DOCSLIB.ORG

Durham E-Theses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Durham E-Theses Merrington: land, landlord and tenants 1541 1840 Morrin, Elizabeth Jean How to cite: Morrin, Elizabeth Jean (1997) Merrington: land, landlord and tenants 1541 1840, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4757/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk MERRINGTON: LAND, LANDLORD AND TENANTS 1541 - 1840. A STUDY IN THE ESTATE OF THE DEAN AND CHAPTER OF DURHAM. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without the written consent of the author and information derived from it should be acknowledged. SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF Ph.D DURHAM UNIVERSITY SEPTEMBER 1997 BY ELIZABETH JEAN MORRIN 2 3 JAN 199S MERRINGTON: LAND, LANDLORD AND TENANTS 1541-1840. BY ELIZABETH JEAN MORRIN ABSTRACT This thesis considers the performance of the Dean and Chapter of Durham as estate managers from 1541-1840, as perceived from the detailed study of one parish. Durham was created as a New Foundation Cathedral in 1541 by Henry VI11 and endowed with the lands of the Priory, which had been dissolved in 1539. Durham Chapter administered the same lands until 1840 when central government again intervened with cathedral estates. Cathedral chapters have been described as 'inactive rentier' landlords. Durham Chapter's management is compared with that of other landlords to see if this description was justified. The Chapter's response to problems and challenges, such as tenant right and inflation in the sixteenth century, civil war and abolition in the seventeenth century and rapidly changing agricultural practices in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries is considered. The thesis concludes that by 1626 Durham Chapter had created an effective system of estate management, knovm as beneficial leasehold, which offered tenants security of tenure and fixed rents, while compensating the Chapter for inflation by regular renewal fines, related to the true value of the land. The Chapter were not inactive rentiers in 1640: they promoted agricultural innovation, especially enclosure of the townships. The work of the Chapter was only interrupted by the Civil War, not fundamentally altered. The Chapter recovered relatively rapidly at the Restoration: their tenants had greater problems because of the costs of war and land purchase. By the nineteenth century, the Chapter were left behind by progressive leindlords who controlled their tenants' farming practices and drew a greater financial return from their lands than Durham Chapter achieved. However, progress continued on the Chapter estate, as the security of beneficial leasehold encouraged tenants to invest, for example in restructuring their farms, breeding improved cattle and introducing new field crops and rotations. CHAPTER THREE: FACING THE CHALLENGE FOR LANDLORD AND TENANTS: RESTORATION, RECOVERY AND RESUMPTION OF WORK 1660-1699. 150 Section A. The Problems of Restoration for the Dean and Chapter and their tenants, 1660-65. 150 Section B. Chapter policies resumed, 1665-99. 187 Section C. Relations with tenants, partnership continued: security of tenure and agricultural progress. 192 Section D. Towards rentier status:increasing sub-tenancy begins to distance the Dean and Chapter from the cultivators of the land. 206 CHAPTER FIVE. PROFESSIONALIZATION OF ESTATE MANAGEMENT, 1700-75. 217 Section A. The employment of professional officers for estate management. 217 Section B. The broader horizons of the beneficial leaseholders. 226 Section C. Land distribution and use. 244 Section D. The effects of beneficial leasehold tenure. Comparison with other landlords, c. 1775. 258 CHAPTER FIVE. AGRICULTURAL PROGRESS DESPITE AN INCREASINGLY ANACRONISTIC LANDLORD, 1775-1840. 264 Section A. Some policy short comings in a changing world. 265 Section B Nineteenth century Chapter estate income and national rent levels. 276 Section C. Chapter support for expanding industrial development in Merrington. 283 Section D. First doubts about the security of beneficial leasehold and the changing nature of tenants. 296 Section E. Tenant led agricultural innovation. 303 CHAPTER SIX. CHAPTER AND THEIR TENANTS IN PARTNERSHIP AGAINST THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE ESTATE AND THE END OF BENEFICIAL LEASEHOLD. 320 CONCLUSION 329 BIBLIOGRAPHY 338 List of Figures Page 0.1. The study area of Merrington. 11 0.2. Merrington within County Durham. 12 0.3. The bursar's estate under the Prior and Convent with the Merrington townships underlined. 