DOCSLIB.ORG

Hitler's Grotesque Economics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hitler's Grotesque Economics Hitler’s grotesque economics Tooze describes Speer as a power Sinclair Davidson reviews hungry man who inflated his own abili- The Wages of Destruction: ties and expanded his bureaucratic em- pire. Ultimately Speer is portrayed as a The Making and Breaking self-serving bureaucrat and a spin-doctor. of the Nazi Economy It is difficult to know what to make of by Adam Tooze Tooze’s portrayal of Speer. Being a spin- (Allen Lane, 2007, 799 pages) doctor is not a crime against humanity. Speer may have been morally complicit in many of the crimes of Nazi Germany, n the acclaimed television series but Tooze’s new evidence is not enough Band of Brothers the Webster char- to doubt the judgement at Nuremberg— acter abuses a column of German I which chose to merely imprison, rather prisoners of war, ‘Say hello to Ford, and than execute, Speer. General fuckin’ Motors. You stupid fas- murder millions and millions of people. Ultimately Germany lost the war be- cist pigs. Look at you. You have horses. The Holocaust was not simply a case of cause they could not match the resources What were you thinking?’ In The Wages murdering a hated minority; it was the of the Americans, British, and Soviet of Destruction: The Making and Breaking starting point of a planned mass murder economies. Had the Allies done more to of the Nazi Economy, a recent and contro- on a far greater scale. destroy the German economy, the war versial book Adam Tooze, senior lecturer The war had caused substantial eco- could have ended earlier—more bomb- in economic history at Cambridge, sets nomic problems in Europe. The food ing of the Ruhr Valley and less bombing out what the Germans were thinking. supply was severely disrupted. It was of Berlin. Some high ranking German He has provided an exhaustive account only the mass murder of eastern Jews and officers, such as General Georg Thomas of the economics of the Third Reich. Ukrainians that allowed for sufficient also knew the balance of resources was In particular he sets out the eco- food supplies in 1942. Tooze explains unfavourable. nomic constraints facing the Germans in the trade-off associated with the need for Tooze has little time for the argu- the prosecution of the war. slave labour, the need to murder and the ment that the German war economy War history normally consists of food supply. It is a horrific story of in- was inefficient and German planning -in battlefield or political maneuvering— centives, economic constraints, perverted competent. As he indicates the Germans this history however concerns itself more worldviews and amoral pragmatism. fought the world to a standstill. So why with balance of payments, over-valued This ‘Hunger Plan’ is well worth a then did the war break out when it did? currencies and coal supplies. This is a book by itself. Tooze, however, is com- The usual argument is that Hitler mis- perspective that many general readers or prehensive. He touches on many other calculated. Tooze’s argument is that there the average arm-chair expert on WWII aspects of the war economy. The balance was nothing to gain by waiting—the will be likely to appreciate. of payments was a problem for Germany, outbreak of war was a calculated risk. The controversial aspect of the ultimately solved by non-market means. Tooze has made an important con- analysis is that the Nazi’s were not sim- As Gustav Schlotterer told German busi- tribution. Some aspects are likely to be ply madmen. They were highly rational nessmen in July 1940: controversial. Understanding the eco- and acted consistently given their warped nomic constraints facing the Germans world-view and the economic and politi- Our tendency is to use sleight of during the war, and the incentives the cal constraints they faced. hand, guile and possibly violence Nazi’s perceived provides a greater in- This makes their ’grand plan’ all the to get the European states to sell sight into those terrible events. more grotesque. It is well-known that Nazi their goods to Germany, but to It will be difficult for future histori- Germany invaded Russia in order to ex- leave their credits, when they ans to write about WWII without paying pand its own territory and to provide Ger- build up, in Berlin. serious attention to this well argued, well many with ‘living space.’ Tooze explains At least he was honest. Tooze has taken documented narrative. how the Nazi’s went to war in order to a disliking to Albert Speer, and spends a Some readers will find the argu- great deal of time and effort document- ments dense and bewildering but the ing how dishonest he was. In particular, Sinclair Davidson is a Senior Fellow book is well worth the time and effort. with the Institute of Public Affairs. Tooze expresses surprise that Speer was not executed after Nuremburg. R 42 IPA Review | November 2008 www.ipa.org.au.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Pillars of American Grand Strategy in World War II by Tami Davis Biddle
