County Profile INTRODUCTION COUNTY PROFILE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Handbook Publication.Pub
Table of Contents Maui County’s Landscape and Gardening Handbook Xeriscaping in Maui County ................................................................. 1 Planning and Design................................................................................................................. 1 Hydro-zones.............................................................................................................................. 1 Plant Selection and the Maui jkCounty Planting Zones............................................................ 2 Soil Preparation ........................................................................................................................ 4 Mulching.................................................................................................................................... 5 Irrigation .................................................................................................................................... 5 Maintenance ............................................................................................................................. 7 Other Interesting Techniques for the Ambitious ..................................... 8 Xeriscape Ponds....................................................................................................................... 8 Aquaponics in the Backyard ..................................................................................................... 9 Water Polymer Crystals ........................................................................................................... -
Geology of Hawaii Reefs
11 Geology of Hawaii Reefs Charles H. Fletcher, Chris Bochicchio, Chris L. Conger, Mary S. Engels, Eden J. Feirstein, Neil Frazer, Craig R. Glenn, Richard W. Grigg, Eric E. Grossman, Jodi N. Harney, Ebitari Isoun, Colin V. Murray-Wallace, John J. Rooney, Ken H. Rubin, Clark E. Sherman, and Sean Vitousek 11.1 Geologic Framework The eight main islands in the state: Hawaii, Maui, Kahoolawe , Lanai , Molokai , Oahu , Kauai , of the Hawaii Islands and Niihau , make up 99% of the land area of the Hawaii Archipelago. The remainder comprises 11.1.1 Introduction 124 small volcanic and carbonate islets offshore The Hawaii hot spot lies in the mantle under, or of the main islands, and to the northwest. Each just to the south of, the Big Island of Hawaii. Two main island is the top of one or more massive active subaerial volcanoes and one active submarine shield volcanoes (named after their long low pro- volcano reveal its productivity. Centrally located on file like a warriors shield) extending thousands of the Pacific Plate, the hot spot is the source of the meters to the seafloor below. Mauna Kea , on the Hawaii Island Archipelago and its northern arm, the island of Hawaii, stands 4,200 m above sea level Emperor Seamount Chain (Fig. 11.1). and 9,450 m from seafloor to summit, taller than This system of high volcanic islands and asso- any other mountain on Earth from base to peak. ciated reefs, banks, atolls, sandy shoals, and Mauna Loa , the “long” mountain, is the most seamounts spans over 30° of latitude across the massive single topographic feature on the planet. -
Topographic History of the Maui Nui Complex, Hawai'i, and Its Implications for Biogeography1
Topographic History ofthe Maui Nui Complex, Hawai'i, and Its Implications for Biogeography 1 Jonathan Paul Price 2,4 and Deborah Elliott-Fisk3 Abstract: The Maui Nui complex of the Hawaiian Islands consists of the islands of Maui, Moloka'i, Lana'i, and Kaho'olawe, which were connected as a single landmass in the past. Aspects of volcanic landform construction, island subsi dence, and erosion were modeled to reconstruct the physical history of this complex. This model estimates the timing, duration, and topographic attributes of different island configurations by accounting for volcano growth and subsi dence, changes in sea level, and geomorphological processes. The model indi cates that Maui Nui was a single landmass that reached its maximum areal extent around 1.2 Ma, when it was larger than the current island of Hawai'i. As subsi dence ensued, the island divided during high sea stands of interglacial periods starting around 0.6 Ma; however during lower sea stands of glacial periods, islands reunited. The net effect is that the Maui Nui complex was a single large landmass for more than 75% of its history and included a high proportion of lowland area compared with the contemporary landscape. Because the Hawaiian Archipelago is an isolated system where most of the biota is a result of in situ evolution, landscape history is an important detertninant of biogeographic pat terns. Maui Nui's historical landscape contrasts sharply with the current land scape but is equally relevant to biogeographical analyses. THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS present an ideal logic histories that can be reconstructed more setting in which to weigh the relative influ easily and accurately than in most regions. -
Maui County Tourism Industry Strategic Plan 2017-2026 Maui County Tourism Industry Strategic Plan 2017-2026