14 1.1. Freehold and leasehold land in Hett and Ferryhill. 33 1.2. Reconstruction of the pre-enclosure landscape of Kirk Merrington, c. 1650. 93 1.3. Reconstruction of Hett in 1650. 97 1.4. The post enclosure farms of Ferryhill, 1637-1765. 99 3.1. Four Kirk Merrington farms after the enclosure of 1666. 197 3.2. The enclosure of Spennymoor in Kirk Merrington, Middlestone and Westerton, 1666-98. 199 3.3. The level of fines by decade in Merrington, 1660-1840. 203 4.1. Area of residence of tenants, 1541-1840. 235 4.2. Farm houses outiying in Kirk Merrington fields by 1840. 247 4.3. Mr Bowlby's lands in Ferryhill, 1765. 253 5.1. Industrial development in Kirk Merrington, Middlestone and Westerton by 1840. 293 5.2. Industrial development in Ferryhill and Hett by 1840. 294 5.3. Lands acquired by the Eden family in Kirk Merrington 304 and Middlestone by 1840. List of Tables Page 1.1. Freeholdin wills, 1541-1640. 42 1.2. First grant of leases in Merrington to sitting tenants, 1541-70. 49 1.3. Concurrent and reversionary leases to non-tenants. 57 1.4. Leases sealed under the 1577 Order. 61 1.5. Leases sub ordinem sealed to tenants who had already accepted simple leases from the Dean and Chapter. 63 1.6. First leases granted to existing tenants, 1541-1610. 69 1.7. Land use in Merrington, 1650s. 110 2.1. Durham Dean and Chapter rents from Merrington, 1640-1. 122 2.2. Estimate of amount paid by John Shaw, 1641-60. 147 2.3. Estimate of Shaw's payments as a tenant with no sale. 147 2.4. Expected expenditure by Ferryhill tenants with no sales. 148 2.5. Estimated purchase payments by Ferryhill tenants. 148 3.1. Improved rents, c. 1660. 159 3.2. Kirk Merrington fines and rents, 1660s. 162 3.3. Ferryhill fines and rents, 1660s. 163 3.4. Great Chilton fines and rents, 1660s. 164 3.5. Hett fines and rents, 1660s. 165 3.6. Westerton fines and rents, 1660s. 166 3.7. Middlestone fines and rents, 1660s. 167 4.1. The proportion of widows appointed executrix, 1541 -1840. 229 4.2. Freehold in wills, 1660-1840. 243 4.3. Sizes of tenants'holdings, 1775. 245 4.4. Land use in Merrington, c. 1770. 252 4.5. Arable of Townend Farm. 255 4.6. Arable of Cleves Cross anfMoorhouse farms. 255 5.1. Sublet land in Merrington in acres, 1840. 299 5.2. Land use in Merrington, 1840. 317 List of Plates Page 1. Site of Kirk Merrington mill pond. 209 2. Kirk Merrington mill sluice. 209 3. Kirk Merrington main street, looking west. 210 4. Shellom main street, looking south. 210 5. Middle of Kirk Merrington South Field, looking north. 211 6. Middle of Kirk Merrington South Field, looking south. 211 7. Aerial view of the Fox and Hounds, Kirk Merrington, showing the west room in Middlestone. 212 8. The Fox and Hounds from the north. 212 9. Leasingthom farm, Middlestone. 213 10. Outline of Hett mill race. 213 11. Hett village green, looking north. 214 12. Hett village green, looking south. 214 13. Ferrylough, looking north. 215 14. Ferrylough, looking south. 215 15. High Hill House Farm, Ferryhill. 216 16. Blue House Farm, Kirk Merrington. 216 ABBREVIATIONS AgHR Agricultural History Review BL British Library CA Chapter Acts CC Church Commission CL Counterpart Lease CERO Church of England Record Office CSPD Calendar of State Papers Domestic DCD Durham Dean and Chapter Muniments DCL Durham Cathedral Library DCRO Durham County Record Office DUL Durham University Library DDR Durham Diocesan Records DP Durham Probate EcHR Economic History Review EHR English Historical Review FH Ferryhill GC Great Chilton HC Halmote Court HT Hett KM Kirk Merrington LP Loose Papers MM Middlestone P&P Past and Present PRO Public Record Office RB Receiver's Book Lease register Reg. Surtees Society volumes SS SVT Surveys, Valuations and Terriers TRHS Transactions of the Royal Historical Society WM Westerton INTRODUCTION. Agriculture today is no longer the major source of income in England. In the sixteenth century, agricultural estates provided the major source of income for the Crown; the aristocracy; the Church of England, in the form of episcopal and capitular estates; and Oxford and Cambridge Colleges. All of these were expected to finance their life and work mainly from income from their estates. Whether these estates were managed effectively to provide adequate return to their landlord has been debated ever since.' The debates are possible because many of these estates have good records over a long period of time. The different types of landlord could have great influence on agricultural practice on their lands.
Recommended publications
  • Subject Guide 1 – Records Relating to Inclosure

