SSA 2015 Annual Meeting Announcement Seismological Society of America Technical Sessions 21--23 April 2015 Pasadena, California

IMPORTANT DATES Meeting Pre-Registration Deadline 15 March 2015 Hotel Reservation Cut-Off (gov’t rate) 03 March 2015 Hotel Reservation Cut-Off (regular room) 17 March 2015 Online Registration Cut-Off 10 April 2015 On-site registration 21--23 April 2015

PROGRAM COMMITTEE

This 2015 technical program committee is led by co-chairs Press Relations Pablo Ampuero (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Nan Broadbent CA) and Kate Scharer (USGS, Pasadena CA); committee Seismological Society of America members include Domniki Asimaki (Caltech, Mechanical 408-431-9885 and Civil Engineering), Monica Kohler (Caltech, Mechanical [email protected] and Civil Engineering), Nate Onderdonk (CSU Long Beach, Geological Sciences) and Margaret Vinci (Caltech, Office of Earthquake Programs) TECHNICAL PROGRAM Meeting Contacts The SSA 2015 technical program comprises 300 oral and 433 Technical Program Co-Chairs poster presentations and will be presented in 32 sessions over Pablo Ampuero and Kate Scharer 3 days. The session descriptions, detailed program schedule, [email protected] and all abstracts appear on the following pages. Seachable abstracts are at http://www.seismosoc.org/meetings/2014/ Abstract Submissions abstracts/. Joy Troyer Seismological Society of America 510.559.1784 [email protected] LECTURES

Registration Sissy Stone President’s Address Seismological Society of America The President’s Address will be presented by Lisa Grant 510.559.1780 Ludwig at the Annual Luncheon, Tuesday 21 April. [email protected]

Exhibits Joyner Lecture Noach Dzmura TheJoynerLecturewillbepresentedbyPaulSomervilleat5:15 Seismological Society of America pm Wednesday 22 April. His talk is entitled, “Geoscientists’ 510.559.1783 Capacity to Supply Engineers’ Demands for Seismic Hazard [email protected] Inputs.” doi: 10.1785/0220150017 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 533 TOWN HALL MEETING Tuesday 5:55--7:00 PM, Wednesday 7:30--8:25 AM, and Wednesday 2:15--3:15 PM On Tuesday, 21 April 7:30--9:00 pm we will hold a Town Hall The midterm elections are over, the new Congress is in Meeting titled “The Future of Earthquake Hazard Mitigation: place and we face the same issues as before: a contentious How earthquakes impact Southern California...come meet the legislative environment, declining budgets, and sequestration experts.” This is open to the public and will feature talks from impacts. In this environment, every scientist needs to know 4experts: how to make the best case for their science. Come for an informative session and learn more on the inner workings of 1. Challenges of lifeline mitigation - Craig Davis, LADWP the US Congress, how laws are made, and what to do to become 2. Earthquake Faults in SoCal - Kate Scharer, USGS an effective advocate for science. 3. Earthquake Monitoring of Smart Buildings - Monica Elizabeth brings over 20 years of business, political and Kohler, Caltech advocacy experience and will inform you how to speak to 4. Earthquake Early Warning - Doug Given, USGS representatives to get your message heard, how to establish productive relationships with elected officials and their offices, and how to best impact legislation in Congress, even in this political environment. PRE-MEETING CAREER WORKSHOP

“Career Game-Changers: Strategic Avenues to Landing the WALKING TOUR Right Job and Finding Success in Science,” Monday,20April,1--5PM “Earthquake Engineering 101 Walking Tour of Pasadena Facilitated by Alaina Levine Structures” Alaina asks the big questions early-mid career scientists Walking Tour led by Melvyn Green and Janah Risha and engineers often have the most difficulty answering. Thursday 23 April 5:30 PM and 6:00 PM Participants will leave the workshop and their one-on-one This is an engineer-led walkingtourofexistingandretrofit career consulting session with the skills necessary to understand buildings in Old Town Pasadena. After visiting a variety of and utilize their own value, to maximize their potential, and to venues, the group will end at a local pub for dinner (meal not achieve their career goals both in the short and long term. included). Specifically targeted towards graduate students, postdocs, and early career professionals, this workshop will focus on the current and expanding crisis in the job and career FIELD TRIP market for scientists, and how early-career scientists can best prepare for this challenge. We will specifically address career “Past Earthquakes and Active Structures of the L.A. planning strategies for international scholars, and touch on Region” opportunities both in and outside of academia. Field trip is led by James Dolan, Kate Scharer, Doug Yule and Jerry Treiman One-on-One Career Consulting Sessions Friday 24 April 8 AM--6 PM After the workshop, Alaina will meet with workshop This fieldtrip will focus on major faults of the northern participants about career issues. As a neutral, external, third- Los Angeles metropolitan region, including the geologic effects party, she can be a completely confidential and objective of the earthquakes that they generate. We plan to take a resource who can provide advice specifically for your situation. passenger bus to the following locations: (1) Griffith Park Consultations will be approximately 20 minutes long and Observatory. From here one can see the breadth of the LA will be offered to the first 36 who sign up for the course. Basin, looking south, at uplift along the Newport-Inglewood Participants meet to discuss any career-related issues they have fault and looking north, at fold and thrust systems stacked including: career planning and searching, CV/resume writing; up under the San Gabriel Mountains. This first stop will cover letter writing, professional development, professional provide a framework for the types of geologic structures that etiquette, networking, negotiation, etc. Participants are pose a hazard to LA infrastructure and communities, as well encouraged to bring their CV/resume, cover letter, or any as a detailed discussion of the Puente Hills and Compton other item they wish to have evaluated. thrusts, two major blind thrust faults that underlie much of the metropolitan region. (2) Hollywood fault. This fault was recently designated as an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault GOVERNMENT RELATIONS WORKSHOP Zone by the California Geologic Survey. At this stop we will discuss approaches for collecting geologic data on active faults How Congress Works & How You Can Work Congress in urban areas. (3) Historic reverse fault earthquakes in the Workshop Presenter: Elizabeth Duffy, President of the San Fernando Valley. This stop will discuss the seismologic Federal Affairs Office, Washington, D.C. and government and geologic effects of the 1994 Northridge and 1971 Sylmar affairs coordinator for SSA earthquakes. (4) Time permitting, we will have a final stop

534 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 on the central Sierra Madre fault north of Pasadena to discuss Thursday, 23 April what we know (and don’t know) about this major reverse fault Technical Sessions (8:30 AM--5:00 PM) lurking beneath the northern edge of the metropolitan region. Lunch (12:00 PM--1:00 PM) Some walking will be required, so comfortable shoes and a Walking Tour of Old Town Pasadena (est. 5:30 PM--7:30 PM) hat are recommended. --Leaving from Pasadena Convention Center

SCHEDULE Friday, 24 April Field Trip (est. 8:00 AM--6:00 PM) -- Leaving from Sheraton Most conference events will be held at the Pasadena Pasadena Convention Center in Pasadena, California. Some events are at the nearby Sheraton Pasadena Hotel. This schedule is subject to change.

Preliminary Schedule HOTEL AND TRAVEL INFORMATION Monday, 20 April Board of Directors Meeting (9:30 AM--5:00 PM)--Sheraton The conference will be held at the Pasadena Convention Pasadena Center at 300 E. Green Street, Pasadena, California Career Workshop (1:00 PM--5:00 PM) --Sheraton Pasadena 91101. SSA has room blocks at two nearby hotels Registration (3:00 PM--8:00 PM) this year, Sheraton Pasadena and Westin Pasadena. Icebreaker (6:00 PM--8:00 PM) Rates and reservation links are available online at http://www.seismosoc.org/meetings/2015/hotel.php Tuesday, 21 April Technical Sessions (8:30 AM--6:00 PM) Annual Luncheon (12:00 PM--2:00 PM) EXHIBITORS, SPONSORS, AND ADVERTISERS Student Reception (5:45 PM--7:30 PM) Early Career Reception (5:45 PM--7:30 PM) Information for organizations wishing to register as Reception to honor Susan Newman’s 45 years as Executive exhibitors, sponsor events at the meeting, or advertise Director (5:45 PM--7:30 PM) in the meeting program is on the SSA website at Town Hall Meeting (7:30 PM--9:00 PM) http://www.seismosoc.org/meetings/2015/exhibit/.

Wednesday, 22 April Technical Sessions (8:30 AM--5:00 PM) Lunch (12:00 PM--1:00 PM) Joyner Lecture (5:15 PM--6:15 PM) Joyner Reception (6:15 PM--7:30 PM)

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 535 Technical Sessions

2014 National Seismic Hazard Mapping Updates: Hazard metrics for source inversion validation, and to help build Changes and Influence on Seismic Risk more realistic dynamic models of the earthquake rupture The U.S. Geological Survey publishes new seismic hazard maps process. In addition, we welcome contributions that highlight every six years. These maps display probabilistic estimates developments towards "as-automatic-as-possible" finite-fault of earthquake ground shaking across the United States at inversion, as such procedures will greatly facilitate the various recurrence intervals. The maps are applied in seismic validation process of source inversions. provisions of building codes, insurance rate structures, risk Conveners: Paul Martin Mai (martin.mai@kaust. assessments, and other public policy. Effective communication edu.sa), Lingsen Meng ([email protected]), Shengji of the seismic hazard maps, associated uncertainties in hazard Wei ([email protected]), Jean-Paul Ampuero estimates, and their updates over time could pose a serious ([email protected]) and Danijel Schorlemmner challenge. The session aims to pool together certain key ([email protected]) stakeholders from the variety of end-users of these maps, and examine how the changes introduced through different Advances in High-frequency Ground Motion and versions have influenced their decision-making. To begin, we Attenuation will discuss some of the key changes that were introduced Ground motion at high frequencies (1-30 Hz) has recently during the 2002, 2008, and 2014 cycles of National seismic been a core issue in large seismic hazard assessment projects, hazard maps and how they have influenced our understanding following the Fukushima accident. While existing critical of earthquake hazards throughout the nation. In addition, the facilities and concrete dams are being reassessed in view session will also highlight some of the implications of changes of high-frequency response and attenuation, broadband in hazard in terms of measures such as human exposure, simulations are attempting to reach unprecedented high annualized earthquake loss/risk estimates, changes in design frequencies. This session welcomes all contributions related to criteria, and insurance pricing. high frequency ground motion, with emphasis on attenuation. Conveners: Kishor Jaiswal ([email protected]), Topics of interest include: how physics-based and other Doug Bausch ([email protected]), Nilesh broadband simulation techniques handle high-frequency Shome ([email protected]) and Mark Petersen attenuation; crustal attenuation studies; anelastic attenuation ([email protected]) and scattering effects at high frequencies; spectral analysis studies where results (Q, stress drop) may be subject to Advances in Earthquake Source Inversion trade-offs between kappa and source, path and site effects in Earthquake source inversion and high-frequency rupture that frequency range; studies of hard-site amplification and imaging provide time-dependent information on earthquake rock site characterization; adjustments of ground motion rupture processes, but a synoptic view of the origin and prediction equations (GMPEs) and host-to-target techniques impact of the resulting uncertainties on the estimated source that take into account high-frequency attenuation; new parameters has not been fully developed. Furthermore, the generation GMPEs explicitly accounting for kappa; results optimal integration of various datasets, and the combination and experiences from PSHA projects for critical infrastructure of source inversion and source imaging, to derive a complete that account for high-frequency attenuation; and work on the understanding of the kinematic rupture evolution in space and estimation, components, and physical interpretation of kappa time, still pose many open questions. In this context, reliable and fmax. near-real-time finite-fault parameter estimation are needed, as Conveners: Olga-Joan Ktenidou (olga.ktenidou@ujf- well as high-fidelity rupture-history inversions. grenoble.fr), Norman A. Abrahamson (abrahamson@ This session aims at highlighting recent advances and berkeley.edu), Kim Bak Olsen ([email protected])and comparative studies in finite-fault earthquake source inversion, Ralph Archuleta ([email protected]) including the development of innovative inversion and imaging methods and the rigorous estimation of model Applications of Tsunami Science: Working with States uncertainties. We also invite contributions that integrate and Communities to Improve Tsunami Resilience observational earthquake seismology with earthquake physics Effective tsunami mitigation programs benefit from an and tectonics, with potential applications in ground motion infusion of new research and technologies into practical prediction and early warning studies, to motivate new mitigation and preparedness efforts at the community and developments in source characterization, to define new regional level. Historical and paleo-tsunami information helps

536 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 determine the impact and recurrence of large tsunamis for Site effects have been documented extensively in the literature a particular source or region and provides physical evidence and have been studied through experiments, analytical, for rare events that enriches outreach efforts. Improvements numerical and empirical methods. In practice, site effects are made in source and numerical tsunami modeling provide accounted through semi-empirical GMPEs, which capture communities with enhanced tsunami hazard and risk products the average net site effect (primarily from soil amplification) used for evacuation and preparedness planning, and improved conditional on the site parameter that is used (typically response during a tsunami event, including development of Vs30 and basin depth), but ignore higher-dimensional (3D) real-time products for communities. Lessons learned from the site effects such as topographic amplification. The purpose 2011 Tohoku-oki tsunami are now being applied in tsunami of this session is to facilitate the dissemination of recent mitigation programs worldwide. advances in the understanding, monitoring, simulation and This session will focus on application of techniques and parameterization of 3D site effects in ground motion. Specific technologies into mitigation and education efforts and their topics include recent advances in the mapping and inference effect on community resilience. This includes: 1) advances in of site parameters (Vs30, basin depth and beyond), semi- tsunami engineering, vulnerability, and risk analysis products; empirical models for 3D site effects, simulation-based models 2) tools to help with scenario-specific tsunami preparedness and experimental studies on 3D site-specific response effects, and real-time response; and 3) improved planning and and procedures to account for 3D site effects in seismic code educational resources. provisions. Conveners: Rick Wilson (Rick.Wilson@conservation. Conveners:DomnikiAsimaki([email protected]), ca.gov) and Lori Dengler ([email protected]) Adrian Rodriguez-Marek ([email protected]), Jonathan Stewart ([email protected]) and Alan Yong (yong@ The August 24, 2014 South Napa, CA Earthquake: Science usgs.gov) Results, Impacts and Lessons Learned The M6.0 South Napa earthquake continues to be a scientific Central Coastal California Tectonics surprise: extensive, distributed surface rupture coupled with Earth science data collected in central coastal California since spatially varying, large magnitude post-seismic slip have the 2003 San Simeon and 2004 Parkfield earthquakes have challenged our notions of the relationship between fault significantly added to the understanding of the tectonics and slip at depth and static and dynamic ground motions and seismic hazard of the region. In particular, the application their associated hazards. In addition, in part because of its of new technologies (e.g., differential GPS, GIS, multibeam proximity to a major population center, and in part because bathymetry, airborne and marine magnetics, low energy of the concurrent maturation of new technology, this event 2D/3D seismic reflection, and autonomous seismograph has been studied and imaged by myriad new systems and nodes) through cooperative public-private sector research has platforms with exceptional spatial and temporal density. We enabled high-resolution geophysical imaging of the central encourage a broad range of contributions to this session that California coastal region and has helped reduce the uncertainty will highlight what we have learned from this earthquake and for a number of seismic hazard significant parameters how this will be applied in practice in order to mitigate the This session will feature results from the PG&E- damaging effects of future earthquakes on society. Suggested sponsored Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging topics include the application of new technologies to post- Project – a multidisciplinary offshore/onshore study of earthquake response, application of remote sensing techniques crustal structure, marine paleoseismology, and seismic hazard to detect ground failure, results from, and integration of, near the Irish Hills. In addition, this session will highlight LiDAR and field mapping, geodesy, performance of earthquake cooperative geologic and geophysical research efforts including early warning systems, geology, seismology, ground motions, the PG&E /USGS Central California Cooperative Research site response, performance of buildings and infrastructure, and and Development Agreement (CRADA) and the California post-earthquake coordination activities. Seafloor Mapping Program. We welcome independent Conveners: Gareth Funning ([email protected]), research submissions that focus on the tectonics and seismic Benjamin Brooks ([email protected])andTimothy hazards of the central California coast. Dawson ([email protected]) Conveners:StuartNishenko([email protected]), Neal Driscoll ([email protected]) and Janet Watt (jwatt@ Capturing Site Effects in Strong Ground Motion usgs.gov) Site effects on strong ground motions include the effects of surface and sub-surface topography, stratigraphic Characterizing Ground Motions and Active Faults in Urban discontinuities, and soil layering. These three-dimensional Areas (3D) effects are known to affect the amplitude, frequency Shallow materials can result in significant ground motion and duration of ground motion through mechanisms of amplification or ground failure during earthquakes, and ground response (including impedance and resonance effects), determining whether active faults lie beneath cities is a key basin effects (e.g., preferential focusing, and/or trapping parameter for seismic hazard analyses. However, characterizing of seismic energy), and topographic effects (resonance of a the effects of shallow deposits and active faults beneath topographic feature, energy reverberations in confined space). urban areas can be hampered by the built environment

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 537 and high levels of ambient noise. This session solicits ([email protected]), Paul Somerville (paul.somerville@ contributions describing methodologies for characterizing urs.com) and Ting Lin ([email protected]) urban earthquake hazards. We encourage contributions that include the estimation of ground motion variations from Earthquake Processes and Multiscale Modeling and natural and anthropogenic soils, basin-scale site response, and Characterization of Fragmentation and Damage Patterns identification and characterization of active faults. Topics of in Fault Zones particular interest are descriptions of methodologies suitable The brittle portion of the crust contains structural features for rapid assessments of ground conditions and subsurface such as faults, jogs, joints, bends and cataclastic zones that imaging throughout large urban areas, and studies using dense span a wide range of length scales. These features have arrays of measurements. a profound effect on earthquake nucleation, propagation Conveners:LeeLiberty([email protected])and and arrest mechanisms. They also contribute to prestress Thomas Pratt ([email protected]) heterogeneity and complexity of ground motion patterns. The feedback between seismic/aseismic slip and these Characterizing the Potential Impacts of Surface Fault geometric features leads to (1) different slip modes that Rupture on Transportation Systems ranges from extremely localized to widely distributed, (2) The linear nature of terrestrial transportation systems such activation and de-activation of many of these geometric as highways, railroads and product conveyance systems is features during the seismic cycle, and (3) different spatio- such that crossings of active faults cannot always be avoided. temporal distributions of aftershocks and nucleation sites. Consequently, critical elements of transportation systems such This session solicits contributions in the broad area of as bridges, tunnels and other structures must sometimes be multiscale modeling and characterization of fragmentation designed for surface fault rupture hazards. Reliable estimates and damage generation in fault zones. Possible topics include, of the magnitude, sense and distribution of surface fault but not limited to: (i) constitutive modeling of rate dependent rupture displacement is critical for a robust design. Methods damage accumulation and healing in rocks, (ii) fault zone for performing deterministic and probabilistic analysis of fault topology evolution through strain and strain rate dependent rupture displacement are evolving, aided by an ever-increasing grain size evolution, (iii) strain localization in fault gouge empirical dataset. Empirical observations on the performance and its influence on off-fault damage generation, (iv) field of structures subject to fault rupture offset provide important investigations of spatiotemporal distribution near fault insight into the behavior of such systems. This session will surfaces, (v) computational earthquake models that account incorporate presentations on recent advancements in this explicitly for inelastic processes on and off the faults. field, including research on surface fault rupture hazard Conveners: Ahmed Elbanna ([email protected]) characterization and in the application of research in the design and Harsha Bhat ([email protected]) of transportation projects. Conveners:ZiaZafir(zzafi[email protected]), Engineering and Public Safety Concerns Raised by Jonathan Bray ([email protected])andJamesGingery Seismic Hazard Assessment Methods ([email protected]) Observed hazards and structural performances in recent earthquakes such as the 2014 Napa earthquake (Northern Earthquake Hazards and Risk: Drivers and Consumers of California), 2009 L’Aquila and 2012 Emilia earthquakes Earthquake Research (Italy), 2011 Tohoku earthquake (Japan), etc. raised concerns Early earthquake hazard models date back to the 1960’s about public safety and estimated hazard and risk for future whereas the first earthquake risk models were proposed circa events. The session is an open discussion on various aspects the 1990’s. Both the motivation and methodologies for these on seismic hazard assessment (SHA) approaches as it directly models have evolved substantially since. In particular, recent relates to engineering and public safety applications. So far advances in ground motion prediction equations, probabilistic there have been basically two differing assessment approaches source modeling, inventory compilation, computational (viz., deterministic and probabilistic) used by scientists. engines and vulnerability studies have led to improved hazard Recently, the enhanced deterministic, neo-deterministic SHA and risk modeling advances. Yet, significant gaps and large has been proposed. A goal of this session is to provide balanced uncertainties remain. In this session, we invite hazard and risk information to the public by its proponents. professionals—particularly those in the user community—to The discussion will involve the concept and practicality describe their challenges and their needs in this field for of the approaches with respect to data, theory, assumptions, focused research and future products. Our hope is to motivate analysis, costs/benefits, results, experience, purpose/objective, discussion between hazard and risk disciplines including those track record, and history. Important practical questions for among academia, and practicing professionals, modelers, and the session include: Do we have the confidence that we can the related user communities. Topics including how to address do better with one or the other methodology? Do we have the complexity of earthquake sequences, scenario development reasonable and adequate data available at this time, as required and use, and loss and risk modeling are encouraged. by each of the respective approaches, especially for engineering Conveners: Delphine Fitzenz (delphine.fitzenz@ and public safety applications? Do we have any method for rms.com), Edwin Apel ([email protected]), David Wald assessing adequacy of SHA performances? Do we have any

538 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 objective assessment of the costs and benefits related to over- geodetic modeling and seek to document past earthquake and under-estimated SHA’s? What should be done for the activity and/or improve our understanding of why, where, and future when actual events exceeded hazard estimates by a when earthquakes occur in CENA. particular approach as noted in several recent instances? Is it Conveners: Robert Williams ([email protected]), necessary or not, to relate design or useful life of structures to Oliver Boyd ([email protected]) and William Levandowski seismic hazard level and how realistic are those life determined? ([email protected]) Are we prepared for the largest potential events? Conveners: Lalliana Mualchin (mualchin@hotmail. How Reliable Are Reconstructions and Models of com), Antonella Peresan ([email protected]), Vladimir Surface-Rupturing Earthquakes? Kossobokov ([email protected]) and Jens-Uwe Klügel Historic surface-rupturing earthquakes have demonstrated a ([email protected]) potential for complex, discontinuous rupture traces. With this in mind, how well do reconstructions and models of Engineering Seismology and Ground Motion Prediction past ruptures from paleoseismology, geomorphologic slip-rate This session addresses progress in the development of studies, or finite fault models and forecasts of future surface- ground motion prediction equations, and advances in the rupturing earthquakes [e.g. UCERF3 (CA), WGUEP (UT), J- quantification of earthquake impact on engineering structures SHIS (Japan)] realistically describe the complexity of surface and other induced hazards such as landslides. ruptures? Are earthquake magnitudes and rupture lengths Conveners: Praveen Malhotra (Praveen.Malhotra@ from empirically-based models consistent with individual StrongMotions.com) and Yousef Bozorgnia (yousef@ field-based observations (e.g. timing, displacement) of past berkeley.edu) events? This session will highlight advancements in earthquake science that improve our understanding of fault segmentation, Expanding our Understanding of Explosion rupture dynamics, distributed deformation, along-strike and Phenomenology Through Analysis and Modeling of down-dip fault-slip gradients, and related seismic hazard Seismic Observations and Complementary Data Types topics. We welcome abstracts from a wide spectrum of A thorough understanding of explosion-related phenomena scientists, including paleoseismologic studies of Quaternary- requires a synthesis of many observables, modeling techniques active structures, detailed studies of modern ruptures, and and analysis methods. Determination of details such as dynamic or simulator models of rupture scenarios. We invite explosive yield, source radiation pattern, depth-of-burial or discussion of new, innovative approaches that characterize height-of-burst, etc., is often not possible with seismic active structures and earthquakes using field-based techniques, data alone. Physical constraints can be applied from the computer modeling, and remote sensing. The goal of this fields of infrasound, materials testing, hydro-acoustics, remote session will be to consider ways to improve the documentation sensing, geology, and electromagnetic signals, among others. of past earthquakes and to advance our estimates of earthquake This session will highlight examples and techniques of probabilities. multi-disciplinary explosion-source studies. We also invite Conveners: Scott Bennett ([email protected]), submissions about advancements in any individual field that Katherine Scharer ([email protected])andJulianLozos extends our understanding of underground and subaerial ([email protected]) explosions and their effects. Conveners: Robert Abbott ([email protected]), Induced Seismicity Charlotte Rowe ([email protected])andBrianStump Induced seismicity particularly due to oil and gas activities ([email protected]) has garnered worldwide attention. Several countries in North America and Europe have now reported likely cases of induced From Newspapers to Numerical Analyses: Documenting seismicity that were felt by the nearby population. Recent and Understanding Earthquakes in Central and Eastern damaging earthquakes of M >= 4 in Oklahoma, Colorado, North America Ohio, Texas, and Arkansas have renewed considerable Relative to western North America finding young faults in attention in induced seismicity in the U.S. Given these central and eastern North America (CENA) is a rare, but occurrences of damaging earthquakes and an increase in much appreciated, achievement. Because it is difficult to seismicity rate in the U.S. in the past 12 years, it is of critical find faults and get direct paleoseismic data from a trench importance that induced earthquakes are better monitored across faults in CENA, a wide variety of research must and understood such that their hazards may be mitigated. be employed to reveal the earthquake history. Further, the Topics of interest to address these issues include: (1) what are relative paucity of recent and historic earthquakes in much the mechanisms of induced earthquakes; (2) what methods of CENA stymies an appreciation of the temporal and spatial can be used to distinguish natural and induced earthquakes; pattern and origins of seismicity. We seek contributions from (3) how can the hydrologic regime be modeled to assess the the spectrum of approaches that can provide insight into effects of injection and pore pressure increases; (4) what are earthquake occurrence in low-strain settings. For example, the seismic source parameters of induced earthquakes; (5) approaches may include historical accounts, sand blow and what are the geologic characteristics of injection sites that speleothem studies, geomorphic analyses, crustal imaging, and have undergone induced earthquakes; (6) can fluid-injection

