DOCSLIB.ORG

SCAG Region Value Pricing Project— Regional Express Lane Network Pre-Implementation Assistance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SCAG Region Value Pricing Project— Regional Express Lane Network Pre-Implementation Assistance SCAG Region Value Pricing Project— Regional Express Lane Network Pre-Implementation Assistance REGIONAL CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS (TECHNICAL REPORT) PREPARED FOR: 900 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, 17th FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 IN PARTNERSHIP WITH: PREPARED BY: 444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 800 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 IN ASSOCIATION WITH ECONORTHWEST, MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, AND UCLA INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION STUDIES Revised February 2018 This page left intentionally blank Page ii Regional Express Lane Network Regional Concept of Operations (Technical Report) Acknowledgements This document was prepared by WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff under contract with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The preparation of this report was financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Additional financial assistance was provided through non-federal cash funds from Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA). The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of these agencies. We would like to thank those individuals and organizations who contributed their time and energy to the project. In particular, SCAG would like to thank the following individuals and organizations: SCAG Staff: Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Kome Ajise, Director of Planning Naresh Amatya, PE, Manager of Transportation Planning Annie Nam, Manager of Transportation Finance and Goods Movement (Project Manager) Guoxiong Huang, Manager of Modeling and Forecasting Warren Whiteaker, Program Manager Rajeev Seetharam, PE, Senior Regional Planner (former SCAG staff) Alison Linder, Ph.D., Senior Regional Planner Local Funding Partners Working Group: Shahrzad Amiri, Kathy McCune and Philbert Wong—Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Joe Alcock and Greg Nord—Orange County Transportation Authority Steve Smith—San Bernardino County Transportation Authority John Standiford and Shirley Medina—Riverside County Transportation Commission Peter De Haan—Ventura County Transportation Commission Regional Project Management Team: Angela Jacobs and Jesse Glazer—Federal Highway Administration Joe Rouse—Caltrans Headquarters Caltrans Districts 7, 8 and 12 Transportation Corridors Agency Consultant Team: WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff (prime) Darren Henderson, Project Manager Danny Wu, Deputy Project Manager ECONorthwest Michael Baker International University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Institute of Transportation Studies Disclosure Statement: This document is reflective of discussions and policies at the time of development. As such, some of the elements and priorities discussed in this document may have changed since the document was prepared. The project priorities in this document do not necessarily represent the official positions of the partner agencies. Continuing updates to this document are expected as the region’s express lanes program matures and projects become operational. Regional Express Lane Network Page iii Regional Concept of Operations (Technical Report) This page left intentionally blank Page iv Regional Express Lane Network Regional Concept of Operations (Technical Report) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Document and Intended Audience ............................................................................ 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Express Lanes Defined .................................................................................................................... 3 Enabling Legislation ........................................................................................................................ 3 Project Area ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Regional Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................................... 6 Consistency within the SCAG Region and California ..................................................................... 7 Organization of the Report ............................................................................................................. 7 2.0 CURRENT REGIONAL HOV AND EXPRESS LANE NETWORK ................................................................. 9 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 9 Existing HOV and Express Lane Facilities in SCAG Region ............................................................ 9 Existing HOV Degradation .............................................................................................. 14 Planned and Proposed Express Lanes in SCAG Region ............................................................... 15 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority I-10 and I-15 Express Lanes ......... 17 Riverside County Transportation Commission 91 Express Lanes Extension ............... 18 Riverside County Transportation Commission I-15 Express Lanes .............................. 18 Orange County I-405 Improvement Project Express Lanes ......................................... 19 Other Completed or Ongoing Express Lanes Related Studies ................................................... 19 3.0 FUTURE NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS .............................................................................................. 