 special town meeting on a citizen petition, Article 3.

That article provided that the town “instruct the Board of Selectmen and Town Manager to discontinue” the town’s future funding of the project. However, the Town Moderator, William Litchfield, Esq.,[1] declared at the town meeting that Article 3 was “non- binding” on the Board of Selectmen and Town Manager because, among other things, it sought to instruct the Board to take action rather than to expressly cut off funding. Prior to the vote, Mr. Litchfield offered to assist the petitioner to amend the language of the article to make it binding, but the petitioner declined to do so. Mr. Taylor has never established by an opinion of a legally competent attorney that Moderator Litchfield’s determination that Article 3 was not binding is legally incorrect.

MassDOT Project #606596 Route 28 West Chatham - George Myers.msg.txt[3/17/2017 10:34:17 AM] Comment 2 - G. Myers [3-17-17].pdf It is also important to note that Article 3 did not oppose or reject the project itself, but only sought to instruct the Board of Selectmen and Town Manager to discontinue the town’s funding of it, which had been substantially completed. Since that May 2013 special town meeting, there have been no further town meeting warrant articles, petitions or resolutions opposing the project and no Board of Selectmen majority vote against it.

At MassDOT’s February 19, 2015 25% Design Public Hearing, Mr. Taylor stated that “I am neither in favor nor opposed to the redesigned project as proposed, at least not on a design and engineering level.” However, he continued to expressed his opposition based only on the Article 3 vote in May 2013 explained above. See the transcript of the Design Public Hearing at pp. 52-55.

Mr. Taylor has also pointed to past petitions by some West Chatham businesses opposing the project or some aspect of the project. Petitions by other West Chatham businesses support the project so the importance of all such petitions is limited at best.

One explanation of the opposition of some West Chatham businesses is that the town’s sewer project along Route 28 in West Chatham caused occasional complete road closures which admittedly was harmful to businesses. Some businesses fear that MassDOT will not live up to its commitment to keep Route 28 open throughout construction of the project.

Occasionally, Mr. Taylor and others point to a petition of 2,000+ signatures with the claim that the signatures were in opposition to the overall project as it exists today. However, I and other proponents of the project have had to explain again and again that the petition only had to do with keeping the turning lane. More importantly, the petition signatures were collected six years ago even before the Town’s present West Chatham roadway consultant, Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc., was retained to prepare a design proposal and long before the present 100% design was finalized.

A number of Chatham townspeople have misrepresented and continue to misrepresent that the petition was in opposition to the present design for the West Chatham roadway.

Since 2011, opposition to the project has gradually diminished as MassDOT has continued its outreach to the town in several public meetings. Opposition to the project is now carried out by a handful of people, including Mr. Taylor and his small group, the same group that attends virtually every Cape Cod MPO meeting and speaks against the project. At no time since 2011 has this small group of opponents ever established that there is even a modicum of opposition to the present project among Chatham's other 5,200 voters.

Finally, Mr. Taylor has claimed that MassDOT and MPO have not justified the project based on safety, congestion and access scores. In my view, those considerations are best left in the hands of the experts at MassDOT and MPO.

Respectfully,

MassDOT Project #606596 Route 28 West Chatham - George Myers.msg.txt[3/17/2017 10:34:17 AM] Comment 2 - G. Myers [3-17-17].pdf George Myers

[1] Mr. Litchfield is a local Chatham attorney, has been Chatham’s Town Moderator since 1988 and was a Chatham selectman for 7 years before Chatham adopted its Home Rule Charter in 1995.

MassDOT Project #606596 Route 28 West Chatham - George Myers.msg.txt[3/17/2017 10:34:17 AM] Comment 3 - D. Smith [3-16-17].pdf From: David Smith Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 5:04 PM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: Upcoming MPO Meeting

I want to let you know that I fully support the West Chatham roadway project being discussed at the MPO meeting Monday, March 20. We live in Chatham and frequently attempt to enter Rt. 28 from George Ryder Road. It is very difficult and the upgrades being planned, as well as the beautification of the roadway in West Chatham, will be very welcome and helpful.

David

David Smith 35 Skyline Drive, Chatham, MA Mobile: 508-737-2858

Chatham email - David Smith.txt[3/17/2017 10:31:31 AM] Comment 4 - J. Donogue [3-17-17].pdf From: [email protected] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 8:34 AM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: West Chatham Roadway Project

West Chatham Roadway Project

I am writing in support of the West Chatham Roadway project. As an active year round resident of Chatfield Lane off Barn Hill Road I exit onto Route 28 twice a day being thankful that there will soon be a round about. Currently if there are two cars at the same time, often the case, one turning left and one right, neither can see properly and the one on the right is on Dunkin Donuts lawn. In summer months those impatient with the line of 6 cut through Shop Ahoy or Dunkin Donuts and sometimes use the center lane to speed ahead. With 15 arrows between Barn Hill Road and the Post Office and not accommodating all the businesses it is a confusing roadway especially for the uninitiated.

Rarely is there a pedestrian using a crosswalk or a bicyclist leaving the close bike path to enjoy the area including Harding,s Beach or shoppers strolling. For many this part of Chatham is an old fashioned speedway. It is a pleasure to see a crowd enjoying the Farmer's Market here in warm weather. Surely with an accommodating roadway and neighborhood design West Chatham too will be an attractive part of Chatham.

As regards the roundabout at George Ryder Road I like many avoid exiting that street. It is one if not the most threatening exits in town. I drive good deal-Boston, New England and do regard this project as one very valuable.

Joanne R. Donoghue 65 Chatfield Lane West Chatham MA 02669

West Chatham Roadway Project - Joanne Donogue.txt[3/17/2017 10:34:48 AM] Comment 5 - S. Whitely [3-17-17].pdf

Sara Whiteley Mailing: PO Box 1063, West Chatham MA 02669 Street: 343 Cedar Street, Chatham MA 02633

March 17, 2017

Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization 3225 Main St Barnstable, MA 02630

RE: West Chatham TIP

To whom it may concern:

I am writing today in support of the previously approved West Chatham TIP. As a life‐long resident of Chatham and a West Chatham business owner, I believe this project will have a significant and positive impact on the community. I travel this route multiple times a day and know that the changes will make a difference to the quality of life, economic success and general enjoyment of the residents and visitors who have the opportunity to travel this route.

Sincerely,

Sara Whiteley

Comment 6 - D. & D. Aikman [3-16-17].pdf From: D. Aikman Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 3:33 PM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: West Chatham Road Project

To Whom it May Concern:

We wish to go on record in support of the West Chatham road project that's currently in 100% design phase on the TIP program. We've come so far on this, with the Board of Selectmen unanimously voting in favor many times. Also, many citizens have publicly supported the project in the numerous hearings which have been held over the years. It's time to bring safety to this dangerous section of Route 28. So many people, including both of us, are doing whatever they can to avoid the very dangerous left turns out of George Ryder Road and Barn Hill Road, either choosing an alternate circuitous route or traversing commercial parking lots. This is not right.

We applaud the work of MassDot in coming up with a design that makes sense, and we look forward to seeing the project coming to fruition. It's time!

Thank you for your attention to our opinions.

Don and Debbie Aikman 78 Water Street Chatham

West Chatham Road Project - Aikman.txt[3/17/2017 10:34:36 AM] Comment 7 - J. Blast [3-17-17].pdf From: Jim Bast Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 10:02 AM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: In Favor of West Chatham Roadway Project

Dear Ms. Dillon, this is let the Cape Cod Commission know that as a year-round resident near Route 28 in West Chatham, MA I am very much in favor of the proposed roadway project for safety, convenience and aesthetic reasons.

Jim Bast Chatham, MA 02633-2392 508.348.5666

In Favor of West Chatham Roadway Project - Jim Bast.txt[3/17/2017 10:33:51 AM] Comment 8 - J. Eldrede-Dykens [3-18-17].pdf From: julie dykens Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 2:45 PM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: Fwd: West Chatham Roadway Project just a partial response so far

------Forwarded message ------From: julie dykens Date: Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:17 PM Subject: West Chatham Roadway Project just a partial response so far To: Jeff Dykens , "[email protected]"

I write to you as a business owner situated on a section of The West Chatham Roadway being considered for an upgrade. I write as a seven year witness of the incredible hazards this stretch of roadway presents. Nestled between Ocean State Job Lot and The Patterson's on the north side of 28, my business at 1652 Main Street, is seasonal and it opens in the Spring as tourism and seasonal activity begin to increase. My position is somewhat unique as I am located in the epicenter of the stretch of road being considered for change. My business is an art gallery. Business is relatively slow, definitely not fast-paced. There are never any "art- emergencies"! My location gives me much time to bear witness to the assortment of perils that occur on this stretch of road as my door is usually wide open and I have two enormous windows all of which face route 28. Here are just a few: Often (and with increasing frequency) entire families: grandparents, parents and lots of small children parade by, on the sidewalk in front of my shop on their bikes or on foot. They are enjoying their time together on vacation in our town and making their way along a road which often features vehicles going speeds in excess of fifty MPH. Heaven help these families if their mission is to buy ice cream at The Kreme and Kone restaurant across the street. They stop, as they should, at the crosswalk right next to my shop. Traffic continues to whiz by. Only rarely does a driver perceive that there is a crosswalk or realize they should come to a stop. This is well known. In addition during the busy season, we have many, many international students who come here to work in and support our seasonal businesses. They live where ever they can find housing. Many of them live in West Chatham. Almost all of them ride bicycles. They take their lives in their hands attempting to navigate and cross this crazy stretch of road as they try to get to work or try to get home daily. Also well-known is how difficult it is for drivers of all ages, both local and visiting, to enter or exit this stretch of roadway. Whether trying to exit George Ryder Road onto route 28 east, trying to enter 28 from the West Chatham post office or in the off-chance you do have an art-emergency and try to come to my gallery you must be a very determined and courageous driver! Finally and in conclusion I write to you as a niece whose elderly aunt was involved in a collision as she attempted to exit the West Chatham post office several years ago. This was the beginning of her decline.This was when I first became aware of the dangers on this road. Many people acknowledge that this three lane section of road is very unattractive as well as dangerous. I for one do not understand any lack of support for the proposed changes. At this moment in our history we have a timely opportunity to support the current proposal of the DOT. This piece of Chatham, this gateway to our town need not remain bedraggled, ignored and unsafe. We have an opportunity to demonstrate that we care about the safety, welfare and appeal of all parts of Chatham and lend our support to The Chatham Roadway Project.

Julie Eldredge-Dykens Home: 1745 Main St West Chatham, Ma 02669

Fwd West Chatham Roadway Project - Julie Eldrede-Dykens.txt[3/20/2017 9:01:59 AM] Comment 8 - J. Eldrede-Dykens [3-18-17].pdf Julie Eldredge-Dykens Local Color Gallery 1652 Main St. West Chatham, Ma. 02669

Fwd West Chatham Roadway Project - Julie Eldrede-Dykens.txt[3/20/2017 9:01:59 AM] Comment 9 - J. Meeks [3-19-17].pdf From: JOE MEEKS Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 12:22 PM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: Support for West Chatham Roadway Project

Hello,

My name is Joe Meeks and I am a full-time Chatham resident. I am writing to voice my support for the improvements planned for RT28 in West Chatham being discussed at the MPO meeting on 3/20. I travel that road frequently and find the current 3 lane setup confusing and dangerous when summer residents arrive. I look forward to the planned improvements.

Joe Meeks 228 Pleasant Street Chatham

Support for West Chatham Roadway Project - Joe Meeks.txt[3/20/2017 9:01:40 AM] Comment 10 - S. Hebert [3-18-17].pdf From: Susan Hebert Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 11:39 AM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: West Chatam Roadway Project

I am writing in support of this proposed project. We live here year round. My husband has been summering her since 1948. We purchased our year round home in 1987 and I retired here in 1991. I use this road daily and hate it the way it is. The middle turning lane is the most dangerous road design I have ever seen. The curve in the road makes it almost impossible to turn left when coming onto Rt. 28 from say Ocean State. I will always take a right and turn somewhere in order to head back to town. I have no problem turning left or right on Rt. 28 when traveling on the two lane road. Very much in support of the roundabouts to slow the traffic down and feel this will allow more traffic to see the businesses in the area and frequent them.

Chatham is a scenic town most everywhere except in this location. It needs a uplift and this project seems to fit the bill.

Thank you, Susan Hebert Chatham

West Chatam Roadway Project - Hebert.txt[3/20/2017 9:02:19 AM] Comment 11 - J. & L. Craig [3-17-17].pdf From: [email protected] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 6:36 PM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: West Chatham Roadway Improvement

To Whom it may concern:

We are residents of West Chatham and completely support the improvements proposed for this unsafe roadway corridor.

Joe and Louise Craig West Chatham

West Chatham Roadway Improvement - Joe and Louise Craig.txt[3/20/2017 8:58:55 AM] Comment 12 - R. Rudnick [3-16-17].pdf

Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization 3225 Main Street Barnstable, MA 02630

March 16, 2017

Re: West Chatham Transportation Improvement Project

To the Members of the Metropolitan Planning Organization,

I understand the MPO is meeting Monday, March 20 to discuss the West Chatham roadway project. GRS Property Management d/b/a Lighthouse Realty owns multiple properties on Main Street, Chatham, within both the West Chatham village center and West Chatham Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) project area. We have both commercial and residential property use in this area. In the summertime we operate the Master Mariner Motel, housing J1 students who work in local Chatham businesses. Many of these students ride bikes to and from work in both daylight and dark, which at times becomes hazardous due to traffic. Multiple buildings also house children who are picked up and dropped off on school buses in this area. Our concern for our tenant’s safety is paramount and as such we completely support the West Chatham TIP project.

The West Chatham TIP project is vital to ensure the success and safety of a mixed use, traditional Cape Cod village center and the Town of Chatham as a whole. In order to accommodate a modern round about a small section of our property at 1563 Main Street will be taken, which we believe will be a small price to pay to ensure the success of the project as a whole and in turn the residents and visitors of Chatham.

Sincerely,

Ronald Rudnick, Owner

Cc: Jill Goldsmith, Chatham Town Manager Jeff Dykens, Chairman, Chatham Board of selectmen

Email letter to: [email protected]

Comment 13 - R. Leavitt 1 [4-11-17].pdf WEST CHATHAM VILLAGE & BUSINESS ASSOCIATION Balancing Environment Economic Development Historic Preservation

Steve Woelfel, Chairman Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization 3225 Main Street Barnstable, MA 02630 April 11, 2017

Dear Mr. Woelfel:

RE: 2018 – 2022 TIP Review

West Chatham Village and Business Association is a grass roots neighborhood association of residents and businesses in West Chatham. We support the fiscal 2018 West Chatham TIP project. Attached is a 2015 list of local businesses and other organizations supporting the project. To this list can be added Eastward Companies, recent purchaser of major village center property; Mom & Pop restaurant, new addition to the village center; David Oppenheim, developer of Fishermen’s Alliance headquarters and Oppenheim medical center.

In connection with your current review of TIP projects, we would like to comment on the MPO’s Project Selection Factors used in evaluating projects. Chatham scores very well among major selection factors:

Project evaluation score The West Chatham project has an overall evaluation score of 66, slightly above the average of 62.7 for all 22 projects on the 2018—2022 TIP and slightly above two other Route 28/28A projects scored at 65 and 63. The West Chatham project scores 10 of 10 for enhancement to other assets; 10 of 10 for modern technology, the only project to score 10; 3 of 5 for non-motorist crash history and anticipated safety impact and 2 of 5 for motorist crash history and anticipated safety impact. Overall, safety scores 5 of 10 for the project.

Community support Chatham’s Board of Selectmen unanimously approved the West Chatham project when it was placed on the TIP in 2011. Of the ten former and present selectmen voting on this project over the past six years, eight voted in favor and personally appeared before the MPO to request your support. Three of the five current selectmen voted to approve the project and have personally expressed their support to MPO. Town meeting voted on five separate occasions from 2003 to 2016 demonstrating substantial community support, including in 2015 when Article 48 sponsored by protestors was defeated by substantial margin. (See attached.) Chatham’s Long Range Comprehensive Plan describes West Chatham as having “poor conditions for pedestrians and hazardous intersections and business entrances”. The Plan calls for working with Mass DOT to “improve vehicular safety and improve amenities and conditions for pedestrians”. At MPO’s March meeting, a large contingent of Chatham town officials, former and present Chatham selectmen, road design professionals, business leaders and residents voiced their support for the West Chatham TIP project.

Comment 13 - R. Leavitt 1 [4-11-17].pdf Project readiness The West Chatham project was approved as a TIP project in 2011. The project is at the 100% design stage.

Project cost Estimated construction cost of $4.1 million is within available funding for the 2018 fiscal year. The West Chatham project is similar in cost and scale to an active 2017 Orleans village center Main Street intersection project at Routes 28 and 6A. The town of Chatham has invested over $500,000 for extensive public outreach and professional design of this TIP project.

We want also to address objections voiced by those protesting the West Chatham TIP project:

Threat of business disruption Protesters maintain that any construction period in excess of an arbitrary two or three “seasons” is cause for MPO to abandon the project entirely because of potential business interruption risk. This extreme position fails to acknowledge the existing real risk to other interested parties such as motorists, pedestrians, the handicapped and cyclists if present hazardous conditions are ignored and allowed to continue. A fair and equitable resolution for all parties at risk is to ensure that the road remains open to traffic throughout the construction period regardless of duration and that drivers have unrestricted access to businesses.

