Alternative Voices in Muslim Southeast Asia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alternative Voices in Muslim Southeast Asia Index Note: Page numbers followed by “n” refer to endnotes A Ahmad, Mahmud, 70 AAII. See Ahmadiyah Anjuman Ahmad, Mirza Mubarak, 215 Isha’at Islam Ahmad, Muhammad Ariff, 70, 74, 75 Abbas Taha, Haji, 25 Ahmad, Shahnon, 76 Abduh, Muhammad, 25, 206, 209 Ahmad, Zainal Abidin Bin, 73 Abdulgani, Roeslan, 211 ajaran sesat (deviant teachings), 41 Abdullah Badawi, 5, 6, 119 Akyol, Mustafa, 127 Abou El Fadl, Khaled, 95 al-Afghani, Jamal al-Din, 25, 98 Aceh Freedom Movement. See Alatas, Syed Farid, 127 Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (GAM) Alatas, Syed Hussein, 26, 77, 90, 102, Administration of Islamic Law, 168 121 Administration of Muslim Law Act Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib, 5 (AMLA), 41, 56 Al-Azmeh, Aziz, 89 Ahmad Abdullah, Syeikh, 25 al-Banjari, Muhammad Arsyad, 161 Ahmad, Dzulfefly, 132 Albar, Syed Hamid, 165 Ahmadiyah, 190, 191 alcohol consumption, by Muslim Arab-educated vs. Dutch-educated youth, 24 scholars, 203–7 al-Hadi, Syed Sheikh, 70, 71, 72 influences in Indonesia, 199–200, Ali, Abdul Mukti, 199 207–13 Aliran Kebatinan, 184 Islamic revivalism, 199, 215 Aliran Kepercayaan, 184 Lahore branch, 200 Alisjahbana, Sutan Takdir, 73 receptive attitude towards in al-Kalali, Sheikh Muhammad Salim, Indonesia, 200–203 25 Ahmadiyah Anjuman Isha’at Islam al-Minangkabawi Khatib, Sheikh (AAII), 200 Ahmad, 24–25 Ahmad, Kassim, 76 Al-Qaradawi, Yusof, 129 221 13 AlternativeVoices_IndexIT-1P.indd 221 13/11/19 6:52 pm 222 Index American Muslim communities, 96 Buang, Saedah, 80 Aminurashid, Harun, 70 Buehler, Michael, 143 AMLA. See Administration of Muslim Bush, George W., 6 Law Act (AMLA) Ampera, Kapitra, 145, 146 C Amrullah, Sheikh Abdul Karim, 25 CASIS. See Centre for Advanced Anak Panglima Awang (1961), 73 Studies on Islam, Science, and An’Naim, Abdullahi, 29, 95 Civilisation (CASIS) Anwar, Chairil, 73 ‘Catholic’ Islam, 111 Anwar, Zainah, 29, 126, 127 Centre for Advanced Studies on Arab-educated vs. Dutch-educated Islam, Science, and Civilisation scholars, 203–7 (CASIS), 5 Arabism, in Singapore, 59 CEP. See Council of Eminent Persons arabization, 6, 118 (CEP) Asha’arism, 156–57 Chopp, Rebecca S., 95 Asnawi, Ahmadi, 160 Christianity, 209, 210–11 Association of Women Lawyers civilizational Islam, 120 (AWL), 125 civil law, 56, 57 atheism, 39, 148, 210, 215 civil society organizations (CSOs), Awang, Usman, 72, 76 12, 147 AWL. See Association of Women IKRAM Foundation, 12–13 Lawyers (AWL) Kairos Dialogue Network, 13–15 Ayub, Nisha, 132 Projek Dialog, 11–12 Committee for Islamic Institutional B Reforms, 159 Babu Sahid, Moulavi M.H., 26 Communist Party of Indonesia (PKI), Badawi, Abdullah Ahmad, 131, 191 179n46 conservatism, 11, 15, 40, 118, 142–46, Bakor Pakem, 191, 197n37 149–51 Bangsa Melayu Singapura Dalam Constitutional Court, 184, 186, 187, Transformasi Budayanya 191, 192 (Suratman Markasan), 26 Council of Eminent Persons (CEP), Barisan Nasional government, 12, 119 159 Barton, Greg, 13 Crescent Star Party, 146 Berger, Peter L., 17 customary law, 186, 189 bineka (diversity) citizenship, 187, 194 D Birth of Jesus in the Light of the Qur’an Dahlan, Kyai