MAUI COUNTY TOURISM INDUSTRY STRATEGIC PLAN 2017-2026 Volume 1: Maui County Tourism Overview and Plan Maui County Tourism Industry Strategic Plan 2017-2026 Maui County Tourism Industry Strategic Plan 2017-2026 Contents I. Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 1 II. Introduction and Background ............................................................................ 5 A. Purpose of the Plan .................................................................................................................. 5 B. State and County Plans ............................................................................................................ 6 C. Development Process .............................................................................................................. 6 D. Guiding Principles .................................................................................................................... 6 E. Implementation Framework .................................................................................................... 7 III. Overview of Tourism ......................................................................................... 8 A. State Level ................................................................................................................................ 8 1. Historical Trends ................................................................................................................ 8 2. Vital Issues Facing Hawai‘i -
MAUI NUI DESTINATION MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN 2021–2023 Contents
MAUI NUI DESTINATION MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN 2021–2023 Contents 2 I. INTRODUCTION 20 VI. MOLOKA‘I DESTINATION MANAGEMENT 2 Purpose of the Plan ACTION PLAN 4 Formation of the DMAP 20 Moloka‘i Tourism Situation Analysis 5 Implementation Framework 22 Vision for Moloka‘i’s Tourism 6 II. OVERVIEW OF TOURISM IN HAWAI‘I 22 Moloka‘i Destination Management Actions 6 Overall Trends 28 Moloka‘i Tourism Hotspots 7 Tourism Forecast 30 VII. LĀNA‘I DESTINATION MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN 7 Resident Sentiment 30 Lāna‘i Tourism Situation Analysis 8 III. GOAL 32 Vision for Lāna‘i’s Tourism 8 IV. OBJECTIVES 32 Lāna‘i Destination Management Actions 10 V. MAUI DESTINATION MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN 38 Lāna‘i Tourism Hotspots 10 Maui Tourism Situation Analysis 12 Vision for Maui Tourism 39 Acknowledgement 12 Maui Destination Management Actions 41 Glossary 18 Maui Actions for Future Consideration 42 Sources 18 Maui’s Tourism Hotspots 1 I. Introduction PURPOSE OF THE PLAN In 2019, the Hawaiian Islands received a record high of 10.4 million visitors. While this brought in $17.75 billion in total visitor spending to Hawai‘i’s businesses, generated $2.07 billion in taxes, and supported 216,000 jobs statewide, it also put pressure on some of our destinations and communities. This situa- tion is not unique to Hawai‘i. Other popular destinations—from Venice, Italy to Machu Picchu, Peru, to Kyoto, Japan—have also felt the negative efects of tourism, which not only impacts residents’ quality of life but also the quality of the visitor experience. 2 MAUI NUI DESTINATION MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN 2021–2023 In recognition of these challenges, the Hawai‘i Tour- The idea of “regenerative tourism” gained momentum ism Authority (HTA), in partnership with the coun- in 2020, as the global COVID-19 pandemic increased ties and the respective visitor bureaus, initiated the awareness of tourism’s opportunities and vulnerabili- process of developing community-based Destination ties. -
Department of the Interior
Vol. 77 Monday, No. 112 June 11, 2012 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing 38 Species on Molokai, Lanai, and Maui as Endangered and Designating Critical Habitat on Molokai, Lanai, Maui, and Kahoolawe for 135 Species; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:18 Jun 08, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\11JNP2.SGM 11JNP2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS6 34464 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR writing, at the address shown in the FOR • Reaffirm the listing for two listed FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section plants with taxonomic changes. Fish and Wildlife Service by July 26, 2012. • Designate critical habitat for 37 of ADDRESSES: You may submit comments the 38 proposed species and for the two 50 CFR Part 17 by one of the following methods: listed plants with taxonomic changes. • • Revise designated critical habitat [Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2011–0098; MO Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 92210–0–0009] www.regulations.gov. Search for FWS– for 85 listed plants. R1–ES–2011–0098, which is the docket • Designate critical habitat for 11 RIN 1018–AX14 number for this proposed rule. listed plants and animals that do not • U.S. mail or hand delivery: Public have designated critical habitat on these Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–R1– islands. and Plants; Listing 38 Species on ES–2011–0098; Division of Policy and One or more of the 38 proposed Molokai, Lanai, and Maui as Directives Management; U.S. -