    Subject Guide 1 – Records Relating to Inclosure

    Durham County Record Office County Hall Durham DH1 5UL Telephone: 03000 267619 Email: [email protected] Website: www.durhamrecordoffice.org.uk Subject Guide 1 – Records Relating to Inclosure Issue no. 19 July 2020 Contents Introduction 1 Organisation of List 2 Alphabetical List of Townships 2 A 2 B 2 C 3 D 4 E 4 F 4 G 4 H 5 I 5 K 5 L 5 M 6 N 6 O 6 R 6 S 7 T 7 U 8 W 8 Introduction Inclosure (occasionally spelled “enclosure”) refers to a reorganisation of scattered land holdings by mutual agreement of the owners. Much inclosure of Common Land, Open Fields and Moor Land (or Waste), formerly farmed collectively by the residents on behalf of the Lord of the Manor, had taken place by the 18th century, but the uplands of County Durham remained largely unenclosed. Inclosures, to consolidate land-holdings, divide the land (into Allotments) and fence it off from other usage, could be made under a Private Act of Parliament or by general agreement of the landowners concerned. In the latter case the Agreement would be Enrolled as a Decree at the Court of Chancery in Durham and/or lodged with the Clerk of the Peace, the senior government officer in the County, so may be preserved in Quarter Sessions records. In the case of Parliamentary Enclosure a Local Bill would be put before Parliament which would pass it into law as an Inclosure Act. The Acts appointed Commissioners to survey the area concerned and determine its distribution as a published Inclosure Award.
  • The Cultural Paradigms of British Imperialism in the Militarisation of Scotland and North America, C.1745-1775

    The Cultural Paradigms of British Imperialism in the Militarisation of Scotland and North America, C.1745-1775

    1 The Cultural Paradigms of British Imperialism in the Militarisation of Scotland and North America, c.1745-1775. Nicola Martin Date of Submission: 24th September 2018 This thesis is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Humanities University of Stirling 2 3 Abstract This dissertation examines militarisation in Scotland and North America from the Jacobite Uprising of 1745-46 to the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War in 1775. Employing a biographical, case study approach, it investigates the cultural paradigms guiding the actions and understandings of British Army officers as they waged war, pacified hostile peoples, and attempted to assimilate ‘other’ population groups within the British Empire. In doing so, it demonstrates the impact of the Jacobite Uprising on British imperialism in North America and the role of militarisation in affecting the imperial attitudes of military officers during a transformative period of imperial expansion, areas underexplored in the current historiography. It argues that militarisation caused several paradigm shifts that fundamentally altered how officers viewed imperial populations and implemented empire in geographical fringes. Changes in attitude led to the development of a markedly different understanding of imperial loyalty and identity. Civilising savages became less important as officers moved away from the assimilation of ‘other’ populations towards their accommodation within the empire. Concurrently, the status of colonial settlers as Britons was contested due to their perceived disloyalty during and after the French and Indian War. ‘Othering’ colonial settlers, officers questioned the sustainability of an ‘empire of negotiation’ and began advocating for imperial reform, including closer regulation of the thirteen colonies.
  • East Durham Rural Corridor AAP Board 21 January 2021