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 539 induced earthquakes be controlled; and (7) how to estimate invite contributions to this session from all of these areas the hazard associated with already developed and new fluid of microseismic interest. The goal is the cross-fertilization of injection fields. We invite papers on all forms of induced ideas and techniques that can potentially advance the both seismicity but particularly those associated with waste water- the science and the industrial application of microseismic injection, hydraulic fracturing, geothermal production, and technology. carbon sequestration. Papers from industry are particularly Conveners: Clifford Thurber (thurber@geology. welcome to better inform the research community on the state wisc.edu), Stephen Wilson (stephen.wilson@ of knowledge and practices within the community. seismogenic.com) and Giovanni Grasselli (giovanni. Conveners:IvanWong([email protected]), [email protected]) Justin Rubinstein ([email protected]), Thomas Braun ([email protected]) and T.H.W. Goebel Numerical Modeling of Earthquake Ground Motion, ([email protected]) Rupture Dynamics and Seismic Wave Propagation Advances in numerical modeling methodology in seismology Linking Ground Motion and Earthquake Source Variability are not only driven by emerging requirements in observational (SSA/ESC Joint Session) seismology (e.g., the advent of very dense seismic arrays; Over the past decades, it has been increasingly recognized that demand for near-real-time simulations; the multi-scale, multi- the adequate quantification and understanding of earthquake physics modeling of seismic phenomena; etc.), but also by ground motion variability plays a key role for reliable seismic developments in the mathematical sciences, and through the hazard assessment, in particular for critical structures and adaptation of methods originating in other scientific fields. long return periods. New earthquake and wave propagation Moreover, future methods for very large scale simulations will simulation codes are nowadays sophisticated enough to provide be increasingly influenced by (and may in turn influence) the realistic simulation of the earthquake rupture and associated evolution of computer architectures and programming models. low frequency ground-motion for a given set of input This session is a forum for presenting advances in parameters. We now need to provide probability distributions numerical methodology, whether the principal context is of simulation input parameters and to take into account the observational, mathematical/numerical, or computational. potential correlations between these parameters. One of the We invite contributions focused on development, key challenge of seismology is then to be able then to calibrate verification and validation of numerical-modeling methods, and analyze the physical factors that control the earthquakes and methodologically important applications especially and the ground-motion variability. For example, it has been to earthquake ground motion and rupture dynamics. noticed that the variability of classically determined stress Contributions on the analysis of methods, fast algorithms, drop estimates is significantly larger than implied from the high-performance implementations, large-scale simulations, analysis of the between-event variability of ground motion non-linear behavior, multi-scale problems, and confrontation prediction equations (GMPEs). This observation may have of methods with data are especially encouraged. profound implications, since stress drop is an important Conveners: Peter Moczo ([email protected]), input parameter for ground motion prediction, and leads Steven Day ([email protected]) and Emmanuel Chaljub to the questions whether the variability of seismologically ([email protected]) determined earthquake source parameters is overestimated and, in more general terms, how strongly the physics of the Objective Testing of PSHA & Earthquake Forecast Models source reflect in ground motion variability. We encourage While there has been considerable debate in recent submissions dealing with the link between earthquake source scientific literature as to the validity and usefulness of physics and ground motion variability, such as studies of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA) results, GMPE between-event variability and their relation to source their application is almost ubiquitous as a fundamental parameter variability, analysis of source parameters probability input to international building codes and major civil and distributions, dynamic rupture effects on ground motions, and infrastructure developments. Recent destructive earthquakes the importance of this link for hazard and risk assessment. around the world have stimulated discussions about testability Conveners: Ralph Archuleta (ralph.archuleta@ of seismic hazard assessments. A new wealth of data provides ucsb.edu), Fabrice Cotton ([email protected] an opportunity for researchers and practitioners to ensure that grenoble.fr)andAdrienOth([email protected]) we use state-of-the-art methods and appropriate input models informed by testing and based on thorough and objective Microseismics in Academia, Government and Industry decision-making. Owing to the long time periods involved Government and academic scientists have pursued the study in hazard forecasts, PSHAs will not yield a fully testable of microseismicity for many decades, primarily in the context model in our lifetime. Furthermore, as modelling techniques of monitoring and imaging fault zones and volcanoes. Industry become more sophisticated, how can we determine whether involvement in microseismic studies has a similarly long history "improvements" are truly "improvements" in skill and not in mining and geothermal settings. In the last decade, there just additional complexities? New developments in hazard has been an explosion in interest in microseismics related to assessment are striving to build partial testability into the the exploitation of unconventional gas and oil reservoirs. We models. In the realm of PSHA, as with any science, testing

540 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 is not only about model validation, but is a tool to learn that affect seismic hazard estimates of onshore and offshore about strengths and weaknesses of a model. Furthermore, faults in southern California, including fault structure, slip rate, modern evaluation techniques can support future model paleoseismology, and Neogene tectonic evolution. improvements. Initiatives such as the Collaboratory for the Conveners: Nate Onderdonk (nate.onderdonk@ Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) aim to develop csulb.edu)andRobertFrancis([email protected]) standardized methods and models to forecast the occurrence and hazard resulting from future earthquakes. However, Rethinking PSHA do these methods provide useful and practical input into The core methods behind probabilistic seismic hazard analysis helping understand the forecast skill of PSHAs? We invite (PSHA) were first formalized by Cornell in 1968. Since that presentations on any of the above topics, including: short-term time, the fundamental components have largely remained earthquake forecasts, earthquake forecast model testing, unchanged in most applications: 1) a source model, often made hazard model testing, ground-motion prediction testing up of zones of expected activity, or an active fault model (GMPE & Simulation) and testing metric development. coupled with a smoothed seismicity model based on catalog We also solicit submissions that aim to test the usefulness data, and; 2) empirically based ground motion prediction of current assumptions in all elements of PSHA, including: equations that are based on several basic parameters, such as seismic sources (fault and areal), earthquake recurrence, moment magnitude and distance. The development of the maximum magnitude, ground motions, logic trees, and final individual components has become increasingly complex in hazard outputs. recent years, however the basic structure has largely remained Conveners: Danijel Schorlemmer ([email protected]), unchanged. In this session we invite presentations that explore Matthew Gerstenberger ([email protected]), some of the key assumptions currently used in PSHA and Max Werner ([email protected]), Trevor Allen their implications for hazard, or alternative PSHA methods ([email protected]), Thomas Jordan ([email protected]) that might provide different insight into the hazard. Some and Fabrice Cotton ([email protected]) examples might be the improved quantification of uncertainty in the source modelling, and moving beyond the typical Observing Infrasonic Sources from Ground to Space Poisson-based formulations. The development of PSH models Seismo-acoustic sources, such as (but not limited to), volcanic is challenged by the independence of fault and catalog datasets. eruptions, earthquakes, meteor air blasts, lightning, wind Can hybrid models be used to improve the forecasting skill farms, and chemical explosions, are being studied using high- of PSHA? How can we best incorporate GMPEs into PSHA density ground-based sensor networks. Such sources can when the models are becoming increasingly complex, and all also be studied at higher altitudes using direct (pressure parameters need to be specified in advance? Are there viable sensors on balloons or unmanned aerial vehicles) and indirect modeling alternatives for PSHA (e.g., an integrated source (monitoring electromagnetic fluctuations in the ionosphere or model) that can improve current best-practice? airglow emissions) measurements of the infrasonic (acoustic) Conveners: Matthew Gerstenberger (m.gerstenberger@ field, enabling new insights of source and propagation gns.cri.nz), Mark Stirling ([email protected])andMark phenomenology. This session highlights research on the Petersen ([email protected]) development and utilization of new and existing ground, high- altitude, and space instrumentation for infrasound sensing, Seismic Imaging and Monitoring of Near-surface, and the description and analysis of new seismo-acoustic datasets, Crustal and Global Scales: Recent Advances and Future and the interpretation of modeling results. New theoretical Directions and numerical developments such as seismo-acoustic waveform This session will highlight leading-edge theoretical and modeling are also of interest for this session. practical developments in seismic imaging and monitoring Conveners: Omar Marcillo ([email protected]), applied on different scales (e.g., the meter-scale in near-surface Stephen Arrowsmith ([email protected]) and Lucie Rolland seismology up to the kilometer-scale in crustal seismology) ([email protected]) using both active and passive seismic data. This session includes presentations on various techniques inferring the structure Recent Advances in Understanding the Onshore and of the Earth as well as velocity and attenuation models Offshore Southern California Fault System derived at local, regional, and global scales, for example, Despite being one of the best-studied fault systems in the world, ambient noise tomography and coda-wave interferometry. We important characteristics of many active faults in southern invite both methodological studies, which are demonstrating California remain poorly understood. These include basic the applicability of new methods, as well as studies aimed characteristics such as fault structure, slip rate, and slip history at developing new instrumentation to contribute to this of offshore structures and poorly exposed faults in the Los session. We welcome innovations and advances in 3D Angeles Basin and Mojave Desert. A clearer understanding of traveltime tomography, waveform tomography, surface wave fault behavior such as variations in slip rate through time, strain inversion, joint inversion of multiple geophysical observations distribution across parallel faults in both space and time, and as well as multi-repeated observations of geophysical data connectivity between fault zones is also needed. This session to detect temporal variations of large-scale environments seeks contributions that present new data and interpretations as well as smaller structures such as volcanoes, fault zones

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 541 and landslides. We also invite contributions highlighting the of early warning systems; incorporation of new datasets such physical understanding of the related wave-field composition as geodetic data, gravity observations, and data from low-cost and phenomena at different scales, its variability over space and instruments; proposed new methodologies; and related real- time and its statistical treatment. Discussions on the pitfalls time earthquake response issues such as tsunami early warning, and limitations of such methods and potential remedies are also damage assessment, and public communication. welcomed. Conveners: Sarah Minson ([email protected]) Conveners:MarcoPilz([email protected])andNori and Egill Hauksson ([email protected]), Thomas Nakata ([email protected]) Heaton ([email protected])

Seismic Networks, Instrumentation and Products Structural Health Monitoring and Earthquake Damage This session presents recent advances on seismic networks, Detection in Structures seismic instrumentation, new datasets, seismic data products Strong and even moderate nearby earthquakes can cause and services. Poster Only significant damage to structures such as buildings, bridges, dams, power plants and pipelines, which may result in loss Seismic Sources and Seismicity Studies of life and injuries as well as direct and indirect monetary This session focuses on observational studies of seismic sources, losses. Assessment of the structural health and integrity during tectonic or not, and on studies of seismicity patterns, including or soon after the earthquake, before physical inspection is development and enhancement of data analaysis methods to possible, may assist making timely decisions on evacuation. enable such studies. Timely evacuation of a weakened structure would help avoid Conveners: Christine Ruhl ([email protected])andVaclav loss of life and injuries caused by a potential collapse of a Vavrycuk ([email protected]) weakened structure from shaking from aftershocks. Timely decision not to evacuate a healthy structure would avoid Slow Earthquakes: Diversity in Fault Motion and Their needless evacuation and the costly consequences of loss of Implications in Earthquake Dynamics function. Many methods have been developed over the years, Earthquake faults show a variety of motion – from slow slip such as, e.g., modal, wave, performance based and statistical and associated tremor to supershear rupture. Slow earthquakes pattern recognition methods. Such methods are generally emerge as a major player in releasing and redistributing applicable to other disasters and to longer term condition stress over much of the seismic cycles. They are observed monitoring. This session aims to present new developments globally over multiple spatial and temporal scales. A unifying and findings on all aspects of the problem, from basic studies on theory connecting this diversity and its implications on the mechanics of damage and nonlinear response of structures the fault dynamics, however, remains elusive. Moreover, the to sensing technologies, methodologies and decision systems, factors (fault properties, rheology, frictional and material relevant for a variety of structures and infrastructure systems. heterogeneity etc.) controlling varied fault slip behaviors and Conveners:MariaTodorovska([email protected])and their interplay are poorly understood. We invite abstracts that Philippe Gueguen ([email protected]) highlight different aspects of this broad spectrum of fault slip including, but not limited to, slow earthquakes and associated Using Dense Seismic Array to Image the Subsurface and phenomena. We are interested in slow earthquakes in all forms Monitor Earthquake Activity and sizes – from episodic tremor and slip in the subduction Dense seismic arrays that record continuously have the zones to seismic swarms operating in smaller scales. Studies potential to dramatically increase the resolution of subsurface encompassing multiple styles of fault slip (slow and fast) and imaging, and they can also be used to monitor micro-seismicity. their interactions in space and time are encouraged. We solicit However, the sensors that are used in these arrays usually new observations and analyses from all tectonic settings using lack the low-frequency response of conventional earthquake seismology, geodesy, numerical simulations, laboratory and monitoring networks, and are often deployed at the surface in field experiments. noisy environments. This presents challenges for extracting the Conveners: Abhijit Ghosh (aghosh.earth@gmail. signal from the noise. We invite scientists who have used these com), Christodoulos Kyriakopoulos (christodoulos. types of data or have developed algorithms to work with these [email protected]) and Hongfeng Yang arrays to present their work in this session. Conveners: Robert Clayton ([email protected])and Status and Future of Earthquake Early Warning Brandon Schmandt ([email protected]) Earthquake early warning (EEW) systems have been built in select parts of the world, and are currently being developed The Where, When and Why of Uncharacteristic in several more regions including the west coast of the Earthquakes United States. While all of these systems aim to use data Unexpectedly large and/or complex historic earthquakes, such obtained near to the earthquake source to warn population as the 1920 Haiyuan, 1960 Chile, 1988 Spitak, 1992 Landers, centers of imminent shaking, there is great diversity in the 2011 Tohoku, 2012 Indian Ocean quakes, among others, beg methodologies and data types used. We invite contributions the questions: where might the next uncharacteristic event from all areas related to EEW, such as performance reviews occur, and have geoscientists underestimated the maximum

542 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 size and rates of these type of events? These uncharacteristic record of and processes controlling regular versus atypically earthquakes all ruptured through hypothesized segment large events on fault systems. We welcome abstracts utilizing boundaries that appear to impede rupture during typical the geologic record, geophysical data, crustal deformation earthquakes on these fault systems. Southern California models and dynamic rupture models to shed insight into the contains a number of world-class examples of complex fault behavior of these potentially devastating large earthquakes. systems – the southern San Andreas fault system, the Eastern Conveners:DougYule([email protected]), California Shear Zone, and the Transverse Ranges oblique- Richard Heermance ([email protected]), thrust system – that may spawn the next surprisingly large Elizabeth Madden ([email protected]), Michele earthquake. With this meeting surrounded by these examples, Cooke ([email protected])andJackLoveless we seek contributions that provide global insight into the ([email protected])

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 543 Overview of Technical Program ORAL SESSIONS

Tuesday, 21 April

Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H 8:30–9:45 AM Objective Testing Numerical The August 24, Linking Ground Structural Health of PSHA & Modeling of 2014 South Napa, Motion and Earth- Monitoring and Earthquake Earthquake CA Earthquake: quake Source Vari- Earthquake Forecast Models Ground Motion, Science Results, ability (SSA/ESC Damage Detection Rupture Dynamics Impacts and Joint Session) in Structures and Seismic Wave Lessons Learned 10:45 AM–noon Propagation 2:15–3:30 PM Rethinking PSHA Using Dense From Newspapers Characterizing Expanding our Seismic Array to to Numerical Ground Motions Understanding of Image the Analyses: and Active Faults Explosion Subsurface and Documenting and in Urban Areas Phenomenology Monitor Understanding Through Analysis Earthquake Earthquakes in and Modeling of Activity Central and Seismic Eastern North Observations and America Complementary 4:30–5:45 PM Data Types

Wednesday, 22 April

Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H 8:30–9:45 AM Seismic Imaging Earthquake Hazards The Where, When Advances in Seismic Sources and and Monitoring of and Risk: Drivers and and Why of High-frequency Seismicity Studies Near-surface, Consumers of Uncharacteristic Ground Motion 10:45 AM–noon Crustal and Global Earthquake Research Earthquakes and Attenuation Applications of Scales: Recent Tsunami Science: Advances and Working with States Future Directions and Communities to Improve Tsunami Resilience 1:30–2:45 PM Engineering and How Reliable Are Slow Earthquakes: Public Safety Reconstructions Diversity in Fault Concerns Raised by and Models of Motion and Their Seismic Hazard Surface-Rupturing Implications in Assessment Methods Earthquakes? Earthquake Dynamics 3:45–5:00 PM 2014 National Engineering Seismic Hazard Seismology and Mapping Updates: Ground Motion Hazard Changes and Prediction Influence on Seismic Risk 5:15–6:15 PM Joyner Lecture – Conference Center, Lower Level

544 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Thursday, 23 April

Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H 8:30–9:45 AM Induced Seismicity Observing Infrasonic Central Coastal Characterizing the Earthquake Processes Sources from Ground California Potential Impacts of and Multiscale to Space Tectonics Surface Fault Modeling and Rupture on Characterization of Transportation Fragmentation and Systems Damage Patterns in Fault Zones 10:45 AM–noon Microseismics in Central Coastal Capturing Site Academia, California Effects in Strong Government and Tectonics Ground Motion Industry 1:30–2:45 PM Status and Future of Recent Advances Advances in Earthquake Early in Understanding Earthquake Source 3:45–5:00 PM Warning the Onshore and Inversion Offshore Southern California Fault System

POSTER SESSIONS

Exhibit Hall A r Tuesday Characterizing Ground Motions and Active Faults in Urban Areas r Expanding our Understanding of Explosion Phenomenology Through Analysis and Modeling of Seismic Observations and Complementary Data Types r From Newspapers to Numerical Analyses: Documenting and Understanding Earthquakes in Central and Eastern North America r Linking Ground Motion and Earthquake Source Variability (SSA/ESC Joint Session) r Numerical Modeling of Earthquake Ground Motion, Rupture Dynamics and Seismic Wave Propagation r Objective Testing of PSHA & Earthquake Forecast Models r Rethinking PSHA r Seismic Networks, Instrumentation and Products r Structural Health Monitoring and Earthquake Damage Detection in Structures r The August 24, 2014 South Napa, CA Earthquake: Science Results, Impacts and Lessons Learned r Using Dense Seismic Array to Image the Subsurface and Monitor Earthquake Activity r Wednesday 2014 National Seismic Hazard Mapping Updates: Hazard Changes and Influence on Seismic Risk r Advances in High-frequency Ground Motion and Attenuation r Applications of Tsunami Science: Working with States and Communities to Improve Tsunami Resilience r Earthquake Hazards and Risk: Drivers and Consumers of Earthquake Research r Engineering and Public Safety Concerns raised by Seismic Hazard Assessment Methods r Engineering Seismology and Ground Motion Prediction r How Reliable Are Reconstructions and Models of Surface-Rupturing Earthquakes? r Seismic Imaging and Monitoring of Near-surface, Crustal and Global Scales: Recent Advances and Future Directions r Seismic Sources and Seismicity Studies r Slow Earthquakes: Diversity in Fault Motion and Their Implications in Earthquake Dynamics r The Where, When and Why of Uncharacteristic Earthquakes

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 545 r Thursday Advances in Earthquake Source Inversion r Capturing Site Effects in Strong Ground Motion r Central Coastal California Tectonics r Characterizing the Potential Impacts of Surface Fault Rupture on Transportation Systems r Earthquake Processes and Multiscale Modeling and Characterization of Fragmentation and Damage Patterns in Fault Zones r Induced Seismicity r Microseismics in Academia, Government and Industry r Observing Infrasonic Sources from Ground to Space r Recent Advances in Understanding the Onshore and Offshore Southern California Fault System r Status and Future of Earthquake Early Warning

546 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Program for 2015 SSA Annual Meeting

Presenting author is indicated in bold.

Tuesday, 21 April Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Objective Testing Numerical The August 24, Linking Ground Structural Health of PSHA & Modeling of 2014 South Napa, Motion and Monitoring and Earthquake Earthquake CA Earthquake: Earthquake Source Earthquake Forecast Models Ground Motion, Science Results, Variability Damage Detection Session Chairs: Rupture Dynamics Impacts and (SSA/ESC Joint in Structures Danijel and Seismic Wave Lessons Learned Session) Session Chairs: Schorlemmer, Propagation Session Chairs: Session Chairs: Maria Todorovska Matthew Session Chairs: Gareth Funning, Ralph Archuleta, and Philippe Gerstenberger, Max Peter Moczo, Steven Benjamin Brooks Fabrice Cotton and Gueguen (see page Werner, Trevor Day and Emmanuel and Timothy Adrien Oth (see 603) Allen, Thomas Chaljub (see page Dawson (see page page 599) Jordan and Fabrice 591) 595) Cotton (see page 587)

8:30 INVITED:Some Hybrid Algorithm Seismotectonic INVITED: STUDENT: Damage AM Thoughts on for Numerical Setting of the West Components of the Detection in Testing Probabilities Simulation of Napa Fault and Variability of High-rise Buildings and its Critical Seismic Wave Challenges in NGA-W2 Ground Using Dense Arrays Importance for Propagation in Characterization for Motion Prediction of Seismic Sensors. Science. Marzocchi, Complex Models: Seismic and Surface Models. Alatik, L. Massari, A.,Kohler, W.,Jordan,T.H. Anisotropy, Faulting Hazards. M.,Clayton,R., Attenuation, Dawson, T. E. Heaton, T., Guy, R. Small-Scale Heterogeneities. Kostin, V., Lisitsa, V.,Reshetova,G., Tcheverda, V., Vishnevsky, D.

8:45 INVITED/STUDENT: Coupled Finite INVITED:Extent INVITED:Insights INVITED: AM Data-Driven Element Simulation and Distribution of on Source Identification of Generation of of Earthquakes and Surface Faulting Variability from Dynamic Ground-Motion Tsunami Inception: from the M6.0 Combinations of Characteristics of a Backbone Models A Case Study of the South Napa Theoretical Models Tall Building: for the Logic Tree. 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake of Aug. for Fourier and Modal Analysis and Haendel, A., Earthquake and 24, 2014. Ponti, D. Response Spectral Seismic Kuehn, N. M., Tsunami. Karaoglu, J.,Dawson,T.E., Ordinates and Interferometry. Specht, S., H., Bielak, J. Schwartz,D.P., Advanced Mixed Fletcher, J. B., Scherbaum, F. Brooks, B. A., Effects Models. Ulusoy, H. S., DeLong, S. B., Stafford, P. J. Kalkan, E., Wen, Hecker, S., Hudnut, W.,Baker,L.M. K. W., Kelson, K. I., Lienkaemper, J. J., Prentice, C. S., Rosa, C.M.,Rubin,R.S., Seitz, G. G., Sickler, R. R., Wesling, J. R.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 547 Tuesday, 21 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Objective Testing Numerical The Aug 2014 Linking Ground Structural Health of PSHA ... Modeling ... Napa, CA EQ... Motion ... Monitoring ...

