DOCSLIB.ORG

April 2014 Volume 93, Number 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
April 2014 Volume 93, Number 4 93 April 2014 Volume 93, Number 4 S R Y C T I E L N U C O E P A 11908908 S N S O O C I AT I ISSN 0032-5791 Official Journal of the Poultry Science Association Inc. EDITOR-IN-CHIEF ® T. E. Porter (2016) POULTRY SCIENCE SECTION EDITORS ASSOCIATE EDITORS (2013–2014) Environment, Well-Being, ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ I. Hanning (2016) M. Pines (2014) Ȳȱ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ǯȱ ěȱǻŘŖŗŚǼ T. Poole (2016) I. Estevez (2014) H. Ahmadi (2013) R. M. Hulet (2014) ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ M. M. Beck (2016) W. Alali (2016) ǯȱ ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ A. Pradhan (2014) ǯȱ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ A. Jackson-Davis (2016) ǯȬ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ Genetics C. Ashwell (2016) D. Jackwood (2014) ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗŚǼ J. Dodgson (2016) ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ P. A. Johnson (2016) ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ¢ǰȱ ǰ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗŜǼ C. Jones (2016) K. Reed (2016) Ȳȱ M. R. Bakst (2014) P. Kaiser (2014) T. B. Rodenburg (2014) R. L. Taylor Jr. (2016) R. Beckstead (2016) ǯȱ ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ G. J. M. Rosa (2016) B. R. Behrends (2016) N. Kansaku (2016) W. B. Roush (2013) ȱȱ L. Berghman (2014) E. Kebreab (2013) I. Rozenboim (2014) G. Cherian (2014) W. Berry (2014) E. J. Kim (2016) C. Ruiz-Feria (2013) M. Rodehutscord (2016) D. Biswas (2014) W. Kim (2016) ǯȱǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ E. Esteve-Garcia (2014) J. Brake (2013) ǯȱ ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ K. Bregendahl (2014) K. W. Koelkebeck (2013) C. Schmidt (2016) ǰȱǰ B. Brehm-Stecher (2016) M. H. Kogut (2014) P. Selle (2013) ȱȱȱ¢ J. Buyse (2014) A. Kollanoor-Johny (2016) ǯȱ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ G. Bedecarrats (2016) D. Caldwell (2014) B.-W. Kong (2013) D. H. Shah (2016) ¢¢ǰȱ¢ǰȱ F. Carbonero (2016) ǯȬ ǯȱ ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ Ȳȱ H. Cervantes (2014) ǯȱ ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ǯȱǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ S. C. Chapman (2016) W. Kuenzel (2014) K. Shimada (2016) ǯȱĴȱǻŘŖŗśǼ H.-W. Cheng (2016) ǯȱ ¢£ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ F. Siewerdt (2016) A. L. Johnson (2014) K. K. Chousalkar (2013) S. J. Lamont (2014) M. Singh (2014) ǰȱǰ S. Cloutier (2016) ǯȱǯȱ ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ B. Svihus (2014) Ȳȱȱ¢ A. Collin (2014) J. Lee (2013) C. Swaggerty (2016) C. M. Owens (2014) E. Collisson (2014) E. Leone (2016) S. Tesseraud (2014) S. C. Ricke (2016) ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ F. C. Leung (2016) L. Thompson (2016) M. E. Cook (2014) ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ K. Tona (2014) ǰȱǰ ǯȱĴȱǻŘŖŗŚǼ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ K. Turner (2014) Ȳȱ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗřǼ H.-C. Liu (2016) H. van den Brand (2014) A. McElroy (2016) P. A. Curtis (2013) K. Maciorowski (2014) ǯȱȱȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ E. Delezie (2014) R. H. Marin (2016) ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ¢ȱ R. Dennis (2014) A. McElroy (2016) R. Walzem (2014) T. E. Porter (2016) ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ǯȱǯȱ ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ OFFICERS ǯȱǯȱ£ȱ ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ǯȱ££ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ B. Werner (2014) C. Dunkley (2016) K. Mertens (2013) H. Willemsen (2014) K. D. Dunkley (2014) S. Mignon-Grasteau (2014) ǯȱ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ M. O. Smith ǯȱ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ S. Milillo (2014) ǯȱĴȱǻŘŖŗŚǼ ȱȱ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ M. T. Musgrove (2014) E. A. Wong (2016) T. J. Applegate ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ I. A. Naas (2016) M. Yegani (2016) J. Evans (2016) R. Nannapaneni (2016) A. Yersin (2014) ȱȱ N. Everaert (2014) ǯȱ¢ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ D. Zadworny (2016) D. J. Caldwell M. Farnell (2016) K. J. Navara (2014) M. Zeman (2014) ¢Ȭ S. Foley (2016) R. Nayak (2016) J. Zentek (2016) R. M. Hulet ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ S. L. Noll (2016) ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ N. French (2014) ǯȱǯȱȂ ȱǻŘŖŗŜǼ H. Zhang (2016) ȱ J. Fulton (2014) R. Okimoto (2016) X. Zhang (2013) M. T. Kidd R. Gast (2014) O. Onagbesan (2014) ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ǯȱǯȱ ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ H. Parmentier (2014) H. Zhou (2016) A. P. McElroy (2014) ǯȱ ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ǯȱǯȱ¢ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ I. Gimeno (2016) A. J. Pescatore (2014) ǯȱĚȱǻŘŖŗŚǼ D. R. McIntyre (2014) H. Guo (2016) T. Pharr (2016) ǯȱǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ǯȱ ȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ȱȱě Chris Davies Ron Keller J. B. Hess (2016) ȓǯ Sharon Frick Lisa Krohn S. R. Fernandez (2016) Susan Pollock, Managing Editor Gayle Gleichman Shauna Miller Louise Adam Armgard Haken ȱ Jorge Cazares Christine Horger K. A. Byrne (2014) ǯȱ ǯȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼ ¢ȱ®ȱǻ ȱŖŖřŘȬśŝşŗǼȱȱȱŗŘȱȱȱ¢ȱǻ¢Ǽǯȱȱȱȱȱ¢ǰȱǰȱ ȱȱȱĜǯȱDZȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ, Journals Customer Service ǰȱ¡ȱ¢ȱǰȱŘŖŖŗȱȱǰȱ¢ǰȱȱŘŝśŗřȬŘŖŖşǯ S R Y C Subscription informationȱ¢ȱȱȱǰȱǞśŞşȱǻǼǰȱǞŜŚŝȱǻǼǰȱȱǞŜŞŗȱǻȱȱ T I E L N U Ǽǯȱ¢ȱȱȱȱǰȱǡřŞŖȦǧŚŜŝȱǻǼǰȱǡŚřŞȦǧśřşȱǻǼǰȱȱǡŚŜŗȦǧśŜŝȱǻȱȱǼDzȱ C O E P ȱȱȱǞŚśǯȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱǰȱ ¡ȱ ǰȱ ȱȱǰȱ¡ȱŘȱŜǰȱ ǰȱDZȱƸŚŚȱǻŖǼȱŗŞŜśȬřśȬřşŖŝǰȱȬDZȱǯǯȓǯ ǯȱ ȱȱǰȱȱȱ ȱȱȱǰȱ¡ȱ ǰȱŘŖŖŗȱȱǰȱ A 11908908 ¢ǰȱȱŘŝśŗřǯȱDZȱŞŖŖȬŞśŘȬŝřŘřȱǻȬȱȱȦǼȱȱşŗşȬŜŝŝȬŖşŝŝǰȱȬDZȱȓǯǯȱ S N S O O C I AT I ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱǞŗŘŖȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ. A print subscrip- ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱǞŞŖȱǻǼȱȱǞŗŖŝȱǻȱȱǼǯȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ POULTRY SCIENCE ȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ ǯǰȱŗŞŖŖȱǯȱȱǰȱȱŗŖŖǰȱǰȱ ȱŜŗŞŘŖȬŜşŝŚǰȱDZȱŘŗŝȬřśŜȬśŘŞśǰȱ ASSOCIATION INC. ȬDZȱȓǯǯ Organized 1908 Claimsȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȦȱȱǻ ȱȱǼǯȱ- ĴDZȦȦ ǯ¢ǯ ȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱǯȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ, Journals Customer ĴDZȦȦǯǯ ȱǰȱ¡ȱ¢ȱǰȱŘŖŖŗȱȱǰȱ¢ǰȱȱŘŝśŗřǰȱDZȱŞŖŖȬŞśŘȬŝřŘřȱǻȬȱȱȦ ǼȱȱşŗşȬŜŝŝȬŖşŝŝǰȱȬDZȱȓǯǯ ȚŘŖŗŚȱ¢ȱȱȱ ǯȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ¡ȱ¢ȱǯ POULTRY SCIENCE® Volume 93 April 2014 Number 4 CONTENTS ENVIRONMENT, WELL-BEING, AND BEHAVIOR Modelling of feather pecking behavior in beak-trimmed and non-beak-trimmed crossbred laying hens: Variance component and trait-based approach Y. Sun, E. D. Ellen, J. J. van der Poel, H. K. Parmentier, and P. Bijma ................................773 Comparative proteomic analysis of the breast muscle response to chronic corticosterone administration in broiler chickens showing long or short tonic immobility Wenyan Fu, Yujing Duan, Song Wang, Yingdong Ni, R. Grossmann, and Ruqian Zhao ..........784 Research Note Determination of space use by laying hens using kinematic analysis Joy A. Mench and Richard A. Blatchford .................................................................................794 GENETICS The potential for archiving and reconstituting valuable strains of turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) using primordial germ cells Alexander J. Wade, Nick A. French, and Grenham W. Ireland ................................................799 Genetic parameters for feather pecking and aggressive behavior in a large F2-cross of laying hens using generalized linear mixed models J. Bennewitz, S. Bögelein, P. Stratz, M. Rodehutscord, H. P. Piepho, J. B. Kjaer, and W. Bessei .............................................................................................................................810 IMMUNOLOGY, HEALTH, AND DISEASE In ovo inoculation of chicken embryos with probiotic bacteria and its effect on posthatch Salmonella susceptibility J. E. de Oliveira, E. van der Hoeven-Hangoor, I. B. van de