DOCSLIB.ORG

Durham City Liberal Democrats Wish to Submit the Following Proposals for Consideration As Amended Electoral Divisions for the New Unitary Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Durham City Liberal Democrats Wish to Submit the Following Proposals for Consideration As Amended Electoral Divisions for the New Unitary Council BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL BOUNDARY REVIEW: DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL LIBERAL DEMOCRAT PROPOSAL Durham City Liberal Democrats wish to submit the following proposals for consideration as amended electoral divisions for the new Unitary Council. Context The proposals are based on the following criteria: The number of councillors will remain at 126. Wherever possible the divisions will have two members, though one and three member wards may be created to satisfy other criteria (see below). The electorate of each division will normally be within a tolerance of plus or minus 10% of the County average of 6,373 electors i.e. from 5,738 to 7,010. Data is derived from County projections for 2013 plus the corrected student numbers (see below). Division boundaries will respect parish boundaries and where they are not co- terminus will follow parish ward boundaries. Exceptionally, new parish wards may be created. Natural communities to form the basic building blocks of the divisions. Proposals for Durham City The proposals for Durham City satisfy the above criteria more closely than other suggestions. Change is kept to a minimum, numerical anomalies evened out, and an even stronger sense of community is delivered than with the existing boundaries. A brief commentary is provided after each Divisional description. Student Adjustments The projections to 2013 in some central polling districts are affected by changes in the rules for voter registration which removed registration from members of a household that failed to reconfirm after 12 months. Durham University is a powerful presence in the City’s housing market. The majority of student rented houses appear to have been significantly affected by this ruling, resulting in significant reductions in registration numbers between 2004 and 2008 (e.g. around 1200 voters in Neville’s Cross alone). This should have been a one off alteration to the registration method. Unfortunately, County data projections, have, in error, continued this as a trend. So, for example, between 2008 and 2009 there was no further change. This has been confirmed by the University to officers of the County Council working on this current review. All now accept that the related trend calculations made by the County Council are in error. This factor is evident in all the polling districts marked with an asterisk in the divisions below. We have, therefore, used the more accurate 2008 data rather than the 2013 predictions for those affected divisions, resulting in the adjustments as shown. This assumption is robust as there is evidence that the number of student properties has plateaued with few incidents of such houses reverting to family accommodation. (2 members) Belmont Belmont 5047 Add West Rainton from Sherburn 1791 6838 (+7.3%) Belmont’s numbers require a significant addition. The two obvious candidates are Pittington (as per Labour’s proposal) and West Rainton (our suggestion). Both are equally valid, lying a short distance from Belmont, and with connections for shopping and schooling. Unfortunately, choosing Pittington means that West Rainton has to join Framwellgate Moor, with which it has no meaningful relationship, and is separated by the A1(M) motorway. The separation of these two communities is demonstrated by the fact that it takes almost 15 minutes by minor roads to go from one to the other, if travelling by car, or up to an hour by public transport. It also crosses the major boundary of the River Wear. (2) Gilesgate Gilesgate 5082 Add Hild/Bede College from Elvet 444 Adjust for student data for PD AE* 60 Adjust for student data for PD AH* 121 5707 (-10.5%) Both Labour and Liberal Democrats agree on this minor amendment. The difference between our numbers and theirs is simply due to the student adjustments. (2) Elvet Elvet 6621 Remove Hild/Bede College -444 Remove St Aidan’s College -381 Adjust for student data for PD AG* 291 Adjust for student data for PD AN* 58 6145 (-3.6%) Both Labour and Liberal Democrats agree on this minor amendment. The