21 Regional Express Lanes Network ................................................................................................. 21 Model Scenarios ............................................................................................................. 21 Evaluation Approach and Methodology...................................................................................... 22 Mobility Screening .......................................................................................................... 23 Financial Feasibility Screening ....................................................................................... 24 Averaging the Revenue Maximization and Revenue Minimization Results ............... 26 Regional Express Lane Network Evaluation Results ................................................................... 26 Mobility and Reliability Screening Results .................................................................... 27 Financial Feasibility Screening Results ........................................................................... 28 Composite Mobility and Financial Screening Results ................................................... 29 Regional Express Lane Network Phasing Recommendations .................................................... 31 Preliminary Preferred Express Lane Network and Phasing Recommendations ......... 31 Modified Phasing Recommendations ........................................................................... 32 Regional Express Lane Network Implementation Phasing Plan ................................................. 36 Recommended Network for 2016 RTP/SCS Constrained Plan .................................... 36 Recommended Network for 2016 RTP/SCS Unconstrained Plan ................................ 39 Regional Express Lane Network Page v Regional Concept of Operations (Technical Report) 4.0 FEDERAL AND STATE TOLLING AUTHORIZATION .............................................................................. 41 Federal Express Lane Authorization ............................................................................................ 41 Section 129 General Tolling Program ............................................................................ 41 Section 166 HOV / HOT Lanes ....................................................................................... 42 State Legislative Authorization..................................................................................................... 42 Existing Statewide Authorizing Legislation .................................................................... 43 Metro I-110 / I-10 Express Lanes Authorization ........................................................... 44 RCTC I-15 Express Lanes Authorization ......................................................................... 44 OCTA / RCTC 91 Express Lanes Authorization .............................................................. 45 SBCTA I-10 / I-15 Express Lanes Authorization ............................................................. 45 Assembly Bill 194 ............................................................................................................ 46 Other State Legislative and Regulatory Considerations ............................................................. 46 User Fees ......................................................................................................................... 46 Rate Setting ..................................................................................................................... 48 High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes ...................................................................................... 48 Clean Air Vehicles ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction Metro Expresslanes
    Introducing Metro ExpressLanes The how-to guide for a faster commute on the 110 and 10 freeways Imagine spending less time on the freeway. It’s easy…sign up and save time! Welcome to Metro ExpressLanes – faster commutes and more transportation choices. Starting this Saturday, November 10, the carpool lanes on the 110 Harbor Freeway – between the 91 freeway and Adams Boulevard in downtown Los Angeles – will become Metro ExpressLanes. For the first time, these lanes will be open to solo drivers for a toll. All drivers will need a FasTrak® transponder to use the ExpressLanes. Carpools with two or more people, vanpools and motorcycles with a FasTrak will continue to travel toll-free. And early next year, commuters on the 10 El Monte Busway – between the 605 freeway and Alameda Street in downtown Los Angeles – will also have access to newly-converted ExpressLanes. Our goal is to move more people – not more vehicles – by o=ering more transportation choices. The program features and benefits include: > 59 new clean-fuel buses To access Metro ExpressLanes: > Carpool Loyalty Program for carpools, vanpools and motorcycles Sign up for a FasTrak account and receive your transponder. > New El Monte Station > Widened Adams Boulevard o=-ramp and added a new lane on Mount the FasTrak transponder in your vehicle. Adams Boulevard Before each trip, set the FasTrak transponder to indicate > New Patsaouras Plaza Station how many people are in your vehicle. > Toll credits for frequent transit riders Enter the ExpressLanes at designated FasTrak entry points. > New pedestrian bridge on Adams Boulevard providing direct connection to the new Metro Expo Line 23rd/Flower Station Save time! > Expanded platform and parking spaces at the Metrolink Pomona Station All vehicles will need a pre-paid FasTrak transponder to access the > Lighting and security improvements at the Harbor Metro ExpressLanes.
    [Show full text]
  • METRO EXPRESSLANES What’S It All About?