Threat of congestion Despite protesters claims to the contrary, a virtual simulation of the new roadway design shown at public design hearings, clearly shows no back-up on Route 28 entering the two modern roundabouts at peak traffic periods. The simulation shows existing back-up entering Route 28 from George Ryder Road and Barn Hill Road at peak traffic periods is substantially reduced.

Threat to historic structure Protesters claim that the new roadway is 12 feet from an historic structure at 1566 Main Street. The planned new sidewalk is 12 feet from Fishermen’s Alliance offices in a restored historic sea captains home; an additional 17 to 22 feet of wide sidewalk, green space and shoulder separates the office building’s front porch from slow moving (15 MPH) travel lanes at a landscaped modern roundabout. Another historic home at nearby 1731 Main Street (Chatham’s oldest house), resides no more than 15 feet from existing travel lanes in the traditional village center manner (see downtown Chatham). DOT’s award winning Project Design Guide recommends placing all structures close to the street in traditional village centers like West Chatham to aid in slowing traffic. A thorough Section 106 review determined no adverse effect on historic structures in the project area.

We want to thank the Metropolitan Planning Organization for your consistent support of the West Chatham TIP project over the past six years and urge you not to remove the project from the TIP or delay it further.

Sincerely,

Rick Leavitt, Chairman 31 Barn Hill Road, West Chatham, 02669

Enclosure

Comment 13 - R. Leavitt 1 [4-11-17].pdf Vote “No” On Article 48 It Puts the Brakes on West Chatham Road Improvements

assDOT and Chatham’s DPW describe West Chatham as “hazardous,” an accident ready Mto happen. And, in fact, it has. The Chronicle describes West Chatham as “a blighted roadway, an eyesore, an inconvenience and a hazard.” Article 48 puts needed road improvements to West Chatham in jeopardy.

As West Chatham businesses, we support the town’s plan to revitalize West Chatham Center, making it business-friendly with a new road design: Cape Cod Colonial Tables Ollie’s Local Color Gallery Barn Hill Pottery Cape Wide Insurance Broadmeadow Realty Chatham Stoneware Fancy’s Cornfield Property Dunkin’ Donuts Paul T. Litwin, Attorney Whiteley Plumbing Reed Financial Group Phyllis N. Power Chatham Guest Rooms Munson Gallery Paws and Claws New England Pizza Chatham Interiors Chatham’s Furniture Chatham Liquor Locker Chatham Beauty & Bridal Capt. Haskell Rose House Robin’s Nest Art Studio Cornfield Suites Capt. Bellamy House Ungerdogs Grooming Lovely Nails New England Vacation Rentals Bob’s Back Antiques Bohman Thayer Real Estate Asian Paradise Oasis Salon & Day Spa Mark T. Vokey Insurance Chatham Lock & Key Hair Affinity Chatham Organic Market Gable Building Corp. Donovan Custom Homes Master Mariner Motel Cape Cod Bungalow West Chatham road improvements are endorsed by: • Chatham Board of Selectmen • Chatham Summer Residents Advisory Committee • Chatham Bikeways Committee • Chatham Committee for the Disabled • West Chatham Village and Business Neighborhood Association • Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization • MassDOT Vote “No” On Article 48 at the May 11 Town Meeting

Paid for by the West Chatham Village and Business Neighborhood Association Comment 14 - F. Seldin [4-12-17].pdf Comment 14 - F. Seldin [4-12-17].pdf Comment 15 -M. Walters [4-15-17].pdf

Chatham Summer Residents Advisory Committee

Steve Woelfel, Chairman Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization 3225 Main Street Barnstable, MA 02630 April 15, 2017

Dear Mr. Woelfel:

RE: 2018 – 2022 TIP Review

The Chatham Summer Residents Advisory Committee is appointed by the Chatham Board of Selectman to represent the interests of the summer residents (non-voting taxpayers) of the town. It is our mission to

Give summer residents a voice Give Selectmen the benefit of information and views Give fresh outlooks to the town Take a position and make a case for or against town matters

Over the past few years we have reviewed the plans for the West Chatham corridor and have continually supported those plans. The summer residents use this roadway during the busiest times of the year and are therefore well acquainted with its current limitations. The current roadway does not allow for safe transit along or across the road. The new design of the West Chatham project will enhance this roadway immeasurably. It will improve the safety of the corridor for vehicles AND for pedestrians. Secondly, it will improve the use of the corridor for recreational activities, namely cycling, jogging, walking, etc. In particular, it will provide a safe environment for children to use the corridor for access to and from the town bike path.

We want to thank the Metropolitan Planning Organization for your consistent support of the West Chatham TIP project over the past six years and urge you to maintain the project on the TIP and speed its completion.

Sincerely,

Michael S. Waters, Chairman

Chatham Summer Residents Advisory Committee

Cc: Chatham Board of Selectmen Chatham Town Manager

Comment 16 - J. Goldsmith [4-20-17].pdf Comment 17 - S. Williams [4-20-17].pdf

West Chatham Roadway Plan - Susan Dimm Williams.txt From: SUSAN DIMM Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 2:14 PM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: West Chatham Roadway Plan Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning 3225 Main Street Barnstable, MA 02630

To Whom It May Concern, I have been a resident and a business owner in West Chatham since 1992. My home and business are located on Barn Hill Road, one house away from the intersection of Barn Hill Road and Route 28. In addition, I rented a commercial location in the Shop Ahoy Plaza at that intersection for 3 years. I have had a birds eye view of traffic at all times of the year and conditions. I have personally witnessed 3 accidents at that intersection, that probably weren't even reported to the authorities. Countless times I have seen a car pull into the third lane and the oncoming car honk or brake suddenly, not understanding the intentions of the car in the third lane. I have asked numerous times: "What happened to the third lane in the other towns?" It is obvious that it did't function well and was removed. As a business owner and resident, I am thrilled at the prospect of roundabouts to define the West Chatham business area and SLOW the traffic! If the cars are driving past my business at 40 plus mph, they can not see or read my sign, nor is it easy for them to slow and turn. The green-scaping of the plans is wonderful, although I would like to push for more hydrangeas. The addition of sidewalks on BOTH sides of the road is terrific and long overdue. We have several handicapped residents in motorized wheelchairs that have to ride ON ROUTE 28 to get to their destinations. I have personally pushed my son's stroller through crowded parking lots, dodging moving cars to get to the post office because there is no sidewalk. The curb cuts to business are so large you could practically drive a truck in sideways. Again I have seen many near accidents because 3 cars could enter them at a time.

There is a loud minority of citizens who are not even residents or business owners in West Chatham, who would like to make everyone believe that the vast majority of West Chatham residents and business are against this plan. This is not true. I apologize for not attending but I am working in my business in West Chatham. I totally and whole heartily support this West Chatham roadway plan and am eagerly looking forward to the changes. Please feel free to contact me. Sincerely,

Susan Dimm Williams Barnhill Pottery 46 Barnhill Road West Chatham, MA 02669 508-945-1027 Page 1 Comment 17 - S. Williams [4-20-17].pdf

West Chatham Roadway Plan - Susan Dimm Williams.txt

Page 2 Comment 18 - P. Dooley [4-20-17].pdf

West Chatham Roundabout - Paul Dooley, Kimco.txt From: Marcia Burns Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 5:38 PM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: Re: West Chatham Roundabout Hi Lisa: Here is an email from Paul Dooley, KimcoRealty. Please have it placed into today’s discussion. Thanks for being so helpful in these matters. Dr Burns On Mar 20, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Dooley, Paul wrote:

Dr. Burns:

Mr. Tuxbury has informed me that a hearing is taking place this afternoon at the Cape Cod Commission regarding the above referenced project.

As the owner of the Main Street Plaza, located at the corner of Main Street and George Ryder Road in Chatham, we remain opposed to the construction of this roundabout.

We have made our opposition known by written statement, and testimony at hearings held in the Chatham Town Hall.

We remain opposed to the project, as does our tenant, Ocean State Job lots.

Please feel free to forward this email to the Commission.

Thank you very much.

Paul

Paul C. Dooley Vice President ______

This email and any attached files may contain content that is considered proprietary and/or confidential. All email content and files are intended solely and strictly for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient you should not read, copy, or forward this email. Please notify the sender immediately by a reply email if you are not the intended recipient and delete the email. Subject to the Page 1 Comment 18 - P. Dooley [4-20-17].pdf

West Chatham Roundabout - Paul Dooley, Kimco.txt foregoing, if you are not the intended recipient, all disclosure, distribution, and reproduction, or taking any other action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Unless it is expressly stated in this communication, nothing herein is intended to constitute a binding offer or agreement of any kind. Warning: Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses or malware content are present in this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attached files.

Page 2 Comment 19 - R. Leavitt 1 [4-21-17].pdf

MPO meeting email from R Leavitt with Binding VS NonBinding.txt From: ELLA KENNEY Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 1:27 PM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: MPO meeting Attachments: Binding vs Non-binding and Presumptions (3).pdf Lisa: Please add the attached comments to my letter to MPO. Thanks. Rick Leavitt, Chairman West Chatham Village and Business Association

Page 1 Comment 19 - R. Leavitt 1 [4-21-17].pdf

Binding vs Non-binding At the Special Town Meeting of May 13, 2013, after the vote was announced, Moderator Bill Litchfield described the Article 3 vote as a directive and not binding after discussions with town counsel, Talerman, and Mr. Meservey, the Article 3 petitioner. See the STM video http://ec4.cc/sc432ea9 at 03:24:00 to 03:24:20. The CRC Minutes of July 29, 2013 describe Bill Litchfield’s remarks to the Committee as follows:

“In commenting on recent special town meeting issues concerning the harbor master and Route 28 traffic revisions in West Chatham, he [Litchfield] explained why each town vote was either non-binding or advisory in nature. Most articles on a warrant are binding. Resolutions, directives and other certain wordings are not binding. Petition articles can be binding---it depends on the language.

Regarding binding, he also said you cannot bind an elected official---the only recourse is to vote them out. He added he had offered to help Mr. Meservey with language on the Route 28 petition and would offer the same to any other petitioner.” Emphasis added.

But the most significant evidence in my view is the following explanation of Seth Taylor why Article 3 was not binding on the Board of Selectmen:

At the September 4, 2013 CRC meeting, Seth Taylor himself explained in detail why the non-binding language of Dan Meservey’s petition Article 3 regarding terminating funding of the West Chatham design consultant was not changed to binding language prior to town meeting. See http://ec4.cc/sc34a3f3 at 56:00 to 58:12.

Presumption

Section 2-8 of the Chatham Charter provides:

“The exercise of the legislative power by a vote of town meeting shall be presumed to be binding and shall be implemented by a designated town agency or department in conformance with the law or such vote.” Emphasis added.

The Charter does not state that “a vote of town meeting shall be binding,” but that it is only “presumed to be binding.”

Comment 19 - R. Leavitt 1 [4-21-17].pdf

Several speakers at the April 18, 2017 BOS meeting cited the language of Section 2-8, and suggested that every vote of town meeting is binding (including the Article 3 vote), completely ignoring what effect the word “presumed” might have on the vote.

What is a “presumption” or what does the word “presumed” mean?

A presumption is a rule of law, statutory or judicial, by which finding of a basic fact gives rise to existence of presumed fact, until presumption is rebutted. A legal device which operates in the absence of other proof to require that certain inferences be drawn from the available evidence. Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1185.

A simple example is the “presumption of innocence” enjoyed by every criminal defendant, but that can be overcome or rebutted by evidence.

In the case of Charter Section 2-8, the word “presumed” in that section means that while every town meeting vote should be taken initially as binding, evidence can show that the vote is not binding. In the case of the Article 3 vote at the May 13, 2013 STM, the evidence that overcame or rebutted the binding presumption of the vote was (1) the language of the Article itself which was a directive to an elected body, (2) the legal opinions of Town Counsel and the Town Moderator and (3) the admissions of the petitioner and his decision not to amend the language of the article.

If a town meeting vote is always binding as Taylor and others claim, the word “presumed” in Section 2-8 is superfluous. Even if the Article 3 petitioner intended the language of the article to be binding, that is irrelevant.

Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comments 20-169 Various [4-20-17].pdf Comment 170 - E. Gibbs [4-26-17].pdf

To: David J. Mohler - Executive Director of Transportation Planning-MassDot Thomas J. Tinlin - Highway Administrator- MassDot From: Elaine B. Gibbs- Chatham Re: West Chatham Roadway Project #606596 Public Comment Period Date: April 26, 2017 I suspect this is one of the most controversial project that has ever come before you, reason alone to reject it.

Proponents

You saw at the March MPO meeting - the room suddenly crowded with Selectmen, former Selectmen, spouses of Selectmen and former Selectmen, town employees, letters from/attendance of the largest developers in town (and their surrogates) who own property in the affected area, and those whose property values will dramatically increase as a result of this project.

The Chatham Town Manager was told by MassDot to bring her supporters to that MPO meeting. Opponents, who also happen to be taxpayers with a vested interest in our town, were not extended that same courtesy, but that has been standard operating procedure from the beginning. Business owners, construction workers and many fisherman who rely on this district and are opposed to this project can’t be here because they are working. The purported wide spread support for this project was able to fit in the room.

This is a BOS/developer driven project, using millions of federal taxpayer dollars to ultimately convert West Chatham’s critical commercial district into a multi-family dwelling enclave, transforming it into a narrow, roundabout gated, tree lined street with designer lighting, bike paths to nowhere, and no businesses- under the guise and argument of accidents and speed that don’t exist.

To illustrate what’s ahead, Eastward Companies, the largest residential developer in town, purchased 1610 Main in February of 2016, a 150 year old home with historical significance, that was under the jurisdiction of the HBDC. Somehow on a Friday afternoon 3 months later, the house was condemned by a town official and early the next day, Saturday morning, bulldozers demolished it, to the horror of many, without HDBC or the Historic Commission approval or knowledge. Pesky procedures are apparently actually optional.

Mr. Marsh (Eastward Companies) wrote the MPO (3-16-17) confirming his support of the WC project and his ownership of over an acre of a now vacant lot that he plans “to develop”. It will likely be multifamily housing. This is the future of this critical and historically significant commercial district of Chatham if this plan is approved.

It has been a massive team effort, by developers and local government, to eliminate the last vestige of Chatham’s working class, opposed by virtually everyone else in town, who are offended by the current aesthetic they have deemed unbefitting of Chatham. The elitism is breathtaking and insulting. We are not Newport and have no desire to be.

This project will be incredibly lucrative and a major windfall for some, but a terrible, irreversible loss for the rest of Chatham. To add insult to injury, they expect all of us to pay for this massive venture-Taxpayer funds used for personal gain of a few.

Town Meeting Vote to Defund Project Passes (5-13-13)

Contrary to what town officials assert, only after the 2013 Town Meeting vote to stop funding of this project passed, at the direction of the Town Manager, was it announced that it was “non- binding”, in an attempt to negate the vote and in direct violation of our Town Charter. The Warrant Article discussion on video

1 Comment 170 - E. Gibbs [4-26-17].pdf

began at 2hr:21m, the vote passage was announced at 3hr:23m and at 3hr:24m voters were told it was ”non-binding”. Wrong order. Town Meeting votes are NOT discretionary.

Town Charter (Sec 2-8) approved by the AG clearly states: “The exercise of the legislative power by a vote of town meeting shall be presumed to be binding and shall be implemented”. It’s immaterial what public officials discussed behind closed doors - only what the voters heard at the time of the vote. The video is there for all to see.

Public officials are required to enforce Town law, not attempt to circumvent it or the will of the people, which is happening to this day. The BOS are responsible to all residents, taxpayers and business owners - not just those who will personally benefit locally from increased property values and development. This Town Meeting vote to defund should have been reported to the MPO in 2013 and the project halted.

At the 4-24-17 MPO meeting, an unsigned official-looking document was distributed to MPO members titled “Binding vs. Non-Binding”. It was in fact written by Mr. Leavitt, extremely misleading, but that was not announced to members or the public. His interpretation is self serving, and absolutely no weight should be placed on this non-legal “interpretation.”

Board of Selectman Vote to proceed with Project failed, 2-2. (4-18-17)

On 4-18-17 the Board of Selectmen’s vote to continue support of this project failed 2-2. This failed BOS vote should carry significant weight since the BOS was the original proponent and the current position of the BOS was requested by Mr. Tinlin. Historically, in Chatham, a tie vote fails.

Because of that Selectmen vote, no town official including the town manager, employees and current Selectmen should be advocating for this project, which would be in direct violation of the Selectmen’s vote. Public officials in the past have been reprimanded by the very officials supporting this project today for taking public positions in conflict with a Board vote.

For those challenging this vote, Chairman Dykens’ private residence, which he has owned since 1994, abuts the project, and his wife is a project area business owner. Under State Ethics law, as an abutter he is “presumed to have a financial interest”, precluding him from participating in any discussions or vote. He finally recused himself on 4-18-17 because of his wife’s business, but had not disclosed his private residence on his “Disclosure of Appearance of Conflict”. Under the law, as an abutter with a “presumed financial interest” he was required to recuse himself as soon as he became a public official and member of the board, but did not.