difference between our numbers and theirs is simply due to the student adjustments. (2) Neville’s Cross Neville’s Cross 4947 Add St Aidan’s College from Elvet 381 Adjust for student data for PD AM* 307 Adjust for student data for PD AP* 202 5837 (-8.4%) Both Labour and Liberal Democrats agree on this minor amendment. The difference between our numbers and theirs is simply due to the student adjustments. (2) Newton Hall Newton Hall 6193 Add DT from Framwellgate Moor 395 6588 (+3.4%) The addition of Brasside (DT) makes the numbers right for Framwellgate Moor without jeopardising those of Newton Hall. Brasside is adjacent to Newton Hall and utilises the latter’s shopping facilities and schools. Residents regard this as a natural fit. (1) Framwellgate Moor Framwellgate Moor 7862 Remove Bearpark (DR) -1773 Remove Witton Gilbert (DW) -2153 Remove DT -395 3541 (+11.1%) The separation of Framwellgate Moor, Witton Gilbert, and Bearpark is logical. The three communities are separated geographically, with few overlapping areas of interaction. Both Witton Gilbert and Bearpark have been placed in divisions that not only fit the key criteria but would feel more natural to the residents. This is also agreed by the local councillors. Brasside (DT) is a ‘satellite’ village that sits better with Newton Hall (see above). (3) Esh Winning, Esh, and Bearpark Esh 5120 Add Bearpark (DR) 1773 Add HH from Deerness 1216 Add HI from Deerness 1167 Add HJ from Deerness 412 9688 (1.3%) Esh Division is seriously under-numbered and the addition of Esh Winning is logical and helpful. The previous separation of Esh Winning and Hamsteels, effectively co-joined communities sharing all facilities, was a matter of expedience (because of former district council boundaries) that is no longer required. Our proposal brings this and other adjacent communities into one natural community, without damaging the credibility of other divisions. The addition of Bearpark transforms a too big two member ward into a well proportioned three member ward. Bearpark’s most natural “partner’ is Ushaw Moor, but no proposal has been able to make the numbers work for these two communities. The next most natural solution for Bearpark is to join Esh through its close connection with Langley Park. This has not been possible previously because of former district council boundaries. (2) Brandon Brandon 7147 Remove Meadowfield (HB) -1570 Remove Langley Moor (HA) -982 Add New Brancepeth (HG) 828 Add Brancepeth (GA) 340 5763 (-9.6%) The existing division of Brandon is significantly over-numbered. There appear to be no options to keep its adjacent communities to the east (Langley Moor and Meadowfield) in either a three member division or two 2 member divisions. The inclusion of two smaller adjacent communities (Brancepeth and New Brancepeth) to the west solves this problem. The boundary between Brandon and the combination of Langley Moor and Meadowfield is strengthened by being the track of a former railway and now public footpath. The northern boundary of the HG polling district is clearly delineated by a river. (1) Ushaw Moor (new seat) Add Ushaw (HD) 807 Add Ushaw Moor (HE) 1503 Add Broom Park (HF) 1053 3363 (+5.5%) The three components of this division form a very recognisable single community with shared community facilities and schools. In the recent past it has also been a discrete district council ward. (2) Durham South Durham South 4844 Add Meadowfield from Brandon 1570 Add Langley Moor from Brandon 982 Remove Shincliffe -1412 5984 (-6.1%) Durham South has always been a slightly awkward geographical area including a string of villages running east/west across the southern boundary of Durham City. Most focus inwards (not east/west) into the City and have relatively little in common with most of the other villages concerned. However, like other proposals, there appear to be no alternatives that do not disrupt several other divisions. Our proposal brings the co-joined communities of Langley Moor and Meadowfield into Durham South which allows Shincliffe and Sherburn Hospital to move into Sherburn Division where they sit more naturally. As in previous reviews this is the division that allows other divisions to work well. Our proposal ensures improvement from the current situation in that all the communities in this division now have strong links with some other villages in the Division and are able to have their