DOCSLIB.ORG

Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class Free FREE HEAVY CRUISERS OF THE ADMIRAL HIPPER CLASS PDF Gerhard Koop,Klaus-Peter Schmolke | 208 pages | 06 Jun 2014 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781848321953 | English | Barnsley, United Kingdom Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper and the Prinz Eugen class Admiral Hipperthe first of five ships of her class, was the lead ship of the Admiral Hipper class of heavy cruisers which served with Nazi Germany 's Kriegsmarine during World War II. The ship was named after Admiral Franz von Hippercommander of the German battlecruiser squadron during the Battle of Jutland in and later commander-in-chief of the German High Seas Fleet. She was armed with a main battery of eight Admiral Hipper saw a significant amount of action during the war, notably present during the Battle of the Atlantic. In Decembershe broke out into the Atlantic Ocean to operate against Allied merchant shipping, though this operation ended without significant success. In FebruaryAdmiral Hipper sortied again, sinking several merchant vessels before eventually returning to Germany via the Denmark Strait. As a result, Admiral Hipper was returned to Germany and decommissioned for repairs. The ship was never restored to operational status, however, and Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class 3 MayRoyal Air Force bombers severely damaged her while she was in Kiel. Her crew scuttled the ship at her mooringsand in Julyshe was raised and towed to Heikendorfer Bay. She was ultimately broken up for scrap in — and her bell is currently on display at the Laboe Naval Memorial. The Admiral Hipper class of heavy cruisers was ordered in the context of German naval rearmament after the Nazi Party came to power in and repudiated the disarmament clauses of the Treaty of Versailles. Admiral Hipper was After the installation of a clipper bow during fitting out, her overall length increased to Admiral Hipper was powered by three sets of geared steam turbineswhich were supplied with steam by twelve ultra-high pressure oil-fired boilers. Admiral Hipper ' s primary armament was eight She had four triple The ship was equipped with three Arado Ar seaplanes and one catapult. A raked funnel cap was also installed. The ship also made port calls to Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class Baltic ports, including cities in Estonia and Sweden. In August, the ship conducted live fire drills in the Baltic. She was briefly used Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class patrol the Baltic, but she did not see combat, and was quickly returned to training exercises. Sea trials in the Baltic resumed in Januarybut severe ice restrained the ship to port. On 17 February, the Kriegsmarine pronounced the ship fully operational, and on the following day, Admiral Hipper began her first major wartime patrol. A third destroyer, Wolfgang Zenkerwas forced to turn back after sustaining damage from ice. The ships operated under the command of Admiral Wilhelm Marschall. KzS Heye was given command of Group 2 during the operation. The ships steamed out of the roadstead at midnight on the night of 6—7 April. While steaming off the Norwegian coast, Admiral Hipper was ordered to divert course to locate the destroyer Bernd von Arnimwhich had fallen behind Group 1. Admiral Hipper rained fire on Glowwormscoring several hits. Glowworm attempted to flee, but when it became apparent she could not break away from the pursuing cruiser, Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class turned toward Admiral Hipper and fired a spread of torpedoes, all of which missed. The British destroyer scored one hit on Admiral Hipper ' s starboard bow before a rudder malfunction set the ship on a collision course with the German cruiser. Forty survivors were picked up Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class the German ship. After trying to purchase fuel from locals, the aircrew were detained and handed over to the police. After arriving off Trondheim, Admiral Hipper successfully passed herself off as a British warship long enough to steam past the Norwegian coastal artillery batteries. The ship entered the harbor and docked shortly before to debark the mountain troops. After the ground