DOCSLIB.ORG

Pv Narasimha Rao Kanthanapally Sujala Sravanthi Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pv Narasimha Rao Kanthanapally Sujala Sravanthi Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT P V NARASIMHA RAO KANTHANAPALLY SUJALA SRAVANTHI PROJECT JAYASHANKAR BHUPALAPALLY DISTRICT, TELANGANA CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION & CAD DEPARTMENT K C COLONY, CHINTAGATTU, WARANGAL- 506002, TELANGANA CONSULTANTS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY CONSULTANTS PVT LTD # 13/2, 1ST MAIN ROAD, NEAR FIRE STATION, INDUSTRIAL TOWN, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010 NOVEMBER 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR P V NARASIMHA RAO KANTHANAPALLY SUJALA SRAVANTHI PROJECT IN JAYASHANKAR BHUPALAPALLY DISTRICT, TELANGANA Project By CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION & CAD DEPT. K. C COLONY, CHINTAGATTU, WARANGAL - 506002, TELANGANA. Consultants ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY CONSULTANTS PVT LTD # 13/2, 1ST MAIN ROAD, NEAR FIRE STATION, INDUSTRIAL TOWN, RAJAJINAGAR,BENGALURU-560 010, NABET/EIA/1518/SA 024 DOCUMENT NO. EHSC/I&CAD/KCC/ETR/2017 -18/PVNKSSP NOVEMBER 2018 P V Narasimha Rao Kanthanapally Sujala Sravathi Project in Executive summary Jayashankar Bhupalapally District, Telangana of Final EIA Report REVISION RECORD Rev. No Date Purpose Issued as Executive summary of Draft EIA Report EHSC/01 28.04.2018 for Comments and Suggestions Issued as Draft EIA Report for submission to EHSC/02 04.07.2018 TSPCB for conducting Environmental Public Hearing Issued as Final EIA Report to client and experts EHSC/03 19.11.2018 for comments and suggestions Issued as Final EIA Report for submission to EHSC/04 05.12.2018 MoEF&CC, New Delhi for issue of Environmental Clearance I&CAD Department, Government of Telangana 1 EHS Consultants Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru P V Narasimha Rao Kanthanapally Sujala Sravathi Project in Executive summary Jayashankar Bhupalapally District, Telangana of Final EIA Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 2. Project Description ................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Need for the project ................................................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Water availability ........................................................................................................................................... 18 2.3 Command area of the project ................................................................................................................ 18 2.4 Structural components of the project ................................................................................................. 19 2.5 Land Requirement ........................................................................................................................................ 20 2.6 Submergence of River bed area ............................................................................................................ 20 2.7 Existing cropping pattern details ........................................................................................................... 20 2.8 Benefit cost ratio ........................................................................................................................................... 20 3. Description of baseline environment .......................................................................................................... 20 3.1 Physical Environment .................................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.1 Topography ............................................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.2 Ambient air quality .............................................................................................................................. 21 3.1.3 Ambient Noise levels .......................................................................................................................... 21 3.1.4 Seismicity .................................................................................................................................................. 21 3.1.5 Geology and Minerals ........................................................................................................................ 21 3.1.6 Soil types .................................................................................................................................................. 21 3.1.7 Hydrogeology......................................................................................................................................... 