DOCSLIB.ORG

The Quilt Circle 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Data Steward Be a reliable source of Advocate for regional and state information for the R&E networking community research and education networks Quilt Goals Build an Agile Organization to support our Be the Convener for member and members in a fast changing networking landscape community forums Foster a collaborative environment About The Quilt Founded in 2000, The Quilt is a not-for-profit collaboration of our country’s advanced regional networks. It is a vibrant forum where leaders of these organizations meet with their peers to innovate, share best practices and explore new ideas with one another to collectively advance networking for research and education in the U.S. Based on its members’ combined experiences in operations and development of leading edge technologies, The Quilt aims to influence the national agenda on information technology infrastructure with particular emphasis on networking. Through its collaborations, The Quilt promotes the delivery of networking services at a lower cost, higher performance, greater reliability and security. The Quilt is a member-powered organization. It derives its funding and organizational support from contributions and volunteer efforts of its members. A Letter from the President The last year proved to be a very distinctive year for our country’s In support of our members in this area, The Quilt found itself quite advanced regional research and education networks with the focused on three of its Guiding Principles in the last year: release of federal funds through the National Telecommunications • fostering a collaborative environment and Information Agency’s Broadband Technologies Opportunity • advocating for regional and state research and education Program and the National Science Foundation’s Advanced networks and Research Infrastructure Program. Both of these programs aim • acting as a data steward for collecting information about our to expand broadband opportunities for our country’s community member organizations anchor institutions as well as further the advanced research infrastructure for our country’s higher education institutions. These The Quilt established a member and community forum to share areas are the cornerstones of the work Quilt member organizations information about the BTOP program. In this forum, members have performed for decades in support of providing advanced exchange ideas and provide information on their own efforts to networking capabilities to their members. deploy these grant funded projects. Through these efforts, The Quilt saw its members at their best. The support and cooperative As recipients and sub recipients of BTOP grants, seven Quilt spirit among the consortium was immeasurable and our work members collectively received $483 million in grant dollars, not together this year was a valuable reminder of the stake we all share including matching funds, for broadband projects. In addition, in the success of one another’s organizations. eleven of our members are actively involved in the planning and deployment of the BTOP initiatives in their state or region. Three This edition of the Quilt Circle is filled with stories about our members of our members received NSF ARI awards to deploy leading edge in action in their communities, supporting advanced research, 100Gbps networks. education, healthcare, and economic development through their advanced, high-capacity networks. These stories highlight our These funds provided many of our members with an unprecedented members’ participation in the NTIA and NSF programs and feature opportunity to increase capacity to existing members and to the on-going work of our members to fulfill their public service extend their networks into rural areas of their states that were missions. All serve as wonderful examples of the dedication and otherwise too cost-prohibitive to reach. As a result of these high level of support these organizations provide for their members. projects, extraordinary partnerships have developed between We are grateful to all for sharing their stories with us. our members and private companies, many of which are local telecommunications providers. These partnerships not only create As The Quilt embarks on its second decade of working with our the opportunity to connect thousands of additional community members, we look forward to our continued collaboration on anchor institutions to our member networks but also for partner topics of key importance to our country’s advanced regional and telecommunications providers to share this infrastructure to state research and education networks. provide broadband services to residences and businesses that was not previously possible. Jen Leasure Leasure President and CEO Member organizations collaborate to collectively advance research & education networking. We collaborate by: » Developing and The Quilt serves a single exchanging best point of contact to engage practices partners on behalf of our » Solving problems members and their work. together » Sharing information Examples Members leverage the collective » Developing the newest » Federal Policies such consortia knowledge and buying power, advancements in as the FCC’s national contributing to the value each member networking broadband plan proviedes to their participants. » Federal funding sources Examples such as the National Knowledge Broker » Hosting community Science Foundation and » Support organizational review projects workshops, e.g., optical Broadband Technology by peers networking workshop Opportunities Program » Source of aggregate data about our series (BTOP) country’s R&E networks » Providing a collection of » Industry Partners such member business model as optical equipment Buying Consortia cases providers » Commodity internet services (CIS) » Convening the Tele- » Network Equipment Presence working group » Since 2002, members have saved a total of $68,000,000 on CIS Members and Board of Directors Albuquerque GigaPoP (NM) LONI (LA) OARnet (OH) Gary Bauerschmidt Lonnie Leger Paul Schopis http://abqg.unm.edu/ http://www.loni.org/ http://www.oar.net/ CENIC (CA, NV, AZ) Mid-Atlantic Crossroads (DC, VA, MD) OneNet (OK) Dave Reese Abdella Battou James Deaton http://www.cenic.org/ http://www.maxgigapop.net http://www.onenet.net/ Florida LambdaRail (FL) Merit (MI) Oregon GigaPoP (OR) Veronica Sarjeant Don Welch David Crowe http://www.flrnet.org/ http://www.merit.edu/ http://oregon-gigapop.net/ Front Range GigaPoP (CO, WY) MOREnet (MO) OSHEAN (RI) Jeff Custard Chip Byers George Loftus http://www.frgp.net/ http://www.more.net/ http://www.oshean.org/ Great Plains Network (OK, SD, KS, MREN (IL) PNWGP (AK, HI, WA, ID, MT) MO, NE, AR) Joe Mambretti Amy Philipson Claude Garelik http://www.mren.org/ http://www.pnw-gigapop.net/ http://www.greatplains.net/ NCREN (NC) Southern Crossroads (AL, GA, FL, MS, Indiana GigaPoP (IN) Joe Freddoso SC, TN) Dave Jent https://www.mcnc.org/ Ron Hutchins http://indiana.gigapop.net/ http://www.sox.net/site/ Network.Virginia (VA) KanREN (KS) Richard Hach Three Rivers Optical Exchange (PA, WV) Cort Buffington http://www.networkvirginia.net/ Wendy Huntoon http://www.kanren.net/ https://www.3rox.net/ Northern Crossroads (CT, MA, ME, KyRON (KY) NH, RI, VT) Utah Education Network (UT) Doyle Friskney Michael Krugman Jim Stewart http://kyron.ky.gov/ http://www.nox.org/ http://www.uen.org/ LEARN (TX) Northern Lights (MN) WiscREN (WI) Mike Phillips Myron Lowe Dave Lois http://www.tx-learn.org/ http://www.northernlights.gigapop.net/ http://www.wiscnet.net/ NYSERNet (NY) Tim Lance http://www.nysernet.org/ Quilt Staff Jen Leasure Jennifer Griffin President and CEO Program Coordinator [email protected] [email protected] ©2011, The Quilt Acknowledgements The Quilt wishes to recognize and thank its associate member, MIDnet, for its contributions to this publication. The Quilt also wishes to recognize and thank our member LONI and Andrew Parrino of Louisiana State University for his exceptional support in crafting this publication. Ocean Observatories Will Make Use of CENIC and PNWGP 10-Gigabit Peerings with Amazon Web Services In an effort to control cost while expanding services for their including elasticity to deal with a highly variable demand. So we members, Corporation for Education Network Initiatives in focused on core measurement processing as well as distribution California (CENIC) and Pacific NorthWest GigaPoP (PNWGP) and presentation of the data. This led to a shared model where are collaborating to provide two 10 Gigabit per second (Gbps) some work could be managed by academic computing and other connections to the Amazon Web Services: Amazon Simple work by commercial clouds.” Storage Service (Amazon S3) and Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2). S3 provides a web services interface that can be The OOI will monitor and forecast environmental changes in the used to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from oceans on global, regional and coastal scales. Scientists will be anywhere on the web and gives developers access to the same able to extrapolate from data gathered by an array of more than scalable, reliable, fast and inexpensive data storage infrastructure 50 diverse sensor types and other scientific instruments that that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. EC2 will communicate through permanently installed seafloor cables features a web service interface that allows researchers to obtain and satellite telemetry. Scientists will then be able to share data and configure the massive compute resources that innovative
Recommended publications
  • QUILT CIRCLE2020 a Letter from the President