troops seized control of the coastal batteries, the ship left Trondheim, bound for Germany. She was escorted by Friedrich Eckoldt ; she reached Wilhelmshaven on 12 April, and went into drydock. The dockyard workers discovered the ship had been damaged more severely by the collision with Glowworm than had previously been thought. Nevertheless, repairs were completed in the span of two weeks. Admiral Marschall organized a mission to seize Harstad in early June ; Admiral Hipperthe battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenauand four destroyers were tasked with the operation. Marschall's squadron was then tasked with intercepting an Allied convoy that was reported to be in the area. The ships failed to find the convoy, and returned to Trondheim to refuel. On 13 June, the ship's anti-aircraft gunners shot down an attacking British bomber. The ship was seized and sent to occupied Norway with a prize crew. Admiral Hipper was ordered to leave the Norwegian theatre on 5 August for an overhaul in Wilhelmshaven. This was completed on 9 September and with a new commanding officer, Wilhelm Meiselthe cruiser made ready to participate in Operation Sea Lionthe planned invasion of the United Kingdom. Admiral Hipper's role would have been a diversionary foray into Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class North Sea, Operation Herbstreise or "Autumn Journey", with the aim of luring the British Home Fleet away from the intended invasion routes in the English Channel. Following the postponement of that operation, on 24 September the ship left Wilhelmshaven on a mission break out into the Atlantic Ocean to raid merchant traffic. The fire forced the crew to shut down the ship's propulsion system until the blaze could be brought under control; this rendered Admiral Hipper motionless for several hours on the open sea. The ship made a second attempt to break out into the Atlantic on 30 November; she successfully navigated the Denmark Strait undetected on 6 December. Five of the twenty ships were allocated to Operation Excess. The convoy was protected by a powerful escort composed of the aircraft carriers Furious and Argusthe cruisers BerwickBonaventureand Dunedinand six destroyers. She quickly withdrew, using her main guns to keep the destroyers at bay. Ten minutes later, Berwick reappeared off Admiral Hipper ' s port bow; [25] [27] the German cruiser fired several salvos from her forward turrets and scored hits on the British cruiser's rear turrets, waterline, and forward superstructure. Admiral Hipper then disengaged, to prevent the British destroyers from closing to launch a torpedo attack. By now, the ship was running low on fuel, and so she put into Brest in occupied France on 27 December. On 1 FebruaryAdmiral Hipper embarked on her second Atlantic sortie. The following morning, Admiral Hipper closed in and sank several of the ships. She therefore returned to Brest on 15 February. British bombers were regularly attacking the port, however, and the Kriegsmarine therefore decided Admiral Hipper should return to Germany, where she could be better protected. Before the ship could leave, damage caused to the ship's hull by wrecks in the Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class had to be repaired. After completion of the refit, Admiral Hipper conducted sea trials in the Baltic before putting into Gotenhafen on 21 December for some minor refitting. By March, the ship was again fully operational. Several British submarines were patrolling the area, Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class failed to intercept the German flotilla. Admiral Hipper and her escorts reached their destination on 21 March. Swedish intelligence had meanwhile reported the German departures to the British Admiraltywhich ordered the convoy to disperse. Aware that they had been detected, the Germans aborted Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class operation and turned over the attack to U-boats and the Luftwaffe. The scattered vessels could no longer be protected by the convoy escorts, and the Germans sank 21 Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class the 34 isolated transports. After her return to port, Admiral Hipper was transferred to Bogen Bay near Narvik for repairs to her propulsion system. Vizeadmiral Oskar