    East Durham Rural Corridor AAP Board 21 January 2021

    East Durham Rural Corridor Area Action Partnership Minutes of the Board Meeting Thursday 21 January 2021 (Virtual Meeting - held via Microsoft Teams) Present: Malcolm Gray (Chair), Cllr Stuart Dunn, Angela Stobbart, Jen Straughan-Hawley, Chris Varty, Cllr Peter Brookes (Alternate), Tony Cutmore, Peter Maddison, Cllr Maura McKeon, Neighbourhood Insp Sarah Honeyman, Maureen Dixon-Berne (for Michelle Atkinson) Officer Attendance: Jane Bellis – AAP Co-ordinator Lyndsey Hunter – Community Development Project Officer Marie Ainscough – AAP Support Officer Presenters: Gary Ridley- Assistant Chief Officer for the force and Chief Finance Officer for the PCVC’s Office Sharon Caddell – Interim Chief Executive and Monitoring Officer for the PCVC’s Office for Durham Forum Members: 6 forum members attended the meeting Apologies: Cllr Lucy Hovvels, Jo Farrell, Allan Blakemore, Mel Carr, Cllr John Robinson, Clair White, Steve White, Cllr David Brown Introductions and Apologies Malcolm Gray welcomed everyone to the virtual board meeting of the East Durham Rural Corridor AAP and apologies were noted for those who were unable to attend the meeting. Minutes of the Meeting held on 23 November 2020 & Matters Arising The minutes of the meeting held on 23 November 2020 were agreed as a true and accurate record. Cllr John Robinson requested a report on how much had been allocated for each county ward in the AAP area. This information will be brought to next board meeting in March which will be the year end meeting. Declarations of Interest/ Meeting Etiquette/ New Ways of Working Everyone was reminded of the meeting etiquette. Countywide Partner Issues Custody Briefing Sharon Caddell and Gary Ridley delivered a joint presentation in relation to the new centralised custody facility.
  • Division Boundaries in City of Durham and Durham South

    Division Boundaries in City of Durham and Durham South

    SHEET 8, MAP 8 Electoral division boundaries in the City of Durham and Durham South LE AVENUE R FINCHA Union Hall Farm iv FRAMWELLGATE MOOR CP e y r a w W l The Arnison Centre i e ) Poultry Farm a a R r M AD ( RO HALE d INC 1 e F l t Moor House Farm Mercia HM Prison A n a ) s i 7 Retail Park Frankland m 6 s d 1 i ( HOUSE LANE A Low Newton D y POTTER A E a BB N w l EY A Remand Centre i RD L HM Prison a AD T Mallygill RO I R BEY Sports P Frankland Quarry T AB Civic E Recreation Centre (dis) WEST RAINTON CP Amenity E Pity Me R Ground Site T S T C SHERBURN ED N Abbey Road A N O Industrial Estate T R W E i F R nc B Pond h 0 B U G 9 R ill 6 6 Y A 53 2 R O D A i AD s RO RY D m OTHBU R a n Finchale t l e y Primary d a R w l E School i a a N i l Pond w R A L a d y e T l I t P n a ESH AND WITTON m s i GILBERT ED D P IT T IN G C T y P O T Di a N E s w WITTON GILBERT CP E ma il E n RIV tled a R R D R E ailw d T S a OU y tle S H n R a T R Earl's House CA m N is D Hospital O St Godric's RC VA R FRAMWELLGATE AND Sewage Works F Playing Field Primary School ) k NEWTON HALL ED c ra T E DRIVE ( CARR HOUS E N A Belmont L R Framwellgate D ive Viaduct y N r W a A e School w L ar Dismantled Railway il Quarry a K Durham L N A R A (dis) (Secondary) N NEWTON HALL d R B le F E G t n King K L Running a R E Durham George's m O Y Track A Blue Coat is Golf Course Field D R D O Junior School A 7 Framwellgate Moor D 6 E 1 N Primary School A A L D Durham A IT O P Newton Hall Playing Field R Infants' School RBURY Caravan Park CANTE BEK ROAD D Ramside Hall A O Hotel R 0
  • Spennymoor Area Action Partnership Action Area