Linde, R. C. Montijn, and J. M. B. M. van der Vossen ................................................................................................818 Dramatic differences in the response of macrophages from B2 and B19 MHC-defined haplotypes to interferon gamma and polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid stimulation Maisie E. Dawes, Lisa M. Griggs, Ellen W. Collisson, Worthie E. Briles, and Yvonne Drechsler ................................................................................................................830 Effects of dietary clays on performance and intestinal mucus barrier of broiler chicks challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and on goblet cell function in vitro J. A. S. Almeida, N. P. Ponnuraj, J. J. Lee, P. Utterback, H. R. Gaskins, R. N. Dilger, and J. E. Pettigrew ....................................................................................................................839 Transcriptome analysis reveals an activation of major histocompatibility complex 1 and 2 pathways in chicken trachea immunized with infectious laryngotracheitis virus vaccine Juan Luo, José A. Carrillo, Kimberly R. Menendez, Nathaniel L. Tablante, and Jiuzhou Song .......................................................................................................................848 Fluoroquinolone resistance and molecular characterization of gyrA and parC quinolone resistance- determining regions in Escherichia coli isolated from poultry M. Vanni, V. Meucci, R. Tognetti, P. Cagnardi, C. Montesissa, A. Piccirillo, A. M. Rossi, D. Di Bello, and L. Intorre ........................................................................................................856 Chicken NK-lysin is an alpha-helical cationic peptide that exerts its antibacterial activity through damage of bacterial cell membranes Mi Ok Lee, Hyun-Jun Jang, Jae Yong Han, and James E. Womack......................................... 864 Contribution of Salmonella Enteritidis virulence factors to intestinal colonization and systemic dissemination in 1-day-old chickens Tarek M. Addwebi, Douglas R. Call, and Devendra H. Shah ....................................................871 Arginine and vitamin E improve the immune response after a Salmonella challenge in broiler chicks X. Liu, J. A. Byrd, M. Farnell, and C. A. Ruiz-Feria ...............................................................882 Research Note Exposure of juvenile Leghorn chickens to lead acetate enhances antibiotic resistance in enteric bacterial flora M. Nisanian, S. D. Holladay, E. Karpuzoglu, R. P. Kerr, S. M. Williams, L. Stabler, J. Vaun McArthur, R. Cary Tuckfield, and R. M. Gogal Jr. ....................................................891 METABOLISM AND NUTRITION Effects of low ambient temperatures and dietary vitamin C supplement on growth performance, blood parameters, and antioxidant capacity of 21-day-old broilers X. Yang, Y. H. Luo, Q. F. Zeng, K. Y. Zhang, X. M. Ding, S. P. Bai, and J. P. Wang ...........898 Effect of calcium level and phytase addition on ileal phytate degradation and amino acid digestibility of broilers fed corn-based diets A. M. Amerah, P. W. Plumstead, L. P. Barnard, and A. Kumar .............................................906 Lactobacillus sakei modulates mule duck microbiota in ileum and ceca during overfeeding F. Vasaï, K. Brugirard Ricaud, L. Cauquil, P. Daniel, C. Peillod, K. Gontier, A. Tizaoui, O. Bouchez, S. Combes, and S. Davail .......................................................................................916 Understanding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Mother Hens' Uropygial Secretion Analogue) Sur Le Stress Des Poulets