Hj Ahmad, 25 (Basharat Ahmad), 210 Bisri, Mustofa, 141 DDII. See Dewan Dakwah Islamiyah Boff, Leonardo, 95 Indonesia (DDII) 13 AlternativeVoices_IndexIT-1P.indd 222 13/11/19 6:52 pm Index 223 Decline of Liberalism as an Ideology, The Gerakan Ahmadiyah Indonesia (Hallowell), 93 (GAI), 200 Defending Islam Act, 139 Ghulam Ahmad, Mirza, 200, 205, 210, Department of Islamic Development 211 Malaysia (JAKIM), 118, 119, 122, Golkar Party, 21 126 Gospel of Action, The (Kamal-ud-Din), Dewan Dakwah Islamiyah Indonesia 205, 211 (DDII), 213 Gul, Abdullah, 127 Dingemans, L.F., 201 Gutiérrez, Gustavo, 95 divorce in Islam, 204 Djojosoegito, R. Ng., 202 H halal, 4–5, 19, 34, 57 E Halida, Rizka, 144 Eck, Diana L., 17 Halil, Rasiah, 70, 80 “Een Ereschuld” (debt of honour), Hallowell, John H., 93 201 Hamid, A. Ghani, 78 Embong, Ghazali, 163 Hamzah, Amir, 73 Engineer, Asghar Ali, 29 haram, 19, 160 Ethical Policy, 201, 202 Harmony Bill, 191 European Muslims, 18 Hashemi, Nader, 95 Hassan, Ibrahim Azmi, 162 F Hassan, Ustaz Ahmad, 26 Faisal Tehrani, 6 Het Licht (journal), 207 Faruqi, Ismail, 5 hibah ruqbah (rukbah-gift), 46 Faruqi, Shad Saleem, 121, 159 Himpunan Mahasiswa Indonesia Fealy, Greg, 140, 141 (HMI), 40 Federal Constitution, 160 HINDRAF. See Hindu Rights Action Federal Territories Religious Force (HINDRAF) Department (JAWI), 127 Hindu Rights Action Force Freedom Papua Organization. See (HINDRAF), 6 Organisasi Papua Merdeka Hisyam, Usama, 145 (OPM) Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI), Fromm, Erich, 67 146–47 HMI. See Himpunan Mahasiswa G Indonesia (HMI) Gabungan Bertindak Malaysia Holy Qur’an, The (Muhammad Ali), (GBM), 13 210 GAI. See Gerakan Ahmadiyah humanism, 76–81 Indonesia (GAI) Human Rights Commission of Gandhi, Indira, 167, 171 Malaysia (SUHAKAM), 164 Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (GAM), 193 human rights issues in Indonesia 13 AlternativeVoices_IndexIT-1P.indd 223 13/11/19 6:52 pm 224 Index hierarchy and discrimination, non-Muslims, 144 189–92 Nusantara Islam, 59 political identity and populism, Pancasila vs. Islamists, 146–49 184–87 Perppu Ormas, 147 Hussin, Zaleha, 163 pornography bill, 148 post-1998 democratization, 140 I presidential election of 2019, 140 Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab, Muhammad, religious education, 151 111 religious intolerance, 144 Ibn Khaldun’s socio-historical 212 movement, 145–47 method, 103 Yudhoyono, Susilo Bambang, 143 ICCR. See International Covenant on Indonesian Democratic Party of Civil and Political Rights (ICCR) Struggle, 145 ICERD. See International Convention Indonesian Islamic Propagation on the Elimination of All Forms Council, 213 of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) Indonesian Muslim organizations, Idenburg, A.W.F., 201 142 IFSO. See International Federation of Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI), Students Organisations (IFSO) 139, 145 IIUM. See International Islamic Institute of the Malay World and University of Malaysia (IIUM) Civilization (ATMA), 124 ijtihad (reasoning), 26 Institutional Reforms Committee IKRAM (IKRAM Foundation (IRC), 159 Malaysia), 12–13 Intellectuals in Developing Societies, Indonesia 92 Ahmadiyah Community, 200 International Convention on the changing