    Spennymoor Area Action Partnership Action Area

    Spennymoor Area Action Partnership Area Annual Review 2013/14 Spennymoor AAP – Annual Review 2013/14 Foreword from Alan Smith, Outgoing Spennymoor AAP Chair I would like to thank everyone associated with the Spennymoor Area Action Partnership for contributing to another excellent year in moving forward and trying to make a real difference in the AAP area. Having been given a clear steer on the need to continue with the key priorities of Children & Young People and Employment and Job Prospects, there has been a real drive and energy to succeed. The major occasion of our year, held in November, was the ‘Your Money, Your Area, Your Views’ event. The event provided the opportunity for members of our communities to vote on projects they wanted to receive funding, to vote on the AAP priorities for the 2014/15 financial year and to have their say on the future budget for Durham County Council (DCC). Overall the event was a great success with over 900 people attending on the day. The event also showed how committed the people of our area are to supporting and improving the community they live and work in. Taking community cohesion one step further, it was great to see that the community engagement processes that have been put in place by DCC (AAPs being pivotal in this) were a key element of the LGC Council of The Year award given to DCC recently. A major role in DCC achieving this accolade was a full day of assessment by an independent panel and for me it was a real boost that our partnership was selected to be part of this judging day.
  • Derbyshire Parish Registers. Marriages

    Derbyshire Parish Registers. Marriages

    942.51019 M. L; Aalp v.4 1379092 GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00727 4241 DERBYSHIRE PARISH REGISTERS. flDarriagea, IV. phiiximore's parish register series. vol. xc. (derbyshire, vol. iv.) One hundred and fifty only printed. I0.ip.cj : Derbyshire Parish Registers, flftat triages. Edited by W. P. W. PHILLIMORE, M.A., B.C.L., AND LL. LL. SIMPSON. £,c VOL. IV. ILon&on Issued to the Subscribers by Phillimore & Co., 124, Chancery Lane. 1908. — PREFACE. As promised in the last volume of the Marriage Registers of Derbyshire, the marriage records of St. Alkmund's form the first instalment of the Registers of the County Town. The Editors do not doubt that these will prove especially interesting to Derbyshire people. In Volume V they hope to print further instalments of town registers in the shape of those of St. Michael's and also some village registers. It will be noticed that St. Alkmund's register begins at the earliest possible date, 1538, but of the remainder, two do not start till the seventeenth century and one, that of Quarndon, synchronizes with the passing of Lord Hardwicke's Marriage Act. 1379092 It will be convenient to give here a list of the Derby- shire parishes of which the Registers have been printed in this series: Volume I. Volume II. Dale Abbey Boulton Brailsford Duffield Stanton-by-Dale Hezthalias Lownd Volume III. Stanley or Lund Duffield Spondon Breaston Church Broughton Mellor Kirk Ireton Sandiacre Hault Hucknall Volume IV. Risley Mackworth Derby— St. Alkmund's Ockbrook Allestree Quarndon Tickenhall Foremark It has not been thought needful to print the entries — verbatim.
  • Nicola Coulthard

    Nicola Coulthard

    Nicola Coulthard I am a Childminder in Middlestone Moor. I have a large family home with a purpose built playroom with direct access onto a well equipped garden. I follow curriculum guidance for holiday care. I offer a wide variety of toys and equipment, loving family atmosphere and emphasis on high quality service and care in every aspect of the business. I offer home grown vegtables and locally sourced meat with food cooked fresh daily, and all diets catered for. I hold a Degree in Children's Education and Development and have experience supporting children with disabilities and special educational needs. I hold Level 2 Safeguarding and Level 2 award in Food Safety in Catering. I was also awarded by Bishop Auckland College in 2010 for 'Enthusiasm and Commitment' to 'Carry on Caring'. I am a council appointed Governor with experience of nursery school and primary school, and constantly update my training through Durham County Council. I am a member of a formal childminding network and I am currently able to deliver funded early years education from two years with your golden tickets and I work full time alongside my long term staff. To find out more about help with childcare costs please visit www.durham.gov.uk/childcarecosts When is it on? Time of day Morning Afternoon Evening Session Monday to Friday information 7.00am to 6.00pm Who to contact Contact name Nicola Coulthard Contact Childminder position Telephone 07917 755 470 E-mail [email protected] Where to go Address Middlestone Moor Spennymoor County Durham Postcode DL16 Other details Cost £4 per hour description Age range From 0 years 0 months to 16 years 0 months Availability Childcare Closed bank holidays availability Before school Term time School holidays After school Overnight care Free 3/4 yr Yes places Free 2 yr Yes places Will be Yes providing 30 hours 30 Hours I have shared funding with Middlestone Partner Details Moor Nursery School and Kirk Merrington (These are Pre-school and I’m happy to drop off for details of any sessions.
  • Review of Community Governance in the Unparished Area of Durham City Carried out by Durham County Council Final Recommendations