    TTHHÈÈ SSEE En vue de l'obtention du DOCTORAT DE L’UNIV ERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE Délivré par L'Institut National Polytechnique Discipline ou spécialité : Pathologie, Toxicologie, Génétique & Nutrition Présentée et soutenue par Iltud MADEC Le 19 mai 2008 Titre : Effets du sémiochimique MHUSA (Mother Hens’ Uropygial Secretion Analogue) sur le stress des poulets de chair. Approches zootechnique, physiologique et comportementale. JURY Pr Jean DAYDE, Président. Pr Xavier MANTECA, Rapporteur. Pr Giovanni RE, Rapporteur. Pr Patrick PAGEAT, Tuteur. Dr Jean-François GABARROU, Tuteur. Pr Xavier FERNANDEZ, Membre. Dr Anne-Marie LESENEY, Membre. Ecole doctorale : Sciences Ecologiques, Vétérinaires, Agronomiques et Bioingéniéries Unité de recherche : Institut de Recherche Phérosynthèse, Ecole d'Ingénieurs de Purpan Directeur(s) de Thèse : Pr Vassilia THEODOROU Rapporteurs : MM. les Pr X. MANTECA et G. RE SOMMAIRE Remerciements Liste des publications Liste des sigles et abréviations Liste des illustrations INTRODUCTION Partie I : contexte de l’étude Partie II : objectifs de travail et résultats Partie III : discussion générale CONCLUSION Bibliographie Table des matières 1 « On aime sa mère presque sans le savoir, et on ne s’aperçoit de toute la profondeur des racines de cet amour qu’au moment de la séparation dernière. » Guy de Maupassant 2 Remerciements Ce mémoire n’est pas un aboutissement, mais une étape. Néanmoins ce moment marque, comme tous les moments forts d’une vie. Il faut maintenant passer à autre chose en se servant de cette dernière comme d’un atout. Cette étape m’a vu grandir et évoluer vers une certaine forme de maturité, j’espère en faire partager mon entourage. C’est ce dernier, tant professionnel que personnel (parfois les deux sont conjugués), que je souhaite remercier dans ce message.
    [Show full text]
  • Chickens As Patients - UEP2013 - VIN
    7/27/2020 Chickens as Patients - UEP2013 - VIN Chickens as Patients AAVAC-UPAV 2013 Anna Meredith, MA, VetMB, PhD, CertLAS, DZooMed, MRCVS Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK Introduction The keeping of non-commercial backyard poultry is increasing greatly in popularity. Ducks, geese, pheasants, guinea fowl and other species may all be kept, but chickens are probably the most common species presented in general practice. People keep chickens for different reasons, including just having a few hens for private egg production and consumption, breeding of exhibition or "fancy" birds, small layer or meat bird flocks, or as true pets that also help to weed the garden. Chicken owners will vary from very experienced to complete novices. For these types of poultry, the local small animal or mixed veterinary practitioner is likely to be called upon rather than an experienced commercial poultry vet, although this may well be after advice has been sought from the breeder, agricultural merchant or internet first and various treatments applied. Many owners become very attached to their birds and invest time and money in their care, and will expect their veterinary surgeon to be knowledgeable, able to advise on general husbandry and management and to treat any problems effectively. The domestic chicken is descended from the red junglefowl (Gallus gallus), but has been domesticated into a large variety of breeds. Choice of breed usually depends on the purpose of keeping the chicken. Bantams are often kept if space is limited; these are small varieties with correspondingly small eggs, and most large breeds have a bantam (miniature) version.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Feather Pecking and Cannibalism in Laying Hens Without
    CONTROLLING FEATHER PECKING & CANNIBALISM IN LAYING HENS WITHOUT BEAK TRIMMING A Compassion in World Farming Report by Heather Pickett MSc BSc (hons) October 2009, revised March 2011 Registered Charity No. 1095050 Compassion in World Farming is grateful to The Rufford Maurice Laing Foundation whose funding made this research possible. www.rufford.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Hens are often beak trimmed to reduce the risk of welfare problems caused by feather pecking and cannibalism. The consequences of beak trimming for welfare include trauma during the procedure, pain due to tissue damage and nerve injury, loss of normal function due to reduced ability to sense materials with the beak, and loss of integrity of a living animal. This report reviews the evidence from the scientific literature and from practical experience, which demonstrates that feather pecking and cannibalism can be controlled in non-cage systems without beak trimming through (i) the use of appropriate strains and selective breeding to further reduce the hens’ propensity to feather peck and (ii) good design of non-cage systems and implementation of a range of preventive management practices. Experience in other European countries where beak trimming has been prohibited indicates that, with experience, laying hens can be successfully managed in non-cage systems without beak trimming. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has repealed the ban on the beak trimming of laying hens in England, which was due to come into force on 1st January 2011. Instead, the government has merely banned the use of the hot blade method for beak-trimming, except in emergencies on-farm, while allowing beak-trimming by the infra-red (IR) beam method to continue.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Nutritional Factors on Feather Pecking Behaviour of Laying Hens in Non-Cage Housing Systems
    Impact of nutritional factors on feather pecking behaviour of laying hens in non-cage housing systems 1* 2 1 1 M.M. VAN KRIMPEN , R.P. KWAKKEL , G. ANDRÉ , C.M.C. VAN DER PEET-SCHWERING , L.A. 3,4 2 DEN HARTOG and M.W.A. VERSTEGEN 1Animal Production, Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen UR, PO Box 65, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands; 2Animal Nutrition Group, 3Animal Production Systems Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands and 4Nutreco R&D, PO Box 220, NL-5830 AE Boxmeer, The Netherlands *Corresponding author: [email protected] The expected bans on battery cages (EU) and beak trimming (e.g. The Netherlands) may cause an increased risk of feather pecking and cannibalism in layers. Many factors influence feather pecking behaviour, but in this review we will focus on nutritional factors. Dietary deficiencies, resulting in inaccurate delivery of nutrients, may increase feather pecking behaviour and cannibalism. Severe feather pecking has been demonstrated in birds that were fed too low mineral levels, protein levels or amino acid levels (methionine, arginine). Feeding high-NSP diets, low energy diets, or roughages reduced feather pecking. Providing additional grain or straw in the litter during rearing could result in lower levels of feather pecking behaviour in adult stages. Nutritional factors seem to reduce feather pecking behaviour in laying hens if these factors increase the time related to foraging, feed intake and satisfying. Laying hens may spend more time on these behaviours when they are fed 1) mash diets in stead of crumbles or pellets, 2) low energy diets, 3) high (in-)soluble fibre diets or 4) roughages.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Feather Cover a Guide to Reducing the Risk of Injurious Pecking Occurring in Non-Cage Laying Hens
    Improving Feather Cover A guide to reducing the risk of injurious pecking occurring in non-cage laying hens 2013 © University of Bristol Introduction This guide summarises strategies available to reduce the risk of injurious pecking occurring in non- cage laying hens during both rearing and laying. Beak-trimming and alterations to lighting are commonly practised to control injurious pecking, but these are not ideal in terms of bird welfare. The strategies discussed in this guide offer many ways of reducing the risk of injurious pecking occurring, which may also offer other benefits. Injurious pecking (IP) is an umbrella term covering a group of behaviours; gentle and severe feather pecking, vent pecking, and cannibalistic pecking. Gentle feather pecking (GFP) consists of gentle pecks to the tips of the feathers. This type of feather pecking (FP) usually does not result in much damage and is often ignored by the recipient. It can indicate a welfare problem in the bird performing the behaviour, and precede more serious pecking. Severe feather pecking (SFP) causes the most damage to Cannibalistic pecking occurs when SFP the recipient; it consists of forceful pecks and pulls of has led to feather loss and bald feathers that are frequently eaten and results in feather patches. Pecking can then continue on loss especially on the back, vent and tail area. Victims of the skin, leading to wounds and may SFP often initially move away, squawk or confront the eventually lead to the victim’s death pecker in response to receiving SFP, which are painful. If due to excessive blood loss, tissue SFP continues, however, victims have also been observed damage & infections.