Kummetz commanded the squadron from Admiral Hipper. Kummetz dispatched the destroyer Z27 to sink the two Soviet ships. In Decemberconvoy traffic to the Soviet Union resumed. Raeder ordered the forces assigned to Operation Regenbogen into action. Kummetz's Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral Hipper Class was to divide his force in half; he would take Admiral Hipper and three destroyers north of the convoy to attack it and draw away the escorts. At on the 31st, the British destroyer Obdurate spotted the three destroyers screening for Admiral Hipper ; the Germans opened fire first. Four of the other five destroyers escorting the convoy rushed to join the fight, while Achates laid a smoke screen to cover the convoy. Kummetz then turned back north to draw the destroyers away. Captain Robert Sherbrookethe British escort commander, left two destroyers to cover the convoy while he took the remaining four to pursue Admiral Hipper. Rear Admiral Robert Burnett 's Force R, centered on the cruisers Sheffield and Jamaicastanding by in distant support of the Allied convoy, [44] raced to the scene. The cruisers engaged Admiral Hipperwhich had been firing to port at the destroyer Obedient. Burnett's ships approached from Admiral Hipper ' s starboard side and achieved complete surprise. The other two hits started a fire in her aircraft hangar. She fired a single salvo at the cruisers before turning toward them, her escorting destroyers screening her with smoke. After emerging from the smoke screen, Hipper was again engaged by Burnett's cruisers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Frisk Oslofjord: RESYME Etter Seminar 14/11-2018 Statens Park Tønsberg
    Frisk Oslofjord: RESYME etter seminar 14/11-2018 Statens Park Tønsberg Oslofjordens tilstand er svekket og fjorden er nærmest fiskedød. FRISK OSLOFJORD skal samle og formidle kunnskap om det undersjøiske landskapet og livet under de blå flater i Færder og Ytre Hvaler nasjonalparker og etablerer et grunnlag for kunnskapsbasert forvaltning. Kystforvaltning skal ikke lenger gjøres i blinde, og befolkningen, spesielt barn og unge som er framtidens beslutningstakere, skal opplyses for å styrke et bredt eierskap til fjorden og de tiltak som må gjennomføres. FRISK OSLOFJORD skal ta i bruk ny teknologi som kan revolusjonere framtidig kartlegging og overvåking i havet. Prosjektet ble presentert i Auditoriet Statens Park Tønsberg den 11 nov. 2018 for nærmere 60 fremmøtte med representanter fra: Besøkssenter Færder nasjonalpark, Besøkssenter Ytre Hvaler nasjonalpark, Fiskeridirektoratet, Fylkesmannen i Vestfold, Fylkesmannen i Østfold, Færder kommune, Kystverket, Nasjonalparkstyrene, Miljødirektoratet / Statens naturoppsyn, Oslofjordens Friluftsråd, RFF Oslofjordfondet, Skjærgårdstjenesten Færder, Små fiskeren, Sparebankstiftelsen DNB, Statens naturoppsyn, Vannområde Horten-Larvik/Aulivassdraget, Vestfold fylkeskommune, Vestfold fylkeskommune Utdanningsavdelingen, Østfold fylkeskommune, Opplæringsavdelingen, samt deltakere fra de 6 partnere som har gått sammen for å gjennomføre prosjektet FRISK OSLOFJORD: Havforskningsinstituttet, Inspiria, Kartverket sjødivisjonen, Kongsberg Maritime, NGU og NIVA. Færder og Ytre Hvaler nasjonalparker er prosjekteier
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Late-Pleistocene Foraminifera from the Oslofj Ord Area, Southeast Norway
    NORSK GEOLOGISK TIDSSKRIFT 33 LATE-PLEISTOCENE FORAMINIFERA FROM THE OSLOFJ ORD AREA, SOUTHEAST NORWAY BY RoLF W. FEYLI�G-HANSSEN (University of Oslo) CONTENTS P age Abstract 109 Introduction .................... ... ....... 109 The Yoldia-clay ...................... ..... 113 The Arca-clay ................... ............ 119 Transitional sediments . ......... .......... 120 The lsocardia-clay ....... ..................... 121 The Foraminifera ..... ........... .. .. 125 Index of foraminiferal species . .. .. .. .. 144 References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 146 Plates I-Il . ... ..................... ..... 