DOCSLIB.ORG

Agricultural Building Ventilation Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agricultural Building Ventilation Systems 306-412-1 AGRICULTURAL BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEMS MARCH 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project has been provided by the Governments of Canada and British Columbia through Growing Forward 2, a federal-provincial-territorial initiative DISCLAIMER Opinions expressed in this document are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Governments of Canada and British Columbia. The Governments of Canada and British Columbia, and their directors, agents, employees, or contractors will not be liable for any claims, damages, or losses of any kind whatsoever arising out of the use of, or reliance upon, this information. The report was prepared exclusively for the BC Ministry of Agriculture by Amec Foster Wheeler Americas Limited (Amec Foster Wheeler). The quality of information, conclusions and estimates contained herein is consistent with the level of effort involved in Amec Foster Wheeler's services and based on: i) information available at the time of preparation, ii) data supplied by outside sources and, iii) the assumptions, conditions and qualifications set forth in this report. This report is intended to be used by the BC Ministry of Agriculture only, subject to the terms and conditions of its contract with Amec Foster Wheeler. Any other use of, or reliance on, this report by any third party is at that party’s sole risk. Prepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Mining & Metals Americas www.amecfw.com C ONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 The Market........................................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1 Dairy ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.1.2 Poultry..................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.3 Swine ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Animal Demographics in BC................................................................................................ 4 2.2.1 BCStats Development Regions .............................................................................. 5 2.2.2 Distribution of Dairy, Poultry and Swine ................................................................. 7 2.3 Climate in B.C. ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.1 Climatic Conditions in B.C. ..................................................................................... 8 2.3.2 Summary of Climate Change in British Columbia .................................................. 9 2.3.3 Impacts of Climate Change on Barn Ventilation .................................................. 10 3.0 AGRICULTURAL BUILDING HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEMS ....................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Purposes of Agricultural Building HVAC Systems ............................................................ 11 3.2 Ventilation Systems for Livestock and Poultry Housing .................................................... 12 3.2.1 Fans ...................................................................................................................... 12 3.2.2 Natural Ventilation ................................................................................................ 13 3.2.3 Dual Ventilation .................................................................................................... 16 3.2.4 Exhaust Ventilation Systems ................................................................................ 18 3.2.5 Tunnel Ventilation ................................................................................................. 20 3.2.6 Pit Ventilation ........................................................................................................ 23 3.2.7 Combination Pressure / Exhaust Systems ........................................................... 25 3.2.8 Neutral Pressure Systems .................................................................................... 26 3.2.9 Positive Pressure Ventilation Systems ................................................................. 27 3.3 Heating Systems ............................................................................................................... 29 3.3.1 In-Floor Heating .................................................................................................... 29 3.3.2 Gas-Fired Radiant Heating ................................................................................... 31 3.3.3 Convective Heating .............................................................................................. 33 3.3.4 Unit Heaters .......................................................................................................... 34 3.4 Cooling and Circulation Systems ...................................................................................... 36 3.4.1 Air Circulation Fans .............................................................................................. 