religious-political Elimination of All Forms of landscape, 140–42 Racial Discrimination (ICERD), civil society organizations, 147 7, 12, 131 conservatism, 142, 150 International Covenant on Civil and democracy and conservatism, Political Rights (ICCR), 169, 149–52 188 elections and intolerance, 143–46 International Federation of Students Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, 146–47 Organisations (IFSO), 40 Indonesian Ulama Council, 139, 145 International Institute of Islamic Jakarta gubernatorial election Thought and Civilization (2017), 143 (ISTAC), 5 literary scene, 73 International Islamic University of Muhammadiyah, 141 Malaysia (IIUM), 126 Nahdlatul Ulama, 141 inter-religious marriage, 39, 142 National Awakening Party, 141 Iranian revolution of 1979, 4, 40, 161 13 AlternativeVoices_IndexIT-1P.indd 224 13/11/19 6:52 pm Index 225 IRC. See Institutional Reforms Fazlur Rahman’s categorization of, Committee (IRC) 214 IRF. See Islamic Renaissance Front in Indonesia, 200, 204–5, 215 (IRF) 1979 Islamic Revolution, 157, 158 ISIS. See Islamic State in Iraq and Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Syria (ISIS) 120 Islam Berkemajuan (Modern Islam), Islamism, 4, 111, 145 120 Islamization, 28, 42 Islam Hadhari (Civilizational Islam), “Islam on slavery”, 204 5, 120 Islams and Modernities (Al-Azmeh), Islam Nusantara (Archipelagic Islam), 89 120 Islam, Songkok dan Bahasa (Maarof Islam Wasatiyyah (Moderate Islam), Salleh), 26 120 Ismail, A. Samad, 72 Islamic Boarding School Foundation, Ismail, Hamed, 70 213 ISTAC. See Islamic Institute of Islamic discourse in Malaysia, Thought and Civilisation 119–27 (ISTAC) “arabization”, 118 foreign speakers, 127–29 J Islamic institutions, 122–23 Jaafariyyahs, 160, 163, 165 Islamic NGOs, 118 JAI. See Jemaat Ahmadiyah Indonesia Pakatan Harapan government, (JAI) 119 Jakarta Charter, 35 reforms, 129–33 Jakarta gubernatorial election (2017), religious bureaucracy, 118, 133 universities, 133 143 Islamic education, 42 JAKIM (Department of Islamic Islamic Institute of Thought and Development Malaysia), 5, 7 Civilisation (ISTAC), 126 Jalaluddin, Sheikh Tahir, 25, 70–72 Islamic law, 49, 93, 98, 103 Jamaluddin al-Afghani, 25 Islamic Party of Malaysia (PAS), 130 Jaringan Islam Liberal (JIL), 128 “Islamic Protestantism”, 112 Jemaah Islamiah (JI), 120 Islamic reform, 24, 72 Jemaat Ahmadiyah Indonesia (JAI), Islamic religious literature, 24 200 Islamic Renaissance Front (IRF), 11, JIB. See Jong Islamieten Bond (JIB) 119, 124 “Jihad in Islam”, 204 Islamic Resurgence in Malaysia JIL. See Jaringan Islam Liberal (JIL) (Chandra Muzaffar), 3 Joko Widodo (Jokowi), 145, 146, 147, Islamic revivalism 150, 184, 193 early twentieth century, 199 Jomo, Kwame Sundaram, 159 13 AlternativeVoices_IndexIT-1P.indd 225 13/11/19 6:52 pm 226 Index Jong Islamieten Bond (JIB), 203, 206, civil society organizations, 12 207 halal certification, 5 IMAN, 10 K Islamic institutions, 4 Kairos Dialogue Network (KDN), Islamization of modern sciences, 5 13–15 non-Muslim groups, 7 Kamali, M. Hashim, 95, 121 politics of islamic discourse in, 3–8 Kamal-ud-Din, Khwaja, 209, 211 population, 9 Kamaluddin, Mohd Zuki, 164 post-Islamic revivalism, 4 Kamari, Isa, 70, 80 poverty in, 9 KDN. See Kairos Dialogue Network radicalization, 6 (KDN) religiosity in, 3, 11 Khan, Muqtader, 95 security threats, 6 Khomeini, Ayatollah, 130 state responses to Islamization, 5–8 Koening, Matthias,