    Leveraging Strength: The Pillars of American Grand Strategy in World War II by Tami Davis Biddle Tami Davis Biddle is the Hoyt S. Vandenberg Chair of Aerospace Studies at the U.S. Army War College in Carlisle, PA. She is the author of Rhetoric and Reality in Air Warfare: The Evolution of British and American Thinking about Strategic Bombing, 1914–1945, and is at work on a new book titled, Taking Command: The United States at War, 1944–1945. This article is based on a lecture she delivered in March 2010 in The Hertog Program on Grand Strategy, jointly sponsored by Temple University’s Center for Force and Diplomacy, and FPRI. Abstract: This article argues that U.S. leaders navigated their way through World War II challenges in several important ways. These included: sustaining a functional civil-military relationship; mobilizing inside a democratic, capitalist paradigm; leveraging the moral high ground ceded to them by their enemies; cultivating their ongoing relationship with the British, and embra- cing a kind of adaptability and resiliency that facilitated their ability to learn from mistakes and take advantage of their enemies’ mistakes. ooking back on their World War II experience from the vantage point of the twenty-first century, Americans are struck, first of all, by the speed L with which everything was accomplished: armies were raised, fleets of planes and ships were built, setbacks were overcome, and great victories were won—all in a mere 45 months. Between December 1941 and August 1945, Americans faced extraordinary challenges and accepted responsibilities they had previously eschewed.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Rocket Jet and the Nuclear Programs of World War II Max Lutze Union College - Schenectady, NY
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2016 The German Rocket Jet and the Nuclear Programs of World War II Max Lutze Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the European History Commons, German Language and Literature Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Military History Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Lutze, Max, "The German Rocket Jet and the Nuclear Programs of World War II" (2016). Honors Theses. 179. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/179 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The German Rocket, Jet, and Nuclear Programs of World War II By Max Lutze * * * * * * * * * Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of History UNION COLLEGE March, 2016 2 Abstract German military technology in World War II was among the best of the major warring powers and in many cases it was the groundwork for postwar innovations that permanently changed global warfare. Three of the most important projects undertaken, which were not only German initiatives and therefore perhaps among the most valuable programs for both the major Axis and Allied nations, include the rocket, jet, and nuclear programs. In Germany, each of these technologies was given different levels of attention and met with varying degrees of success in their development and application.
    [Show full text]
  • The Combined Bomber Offensive's Destruction Of
    Feature The Combined Bomber Offensive’s Destruction of Germany’s Refined-Fuels Industry Lt Col Woody W. Parramore, USAF, Retired In May 1944 after the initial Eighth Air Force raid on Germany’s synthetic oil plant, Albert Speer recalled telling Adolf Hitler that “the enemy has struck us at one of our weakest points. If they persist at it this time, we will soon no longer have any fuel production worth mentioning. Our one hope is that the other side has an air force General Staff as scatterbrained as ours!” After two months of persistent bombing attacks against the oil industry, Speer explained once again to Hitler that “it would be pointless to have tanks if we could not produce enough fuel.” —Albert Speer, Inside the Third Reich: Memoirs evisionist historians have advanced the idea that the collapse of Germany’s refined-fuels industry during World War Two re- R sulted from Allied ground forces capturing the natural re- March–April 2012 Air & Space Power Journal | 72 Feature Parramore Destruction of Germany’s Refined-Fuels Industry sources needed for refined-fuel products as opposed to the Combined Bomber Offensive’s (CBO) air attacks. An examination of the facts should enable Airmen to properly assess the CBO’s effectiveness against the German oil industry and enable them to appreciate the joint nature of the fight to defeat Germany. The initial, though controversial, history that addresses this matter— the United States Strategic Bombing Survey (USSBS)—concluded that air attacks caused the oil industry’s demise and “heavily contributed
    [Show full text]
  • War and Disintegration, 1914-1950
    War and Disintegration, 1914-1950 Jari Eloranta* and Mark Harrison** This is a draft chapter for Unifying the European Experience: An Economic History of Modern Europe, edited by Stephen Broadberry and Kevin O’Rourke, in preparation for publication by Cambridge University Press. * Department of History, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA. Email: [email protected] . ** Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK Email: [email protected]. War and Disintegration, 1914-1950 Introduction Between 1914 and 1945 Europe’s economic development and integration were interrupted and set back by two world wars, and its regional patterns were brutally distorted by combat, exterminations, migrations, and the redrawing of borders.1 World War I (the ‘Great War’ of 1914-1918) set more than thirty countries into conflict with each other and led to ten million premature deaths. It was dwarfed only by World War II (1939-1945), in which more than sixty countries waged war and the war prematurely ended the lives of more than 55 million people (Broadberry and Harrison, 2005b). As for who fought whom, there were limited continuities: in both wars, Germany, Austria, and Hungary fought Britain, France, and Russia for much of the time. Other allegiances changed. For ease of reference, Table 6.1 lists the European countries that were in or out of each war and, if in, on what side. Table 6.1 Although punctuated by an ‘interwar period,’ the two wars can be understood as a single historical process. The process was global but the European dimension was fundamental to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Penguin Group (Usa)