151 Abst rac t : The present paper is a preliminary report on a quanti­ tative study of the foraminiferal contents of Late- and Post-Glacial clay samples from the Oslofjord area. It appears that sedimen�s of Late-Glacial and Post-Glacial age are sharply defined by a few dominent species in their foraminiferal faunas. A subdivision can be based partly on the dominance of some species and partly on the presence of certain a::cessory species. In this way, most samples from the area could be rapidly pla::ed in the old strati­ graphic scheme based on megafossils. Introduction. For the Oslofjord area BRøGGER (1900-19 01) established a stratigraphy of the sediments dep)sited at the r etreating front of the ice of the latest glaciation on the basis of their content of fossil 12 -Geo!. 33 110 ROLF W. FEYLI:-.IG-HAXSSEN pelecypods. He thus divided the clay sediments into the following main horizons: Yoldia-clay, Arca-clay, Mytilus- and Cyprina-clay, (of Late-Glacialage) Cardium-clay, Ostrea-clay, Isocardia-clay, (of Post­ Glacial age), and Mya-clay which is of recent origin. The Yoldia-clay is a high-arctic sediment. Its index fossil is Portlandia arctica (GRAY) ( = Yoldia arctica GRAY) which at present lives only in arctic waters, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fortress Trail at Oscarsborg Fortress
    Welcome to the fortress trail Welcome to the cultural heritage site and natural wonder of Oscarsborg. Follow us on social media On this map, we have highlighted places of interest. Some of the points #oscarsborg at Oscarsborg Fortress are marked with QR codes. Follow the map and discover the enthralling history of Oscarsborg Fortress! The Fortress trail lasts around 1.5 hours at a normal walking pace. We hope you have a pleasant walk and experience. Bathing spot 19 2 20 /2 Bathing spot 1 2 r B Bathing spot te ru , # o sl O o Guest Harbour t y r Oscarsborg r 18 e Harbour Inn F r 17 e m Kaholmen South The Commandant’s m 8 u 9 Residence S 21 7 The Torpedo Battery 10 1 6 13 Kaholmen North 14 11 16 3 four years to construct (1874-1879). The material was freighted in on barges from The Main Fort Røyken. Today, 50 metres of the Jetty has been removed to facilitate leisure boats. 15 4 Fortress Museum 6 WESTERN BEACH QUAY / CRANE QUAY 5 The wharf was built in 1862 in order to enable ammunition to be brought ashore. 12 2 This ammunition was then transported through a tunnelto the Main Battery’s The Main Battery k a underground arsenal. The Fortress’s electric ferry which went between the b ø r Kaholmen islands, Håøya and Bergholmen was also located here. Today, the quay is D Oscarsborg Fortress’ only deep-water quay and is used for larger boats. This is where o t the liner B21/B22 from Oslo/Aker Brygge Pier is situated during the summer season.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Studies of Pollution in the Oslofjord
    Helgol~inder wiss. Meeresunters. 17, 455-461 (1968) Introduction to the studies of pollution in the Oslofjord JOHAN T. RUUD Institute of Marine Biology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway KURZFASSUNG: Einfiihrung in die Untersuchungen fiber die Verunreinigung im Oslo- fjord. Der Oslofjord erstreckt sich etwa 100 km in n/Srdlicher Richtung yore Skagerrak bis nach Oslo. Bei Dr~bak, etwa auf dem zweiten Drittel des Weges nach Oslo, gibt es eine Reihe yon Hindernissen, die einem ungehinderten Austausch der Wassermassen im Fjord entgegenstehen. Der wichtigste Durchlaf~ ist nur etwa 300 m breit und hat eine Wassertiefe ~iber der Schwelle yon 19 m. Hinter Drobak besteht der Fjord aus zwei Becken, dem Westfjord und dem Bunne- fjord, die Tiefen yon 164 m beziehungsweise von 160 m aufweisen. Der Fjord hinter Drobak hat eine Fl~che yon 191 km~; die Wassermenge betr~igt nach Berechnungen 9,4 Milliarden m ~. Der j~hrliche Zufluf~ an Siit~wasser, das durch Abw~.sser yon ca. 700 000 Menschen und einer bedeutenden Industrie verunreinigt wird, betr~igt etwa 800 Millionen m 3. Studien fiber die Fauna wurden im 18. Jahrhundert von O. F. MiSLLER und im 19. Jahrhundert von M. und G. O. SARS vorgenommen. Ausgedehntere Untersuchungen wurden um 1900 yon J. Hjollx und H. H. GRAN begonnen. Seit Anfang der dreit~iger Jahre sind diese Untersuchungen yon den biologischen Instituten der Universit~it Oslo weitergefiihrt worden. 1953 wurde die Situation hinsichtlich der Verunreinigung des Fjords alarmierend. Die Beh/Srden der Stadt Oslo wurden davon unterrichtet, dal~ umfassendere Untersuchungen notwendig seien, um die Folgen, die dadurch entstehen, daf~ der Fjord als Auffangbecken f~ir die Abw~isser der Stadt dient, zu erforschen.