Recommended publications
  • Malaysia 2019 Human Rights Report
    MALAYSIA 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Malaysia is a federal constitutional monarchy. It has a parliamentary system of government selected through regular, multiparty elections and is headed by a prime minister. The king is the head of state, serves a largely ceremonial role, and has a five-year term. Sultan Muhammad V resigned as king on January 6 after serving two years; Sultan Abdullah succeeded him that month. The kingship rotates among the sultans of the nine states with hereditary rulers. In 2018 parliamentary elections, the opposition Pakatan Harapan coalition defeated the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition, resulting in the first transfer of power between coalitions since independence in 1957. Before and during the campaign, then opposition politicians and civil society organizations alleged electoral irregularities and systemic disadvantages for opposition groups due to lack of media access and malapportioned districts favoring the then ruling coalition. The Royal Malaysian Police maintain internal security and report to the Ministry of Home Affairs. State-level Islamic religious enforcement officers have authority to enforce some criminal aspects of sharia. Civilian authorities at times did not maintain effective control over security forces. Significant human rights issues included: reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings by the government or its agents; reports of torture; arbitrary detention; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; reports of problems with
    [Show full text]
  • AGM2020-Finalreport.Pdf
    INDEX 1 List of Committee Members 2 2 Agenda of 2019 AGM 3 3 Minutes of 2019 AGM and List of Attendance 4-12 4 Chairman’s Report 13-14 5 Accounts & Finance / Secretariat Sub-committee Report 15-23 6 Perak Bar Representative 24-29 7 Professional Development And ADR Sub-committee Report 30-32 8 Library / Perak Bar Development Sub-committee Report 33-35 9 Conveyancing Sub-committee Report 36-37 10 Courts Liasion Sub-committee Report 38-39 11 Criminal Law Sub-committee Report 40 12 Sports Sub-committee Report 41-43 13 Syariah Sub-committee Report 44-45 14 Legal Aid and YBGK Sub-committee Report 46-48 15 Chambering Students / Young Lawyers Sub-committee Report 49-52 16 Information Technology / Publicity Sub-committee Report 53-54 17 Social Subcommittee 55-56 18 Perak Bar Seniority List 57-82 19 List of Pupils as at 31.12.2019 and Pupils called to the Bar in 2019 83-88 20 Flowers and Condolences 89 21 Events of 2019 90-105 1 2 1. To confirm and adopt the minutes of the Perak Bar Annual General Meeting held 22.02.2019. 2. Matters arising from the above minutes. 3. To consider, to adopt the Annual Report 2019/2020. 4. To consider, to pass the Accounts for the period 1.1.2019 to 31.12.2019. 5. To elect the Chairman of the Perak Bar Committee for the year 2020/2021. 6. To elect ten members of the Perak Bar Committee for 2020/2021. 7. To elect one Member to represent the Perak Bar to the Bar Council for the year 2020/2021.