36 3.4.2 Ducted Recirculation Systems ............................................................................. 39 3.4.3 Cooling with Low-Pressure Water Sprinklers or Drippers .................................... 41 3.4.4 Evaporative Cooling with Direct High–Pressure Misting ...................................... 43 3.4.5 Evaporative Cooling Pads .................................................................................... 45 3.4.6 Evaporative Cooling in Forced Air Systems – Indirect ......................................... 47 3.5 Heat Recovery and Alternatives ........................................................................................ 49 3.5.1 Air-to-Air Heat Recovery....................................................................................... 49 3.5.2 Building Thermal Capacitance ............................................................................. 50 3.5.3 External Thermal Capacitance ............................................................................. 51 3.5.4 Earth Tube System ............................................................................................... 52 3.5.5 Transpired Solar Walls ......................................................................................... 54 3.5.6 Passive Solar Air Heater ...................................................................................... 56 TOC 3.5.7 Greenhouse Barns ............................................................................................... 58 3.5.8 Heat Pumps for Heating and Cooling ................................................................... 58 3.6 Noise, Odour, Dust and Biosecurity .................................................................................. 60 3.6.1 General ................................................................................................................. 60 3.6.2 Noise Control Earth Berms ................................................................................... 62 3.6.3 Noise Barrier Fences ............................................................................................ 63 3.6.4 Vegetative Buffers ................................................................................................ 64 3.6.5 Misting Showers for Dust Abatement ................................................................... 65 3.6.6 Building Electrostatic Charge for Dust Abatement ............................................... 66 3.6.7 Ducted Sound Attenuators ................................................................................... 68 3.6.8 Biosecurity: Air Filtration for Exhaust Air Cleaning ............................................... 69 3.6.9 Biosecurity: Intake Air Biofiltration ........................................................................ 70 3.6.10 Biofiltration for Complete Exhaust System Air Cleaning ...................................... 71 3.6.11 Wet Scrubbers for Exhaust Air Cleaning .............................................................. 73 3.6.12 UV Light for Exhaust Air Cleaning ........................................................................ 75 3.6.13 Non-Thermal Plasma for Exhaust Air Odour Abatement ..................................... 76 3.6.14 Windbreak Walls ................................................................................................... 77 3.6.15 Exhaust Stacks ..................................................................................................... 79 3.6.16 Site Selection and Yard Layout ............................................................................ 80 4.0 THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR VENTILATION OF AGRICULTURAL BUILDINGS .... 81 4.1 General .............................................................................................................................. 81 4.2 Energy and Mass Balance................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University of Guelph-University of Guelph 2020 Food Price Report
    CANADA’S FOOD PRICE REPORT 10TH EDITION 2020 AUTHORS AND ADVISORS DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY MEMBERS Dr. Sylvain Charlebois Dr. Andrea Giusto Hyejung (Cathy) Bae (Lead Author and Project Lead for Department of Economics Applied Research, Nova Scotia Dalhousie University) [email protected] Community College Agri-Food Analytics Lab [email protected] Kathleen Kevany [email protected] Faculty of Agriculture Emon Majumder Eamonn McGuinty [email protected] Applied Research, Nova Scotia Agri-Food Analytics Lab Community College Don Fiander [email protected] [email protected] DalAnalytics Dr. Vlado Keselj [email protected] Jay Harris Faculty of Computer Science Schulich School of Business, York Joon Son [email protected] University IBM Canada [email protected] Janet Music [email protected] Agri-Food Analytics Lab [email protected] UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH MEMBERS Dr. Simon Somogyi Paul Uys Dr. Jess Haines (Project Lead for University Ontario Agricultural College Family Relations and Applied of Guelph) (OAC) Nutrition Gordon S. Lang School of [email protected] [email protected] Business and Economics Dr. Francis Tapon Dr. Graham Taylor [email protected] Gordon S. Lang School of School of Engineering Dr. Erna Van Duren Business and Economics [email protected] Gordon S. Lang School of [email protected] Alexander Moksyakov Business and Economics School of Engineering [email protected] [email protected] Canada’s Food Price Report 2020 is a collaborative effort between Dalhousie University, led by the Faculties of Management