    Review of Community Governance in the Unparished Area of Durham City Carried out by Durham County Council Final Recommendations

    Review of Community Governance in the Unparished Area of Durham City carried out by Durham County Council Final Recommendations (No Parishing Arrangements) On 26 October 2011, the County Council approved terms of reference for the conduct of a Community Governance Review in the area of Durham City. The terms of reference were published on 1 November and included the terms of the petition which had been received from residents requesting the establishment of a town council. Although the petition was not compliant with the legislation the Council decided to undertake the review. On 21 st March 2012, the Council approved Draft Recommendations for a second period of consultation with Durham. This draft can be accessed at www.durham.gov.uk/communitygovernance On 25 July 2012, the Council approved a further consultation of the areas of Aykley Vale, Priory Road and Dryburn Park to request whether the residents of these areas would prefer to be either simply parished, or to join Framwellgate Moor Parish Council. The Review The Council is carried out this review under the Local Government Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 (‘the Act’). It was known to the Council that there was a wish in the area by some residents to have the review with a view to establishing parish council arrangements. The review was however delayed whilst the Council was waiting for the Local Government Boundary Commission for England recommendations in relation to electoral arrangements for County Durham, following Local Government Reorganisation in 2009. The review was commenced before final recommendations were published by the Boundary Commission in order to enable the Council to put in place any electoral arrangements for any parish council established by the review in time for the County Council elections on 2 May 2013.
  • Councillors N Anderson, M Chard, O Edwards, R Kemp, J Peart, E Wilding, M Wilson and M Wright

    Councillors N Anderson, M Chard, O Edwards, R Kemp, J Peart, E Wilding, M Wilson and M Wright

    BEARPARK PARISH COUNCIL At a meeting of Bearpark Parish Council held on Wednesday 18 October 2017 at 7.00 p.m. Present: Councillors N Anderson, M Chard, O Edwards, R Kemp, J Peart, E Wilding, M Wilson and M Wright. 17/65 ELECTION OF CHAIR The Clerk sought nominations for the position of Chair of the Council, following Councillor Kemp’s decision to vacate the role. The nomination of Councillor M Wright was Moved by Councillor M Wilson, Seconded by Councillor O Edwards Resolved That Councillor M Wright be elected Chair of the Council for the remainder of the 2016/17. Councillor Wright signed the Declaration of Acceptance of Office. Councillor M Wright in the Chair 17/66 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillors E Hull, T Wilson and County Councillor D Bell. 17/67 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest in relation to any item of business on the agenda. 17/68 REPRESENTATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC There were no representations from the public. 17/69 POLICE REPORT The Clerk informed the Council that he had followed up concerns expressed at the previous meeting regarding police presence at meetings and the absence of a police report. A position statement had been circulated to all Councillors via the Clerk, from the Chief Inspector for the area following the representations. The Parish Council expressed their disappointment with the stance that had been taken, particularly with regards to the provision of a report and felt that the issue should be escalated further to the Police and Crime Commissioner.
  • PEN (Organization)

    PEN (Organization)