    [Show full text]
  • Chów I Hodowla Zwierząt Gospodarskich Na Przestrzeni 70 Lat - Problemy I Wyzwania
    70 LAT g | 1950-2020 { m x z b Chów i hodowla zwierząt gospodarskich na przestrzeni 70 lat - problemy i wyzwania Zakład Hodowli Drobiu Zakład Hodowli Drobnego Inwentarza Instytutu Zootechniki PIB MONOGRAFIA Kraków 2020 Chów i hodowla zwierząt gospodarskich na przestrzeni 70 lat – problemy i wyzwania Zakład Hodowli Drobiu Zakład Hodowli Drobnego Inwentarza Instytutu Zootechniki PIB MONOGRAFIA Kraków 2020 1 INSTYTUT ZOOTECHNIKI PAŃSTWOWY INSTYTUT BADAWCZY 32-083 Balice, ul. Krakowska 1 tel. 12 3572500 fax 12 422 8065 www.izoo.krakow.pl facebook.com/IZOO.PIB twitter.com/iz_pib [email protected] Monografia pod redakcją: prof. dr hab. Dorota Kowalska dr hab. Katarzyna Połtowicz, prof. IZ PIB Recenzenci: prof. dr hab. Grażyna Jeżewska-Nitkowska prof. dr hab. Stanisław Socha Opracowanie redakcyjne: mgr Danuta Dobrowolska Opracowanie graficzne, projekt okładki i skład tekstu: mgr Bogusława Krawiec Fot. na okładce: archiwum Zakładu Hodowli Drobnego Inwentarza J. Calik, K. Anders ISBN 978-83-7607-353-8 © Copyright by Instytut Zootechniki PIB Ark. wyd. 15,1 Ark. druk. 14,4 Druk: Zespół Wydawnictw i Poligrafii IZ PIB 2 PRACE NAUKOWE Z ZAKRESU HODOWLI DROBIU I DROBNEGO INWENTARZA W INSTYTUCIE ZOOTECHNIKI PAŃSTWOWYM INSTYTUCIE BADAWCZYM 3 Spis treści Zakład Hodowli Drobiu ..................................................................... 5 Zakład Hodowli Drobnego Inwentarza ............................................. 121 4 Zakład Hodowli Drobiu 5 Spis treści rozdziału Zakład Hodowli Drobiu 1. Eugeniusz Herbut, Katarzyna Połtowicz: Rys historyczny ……………………………………………..…………… 7 2. Józefa Krawczyk, Jolanta Calik: Genetyka i bioróżnorodność drobiu …..………………………………… 17 3. Ewa Sosnówka-Czajka, Iwona Skomorucha: Systemy utrzymania a produkcyjność i dobrostan drobiu …….………..... 38 4. Iwona Skomorucha, Ewa Sosnówka-Czajka: Wpływ różnych technologii chowu na produkcyjność i dobrostan kurcząt brojlerów ………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Effects of Furnished Cages and Battery Cages on Behavioral Exhibitions in White Leghorn Chickens
    Research Note Furnished cage system and hen well-being: Comparative effects of furnished cages and battery cages on behavioral exhibitions in White Leghorn chickens K. Mile* and H.-W. Chengf' *Depai.tirient of Animal $renc:es. Purdue University. Wet Lafayette, IN 7907: (lad TLicstocJi Behacior Research Unit. USDA -Aqricuitwr'al Research Service. West Lafayette. IN 47907 ABSTRACT The battery cage system is being banned birds were housed per cage, providing a stocking den- ill European Union before or by 2012, and the fur- sity of 610 (-Ili 2 of floor space per bird. Behavioral ob- nished cage system will be the only cage system allowed servations were conducted using the Xoldus Observer after 2012. This stud y was conducted to exanune the software package. The birds were observed at 5-mm different effects of caging s ystems, furnished ('ages vs. intervals for the entire light period. The birds housed in battery cages, oil behaviors. One hundred ninety- battery cages had higher posture and behavioral transi- two 1 -d-old non-beak-trinuned I-Tv-Line \V-36 White tions and increased time spent walking and perform- chicks were reared using standard nianageinent ing exploratory behavior (P < 0.05. 0.01. respective- practices in raised wire cages. At 19 wk of age, the birds ly) which may indicate they were stressed. resulting were randomly assigned into battery cages or furnished iii restlessness. whereas the birds housed in furnished cages. The battery cages were commercial wire cages ('ages had higher levels of preening ( P < 0.05). Preen- containing 6 birds per cage.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 38Th International Congress of the Isae