Incomplete Testing of Proposed Plan

FACT:In 2011, when the BOS gave HSH a directive to remove the turning lane and put in roundabouts, the process began of trying to shove a square peg into a round hole. Not one concession has been made to business owners or the public at large since. Every study done or not done since has been to advance that directive. The design process was flawed from the very beginning.

FACT:The entire premise of this project is false. There is no empirical data at the state or local level to support the safety claim. Anecdotal stories of “near misses” and “unreported accidents” are not data. But it has become a rallying cry to justify the massive scope and expense of this project, ignoring 90% of the business owners directly affected, 2186 signatures opposed, and a binding Town Meeting vote to defund this project.

FACT:We have a congestion problem with population going from 3000 to 35,000 in our peak season, and it’s getting worse every year. 2016 was the worst yet. There is no other town on the Cape that has such a massive swing in population, already causing traffic jams. Adding “calming” features of roundabouts, turning lane removal, and narrowing of traffic lanes will exponentially exacerbate the congestion.

FACT: MassDot is responsible for the entire Rt 28 corridor, not just the project area.

2 Comment 170 - E. Gibbs [4-26-17].pdf

FACT: Mass Dot guidelines require that no project be approved that negatively impacts other portions of Rt 28.

FACT:Mass Dot guidelines require peak traffic be measured and then be built to 10% of peak, and no plan should be approved that has a negative impact on other areas of Rt 28.

Inadequate Traffic Studies and Testing

I take exception to Mr. San Clemente’s (HSH) characterization at the March MPO meeting of traffic testing actually done. He sent me the raw data 2 years ago.

The argument that this project has been debated for over 10 years and it’s time, is a red herring. What we still don’t know is astounding.

(1)Not one day between June 24 and August 21-our peak season- were measured. Only the week of June 16 2013- 10 days prior to July 4 when there is a massive influx of tourists; and August 22 after most had left because school started Aug.27 in 2013 in most towns.

How can you build to peak, when peak was never measured?

(2) No studies of potential traffic back up on Rt. 28because of the roundabouts- with the only egresses 1/2 mile east (Old Queen Anne) and 1 mile west (RT 137) - or the environmental impact of cars idling in traffic.

(3) No studies on alternate route traffic back-up that will occur on Old Queen Anne/ Crowell and Old Harbor Rd -all 3 intersecting RT 28, when cars are redirected by GPS.

(4) No impact studies of curb cuts being removed for aesthetics and pedestrian traffic, with no regard for what it will do to business customers and deliveries. Using cones for testing was never done.

(5) No temporary blocking off of the turning lane to test the impact on business and accidents.

(6) Not one mention, let alone studies, of the impact on local traffic of future multifamily development, or increased public safety issues or on water or sewer capacity as a result of that development.

(7) For over a year no one has contacted the Meservey brothers or their trucking company, regarding longstanding concerns with the roundabout placements for oversized trucks, despite repeated requests. I trust the Meservey brothers real life experience of 50 years over Mr. San Clemente’s from HSH, yet their professional input has been repeatedly ignored by HSH and MassDOT.

(8) We still don’t know what it will cost Chatham taxpayers and property owners to maintain this corridor.

(9) We were told for years the construction schedule would be 2-3 seasons. In March 2017 we were told it was up to 5 construction seasons. We’re now being told it will be 2 full years of construction assuming winter work is possible and there are no unexpected delays. The CTD is not yet final and we are just weeks away from a final vote whether or not to proceed. Guaranteed businesses will fail before construction is finished. If that is the ultimate objective, to make way for residential development, it will be a resounding success.

With the new construction schedule, it is more than likely this project will overlap with the Crowell Rd project and sewer work on 137. We can not function as a year round community, or businesses survive, with 3 major access roads consecutively or concurrently under construction. This is terrible town planning. This new timetable alone should stop this project. It will kill business and tourism in this area. Business won’t survive the construction- or the final design.

3 Comment 170 - E. Gibbs [4-26-17].pdf

(10)Taking land by eminent domain at significant taxpayer expense from businesses that will be hurt by it, for a beautification project they don’t want and will have to maintain, when there are no safety issues, is unnecessary, expensive government overreach, heavy handed, and wrong.

Liability

Who do we go to for remedy when businesses close because trucks can’t make deliveries, commercial vehicles can’t make turns, if a person dies in an ambulance stuck in traffic, a firetruck can’t get through, a cyclist is hit when a visitor uses the bike lane to go around a car waiting to turn, or doesn’t see a pedestrian in the crosswalk because of a stopped vehicle blocking their view, when traffic is dead stopped for a 1/2 mile entering roundabouts, when a high speed cyclist finds the bike lane abruptly ends, when the accidents go up? I predict there are a boatload of lawsuits just waiting to happen because all of these design flaws have been brought to the attention of officials, ad nauseam, and ignored.

The final product will be held up as a design of what not to do anywhere else- 2 single lane roundabouts within 900 feet of each other on a major artery, which we will own for the next 30 years. What could possibly go wrong?

Cost

Spending potentially $7-8 million of taxpayer money after design and land taking, on aesthetics, gentrification and development of West Chatham, dramatically increasing property values and development opportunities of a few, putting hard working people out of work with massive disruption, loss of a crucial business district, and safety at risk for the rest of Chatham- full time residents, taxpayers and tourists, simply can not be justified.

I urge you to vote against this project.

I believe the job of the MPO, a thankless task, is to make ruthlessly objective decisions, weighing both the financial cost-almost half your annual allocation- and the personal cost/benefit to the community. If you do that, cutting out all the noise and evaluating only the facts, I don’t see how this project can be justified and move forward. At the March MPO meeting Mr. Mohler confirmed that if this project were to be rejected, there would be plenty of places to use the money. It would not be lost. Throwing good money after bad should not be an argument to move forward.

The lack of complete impact studies, Town Meeting vote to stop funding, 90% of affected business owners whose very livelihoods are at risk and the loss of a critical commercial area, 2186 petitioners opposed, the failed BOS vote on 4-18-17 to continue this project, the most recent extended construction schedule still not finalized, the potential legal implications of the design moving forward, the 100% plan still not finalized, and the massive taxpayer cost for what is nothing more than a beautification and gentrification project, are each reasons enough to stop this project.

The negative implications for Chatham at large are huge and have been dismissed and ignored. It is a terrible and capricious waste of much needed funding that could be better utilized in other areas in Chatham, or elsewhere that are actually dangerous.

Elaine Gibbs

152 Cross Street Chatham Ma 02633

4 Comment 171 - M. Ells [4-28-17].pdf Comment 172 - M. McCauley [4-28-17].pdf

FW West Chatham Road project is NOT a good idea.txt From: Sherman, Gabriel (DOT) Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 9:15 AM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: FW: West Chatham Road project is NOT a good idea Good morning Glenn, This comment was sent directly to Steve. Please make sure it is included with the rest of the comments received for the next MPO meeting. Have a nice weekend, Gabe Gabriel Sherman MassDOT Office of Transportation Planning | Research Section | Capital Planning Group MPO Liaison | Freight Plan Coordinator | Research Project Coordinator 10 Park Plaza Suite 4150 Boston, MA 02116 | phone 857.368.8866 | email [email protected]

From: Woelfel, Steve (DOT) Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 8:37 AM To: Sherman, Gabriel (DOT) Subject: Fwd: West Chatham Road project is NOT a good idea

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message: From: mary mccauley Date: April 28, 2017 at 8:27:19 AM EDT To: "Woelfel, Steve (DOT)" Subject: Re: West Chatham Road project is NOT a good idea Thank you for acknowledging this. Part of this plan also wants bikers on route 28. We have a beautiful bike path where everyone is safe. If you put a bike path on 28 you will encourage families with small children to use it. My husband and I ride all summer however he was hit by a car on the road … this feature starts and ends quickly which leaves bikers on route 28 vulnerable to accidents. On another note, they have a summer resident committee however, they are appointed by the selectman. They all showed up at a meeting in their blue blazers and were commenting on how great they all looked together. They meet on Saturdays at the Chatham Bars Inn in the summer. No other summer residents are invited. At one of the meetings on this project a member of the summer residents committee got up and said they supported the selectman ….. I then stood up and stated they never contacted anyone other than themselves to come to this decision. I am not sure how they can be the voice when it is a committee of 6-8 and they do not keep the 50,000 summer residents up to date on anything via e mail, or regular mail. There is something very wrong here and I have been told it is not so much the new selectman pushing this but some of the ones that have actually left… In the last few weeks we have learned who it is who is pushing changes to Route 28 in West Chatham. It is former selectmen, a few current selectmen, and the development community. The big developers have been attending Metropolitan Planning Organization meetings at the Cape Cod Commission, and writing letters strongly supporting roadway changes – loss of turning lane, two roundabouts 900 feet apart, and the taking of land to construct this unneeded and unwanted Page 1 Comment 172 - M. McCauley [4-28-17].pdf

FW West Chatham Road project is NOT a good idea.txt project – which will drastically harm our West Chatham businesses. Several of them spoke at the recent BOS discussion and vote. Members of the development community are Ron Rudnick, David Oppenheim, Bill Marsh, and those who serve for them: David Whitcomb, Eric Whiteley, George Myers, and Rick Leavitt. Why are they doing this? We believe to ruin local businesses, buy land cheap, and put in condos, apartments, and multi-family housing These are the benefactors not the town. [email protected] 203-984-0184 Cell 203-621-3121 Fax

On Apr 28, 2017, at 8:10 AM, Woelfel, Steve (DOT) wrote: Ms. McCauley:

Thank you for your comments. I will make sure all MPO members see them as well.

Thanks,

Steve Woelfel

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 28, 2017, at 7:18 AM, mary mccauley wrote: HI Mr. Woelfel, I have been a resident of West Chatham for the last 19 years. I love it just the way it is. Chatham has been spending money on new many things like a new Police Department , Fire Department and now a rotary and road project that is being pushed forward to enhance the “ Chatham Brand” on Cape Cod. As a summer resident we are not allowed to vote on what happens there, ( taxation without representation). There was a vote held by the town of Chatham on this project a few years ago. I attended one of the meetings on this when Selectman Tim Roper stated and I quote “ The misinformed majority has voted not to proceed with this project however we are going to continue on with it". So someone is getting something if the selectman are not actually moving in a direction of the voters will. This was filmed I am not making it up….. This is wrong on many level. Their studies are not done in the summer when it is peak traffic. I live in a place where is would be impossible make a left hadn’t turn on Page 2 Comment 172 - M. McCauley [4-28-17].pdf

FW West Chatham Road project is NOT a good idea.txt to my street without the turn lane on route 28. Most all of the businesses are opposed to it. One of the members of the firm working on this stated at a meeting that he had spoken to the owner of the Hess gas station and he did not have any issues. Mr Meservy,who owns the Hess gas station, then stood up and said no one had been in touch with him ever and he was opposed to this. The large gasoline trucks that deliver to his gas station will not be able to go around a rotary at all. All in all this is not something we need or want they just want Chatham to have a new cute look. If there is so much money around I would rather fix the opioid problem on the cape which is a real issue rather than spend all this money on something that works quite well the way it is. Thank you for your consideration on this matter A tax payer who has no say….. mary mccauley [email protected] 203-984-0184 Cell 203-621-3121 Fax

Page 3 Comment 173 - M. McCauley [4-28-17].pdf

RE West Chatham Road project we don't want it...... txt From: Glenn Cannon Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 11:28 AM To: Mary Subject: RE: West Chatham Road project we don't want it..... Thank You Mary, I will include your comments in the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization packet for their review. Glenn Glenn Cannon Director of Technical Services 3225 Main Street, P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 (508) 362 - 3828 From: Mary [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:53 AM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: Re: West Chatham Road project we don't want it.....

Yes and the most important thing is there was a vote held by the town on this and it was voted down by a majority yet they are still moving forward.... Someone is winning big on the deal and it is not the town. Thanks

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 28, 2017, at 9:21 AM, Glenn Cannon wrote: Hi Mary,

Do you want me to pass this email to the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization also?

Glenn

Glenn Cannon Director of Technical Services 3225 Main Street, P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 (508) 362 - 3828

From: mary mccauley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 9:07 AM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: Re: West Chatham Road project we don't want it.....

Thank you for acknowledging my response . Part of this plan also wants bikers on route 28. We have a beautiful bike path where everyone is safe. If you put a bike path on 28 you will encourage families with small children to use it. My husband and I ride all summer however he was hit by a car on the road … this feature starts and ends quickly which leaves bikers on route 28 vulnerable to accidents. On another note, they have a summer resident committee however, they are appointed by the selectman. They all showed up at a meeting in their blue blazers and were commenting on how great they all looked together. They meet on Saturdays at the Chatham Bars Inn in the summer. No other summer residents are invited. At one of the meetings on this project a member of the summer residents committee got up and said they supported the selectman ….. I then stood up and stated they never contacted anyone other than themselves to come to this Page 1 Comment 173 - M. McCauley [4-28-17].pdf

RE West Chatham Road project we don't want it...... txt decision. I am not sure how they can be the voice when it is a committee of 6-8 and they do not keep the 50,000 summer residents up to date on anything via e mail, or regular mail. There is something very wrong here and I have been told it is not so much the new selectman pushing this but some of the ones that have actually left…

In the last few weeks we have learned who it is who is pushing changes to Route 28 in West Chatham. It is former selectmen, a few current selectmen, and the development community. The big developers have been attending Metropolitan Planning Organization meetings at the Cape Cod Commission, and writing letters strongly supporting roadway changes – loss of turning lane, two roundabouts 900 feet apart, and the taking of land to construct this unneeded and unwanted project – which will drastically harm our West Chatham businesses. Several of them spoke at the recent BOS discussion and vote. Members of the development community are Ron Rudnick, David Oppenheim, Bill Marsh, and those who serve for them: David Whitcomb, Eric Whiteley, George Myers, and Rick Leavitt. Why are they doing this? We believe to ruin local businesses, buy land cheap, and put in condos, apartments, and multi-family housing These are the benefactors not the town. mary mccauley [email protected] 203-984-0184 Cell 203-621-3121 Fax

On Apr 28, 2017, at 8:40 AM, Glenn Cannon wrote:

Hello Ms. McCauley,

Thank you for your comment. I will pass your comment onto the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization for their meeting on May 22, 2017.

Glenn

Glenn Cannon Director of Technical Services 3225 Main Street, P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 (508) 362 - 3828

From: mary mccauley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 7:23 AM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: West Chatham Road project we don't want it.....

Hi Mr. Cannon, I have been a resident of West Chatham for the last 19 years. I love it just the way it is. Chatham has been spending money on new many things like a new Police Department , Fire Department and now a rotary and road project that is being pushed forward to enhance the “ Chatham Brand” on Cape Cod. As a summer resident we are not allowed to vote on what happens there, ( taxation without Page 2 Comment 173 - M. McCauley [4-28-17].pdf

RE West Chatham Road project we don't want it...... txt representation). There was a vote held by the town of Chatham on this project a few years ago. I attended one of the meetings on this when Selectman Tim Roper stated and I quote “ The misinformed majority has voted not to proceed with this project however we are going to continue on with it". So someone is getting something out of this deal if the selectman are not actually moving in a direction that the majority of the town voted on. This was filmed I am not making it up….. This is wrong on many level. Their studies are not done in the summer when it is peak traffic. I live in a place where is would be impossible make a left hadn’t turn on to my street without the turn lane on route 28. Most all of the businesses are opposed to it. One of the members of the firm working on to develop this project stated at a meeting that he had spoken to the owner of the Hess gas station and he did not have any issues. Mr Meservy, who owns the Hess gas station,then stood up and said no one had been in touch with him ever and he was opposed to this. The large gasoline trucks that deliver to his gas station will not be able to go around a rotary at all. All in all this is not something we need or want they just want Chatham to have a new cute look and possible someone is making out on the deal…. If there is so much money around I would rather fix the opioid problem on the Cape which is a real issue rather than spend all this money on something that works quite well the way it is. Thank you for your consideration on this matter A tax payer who has no say….. mary mccauley [email protected] 203-984-0184 Cell 203-621-3121 Fax

Page 3 Comment 174 - M. McCauley [4-28-17].pdf

FW West Chatham Mass project.txt From: Mohler, David (DOT) Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 11:45 AM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: FW: West Chatham Mass project For your records. -----Original Message----- From: mary mccauley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 1:31 PM To: Mohler, David (DOT) Subject: West Chatham Mass project HI Mr. Mohler, I have been a resident of West Chatham for the last 19 years. I love it just the way it is. Chatham has been spending money on new many things like a new Police Department , Fire Department and now a rotary and road project that is being pushed forward to enhance the “ Chatham Brand” on Cape Cod. As a summer resident we are not allowed to vote on what happens there, ( taxation without representation). There was a vote held by the town of Chatham on this project a few years ago. I attended one of the meetings on this when Selectman Tim Roper stated and I quote “ The misinformed majority has voted not to proceed with this project however we are going to continue on with it". So someone is getting something if the selectman are not actually moving in a direction of the voters will. This was filmed I am not making it up….. This is wrong on many level. Their studies are not done in the summer when it is peak traffic. I live in a place where is would be impossible make a left hadn’t turn on to my street without the turn lane on route 28. Most all of the businesses are opposed to it. One of the members of the firm working on this stated at a meeting that he had spoken to the owner of the Hess gas station and he did not have any issues. My Meservy then stood up and said no one had been in touch with him ever and he was opposed to this. The large gasoline trucks that deliver to his station will not be able to go around a rotary at all. All in all this is not something we need or want they just want Chatham to have a new cute look. If there is so much money around I would rather fix the opioid problem on the cape which is a real issue rather than spend all this money on something that works quite well the way it is. Thank you for your consideration on this matter A tax payer who has no say….. mary mccauley [email protected] 203-984-0184 Cell 203-621-3121 Fax

Page 1 Comment 175 - J. Kelly [4-28-17].pdf

RE Public Comment on West Chatham Roadway Project #606596.txt From: Glenn Cannon Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 11:32 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Sherman, Gabriel (DOT) Subject: RE: Public Comment on West Chatham Roadway Project #606596 Hello Ms. Kelley,

Thank you for your comment. I will pass your comment onto the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization for their meeting on May 22, 2017.