    QUILT CIRCLE2020 a Letter from the President

    THE QUILT CIRCLE2020 A Letter From the President This 2020 Quilt Circle edition commemorates the 20th Anniversary of The Quilt. The fabric of our research and education (R&E) networking community has never been stronger. While our Quilt community has evolved in new and exciting ways in the past two decades, we have also been faced with a number of challenges which we take head-on and always with the spirit of collaboration. As we address the unprecedented challenges presented by the current global public health crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the work of our members is more important than ever to the missions of their member communities. U.S. higher education institutions rely on R&E networks to give them a competitive edge in the most impactful scientific research initiatives which is essential in this crisis. We connect the educational institutions that support university medical centers and their associated hospitals. R&E networks also connect tens of thousands of other community anchor institutions, including K-12 schools, public libraries, local/state government, research sites, cultural institutions, public safety, and tribal lands. Being responsive and providing vital networking infrastructure and resources right now to address immediate needs is who we are and what we do. R&E networks are part of our nation’s critical infrastructure. This year’s edition of The Quilt Circle showcases several examples of the key role of R&E network members in both providing and facilitating the use-network infrastructure to further scientific discovery and collaborations at higher education institutions of all sizes.
  • June 2006 Steering Committee Materials

    June 2006 Steering Committee Materials

    Utah Education Network Steering Committee June 16, 2006 U TAH EDUCATION NETWORK S TEERING COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE 16, 2006 Committee of the Whole / Business Meeting 9:00 a.m.- 11:00 a.m. Welcome and Introductions Tab 31 FISCAL YEAR 2007 BUDGET – ACTION . 1 FY 2007 UEN BUDGET - DRAFT . 7 Tab 1 UTAH EDUCATION NETWORK FY 2007 STRATEGIC PLAN – ACTION. 9 UTAH EDUCATION NETWORK FY2007 PLAN - DRAFT . 11 Tab 2 STEERING COMMITTEE STRUCTURE, MEETING FORMAT AND . 25 PROPOSED MEETING DATES – ACTION Tab 4 POLICY 2.1: NETWORK CONNECTIVITY CHARGES – ACTION . 27 UTAH EDUCATION NETWORK 2.1 NETWORK CONNECTIVITY CHARGES . 31 UTAH EDUCATION NETWORK FEE STRUCTURE . 37 NETWORK CONNECTIVITY CHARGES DECISION TREE . 39 Tab 5 NATIONAL LAMBDARAIL (NLR) MEDIA RELEASE – DISCUSSION . 41 NATIONAL LAMBDARAIL (NLR) MEDIA RELEASE . 43 Tab 6 STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES . 45 Tab 7 OTHER . 53 11:00 a.m.- Instructional Services Subcommittee 12:00 p.m. Tab 7 END-OF-LIFE POLICY FOR WEB SERVICES – ACTION . 55 i Tab 8 INTERNET SAFETY PROJECT – ACTION . 57 Tab 9 HIGHER EDUCATION LEARNING OBJECTS MEETING REPORT – DISCUSSION . 59 Tab 10 TELESCOPE USERS GROUP MEETING – DISCUSSION . 61 Tab 11 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND HIGHER EDUCATION ADVISORY . 63 COMMITTEE REPORTS – DISCUSSION PUBLIC EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT . 65 HIGHER EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT . 69 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Technical Services Subcommittee Agenda Tab 12 STATE OF UTAH REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS (SURIN) – ACTION . 73 STATE OF UTAH REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS (SURIN) . 75 Please place these materials in your Steering Committee Binder. ii UEN Steering Committee - June 2006 C OMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE T AB 31 FISCAL YEAR 2007 BUDGET – ACTION Issue The FY 2007 UEN Budget is ready for fi nal review and approval by the Steering Committee.
  • On Multi-Point, In-Network Filtering of Distributed Denial-Of-Service Traffic

    On Multi-Point, In-Network Filtering of Distributed Denial-Of-Service Traffic

    On Multi-Point, In-Network Filtering of Distributed Denial-of-Service Traffic Mingwei Zhang∗, Lumin Shi∗, Devkishen Sisodia∗, Jun Li∗, Peter Reihery ∗ University of Oregon fmingwei, luminshi, dsisodia, [email protected] y University of California, Los Angeles [email protected] Abstract—Research has shown that distributed denial-of- in a common language. Further, it is also unknown how these service (DDoS) attacks on the Internet could often be better solutions perform under insufficient knowledge of the attacks handled by enlisting the in-network defense of multiple au- or against intelligent adversaries who can dynamically revise tonomous systems (ASes), rather than relying entirely on the victim’s Internet Service Provider at the edge. Less noticed their attack strategies to escape defense. Without a quantitative but important is the fact that an in-network defense can also comparison, it is hard for a DDoS victim to select the most remove DDoS traffic from the Internet early en route to the suitable solution to achieve its defense goal and meet the victim, thus decreasing the overall load on the Internet and resource requirements. reducing chances of link congestion. However, it is not well In this paper, we introduce a modeling and simulation understood to what degree different in-network defense strategies can achieve such benefits. In this paper, we model the existing framework to systematically evaluate in-network DDoS de- two main categories of in-network DDoS defense algorithms fense algorithms. The framework contains a general model (PushBack, SourceEnd) and propose a new type of algorithm that can describe the attack and defense for various defense (StrategicPoints).
  • UEN Board Meeting

