Spatial Urban and Peri-Urban Biodiversity Patterns

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spatial Urban and Peri-Urban Biodiversity Patterns Spatial urban and peri-urban biodiversity patterns Olga Tzortzakaki PhD Thesis Department of Biology University of Patras 2018 2 Χωρικά πρό τυπά άστική ς κάι περιάστική ς βιόπόικιλό τήτάς Όλγά Τζωρτζάκάκή Διδάκτόρική Διάτριβή Τμήμά Βιόλόγίάς Πάνεπιστήμιό Πάτρών 2018 3 4 Examining Committee Sinos Giokas, Associate Professor, University of Patras (Supervisor) Vassiliki Kati, Associate Professor, University of Ioannina (Advisory Committee) Konstantinos Nikolakopoulos, Associate Professor, University of Patras (Advisory Committee) Maria Panitsa, Assistant Professor, University of Patras Savvas Kazantzidis, Senior Researcher, Hellenic Agricultural Organization “DEMETER” Robert Nudds, Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, UK Benoît Fontaine, Researcher, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, France Επταμελής Εξεταστική Επιτροπή Σίνος Γκιώκας, Αναπληρωτής Καθηγητής, Πανεπιστήμιο Πατρών (Επιβλέπων) Βασιλική Κατή, Αναπληρώτρια Καθηγήτρια, Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων (Τριμελής Συμβουλευτική Επιτροπή) Κωνσταντίνος Νικολακόπουλος, Αναπληρωτής Καθηγητής, Πανεπιστήμιο Πατρών (Τριμελής Συμβουλευτική Επιτροπή) Μαρία Πανίτσα, Επίκουρη Καθηγήτρια, Πανεπιστήμιο Πατρών Σάββας Καζαντζίδης, Τακτικός Ερευνητής, Ελληνικός Γεωργικός Οργανισμός «ΔΗΜΗΤΡΑ» Robert Nudds, Επίκουρος Καθηγητής, Τμήμα Βιολογίας, Ιατρικής και Υγείας, Πανεπιστήμιο Manchester, ΗΒ Benoît Fontaine, Ερευνητής, Εθνικό Μουσείο Φυσικής Ιστορίας, Γαλλία Approval of a dissertation for the obtainment of a PhD degree from the Department of Biology of the University of Patras does not imply acceptance of the author’s opinions. L. 5343/1932, article 202. Η έγκριση της διατριβής για την απόκτηση Διδακτορικού Διπλώματος από το Τμήμα Βιολογίας του Πανεπιστημίου Πατρών δεν υποδηλώνει την αποδοχή των γνωμών του συγγραφέα. Ν. 5343/1932, άρθρο 202. 5 6 Table of contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 12 Chapter 1. General introduction .......................................................................................... 15 1.1 The urban environment ............................................................................................. 16 1.2 Impacts of urbanisation on biodiversity .................................................................... 17 1.3 Species responses to urbanisation ............................................................................. 19 1.4 Biodiversity conservation in the urban environment ................................................ 20 1.5 Scope of the study ..................................................................................................... 20 1.6 Thesis outline ............................................................................................................ 22 References ............................................................................................................................ 23 Chapter 2. Study area........................................................................................................... 31 2.1 Study area .................................................................................................................. 32 2.2 The urbanisation gradient .......................................................................................... 34 References ............................................................................................................................ 37 Chapter 3. Seasonal patterns of urban bird diversity in a Mediterranean coastal city: the positive role of open green spaces ........................................................................................... 39 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 40 3.2 Methods ..................................................................................................................... 42 3.2.1 Study area and site selection .............................................................................. 42 3.2.2 Bird surveys ....................................................................................................... 43 3.2.3 Land-cover types ................................................................................................ 44 3.2.4 Data analysis ...................................................................................................... 44 3.3 Results ....................................................................................................................... 45 3.3.1. The urbanisation gradient .................................................................................. 45 3.3.2. Bird diversity ..................................................................................................... 46 3.3.3. Effects of land-cover types on bird diversity ..................................................... 