Glenn

Glenn Cannon Director of Technical Services 3225 Main Street, P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 (508) 362 - 3828

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:59 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Glenn Cannon Subject: Public Comment on West Chatham Roadway Project #606596

Dear Sir:

I am writing to express my opposition to this project. Chatham Town Meeting turned down the project in May 2013. More recently, the Board of Selectmen did not support this project. (April 18. 2017) The loss of the turning lane would completely destroy the West Chatham businesses. I am sure you are aware of the petitions signed by as many as 2,186 people who oppose this project with two roundabouts 1,000 feet apart, no turning lane, and land takings. This road is much safer now than it will be if this project goes forth, especially in the summer months with people trying to get to Harding’s Beach for swimming or Barn Hill landing with their boats. The Mass Department of Transportation, who are proposing the project, admit that the roundabout at Barnhill does not include a design inclusive of the traffic in the months of July and August. With everyone having such a short fuse these days, It will be a disaster! I do not see any benefit in going forward with this project. A few vocal people with time and/or money are in favor of it. One wonders why. Sincerely, Judith B. Kelley West Chatham Sent from Mail for Windows 10

Page 1 Comment 176 - D. Burns [4-29-17].pdf

Fwd Project # 606596 Timeline.txt From: Woelfel, Steve (DOT) Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 2:35 PM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: Fwd: Project # 606596 Timeline

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message: From: David Burns Date: April 29, 2017 at 10:58:02 AM EDT To: "Woelfel, Steve (DOT)" Subject: Project # 606596 Timeline West Chatham Association, Inc. Post Office Box 291 West Chatham, MA 02669 April 29, 2017

Thomas J. Tinlin, Highway Administrator, MassDOT David Mohler, Executive Director, Office of Transportation Planning and MPO Chairman Steve Woelfel, Director of Strategic Planning, Office of Transportation Planning

Re: West Chatham Roadway Project #606596

Dear Mr. Tinlin, Mr. Mohler, and Mr. Woelfel:

I hope you understand the concern that citizens and business owners in West Chatham are experiencing as a result of the latest West Chatham Roadway Project timeline. At least one tenant of Shop Ahoy has given notice that they will not renew their lease. The first casualty. We had been promised the timeline would be available at the MPO meeting held on April 24, 2017. Our Town Manager stated at the April 18th meeting of the Board of Selectmen that the detailed timeline would be available at that time. Ms. Pam Haznar made the same announcement at the MPO’s meeting on March 20, 2017. Ms. Haznar, who said that she was representing Mr. Tinlin, was vague at April

24th’s MPO meeting. She said she had forgotten to bring the draft timeline and hesitated to be more specific than that the construction would take 24 months beginning in the spring of 2019. Some of those of us in attendance understood that the 24 months did not include the two summers when there would be no construction; others believe that in addition to 24 months, final paving and planting cannot occur before Spring, 2022. Chatham Selectman Dean Nicastro attempted to clarify what Ms. Haznar stated, but, again, Ms. Haznar would not be specific. Mr. Woelfel was there and at the end of the meeting said in essence that MassDOT cannot guarantee any schedule. Things happen and can always go over schedule. Understanding that “things happen” and understanding that the only schedule that has been released to Ms. Haznar is a draft, we would greatly appreciate having the draft timeline in writing so that there is no misunderstanding and misinformation about the current proposed construction plans. Chatham citizen Elaine Gibbs wrote to Ms. Haznar the day after the meeting, as well as several times thereafter. Ms. Haznar refuses to provide anything in writing and stated that when she releases the schedule it will be only to the Town Manager. If MassDOT’s statewide strategic plan includes civic engagement and excellent customer service, then how is it possible that we are being refused information that is of great importance? The MPO meets again on May 22 and it is our understanding that members will vote on the 2018-2021 TIP Development plan. We believe that the construction plan is purposely being withheld until the day of that meeting or thereafter. We Page 1 Comment 176 - D. Burns [4-29-17].pdf

Fwd Project # 606596 Timeline.txt believe such action is unfair and urge you to release the draft of the schedule as soon as possible. Respectfully, David E. Burns, M.D. President, West Chatham Association, Inc.

Page 2 Comment 177 - S. Joyce [4-30-17].pdf

Fwd Comment on West Chatham Roadway Project # 606596.txt From: Woelfel, Steve (DOT) Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 3:45 PM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: Fwd: Comment on West Chatham Roadway Project # 606596

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message: From: Sadie Joyce Date: April 30, 2017 at 12:55:07 PM EDT To: "Mohler, David (DOT)" , "Tinlin, Thomas (DOT)" , "Woelfel, Steve (DOT)" Subject: RE: Comment on West Chatham Roadway Project # 606596 Gentlemen, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the rotary project that is being considered for West Chatham. I have been a resident of West Chatham for over thirty years. My neighbors and I are concerned about the negative impact this project will have on the business community and the quality of life we have enjoyed and continue to cherish. The current turning lane and road conditions are safe and allow for pedestrian travel and easy access to the businesses and residential streets. The proposal will generate confusion and traffic back ups.

I am also concerned about the whole process and procedure that has advanced this project. Initially, this project was supported by five selectmen and members of a development group seeking to make a profitable investment. On April 18, 2017, the Chatham Board of Selectmen voted to no longer support this project. This vote reflects the will and interests of the citizens of Chatham who turned down the project in May of 2013 at a Town Meeting. Additionally, over 2 thousand people have signed a petition opposing the loss of a turning lane and construction of two rotaries as a replacement.

In conclusion, I ask that you deny the necessary permits that would allow this project to go forward. Keep West Chatham safe and rotary free!

Very truly yours,

Mrs. Sadie G. Joyce

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

Page 1 Comment 178 - T. Zombas [5-1-17].pdf

Fwd Project # 606596.txt From: ANTHONY ZOMBAS Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 8:32 AM To: Glenn Cannon; [email protected] Subject: Fwd: Project # 606596

------Original Message ------From: ANTHONY ZOMBAS To: [email protected], [email protected] Date: April 29, 2017 at 7:49 PM Subject: Project # 606596 Public comment on West Chatham ,Roadway Project # 606596 I Anthony Zombas property owner of Shop Ahoy Plaza and Mom and Pops take out restaurant next door at 1603 Main Street strongly oppose this project and the impact it will have on their livelihoods and businesses. We feel loss of turning lane, two roundabouts 900 feet apart, and the taking of land to construct this unneeded and unwanted project which will drastically harm our West Chatham businesses. This so called Members of the Development Community are individuals which are pushing for this project, are there to ruin local business, buy land cheap, and put in condos, apartments and multi family housing. I'm writing this letter to oppose the project and protect the businesses there.

Here are other facts you can reference:

The project was started by five Selectmen in collaboration with several members of the development community ten years ago. ·By lawful vote on April 18, 2017, the Chatham Board of Selectmen voted to no longer support this project. ·This project was turned down by Town Meeting in May 2013.The Board of Selectmen ignored the will of the people.Not one of them is currently on the Board. ·2,186 people signed a petition opposing the loss of the turning lane; and the businesses have submitted four petitions opposed to the turning lane, the roundabouts, and land takings. ·A proposed “Complete Street” that extends for less than 1000 feet is a joke, but an expensive joke. ·While the road is safe now, there will be many accidents in the future. Thank you for taking the time to read my letter, Tony Zombas Tel. 508-737-7716 [email protected]

Tony Zombas Tel. 508-737-7716 [email protected]

Tony Zombas Tel. 508-737-7716 [email protected] Page 1 Comment 179 - D. Noris [5-2-17].pdf

Fwd West Chatham project.txt From: Mohler, David (DOT) Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 9:46 AM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: Fwd: West Chatham project

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message: From: "[email protected]" Date: May 2, 2017 at 9:39:51 AM EDT To: "Mohler, David (DOT)" Subject: West Chatham project Please do not go forward with the change proposed for West Chatham It was voted down by the residents It has been opposed by the majority of West Chatham businesses that would be harmed in both the short term as well as the long term The money would be better allocated to restoring necessary infrastructure Thank You David Norris Shop Ahoy Liquors

Page 1 Comment 180 - D. Noris [5-2-17].pdf

FW West Chatham project.txt From: Woelfel, Steve (DOT) Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 11:17 AM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: FW: West Chatham project

-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 9:46 AM To: Woelfel, Steve (DOT) Subject: West Chatham project Please do not go forward with the proposed changes to West Chatham It was voted down by the residents Most West Chatham business oppose the project The money would be better allocated restoring our infrastructure Thank You David Norris Shop Ahoy Liquors

Page 1 Comment 181 - D. Noris [5-3-17].pdf From: Glenn Cannon Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 11:24 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: West Chatham project

Thank you for your comment.

I will pass your comment onto the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization for consideration at their May 22, 2017 meeting.

Glenn

Glenn Cannon Director of Technical Services 3225 Main Street, P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 (508) 362 - 3828

-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 9:50 AM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: West Chatham project

Please do not go forward with the proposed changes to West Chatham The residents voted against the project Most West Chatham businesses do not want the project The money would be better allocated to restoring infrastructure Thank You David Norris Shop Ahoy Liquors

RE West Chatham project.txt[5/11/17, 3:37:52 PM] Comment 182 - J. Patterson [5-3-17].pdf

FW West Chatham Roadway Project #606596.txt From: Woelfel, Steve (DOT) Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 2:39 PM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: FW: West Chatham Roadway Project #606596

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 2:16 PM To: Mohler, David (DOT); Tinlin, Thomas (DOT) Cc: Woelfel, Steve (DOT); gcannon Subject: West Chatham Roadway Project #606596 May 3, 2017

To Whom it May Concern:

My family has owned the land at 1652, 1624, 1620 and one other un-numbered lot in West Chatham for generations through hard work of my great grandfather and his family. There is a select group of folks in town along with developers that have decided to make this project their mission to drive out businesses and put in multi-family housing. I strongly urge against using Federal and State money for this.

As previously noted, there is absolutely no safety issue with this stretch of roadway and it was turned down by Town Meeting in 2013 and the selectman voted it down just a few weeks ago at their meeting of April 18th. This is an issue that has divided our Town to the point of no return.

My family is completely opposed to this project and the land taking. We should not be required to maintain the final result when we are opposed to it. It is wrong to take our land for a project that has no safety issues whatsoever. You are looking at a select group of very well connected people in this Town who have nothing better to do with their time (while the rest of us work) than press forward with this project to line their own pockets. When they don’t get their way they go to Sarah Peake and others in the State House to use their influence. This is just wrong on so many levels and that this has been allowed to go as far as it has. Even the Chairman of our Selectman has voted on this issue in the past which is a clear conflict of interest. These people have absolutely no shame. There are many other roadways that could use this funding. To close down our stretch of roadway for a minimum of two years of construction (and drive businesses out) is unconscionable. The people pushing this project forward are no longer on the Board of Selectman and the new Board has decided against it. I am begging you to please reconsider and direct these funds be used elsewhere Page 1 Comment 182 - J. Patterson [5-3-17].pdf

FW West Chatham Roadway Project #606596.txt Sincerely, Judy Patterson Representing the Harding Patterson Family Trust West Chatham 508-945-9141

Page 2 Comment 183 - B. & A. Comeau [5-4-17].pdf

RE PUBLIC COMMENT ON EST CHATHAM ROADWAY PROJECT #606596.txt From: Glenn Cannon Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2017 1:20 PM To: WILLIAM COMEAU Subject: RE: PUBLIC COMMENT ON EST CHATHAM ROADWAY PROJECT #606596 Hello Bill and Ann, Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be included in the Metropolitan Planning Organization packet for their consideration on May 22, 2017. Glenn Glenn Cannon Director of Technical Services 3225 Main Street, P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 (508) 362 - 3828

From: WILLIAM COMEAU [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2017 12:29 PM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: Fwd: PUBLIC COMMENT ON EST CHATHAM ROADWAY PROJECT #606596

------Original Message ------From: WILLIAM COMEAU To: [email protected] Date: May 4, 2017 at 12:26 PM Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT ON EST CHATHAM ROADWAY PROJECT #606596 Dear Mr.Tinlin:

I am writing in regard to this unlawful project.

This roadway was rejected by the people of the town several times. More than 2000 people signed FOUR petitions opposed to the turning lane, the roundabouts, and land takings.

The Board of Selectmen ignored the will of the people...... Not one is currently on the Board.

I could go on and on...... a road for only 1000 FEET! Please don't let this happen. Sincerely yours,

Bill and Ann Comeau

Page 1 Comment 184 - E. Gibbs [5-7-17].pdf

Fwd West Chatham Project #606596 (2).txt From: Woelfel, Steve (DOT) Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2017 1:49 AM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: Fwd: West Chatham Project #606596

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message: From: elaine gibbs Date: May 6, 2017 at 10:51:57 PM EDT To: "Haznar, Pamela (DOT)" Cc: "Currier, Thomas (DOT)" , "Jill Goldsmith ([email protected])" , "Woelfel, Steve (DOT)" , "Perry, Mary-Joe (DOT)" , "Tinlin, Thomas (DOT)" , "Mohler, David (DOT)" Subject: Re: West Chatham Project #606596 Dear Ms. Hazner, I'm disappointed that you did not reply to my last email and follow-up, simply requesting clarification of what you had said at the meeting on 4-24 with respect to the construction period. There are actually people whose very livelihoods depend on this schedule and it deserved a response.

Can you tell me when you think the final CTD will be completed? We are fast approaching May 22. I think it is quite unreasonable not to have the CTD finalized before the Public Comment period expires so people have an opportunity to review it in the event they wish to comment on it before any vote is taken.

Thank you in advance. Elaine Gibbs

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:44 AM, elaine gibbs wrote: Dear Ms. Haznar,

Just a reminder. I would appreciate a clarification of what you said on Monday regarding the anticipated construction period and summers impacted- recognizing that it is not final.

Thanks Elaine Gibbs On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:33 AM, elaine gibbs wrote: Dear Ms. Haznar. Thank you for your quick response. It's appreciated. I understand the policy of not releasing the CTD until it is final. My reason for asking is that there was a great deal of confusion about what was said yesterday. At the March meeting we were told it looked as if it was going to be 5 seasons of construction and 2 summers impacted. Yesterday 2 years of actual construction, 2 years total, and 24 months were all mentioned. In terms of impact on Chatham, they are different.

I recognize that it may change, but would appreciate it if you would re-state what you said yesterday in terms of actual construction and the total length of the project Page 1 Comment 184 - E. Gibbs [5-7-17].pdf

Fwd West Chatham Project #606596 (2).txt (including impacted summers). We had been told by the Town Manager that the final CTD would be available at yesterday's meeting. With a final vote on this project in a matter of weeks, this is critical information that I hope will be available well before that date. Many Thanks Elaine Gibbs

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Haznar, Pamela (DOT) wrote: Ms. Gibbs As I stated at yesterday’s MPO meeting, the preliminary CTD is under review and will be revised per comment. Upon revision the CTD will be delivered to the Town of Chatham. ______Pamela Haznar, P.E. District Five Project Development Engineer MassDOT – Highway Division 1000 County Street, Taunton, MA 02780 | 508-884-4239

From: elaine gibbs [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 8:36 PM To: Haznar, Pamela (DOT) Subject: West Chatham Project #606596

Dear Ms. Haznar,

I was at the MPO meeting today and am requesting the preliminary construction schedule of this project you indicated was at your office. You also indicated that it was going to be approximately 2 years- beginning in January 2019 and ending December 2020. with the summers of 2019/2020 impacted. I was the one who asked if you could send me what you have in your office.

Our Town Manager had previously assured us the final detailed schedule would be available today, which we communicated to business owners. I'm sure you can understand the need to nail this down as no vote should be taken to move forward without this crucial data. They are anxious to know, as their livelihoods and very business survival depends on it. I guess I don't understand why this schedule hasn't been available for some time. I don't know how you can determine the cost of a project without knowing how long its going to take.

If I understand correctly, the 2 years -beginning in January 2019, with completion in December 2020- would require working in the winter of (Jan2020) and also assumes no unexpected delays. If either or both of those were not to occur, this project could go well into 2021. Is that correct?

I am confused as to how it could be completed by December 2020 when the last items would be planting trees/plants/grass. We were told by our DPW director that once the project is complete, final surfacing is not recommended until after the infrastructure has gone through a winter. which- best case scenario- would bring is Page 2 Comment 184 - E. Gibbs [5-7-17].pdf

Fwd West Chatham Project #606596 (2).txt to the late spring 2021.