    UEN Board Meeting

    UEN Board Meeting February 15, 2013 9:00 a.m. Dolores Doré Eccles Broadcast Center and IVC Utah Education Network Board Meeting Agenda February 15, 2013 9:00 a.m. Welcome and Introductions 1. Approval of the Minutes – Action .....................................................1 1. Attachment A – Utah Education Network Board Meeting Minutes ..................3 2. Executive Director’s Report – Discussion ........................................7 3. Closed Session ..................................................................................9 4. Services Dependencies – Discussion ........................................... 11 4. Attachment A – Services Dependencies Analysis ...................................... 13 5. NTIA BTOP Infrastructure Grant Update – Discussion .................. 29 5. Attachment A – UEN Proposed BTOP Fiber IRUs: Northern Utah and Salt Lake City Downtown Area ......................................................... 31 6. Utah Data Alliance – Action ............................................................ 33 6. Attachment A – Utah Data Alliance Brief for UEN Board .............................. 35 7. FY 2013 Mid-Year Progress Report – Discussion .......................... 37 7. Attachment A – UEN FY 2013 Initiatives .................................................. 39 8. Advisory Council – Action ............................................................... 43 9. Video Productions – Discussion ..................................................... 45 10. UEN Calendar – Discussion...........................................................
  • Growth of the Internet

    Growth of the Internet

    Growth of the Internet K. G. Coffman and A. M. Odlyzko AT&T Labs - Research [email protected], [email protected] Preliminary version, July 6, 2001 Abstract The Internet is the main cause of the recent explosion of activity in optical fiber telecommunica- tions. The high growth rates observed on the Internet, and the popular perception that growth rates were even higher, led to an upsurge in research, development, and investment in telecommunications. The telecom crash of 2000 occurred when investors realized that transmission capacity in place and under construction greatly exceeded actual traffic demand. This chapter discusses the growth of the Internet and compares it with that of other communication services. Internet traffic is growing, approximately doubling each year. There are reasonable arguments that it will continue to grow at this rate for the rest of this decade. If this happens, then in a few years, we may have a rough balance between supply and demand. Growth of the Internet K. G. Coffman and A. M. Odlyzko AT&T Labs - Research [email protected], [email protected] 1. Introduction Optical fiber communications was initially developed for the voice phone system. The feverish level of activity that we have experienced since the late 1990s, though, was caused primarily by the rapidly rising demand for Internet connectivity. The Internet has been growing at unprecedented rates. Moreover, because it is versatile and penetrates deeply into the economy, it is affecting all of society, and therefore has attracted inordinate amounts of public attention. The aim of this chapter is to summarize the current state of knowledge about the growth rates of the Internet, with special attention paid to the implications for fiber optic transmission.
  • 1117 M. Stahl Obsoletes Rfcs: 1062, 1020, 997, 990, 960, 943, M

    1117 M. Stahl Obsoletes Rfcs: 1062, 1020, 997, 990, 960, 943, M

    Network Working Group S. Romano Request for Comments: 1117 M. Stahl Obsoletes RFCs: 1062, 1020, 997, 990, 960, 943, M. Recker 923, 900, 870, 820, 790, 776, 770, 762, SRI-NIC 758, 755, 750, 739, 604, 503, 433, 349 August 1989 Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93 INTERNET NUMBERS Status of this Memo This memo is an official status report on the network numbers and the autonomous system numbers used in the Internet community. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Introduction This Network Working Group Request for Comments documents the currently assigned network numbers and gateway autonomous systems. This RFC will be updated periodically, and in any case current information can be obtained from Hostmaster at the DDN Network Information Center (NIC). Hostmaster DDN Network Information Center SRI International 333 Ravenswood Avenue Menlo Park, California 94025 Phone: 1-800-235-3155 Network mail: [email protected] Most of the protocols used in the Internet are documented in the RFC series of notes. Some of the items listed are undocumented. Further information on protocols can be found in the memo "Official Internet Protocols" [40]. The more prominent and more generally used are documented in the "DDN Protocol Handbook" [17] prepared by the NIC. Other collections of older or obsolete protocols are contained in the "Internet Protocol Transition Workbook" [18], or in the "ARPANET Protocol Transition Handbook" [19]. For further information on ordering the complete 1985 DDN Protocol Handbook, contact the Hostmaster. Also, the Internet Activities Board (IAB) publishes the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" [52], which describes the state of standardization of protocols used in the Internet.
  • Annual Report

