DOCSLIB.ORG

Town and Parish Council Submissions to the Durham County Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Town and Parish Council Submissions to the Durham County Council Electoral Review Town and parish council submissions to the Durham County Council electoral review This PDF document contains 34 submissions from town and parish councils in County Durham. Some versions of Adobe Acrobat allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. From: Marion Wilson Sent: 21 July 2011 14:28 To: Reviews@ Subject: Co. Durham Boundary Changes/ Bearpark RE: CO.DURHAM BOUNDARY CHANGES. BEARPARK Dear Sir, Bearpark Parish Council would welcome a change in the electoral arrangements whereby Bearpark would be incorporated into the Deerness Ward as local amenities and services (such as schools and bus routes) and strong community links are shared by residents within the electoral division. Yours Sincerely Mrs. Marion Wilson Chair Bearpark Parish Council From: JOHN IRVINE Sent: 04 July 2011 00:01 To: Reviews@ Subject: Suggested boundary changes-Fishburn, Co Durham Hello, I have been asked to write on behalf of Fishburn Parish Council, but I also write as a resident of Fishburn myself, to object strongly to the proposals that link Fishburn in with Sedgefield as opposed to the Trimdons. In the first draft of proposed changes, no suggestion was made that Fishburn would be affected. As a result of Bishop Middleham and West Cornforth wanting change, Fishburn suddenly gets moved, as it has on several occasions in the past. Fishburn people are generally unaware that this change is about to happen, and I notice no-one from Fishburn commented on the first or second draft of proposals. This is probably because the amount of publicity in the village has been negligible, and I myself received no notification whatsoever about the second draft proposal, either by e-mail or letter, hence no comment from the Parish Council before now. Fishburn people associate themselves with the Trimdons, as they generally feel they have more in common with them than with Sedgefield. Many of the residents of Fishburn are from Trimdon and still have family there. Fishburn is the 'poor' neighbour when it is compared with Sedgefield in terms of housing, shops and community groups. We have been extremely well represented by our councillors from Trimdon in the past 3 or 4 years and would like this situation to continue. To see that Ludworth is linked with Trimdon and we are not makes very little sense in terms of the distance between the villages. We are about 1 and a half miles from Trimdon Village and nearly 3 from Sedgefield. Ludworth is about 5 or 6 miles the other side of Trimdon. On a second point, we notice that the Sedgefield Parliamentary constituency could be dissolved, and Fishburn could find itself in with Stockton North, which is not even in the same county!! Fishburn people always think that this village is the last to be considered for anything, and moves like those proposed just go to show that we are a moveable commodity that can be shifted to suit others. This is just not good enough, and I urge you to reconsider. At the very least you should have publicised these proposals more and taken the opportunity to seek more views. Fishburn has only recently published its first newsletter, which was distributed before this news had a chance to go in. I can imagine that there would be many more people objecting if they knew what was about to happen. John F Irvine Parish Clerk Fishburn Parish Council From: Lucy Stephenson Sent: 27 July 2011 20:28 To: Reviews@ Subject: Review of Boundaries in County Durham - Healeyfield Parish Council Dear Sir / Madam, Following debate at a recent Parish Council meeting, Members were pleased to learn that there were no proposed changes to the boundaries or County Council representation of the Lanchester Division of which Healeyfield Parish Council and Castleside form part of. Therefore I would be most grateful if you would please accept this email as formal acknowledgement of the Parish Council's agreement to the 'no change' proposal for this area. The Parish Council feel that the present boundary as it exists takes care of the interests of the communities in which our two local County Councillors represent, both of which have our communities interests high on their agenda. Kindest Regards Lucy Stephenson Clerk to Healeyfield Parish Council. From: Mickleton Pc Sent: 29 July 2011 13:46 To: Reviews@ Subject: DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL Dear Sirs BOUNDARY COMMISSION'S PROPOSALS FOR DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL DIVISIONAL (WARD) BOUNDARIES With reference to the Boundary Commissions recommendations for Durham County Council, Mickleton Parish Council agrees with the draft recommendations for Barnard Castle East and West for Durham County Council's proposal for two twomember divisions with an East/West split of Teesdale at Barnard Castle. Yours faithfully Mickleton Parish Council Northh Lodgeo e ParishPa s Councilou Clerk: Mr D Murrell, e-mail: [email protected] 19th July 2011 Durham County Council Electoral Boundary Review North Lodge Parish Council [NLPC] response to the Local Government of England Boundary Commission [LGBCE] Further Draft Recommendations for Chester-le-Street. After appropriate consideration at its June and July meetings, North Lodge Parish Council resolved to support the Commission’s further draft recommendations for the formation of the three single-councillor electoral divisions of Chester-le-Street East, Chester-le-Street North and North Lodge, except in that NLPC proposes that Northlands, with its electorate of 119 [2011 figure] should be transferred from North Lodge ED to Chester-le-Street North ED, thus acknowledging Northlands’ integral position and community links within Polling Division NDLA and retaining Northlands’ community links with South Pelaw in Polling Division NDLB. The reasons and evidence for the proposed transfer of Northlands to Chester-le-Street North ED are: 1. Electoral Equality The following is evidence that the transfer of Northlands’ electorate of 119 (2011) to Chester-le-Street North ED from North Lodge ED distinctly improves electoral equality in making Chester-le-Street North ED and North Lodge ED each within 1% variance from the Durham County average number of electors by 2016. Position with Northlands electorate of 119 transferred to Chester-le-Street North ED from North Lodge ED Number of Variance Number of Variance Number of Electorate electors per from Electorate electors per from Division Name councillors (2011) councillor average % (2016) councillor average % Chester-le- 15 Street North 1 3225 3225 0% 3294 3294 1% 41 North Lodge 1 2985 2985 -8% 3237 3237 -1% 2. Community Links The following extract from the “euVue Chester-le-Street” website is evidence that: • Residents of the major housing development extension to Highfield Rise, carried out by Miller Homes on the former Highfield Hospital site, have an abiding community interest in the new Northlands play area, through the Section 106 funding of £33,000 for the public artwork. • Residents in the South Pelaw area, in which the two schools mentioned sit side by side, have an abiding community interest in the new Northlands play area. • Residents of Northlands, with some of its housing shown in the background to the photograph, have an abiding community interest in the new Northlands play area. From www.euvuechester-le-street.co.uk/ ____________________________________________________________________ Throwing a party for playtime in Chester-le-Street (4 July 2011) Chester-le-Street’s Roman past is helping put the fun back into playtime at the new Northlands play area. The revamped facility now incorporates 16 giant dice carved from stone boulders to represent Roman dice, reflecting the history of the town and the theme of play. Vice chair of Durham County Council, Linda Marshall, joined youngsters and local residents to celebrate the completion of the public artwork created by North East artist Andrew Mckeown, To help the party go with a swing there was a musical performance by Black Bottom Brass, a seven-piece brass band from Japan visiting County Durham as part of Durham County Council’s international festival – BRASS. Artist Andrew began work on the project last year, running design workshops with pupils at South Pelaw Infant School and Chester-le-Street Junior School followed by a series of consultation events with local residents. He said: “After visiting the Northlands site and consulting with the local community, I felt that a large number of smaller, randomly-placed sculptures would work better than one large sculpture in the middle of the playing field. “The dice are designed to look old and worn, like those that would have been used in games played by Roman soldiers stationed at Congangis or passing through on their way to Hadrian’s Wall. “Their informal arrangement spread over the play area is intended as a kind of visual pun to invoke the impression of the sculptures having been cast into position as if they had been rolled.” The project, which has cost a total of £33,000, has been paid for by Miller Homes, which set the money aside as a condition of planning permission for a housing development on the former Highfield Hospital site. ____________________________________________________________________ It follows from the above evidence that Northlands is best transferred to Chester- le-Street North ED so that community links through the Northlands play area are preserved with respect to Highfield Rise and South Pelaw in particular. -----Original Message----- From: Alan Wake Sent: 25 June 2011 21:51 To: Reviews@ Subject: County Durham electoral review Re: consultation Dear Sir/Madam, I wish to express my dismay that Ouston has been absorbed into a district entitled "Pelton ED". I and the council wish to support Cllr Colin Carr's suggestion that the district instead be named "Beamish ED" which is a badge the electors of Ouston can wear with pride.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Councillors N Anderson, M Chard, O Edwards, R Kemp, J Peart, E Wilding, M Wilson and M Wright