    [Show full text]
  • 155KB***The Courts and the Enforcement of Human Rights
    (2020) 32 SAcLJ 458 THE COURTS AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS This article examines how the Malaysian courts have dealt with substantive human rights issues in the cases that have come before them, focusing particularly on the last ten years. It highlights cases where the courts demonstrated greater willingness to review executive action and parliamentary legislation and test them against constitutional provisions that protect fundamental liberties such as the right to life, and freedom of expression, association and assembly. It also looks at cases which have taken a less flexible approach on these issues. The article also touches on the issues of access to justice, locus standi and justiciability of cases involving human rights issues before the Malaysian courts. Ambiga SREENEVASAN1 LLB (Exeter); Barrister-at-law (non-practising) (Gray’s Inn); Advocate and Solicitor (High Court in Malaya). DING Jo-Ann LLB (Manchester), MSt in International Human Rights Law (Oxford); Barrister-at-law (non-practising) (Lincoln’s Inn). Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people …[2] 1 Former President of the Malaysian Bar (2007–2009), former chairperson and co-chairperson of the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih 2.0) (2010–2013), former president of the National Human Rights Society (Hakam) (2014–2018), Commissioner of the International Commission of Jurists.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Freedom Implications of Sharia Implementation in Aceh, Indonesia Asma T
    University of St. Thomas Law Journal Volume 7 Article 8 Issue 3 Spring 2010 2010 Religious Freedom Implications of Sharia Implementation in Aceh, Indonesia Asma T. Uddin Bluebook Citation Asma T. Uddin, Religious Freedom Implications of Sharia Implementation in Aceh, Indonesia, 7 U. St. Thomas L.J. 603 (2010). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UST Research Online and the University of St. Thomas Law Journal. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IMPLICATIONS OF SHARIA IMPLEMENTATION IN ACEH, INDONESIA ASMA T. UDDIN* INTRODUCTION On Monday, September 14, 2009, the provincial legislature in Aceh, Indonesia passed Sharia regulations imposing stringent criminal punish- ments for various sexual offenses, such as adultery and fornication.1 Sharia, literally meaning “way to a watering place,” is a set of divine principles that regulate a Muslim’s relationship with God and man by providing social, moral, religious, and legal guidance. It is implemented through fiqh, or Is- lamic jurisprudence, which is the science of interpreting religious texts in order to deduce legal rulings. The Acehnese Sharia regulations are the latest manifestations of a process of formal implementation of Sharia that began in 2002 in Aceh.2 Given the gravity of the associated punishments, the reg- ulations have caught national and international attention, with human rights activists across the world decrying the severity of the corporal punishments imposed by the regulations. Much less frequently scrutinized are the regula- tions’ implications for other human rights—such as religious freedom. This paper analyzes these regulations’ religious freedom implications for both Muslims and non-Muslims.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Look at the Jakarta Charter Controversy of 1945
    Another Look at the Jakarta Charter Controversy of 1945 R. E. Elson* On the morning of August 18, 1945, three days after the Japanese surrender and just a day after Indonesia's proclamation of independence, Mohammad Hatta, soon to be elected as vice-president of the infant republic, prevailed upon delegates at the first meeting of the Panitia Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia (PPKI, Committee for the Preparation of Indonesian Independence) to adjust key aspects of the republic's draft constitution, notably its preamble. The changes enjoined by Hatta on members of the Preparation Committee, charged with finalizing and promulgating the constitution, were made quickly and with little dispute. Their effect, however, particularly the removal of seven words stipulating that all Muslims should observe Islamic law, was significantly to reduce the proposed formal role of Islam in Indonesian political and social life. Episodically thereafter, the actions of the PPKI that day came to be castigated by some Muslims as catastrophic for Islam in Indonesia—indeed, as an act of treason* 1—and efforts were put in train to restore the seven words to the constitution.2 In retracing the history of the drafting of the Jakarta Charter in June 1945, * This research was supported under the Australian Research Council's Discovery Projects funding scheme. I am grateful for the helpful comments on and assistance with an earlier draft of this article that I received from John Butcher, Ananda B. Kusuma, Gerry van Klinken, Tomoko Aoyama, Akh Muzakki, and especially an anonymous reviewer. 1 Anonymous, "Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945: Pengkhianatan Pertama terhadap Piagam Jakarta?," Suara Hidayatullah 13,5 (2000): 13-14.