    [Show full text]
  • How Can Cooperation Between Neighbouring Ports Within the Oslofjord Area Become Reality?
    HØGSKOLEN I VESTFOLD How can cooperation between neighbouring ports within the Oslofjord area become reality? A study of two neighbouring ports and the opportunities of future collaboration for mutual benefits Øivind Berg November 2013 In partial fulfilment of the degree Master in Maritime Management, Department of Maritime Technology and Innovation, Vestfold University College, Horten, Norway Acknowledgement This thesis would not have arisen without the kind contribution from Finn Flogstad, Port Director, Port of Grenland, Jan Fredrik Jonas, Port Director, Port of Larvik, Jan Einar Skarding, Marketing and Logistics Manager, Port of Grenland, Per Kvaale Caspersen, Project Manager at Vestfold Municipal County, and Olav Risholt, Project Manager Telemark Municipal County. I must also thank advisors and colleagues at Vestfold University College; Halvor Schøyen, PhD, Kjell Ivar Øvergård Dr. Professor, Jørn Kragh Project Manager and Tine Viveka Westerberg for valuable information and good advice. And, not at least: the one at home Halldis, who has not seen me for a good while. Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1 Research question ................................................................................................................... 2 Relation to other work in the area .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metreport Oceanography a High-Resolution, Curvilinear ROMS Model for the Oslofjord Fjordos Technical Report No
    No. 4/2016 ISSN 2387-4201 METreport Oceanography A high-resolution, curvilinear ROMS model for the Oslofjord FjordOs technical report No. 2 Lars Petter Røed1,2, Nils Melsom Kristensen1, Karina Bakkeløkken Hjelmervik3 and André Staalstrøm4 1Norwegian Meteorological Institute, 2Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, 3University College of Southeast Norway, 4Norwegian Institute of Water Research aa METreport Title Date A high-resolution, curvilinear ROMS model for the Oslofjord. Fjor- June 7, 2016 dOs technical report No. 2 Section Report no. Ocean and Ice 4/2016 Author(s) Classification Lars Petter Røed, Nils Melsom Kristensen, Karina Bakkeløkken ③Free ❥Restricted Hjelmervik, André Staalstrøm Client(s) Client’s reference Oslofjordfondet Abstract Provided is documentation of a new Oslofjord model, FjordOs CL, utilizing the curvilinear option of the Regional Ocean Modeling System - ROMS. The development is part of the project FjordOs. FjordOs CL has a spatial grid size varying from about 50 meters in the Drøbak sound to about 300 meters at its southern open boundary bordering on the Sk- agerrak. It features 42 terrain-following levels in the vertical. In addition to being forced by atmospheric, river and tidal input it is also forced by oceanic input at the open boundary. The atmospheric input is extracted from MET Norway’s operational NWP model (AROME- MetCoOp), while oceanic input is extracted from MET Norway’s operational, ocean forecast- ing model NorKyst800. The river input consists of observational based estimated discharges from 37 rivers along the perimeter of the fjord. The tidal input is based on the TPXO Atlantic database modified by observations and consists of nine tidal constituents as input.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Geology of the So.Uthern Part Of
    CONTRIBUTION TO THE GEOLOGY OF THE SO. UTHER N PART OF THE OSLOFJORD THE RHOMB-PORPHYRY CONGLOMERATE WITH REMARKS ON YOUNGER TECTONICS WITH 12 TEXT·FIGURES, 5 PLATES AND l MAP BY LEIF STØRME R Introduction. In his classical work: "O ber die Bildungsgeschichte des Kristiania­ fjords" ( = Oslofjord), Brøgger (1886) was a ble to demonstrate and explain in their main features, the peculiar geologic structures which led to the formation of the Oslofjord and influenced the topo­ graphy also of the adjacent parts of the Oslo Region. The origin of the fjord is chiefly due to considerable subsidences along mainly N-S fault-lines probably of Permian age. The greatest fault runs along the east side of the fjord and borders the Oslo Region with its Paleozoic sediments and igneous rocks, from the Precambrian area to the east. The present paper deals primarily with the so-called rhomb­ porphyry conglomerate which forms one of the youngest sedimentary series of the