    PEN (Organization): An Inventory of Its Records at the Harry Ransom Center Descriptive Summary Creator: PEN (Organization) Title: PEN (Organization) Records Dates: 1912-2008 (bulk 1926-1997) Extent: 352 document boxes, 5 card boxes (cb), 5 oversize boxes (osb) (153.29 linear feet), 4 oversize folders (osf) Abstract: The records of the London-based writers' organizations English PEN and PEN International, founded by Catharine Amy Dawson Scott in 1921, contain extensive correspondence with writer-members and other PEN centres around the world. Their records document campaigns, international congresses and other meetings, committees, finances, lectures and other programs, literary prizes awarded, membership, publications, and social events over several decades. Call Number: Manuscript Collection MS-03133 Language: The records are primarily written in English with sizeable amounts in French, German, and Spanish, and lesser amounts in numerous other languages. Non-English items are sometimes accompanied by translations. Note: The Ransom Center gratefully acknowledges the assistance of the National Endowment for the Humanities, which provided funds for the preservation, cataloging, and selective digitization of this collection. The PEN Digital Collection contains 3,500 images of newsletters, minutes, reports, scrapbooks, and ephemera selected from the PEN Records. An additional 900 images selected from the PEN Records and related Ransom Center collections now form five PEN Teaching Guides that highlight PEN's interactions with major political and historical trends across the twentieth century, exploring the organization's negotiation with questions surrounding free speech, political displacement, and human rights, and with global conflicts like World War II and the Cold War. Access: Open for research. Researchers must create an online Research Account and agree to the Materials Use Policy before using archival materials.
  • The North Pennines

    The North Pennines

    LANDSCAPE CHARACTER THE NORTH PENNINES The North Pennines The North Pennines The North Pennines Countryside Character Area County Boundary Key characteristics • An upland landscape of high moorland ridges and plateaux divided by broad pastoral dales. • Alternating strata of Carboniferous limestones, sandstones and shales give the topography a stepped, horizontal grain. • Millstone Grits cap the higher fells and form distinctive flat-topped summits. Hard igneous dolerites of the Great Whin Sill form dramatic outcrops and waterfalls. • Broad ridges of heather moorland and acidic grassland and higher summits and plateaux of blanket bog are grazed by hardy upland sheep. • Pastures and hay meadows in the dales are bounded by dry stone walls, which give way to hedgerows in the lower dale. • Tree cover is sparse in the upper and middle dale. Hedgerow and field trees and tree-lined watercourses are common in the lower dale. • Woodland cover is low. Upland ash and oak-birch woods are found in river gorges and dale side gills, and larger conifer plantations in the moorland fringes. • The settled dales contain small villages and scattered farms. Buildings have a strong vernacular character and are built of local stone with roofs of stone flag or slate. • The landscape is scarred in places by mineral workings with many active and abandoned limestone and whinstone quarries and the relics of widespread lead workings. • An open landscape, broad in scale, with panoramic views from higher ground to distant ridges and summits. • The landscape of the moors is remote, natural and elemental with few man made features and a near wilderness quality in places.
  • Mutual Aid and Community Support – North Durham

    Mutual Aid and Community Support – North Durham

    Mutual aid and community support – North Durham Category Offer Date and time Contact Catchgate and Annfield Plain Isolation support Coronavirus period Text HELP to 07564 044 509 or email Isolation support If you need support with tasks such as [email protected] 23, Front Street, shopping, collecting prescriptions, Annfield Plain, receiving a friendly call or someone to Stanley check you are ok there are volunteers DH9 7SY to support you. PACT house Stanley Isolation support Coronavirus period Telephone: 07720 650 533 39 Front St, If you need support with tasks such as Stanley shopping, collecting prescriptions, DH9 0JE receiving a friendly call or someone to check you are ok. There are volunteers to support you. Pact House, Home delivery meal and Foodbank Coronavirus period Telephone: 07720 650 533 39 Front Street, support Email: [email protected] Stanley Home Meal delivery for Elderly, ​ County Durham, Vulnerable and people self-isolating, or message on Facebook DH9 0JE. Open access Foodbank running https://www.facebook.com/PACTHouseStanley/ Monday-Friday 10am-4pm, Saturday 11.30am-1.30pm at Stanley Civic hall, The Fulforth Centre, Covid19 Meal support Every Wednesday and Telephone 0191 3710601 and leave a message Front Street, Friday between 1-2pm. email [email protected] ​ Sacriston, Sacriston Parish Council and The Coronavirus period Or contact them through their Facebook page Durham Fulforth Centre will help supply meals https://www.facebook.com/fulforthcentre/ DH7 6JT. to the most vulnerable. All meals will be prepared and cooked within The Fulforth Centre by cooks with relevant Food Hygiene certification. Meals will be supplied two days per week - Wednesday and Friday, commencing Wednesday 8 Mutual Aid Covid-19 is a list of local support groups that have been established during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.