    [Show full text]
  • From Custom to Pancasila and Back to Adat Naples
    1 Secularization of religion in Indonesia: From Custom to Pancasila and back to adat Stephen C. Headley (CNRS) [Version 3 Nov., 2008] Introduction: Why would anyone want to promote or accept a move to normalization of religion? Why are village rituals considered superstition while Islam is not? What is dangerous about such cultic diversity? These are the basic questions which we are asking in this paper. After independence in 1949, the standardization of religion in the Republic of Indonesia was animated by a preoccupation with “unity in diversity”. All citizens were to be monotheists, for monotheism reflected more perfectly the unity of the new republic than did the great variety of cosmologies deployed in the animistic cults. Initially the legal term secularization in European countries (i.e., England and France circa 1600-1800) meant confiscations of church property. Only later in sociology of religion did the word secularization come to designate lesser attendance to church services. It also involved a deep shift in the epistemological framework. It redefined what it meant to be a person (Milbank, 1990). Anthropology in societies where religion and the state are separate is very different than an anthropology where the rulers and the religion agree about man’s destiny. This means that in each distinct cultural secularization will take a different form depending on the anthropology conveyed by its historically dominant religion expression. For example, the French republic has no cosmology referring to heaven and earth; its genealogical amnesia concerning the Christian origins of the Merovingian and Carolingian kingdoms is deliberate for, the universality of the values of the republic were to liberate its citizens from public obedience to Catholicism.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are Indonesians Prone to Support the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria?
    WHY ARE INDONESIANS PRONE TO SUPPORT THE ISLAMIC STATE OF IRAQ AND SYRIA? Karen Savitri Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang [email protected] ABSTRACT Negara Islam Irak dan Syam, atau lebih dikenal sebagai ISIS, mendeklarasikan dirinya sebagai sebuah khilafah, atau negara Islam, dengan Abu Bakar Al-Baghdadi sebagai Khalifah atau pemimpin atas segala umat Muslim, pada tahun 2014. Dalam aksinya, mereka membunuh banyak orang, merugikan harta benda, serta membuat kerusakan infrastruktur dari wilayah kekuasaannya di Timur Tengah sampai dengan Asia Tenggara. Kabar kekerasan ISIS terdengar melalui media massa, dari internet, dalam artikel berita, dan didiskusikan di media sosial. Namun, dengan segala informasi mengenai kekejaman ISIS, mengapa masih ada orang Indonesia yang mendukung ISIS? Apa yang membuat mereka membenci orang-orang kafir? Apa yang memotivasi mereka untuk berjuang demi ISIS, bahkan sampai rela untuk kehilangan nyawa? Penelitian ini, dengan mengaplikasikan teori konstruktivisme, mendiskusikan kisah sejarah Indonesia dan faktor sosial yang mendasari alasan orang Indonesia mendukung ISIS. Dengan metode penelitian kualitatif, data dikumpulkan melalui interview dan studi literatur dari buku dan artikel penelitian. Peneliti mendiskusikan total 6 (enam) faktor pendorong dan penarik, mulai dari kisah sejarah, radikalisme di Tanah Air, kecendrungan orang Muslim di Indonesia, dan generasi milenial. Keywords: Radicalization, extremism, ISIS, Indonesia 1. Introduction Since the Islamic State of Iraq and Indonesians, including women
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 Annual R Epo T 2019 Commission of M Alaysia Human Rig H Ts
    HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF MALAYSIA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ANNUAL ANNUAL R EPO R T 2019 COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIG H TS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF MALAYSIA M SUHAKAM ALAYSIA Level 11, Menara TH Perdana, 1001, Jalan Sultan Ismail, 50250 Kuala Lumpur. URL: http://www.suhakam.org.my HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF MALAYSIA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 FIRST PRINTING, 2020 Copyright Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) The copyright of this report belongs to the Commission. All or any part of this report may be reproduced provided acknowledgment of source is made or with the Commission’s permission. The Commission assumes no responsibility, warranty and liability, expressed or implied by the reproduction of this publication done without