    Annual Report

    2015 Annual Report ANNUAL 2015 REPORT CONTENTS i Letter from the President 4 ii NYSERNet Names New President 6 iii NYSERNet Members Institutions 8 iv Membership Update 9 v Data Center 10 vi VMWare Quilt Project 11 vii Working Groups 12 viii Education Services 13 ix iGlass 14 x Network 16 xi Internet Services 17 xii Board Members 18 xiii Our Staff 19 xiv Human Face of Research 20 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Colleagues, I am pleased to present to you NYSERNet’s 2015 Annual Report. Through more than three decades, NYSERNet’s members have addressed the education and research community’s networking and other technology needs together, with trust in each other guiding us through every transition. This spring inaugurates more change, as City. The terrible attack of Sept. 11, 2001, we welcome a new president and I will step complicated achievement of that goal, made down from that position to focus on the it more essential, and taught a sobering research community’s work and needs. lesson concerning the importance of communication and the need to harden the By itself, working with NYSERNet’s infrastructure that supports it. We invested extraordinary Board and staff to support in a wounded New York City, deploying fiber and building what today has become a global exchange point at “ These two ventures formed pieces 32 Avenue of the Americas. In the process, we forged partnerships in a puzzle that, when assembled, that have proved deep and durable. benefited all of New York and beyond.” Despite inherent risks, and a perception that New York City the collective missions of our members institutions might principally benefit, for the past 18 years has been a privilege NYSERNet’s Board unanimously supported beyond my imagining.
  • Download Vol 3, No 3&4, Year 2010

    Download Vol 3, No 3&4, Year 2010

    The International Journal on Advances in Networks and Services is published by IARIA. ISSN: 1942-2644 journals site: http://www.iariajournals.org contact: [email protected] Responsibility for the contents rests upon the authors and not upon IARIA, nor on IARIA volunteers, staff, or contractors. IARIA is the owner of the publication and of editorial aspects. IARIA reserves the right to update the content for quality improvements. Abstracting is permitted with credit to the source. Libraries are permitted to photocopy or print, providing the reference is mentioned and that the resulting material is made available at no cost. Reference should mention: International Journal on Advances in Networks and Services, issn 1942-2644 vol. 3, no. 3 & 4, year 2010, http://www.iariajournals.org/networks_and_services/ The copyright for each included paper belongs to the authors. Republishing of same material, by authors or persons or organizations, is not allowed. Reprint rights can be granted by IARIA or by the authors, and must include proper reference. Reference to an article in the journal is as follows: <Author list>, “<Article title>” International Journal on Advances in Networks and Services, issn 1942-2644 vol. 3, no. 3 & 4, year 2010, <start page>:<end page> , http://www.iariajournals.org/networks_and_services/ IARIA journals are made available for free, proving the appropriate references are made when their content is used. Sponsored by IARIA www.iaria.org Copyright © 2010 IARIA International Journal on Advances in Networks and Services Volume
  • Chapter 17 University of Utah Part 1 Educational Telecommunications