voice heard. Sherburn and Coxhoe (two options) (2) Sherburn – Option 1 Sherburn 7072 Remove Ludworth to Thornley -521 Remove West Rainton to Belmont -1791 Add Shincliffe and Sherburn Hospital from Durham South 1412 6172 (-3.2%) (2) Coxhoe – Option 1 Coxhoe (unchanged) 5361 (-15.9%) (2) Sherburn – Option 2 Sherburn 7072 Remove Ludworth to Thornley -521 Remove Shadforth to Coxhoe -362 Remove West Rainton to Belmont -1791 Add Shincliffe and Sherburn Hospital from Durham South 1412 5810 (-8.8%) (2) Coxhoe – Option 2 Coxhoe 5361 Add Shadforth from Sherburn 362 5723 (-10.2%) Sherburn’s electorate is slightly outside the plus 10% guideline but includes some communities that sit more naturally elsewhere now that the District Council boundary has been taken out of the equation. There are two options that are more natural and have fewer negative consequences than Labour’s proposal. Both Labour and Liberal Democrats agree that Ludworth should move to Thornley (which needs additional voters). We also agree that the peripheral community of West Rainton should be moved. However, we strongly disagree that it should be moved to Framwellgate Moor. This proposal has no logic whatsoever especially when it can join Belmont ‘down the road’ (see above). To ‘replace’ the voters lost from West Rainton we include Shincliffe and Sherburn Hospital allowing Sherburn to remain as a two member division.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Subject Guide 1 – Records Relating to Inclosure
    Durham County Record Office County Hall Durham DH1 5UL Telephone: 03000 267619 Email: [email protected] Website: www.durhamrecordoffice.org.uk Subject Guide 1 – Records Relating to Inclosure Issue no. 19 July 2020 Contents Introduction 1 Organisation of List 2 Alphabetical List of Townships 2 A 2 B 2 C 3 D 4 E 4 F 4 G 4 H 5 I 5 K 5 L 5 M 6 N 6 O 6 R 6 S 7 T 7 U 8 W 8 Introduction Inclosure (occasionally spelled “enclosure”) refers to a reorganisation of scattered land holdings by mutual agreement of the owners. Much inclosure of Common Land, Open Fields and Moor Land (or Waste), formerly farmed collectively by the residents on behalf of the Lord of the Manor, had taken place by the 18th century, but the uplands of County Durham remained largely unenclosed. Inclosures, to consolidate land-holdings, divide the land (into Allotments) and fence it off from other usage, could be made under a Private Act of Parliament or by general agreement of the landowners concerned. In the latter case the Agreement would be Enrolled as a Decree at the Court of Chancery in Durham and/or lodged with the Clerk of the Peace, the senior government officer in the County, so may be preserved in Quarter Sessions records. In the case of Parliamentary Enclosure a Local Bill would be put before Parliament which would pass it into law as an Inclosure Act. The Acts appointed Commissioners to survey the area concerned and determine its distribution as a published Inclosure Award.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents. Proceedings at the Nomination. Page Polling Districts
    E S CONT NT . i Proceedings at the Nominat on . PAGE Polling Districts Castle Eden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gateshead Heworth Hetton - le -Hole J arrow Lanchester Seaham Harbour Shotley Bridge South Shields Sunderland Winlaton Analysis of the P011 A nalysis o f Districts A l o f n na yses Tow ships O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Index of Townships RE F E RE N CE S l l f ll made to Doub e Entries in the Voting Co umns , where the o owing ‘ evi ations are used to denote other Districts CE for Castle Eden L for Lanchester CS Chester -le - Street SH Seaham Harbour D Durham SB Shotley Bridge G Gateshead SS South Shields H Heworth S Sunderland HH Hetton -le - Hole Wh Whickham J J arrow Wn Winlaton are l l Doub e Entries occur in the same District, the numbers on y are a—m PROCEEDING S AT THE NOMINATION . The Nomination for the Northern Division of the County o f Durham . l l ook p ace in the Market P ace , Durham , (the County Courts being i 2 oth o f 1 8 6 8 . nder repair) , on Friday, the November, . U ff Of . W E WOOLER, ESQ IRE , Under Sheri , Returning ficer _ SIR WI IA O of ll HEDWORTH LL MS N , BARONET , Whitburn Ha , was - of Elemore ll proposed by Henry John Baker Baker, Esquire , Ha , of f and seconded by Joseph Laycock, Esquire , Low Gos orth, l - - Newcast e upon Tyne .