50 3.3.4. Bird community structure .................................................................................. 51 3.4 Discussion ................................................................................................................. 53 3.4.1. The urban environment ...................................................................................... 53 3.4.2. Seasonal bird diversity ....................................................................................... 54 3.4.3. Effect of land-cover types on urban bird diversity ............................................ 54 3.4.4. Management implications .................................................................................. 56 References ............................................................................................................................ 58 7 Chapter 4. Butterfly diversity along the urbanisation gradient in a densely-built Mediterranean city: Land cover is more decisive than resources in structuring communities 65 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 66 4.2 Methods ..................................................................................................................... 67 4.2.1 Study area and sampling sites ............................................................................ 67 4.2.2 Butterfly surveys ................................................................................................ 69 4.2.3 Land cover and local habitat characteristics ...................................................... 69 4.2.4 Data analysis ...................................................................................................... 70 4.3 Results ....................................................................................................................... 71 4.3.1 Vegetation and habitat features along the urbanisation gradient ....................... 72 4.3.2 Butterfly diversity along the urbanisation gradient ........................................... 73 4.3.3 Drivers of butterfly diversity patterns ................................................................ 74 4.4 Discussion ................................................................................................................. 77 4.5 Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 80 References ............................................................................................................................ 81 Chapter 5: Bat diversity patterns along the urbanisation gradient ........................................... 87 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 88 5.2 Methods ..................................................................................................................... 89 5.2.1 Study area........................................................................................................... 89 5.2.2 Bat surveys and sound data analysis .................................................................. 91 5.2.3 Environmental variables .................................................................................... 93 5.2.4 Data analysis ...................................................................................................... 94 5.3 Results ....................................................................................................................... 95 5.3.1 The urban environment ...................................................................................... 95 5.3.2 Species identification and occurrence ................................................................ 96 5.3.3 Bat activity along the urbanisation gradient ...................................................... 98 5.3.4 Relationship between bat activity and environmental variables ...................... 100 5.4 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 103 References .......................................................................................................................... 108 Chapter 6: General discussion ............................................................................................... 115 6.1 Diversity along the urbanisation gradient ............................................................... 116 6.2 The effect of the environment on diversity
Recommended publications
  • Download Article (PDF)