    JEWISH STUDIES 2009 PENGUIN GROUP (USA) Here is a selection of Penguin Group (USA)’s Jewish Studies titles. Please click on the 13-digit ISBN to get more information on each title. Examination and personal copy forms are available at the back of the catalog. For personal service, adoption assistance, and complimentary exam copies, sign up for our College Faculty Info Service at http://www.penguin.com/facinfo 2 FEATURED TITLES FEATURED TITLES Robin Wright f DREAmS AND Shadows The Future of the middle East “This is the best of all possible worlds: An old hand guides us through the changes in post-9/11 Middle East, and is able to sort out in a sober, smart way what is really going on.”—Thomas E. Ricks, author of Fiasco. “This volume, full of mesmerizing detail and large truths, sets a new standard for scholarship on the modern Middle East.”—Madeleine Albright. “A thought-provoking and eminently readable look at the current and future generation of leaders.”—The Boston Globe. Penguin • 480 pp. • 978-0-14-311489-5 • $17.00 Sadia Shepard f ThE GIRL from FOREIGN A memoir “Elegantly crafted...[Shepard’s] writing is vivid and her meditations on heritage and grief are moving.” —The New Yorker. “A rich tapestry of theology, art, emotions and forgotten lore.”—The Washington Post. Penguin • 384 pp. • 978-0-14-311577-9 • $16.00 TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURED TITLES ....................................2 YOUNG ADULT ...................................... 16 JEWISh LIVES ...........................................4 JEWISh RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS ......... 17 hISTORY ...................................................6 ANThOLOGIES & REFERENCE............... 19 HANNAH ARENDT ....................................................6 THE COMPLETE IDIOT’S GUIDES ...................... 20 RICHARD J.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Economics Cause World War Ii?
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DID ECONOMICS CAUSE WORLD WAR II? Robert J. Gordon Working Paper 14560 http://www.nber.org/papers/w14560 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2008 This paper is a review article of Tooze (2006) and related literature on the same topic and will appear in the Journal of Economic History in March, 2009. I am grateful to Joel Mokyr for helpful suggestions. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2008 by Robert J. Gordon. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Did Economics Cause World War II? Robert J. Gordon NBER Working Paper No. 14560 December 2008 JEL No. H56,N14,N24,N54,N64,N70,N74,N80,N84 ABSTRACT Historians have long recognized the role of economic resources and organization in determining the outcome of World War II: the Nazi economy lacked the economic resources and organization to oppose the combined might of the U.S., U.K., and U.S.S.R. A minority view is that the Germans were defeated not by economics, but by Hitler's many strategic and tactical mistakes, of which the most important was the invasion of the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of the Second World War: Seventy-Five Years on Continents and Changing the Lives of Millions
    The Second World War was the largest conflict in history, touching five The Economics of the Second World War: Seventy-Five Years On continents and changing the lives of millions. The scale of mobilisation of all sectors of the economy and society had redefined the concept of ‘total war’. It The Economics of the was the last time that Western societies were mobilised for an all-consuming conflict that demanded years of sacrifice and service from every citizen and every family. Such watershed moments are sometimes neglected in economics. This eBook brings together recent research on a range of aspects of the war Second World War: including the extensive war preparations of the great powers; the conduct of the war (including the management of economic mobilisation, economic warfare, economic exploitation, and the role of economists); and the war’s consequences for demography, inequality, economic recovery and political Seventy-Five Years On attitudes. The Second World War witnessed the growth and power of economics as a weapon and strategy in warfare. Economics – and economists – were everywhere in the war. Economic considerations motivated the war. The war was managed with the help of economics. Economic factors powerfully influenced its outcome. There were profound and persistent economic Edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison consequences. The eBook examines the role of economics in the preparations, causes, conduct and consequences of the war. Chapters examine the importance of economic factors in the war preparations, studying the effect of the great depression on the German economy and its role in carrying Hitler to power, German economic mobilisation and the transformative rearmament plans of the Soviet Union under Stalin.