9:00 Revision of ANewDiscrete Differencing of INVITED:Stress Wave Propagation AM Earthquake Representation of Airborne Laser Drop Variability in Buildings as Catalogues on Heterogeneous Scanning Data and its Relationship Periodic Structures: Probabilistic Terms: Medium for the Acquired Before and to Variability in Timoshenko Beam Consequences on Finite-difference After the 2014 South GMPEs. Baltay, A. with Slabs Model PSHA Validation. Modeling of Seismic Napa Earthquake. S.,Hanks,T.C. and its Application Mucciarelli, M. Wave Propagation Hudnut, K. W., to Structural System and Earthquake Glennie, C. L., Identification and Motion. Kristek, J., Brooks, B. A., Health Monitoring. Moczo, P.,Chaljub, Arrowsmith,J.R., Todorovska, M. I., E., De Martin, F., Nissen, E., Oskin, M. Ozmutlu, A., Kristekova, M., E., Kellogg, L. H., Ebrahimian, M. Galis, M. Crosby, C., Delong, S., Dawson, T. E., Hoirup, D. F., Ericksen, T. 9:15 Finding Where 3D Simulations of Co- and Post-Seismic Magnitude System AM Forecasts Fail. M9 Cascadia Near-field Dependence of Identification, Michael, A. J., Earthquakes: Deformation Stress Drop: Insights Model Calibration, Llenos, A. L. Sedimentary-Basin Associated with the from the Observed and Damage Amplification and 2014 M6.0 South Magnitude Scaling Detection in Ground-Motion Napa Earthquake of Ground-Motions. Layered Systems by Variability. Frankel, Surface Rupture. Derras, B., Cotton, Using Transfer A. D.,Stephenson, Brooks, B. A., F.,Drouet,S. Matrix Formulation. W. J. Glennie, C. L., Safak, E., Minson, S. E., Murray, Kocakaplan, S., J., Hudnut, K., Kaya, Y. Ericksen, T. L.

9:30 Retrospective Optimal Initiation INVITED: Earthquake INVITED:Southern INVITED: AM Evaluation of of Dynamic Early Performance in California Development of Time-Dependent Ruptures in the M 6.0 South Napa Earthquake Scaling Regional Earthquake Forecast Numerical earthquake: UCB’s from Stable Event Earthquake Early Models during the Simulations. Galis, algorithms ElarmS Ratio Levels. Warning System 2010-12 Canterbury, M., Pelties, C., and GlarmS. Hellweg, Mayeda, K., Walter, with Structural New Zealand, Kristek, J., Moczo, M., Allen, R. M., W. R., Yoo, S. Health Monitoring Earthquake P.,Ampuero,J.P., Henson, I., Johanson, function toward Sequence. Werner, Mai, P. M., Duru, K. I., Neuhauser, D., Real-time M. J., Gerstenberger, Grapenthin, R. Earthquake M. C., Liukis, M., Information Marzocchi, W., Navigation. Rhoades, D. A., Motosaka, M., Taroni, M., Zechar, J. Ohno, S., Mitsuji, D., Cattania, C., K., Wang, X. Christophersen, A., Hainzl, S., Helmstetter, A., Jimenez, A., Steacy, S., Jordan, T. H.

548 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Tuesday, 21 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Objective Testing Numerical The Aug 2014 Linking Ground Structural Health of PSHA ... Modeling ... Napa, CA EQ... Motion ... Monitoring ...

9:45– 10:45 Break AM 10:45 Testing and Nonlinear Complexity in the Statistical Properties INVITED: AM Evaluation of Simulations of Coseismic Fault of Strss Drop Predetermined Seismic Hazard Spontaneous Geometry and in the Estimates from the Earthquake Damage Models for Long Rupture on the Postseismic Slip Generalized Spectral Scenarios (PEDS) Return Periods with Southern San Distribution of the Inversion of Strong for Structural Fragile Geologic Andreas Fault. South Napa Ground Motions Health Monitoring. Features. Stirling, Roten, D.,Cui,Y., Earthquake, from Observed by K-Net, Trifunac, M. D. M., Rood, D., Olsen, K. B., Sentinel-1a Insar KiK-Net, and the Barrell, D., Day, S. M. and Near-Field GPS JMA Shindokei Zondervan, A. Data. Funning, G. Network in Japan. J.,Floyd,M.A., Nakano, K., Walters, R. J., Kawase, H., Elliott, J. R., Wright, Matsushima, S. T. J., Marinkovic, P., Larsen, Y.

11:00 INVITED:Testing From Stiffness to INVITED: How Do Nonlinear AM Probabilistic Seismic Strength in Coseismic and Earthquake Stress Dynamics Induced Hazard Estimates Large-Scale Ground Postseismic Drop Variations in a Structure By Against Deformation Deformation Reflect in Strong Seismic and Observations, Forecasting. Shi, J., History of the Motion Intensity Environmental Application Asimaki, D. August 2014 Mw Observations? Oth, Loading. Gueguen, Examples. Beauval, 6.0 South Napa A.,Miyake,H., P.,Johnson,P.A., C., Tasan, H., Earthquake Bindi, D. Roux, P. Helmstetter, A. Measured with InSAR Time Series. Fielding,E.J., Milillo, P., Bürgmann, R., Samsonov, S., Yun, S. H., Brooks, B., Hudnut, K., Lienkaemper, J., Agram, P.

11:15 INVITED: Direct Surface-Wave INVITED: Macroseismic Application of AM Verification of Propagation Modes Finite-Source Intensity Rotation Rate Seismic Hazard in the Valley of Modeling of the Distributions: Sensors in Structural Maps. Mak, S., Mexico: Insights South Napa Robust Indicators of Health Monitoring Schorlemmer, D. from Realistic 3D Earthquake. Dreger, Stress Drop? of Building Earthquake D. S., Woodell, K. Hough, S. E. Structures. Simulations. E.,Huang,M.H. Zembaty, Z.,Bobra, Sanabria, J. D., P., Kokot, S. Cruz-Atienza, V. M.,Tago,J., Chaljub, E., Virieux, J.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 549 Tuesday, 21 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Objective Testing Numerical The Aug 2014 Linking Ground Structural Health of PSHA ... Modeling ... Napa, CA EQ... Motion ... Monitoring ...

11:30 INVITED: Metrics, STUDENT: INVITED: INVITED: Recipe System AM Bayes, and Evaluation of Three-Dimensional for Predicting Identification of a BOGSAT: How To Attenuation Models Ground Motion Strong Ground 5-Storied Assess And Revise (Q-Vs Simulations of the Motion from Steel-Frame Earthquake Hazard Relationships) used 2014 South Napa Subduction Structure based on Maps. Stein, S., in Physics-Based Earthquake using Earthquake Natural Frequency Brooks, E., Ground-Motion the USGS Scenarios. Miyake, Deviation with Spencer, B. Earthquake Geologic/Seismic H.,Koketsu,K., Known Mass Simulation. Model and Various Irikura, K. Loading. Khoshnevis, N., Source Models. Hatakeyama, N., Taborda, R. Rodgers, A. J., Kawase, H., Pitarka, A., Dreger, Matsushima, S. D. S., Aagaard, B. T.

11:45 STUDENT: Progress of the Ground-Motion Anatomy of Non-Stationary vs. AM Assessing the Southern California Simulations of 3-D Near-Field Nonlinear Effects Long-term Earthquake Center Basin Effects for Ground-Shaking Recorded During Performance Technical Activity Aftershocks from Generated by Earthquakes on Earthquake Hazard Group on Ground the 2014 South Dynamic Rupture Monitored Maps. Brooks, E., Motion Simulation Napa Earthquake. Simulations. Buildings. Stein, S., Validation. Aagaard, B. T., Cauzzi, C.,Dalguer, Ditommaso, R., Spencer,B.D. Rezaeian, S., Rodgers, A. J., L., Baumann, C., Mucciarelli, M., Luco, N. Pitarka, A. Giardini, D. Ponzo, F. C. Noon– 2:15 Lunch PM

550 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Tuesday, 21 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Rethinking PSHA Using Dense Seismic From Newspapers to Characterizing Expanding our Session Chairs: Array to Image the Numerical Analyses: Ground Motions Understanding of Matthew Subsurface and Documenting and and Active Faults Explosion Gerstenberger, Mark Monitor Earthquake Understanding in Urban Areas Phenomenology Stirling and Mark Activity Earthquakes in Session Chairs: Lee Through Analysis Petersen (see page Session Chairs: Central and Eastern Liberty and Thomas and Modeling of 589) Robert Clayton and North America Pratt (see page 601) Seismic Brandon Schmandt Session Chairs: Observations and (see page 593) Robert Williams, Complementary Oliver Boyd and Data Types William Levandowski Session Chairs: Robert (see page 597) Abbott, Charlotte Rowe and Brian Stump (see page 605)

2:15 Rethinking PSHA: STUDENT:Wave Quantifying Urban Hazard Map Effect of PM the Next Steps With Gradiometry and its Interactions among Pilot Study For The Geomechanical the New Zealand Link with Helmholtz Gravity-derived Stress, Charleston, SC Properties Anisotropy National Seismic Tomography Applied Far-field Quadrangle. on the Near-field and Hazard Model. to USArray. Liu, Y., Compression, and Cramer, C.,Jaume, the Far-field Seismic Gerstenberger, M. Holt, W. E. Inherited Structures S., Levine, N., Braud, Responses due to C.,Stirling,M.W., in the Central United A.,Chapman,M. Underground McVerry, G., States. Levandowski, Explosions. Vorobiev, Rhoades, D. A., W. B.,Boyd,O.S. O. Y., Ezzedine, S. M., Harte, D., Van Antoun, T. H., Glenn, Dissen, R., Nicol, A., L. A. Christophersen, A., Fry, B., Zhao, J.

2:30 INVITED: Comparison of the Exploring STUDENT: Modeling PM UCERF3: Lessons Ray Ansatz and Full Paleoseismic Signals Near-Surface, Near-Source Learned. Page, M. Wave Field Solution from Caves in the Site-Specific, and Phenomenology with T.,Field,E.H., for Wave Central and Eastern Frequency- a Novel Visco-Plastic Milner, K. R. Gradiometry in the USA. Tinsley, J. C., Dependent Continuum Model SAFOD Borehole. Paces,J.B., Amplification of and its Implications Langston, C. A., Panno, S. V. Seismic Strong on Close-In Seismic Ayele, M. Ground Motions in Observables. Rougier, Taipei Basin. E., Knight, E. E., Young, B. A., Yang, X., Patton, H. J. Chen,K.C.,Chiu,J. M., Langston, C. A.

2:45 INVITED: Basic Wave AreIntraplateFaults Fault Kinematics Shear Release from PM Observations on Propagation Results Accruing Strain? Beneath the Explosive Loading at a UCERF3 and Its from a Highly-Dense Calais, E.,Craig,T.J. Southern Puget Jointed Test Site. Applications to Seismic Array on the Lowland, Steedman, D. W., Site-Specific PSHA. San Jacinto Fault Washington State: Bradley, C. R. Biasi, G. P. Zone. Ben-Zion, Y., Strain Partitioning Vernon, F., Ozakin, in the Northern Y.,Zigone,D.,Ross, Cascadia Forearc. Z., Meng, H., White, Pratt, T.,Liberty,L. M., Reyes, J., Hollis, D., Barklage, M.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 551 Tuesday, 21 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Rethinking PSHA Using Dense From Newpapers Char Ground Expanding Seismic Array ... to Num ... Motions ... Understanding ...

3:00 Is There Evidence Determining Near STUDENT: Noise or Depth-dependent Numerical PM for the Basic Surface Structure in Signal? Trying to Soil Amplification Investigation of the Assumption for the the Los Angeles Understand GPS Model for Georgia Impact of the Standard Basin Using Velocity BasininGreater Geological and Probabilistic Seismic Correlation of Uncertainties in Vancouver, British Geomechanical Hazard Assessment? Dense Arrays. Central-Eastern Columbia, Canada. Properties on the Wyss, M. Clayton, R.,Tsai,V. North America. Kim, B.,Seyhan,E. Seismo-Acoustic Dmitrieva, K., Responses of Segall, P. Underground Explosions. Ezzedine, S. M., Vorobiev, V. Y., Rodgers, A., Pitarka, A., Glenn, L. A., Antoun, T. H.

3:15 Seismic Efficiency: STUDENT:Active Crustal Structure STUDENT: STUDENT: PM Mechanisms and Faulting in Below the Southern Geomorphic Seismoacoustics of Global Perspectives. Long-Beach, CA, Appalachian Blue Mapping and Explosions at LaForge, R., from Dense Array Ridge and Valley Geophysical Studies Varying Scaled Ostenaa, D., Addo, Data. Inbal, A., and Ridge to Assess the Seismic Depth of Burial. K., Lawrence, M. Clayton, R., Provinces: Hazard along the Bowman,D.C., Ampuero, J. P. Implications for North Boqueron Lees, J. M., National Seismic Bay-Punta Montalva Taddeucci, J., Hazard Maps. Fault Zone: A Graettinger, A. H., Powell, C. A. Capable Fault Sonder, I., System In Valentine, G. Southwestern Puerto Rico. Adames, R., Asencio, E. 3:30– 4:15 Break PM 4:30 INVITED: Localizing and TheSourceofthe San Andreas Fault Effect of the Cavity PM Project’17: A Monitoring 1886 Charleston Surface Gas Volume on Collaboration of Coherent Earthquake: Deformation Seismic Coupling Probabilistic Seismic Phenomena in an Similarities of Modeling for for Underground Hazard Analysis Urban Current Seismicity Protection of Explosions. (PSHA) Modelers Environment. in the Epicentral Southern California Stroujkova, A. and Users to Riahi, N., Area with the Critical Develop Ground Gerstoft, P. Aftershocks of the Infrastructure. de Motion Maps for M5.8Mineral, Lamare, R. G., the 2024 Virginia Earthquake Weldon, R. J., Yule, International of 2011. Chapman, J. D., Hammond, Building Code. M. C.,Hardy,A.C., W. C., Freeman, S. Luco, N.,Tong,M., Beale, J. A., Wu, Q. T., Rodriguez, A. J. Hamburger, R., Schneider, P., Rezaeian, S.

552 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Tuesday, 21 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Rethinking PSHA Using Dense From Newpapers Char Ground Expanding Seismic Array ... to Num ... Motions ... Understanding ...

4:45 INVITED:Event Matched Filter STUDENT: Surface and Body International PM Characterization for Detection of Coulomb Stress Wave Active Source Monitoring System Risk Models: from Microseismicity in Changes due to the Imaging with a Correlation Segment-Centered to LongBeachwitha 2011 Mw 5.8 Multicomponent Detection at the aRegional 5200-station Dense Mineral, Virginia Land Streamer: a North Korean Perspective. The Case Array. Peng, Z.,Li, Earthquake. Wu, New Approach to Nuclear Test Site at of NZEQ. Fitzenz, D. Z., Meng, X., Inbal, Q.,Chapman,M.C. Urban Earthquake Punggye-ri with D.,Nyst,M. A., Hollis, D., Hazard Insights from the Ampuero, J. P. Assessments. Source Physics Liberty, L. M., Experiment. Ford, Gribler, G. S. R.,Walter,W.R., Dodge, D. A., Hauk,T.F. 5:00 Canada’s 5th Detection and Using Modern Near-Surface Fault Fusing Multiple PM Generation Seismic Location of Geophysical Data to Trace Identification Geophysical Hazard Model for the Microseismic Events Look for an Active Using Guided-Wave Signatures to Detect 2015 National at Mt St Helens FaultattheSiteof PGV and Small Chemical Building Code of from Dense Nodal an Historic CEUS Tomographic Explosions At Local Canada. Allen, T. I., Data. Hansen, S. Event: The 1727 Vp/Vs Ratios. Distances. Adams, J., Halchuk, M.,Schmandt,B., Newburyport, MA Catchings, R. D., Carmichael, J. D., S., Rogers, G. C. Levander, A., Earthquake. Goldman, M. R., Arrowsmith, S. J., Kiser, E. Ebel,J.E. Rymer, M. J., Nemzek, R. J., Setnz, Sickler, R. R., Criley, K., Anderson, D. N. C. J., Chan, J. H.

5:15 The Roadmap for STUDENT: Precise Great Bay UAVSAR Remote Exploring PM Updating the Italian Relative Earthquake Lineament: Cause of Sensing Method for Correlation Seismic Hazard Depth the 1755 Cape Ann, Determining Methods of Model. Meletti, C., Determination Massachusetts, Few-Mm Surface Identifying Marzocchi, W., Using Array Earthquake? Fracture Slip. Explosions. Walter, D’Amico, V., Faenza, Processing Marple, R. T., Parker,J.W., W. R.,Ford,S.R., L., Martinelli, F., Techniques. Florez, Altamura,R.J., Donnellan, A., Dodge, D., Pyle, M., Roselli, P., Taroni, M., M. A.,Prieto,G.A. Hurd, J. D. Glasscoe, M. T., Hauk, T. Visini, F. Stough, T. M., Pierce, M., Wang, J.

5:30 STUDENT: Very Low Velocity Ground Motion UAVSAR P-coda and MsU PM Operational Anomaly Detected Prediction Observation of Calibration for Earthquake by Analysis of CCF Equations for Active Structures Improved Event Forecasting in in a Dense Network. Eastern North Associated with the Identification. California: A Iglesias, A., America Using a 2014 M 5.1 La Napoli, V., Russell, Prototype System Córdoba-Montiel, Hybrid Empirical Habra Earthquake. D., Yoo, S., Combining Ucerf3 F., Hjörleifsdóttir, Method. Pezeshk, Donnellan, A., Mayeda, K. and Cybershake. V.,Singh,S.K. S.,Zandieh,A., Parker, J. W., Grant Milner, K. R.,Jordan, Campbell, K. W., Ludwig, L., Rundle, T. H., The Working Tavakoli, B. J. B., Hauksson, E. Group on California Earthquake Probabilities and The CyberShake Collaboration

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 553 Tuesday, 21 April (continued) Tuesday, 21 April Poster Sessions 15. The December 1, 2014 Flagstaff, Arizona Earthquake (Mw4.7). Brumbaugh, D.,Young,J. Characterizing Ground Motions and Active Faults in 16. Damage Features and Strong Ground Motion Urban Areas (see page 608) Characteristics of Ludian Ms6.5 Earthquake in Yunnan Province, China. Qiao, S.,Liu,A.W.,Chen,X.L.,Wen, Z.P.,Cui,J.W.

1. STUDENT: Characterizing the Recent Behavior of the Ventura Blind Thrust Fault: Results from the Brookshire Avenue, Ventura, Study Site. Grenader, J. R.,Dolan,J. Expanding our Understanding of Explosion F.,McAuliffe,L.J.,Rhodes,E.J.,Shaw,J.H.,Pratt,T.L., Phenomenology Through Analysis and Modeling of Hubbard, J. Seismic Observations and Complementary Data Types 2. Lidar and Geophysical Mapping of the Rodgers Creek- (see page 611) Healdsburg Fault Through Santa Rosa, California. Hecker, S., Langenheim, V. E., Williams, R. A., Hitchcock, C. S., DeLong, S. B. 3. Lidar identifies source for 1872 earthquake near Chelan, 17. Geologic Cross Sections Constructed Along Five Washington. Sherrod, B. L. Geophone Lines in Place for Source Physics Experiment 4. Enhanced Seismic Monitoring for British Columbia’s Shots at the Nevada National Security Site. Huckins- North Coast. Brillon, C., Allen, T. I. Gang,H.E.,Reed,D.N.,Mercadante,J.M.,Drellack, 5. Shear-Wave Velocity in the Seattle Basin Characterized S. L.,Prothro,L.B.,Townsend,M.J. Through KRSPAC: Insights from a New Approach to 18. Developing a 3-D Seismic-Attribute Framework Model Basin-Scale Vs Imaging. Stephenson,W.J.,Odum,J.K., of Yucca Flat, Nevada National Security Site. Prothro, Asten,M.W.,Frankel,A.D. L. B., Townsend, M. J., Huckins-Gang, H. E., Drellack, 6. Surface Wave Velocity Measurements in the San S.L.,Reed,D.N.,Kincaid,T.R.,Day,K.E. Francisco Bay Delta Region. Craig, M. S., Hayashi, K., 19. Representation of Damage Zones Associated with Shuler, S., Jones, M., Roughley, C., Galvin, J. Underground Nuclear Explosions in a 3-D Seismic- 7. A Local Seismicity Study at the Central Part of the Attribute Model of Yucca Flat, Nevada National Magdalena Shelf, in the Pacific Margin of Baja California Security Site. Townsend, M. J., Prothro, L. B., Drellack, Sur, Mexico. Munguía, L., González, M., Navarro, M., S. L. Valdez, T., Mayer, S., Aguirre, A., Wong, V., Luna, M. 20. Synthesis of Geologic and Historical Seismic Data from 8. Investigating the Historical Seismicity of the Indonesian Nuclear and Chemical Explosions to Characterize the Archipelago using Macroseismic Intensity Observations. Source Physics Experiment Dry Alluvium Geology Site. Martin, S. S.,Bradley,K.,Hubbard,J.,Hananto,N.D., Rodgers, A. J., Wagoner, J., Pitarka, A., Helmberger, D. Sieh, K., Singh, S. C. V.,Harben,P.,Prothro,L. 9. Preliminary Results of Crustal Structure Beneath 21. Well Log Correlation of the Source Physics Experiment Nasiriyah and Basra Areas, Southern Iraq, Using (SPE) Phase I Test Bed. Snelson, C. M.,Coblentz,D., Inversion of Fundamental Mode Rayleigh Wave Townsend, M. J., Prothro, L. Dispersion Curves. Mahdi, H., Al-Mohaned, R., Al- 22. Introducing PAsTA: A Statistical Framework for Zubairi, Z., Gok, R. Association of Multi-Phenomenologies. Euler, G. 10. Ground Motion Simulation in Azerbaijan. Gok, R., G.,Blom,P.S.,Arrowsmith,S.J.,Anderson, Pitarka, A., Kazimova, S., Yetirmishli G., G. D. N. 11. What’s Shaking in DC?: Measuring the Variations in 23. STUDENT: The Effects of 3D Heterogeneity on Earthquake Ground Motions in Washington, DC. Pratt, Regional Moment Tensor Source-Type Discrimination. T. L.,Hough,S.E.,Horton,J.W.,Chapman,M.C., Chiang, A., Dreger, D. S., Pitarka, A., Ford, S. R. Beale, J. N. 24. Locating the Origin of Scattered Waves By Simulating 12. Seismic and Liquefaction Hazard Maps For the St. Time Reversal of the Seismic Wavefield. Myers, Louis Metropolitan Area. Cramer, C., Williams, R., S. C., Pitarka, A., Simmons, N. A., Sjogreen, B., Boyd,O.,Bauer,R.,Voigt,V.,Pierce,L.,Chung,J., Johannesson, G. Rogers, D. 25. Pn Spreading and Attenuation around Korean Peninsula 13. STUDENT: Passive Source Study in the San Gorgonio Constrained with Observations from the North Korean Pass, CA. Tarnowski, J. M., Ghosh, A., Oglesby, D. D. Nuclear Tests. Zhao,L.F.,Xie,X.B.,Tian,B.F.,Chen, 14. Towards Constructing “Visible” Disaster Mitigation Q.F.,Hao,T.Y.,Yao,Z.X. Community Network in Yokohama, Japan. Kim, A., 26. Coupling Hydrodynamic and Wave Propagation Uematsu, H., Iwamoto, S., Sasaki, A., Hoshino, Y., Modeling for Waveform Modeling of SPE. Larmat, C. Takeuchi, T. S., Steedman, D. W., Rougier, E., Bradley, C.