    ISSN 0375-1511 Rec. zool. Surv. India: 112(part-3) : 101-112,2012 OBSERVATIONS ON THE STATUS AND DIVERSITY OF BUTTERFLIES IN THE FRAGILE ECOSYSTEM OF LADAKH 0 & K) AVTAR KAUR SIDHU, KAILASH CHANDRA* AND JAFER PALOT** High Altitude Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Solan, H.P. * Zoological Survey of India,M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata 700 053. **Western Ghats Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Calicut, Kerala INTRODUCTION between Zansker and Ladakh ranges and Nubra valley on the east side of Ladakh range crossing As one of the more inaccessible parts of the the Khardungla pass. The river Indus is the Himalayan Ranges, the cold deserts of India are backbone of Ladakh. resource poor regions. These could be considered as an important study area because of their As a distinct biome, this cold desert need extremely fragile ecosystem. The regions on the specially focused research and a concerted effort north flank of the Himalayas experience heavy in terms of natural resource management, snowfall and these remains virtually cut off from especially in the light of their vulnerable ecosystems the rest of the country for several months in the and highly deficient natural resource status. year. Summers are short. The proportion of oxygen Ecology and biodiversity of the Ladakh is under is less than in many other places at a comparable severe stress due to severe pressures. Ladakh and altitude because of lack of vegetation. There is little Kargil districts have been greatly disturbed since moisture to temper the effects of rarefied air. The 1962 because of extensive military activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 21 (3): 296-297; 01. XII. 1998 ISSN 0342-7536 Pseudophilotes vicrama schiffermuelleri confirmed from the Greek island of Kos (Lycaenidae) Alain Olivier Luitenant Lippenslaan 43 B 14, B-2140 Antwerpen, Belgium Summary. The presence of the little blue Pseudophilotes vicrama schiffermuelleri (Hemming, 1929) on the Greek island of Kos is confirmed. Zusammenfassung. Das vorkommen des kleinen Bläulings Pseudophilotes vicrama schiffermuelleri (Hemming, 1929) auf der griechischen Insel Kos wird bestätigt. Résumé. La présence du petit lycène Pseudophilotes vicrama schiffermuelleri (Hemming, 1929) sur l'île grecque de Kôs est confirmée. Key words: Lycaenidae, Pseudophilotes vicrama schiffermuelleri, Greece, Kôs In a recent synthesis on the butterflies of the Greek island of Kos (Olivier & De Prins, 1996), 46 species were reported from this island. In the closing discussion, the authors commented on the curious "absence" of the little blue Pseudophilotes vicrama schiffermuelleri (Hemming, 1929), the more as the species is known from the surrounding smaller islands of Kâlimnos, Léros and Nissiros (Olivier, 1996, 1997 and unpublished). Recently, however, Tolman & Lewington (1997: 97) included Kos among the Greek islands from where it is known and Pam- peris (1997: 154) indicated its presence on the island as well on his distribution map, both these authors basing their record on putative data from literature while, as far as I am aware, this butterfly had never been reported from there so far. In November 1997, while visiting the Zoological Museum of Amsterdam, I came across two male specimens with the labels "10 km SE Kôs/0-200 m/28.IV.1993/leg.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and Its Buffer Zone
    Fr a g m e n t a Fa u n ist ic a 51 (2): 107-118, 2008 PL ISSN 0015-9301 O M u seu m a n d I n s t i t u t e o f Z o o l o g y PAS Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and its buffer zone Izabela DZIEKAŃSKA* and M arcin SlELEZNlEW** * Department o f Applied Entomology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776, Warszawa, Poland; e-mail: e-mail: [email protected] **Department o f Invertebrate Zoology, Institute o f Biology, University o f Białystok, Świerkowa 2OB, 15-950 Białystok, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Kampinos National Park is the second largest protected area in Poland and therefore a potentially important stronghold for biodiversity in the Mazovia region. However it has been abandoned as an area of lepidopterological studies for a long time. A total number of 80 butterfly species were recorded during inventory studies (2005-2008), which proved the occurrence of 80 species (81.6% of species recorded in the Mazovia voivodeship and about half of Polish fauna), including 7 from the European Red Data Book and 15 from the national red list (8 protected by law). Several xerothermophilous species have probably become extinct in the last few decadesColias ( myrmidone, Pseudophilotes vicrama, Melitaea aurelia, Hipparchia statilinus, H. alcyone), or are endangered in the KNP and in the region (e.g. Maculinea arion, Melitaea didyma), due to afforestation and spontaneous succession. Higrophilous butterflies have generally suffered less from recent changes in land use, but action to stop the deterioration of their habitats is urgently needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Pollution and Gynandromorphic Butterflies in Southern Russia