    BEARPARK PARISH COUNCIL At a meeting of Bearpark Parish Council held on Wednesday 18 October 2017 at 7.00 p.m. Present: Councillors N Anderson, M Chard, O Edwards, R Kemp, J Peart, E Wilding, M Wilson and M Wright. 17/65 ELECTION OF CHAIR The Clerk sought nominations for the position of Chair of the Council, following Councillor Kemp’s decision to vacate the role. The nomination of Councillor M Wright was Moved by Councillor M Wilson, Seconded by Councillor O Edwards Resolved That Councillor M Wright be elected Chair of the Council for the remainder of the 2016/17. Councillor Wright signed the Declaration of Acceptance of Office. Councillor M Wright in the Chair 17/66 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillors E Hull, T Wilson and County Councillor D Bell. 17/67 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest in relation to any item of business on the agenda. 17/68 REPRESENTATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC There were no representations from the public. 17/69 POLICE REPORT The Clerk informed the Council that he had followed up concerns expressed at the previous meeting regarding police presence at meetings and the absence of a police report. A position statement had been circulated to all Councillors via the Clerk, from the Chief Inspector for the area following the representations. The Parish Council expressed their disappointment with the stance that had been taken, particularly with regards to the provision of a report and felt that the issue should be escalated further to the Police and Crime Commissioner.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Aid and Community Support – North Durham
    Mutual aid and community support – North Durham Category Offer Date and time Contact Catchgate and Annfield Plain Isolation support Coronavirus period Text HELP to 07564 044 509 or email Isolation support If you need support with tasks such as [email protected] 23, Front Street, shopping, collecting prescriptions, Annfield Plain, receiving a friendly call or someone to Stanley check you are ok there are volunteers DH9 7SY to support you. PACT house Stanley Isolation support Coronavirus period Telephone: 07720 650 533 39 Front St, If you need support with tasks such as Stanley shopping, collecting prescriptions, DH9 0JE receiving a friendly call or someone to check you are ok. There are volunteers to support you. Pact House, Home delivery meal and Foodbank Coronavirus period Telephone: 07720 650 533 39 Front Street, support Email: [email protected] Stanley Home Meal delivery for Elderly, ​ County Durham, Vulnerable and people self-isolating, or message on Facebook DH9 0JE. Open access Foodbank running https://www.facebook.com/PACTHouseStanley/ Monday-Friday 10am-4pm, Saturday 11.30am-1.30pm at Stanley Civic hall, The Fulforth Centre, Covid19 Meal support Every Wednesday and Telephone 0191 3710601 and leave a message Front Street, Friday between 1-2pm. email [email protected] ​ Sacriston, Sacriston Parish Council and The Coronavirus period Or contact them through their Facebook page Durham Fulforth Centre will help supply meals https://www.facebook.com/fulforthcentre/ DH7 6JT. to the most vulnerable. All meals will be prepared and cooked within The Fulforth Centre by cooks with relevant Food Hygiene certification. Meals will be supplied two days per week - Wednesday and Friday, commencing Wednesday 8 Mutual Aid Covid-19 is a list of local support groups that have been established during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Handlist 13 – Grave Plans
    Durham County Record Office County Hall Durham DH1 5UL Telephone: 03000 267619 Email: [email protected] Website: www.durhamrecordoffice.org.uk Handlist 13 – Grave Plans Issue no. 6 July 2020 Introduction This leaflet explains some of the problems surrounding attempts to find burial locations, and lists those useful grave plans which are available at Durham County Record Office. In order to find the location of a grave you will first need to find which cemetery or churchyard a person is buried in, perhaps by looking in burial registers, and then look for the grave location using grave registers and grave plans. To complement our lists of churchyard burial records (see below) we have published a book, Cemeteries in County Durham, which lists civil cemeteries in County Durham and shows where records for these are available. Appendices to this book list non-conformist cemeteries and churchyard extensions. Please contact us to buy a copy. Parish burial registers Church of England burial registers generally give a date of burial, the name of the person and sometimes an address and age (for more details please see information about Parish Registers in the Family History section of our website). These registers are available to be viewed in the Record Office on microfilm. Burial register entries occasionally give references to burial grounds or grave plot locations in a marginal note. For details on coverage of parish registers please see our Parish Register Database and our Parish Registers Handlist (in the Information Leaflets section). While most burial registers are for Church of England graveyards there are some non-conformist burial grounds which have registers too (please see appendix 3 of our Cemeteries book, and our Non-conformist Register Handlist).