    [Show full text]
  • Johne's Disease Prevention and Control on Organic Dairy Farms in Ontario, Canada
    Johne’s Disease Prevention and Control on Organic Dairy Farms in Ontario, Canada by Laura Pieper A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Population Medicine Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Laura Pieper, July, 2014 ABSTRACT JOHNE’S DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL ON ORGANIC DAIRY FARMS IN ONTARIO, CANADA Laura Pieper Advisor: University of Guelph, 2014 Professor David F. Kelton This thesis investigates Johne’s disease (JD) risk factors and control strategies on organic and conventional dairy farms in Ontario, Canada. The JD Risk Assessment and Management Plan (RAMP) was evaluated and used for the comparison of JD control between both farming types. Attitudes about JD control among organic producers and veterinarians were further investigated. RAMP data and JD milk or serum ELISA results from herds voluntarily participating in the Ontario Johne’s Education and Management Assistance Program (OJEMAP) were used for the first three research chapters. Individual interviews and focus groups with organic producers and veterinarians were used in the last two research chapters to understand attitudes about JD prevention and control, as well as about organic farming and the veterinarian-producer relationship. The veterinarian conducting the RAMP greatly influenced the RAMP scores and the recommendations that were given to the producers. However, the RAMP was considered useful in determining the between-herd and within-herd JD transmission risk and in identifying recommendations for JD control for the producers. Organic and conventional farms had a similar herd-level ELISA test-positive prevalence, but affected organic herds had a higher within-herd prevalence than affected conventional herds.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Practices and Their Potential Influence on Johne's Disease Transmission on Canadian Organic Dairy Farms—A Concept
    Sustainability 2014, 6, 8237-8261; doi:10.3390/su6118237 OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Review Management Practices and Their Potential Influence on Johne’s Disease Transmission on Canadian Organic Dairy Farms—A Conceptual Analysis Laura Pieper 1, Ulrike Sorge 2, Ann Godkin 3, Trevor DeVries 4, Kerry Lissemore 1 and David Kelton 1,* 1 Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Ontario, ON N1G 2W1, Canada; E-Mails: [email protected] (L.P.); [email protected] (K.L.) 2 Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Veterinary Science and Policy Group, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAF), Ontario, ON NOB 1S0, Canada; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, ON N1G 2W1, Canada; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-519-824-4120 (ext. 54808); Fax: +1-519-763-8621. External Editor: Marc A. Rosen Received: 2 September 2014; in revised form: 4 November 2014 / Accepted: 5 November 2014 / Published: 18 November 2014 Abstract: Johne’s disease (JD) is a chronic, production-limiting disease of ruminants. Control programs aiming to minimize the effects of the disease on the dairy industry have been launched in many countries, including Canada. Those programs commonly focus on strict hygiene and management improvement, often combined with various testing methods. Concurrently, organic dairy farming has been increasing in popularity. Because organic farming promotes traditional management practices, it has been proposed that organic dairy production regulations might interfere with implementation of JD control strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology V1.0
    WELCOME TO DAIRY FARMS + THE CANADIAN DAIRY PRODUCTION SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT TOOL STRUCTURE AND METHODOLOGY V1.0 LAST UPDATE: MARCH 2016 www.dairyfarmsplus.ca Groupe AGÉCO 2014, rue Cyrille-Duquet, bureau 307 Québec (QC) G1N 4N6 Canada www.groupeageco.ca Dairy Farms + Structure and methodology v1.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DISCLAIMER About Dairy Farmers of Canada Run for farmers by farmers, Dairy Farmers of Canada is the voice of Canadian dairy farmers. Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC) is the national policy, lobbying and promotional organization representing Canada’s farmers living on approximately 12,000 dairy farms. DFC strives to create stable conditions for the Canadian dairy industry, today and in the future. It works to maintain policies that foster the viability of Canadian dairy farmers and promote dairy products and their health benefits. Dairy farmers fund its operations, including promotional activities. About Dairy Farms + Dairy Farms + is funded by Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, the Canadian Dairy Network and the Canadian Dairy Commission under the Dairy Research Cluster Initiative. The tool was developed by Groupe AGÉCO. In the consulting field for nearly 15 years, Groupe AGÉCO has been at the forefront of the agri-food economy and corporate responsibility sectors. The AGÉCO team helps clients make the right decisions to capitalize on their business environments. In addition to being the very first consulting firm to specialize in economic studies in the agri-food sector, Groupe AGÉCO is a pioneer in social life cycle analysis. With the acquisition of the activities of Quantis Canada in 2015, AGÉCO is able to provide a comprehensive range of corporate responsibility services focused on social, economic and environmental aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Johne's Disease Prevention and Control on Organic Dairy Farms in Ontario, Canada
    Johne’s Disease Prevention and Control on Organic Dairy Farms in Ontario, Canada by Laura Pieper A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Population Medicine Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Laura Pieper, July, 2014 ABSTRACT JOHNE’S DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL ON ORGANIC DAIRY FARMS IN ONTARIO, CANADA Laura Pieper Advisor: University of Guelph, 2014 Professor David F. Kelton This thesis investigates Johne’s disease (JD) risk factors and control strategies on organic and conventional dairy farms in Ontario, Canada. The JD Risk Assessment and Management Plan (RAMP) was evaluated and used for the comparison of JD control between both farming types. Attitudes about JD control among organic producers and veterinarians were further investigated. RAMP data and JD milk or serum ELISA results from herds voluntarily participating in the Ontario Johne’s Education and Management Assistance Program (OJEMAP) were used for the first three research chapters. Individual interviews and focus groups with organic producers and veterinarians were used in the last two research chapters to understand attitudes about JD prevention and control, as well as about organic farming and the veterinarian-producer relationship. The veterinarian conducting the RAMP greatly influenced the RAMP scores and the recommendations that were given to the producers. However, the RAMP was considered useful in determining the between-herd and within-herd JD transmission risk and in identifying recommendations for JD control for the producers. Organic and conventional farms had a similar herd-level ELISA test-positive prevalence, but affected organic herds had a higher within-herd prevalence than affected conventional herds.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 2.0 a POSSIBLE ROADMAP for the CANADIAN DAIRY INDUSTRY Sylvain Charlebois Jean-Luc Lemieux Simon Somogyi TABLE of CONTENTS
    SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 2.0 A POSSIBLE ROADMAP FOR THE CANADIAN DAIRY INDUSTRY Sylvain Charlebois Jean-Luc Lemieux Simon Somogyi TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 WHAT IS SUPPLY MANAGEMENT? 6 Canadian farm commodities that are governed by supply management. 6 1.0 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 OVERVIEW 8 Figure 1: I believe dairy farming is an important industry in Canada. 9 Figure 2: I believe it is important to support Canadian dairy farms by buying Canadian dairy products. 9 Figure 3: I believe the government should protect supply management in the dairy industry. 9 Figure 4: If dairy products were more expensive, I would still purchase them if it means that we can keep dairy farms in Canada. 10 1.2 CONTEXT 10 Figure 5: Annual Total Fluid Milk Sales in Litres per Capita Canada (2008 to 2018 where Data Available) 11 Figure 6: Global Fluid Milk Consumption in Litres per Capita 12 Figure 7: Total Cheese Sales in Kg per Capita (Canada, 1999 to 2018) 13 1.3 HISTORY OF SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 14 Figure 8: Number of Dairy Farms in Canada (1967 to 2018) 15 Figure 9: Canadian Farm Cash Receipts from Dairying in Canada 1971 to 2018 (in Millions of Dollars) 15 Figure 10: Number of Dairy Cows and Heifers in Canada (1960 to 2018) 16 Figure 11: I am familiar with supply management in the dairy industry. 17 Figure 12: I prefer to eat food produced within my province or region if possible. 18 SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 2.0 | PREPARED BY DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY AGRI-FOOD ANALYTICS LAB AND ARRELL FOOD INSTITUTE | 2 2.0 A ROADMAP FOR THE FUTURE 19 2.1 SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 19 2.2 CHANGING SUPPLY MANAGEMENT FOR THE RIGHT REASONS 19 2.3 WHAT CANADIANS ARE SAYING ABOUT OUR DAIRY INDUSTRY 21 Figure 13: I believe supply management is good for the Canadian economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Prix Alimentaires Canadiens 10E Édition 2020 Auteurs Et Conseillers