554 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Tuesday, 21 April (continued) 27. Source Time Function and RDP of Nuclear/Chemical 42. Peverly Brook Scarp and Lineament of Southeastern Explosions Using Time-Domain Convolution. Saikia, New Hampshire, USA: A Late Pleistocene or Younger C. K.,Woods,M.,Dwyer,J.J. Fault Scarp? Marple, R. T., Altamura, R. J., Hurd, J. D. 28. Sensitivity Analysis of the Far-Field Motion From the 43. New Faults Imaged Beneath the Daytona Beach Sand SPE3 Underground Chemical Explosion. Pitarka, A., Blow Lineament near Marianna, Arkansas. Odum, J. K., Ezzedine, S. M., Vorobiev, O. Y., Antoun, T. H., Glenn, Tuttle, M. P., Williams, R. A., Stephenson, W. J., Al- L.A.,Mellors,R.J.,Walter,W.R. Shukri,H.J. 29. Regional Attenuation of Southern Nevada Using Multiphase Inversion. Pyle, M. L.,Walter,W.R., Pasyanos,M.E. Linking Ground Motion and Earthquake Source 30. An Expanded Feature Set for Regional Seismic Variability (SSA/ESC Joint Session) (see page 617) Discrimination. MacCarthy, J. K.,Hartse,H.E., Anderson, D. N. 44. STUDENT: Do We Need to Consider Off-Fault Material Heterogeneities in Dynamic Rupture Simulations?. Ma, X.,Elbanna,A.E. From Newspapers to Numerical Analyses: Documenting 45. Broadband Ground Motions from Dynamic Models and Understanding Earthquakes in Central and Eastern of Rupture on the Northern San Jacinto Fault, and North America (see page 614) Comparison with Precariously Balanced Rocks. Lozos, J. C.,Olsen,K.B.,Brune,J.N.,Takedatsu,R.,Brune,R. 31. New Research and Monitoring Opportunities with the J., Oglesby, D. D. Central and Eastern United States Seismic Network. 46. Quantifying the Variability of Finite Earthquake Source Sumy, D. F.,Woodward,R.L.,Frassetto,A.M.,Busby, Processes with 1-Point and 2-Point Statistics. Song,S.G. R. W. 47. Hybrid Broadband Ground Motion Simulation Using 32. Sharpening the Focus: Possibilities and Pitfalls of New Both Dynamic and Stochastic Methods: Application to Madrid Earthquake Historical Research. Moran, N. K. the Central Marmara Fault (Turkey). Herrero, A. F., 33. STUDENT: Regression Relationships Between Modified Aochi, H., Akinci, A. Mercalli Intensities and Ground Motion Parameters. 48. Kinematic Rupture Characterization for Ground Ogweno,L.P., Cramer, C. H. Motion Simulation of Shallow Crustal Earthquakes. 34. Development of GMPEs with Multiple Region-Specific Graves,R.W.,Pitarka,A. Random Effects: the PEER NGA-East Example. Kuehn, 49. Variability of Long-Period Ground Motions from M7 N. M., Hollenback, J., Goulet, C., Abrahamson, N. Earthquake Simulations on the Salt Lake City Segment, 35. STUDENT: Hybrid Empirical Ground-Motion Wasatch Fault Zone, Utah. Moschetti, M. P., Hartzell, Prediction Equations for the Gulf Coast Region. Haji- S. H., Ramirez-Guzman, L., Angster, S., Frankel, A. Soltani, A., Pezeshk, S., Zandieh, A. 50. STUDENT: Focal Mechanism Dependence of Radiated 36. STUDENT: Anisotropy Beneath the New Madrid Seismic Energy for Moderate and Large Earthquakes. Seismic Zone – A Study of Shear Wave Splitting. Kiuchi, R., Mori, J. J. Nyamwandha, C. A., Powell, C. A. 51. The Global SCARDEC Source Database to Constrain 37. Lithospheric Structure Beneath Northern Mississippi Ground Motion Simulation Input Parameters and their Embayment from Joint Inversion of Surface Wave Variability. Courboulex, F.,Causse,M.,Vallee,M., Dispersion and Receiver Functions. Su, H., Herrmann, Chounet, A., Alfonso-Naya, V. R. B., Guo, H. 52. Subduction Interface Fault Scaling Relationships 38. Joint Inversion of Surface Wave Dispersion and Receiver to Facilitate Rapid Ground-Shaking and Impact Functions for Crustal Structure in Oklahoma. Guo, H., Assessments. Allen, T. I.,Hayes,G.P. Herrmann, R. B., Su, H. 39. Structure of the Moho in Northern New York and New Numerical Modeling of Earthquake Ground Motion, England Using Seismic Refraction and Receiver Function Rupture Dynamics and Seismic Wave Propagation (see Observations. Cipar, J. page 619) 40. Comparison of Magnitude Scales at Very Short Distances: The Charlevoix, Quebec, Seismic Zone. Bent, A. L.,Vadnais,F. 53. Comparisons of Kinematic Rupture Models Generated 41. Crustal Structure of the St. Lawrence Corridor from With an Asperity Modeling Technique and GP2014 Teleseismic Receiver Functions and a Temporary Method. Pitarka, A., Graves, R., Somerville, P., Irikura, Broadband Array. Bent,A.L.,Kao,H. K., Miyake, H.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 555 Tuesday, 21 April (continued)

54. STUDENT: Seismic Source Spectra and Estimated Stress 67. New Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations Drop from Complex Faulting Behaviors. Wang, Y.,Day, for East Malaysia and Borneo Island. Adnan, A. B., S. M., Shearer, P. M. Harith,N.S.,Shoushtari,A.V. 55. STUDENT: SCEC Broadband Platform Simulations for 68. Seismic Excitation and Modeling of Precarious Rocks the PEER NGA-East Project. Bayless, J. R.,Goulet,C. near Los Alamos, New Mexico. Menq, F., Macfarlane, E., A., Hollenback, J. Stokoe, K., Schultz-Fellenz, E., Lee, R. 56. STUDENT: Near-Field Rotational Strong Ground 69. Testing of Earthquake and the Resulting Ground- Motion Simulation Using an EGF Methodology and a Motion forecasts: A Difficult Task. Wang, Z. New6DOFDataSet.Yin,J.,Nigbor,R.,Chen, Q. 70. Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability 57. 3D Numerical Simulations of Earthquake Ground - Global Activities. Schorlemmer, D., Gerstenberger, M. Motion in Sedimentary Basins: Verification and C.,Hirata,N.,Jordan,T.H.,Liukis,M.,Marzocchi,W., Comparison of Methods. Chaljub, E., Moczo, P., Rhoades, D. A., Tsuruoka, H., Werner, M., Zechar, J., Kristek, J., Maufroy, E., De Martin, F., Kristekova, M., The CSEP Working Group Cipciar,A.,Hollender,F.,Bard,P.-Y.,Klin,P.,Priolo,E., 71. Current Status of the Collaboratory for the Study of Zhang,Z.,Zhang,W.,Chen,X. Earthquake Predictability. Liukis, M.,Werner,M., 58. Modeling of 1D Wave Propagation in Nonlinear Soils Schorlemmer, D., Yu, J., Maechling, P. J., Zechar, J., using the Elasto-plastic Iwan Model by Four Numerical Jordan, T. H., The CSEP Working Group Schemes. Mercerat, E. D., Bonilla-Hidalgo, F., De 72. A New Way to Calculate Static Stress Change: Improved Martin, F., Delavaud, E., Gelis, C., Glinsky, N., Kristek, Aftershock Forecasting. Segou, M. S.,Parsons,T.P. J., Moczo, P., Oral, E., Santisi, M.P. , Richterova, A. 59. Modeling Long-period Seismic Waves in the Gulf Region from Distant Large Earthquakes. Cakti, E., Sesetyan, K., Rethinking PSHA (see page 623) Madariaga, R., Harmandar, E. 60. Near-Field Coseismic Tilt Motions Measured By Collocated High-Rate Gps and Accelerometers During 73. Improved Regression Relations for Earthquake Source the 2010 Mw 7.2 El Mayor-Cucapah Earthquake Parameters. Wells,D.L., Youngs, R. R. and Their Comparison to Synthetics Predicted With 74. Ranking of Scaling Relations. Leonard, M. KinematicSourceModels.Geng, J., Bock, Y., Crowell, 75. Scaling Relationships for Partially Creeping Faults. B.W.,Goldberg,D.E.,Melgar,D.,Wang,R.,Zhang,Y. Hough, S. E.,Page,M. 61. Effect of Varying Dip Angle on the Dynamic Rupture 76. Impact from Magnitude-Rupture Length Uncertainty of the Mw 7.2 El-Mayor Cucapah Earthquake, April 4, on Seismic Hazard and Risk in the Central and Eastern 2010. Kyriakopoulos, C., Oglesby, D., Funning, G. J. United States. Apel, E.,Nyst,M.,Kane,D. 62. The 1927 Jericho Earthquake Revisited – Comparison 77. Estimating Magnitudes of Large Earthquakes from with Numerical Results Using the Distributed Slip Rupture Length of Faults with Low Slip Rates. Model. Shani-Kadmiel, S., Tsesarsky, M.,Gvirtzman,Z. Anderson, J. G.,Wesnousky,S.G.,Biasi,G.P. 63. Homogenization of the Wave Equation for Interaction 78. Revisiting the Fault Magnitude Frequency Distribution between Explosive Source and Local Heterogeneities. for Site-Specific PSHA. Biasi, G. P.,Thompson,S., Burgos, G., Capdeville, Y., Guillot, L. AbramsonWard, H. 64. On Adequacy of Plane-Wave Approximation for 79. Segmenting the Aleutian Megathrust. Porto, N. M., Evaluating Near-Field Seismic Rotational Ground Fitzenz, D. D. Motion: Case of SH Source. Singla, V. K.,Gupta,V.K. 80. Implementing the Effect of the Rupture Directivity 65. STUDENT: Virtual Quake: The Software Formerly on PSHA Maps: Application to the Marmara Region Known as Virtual California. Schultz, K. W.,Sachs, (Turkey). Akinci, A., Spagnuolo, E., Herrero, A., M.K.,Heien,E.M.,Yoder,M.R.,Turcotte,D.L., Pucci, S. Donnellan, A., Rundle, J. B. 81. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessments for Taiwan. Wang, Y. J.,Chan,C.H.,Lee,Y.T.,Ma,K.F.,Shyu,J. B. H. Objective Testing of PSHA & Earthquake Forecast 82. Off-Fault Strain-Rate Estimation and Application to the Models (see page 621) Seismic Hazard Analysis. Zeng, Y., Shen, Z. K., Petersen, M. D. 83. Impact of Catalog Declustering Approach on Hazard 66. Spectral Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for and Risk in Mexico. Kane, D.,Woessner,J.,Apel,E., Sumatran Subduction Interface Earthquakes based on Nyst, M. Recorded Data in Peninsular Malaysia. Adnan, A. B., 84. Functional PSHA. Powers, P. M. Shoushtari, A. V., Harith, N. S. 85. GMPE Space. Chiou, B.

556 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Tuesday, 21 April (continued) 86. Selecting and Weighting of GMPEs for PSHA based on 97. Development of an Active Source Field Calibration High-Dimensional Visualization Tools. Kuehn, N. M., System. Zeiler, C. P. Abrahamson, N. 98. Installation of High-Frequency Array and Broadband 87. Role of Seismic Zonation of the Northern Apennines, Seismic Stations in South Central Iraq. Al-Shukri, H., GMPEs and hazard software for PSHA evaluation in Mahdi,H.,Abd,N.,Chlaib,H.,Ramthan,A.,Gok,R. Emilia-Romagna, Italy. Mucciarelli, M.,Santulin,M., Tamaro, A., Rebez, A., Sandron, D., Slejko, D., Martelli, L., Sani, F., Bonini, M., Corti, G. 88. A Contemporary Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Structural Health Monitoring and Earthquake Damage Assessment (PSHA) Framework for Iraq and Detection in Structures (see page 628) Neighboring Regions. Onur, T.,Gok,R.,Abdulnaby, W.,Shakir,A.M.,Numan,N.,Mahdi,H., Al-Shukri, H. 99. Earthquake Damage Estimation of the Building InventoryintheValleyofMexicobasedonSemi- coupled Long Period (T>1s) Large Scale 3D Earthquake Seismic Networks, Instrumentation and Products (see Simulations and Building Models. Quiroz-Ramirez, A., page 626) Ramirez-Guzman, L. 100. Data-Driven Post-Earthquake Rapid Structural Safety 89. Compilation of an Earthquake Catalog for Iraq and Assessment. Goulet, J. A., Michel, C., Der Kiureghian, A. Neighboring Regions. Onur, T.,Gok,R.,Dodge,D.A., 101. STUDENT: A New Paradigm for Structural Health Abdulnaby, W., Mahdi, H. Monitoring and Post-Disaster Damage Assessment of 90. Caltech/USGS Southern California Seismic Network Civil Structures. Ebrahimian, H.,Astroza,R.,Conte,J. (SCSN): Operations and Future Plans. Bhadha, R., P. Andrews, J., Guiwits, S., Hauksson, E., Watkins, M., 102. Multi-sensor, Multi-scale Structural Health Monitoring Crummey, J., Thomas, V. I. of Damage to the Watts Towers. Abazarsa, F.,English, 91. Products and Services Available from the Southern J., Nigbor, R., Preusser, F., Taciroglu, E. California Earthquake Data Center. Yu, E.,Acharya, 103. STUDENT: A Seismogeodetic Approach to Building P., Bhaskaran, A., Chen, S., Chowdhury, F., Hutton, K., Monitoring Using Low-Cost MEMS Accelerometers. Hauksson,E.,Clayton,R.W. Saunders, J. K.,Bock,Y.,Fleischman,R.,Geng,J., 92. The ANSS Station Information System: A Centralized Goldberg,D.E.,Haase,J.S.,Melgar,D.,Nema,A., Station Metadata Repository for Populating, Managing Offield, D. G., Restrepo, J., Squibb, M., Zhang, Z. and Distributing Seismic Station Metadata. Yu, 104. STUDENT: Time-Wave Velocity Analysis for Early E., Chowdhury, F., Acharya, P., Kientz, S., Earthquake Damage Detection in Buildings: Application Thomas, V. to a Damaged Full-Scale RC Building. Rahmani, M., 93. Latest Web Service and Data Product Developments At Ebrahimian, M., Todorovska, M. I. theIRISDMC.Trabant,C.,Hutko, A., Van Fossen, M., 105. STUDENT: Is Ambient Excitation as Effective as the Ahern, T., Weekly, R., Bahavar, M. Larger Amplitude Earthquake Excitation for Detecting 94. Tracking Station Noise Characteristics in Alaska Using Earthquake Damage in Full-Scale Structures? Some IRIS MUSTANG Web Services. Bruton, C. P., Ruppert, Results Based on Shake Table Tests of a Full-Scale 7- N. A., Frassetto, A. Story Building Slice. Ebrahimian, M., Todorovska, M. I. 95. Challenges and Solutions for Placing a Seismometer on 106. Using Structural Health Monitoring Techniques to Mars. Hurst, K. J., Lognonne, P., Laudet, P., Banerdt, Determine the Effect of Infill Walls on Dynamic W. B., de Raucourt, S., Deleuze, M., Ijpelaan, F., Kerjean, Behavior of Steel Structures. Sumer, Y.,Boru,E., L.,Perez,R.,Pont,G.,Sylvestre-Baron,A.,Verdier, Agcakoca, E., Aktas, M., Kuyuk, H. S. N., Bahandari, P., Denise, R., Ervin, J., Feldman, J., 107. The Feasibility Examination of Extracting Story-by- Hagman,M.,Klein,K.,Mikellides,I.,Lin,J.,Onufer, story Shear-wave Velocity From Microtremor Records N., Trebi-Ollennu, A., Umland, J., Giardini, D., Zweifel, of High-rise Buildings. Wang, X., Masaki, K., Irikura, P.,Bramanti, C., Pike, W.T., Calcutt, S., Mimoun, D., K., Motosaka, M. Bierwirth,M.,Christensen,U.andtheSEIS/InSight 108. STUDENT: Maximum Response Evaluation of Instrument Team. Traditional Wooden Buildings based on Seismic Observation and Experimental Result. Sugino, M., 96. STUDENT: Development of the Next Generation of Seismological Instrumentation for Polar Environments. Ohmura, S., Hayashi, Y. Winberry,J.P.,Huerta,A.D.,Bernsen, S. P.,Parker, 109. Low Price Seismic and Structural Response T., Carpenter, P., Woodward, R., Beaudoin, B., Bilek, S., Measurement Method Using Smart Devices. Dang, J., Anderson, K. Wang, X., Shrestha, A., Kikuchi, Y.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 557 Tuesday, 21 April (continued) 110. Significant Change Detection from Airborne Lidar Point J. R., Jo, M., Manipon, G. J., Agram, P., Moore, A. W., Clouds. Jalobeanu, A.,Kim,A.M.,Runyon,S.C., Jung, H., Webb, F. H., Milillo, G., Rosinski, A Olsen, R. C., Kruse, F. A. 124. Rupture History of 2014 Mw 6.1 South Napa Valley 111. Experimental Period-Height Relationships vs. Building Earthquake and Its Impact to the Practice of Ground Code Provisions In EU and USA. Gallipoli, M. R., Strong Motion Prediction. Ji, C.,Archuleta,R.J., Gueguen, P., Masi, A., Mucciarelli, M., Perrault, M. Twardzik, C. 112. Seismic Response of Bridge Foundations Considering 125. Ambient Noise-Based Monitoring of Seismic Velocity Nonlinear Soil Structure Interaction Effect. Kirtel, O., Changes Associated with The 2014 Mw 6.0 South Napa Celebi,E.,Aktas,M.,Kuyuk,H.S. Earthquake. Taira, T., Brenguier, F., Kong, Q. 126. STUDENT: Understanding the Lithospheric Structure Beneath the California Margin Using the Aug 24, 2014 The August 24, 2014 South Napa, CA Earthquake: South Napa Earthquake. Lai, V. H.,Wei,S.,Li,D.,Lui, Science Results, Impacts and Lessons Learned (see page S.K.Y.,Graves,R.W.,Helmberger,D. 631) 127. Multiple Holocene-Age Events on the Easternmost Surface Rupture of the August 24, 2014 South Napa Earthquake. Seitz, G.,Ryan,K.,Rosa,C. 113. Coseismic and Postseismic Deformation Due to the 128. Acquisition, Management, and Mapping of Data from South Napa Earthquake Inferred from Geodetic Data. the August 24, 2014 M6.0 South Napa Earthquake. Murray, J. R.,Svarc,J.,Pollitz,F.,Floyd,M.,Funning, Julius, A.,Ortiz,M.,Tremayne,H.,Blair,J.L. G., Johanson, I., Brooks, B. 129. PG&E Earthquake Response: A Case Study from 114. Unusual Downhole and Surface Free-Field Records Near the 2014 South Napa Earthquake. Madugo, C. L., Carquinez Bridges During 24 August 2014 M6.0 South Steinberg, S. M., McClaren, M. K., Ferre, K. S. Napa, CA, Earthquake. Celebi, M. 130. California Earthquake Clearinghouse Activation for 115. Rates and Patterns of Coseismic and Postseismic Surface August 24, 2014, M6.0 South Napa Earthquake. Deformation from the South Napa Earthquake as Rosinski, A., Ortiz, M.,Tremayne,H. Measured by Terrestrial Laser Scanning. DeLong,S.B., 131. Ambient Tremor Activity Triggered by the 24 August Lienkaemper, J. J. 2014, M6.0 South Napa Earthquake in the Parkfield- 116. Aftershock Statistics of the 2014 South Napa Cholame Region of California. Nadeau, R. M. Earthquake. Yikilmaz, M. B., Shcherbakov, R., 132. Post-Earthquake Rupture Characterization and Analysis Turcotte,D.L.,Kellogg,L.H.,Rundle,J.B. of Pipeline Deformation near the Southern End of the 117. Forecasting the (Un)Productivity of the 2014 M6.0 24 August 2014 West Napa Fault Rupture. Lutz, A. T., Llenos, A. L. South Napa Aftershock Sequence. , Hitchcock, C. H., Hart, J. D., Wade, A. M. Michael, A. J. 133. Shallow Geophysical Investigations following the South 118. The 2014 Mw6.1 South Napa Earthquake: an Energetic Napa Earthquake. Turner, J., Trench, D., Protti, B., Event with Shallow Asperity and Rapid Afterslip. Wei, Brossy,C.,Mayo,Z. S. J.,Barbot,S.,Graves,R.,Lienkaemper,J.,Wang,T., 134. Virtual California, Etas, and Openhazards Web Hudnut, K., Fu, Y., Helmberger, D. V. Services: Responding to Earthquakes in the Age of 119. UAVSAR Observations of Co And Postseismic Slip of Big Data. Yoder, M. R.,Schultz,K.W.,Heien,E. The M 6.0 South Napa Earthquake. Donnellan, A., M.,Rundle,J.B.,Turcotte,D.L.,Glasscoe,M.T., Parker,J.W.,GrantLudwig,L.,Rundle,J.B. Donnellan, A. 120. Aftershock Observation and S-wave Velocity Surveys using Portable Accelerometers on the Surface Rupture of the August 24, 2014 South Napa, CA Earthquake. Hayashi, K.,Roughley,C.,Craig,M. Using Dense Seismic Array to Image the Subsurface and 121. An Analysis of Back Projection and Source Sensitivity Monitor Earthquake Activity (see page 636) of the August 24th Napa Earthquake, Using 3D Simulations. Aguirre, J., Ramirez-Guzman, L., Prado, L. E. A. 135. STUDENT: Internal Structure of the San Jacinto Fault 122. Pre- and Post-Earthquake Paleoseismic Trenching on Zone at Jackass Flat from Earthquake Data Recorded by the West Napa Fault. Rubin, R. S.,Dawson,T.E., a Dense Linear Array. Qiu, H., Ben-Zion, Y., Ross, Z. E., Mareschal, M., Madugo, D., Madugo, C. Share, P. E., Vernon, F. 123. Use of Rapid Geodetic Observations for the M6.0 136. Imaging the Shallow Structure of the San Jacinto August 24, 2014 South Napa Earthquake. Yun, S., Fault Zone with High Frequency Noise. Zigone, D., Owen,S.E.,Hua,H.,Milillo,P.,Fielding,E.J.,Hudnut, Ben-Zion, Y., Campillo, M., Hillers, G., Roux, P., K.W.,Dawson,T.,Barnhart,W.,McCring,T.,Murray, Vernon, F.

558 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Tuesday, 21 April (continued)

137. STUDENT: Inversion of Inter-Station Attenuation from 142. Automatic Anthropogenic Transient Classification Ambient Seismic Noise Recorded by a Linear Array. Liu, using Clustering Techniques. Riahi, N.,Gerstoft,P. X., Ben-Zion, Y., Zigone, D. 143. STUDENT: Teleseismic P-Waves Across the Long Beach 138. Fault Zone Trapped Noise and Fault Zone Array As Seen Through the Eyes of Wave-Gradiometry. Reverberations from Cross-Correlations of Seismic Bockholt,B.M., Yang, Y., Langston, C. A. Noise and Earthquake Waveforms. Hillers, G., 144. Seismic-Wave Gradiometry with a Dense Array in Campillo, M., Ben-Zion, Y., Roux, P., Lecointre, A., Belmont County, Ohio. Barker, L.,Langston,C.A. Vernon, F. L. 145. Crust-Mantle Boundary Depth in the Sierra Nevada 139. STUDENT: Attenuation Properties of the Shallow San from Autocorrelations of Seismic Noise. Ramos, M., Jacinto Fault Zone From Data of Highly-Dense Seismic Tibuleac, I. M., Von Seggern, D. Array. Ozakin, Y.,Ben-Zion,Y.,Share,P.E.,Zigone,D., 146. CSN - Community Seismic Network. Clayton, R., Ross, Z., Vernon, F. Kohler,M.,Massari,A.,Guy,R.,Heaton,T.,Chandy, 140. STUDENT: Imaging Results from Dense Seismic Array M.,Bunn,J.,Cochran,E. on the San Jacinto Fault Zone Generated By Besty Gun 147. Automatic Processing of Continuous Data in Active Shots. Meng, H.,Ben-Zion,Y. Seismic Region. Wu,F.T.,Ross,Z.,Okaya,D.,Liang, 141. STUDENT: Natural Migration of Back-scattered Surface W. T., Kuo-Chen, H. Waves Using Ambient-Noise Cross-correlations: Long 148. STUDENT: Earthquake Rupture and Hidden Events Beach Dense Array and USArray Examples. AlTheyab, Detection for the 2014 Mw 8.2 Iquique Earthquake. Li, A.,Workman,E.,Lin,F.C.,Schuster,G.T. B.,Ghosh,A.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 559 Wednesday, 22 April – Oral Sessions Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Seismic Imaging Earthquake The Where, When Advances in Seismic Sources and Monitoring of Hazards and Risk: and Why of High-frequency and Seismicity Near-surface, Drivers and Uncharacteristic Ground Motion Studies Crustal and Global Consumers of Earthquakes and Attenuation Session Chairs: Scales: Recent Earthquake Session Chairs: Session Chairs: Christine Ruhl and Advances and Research Doug Yule, Richard Olga-Joan Vaclav Vavrycuk Future Directions Session Chairs: Heermance, Ktenidou, Norman (see page 655) Session Chairs: Delphine Fitzenz, Elizabeth Madden, A. Abrahamson, Marco Pilz and Nori Edwin Apel, David Michele Cooke and Kim Bak Olsen and Nakata (see page Wald, Paul Jack Loveless (see Ralph Archuleta (see 639) Somerville and Ting page 647) page 651) Lin (see page 643)

8:30 Regionalization INVITED: INVITED: Future INVITED:High Two-Way AM Based on Receiver Increasing Demand Earthquakes in Frequency Seismic Reverse-Time Functions. Larmat, for Earthquake Areas of Low Strain Hazard Estimation Imaging for Seismic C. S., Maceira, M., Research and Data Rate. Bilham, R. and Impacts on Sources. Nakata, N., Romanowicz, B., in the Insurance Seismic Performance Beroza, G. C. Chai, C., Ammon, Industry. Evaluation for C. J., He, R., Franco, G. Dams. Muto, M., Zhang, H. Duron, Z.