the Commission’s permission. Notification of such use is required. All rights reserved. Published in Malaysia by HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF MALAYSIA (SUHAKAM) 11th Floor, Menara TH Perdana 1001 Jalan Sultan Ismail 50250 Kuala Lumpur E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://www.suhakam.org.my Printed in Malaysia by Mihas Grafik Sdn Bhd No. 9, Jalan SR 4/19 Taman Serdang Raya 43300 Seri Kembangan Selangor Darul Ehsan National Library of Malaysia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data ISSN: 1511 - 9521 MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION 2019 From left: Prof. Dato’ Noor Aziah Mohd. Awal (Children’s Commissioner), Dato’ Seri Mohd Hishamudin Md Yunus, Datuk Godfrey Gregory Joitol, Mr. Jerald Joseph, Tan Sri Othman Hashim (Chairman), Dato’ Mah Weng Kwai, Datuk Lok Yim Pheng, Dr. Madeline Berma and Associate Prof. Dr. Nik Salida Suhaila
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Title (Use Style: Paper Title)
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 302 2nd International Conference on Culture and Language in Southeast Asia (ICCLAS 2018) Reassessing the Idea of Non-Egalitarian Islam in Indonesia: A Debate on Constitutional History Muhammad Bahrul Ulum The Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Jember East Java, Indonesia [email protected] Abstract—This paper was aimed to reassess the idea of non- though it resulted in diametral cleavages in Indonesia’s egalitarian Islam in Indonesia in the lens of a constitutional history multicultural and multireligious society. and the extent to which it has been contested and negotiated to the face of Indonesia’s current political landscape. This study was a Such incident implies the need to reassess episodes debated doctrinal research by collecting relevant articles on state-religion state-religion relations which have emerged since the idea of debates within Indonesia’s constitutional history. The data were Indonesia's independence. The debate in the Investigatory compiled to examine the rise of non-egalitarian Islam driven by Committee for the Preparation of Independence or Badan the Muslim's struggle over the state in the constitutional design. It Penyelidik Usaha Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia reveals though Pancasila is regarded as a final document to (BPUPKI) showed it ended up with an arduous choice between represent Indonesia’s identity and philosophy, it is inevitable to be a pluralistic society and a society with a dominant rule based on part of a long contentious history since the idea to establish Sharia [2]. Currently, it has been re-emerged by the major independence whether it was pluralistic society or a society with a Islamic parties to consider a pluralist philosophy that implies to dominant rule based on Sharia.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 162 International Conference on Law and Justice (ICLJ 2017) Political Discrimination Against Non-Muslims in Contemporary Indonesia Mujar Ibnu Syarif Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia [email protected] three Muslim majority countries that have been led by non- Abstract—This article charts the political discourse amongst Muslim Presidents: Senegal, Nigeria and Lebanon. Although Islamic leaders regarding political discrimination against non- Muslim minorities in contemporary Indonesia. The focus is about the roughly 94% of its population is Muslim, from 1980 to 1988 possibility of a non-Muslim to become political leaders such as Senegal was led by a Catholic President, Leopold Sedar president, head of parliament, governor, and other prominent Senghor. Nigeria, whose population also has more Muslims positions in Indonesia, the world’s most populated Muslim state. than it has Christians, saw Olusegun Obasanjo, who is Recently, classical Islamic discourse on this issue, which has Christian, serving as President of the country not just once but generally rejected this possibility, had tended to be trapped in a for three terms: 1976 to 1979, 1999 to 2004, and most recently normative model of analysis which today seems intolerant and rigid. from 2004 to 2007. This article contends that this discourse, to some extent, does not The most striking example, however, is Lebanon. In spite properly appreciate the complex social, cultural, historical and political realities of the Muslim community today. Indeed, many of an estimated 64% of its population being Muslim, Lebanon other contemporary scholars view this mode of discourse as failing has been led by Christian Presidents since 1943.