    [Show full text]
  • Shincliffe Show 16 Th September Application Form Inside
    Issue 56 – July 2017 Shincliffe Show 16th September Application Form inside CHILDREN’S & YOUTH ORGANISATIONS USEFUL INFORMATION SHINCLIFFE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION BABY AND TODDLER GROUP: Tuesday & Chair: Pete Hagger 386 7085 Thursday—9.30 a.m. – 11.30 a.m. Secretary: Del Faye 386 0369 Contact: Alice Coombes Email: [email protected] [email protected] 07894738386 Contact us on Facebook SCOUTS & CUBS & BEAVERS KEEP FIT BY MOVING AND DANCING Website: www.durhamcityscouts.org.uk Thursdays at 8pm, WI HUT Contact: John Little Tuesdays at 12, St Mary’s Church Hall (Gentle Class) [email protected] Contact: Alison Swarbrick: 383 0346 GUIDES/BROWNIES/RAINBOWS PILATES District Commissioner Carole Forster: 372 1786 Contact: Alison Brown: 386 1094 Regional Office 01904 676076 SHINCLIFFE WOMEN’S INSTITUTE meets in the WI Website: wwwgirlguidingnortheast.org.uk Hall in Shincliffe Village on the first Wednesday in the SHINCLIFFE JUNIOR FOOTBALL CLUB month. Communication Officer: Sarah McGuiggan President: Yvonne Willis: 386 2124 07786911060 Hall Bookings: Margaret Chapman: 386 3730 POLICE SHINCLIFFE PARISH COUNCIL Ring County Police Headquarters, Aykley Heads, for Chair: George Lee: 384 1437 Durham City Police Station and Bowburn Police Clerk: Kate Cuthbert: 07701027450 Station: 0845 606 0365 Meetings on the third Tuesday in the month at 7.00 For all emergency calls ring 999 p.m. (except August) For all non emergency calls ring 101 Email: [email protected] COUNTY TRAVELLING LIBRARY – Alternate Website: www.shincliffeparishcouncil.co.uk Thursdays 12.40p.m. - 1.45 p.m. High Shincliffe Contacting Shincliffe Parish Council and the Parish (outside 6, High Street) Clerk: - there are 5 councillors (in addition to the 1.50 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham - Langley Park Service 14 Sunday 19Th November 2017 Only
    Durham - Langley Park Service 14 Sunday 19th November 2017 only Service 14 14 14 14 14 Durham Bus Station, Stand A - 1935 2035 2135 2235 Arnison Centre, Sainsbury's - 1946 2046 2146 2246 Sacriston Crossroads - 1954 2054 2154 2254 Langley Park, Stringer Terrace (a) - 2004 2104 2204 2304 Langley Park, Stringer Terrace (d) 1905 2005 2105 2205 - Sacriston Crossroads 1915 2015 2115 2215 - Arnison Centre, Sainsbury's 1922 2022 2122 2222 - Durham Bus Station, Stand A 1933 2033 2133 2233 - Durham - Consett Service 15 Thursday 16th - Sunday 19th November 2017 only SU SU Service 15 15 15 15 Durham Bus Station, Stand C 1935 2050 2205 2315 University Hospital of Nth Durham 1938 2053 2208 2318 Witton Gilbert, Glendinning Arms 1944 2059 2214 2324 Kaysburn 1946 2101 2216 2326 Lanchester, Village Green 1953 2108 2223 2333 Iveston 1959 2114 2229 2339 Leadgate, opposite Co-operative 2002 2117 2232 2342 Number One Roundabout 2006 2121 2236 2346 Consett Bus Station 2008 2123 2238 2348 Sunday 19th November 2017 only Service 15 Consett Bus Station 1845 Number One Roundabout 1847 Leadgate, opposite Co-operative 1851 Iveston 1854 Lanchester, Village Green 1859 Kaysburn 1907 Witton Gilbert, Glendinning Arms 1909 University Hospital of Nth Durham 1915 Durham Bus Station 1918 SU = Sunday Only Durham - Stanley Service 16 Thursday 16th - Sunday 19th November 2017 only SU SU SU Service 16 16 16 16 16 Durham Bus Station, Stand C 1855 1955 2055 2155 2255 University Hospital of Nth Durham 1859 1959 2059 2159 2259 Framwellgate Moor, New College 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
    [Show full text]
  • ON the WORK of MID DURHAM AAP… March 2018
    A BRIEF ‘HEADS UP’ ON THE WORK OF MID DURHAM AAP… March 2018 WELCOME Welcome to your March edition of the AAPs e-bulletin / e-newsletter. In this month’s edition we will update you on: - Mid Durham’s next Board meeting - Community Snippets - Partner Updates For more detailed information on all our meetings and work (notes, project updates, members, etc) please visit our web pages at www.durham.gov.uk/mdaap or sign up to our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/pages/Mid-Durham-Area-Action- Partnership-AAP/214188621970873 MID DURHAM AAP - March Board Meeting The Mid Durham AAP will be holding its next Board meeting on Wednesday 14th March 2018 at 6pm in New Brancepeth Village Hall, Rock Terrace, New Brancepeth, DH7 7EP On the agenda will be presentation on the proposed Care Navigator Programme which is a person-centred approach which uses signposting and information to help primary care patients and their carers move through the health and social care system. There will also be several Area Budget projects coming to the Board including the Deernees Paths and an Environment Improvement Pot that if approved will start later this year. We ask that you register your attendance beforehand by contacting us on 07818510370 or 07814969392 or 07557541413 or email middurhamaap.gov.uk. Community Snippets Burnhope – The Community Centre is now well underway and is scheduled for completion at the end of May. The builder – McCarricks, have used a drone to take photos… Butsfield Young Farmers – Similar to Burnhope, the young Farmers build is well under way too and is due for completion in mid-March… Lanchester Loneliness Project – Several groups and residents in Lanchester are working together to tackle social isolation within their village.