    Vol. 2 No. 2 1995 DANTCHENKO et al.: Gynandromorphic Russian Butterflies 77 HOLARCTIC LEPIDOPTERA, 2(2): 77-79 NUCLEAR POLLUTION AND GYNANDROMORPHIC BUTTERFLIES IN SOUTHERN RUSSIA ALEXANDER DANTCHENKO, THOMAS C. EMMEL, AND ANDREI SOURAKOV Avangardnaia st. 11-160, ROS-125493 Moscow, Russia; Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA; Department of Entomology & Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA ABSTRACT.- An unusual population of the lycaenid butterfly, Meleageria daphnis (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), is found in the Kislovodsk area (43.8°N lat., 42.7°E long.) of southern Russia; 60% of the observed females in the adult population have been partial gynandromorphs or sexual mosaics during the period of 1988 to 1993. This site is within 30 km of the center of the refining area where uranium was processed for the first Soviet atomic bombs, and is also within the southeastern boundary (extent as of 2 May 1986) of the cloud of radiation released from the Chernobyl disaster on 26 April 1986. The situation may reflect a high level of radiation-induced somatic mutations or a genetic alteration in the Y-chromosome carried by most of the females in the population. KEY WORDS: Agrodiaetus, gynandromorph, Leguminosae, Lycaenidae, Meleageria, nuclear pollution, Pseudophilotes, sexual mosaic, somatic mutations. The lycaenid butterfly Meleageria daphnis daphnis ([Denis & July-August and is associated with Coronilla varia L. Schiffermiiller]), occurs through Europe to the Ural Mountains, (Leguminosae) as a foodplant. Males emerge starting with several subspecies (Nekrutenko, 1990; Tuzov, 1993). This approximately 2 weeks before any female. Then gynandromorphic species is sexually dimorphic, with the males being bright blue in females emerge about 1 week prior to normal females.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhopalocera) Fauna of Podgorica (Montenegro, Balkan Peninsula)
    J. Entomol. Res. Soc., 23(1): 27-40, 2021 Research Article Doi: 10.51963/jers.v23i1.1955 Online ISSN:2651-3579 First Insights into the Springtime Butterfly (Rhopalocera) Fauna of Podgorica (Montenegro, Balkan Peninsula) Sylwia Katarzyna PIETRZAK Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, U n i v e r s i t y o f Ł ó d ź , B a n a c h a 1 2 / 1 6 , 9 0 - 2 3 7 Ł ó d ź , P O L A N D e - m a i l : s y l w i a . p i e t r z a k @ e d u . u n i . l o d z . p l ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2648-6486 ABSTRACT The work shows the results of research on butterfly species richness, which took place in Podgorica (Montenegro) between April and June of 2017. The material was gathered on 14 sites located within the city borders. Observations confirmed the presence of 48 species of butterflies representing 5 families: Hesperidae (5 species), Papilionidae (3 species), Pieridae (9 species), Lycaenidae (13 species) and Nymphalidae (18 species). The most common species were Iphilcides podalirius, Papilio machaon, Colias croceus, Coenonympha pamphilus, Polyommatus icarus and Aricia agestis. Results are discussed on a background of two species lists from other urban areas of Balkan Penisula (Zagreb and Patras) as well as a diversity of the butterfly fauna of Montenegro. It is the first analysis of the butterfly fauna of Podgorica city. Key words: Lepidoptera, urban fauna, urban entomology, species richness, butterfly survey. Pietrzak, S.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
    [Show full text]
  • The Butterflies of the Northern Aegean Island of Gökçeada (Imros) (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea & Hesperioidea) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Seven, S. The butterflies of the northern Aegean Island of Gökçeada (Imros) (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea & Hesperioidea) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 36, núm. 141, marzo, 2008, pp. 125-132 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45514115 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative SHILAP Nº 141 16/3/08 17:21 Página 125 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 36 (141), marzo 2008: 125-132 CODEN: SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 The butterflies of the northern Aegean Island of Gökçeada (Imros) (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea & Hesperioidea) S. Seven Abstract In this study, butterflies collected from Gökçeada are presented, including old records from the literature. Seven species collected during the course of this study [Allancastria cerisyi (L., 1758), Leptidea sinapis (L., 1758), Issoria lathonia (L., 1758), Plebicula thersites (Cantener, [1835]), Pseudophilotes vicrama (Moore, 1865), Tarucus balkanicus (Freyer, [1844]), Glaucopsyche alexis (Poda, 1761)] are the first record for the Gökçeada. With this study the number of species from Gökçeada was raised from 45 to 52. Seven species are proposed for endangered (E) status and 13 species for vulnerable (VU) status. KEY WORDS: Butterflies, new records, distribution, endangered, vulnerable, Imros, Turkey. Las mariposas del norte de la isla egea de Gökçeada (Imros) (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea & Hesperioidea) Resumen En este estudio, se presentan las mariposas capturadas de Gökçeada, incluyendo antiguas citas bibliográficas.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of European Butterflies V1.0