8:45 STUDENT: Receiver 20 Years of Using INVITED:From INVITED:Modeling STUDENT: AM Wavefield Imaging Earthquake Stable to the Distance Persistent Seismicity by 3D Reverse Time Scenarios in Risk Destructive: How Dependence of at Sheldon National Migration of Reduction Practice. Creeping Fault Spectral Amplitude Wildlife Refuge, Earthquake Body Rodgers, J. E., Segments Can Join and the Spectral Northwest Nevada. Waves. Li, J.,Shen, Tucker, B. E., Seismic Events. Decay Parameter Ruhl,C.J.,Smith, Y., Zhang, W. Tobin, L. T. Lapusta, N. (“kappa”) in K. D., Kent, G. M., Synthetic Rennie, T. Seismograms by Controlling the Depth and Frequency Dependence of Q. Anderson, J. G., Yagoda-Biran, G., McBean, K.

9:00 An Effective INVITED: Bi-Modal Behavior Kappa Issues and Large-Scale Analysis AM Medium Theory for Challenges in of the North Correlations: of Global Seismicity Three-Dimensional Earthquake Risk Anatolian fault. Insights from NGA Data for Elastic Modeling from a Kozaci, O. Rock Sites. High-Precision Heterogeneities. Reinsurer’s Ktenidou, O. J., Event Location. Jordan, T. H., Perspective. Abrahamson,A.N. Waldhauser, F., Song, X. Kaeser, M. A. Schaff, D. P.

560 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Wednesday, 22 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Seismic Imaging & EQ Hazards and The Where, When Adv in High-Freq Seismic Sources & Monitoring ... Risk and Why ... Ground ... Studies

9:15 Full-3D Putting Pager’s Time-Dependent On the Use and STUDENT:The AM Tomography of Rapid Earthquake Coupling and Misuse of "Kappa" in Magnitude- Crustal Structure in Loss Estimation Future Seismic the Stochastic Frequency Central California. Capabilities to Use: Potential on the Simulation of Distribution of Lee, E. J.,Jordan,T. the Usaid/Ofda Subduction Ground Motion: Bucaramanga Nest H., Chen, P., Scenario Efforts and Interfaces of Japan. Example Seismicity and its Maechling, P. J., Post Earthquake Loveless, J. P., Applications Using Relationship to the Boué, P., Denolle, Response-Related Meade, B. J. the Mechanism of M., Beroza, G. C., Applications. EUROSEISTEST Intermediate-Depth Eymold, W. K. Jaiswal, K. S., Database Records. Earthquakes. Marano,K.D., Roumelioti, Z., Barrett, S. A., Wald, D. J., Hearne, Ktenidou, O. J., Beroza,G.C. M., Lenon, C. P., Abrahamson,N.A., Mayberry, G. Pitilakis, K., Cotton, F.

9:30 STUDENT:Seismic INVITED: Inter-, Co-, and Incremental Site Iterative Joint AM Noise Analysis to Synchronous Post-Seismic Fault Attenuation from Inversion for Stress Constrain Shallow Rupture of the Slip Associated Garner Valley Array and Fault Velocity Structure Wasatch and West With Recent Large Recordings. Kottke, Orientations from in the Southern San Valley Fault Zones Megathrust A. R.,Hashemi,A. Focal Mechanisms. Andreas Fault in Northern Salt Earthquakes. Vavrycuk, V. Region. Tsang, S., Lake Valley, Utah. Simons, M., Tanimoto, T. DuRoss, C. B., Duputel, Z., Riel, B., Hylland,M.D. Jiang, J., Owen, S., Moore, A., Jolivet, R., Rivera, L., Ortega, F., Kanamori, H., Fielding, E., Samsanov, S., Norabuena, E. 9:45– 10:45 Break AM

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 561 Wednesday, 22 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Seismic Imaging & EQ Hazards and The Where, When Adv in High-Freq Applications of Monitoring... Risk andWhy... Ground... Tsunami Science: Working with States and Communities to Improve Tsunami Resilience Session Chairs: Rick Wilson and Lori Dengler (see page 656)

10:45 Monitoring and Spatio-Temporal INVITED:Evidence INVITED: Penultimate AM Imaging the Patterns of for Non-Persistent Amplitude Predecessors of the Response of Crustal Seismicity and Risk Rupture Modeling in the 2004 Indian Ocean Materials to Various Models. Fitzenz, D. Terminations at Explosion Tsunami in Aceh, Natural and D.,Chang,C.Y. Central Wasatch Monitoring World. Sumatra: Anthropogenic Fault Zone Segment Phillips, W. S., Stratigraphic, Loading Boundaries, Utah. Fisk, M. D., Stead, Archeological and Mechanisms of Bennett, S. E. K., R. J., Begnaud, M. Historical Evidence. Different Gold,R.D., L., Yang, X., Sieh, K.,Daly,P., Amplitude and DuRoss, C. B. Ballard, S. McKinnon, E. E., Periodicity. Pilarczyk, J., Chiang, Hillers, G. H. W., Horton, B., Rubin, C., Shen, C. C., Ismail, N., Vane, C.

11:00 Developing Geoscientists’ Turning The Importance of INVITED: AM Path-Dependent Capacity to Supply Uncharacteristic Incorporating a Advisories for Uncertainty Engineers’ Demands Earthquakes into Variable Q Model in Earthquakes and Estimates for Use for Seismic Hazard Expected Events: Ground Motion Tsunamis: An With the Regional Inputs. Identifying Fault Prediction Emergency Seismic Travel Time Somerville, P. Geometry and Equations. Management (Rstt) Model. Damage Pasyanos, M. E., Perspective. Begnaud, M. L., Development Pitarka, A., Goltz, J. D. Anderson, D. N., within Fault Steps as Baltay, A. S., Phillips, W. S., Key Characteristics Abrahamson, N. A. Myers, S. C., of Segmented Ballard, S. Systems. Madden, E. H., Cooke, M. L., Savage, H.

11:15 Estimation of Risk Modeling ACasefor STUDENT:Lg INVITED: AM Time-Lapse Velocity Needs and Barriers Multi-Fault Rupture Attenuation of the Assessment of Changes in the to Action: A Global in the Southern Contiguous United Nearshore Hazard Earth by Full Study of Earthquake California States. Gallegos, A. due to Waveform Inversion Safety Practitioners. Earthquake of C., Ranasinghe, N. Tsunami-Induced of Repeating Seismic Moresco, J. C., December 8th, R.,Ni,J.F.,Sandvol, Currents. Lynett, Events. Kamei, R., Peek, L., 1812. Lozos, J. C. E., Hearn, T. P.,Ayca,A., Lumley, D. Tucker, B. E. Borrero, J., Wilson, R., Eskijian, M., Miller, K.

562 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Wednesday, 22 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Seismic Imaging & EQ Hazards and The Where, When Adv in High-Freq Appl of Tsuami Monitoring... Risk andWhy... Ground... Science

11:30 On the Use of the Visualizing Seismic Uncharacteristic STUDENT:CODA INVITED: AM Autocorrelation Hazards and Risk. Earthquakes and Quality Factor (Qc) Probabilistic Function: the Nikbakht, H., Multi-Strand Sensitivity Kernels Tsunami Hazard Constraint of Using Lin, T. Ruptures of the in Scattering and Mapping in Frequency Band Southcentral San Absorbing Media. California. Thio, H. Limited Signals. Andreas Fault Mayor, J.,Margerin, K.,Li,W.,Wilson, Pilz,M.P., System. Grant L., Calvet, M. R., Miller, K. Parolai, S. P. Ludwig, L.

11:45 Non-Perturbational Automated Potential for Large STUDENT: INVITED:TheNew AM Surface Wave Operational Earthquakes on the Estimation of Tsunami Design Inversion: A Earthquake Risk Patton Escarpment, Quality Factor in Provisions of the Dix-type Relation Assessment: Offshore Southern the Caribbean ASCE 7-2016 for Surface Waves. Challenges and California. Region Using Standard. Tsai, V. C., Promise. Rundle, J. Legg, M. R. L g-wave Chock, G. Y. K. Haney, M. M. B.,Holiiday,J.R., Attenuation. Graves,W.R., Haji-Soltani, A., Rundle, P. B., Pezeshk, S., Hannon, A., Hosseini, M., Rundle, D. E., Chapman, M. Graves, C. R. Noon– 1:30 Lunch PM

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 563 Wednesday, 22 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Seismic Imaging & Engineering and How Reliable Are Adv in High-Freq Slow Earthquakes: Monitoring... Public Safety Reconstructions Ground... Diversity in Fault Concerns raised by and Models of Motion and Their Seismic Hazard Surface-Rupturing Implications in Assessment Earthquakes? Earthquake Methods Session Chairs: Dynamics Session Chairs: Scott Bennett, Session Chairs: Lalliana Mualchin, Katherine Scharer Abhijit Ghosh, Antonella Peresan, and Julian Lozos Christodoulos Vladimir (see page 649) Kyriakopoulos and Kossobokov and Hongfeng Yang (see Jens-Uwe Klügel page 657) (see page 645)

1:30 High-Resolution How Seismic Can Recurrence k0: The Role of INVITED:The PM Surficial Soil Hazard Assessment Models Explain the Intrinsic and Continuum of Slip Velocity Models in Method and the Century-Long Scattering along the the Canterbury, Rationale for Design Hiatus in California Attenuation. Subduction New Zealand Basin. Criteria Determines Paleo-Seismic Parolai, S.,Bindi, Megathrust: Bradley, B. A., aSafeOutcomeor Events? Jackson, D. D., Pilz, M. Observations and McGann, C. R., Disaster. Mualchin, D., Understanding Cox, B. R., L.,Barosh,P.J. Richards-Dinger, K., Gained from the Wotherspoon, L. Milner, K. Nicoya Seismic M.,Wood,C.M., Cycle Observatory. Lee, R. L., Newman, A. V., Teague, D. P. Kyriakopoulos, C., Feng,L.,Hobbs,T. E.,Dixon,T.H., Malservisi, R., Protti,J.M.

1:45 Potential of INVITED:Has INVITED/STUDENT: STUDENT: Spatial and PM Ambient Seismic Performance Based How do Models of Broadband (0–8 Temporal Noise Techniques to Engineering Broken Paleoseismic Hz) Ground Variations of Large Monitor the St. the Power Law? Rupture Motion Variability Slow Slip Events at Gallen Geothermal Heaton, T. H. Detectability Affect From Ensemble the Southcentral Site (Switzerland). Estimates of Simulations of the Alaska Subduction Obermann, A., Earthquake 1994 Mw 6.7 Zone. Fu, Y.,Liu, Kraft, T., Larose, E., Probabilities? Northridge Z., Freymueller, J. T. Wiemer, S. Gilchrist, J. J., Earthquake Dieterich, J. H., Including Rough Richards- Fault Descriptions Dinger, K. B. and Q(f). Withers, K. B.,Olsen,K.B., Shi,Z.,Day,S.M.

564 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Wednesday, 22 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Seismic Imaging & Engineering & Pub How Reliable are Adv in High-Freq Slow Earthquakes Monitoring... Safety ... Reconst ... Ground...

2:00 Investigating Effective Paleoseismic Speed STUDENT: STUDENT: PM Geothermal Systems Scenario-Based Dating: Pushing the Inclusion of Analytical and Using Virtual Seismic Risk Limits on Dating Nonstationary Coda Numerical Studies Seismometers. Mitigation at Earthquakes and in Time and of Slow and Fast Matzel, E., National and Local Re-thinking Inputs Frequency for Earthquakes on Morency, C., Scale. Peresan, A., Used in OxCal Age Computing Faults with Mixed Templeton, D., Magrin, A., Vaccari, Models. Streig, A. Synthetic Ground Velocity-Weakening Pyle, M. F., Romanelli, F., R.,Weldon,R.J., Motions from /Velocity- Panza, G. F. Dawson,T.E., Earthquake Strengthening Gavin, D., Scenarios. Rheology. Luo, Y., Guilderson, T. Crempien, J. G. F., Ampuero, J. P. Archuleta, R. J.

2:15 Downhole Seismic INVITED:Seismic Dynamic Rupture Ground Motion PBO Strainmeter PM Monitoring in the Hazard Assessment: Models of Historic Simulation for the Observations of Istanbul/Eastern Sea A Difficult but and Recent August 23, 2011, Slow Slip Events in of Marmara Region: Necessary Task for Paleoseismic Mineral, Virginia the Cascadia The ICDP-GONAF Seismologists. Ruptures on the Earthquake Using Subduction Zone: Project. Bohnhoff, Wang, Z. Northern and Physics-Based and Assessing Their M.,Dresen,G., Central San Jacinto Stochastic Implications for Raub, C., Acarel, D., Fault. Lozos, J. C., Broadband Time-varying Kilic, T., Kartal, R. Rockwell, T. K., Methods. Rezaeian, Earthquake F., Kadirioglu, F. T., Onderdonk, N. W. S., Hartzell, S., Probability. Nurlu, M., Bulut, F., Sun, X. Roeloffs, E. A., Malin, P.E. Beeler, N. M.

2:30 In-situ Assessment On the INVITED: Open Discussion on Crustal Shear Wave PM of the G-γ curve for Development of the Paleoseismic High-frequency Anisotropy Characterizing the Seismic Design Basis Evidence for the Ground Motion and Extracted from Nonlinear Response of Critical System-Level Attenuation: Tremor along the of soil: Application Infrastructures and Coordination of Moving Forward. Entire Cascadia to the Garner Valley Lifelines. Large Earthquakes, Abrahamson, N. Margin in US. Downhole Array Kluegel, J. U. Strain A.,Ktenidou,O.J., Ghosh, A., (GVDA) and the “Super-Cycles”, and Olsen, K. B., Huesca, E. Wildlife Temporally Variable Archuleta, R. J. Liquefaction Array Fault Strength: (WLA). Chandra, J., Behavior of the Guéguen, P.,Steidl, Garlock-Saf-Ecsz J.H.,Bonilla,L.F. System in Southern California. Dolan, J. F.,McAuliffe,L.J., Rhodes, E. J., McGill, S. F., Sammis, C. G. 2:45– 3:45 Break PM

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 565 Wednesday, 22 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Seismic Imaging & 2014 National How Reliable are Engineering Slow Earthquakes Monitoring... Seismic Hazard Reconst... Seismology and Mapping Updates: Ground Motion Hazard Changes Prediction and Influence on Session Chairs: Seismic Risk Praveen Malhotra Session Chairs: and Yousef Kishor Jaiswal, Bozorgnia (see page Doug Bausch, 654) Nilesh Shome and Mark Petersen (see page 646)

3:45 Near-vertical Multiple Earthquake Hazard INVITED: NGA-West2 INVITED: PM ScS Phases and WhentheRateis Distributed Ground Motion Very-low-frequency Vertically Averaged Non-Stationary: Deformation and Models for Vertical Earthquakes in Mantle Properties. The Challenge of Fault Slip in the and Vertical-to- Japan: Its Kanamori, H., the U. S. Eastern California Horizontal Implications on the Rivera, L. Midcontinent. Shear Zone. Evans, Response Spectra. Earthquake Physics Ellsworth, W. L., E. L.,Pollitz,F.F. Bozorgnia, Y., and Seismic Hazard. Cochran, E. S., Campbell, K. W. Ito, Y. Llenos, A. L., McGarr, A., Michael, A. J., Mueller, C. S., Petersen, M., Rubinstein, J. L.

4:00 SEIS/INSIGHT: The Overview of the Cryptic Strike-Slip Vertical GMPEs STUDENT: PM 2016 Seismic Third Uniform Deformation in a Based on the Volcanic Deep Discovery of Mars. California Region of Presumed NGA-W2 Database. Long-Period Lognonne, P., Earthquake Rupture Normal Faulting: Gulerce, Z., Kamai, Earthquakes in Banderdt, W. B., Forecast (UCERF3) The Washoe Shear R., Abrahamson, N. Japan. Aso, N., Giardini, D., Pike, W. –FromMulti-Fault Zone, Reno Basin, A.,Silva,W.J. Ohta, K., Ide, S. T., Christensen, U., Ruptures to an Nevada. Briggs, R. Mimoun, D., Clinton, Operational W., dePolo, C. M., J., Dehant, V., Earthquake Gold,R.D., Golombek, M., Garcia, Forecast. Reitman, N. R., Johnson, C., Field, E. H. Kobayashi, N., Knapmeyer-Endrun, B.,Mocquet,A., Panning, M., Smrekar, S.,Tromp,J., Wieczorek, M., Weber, R.C., Beucler, E., Blanchette-Guertin, J., Daubar, I., Drilleau, M., Kawamura, S.Kedar, T., Murdoch, N., Hurst, K., Laudet, P. and the InSight/SEIS Team.

566 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Wednesday, 22 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Seismic Imaging & 2014 Natl Seismic How Reliable are Engineering Slow Earthquakes Monitoring... Hazard ... Reconst... Seismology ...

4:15 STUDENT:Usinga INVITED: STUDENT:Lidar Summary of Tectonic Tremor PM Joint Tomography Implications of Analysis of the Ground-motion Modulation by Inversion to Improve Changes to Seismic Structurally Mature Prediction Intraslab Fluid Models of Sierra Hazard Wairau and Immature Equations for Diffusion During Negra Volcano, Characterization on Awatere Faults, New Subduction Zones Silent Earthquakes. Galapagos. Tepp, G., Building Codes and Zealand: Evidence for based on Cruz-Atienza, V. Ebinger,C.,Seats,K., Engineering Progressive Strong-motion M., Villafuerte, C., Roecker, S. Applications. Geomorphic Records from Japan. Caballero, E., Kircher, C. A. Manifestation of Zhao,J.X. Kostoglodov, V., Distributed Husker, A. Deformation and Structural Localization During Fault Slip. Zinke, R., Dolan, J. F., Grenader, J. R., Van Dissen, R., Rhodes, E. J., McGuire, C. P., Langridge, R. M., Nicol, A., Hatem, A. E.

4:30 Tracking Magmatism INVITED:New STUDENT: Refining Normalized Improved PM At Active Volcanoes Audiences, New the Magnitude of Response Spectrum Understanding of of the Aleutian Arc Products for the Shallow Slip Deficit. of Ground Motion. Moderate-size Via Ambient Noise. USGS National Xu, X.,Tong,X., Malhotra, P. K. Earthquake Bennington, N. L., Seismic Hazard Sandwell, D. T., Sequences on the Haney, M., De Maps. Perry, S. C., Milliner, C. W. D., San Jacinto Fault Angelis, S., Thurber, Petersen, M. D. Dolan, J. F., Leprince, and Their C. H., Freymueller, J., S., Ayoub, F. Relationship with Larose, E. Deep Creep. Meng, X., Peng, Z.

4:45 Potential Advantages Earthquake Risk in STUDENT:Isthe Fault Rupture Relationship of a PM of Continuous Data Conterminous Co-seismic Slip Hazard Very Long-Term Collection in Active United States Using Distribution Fractal? Investigations in Slow Event to the Source Experiments: the Usgs Milliner, C. W. D., California – 2011 Tohoku Characterizing the Probabilistic Seismic Sammis, C., Allam, A., Arguments in Favor Earthquake. Seismic Structure of Hazard Models. Dolan, J. F., of Changing the Koketsu, K., Basins and Upper Jaiswal, K. S., Hollingsworth, J. Alquist-Priolo Act. Kobayashi, H. Crust of the Bighorn Petersen, M. D., Gonzalez, T. Mountains Region in Bausch, D., Chen, Northern Wyoming. R., Rukstales, K., Worthington, L. L., Leith, W. Sheehan, A. F., Schmandt, B., Miller, K. C., Harder, S. H. 5:15 Joyner Lecture - Conference Center PM Design Ground Motions for the Reconstruction of Christchurch. Paul G. Somerville

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 567 Wednesday, 22 April (continued)

Wednesday, 22 April – Poster Sessions 15. STUDENT: Lateral Variations of CODA Wave AttenuationintheAlps.Mayor, J.,Calvet,M.,Margerin, 2014 National Seismic Hazard Mapping Updates: Hazard L., Traversa, P. Changes and Influence on Seismic Risk (see page 660) 16. Hybrid-Empirical Ground Motion Models for Georgia. Askan, A.,Tsereteli,N. 17. STUDENT: Application of Broadband Simulation Technique in Development of New Hybrid Empirical 1. Update of California Shaking Hazard Map Ground Motion Model in Central and Eastern North Incorporating Site Amplification. Chen, R., Wills, C. America. Shahjouei, A., Pezeshk, S. J., Branum, D. M., Petersen, M. D. 18. STUDENT: Broadband Strong Ground Motion 2. Modeling Earthquake Hazard and Risk for the Cascadia Simulation for a Potential Mw7.0 Earthquake on Subduction Zone. Nyst, M., Williams, C., Fitzenz, D. D. The Enriquillo Fault in Haiti. Douilly, R., Calais, E., 3. STUDENT: Site Response in the Central and Eastern Freed, A. M. United States. Yassminh, R.,Sandvol,E.A. 19. The SCEC Broadband Platform: An Open-Source 4. STUDENT: Empirical Ground Motion Prediction Platform for Strong Ground Motion Simulation and Equations for Eastern North America with the Addition Validation. Silva, F., Maechling, P., Callaghan, S., of Intensity Observations. Al Noman, M. N., Cramer, Jordan, T. C. H. 20. STUDENT: Broadband Synthetic Seismograms for Normal-Faulting Earthquakes Using the Composite Advances in High-frequency Ground Motion and Source Model. McBean, K. M., Anderson, J. G. Attenuation (see page 660) 21. Ground-Motion Simulations from 3D Dynamic Rupture Simulations of Dipping Rough-Fault Events. Shi, Z.,Day,S.M. 5. The Site Attenuation Parameter and its Variability for 22. STUDENT: Analysis of 3D Deterministic Broadband (0- Rock Sites in New Zealand. Van Houtte, C.,Holden,C., 25 Hz) Ground Motions Generated by Models of Small- Larkin, T., Ktenidou, O. J. scale Crustal Heterogeneities and Q(f). Savran, W. H., 6. STUDENT: Empirical Estimation of Kappa in the Low- Olsen, K. B. to-Moderate Seismicity Context of Southeastern France. Perron, V., Hollender, F., Bard, P. Y., Gélis, C., Ktenidou, O. J., Hernandez, B. 7. Epistemic Uncertainty and Limitations of the Kappa0 Applications of Tsunami Science: Working with States model for Near-surface Attenuation at Hard Rock Sites. and Communities to Improve Tsunami Resilience (see Edwards, B., Ktenidou, O., Cotton, F., Abrahamson, N., page 664) Van Houtte, C., Fäh, D. 8. Kappa in the Region of the Gulf of California, México. Castro,R.R., Avila-Barrientos, L. 23. The SAFRR Tsunami Scenario: from Publication to 9. Nonlinear Interaction of Strong S-Waves, Surface Implementation. Ross, S. L.,Jones,L.M.,Miller,K., Waves, P-Waves, and Near-Field Velocity Pulses in the Wilson, R. I., Bahng, B., Barberopoulou, A., Borrero, Shallow Subface Leading to Nonlinear Attenuation. J.C.,Brosnan,D.M.,Bwarie,J.T.,Cambpell,N.M., Sleep, N. H., Nakata, N. Geist, E. L., Johnson, L. A., Kirby, S. H., Knight, W. R., 10. Towards the Definition of Reference Motions (1000< Long, K., Lynett, P., Mortensen, C. E., Nicolsky, D. J., VS <3000 m/s): Estimating Transfer Functions to Oglesby,D.D.,Perry,S.C.,Plumlee,G.S.,Porter,K. < < Correct KiK-net ’Rock’ Sites (500 VS30 1500 A., Real, C. R., Ritchie, L. A., Ryan, K., Suleimani, E., m/s) for Site Effects. Laurendeau, A., Foundotos, L., Thio,H.K.,Titov,V.V.,Wein,A.,Whitmore,P.M., Hollender, F., Ktenidou, O. J., Hernandez, B. Wood, N. J. 11. STUDENT: Near-Surface QS and t* Estimation from 24. Tsunami Evacuation Park for Padang, West Sumatra. Noise Cross Correlations. Haendel, A.,Ohrnberger,M., Tucker, B. E., Cedillos, V., Kornberg, K. A., Deierlein, Krueger, F. G. G., Di Mauro, M. 12. Using PGA and PGV Data to Easily Estimate Station 25. Time-dependent Geo-targeted Alerts and Warning Specific Kappa. Baltay, A. S.,Hanks,T.C. Enabled by Dense Observations of the 2011 Tohoku 13. Attenuation of 3-Component Ground Motion in Tsunami. Kohler,M.D.,Ampuero,J.P.,Sutton,J.N., Western Anatolia Horst-Graben System, Turkey. Bowden, D. C. Kurtulmus, T. O.,Akyol,N. 26. Examining Hikurangi Trench M9 Event Characterization 14. Accuracy of Estimated Quality Factors in the New for Tsunami Modeling. Williams, C. R.,Nyst,M.C., Madrid Seismic Zone. Hosseini, M., Pezeshk, S., Haji- Farahani, R., Astill, S., Bryngelson, J., Lee, R., Wilson, P., Soltani, A. Molas, G.

