Exploring Generalities in the Drivers of Diversity Patterns In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exploring Generalities in the Drivers of Diversity Patterns In EXPLORING GENERALITIES IN THE DRIVERS OF DIVERSITY PATTERNS IN FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPES: MULTI-CONTINENTAL MODEL CROSS- COMPARISONS USING BUTTERFLIES By NATALIE S ROBINSON B.S., University of California, Berkeley, 2003 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology 2014 This thesis entitled: Exploring Generalities in the Drivers of Diversity Patterns in Fragmented Landscapes: Multi- continental Model Cross-Comparisons Using Butterflies written by Natalie Suzanne Robinson has been approved for the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology _______________________________________ (Dr. M. Deane Bowers, Committee Co-chair) _______________________________________ (Dr. Robert Guralnick, Committee Co-chair) _______________________________________ (Dr. Kendi Davies) _______________________________________ (Dr. Brett Melbourne) _______________________________________ (Dr. Cesar Nufio) _______________________________________ (Dr. Stefan Leyk) Date_______________ The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. Robinson, Natalie S. (Ph.D., Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) Exploring Generalities in the Drivers of Diversity Patterns in Fragmented Landscapes: Multi- continental Model Cross-Comparisons Using Butterflies Thesis directed by Professors M. Deane Bowers and Robert Guralnick ABSTRACT Landscape modification is leaving an irrevocable scar on the planet, most notably through habitat fragmentation. Fragmented landscapes are often unable to support communities that once inhabited them, leading to unprecedented rates of global biodiversity loss. As a result, substantial research effort focuses on investigating the drivers of species’ responses to habitat fragmentation, usually for one or a few species at select locations. This dissertation expands upon previous research in order to broaden understanding of the determinants of diversity patterns in fragmented landscapes. I modeled variation in among fragment butterfly diversity for entire communities, using both environmental attributes and species traits as predictors. I then compared models across three, widely separated fragmented landscapes. I found that patch area and water availability had consistent influences on butterfly diversity patterns; these factors may warrant inclusion into management policies for fragmented landscapes worldwide. Other predictors, e.g., butterfly wing length, had variable influences on diversity patterns, although results revealed similarities between certain study areas. For example, habitat heterogeneity influenced diversity patterns similarly in two study areas, possibly due to similarities in ecological and/or climatic characteristics (e.g., drought-prone summers). Furthermore, species traits played important, albeit inconsistent, roles in driving butterfly diversity patterns; this iii pattern also potentially driven by among location ecological and/or climatic conditions. In all, this integrative data reuse analysis demonstrated patterns that may provide crucial information for better understanding wide-spread species responses to habitat fragmentation. The final component of this dissertation was an exploration of questions that arose from the data reuse strategy employed: how different are models constructed from datasets obtained via disparate levels of survey effort, and what implications does this have for data reuse analyses. I constructed a new model using data collected via 2/3 of the full sampling effort for one dataset. The model was almost identical to that constructed from the full dataset, and the use of this ‘reduced sampling effort’ dataset would thus have had negligible impact on previous results. This work provides insight into the sensitivity of downstream analyses to variation in survey methods, and substantiates the validity of analyses reusing datasets collected by different researchers. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am not sure how I can put to words all of my appreciation for the myriad people whose support and understanding have helped me through this crazy journey. This is a long list, which starts with my major advisors, Deane Bowers and Rob Guralnick. Together you have given me zillions of hours of your time, through countless meetings, edits, and talks. You have been my cheerleaders, my mentors, my inspiration, and my friends. You have shaped both my dissertation research, and my ability to ask deeper questions, perform more focused investigations, and communicate more effectively than I ever thought possible. You took a naïve girl from a sheltered world and made her into a scientist, and all of my past and future successes are owed to you. Deane and Rob, I can never thank you enough for your intellectual stimulation, enthusiasm, tenacity, and encouragement. I would also like to sincerely thank my other committee members, Kendi Davies, Stefan