    [Show full text]
  • Power, Religion and Terror in Indonesia the Religion Article
    > Research & Reports continued from page 23 > resulting in the preservation of the orig- the crucial articles, including, of course, inal Article 29. The PBB and PDU fac- Power, Religion and Terror in Indonesia the religion article. No agreement was tions and some Islamic parties and reached except that, as far as possible, movements vowed to continue their Why has there been so much conflict and violence in Indonesia over the past few years? A deadlock should be avoided at the annu- struggle into the future. Research > deceptively simple answer is that Indonesia has been experiencing intense power struggles al session. Both Islamic and secular This was not the first taste of failure Southeast Asia since the demise of former President Suharto. Conflict in Indonesia is often related to parties formulated alternative amend- for the proponents of Islamic sharia in power. Just as conflict is extremely diverse, power, too, has many meanings and many ments to the religion article before the Indonesia. The seven words of the Jakar- manifestations in Indonesian society. Conflict over power does not necessarily result in annual session. ta Charter, issued on 22 June 1945, were violence, let alone in an epidemic of bloodshed. Moreover, power conflicts are not the cause then ‘amended’ because of the protest of all violence. However, this study explores the hypothesis that particular conceptions, Article 29: 1 of the ‘people of the Eastern Part of symbols, institutionalizations, and concrete practices of power, play a major role in the Alternative one: The state is based upon Indonesia’. In the Constituent Assem- generation and suppression of violence in Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ahmad Zahri Bin Mirza Abdul Hamid V AIMS
    [2020] 1 LNS 494 Legal Network Series DALAM MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 02(f)-11-02/2019(W)] ANTARA AHMAD ZAHRI BIN MIRZA ABDUL HAMID (Singapore ID.: S73102254A) ... PERAYU DAN AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD (No. Syarikat: 794695-X) … RESPONDEN) (Dalam Perkara Rayuan Sivil No.: W-02(A)-287-02/2017 Di Mahkamah Rayuan Malaysia Bidang Kuasa Rayuan Antara AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD (No. Syarikat: 794695-X) … PERAYU Dan AHMAD ZAHRI BIN MIRZA ABDUL HAMID (Singapore ID.: S73102254A) ... RESPONDEN) (Dalam Perkara Mahkamah Tinggi Malaya Kuala Lumpur Bahagian Rayuan dan Kuasa-Kuasa Khas Permohonan Untuk Semakan Kehakiman No: WA-25-117-07/2016 Antara AIMS CYBERJAYA SDN BHD (No. Syarikat: 794695-X) … PEMOHON Dan AHMAD ZAHRI MIRZA ABDUL HAMID (Singapore ID.: S73102254A) ... RESPONDEN) CORAM: 1 [2020] 1 LNS 494 Legal Network Series TENGKU MAIMUN TUAN MAT, CJ MOHD ZAWAWI SALLEH, FCJ IDRUS HARUN, FCJ NALLINI PATHMANATHAN, FCJ ABDUL RAHMAN SEBLI, FCJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Introduction [1] The key issue in this appeal is whether the appellant/claimant was employed on a fixed term contract or was a permanent employee of the respondent at the material time. The Industrial Court and the High Court found that the appellant/claimant was a permanent employee of the respondent and his dismissal from his employment was without just cause or excuse. On appeal, the Court of Appeal set aside the decision of the High Court and allowed the respondent’s appeal. [2] On 7.1.2019, this Court granted the appellant/claimant leave to appeal on the following questions of law: (i) Whether a need for work permit is a material consideration in determining whether an employment contract is a genuine fixed term contract; and (ii) Does a contract of employment which is renewed successively without application by the employee and without any intermittent breaks in between, is in reality a permanent employment.
    [Show full text]