    RAPPORT ANNUEL SUR LES PRIX ALIMENTAIRES CANADIENS 10E ÉDITION 2020 AUTEURS ET CONSEILLERS ÉQUIPE DALHOUSIE Dr Sylvain Charlebois Dr. Andrea Giusto Hyejung (Cathy) Bae (Chef de projet) Département des Sciences Recherche appliquée, Collège Agri-Food Analytics Lab économiques communautaire de la Nouvelle- [email protected] [email protected] Écosse (NSCC) [email protected] Eamonn McGuinty Kathleen Kevany Agri-Food Analytics Lab Faculté d’agriculture Emon Majumder [email protected] [email protected] Recherche appliquée, Collège communautaire de la Nouvelle- Dr Vlado Keselj Don Fiander Écosse (NSCC) Faculté des sciences DalAnalytics [email protected] informatiques [email protected] [email protected] Jay Harris Joon Son École de commerce Schulich, Janet Music IBM, Canada Université York Agri-Food Analytics Lab [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ÉQUIPE GUELPH Dr Simon Somogyi Dr Paul Uys Dr Jess Haines (Chef d’équipe-Guelph) Collège d’agriculture de l’Ontario Département de relations École de commerce et des (OAC) familiales et nutrition appliquée sciences économiques Gordon S. [email protected] [email protected] Lang School Dr Francis Tapon Dr Graham Taylor [email protected] École de commerce et des Faculté d’ingénierie Dr Erna Van Duren sciences économiques Gordon S. [email protected] École de commerce et des Lang School Alexander Moksyakov sciences économiques Gordon S. [email protected] Faculté d’ingénierie Lang School [email protected] [email protected] RAPPORT CANADIEN SUR LES PRIX
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Election Kit.Pdf
    General Key Messages ISSUE KEY MESSAGE(S) ON THE FARM Animal Care • Animal care is a priority for all Canadian dairy farmers. Dairy farmers’ commitment to providing high quality milk begins with a high standard of animal care that includes providing their cows with nutritious diets, healthy living conditions and good veterinary care. • Dairy farmers have a strict Code of Practice on the care and welfare of dairy cattle. Based on a document originally developed by the Canadian Federation of Humane Societies and the Canadian Agri-Food Research Council, the Code was significantly updated by the National Farm Animal Care Council (NFACC) and industry groups in 2009. The Code of Practice are national guidelines for the care and handling of the different species of farm animals. • Dairy farmers started being assessed for their compliance to the Code in 2015. Within four years, all farms will be trained, then validated by provincial producer groups, under the umbrella of the proAction initiative. The assessment program was developed with many experts and stakeholders with the common objective of making concrete improvement on farms. Antibiotics • All milk is tested for antibiotics before it is unloaded at the processing plant. If antibiotic residues are detected, the load of milk is rejected and properly discarded. Since samples are always taken at the farm, any antibiotic residues will be traced back and the farmer penalized. The farmer must pay a fine, pay for the milk disposed of and all related costs. • Just like any living being, cows sometimes get sick or fight an infection. When a cow is sick, veterinarians may prescribe medication such as antibiotics.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Food Price Report
    CANADA’S FOOD PRICE REPORT 10TH EDITION 2020 AUTHORS AND ADVISORS DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY MEMBERS Dr. Sylvain Charlebois Dr. Andrea Giusto Hyejung (Cathy) Bae (Lead Author and Project Lead for Department of Economics Applied Research, Nova Scotia Dalhousie University) [email protected] Community College Agri-Food Analytics Lab [email protected] Kathleen Kevany [email protected] Faculty of Agriculture Emon Majumder Eamonn McGuinty [email protected] Applied Research, Nova Scotia Agri-Food Analytics Lab Community College Don Fiander [email protected] [email protected] DalAnalytics Dr. Vlado Keselj [email protected] Jay Harris Faculty of Computer Science Schulich School of Business, York Joon Son [email protected] University IBM Canada [email protected] Janet Music [email protected] Agri-Food Analytics Lab [email protected] UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH MEMBERS Dr. Simon Somogyi Paul Uys Dr. Jess Haines (Project Lead for University Ontario Agricultural College Family Relations and Applied of Guelph) (OAC) Nutrition Gordon S. Lang School of [email protected] [email protected] Business and Economics Dr. Francis Tapon Dr. Graham Taylor [email protected] Gordon S. Lang School of School of Engineering Dr. Erna Van Duren Business and Economics [email protected] Gordon S. Lang School of [email protected] Alexander Moksyakov Business and Economics School of Engineering [email protected] [email protected] Canada’s Food Price Report 2020 is a collaborative effort between Dalhousie University, led by the Faculties of Management