    METRO EXPRESSLANES What’s it all about? Metro ExpressLanes is a multi-faceted initiative designed congestion challenges by adding new services, expanding to improve tra;c flow and travel patterns by creating routes and developing and improving existing lines of alternative choices for everyone traveling on the 110 and 10 service. This ensures a more sustainable and reliable freeways, regardless of travel preferences: transit, carpool, transportation corridor for all. The goal of the Metro or solo driver. The project integrates several infrastructure ExpressLanes project is to move people, not vehicles. projects to increase the overall impact on current tra;c It’s About Time It’s About Choice Metro ExpressLanes encourages time-saving travel For the first-time ever, solo drivers have more options options through the use of pricing, technology, and when traveling alone. By allowing greater access to improved bus service. ExpressLanes, more evenly distributed tra;c flow is achieved across all lanes. supporting program features: supporting program features: > 45 MPH ExpressLane minimum average speed > Conversion of the I-110 Harbor Transitway HOV lanes > Frequent Express Bus service (every 5 to 10 minutes (182nd Street to Adams Bl) to ExpressLanes during peak hour) > Conversion of the I-10 El Monte Busway HOV lanes (I-605 to Alameda St) to ExpressLanes It’s About New, Reliable and Convenient Service It’s About Expansion and Improvement Metro ExpressLanes now o=ers commuters more Metro ExpressLanes provides funding for new station frequent travel options by adding new lines of service, investment and reduction of bottlenecks along the along with more convenient travel times.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Finance/Budget Department
    Adopted Budget July 1, 2015 – June 30, 2016 Table of Contents 1 BUILDING OUR MOBILITY 2 > Message from the CEO 4 > Board of Directors 6 > Organizational Chart 10 OVERVIEW 12 > Metro (LACMTA) 14 > Transit Expansion Timeline 16 > Improved Transit Service 18 > Delivering Transit & Highway Projects 22 > State of Good Repair 24 > Sustainability 26 > Congestion Management 27 > Budget Summary 28 BUDGET DETAILS 30 > Resources 32 > Expenditures 34 > Enterprise Fund 36 > Capital Program 38 > Regional Subsidy Funding Programs 40 > Congestion Management 42 > Debt 44 > Fund Balances & Governmental Fund Financial Statements 46 > Measure R 48 > Full-Time Equivalents (FTE) 52 APPENDICES 54 > Appendix I: Service Statistics 56 > Appendix II: Activity Based Bus Cost Model 58 > Appendix III: Activity Based Rail Cost Model 60 > Appendix IV: Capital Program Project Listing 62 > Appendix V: Regional Transit Allocations 70 > Appendix VI: Subsidies to Local Agencies 72 > Appendix VII: Legally Separate Entities 74 > Appendix VIII: Los Angeles County Subregions & Supervisory Districts 76 ABBREVIATIONS 78 Building our Mobility 4 Message from the CEO With the benefit of visionary and generous voters, our county has strong local support for transportation, including the most recent sales tax, Measure R, which passed in 2008 at the beginning of the Great Recession. This measure and past voter support makes possible the construction we see today, and keeps Metro fares among the lowest of any major transit system in the U.S. But we’re not going it alone. Last year, we secured more than $3 billion in federal support, including approximately $2 billion in federal New Starts money and more than $1 billion in low- interest TIFIA loans for Phase 1 of the Westside Purple Line Subway and the Regional Connector.
    [Show full text]
  • Expresslanes
    Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority METRO EXPRESSLANES Program Fact Sheet Información del proyecto july 2012 It’s about time. about the expresslanes demonstration program The Los Angeles County Metropolitan The Metro ExpressLanes Demonstration Transportation Authority (Metro) and Program is primarily funded with a $210 Caltrans District 7, along with Foothill million congestion reduction demonstration Transit Agency, Gardena Municipal grant from the U.S. Department of Bus Lines, Los Angeles Department of Transportation (USDOT). Transportation, Southern California Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink) and Program Goal Torrance Transit, are partnering in a one- The goal is to provide commuters, regardless of income level, with new and better travel options along two of year demonstration program during which LA County’s most congested corridors. The program will: existing carpool lanes on the I-110 Harbor Transitway (between Adams Bl and Artesia > Test strategies to alleviate congestion > Fund additional transit alternatives Transit Center) and I-10 El Monte Busway > Maximize freeway capacity usage (between Alameda St and I-605) will be > Increase travel time savings > Improve trip reliability and safety converted to High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) > Reduce air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions lanes – called Metro ExpressLanes. Metro ExpressLanes are scheduled to open in 2012. información sobre el programa de demostración metro expresslanes Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation El Programa de Demostración Metro Authority (Metro) y Caltrans District 7, ExpressLanes está >nanciado principalmente junto con Foothill Transit Agency, Gardena con un subsidio de $210 millones para Municipal Bus Lines, Los Angeles Department la demostración de la reducción del of Transportation, Southern California congestionamiento del Departamento de Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink) y Torrance Transporte de los Estados Unidos (USDOT).