22 3.1.8 Surface Water ......................................................................................................................................... 22 3.1.9 Land use assessment .......................................................................................................................... 23 3.2 Biological Environment ................................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.1 Flora and Fauna ......................................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.2 Protected Areas .......................................................................................................................................... 25 4. Anticipated Environmental Impacts & Mitigation Measures ........................................................... 25 4.1 Impacts during Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 26 4.1.1 Ambient Air Quality .................................................................................................................................. 26 4.1.1.1 Anticipated impacts ......................................................................................................................... 26 4.1.1.2 Mitigation measures ........................................................................................................................ 27 4.1.2 Ambient Noise Level ................................................................................................................................ 28 4.1.2.1 Sources of noise pollution ............................................................................................................ 28 4.1.2.2 Mitigation measures ........................................................................................................................ 28 4.1.3 Water Environment ................................................................................................................................... 29 4.1.3.1 Sources of water pollution ........................................................................................................... 29 4.1.3.2 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................................ 30 4.1.4. Soil Environment ....................................................................................................................................... 30 I&CAD Department, Government of Telangana 2 EHS Consultants Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru P V Narasimha Rao Kanthanapally Sujala Sravathi Project in Executive summary Jayashankar Bhupalapally District, Telangana of Final EIA Report 4.1.4.1 Sources of soil pollution ................................................................................................................ 30 4.1.4.2 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................................ 31 4.1.5 Land use assessment ............................................................................................................................... 31 4.1.5.1 Impacts .................................................................................................................................................. 31 4.1.5.2 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................................ 31 4.1.6 Impact on Solid & Hazardous Environment ................................................................................. 32 4.1.6.1 Impacts .................................................................................................................................................. 32 4.1.6.2 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................................ 32 4.1.7 Impact on Hydrology & Geology ...................................................................................................... 33 4.1.7.1 Impacts .................................................................................................................................................. 33 4.1.7.2 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................................ 34 4.1.8 Impact on Biological Environment .................................................................................................... 34 4.1.8.1 Impacts .................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Live Storage Capacities of Reservoirs As Per Data of : Large Dams/ Reservoirs/ Projects (Abstract)