    [Show full text]
  • 52 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    52 bus time schedule & line map 52 Durham - East Hedleyhope View In Website Mode The 52 bus line (Durham - East Hedleyhope) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Durham: 6:49 AM - 4:49 PM (2) East Hedleyhope: 8:34 AM - 5:44 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 52 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 52 bus arriving. Direction: Durham 52 bus Time Schedule 66 stops Durham Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 6:49 AM - 4:49 PM Turning Circle, East Hedleyhope Tuesday 6:49 AM - 4:49 PM Deerness View, East Hedleyhope Deerness View, Hedleyhope Civil Parish Wednesday 6:49 AM - 4:49 PM Old Pit, East Hedleyhope Thursday 6:49 AM - 4:49 PM Friday 6:49 AM - 4:49 PM Stable House Farm, East Hedleyhope Saturday 6:49 AM - 4:49 PM Hedley Hill Terrace, Waterhouses Black Horse, Waterhouses Terrace, Waterhouses 52 bus Info Hamilton Row, Brandon And Byshottles Civil Parish Direction: Durham Stops: 66 Church, Waterhouses Trip Duration: 45 min Line Summary: Turning Circle, East Hedleyhope, Old Co-Op Store, Waterhouses Deerness View, East Hedleyhope, Old Pit, East Hedleyhope, Stable House Farm, East Hedleyhope, Station Street, Brandon And Byshottles Civil Parish Hedley Hill Terrace, Waterhouses, Black Horse, Football Ground-Social Club, Waterhouses Waterhouses, Terrace, Waterhouses, Church, Waterhouses, Old Co-Op Store, Waterhouses, Football Ground-Social Club, Waterhouses, College College View, Esh Winning View, Esh Winning, Lymington Crossing, Esh Winning, Co-Operative Store, Esh Winning,
    [Show full text]
  • County Durham Plan Examination Matter 8 (F) - Hearing Statement
    County Durham Plan Examination Matter 8 (f) - Hearing Statement Housing Allocations R. Stevenson & Sons (ID: 1014520) Friday, October 18, 2019 © 2019 Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Ltd, trading as Lichfields. All Rights Reserved. Registered in England, no. 2778116. 14 Regent’s Wharf, All Saints Street, London N1 9RL Formatted for double sided printing. Plans based upon Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright reserved. Licence number AL50684A 22757/02/NW/LN 17914396v1 County Durham Plan Examination : Matter 8 (f) - Hearing Statement Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Land at Cook Avenue, Bearpark 2 3.0 The Industrial Estate 3 4.0 Accordance with the Plan’s Vision, Objectives and Overall Spatial Strategy 4 Vision 4 Objectives 4 Spatial Strategy 6 5.0 Availability 7 6.0 Viability and Market Interest 8 County Durham Plan Examination : Matter 8 (f) - Hearing Statement Appendices Appendix 1 Accessibility Credentials Appendix 2 Photos of the Industrial Units Appendix 3 Letter from JW Wood Appendix 4 Letter from H&H Appendix 5 Email from Taylor Wimpey County Durham Plan Examination : Matter 8 (f) - Hearing Statement 1.0 Introduction Are the housing allocations proposed in policy 4 (Table 7) and shown on the policies map justified? In particular, are they in suitable locations in the context of the Plan’s vision, objectives and overall spatial strategy, and is there a reasonable prospect that they will be available and could be viably developed at the point envisaged? Are the site specific requirements set out in Table 7 justified? 1.1 Thank you for providing us with the opportunity to submit a Hearing Statement in relation to Matter 8 ‘Housing Allocations’ on behalf of our client, R Stevenson & Sons, regarding their land holdings at Cook Avenue, Bearpark, which has a draft allocation for 200 dwellings (Ref: H7).