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Congestion Reduction Demonstration (Metro Expresslanes) Program
    Los Angeles Congestion Reduction Demonstration (Metro ExpressLanes) Program National Evaluation: Transit System Data Test Plan www.its.dot.gov/index.htm FINAL – April 16, 2012 Publication Number FHWA-JPO-11-TBD LOS ANGELES CONGESTION REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION (METRO EXPRESSLANES) PROGRAM NATIONAL EVALUATION: TRANSIT SYSTEM DATA TEST PLAN By Battelle Memorial Institute 505 King Ave. Columbus OH 43201 Prepared for United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Operations 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 Contract No. DTFH61-06-D-00007/ORDER 07-T-08002/WO BA07-041 FINAL April 16, 2012 QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT The U.S. Department of Transportation provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. U.S. DOT periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-JPO-11-TBD 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Los Angeles Congestion Reduction Demonstration April 16, 2012 (Metro ExpressLanes) Program: Transit System Data Test Plan – FINAL 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Brian Pessaro, Center for Urban Transportation Research, Matt Burt, Battelle 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Battelle 505 King Avenue 11. Contract or Grant No. Columbus, OH 43201 DTFH61-06-D-00007/ORDER 07-T- 08002/WO BA07-041 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13.
    [Show full text]
  • I-10 Expresslanes Program HOV5+ PILOT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN a DEGRADATION MITIGATION STRATEGY
    ATTACHMENT A I-10 ExpressLanes Program HOV5+ PILOT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN A DEGRADATION MITIGATION STRATEGY October 2019 Prepared by: TASK 2: Literature Review Technical Memorandum Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Methodology and Findings ........................................................................................................ 3 Peer Agencies' Lessons Learned and Best Practices .................................................... 3 Partner Transit Agencies and Key Stakeholder Interviews ............................................. 4 Pilot Implementation Plan Development ................................................................................... 6 Pilot Implementation Plan .......................................................................................................... 7 Next Steps ............................................................................................................................... 12 1 I-10 HOV Degradation Mitigation .......................................................................................... 13 Background .................................................................................................................... 13 I-10 ExpressLanes Performance Degradation .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • El Monte Station Connections Foothilltransit.Org
    metro.net El Monte Station Connections foothilltransit.org BUSWAY 10 Greyhound Foothill Transit El Monte Station Upper Level FT Silver Streak Discharge Only FT486 FT488 FT492 Eastbound Metro ExpressLanes Discharge Walk-in Center 24 25 26 27 28 Only Bus stop for: 23 EMT Red, EMT Green EMS Civic Ctr Main Entrance Upper Level Bus Bays for All Service B 29 22 21 20 19 18 Greyhound FT Silver Streak FT481 Metro Silver Line Metro Bike Hub FT494 Westbound (Coming Soon) RAMONA BL RAMONA BL A Metro Bus stop for: Division 9 EMS Flair Park Parking Structure Building SANTA ANITA AV El Monte Station Lower Level 1 Bus Bay A Bus Stop (on street) 267 268 487 190 194 FT178 FT269 FT282 2 Metro Rapid 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Bus Bay 577 Metro Silver Line 8 18 Bus Bay Lower Level Bus Bays Elevator 76 Eastbound Escalator 17 Bike Rail 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Bike Parking 270 176 Discharge Only ROSE 770 70 Parking Building 15-2433 ©2015 LACMTA AUG 2015 Subject to Change Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Street Stop Street Stop Street Stop 7th St/Metro Center Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Harbor Fwy Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Pershing Square Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line , 70, 76, 770, 1 2 17 18 FT Silver Streak 19 20 21 37th St/USC Busway Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Harbor Gateway Transit Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Pomona TransCenter ÅÍ FT Silver Streak 28 Alhambra 76, 176 6 17 Highland Park 176 6 Puente Hills Mall FT178, FT282 14 16 Altadena 267, 268 9 10 Industry Å 194, FT282