    LIVE STORAGE CAPACITIES OF RESERVOIRS AS PER DATA OF : LARGE DAMS/ RESERVOIRS/ PROJECTS (ABSTRACT) Completed Under Construction Total No. of No. of No. of Live No. of Live No. of Live No. of State/ U.T. Resv (Live Resv (Live Resv (Live Storage Resv (Live Total No. of Storage Resv (Live Total No. of Storage Resv (Live Total No. of cap data cap data cap data capacity cap data Reservoirs capacity cap data Reservoirs capacity cap data Reservoirs not not not (BCM) available) (BCM) available) (BCM) available) available) available) available) Andaman & Nicobar 0.019 20 2 0.000 00 0 0.019 20 2 Arunachal Pradesh 0.000 10 1 0.241 32 5 0.241 42 6 Andhra Pradesh 28.716 251 62 313 7.061 29 16 45 35.777 280 78 358 Assam 0.012 14 5 0.547 20 2 0.559 34 7 Bihar 2.613 28 2 30 0.436 50 5 3.049 33 2 35 Chhattisgarh 6.736 245 3 248 0.877 17 0 17 7.613 262 3 265 Goa 0.290 50 5 0.000 00 0 0.290 50 5 Gujarat 18.355 616 1 617 8.179 82 1 83 26.534 698 2 700 Himachal 13.792 11 2 13 0.100 62 8 13.891 17 4 21 J&K 0.028 63 9 0.001 21 3 0.029 84 12 Jharkhand 2.436 47 3 50 6.039 31 2 33 8.475 78 5 83 Karnatka 31.896 234 0 234 0.736 14 0 14 32.632 248 0 248 Kerala 9.768 48 8 56 1.264 50 5 11.032 53 8 61 Maharashtra 37.358 1584 111 1695 10.736 169 19 188 48.094 1753 130 1883 Madhya Pradesh 33.075 851 53 904 1.695 40 1 41 34.770 891 54 945 Manipur 0.407 30 3 8.509 31 4 8.916 61 7 Meghalaya 0.479 51 6 0.007 11 2 0.486 62 8 Mizoram 0.000 00 0 0.663 10 1 0.663 10 1 Nagaland 1.220 10 1 0.000 00 0 1.220 10 1 Orissa 23.934 167 2 169 0.896 70 7 24.830 174 2 176 Punjab 2.402 14
    [Show full text]
  • Committee for Consultations on the Situation in Andhra Pradesh
    COMMITTEE FOR CONSULTATIONS ON THE SITUATION IN ANDHRA PRADESH REPORT December 2010 THE COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON Shri Justice B N Srikrishna (Retd.) Former Judge, Supreme Court of India MEMBER SECRETARY Shri Vinod Kumar Duggal, IAS (Retd.) Former Home Secretary, Government of India MEMBERS Prof (Dr.) Ranbir Singh Vice Chancellor, National Law University, Delhi Dr. Abusaleh Shariff Chief Economist /Senior Fellow, National Council of Applied Economic Research, Delhi Prof (Dr.) Ravinder Kaur Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, IIT, Delhi The Inter State Council Secretariat (ISCS) provided full secretarial assistance including technical and budgetary support to the Committee C O N T E N T S VOLUME - I Prologue i Approach and Methodology iv Acknowledgements xii List of Tables, Figures, Appendices xvii Abbreviations xxix Chapter 1 Developments in Andhra Pradesh-A Historical Background 1 Chapter 2 Regional Economic and Equity Analysis 63 Chapter 3 Education and Health 125 Chapter 4 Water Resources, Irrigation and Power Development 177 Chapter 5 Public Employment Issues 245 Chapter 6 Issues Relating to Hyderabad Metropolis 295 Chapter 7 Sociological and Cultural Issues 341 Chapter 8 Law & Order and Internal Security Dimensions 423 Chapter 9 The Way Forward 425 VOLUME - II Appendices 1-173 Index 174 “In ages long past a great son of India, the Buddha, said that the only real victory was one in which all were equally victorious and there was defeat for no one. In the world today that is the only practical victory; any other way will lead to disaster”. Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru speaking on „Disputes and Discord‟ in the United Nations General Assembly on October 3, 1960 Prologue It has not been an easy task.
    [Show full text]
  • NW-109 Wainganga-Pranahita River Final
    Final Feasibility Report National Waterway-109 Region V – Wainganga-Pranahita River Kaleshwaram to Chandapur (165.78km) SURVEY PERIOD: 30 MAY 2016 TO 03 JUL 2016 Volume - I Prepared for: Inland Waterways Authority of India (Ministry of Shipping, Govt. of India) A-13, Sector – 1, NOIDA Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh – 201 301 Document Distribution Date Revision Distribution Hard Copy Soft Copy INLAND WATERWAYS 9 Dec 2016 Rev – 0 01 01 AUTHORITY OF INDIA INLAND WATERWAYS 21 Apr 2017 Rev – 1.0 01 01 AUTHORITY OF INDIA INLAND WATERWAYS 01 Dec 2017 Rev – 1.1 04 04 AUTHORITY OF INDIA INLAND WATERWAYS 26 Oct 2018 Rev – 1.2 04 04 AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IIC Technologies Ltd. expresses its sincere gratitude to IWAI for awarding the work of carrying out detailed hydrographic surveys in the New National Waterways in NW-109 in Region V – from Kaleshwaram to Chandapur village. We would like to use this opportunity to pen down our profound gratitude and appreciations to Shri Pravir Pandey, IA&AS, Chairman IWAI for spending his valuable time and guidance for completing this Project. IIC Technologies Ltd., would also like to thank, Shri Alok Ranjan, ICAS, Member (Finance), Shri Shashi Bhushan Shukla, Member (Traffic), Shri S.K. Gangwar, Member (Technical) for their valuable support during the execution of project. IIC Technologies Ltd, wishes to express their gratitude to Capt. Ashish Arya, Hydrographic Chief IWAI, Cdr. P.K. Srivastava ex-Hydrographic Chief and Shri SVK Reddy, Chief Engineer-I for their guidance and inspiration for this project. IIC Technologies Ltd, would also like to thank Sh.