Leyk, Brett Melbourne, and Cesar Nufio, whose insights and feedback through the years have shaped my PhD into something truly unique and exciting. Finally, I feel lucky to have been accepted into a department of such amazing, supportive faculty and staff as are found in EEB. Special thanks to Jeff Mitton for encouraging me to explore my options and pursue my dreams, Yan Linhart for sharing his infectious love of science and seeing me through early days of my studies, and Mike Grant for your encouragement and intellectual support. My ability to complete this PhD hinged upon help and support from a few key people. To my collaborators, Martin Konvicka, Tomas Kadlec, and Matt Williams, your willingness to share your hard-earned data and work with me to develop new ideas are at the heart of making this integrative study possible. I am forever grateful for having had the opportunity to work with other like-minded scientists who believe in the importance of sharing data, and who were willing v to do whatever I needed in order to help me complete these analyses. Special thanks also to several people who helped me gather and synthesize additional information for this project through the years, Laura Tietz, Annie Frazier, Jan Koenig, and Monica Rother. To my the friends, both biological and non-biological, you’ve seen me through so many years, supported me and understood what I was trying to do, expanded my ways of thinking, and accompanied me on countless adventures. In particular, to the girls, Susan Whitehead, Loren Sackett, Kallin Tea, Se Jin Song, Mary Kay Herzenach, and Katherine McClure, our girls nights were a sustaining force during these many years in the Master’s and PhD programs, and I love you all for your commitment to our friendships. To my other biological friends, Carolina Quintero, Ty Tuff, Evan Lampert, Amanda Williams, Niffer Wilkening, and so many more; your support and feedback have aided in this project in ways that you could not even know, thank you for every minute of it. I also wish to acknowledge the Bowers and Guralnick labs, past and present, including Caitlin Kelly, Megan Blanchard, Toby Hammer, Adrian Carper, Peri Mason, Collin Schwantes, Carolina Quintero, Mary Jamieson, Katie Wolfson, Brian Stucky, Gaurav Vaidya, Leisl and Peter Erb, Nate Kleist, Aiden Beers, and Aly Seeberger, thank-you for the stimulating conversation and amazing feedback throughout this process. And finally, to my non- biological friends, I would have gone crazy if you had not been there to remind me that there is more to life than just school. Special thanks to Amber Freeman and Cris Sturgis, my oldest and dearest friends whose support has been unbelievable. Thank-you also, and especially, to Jeremy Lauffenburger, Phil Sonnenfeld, Truman Bradley, Taylor Chase, and Anna Jablonski for the late night Catan games, amazing hut trips, incredible raft trips, and other inspiring adventures. Finally, I am unendingly grateful to my family, without whom I never would have had the strength to upend my life, start with a clean slate, and make a new and brighter future for vi myself. To Jessica Robinson, you have been at times my sounding board, and at others my ear, and I appreciate your love and support over all of these years. To my Mom, Susan Robinson, you provided me with the one thing that has made every success in my life possible, a belief that I can do anything that I set my mind to. You taught me early to be strong, independent, tenacious, and confident in my ability to achieve any goal, no matter how challenging. I can never repay you, or express enough gratitude for you to understand that you are the foundation of everything that I am, and that I couldn’t be more proud to be your daughter. To my Dad, Bruce Robinson, you are my rock, my hero. I have always known that you believed in me, that your support for me could never be shaken, and that your love for me is completely unconditional. I walk with a higher step, a brighter smile, and a more compassionate heart because you are my father, and I will always strive to be, and to do, better, in the hopes that I can someday come even close to living up to your example. To Paula Connelly, you have supported me in so many ways, taking me to amazing places, giving me opportunities to have fun and enjoy this crazy ride, and helping me to travel around the world; thank-you. And finally, to Brooks Lustig, my partner, my best friend- I have taken you on a ride that neither one of us ever could have expected, and I do not think there are words enough in this world to express how much I appreciate your help in getting me to the finish line. Thank-you for supporting me when I needed help keeping my head up, making me laugh when I wanted to cry, and pushing me to always have fun and enjoy this life. I am fortunate have received generous financial support for this work through funding from the University of Colorado Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, the University of Colorado Beverley Sears Grant, The University of Colorado Graduate School, and the University of Colorado Museum of Natural History.
Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Phyciodes Butterfly Species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): Complex Mtdna Variation and Species Delimitations
    Systematic Entomology (2003) 28, 257±273 Phylogenetic relationships of Phyciodes butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): complex mtDNA variation and species delimitations NIKLAS WAHLBERG*, RITA OLIVEIRA* andJAMES A. SCOTTy *Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Ecology and Systematics, University of Helsinki, Finland, and yLakewood, Colorado, U.S.A. Abstract. Mitochondrial DNA variation wasstudied in the butterfly genus Phyciodes (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) by sequencing 1450 bp of the COI gene from 140 individuals of all eleven currently recognized species. The study focused on four species in particular that have been taxonomically difficult for the past century, P. tharos, P. cocyta, P. batesii and P. pulchella. A cladistic analysis of ninety-eight unique haplotypesshowedthat Phyciodes formsa monophyletic group with P. graphica as the most basal species. Of the three informal species groupsdescribed for Phyciodes, only one (the mylitta-group) isunambiguously monophyletic. Within the tharos-group, seven well supported clades were found that correspond to three taxa, P. tharos, P. pulchella and a grade consisting of P. cocyta and P. batesii haplotypesinterdigitated with each other. None of the clades is formed exclusively by one species. The patterns of haplotype variation are the result of both retained ancient polymorphism and introgression. Introgression appearsto be mostcommon between P. cocyta and P. batesii; however, these two species occur sympatrically and are morphologically and ecologically distinct, suggesting that the level of current introgression does not seem to be enough to threaten their genetic integrity. The results indicate that mitochondrial DNA sequences must be used with great caution in delimiting species, especially when infraspecific samples are few, or introgression seems to be rampant.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    ISSN 0375-1511 Rec. zool. Surv. India: 112(part-3) : 101-112,2012 OBSERVATIONS ON THE STATUS AND DIVERSITY OF BUTTERFLIES IN THE FRAGILE ECOSYSTEM OF LADAKH 0 & K) AVTAR KAUR SIDHU, KAILASH CHANDRA* AND JAFER PALOT** High Altitude Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Solan, H.P. * Zoological Survey of India,M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata 700 053. **Western Ghats Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Calicut, Kerala INTRODUCTION between Zansker and Ladakh ranges and Nubra valley on the east side of Ladakh range crossing As one of the more inaccessible parts of the the Khardungla pass. The river Indus is the Himalayan Ranges, the cold deserts of India are backbone of Ladakh. resource poor regions. These could be considered as an important study area because of their As a distinct biome, this cold desert need extremely fragile ecosystem. The regions on the specially focused research and a concerted effort north flank of the Himalayas experience heavy in terms of natural resource management, snowfall and these remains virtually cut off from especially in the light of their vulnerable ecosystems the rest of the country for several months in the and highly deficient natural resource status. year. Summers are short. The proportion of oxygen Ecology and biodiversity of the Ladakh is under is less than in many other places at a comparable severe stress due to severe pressures. Ladakh and altitude because of lack of vegetation. There is little Kargil districts have been greatly disturbed since moisture to temper the effects of rarefied air. The 1962 because of extensive military activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue3.7 MB
    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 21 (3): 296-297; 01. XII. 1998 ISSN 0342-7536 Pseudophilotes vicrama schiffermuelleri confirmed from the Greek island of Kos (Lycaenidae) Alain Olivier Luitenant Lippenslaan 43 B 14, B-2140 Antwerpen, Belgium Summary. The presence of the little blue Pseudophilotes vicrama schiffermuelleri (Hemming, 1929) on the Greek island of Kos is confirmed. Zusammenfassung. Das vorkommen des kleinen Bläulings Pseudophilotes vicrama schiffermuelleri (Hemming, 1929) auf der griechischen Insel Kos wird bestätigt. Résumé. La présence du petit lycène Pseudophilotes vicrama schiffermuelleri (Hemming, 1929) sur l'île grecque de Kôs est confirmée. Key words: Lycaenidae, Pseudophilotes vicrama schiffermuelleri, Greece, Kôs In a recent synthesis on the butterflies of the Greek island of Kos (Olivier & De Prins, 1996), 46 species were reported from this island. In the closing discussion, the authors commented on the curious "absence" of the little blue Pseudophilotes vicrama schiffermuelleri (Hemming, 1929), the more as the species is known from the surrounding smaller islands of Kâlimnos, Léros and Nissiros (Olivier, 1996, 1997 and unpublished). Recently, however, Tolman & Lewington (1997: 97) included Kos among the Greek islands from where it is known and Pam- peris (1997: 154) indicated its presence on the island as well on his distribution map, both these authors basing their record on putative data from literature while, as far as I am aware, this butterfly had never been reported from there so far. In November 1997, while visiting the Zoological Museum of Amsterdam, I came across two male specimens with the labels "10 km SE Kôs/0-200 m/28.IV.1993/leg.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and Its Buffer Zone