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/844175; this version posted November 16, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. A complete time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny of the European butterflies Martin Wiemers1,2*, Nicolas Chazot3,4,5, Christopher W. Wheat6, Oliver Schweiger2, Niklas Wahlberg3 1Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Eberswalder Straße 90, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany 2UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Community Ecology, Theodor- Lieser-Str. 4, 06120 Halle, Germany 3Department of Biology, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden 4Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden. 5Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Box 461, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden. 6Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden *corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected] Abstract With the aim of supporting ecological analyses in butterflies, the third most species-rich superfamily of Lepidoptera, this paper presents the first time-calibrated phylogeny of all 496 extant butterfly species in Europe, including 18 very localized endemics for which no public DNA sequences had been available previously. It is based on a concatenated alignment of the mitochondrial gene COI and up to 11 nuclear gene fragments, using Bayesian inference of phylogeny. To avoid analytical biases that could result from our region-focus sampling, our European tree was grafted upon a global genus- level backbone butterfly phylogeny for analyses. In addition to a consensus tree, we provide the posterior distribution of trees and the fully-concatenated alignment for future analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveys of Butterfly and Skipper Fauna in the Southwestern Part of the Republic of Macedonia (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea & Hesperioidea)
    NATURA SLOVENIAE 18(2): 23-37 Prejeto / Received: 25.10.2016 ZNANSTVENI ČLANEK Sprejeto / Accepted: 17.11.2016 Surveys of butterfly and skipper fauna in the southwestern part of the Republic of Macedonia (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea & Hesperioidea) Vid ŠVARA1, Miloš POPOVIĆ2,3, Andrej PETERNEL4, Đorđe RADEVSKI3, Kaja VUKOTIĆ5, Rudi VEROVNIK6 1 Jakčeva ulica 1, 2380 Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia; e-mail: [email protected] 2 University of Niš, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Department of Biology and Ecology, Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia; E-mail: [email protected] 3 HabiProt, Bulevar Oslobođenja 106/34, 11040 Beograd, Serbia 4 Javorje 31, 4223 Poljane, Slovenia; E-mail: [email protected] 5 Osek 14b, 5261 Šempas, Slovenia; E-mail: [email protected] 6 University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Biology, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Data from four surveys within the last six years were combined in order to improve the knowledge of the butterfly distribution in the Republic of Macedonia. These surveys covered a total of 40 localities, with special emphasis on less sampled areas of the south-western part of the country. The study yielded recording of 131 species, including several habitat specialist and potentially threatened butterflies. Interesting records for the following species are discussed in detail: Muschampia tessellum, Anthocharis gruneri, Euchloe penia, Tarucus balkanicus, Cupido alcetas, Pseudophilotes bavius, Polyommatus aroaniensis, Polyommatus escheri, Araschnia levana and Melitaea ornata. Ten species observed are considered threatened at the European level and 18 of them at the country level. This proves high conservation value of the studied region with many butterfly rich habitats still preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Generalities in the Drivers of Diversity Patterns In
    EXPLORING GENERALITIES IN THE DRIVERS OF DIVERSITY PATTERNS IN FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPES: MULTI-CONTINENTAL MODEL CROSS- COMPARISONS USING BUTTERFLIES By NATALIE S ROBINSON B.S., University of California, Berkeley, 2003 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology 2014 This thesis entitled: Exploring Generalities in the Drivers of Diversity Patterns in Fragmented Landscapes: Multi- continental Model Cross-Comparisons Using Butterflies written by Natalie Suzanne Robinson has been approved for the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology _______________________________________ (Dr. M. Deane Bowers, Committee Co-chair) _______________________________________ (Dr. Robert Guralnick, Committee Co-chair) _______________________________________ (Dr. Kendi Davies) _______________________________________ (Dr. Brett Melbourne) _______________________________________ (Dr. Cesar