    [Show full text]
  • A Re-Assessment of the German Armaments Production During World War Ii
    113 A RE-ASSESSMENT OF THE GERMAN ARMAMENTS PRODUCTION DURING WORLD WAR II Ioannis-Dionysios Salavrakos 1 University of Athens Abstract The German armaments production during World War II (1939-1945) is a highly debatable issue. Many studies point out that it was a success story since the overall production increased in spite of the heavy Allied air bombing campaign during the period 1943-1945. Others point out that the size of the production could not balance the aggregate production of Britain, USA, and the USSR. This study points out that by the end of 1941 with the entry of the USSR and the US in the war Germany had to plan for two different types of war. One was a land war against the USSR and the second was a naval-air war against the Anglo-Saxon Powers (Britain and the USA). German industry did quite well with the first challenge (with the assistance of captured material and industrial power of occupied Europe) but failed in the naval-air war against the Anglo-Saxon Powers. 1. Introduction The German armaments production during World War II (1939-1945) is a highly debatable issue. The debate is focused on the following issues: The first is the volume of the production. Many economists and historians observe a high volume of production even under the constraint of allied bombing. Others hold the view that the production levels, for the most industrialized European power, were quite low and could not match the combined armaments production of Great Britain and USSR, let alone the considerable production of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Reich As Rogue Regime Adam Tooze’S Wages of Destruction
    Historical Materialism ��.3–4 (�0�4) 330–350 brill.com/hima The Third Reich as Rogue Regime Adam Tooze’s Wages of Destruction Dylan Riley University of California, Berkeley, Department of Sociology [email protected] Abstract What was the connection between the structure of the German economy in the 1930s and German aggression in World War ii? Adam Tooze’s Wages of Destruction forcefully poses this issue, but fails to adequately resolve it. Instead, on this decisive question, his analysis oscillates uneasily between two equally unconvincing models: rational-choice theory and cultural determinism. This surprising explanatory failure derives from an inadequate theorisation of German imperialism as the expression of the combined and uneven development of the German economy and society in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. Keywords fascism – war – imperialism – economic development – ideology Summary Adam Tooze’s deeply impressive Wages of Destruction has not had the dis- cussion it deserves. Reception divides fairly evenly between journalistic puff, and often acute but somewhat narrowly focused academic criticism. Yet the text raises fundamental issues, above all for this journal. For, although Tooze’s argument is quite clearly materialist, it eschews and indeed is highly criti- cal of the various broadly Marxist interpretations of the Third Reich (such as those of Mason1 and Neumann)2 that seek to explain its evolution in terms 1 Mason 1995. 2 Neumann 1966. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���4 | doi �0.��63/�569�06X-��34�380 The Third Reich as Rogue Regime 331 of a perverse social compromise which dictated first the strategy of Blitzkrieg (Poland, France) and then Vernichtungskrieg (Barbarossa).