    [Show full text]
  • (SCR) Status of Projects
    SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY STATUS OF TARGETED & NON TARGETED PROJECTS As on 01.10.20 NEW LINES Name of Project: MANOHARABAD - KOTHAPALLI, 151.36 Km (PH -11, New lines) S C Railway Name of Project: MANOHARABAD - KOTHAPALLI, 151.36 Km (PH -11, New lines) S C Rly SNAP SHOT OF FULL PROJECT Year of Inclusion 2006 - 07 Month & year of Final Sanction July, 2016 Project falling in (Railway) South Central Railway Project falling in (States) Telangana Executing Agency CAO ( C ) SCR ROR ( + %) (+) 0.16 % Length of Complete Project 151.36 km 1373.74 Cr Latest anticipated Cost of Project (Original sanc 1160.47 Cr. + 213.26 Cr MM ) Up to date Expenditure of full project 460.93 Cr. (Rly: 400.93 Cr + State: 60.00 Cr) Physical Progress of full Project (%) 25 % Financial Progress of full Project (%) 39 % Outlay 2020-21 (in Cr.) 79.00 Cr. Manoharabad-Gajwel(31.071 km) CRS authorisation Length of Project already Commissioned (km) received on 19.06.2020 and workman special run on 26.08.20. Mar, 25 (Subject to handing over of land & deposition Likely TDC of complete project (Month & Year) of 1/3rd share by Telangana Govt) Name of Project: MAHABUBNAGAR - MUNIRABAD, (PH - 11, New lines) S C Railway SCR portion: DEVARAKADRA - KRISHNA, 65.74 Km Name of Project: MAHABUBNAGAR - MUNIRABAD, (PH - 11, New lines) S C Railway SCR portion: DEVARAKADRA - KRISHNA, 65.74 Km SNAP SHOT OF FULL PROJECT Year of Inclusion 1997 - 98 Month & year of Final Sanction January, 2012 Project falling in (Railway) South Central Railway Telangana (SCR portion 65.74 km), Project falling in (States) Karnataka (SWR portion, 161.675km) Executing Agency CAO ( C ) SCR & CAO ( C ) SWR ROR ( + %) (+ ) 3.49 % Length of Complete Project 16+65,74 NL,81.74 (SCR portion) 243.50 Complete project (Overall: Rs 3421.35 Cr) Latest anticipated Cost of Project 907.71 Cr.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of India Ministry of Jal Shakti, Department of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI, DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, RIVER DEVELOPMENT & GANGA REJUVENATION LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. †919 ANSWERED ON 27.06.2019 OLDER DAMS †919. SHRI HARISH DWIVEDI Will the Minister of JAL SHAKTI be pleased to state: (a) the number and names of dams older than ten years across the country, State-wise; (b) whether the Government has conducted any study regarding safety of dams; and (c) if so, the outcome thereof? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR JAL SHAKTI & SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT (SHRI RATTAN LAL KATARIA) (a) As per the data related to large dams maintained by Central Water Commission (CWC), there are 4968 large dams in the country which are older than 10 years. The State-wise list of such dams is enclosed as Annexure-I. (b) to (c) Safety of dams rests primarily with dam owners which are generally State Governments, Central and State power generating PSUs, municipalities and private companies etc. In order to supplement the efforts of the State Governments, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Department of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation (DoWR,RD&GR) provides technical and financial assistance through various schemes and programmes such as Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Programme (DRIP). DRIP, a World Bank funded Project was started in April 2012 and is scheduled to be completed in June, 2020. The project has rehabilitation provision for 223 dams located in seven States, namely Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand. The objectives of DRIP are : (i) Rehabilitation and Improvement of dams and associated appurtenances (ii) Dam Safety Institutional Strengthening (iii) Project Management Further, Government of India constituted a National Committee on Dam Safety (NCDS) in 1987 under the chairmanship of Chairman, CWC and representatives from State Governments with the objective to oversee dam safety activities in the country and suggest improvements to bring dam safety practices in line with the latest state-of-art consistent with Indian conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Algal Diversity in Lower Manair Dam, Karimnagar, Telangana, India