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE ISAE Laura Hänninen & Anna Valros (editors) Helsinki, Finland 2004 274p. Published by ISAE 2004 Printed in Finland Copyright © ISAE 2004 Reprinted from Hänninen, L & Valros, A.(eds), Proceedings of the 38th International Congress of the ISAE (2004). Col.University of Helsinki, University of Kuopio and MTT Agri-Food Research Finland, Finland. Reprinted from Hänninen, L & Valros, A.(eds), Proceedings of the 38th International Congress of the ISAE (2004). Col.University of Helsinki, University of Kuopio and MTT Agri-Food Research Finland, Finland. CONTENTS CREDITS 4 CONGRESS SPONSORS 7 LOCAL MAP 8 INFORMATION ABOUT POSTER SESSIONS 10 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM 11 ABSTRACTS OF WOOD-GUSH MEMORIAL 28 AND PLENARIES ABSTRACTS OF ORAL PRESENTATIONS 38 ABSTRACTS OF POSTERS 145 INDEX 257 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 265 3 Reprinted from Hänninen, L & Valros, A.(eds), Proceedings of the 38th International Congress of the ISAE (2004). Col.University of Helsinki, University of Kuopio and MTT Agri-Food Research Finland, Finland. CREDITS ORGANIZING INSTITUTES University of Helsinki University of Kuopio MTT, Agrifood Research Finland PROCEEDINGS SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON Jaakko Mononen SECRETARY Anna Valros MEMBERS Hannu Saloniemi, Timo Nevalainen, Asko Mäki-Tanila, Teppo Rekilä, Hannu Korhonen, Risto Kauppinen, Eila Kaliste, Leena Ahola EDITORS Laura Hänninen & Anna Valros LAYOUT Liana Simonen LOGO AND COVER DESIGN Pate Pesonius 4 Reprinted from Hänninen, L & Valros, A.(eds), Proceedings of the 38th International Congress of the ISAE (2004). Col.University of Helsinki, University of Kuopio and MTT Agri-Food Research Finland, Finland. IN ADDITION TO THE SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZING COMMITTEE SEVERAL PERSONS HAVE BEEN REVIEWING ABTSRACTS.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Egg Tip
    The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences / Athens, Georgia 30602-4356 NOVEMBER 2010 COMMERCIAL EGG TIP . A BRIEF LOOK AT DIFFERENT HOUSING SYSTEMS FOR COMMERCIAL LAYERS Concerns for laying hens’ welfare began in the 1960’s and led to an aversion to eggs produced by hens housed in conventional battery cages. As a result the European Union (EU) has banned the use of battery cages beginning in January 2012. This move has resulted in the development of alternative housing systems for laying hens. While the EU ban does not currently apply to the commercial egg producers in the United States, some states have made moves towards banning the use of battery cages for laying hens, the most recent being California. With the passing of Proposition 2 in California there has been a renewed effort to develop alternative housing systems to meet all the requirements of good hen welfare. A number of different systems are currently being used to house laying hens, but the majority of laying hens in the US are still housed in conventional cages. Each of the systems used have advantages and disadvantages that vary based on location, management, and genetic strain of the hens. Conventional Cage Housing System Conventional battery cages for laying hens were first developed in the US during the 1920s to 1930s. The system was developed to reduce the incidence of disease and parasites and also to reduce cannibalistic pecking. Cages makes management of the birds easier and requires less space than the other systems. No bedding material is used in this system as the cages are suspended above the floor allowing the bird droppings to fall through the mesh floors and collect below the cages.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives to the Barren Battery Cage for the Housing of Laying Hens in the European Union
    ALTERNATIVES TO THE BARREN BATTERY CAGE FOR THE HOUSING OF LAYING HENS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A report by Compassion in World Farming 3 2007 © Dale Arey (CIWF) ALTERNATIVES TO THE BARREN BATTERY CAGE FOR THE HOUSING OF LAYING HENS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A report by Compassion in World Farming Written by Heather Pickett BSc (Hons) MSc 2007 © Compassion in World Farming, 007 ISBN 900 56 407 Compassion in World Farming nd Floor, River Court, Mill Lane, Godalming, Surrey GU7 EZ, UK Tel: +44(0)483 5950 Fax: +44(0)483 86639 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ciwf.org.uk Registered Charity Number 095050; a Company limited by Guarantee, registered number 4590804. 