I'd appreciate it if you could forward to me the preliminary schedule you indicated you have. Business don't want a best case scenario. They need a realistic and worst case scenario based on prior projects as their survival depends on it. We are now within weeks of having the MPO making a decision. The length of time should be an absolute priority, well in advance, before any vote is taken.

Thank you for your assistance.I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Elaine Gibbs

Page 3 Comment 185 - D. Burns [5-8-17].pdf

Fwd Out of Frustration(s).txt From: Woelfel, Steve (DOT) Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 12:43 PM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: Fwd: Out of Frustration(s)

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message: From: David Burns Date: May 8, 2017 at 11:06:59 AM EDT To: "Tinlin, Thomas (DOT)" , "Kadich, Jared (DOT)" , "Mohler, David (DOT)" , "Woelfel, Steve (DOT)" Subject: Out of Frustration(s) Thomas J. Tinlin, Acting Highway Administrator MassDOT Ten Park Plaza, Suite 4160 Boston, MA 02116

Dear Mr Tinlin, Mr. Mohler, Mr Woelfel:

I was searching MassDOT’s website last night in an effort to find the timeline for the West Chatham Roadway Project since none of you has replied to my request for the schedule or to those of other Chatham citizens who have made the same request. I came across your Mission and Values statement. I want to bring to your attention a few phrases and sentences found therein. Under VALUES: Honesty – We will provide the public accurate information that is understandable and accessible. Respect – We will treat the public as our valued customer, and treat one another how we would like to be treated. Innovation – We will improve…using creative thinking and best available practices and technology, while minimizing disruption to the public. Under MISSION: …provide our nation’s safest and most reliable transportation system in a way that strengthens our economy and quality of life. The Cape Cod MPO meets on March 22, two weeks from today, and we are asking for a copy of MassDOT’s timeline on the West Chatham Roadway Project, or a clarification of what Ms. Pam Haznar said at the MPO meeting on April 24, 2017 with respect to the construction period. There was a great deal of confusion about what she said, and nothing was in writing. It seems unreasonable and unfair not to have a timeline available during the MPO public comment period. There are many people whose livelihoods depend on this schedule. I believe a response from you is needed and would be appreciated. Thank you in advance. David E Burns, MD Copy: David Mohler, Steve Woelfel

Page 1 Comment 186 - J. Hyman [5-10-17].pdf

RE Tip 2.txt From: Glenn Cannon Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 12:48 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Tip 2 Hello Jeff, Thank you for your comment. I will include your comment in the Metropolitan Planning Organization packet for consideration at their meeting on May 22, 2017. Glenn Glenn Cannon Director of Technical Services 3225 Main Street, P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 (508) 362 - 3828 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 8:15 PM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: Tip

Please consider adding bike trail mileage to the Cape Cod rail trail as it benefits many cyclists and tourists that visit Cape Cod.

Sent from my iPhone. Jeff Hyman AMC Member

Page 1 Comment 187 - H. Dann [5-10-17].pdf

RE TIP.txt From: Glenn Cannon Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 12:49 PM To: Harriet Dann Subject: RE: TIP Hello Harriet, Thank you for your comment. I will include your comment in the Metropolitan Planning Organization packet for consideration at their meeting on May 22, 2017. Glenn Glenn Cannon Director of Technical Services 3225 Main Street, P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 (508) 362 - 3828 -----Original Message----- From: Harriet Dann [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 9:18 PM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: TIP

We support any improvements to the bike system on the Cape. This is the future, well worth spending now investing in the future!! Biking is the way of the future! Increases health, decreasycarbon footprint!! H

Page 1 Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

From: Jill Goldsmith To: Currier, Thomas (DOT); Currier, Thomas (DOT) ([email protected]); Joe SanClemente ([email protected]); Glenn Cannon Cc: Terry Whalen Subject: FW: CHATHAM CTD purpose -- Chatham #606596 Date: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:00:43 PM Attachments: 606596 Chatham Contract Time Determination PSE submission 5-8-2017.pdf Importance: High

I would like the following email uploaded to the project website, and made available to the JTC if appropriate. It was requested by a local citizens group and provided to the BOS. Thank you! Jill

Jill R. Goldsmith, Chatham Town Manager, ICMA-CM 549 Main Street, Chatham MA 02633 508.945.5105 ph | 508.945.3550 fx | 774.212.6066 cell | www.chatham-ma.gov

Please be advised that email messages and attached content sent from and to this email account are public records unless qualified as an exemption under the Massachusetts Public Records Law - http://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.htm.

From: Currier, Thomas (DOT) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 1:22 PM To: elaine gibbs; Haznar, Pamela (DOT) Cc: Jill Goldsmith; Woelfel, Steve (DOT); Perry, Mary-Joe (DOT) Subject: RE: West Chatham Project #606596

Ms. Gibbs,

The Town of Chatham has a copy of the Contract Time Determination (CTD) for public view. It is a tool to estimate construction duration. It is not a construction schedule. The construction will take about two years to complete.

Thanks for your interest in the project, Tom

Thomas Currier, P.E. | Supervising Project Manager | MassDOT – Highway Division 10 Park Plaza, Boston | 857-368-9348 | e [email protected]

From: Currier, Thomas (DOT) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 12:24 PM To: Jill Goldsmith; Terry Whalen Cc: Haznar, Pamela (DOT); Perry, Mary-Joe (DOT) Subject: FW: CHATHAM CTD purpose -- Chatham #606596

Jill,

As promised, here is the Contract Time Determination for the West Chatham Project. This is not a Construction Schedule. The purpose of this document is to help determine how much time it would take to complete the work. Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

Thanks, Tom

Thomas Currier, P.E. | Supervising Project Manager | MassDOT – Highway Division 10 Park Plaza, Boston | 857-368-9348 | e [email protected]

From: Haznar, Pamela (DOT) Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 11:15 AM To: Currier, Thomas (DOT) Cc: Perry, Mary-Joe (DOT); Woelfel, Steve (DOT); Travers, Bill (DOT); Sherman, Gabriel (DOT); Wheeler, Robert (DOT) Subject: CHATHAM CTD purpose -- Chatham #606596

Tom I am sending you the CTD for distribution to the Town. The Contract Time Duration is a document developed and revised during the design stage that identifies one potential method for construction operations and provides a reasonable determination of the means and methods to construct a project. The CTD is not the Contractor’s construction schedule. It is a tool used during the design stage. Pam

______Pamela Haznar, P.E. District Five Project Development Engineer MassDOT – Highway Division 1000 County Street, Taunton, MA 02780 | 508-884-4239

Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

PSE DESIGN SUBMISSION CONTRACT TIME DETERMINATION Main Street (Route 28) From George Ryder Road to Barn Hill Road

Chatham, Massachusetts Project File No. 606596

Prepared for Massachusetts Department of Transportation

Prepared by Howard Stein Hudson 11 Beacon Street, Suite 1010 Boston, MA 02108

May 8, 2017

Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

1. Executive Summary

1.1 CONTRACT TIME DETERMINATION (CTD) SUMMARY Howard Stein Hudson (HSH) conducted a Contract Time Determination study (CTD) for the proposed improvements to Main Street (Route 28) from George Ryder Road to Barn Hill Road (606596) in Chatham, Massachusetts.

The objective of the project is to improve access and safety for all road users along an approximately 1,700 foot segment of Main Street (Route 28) between George Ryder Road and Barn Hill Road. The project will construct two modern single lane roundabouts at the intersections of George Ryder Road and Barn Hill Road with Main Street. Along Main Street, between George Ryder Road and Barn Hill Road, the project would eliminate the existing two-way left-turn lane and provide one travel lane in each direction with 5-foot shoulders on either side of the roadway, a 10-foot multi-use path with a 5-foot green buffer on the north side of the roadway and a sidewalk with a green buffer on the south side. The project will provide compliant pedestrian access ramps at all intersections, improvements to the drainage system, new ornamental light fixtures, and other streetscape improvements.

The CTD schedule was prepared using Oracle Primavera P6, version 15.1. The schedule is developed using Critical Path Method (CPM) and is intended to demonstrate a reasonable approach to completing the project in the time indicated. The CTD should not be used as a construction schedule. The schedule considers most critical elements of the work but cannot account for all items.

The project is located on Cape Cod within massDOT District 5 and is therefore subject to a summer moratorium, typically from Memorial Day to Labor Day. Projects in District 5 can be challenging to construct it a timely manner due to the summer moratorium, the winter moratorium, planting restrictions and paving restrictions. Considering the importance of the project roadway to businesses and local travel, HSH has developed a schedule that includes measures to accelerate the work. The schedule proposes an early start for the utility work early in the fall of 2018 and continuing through the winter. The schedule also combines multiple work zones from the Temporary Traffic Control Plans (TTCP) and assumes multiple contractor crews to advance the work in key stages. Finally, we suggest a minor delay to the start of the summer moratorium until public school is out of session in order to maximize construction when weather conditions are optimal.

These efforts demonstrate a workflow that will allow the project to be completed in approximately two construction seasons. Given the concerns of the project stakeholders HSH recommends that measures to accelerate the project be considered.

| 1 | Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

The following table indicates the 6 project milestones developed for the CTD.

Milestones Act ID Schedule Date

Advertisement Date ADV 3/17/2018 Bid Opening BID OP 7/15/2018

Award AWD 8/14/2018 Notice to Proceed NTP 9/13/2018 Contractor Field MS01 2/4/2021 Completion (CFC) Substantial Completion/Full MS02 11/6/2020 Beneficial Use (SC/FBU)

NTP to MS01 - 876

NTP to MS02 - 786

As the attached Gantt chart indicates, the utility relocation on the project is represents the critical path for the project. HSH recommends that the District consider this project for District Initiated Early Utility Relocation. We also recommend the District consider other means to accelerate the work.

The items listed below are restrictions that were used to develop the schedule and if they change, the schedule may be impacted.

 In order to prevent delays associated with the proposed completion date slipping, the NTP should be issued no later than September 13, 2018;

 Early utility NTP should be issued on or about August 14, 2018;

 The Cape Cod area summer work moratorium from Memorial Day to Labor Day (assumed June 30th to Labor Day); and

 Staged work to maintain travel lanes and access to businesses to the greatest extent possible.

| 2 | Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

2. Purpose

The schedule and narrative are developed for the sole use of MassDOT and should not be shared with the DB Entity/Contractor. The CTD is prepared using Critical Path Method (CPM) scheduling techniques to estimate the duration of the construction portion of the project and is generated to demonstrate that there is at least one reasonable/buildable plan to finish the project within the timeframe specified. This CTD considers most/critical constructability aspects as part of this planning effort, however, not all constructability aspects have been drafted/commented upon as part of this CTD. This CTD schedule is based on the 100% design and is intended to provide a conceptual baseline comparison of what is a reasonable and achievable duration for the construction of the project.

3. Project Description

MassDOT has established a preliminary cost estimate of $3,200,000 for Project #606596, which includes but is not limited to the following gross civil construction activities:

 Roadway widening;  Storm water management improvements;  Utility relocation;  Installation of a shared use path; and  New pavement, pavement markings and signage.

4. References

The CTD was developed using information contained in the following documents:

1) MassDOT Project Description - Project 606596;

2) 100% Design Resubmission drawing set dated February 21, 2017;

3) Draft Project Utilities Coordination (PUC) Form dated April 6, 2017; and

4) Project Preliminary Design Estimate dated February 16, 2017 and based on 100% Design.

5. Methodology

The project scope was separated into approximately 130 discrete activities. The duration of each activity was calculated based on the quantity take offs, recent, relevant projects and crew

| 3 | Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

assumptions. After defining the activities which represent the scope of the project, logical relationships between the activities were created to reflect the sequence in which the work could be performed. The schedule was then calculated based on the activity durations, and the sequence of the activities. The application of the resources over time was evaluated based on the number of activities worked during the construction of each phase. Below is a description of the project phases used for developing the schedule.

ADVERTISE, AWARD & DESIGN:  The anticipated Advertisement date for this project is currently forecasted to be March 17, 2018.

UTILITY PHASE 1: FORCE ACCOUNT UTILITIES  Verizon install 14 new utility poles, conduit, build new overhead fiber and cables and wreck- out existing plant;  Eversource—install new conduit, manholes, handholes and overhead power cables. Wreck- out old cables;  Comcast—Build new overhead cable and wreck-out old cable. The force account for this effort has not been finalized and;  Open Cape—relocate existing fiber strand to new utility poles.

CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1: RECONSTRUCTION OF MAIN STREET (TTCP 41-42)

Stage 1  Demo existing sidewalk and curb line on South side of Main Street between the roundabouts  Install all proposed drainage structures and street lights  Install proposed curb, HMA sidewalk, and concrete wheelchair ramps

Stage 2  Demo existing sidewalk and curb line on North side of Main Street between the roundabouts  Install all proposed drainage structures and street lights  Install proposed curb, HMA sidewalk, and concrete wheelchair ramps

CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2: CONSTRUCTION OF WEST ROUNDABOUT (TTCP 43-48)

Stage 1  Demo existing sidewalk and curb line on South side of Main Street and on George Ryder Road South from the West most limit of work to the West most completed work from Phase 1  Install all proposed drainage structures and street lights  Install proposed curb, HMA sidewalk, and concrete wheelchair ramps, and stamped concrete buffers

| 4 | Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

Stage 2  Demo existing sidewalk and curb line and complete site work for roadway expansion on North side of Main Street to the Western most completed work from phase 1 and on George Ryder Road Northeast to the limit of work  Install all proposed drainage structures and street lights  Install proposed curb, HMA sidewalk, and concrete wheelchair ramps, and stamped concrete buffers

Stage 3  Demo existing sidewalk and curb line and complete site work for roadway expansion on North side of Main Street from the limit of work to the proposed roundabout and on George Ryder Road Northwest to the limit of work  Install all proposed drainage structures and street lights  Install proposed curb, HMA sidewalk, and concrete wheelchair ramps, and stamped concrete buffers

Stage 4  Install proposed median islands on each approach of the proposed West roundabout.  Install proposed landscape plantings

Stage 5  Demo area for proposed West roundabout  Install proposed curb and stamped concrete for roundabout  Install proposed landscape plantings

Stage 6  Complete full depth pavement reconstruction where proposed to the end of completed work from Phase 1

CONSTRUCTION PHASE 3: (TTCP 49-54)

Stage 1  Demo existing sidewalk and curb line on Barn Hill Road West to Main Street  Install all proposed drainage structures and street lights  Install proposed curb, HMA sidewalk, and concrete wheelchair ramps  Install loam and seed and proposed landscape plantings

Stage 2  Demo existing sidewalk and curb line on Barn Hill Road East to Main Street South Eastern most limit of work

| 5 | Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

 Install all proposed drainage structures  Install proposed curb, HMA sidewalk, and concrete wheelchair ramps

Stage 3  Demo existing sidewalk and curb line on Main Street North from the work completed in Phases 1 and 2 to the Eastern most limit of work  Install all proposed drainage structures  Install proposed curb, HMA sidewalk, and concrete wheelchair ramps

Stage 4  Install proposed median islands on each approach of the proposed East roundabout.

Stage 5  Demo area for proposed East roundabout  Install proposed curb and stamped concrete for roundabout

CONSTRUCTION PHASE 4: FINAL PAVEMENT  Raise all castings and structures to final pavement elevation  Cold plane the roadway in proposed areas  Complete final surface course within the limits of work  Install street lights project-wide  Install landscaping project-wide

6. Critical Path

For the purposes of this CTD, a project's critical path is the longest continuous path of activities through the project. The critical path determines the completion date of the project. A delay of any of the activities on the critical path will delay the completion date of the project. As shown in the schedule, the critical path for the project is the utility work, specifically the new Verizon utility poles and associated cabling.

7. Assumptions

The following assumptions were used in the development of this schedule as shown:

7.1 GENERAL  All work will be performed according to a 5 day 40 hour standard workweek, which includes Massachusetts state holidays as listed on the DOT web site and shut down of work during

| 6 | Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

winter. Non public utilities are not subject to winter shut down and are expected to continue work through the winter. MassDOT calendars 1, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 14 were used for scheduling;

 No work is performed from approximately December 15 through March 15 for the winter moratorium except for non-public utilities and project closeout activities. Paving and landscaping activities are subject to their respective calendars;

 The project will be subject to District 5 (Cape Cod area) summer moratorium where work will not be permitted from June 30th to Labor Day;

 Labor, equipment and materials will be available when and as needed;

 Timely receipt and review for submittals are shown in the schedule; and

 The schedule assumes one primary work area at a time except for Phase 1, Stage 1 and Phase 2 Stage 2.

7.2 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC The schedule has been developed as per the TTCP in the design documents. As this project proposes improvements along Route 28, an area with local businesses, smart work zone technologies may be advantageous. Real-time traffic information, portable changeable message signs and corridor information that can be accessed via the internet can inform the public and temper driver expectations. At a minimum, the contract documents should include detailed requirements for a robust public outreach effort from the contractor.

8. UTILITY COORDINATION

8.1 SCOPE OF UTILITY WORK The PUC form (attached) has been utilized to develop many access restraints and the CTD. This will be included in the contract bid documents and will be the basis of the Contractors baseline schedule. The utility relocation for this project includes the relocation of 14 utility poles to accommodate roadway reconstruction. The work includes relocating all the overhead cabling on the utility poles.