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Expresslanes – How It Works
    metro.net Metro ExpressLanes – How It Works 7 carpools, vanpools and motorcycles can use the 6 ExpressLanes toll free with ® a FasTrak transponder. 1 5 ON 4 LANE LY E XPRES S ONL S LANE Y EXPRES S S 3 solo drivers on the i-10 1 and i-110 with a FasTrak® transponder can choose to pay a toll to use the ExpressLanes. 2 (not to scale) The I-110 and I-10 Metro ExpressLanes 1. Prior to starting your trip, you will indicate the number of 3. The first sign will be a FasTrak only ExpressLanes sign 6. The fourth sign marks the start of the ExpressLanes regulations will be enforced by occupants in your vehicle by moving the switch on the approximately 1/2 mile away from the entrance to signify toll segment and is the final reminder to the driver that the California Highway Patrol using transponder to the appropriate setting (1, 2, 3+). the distance remaining to enter the ExpressLanes. Entry to Fastrak is required beyond this point. visual and electronic means. and exit from the ExpressLanes will be indicated by a single dashed white line. 7. Once you are beyond the Expresslanes entry/exit point, where the dashed white line ends and the double solid white 4. Tolls on the ExpressLanes are based on the current lines begin again, an overhead antenna will read the FasTrak congestion level and the length of your trip. Approximately transponder, and for solo drivers who choose to use the ¼ mile away from the entrance to the ExpressLanes, ExpressLanes, the correct toll amount will be automatically the second overhead electronic sign displays two toll amounts: deducted from your FasTrak account based upon the toll 1) The current toll from this entrance to the next major exit; amounts displayed to you on the second sign.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of L.A. Metro's Expresslanes As a Congestion Reduction Strategy Aidan Holliday Senior Comprehensive Project
    A Case Study of L.A. Metro’s ExpressLanes as a Congestion Reduction Strategy Aidan Holliday Senior Comprehensive Project- UEP 411 Submitted for the Consideration of a BA in Urban and Environmental Policy Occidental College Professor Cha and Professor Shamasunder Spring 2018 Holliday 2 Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………4 Literature Review…………………………………………………………………………..5 Summary…………………………………………………………………………....5 Overview of Congestion in Los Angeles…………………………………………..6 Combating Congestion: Congestion Pricing……………………………………...8 Congestion Pricing Model: Singapore……………………………………………10 Updates to Singapore’s Congestion Pricing……………………………………...10 Barriers to Congestion Pricing in L.A. County………………………………….11 Survey on Congestion Relief in L.A. County…………………………………….12 Congestion Pricing Stakeholders………………………………………………....13 The Role of Public Transit in Reducing Congestion…………………………….14 The Expansion of Bus Rapid Transit…………………………………………….14 Combating Congestion: Bus Rapid Transit……………………………………..15 Recommendations for BRT……………………………………………………….16 Model BRT System: Ottawa……………………………………………………...17 Takeaways………………………………………………………………………….18 Background………………………………………………………………………………...18 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………….20 Qualitative Case Study…………………………………………………………….21 Content Analyses…………………………………………………………………..21 Interviews…………………………………………………………………………..22 Findings and Analysis………………………………………………………………………23 Holliday 3 News Articles: Emphasis on Personal Cost……………………………………….23 Opinion Pieces……………………………………………………………………....25
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Including Amendments 1-30 (In $000`S)