Maui Field Trip
MAUI FIELD TRIP John Sinton University of Hawai‘i Department of Earth Sciences April, 2019 1 Cover image: Landsat 7 mosaic; courtesy of NASA Hawai‘i Infomart Project 2 Introduction The following describes field excursions of geological interest on the island of Maui, Hawai‘i. These excursions can be done in almost any sequence or direction of travel. Aspects of Hawaiian volcano evolution, structure, and petrology are emphasized. To do all of the excursions requires four or more full days, depending on the speed, energy and enthusiasm of the field tripper. A circle trip around West Maui, the older of the two volcanoes that make up the island, is described in the first excursion, along with notes on the Quaternary deposits found on the isthmus that separates West Maui and East Maui volcanoes. Trips on East Maui Volcano include Haleakalā Crater, the upper SW rift zone, and the lower SW rift zone. Other stops of geological interest, particularly along the road from Kahului to Kaupō via Ke‘anae and Hāna (E. Maui) are accessible by private automobile. Suggested stops along this road are given in Stearns [1942a]. This guide relies heavily on work by Stearns and Macdonald [1942], Macdonald and Katsura [1964], Macdonald and Powers [1968], Macdonald [1978], Kyselka and Lanterman [1980], Pukui et al. [1981], Diller [1982], Sinton et al. [1987], Bergmanis [1998], Sterling [1998], Bergmanis et al. [2000], Sherrod et al. [2003; 2007] and unpublished data from a variety of sources. The life cycle of most Hawaiian volcanoes is generally considered to involve four main eruptive stages: 1) an early submarine (seamount) stage (Lō‘ihi is the only known presently active example); 2) the main subaerial shield-building stage; 3) an alkalic, postshield “capping” stage, and 4) in some cases a rejuvenated stage of alkalic basalts that generally accounts for <1% of the total volume. -
Annual Report on Operations July 1, 2005 - June 30, 2006
MAUI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD, INC. Annual Report on Operations July 1, 2005 - June 30, 2006 Strengthen Diversify Honor MAUI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD, INC. Annual Report on Operations July 1, 2005 - June 30, 2006 Our Vision A future in which abundant opportunities for rewarding employment are met by a qualified, resident workforce in Maui County, a community which honors its cultural heritage and natural environment Our Mission To provide leadership and vision in our community for the responsible design and development of a strong, sustainable, and diversified economy for Maui County EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Every MEDB year seems to take on a character of its own. The 2005-2006 year was no exception. Ke alahele, Hawaiian for “pathway,” set the theme for our major endeavors, the most prominent of which was the completion of our new home—and pathway. The arduous journey that began nearly four years ago gave way to a memorable blessing and celebration. We started down another path this year, with the launch of the MEDB Ke Alahele Education Fund. Grantmaking to strengthen science and technology education is the natural next step for MEDB. Targeted to educators and students, the fund builds on our history of education and workforce preparation for the 21st Century. Thanks to the dedication of the Education Committee headed by Curt Leonard and Michael Reiley, we reached our first-year goal in just two weeks. Yet another opportunity came forward this year, causing us to take a different turn on a path we were already on. We have managed the AMOS Conference for the Air Force Research Laboratory since 1999. -
Dear Budget and Finance Committee, I Am Writing to Express Support For
BF Committee From: allenvivian <[email protected] > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 9:05 AM To: BF Committee Subject: County funds for land trust Dear Budget and Finance Committee, I am writing to express support for budgeting the maximum amount of monies for future purchase of Hawaii lands for placement into trust. Preservation and protection of Hawaiian lands and resources are very important for the community of Hana and Maui County as a whole. I also encourage a long term approach to identifying and prioritizing future funding and acquisition of Island resources for generations to come. Sincerely, Allen Greenfield 248-8555 BF Committee From: Na Hale 0 Maui <[email protected] > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 12:21 PM To: BE Committee Subject: FW: Support letter to Budget & Finance for $1 Million for Na Hale 0 Maui From: Andrea Sisouvong [mailto:petitsoleil .maui@gmail .com] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 12:16 PM To: info©nahaleomaui.org Subject: Support letter to Budget & Finance To Hon. Rikki Hokama, Chair Budget & Finance Committee 200 S. High Street Wailuku, HI 96793 Reg. $1,000,000 for Housing and Land Enterprise of Maui, Na Hale 0 Maui Kahoma Homes Aloha Chair Hokama and Members of the Budget & Finance Committee, We are a Ohana of Five and live in Wailuku. My Husband works at the Westin KORV and commutes daily from Wailuku to Kaanapali. His commutes can take up to 3 hours daily. On a good day without any street / weather accident. We are asking for your support for Na Hale 0 Maui's request for $1 million from the Affordable Housing Fund to help fund the Kahoma Homes. -