    J. Algal Biomass Utln. 2017, 8(2): 11-15 Algal diversity in Lower Manair Dam eISSN: 2229 – 6905 Studies on algal diversity in Lower Manair Dam, Karimnagar, Telangana, India L. Srinivas, Y. Seeta* and P. Manikya Reddy Department of Botany, Osmania University, Hyderabad-500007, Telangana State, India. *Department of Environmental Science, Osmania University, Hyderabad-500007, Telangana State, India. Abstract Lakes are the important water resources and used for several purposes. The water quality of all fresh water environments is assessed by the physico-chemical and biological parameters. The present investigation is focused on the water quality and diversity of algae. In the present study, four groups of algae viz., Bacillariophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Cyanophyceae and Euglenophyceae were identified. In the dam Bacillariophyceae was dominant among all other classes having maximum diversity followed by Chlorophyceae, Cyanophyceae and Euglenophyceae. The maximum growth of diatoms was recorded during winter, minimum values were attained during summer and rainy season.The dam water is extensively used for drinking and irrigational purposes. Key words: Physico-chemical parameters, Manair dam, Phytoplankton and Diversity Introduction In limnological studies, to determine the water quality in lake, pond, stream and river and to identify of algae that composed to primary productivity and to obtain this continuity are very important. Diversity of phytoplankton is an indication of purity and the use of community structure to assess pollution is conditioned by four assumptions: the natural community will evolve towards greater species complexity which eventually stabilizes; this process increases the functional complexity of the system; complex communities are more stable than simple communities, and pollution stress simplifies a complex community by eliminating the more sensitive species (Akbay et al., 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Waterlogging in Sriram Sagar Command Area
    CS(AR) 202 ASSESSMENT OF WATERLOGGING IN SRIRAM SAGAR COMMAND AREA \ e ana We Trans! NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HYDROLOGY JAL VIGYAN BHAWAN ROORKEE - 247 667 (U.P.) INDIA 1995-96 PREFACE India has very large and ambitious plans for the development of irrigation and, which are indeed very essential for diversifying agriculture as also for increasing and stabilizing crop production. It is expected that when the various irrigation projects are completed, irrigation will be practiced over, at least double the present area. This is what it should be if the country has to make economic progress quickly. But if the intelligent use of water is not pre-planned, the dreadful history may repeat itself with all its attendant havocs of seepage, rise in water table, widespread waterlogging and salinity. Irrigated agriculture instead of ensuring prosperity and economic stability may threaten the very security of the'land. Waterlogging throws a challenge to irrigated agriculture. The success depends how we take up that challenge and save our national heritage, the soil, from deterioration. Irrigation projects involving interbasin transfer of water without adequate drainage has disrupted the equilibrium between the ground water recharge and discharge resulting in accretions to the ground water table. After commissioning of the Sriram Sagar Irrigation Project in 1970, there was a general rise in grOund water table. The Sriram Sagar command area faces problems of waterlogging resulting from over irrigation & seepage losses through distributory system. This study is an attempt to assess the areas affected by waterlogging and areas sensitive to waterlogging in the Sriram Sager command area using Indian Remote Sensing Satellite data.
    [Show full text]
  • Andhra Pradesh State Administration Report
    ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ADMINISTRATION REPORT 1977-78 2081-B—i 'f^ *0 S» ^ CONTENTS. Chapter Name of the Chapter Pages No. (1) (2) (3) I. Chief Events of the Year 1977-78 1-4 II- The State and The Executive 5-7 III. The Legislature 8-10 IV. Education Department 11-16 V. Finance and Planning (Finance Wing) Department 17-20 VI. Finance and Planning (Planning Wing) Department 21-25 VII. General Administration Department . 26-31 VIII. Forest and Rural Development Department 32-62 IX. Food and Agriculture Department 63-127 X. Industries and Commerce Department J28-139 XI. Housing, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department .. 140-143 XII. Home Department .. .. 144-153 XIII. Irrigation and Power Department 154-167 XIV. Labour, Employment, Nutrition and Technical Education Department 168-176 XV. Command Area Development Department 177-180 XVI. Medical and Health Departeeent 181-190 XVII Panchayati Raj Department 191-194 xvin. Revenue Department .. 195-208 XIX. Social Welfare Department 209-231 XX. Transport, Roads and Buildings Department 232-246 Ill C hapter—I “CHIEF EVENTS OF THE YEAR” April 1977. An ordinance to provide for the take over of the Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada, promulgated. May 5, 1977. Smt. Sharda Mukerjee w^as sworn-in as Governor of Andhra Pra­ desh. May 2% 1977. The World Bank agreed to provide an amount of Rs. 15 crores for the development of ayacut roads in the left and right canal areas of the Nagarjuna Sagar Project. June 2, 1977. An agreement providing for a Suadi Arabia loan of 100 million dollars (Rs.