8.2 ACCESS RESTRAINTS The only known access restraints are the winter moratorium, the summer moratorium and the staged work indicated in the TTCP.

| 7 | Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

9. COST

The current available cost and quantity estimates were utilized to derive the activity and schedule duration. The total cost was $3,200,000.00

10. SCHEDULE CONTINGENCY

HSH has determined that the project can be completed in the duration provided in Section 1 of this report. HSH believes these durations are reasonable and achievable. Although weather delays are not predictable, HSH has utilized appropriate massDOT calendars that include lost work days for weather.

11. LIMITATIONS OF OPERATIONS

Operations will be limited by seasonal weather restrictions, maintenance of traffic, utility work (see previous section), access to neighboring businesses and residences, etc.

11.1 SEASONAL RESTRICTIONS

11.1.1 LANDSCAPING  Landscape Calendar #13: – HSH will use the following summary schedule for most landscaping:  Planting can occur during the Spring Season (April 15 to June 1) and Fall Season (August 15 to November 1) subject to the summer moratorium. – MHD Standard Specifications -Ed. 1988, Section 771.60, Excerpt below:  Balled and burlapped plants may be planted in the spring until June 15 and in the fall from August 15 to November 1.  Container grown plants may be planted at any time the ground is not frozen (provided specified minimum time of growth and root development has been met).  Bare rooted plants shall be planted only from the time ground thaws in spring until May 15.

11.1.2 WINTER INEFFICIENCY The project will not be active during the winter moratorium.

11.1.3 SUMMER MORATORIUM

| 8 | Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

In the Cape Cod region of massDOT District 5, a summer moratorium is imposed on roadway project from Memorial Day to Labor Day. HSH suggests that this moratorium begin on or about June 30th to coincide with the start of the typical vacation period. Tourism and its associated traffic are most active during school vacation and it assumed work during the week can still occur prior to school dismissal. For the project schedule, the summer moratorium is assumed to begin annually on June 10th.

11.1.4 CONCRETE RESTRICTIONS  Per Supplemental Spec, Section 901 – Minimum cure duration before adding load: 7 calendar days

11.2 TRAFFIC CONTROL The contractor is required to maintain, to the greatest extent practical, the same number of travel lanes as exist today. Periodic lane closures, traffic shifts and pedestrian detours will likely be required and will be coordinated through the massDOT resident engineer. It is assumed that that limited weekend and/or night work may also be required to maintain the schedule.

12. ACCELERATION SCHEDULES

For the baseline schedule, construction sequences will proceed in a linear fashion utilizing one set of equipment/crews (excavators, forms, etc.) in the most cost effective manner. As the schedule indicates, the most beneficial acceleration to the project is the utility pole relocation and the associated activities. The project schedule can also be reduced if proximate activities and stages are combined and additional resources are applied.

As shown in the attached schedule, initiating early utility work and using additional resources can reduce the schedule of the roadwork to two construction seasons. Reducing the duration of it will mitigate impacts to the public and may reduce project cost.

| 9 | Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

13. Attachments

CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

PROJECT UTILITY COORDINATION FORM

| 10 | Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

BASELINE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

606596 CHATHAM PSE Contract Time Determination Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf MAIN STREET (ROUTE 28) FROM GEORGE RYDER ROAD Baseline Schedule TO BARN HILL ROAD May 8, 2017

March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 25 04 11 18 25 01 08 15 22 29 06 13 20 27 03 10 17 24 01 08 15 22 29 05 12 19 26 02 09 16 23 30 07 14 21 28 04 11 18 25 02 09 16 23 30 06 13 20 27 03 10 17 24 03 10 17 24 31 07 14 21 28 05 12 19 26 02 09 16 23 30 07 14 21 28 04 11 18 25

Contract Advertisement Bid Opening Award Notice To Proceed

04-Dec-18, HSH 2012077-2.PRE Contractor Prepare Shop Drawing TTCP Shop Dwg Review Gravel/Stone Materials Shop Dwg Review Landscape/Wall Materials Shop Dwg Review Water Distribution Materials Shop Dwg Review Review Contractor Baseline Schedule Review Contractor Health and Safety Plan Review Contracor SWPPP Review Traffic Items Drainage Materials Shop Dwg Review Site Mobilization 14-Jun-19, HSH 2012077-2.UTIL 1 Verizon Install Utility Poles Eversource: MH's, HH's, Risers & Underground Cables Eversource Install Overhead Equipment, Wires & Transformers Open Cape Install Hardware & Cable Comcast Transfer Overhead Wires Verizon Install Conduit Verizon Install Messenger, Copper & Fiber Cables Verizon Splice & Terminate Copper & Fiber Cables Verizon Remove Existing Plant Verizon Remove Existing Utility Poles

29-May-19, HSH 2012077-2.CON-1 (Phase 1).Stage 1 Demo Existing Road/Curb Install Drainage Structures Install Drainage Trunk/Laterals Install Street Lighting Underground Full Depth Pavement Construction Install Curb Install Wheelchair Ramps Install HMA Sidewalk

Demo Existing Road/Curb Install Drainage Structures Install Drainage Trunk/Laterals Install Street Lighting Underground

Demo Existing Road/Curb Install Drainage Structures Install Drainage Trunk/Laterals Install Street Lighting Underground 606596 CHATHAM PSE Contract Time Determination Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf MAIN STREET (ROUTE 28) FROM GEORGE RYDER ROAD Baseline Schedule TO BARN HILL ROAD May 8, 2017

Full Beneficial Use/Substantial Completion Contractor Field Co

11-Sep-19, HSH 2012077-2.CON-1 (Phase 1)

11-Sep-19, HSH 2012077-2.CON-1 (Phase 1).Stage 2

Install Curb Install Wheelchair Ramps Install HMA Sidewalk 20-Mar-20, HSH 2012077-2.CON-2 (Phase 2) 20-Sep-19, HSH 2012077-2.CON-2 (Phase 2).Stage 1

Install Curb Install Wheelchair Ramps Install Stamped Concrete Install HMA Sidewalk 15-Oct-19, HSH 2012077-2.CON-2 (Phase 2).Stage 2 Demo Existing Road/Curb Install Drainage Structures Install Drainage Trunk/Laterals Install Street Lighting Underground Install Curb Install Wheelchair Ramps Install HMA Sidewalk 19-Nov-19, HSH 2012077-2.CON-2 (Phase 2).Stage 3 Demo Existing Road/Curb Install Drainage Structures Install Drainage Trunk/Laterals Full Depth Pavement Construction Install Curb Install Wheelchair Ramps Install Stamped Concrete Install HMA Sidewalk 05-Dec-19, HSH 2012077-2.CON-2 (Phase 2).Stage 4 Demo Existing Road/Curb Install Wheelchair Ramps Install Stamped Concrete 20-Mar-20, HSH 2012077-2.CON-2 (Phase 2).Stage 5 Demo Existing Road/Curb Full Depth Pavement Construction Install Curb Install Stamped Concrete 606596 CHATHAM PSE Contract Time Determination Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf MAIN STREET (ROUTE 28) FROM GEORGE RYDER ROAD Baseline Schedule TO BARN HILL ROAD May 8, 2017

September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 25 01 08 15 22 29 06 13 20 27 03 10 17 24 01 08 15 22 29 05 12 19 26 02 09 16 23 01 08 15 22 29 05 12 19 26 03 10 17 24 31 07 14 21 28 05 12 19 26 02 09 16 23 30 06 13 20 27 04 11 18 25 01 08 15 22 29 06 13 20 27 03 10 17 24 31 07 14 1 10-Sep-20, HSH 2012077-2.CON-3 (Phase 3) 20-Apr-20, HSH 2012077-2.CON-3 (Phase 3).Stage 1 Demo Existing Road/Curb Install Drainage Structures Install Drainage Trunk/Laterals Install Street Lighting Underground Full Depth Pavement Construction Install Curb Install Wheelchair Ramps Install HMA Sidewalk 07-May-20, HSH 2012077-2.CON-3 (Phase 3).Stage 2 Demo Existing Road/Curb Install Drainage Structures Install Drainage Trunk/Laterals Install Street Lighting Underground Install Curb Install Wheelchair Ramps Install HMA Sidewalk 10-Jun-20, HSH 2012077-2.CON-3 (Phase 3).Stage 3 Demo Existing Road/Curb Install Drainage Structures Install Drainage Trunk/Laterals Install Street Lighting Underground Install Curb Install Wheelchair Ramps Install HMA Sidewalk 23-Jun-20, HSH 2012077-2.CON-3 (Phase 3).Stage 4 Demo Existing Road/Curb Install Curb Install Wheelchair Ramps 10-Sep-20, HSH 2012077-2.CON-3 (Phase 3).Stage 5 Demo Existing Road/Curb Full Depth Pavement Construction Install Curb Install Stamped Concrete 05-Nov-20, HSH 2012077-2.PAVE Install Street Lights Install Lanscaping (trees, ground cover, seed) Cold Plane Raise Castings Pave Project Pavement Cure Install Pavement Markings and Signage 03-Feb-21, HSH 20 Substantial Completion Inspection/Punchlist Final Inspection/Acc Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

PROJECT UTILITY COORDINATION FORM

Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf

DRAFT

Project Utilities Coordination (PUC) Form 4/6/2017 CONTACTS AND GENERAL UTILITY INFORMATION Revision Date:

City/Town: Project File #: PUC Completed by: Utility Pole Set: Chatham 606596 CJL Verizon Route/Street: Resident Engineer: Mass DOT PM: Scheduled Ad Date: Total Poles Relocated: 4/6/2017 Route 28 Roundabouts Thomas Currier 9/30/2016 13 PRINTED

Consultant: Contact: Office # Cell # Email Howard Stein Hudson Thomas Stokes [email protected] Potential for District Utilities Utilities On Scope, Budget, Initiated Early Underground (UG) Utility Company Bridge/Structure Contact Office # Cell # Email Duration Submitted Reimbursement Relocation * /Aerial (OH) Yes No Agreement Non-Reimb'le Notes YES NO YES NO UG OH steven.owens@ Eversource-Electric Steven Owens (508) 441-5881 x x x x x eversource.com Michael.Kelley@ Verizon Mike Kelley (508) 884-4969 x x x x x x verizon.com Open Cape Gary Farrenkopf (508) 362-2224 (508) 524-5903 [email protected] x x x x x Kevin_Rakos@ Comcast Kevin Rakos (508) 760-3400 (617) 279-5655 x x x x x x cable.comcast.com Tommy.Fang@ Non-Particapting Work for Gas Main NGRID-Gas Tommy Fang (781) 907-2807 (617) 438-0718 N/A x x x x nationalgrid.com Upgrades.

Utility Relocation Notes for MassDOT Contractor Unless otherwise noted by Contract, the MassDOT Contractor is to provide the District Construction Office with 7 Calendar Days advance notification in order to validate the current progress and provide the required 30 Days advance notice-to-proceed for the first Utility - and each subsequent Utility. These advance notifications are to be identified in the Contractor's Schedules (Pre-Con preparation, Baseline, Subnets, and Updated/Monthly Schedules) as specified in Subsection 8.02 (for DBB Contracts) and/or Section 9 (of DB Contracts). Note: The durations included below do not include these lead-times. See Additional 'Important Basis notes for Contractor' - on last PUC Form page. Additional notes:

Suggested Sequence of Relocation ( Based on Consultant proposed construction staging) The sequence as detailed on the following pages is based on the consultants proposed staging plan. This information was compiled through meetings that included all of the utilities listed below along with the designer and the Town of Chatham. The information provided is the best available information prior to project advertisement. Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf PUC FORM - CONTINUED

Is 'enabling' (prep) work, by the Contractor, necessary prior to the start of the first series of utility relocations: Yes No 4/6/2017 x PRINTED

Has any of the Utility work been identified to work concurrently Yes No x

Access Restraint & Limitations of Concurrent / Exclusive Utility Work Operations Notes Contractor note: In planning and executing the work, the Access Restraints listed in the Special Provisions, takes Should an AR be considered for the precedence over the checklist in these 4 columns. Contractor ? Exclusive Concurrent ` Contractor Contractor Utility on

RESPONSIBLE PARTY PARTY RESPONSIBLE Utilities ` Off-Site Concurrent site DESCRIPTION - Utility Relocation Phases, Tasks and Activities ` (Lead time not included) not time (Lead Access Restraint physical physical Utility are are Utility with other other with construction construction same vicinity vicinity same with no other other no with No Contractor Contractor No Utility working working Utility Utility working working Utility operations on- operations but NOT in the in the NOT but Utilities on site on Utilities Contractor and and Contractor working on-site - on-site working site (while Utility Utility (while site Estimated Duration (Work Days) by Utilities Reason/Note (optional) (optional) Reason/Note Potential (Yes/No) Utilities in vicinity vicinity in Utilities C Contractor = U = Utility Co. Stage : 1 > Contractor to provide 30 day advance notice to all utilities. C > Contractor to perform individual tree and stump removal work.

UTILITY OPERATIONS - Overhead Task: 1 U Verizon U Grants and easements for new pole and anchor locations to be obtained before work can begin U Verizon set 14 Jointly Owned utility poles and associated anchors 22 x x U Electric Co. to transfer all plant before CATV & Verizon can proceed U CATV to transfer all plant before Verizon can proceed

U VZ contractor place conduit from MH3704 to UP1 Barn Hill Rd & UP770 Main St 5 x x U VZ contractor provide splice pit, trench to new UP764, place conduit to new UP, restore area. 3 x x

U Verizon Line place all aerial strand & guying 5 x x U Verizon Line place all aerial copper cables 3 x x U Verizon Line place all riser copper cables 3 x x U Verizon Line place all fiber cables 3 x x

U Verizon Splice all fiber cables 13 x x U Verizon Splice all aerial copper cables 21 x x U Verizon Splice all underground copper cables 10 x x U Verizon Splice cut over all side leads 18 x x U Verizon Splice all terminals (copper) and recon drops 7 x x

U Verizon Splice cut off all aerial copper cables to be removed 11 x x U Verizon Splice cut off all underground copper cables to be removed 5 x x U Verizon Line Transfer plant to new utility poles 6 x x U Verizon Line remove all fiber cables 3 x x U Verizon Line remove all aerial copper cables & associated plant 6 x x U Verizon Line remove all underground copper cables 1 x x U Verizon Line remove all jointly owned Utility Poles & anchors 7 x x Sub-Total 152 Task: 2 U Eversource-Electric U Eversource-Electric - break into manholes, install hand holes and risers 5 x x U Eversource-Electric - prepare riser 1 x x U Eversource-Electric - replace underground cable 3 x x U Eversource-Electric - splice cables 1 x x U Eversource-Electric - frame installed UP's 7 x x U Eversource-Electric - replace OHW 4 x x U Eversource-Electric - replace transformers 1 x x U Eversource-Electric - install overhead equipment and cut outs 3 x x U Eversource-Electric - build risers 1 x x Sub-Total 26 Task: 3 U Open Cape U Open Cape -Place hardware on newly relocated poles. 1 x x U Open Cape - release stored cable at (1) location, release cable supports at (20) UP locations. 1 x x U Open Cape - redistribute cable over 1,150' of pole line, transfer to new locations. 1 x x U Open Cape - place and Fasten cable supports and cable on (10) new set-ups. Refasten cabling to existing poles. 1 x x U Open Cape -remake slack location and document remaining stored cable footage. Break down work location. 1 x x

Sub-Total 5 Task: 4 U Comcast ** U Comast - transfer OHW's to new UP's 13 x x

Sub-Total 13 Comment 188 - G. Goldsmith [5-10-17].pdf Access Restraint & Limitations of Concurrent / Exclusive Utility Work Operations Notes Contractor note: In planning and executing the work, the Access Restraints listed in the Special Provisions, takes Should an AR be considered for the precedence over the checklist in these 4 columns. Contractor ? Exclusive Concurrent ` Contractor Contractor Utility on

RESPONSIBLE PARTY PARTY RESPONSIBLE Utilities ` Off-Site Concurrent site DESCRIPTION - Utility Relocation Phases, Tasks and Activities ` (Lead time not included) not time (Lead Access Restraint physical physical Utility are are Utility with other other with construction construction same vicinity vicinity same with no other other no with No Contractor Contractor No Utility working working Utility Utility working working Utility operations on- operations but NOT in the in the NOT but Utilities on site on Utilities Contractor and and Contractor working on-site - on-site working site (while Utility Utility (while site Estimated Duration (Work Days) by Utilities Reason/Note (optional) (optional) Reason/Note Potential (Yes/No) Utilities in vicinity vicinity in Utilities C Contractor = U = Utility Co. UTILITY OPERATIONS - Underground Task: 5 U NGRID-Gas ** U NGRID-Gas - to cut, cap and purge existing 4" BS gas main to provide clearance for proposed drainage lines. (No Force Account) 10 x x

Sub-Total 10 IMPORTANT BASIS NOTES - FOR CONTRACTOR 1 Unless otherwise specified in the MassDOT Construction Contract, or unless specifically noted within this PUC Form, these durations (herein) are based upon the Contractor providing unimpeded access to the Utility company to perform Utility relocations (see Note 5 - Access). 2 "Concurrent Utilities" operations noted herein, are to signify those Utility Company operations that can be worked concurrently (e.g. Utility A and Utility B work on-site together) - MassDOT and the Contractor are to prepare NTPs to Utilities accordingly. 3 "Potential Access Restraints" noted within this PUC Form are for planning purposes. See MassDOT Contract for Contractual Access Restraints (refer to Subsections 8.02, 8.03, and/or 8.06 for Design Bid Build Contracts and Volume II Section 9 for Design Build Contracts). 4 Utility non-work periods - For planning purposes, the durations above contain some non work days (contingency) for New England conditions (precipitation, high temperatures, low temperatures, snow, ice). Gas line work however, typically has a seasonal restriction and can NOT be installed from 15-November to 15-March. Municipally Owned Electric and Gas Utilities are also restricted from proceeding from 15-November to 15-March. The Contractor shall (and the CTD plan) reflect this calendar restriction within the schedule (unless otherwise note). 5 Access - Unless otherwise noted in the Contract, and in addition to the 'enabling' notes above, the Contractor must provide safe and unimpeded access (for trucks, lifts, cranes, etc.) to the Utilities, to allow for the proposed relocation(s) - including but not limited to snow removal, clearing and grubbing, guard rail removal, barrier removal, tree removal, and grading. 6 For all MassDOT construction contracts issued after January 2014, the new Utility Coordination/documentation specification is required. This is Section 8.14 in Design-Bid-Build Contracts (see Design-Build index reference for applicable section #). 7 Prior to starting any and all enabling work for Utilities, the Contractor is to plan in advance with submittals and approved durations. 8 * Potential District Initiated Early Utility Relocation - if noted herein, the District reserves the right to initiate early utility relocation in advance of the Contract NTP. In submitting a bid price and in the development/basis of the Baseline Schedule, the Contractor shall not plan the Work with the potential benefit of any form of 'early utility relocation.' As a requirement of the Baseline submission, unless otherwise noted in this Specification, the earliest that the first Utility company is to receive the 30 days advance notification to mobilize to the site, will be 7 calendar days after the pre-construction meeting and never sooner than 7 days after the Contract NTP.