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Dairy Farmers Are Leading the Way in Sustainable Dairy Farming
    The Environmental and Socioeconomic Life Cycle Assessment of Canadian Milk Production Canadian dairy farmers are leading the way in sustainable dairy farming The Canadian dairy sector operates in a fast evolving environment: Consumers are more Citizens expect Dairy businesses The global dairy industry and more concerned Canadian companies in operating in supply is continuously improving about the sustainability the agri-food sector to chains need to work sustainable dairy of food products. be responsible corporate together to meet the production. citizens. challenge of sustain- able growth. In an effort to meet these expectations and to clarify the path towards sustainable milk production in Canada, the Dairy Farmers of Canada commissioned a Socioeconomic and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Canadian Milk Production. What is LCA? LCA is a world-renowned methodology used by various organizations in the About the study agri-food sector – from individual companies to sectoral associations. In this This LCA study is part of a project, environmental impacts and social performance were evaluated at every research cluster that brings life cycle stage, from raw material extraction up to the processing plant gate, to universities, government and offer a global and comprehensive profile of Canadian milk production. the dairy sector together on Life Cycle Perspective research to drive innovation in Social performance Environmental impacts the dairy industry. Concerned stakeholders Issues assessed The assessment involved the participation of 300 farmers and several stakeholders from different regions. The results thus account for geographical and regulatory differences across Canada. An important milestone for the Canadian dairy industry This diagnostic provides useful information for the Canadian dairy industry.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Agribusiness Market Study
    AGRIBUSINESS MARKET STUDY June 2020 1 “Go to the centre of the store, you'll find a lot of products processed elsewhere. And what's hurting is that we are actually buying a lot of food from elsewhere in the world with Canadian ingredients in them. We ship out wheat, beef, pork and buy it back in a bottle or a can at ten times the price. We need more investments. That, to me, is the weakest link we have"1 Sylvain Charlebois Director, Agri-Food Analytics Lab Dalhousie University (April 17, 2020) 2 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Overview of Calgary Economic Development .................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Agribusiness Overview .................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Document Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.4 Document Exclusions .................................................................................................................................... 8 2.0 SUBSECTOR ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Food, Beverage, and Meat Processing .......................................................................................................... 10 Overview - Food,
    [Show full text]
  • From Government Regulation to the Open Market: a Study on the Effects of Regulation Change
    Running head: A Study on the Effects of Regulation Change in the Dairy Industry From Government Regulation to the Open Market: A Study on the Effects of Regulation Change in the Dairy Industry in Australia, Ireland, and Canada A Case Study Analysis Christine N. Zwart School of Environmental Design and Rural Planning University of Guelph Running head: A Study on the Effects of Regulation Change in the Dairy Industry Abstract With the rise in globalization international trade agreements introduce new opportunities for trade on an international scale, yet can affect how agriculture operates at the local level. This paper examines how deregulation and trade liberalization has affected the dairy industry in Aus- tralia and discusses how liberalization through the CAP, the CETA, and the TPP may affect the dairy industries in Ireland and Canada. By using Australia as a benchmark to make some predic- tions about the Irish and Canadian cases it is apparent that under the right conditions the dairy industry has the ability to survive major policy changes. In the Irish case study, it is apparent that their dairy industry has great capacity for growth under recent changes to the CAP, however their goal of increasing their dairy yields by 50% by 2020 may be overly optimistic as Irish producers will be competing for international markets. Ireland is also likely to see a reduction in total num- ber of dairy farms over time. The future for Canadian dairy is less certain should the government abandon supply management. Many economists would like to see the end of supply management in Canada, while those in the dairy sector are set on keeping it.
    [Show full text]