    [Show full text]
  • Warangal District Census Handbook Deserve My Thanks Tor Their Contribution
    CENSUS OF INDIA 1981 SERIES 2 .ANDH ~A ,PRADESH DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK WARANGAL PARTS XIII-A & B VILLAGE & TOWN DIRECTORY i VILLAGE & TOWNWISE PRIMARY CENSUS ABSTRACT S. S. JAYA RAO OF THE INDIAN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE DIRECTOR OF CENSUS OPERATIONS ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH 1986 POTHANA - THE GREAT DEVOUT POET The motif presented on the cover page represents Bammera Pothana, also called Pothanamatya, a devout poet belonging to the 15th century A. D. said to have hailed from the village Bammera near Warangal. The spiritual history of India is replete with devotional poetry and it was termed as BHAKTI movement, the 'CULT OF DEVOTION'. The SRIMADANDHRA MAHA­ BHAGA VATHAM rendered in Telugu by Pothana gave necessary fillip to this movement And nay! he could be treated as a progenitor of this movement. Pothana started this movement even before Chaitanya started the same movement in Bengal and Vallabh8chC/rya in Gujarat. In the Telugu country, this movement wastaken to great heights by Saints and lyricists like Annamacharya, Kshetrayya and Ramadas of Bhadrachalam fa"!e. Besides Bhagavatham,Pothana wrote VEERABHADRA VIJAYAM in praise of Lord Siva, which could be considered almost a Saivaite AGAMA SASTRA, BHOGINI DANDAKAM and NARA YANA SATAKAM, a devotional composition in praise of Lord Narayana or Vishnu. Pothana was a great poet of aesthetic eminence and his style was so simple and attractive to the common people as well as pedants. It is charming and sweet, and it won the hearts of the Telugu speaking people in a great sweep. He was one among the three or four top ranking Telugu poets of those days and even today.
    [Show full text]
  • August 29, 2011 00:00 IST | Updated: August 29, 2011 04:04 IST Tiruvannamalai, August 29, 2011
    Published: August 29, 2011 00:00 IST | Updated: August 29, 2011 04:04 IST Tiruvannamalai, August 29, 2011 Turmeric farmers fear steep fall in revenue Turmeric crop at Kalpattu near Padavedu. — Photo: D.Gopalakrishnan Turmeric farmers fear that there could be a huge fall in revenue this year despite a good harvest. While falling prices play the spoilsport, lack of storage facilities and market in Tiruvannamalai district, an emerging turmeric cultivation region, force them to shell out more money to transport processed turmeric to Erode market. Though Tiruvannamalai district is not famous for turmeric cultivation like Erode is, gradually the turmeric cultivation has extended in various parts of the district, as the farmers were attracted by the returns the crop gave in the previous years. According to official statistics, 11 out of 18 blocks in the district has turmeric cultivation while only Chengam, Polur, Arani and West Arani blocks have concentrated pockets of turmeric cultivation. Kalpattu, a small hillside village near Kannamangalam features turmeric as its main crop alongside yam. S.Settu, Villag Panchayat member and a farmer, said that turmeric which was once considered by villagers to be as promising as gold now turned into a cause for nightmare. “Until last year, a quintal of turmeric sold for about Rs.17,000 in Erode market. This year the market witnessed a steady fall and now reached as low as Rs.5,000- Rs.6,000 a quintal. Moreover, the cost involved in transporting turmeric to Erode market eats into the revenue,” he complained. “Apart from Kalpattu, villages like Keel Arasampattu, Nanjukondapuram, Naga Nadhi, Amirthi, Kattukanallur, Kathazhampattu and Padavedu in this region cultivate turmeric in vast areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report on Water Use Efficiency Studies for 35 Irrigation Projects