    Chapter 17 University of Utah Part 1 Educational Telecommunications

    Utah Code Chapter 17 University of Utah Part 1 Educational Telecommunications 53B-17-101 Legislative findings on public broadcasting and telecommunications for education. The Legislature finds and determines the following: (1) The University of Utah's Dolores Dore' Eccles Broadcast Center is the statewide public broadcasting and telecommunications facility for education in Utah. (2) The center shall provide services to citizens of the state in cooperation with higher and public education, state and local government, and private industry. (3) Distribution services provided through the center shall include KUED - TV, KUER - FM, and KUEN - TV. (4) KUED - TV and KUER - FM are licensed to the University of Utah. (5) The Utah Education and Telehealth Network's broadcast entity, KUEN - TV, is licensed to the Utah Board of Higher Education and, together with UETN, is operated on behalf of the state's systems of public and higher education. (6) All the entities referred to in Subsection (3) are under the administrative supervision of the University of Utah, subject to the authority and governance of the Utah Board of Higher Education. (7) This section neither regulates nor restricts a privately owned company in the distribution or dissemination of educational programs. Amended by Chapter 365, 2020 General Session 53B-17-101.5 Definitions. As used in this part: (1) "Board" means the Utah Education and Telehealth Network Board. (2) "Education Advisory Council" means the Utah Education Network Advisory Council created in Section 53B-17-107. (3) "Digital resource" means a digital or online library resource, including a database. (4) "Digital resource provider" means an entity that offers a digital resource to customers for license or sale.
  • Broadband for Education: the National Internet2 K20 Initiative’S and WICHE’S Recommendations to the FCC

    Broadband for Education: the National Internet2 K20 Initiative’S and WICHE’S Recommendations to the FCC

    Broadband for Education: The National Internet2 K20 Initiative’s and WICHE’s Recommendations to the FCC Who are we? Internet2: We bring together Internet2’s world-class network and research community members with innovators from colleges and universities, primary and secondary schools, libraries, museums and other educational institutions, the full spectrum of America’s education community, including both formal and informal education. The National K20 Initiative extends new technologies, applications, and rich educational content to all students, their families and communities – no matter where they’re located. We have had immense success connecting the institutions above – in fact, over 65,000 institutions are now connected to the National Internet2 network – but to realize fully the potential of Internet2 all institutions must have adequate bandwidth. What follows are principles we endorse and urge the FCC to adopt. We divide our recommendations into two interrelated categories: connectivity and e-rate support. Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE): WICHE and its 15 member states work to improve access to higher education and ensure student success. Our student exchange programs, regional initiatives, and our research and policy work allow us to assist constituents in the West and beyond. Equitable access to broadband technology and, in particular, technology-enabled education, is among our strategies. At present much of the West, particularly the “frontier West,” has little or no access to adequate bandwidth. Many of our institutions are not among those connected by and participating in the Internet2 K20 Initiative. The principles and recommendations below would remedy this situation. Our recommendations: (1) Connectivity • Elementary schools, secondary schools, and branch libraries should be connected at 100 Mbps to 10 Gbps.
  • Network Working Group S. Kirkpatrick Request for Comments: 1166 M

    Network Working Group S. Kirkpatrick Request for Comments: 1166 M

    Network Working Group S. Kirkpatrick Request for Comments: 1166 M. Stahl Obsoletes RFCs: 1117, 1020, 997, 990, 960, 943, M. Recker 943, 923, 900, 870, 820, 790, 776, 770, 762, July 1990 758, 755, 750, 739, 604, 503, 433, 349 Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93 INTERNET NUMBERS Status of this Memo This memo is a status report on the network numbers and autonomous system numbers used in the Internet community. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Table of Contents Introduction.................................................... 1 Network Numbers................................................. 4 Class A Networks................................................ 7 Class B Networks................................................ 8 Class C Networks................................................ 47 Other Reserved Internet Addresses............................... 100 Network Totals.................................................. 101 Autonomous System Numbers....................................... 102 Documents....................................................... 111 Contacts........................................................ 115 Security Considerations......................................... 182 Authors' Addresses.............................................. 182 Introduction This Network Working Group Request for Comments documents the currently assigned network numbers and gateway autonomous systems. This RFC will be updated periodically, and in any case current information can be obtained from Hostmaster at the DDN Network Information
  • May 2013 Report APPENDIX D

    May 2013 Report APPENDIX D

    APPENDIX D 2013 ESINet Steering Committee Report to the 130th General Assembly Technical Standards Subcommittee INFRASTRUCTURE EVALUATION An examination of the readiness of the state’s current technology infrastructure to support a statewide emergency services internet protocol network for Next Generation 9-1-1 Services. 0 | P a g e Table of Contents PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 EXISTING TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................. 2 OHIO OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................................ 3 OIT Telecommunications .............................................................................................................................. 3 Procurement ................................................................................................................................................. 3 DAS Network Contract Management Services ............................................................................................. 4 Contracts by Service ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Reach…. ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Capacity