    Fr a g m e n t a Fa u n ist ic a 51 (2): 107-118, 2008 PL ISSN 0015-9301 O M u seu m a n d I n s t i t u t e o f Z o o l o g y PAS Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and its buffer zone Izabela DZIEKAŃSKA* and M arcin SlELEZNlEW** * Department o f Applied Entomology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776, Warszawa, Poland; e-mail: e-mail: [email protected] **Department o f Invertebrate Zoology, Institute o f Biology, University o f Białystok, Świerkowa 2OB, 15-950 Białystok, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Kampinos National Park is the second largest protected area in Poland and therefore a potentially important stronghold for biodiversity in the Mazovia region. However it has been abandoned as an area of lepidopterological studies for a long time. A total number of 80 butterfly species were recorded during inventory studies (2005-2008), which proved the occurrence of 80 species (81.6% of species recorded in the Mazovia voivodeship and about half of Polish fauna), including 7 from the European Red Data Book and 15 from the national red list (8 protected by law). Several xerothermophilous species have probably become extinct in the last few decadesColias ( myrmidone, Pseudophilotes vicrama, Melitaea aurelia, Hipparchia statilinus, H. alcyone), or are endangered in the KNP and in the region (e.g. Maculinea arion, Melitaea didyma), due to afforestation and spontaneous succession. Higrophilous butterflies have generally suffered less from recent changes in land use, but action to stop the deterioration of their habitats is urgently needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Act Native Woodland Conservation Strategy and Action Plans
    ACT NATIVE WOODLAND CONSERVATION STRATEGY AND ACTION PLANS PART A 1 Produced by the Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development © Australian Capital Territory, Canberra 2019 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from: Director-General, Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government, GPO Box 158, Canberra ACT 2601. Telephone: 02 6207 1923 Website: www.planning.act.gov.au Acknowledgment to Country We wish to acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land we are meeting on, the Ngunnawal people. We wish to acknowledge and respect their continuing culture and the contribution they make to the life of this city and this region. Accessibility The ACT Government is committed to making its information, services, events and venues as accessible as possible. If you have difficulty reading a standard printed document and would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, such as large print, please phone Access Canberra on 13 22 81 or email the Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate at [email protected] If English is not your first language and you require a translating and interpreting service, please phone 13 14 50. If you are deaf, or have a speech or hearing impairment, and need the teletypewriter service, please phone 13 36 77 and ask for Access Canberra on 13 22 81. For speak and listen users, please phone 1300 555 727 and ask for Canberra Connect on 13 22 81. For more information on these services visit http://www.relayservice.com.au PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CONTENTS VISION ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Patch Size and Connectivity Influence the Population Turnover of the Threatened Chequered Blue Butterfly, Scolitantides Orion (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)
    Eur. J. Entomol. 105: 131–136, 2008 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1312 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Patch size and connectivity influence the population turnover of the threatened chequered blue butterfly, Scolitantides orion (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) ATTE KOMONEN1*, TUULI TIKKAMÄKI1, NIINA MATTILA2 and JANNE S. KOTIAHO2, 3 1Faculty of Forest Sciences, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 University of Joensuu, Finland 2Department of Biological and Environmental Science, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland 3Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland Keywords. Butterfly conservation, colonization, connectivity, extinction, Lycaenidae, metapopulation, patch size, Scolitantides orion, Sedum telephium, population turnover Abstract. Chequered blue butterfly, Scolitantides orion (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) has severely declined in many parts of Europe and is currently red-listed in many countries. We studied the population structure and turnover of the species in a lake-island system in a National Park in eastern Finland over a three-year period. The incidence of the chequered blue on the suitable islands (n = 41) and habitat patches (n = 123) was high: an average of 82% of the islands and patches were occupied over the three year period. At the island scale, the annual population turnover rate was 17%, with an extinction and colonization rate of 7% and 10%, respectively. At the patch scale, the annual population turnover was 16%, with 7% extinction and 9% colonization rate. Islands that were occupied over the three year period had a larger area of suitable habitat than islands in which turnover events were observed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Little Things That Run the City How Do Melbourne’S Green Spaces Support Insect Biodiversity and Promote Ecosystem Health?