    [Show full text]
  • County Durham Plan Examination - Hearing Statement Matter 8: Housing Land Supply Barratt David Wilson Homes
    County Durham Plan Examination - Hearing Statement Matter 8: Housing Land Supply Barratt David Wilson Homes a) Commitments Is the assumption in Table 2 in the Plan that 15,946 homes will be provided on ‘commitments as at 30 September 2018’ justified? BDW do not consider that the commitments as at September 2018 are justified as a large number of are unlikely to ever come forward for the following reasons: 1. The Council state that ‘…it is unlikely that all of these [commitments] will come forward during the Plan period for a variety of reasons such as abnormal costs, including land contamination, or a lack of house builder interest’ (paragraph 24, Housing Need and Residual for Allocation and Evidence Paper 2. Historically, based on the councils own evidence, 17% of sites with permission have lapsed (paragraph 25, Housing Need and Residual for Allocation and Evidence Paper). 3. The Council’s evidence base also states that 2,159 houses included with the commitments, were at committee more than 6 months ago. In some cases, these unresolved S106 agreement cases are 10 years old (paragraph 37, Housing Need and Residual for Allocation and Evidence Paper). It should be noted that the majority of these applications will not be compliant with the emerging plan, for example compliance with NDSS and provision of older person housing, and as such may not be suitable for approval following adoption of the Local Plan. This clearly demonstrates that there are numerous issues associated with the 15,946 homes identified in table 2 and their contribution to future delivery is far from guaranteed.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Lady Queen of Martyrs, Newhouse, Esh Winning
    West Durham Catholic Parishes: Esh, Esh Winning, Langley Park and Ushaw Moor St John Boste Pastoral Office, Durham Road, Ushaw Moor, Durham. DH7 7LF Priest: Father David Coxon Tel: (0191) 373 0219 Secretary: Lisa Hatton Tel: (0191) 373 0219 Office Hours: Tues – Thurs from 9.30am–2.30pm E-mail: [email protected] Website: wdrcp.org Primary Schools: St Joseph’s, Ushaw Moor: Tel. (0191) 373 0355 Our Lady Queen of Martyrs, Esh Winning: Tel. (0191) 373 4343 St Michael’s Esh Laude: Tel. (0191) 373 1205 Hospital R C Chaplain Father Paul Tully Tel. (01388) 818544 Please telephone the Chaplain if you have someone in hospital who would like a visit. St Joseph’s St Michael’s Our Lady Queen of St Joseph’s Langley Ushaw Moor Esh Laude Martyrs, Newhouse Park Saturday 9 February 6.00 pm Mass Jackson & Bullen Family , Patricia Edwards & People of the Parish Sunday 10 February 9.00 am Mass 10.30 am Mass 5th Sunday of the Year James and Anne Paul Boddice (sick) Redmond, Teresa Rochford & Maggie Rowntree & People of the Parish People of the Parish Monday 11 February Tuesday 12 February 6.15 pm Confessions 7.00 pm Mass Anne Cutmore Wed 13 February 9.15 am Mass School Chapel Priest’s Intention Thurs 14 February 9.15 am Mass SS Cyril, Monk & Methodius Priest’s Intention Bp Patrons of Europe Friday 15 February 9.15 am Mass Aileen Cook Saturday 16 February 6.00 pm Mass Catherine O’Neil & People of the Parish Sunday 17 February 9.00 am Mass 10.30 am Mass 6th Sunday of the Year People of the Parish Michael & Mary Ann Peel, Nora Stiff & People of the Parish Sick: Ann Waugh, Faith Wilthew, Caitlin Minnis and Monica Mitten from Ushaw Moor.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Uncontested Election
    NOTICE OF UNCONTESTED ELECTION Durham County Election of Parish Councillors for Bearpark Parish on Thursday 4 May 2017 I, being the Returning Officer at the above election, report that the persons whose names appear below were duly elected Parish Councillors for Bearpark Parish. Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) ANDERSON 12 South View, Bearpark, Labour Party Norman Mark Durham, DH7 7DE CHARD 19 Aldin Grange Terrace, Labour Party Margaret Anne Bearpark, Durham, DH7 7AN EDWARDS 3 Flass Terrace, Ushaw Moor, Labour Party Owen Christopher County Durham, DH7 7LD HULL 60 Taylor Avenue, Bearpark, Labour Party Elizabeth Anne Durham, DH7 7AY KEMP 18 Blackburn Close, Bearpark, Labour Party Rosemary Alison Durham, DH7 7TQ PEART 32 Taylor Avenue, Bearpark, Labour Party John Howe Durham, DH7 7AY WILDING 42 Ritson Avenue, Bearpark, Labour Party Eleanor Marie Durham, DH7 7BG WILSON 58 Taylor Avenue, Bearpark, Labour Party Marion Durham, DH7 7AY WILSON 58 Taylor Avenue, Bearpark, Labour Party Tony Durham, DH7 7AY Dated Friday 7 April 2017 Terry Collins Returning Officer Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Room 1/104-115, County Hall, Durham, DH1 5UL NOTICE OF UNCONTESTED ELECTION Durham County Election of Parish Councillors for Bishop Middleham Parish on Thursday 4 May 2017 I, being the Returning Officer at the above election, report that the persons whose names appear below were duly elected Parish Councillors for Bishop Middleham Parish. Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) COOKE 5 High Road, Bishop Middleham,
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Lib Dem Survey on County Durham Plan
    RESULTS OF LIB DEM SURVEY ON COUNTY DURHAM PLAN Several thousand surveys were delivered by the Lib Dems to the West of Durham City in Newton Hall, Brasside, Witton Gilbert, Pity Me and Framwellgate Moor to get views on Durham County Council’s proposals for new housing, the development of Aykley Heads, and proposals for two relief roads. In addition the survey was advertised in the local press and residents from other parts of the area also made contributions. A full survey of Bearpark has yet to be carried out, as we are waiting for a consultation meeting in the village, currently penciled in for April 17 th 3.30pm to 7.30pm, mainly centred around the Western relief Road issues. Separate information about responses to housing in Witton Gilbert are being provided to the Council in a separate document. Over 300 people responded and hundreds of comments related to the County Durham Plan and Consultation are detailed in this report. In addition a separate survey was conducted by the Lib Dems in Neville’s Cross relating to the Western Relief Road and other local issues which had over 200 responses but is not included in this report. The comments in this report are entirely from residents and should not be taken as representing the views of the County Council or any political group. Mark Wilkes – County Councillor, Framwellgate Moor Division Amanda Hopgood – County Councillor, Newton Hall Division Mamie Simmons – County Councillor, Newton Hall Division BRIEF OVERVIEW OF RESPONSES • Over 80% against proposals for housing on greenbelt. • Over 80% feel Durham County Council hasn’t consulted properly on the plans • Over 60% in favour of Western Relief Road • Nearly 70% in favour of Northern Relief Road • Residents split nearly 50-50 on proposals for Aykley Heads • New housing should be family homes and first-time buyer homes with strong view that this housing should be eco-friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham City Liberal Democrats Wish to Submit the Following Proposals for Consideration As Amended Electoral Divisions for the New Unitary Council
    BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL BOUNDARY REVIEW: DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL LIBERAL DEMOCRAT PROPOSAL Durham City Liberal Democrats wish to submit the following proposals for consideration as amended electoral divisions for the new Unitary Council. Context The proposals are based on the following criteria: The number of councillors will remain at 126. Wherever possible the divisions will have two members, though one and three member wards may be created to satisfy other criteria (see below). The electorate of each division will normally be within a tolerance of plus or minus 10% of the County average of 6,373 electors i.e. from 5,738 to 7,010. Data is derived from County projections for 2013 plus the corrected student numbers (see below). Division boundaries will respect parish boundaries and where they are not co- terminus will follow parish ward boundaries. Exceptionally, new parish wards may be created. Natural communities to form the basic building blocks of the divisions. Proposals for Durham City The proposals for Durham City satisfy the above criteria more closely than other suggestions. Change is kept to a minimum, numerical anomalies evened out, and an even stronger sense of