9 **Assumed Duration, Not Provided By Utility Company. Comment 189 - E. Gibbs [5-12-17].pdf

Fwd West Chatham Project #606596.txt From: Woelfel, Steve (DOT) Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 11:22 AM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: Fwd: West Chatham Project #606596

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message: From: elaine gibbs Date: May 12, 2017 at 10:51:57 AM EDT To: "Currier, Thomas (DOT)" Cc: "Haznar, Pamela (DOT)" , "Jill Goldsmith ([email protected])" , "Woelfel, Steve (DOT)" , "Perry, Mary-Joe (DOT)" Subject: Re: West Chatham Project #606596 Dear Mr. Currier and Ms. Hazner: I have received a copy of the CTD prepared by HSH with respect to to the WC corridor project #606596.

In the cover letter Mr. Currier indicated that construction will take "about 2 years to complete." HSH indicated project completion would be "approximately 2 construction seasons".

I recognize that MassDOT determines seasons differently than we do in terms of tourist seasons.

Could you clarify MassDOT's definition of a construction season. That would be most helpful. Many thanks. Elaine Gibbs

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Currier, Thomas (DOT) wrote: Ms. Gibbs,

Thanks for your interest in the project, Tom

Thomas Currier, P.E. | Supervising Project Manager | MassDOT – Highway Division 10 Park Plaza, Boston | 857-368-9348 | e [email protected]

From: elaine gibbs [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2017 10:52 PM To: Haznar, Pamela (DOT) Cc: Currier, Thomas (DOT); Jill Goldsmith ([email protected]); Woelfel, Steve (DOT); Perry, Mary-Joe (DOT); Tinlin, Thomas (DOT); Mohler, David (DOT) Subject: Re: West Chatham Project #606596

Dear Ms. Hazner, I'm disappointed that you did not reply to my last email and follow-up, simply requesting clarification of what you had said at the meeting on 4-24 with respect to the construction period. There are actually people whose very livelihoods Page 1 Comment 189 - E. Gibbs [5-12-17].pdf

Fwd West Chatham Project #606596.txt depend on this schedule and it deserved a response.

Thank you in advance. Elaine Gibbs

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:44 AM, elaine gibbs wrote: Dear Ms. Haznar,

Just a reminder. I would appreciate a clarification of what you said on Monday regarding the anticipated construction period and summers impacted- recognizing that it is not final.

Thanks Elaine Gibbs

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:33 AM, elaine gibbs wrote: Dear Ms. Haznar. Thank you for your quick response. It's appreciated. I understand the policy of not releasing the CTD until it is final.

My reason for asking is that there was a great deal of confusion about what was said yesterday. At the March meeting we were told it looked as if it was going to be 5 seasons of construction and 2 summers impacted.

Yesterday 2 years of actual construction, 2 years total, and 24 months were all mentioned. In terms of impact on Chatham, they are different.

I recognize that it may change, but would appreciate it if you would re-state what you said yesterday in terms of actual construction and the total length of the project (including impacted summers).

We had been told by the Town Manager that the final CTD would be available at yesterday's meeting. With a final vote on this project in a matter of weeks, this is critical information that I hope will be available well before that date.

Many Thanks Elaine Gibbs

Page 2 Comment 189 - E. Gibbs [5-12-17].pdf

Fwd West Chatham Project #606596.txt

From: elaine gibbs [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 8:36 PM To: Haznar, Pamela (DOT) Subject: West Chatham Project #606596

Dear Ms. Haznar,

Thank you for your assistance.I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Elaine Gibbs

Page 3 Comment 190 - J. O'Toole [5-15-17].pdf

Endorsement of the West ChathamRt 28 Project.txt From: O'Toole, John Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 11:22 AM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: Endorsement of the West Chatham/Rt 28 Project Attachments: Ltr to CCC 051517.docx.pdf Hi Glenn I am the Meeting Facilitator for the Chatham Bikeways Committee. You and I met briefly at the recent All Cape Bikeways Meeting in Falmouth. I understand today is the last day of the comment period on the West Chatham/Rt 28 Project. I attach my letter endorsing the West Chatham/RT 28 Project. By the way, I am planning to introduce the topic of exploring the development of a Bike Plan with the Chatham Bikeways Committee in conjunction with the Cape Cod Commission. I am optimistic that the Committee will be interested as well. If so, I will suggest the next step will be to ask you to attend our next meeting which is scheduled for Monday June 26 at 5:00 pm.

I will be back to you shortly to confirm.

Page 1 Comment 190 - J. O'Toole [5-15-17].pdf Comment 191 - S. Buckley [5-15-17].pdf

Comment to Draft TIP 2018-2022 .txt From: Stephen Buckley Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 4:33 PM To: Glenn Cannon Subject: Comment to Draft TIP 2018-2022 Dear Mr. Cannon,

For its consideration on finalizing the 2018-2022 TIP (Transportation Improvement Program), I would like the Cape Cod MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization) to be aware that I have made a Public Records Request of MassDOT (see email, further below), specifically for: " ... any record received by MassDOT from the Town of Chatham concerning its choice of a recommended "pre-25%" design concept from amongst the various design alternatives for MassDOT Project #606596 as presented by a MassDOT consultant to the Chatham Board of Selectmen during its meeting of 11/12/13." By law, MassDOT is required to respond to my request by May 19 (i.e., the Friday before the next MPO meeting on May 22), so I will be able to inform the MPO, at that time, whether the MassDOT has been able to locate and provide any record from the Town of Chatham on its decision regarding the "pre-25%" design for the following TIP project: Chatham, Rte 28 - George Ryder Rd to Barn Hill Rd (2018) If the MPO approves the proposed TIP for 2018-2022, then I suggest that its members only do so with the provision that MPO member, Thomas J. Tinlin, Administrator, MassDOT Highway

Division, investigate and later report to the MPO about any omissions or irregularities regarding the public planning process, as required by federal regulations, for the subject Chatham project. best,

Stephen Buckley 15 Balfour Lane, Unit T Chatham, MA 02633 http://www.OpenChatham.com

======

Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 16:44:48 -0400 To: [email protected] From: Stephen Buckley Subject: MassDOT Public Records Request: Town's Decision on Pre-25% Design (MassDOT Project #606596 - Chatham, MA)

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Massachusetts Public Records Law, M.G.L. c.66, §10, I hereby request the following records:

I am looking for any record received by MassDOT from the Town of Chatham concerning its choice of a recommended "pre-25%" design concept from amongst the various design alternatives for MassDOT Project #606596 as presented by a MassDOT consultant to the Chatham Board of Selectmen during its meeting of 11/12/13. Page 1 Comment 191 - S. Buckley [5-15-17].pdf

Comment to Draft TIP 2018-2022 .txt

I can not find any such record on MassDOT's Highway Projects website, http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/highway/ProjectInfo.aspx, nor on the Town of Chatham's website for that project, http://www.wcroadwaydesign.info/documents.html

I also request that, if appropriate, fees be waived as we believe this request is in the public interest, as suggested but not stipulated by the recommendations of the Massachusetts Supervisor of Public Records. The requested documents will be made available to the general public free of charge as part of the public information service at MuckRock.com, processed by a representative of the news media/press and is made in the process of news gathering and not for commercial usage.

I expect the request to be filled in an accessible format, including for screen readers, which provide text-to-speech for persons unable to read print. Files that are not accessible to screen readers include, for example, .pdf image files as well as physical documents.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 10 business days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Stephen Buckley 15 Balfour Lane, Unit T Chatham, MA 02633

Page 2 Comment 192 - D. Burns [5-15-17].pdf

Project # 606596.txt From: David Burns Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 3:50 PM To: David Mohler; Glenn Cannon Subject: Project # 606596 Attachments: West Chatham Bus Pet. Alphabetical MPO.B -by bus name.xlsx; Business Signatures petition- Oct2016.pdf Mr. David J. Mohler Executive Director Office of Transportation Planning Massachusetts Department of Transportation 10 Park Place Room 4150 Boston, MA 02116-3069 Re. MassDOT Project #606596 Dear Chairman of the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization: As part of the Public Comment Period on the TIP, I am enclosing the latest petition from business and property owners in the West Chatham neighborhood center. More than 90% of all business owners, operators, and property owners in the neighborhood center are opposed to this project. These signatures represent approximately 90% of those in the neighborhood center who will be directly impacted by this Project.

These same business and property owners are devastated by the recently provided Chatham Contract Time Determination ((CTD) – a two year at best construction project. For almost ten years they have been protesting a two- three season project. Unfortunately, this CTD is HSH’s demonstration that there is at least one/reasonable plan to finish the project within the timeframe specified. It is loaded with contingencies and work outside MassDOT requirements and moratoriums. What this all comes down to is poor planning and the fear that Cape Cod will somehow “lose” the funding allocated to this project. Even though Steve Woelfel said that the money will not be lost to the Commonwealth, it would be lost to the Cape. So instead of using the funding where it is needed and wanted, Project # 606596 will move forward despite a Chatham Town Meeting vote that attempted to stop it in 2013. Chatham voters call on MPO members to recognize this poorly planned design, eliminating the two-way turning lane and installing two roundabouts within 900 feet of each other. Sincerely, David E. Burns, M.D. President, West Chatham Association, Inc.

Enclosed are the signatures and addresses of the West Chatham Businesses who signed their opposition in 2016 to Project # 606596:

Page 1 Comment 192 - D. Burns [5-15-17].pdf

West Chatham Business Petition to MPO re RT 28 redesign

Business Name Business Address

Asian Paradise 1587 Main Street At Home Again 1705 Main Street Barn Hill Properties LLC 1603 Main Street Barn Hill Properties LLC 1605 Main Street Botsolis Family Realty Trust 1615-1619 Main Street Brooks Lapidary 1924 Main Street Butler Heating & A/C 18 Cosby Lane Cape Wide Insurance 1685 Main Street Chatham Jam and Jelly Shop 16 Seaquansett Road Chatham Pottery 2058 Main Street Chatham Seafarer Motel 2079 Main Street Chillers - Barn Hill Properties LLC 22 Barn Hill Road Clark's Auto Repair 2284 Main Street Complete Payroll Solutions 1671 Main Street Cynthia Harding 1620 Main Street David Nunheimer, Attorney 26 George Ryder Road Follys Antiques & Design 1583 Main Street Garrison Financial Inc. 26 George Ryder Road In My Travels 1705B Main Street Jeff Patterson Landscaping 1624 Main Street JKM Property 3 1685 Main Street JKM Property 3 1705 Main Street JKM Property 4 1715 Main Street JKM Property 4 18 George Ryder Road John P. Fougere Inc. 28 Barn Hill Road Joseph Buckley 1533 Main Street Kreme N Kone 1653 Main Street Larry's PX 1591 Main Street Lot 74, the Millers Main Street/MarketPla Lovely Nails 1585 Main Street Marion's Pie Shop 2022 Main Street Mary Beth Cuddy, Attorney 1685 Main Street Mayflower Holdings LLC 30 MarketPlace Meservey Shell Station 1698 Main Street Ocean State Job Lot 1674 Main Street Pates Restaurant 1260 Main Street, RT 2 Patterson Family Trust 1652 Main Street Paws & Claws 1615 Main Street Ron Meservey Truck Repair 1718 Main Street Shell Car Wash 1698 Main Street Shop Ahoy Liquors 1589 Main Street Shop Ahoy Plaza - Barn Hill Properties LLC 1579-1591 Main Street Short N Sweet 2334 Main Street Stephen Hart Building Design 30 MarketPlace TB Home Improvements 1054 Main Street The Rockin Unicorn Nursery School 1762 Main Street Turner Art Gallery 2078 Main Street Comment 192 - D. Burns [5-15-17].pdf Comment 192 - D. Burns [5-15-17].pdf Comment 192 - D. Burns [5-15-17].pdf Comment 192 - D. Burns [5-15-17].pdf Comment 192 - D. Burns [5-15-17].pdf Comment 192 - D. Burns [5-15-17].pdf Comment 192 - D. Burns [5-15-17].pdf Comment 192 - D. Burns [5-15-17].pdf Comment 193 - T. Cahir [5-11-17].pdf Comment 193 - T. Cahir [5-11-17].pdf Comment 196 - R. Leavitt [5-10-17].pdf

From: ELLA KENNEY [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:57 PM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: West Chatham Public Comment

Lisa: Attached is comment on the West Chatham project for the upcoming May 22 MPO review of the 2018-2022 TIP.

Rick Leavitt, Chairman

West Chatham Village and Business Association Comment 196 - R. Leavitt [5-10-17].pdf WEST CHATHAM VILLAGE and BUSINESS ASSOCIATION Balancing Environment Economic Development Historic Preservation

Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization: May 10, 2017

WCVBA is a grass roots neighborhood association of residents and businesses; we want to thank the MPO for your continued support of Chatham’s innovative Transportation Improvement Program project on Route 28 in West Chatham. Throughout the six years since Chatham qualified for TIP funding in 2011, town, regional and state officials have worked together in a productive partnership for the benefit of our community. Chatham has invested heavily in both time and money in one of the most extensive community outreach efforts to ensure community support for this project.

Town meeting voted a Long Range Comprehensive Plan to “improve vehicular safety and improve public amenities and conditions for pedestrians” in West Chatham described as having a “highway corridor, strip development appearance, designed for the automobile with poor conditions for pedestrians, hazardous intersections and business entrances.” Eight of ten former and current selectmen voted in favor of this TIP project in a series of votes beginning in 2011.

At the request of the Board of Selectmen, Chatham’s Planning Board and Historic Business District Commission recently held several joint meetings to further gage public sentiment for this TIP project. The committees reported widespread community support for the project, recommending landscaping, lighting, and hardscaping upgrades desired by the public.

We strongly urge MPO to follow the recommendation of the Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee and continue your long-standing approval of the West Chatham project for the 2018 TIP.

Sincerely,

Rick Leavitt, Chairman Comment 202 - G. Meyers [5-17-17].pdf

From: Lisa Dillon To: George Myers Cc: Steven Tupper Subject: RE: Comments on Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program Federal Fiscal Year 2018 – 2022 Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 8:03:10 AM

Good Morning Mr. Myers,

Thank you for your comments. These comments will be submitted to the MPO and included in the meeting packet for the May 22, 2017 meeting.

Best,

Lisa

From: George Myers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 12:07 AM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: Comments on Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program Federal Fiscal Year 2018 – 2022

Cape Cod MPO:

My name is George Myers. I have been an active proponent of the West Chatham Route 28 project from a time prior to the PIF submission to MassDOT in July 2011. I am submitting herewith my remarks concerning the project for the May 22, 2017 Public Meeting of the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization for consideration of the Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program Federal Fiscal Year 2018 – 2022.

As MPO Chairman Steve Woelfel correctly pointed out at the April 24, 2017 MPO meeting, the issues that Chatham opponents and proponents of the project are dealing with are primarily town issues and not issues of particular relevance to the TIP.

Nevertheless, I wish to address some of the past statements made and recent actions taken by former Chatham Selectman Seth Taylor who, along with Selectman Amanda Love, are the only two Chatham selectmen who have opposed the West Chatham project over the past 4 years.

In light of Mr. Taylor’s defeat in the May 11, 2017 election by Selectman Shareen Davis, it is appropriate that Selectman Davis’ position on the West Chatham Route 28 project in comparison to Mr. Taylor’s be explained to the MPO.

Positions of Selectman Shareen Davis and Former Selectman Comment 202 - G. Meyers [5-17-17].pdf Seth Taylor on the West Chatham Route 28 project.