    [Show full text]
  • Chester-Le-Street/Durham
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. Principal Area Boundary Review DISTRICT OF CHESTER LE STREET; CITY OF DURHAM LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION fc'Oll ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell FRIGS FSVA MEMBERS Lady Ackner Mr T Brockbank DL Professor G E Cherry Mi- K J L Newell Mr B Scholes OBE THE RT. HON. PATRICK JENKIN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT BACKGROUND 1. In a letter dated 20 March 198! the Chester-le-Street District Council invited us to make proposals for certain changes to the boundary of their district with the district of the City of Durham. The suggestion for changes had arisen during the course of the review by the District Council of the parish pattern in their area and involved the parishes of Plawsworth and Sacriston. Durham City Council had not at that stage completed their own parish review, but it was clear that the changes concerned were not supported by them or by the councils of the three parishes in their district which would be involved - Framwellgate Moor, Kimblesworth and Witton Gilbert. We decided to defer action on the matter until we had received Durham City Council's parish review report. ?., In submitting their report in August 1982 Durham City Council opposed all the district boundary changes suggested by Chester-le-Street District Council; Kimblesworth Parish Council wrote to us separately to emphasise their opposition to the ones affecting then. The City Council sent us a copy of a letter from the Durham County Council, however, which said, in relation to the possibility of changes in th^ Kimblesworth Parish boundary, that the Council considered that the villages of Kimblesworth and Nettlesworth (the latter currently in Plawsworth Parish, Chester-le-Street) should be treated as one settlement and that future development should be in relation to a single local plan.
    [Show full text]
  • DURHAM:. Tal 64:9
    TRADES DIRECTORY.] DURHAM:. TAl 64:9 Gent John, King street, Barnard Castle Hunter Thomas &Sons, 83 & 84 High )IartinMissD.74Ma.ndale rd.Sth.Stocktn. uent John, Sadbergo, Darlington street west, Sunderland Martin Peter, 32 Silver street, Stockton uent Michael, Gainford, Darlington Hunter William Lock hart, 12 Gibson Martin Robert, uParliament st.Stockton *Gent Richd.B. King st. Barnard Castle terrace, Chester road, Sunderland Martindale T.2 Market hall,HartlepoolW Gibb Alexander, I96 .Albert rd. Jarrow Hutchinson Jacob, I Mount pleasant, Mason James, Burlington buildings, Gibb Alexander, 2 Elm street, Jarrow Consett R.S.O Suffolk street, Sunderland *Gibbon Matthew, Staindrop, Darlingtn HutchinsonThos.Byers grn.Spennymoor Masterton W.9 Wellington st.Gateshead Gibbon W.2 Wesley st. Willington R.S.O HutchinsonT.Io Chester ter.Sunderla.nd Mathieson John B. Lyon street, Heb­ Gibson Jonn. Crawcrook, Ryton R.S.O Hutchinson Thos.22Edwardst.Stockton burn, Newcastle Gibson Stephen, 29 Ripon st. Gateshead Hutchinson Tbos. Gainford, Darlington Mawston J. Easington la. Fence Hous~s uilhespie Thomas, Cornsay, Durham Hutchinsqn Thomas, Middleton-in- Metcalfe John, 51 North rd. Darlington Gilhespy Robt. Winlaton,Blaydon R.S.O Teesdale, Darlington Miller James, ro Shakespeare street, Gilhespy Thomas, Rectory lane, Win- Hutchison Robert, 88 Newgate street, Southwick, Sunderland laton, Blaydon R.S.O · Bishop Auckland Millett Chas.46 Cuthbert st. Sth.Shields *Gilhome Wm. I79 High st. we. Sundrld JacksonJ. W~stAuckland,Bishop.Aucklnd Millican Thomas, I South st. Gateshead Gillhespy George, Boldon colliery, West Jameson M. 3 The Royalty, Sunderland Mtlls Henry, r Charles street, Jarrow Boldon, East Boldon R.S.O Jarrett D. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Councillors N Anderson, M Chard, O Edwards, R Kemp, J Peart, E Wilding, M Wilson and M Wright