568 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Wednesday, 22 April (continued) 27. Specification of Tectonic Tsunami Sources along the Western Alaska Peninsula for Inundation Engineering and Public Safety Concerns raised by Mapping and Hazard Assessment. Suleimani, E., Seismic Hazard Assessment Methods (see page 668) Nicolsky, D. J. 28. STUDENT: Assessment of Interseismic Coupling Models to Estimate Tsunami Inundation and Runup. González- 38. How Long Time Will We Go with so Many Carrasco, J., Aránguiz, R., Domínguez, J. C., González, Uncertainties in Evaluation of Hazard and Seismic Risk? G.,Cienfuegos,R.,Catalán,P.,Urra,L. Marmureanu, G.,Cioflan,C.O.,Marmureanu,A., 29. STUDENT: Dynamic Models of Earthquakes and Manea, E. F. Tsunamis from Rupture on the Pitas Point and 39. Seismic Hazard Maps and Real Seismicity for the Italian Lower Red Mountain Faults Offshore Ventura, Territory. Peresan, A., Nekrasova, A., Kossobokov, V. I., California. Ryan,K.J.,Geist,E.L.,Barall,M.,Oglesby, Panza, G. F. D. D. 40. Errors in Seismic Hazard Assessment are Creating Huge 30. Post- and Co-Tsunami Science Teams: Cascadia Human Losses. Bela, J. Planning, Northern California. Patton, J. R.,Wilson, 41. Post-Tohoku Views of Seismic Hazard in Japan: R.,Rosinski,A.,Falls,J.,Dengler,L.A.,Hemphill- Implications for Loss Estimation and Risk Management. Haley, E., Moley, K., Admire, A., Nicolini, T., Miller, Thenhaus, P. C., Bolton, M. K., Campbell, K. W., K.,McPherson,R.C.,Leroy,T.H. Gupta, N. 31. California’s Tsunami Preparedness Campaign. Miller, 42. Source Scaling Relations of Subduction Earthquakes K.,Siegel,J.,Pridmore,C.,Wilson,R. for Strong Ground Motion and Tsunami Prediction. 32. New Tsunami Preparedness and Response Tools Skarlatoudis, A.,Somerville,P.,Thio,H.K. for California Communities. Wilson, R. I., 43. Response Spectra Ground-Motion Prediction Equation Miller, K. M. Development Based on Empirical Fourier Amplitude Spectra Model and Calibrated Duration Model: The PEER NGA-East Example. Hollenback, J. C.,Kuehn, Earthquake Hazards and Risk: Drivers and Consumers of N.,Goulet,C.,Abrahamson,N.A. Earthquake Research (see page 666) 44. The South American Strong-Motion Database in the Framework of the GEM-SARA Project. Castellanos, M., Castillo, L., Drouet, S.,Marañon,G.,Lozano,C., 33. Reevaluation of Earthquake Losses in Istanbul and Minaya,E.,Montalva,G.,Morales,C.,Pirchiner,M., of Implications for the Performance of the Turkish Carlos, J., Virachuca, C., Weatherill, G. Catastrophe Insurance Pool. Cakti, E., Hancilar, U., 45. The 2015 Update of the New Zealand Strong Motion Sesetyan, K. Database. Van Houtte, C., Kaiser, A., McVerry, G., 34. Conditional Ground Motion Simulations for Near- Perrin, N., Bourguignon, S., Bannister, S., Holden, C., Real Time and Scenario Loss Assessments Using Wotherspoon, L., Gerstenberger, M., Behr, Y. Shakemap. Horspool, N. A.,Worden,C.B., 46. Graizer-14 Ground Motion Predication Equations for Wald, D. J. The Central Eastern United States. Graizer, V. 35. Decision Support and Data Discovery Tools for Disaster 47. Update of the Graizer-Kalkan Ground-Motion Response – E-DECIDER & GeoGateway. Glasscoe, M. Prediction Equation for Shallow Crustal Continental T., Donnellan, A., Parker, J. W., Granat, R. A., Won, P., Earthquakes. Kalkan, E., Graizer, V. Lyzenga, G. A., Pierce, M. E., Wang, J., Grant Ludwig, L., 48. Unexpected Low Damage in the 2013-4-20 Lushan Eguchi,R.T.,Huyck,C.K.,Hu,Z.,Chen,Z.,Yoder,M. Earthquake, a Possible Reginal Effect in Magnitude R., Rundle, J. B., Rosinski, A. Scaling. Lan, X.,Zhao,J.X.,Lu,M.,Sun,X. 36. STUDENT: Using the Macro-Element Method to 49. An Updated Global Model for Prediction of Seismically Assess the Seismic Vulnerability of Masonry Aggregates: Induced Landslides. Kim, B., Santha, R., Shome, N. Large Scale Methodology. Seddiki, E., Serrhini, K., 50. STUDENT: An Empirical Global Model for Predicting Maizia, M. Seismically Induced Landslides in Near Real-Time. 37. The L’Aquila Trial: Acquittal After Conviction. Nowicki, M. A.,Hamburger,M.W.,Wald,D.J., Braun, T., Amato, A., Cultrera, G., Demartin, M., Robeson, S. M., Hearne, M. De Martini, P. M., Margheriti, L., Pondrelli, S., 51. STUDENT: A Complete Site-Specific Hazard Analysis Todesco, M., Bonaccorso, A.,Cocco, M., Galadini, for a Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) Tank Station F.,Pantosti,D.,Meltti,C.,Nostro,C.,Pacor,F., Considering Associated Uncertainties. Haji-Soltani, A., Quareni, F. Pezeshk, S., Hosseini, M.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 569 Wednesday, 22 April (continued) 52. Can NGA-West2 GMPES Be Used In Europe?: Japan, Event Along the Northern Itoigawa-Shizuoka Comparison of CB14 with ASB14 and Bea14. Tectonic Line is Not Characteristic. Okada, S., Campbell, K. W., Bozorgnia, Y. Ishimura,D.,Niwa,Y.,Toda,S. 64. STUDENT: The May 2014, Bay of Bengal Earthquake: an Example for Activation of Ocean Bottom Hot Spot Trails. Mallick, R., Rajendran, K. How Reliable Are Reconstructions and Models of 65. STUDENT: Along-Strike Slip Profiles from a Global Surface-Rupturing Earthquakes? (see page 671) Dataset of Finite-Source Models. Donovan, J.,Jordan,T. H. 66. STUDENT: Variability of Earthquake Slip and Arresting 53. History of Six Surface-Faulting Holocene Earthquakes Depth in Fault Models With Depth-Dependent At the Alpine Trench Site, Northern Provo Segment, Properties. Jiang, J.,Lapusta,N. Wasatch Fault Zone, Utah. Bennett, S. E. K., DuRoss, 67. Observed Maximum Earthquake Magnitude in C.B.,Gold,R.D.,Briggs,R.W.,Personius,S.F., Continental Strike-Slip Faults in relation to Cumulative Reitman,N.G.,Hiscock,A.I.,Devore,J.D.,Gray,H. Offset and Seismogenic Thickness. Martínez-Garzón, J., Mahan, S. P., Bohnhoff, M., Ben-Zion, Y. 54. Multiple Holocene Surface-Faulting Earthquakes at the Corner Canyon Trench Site on the Salt Lake City Segment of the Wasatch Fault Zone, Utah. DuRoss, C. B.,Bennett,S.E.K.,Personius,S.F.,Gold,R.D.,Briggs, Seismic Imaging and Monitoring of Near-surface, R. W., Hiscock, A. I., Reitman, N. G., DeVore, J. D., Crustal and Global Scales: Recent Advances and Future Mahan, S. A. Directions (see page 674) 55. Paleoseismology of the Northern Segments of the Great Salt Lake Fault, Utah. Dinter, D. A., Pechmann, J. C. 56. Four Earthquakes in Four Thousand Years: Paleoseismic 68. STUDENT: Seismic Velocity and Attenuation Results from the Kings Canyon Fault Zone, Carson City, Tomography of the Tonga Subduction Zone and Lau Nevada, USA. Gold,R.D.,dePolo,C.M.,Briggs,R.W., Back-arc Basin. Wei, S. S.,Wiens,D.A.,Zha,Y.,Webb, Crone, A., Mahan, S., Amidon, W. S. C. 57. STUDENT: Establishing Early-Mid Holocene Slip Rate 69. STUDENT: Eikonal Noise-Based Tomography of the Data for the Mojave Section of the San Andreas Fault. Southern California Plate Boundary Region. Qiu, H., Barr, M. A., Cowgill, E. S., Scharer, K. M. Zigone, D., Lin, F. C., Ben-Zion, Y. 58. Ages of Paleoearthquakes Along Four Faults (California 70. STUDENT: Improvement of the Shear Wave Velocity Wash, Wildcat Wash, Black Hills and Pahrump) in Structure Beneath Bucharest (Romania) Using Non- Southern Nevada. Taylor, W. J. Invasive Techniques. Manea, E. F.,Michel,C.,Fäh,D., 59. Seismicity Statistics and Stress in Regions with High Poggi, V., Edwards, B., Cioflan, C. O., Radulian, M., Tectonic Complexity: A Comparative Study of the Balan, S. F. Greater San Gorgonio and Ventura Regions in Southern 71. STUDENT: Rayleigh Wave Attenuation from Ambient California. Goebel, T. H. W., Haukssom, E., Plesch, A., Noise Measurements in the Iberian Peninsula. Noriega, Shaw, J. R.,Moschetti,M.P.,Ugalde,A.,Villasenor,A., 60. STUDENT: Full Source Tensors of San Jacinto Fault Contribution of the Team Consolider-Ingenio 2010 Zone Earthquakes Based on the gCAP Inversion Method TOPO-IBERIA (CSD2006-00041) project. and 3D Velocity Model. Ross, Z. E.,Ben-Zion,Y.,Zhu, 72. STUDENT: Ambient Noise Tomography Across the L., Graves, R. W. Alaskan Cordillera. Ward, K. M. 61. Complex Fault Structure in the Salton Trough and 73. STUDENT: Three-Dimensional P and S Wave-Velocity Deformation During the 2010 M7.2 El Mayor-Cucapah Model of The Northern Mississippi Embayment Earthquake from Geodetic and Seismic Data. Huang, Sediments. Mostafanejad, A.,Langston,C.A. M., Fielding, E. J., Sun, J., Dickinson, H. L., Freed, A., 74. Seismic Structure in Central California: Towards Burgmann, R., Gonzalez-Ortega, A., Gonzalez-Escobar, Identifying the Tectonic Origin of the Isabella Anomaly. M., Samsonov, S., Gonzalez-Garcia, M., Fletcher, J., Dougherty, S. L.,Hoots,C.R.,Hansen,S.,Clayton,R. Hinojosa-Corona, A. W., Schmandt, B. 62. Transtensional Tectonics oftheMintoFlatsFaultZone 75. STUDENT: Characterization of the San Jacinto Fault and Nenana Basin, Central Alaska. Tape, C.,Silwal,V., Zone Northwest of the Trifurcation Area from Ji, C., Hutchinson, L., West, M., Ruppert, N. Earthquake Data Recorded by a Dense Linear Array. 63. The First Surface-Rupturing Earthquake in 20 Years on Share, P.,Ben-Zion,Y.,Ross,Z.E.,Qiu,H.,Vernon, a HERP Major Active Fault: Mw=6.2 2014 Nagano, F. L.

570 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Wednesday, 22 April (continued)

76. STUDENT: Elucidating Fault Zone Structures in the Begnaud, M. L.,Ballard,S.,Young,C.J.,Hipp,J.R., South-Central Transverse Ranges Area using Double Encarnacao,A.V.,Maceira,M.,Phillips,W.S.,Chael,E. Difference Tomography. Share, P.,Ben-Zion,Y., P., Rowe, C. A. Thurber, C. H. 95. A Synthetic Study into the Causes and Solutions for 77. Velocity Structure of the Iran Region Using Seismic the Non-Uniqueness in the Surface Wave Inversion. and Gravity Observations. Maceira, M.,Syracuse,E.M., Hosseini, M., Pezeshk, S. Bergman,E.,Phillips,W.S.,Begnaud,M.L.,Zhang,H. 96. Standardized Access to Seismic Velocity Models Using 78. Structures and Seismic Activity of the Xishancun the Unified Community Velocity Model (UCVM) Landslide, Sichuan. Chu, R.,Ni,S.,Wei,Z.,Bao,F.,Ye, Software. Gill, D.,Small,P.,Taborda,R.,Lee,E.,Olsen, L., Tang, C. K.B.,Maechling,P.,Jordan,T.H. 79. STUDENT: Seismic Imaging of the Eastern Pacific Plate. 97. STUDENT: Vp/Vs Ratios of the Source Region of Cronin, Meagan, A.,BrownJustin,R. West Bohemian Earthquake Swarms. Bachura, M., 80. STUDENT: The Surface Wave, Shear Wave Splitting, Fischer, T. and Higher Mode Seismic Anisotropy Comparison of 98. STUDENT: Attenuation of the Coda Waves in West the Mexican Subduction Zone. Stubailo, I.,Davis,P.M. Bohemia Earthquake Swarm Region. Bachura, M., 81. Relating Seismic Subduction Images in Southern Peru to Fischer, T. Mineralogy. Kim, Y.,Clayton,R.W. 99. Seismic Interferometry Using Regional Earthquake 82. STUDENT: Joint Inversion of Body Wave Receiver Records. Juarez, A., Ramirez-Guzman, L., Rabade, S. Function and Rayleigh Wave Ellipticity. Chong, J., 100. Joint Inversion of Seismic and Gravity Data for Velocity Ni, S. Structure and Hypocentral Locations of the Colombian 83. Lateral Variations of P-Wave Velocity Gradient in the Subduction Zone. Syracuse, E. M.,Maceira,M.,Prieto, Uppermost Mantle Under Eurasia. Yang, X. G.A.,Zhang,H.,Ammon,C.J. 84. STUDENT: Short-Period Surface-Wave Tomography 101. Distinguishing Artifacts of Earthquake Catalog Errors from Ambient Noise: Alborz Mountain Region of Iran. from Genuine Seismicity Patterns. Zaliapin, I.,Ben- Crippen, A. G., Ferris, A., Priestly, K., Tatar, M. Zion, Y. 85. Shallow Crustal Discontinuities from High-Frequency 102. STUDENT: Earthquake Cluster Identification in the San Waveforms of Swarm Earthquakes in West Jacinto Fault Zone. Zhang, Q.,Shearer,P.M. Bohemia/Vogtland Seismoactive Area. Vavrycuk, V., 103. STUDENT: Characterization of Seismic Swarms in Utah. Hrubcova, P., Bouskova, A. Batchelor, C. E.,Koper,K.D.,Pankow,K.L. 86. Seismic Structures in Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. Lin, G., 104. Earthquake Frequency - Magnitude Distribution and Shearer, P. M., Amelung, F., Okubo, P. G. Fractal Dimension in Northern California. Karimi, S., 87. STUDENT: 3 Dimensional Ray-Bending Seismic Baturan, D., Greig, W., Law, A. Tomography of the Peruvian Andes Crustal Root and 105. STUDENT: Analysis on the Possibility of the the Subducting Nazca Plate. Abatchev, Z.,Davis,P. Independence Between the 2013 Lushan Earthquake 88. Development of a Low Cost Method to Estimate and the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake on Longmen Shan the Seismic Signature of a Geothermal Field from Fault, Sichuan, China. Ke, K. J.,Shiyong,S.Y.Z., Ambient Seismic Noise Analysis. Tibuleac, I. M., Jiancang,J.C.Z.,ChangshengJiang,C.S.J. Pullammanappallil, S., McLachlan, H. 106. STUDENT: Gorda and Juan de Fuca Plate Seismicity 89. Comparison of Ambient Noise and Active Source Recorded by the Cascadia Initiative and Blanco Analysis of Shallow Structures within an Urban Transform Fault Zone Seismic Arrays. Ghorbani, P., Environment along the Kapiti Coast New Zealand. Nabelek, J., Braunmiller, J. Pancha, A., Tibuleac, I. M., Pullammanappallil, S., 107. Retrieving Source Time Functions of Regional Phases Stern, T. and Coda Using Array Data. Xie, J. 90. A Test of a 13,000-kg Weight-Drop Seismic Source. 108. STUDENT: Recognition of Stick-Slip Surface Wave Abbott, R. E.,Preston,L. Signals from the Whillans Ice Stream: a Data Mining 91. STUDENT: Error Analysis and Temporal Variations of Approach Combining Subspace Detection and Random Cross-Correlations of Ambient Noise. Liu, X.,Ben- Forest Classification. Bernsen, S. P. Zion, Y., Zigone, D. 109. Seismic Zones Regionalization of the Red Sea Region. 92. Multi-pathing of Rayleigh Waves Retrieved from Alamri, A. Ambient Seismic Noises. Xia, Y. J., Ni, S. D. 110. Seismic Crisis at Chiles and Cerro Negro Volcanoes. 93. Co-Seismic Velocity Change Associated With the 2011 Torres Corredor, R., Cadena Ibarra, O., Gómez M7.1 Van/Turkey Earthquake: Crustal Response to a Martínez,D.,Ruiz,M.,Prejean,S.,Lyons,J.,White,R. Major Event. Acarel, D., Bulut, F., Bohnhoff, M. 111. Earthquakes Trigger True Polar Wander Over 94. Extending SALSA3D: Adding Secondary Phases to a Geological Times. Cambiotti, G., Wang, X., Sabadini, Global 3D Model for Improved Seismic Event Location. R., Yuen, D. A.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 571 Wednesday, 22 April (continued)

112. STUDENT: Multi-Decadal Analysis of Global Trends in Sequence. Kwong, K. B.,DeShon,H.R.,Thurber,C.H., Microseism Intensities: A Proxy for Changes in Storm Saul, J. Activity and Oceanic Wave State. Anthony, R. E.,Aster, 127. STUDENT: Interseismic Coupling on the Main R. C., Rowe, C. Himalayan Thrust, Implications for Extreme 113. Seismic Unrest At the Chiles – Cerro Negro Volcanic Earthquakes. Stevens, V. L.,Avouac,J.P.H. Complex, Ecuador. Hernandez, S., Ruiz, M., Segovia, 128. Seismic Intensity Maps for Scenario Events on the M.,Viracucha,E. Eastern Segments of North Anatolian Fault Zone of Turkey based on Simulated Ground Motion Data. Karim Zadeh Naghshineh, S.,Askan,A., Slow Earthquakes: Diversity in Fault Motion and Their Bilal, M. Implications in Earthquake Dynamics (see page 683) 129. STUDENT: Continuing Geophysical Analysis of Seismically Active Structures in the Matanuska-Susitna Valley Region near Anchorage, Alaska. Glover,C.O., 114. Shallow Up-Dip Deformation, Tremor, and Very-Low- Doser, D. I., Schinagel, S. M. Frequency Earthquakes at an Erosional Margin: 6 130. The Yakutat Plate and Its Southcentral Alaska Years of Data from the Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica. Megathrust Earthquakes. Reeder, J. W. Schwartz, S. Y., Hernandez, S. 131. Seismicity, Strain and Hazards at the Mendocino Triple 115. STUDENT: A Multi-Method Systematic Search for Non- Junction, Northern California. McPherson, B. C., Volcanic Tremor near the San Jacinto Fault. Hutchison, Smith, S. W., Williams, T. B., Pryor, I., Patton, J. R., A. A.,Ghosh,A. Rollins, J. C., Hemphill-Haley, M., Carver, G. 116. Challenges Detecting Ambient Tectonic Tremors in 132. Mismatch Between Interseismic Ground Deformation Southern California. Brown, J. R. and Paleoseismic/Paleogeodetic Observations, 117. STUDENT: Quantify Slow-Slip and Tremor in Parkfield, Humboldt Bay, Northern California, Cascadia CA. Delbridge, B., Bürgmann, R., Nadeau, R. M. Subduction Zone. Patton, J. R.,Leroy,T.H.,Williams, 118. Scaling Relation in Slip Deficit During Interseismic T.B.,McPherson,R.C.,Anderson,J.K.,Burgette,R., Period from Numerical Simulations. Aochi, H.,Ide,S. Hemphill-Haley, M., Weldon, R., Carver, G.C., Kelsey, 119. Identifying Episodic Tremor and Slip in the Pacific H. M. Northwest from PBO GPS and Strainmeter Time Series. 133. Sedimentary Evidence for the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Puskas, C. M.,Hodgkinson,K.M.,Melbourne,T., Subduction Zone Earthquake. Patton, J. R.,Goldfinger, Phillips,D.A.,Meertens,C.M. C., Djadjadihardja, Y., Udrekh, 120. A Study of Low Frequency Earthquake Magnitudes in 134. STUDENT: Dynamically Triggered Earthquakes and Northern Cascadia. Bostock, M. G.,Thomas,A.M. Tremor: A Look at Western North America Using Two 121. STUDENT: Source Mechanism and Tsunami Generation Recent Large Magnitude Events. Hatch, R. L.,Polet,J. of the 2013 Balochistan Earthquake. Parameswaran, R. 135. Radiated Seismic Energy of the 18 April 2014 M., Rajendran, K. Papanoa, Mexico Earthquake (Mw7.2), and its Principal Aftershocks. Pérez-Campos, X.,Singh,S.K. 136. Frequency of Plausible, Worst-Case Scenario Earthquakes on the Southernmost San Andreas Fault. The Where, When and Why of Uncharacteristic Yule, D.,Scharer,K.,Sieh,K.,Wolff,L.,Witkosky,R., Earthquakes (see page 685) McBurnett, P., Ramzan, S. 137. STUDENT: Using B4 Lidar and Crn Age Data to 122. STUDENT: Triggered Seismicity due to Barometric Constrain Slip Rates Along the San Andreas Fault Pressure Changes. West, J. D.,Garnero,E.J.,Shirzaei, System At Millard Canyon, San Gorgonio Pass. M. Desjarlais, I. C., Yule, J. D., Heermance, R. V. 123. Observations of Temporal Variations in Seismicity and 138. STUDENT: New High-Resolution Topographic Data Crustal Properties. Delorey, A. A., Johnson, P. A. and Updated Tectonic Geomorphology at Wheeler 124. STUDENT: Dynamic Triggering in Yunnan Following Ridge, California. Kleber, E. J.,Arrowsmith,J.R., the 2012 Indian Ocean Earthquake. Li, L.,Peng,Z., DeVecchio, D. E. Wang, B., Wu, J. 139. Analysis of the March 21, 2009 (M=4.8) Bombay Beach 125. STUDENT: Self-Sustained Dynamic Triggering of Small Earthquake Swarm. Simila, G.,McStroul,G. Local Earthquakes in the Himalayas. Mendoza, M. M., 140. Whatever Does a M5.8 Earthquake on the Low Angle Ghosh,A.,Rai,S.S. Normal Altotiberina Fault (Italy)? Braun, T., Caciagli, 126. STUDENT: Teleseismic Double-Difference Relocation M.,Pucci,S.,Batllo,J.,Cesca,S. of the 2012 Indian Ocean Intraplate Earthquake

572 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Thursday, 23 April Oral Sessions

Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Induced Seismicity Observing Central Coastal Characterizing the Earthquake Session Chairs: Ivan Infrasonic Sources California Potential Impacts Processes and Wong, Justin from Ground to Tectonics of Surface Fault Multiscale Rubinstein, Thomas Space Session Chairs: Rupture on Modeling and Braun and T.H.W. Session Chairs: Stuart Nishenko, Transportation Characterization of Goebel (see page Omar Marcillo, Neal Driscoll and Systems Fragmentation and 689) Stephen JanetWatt(seepage Session Chairs: Zia Damage Patterns Arrowsmith and 697) Zafir, Jonathan Bray in Fault Zones Lucie Rolland (see and James Gingery Session Chairs: page 693) (see page 702) Ahmed Elbanna and Harsha Bhat (see page 706)

8:30 Geomechanical STUDENT:Joint Central Coastal INVITED:Towards STUDENT:Strain AM Assessment of Inversion of Seismic California Seismic the Development of Localization and Seismicity from and Barometric Imaging Project: An Design Curves for Efficiency of Hydraulic Data for Overview. Characterising Initiating Strike-Slip Fracturing. Surface-Pressure Nishenko, S., Strike-Slip Surface Faults in Wet Maxwell, S. C. Source: Monitoring Greene, H. G., Fault Rupture Kaolin Experiments. of the Decay of a O’Connell, D. R. H., Displacement: An Hatem, A. E., Hurricane Eyewall. Hogan, P., Unruh, Example from the Cooke, M. L., Lamontagne, A., J., AbramsonWard, 2010 Greendale Toeneboehn, K. Tanimoto, T. H., McLaren, M. K. Fault Rupture, New Zealand. Van Dissen, R. J., Hornblow, S., Litchfield, N., Quigley, M., Villamor, P., Nicol, A., Barrell, D. J. A.