community is delivered than with the existing boundaries. A brief commentary is provided after each Divisional description. Student Adjustments The projections to 2013 in some central polling districts are affected by changes in the rules for voter registration which removed registration from members of a household that failed to reconfirm after 12 months. Durham University is a powerful presence in the City’s housing market. The majority of student rented houses appear to have been significantly affected by this ruling, resulting in significant reductions in registration numbers between 2004 and 2008 (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Witton Gilbert Durham
    Witton Gilbert In the Seventeenth And Eighteenth Centuries Katherine Mary Beer 1974 PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory trial version http://www.fineprint.com Contents Introduction References: Witton Gilbert in the Seventeenth Century 1 The parish in the Eighteenth Century 11 The Church at Witton Gilbert in the Eighteenth Century 17 The Clerk 22 The Sexton 27 The Poor 28 Appendices: 1. Record of Births, Marriages and Deaths taken from the Parish Registers of Witton Gilbert for the Seventeenth And Eighteenth Centuries 35 2. Some Farms in the Parish in the Mid-Eighteenth Century 38 3.1. Lists of members of the “Vestry”. 1745 and 1760 41 3.2. The Churchwardens of Witton Gilbert. 1716-1769 42 3.3. The Constables of Witton Gilbert. 1740-1772 43-44 3.4. The Overseers of the Poor. 1739-1768 45 3.5. Collectors of the Land Tax and Window sess. 1742-1772 46 Acknowledgements I should like to thank the Archivists in the Prior’s Kitchen, Durham for their help and H.F. Beer for his calculations on the population figures in Appendix 1. I should also like to thank the Rector of Witton Gilbert for allowing me access to the Parish Records. PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory trial version http://www.fineprint.com Introduction This account of the parish of Witton Gilbert in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, has been compiled using material which is still preserved in the church safe at Witton Gilbert. The Churchwardens’ Account Books for the years 1738-1769, are in a good state of preservation. They give detailed items of annual church expenditure.
    [Show full text]
  • North Durham
    Mutual aid and community support – North Durham Category Offer Date and time Contact Catchgate and Annfield Plain Isolation support Coronavirus period Text HELP to 07564 044 509 or email Isolation support If you need support with tasks such as [email protected] 23, Front Street, shopping, collecting prescriptions, Annfield Plain, receiving a friendly call or someone to Stanley check you are ok there are volunteers DH9 7SY to support you. PACT house Stanley Isolation support Coronavirus period Telephone: 07720 650 533 39 Front St, If you need support with tasks such as Stanley shopping, collecting prescriptions, DH9 0JE receiving a friendly call or someone to check you are ok. There are volunteers to support you. Pact House, Home delivery meal and Foodbank Coronavirus period Telephone: 07720 650 533 39 Front Street, support Stanley Email: [email protected] County Durham, Home Meal delivery for Elderly, or message on Facebook Vulnerable and people self-isolating, DH9 0JE. https://www.facebook.com/PACTHouseStanley/ Open access Foodbank running Monday-Friday 10am-4pm, Saturday 11.30am-1.30pm at Stanley Civic hall, The Fulforth Centre, Every Wednesday and Telephone 0191 3710601 and leave a message Front Street, Covid19 Meal support Friday between 1-2pm. email [email protected] Sacriston, Coronavirus period Or contact them through their Facebook page Sacriston Parish Council and The Durham Fulforth Centre will help supply meals https://www.facebook.com/fulforthcentre/ DH7 6JT. to the most vulnerable. Mutual Aid Covid-19 is a list of local support groups that have been established during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. To find a local group visit https://www.mutual-aid.co.uk/ Mutual aid and community support – North Durham Category Offer Date and time Contact All meals will be prepared and cooked within The Fulforth Centre by cooks with relevant Food Hygiene certification.
    [Show full text]