Oslo Region and which occurs on a num ber of islands situated along the east side of the fjord. The term rhomb-porphyry conglomerate was introduced by Brøgger (1900) to signi fy a thick series chiefly of breccias and conglomerates consisting almost ex­ clusively of fragments of various types of Permian rhomb-porphyry Javas. The sediments exhibit several peculiar characteristics which are described and tentatively interpreted in the present paper. The consolidated sediments have in post-Permian time been subject to considerable tectonic disturbances. A study of the structures has led the author to the conception of a connection with the late Mesozoic and Tertiary orogenetic movements of northern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Quatemary Sediments and Bedrock Geology in the Outer Oslofjord and Northemmost Skagerrak
    Quatemary sediments and bedrock geology in the outer Oslofjord and northemmost Skagerrak ANDERS SOLHEIM & GISLE GRØNLIE Solheim, A. & Grønlie, G.: Quaternary sediments and bedrock geology in the outer Oslofjord and northernmost Skagerrak. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, Vol. 63, pp. 55-72. ISSN 0029-196X. Shallow seismic (sparker), magnetic and bathymetric profiling were carried out on two cruises in the outer Oslofjord in 1979 and 1980. The survey area is characterized by deep silled basins defined by the main structural trends of the surrounding land area. The Quaternary scdiments, largcly restricted to these major basins. can be dividcd into three main units of supposed pre-Weichselian to Holocene age. Most of the sediments were probably deposited during relatively short time intervals in the Late Weichselian under ice-proximal conditions, and in the early Holocene. Magnetic total field and scismic data wcrc uscd to map the submarine outlines of the Permo­ Carboniferous Vestfold lavas, the Perm i an sedimentary rocks and the Larvik i te body. The presencc of other intrusives in the eastern and southern part of the survey area is discussed. A. Solheim & G. Grønlie, Institutt for geologi, Postboks 1047, Blindern, Oslo 3, Norway. Present address of A. So/heim: Norsk Polarinstitutt, Rolfstangvn. 12, N-1330, Oslo Lufthavn. Present address of G. Grønlie: Det Norske Oljeselskap, Postboks 9556, Egertorget, N-Os/o l. The survey area is situated in the southern part 3. to map the submarine bedrock geology and of the Permo-Carboniferous Oslo Graben, a structural pattern. downfaulted block of Paleozoic rocks, about 50 In this paper we present data and results ob­ km wide and more than 200 km long in a north­ tained during both cruises.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme King Harald`S World Gym for Life Challenge 26-30 July 2017 Vestfold - Norway Contents
    PROGRAMME KING HARALD`S WORLD GYM FOR LIFE CHALLENGE 26-30 JULY 2017 VESTFOLD - NORWAY CONTENTS Welcome to Norway................................................................4 Local Organising Committee....................................................5 Welcome all Gymnasts............................................................6 Morinari Watanabe.................................................................7 This is World Gym for Life Challenge 2017.................................8 Participants..........................................................................10 Programme..........................................................................11 Information..........................................................................12 Contest venue......................................................................13 Shuttle bus..........................................................................13 Workshop............................................................................14 Side evets...........................................................................15 World Gym for life Outfit........................................................16 Evaluators and Feedbackers...................................................17 Training and contest schedule - Large Dance Groups.................18 Training and contest schedule - Groups with apparatus..............19 Training and contest schedule - Small Dance Groups.................20 Schedule Show Performances.................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • The Fortress Trail at Oscarsborg Fortress!