8:45 STUDENT:The Shock Wave INVITED:The INVITED:Very AComparative AM Role of Fractures Velocity for the California Seafloor Near-Fault Strong Study of Seismicity and Faults in 2011 Shimoe-dake, Mapping Program Ground Motions. Statistics in Hydraulic Kirishima Eruption Documents Active Dreger, D. S., Laboratory Fracturing: A of 1 February 2011. Faults Offshore Chopra, A. K., Yoo, Stick-Slip Percolation Mori, J., Yamada, Central California. S. H. Experiments, Perspective. Norris, M. Johnson, S. Y., Mining Operations J. Q.,Turcotte,D. Watt, J. T. and Nature: L., Rundle, J. B. Implications for Fault Mechanics. Goebel, T. H. W., Kwiatek, G., Becker, T. W., Sammis, C. G., Dresen, G.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 573 Thursday, 23 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Induced Seismicity Observing Central Coastal CA Char Potential Multiscale Infrasonic Sources Tectonics Impacts ... Modeling ...

9:00 Application of INVITED/STUDENT: INVITED: INVITED: STUDENT: AM Large-Scale Infrasound in the High-resolution Numerical and Multiscale, Earthquake Stratosphere Neotectonic Physical Modelling Spontaneous Simulations to Measured with a Investigation of the of Fault Rupture Stick-Slip Events in Seismicity Induced Free Flying Acoustic San Gregorio Fault Propagation Rotary-Shear by Fluid Injection. Array. Bowman, D. Zone, Offshore through Soil and Experiments as Dieterich, J. H., C.,Lees,J.M. Central California. Interaction with Analogous to Richards-Dinger, K. Maier, K. L., Paull, Foundation- Earthquake B., Kroll, K. A. C. K., Brothers, D. Structure Systems. Rupture. Zu, X., S., McGann, M., Anastasopoulos, I., Reches, Z. Caress, D. W., Gazetas, G. Lundsten, E. M., Anderson, K., Gwiazda, R.

9:15 Peak Rates and INVITED: INVITED:SlipRates INVITED: STUDENT: AM Largest Magnitude Ionospheric for the Hosgri and Addressing Fault Multicycle Events in Volcanic Seismology: from Shoreline Fault Rupture Hazard for Simulations of Earthquake Swarms. Earth Maturity to Zones Offshore Bridges across Earthquake Rupture McNutt, S. R. Venus Dreams. Coastal Central California. in Regions with Lognonne, P., California – Results Sojourner, A., Complex Fault Rolland, L., Rakoto, of High-Resolution Ostrom, T. A., Geometry. Kroll, K. V., Coisson, P., 3D Seismic Shantz, T. J., A.,Oglesby,D.O., Khelfi, K., Drilleau, Reflection Surveys. Yashinsky, M. Richards-Dinger, K. M., Makela, J., Greene, H. G., B.,Dieterich,J.H. Astafyeva, E., Nishenko, S., Occhipinti, G., Hogan, P., Garcia, R., Mimoun, AbramsonWard, H. D.,Smrekar,S.

9:30 Are Source INVITED: Stratigraphic INVITED: STUDENT: AM Characteristics of Infrasound Framework of the Characterization Conditions Fluid Driven Techniques for Central California and Mitigation of Governing Hydraulic Fracture Investigating the Shelf for Assessment Surface Fault Supershear Induced Interior Structure of of Quaternary Rupture Hazard for Transition on Earthquakes Venus. Stevenson, Activity of Offshore a Light Rail Project. Nonplanar Faults. Distinct from D. J., Mimoun, D., Faults. Gingery, J. R., Bruhat, L., Natural Tectonic Members of the AbramsonWard, Rugg, S. H., Bray, J. Dunham, E. M., Earthquakes? KISS Venus H.,Lewandowski, D., Rockwell, T. K., Fang, Z. Viegas, G., Seismology Study N., Gray, B., Zafir, Z. Urbancic, T., Team (Cutts, J.) Hanson, K., Greene, Baig, A. H. G., Nishenko, S. 9:45– 10:45 Break AM

574 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Thursday, 23 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Induced Seismicity Microseismics in Central Coastal CA Capturing Site Multiscale Academia, Tectonics Effects in Strong Modeling ... Government and Ground Motion Industry Session Chairs: Session Chairs: Domniki Asimaki, Clifford Thurber, Adrian StephenWilsonand Rodriguez-Marek, Giovanni Grasselli Jonathan Stewart (see page 694) and Alan Yong (see page 703)

10:45 Are ENA INVITED:What Shoreline and INVITED: Effects of A 3D, Rotationally AM Potentially Induced Can Microseismic Oceano Fault Zones’ Surface and Invariant Form of Earthquakes Tell Us About Geometry and Slip Underground Crustal Stress Different from Hydraulic Rate Constraints, Topography on Relaxation Natural Fracturing? San Luis Obispo Ground Motion: an Equations with Earthquakes? Maxwell, S. C. Bay, Offshore South Overview of Some Applications for Cramer,C.H. Central Coastal Recent European Earthquake California. Hogan, Collaborative Simulation and P. J., Greene, H. G., Results. Bard, P. Y., Off-Fault Moment Nishenko, S., Cultrera, G., Release Estimates. Bergkamp, B. J. Theodoulidis, N., Smith, D. E., Pitilakis, K., Faeh, Dieterich, J. H. D., Parolaiap, S., Moczo, P., EXTENDED NERA WP11 team : C. Cornou, E. Chaljub, A. Imtiaz, A. Rovelli, P. Bordoni, F. Cara, G. DiGiulio,G.Milana, V. Pessina, M. Pisciutta, A. Savvaidis, K. Makra, E.Riga,F.Gelagoti, J. Burjanek, C. Cauzzi, T. Boxberger, J. Kristek, F. Hollender, C. Guyonnet-Benaize, A. Stambouli, D. Zendagui and B. Derras

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 575 Thursday, 23 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Induced Seismicity Microseismics ... Central Coastal CA Capturing Site Multiscale Tectonics Effects ... Modeling ...

11:00 AComparisonof Resolving Time INVITED:3D A Numerical Study Bigger Aftershocks AM Stress Drop Between Dependant Stress Subsurface of the Occur Farther Tectonic and Variations Through Structural Imaging Source-Related Away. van der Elst, Potentially Induced Analysis of of the Irish Hills, Variability of Site N. J.,Shaw,B.E. Earthquakes in the Microseismicity (M California, Using Effect in the CEUS. Boyd,O.S., < 0) Recorded Active Seismic, Mygdonian Basin, McNamara, D., During Hydraulic Gravity, and Greece. Maufroy, Hartzell, S., Fracture Magnetic Data. E.,Chaljub,E., Choy, G. Stimulations. Baig, O’Connell, D. R. Hollender, F., Bard, A. M., Urbancic, T. H.,Turner,J., P. Y., De Martin, F., I., von Lunen, E. Gooodman, J., Roumelioti, Z., Lajoie, L., Sowers, J., Theodoulidis, N. Angell, M., Nishenko, S., Zhou, D., Wang, W., Zhang, J., Brock, K.

11:15 Are Earthquakes INVITED:Tracking Structure of the Horizontal-to- Local Fault AM Triggered By Fluid-Driven Irish Hills, Vertical Spectral Structures from Hydraulic Earthquake Swarms California, From Ratios (HVR) for Directivity Analysis Fracturing More in Long Valley Synthesis of Seismic Microtremors and of Small Common Than Caldera, California Reflection, Earthquake Earthquakes at the Previously using Massive Geophysical and Motions: Diffuse San Jacinto Fault Recognized? Waveform-Based Geological Data. Field Interpretation Zone. Kurzon, I., Holland, A. A., Methods. Shelly, D. Unruh, J.,Givler, of the Ratios of Vernon, F. L., Darold, A. P. R., Ellsworth, W. L., R., Goodman, J., HVR. Kawase, H., Astiz, L. Montgomery- Turner, J., Mori, Y., Brown, E. K., Hill, O’Connell, D., Matsushima, S., D.P.,Prejean,S.G., Nishenko, S. Nagashima, F., Mangan,M.T. Sánchez-Sesma, F. J.

11:30 INVITED:Seismic INVITED:Seismic Signs of a Subtle Understanding, AMultiscaleModel AM Monitoring and Monitoring of the Near-Coast Shear Parameterization for Shear flow of Analysis of a Deep Aaknes Rockslide. Strain Rate Gradient and Simulation of Granular Materials Geothermal Project Kühn, D., Fischer, Revealed by Three-Dimensional with Breakable in St. Gallen, T., Roth, M. Application of New Topography Effects. Particles: Role of Switzerland. Analysis Methods to Jeong, S., Force Chain Edwards, B.,Kraft, the Central Mohammadi, K., Instabilities and T., Cauzzi, C., California Coast Asimaki, D. Implications for Kästli, P., Ranges GPS Strain Localization, Wiemer, S. Velocity Field. Grain Size Thatcher, W., Evolution and Murray, J. A., Energy Partitioning. Simpson, R. Elbanna, A. E.

576 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Thursday, 23 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Induced Seismicity Microseismics ... Central Coastal CA Capturing Site Multiscale Tectonics Effects ... Modeling ...

11:45 INVITED:Was INVITED: INVITED: STUDENT: STUDENT: AM 2012 Brawley Double-Difference Preliminary Diffracted Modeling the LA Swarm Triggered by Seismic Findings of the Wave-field and SF Repeating Fluid Injection? Tomography: Independent Peer Decomposition and Sequences in Wei, S. J.,Avouac, Multiple Scales and Review Panel for Multi-dimensional Parkfield. Lui, S. K. J. P., Hudnut, K. Joint Inversions. Seismic Hazard Site Effects in the Y.,Lapusta,N. W., Donnellan, A., Zhang, H., Studies at Diablo Argostoli Valley, Parker,J.W., Thurber, C. H. Canyon. Wills, C. Greece. Imtiaz, A., Graves,R.W., Cornou, C., Bard, P. Helmberger, D. V., Y., Hobiger, M., Fielding, E., Liu, Z, Cultrera, G., Cappa, F, Eneva, M. Boxberger, T., Theodoulidis, N. Noon– 1:30 Lunch PM Induced Seismicity Status and Future Recent Advances in Capturing Site Advances in of Earthquake Understanding the Effects... Earthquake Source Early Warning Onshore and Inversion Session Chairs: Offshore Southern Session Chairs: Paul Sarah Minson and California Fault Martin Mai, Lingsen Egill Hauksson, System Meng, Shengji Wei, Thomas Heaton Session Chairs: Nate Jean-Paul Ampuero (see page 695) Onderdonk and and Danijel Robert Francis (see Schorlemmner (see page 699) page 708)

1:30 INVITED:Changes INVITED: STUDENT: INVITED/STUDENT: STUDENT: PM in the ShakeAlert Progress: Holocene Evolution The Influence of Complexities of Characteristics of Implementing of Carpinteria Hard Rock Depth Interplate Induced Seismicity Public Earthquake Marsh, Southern on Nonlinear Site Earthquakes of due to long-term Early Warning for California: Evidence Response Analysis in Multiple Rupture Fluid Injection at the U.S. Given, D., for Subsidence. the Eastern United Stages Revealed by The Geysers West Coast Reynolds,L.C., States. Harmon, J., Back-Projection. Geothermal Field: Earthquake Early Simms, A. R., Hashash, Y. M. A., Fan, W., Implications to Warning Rockwell, T. K., Nikolaou, S., Shearer, P. M. Fracture Generation Development Team Peters, B. Pehlivan, M., Mechanism and Stewart, J. P., Rathje, Seismic Hazard. E. M., Campbell, K. Kwiatek, G., W.,Silva,W.J. Martínez-Garzón, P., Bohnhoff, M., Dresen, G., Sone, H., Hartline, C.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 577 Thursday, 23 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Induced Seismicity Status & Future of Recent Adv in Capturing Site Adv in EQ Source EQ Warning Understanding ... Effects... Inversion

1:45 INVITED:Oilfield INVITED:AP-wave Interseismic Strain Vs30 for Site Effective 1D Model PM Operations and Based, On-site Accumulation Response – Why, Inversion from Earthquakes in the Method for Across Metropolitan When, and How? Teleseismic Greater Los Angeles Earthquake Early Los Angeles: Deep Kamai, R., Empirical Green’s Basin, Southern Warning. Slilp Along the Abrahamson, N. A., Functions. Yue, H., California: Colombelli, S., Puente Hills Thrust. Silva, W. J. Helmburger, D. Analyzing a Century Caruso, A., Zollo, Argus, D. F., of Data, Including A.,Festa,G., Agram, P. Volume Changes Kanamori, H. and Mmax. Hauksson, E., Goebel, T. H. W., Ampuero, J. P., Cochran, E.

2:00 STUDENT: Joint Variations in Slip On the Accuracy of STUDENT: PM Potential Induced Seismic-Geodetic Rate and Size of Vs30-based Site Back-Propagating Seismicity in the Real-Time Finite Pre-Historic Response Rupture during the Raton Basin, Fault Models for Earthquakes During Amplifications in 2014 Iquique Chile Colorado and New Earthquake Early the Past 2000 years California. Earthquake. Mexico, 2008-2009. Warning. Minson, on the Northern San Thompson, E. M., Okuwaki, R.,Yagi, Nakai, J. S., S. E.,Böse,M., Jacinto Fault Zone Wald, D. J. Y., Hirano, S. Sheehan, A. F., Felizardo, C., and Implications for Weingarten, M., Heaton, T. H., the Lack of Major Bilek, S. L. Hauksson, E. Historic Earthquakes on the Fault. Onderdonk, N. W., McGill, S. F., Rockwell, T. K.

2:15 Wastewater Prediction of STUDENT: STUDENT: Source PM Disposal, Hydraulic Ground Shaking Frictional Accounting for Characteristics of Fracturing, and from Shaking Itself: Properties, Slip Impedance and the 23 October Seismicity in Application of Rates, and Attenuation Effects 2011 Mw 7.2 Van Southern Kansas. Numerical Shake Unknown Faults in on Input Ground Earthquake Rubinstein, J. L., Prediction Method the Imperial Valley: Motions used in Site Sequence in SE Ellsworth, W. L., for Various New Results from Response Analyses. Anatolia. Benz, H., Walter, S., Frequency Bands. High-Resolution Cabas, A., Gorgun, E. Llenos, A. Hoshiba, M., Geodesy. Lindsey, Rodriguez- Aoki, S. E. O.,Fialko,Y. Marek, A.

578 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Thursday, 23 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Induced Seismicity Status & Future of Recent Adv in Capturing Site Adv in EQ Source EQ Warning Understanding ... Effects... Inversion 2:30 Are There Relations Towards Real-Time New Constraints on Site Effects and A New Strategy to PM between Basement Risk Reduction for Active Fault Ground Motion Compare Inverted Geologic Features Strategic Facilities Architecture in the Variability: Rupture Models and Seismicity in through Earthquake Inner California Traditional Spectral Exploiting the Oklahoma? Early Warning: Borderlands, Ratios vs. GMPE Eigen-Structure of Constraints from Summary of the Offshore Southern Residuals. the Inverse Problem. Magnetic and REAKT Experience. California. Ktenidou,O.J., Gallovic, F., Gravity Anomaly Cauzzi, C.,Sousa Bormann, J. M., Roumelioti, Z., Ampuero, J. P. Maps. Shah, A. K., Oliveira, C., Kent, G. M., Abrahamson,N.A., Keller, G. R. Iervolino, I., Emolo, Driscoll, N. W., Cotton, F., Pitilakis, A., Zollo, A., Kell, A. M., K., Hollender, F. Zülfikar, C., Sahakian, V. J., Pitilakis, K., Harding, A. J., Vogfjord, K., Lai, C., Holmes, J. J., Sokos, E.,Erdik, M., Klotsko, S. A., Safak, E., Gasparini, Wesnousky, S. G. P., Wiemer, S., Zschau,J.,Behr,Y., Clinton, J., Esposito, S., Colombelli, S., Picozzi, M., Karapetrou, S., Bindi, D., Zuccolo, E., Parolai, S., Miranda, N., Ferreira, M., Jonsdottir, K., and the WP7 end-user community. 2:45– 3:45 Break PM

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 579 Thursday, 23 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Induced Seismicity Status & Future of Recent Adv in Capturing Site Adv in EQ Source EQ Warning Understanding ... Effects... Inversion

3:45 STUDENT: Optimizing High-Resolution INVITED: STUDENT: PM Scientific Principles Earthquake Early Mapping of Two PRENOLIN Project: Resolvability Power Affecting Protocols Warning Alert Lead Large-Scale a Benchmark on of Finite Fault for Times in the Pacific Transpressional Numerical Simulation Inversions. Adams, Site-characterization Northwest. Bodin, Fault Zones in the of 1-D Nonlinear Site M.,Ji,C., and Risk Assessment P., Hotovec-Ellis, A. California Effect. 3 – Preliminary Archuleta, R. Related to the J., Hartog, J. R., Continental Results from the Potential for Kress, V., Vidale, J. Borderland: Santa Validation Phase on Seismicity Triggered Cruz-Catalina Ridge Real Sites. Régnier, J., by Wastewater and Ferrelo. Legg, Bonilla, L. F., Bard, P. Injection and M. R.,Kohler,M. Y., Bertrand, E., Hydraulic D., Shintaku, N., Kawase, H., Fracturing. Walters, Weeraratne, D. S. Hollender, F., Marrot, R. J.,Zoback,M.D., M., Sicilia, D., & the Baker, J. W., PRENOLIN Beroza, G. C. participants: Assimaki, D., Boldini, D.,Iai,S.,Kramer,S., Foerster, E., Gélis, C., Gazetas, G., Gingery, J., Hashash, Y., Moczo, P., Foti, S., Lanzo, G., Lopez-Caballero, F., DeMartin, F., Jeremic, B., Nieto-Ferro, A., Santisi, M.P., Mercerat, D., Tropeano, G., Taibat, M., Giannakou, A.

4:00 How Similar are the Confirming STUDENT:Imaging Non-Ergodic Site Finite Fault PM Seismic Hazards Earthquakes in the Newport- Response using Kinematic Inversion from Natural and Earthquake Early Inglewood/Rose Amplification with Regional Data Fluid-Induced Warning Systems. Canyon Fault Zone; Derived from 1D and its Utility for Earthquakes? Kuyuk, H. S., Implications with Analysis. Afshari, K., Tsunami McGarr, A., Colombelli, S., Current Fault Stewart, J. P., Goulet, Inundation Rubinstein, J., Zollo, A., Allen, R. Models. Sahakian, C. A. Prediction. Melgar, Ellsworth, W. M.,Erdik,M.O. V. J., Bormann, J. D.,Riquelme,S., M.,Klotsko,S.A., Geng, J., Allen, R. Holmes, J. J., M., Bock, Y. Driscoll, N. W., Harding, A. J., Kent, G. M., Wesnousky, S. G.

580 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Thursday, 23 April (continued) Time Ballroom B Ballroom C Ballroom F Ballroom G Ballroom H Induced Seismicity Status & Future of Recent Adv in Capturing Site Adv in EQ Source EQ Warning Understanding ... Effects... Inversion 4:15 Incorporating Use of Smart Phones Shear Zone Comparisons of Dynamic Rupture vs PM Induced Seismicity for Resolving Evolution Within a Low-Strain Aseismic Slow-Slip: in the 2014 United Frequency Content Widening Rift Amplification at the 2014 Iquique States National of Artificial System: San Pedro Soft-Sediment, Earthquake Seismic Hazard Non-stationary Basin fault – San Hard-Rock, Sequence. Meng, L., Models. Petersen, Synthetic Signal. Diego Trough fault, Topographic, and Huang, H., M. D., Mueller, C. Aktas, M., Kuyuk, Offshore Southern Fault-Zone Sites in the Burgmann, R., S.,Moschetti,M.P., H. S. California. Francis, Hayward Fault Zone, Ampuero, J. P., Hoover, S. M., R. D., Legg, M. R., California. Catchings, Strader, A. Rubinstein, J. L., Castillo,C.M. R. D.,Strayer,L.M., Llenos, A. L., Goldman, M. R. Michael, A., Ellsworth, W. L., Holland, A.A., Anderson, J.G.

4:30 Examination of the STUDENT:myShake The Palos Verdes The Interpacific STUDENT:Seismic PM Strong Motion and -Building Fault Offshore Project: an Rupture of Oceanic Broadband Data for Smartphone Seismic Southern California: International Strike-slip Injection-Induced Network. Kong, Q., Late-Pleistocene to Cooperative Earthquakes. Earthquakes in the Allen, R. Present Tectonic Benchmark for Aderhold, K., U.S. Wong, I., Bott, Geomorphology, Assessing Reliability Abercrombie, R. E. J.,Dober,M., Seascape Evolution and Accuracy of Thomas, P. and Slip-Rate Invasive and Estimate Based on Non-invasive Seismic Auv and Rov Methods for Site Surveys. Brothers, Characterization. D. S.,Conrad,J.E., Garofalo, F., Foti, S., Maier, K. L., Paul, Hollender, F., Cornou, C. K., McGann, M., C.,Bard,P.Y.,Cox,B. Caress, D. W. R., Dechamp, A., Ohrnberger, M., Sicilia, D., Vergniault, C.