Mauna Loa, Hawaii
Life and Death Kure Atoll (30 Ma) of Hawaiian Gardner Pinnacles (12 Ma) meo SeamountsEmperor Volcanoes Kauai (4-5 Ma) Mauna Loa, Hawaii (<1 Ma) Pacific Plate Hawaiian Ridge Kilauea, Hawaii (<0.6 Ma) Hawaiian hotspot (28 Ma) Midway Pearl & 500 km Hermes Reef Northwest Hawaiian Islands Pacific plate Kure 9-10 cm/yr N Pioneer Bank (20 Ma) Laysan (12 Ma) Raita Gardner Salmon Pinnacles Bank St. Rogatien Lisianski Northampton (10 Ma) Maro Reef Mokumanamana Nihoa Main Hawaiian Islands Middle Brooks Bank Bank French (4-6 Ma) Frigate Kaua’i Shoals Keoea Twin (12 Ma) Banks O’ahu Pacific plate Moloka’i Emperor 9-10 cm/yr Seamounts Maui Hawaiian Ni’ihau Ridge Necker Ridge (0-1 Ma) Area Lana’i of Hawai’i map Kaho’olawe Mid-Pacific Mountains Pacific Ocean Horizon Guyot Hawaiian hotspot Salmon Pearl & Pioneer Northampton Laysan Kure Midway Bank Hermes Reef Lisianski Maro NW Bank West East SE 0 -2000 Elevation (m) -4000 2700 2650 2600 2550 2500 2450 2400 2350 2300 2250 2200 2150 2100 2050 2000 1950 1900 1850 1800 1750 1700 Gardner French Frigate St. Rogatien Brooks Twin Middle NW Raita Pinnacles Bank Shoals Mokumanamana Keoea Banks Nihoa Bank SE 0 -2000 -4000 Elevation (m) 1650 1600 1550 1500 1450 1400 1350 1300 1250 1200 1150 1100 1050 1000 950 900 850 800 750 700 Mauna Kea Mauna Loa 4000 Haleakala Hualalai East West 2000 Kaua‘i Wai‘anae West Moloka‘i Maui Lana‘i Kohala Kilauea Ni‘ihau Ko‘olau Moloka‘i Kaho‘olawe 0 NW SE Mahukona Lo‘ihi Elevation (m) -2000 -4000 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Distance from Kilauea (km) Figure 1. -
Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation for Maui Nui
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR MAUI NUI Draft | 14 January 2013 prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 N. Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 prepared by: Industrial Economics, Incorporated 2067 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02140 Draft Economic Analysis – January 14, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1 Introduction 1-1 1.2 Economic Activities Considered in this Analysis 1-4 1.3 Summary of Conclusions 1-4 1.4 Organization of the Report 1-9 CHAPTER 2 FRAMEWORK FOR THE ANALYSIS 2.1 Background 2-2 2.2 Categories of Potential Economic Effects of Species Conservation 2-4 2.3 Analytic Framework and Scope of the Analysis 2-7 2.4 Information Sources 2-20 2.5 Presentation of Results 2-21 CHAPTER 3 DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 3.1 Introduction and Regulatory Overview 3-3 3.2 Scope and Scale of Future Development within the Proposed Critical Habitat 3-9 3.3 Economic Impacts of Critical Habitat on Development Activities 3-14 3.4 Assumptions and Limitations 3-22 CHAPTER 4 ENERGY PROJECTS 4.1 Introduction and Regulatory Overview 4-2 4.2 Scope and Scale of Renewable Energy Projects within Proposed Critical Habitat 4-5 4.3 Economic Impacts of Critical Habitat Designation on Energy Projects 4-8 4.4 Assumptions and Limitations 4-13 CHAPTER 5 GRAZING AND FARMING ACTIVITIES 5.1 Introduction and Regulatory Overview 5-3 5.2 Scope and Scale of Grazing and Farming Activities within the Proposed Critical Habitat Area 5-8 5.3 Economic Impacts of Critical Habitat on Grazing and Farming -
Reef Predator Movements at the Molokini MLCD and the Greater
Reef Predator Movements at the Molokini Marine Life Conservation District (MLCD) and the greater Maui Nui Complex Alan Friedlander1, Alexander Filous1, and Russell Sparks2 1Fisheries Ecology Research Lab, Department of Biology, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822 2Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Aquatic Resources, 130 Mahalani Street Wailuku, HI 96793 Introduction From November 2013 to August 2015, the movement patterns of five species of predators including, White Tip Reef Shark (Triaenodon obesus), Grey Reef Shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos), Ulua (Caranx ignobilis), Omilu (Caranx melampygus) and Uku (Aprion virscens) were studied with passive acoustic telemetry. The objective of this study was to describe the movement and residency of these species within the Molokini Marine Life Conservation District (MLCD). Acoustic array design An array of acoustic monitors was used to track the movements of predators in the Molokini MLCD. Seven receivers were deployed around the Molokini MLCD and 18 receivers were in place around Maui and Kahoolawe. The array allowed us to document predator movements within the Molokini MLCD and also look at large-scale movements among the islands of Maui Nui (Figure 1). Fish capture and transmiter deployment Predators in the MLCD were captured with hook and line and tagged with Vemco V-13 coded transmitters surgically implanted into the body cavity of each animal through a 2 cm incision in the abdominal wall and tagged with a conventional dart tag. Movement patterns of each species in the MLCD Omilu are primarily active in subzone A of the MLCD during day light hours and on average were present during 77% of the days they were monitored.