3 Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 8 2. Alternatives to the barren battery cage for the housing of laying hens in the European Union 8 2. ‘Enriched’ cages 8 2. Non-cage systems 9 3. The ability of ‘enriched’ cages and non-cage systems to meet the behavioural needs of hens 10 3. The natural behaviour and cognitive abilities of hens 10 3. Nesting 10 3.3 Foraging and dustbathing 13 3.4 Perching 15 3.5 Space requirements and social group size 16 4. Addressing key welfare concerns in ‘enriched’ cages and non-cage systems 19 4. Feather pecking and cannibalism 19 4. Bone strength and fractures 23 4.3 Mortality 24 5. Overall comparison of welfare in ‘enriched’ cages and non-cage systems 25 6. Economics of changing to non-cage systems 27 6. Production costs in non-cage systems 27 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Feather Pecking in Organic Rearing Hens
    Feather pecking in organic rearing hens M. Bestman and J.P. Wagenaar Abstract – Feather pecking is the main welfare prob- METHODS lem in organic laying hens. Several studies showed For our study we concentrated on 10 different rear- that rearing factors are of crucial importance for ing farms, who were contracted by 3 hatcheries. We feather pecking not only during rearing, but also monitored 29 flocks of pullets on these 10 farms. during the laying period. In order to collect back- However, some of our 29 flocks have spend their ground information for our handbook about organic first weeks on another farm. Therefore, in our study pullet rearing, we collected data from 29 flocks from week 1 to week 30. We wanted to know the degree of 19 different farms were involved that did warm feather pecking during rearing, risk factors for feather rearing and 10 different farms that did cold rearing. pecking and the persistence of feather pecking There was some overlap between the 19 warm and throughout the whole life. Feather pecking was seen the 10 cold rearing farms, formed by the farms that in 54% of the rearing flocks, although symptoms could do both. Finally, the hens raised on our ‘study’ were very subtle. The main risk factor was high den- farms went to 29 different laying farms. sity during the first 4 weeks of life. Finally, feather We collected data from week 1 to week 30 about pecking once started during rearing, seems to be very management, housing and feather pecking damage. persistent throughout the whole life.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Sciences 52.Indb
    Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW Animal Science No 52 Warsaw 2013 Contents BRZOZOWSKI M., STRZEMECKI P. GŁOGOWSKI R., DZIERŻANOWSKA- Estimation the effectiveness of probiot- -GÓRYŃ D., RAK K. The effect of di- ics as a factor infl uencing the results of etary fat source on feed digestibility in fattening rabbits 7 chinchillas (Chinchilla lanigera) 23 DAMAZIAK K., RIEDEL J., MICHAL- GRODZIK M. Changes in glioblastoma CZUK M., KUREK A. Comparison of multiforme ultrastructure after diamond the laying and egg weight of laying hens nanoparticles treatment. Experimental in two types of cages 13 model in ovo 29 JARMUŁ-PIETRASZCZYK J., GÓR- ŁOJEK J., ŁOJEK A., SOBORSKA J. SKA K., KAMIONEK M., ZAWIT- Effect of classic massage therapy on the KOWSKI J. The occurrence of ento- heart rate of horses working in hippo- mopathogenic fungi in the Chojnowski therapy. Case study 105 Landscape Park in Poland 37 ŁUKASIEWICZ M., MROCZEK- KAMASZEWSKI M., OSTASZEW- -SOSNOWSKA N., WNUK A., KAMA- SKA T. The effect of feeding on ami- SZEWSKI M., ADAMEK D., TARASE- nopeptidase and non-specifi c esterase WICZ L., ŽUFFA P., NIEMIEC J. Histo- activity in the digestive system of pike- logical profi le of breast and leg muscles -perch (Sander lucioperca L.) 49 of Silkies chickens and of slow-growing KNIŻEWSKA W., REKIEL A. Changes Hubbard JA 957 broilers 113 in the size of population of the European MADRAS-MAJEWSKA B., OCHNIO L., wild boar Sus scrofa L. in the selected OCHNIO M., ŚCIEGOSZ J. Comparison voivodeships in Poland during the years of components and number of Nosema sp.
    [Show full text]