    Summary Report On Water Use Efficiency Studies For 35 Irrigation Projects Organized by Performance Overview & Management Improvement Organization Central Water Commission Government of India February, 2016 1 Contents S.No TITLE Page No Prologue 3 I Abbreviations 4 II SUMMARY OF WUE STUDIES 5 ANDHRA PRADESH 1 Bhairavanthippa Project 6-7 2 Gajuladinne (Sanjeevaiah Sagar Project) 8-11 3 Gandipalem project 12-14 4 Godavari Delta System (Sir Arthur Cotton Barrage) 15-19 5 Kurnool-Cuddapah Canal System 20-22 6 Krishna Delta System(Prakasam Barrage) 23-26 7 Narayanapuram Project 27-28 8 Srisailam (Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy Sagar Project)/SRBC 29-31 9 Somsila Project 32-33 10 Tungabadhra High level Canal 34-36 11 Tungabadhra Project Low level Canal(TBP-LLC) 37-39 12 Vansadhara Project 40-41 13 Yeluru Project 42-44 ANDHRA PRADESH AND TELANGANA 14 Nagarjuna Sagar project 45-48 TELANGANA 15 Kaddam Project 49-51 16 Koli Sagar Project 52-54 17 NizamSagar Project 55-57 18 Rajolibanda Diversion Scheme 58-61 19 Sri Ram Sagar Project 62-65 20 Upper Manair Project 66-67 HARYANA 21 Augmentation Canal Project 68-71 22 Naggal Lift Irrigation Project 72-75 PUNJAB 23 Dholabaha Dam 76-78 24 Ranjit Sagar Dam 79-82 UTTAR PRADESH 25 Ahraura Dam Irrigation Project 83-84 26 Walmiki Sarovar Project 85-87 27 Matatila Dam Project 88-91 28 Naugarh Dam Irrigation Project 92-93 UTTAR PRADESH & UTTRAKHAND 29 Pilli Dam Project 94-97 UTTRAKHAND 30 East Baigul Project 98-101 BIHAR 31 Kamla Irrigation project 102-104 32 Upper Morhar Irrigation Project 105-107 33 Durgawati Irrigation
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    DRA,i REPoRI itN()K f)PPIDIAA v SE (A I N D i a ANDHRAPRADESH IRRIGATION PROJECT - Itl Public Disclosure Authorized SRI RAMASAGAR PROJECT PROJECTAFFECTED PERSONS ECONOMICREHABILITATION PROGRAMME (PAPERP) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Preparedfor IRRIGATIONAND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENI GOVERNMENTOF ANDHRAPRADESH HYDERABAD Public Disclosure Authorized Agricultural finance Corporation Limited (WhollyOwned by the CommercialBanks) HYDERABAD NOVEMBER1995 IJKAI I KPEI-RI (FOR OFFICIAL, tLSE ONI Y I N D I A ANDHRAPRADESH IRRIGATION PROJECT - III SRI RAMASAGAR PROJECT PROJECTAFFECTED PERSONS ECONOMICREHABILITATION PROGRAMME (PAPERP) VOLUME- 11 ACTIONPLAN Preparedfor IRRIGATIONAND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GQVERNMENTOF ANDHRAPRADESH HYDERABAD I w Agricultural Finance Corporation Limited (WhollyOwned by the CommercialBanks) HYDERABAD NOVEMBER1995 INDIA ANDHRA PRADESHIRRIGATION PROJECT - III SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDY OF PROJECTAFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS UNDER SRI RAMA SAGAR PROJECT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Our acknowledgements are due to Sl.no Name Designation i A. SECRETARIAT . 1 Shri K. _ Koshal Ram, IAS PrincipalSecret_ ary.(I...CADD 1. Shri K. Koshal SRam, AS Principal Secretary (I & CADD) 2. Shri S. Ray, lAS Principal Secretary (i & CAU5) 1! 3. Shri P.K. Agarwal, IAS Principal Secretary, Projects (I & CAD) 4. Shri M.G. Gopal, IAS Joint Secretary (I & CADD) 5. Dr. W.R. Reddy, IAS Joint Secretary, Irrigation 6. Shri B. Narsaiah, [AS Special Collector, SRSP & SLBC B., SRI RAMASAGAR PROJECT 1. Shri M. Dharma Rao Chief Engineer 2. Shri B. Anantha Ramulu Superintending Engineer, Karimnagar 3. Shri Muralidhara Rao Executive Engineer, Warangal 4. Shri M. Lakshminarayana Executive Engineer, Hanamkonda 5. Shri R. Laxma Reddy Executive Engineer, Huzurabad i 6. Shri M. Sudhakar Executive Engineer 7. Shri K. RavinderReddy I ExecutiveEngineer, Hanumakonda 8.
    [Show full text]