    BEARPARK PARISH COUNCIL At a meeting of Bearpark Parish Council held on Wednesday 18 October 2017 at 7.00 p.m. Present: Councillors N Anderson, M Chard, O Edwards, R Kemp, J Peart, E Wilding, M Wilson and M Wright. 17/65 ELECTION OF CHAIR The Clerk sought nominations for the position of Chair of the Council, following Councillor Kemp’s decision to vacate the role. The nomination of Councillor M Wright was Moved by Councillor M Wilson, Seconded by Councillor O Edwards Resolved That Councillor M Wright be elected Chair of the Council for the remainder of the 2016/17. Councillor Wright signed the Declaration of Acceptance of Office. Councillor M Wright in the Chair 17/66 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillors E Hull, T Wilson and County Councillor D Bell. 17/67 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest in relation to any item of business on the agenda. 17/68 REPRESENTATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC There were no representations from the public. 17/69 POLICE REPORT The Clerk informed the Council that he had followed up concerns expressed at the previous meeting regarding police presence at meetings and the absence of a police report. A position statement had been circulated to all Councillors via the Clerk, from the Chief Inspector for the area following the representations. The Parish Council expressed their disappointment with the stance that had been taken, particularly with regards to the provision of a report and felt that the issue should be escalated further to the Police and Crime Commissioner.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Aid and Community Support – North Durham
    Mutual aid and community support – North Durham Category Offer Date and time Contact Catchgate and Annfield Plain Isolation support Coronavirus period Text HELP to 07564 044 509 or email Isolation support If you need support with tasks such as [email protected] 23, Front Street, shopping, collecting prescriptions, Annfield Plain, receiving a friendly call or someone to Stanley check you are ok there are volunteers DH9 7SY to support you. PACT house Stanley Isolation support Coronavirus period Telephone: 07720 650 533 39 Front St, If you need support with tasks such as Stanley shopping, collecting prescriptions, DH9 0JE receiving a friendly call or someone to check you are ok. There are volunteers to support you. Pact House, Home delivery meal and Foodbank Coronavirus period Telephone: 07720 650 533 39 Front Street, support Email: [email protected] Stanley Home Meal delivery for Elderly, ​ County Durham, Vulnerable and people self-isolating, or message on Facebook DH9 0JE. Open access Foodbank running https://www.facebook.com/PACTHouseStanley/ Monday-Friday 10am-4pm, Saturday 11.30am-1.30pm at Stanley Civic hall, The Fulforth Centre, Covid19 Meal support Every Wednesday and Telephone 0191 3710601 and leave a message Front Street, Friday between 1-2pm. email [email protected] ​ Sacriston, Sacriston Parish Council and The Coronavirus period Or contact them through their Facebook page Durham Fulforth Centre will help supply meals https://www.facebook.com/fulforthcentre/ DH7 6JT. to the most vulnerable. All meals will be prepared and cooked within The Fulforth Centre by cooks with relevant Food Hygiene certification. Meals will be supplied two days per week - Wednesday and Friday, commencing Wednesday 8 Mutual Aid Covid-19 is a list of local support groups that have been established during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-Jul-1924
    Northern Naturalists’ Union Field Meeting Reports- 1924-2005 Contents Hawthorn Dene, 1, 5-jul-1924 .............................. 10 Billingham Marsh, 2, 13-jun-1925 ......................... 13 Sweethope Lough, 3, 11-jul-1925 ........................ 18 The Sneap, 4, 12-jun-1926 ................................... 24 Great Ayton, 5, 18-jun-1927 ................................. 28 Gibside, 6, 23-jul-1927 ......................................... 28 Langdon Beck, 7, 9-jun-1928 ............................... 29 Hawthorn Dene, 8, 5-jul-1928 .............................. 33 Frosterley, 9 ......................................................... 38 The Sneap, 10, 1-jun-1929 ................................... 38 Allenheads, 11, 6-july-1929 .................................. 43 Dryderdale, 12, 14-jun-1930 ................................. 46 Blanchland, 13, 12-jul-1930 .................................. 