    The Little Things that Run the City How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Luis Mata, Christopher D. Ives, Georgia E. Garrard, Ascelin Gordon, Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk, Kirsten Parris and Sarah A. Bekessy The Little Things that Run the City – How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Report prepared for the City of Melbourne, November 2015 Coordinating authors Luis Mata Christopher D. Ives Georgia E. Garrard Ascelin Gordon Sarah Bekessy Interdisciplinary Conservation Science Research Group Centre for Urban Research School of Global, Urban and Social Studies RMIT University 124 La Trobe Street Melbourne 3000 Contributing authors Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk and Kirsten Parris. Cover artwork by Kate Cranney ‘Melbourne in a Minute Scavenger’ (Ink and paper on paper, 2015) This artwork is a little tribute to a minute beetle. We found the brown minute scavenger beetle (Corticaria sp.) at so many survey plots for the Little Things that Run the City project that we dubbed the species ‘Old Faithful’. I’ve recreated the map of the City of Melbourne within the beetle’s body. Can you trace the outline of Port Phillip Bay? Can you recognise the shape of your suburb? Next time you’re walking in a park or garden in the City of Melbourne, keep a keen eye out for this ubiquitous little beetle.
    [Show full text]
  • From Mainland Southeastern Australia, with Ar
    © The Authors, 2018. Journal compilation © Australian Museum, Sydney, 2018 Records of the Australian Museum (2018) Vol. 70, issue number 5, pp. 423–433. ISSN 0067-1975 (print), ISSN 2201-4349 (online) https://doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.70.2018.1715 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:62503ED7-0C67-4484-BCE7-E4D81E54A41B Michael F. Braby orcid.org/0000-0002-5438-587X A new subspecies of Neolucia hobartensis (Miskin, 1890) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) from Mainland Southeastern Australia, with a Review of Butterfly Endemism in Montane Areas in this Region Michael F. Braby1* and Graham E. Wurtz2 1 Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton ACT 2601, Australia, and National Research Collections Australia, Australian National Insect Collection, GPO Box 1700, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia 2 Thurgoona NSW 2640, Australia [email protected] Abstract. Neolucia hobartensis albolineata ssp. nov. is illustrated, diagnosed, described and compared with the nominate subspecies N. hobartensis hobartensis (Miskin, 1890) from Tasmania and N. hobartensis monticola Waterhouse & Lyell, 1914 from northern New South Wales, Australia. The new subspecies is restricted to montane areas (mainly >1000 m) in subalpine and alpine habitats on the mainland in southeastern Australia (southern NSW, ACT, VIC) where its larvae specialize on Epacris spp. (Ericaceae). It thus belongs to a distinct set of 22 butterfly taxa that are endemic and narrowly restricted to montane areas (>600 m, but mainly >900 m) on the tablelands and plateaus of mainland southeastern Australia. Monitoring of these taxa, including N. hobartensis ssp., is urgently required to assess the extent to which global climate change, particularly temperature rise and large-scale fire regimes, are key threatening processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Articles
    T The Journal of Research ON THE LePIDOPTERA Volume 37 1998 (2003) The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera ISSN 0022 4324 Published by: The Lepidoptera Research Foundation, Inc. 9620 Heather Road Beverly Hills, California 90210-1 757 TEL (310) 399 6016 FAX (310) 399 2805 E-MAIL: Editorial: [email protected] Business: [email protected] Technical: [email protected] Eounder: William Hovanitz (1915-1977) Editorial Staff: Rudolf H.T. Mattoni, editor E-MAIL: [email protected] Scott E. Miller, assistant editor E-MAIL: [email protected] Zdenka IMenova, technical editor E-MAIL: [email protected] Associate Editors: The Lepidoptera Research Eoundation is in process of reorganization. The corps of associate editors will be established when complete. Manuscripts and notices material may be sent to the editor, Rudolf H.T. Mattoni, E-MAIL: [email protected] or to the above address. Electronic transmissions are preferable. Please note the instructions to authors on the back inside covert of this Journal Technical editor at the address: Zdenka Ki'enova, University of South Bohemia, Branisovska 31, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic. The journal is sent to all members of the Foundation. Classes of membership: Regular (Individual) $ 20.00 year (vol.) Contributing $ 30.00 or more year (vol.) Student/ Retired-Worldwide $ 18.00 year (vol.) Subscription Rate/ Institutions $ 30.00 year (vol.) Life $ 300.00 Statement of ownership and management THE JOURNAL OE RESEARCH ON THE LEPIDOPTERA is published two times a year by the LEPIDOPTERA RESEARCH EOUNDATION, INC. Publication and business offices are located at the Beverly Hills, California address given above.
    [Show full text]