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Economic Isolation on Warring Powers
    The Scholar Texas National Security Review: Volume 3, Issue 2 (Spring 2020) Print: ISSN 2576-1021 Online: ISSN 2576-1153 DESPERATE MEASURES: THE EFFECTS OF ECONOMIC ISOLATION ON WARRING POWERS Erik Sand 12 Desperate Measures: The Effects of Economic Isolation on Warring Powers Scholars and strategists have long debated whether cutting off an opponent’s trade is an effective strategy in war. In this debate, success or failure has usually been judged based on whether the state subjected to economic isolation surrenders without being defeated on the battlefield. This approach, however, has missed a more important way in which economic isolation affects its target: strategy. Economic isolation constrains a state’s strategic choices and leaves its leaders to choose from the remaining options, which are almost always riskier. As analyses of German decision-making in World Wars I and II demonstrate, these riskier strategies often involve escalating the conflict at hand. ow does a state’s access to the inter- region at the start of a conflict.2 On the other hand, national economy affect its strategy not all potential U.S. adversaries are so well con- to prevail in war? This question bears nected to the international economy. North Ko- on some of the most important inter- rea, for example, maintains a national ideology of nationalH challenges facing the United States today. self-sufficiency and does its best to isolate itself Economic sanctions have become a frequent tool from the world, to avoid being vulnerable to such in American foreign policy
    [Show full text]
  • The Political and Military Ambitions of Nazi Germany
    Linfield University DigitalCommons@Linfield Senior Theses Student Scholarship & Creative Works 12-15-2016 Warlord: The Political and Military Ambitions of Nazi Germany William R. Underhill Linfield College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/histstud_theses Part of the Economic History Commons, European History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Underhill, William R., "Warlord: The Political and Military Ambitions of Nazi Germany" (2016). Senior Theses. 3. https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/histstud_theses/3 This Thesis (Open Access) is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It is brought to you for free via open access, courtesy of DigitalCommons@Linfield, with permission from the rights-holder(s). Your use of this Thesis (Open Access) must comply with the Terms of Use for material posted in DigitalCommons@Linfield, or with other stated terms (such as a Creative Commons license) indicated in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, or if you have questions about permitted uses, please contact [email protected]. Warlord:The Political and Military Ambitions of Nazi Germany By William R. Underhill A senior thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for HIST 485 Senior Seminar Linfield College McMinnville, Oregon 12/15/2016 THESIS COPYRIGHT PERMISSIONS Please read this document carefully before signing. If you have questions about any of these permissions, please contact the DigitalCommons Coordinator. Title of the Thesis: /\ Political Ambitions oft /V Nazi Germany arlord The and Military Author's Name: (Last name, first name) . Underhill( \' .\N William Advisor's Name Dr. Sharon Bailey Glasco DigitalCommons@Linfield is our web-based, open access-compliant institutional repository for digital content produced by Linfield faculty, students, staff, and their collaborators.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of the War with Nazi Germany Adam Tooze and James R
    Comp. by: SSENDHAMIZHSELVAN Stage: Proof Chapter No.: 1 Title Name: GEYERandTOOZE Date:2/2/15 Time:14:35:28 Page Number: 27 1 The economics of the war with Nazi Germany adam tooze and james r. martin The entanglement between war and economics revealed by the First World War was to become one of the defining features of the first half of the twentieth century. Never before had war been so resource-intensive, never before were economies so self-consciously reorganized around the needs of war. The war economies of the First World War were novel and unantici- pated improvisations, experiments in organization. In 1914 the sense of a break was dramatic and shocking, but it had the virtue of clarity. There had been peace and then there was war. After the First World War the victorious powers struggled to restore the clarity of this boundary between war and peace. The new self-conscious ideology of peacefulness that was such a characteristic feature of international relations in the 1920s had its counterpart 1 in the effort to restore the international economy. The relationship between economic restoration and pacification was reciprocal. Curbing arms expend- iture and restoring the ‘knave proof’ discipline of the international gold standard were conjoined aims. Perhaps this nexus was best exemplified by the British ‘ten year rule’ adopted in 1919. To create the conditions necessary for fiscal consolidation and a return to the gold standard, this mandated that military budgeting should proceed on the assumption that no major war should be expected within ten years. In 1928 Churchill had it made self- perpetuating.
    [Show full text]