49 Devil's Water, 14, 15-jun-1931 ............................. 52 Egglestone, 15, 11-jul-1931 ................................. 53 Windlestone Park, 16, June? ............................... 55 Edmondbyers, 17, 16-jul-1932 ............................. 57 Stanhope and Frosterley, 18, 5-jun-1932 ............. 58 The Sneap, 19, 15-jul-1933 .................................. 61 Pigdon Banks, 20, 1-jun-1934 .............................. 62 Greatham Marsh, 21, 21-jul-1934 ........................ 64 Blanchland, 22, 15-jun-1935 ................................ 66 Dryderdale, 23, ..................................................... 68 Raby Park,
    [Show full text]
  • Handlist 13 – Grave Plans
    Durham County Record Office County Hall Durham DH1 5UL Telephone: 03000 267619 Email: [email protected] Website: www.durhamrecordoffice.org.uk Handlist 13 – Grave Plans Issue no. 6 July 2020 Introduction This leaflet explains some of the problems surrounding attempts to find burial locations, and lists those useful grave plans which are available at Durham County Record Office. In order to find the location of a grave you will first need to find which cemetery or churchyard a person is buried in, perhaps by looking in burial registers, and then look for the grave location using grave registers and grave plans. To complement our lists of churchyard burial records (see below) we have published a book, Cemeteries in County Durham, which lists civil cemeteries in County Durham and shows where records for these are available. Appendices to this book list non-conformist cemeteries and churchyard extensions. Please contact us to buy a copy. Parish burial registers Church of England burial registers generally give a date of burial, the name of the person and sometimes an address and age (for more details please see information about Parish Registers in the Family History section of our website). These registers are available to be viewed in the Record Office on microfilm. Burial register entries occasionally give references to burial grounds or grave plot locations in a marginal note. For details on coverage of parish registers please see our Parish Register Database and our Parish Registers Handlist (in the Information Leaflets section). While most burial registers are for Church of England graveyards there are some non-conformist burial grounds which have registers too (please see appendix 3 of our Cemeteries book, and our Non-conformist Register Handlist).
    [Show full text]
  • Drjonespodiatryleaflet.Pdf
    DARLINGTON NHS Foundation Trust Hundens Rehabilitation Centre Building A Hundens Willington Health Centre DERWENTSIDE EASINGTON Chapel Street, Willington DL15 0EQ Service Lane Darlington DL1 1JE Shotley Bridge Community Hospital Murton Clinic delivered by County Durham & Darlington NHS Service delivered by County Durham & Consett DH8 0NB 21 Woods Terrace, Murton SR7 9AG Foundation Trust. Darlington NHS Foundation Trust. Service delivered by County Durham & Service by NHS City Hospitals Sunderland Darlington NHS Foundation Trust CDDFT provide assessment and ongoing care at CDDFT provide assessment and ongoing care Peterlee Community Hospital O’Neill Drive, the clinics indicated above, they also provide at the clinics indicated above, they also Stanley Primary Care Centre Clifford Road, Peterlee SR8 5UQ Service by North Tees & following an initial assessment clinics at the provide following an initial assessment clinics Stanley DH9 0AB Service delivered by County Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust following venues:- at the following venues:- Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust. Cockfield GP Surgery Peterlee Health Centre Gainford GP Surgery Flemming Place, Peterlee SR8 1AD Evenwood GP Surgery CDDFT provide assessment and ongoing care at Whinfield Medical Practice Whinbush Way, Service by Minor Ops Limited Middleton-in-Teasdale GP Surgery the clinics indicated above, they also provide Darlington DL1 3RT Service by Minor Ops Limited following an initial assessment clinics at the Seaham Primary Care Centre following venues:- DURHAM DALES
    [Show full text]