    We are pleased to welcome you to Oscarsborg, a cultural heritage Welcome to the Fortress Trail site of outstanding natural beauty. On this map we have marked at Oscarsborg Fortress! out places of interest. Follow the map and delve into the exhilarating history of Oscarsborg Fortress! The fortress trail takes about 1,5 hrs. to complete at normal walking pace. We hope you will have a pleasant walk and a Badeplass great experience. 20 Badeplass 21 02 6 te Badeplass u , r o 19 sl O e 22 g Gjestehavn r e 18 5 THE JETTY f Havnekro r Work on the 1500-metre long underwater wall began in 1874. The wall traverses e from Hurum via Småskjær (small skerries) to Søndre Kaholmen, which effectively m 17 blocks off the western shipping lane. The filling material is generally made up of m Kommandantboligen o Søndre Kaholmen stone blocks with a weight of up to two tonnes, and covers about 315,000 square S 8 metres in total. The jetty took four years to build, in the period between 1874 and 9 23 1879. The stones were freighted in on barges from Røyken. 50 metres of the jetty 7 Torpedobatteriet has been removed again in later times, to allow pleasure crafts to sail past in the western sea lane. 10 Nordre Kaholmen 6 WESTERN SHORE QUAY / CRANE WHARF 1 6 13 The quay was built in 1862 to enable ammunition to be brought onshore. The ammunition was then transported from the quay through a tunnel to the 14 underground storage rooms of the main battery.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Changes in Ecological Status in Vestfjorden, Inner Oslofjord, Norway
    Temporal changes in ecological status in Vestfjorden, inner Oslofjord, Norway Gerald L. Decelles III Institute of Geosciences The Faculty of Mathematical and Natural Sciences UNIVERSITY OF OSLO 06/2019 Temporal changes in ecological status in Vestfjorden, inner Oslofjord, Norway Gerald L. Decelles III Master Thesis Environmental geology – environmental stratigraphy 60 credits Institute of Geosciences The Faculty of Mathematical and Natural Sciences UNIVERSITY OF OSLO 06/2019 © Gerald L. Decelles III 2019 Temporal changes in ecological status in Vestfjorden, inner Oslofjord, Norway Gerald L. Decelles III http://www.duo.uio.no/ Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo Abstract The inner Oslofjord has undergone many changes in ecological quality throughout time. The Vestfjorden Avløpsselskap (VEAS) wastewater treatment plant has been involved in these changes with a generally positive effect. Given current analytical tools (CTD, total organic carbon (TOC), trace metals (TM), foraminifera, current meters), assessment of the impact (ecologically) that VEAS is having on the benthic zone surrounding the discharge pipes was conducted in fall 2017. This study found an incongruity in ecological quality between benthic areas north and south of the discharge area. Based on sample collected in 2018, the work of this thesis looked to confirm this discrepancy, add temporal markers to tie data collected at this site with data from the rest of the inner Oslofjord, assess the efficacy of foraminifera as indicators of ecological status, and search for a possible mechanism for discrepancy by studying current and circulation regimes in the area near the VEAS discharge. While unable to confirm the data values found in TM analysis in 2017 or the impact of currents in the area on the discharge regime, radiometric dating of a new core placed the changes seen in the area around VEAS in temporal context with what has happened to the inner Oslofjord as a whole.
    [Show full text]