4:45 Shallow Earthquake Early STUDENT: Characteristics and Site STUDENT:The PM Earthquakes and Warning and Rapid Quaternary Response Applications Depth-Dependent Ground Shaking Characterization in Subsidence and of Measured 6DOF Potency of near Newmont the Western U.S. Active Tectonics, Ground Motions at Subduction Zone Mining and Barrick Using Insights from the GVDA. Yin, J., Earthquakes. Goldstrike Facilities, Seismogeodesy. Submerged Marine Nigbor,R.L.,Chen,Q. Nanjundiah, P., Carlin, Nevada. Goldberg, D. E., Terraces Barbot, S. Smith, K., Bock, Y., Clayton, R., Surrounding Santa Jamkhana, Z., Crowell, B. W., Fang, Catalina Island. Ferland, P., Kent, G. P.,Geng,J.,Haase,J. Castillo,C.M., S., Mann, D., Klemperer, S. L., Mattioli, G.S., Francis, R. D., Legg, Melgar, D., Mencin, M. R. D., Offield, D. G., Saunders, J. K., Squibb, M. B., Walls, C., Yu, E.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 581 Thursday, 23 April (continued) Thursday, 23 April Poster Sessions (2012). Dujardin, A.,Causse,M.,Courboulex,F., Traversa, P. Advances in Earthquake Source Inversion (see page 710) 15. STUDENT: Updating the Memphis Area Urban Seismic and Liquefaction Hazard Maps. Dhar, M. S., Cramer, C. 1. The Self-Similarity and Heterogeneity of Slip H., Arellano, D. Distribution on the Fault Surface. Lee, Y. T.,Ma,K. 16. STUDENT: Seismic Amplification in the Los Angeles F.,Yen,Y.T. Basin Using Spectral Ratio Analysis: Preliminary Results 2. A Kinematic Rupture Model for the 2012 Costa from a Temporary Seismic Deployment. Ng, R., Rica Earthquake Derived with a Bayesian Inversion Barklage, M., Polet, J. Approach. Zielke, O.,McDougall,D.,Mai,P.M., 17. STUDENT: Vs30, Topographic Slope, Z1: How Do Site- Babuska, I. Condition Proxies Reduce Ground-Motion aAeatory 3. Green’s Function Calculation for Large and Complex Variability? Derras, B., Cotton, F., Bard, P. Y. Ruptures –the SIV_in3 Experience. Zielke, O., 18. Investigation of the Ground Motion Variability Okuwaki,R.,vanDriel,M.,Pollitz,F.,Yagi,Y., Associated with Site Response for Sites with Vs30 Over Mai, P. M. 500 m/s. Yagoda-Biran, G., Anderson, J. G. 4. Effects of Three-Dimensional Crustal Structure and 19. Evaluation of Topographic Rock Sites as Reference Sites, Smoothing Constraint on Earthquake Slip Inversions: Southeastern France: Application of the Frequency- Case Study of the Mw6.3 2009 L’aquila Earthquake. Scaled Curvature Proxy. Maufroy, E., Perron, V., Gallovic, F., Imperatori, W., Mai, M. Hollender, F., Langlais, M., Cruz-Atienza, V. M., Cotton, F. 5. STUDENT: Slab Correction Operator. Bai, K.,Li,D., Helmberger, D. 20. STUDENT: Improving the Understanding of the Link 6. Near Realtime, Multi-Approach Earthquake Source between Seismic Site Effects and the Geological Profile Inversions, and an Extensive, Consistent Finite Fault for Sites in the United Kingdom. Tallett-Williams, S., Database. Hayes, G. P., Benz, H. M., Barnhart, W. D. Fenton, C. 7. Foreshocks and Nucleation Process of the Mw 6.3 21. Development of an Open-Source Hybrid Global Vs30 Northern Nagano Prefecture, Japan, Earthquake of Model. Worden, C. B., Wald, D. J., Sanborn, J., November 22, 2014. Noda, S., Ellsworth, W. L. Thompson, E. M. 22. H/V Measurements to Determine Depth of Bedrock 8. STUDENT: A Systematic Investigation of the Relations Among Source ParametersforEarthquakesAt and Vs30 in Boston, Massachusetts, a High Impedance Intermediate Depths. Arce, A.,Ji,C.,Archuleta,R.J. Contrast Environment. Baise, L. G.,Yilar,E., Ebel, J. E. 9. STUDENT: Focal Mechanisms of the 24 May 2014 Mw 7.0 North Aegean Sea Earthquake Sequence. Gorgun, 23. Passive and Active Seismic Observations of Site and B.,Gorgun,E. Topographic Response on a Mesa near Los Alamos, New Mexico. Stolte, A. C., Cox, B. R., Larmat, C. S.,Stokoe, 10. STUDENT: Rapid Assessment of Earthquake Characteristics. Lui, S. K. Y.,Yu,J.,Wei,S.,Graves, K. H., Lee, R. C. R. W., Helmberger, D. V. 24. Site Effects in Alpine Regions through Systematic Site Characterization of Seismic Stations and Empirical Spectral Amplification. Michel, C., Edwards, B., Poggi, Capturing Site Effects in Strong Ground Motion (see V.,Burjanek,J.,Cauzzi,C.,Fäh,D. page 712) 25. Clark County’s Earthquake Parcel Map: Comprehensive Community Resilience for $20 per Household. Louie, J. N., Pullammanappallil, S. K. 11. Quantification of the Spatially Variable Ground Motion 26. STUDENT: Mapping of Site Characteristics Using and its Influence on the Linear and Non-linear Structural HVSR on Cal Poly Pomona Campus. Ho,K.Y.K., Response of a Single Degree of Freedom. Application Polet, J. to the Shallow Sedimentary Valley of Argostoli, Greece. 27. Evaluation of Site Effect Features of Miocene Paleo- Koufoudi, E.,Cornou,C.,Grange,S.,Dufour,F.,Imtiaz, canyons in South Eastern France Using Ambient A. Vibration Methods. Hollender, F.,Cushing,E.M., 12. Site-Effects from the Observed Strong Ground Motions Dussouillez, P., Nechtschein, S., Guyonnet-Benaize, C., in Western China. Rong, M., Wang, Z., Woolery, E. W., Bailly, T., Delavaud, E., Cornou, C., Bellier, O., Gelis, C., Lu, Y., Li, X. Perron, V. 13. A Compilation of VS30 in the United States. Yong, A., 28. Velocity Profile Characterization of French Thompson,E.M.,Wald,D.J.,Knudsen,K.L.,Odum,J. Accelerometric Permanent Network Stations: Results, K., Stephenson, W. J., Haefner, S. Methodological Feedback and Implications. Hollender, 14. STUDENT: Simulation of the Basin Effects in the Po F., Cornou, C., Dechamp, A., Renalier, F., Thomassin, S. Plain During the Emilia-Romagna Seismic Sequence

582 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Thursday, 23 April (continued)

29. STUDENT: Aftershocks Recordings Since 2010 to 44. Revised Offshore Mapping of Fault and Fold Highlight Site Effects in the Port-au-Prince Basin Deformation Associated with the Hosgri Fault Zone, (Haiti). Comparison Between Spectral Ratio and 1D- the Point Buchon Fault and the Shoreline Fault, Central Numerical Simulations. St Fleur, S., Courboulex, F., Coastal California. Angell, M.,Buga,M.,Turner,J., Bertrand, E., Deschamps, A., Mercier de Lepinay, B., Sowers,J.,Nishenko,S. Boisson,D.,Hough,E.S. 45. Submarine Paleoseismic Slip Rate Constraints of 30. Improved Estimation of Site Response Using Random Hosgri Fault Zone from High-Resolution 3D Seismic- Vibration Theory. Seifried, A. E., Toro, G. R. Reflection Data, Offshore Point Sal, Central Coastal 31. The Valley of Mexico Ground Motion: Regional, Local California. Hogan, P. J., Greene, H. G., Nishenko, S., and Soil-Infrastructure Interaction. Ramirez-Guzman, Bergkamp, B. J. L. 46. INVITED: Advanced 3D Seismic Detection and 32. STUDENT: Effects of Site Geometry on Short-distance Visualization of Faults and Fluid Pathways along the Spatial Coherency in Argostoli, Greece. Imtiaz, A., Hosgri Strike-Slip Fault Zone Offshore Point Sal, Cornou,C.,Bard,P.Y.,Zerva,A. California. Kluesner, J., Brothers, D., Hogan, P., Greene, 33. Geophysical Characterization of Seismographic Station G., Nishenko, S., Watt, J., Johnson, S. Sites in the Central and Eastern United States. Martin, 47. Restoring Fault Slip: Testing Alternative Correlations of A. J.,Stokoe,K.H.,Salomone,L.,Diehl,J.G. Faulted Channels Buried Beneath the Outer Continental 34. STUDENT: Site Amplification from Ambient Noise Shelf in Estero Bay and the Implications for Slip Rate Wavefronts. Bowden, D. C.,Tsai,V.C.,Lin,F.C. of the Hosgri Fault. AbramsonWard, H.,Lewandowski, 35. Determination of Vs30 at CGS Geotechnical Arrays N.,Thompson,S.,Hanson,K.,Nishenko,S. Using Strong-Motion Data. Haddadi, H.,Shakal,A., 48. Shallow Subsurface 3D Structural Imaging Near Diablo Huang, M. Canyon Power Plant, California, Using Active Seismic, 36. STUDENT: Updated Geospatial Liquefaction Model for Gravity, and Magnetic Data. Turner, J.,Sowers,J., Global Use. Zhu, J.,Baise,L.G.,Thompson,E.M. Goodman, J., Lajoie, L., O’Connell, D., Nishenko, S.

Characterizing the Potential Impacts of Surface Fault Central Coastal California Tectonics (see page 718) Rupture on Transportation Systems (see page 721)

37. A Geologic Compilation Map of the Central California 49. INVITED: Engineering Consequences and Mitigation for Coast Ranges West of the San Andreas Fault; Results, Surface Fault Rupture. Bray,J.D. Challenges, and Potential Use in Seismic Hazard 50. Surface Fault Rupture Characteristics of Reverse Faults. Analysis. Roberts, M. A.,Graymer,R.W. Moss, R. E. S. 38. Geophysical Characterization of the Offshore Los Osos 51. Development and Applications of Probabilistic Fault Fault Zone: Insights into Block Boundary Deformation. Displacement Hazard. Thio, H. K., Somerville, P. Watt, J. T.,Hardebeck,J.L.,Johnson,S.Y. 39. Strike-slip Fault Structures Inferred from Seismicity in Estero Bay, Central Coastal California. Hardebeck, J. Earthquake Processes and Multiscale Modeling and L., Watt, J. T. Characterization of Fragmentation and Damage Patterns 40. A Propagating Half Graben Separates the Hosgri and in Fault Zones (see page 721) San Simeon Fault Zones Offshore Cambria, California. Rietman, J. D., Greene, H. G.,Nishenko,S.P. 41. Fluid and Strong Ground-Motion Induced Slope 52. STUDENT: Dynamic Gouge Compaction and Dilatancy Failures Along the Western Hosgri Fault Zone in as a Simple Mechanism for Fault Zone Weakening and Northern Estero Bay Region, California. Greene, H. Short-Duration Slip Pulses. Hirakawa,E.T.,Ma,S. G.,Rietman,J.,Johnson,S.Y.,Nishenko,S. 53. Characterization of Damage Structure and Heal of 42. PG&E Ocean Bottom Seismometer (OBS) Project: Rupture Zones by Fault-Zone Trapped Waves. Li, Y. G. Initial Results from a Shallow Water Deployment, 54. Full Waveform Modeling of Regional and Fault-Specific offshore Central California, 27 July 2013 to 1 April 2014. Seismic Phases Along the San Jacinto Fault Zone Using McLaren, M. K. Realistic 3D Velocity Models. Allam, A. A.,Tape,C., 43. The Potential of a Seafloor Geodesy Network Off Ben-Zion, Y. Central California to Constrain Present Day Hosgri 55. STUDENT: Shear-wave Anisotropy Near the San Jacinto Fault Slip Rate. Ericksen, T.,Chadwell,C.D.,Brooks, Fault Zone, Southern California. Li, Z.,Peng,Z.,Ben- B., Murray, J., Thatcher, W. Zion, Y., Vernon, F.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 583 Thursday, 23 April (continued)

56. STUDENT: Localized and Distributed Interseismic 71. Recurrence Analysis for Potentially Induced Earthquakes Creep Along the Southern San Andreas Fault. in Oklahoma, Kansas, and the Raton Basin. Mueller, C. Lindsey, E. O.,Fialko,Y.,Bock,Y.,Sandwell,D.T., S.,Moschetti,M.P. Bilham, R. 72. The Conway Springs Earthquake of November 2014 – 57. STUDENT: How Do Free Surface Lateral Slip A Rare Moderate-Sized Earthquake in Kansas. Choy, Distribution and Off Fault Plastic Strain on Strike G. L., Boyd, O. S., McNamara, D. E., Miller, R., Slip Faults Vary By Fault Surface Roughness? Yao, Q., Rubinstein, J. Day, S., Shi, Z. 73. STUDENT: Characterization and Classification of 58. STUDENT: Scaling Properties of Foreshocks in Models Discrete Clusters of Earthquakes from 2008-2015 of Laboratory-Scale Rate-and-State Faults. Higgins, N., in North-Central Arkansas, Natural or Induced: Lapusta, N. Illustrating Their Influence on the National Seismic 59. STUDENT: Source Geometry and Free Surface Hazard Maps. Ausbrooks, S. M.,Horton,S.P. Influence on Earthquake Rupture Characteristics in the 74. STUDENT: A 3D Model of Pore Pressure Diffusion Subduction Zone off Mexico’s Pacific Coast. Carrillo- Associated with Induced Seismicity in Guy, Arkansas. Lucia, M. A., Ramírez-Guzmán, L. Ogwari, P. O.,Horton,S.P. 60. Imaging Supershear Laboratory Earthquakes with Ultra 75. Induced Seismicity in Western Alberta Due to Oil and High-speed DIC. Rubino, V.,Rosakis,A.J.,Lapusta,N. Gas Activities. Wong, I., Bott, J., Nemser, E. 61. STUDENT: Towards Reconciling Magnitude-Invariant 76. Discrimination and Assessment of Potentially Induced Stress Drops with Dynamic Weakening. Perry, S., Seismicity in Tectonic Active Zones – A Case Study from Lapusta, N. California. Bachmann, C. E., Foxall, W. 77. Analysis of Seismicity Coincident with Hydraulic Fracturing of a Well inSouthernOklahoma.Darold, Induced Seismicity (see page 723) A. P.,Holland,A.,Gibson,A.R. 78. STUDENT: Towards Understanding Source Mechanism of Hydraulic Fracturing Induced Earthquakes: 62. STUDENT: Statistical Properties of Induced and Sensitivity Analyses using a Constrained Focal Triggered Earthquakes at The Geysers, California. Mechanism Inversion Method. Iida, S.,Kim,A. Hawkins, A. K.,Turcotte,D.L.,Yikilmaz,M.B., 79. Identification of Induced Seismicity Using the Theory of Kellogg, L. H., Rundle, J. B. Records. Zhu, J.,Baise,L.G.,Vogel,R.M. 63. Magnitude-Frequency Distribution of Potentially 80. Fracture-Mechanics-Based Constraints of Maximum Induced Earthquakes in the Guy, Arkansas Sequence. Magnitude of Induced Earthquakes. Galis, M., Huang, Y.,Beroza,G. Ampuero,J.P.,Mai,P.M. 64. STUDENT: Relative Contributions of Tectonic Strain 81. STUDENT: Source-Type Specific Inversion of Moment and Pumping to Seismicity at California Geothermal Tensors. Nayak, A., Dreger, D. S. Fields. Weiser, D. A.,Jackson,D.J. 82. Statistical Properties of Microearthquakes Induced by 65. STUDENT: Detection of Induced Seismicity Due to Oil Hydraulic Fracturing. Maghsoudi, S.,Eaton,D.W., and Gas Extraction in the Northern Gulf of Mexico, Davidsen, J. USA. Fadugba, O. I.,Ebel,J.E. 83. Preliminary Likelihood Testing of Earthquake Rate 66. Possible Effects of Geothermal Operations on Models from Induced Seismicity. Hoover, S. M., Earthquake Triggering Processes in the Salton Sea Moschetti,M.P.,Petersen,M.D.,McNamara,D.E. Geothermal Field. Chen, X.,McGuire,J. 84. Increased Earthquake Rates in the Central and Eastern 67. Improved Detection and Location of Microseismicity US Portend Higher Earthquake Hazards. Llenos, A. During the 2005 Habanero EGS Stimulation in the L., Rubinstein, J. L., Ellsworth, W. L., Mueller, C. S., Cooper Basin of South Australia. Templeton, D. C., Michael, A. J., McGarr, A., Petersen, M. D., Weingarten, Johannesson, G., Pyle, M., Matzel, E. M.,Holland,A.A. 68. STUDENT: Characterizing Earthquake Clusters in 85. STUDENT: Combined Data Inversion for Full Oklahoma Using Subspace Detection. McMahon, N. Moment Tensors of Small Earthquakes. Boyd,O.S., D.,Benz,H.M.,Aster,R.C.,McNamara,D.E. Dreger, D. S. 69. Rupture Characteristics of Hydraulic Fracture Induced- 86. Cross-correlation Traffic Light Systems for Induced Triggered Seismicity Using Wide-band Recordings from Seismicity. Friberg, P. A.,Dricker,I.G. 0.1Hz to 1kHz. Urbancic, T. I.,Baig,A.M.,Bosman,K. 87. Surface Deformation Rates at the Southern Salton Sea: 70. STUDENT: Low Stress Drops Observed for the Ongoing Fault Slip or Geothermal Energy Production? 2011 M5.7 Prague, Oklahoma Earthquake Sequence. Barbour, A. J., Evans, E. L., Hickman, S. H., Eneva, M. Neighbors, C.,Sumy,D.F.,Cochran,E.S.,Atkinson, 88. STUDENT: Development of a Ground Motion G. M., Keranen, K. M. Prediction Method for Carbon Dioxide Injection-

584 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 Thursday, 23 April (continued) Induced Earthquakes. Stone, I. P., Lee, R. C., Bradley, with One-dimensional Velocity Model Inversion. Li, Z., C. R., Larmat, C. S. Peng, Z. 89. STUDENT: Effects of the Earth Characteristics 105. STUDENT: Revised Pure-Python Phase Picker and 3D on Induced Seismicity Potential. Hosseini, S. M., Event Associator. Chen, C.,Holland,A.A. Aminzadeh, F. 90. Monitoring Earthquakes Triggered by the Impoundment of the La-Romaine-2 Reservoir, Quebec, Canada. Lamontagne, M., Kara, R., Tournier, J. P., Noel, G., Observing Infrasonic Sources from Ground to Space (see Lavoie, D. page 732) 91. Reservoir Induced/Triggered Seismicity: A Review. Braun, T.,Dahm,T.,Kuehn,D. 106. Infrasound Observations From a Seismo-Acoustic 92. How to Mitigate Rockburst Induced Ground Excitations Hammer Source at the Nevada National Security Site. in Structural Design. Zembaty, Z., Kokot, S., Lai, C. Jones, K. R.,Abbott,R.,Hampshire,J.,White,R., 93. Toward a Public Data Policy for Induced Seismicity in Marcillo,O.,Whitaker,R.W. Italy. Priolo, E., Mucciarelli, M. 107. Simulation of Coupled Seismoacoustic Wave Propagation in Three-Dimensions with a Summation- by-Parts Finite Difference Method. Rodgers, A. J., Microseismics in Academia, Government and Industry Sjogreen, B., Petersson, N. A. (see page 730) 108. A Statistical Framework for Inversion of Atmospheric Winds using a Distant Continuous Infrasonic Source. Blom, P. S.,Arrowsmith,S.J. 94. 4D Tomography and Deformation from Microseismic 109. On the Array Processing of Wind-farm Infrasound Data. Crowley, J. W., Baig, A. M., Urbancic, T. I. Signals. Marcillo, O., Arrowsmith, 95. Investigating the Relationship Between Velocity Model 110. On the Use of Microbarometers on Balloon Platforms to Complexity and Earthquake Location Accuracy. Greig, Probe the Internal Structure of Venus. Arrowsmith, S. D. W., Baturan, D., Law, A. J., Bowman, D., Rolland, L., Lees, J., Mimoun, D., Hall, 96. STUDENT: Complex Fault Structure Revealed with J., Blom, P., Marcillo, O., Whitaker, R. Improved Earthquake Catalogs near the San Andreas 111. Radiation Patterns of Persistent Acoustic Sources Fault Observatory at Depth Borehole Array. Walker, R. Investigated with Free-Flying Microphones. Lees, J. M., L.,Okaya,D.A.,Sumy,D.F. Bowman, D. C. 97. STUDENT: Exploring Differences between Epicenter 112. Spaced-Based Observations of Seismic-Infrasound- locations from an Array of Surface Seismometers and Induced Ionospheric and Atmospheric Disturbances. a Downhole Array of Geophones at The Napoleonville Yang,Y.-.M.,Komjathy,A.,Meng,X.,Verkhoglyadova, Salt Dome, Louisiana. Mousavi, S. M.,Horton,S. O., Langley, R. B., Mannucci, A. J. 98. STUDENT: Study the Locations and Focal Mechanisms 113. Seismic and Ionospheric Signatures for Monitoring of Micro-seismic Events Near a High Velocity Interface. the Initiation of a Tsunami. Rolland,L.M., Smith, T.,Ji,C. Larmat, C. 99. STUDENT: Detection of Repeating Earthquakes Using the Cascadia Initiative Amphibious Dataset. Morton, E. A.,Bilek,S.L.,Rowe,C.A. 100. STUDENT: Automatic Detection and Picking of Direct Recent Advances in Understanding the Onshore and P,SandFaultZoneHead&TrappedWaves.Ross, Z. Offshore Southern California Fault System (see page 733) E., Ben-Zion, Y. 101. An Improved Algorithm for Automatic Picking of Seismic S-wave Arrivals in Continuous Data with 114. An Active Northwest-Trending Normal Fault Zone in Application to the San Jacinto Fault Zone. White, M., Santa Clarita, Transverse Ranges, Eastern Ventura Basin, Ross, Z., Reyes, J., Vernon, F., Ben-Zion, Y. Southern California. Swanson, B. J. 102. STUDENT: Earthquake Detection in Central Virginia 115. STUDENT: Geodesy-Based Estimates of Loading Rates Using a Dual Template and Autocorrelation Method. on Faults Beneath the Los Angeles Basin With a Kelly, A. L.,Brown,J.R. New, Computationally Efficient Method to Model 103. Automated P-wave Onset Time Detector based Dislocations in 3d Heterogeneous Media. Rollins, J. C., on Dissipated Damping Energy of SDF Oscillator. Landry,W.,Barbot,S.D.,Argus,D.F.,Avouac,J.P. Kalkan, E. 116. Identifying Surface Rupture Hazard Along the Northern 104. STUDENT: A Predict-and-Search Strategy for Picking Margin of the Los Angeles Basin. Treiman, J. A., P and S Phases: Signal-to-Noise Ratio Detector Joint Hernandez,J.L.,Olson,B.P.E.

Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015 585 Thursday, 23 April (continued) 117. Geomorphic Evaluation of the Santa Monica Fault Zone, Allen, R. M., Henson, I., Johanson, I., Neuhauser, D., Northwestern Los Angeles Basin, Southern California. Grapenthin, R. Olson, B. P. E. 128. ShakeAlert Earthquake Early Warning in the Pacific 118. An Updated Evaluation of the Hollywood - Raymond Northwest. Hartog,J.R.,Kress,V.C.,Bodin,P., Fault Zones, Los Angeles, California. Hernandez, J. L., Henson, I. H., Neuhauser, D. S. Olson, B. P. E. 129. Synthetic Testing of the Pacific Northwest Joint Seismic 119. Paleoseismology of the Southern Clark Strand of the San and Geodetic Earthquake Early Warning System. Jacinto Fault Zone, Southern California. Buga, M. T., Crowell, B. W.,Schmidt,D.A.,Bodin,P.,Vidale,J.E. Rockwell, T. K., Owen, L. A. 130. Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Absolute 120. Strain Partitioning Along the Onshore Palos Velocity Response Spectra (1-10 s) in Japan for Verdes Fault Zone: New Constraints on the Earthquake Early Warning. Dhakal, Y. P., Suzuki, W., Geometry, Distribution and Kinematics of Quaternary Kunugi, T., Aoi, S. Deformation. Goodman, J. T., Ostenaa, D. A., Hogan, 131. Application of the Maximum Likelihood Earthquake P. J., O’Connell, D. R. H., Turner, J. P. Location Method to Early Warning System in South 121. STUDENT: New High-Resolution 3D Imagery of Korea. Sheen, D. H.,Seong,Y.J.,Park,J.H.,Lim,I.S., Deformation and Fault Architecture of the Newport- Chi, H. C. Inglewood/Rose Canyon Fault in the Inner California 132. STUDENT: A Reality Check Algorithm Based on Borderlands. Holmes, J. J., Driscoll, N. W., Sahakian, Waveform Envelopes in Early Warning. Karakus, G., V. J., Bormann, J. M., Kent, G. M., Harding, A. J., Heaton, T. Wesnousky, S. G. 133. STUDENT: Apply Prior Information to Increase 122. Structure and Evolution of the THUMS-Huntington Warning Times for Earthquake Earning Warning. Yin, Beach Fault, Offshore Southern California. Ishutov, S., L.,Heaton,T. Legg, M. R.,Francis,R.D. 134. Refining Parameter Optimization for the Onsite 123. Structure and Evolution of the Eastern Boundary of the Earthquake Early Warning Algorithm. Andrews, J. R., California Outer Continental Borderland. De Hoogh, G. Cochran, E., Verrier, F., Hauksson, E., Felizardo, C., L., Nicholson, C., Sorlien, C., Francis, R. D. Boese, M. 124. Application of a New Event Detection Algorithm to an 135. CISN ShakeAlert: UserDisplay for Providing Ocean Bottom Seismometer Dataset Recorded Offshore Earthquake Alerts to End-Users. Felizardo, C.,Vinci, Southern California. Kohler,M.D., Bunn, J. J., Chandy, M., Boese, M., Andrews, J., Hauksson, E., Heaton, T. K. M., Weeraratne, D. S. 136. Implementation of GNSS-Constrained Real-Time 125. STUDENT: The ALBACORE OBS Array and a Finite Fault Modeling for Improved Earthquake Early 3D Seismic Velocity Model Offshore Southern Warning: Current Activities at USGS, Menlo Park. California. Bowden, D. C.,Kohler,M.D., Smith, D. E., Langbein, J. O., Murray, J. R., Guillemot, Tsai,V.C. C., Minson, S. E. 137. Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Pre-Earthquake Ambient Seismic Noise for Advance Warning. Gupta, I. Status and Future of Earthquake Early Warning (see page N., Schaff, D. P., Richards, P. G., Rastogi, B. K., Mahesh, 736) P., Mondal, P., Wagner, R. A. 138. Exploring the Readiness for Earthquake Early Warning at Seismic Networks Across Europe. Behr, Y.,Cauzzi,C., 126. The Discrimination Filter to Avoid EEW Alerting Clinton, J. F., Jonsdottir, K., Comoglu, M., Erlendsson, Triggered by Teleseismic Earthquakes using Geometric P., Marmureanu, A., Paraskevopoulos, P., Pinar, A., Distribution of Triggered Stations. Chi, H. C.,Park,J. Salichon, J., Sokos, E. H.,Lim,I.S.,Seong,Y.J. 139. STUDENT: Sensor-Cloud based Low Cost Wireless 127. ElarmS & GlarmS, UC Berkeley’s Earthquake Early Seismic Sensor for Earthquake Early Warning System, Warning Algorithms inCISNShakeAlert.Hellweg, M., QuickAlerT. Kuyuk, R. T., Kuyuk, H. S.

586 Seismological Research Letters Volume 86, Number 2B March/April 2015