Excerpts from the Cape Cod Chronicle - May 4, 2017

Statement of Selectman Shareen Davis

“In keeping with our comprehensive plan, in 2011 the town submitted a project initiative form to MassDOT for improvement of Route 28 between Barn Hill and George Ryder roads. There have been many planning meetings and workshops on this project. These open processes directly contributed to the consensus building process used to help the affected neighborhoods, residents and community at large to develop the proposed amendments and to understand how the amendments would impact them. We are now in a 21-day public comment period before the Metropolitan Planning Organization takes a final vote on the project.

I’m for the project. It will provide access for bikers and pedestrians, eliminate the third lane and slow traffic, clarify access to area businesses, improve better intersection to George Ryder and Barn Hill Roads and enhance the streetscape and landscape which will benefit the existing West Chatham businesses and neighborhood.

Impact on the travel way will not be like the sewer project where under the former town manager, area businesses were not notified properly about construction schedules and access was limited. This is a surface project and proper notification will go out to businesses and residents and the state’s plan is to keep a lane open to travel and access to businesses.

Regarding the 2013 town meeting vote of a petition article to defund design that would have stopped the project, a vote was taken and the moderator stated that the vote was non-binding. Hindsight is always sharper than foresight. The “binding-ness” is often dependent on the language used in an article. Words like “advise,” “urge” “encourage” etc. are not mandating words. Our moderator [an attorney] is available to petitioners to help them get the appropriate words so that they get the result they desire.

This petitioner did not change the language in the article and therefore the language of the article was deemed non-binding. In 2015 another article presented at town meeting could have virtually killed the project and it did not pass. This is an improvement project, let’s get it done for the community of West Chatham.

Davis said she believes that while the charter indicates that town meeting votes are ‘presumed’ to be binding, ‘presumed’ does not make it the law. In this case, the moderator indicated that the vote was nonbinding, she said. Davis said she supports the roadway redesign as a means of Comment 202 - G. Meyers [5-17-17].pdf improving safety and supporting local businesses.”

Statement of Former Selectman Seth Taylor

“There are folks in town who like the project and folks who do not. I take no position on the merits or deficiencies of the project in engineering terms. I know that it is impossible to say for certain what will happen if the project goes forward. Will it be as great as some proponents believe, or will it be as bad as some opponents believe? I suspect the answer will be in the middle. That said, I am on the record opposing the project and I remain firm in my position.

I believe Section 2-8 of Chatham’s Home Rule Charter is controlling when it comes to the roadway project. Town meeting voted to end it and every component of town government is obliged to abide by that decision. ‘Presumed’ is the controlling word in Section 2-8, and it is a word my opposition, and others, have a problem defining. ‘Presumed’ means to accept something as fact in advance of its occurrence, i.e. ‘I presume the sun will rise tomorrow.’ It is a fact that town meeting voted down the project and an accomplished fact need no longer be presumed – it simply is.”

Excerpt from the Cape Cod Chronicle Report of the April 24, 2017 MPO Meeting

“Selectman Amanda Love told the transportation officials [MPO] that, in a 2-2 vote last week, the board of selectmen failed to pass a motion that would have endorsed the continuation of the roadway plan.

‘In Chatham, a tie vote fails,’ she said.

Rick Leavitt of the West Chatham Village and Business Association pointed out that the vote would have been 3-2 if board Chairman Jeffrey Dykens hadn’t recused himself. At last week’s meeting, Dykens said board member Seth Taylor called on him to recuse himself, citing a potential violation of the state’s conflict of interest law. Dykens’ wife owns a business in the construction area, and Dykens owns property abutting the project area.

Selectman Dean Nicastro said he supports the continuation of the West Chatham roadway project. With regards to the board’s position, ‘I suggest you not attach too much significance to last week’s board of selectmen vote,’ he told the MPO members. Calling it ‘a gratuitous exercise,’ Nicastro said the vote was the product of a board member ‘who is a candidate for reelection in about two weeks’ time.’”

G Myers Comments on the April 24, 2017 MPO Meeting

Comment 202 - G. Meyers [5-17-17].pdf Selectman Nicastro’s characterization of the 2-2 BOS vote as a “gratuitous exercise” is right on point. The board member he referred to was Selectman Seth Taylor who was not reelected, I suggest, in part, because of his opposition to the West Chatham Route 28 project.

Not only was the vote a gratuitous exercise as it turned out, it was also a vote manipulated by Mr. Taylor in concert with Ms. Love based on the motion he made calculated to set up Selectman Amanda Love’s characterization of the 2-2 vote as a failure to endorse the project. As noted above, Ms. Love did, in fact, characterize the vote in those terms to the MPO.

After Chairman Dykens recused himself from the April 18, 2017 BOS meeting at the instance of Selectman Taylor, Taylor moved to “continue support” for the project knowing full well that the vote would be a 2-2 tie allowing Ms. Love’s aforesaid characterization. Of course, had he moved according to his well-known position in opposition to the project (his position for the past several years), the vote could only be characterized as continued support for the project.

The following excerpt from the minutes of the April 18, 2017 BOS meeting shows how Mr. Taylor, in concert with Ms. Love, manipulated the vote:

“Motion: by Seth Taylor to continue support of Massachusetts Department of Transportation’s (MDOT) West Chatham (Rte. 28) Roadway Design project and instruct the Town Manager to inform MDOT and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) of the results of this vote. [Emphasis added.]

Second: by Amanda Love.

Vote: 2-2, Seth Taylor and Amanda Love dissenting. The motion fails.

Motion: by Seth Taylor to instruct the Town Manager to advise MDOT and the MPO of the Board’s vote.

Second: by Amanda Love.

Vote: 3-1, Dean Nicastro dissenting.

It was requested that the Town Manager include in the correspondence that a split vote results in a failed motion.”

Thus, Mr. Taylor and Ms. Love sought to derail the West Chatham Route 28 project with a petty political subterfuge. A BOS vote taken after May 11 will likely result in a 3-1 vote endorsing the project with Chairman Dykens recusing himself. Comment 202 - G. Meyers [5-17-17].pdf

For the foregoing reasons, the opposition to the West Chatham Route 28 project by former Selectman Taylor, Selectman Love and their small group of supporters, based on the 2013 Town Meeting vote, the April 18, 2017 BOS vote and the alleged support of the citizens of Chatham, is wholly without merit.

Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the MPO vote to retain the West Chatham project on the Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for Federal Fiscal Year 2018-2022.

Respectfully,

George Myers In the May 11, 2017 town election, which can be viewed as a referendum on the West Chatham Route 28 project, Ms. Davis defeated Mr. Taylor by a vote of 1289 to 706, a margin that clearly constitutes endorsement of the project by Chatham voters. This paragraph is an excerpt from the April 27, 2017 Cape Cod Chronicle. Mr. Taylor’s interpretation of Charter Section 2-8 (“The exercise of the legislative power by a vote of town meeting shall be presumed to be binding . . .”) is legally flawed because it renders the word “presumed” in that section meaningless. If “presumed to be binding” always means “binding” as Mr. Taylor claims, Section 2-8 should not have used the word at all, but provided that “The exercise of the legislative power by a vote of town meeting shall be binding.” The only reasonable interpretation of Section 2-8 is that there is a rebuttable presumption that a town meeting vote is binding. In the case of the 2013 town meeting vote, the presumption was rebutted as determined by Town Counsel and the Moderator because of the petitioner’s use of the word “instruct” and his refusal to amend the petition. The Cape Cod Chronicle reported these comments in the April 27, 2017 issue. Comment 203 - S. Summers [5-17-17].pdf

From: Lisa Dillon To: Sean Summers Cc: Steven Tupper Subject: RE: Chatham MPO Meeting Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 1:06:02 PM

Thank you for your comments Sean. They will be submitted to the MPO members and included in the MPO meeting packet.

Lisa

-----Original Message----- From: Sean Summers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 12:44 PM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: Chatham MPO Meeting

My Name is Sean Summers. I was a four term Selectman in Chatham. I decided not to seek a fifth term. I am a strong proponent of the West Chatham project. Like much of the town I was unsure about rotaries until I studied the proposal and looked into how well they have worked all over the state and the country.

Chatham has had non-binding votes every year for a very long time. To suggest otherwise is not honest. IN addition in the past two years not one article was put forth by the proponents seeking to stop the project. Why do you suppose they did not wish to “clarify” the position of the people? The answer is as obvious and very simple. The people of Chatham support this project!! The group you see are the same group that argues about virtually every topic at all public hearings. Its been that way for years.

In addition a recent election was just had in Chatham where the incumbent was defeated in a landslide! His Opponent, Shareen Davis was easily victorious by a margin that I believe is a record. It certainly is the largest margin in the past 20 years at least! The incumbent spoke often about how he was representing the true wishes of the community in his non-sensical opposition to a project that has been vetted over and over again!

I am a Native Cape Codder and Chathamite. Everyone in town has viewed this area of West Chatham as an eye sore from as far as I can remember. Everyone wants this area improved!

It was only this most recent incarnation of a Select board that had two of five members not supporting the project and the truth is Selectman Love votes in lock step with the recently defeated Selectman Taylor. Every other Selectman in the past six or seven years has supported this project. In fact, when it was learned that your committee was hearing only from those folks myself and I believe four other previous selectman showed up at one of your meetings recently to provide some balance to what you have been hearing.

Most of us work and have a hard time making meetings during the day in Barnstable. We don't feel we should have to go. The process is still technically supported by Chatham and if you wanted another vote today it would be 3-1 with only Ms love dissenting. It would be 4-1 but the before mentioned Selectman Taylor publicly suggested Selectman Dykens should not vote because his wife rents a building on RT 28. Jeff did not feel he needed to recuse but that is the kind of guy he is. If there is anyone thinking he might have an interest in a project he would be cautious and step down. The dissenters and the folks you have heard from have told you that these two represent the true wishes of the town. The West Chatham Project was the biggest issue of the election and the results speak for themselves.

In Sum, the project will be great for business!! Great aesthetically, MA DOT did a tremendous job and because of the vocal minority went above and beyond the normal vetting process yet it still will never be enough… The opponents suggest businesses dont support the project. That is not true!!! Many do support the project but there are some who dont support any construction at all because of a closing of the road when the town put the sewer in.. It hurt there business. This project wont close the road but some are afraid. These are the businesses that the opponents Comment 203 - S. Summers [5-17-17].pdf claim do not support the project… That simply is not true…. They could care less one way or another they simply dont want any road improvement. It is not the specific project that some oppose…

You have heard much…. Lately I think you are hearing finally from a wider majority of town folks. I know you did not hear from us initially. I hope now you see this project has much wider support than you were originally informed of and most importantly I hope you support it not because of this silly argument but because it is a good project on its own merits and will be an improvement economically and asthetically for the town and the district!

I ask you all to please support this worthwhile project!

Respectfully Sean Summers Chatham Ma. 508-326-5964 Comment 204 - R. Leavitt [5-17-17].pdf

From: Lisa Dillon To: ELLA KENNEY Cc: Steven Tupper Subject: RE: West Chatham TIP Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 8:04:26 AM

Thank you Mr. Leavitt. Your comments will be submitted to the MPO and included in the meeting packet.

Lisa

From: ELLA KENNEY [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 7:53 AM To: Lisa Dillon Subject: West Chatham TIP

Lisa:

Attached is my letter to MPO for their May 22 meeting packet.

Rick Leavitt Comment 204 - R. Leavitt [5-17-17].pdf

Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization:

RE: West Chatham Transportation Improvement Program Project

Critics of MassDOT’s West Chatham roadway improvement plan are sincere in their skepticism that the project will benefit Chatham. Indeed, they are on record that the project will harm Chatham. They overlook the larger purpose of the project and misjudge the mood of Chatham voters. In a clear sign of community support, Chatham voters last week overwhelmingly rejected a one term selectman who opposed the project and made his opposition a major campaign issue. The margin of victory for the candidate supporting the project was nearly two to one. As matters stand today, four out of five Chatham selectmen support the West Chatham TIP project.

These voting results confirm a trend that began four years ago in 2013 when a special town meeting was asked by critics, in a citizen’s petition, to cut-off design funding for the project; the resulting advisory vote was effectively split resulting in a decision by selectmen to continue supporting the project. Two years later in 2015, town meeting outright rejected another citizen petition from the same critics to stop the project; voters by then had been made aware for the first time at a 75% design public hearing of the project’s many substantial benefits.

Critic’s resistance to this project began six years ago in 2011 when a signature petition was circulated to “SAVE THE THIRD LANE”. Petition signers were not informed then by narrow petition language of MassDOT’s comprehensive roadway improvement plan because there was no plan at that time. As full details emerged much later, community support for the plan became widespread and was demonstrated once again in last week’s election results.

Chatham voters by a wide margin and their elected representatives have made their support clear. MPO members and MassDOT officials can be confident in moving ahead with the West Chatham TIP project.

Rick Leavitt 31 Barn Hill Road, Chatham May 17, 2017

Comment 205 - D. Mohler [5-17-17].pdf Comment 205 - D. Mohler [5-17-17].pdf Comment 206 - E. Gibbs [5-18-17].pdf

From: Glenn Cannon To: elaine gibbs; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Lisa Dillon; Steven Tupper Subject: RE: West Chatham Roadway Project #606596 CTD Report Date: Thursday, May 18, 2017 4:22:33 PM

Hello Elaine,

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be forwarded to the MPO for their consideration at the May 22, 2017 MPO meeting.

Glenn

Glenn Cannon Director of Technical Services 3225 Main Street, P.O. Box 226 Barnstable, MA 02630 (508) 362 - 3828

From: elaine gibbs [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 4:16 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Glenn Cannon Subject: West Chatham Roadway Project #606596 CTD Report

Dear Mr. Tinlin, Attached is a letter regarding the "accelerated" CTD schedule received from MassDOT last week with a new projected construction time frame of approximately 2 years- significantly longer than we had been advised of up until January of this year.

I'd appreciate you consider this request.

Many Thanks Elaine Gibbs - Chatham Comment 206 - E. Gibbs [5-18-17].pdf

To: Mr. Thomas Tinlin! From: Elaine Gibbs - Chatham! Re: West Chatham RoadwayProject #606596! !Date: May 18, 2017! I would ask that you request a delay in the vote that may take place by MPO on Monday May 22 to !proceed with the West Chatham Roadway Project #606596 for the following reasons. ! As you know, Chatham is a resort community with a winter population of 4000 swelling to over 35,000 in the summer. Because this is our second largest commercial area, it is directly impacted by the seasonal !increase.I would refer you to my letter of 4-26-17 with respect to specific flaws in the project development.! Since 2011, when Chatham Selectmen requested this project, we have been told the time frame would be 2-3 Chatham seasons- Fall/Spring and perhaps Fall to complete- reported as recently as January 2017 by our DPW Director to the Selectmen. The greatest concern by opponents has been project length that !would dramatically and negatively impact business, residents, and tourists. It seems now to be a reality. ! After 6 years under review, on May 10, the Town Manager received an “accelerated” CTD indicating the project would now require 2 years of construction.That estimate did not include 3rd party “Early Utility Installation” beginning 9-13-18 through the winter. For Chatham purposes, this is a minimum construction period of 2 1/2 years. (9-13-2018 thru 2-15-2021).It could easily extend into a 3+ year project if any !component in the Critical Path is delayed. Weather and utility relocation alone could cause this to happen.! MassDOT CTD Guidelines indicate a CTD should have been completed at 25%, 75% and 100% design stages. To learn only now about this markedly longer construction estimate is deeply alarming. MassDOT normally requests a non-“accelerated” CTD as well, that would reflect the standard MassDOT calendar. I !have asked Ms. Hazner and Mr. Currier several times if one was completed, with no reply. ! This accelerated schedule requires shoulder season work beginning in mid - September ( critical shoulder season for Chatham), and extending the Spring construction period from Memorial Day to June 30- 4 days prior to July 4. During that June shoulder season, boats are being put in the water at 2 marinas and a town landing on Barn Hill Rd, and summer residents and tourists are arriving. The work scheduled for June is highly invasive-demolition and installation of sidewalks and drainage installation. If the utility work !is delayed, delaying this component, the construction site will be totally disrupted throughout the summer. ! This CTD also requires winter work, multiple work zones/crews in a small construction area of 1200 feet - increasing congestion- and night/weekend work as needed to meet the time frame. If planting and final paving, currently scheduled for November 2020, are delayed for any reason, it will have to be postponed !until April 2021. This is an overly optimistic, unrealistic schedule for Chatham for all of the above reasons. ! You may not be aware that at the same time this construction is taking place, sewer construction on Rt 137 will occur (2019-2021) and the Crowell Rd TIP project will begin 2021. Chatham will be undergoing 3 major construction projects for 5 years (2018-2023). This is poor planning at best. I don’t know how much !disruption a town is required to undergo where people have to live and work, and who depend on tourism.! This is a taxpayer funded $4.3M+ (excluding land taking), beautification/development project, in a critical commercial area, resulting in vital businesses failing because of the scope and length of this project. ! !(It is not $3.2M as HSH stated in the CTD) which reinforces concerns about the accuracy of this report.! I request a delay in any vote to proceed, unless or until Chatham officials agree to present the schedule in a Public Forum for discussion; and Mass DOT has HSH generate a more realistic non-accelerated CTD. !Only then should an informed decision be made as to if and/or how to proceed.! Respectfully, ! Elaine Gibbs Chatham! !

Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program for FFY 2018-2022