Nufio) _______________________________________ (Dr. Stefan Leyk) Date_______________ The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. Robinson, Natalie S. (Ph.D., Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) Exploring Generalities in the Drivers of Diversity Patterns in Fragmented Landscapes: Multi- continental Model Cross-Comparisons Using Butterflies Thesis directed by Professors M. Deane Bowers and Robert Guralnick ABSTRACT Landscape modification is leaving an irrevocable scar on the planet, most notably through habitat fragmentation. Fragmented landscapes are often unable to support communities that once inhabited them, leading to unprecedented rates of global biodiversity loss. As a result, substantial research effort focuses on investigating the drivers of species’ responses to habitat fragmentation, usually for one or a few species at select locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica, 20.12.2013, ISSN 0342-7536 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; Download Unter Und
    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 36 (2): 109-126 109 Dinara Massif - a new hotspot for the butterfly (Papilionoidea) diversity of the Dinaric Arc ^ Toni Koren ^ & Boris Laus ' University of Primorska, Science and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Biodiversity Studies, SI -6000, Koper, Garibaldijeva 1, Slovenia; [email protected] 2 Association for Biological Research - BIOM, Biankinijeva 12b, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] Received 11 February 2013; reviews returned 20 March 2013; accepted 5 June 2013. Subject Editor: Zdenëk F. Fric. Abstract. The Dinara Massif range is the highest mountain range in Croatia, located in the southeastern part of the country. During the last three years we conducted a butterfly survey on three mountains belonging to the Dinara Massif: Dinara, Kamesnica and Troglav. We recorded 94 butterfly species; for the first time exact localities were given for 46 of them, while two were entirely new records for the area. A comparison with five other mountains belonging to the Dinaric Arc was performed using the Sorensen similarity index, which revealed that Blidinje (Cvrsnica & Vran complex) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Mt. Velebit in Croatia have the highest similarity with the Dinara Massif Several rare species were recorded during this survey, of which Polyommatus ripartii (Freyer, 1830) represents the second record for Croatia. The known ranges for Pieris balcana (Lorkovic, 1970), Polyommatus damon (Dennis & Schiffermüller, 1775), Polyommatus eros (Ochsenheimer, 1 808) and Polyommatus ripartii in Croatia were much expanded. Introduction Butterflies are one of the best studied groups of insects in most of Europe, especially in terms of their biology, distribution (Kudma et al.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Biology of Ten Lycaenid Butterflies (Lepidoptera
    Acta entomologica silesiana Vol. 23 (online 018): 1–16 ISSN 1230-7777, ISSN 2353-1703 (online) Bytom, September 23, 2015 New data on the biology of ten lycaenid butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) of the genera Tomares RAMBUR, 1840, Pseudophilotes BEURET, 1958, Polyommatus LATREILLE, 1804, and Plebejus KLUK, 1780 from the Crimea and their attending ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Jarosław Bury1, Vladimir saVchuk2 1 Markowa 1498, 37-120 Markowa, e-mail: [email protected] 2 Ukraina, Theodosia, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. New data on the biology of ten lycaenid butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) of the genera Tomares RAMBUR, 1840, Pseudophilotes BEURET, 1958, Polyommatus LATREILLE, 1804, and Plebejus KLUK, 1780 from the Crimea and their attending ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Data on the biology of ten lycaenid species of the genera Tomares ramBur, 1840, Pseudophilotes Beuret, 1958, Polyommatus (Polyommatus) latreille, 1804, Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) hüBner, 1822, Polyommatus (Aricia) reichenBach, 1817, Polyommatus (Meleageria) de sagerra, 1926 and Plebejus kluk, 1780 from the Crimea, their host plants and attending ants are given. Eight new records of attending ants are presented here for the first time – Tetramorium sp. for T. callimachus (eVersman, 1848), Formica (Serviformica) sp. and Plagiolepis sp. for T. nogelli (Freyer, 1851), Formica sp. for P. bavius (eVersman, 1832), Camponotus sp. for Pseudophilotes vicrama (moore, 1865), Camponotus sp. for P. (Polyommatus.) thersites (cantener, 1835), Plagiolepis sp. for P. (Meleageria) daphnis (denis et schiFFermüler, 1775), and Plagiolepis sp. for P. (Agrodiaetus) damocles (herrich-schäFFer, 1844). KEY WORDS: ant-butterfly relationship, host plants, myrmecophily, Ukraine. INTRODUCTION Distribution of butterflies of the family Lycaenidae leach, 1815 is relatively well known in Europe, Ukraine and the Crimea.
    [Show full text]