    2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Los Angeles County Transit Including Amendments 1-30 (In $000`s) 1/19/2021 Public Project Listings 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Los Angeles County Transit - Project Listing Including Amendments 1 - 30 (In $000`s) Conform EXEMPT - Total FTIP ID LA970501 FTIP Amendment LA County (METRO) 19-22 $618,235 Category 93.126 Project Cost Lead ACCESS Modeling NO Agency SERVICES INC. PAO00 - PARATRANSIT County Los Angeles Primary Program Code Air Basin SCAB RTP ID LA970501 OPERATIONS/OPERATING ASSISTANCE System Transit Project From to Limits ANNUAL EXPENDITURES INCLUDING SERVICE PROVIDER CONTRACTS FOR COMPLEMENTARY ADA PARATRANSIT IN LOS Description ANGELES COUNTY Phase Fund Source (in $000s) Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Future Total CON 5310 - FTA FHWA TRANSFER FUNDS $126,600 $67,700 - - - - - - $194,300 CON PC40 - Los Angeles County Proposition "C40" $80,847 - $60,000 - - - - - $140,847 CON STPL-R - STP Local Regional $66,000 - $3,288 $69,500 $71,300 $73,000 - - $283,088 Total Construction $273,447 $67,700 $63,288 $69,500 $71,300 $73,000 - - $618,235 Total Programmed $273,447 $67,700 $63,288 $69,500 $71,300 $73,000 - - $618,235 https://scag.ecointeractive.com/secure/report_fed_type_pj_list_all.asp?CMD=report&FFY_TYPE=&PUBLIC_FILTER=&MC_GROUP=&ONLYTOTA… 1/230 1/19/2021 Public Project Listings 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Los Angeles County Transit - Project Listing Including Amendments 1 - 30 (In $000`s) Conform EXEMPT - Total FTIP ID LA9918894 FTIP Amendment LA County (METRO) 19-23 $413 Category 93.126 Project Cost ACCESS Lead SERVICES Modeling Agency INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Congestion Reduction Demonstration (Metro Expresslanes)
    Los Angeles Congestion Reduction Demonstration (Metro ExpressLanes) Program National Evaluation: Ridesharing Data Test Plan www.its.dot.gov/index.htm Final Report — July 9, 2012 Publication Number FHWA-JPO-13-031 Produced by the Urban Partnership Agreement Demonstration Evaluation U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The U.S. Government is not endorsing any manufacturers, products, or services cited herein and any trade name that may appear in the work has been included only because it is essential to the contents of the work. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-JPO-13-031 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Los Angeles County Congestion Reduction Demonstration July 9, 2012 (Metro ExpressLanes) Program: Ridesharing Data Test Plan – Final 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Eric Schreffler (ESTC) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Battelle 505 King Avenue 11. Contract or Grant No. Columbus, OH 43201 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This report presents the Ridesharing Data Test Plan for the national evaluation of the Los Angeles (L.A.) County Congestion Reduction Demonstration (CRD) under the United States Department of Transportation (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Expresslanes Back Office System (BOS)
    LACMTA Back Office System Requirements EXHIBIT A - STATEMENT OF WORK Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA or Metro) Metro ExpressLanes Back Office System (BOS) June 21, 2017 Final Draft LACMTA Back Office System Requirements CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. TOLL CORRIDORS AND TRANSACTION PROCESSING ............................................................................ 1 1.2. METRO EXPRESSLANES BACK OFFICE SYSTEM (BOS) PROJECT OVERVIEW........................................ 2 1.3. SYSTEM OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.4. LITIGATION INVOLVING THE EXPRESSLANES...................................................................................... 6 2. STATEMENT OF WORK AND REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................... 8 2.1. BACK OFFICE SYSTEMS STATEMENT OF WORK .................................................................................. 8 2.2. GLOBAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1. Environments..................................................................................................................................................10 2.2.2. System Functionality...................................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]